Full Text
Final Decision Type I Staff Report: Property Line Adjustment File number(s): PLA 2019-02 Related files: ANX 2017-05, PP 2017-01, PUD 2017-01, & SUB 2017-01 (collectively known as “Smith Creek Development”) Project name: Smith Creek Development: Phases 1B, 3A, & 4A Date of decision: March 22, 2019 Date of mailing: March 25, 2019 Applicant: Hazel M. Smith Properties, LLC Landowners: Hazel M. Smith Properties, LLC; Don Ivan Mametieff; & Anna Kamis Site location: 690 Ben Brown Ln and 15198 & 15218 Stubb Rd NE Tax Lot(s): 052W13 00105, 052W13BD00100, and 052W13BD00200 ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 2 of 14 Summary: The applicant applied for property line adjustment PLA 2019-02 in order to adjust property lines to align with the boundaries of Smith Creek Development Phases 1B, 3A, and 4A per the phasing plan (Attachment 104). The south property line of Tax Lot 200 is adjusted to divide Parcel 2 of Partition Plat 2018-65 (Attachment 102), creating Proposed Adjusted Property A, which is identical to Phase 1B in the Phasing Plan. The south property line of Tax Lot 100 is adjusted to divide Parcel 2 of Partition Plat 2018-65, creating Proposed Adjusted Property B, which is identical to Phase 4A. The resulting Proposed Adjusted Property C is identical to Phase 3A. Tax Lot Street Address Ownership PLA Adjusted Property 052W13 00105 None; west/southwest of 690 Ben Brown Ln, a Smith family homestead address that staff uses to track the Smith Creek Development through final plat (following preliminary subdivision SUB 2017-01) and assigning of new street addresses Hazel M. Smith Properties, LLC A, B, and most of C 052W13BD00100 15218 Stubb Rd NE Don Ivan Mametieff North minority of C 052W13BD00200 15198 Stubb Rd NE Anna Kamis North minority of C Background The applicant through Stafford Land Company and Ordinance No. 2565 (2018) annexed territory including the subject property and obtained approval of a planned unit development (PUD), preliminary subdivision, and ancillary applications for the Smith Creek Development via the Final Order of November 14, 2018. As part of contract purchase agreement with the landowners to purchase subareas of the territory over time, the applicant had been adjusting lot lines and partitioning under Marion County jurisdiction prior to annexation. The applicant had intended to complete the last adjustment, Marion County PLA 17-035, but annexation occurred and the County ceased review. The applicant then applied to the City for this PLA 2019-02 and Partition (PAR) 2019-01 also related to the Smith Creek Development. The applicant’s purpose through the PLA and PAR is to adjust and create lot lines that align with the phase boundaries of the Smith Creek Development, which has nine phases as illustrated below in the excerpted Smith Creek Exhibit C-6 in blue dashed lines: ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 3 of 14 As illustrated at the top of this staff report / final decision, this PLA relates to Phases 1B, 3A and 4A. Context The applicant is not proposing any development or the establishment of any new land uses as part of this PAR and is yet to apply for Smith Creek Development Phase 1B, 3A, and 4A final plats following approval of SUB 2017-01. Condition of approval PLA-2 memorializes this understanding and that this PLA in no way abrogates or supersedes the Smith Creek Final Order conditions of approval. Introduction The application submittal date February 15, 2019, the completeness date is February 27, 2019, and the 120th day deadline for final action per Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 92.105 and 227.178 would have been June 27, 2019. This review is of the drawings submitted February 15 (Attachment 101). ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 4 of 14 The subject property is approximately 45.84 acres, generally west/southwest of the dead-end of Ben Brown Lane, along the north side of Parr Road, and along the east side of Stubb Road NE. Section references are to the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO). Staff finds that the application meets WDO provisions or can meet them with conditions and approves it with conditions. The applicant’s next steps are recordation with Marion County. Because it is a Type I administrative approval requiring no public hearing, this staff report serves as both a property line adjustment (PLA) approval and public notice of final decision to owners of property within 250 feet of the subject property. ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 5 of 14 Conditions of Approval PLA-1. Next Step / Recording: The applicant shall: a. To meet WDO 5.01.08B.5, record the approved plat with revisions per Condition PLA-3 and with Marion County with materials prepared consistent with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 92 and Marion County Surveyor standards; and b. Do so prior to recording any of a Subdivision Final Plat Approval per WDO 5.01.06 or “Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Plan Approval” per 5.01.07 for any of Smith Creek Development Phases 3A and 4A (SUB 2017-01). PLA-2. Relationship to Smith Creek Development: Approval of Property Line Adjustment 2019- 02 does not abrogate or supersede any conditions of approval in the Smith Creek Development Final Order of November 14, 2018 that included Preliminary Subdivision SUB 2017-01. PLA-3. PUEs: To meet WDO 3.02.01, The applicant shall dedicate a public utility easement (PUE) five feet wide minimum along each lot line abutting a public street – specifically along Stubb Road NE and along the segment of Parr Road between Stubb Road NE and the west boundary of the existing 10-foot PUE along the north side of Parr Road (Reel 1344, Page 565). Notes to the Applicant The following are not conditions of approval, but are important notes for the applicant to be aware of and follow for the site development as part of the permitting stage: 1. Time Limit: WDO 4.02.04B. specifies that, “A final decision on any application shall expire within three years of the date of the final decision unless: 1. a building permit to exercise the right granted by the decision has been issued; 2. the activity approved in the decision has commenced; or 3. a time extension, Section 4.02.05, has been approved. Because unrecorded re-plats lingering indefinitely have burdened staff, Condition PLA-1 sets sooner time limits for subsection 2. to begin and finish recordation. 2. Issuing Authority: Per 5.01.06C., the Community Development Director is the signing authority for Mylar plat sheets. 3. Plat Tracker: Marion County maintains a plat tracking tool at . Use it to check on the status of a recordation request to the County. City staff does not track County plat recordation. 4. Records: Staff suggests that the applicant and landowner retain a copy of this staff report / final decision. ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 6 of 14 Analyses & Findings: This final decision analyzes the application materials and finds through statements how the application materials relate to and meet applicable provisions such as criteria, requirements, and standards. They confirm that a given standard is met or if not met, they call attention to it, suggest a remedy, and have a corresponding recommended condition of approval. Symbols aid locating and understanding categories of findings: Symbol Category Indication Requirement (or guideline) met No action needed Requirement (or guideline) not met Correction needed Requirement (or guideline) not applicable No action needed • Requirement (or guideline) met, but might become unmet because of condition applied to meet separate and related requirement that is not met • Plan sheets and/or narrative inconsistent • Other special circumstance benefitting from attention Revision needed for clear and consistent records Land Use & Zoning Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential Zoning District RSN, RMN Overlay District(s) None Existing Use(s) Single-family detached dwellings, agriculture The lot is a legal lot of record: Partition Plat 2018-65, Parcel 2 (see Attachment 102). The applicable provisions appear in bold below. Property Line Adjustment Provisions 2.02 Residential Zones The proposal adjusts property lines of three lots to align with the boundaries of Smith Creek Development Phases 1B, 3A, and 4A. The south property line of Tax Lot 200 is adjusted to divide Parcel 2 of Partition Plat 2018-65 (Attachment 102), creating Proposed Adjusted Property A (8.88 acres), which is identical to Phase 1B in the Phasing Plan. The south property line of Tax Lot 100 is adjusted to divide Parcel 2 of Partition Plat 2018-65, creating Proposed Adjusted Property B (14.97 acres), which is identical to Phase 4A. The resulting Proposed Adjusted Property C (21.97 acres) is identical to Phase 3A. A portion of Proposed Adjusted Property C is zoned Nodal Residential Single-Family (RSN) and contains two existing single-family homes (15198 & 15218 Stubb Rd NE) in the RSN zone. Table 2.02C describes site development standards for the RSN zone. ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 7 of 14 Nodal Residential Single-Family (RSN) - Site Development Standards Table 2.02C Lot Area, Minimum (square feet) Standard lot Interior or cul-de-sac lot 6,000 1 Lot Width, Minimum (feet) Standard lot Interior or cul-de-sac lot 50 Lot Depth, Average (feet) Standard lot 90 Standard lot Residential Density, Minimum (units per net acre) 5.2 Street Frontage, Minimum (feet) Standard lot Interior or cul-de-sac lot 40 Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Minimum (feet) 20 3, 4 Front Porch Setback, Maximum (feet) 10 Side Setback, Minimum (feet) 5 7, 8 Rear Setback, Average (feet) Primary structure 20 or 0 5, 7, 10 Accessory structure 5 Setback to a Private Access Easement, Minimum (feet) 5 Lot Coverage, Maximum (percent) Primary building height 16 feet or less 40 9 Primary building height more than 16 feet 35 9 Accessory structure 25 of rear yard 6, 9, 11 Building Height, Maximum (feet) Primary structure 35 Features not used for habitation 70 Accessory structure 1511 1. Flag lots are not allowed in the RSN zone. 3. Measured from the Special Setback (Section 3.03.02), if any 4. Infill lots between developed lots: average of abutting residential buildings, plus or minus 5 feet, but not less than 10 feet 5. With a maximum deviation of five feet from the setback standard 6. Accessory structures are included in the total lot coverage. 7. A house of worship shall be set back at least 20 feet from a property line abutting a residential zone or use. 9. Lot coverage limitations determined by setbacks for small lot and row house development 10. Garages have a 20 ft or 0 ft setback 11. Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to specific development standards (see Section 2.07, Special Uses) ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 8 of 14 Proposed Adjusted Properties A and B, along with the rest of Proposed Adjusted Property C, are zoned Nodal Multi-Family Residential (RMN). Table 2.02F describes site development standards for the RMN zone. Nodal Medium Density Residential (RMN) - Site Development Standards Table 2.02F Lot Area, Minimum (square feet) Any other use Not specified 7 Lot Width, Minimum (feet) Any other use Not specified 7 Lot Depth, Average (feet) Any other use Not specified 7 Street Frontage, Minimum (feet) Any other use 200 Residential Density (units per net acre) Minimum Any other use Not specified 7 Maximum Any other use Not specified 7 Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Minimum (feet) Any other use Abutting commercial or industrial zone, or collector or arterial street 20 4 Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Maximum (feet) Any other use Not specified Side Setback, Minimum (feet) All other uses Abutting RS, RM, or P/SP zone, or an existing single- family, duplex, or multiple-family dwelling Building height (feet) 16 or less 24 more than 16 and less than 28 30 28 or more 36 Accessory structure Same as primary Rear Setback, Minimum (feet) Any other use Same as side Accessory structure 5 Setback to a Private Access Easement, Minimum (feet) 5 Lot Coverage, Maximum (percent) Any other use Not specified 7, 10 Building Height, Maximum (feet) Primary structure 45 Features not used for habitation 70 Accessory structure 1512 ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 9 of 14 4. Measured from the Special Setback (Section 3.03.02), if any 7. The minimum lot dimensions, maximum density, and maximum lot coverage are determined by setbacks, off-street parking, and landscaping requirements. 10. Lot coverage limitations determined by setbacks for small lot and row house development 12. Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to specific development standards (see Section 2.07, Special Uses) The existing single-family houses on Proposed Adjusted Property C remain in conformity with the site development standards of Table 2.02F. Conformance with setbacks is specifically illustrated in the excerpted image of the PLA drawing (Attachment 101) below: . Each adjusted property exceeds the lot area, width, depth, and street frontage standards for the relevant table. Because no corollary development is proposed with this PLA, the remaining density, setback, lot coverage, and building height standards are not applicable. The provisions are met. 3.01.01 Applicability A. Right-of-way standards apply to all public streets. B. Improvement standards apply to all public and private streets, sidewalks and bikeways. C. Functional standards are identified in the Woodburn TSP. D. This applies to all development, and is not limited to partitions, subdivisions, multi-family, commercial or industrial construction, or establishment of a manufactured dwelling or recreational vehicle park. Construction of a single-family dwelling or placement of a manufactured dwelling does not, for the purposes of this Section, constitute development, however, in no case can this type of development occur without minimal access as determined by the Director. ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 10 of 14 1.02 Definitions Development: A building or grading operation, making a material change in the use or appearance of a structure or land, dividing land into two or more parcels, partitioning or subdividing land, or the creation or termination of an access right. Because the proposal is a property line adjustment and so does not match any of the items within the above definition of “development”, the frontage/public/street improvement provisions are not applicable. For this reason, there are no conditions of approval similar to PAR 2019-01 Condition PAR-4 that addresses and secures frontage/public/street improvements were the Smith Creek Development Final Order of November 14, 2018 to expire without development of required such improvements. The provision is not applicable. 3.02.01 Public Utility Easements A. The Director shall require dedication of specific easements for the construction and maintenance of municipal water, sewerage and storm drainage facilities located on private property. B. A five-foot wide public utility easement shall be dedicated along each lot line abutting a public street. C. As a condition of approval for development, including property line adjustments, partitions, subdivisions, design reviews, or Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), the Director may require dedication of public utility easements. The proposed PLA (Exhibit 4; Attachment 101) illustrates and notes via Note 6 an existing 10- foot public utility easement (PUE; Reel 1344, Page 565) along the easterly segment of the north side of Parr Road. However, additional PUEs are needed. The applicant needs to dedicate a PUE five feet wide minimum along each lot line abutting a public street – specifically along Stubb Road NE and along the segment of Parr Road between Stubb Road NE and the west boundary of the existing 10-foot PUE. Staff confirms that upon Smith Creek Phase 3A and 4A final plats and through Design Review (DR) for Phase 1B that the developer would modify PUEs. The provisions are met with Condition PLA-3. 3.02.03 Street Lighting A. Public Streets Public streets abutting a development shall be illuminated with street lights installed to the standards of the City and the electric utility. As examined for 3.01, because the proposal is not “development”, street lighting provisions are not applicable. ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 11 of 14 The provision is not applicable. 3.02.04 Underground Utilities All permanent utility service to and within a development shall be underground, except where overhead high-voltage (35,000 volts or more) electric facilities exist. Because no development or redevelopment of electric power lines is proposed, the provision is not applicable. The provision is not applicable. 