Document Woodburn_doc_56c8ec7c14

COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 2021 Page 1 - Council Meeting Minutes, April 12, 2021 DATE COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, CITY OF WOODBURN, COUNTY OF MARION, STATE OF OREGON, APRIL 12, 2021 CONVENED The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. with Mayor Swenson presiding. ROLL CALL Mayor Swenson Present -via video conferencing Councilor Carney Present -via video conferencing Councilor Cornwell Present -via video conferencing Councilor Schaub Absent Councilor Swanson Present- via video conferencing Councilor Puente Present- via video conferencing Councilor Cabrales Present- via video conferencing Staff Present (via video conferencing): City Administrator Derickson, City Attorney Shields, Economic Development Director Johnk, Acting Police Chief Pilcher, Community Development Director Kerr, Operations Director Stultz, Public Works Project and Engineering Director Liljequist, Finance Director Turley, Human Resources Director Gregg, Assistant City Attorney Granum, Senior Planner Cortes, City Recorder Pierson APPOINTMENTS Carney/Cornwell…appoint Rebecca Lerback to the Woodburn Public Library Board. The motion passed unanimously. PROCLAMATION Mayor Swenson read a proclamation declaring April Child Abuse Preventions Month. CONSENT AGENDA A. Woodburn City Council minutes of March 22, 2021, B. Zayo Group, LLC Franchise Settlement Agreement Carney/Cornwell…adopt the Consent Agenda. The motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS A Public Hearing to consider input on annexation of approximately 39.68 acres of territory known as the Oregon Golf Association Property with no street address along the east side of Boones Ferry Rd NE north of Hazelnut Dr (ANX 2020-01) and approval of related land use applications for development into the Trillium Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD 2020-01). Mayor Swenson declared the hearing open at 7:06 p.m. for the purpose of hearing public input on annexation of approximately 39.68 acres of territory known as the Oregon Golf Association Property with no street address along the east side of Boones Ferry Rd NE north of Hazelnut Dr (ANX 2020-01) and approval of related land use applications for development into the Trillium Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD 2020-01). Mayor Swenson asked if there were any declarations from the Council. City Recorder Pierson read the public hearing statement. Community Development Director Kerr and Senior Planner Cortes provided a staff report. Chris Goodell, with AKS Engineering provided testimony on behalf of the applicant. Kelly Hossaini, 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 2021 Page 2 - Council Meeting Minutes, April 12, 2021 with Miller Nash Graham and Dunn, provided testimony on the objection of the two proposed conditions of approval related to road frontage improvements. Todd Mobley, with Lancaster Mobley, provided testimony on the sight line at Trillium Place. Councilor Carney asked if a playground for children would be put in and Mr. Goodell answered no. Mayor Swenson asked if any member of the public wished to speak in support of the of the annexation of approximately 39.68 acres of territory known as the Oregon Golf Association Property with no street address along the east side of Boones Ferry Rd NE north of Hazelnut Dr (ANX 2020-01) and approval of related land use applications for development into the Trillium Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD 2020-01). No members of the public wished to speak in support. Mayor Swenson asked if any member of the public wished to speak in opposition of the annexation of approximately 39.68 acres of territory known as the Oregon Golf Association Property with no street address along the east side of Boones Ferry Rd NE north of Hazelnut Dr (ANX 2020-01) and approval of related land use applications for development into the Trillium Reserve Planned Unit Development (PUD 2020-01). Jim Nicolarsen, 620 Troon Ave, Woodburn, stated that he believes there are issues with the open space in this application and asked if there were any questions on the letters they sent to Council. Mr. Goodell provided rebuttal testimony on the letters received and Councilor questions. City Attorney Shields stated that he has concerns with the applicant saying they are opposed to frontage improvements and Director Kerr stating that the annexation is not justified if the frontage improvements are not made. Ms. Hossaini stated that the applicant, while disagreeing that they should have to make the frontage improvements on Boones Ferry Rd. and Hazelnut, will make the frontage improvements if Council requires them for approval of the annexation. Mayor Swenson closed the hearing at 9:07 p.m. Councilors provided comments and discussion on the application. Carney/Cabrales… deny the annexation request for Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-1 PLA 2020 etcetera and direct staff to prepare an ordinance and final order to submit for consideration at a future meeting. On roll call vote the motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL GOAL The City Council reviewed the goals and no action was taken. PLANNING COMMISSION OR ADMINISTRATIVE LAND USE ACTIONS A. Call-Up Briefing: Planning Division staff approval of a Design Review and Exception to Street Right-of-Way and Improvement Requirements (“Street Exception”) application package for the I-5 Pump Station at 598 Stacy Allison Way (DR 21-01 & EXCP 21-01) B. Call-Up Briefing: Planning Division staff approval of a Zoning Adjustment application for 622 Bishopick Way (ZA 21-01) C. Call-Up Briefing: Planning Division staff approval of a Zoning Adjustment application for 575 Ostrom Drive (ZA 21-02) The Council declined to call-up any of the items. CITY ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT The City Administrator reported the following: • The Woodburn Budget Committee Meeting will take place on April 21, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 12, 2021 Page 3 - Council Meeting Minutes, April 12, 2021 • Will keep the Council updated on projects that are underway. MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORTS Councilor Carney thanked his colleagues for maintaining their attention through a very difficult evening. Councilor Puente gave kudos to Scott for his response to a constituent that had an issue. Mayor Swenson stated that he met with our state rep about federal money that could be coming our way and spoke with Teresa Alonso Leon and Kurt Schrader about funding our community center. ADJOURNMENT Carney/Swanson… meeting be adjourned. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:34 p.m. APPROVED ERIC SWENSON, MAYOR ATTEST Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4/19/2021 Woodburn Police Department ARRESTS BY OFFENSES 2021 Year to Date 4 1 1 9 0 0 1 0 3 4 0 8 6 10 10 0 3 1 1 0 1 3 48 3 7 1 0 1 5 1 2 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 3 3 8 1 1 4 2 1 5 1 0 0 0 4 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 3 7 4 0 4 2 0 1 0 0 33 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 0 2 0 3 2 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 12 1 1 7 0 0 0 1 0 26 1 1 0 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 1 1 18 1 1 1 1 4 4 1 14 11 29 15 1 14 3 1 1 2 3 107 4 9 1 1 3 9 4 6 4 3 2 1 3 1 1 1 4 3 6 18 4 3 8 4 3 6 1 WEAPON - SHOOTING IN PROHIBITED AREA WEAPON - POSSESS ILLEGAL WEAPON - EX FELON IN POSSESSION VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY VANDALISM UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO MOTOR VEHICLE TRESPASS TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS THEFT - SHOPLIFT THEFT - OTHER THEFT - FROM MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT - BUILDING STOLEN PROPERTY - RECEIVING,BUYING,POSSESSING SEX CRIME - SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH AN OBJECT RUNAWAY ROBBERY - RESIDENCE ROBBERY - BUSINESS RESTRAINING ORDER VIOLATION RECKLESSLY ENDANDERING RECKLESS DRIVING PROVIDE FALSE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OTHER MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT MINOR IN POSSESSION KIDNAP - FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT HIT AND RUN-MISDEMEANOR FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY FORCIBLE RAPE FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE EXTORTION/BLACKMAIL ELUDE DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR DWS/REVOKED - FELONY DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE DISORDERLY CONDUCT CUSTODY - MENTAL CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE CURFEW CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDALISM OR ARSON BURGLARY - RESIDENCE BURGLARY - OTHER STRUCTURE BURGLARY - BUSINESS ATTEMPTED MURDER ASSAULT SIMPLE ARSON ANIMAL ORDINANCES AGGRAVATED ASSAULT Total Mar Feb Jan CHARGE DESCRIPTION 173 97 81 351 2021 Total Total Mar Feb Jan 161 139 [PHONE REDACTED] Total 178 115 [PHONE REDACTED] Total Page 1 of 2 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4/19/2021 Woodburn Police Department ARRESTS BY OFFENSES 2021 Year to Date 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 [PHONE REDACTED] 2020 2021 450 405 351 Year Arrests Arrests / Year Page 2 of 2 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Police Department CRIMINAL OFFENSES 2021 Year to Date 4/19/2021 2 0 1 1 10 0 1 0 2 5 1 1 0 8 5 10 6 0 3 2 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 1 33 1 15 2 3 2 0 10 9 9 5 4 2 1 1 1 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 7 1 4 3 4 10 0 0 1 3 4 7 3 0 4 2 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 4 26 0 13 2 1 0 2 19 6 10 4 3 1 3 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 9 0 3 0 1 12 0 1 0 3 4 12 1 1 7 3 1 0 1 1 3 3 4 1 27 1 14 4 1 0 1 22 14 11 3 2 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 6 1 1 1 26 1 8 3 7 27 1 2 1 14 13 29 10 1 14 7 1 2 2 2 7 5 7 6 86 2 42 8 5 2 3 51 29 30 12 9 4 7 3 2 1 1 1 4 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 1 3 AGGRAVATED ASSAULT ANIMAL CRUELTY ANIMAL ORDINANCES ARSON ASSAULT SIMPLE ATTEMPTED MURDER BURGLARY - BUSINESS BURGLARY - OTHER STRUCTURE BURGLARY - RESIDENCE CRIME DAMAGE-NO VANDALISM OR ARSON CRIMINAL MISTREATMENT CURFEW CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE CUSTODY - MENTAL DISORDERLY CONDUCT DRIVING UNDER INFLUENCE DRUG LAW VIOLATIONS DWS/REVOKED - FELONY DWS/REVOKED-MISDEMEANOR ELUDE ESCAPE FROM YOUR CUSTODY EXTORTION/BLACKMAIL FAIL TO DISPLAY OPERATORS LICENSE FAILURE TO REGISTER AS SEX OFFENDER FORCIBLE RAPE FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING FRAUD - BY DECEPTION/FALSE PRETENSES FRAUD - CREDIT CARD/AUTOMATIC TELLER MACHINE FUGITIVE ARREST FOR ANOTHER AGENCY HIT AND RUN FELONY HIT AND RUN-MISDEMEANOR IDENTITY THEFT INTIMIDATION /OTHER CRIMINAL THREAT KIDNAP - FOR ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL PURPOSE MINOR IN POSSESSION MISCELLANEOUS MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT NON CRIMINAL DOMESTIC DISTURBANCE OTHER PROPERTY - FOUND LOST MISLAID PROPERTY RECOVER FOR OTHER AGENCY RECKLESS DRIVING RESTRAINING ORDER VIOLATION ROBBERY - BUSINESS ROBBERY - CONV.STORE ROBBERY - OTHER ROBBERY - RESIDENCE RUNAWAY SEX CRIME - CONTRIBUTE TO SEX DELINQUENCY SEX CRIME - FORCIBLE SODOMY SEX CRIME - MOLEST (PHYSICAL) SEX CRIME - PORNOGRAPHY/OBSCENE MATERIAL SEX CRIME - SEXUAL ASSAULT WITH AN OBJECT STALKER STOLEN PROPERTY - RECEIVING,BUYING,POSSESSING THEFT - BICYCLE THEFT - BUILDING Total Mar Feb Jan CHARGE DESCRIPTION Page 1 of 2 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Police Department CRIMINAL OFFENSES 2021 Year to Date 4/19/2021 8 6 12 15 10 3 2 18 6 0 2 1 8 1 12 11 1 6 0 9 3 1 1 0 7 6 12 14 14 2 1 10 2 1 1 0 23 13 36 40 25 11 3 37 11 2 4 1 THEFT - FROM MOTOR VEHICLE THEFT - MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS/ACCESSORIES THEFT - OTHER THEFT - SHOPLIFT TRAFFIC VIOLATIONS TRESPASS UNAUTHORIZED ENTRY INTO MOTOR VEHICLE VANDALISM VEHICLE RECOVERD FOR OTHER AGENCY WEAPON - EX FELON IN POSSESSION WEAPON - POSSESS ILLEGAL WEAPON - SHOOTING IN PROHIBITED AREA Total Mar Feb Jan 330 235 [PHONE REDACTED] Total 307 322 [PHONE REDACTED] Total 259 213 [PHONE REDACTED] Total Total Mar Feb Jan 0 200 400 [PHONE REDACTED] 2019 2020 2021 890 878 729 YEAR OFFENSES Offenses / Year Page 2 of 2 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Police Department ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS 2021 Year to Date 4/19/2021 18 2 16 0 1 14 51 32 0 22 0 0 12 66 41 0 26 2 1 13 83 91 2 64 2 2 39 200 2021 Total Ordinance - Oth Violation Ordinance - Land Use Violations Ordinance - Abate Graffiti Ordinance - Abandoned Vehicles Ordiinance - Abate/Nuisances Animal Complaint Total Mar Feb Jan Ordinance Discription 109 121 97 327 2020 Total 141 99 [PHONE REDACTED] Total 0 50 100 150 200 250 [PHONE REDACTED] 2020 2021 337 254 118 COMBINED TOTAL - CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS VIOLATIONS Ordinance Violations / Code Enforcement Officers 0 40 80 120 160 [PHONE REDACTED] 2020 2021 240 230 117 YEAR TOTALS FOR ALL OFFICERS VIOLATIONS Ordinance Violations / Year 1 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item Agenda Item Review: City Administrator