Full Text
City of Woodburn Page 1 Parks & Recreation Master Plan To: Jesse Cuomo, Director, Community Services Department From: Steve Duh, Conservation Technix, Inc. Date: July 24, 2023 Re: Woodburn Parks & Recreation Master Plan Community Survey Summary Results Conservation Technix is pleased to present the results of a survey of the general population of the City of Woodburn that assesses residents’ recreational needs and priorities. KEY FINDINGS Woodburn residents strongly value their parks and recreation facilities. Nearly all respondents (96%) think parks and recreation are important or essential to quality of life in Woodburn. Very few, about feel they are useful, but not necessary, or not important at all. Residents visit Woodburn parks frequently to participate in a range of activities. Residents of Woodburn frequently use the City's parks and recreation facilities, with more than four in ten visiting at least once a week, if not every day. The most common reasons for park visits included walking or running, using a playground, walking a dog, and for fitness or exercise. While residents prioritize maintaining existing parks and facilities, they are generally supportive of improving the City’s park and recreation system as well. Woodburn residents, when asked about the overall condition of the parks they have visited, shared a positive view with 79% of responses being fair to excellent, leaving 14% stating poor condition and 7% with no opinion. Although there is a positive perception of the maintenance condition of parks, the community desires more amenities and park upgrades, with only 57% of respondents being satisfied to very satisfied with Woodburn’s parks, recreation facilities and open spaces. Overall, survey respondents would like to see the City prioritize: Park Upgrades: When asked to prioritize potential improvements, community members ranked improving and upgrading existing parks as their top priority. In other questions, they called for additional walking trails, picnic areas, playgrounds, and sport courts. In open‐ended responses, community members also asked for additional amenities like covered basketball courts, pickleball courts, disc golf courses, skateparks, and picnic areas. Walking Trails: The community seeks an expansion of walking trails and the establishment of bike paths, emphasizing the importance of connectivity between parks. Residents also specifically requested better lighting along trails, wheelchair‐friendly paths, and pet‐friendly trails. Park Maintenance and Safety: Community members cited maintenance and safety concerns as top reasons why they do not visit more often, and written comments expressed a desire for ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 2 Parks & Recreation Master Plan improved maintenance and safety in existing parks. They advocated for additional cleaning and trash removal in parks, repairs to broken equipment, and increased lighting and enforcement of park rules. SURVEY METHODOLOGY In close collaboration with City of Woodburn staff, Conservation Technix developed the 16‐question survey that was estimated to take less than ten minutes to complete. The mail survey was available in English and Spanish, and the cover letter accompanying the printed survey was written in both languages and included unique QR codes to access each in‐language survey online. The City mailed 2,500 surveys to randomly chosen households in Woodburn on March 16, 2023, of which 262 surveys were completed and returned (10.5% response rate, 5% margin of error). Residents who did not receive a mail survey were able to complete the survey online. Online versions of the survey in English, Spanish and Russian were posted to the City’s website on March 27th. An additional 256 surveys were completed from the general, community‐wide online surveys. In all, 518 surveys were collected, which includes 44 Spanish surveys. The survey was closed on June 3, 2023, and the full dataset was compiled and reviewed. Information about the survey was promoted through several channels, including on the City’s website, through multiple social media postings, and through direct outreach to partner organizations and recreation program participants. Although households were randomly chosen to receive the mail survey, respondents were not necessarily representative of all city residents. Mail survey responses underrepresent residents under 35 years of age and over‐represent residents over the age of 65. See Figure 1 below for age demographics for the mail and online surveys, as well as comparative percentages for Woodburn’s population. See page 12 for other demographic subgroup data comparisons. Figure 1. Age demographics of survey respondents This report includes findings of community opinions based on the combined responses from the mail survey and online. Each section also notes key differences between different demographic groups and among responses to the online‐only survey, where applicable. Percentages in the report may not add up to 100% due to rounding. Age group Survey Respondents Woodburn Mail Online‐only Combined All Over 20 Under 20 4% 2% 3% 31% 20 to 34 10% 23% 17% 16% 23% 35 to 44 14% 30% 22% 13% 18% 45 to 54 10% 17% 13% 12% 17% 55 to 64 15% 12% 13% 12% 16% 65 to 74 24% 12% 18% 