3.04.01A. Street Access Every lot shall have: 1. Direct access to an abutting public street, or 2. Access to a public street by means of an access easement and maintenance agreement to the satisfaction of the Director, and revocable only with the concurrence of the Director. Because proposed Adjusted Property A (Phase 1B) has street frontage along Parr Road, Proposed Adjusted Property B (Phase 4A) has street frontage along Parr Road, and Proposed Adjusted Property C (Phase 3A) has street frontage along a small segment of Parr Road and all of Stubb Road NE, all three lots retain direct access to abutting public streets. The provision is met. 3.08.01 Requirements All partitions and subdivisions shall comply with the standards of ORS Chapter 92 and the Woodburn Development Ordinance. The text does not address property line adjustments, and this final decision does not address the requirements of Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 92 separately, because they are addressed through the review of WDO sections or addressed by the applicant either as part of the property line adjustment or upon development applications. This decision establishes compliance or non-compliance with applicable WDO provisions. However, for clarity for future staff, staff cites two statutory provisions relating to preliminary land divisions about what regulations apply as time passes and when a decision expires: “92.040 Application for approval of subdivision or partition; tentative plan; applicability of local government laws. … After September 9, 1995, when a local government makes a decision on a land use application for a subdivision inside an urban growth boundary, only those local government laws implemented under an acknowledged comprehensive plan that are in effect at the time of application shall govern subsequent construction on the property unless the applicant elects otherwise. A local government may establish a time period during which decisions on land use applications under subsection of this section apply. However, in no event shall the time period exceed 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 12 of 14 years, whether or not a time period is established by the local government. [Amended by 1955 c.756 1973 c.696 1983 c.826 1989 c.772 1995 c.812 2005 c.22 §71]” Items and are not applicable because the proposal is for property line adjustment, not subdivision. In any case, regarding WDO 4.02.04B establishes such a time period, which does not exceed 10 years. Incidentally, the Smith Creek Development Condition SUB-1 establishes a platting schedule, quoted below. The Council approval date of the final order was November 14, 2018. SUB-1. Expiration: The schedule in the table below allows for a due date more than three years past the Council approval date: Table SUB-1 Platting Schedule Phase Subdivision Final Plat Application to the City Recordation with Marion County 1A Same as WDO 4.02.04B.2., specifically, application to the City for final plat Same as WDO 5.01.06C.1. (within 30 calendar days of the Director’s signature on the plat mylar) 1B n/a because no subdivision proposed 2A four years past approval of the preliminary subdivision as dated in the final decision document 2B four years past 2C seven years past 3A five years past 3B five years past 4A seven years past 4B seven years past To prevent this PLA from complicating the Smith Creek Development preliminary subdivision, staff applies a condition of approval. The applicant needs to record a final plat for this PAR prior to recording any of the Smith Creek Development Phase 3A and 4A final plats. The provisions are met with Condition PLA-1b. 5.01.08 Property Line Adjustment; Consolidation of Lots A. Purpose: The purpose of this review is to ensure that adjustments to property lines or the consolidation of existing lots and parcels, complies with the standards of this ordinance (Section and State Statutes (ORS Chapters 92 and 209). Property line adjustments and consolidation of lots are allowed in all zones. B. Criteria: 1. Lot area, depth, width, frontage, building setbacks, vehicular access and lot coverage comply with the standards of this ordinance (Sections 2 and 2. Existing easements are accurately reflected; ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 13 of 14 3. Existing land use and development on the subject property comply with the requirements of prior land use actions; and 4. Buildings and structures abutting the adjusted property lines comply with State building codes and with respect to current occupancy. 