City Attorney Finance April 26, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Scott Derickson, City Administrator FROM: Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Annexation of approximately 31.13 acres of territory known as the Schultz Farm Property with no street address along the west side of Boones Ferry Rd NE north of Hazelnut Dr. and approval of related land use applications for development into the “Dove Landing” Planned Unit Development (ANX 2020-03 & PUD 2020-02) RECOMMENDATION: Conduct a public hearing and make a motion to tentatively approve the land use applications with the changes that this staff memo describes, directing staff to submit an ordinance for consideration at a City Council meeting. BACKGROUND: The item before the Council is action on annexation application ANX 2020-03 by Pacific Community Design, Inc. on behalf of Ettro Capital Management Corp. for property totaling approximately 31.13 gross acres and located along the west side of Boones Ferry Road NE north of Hazelnut Drive. The territory is eligible for annexation because it’s within the City urban growth boundary (UGB). Upon annexation, the City would need to designate the property with City zoning. The Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the territory Low Density Residential. Per Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1, the default compatible base zoning district is Residential Single Family (RS). The proposal dedicates to the City 8.31 acres of public parkland. Development Applications 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 2 Because the applicant proposes also to develop the subject property with 171 houses, there are “child” or corollary development applications: • Planned Unit Development PUD 2020-02: This relates to the site plans and the overall physical site development. PUD is a discretionary land use application type allowing developers to modify Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) provisions – such as getting smaller minimum lot areas and reduced setbacks – in exchange for a minimum area of open space, minimum common area improvements, and “enhanced public amenities”. More to the point, the conditions of approval and the related 200 series of attachments establish PUD development standards and common area improvements. • Preliminary Subdivision SUB 2020-03: This subdivides the land into tracts and small lots per PUD standards – premised upon PUD approval. • Zone Change ZC 2020-02: This designates zoning following annexation. Project Summary The development is 171 detached houses on small lots and among both private common area open space tracts and public parkland tracts. The range of lot sizes is 2,700 square feet (sq ft) to 4,400 sq ft. (For comparison, the Smith Creek Development also had a range of lot sizes, the smallest for detached houses being 3,200 sq ft and for rowhouses 1,800 sq ft.) The development extends the street network with two connections at Boones Ferry Road NE and includes stubs preserving allowance for future extension. Off- street bicycle/pedestrian paths serve as shortcuts through blocks. The central block has a private alley with public access. The alley allows for the four block faces, by not having driveways except two for the alley itself, to have uninterrupted on-street parallel parking and planter strip with many street trees. The Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 3) recommended denial because the developer had refused to dedicate public parkland, and it included back-up conditions of approval were the Commission to recommend approval. Shortly before the hearing, the developer proposed changes meriting approval, particularly agreeing to dedicate public parkland. Staff drafted an addendum memo (Attachment 1) to the Commission summarizing the changes, listing strikethrough-and-underline revisions to some of the conditions of approval, and recommending approval. The Commission recommended approval with the revised conditions. Attachment 2 is a memo from the Assistant City Administrator 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 3 in support of project approval because of the developer agreeing to dedicate public parkland. Of the images that follow, the paired citywide ones show just how large the public parkland dedication is relative to the subject project and existing City parks. Aerial map (2016) with site outlined in purple 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 4 Vicinity map: Subject property in purple, City parks in light green Dove Landing parkland in dark green (Tracts I & K) 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 5 Open space site plan (Apr. 6, 2021) The open space site plan shows along the south the two large tracts that the developer is dedicating to the City as public parkland totaling 8.31 acres. Tract K is the largest at 7.2 acres. Exhibit PUD-6: Tracts to Dedicate to City (outlined in green) The above image is copied from Condition PUD-6 that memorializes dedication of parkland. 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 6 Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission on March 25, 2021 heard and unanimously recommended approval of the consolidated applications package with conditions of approval that staff recommends through both the staff report (Attachment 1: Attachment 102, pages 44+) and with the strikethrough-and- underline revisions per the staff memo addendum to the Commission (Attachment 2, pages 1 & Testimony Besides the applicant, four individuals testified verbally at the hearing: Who Topic Julie Nicolarsen, 620 Troon Ave, Woodburn, OR 97071-7691 Asked about the alley and if it would be one-way Brenda Gonzalez, 1105 Eagle Dr, Woodburn, OR 97071-7711 Asked how many hazelnut trees would be removed, if any, and how many trees would be preserved in the south yard Cindy Wurdinger-Kelly, 16751 Boones Ferry Rd NE, Woodburn, OR 97071-9631 Asked how wide would be the greenway tract behind / west of her house and if there would be a fence or wall Jim Nicolarsen, 620 Troon Ave, Woodburn, OR 97071-7691 Asked if there are other recent developments with lots as small; wanted to know more about the conditioned enhanced pedestrian crossing near Woodburn High School DISCUSSION: Annexation is both a policy and land use decision by the Council. Decision-making criteria for annexation are in Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) 5.04.01C. The attached Planning Commission staff report of March 25, 2021, particularly its Attachment 102 Analyses & Findings, addresses the criteria. At the time of publication, the criteria wouldn’t have been met because the developer had refused to dedicate public parkland. The developer and staff resolved the issue and came to agreement by the time of the Commission hearing. At the hearing, staff was able to find the criteria met and recommended approval with conditions. The developer agrees to dedicate parkland. 