10% 14% 75 and older 22% 5% 13% 8% 12% Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 3 Parks & Recreation Master Plan DETAILED FINDINGS Usage and satisfaction of parks and recreation facilities How much do residents value parks and recreation? Virtually all respondents (96%) feel that local parks and recreation opportunities are important or essential to the quality of life in Woodburn. Eighty‐one percent of respondents overall feel that they are essential; while an additional 15% believe that they are important to quality of life, but not essential, see Figure 2. Only about 3% of respondents believe parks are useful, but not important, or not important. Online respondents more frequently rated parks and recreation opportunities as ‘essential’ to Woodburn’s quality of life as compared to mail respondents. Residents of all ages value parks and recreation similarly – there were no significant differences between age groups. There were also no significant differences based on where respondents live or whether they had children in their home. Online survey respondents were more likely to deem park and recreation opportunities as essential to quality of life than mail survey respondents. How often do residents use City parks and recreation facilities? Respondents were asked how often they visit a City park, recreation facility, or open space in a typical year. A plurality of respondents (43%) visit at least once a week, if not every day, see Figure 3. Another 29% visit one to three times per month, while about 19% visit a few times per year. About one in ten respondents do not visit a park at all. Survey respondents showed a high use of parks regardless of age and location of residence. Respondents without children at home were significantly more likely to visit every day, while those with children were more likely to visit at least once per week. Online respondents reported more frequent use than mail survey respondents. Figure 2A/B. When you think about what contributes to the quality of life in Woodburn, would you say public parks and recreation opportunities are… Response options Mail Online‐only Essential to the quality of life here 77% 94% 83% 96% Important, but not really necessary 17% 13% Useful, but not important 3% 3% Not important or don’t know 3% 0% 81% 15% 3% Essential to the quality of life here Important, but not really essential Useful, but not necessary Not important Don’t know Combined results Figure 3. In a typical year, how often do you visit or use City of Woodburn parks, recreation facilities or open spaces? 12% 31% 19% 10% 19% 9% 1% Everyday At least once a week Two or more times a month About once a month A few times over the year Do not visit Don't know ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 4 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Which park do residents visit most often? Respondents were asked, in an open‐ended question, which local park they visit most frequently. Of the 399 responses, over 60% listed Centennial Park. Another 20% of respondents listed Legion Park, with smaller numbers mentioning the Woodburn Aquatic Center Settlemier Park and Senior Estates Park A few respondents listed Library Square, Hermanson Park, Burlingham Park, Smith Creek Park, Nelson Park, Downtown Plaza, and Heritage Park as their most frequented park locations, see Figure 4. Other City parks and facilities, including Wyffels Park, the Mill Creek Greenway Trail, Alvah Cowan Park, Dahlia Park, Hazel Smith Park, North Front Street Park, and Frank Scheer Locomotive Park, were not listed by any survey respondents. Why do residents visit Woodburn’s parks and recreation facilities? Respondents visit local parks and recreation facilities for a variety of reasons, but the most popular reason is to walk or run More than one in three respondents visit to use a playground walk a dog for fitness or exercise to relax or to attend community events or concerts see Figure 5. Between twenty and thirty percent of respondents visit for family gatherings, swimming, bike riding, or youth sports programs. Fewer than one in five respondents chose sports fields, wildlife viewing, sports courts, recreation programs, or the skate park as a primary reason why they visit local parks. Approximately one in twenty respondents identified an ‘other’ reason for visiting parks, such as to play pickleball or tennis, enjoy nature, or horseshoes. The reasons for visiting city parks and recreation facilities varied between mail and online respondents, with part of the difference attributable to the age group composition between the two. Online respondents were more inclined to visit city parks for most listed activities, including walking and running, playgrounds, sport fields and courts, and community events and festivals. Mail respondents were more likely to visit for wildlife viewing or to state that they didn’t use parks. Location % listing Centennial Park 61% Legion Park 20% Aquatic Center 11% Settlemier Park 9% Senior Estates Park 7% Library Square 3% Hermanson Park (HOA) 3% Burlingham Park 2% Smith Creek Park (HOA) 1% Nelson Park 1% Downtown Plaza 1% Heritage Park 1% Figure 4. Which park or facility do you visit most often? (open‐ended) Figure 5. What would you say are the main reasons your household visits Woodburn parks and recreation facilities? 