5. Property line adjustments are surveyed and monumented to the requirements set forth in State statutes (ORS Chapters 92 and 209) and recorded by the County Surveyor. C. Procedure: The Director shall review and approve the application when it is found that it meets this Ordinance and the State Building Codes. This final decision does not address the requirements of ORS 92 Subdivisions and Partitions and 209 County Surveyors separately, because they are addressed through the review of WDO sections or addressed by the applicant either as part of the property line adjustment or upon development applications. This decision establishes compliance or non-compliance with applicable WDO provisions. Regarding B.1., staff examined above for Sections 2 and 3 and found all proposed adjusted lots to be in compliance with the relevant standards. Regarding B.2., the PLA drawing accurately reflects existing easements to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Regarding B.3., the PLA is of three lots and in order to align with the boundaries of Smith Creek Development Phases 1B, 3A, and 4A (Final Order November 14, 2018). Annexation led the consolidated package of land use applications related to the Smith Creek Development and so far constitutes the City land use history for the territory including the subject property. Staff applies Condition PLA-2 to memorialize this understanding and that this PLA in no way abrogates or supersedes the Smith Creek Final Order conditions of approval. Regarding B.4., Tax Lots 100 and 200 each have an existing single-family house however, as examined for 2.02, the proposed Property Line Adjustment will not bring either structure into nonconformity with setbacks. Because WDO setbacks are generally more demanding than those of the building code, the provision is met. Regarding B.5., the PLA drawing appears to illustrate that which conforms with statute and the County surveyor would accept. Because the criterion refers to an action (recordation through the Marion County surveyor) which can happen only after the City approves the PLA, the criterion is less a criterion than a provision that approval is not vested unless the applicant successfully records a City-approved PLA. Staff applies Condition PLA-1 to make this clear and – based on what has happened with several other PLAs, partitions, and adjustments in recent years – to reduce the likelihood of a re-plat approved by the City but unrecorded by the applicant from lingering indefinitely. The provisions are met with Condition PLA-1 and Condition PLA-2. ---PAGE BREAK--- PLA 2019-02 Page 14 of 14 Conclusion Staff finds that the application meets WDO provisions or can meet them with conditions and approves it with conditions. Submitted by: Dan Handel, Associate Planner Affirmed, Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Attachments: 101. Proposed Property Line Adjustments (Exhibit 4; 3 sheets) 102. Partition Plat No. 2018-65 103a. Marked Tax Map 05 2W 13 103b. Marked Tax Map 05 2W 13BD 104. Smith Creek Development Exhibit C-6 Phasing Plan Expiration: Per WDO 4.02.04B., a final decision expires within three years of the date of the final decision unless: 1. A building permit to exercise the right granted by the decision has been issued; 2. The activity approved in the decision has commenced; or 3. A time extension, Section 4.02.05, has been approved. Appeals: Per WDO 4.01.11E., the decision is final unless appealed pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS), state administrative rules, and WDO 4.02.01. The appeal due date is twelve (12) days from the mailing date of this notice per 4.02.01B.1. A valid appeal must meet the requirements of 4.02.01. Any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved or who is entitled to written notice of the decision may appeal the decision. The decision will not become final until the period for filing an appeal to the City Council has expired, and it cannot be appealed directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). This document is a copy of the decision. A copy of the decision is also available for inspection at no cost, and the City would provide a copy at reasonable cost at the Community Development Department, City Hall, 270 Montgomery Street, Woodburn, OR 97071 during normal business hours. For questions or additional information, contact Vicki Spitznogle, Administrative Assistant, at (503) 982-5246 or [EMAIL REDACTED]. ---PAGE BREAK--- proposed property line adjustments N EXHIBIT 4 (1 OF 3) ATTACHMENT 101 ---PAGE BREAK--- proposed