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 7 The Council reviews and decides upon the consolidated applications package for the development project because per WDO 4.01.07, the City reviews a package at the highest land use review type among the application types. (In this context, it’s the annexation application type, which is Type IV – a Council decision.) FINANCIAL IMPACT: Annexing the territory into city limits would subject it to City taxing authority, including property tax that generates the largest source of funding for general fund services such as the library, policing, and parks and recreation. The City permanent tax rate is $6.0534 per thousand dollars – equal to a millage rate of 6.0534 mils – as set by Oregon Ballot Measure 50 in 1997-98. The property had a rural dwelling, now demolished. The table below simplifies and grossly estimates tax revenue, not accounting for increase resulting from development: Address Tax Lot Marion County Assessed Value (AV) Gross Estimate of City Property Tax (6.0534 mils) none 051W06C000800 (primary) $18,430 $111.56 none 051W06C000400 $16,630 $100.67 Total: $35,060 $212.23 The estimate neither accounts for how the City might assess property value differently than Marion County nor excludes the unknown cost of providing basic utility services to the properties that the City does not already provide. Crucially, site development would increase both the number of residences and assessed valuation (AV) while also increasing City utility and other service costs. 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 (ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD) Page 8 Attachments: 1. Staff memo addendum for Planning Commission (Apr. 8, 2021; 4 pages) 2. Memo “Dove Landing Public Park Dedication” from Assistant City Administrator (Apr. 26, 2021) 3. Planning Commission March 25, 2021 Staff Report and attachments: 101. Marked Tax Map 102. Analyses & Findings (56 pages) 102A. Public Works comments (Mar. 16, 2021) 103. Site plans (19 sheets) 103A. Annexation Service Provider Letters (SPLs; 4 pages) 104A. Parks and Recreation Master Plan excerpts pp. 76-77 (2009; 2 pages) 104B. Parks map "Street Index with Park Buffer" (Aug. 13, 2020) 105A. TSP Fig. 2 “Functional Roadway Classification” 105B. TSP Fig. 6 “Local Street Connectivity Plan” 201.* ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Dictionary & Glossary 202. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Lot & Tract Development Standards 203. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Common Area Improvements & Public Easements 204. [Struck. Number kept to preserve order.] 205. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Tree Protection & Environmental Remediation 206. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Conditioned Fees *The 200 series of attachments are details for the conditions of approval. 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- Addendum April 8, 2021 To: Planning Commission (April 8, 2021) From: Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Cc: McKenzie Granum, Assistant City Attorney Jim Row, Assistant City Administrator Chris Kerr, Community Development Director Stacy Connery, AICP, Planning Manager, Pacific Community Design, Inc. Subject: Addendum to Agenda Item 6: Dove Landing PUD (ANX 2020-03) Summary: After the applicant requested to continue the hearing from March 25 to April 8, the applicant and staff worked collaboratively to reach agreement on several items allowing staff to recommend approval. Based on this agreement, below are recommended revised and additional conditions compared with published March 25 staff report: 1. Parkland: The developer agrees to dedicate the parkland with a condition accommodating parks system development charge (SDC) credit for parkland improvements: PUD-9. a. Common area and parkland improvements: Improvements shall be per Attachment 203. b. Open space: The City and the Developer agree that the WDO standard for PUD improved common area shall be satisfied by dedication and improvement of Tracts I & K. c. Parks SDC credits: All improvements with the exception of the paths as required by Attachment 203, Part C will be 100% SDC creditable. The maximum cost of the improvements to the developer, including soft costs such as surveying and engineering specific to the improvements, shall not exceed the total amount of parks SDCs assessed upon the development. The parks SDC credits shall be administered in a manner consistent with Ordinance 2250. Jim Row, Assistant City Administrator, indicated he’d be at the meeting to talk about parks. 17 April 26, 2021 Council staff memo Attachment 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 2 of 2 2. The developer requests to add 5 lots, and staff drafted this condition: PUD-12. Five more lots: This condition acknowledges and accepts a plan revision of five more lots in place of some Tract H area, for a total of 171 lots, as the applicant submitted April 6 for Planning Commission April 8, 2021. The developer had proposed common area / open space more than the minimum. The change means that the development provides the PUD minimum equal to 30% of gross area. 3. Enhanced pedestrian crossing: The developer requests that this required improvement be SDC creditable: T-BP1. Bicycle/pedestrian off-site improvements: The developer shall: a. TSP: Construct TSP project P45 (TSP p. 64 as Attachment 104A). b. Off-site sidewalk: BFR & Hazelnut: … Details: What constitutes an “enhanced pedestrian crossing” per P45, “sidewalk” per and a “marked crosswalk” per and their corollary improvements is up to PW determination through CEP review; however, for P45 & there shall result a physical change to existing pavement and/or striping serving as an obvious indication for most pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. TSP Project P45 is traffic SDC creditable consistent with SDC ordinances and resolutions. Recommendation: With the addition of Condition PUD-9, staff changes its recommendation to approval with conditions. Attachment(s): A. Testimony by Julie Nicolarsen, 620 Troon Ave, letter (received Apr. 6, 2021) B. Revised plan sheet 11 Open space site plan (submitted Apr. 6, 2021) 18 ---PAGE BREAK--- 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- O STREET P STREET C STREET D STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD E STREET ALLEY 1 ADDED 5 LOTS. 100' X 30' LOT DIMENSIONS TOTAL LOT AREA = 15,876 SF LOCATION OF THE IMPROVED COMMON OPEN SPACE TO BE ESTABLISHED AS A PART OF THE PUBLIC PARK IMPROVEMENT DESIGN ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE ON POND TRACT ABOVE WATER LEVEL TOTAL OPEN SPACE AREA = 20,328 SF PUBLIC PARK PUBLIC PARK OPEN SPACE STORM FUTURE TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT 70 68 67 66 65 64 63 58 61 60 59 56 57 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 43 46 45 44 41 42 40 131 130 129 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 TRACT O 100 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 TRACT N 101 133 153 145 132 152 144 151 143 150 137 149 136 5 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 8 16 1 9 17 2 10 18 3 11 19 4 12 20 160 161 154 162 155 163 156 164 157 165 158 166 159 139 140 141 142 138 39 TRACT F 35 36 37 38 TRACT K TRACT G TRACT I TRACT C TRACT E TRACT J TRACT D TRACT B TRACT A 62 69 TRACT M 76 84 47 85 55 TRACT L 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 73 75 74 71 72 92 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 86 91 90 89 88 87 128 115 24 32 25 33 26 34 27 28 29 30 23 31 148 135 147 134 146 OPEN SPACE TRACT H 1 INCH = 80 FEET 80 40 80 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(11) OPEN SPACE PLAN alt 2.dwg - SHEET: 11 Apr 05, 2021 - 1:23pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 SITE PLAN OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE AREA % SITE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS 10 MA-OR TRAIL OPEN SPACE TAR*ET 9.57 AC 30% OPEN SPACE PROVIDED 9.67 AC 30 % LE*END  PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN 8 MA-OR TRAIL 6 WOOD CHIP TRAIL PUBLIC PARK (TRACT K & I) 8.32 AC 26% OPEN SPACE (ALL OTHER TRACTS)1.35 AC 5% OPEN SPACE AREA % SITE STORM FACILITY 1.17 AC 4% IMPROVED COMMON OPENSPACE 100 SF/LOT X 171 LOTS = 17,100 SF(0.39 AC) MINIMUM *ROSS SITE AREA 31.86 AC 100 % ---PAGE BREAK--- 21 Attachment 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Staff Report To: Planning Commission Through: Chris Kerr, AICP, Community Development Director From: Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Meeting Date: March 25, 2021 (Prepared March 18, 2021) Item: “Dove Landing” Planned Unit Development (ANX 2020-03) Tax Lot(s): 051W06C000800 (primary) & 400 (no address; Boones Ferry Rd NE west side north of Hazelnut Dr) Table of Contents ISSUE BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 RECOMMENDATION 5 ACTIONS 5 ATTACHMENT LIST 5 Issue before the Planning Commission Annexation ANX 2020-03 (Type IV) with proposed planned unit development PUD 2020-02 Dove Landing: Commission is to hold a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council. 22 Attachment 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Dove Landing ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Page 2 of 6 Executive Summary Location The proposed Dove Landing PUD of 166 houses on small lots is based on annexation of 31.13 acres from Marion County. The territory is a former orchard located at northeast city limits along the west side of Boones Ferry Road NE north of Hazelnut Drive. Concept site plan from site plan Sheet 4 Exhibit PUD-6: Tracts to Dedicate to City (outlined in green) Annexation & Zoning Designation Because the Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the territory Low Density Residential per Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1, the default corresponding zoning district is Residential Single Family (RS). Along with an annexation ordinance, the Council would by separate ordinance designate the annexed territory as RS. 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- Dove Landing ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Page 3 of 6 Development Staff and the developer worked diligently to produce a superior site development that includes features such as: 1. Frontage/street improvements including enhanced public amenities in form of wider sidewalks and more street trees; 2. Street stubs that allow a logical network for future development to extend; 3. Subdivision connection paths as shortcuts for people walking and cycling; 4. Common area improvements including a playground; 5. Public parkland totaling 8.32 acres and with improvements such as a paved path, benches, bicycle parking, dog waste stations, a shelter or two, and a pair of restrooms; 6. Remediation of common areas and public parkland through invasive groundcover removal (e.g. Himalaya blackberry) and restorative plantings; and 7. Walking and cycling wayfinding signage. Site plans are within Attachment 103. The Public Works Department, Woodburn Fire District, and Woodburn School District gave the applicant annexation service provider letters (SPLs; Attachment 103A) indicating that they can serve the development. Parkland Dedication Staff finds that the proposal meets applicable Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) provisions per the analyses and findings (Attachment 102) – except for the fact that it does not include the dedication of public parkland. This is a development issue because the developer is indicating refusal to dedicate open space Tracts I & K as public parkland instead of private common area. Here are the key WDO issues regarding the park dedication issue: 1. Commensurate public amenities are required for PUDs. A basic purpose of a PUD is to allow modifications to development standards (e.g. lot size and configuration) in exchange for enhanced public amenities and to obtain public amenities that are commensurate with and justify modifications to WDO provisions. 2. Annexations should meet unmet community needs. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, identifies a lack of public parkland as an unmet community need, and were the developer to not dedicate parkland it would exacerbate the deficiency. 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- Dove Landing ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Page 4 of 6 3. Annexations are required to benefit the City and each approval requires a review to assess impact on the community. Comprehensive Plan Goal G-2 states that the City incorporate territory that will be of “benefit to the City”, and Policy G-2.1 confirms that, “For each proposed expansion of the City, Woodburn shall assess the proposal’s conformance with the City’s plans, and facility capacity and assess its impact on the community.” Not dedicating the parkland would worsen current parks level of service and adversely impact (i.e. harm) the community. 