69% 44% 42% 40% 39% 36% 30% 27% 23% 21% 19% 19% 15% 12% 8% 6% 5% Walking or running Playgrounds Dog walking or dog park Fitness / Exercise Relaxation Community events / concerts Family gatherings / picnicking Swimming Bike riding Youth sport programs Sport fields Wildlife viewing Outdoor sport courts Recreation programs, classes or camps Skate park N/A – I didn’t use any Other (please specify) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 5 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Respondents under the age of 44 were more likely than older residents to visit for playgrounds, youth programs, and skate parks. However, many activities, including running and walking, fitness or exercise, relaxation, dog walking, and community events are similarly popular across all age groups. Respondents with children in their home are more likely to visit parks to visit playgrounds, have family gatherings, participate in youth sports, swim, or use sports fields, compared to respondents without children in the home. Residents who live south of 214 were more likely than residents to the north of 214 to visit to use playgrounds, skate parks, or to ride a bike. Satisfaction with existing recreation and parks Are residents satisfied with Woodburn’s recreation, parks, and open spaces? Most residents are somewhat to very satisfied with Woodburn’s parks, recreation facilities, and open spaces However, more than one in three survey respondents (36%) are either somewhat or very dissatisfied in the city’s park and recreation system, see Figure 6. There were no significant differences in satisfaction between residents of various ages, between those with versus those without children at home, or between residents living in various areas of the city. Online respondents had lower overall ratings of satisfaction than mail respondents. How would residents rate the condition of parks they have visited? Survey respondents have varying views on the condition of Woodburn’s parks, as shown in Figure 7. While 44% of respondents rate the condition of parks they have visited as either excellent or good, 51% rate them as fair or poor. This may reflect a community desire for increased maintenance, cleanliness, and security within parks and/or community needs for additional park amenities, as expressed in other survey questions. Respondents who live north of 214 were significantly more likely than those to the south to rate the condition of City parks as ‘poor’. There were no significant differences in how residents of various ages or household makeup rated the condition of the City’s parks. Figure 6. Rate your household’s satisfaction with City of Woodburn’s parks, recreation facilities, and open spaces. 12% 45% 27% 9% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Very satisfied Somewhat Satisfied Somewhat dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Don't know 6% 36% 37% 14% 7% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Excellent Good Fair Poor Not Sure / No Opinion Figure 7. How would you rate the condition of Woodburn’s parks you have visited? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 6 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Why don’t residents visit more often? When asked why they do not visit Woodburn’s parks, recreation facilities, and open spaces more often, one quarter responded that they do visit often. However, similar numbers do not visit more because they feel parks are not well maintained don’t feel safe in parks or facilities or because there are not enough restrooms see Figure 8. Seventeen percent don’t know what is offered. Smaller percentages of respondents noted that parks are too crowded have insufficient parking do not have the right equipment are too far away or have accessibility barriers preventing them from visiting local parks more often. Some residents use parks or facilities provided by other cities or organizations face age or physical limitations are too busy or are generally not interested suggesting that further improvements may not increase their use of parks. In addition, about one in six respondents wrote in responses citing needs for improved safety and cleanliness in facilities, expanded pool hours, a lack of well‐connected trails, concerns about off‐ leash dogs, and the weather as reasons why they do not visit more frequently. Online respondents were more likely to cite concerns about maintenance and safety or a lack of parking, restrooms, or preferred equipment as reasons they didn’t visit more often. Mail respondents were more likely to note a lack of interest, age, or physical limitations – likely attributable to the higher average age of mail respondents. Respondents with children at home were more likely than those without to cite concerns about maintenance, a lack of preferred equipment, a lack of parking, or being too busy as a reason they do not visit parks more frequently. Respondents living to the north of 214 were more likely to cite a lack of parking or restrooms as a reason they don’t visit more, compared to those living south of 214. There were no significant differences in responses based on age. Figure 8. Check ALL the reasons why your household does not use Woodburn’s recreation