property line adjustments (1of 2) N EXHIBIT 4 (2 OF 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- proposed property line adjustment (2 of 2) N EXHIBIT 4 (3 OF 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 1 ATTACHMENT 102 ---PAGE BREAK--- ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 R ! <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò R ! R ! <Ò <Ò <Ò R ! R ! R ! R ! <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò 399.96 150.18 726.07 AT WO ODBURN 428.30 343.17 1600 4.99 AC 506.42 352.95 262.62 15 10 429.82 320.85 506.42 1107.53 REPLAT 1500 264.52 10.44 AC 1088.29 204.03 LOTS 5 & 6 TRACT - 1' RESERVE STRIP 100.1 2 100.8 4 60.64 93.94 80.00 101.8 1 101.5 0 82.20 750.00 1303.53 15 554.16 152.08 301 859.57 35.34 43.06 707.16 300 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 8.10 AC P.P. 6.00 AC 470.58 433.73 470.58 470.58 2010-033 140.00 750.00 CS 36825 554.27 262.41 220.00 140.00 15.0 93.3 739.50 831.61 646.00 185.65 331.11 [PHONE REDACTED].54 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 2 12.31 AC 7.04 AC 830.00 836.29 830.00 745.00 1362.49 646.00 257.00 1743-0184 1344-0566 281.00 89.40 571.69 352.30 450.00 1218.72 105 900 6.31 600 1000 800 500 700 400 503.90 503.90 444.00 444.00 412.01 415.05 CS 20902 114.06 N89 39W 450 281.00 SW COR B BROWN'S 81.34 CS 36202 ADD'N 90.00 90.00 90.00 CS 34512 1593.01 CS 33929 1596.67 1600.72 90.00 33.38 FLOR A 90.00 60.01 S89 57 01E 700.65 60 674.22 60.00 1089.11 90.00 1146.68 71.35 23.84 44.62 68.07 68.00 98.57 6.34 46.00 46.00 93.66 21.69 25.00 113 .41 17.72 CH (1169.52) 1100 714.00 673.82 1213.45 660.14 802.31 935.55 64.87 CH (4281.42) 1200 480 60 ACCESS EASEMENT 1421.85 1421.85 1300 CS 19926 714.24 11.22 CH (740.54) 8.71 CH (574.86) 7.22 CH (478.52) 59.80 CH (3946.80) 760.65 H 60 60 WEST WA Y 60 STREET 60 KOTKA STREET 60 60 COZY 60 30 30 20 LEASURE 30 30 WEST 60 20 60 30 20 30 20 30 30 HAYES 30 STREET 20 WEST HAYES ST 30 60 20 DRIVE R=50' GARFIELD 60 STREET DRIVE STREET 60 60 30 DRIVE SMITH DE SANTIS MCLAUGHLIN 60 60 DRIVE 30 25 60 STREET HALL SETTLEMIER 25 57.5 25 60 MONTGO AVENUE 60 CLEVELAND 50 OAK 50 STREET SETTLEMIER 3RD SETTLEMIER PA 25 25 50 R=45 SMITH CT 60 AUSTIN AVE WORKMAN 50 60 SMITH 60 DRIV E DRIVE DRIVE WORKMAN 60 MCLAUGHLIN MAPLE ST 60 WORKMAN DRIVE SMITH DRIVE 60 60 60 50 60 SMITH DRIVE 50 50 50 CHERRY ST AVE 50 50 WOODCR E S T CT SETTLEMIER 45 60 40 TOUT STREET BEN 60 50 BROWN 55 60 45 50 WAY LANE 40 ST 60 55 45 ELANA 50 60 KELOWNA 50 50 50 50 ST FIRST FR 50 20 50 80 20 80 20 BOONES FERRY RD 40 BRADLEY ST 80 OGLE ST 80 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 20 60 AKSENIA STREET LUBA STREET BRIDLEWOOD PA 60 LANE 50' PANA CT 50' PANA STREET R=55' 40 AVE WAY ST 80 80 50 60 20 FRONT ST ELANA 60 KELOWNA 50 60 55 SETTLEMIER 25 20 80 PARR 55 ROAD 80 50 60 40 60 50 60 50 BRIDLEWOOD LANE 40 KELOWNA CT 50 50 60 DRIVE UNION PACIFIC RAIROAD OGLE ST 50 BRANDYWINE CT 50 60 20 60 60' 34 80 34 COUNTRY LANE WAY ELANA 50' 60' 20 50' MR 38 50' R=49' DAHLIA AUTUMN 26' 50' 26' BLVD COUNTRY LANE COUNTRY LANE 50' F O XGL O V E 50' STREET 50' AV EN UE 50' TULIP STREET 50' VI N E AV E 50' 50' 50' TULIP AVE VINE AVE 60 MR 38 174 6 57 59. 74 HARVARD D 74 74 CENTER STREET 70 INTERSTATE 5 FWY 74 74 STACEY ALLISON WAY 74 100 74 60 EVERGR EEN R OAD STANF ORD ST STANFORD ST 50 60' DRIVE 60' CREIGHTON ST 50 BOEAN LANE EVERG REEN ROA D SKYLER DRIVE 60' HARVARD 60' DUKE ST R=55' 50 JONAH PLACE 60' 60' 60 60 WES T HAY ES S T . OREGON 50 WEST HAYES 30 74 50 STREET 50 60 50 50 E V ER GR EEN R O AD 50 CIRCLE GOLF COU RSE COLUMBIA DRIVE EVERGREEN BLVD 50 CREIGHTON ST 50 50 BAYLOR DRIVE 50 CLACKAMAS 50 30 DUKE ST GOLF CO URSE CASCADE 30 30 30 60 WEST HAYES 20 30 20 STREET 50 30 NELLIE MUIR GOLF COU RSE CIRCLE ELEMENTARY DRIVE SCHOOL CLACKAMAS CASCADE 74 74 STREET STUBB ROAD CR 517 PARR ACRES MOBILE HOME PARK 60 CR 517 CR 517 PARR PARR ROAD ROAD 60 70 70 70 HERITAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 50 CENTENNIAL ROAD PARK PRIVATE ST UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 80 60 50 CLACKAMAS CIRCLE GOLF COURSE CASCADE DRIVE 50 50 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 CLACKAMAS CIRCLE 50 50 EVERGREEN BLVD COLUMBIA DRIVE BAYLOR DRIVE 50 50 SANTIAM DRIVE 50 50 30 50 60 OXFORD ST 60 OXFORD STREET 60 50 60 CITADEL ST 60 REED AVENUE 60 R=58 EVE RG REE N