4. Park acquisition/development should occur concurrently with development: Council adoption of the parks plan also reinforced Comprehensive Plan Policy L-1.2 as applied to developments including PUDs: “Where feasible, the City will acquire and develop neighborhood parks, trails, and open spaces through the development review process.” Additional factors in support of about why parkland dedication is essential as part of this development are below: A. The developer already proposes the two tracts to be open space with park-like landscaping – a basic PUD standard is that 30% of the gross subject property area is to be common area, conventionally understood to be mostly open space. B. Tracts I & K can well serve as regional parks, and are commensurate with Dove Landing at least in terms of size – 8.32 out of 31.31 gross acres (26.7%) – and in relation to the proposal of 166 houses. C. To require dedication of two of the several open space tracts to the City as public land instead of to a private association as common area has no effect on providing the territory itself as open space – the developer wasn’t going to build housing on it anyway. D. The territory would remain just as open to residents of Dove Landing as parkland as it would were it to remain as private common area. E. An association would be spared maintenance responsibility with the territory as public parkland, and homeowners spared greater dues for such maintenance. F. If the City were to pass on obtaining the parkland now, the opportunity likely would disappear. In this case, though the tracts wouldn’t be developed with lots, it would become annexed private property having higher assessed value by being within city limits and surrounded by development, raising the implied purchase price – were an association ever a willing seller or the City were ever willing to exercise eminent domain. 25 ---PAGE BREAK--- Dove Landing ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Page 5 of 6 Recommendation Denial: Staff would strongly support the project as conditioned and with the dedication of the improved parkland; however, because the developer is indicating refusal to dedicate to the City public parkland, staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the staff report and attachments and recommend denial to the City Council. Alternative: Were the Planning Commission to instead pursue approval with conditions, then staff would recommend the conditions per Attachment 102. Actions The Planning Commission may instead act on the land use application to recommend to: 1. Approve with the conditions per Attachment 102, or 2. Approve with modified conditions. If the Planning Commission were to act upon the recommendation, staff would proceed to a City Council hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 26, 2021, with the Commission recommendation. Attachment List 101. Marked Tax Map 102. Analyses & Findings 102A. Public Works comments (Mar. 16, 2021; 3 pages) 103. Site plans (dated Jan. 15, 2021 and submitted Feb. 9, 2021; 19 sheets) 103A. Annexation Service Provider Letters (SPLs; 4 pages) 104A. Parks and Recreation Master Plan excerpts pp. 76-77 (2009; 2 pages) 104B. Parks map "Street Index with Park Buffer" (Aug. 13, 2020) 105A. TSP Fig. 2 “Functional Roadway Classification” 105B. TSP Fig. 6 “Local Street Connectivity Plan” 201.* ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Dictionary & Glossary 202. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Lot & Tract Development Standards 203. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Common Area Improvements & Public Easements 204. [Struck. Number kept to preserve order.] 205. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Tree Protection & Environmental Remediation 206. ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Conditioned Fees 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- Dove Landing ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Page 6 of 6 *The 200 series of attachments are details for the Attachment 102 conditions of approval. 27 ---PAGE BREAK--- ^ <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò R ! <Ò R ! R 900 40' EAGLE DRIVE JANSEN N80 11W 516.22 75 60 60.00 60 DLC 76 60 1300 REVERE STREET N19 42E 279.63 S86 06E 60 50' 60.00 WAY SE COR R HURLEY LAND CLM 60 1002.05 1604.60 NEWPORT 60 N17 31E 193.776 87.50 LILAC 40 WAY 1000 156.47 50' 60 60.00 CROSBY 60 60 CS 18375 VAN D E R BE CK 90.68 60' ASTOR HAZELNUT S89 15E 829.00 100 60' NW COR VAUGHAN 240.22 50 WAY 150 60 138.09 285.45 SENIOR ESTATES INDEPENDENCE ROAD R 69 INDEPENDENCE 225.75 1/4 COR N74 40W 348.96 100 CAMELLIA 219.97 60 ROANOKE STREET VANDERBECK LANE 60.00 60 50' 50 50 300 353.67 100 60 725.1 60 147.16 DRIVE 33 140 60 829.00 R=52' DRIVE 290.54 50 CS 20910 40' 60' 150 UMPQUA PL MOBILE HOME PARK 79.46 269.40 50 WAY 50' N89 22W 60 60 60 80.00 40 60.00 1030.00 60 1500 60 50' 1 60 MR 69 100 1604.50 60 30 WAY 72.63 60 EAGLE DRIVE S78 55E 445.5 50 NW COR J CASEY LAND CLM 60 CS 19545 140 CS 19515 60 WAY 174 60' 271.68 R=55' 829.00 70 60.00 MULBERRY ROAD 60 60 VANDERBECK LANE N73 09W KING SW COR J CASEY LAND CLM 12 VANDERBECK 60 60.00 GILBERT PLACE 1604.60 246.88 R=50' URSE 60' N00 36E ROAD ARNEY 103.07 UMPQUA 1/4 COR 16.5 728.80 BUNKER AVENUE WAY AVE C.R.511 60 COR LC 60 60 BOONE'S CS 19545 FAIRWAY STREET 141.94 140 HAMPTON 60 DV.721-120 50 100 272.59 60.00 1100 40' 60 CTR SEC GOLF COURSE NE COR R HURLEY LAND CLM 400 COURT 50' 111.64 CS 19545 DR 40 ROAD KING LANE 1200 60 WAY DRIVE JA NSEN WAY 50' HEATHER S09 00W 6 829.00 60 60 50 N19 23W 204.6 60 INTERSTATE HIGHWAY NO.5 N10 21E 60 800 100 40 CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE N89 57E 398.20 40 60 180.00 BOGIE CT FERRY 200 ROAD 60 61.50 60 60 60' 70 838.5 1400 228.51 7 60 1/4 COR ROAD LANE DOGWOOD WAY 03 60 0 03 03 0 03 60 0 03 03 0 SEE MAP 052W01DD SEE MAP 051W06DC SEE MAP 052W12AA SEE MAP 051W07BB SEE MAP 051W07BA SEE MAP 051W07AB SEE MAP 051W06A SEE MAP 051W06D SEE MAP 051W06D SEE MAP 052W01 SEE MAP 052W01D SEE MAP 051W06B 06CC 06CD MARION COUNTY, OREGON SW1/4 SEC6 T5S R1W W.M. WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 1W 06C 05 1W 06C SCALE 1" = 200' FOR ADDITIONAL MAPS VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.co.marion.or.us DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 05 1W 06C 05 1W 06C WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 1W 06C 05 1W 06C 05 1W 06C 05 1W 06C LEGEND LINE TYPES CORNER TYPES Section Corner <Ò 15 16 21 22 Waterline - Non Railroad Centerline Historical Boundary Easement Taxcode Line Map Boundary Road Right-of-Way Taxlot Boundary Railroad Right-of-Way Private Road ROW Subdivision/Plat Waterline - Taxlot NUMBERS Tax Code Number 00 