facilities, parks or open spaces or attend City events more often. (Check all that apply) 28% 27% 25% 21% 17% 16% 13% 13% 13% 12% 9% 8% 7% 4% 3% Are not well maintained Do not feel safe N/A ‐ I/we use them often Not enough restrooms Do not know what is offered Other (please specify) Use those provided by another… Too crowded Not enough parking Age or physical limitations Do not have the right equipment Too far away / Lack… Too busy Not interested Physical accessibility barriers ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 7 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Does the number of existing park and recreation amenities meet residents’ needs? Residents were generally split on whether they feel the City provides enough park, trails, and recreation facilities. About two‐thirds of survey respondents would like to see more walking and biking trails while 59% would like the City to provide more picnic areas and shelters, see Figure 9. Approximately half of residents would like to see more sports courts and developed parks with playground. Between 40% and 50% would like to see more aquatics and recreation programs and community events. Residents with children in their home were more likely than those without to believe there are not enough of every listed amenity except walking trails and picnic areas, where their responses were similar. Respondents who live north of 214 were significantly more likely than those to the south to feel the City did not have enough sports fields. There were no significant differences between respondents based on age. 9% 10% 4% 5% 5% 7% 5% 6% 40% 34% 17% 34% 34% 26% 25% 15% 32% 42% 48% 48% 50% 52% 59% 72% 18% 14% 31% 13% 10% 15% 12% 7% Sport fields Community events Recreation programs Aquatics / pool programs Developed parks Sport courts Picnic areas & shelters Walking / pedestrian trails 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% More than enough About the right number Not enough Don't Know Figure 9. When it comes to meeting the needs for park and recreation facilities, how would you rate the availability of each of the following? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 8 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Investment Priorities What park and recreation amenities would residents support adding in Woodburn? The survey asked residents about their support for a variety of potential additions to the park system. More than half of residents were either very supportive or somewhat supportive of adding nearly all listed amenities. As shown in Figure 10, virtually all residents are either very or somewhat supportive of additional walking trails picnic areas and shelters upgraded or renovated playgrounds outdoor splash pads an amphitheater or outdoor performance area and indoor fitness and exercise facilities Large majorities are also supportive of the City adding more playgrounds community gardens basketball courts and outdoor fitness equipment More than half of residents support the City adding more off‐leash dog areas, sports fields, sports courts, a disc golf course, and a bike skills course or pump track. Younger residents, especially those under 45, expressed a greater interest in additional or upgraded playgrounds and outdoor splash pads as compared to older residents. Residents with children at home were more likely to support additional playgrounds, splash pads, and basketball courts, as compared to those without children at home. Those without children in the household were more likely to support additional dog parks and pickleball courts. While they were still generally supportive, respondents living north of 214 and west of Boones Ferry Road (map area A) were less supportive of additional sports fields, splash pads, and playgrounds as compared to residents of other areas. What park and recreation investments would residents prioritize? Respondents were asked to rank a list of potential park system investments. In aggregated survey data, respondents identified improving and upgrading existing parks as their top priority, followed closely by expanding trail opportunities, see Figure 11A. Adding new recreational options in existing parks and acquiring additional land for future parks were moderate priorities. Expanding recreation programs and camps was ranked as the lowest priorities by respondents. Figure 10. The following list includes additional amenities that the City of Woodburn could consider adding to the park system. Please indicate your level of support for each. 22% 27% 29% 30% 30% 31% 32% 32% 38% 40% 41% 48% 53% 53% 54% 54% 56% 57% 76% 22% 27% 26% 33% 33% 38% 30% 37% 33% 31% 25% 30% 24% 33% 28% 27% 25% 26% 16% 24% 28% 29% 21% 21% 16% 21% 16% 19% 15% 22% 13% 13% 7% 11% 10% 10% 8% 33% 18% 16% 16% 16% 15% 16% 15% 10% 14% 12% 9% 10% 7% 7% 9% 9% 9% 5% Futsal courts Bike skills course / Pump track Sand volleyball Pickleball courts Tennis courts Sport fields (baseball/softball) Disc golf course Sport fields (soccer, football, lacrosse) Outdoor fitness equipment Basketball courts Off‐leash dog areas (dog parks) Community gardens Additional playgrounds Picnic areas & shelters Outdoor splash pad Amphitheater Indoor fitness facilities Upgraded playgrounds Walking trails 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Very Supportive Somewhat Supportive Not Supportive Not Sure ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 9 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Respondents to the mail and online surveys differed in their selection of ranked priorities, with online survey respondents more strongly supportive of expanding recreational options in existing parks and mail respondents more supportive of expanding trail opportunities, see Figure 11B. Respondents from households with children were more likely to prioritize expanding recreation classes and camps compared to those without. There were no significant differences in priorities based on age or location of residence. 