ROA D 50 CLEMSON STREET HARVARD DRIVE VASSER ST 60 WILLAMETTE ST 60 LINFIELD AVENUE 60 60 50 60 74 PALIMINO AVE 60 ST 60 PARADISE ST PRAIRIE 60 60 SWEETWATER AVENUE R=40 ROAD 74 30 30 40 40 174 100 60 HOOPER STACEY ALLISON WAY 60 EVERGREEN 7 60 RAILROAD SW COR G LEASURE DLC 78 NW COR J B DUCHAME DLC 80 12 11 1/4 COR 13 14 12 7 13 18 SW COR A DUBOIS DLC 98 1/4 COR CTR SEC 1/4 COR SE COR RS OF T ROY DLC 82 N'LY NW COR P RAYMOND DLC 88 SW COR M LORE DLC 61 SE COR M LORE DLC 61 NE COR M FOISEY DLC 104 W'LY NW COR P RAYMOND DLC 88 13 14 23 24 18 13 1/4 COR 19 24 103 03 93 0 103 03 03 0 103 00 03 0 103 03 03 0 103 00 03 0 103 03 03 0 1001 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 38.45 AC 1.75 AC P.P. 2017-054 513.88 30.05 300.33 267.84 282.83 267.80 486.71 897.92 504.02 280.94 105 PARCEL 2 45.18 AC 393.44 10.00 330.97 211.54 23.62 65.00 119.85 420.24 160.97 247.98 71.00 7.93 2.00 694.28 100.00 290.31 100 PARCEL 1 4.92 AC 211.00 211.58 NOTE: ASSESSED WITH TAXLOT 4100 ON MAP 05 1W 18BC SE COR A DUBOIS DLC 98 P.P. 2018-065 P.P. 1994- 110 106 107 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 51.58 AC 44.82 AC 798.98 480.00 259.68 479.84 168.00 104.41 194.66 596.87 386.97 67.62 210.90 106.93 56.46 150.95 313.84 495.96 71.38 41.21 90.00 25.00 80.00 99.84 55.78 166.00 P.P. 2018-075 SEE MAP 052W12C SEE MAP 052W12DC SEE MAP 052W12DD SEE MAP 051W07CC SEE MAP 051W18BA SEE MAP 051W18BD SEE MAP 051W19B SEE MAP 052W23 SEE MAP 052W24 SEE MAP 052W11 SEE MAP 052W14 SEE MAP 051W18CA SEE MAP 051W18C 18BB 18CB 12CD 13AB 13BA 13BC 13BD 18BC 18CC 13AA MARION COUNTY, OREGON SEC 13 T5S R2W W.M. WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 SCALE 1" = 400' FOR ADDITIONAL MAPS VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.co.marion.or.us DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 LEGEND LINE TYPES CORNER TYPES Section Corner <Ò 15 16 21 22 Waterline - Non Railroad Centerline Historical Boundary Easement Taxcode Line Map Boundary Road Right-of-Way Taxlot Boundary Railroad Right-of-Way Private Road ROW Subdivision/Plat Waterline - Taxlot NUMBERS Tax Code Number 000 00 00 0 All acres listed are Net Acres, excluding any portions of the taxlot within public ROWs Acreage Tick Marks: A tick mark in the road indicates that the labeled dimension extends into the public ROW 0.25 AC NOTES 200.00 175.00 PLOT DATE: 2/26/2019 CANCELLED NUMBERS 101 102A2 104 [PHONE REDACTED] R ! DLC Corner <Ò 1/4 Section Cor. Ð 1/16TH Section Cor. ATTACHMENT 103a ---PAGE BREAK--- ^ Ð Ð R ! Ð <Ò 140 19.41 CH 100 300 110 110 150 150 140 200 110 110 300 400 140 500 150 CS 15919 300 329.82 179.82 19.46 (1284.36) 433.82 871 600 700 150 150 871 472.82 144.82 958.32 800 100 100 958.32 78 1340.82 900 201 391 WEST 501 1000 66.9 210.6 100 130.71 128.21 130.71 31 2.5 290.4 143.50 143.68 1500 121 1300 1400 1200 622.28 207.43 207.43 1100 207.42 331.00 1600 331.00 1700 1800 331.00 CS 23670 300.00 300.00 300.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 210.00 CS 21117 207.43 207.43 207.42 130.71 128.21 128.22 143.50 145.00 STUBB ROAD CR 517 60 CR 517 PARR ROAD 60 ROAD 74 30 30 40 40 EVERGREEN SW COR A DUBOIS DLC 98 1/16 COR 1/16 COR CTR SEC 1/16 COR 103 00 03 0 10 SEE MAP 052W13BC SEE MAP 052W14 SEE MAP 052W13 MARION COUNTY, OREGON SE1/4 NW1/4 SEC13 T5S R2W W.M. WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 2W 13BD 05 2W 13BD SCALE 1" = 100' FOR ADDITIONAL MAPS VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.co.marion.or.us DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 05 2W 13BD 05 2W 13BD WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 2W 13BD 05 2W 13BD 05 2W 13BD 05 2W 13BD LEGEND LINE TYPES CORNER TYPES Section Corner <Ò 15 16 21 22 Waterline - Non Railroad Centerline Historical Boundary Easement Taxcode Line Map Boundary Road Right-of-Way Taxlot Boundary Railroad Right-of-Way Private Road ROW Subdivision/Plat Waterline - Taxlot NUMBERS Tax Code Number 000 00 00 0 All acres listed are Net Acres, excluding any portions of the taxlot within public ROWs Acreage Tick Marks: A tick mark in the road indicates that the labeled dimension extends into the public ROW 0.25 AC NOTES 200.00 175.00 PLOT DATE: 1/23/2018 CANCELLED NUMBERS R ! DLC Corner <Ò 1/4 Section Cor. Ð 1/16TH Section Cor. ATTACHMENT 103b ---PAGE BREAK--- STAFFORD PHASING 6, 5/29/2018 6:12:28 AM ATTACHMENT 104