00 0 All acres listed are Net Acres, excluding any portions of the taxlot within public ROWs Acreage Tick Marks: A tick mark in the road indicates that the labeled dimension extends into the public ROW 0.25 AC NOTES 200.00 175.00 PLOT DATE: 10/16/2020 CANCELLED NUMBERS 500 600 700 R ! DLC Corner <Ò 1/4 Section Cor. Ð 1/16TH Section Cor. 28 Attachment 101 ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment 102 Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 1 of 56 ANX 2020-03: Analyses & Findings This attachment to the staff report analyzes the application materials and finds through statements how the application materials relate to and meet applicable provisions such as criteria, requirements, and standards. They confirm that a given standard is met or if not met, they call attention to it, suggest a remedy, and have a corresponding recommended condition of approval. Symbols aid locating and understanding categories of findings: Symbol Category Indication Requirement (or guideline) met No action needed Requirement (or guideline) not met Correction needed Requirement (or guideline) not applicable No action needed  Requirement (or guideline) met, but might become unmet because of condition applied to meet separate and related requirement that is not met  Plan sheets and/or narrative inconsistent  Other special circumstance benefitting from attention Revision needed for clear and consistent records Deviation: Planned Unit Development, Zoning Adjustment, and/or Variance Request to modify, adjust, or vary from a requirement Section references are to the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO). Table of Contents Project Name & Case File Numbers 2 Location 2 Land Use & Zoning 2 Statutory Dates 3 Annexation Provisions 4 Zoning Map Change Provisions 11 Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District (RCWOD) Provisions 12 Subdivision Preliminary Approval Provisions 13 Planned Unit Development Provisions 14 29 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 2 of 56 Remaining Provisions 37 Recommendation: Denial 44 Alternative: Approval with Conditions of Approval 44 Applicant Identity 51 Notes to the Applicant 51 Project Name & Case File Numbers The applicant submitted the project name Schultz Farm, but through re-submittal renamed it to Dove Landing. The land use application master/parent case file number is Annexation ANX 2020-03, and the children/corollary case file numbers are Planned Unit Development PUD 2020-02, Preliminary Subdivision SUB 2020-03, & Zone Change 2020-02. Location Address(es) None (west side of N. Boones Ferry Rd north of Hazelnut Dr) Tax Lot(s) 051W06C000800 (primary) & 400; respectively 17.13 & 14.00 acres, totaling 31.13 acres Nearest intersection N. Boones Ferry Rd & Hazelnut Dr Land Use & Zoning Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Low Density Residential Zoning District Residential Single Family (RS) Overlay District(s) none Existing Use(s) Closed orchard For context, the comprehensive plan land use map designations and zoning are illustrated below with excerpts from the City geographic information system (GIS) and the zoning is tabulated further below: 30 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 3 of 56 Comprehensive Plan land use map excerpt Zoning map excerpt Cardinal Direction Adjacent Zoning North No City zoning because not annexed and outside the City urban growth boundary (UGB) East No City zoning because not annexed and outside the City urban growth boundary (UGB). ANX 2020-01 Trillium Reserve under review. South RS; from east to west: two rural homesteads and Miller Links subdivision West RM; Woodburn Senior Estates Manufactured Home Community Statutory Dates Application Completeness February 12, 2021 120-Day Final Decision Deadline June 12, 2021 per Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 227.178. (The nearest and prior regularly scheduled City Council date would be either May 10 or 24, 2021, depending on coronavirus.)* *However, the Assistant City Attorney had counseled staff on January 16, 2018 that an annexation request is not subject to the 120-day deadline for final action per 227.178(8). 31 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 4 of 56 Annexation Provisions Because the proposal is for annexation, per 5.04 it requires a Type IV review with City Council decision. The applicant submitted application materials on October 30, 2020 and revised and additional materials through February 11, 2021 (excerpted within Attachment 103). 5.04.01 Annexation A. Purpose: The purpose of this Type IV review is to provide a procedure to incorporate contiguous territory into the City in compliance with state requirements, Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, and Woodburn Development Ordinance. B. Mandatory Pre-Application Conference: Prior to requesting annexation to the City, a Pre- Application Conference (Section 4.01.04) is required. … C. Criteria: 1. Compliance with applicable Woodburn Comprehensive Plan goals and policies regarding annexation. 2. Territory to be annexed shall be contiguous to the City and shall either: a. Link to planned public facilities with adequate capacity to serve existing and future development of the property as indicated by the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan; or b. Guarantee that public facilities have adequate capacity to serve existing and future development of the property. 3. Annexations shall show a demonstrated community need for additional territory and development based on the following considerations: a. Lands designated for residential and community uses should demonstrate substantial conformance to the following: 1) The territory to be annexed should be contiguous to the City on two or more sides; 2) The territory to be annexed should not increase the inventory of buildable land designated on the Comprehensive Plan as Low or Medium Density Residential within the City to more than a 5-year supply; 3) The territory proposed for annexation should reflect the City’s goals for directing growth by using public facility capacity that has been funded by the City’s capital improvement program; 4) The site is feasible for development and provides either: a) Completion or extension of the arterial/collector street pattern as depicted on the Woodburn Transportation System Plan; or b) Connects existing stub streets, or other discontinuous streets, with another public street. 