9% 18% 11% 28% 38% 9% 15% 33% 17% 23% 19% 16% 28% 19% 18% 26% 20% 20% 23% 10% 37% 31% 8% 13% 10% Expanding recreation classes & camps Acquiring additional land for future parks Adding new recreational options in existing parks Expanding trail opportunities Improving or upgrading existing parks 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 Mail Online Highest Improving or upgrading existing parks Improving or upgrading existing parks Expanding trail opportunities Adding new recreation options in existing parks Adding new recreation options in existing parks Expanding trail opportunities Acquiring additional land for future parks Acquiring additional land for future parks Lowest Expanding recreation classes and camps Expanding recreation classes and camps Figure 11A/B. For the following list, indicate how you would rank the priority for each (1st priority is highest and 5th priority is lowest). Chart shows combined data from the mail and online surveys. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 10 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Which recreation programs and activities are of interest to residents? Survey respondents were asked about their level of interest in a variety of recreational programs and activities that the City of Woodburn does, or could, offer. More than three quarters of respondents were very or somewhat interested in seeing more community events, adult classes, and aquatics programs. More than half of respondents were interested in all the other recreational programs and activities listed, with the exception of E‐sports, see Figure 12. Younger residents, particularly those under 44, were more likely than older residents to express interest in youth activities and sports, family programs, adult classes, and swimming lessons. Older respondents showed more interest in programs for adults over 55. Survey respondents with children at home were more likely than those without to note interest in family, youth, and teen programs as well as swimming lessons. Residents without children at home were more likely to express interest in programs for adults and people over 55, which reflects the demographics of this group. Do residents have specific improvements they would like to see? Respondents were asked to describe one thing that they would like to see the City of Woodburn do to improve parks, trails, aquatics, and/or recreation programs. While respondents provided 380 specific comments and ideas, a few themes emerged: Park Maintenance and Safety: Community members frequently expressed a desire for improved maintenance and safety in existing parks. Many spoke of concerns about the maintenance and upkeep of parks, including regular cleaning, lawn care, removal of litter, and repairs to broken equipment. Others mentioned concerns about safety in parks, including issues like drugs, homeless individuals, and the need for police patrols. There are also requests for better lighting and enforcement of park rules to ensure a safe environment. Park Upgrades: While community members emphasized the importance of maintaining existing parks and facilities, they also called for upgrades such as improved playgrounds, restroom renovations, and well‐maintained walking trails. In their responses, community members also asked for additional amenities like covered basketball courts, pickleball courts, disc golf courses, skateparks, and picnic areas. There are also suggestions to renovate existing facilities and playgrounds to provide safe and enjoyable experiences for all age groups. Figure 12. …For each of the following, please indicate the level of interest your household has in the program or activity. 9% 23% 25% 27% 31% 34% 35% 37% 40% 42% 49% 10% 27% 29% 29% 37% 24% 23% 24% 34% 38% 36% 73% 42% 41% 37% 23% 38% 35% 33% 22% 16% 12% 7% 8% 5% 8% 9% 4% 7% 6% 4% 4% 3% E‐Sports Teen activities Adult sports Programs for adults 55 + Family programs Swimming lessons Youth sports Youth activities Aquatics programs Adult classes Community Events 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% Very Interested Somewhat Interested Not Interested Not Sure ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 11 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Walking Trails and Connectivity: The community seeks an expansion of walking trails and the establishment of bike paths, emphasizing the importance of connectivity between parks. Residents also specifically requested better lighting along trails, wheelchair‐friendly paths, and pet‐friendly trails. Aquatic Center Enhancements: Community members expressed a desire for upgrades to the aquatic center, including expanded hours, additional aquatic classes, and improved indoor facilities. They also called for the addition of more slides, diving boards, and a wave pool to enhance the overall experience. Dog Parks and Off‐Leash Areas: Enhancing dog parks is a priority, with requests for improvements such as shelters, seating areas, and increased maintenance and cleanliness. The community also desires the creation of more dog parks and off‐leash areas to cater to the needs of pet owners. Community Center and Recreation Programs: Building a new community center that offers various amenities and recreation programs is another common desire. The community would like to see more options for youth sports leagues, additional fitness facilities, and improved staffing and availability of programs, including swimming lessons and senior activities, to cater to the diverse needs and interests of residents. Communication and Information: Some survey respondents asked for improved communication channels, such as a city cable channel or newsletter, to inform residents about community events, park offerings, and important happenings in town. Others requested a more user‐friendly website that provides easy access to information, including programs, activities, and registrations, reducing the need to search through multiple sources. A compilation of write‐in comments is on file with the Woodburn Community Services Department. Communication preferences How do residents want to hear about Woodburn’s parks, programs, and events? A majority of residents prefer to learn about City parks, recreation facilities and special events through the Woodburn Newsletter the City website or Facebook see Figure 13. These methods were popular across all age groups. The Woodburn Independent, community event signs, and direct email were also popular ways of learning about Woodburn parks, preferred by 37‐39% of respondents each. Twitter was less popular. Some residents wrote in other preferred methods of contact, predominately direct mail. Figure 13. Please check ALL the ways you would prefer to learn about Woodburn’s parks, programs, and events. 66% 62% 51% 39% 38% 37% 6% 5% 3% Woodburn Newsletter City website Facebook Woodburn Independent Community event signs Direct email Other (please specify) Twitter None of these ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 12 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Perhaps unsurprisingly, residents who responded to the online survey to prefer online sources of information, notably the City’s website and Facebook, as compared to respondents to the mail survey. Residents with children at home were more likely to prefer communication through Facebook than those without children at home. There were no significant differences in communication preferences between residents living in different areas of the city. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 13 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Demographics Age groups Overall, nearly half of mail respondents were above 65 years of age Online‐only survey respondents tended to be younger than mail respondents – 55% were under 44 years and only 17% were over 65. Number of children in household The majority (68%) of respondents to the mail survey live in households with no children under 18, while about thirty percent live in a household with either one two or three or more (10%) children. Online‐only survey respondents were significantly more likely to live in households with children than respondents to the mail survey – 61% had children in the home. Location of residence Nearly all survey respondents live within the City of Woodburn. About 42% of mail respondents live to the north of 214 (map areas A and B) and 58% live to the south (map areas C and The largest portion of respondents to the mail survey, 32%, live in the southwest portion of the City (map area Online survey respondents were more likely to live south of 214 See map on following page. 4% 10% 14% 10% 15% 24% 22% 0% 10% 20% 30% < 20 20‐34 35‐44 45‐54 55‐64 65‐74 75 + Mail survey responses Online‐only survey responses Online‐only survey responses Mail survey responses Online‐only survey responses Mail survey responses 31% 11% 32% 26% 0% 0% 10% 20% 30% ( A ) Northwest ( B ) Northeast ( C ) Southwest ( D ) Southeast Don’t live in City 16% 11% 30% 34% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% ( A ) Northwest ( B ) Northeast ( C ) Southwest ( D ) Southeast Don’t live in City 2% 23% 30% 17% 12% 12% 5% 0% 10% 20% 30% < 20 20‐34 35‐44 45‐54 55‐64 65‐74 75 + 68% 10% 11% 10% 0% 25% 50% 0 1 2 3 or more 39% 12% 31% 18% 0% 25% 50% 0 1 2 3 or more ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 14 Parks & Recreation Master Plan Survey map for location responses 40% ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 15 Parks & Recreation Master Plan ATTACHMENT 1. SURVEY INSTRUMENT ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 16 Parks & Recreation Master Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 17 Parks & Recreation Master Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 18 Parks & Recreation Master Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn Page 19 Parks & Recreation Master Plan