32 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 5 of 56 5) Annexed [sic] fulfills a substantial unmet community need, that has been identified by the City Council after a public hearing. Examples of community needs include park space and conservation of significant natural or historic resources. b. Lands designated for commercial, industrial and other uses should demonstrate substantial conformance to the following criteria: 1) The proposed use of the territory to be annexed shall be for industrial or other uses providing employment opportunities; 2) The proposed industrial or commercial use of the territory does not require the expansion of infrastructure, additional service capacity, or incentives that are in excess of the costs normally borne by the community for development; 3) The proposed industrial or commercial use of the territory provides an economic opportunity for the City to diversify its economy. D. Procedures: 1. An annexation may be initiated by petition based on the written consent of: a. The owners of more than half of the territory proposed for annexation and more than half of the resident electors within the territory proposed to be annexed; or b. One hundred percent of the owners and fifty percent of the electors within the territory proposed to be annexed; or c. A lesser number of property owners. 2. If an annexation is initiated by property owners of less than half of property to be annexed, after holding a public hearing and if the City Council approves the proposed annexation, the City Council shall call for an election within the territory to be annexed. Otherwise no election on a proposed annexation is required. E. Zoning Designation for Annexed Property: All land annexed to the City shall be designated consistent with the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, unless an application to re-designate the property is approved as part of the annexation process. F. The timing of public improvements is as follows: 1. Street dedication is required upon annexation. 2. Dedication of public utility easements (PUE) is required upon annexation. 3. Street improvements are required upon development. 4. Connection to the sanitary sewer system is required upon development or septic failure. 5. Connection to the public water system is required upon development or well failure. 6. Connection to the public storm drain system is required upon development. Regarding subsection staff hosted two pre-application conferences: Pre-App PRE 2019-03 on February 27, 2019 and PRE 2020-21 on September 3, 2020. The applicant requests that the City designate the annexed territory with the Residential Single Family (RS) zoning district. 33 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 6 of 56 Regarding the criteria of subsection 1. The City Comprehensive Plan, Section G. Growth Management and Annexation contains annexation policies on pp. 30-31. The annexation criteria in the WDO already reflect the goals, including efficient City services. First, the territory to be annexed is within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The premise of a UGB is to define an area feasible for the City to provide services to greenfield development over approximately 20 years as described in the Comprehensive Plan. So, in this way the annexation of territory within the UGB is consistent with the comp plan. Second, the territory also is adjacent to infrastructure that development can make use of or extend into the territory to develop it:  Roads and street: N. Boones Ferry Road borders to the property to the east, providing a means of access. (The annexation legal description and map series excludes the right-of-way (ROW) adjacent to the site. ANX 2020-01 Trillium Reserve is annexing it.)  Transit: Along N. Boones Ferry Road, the City and other agencies could run transit vehicles.  Potable water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater sewer: These are adjacent or nearby, and as the Public Works Department Directs at the civil engineer plan (CEP) review and public works permit stage, the developer will upgrade and extend them as necessary to provide laterals to the site development and for these upgraded and extended utilities to accommodate the demands of the development.  Other: Other franchise utility providers attend to such utilities as electric power, cable television and internet, natural gas, and cellular wireless telephony, often using existing or extended ROWs. Regarding public parkland, the proposed development doesn’t meet the criterion because it fails to meet certain Comprehensive Plan policies. Because the issue is best understood in the context of development, see the Planned Unit Development Provisions below for further analysis and findings. 2. The territory is contiguous to the City. Per the comp plan and with implementation through the WDO, upon development of the territory the City would require improvements that guarantee that public facilities have adequate capacity to serve such development. 34 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 7 of 56 The Public Works Department identified no impediments to serve the development that would not be resolved at the permitting stage, evidenced by the Public Works comments that are Attachment 102A. Second, the Public Works Department, Woodburn Fire District (WFD), and Woodburn School District (WSD) submitted service provider letters (SPLs) as annexation applications require. They are in Attachment 103A. The Public Works one dated October 13, 2020 states: “This letter is to certify that the City of Woodburn has no capacity issue with the public wastewater treatment facility or public water treatment facility. However, the subject property is not adjacent to an existing collection system for water, wastewater or a public storm sewer collection system. The requirements for these collection facilities would still need to be determined. The capacity analysis, design and installation would be the responsibility of the applicant/property owner.” Along with the Public Works comments that are Attachment 102A, it appears to Planning Division staff that the Public Works Department has no objection to annexation and that public works can serve the development through typical public improvements by a developer of the territory to be annexed. Additionally, the applicant’s narrative (October 29, 2020, p. 53) states: “Although the proposed 154-unit PUD is not phased, it’s important to note that the homebuilding process will not occur at once upon annexation. Following planning approval, the proposed site construction documents must be reviewed and approved, and the site streets and utility infrastructure constructed prior to beginning home building. These stages can take 9 to 12+ months. Individual home construction can take 3 months and homes are typically constructed on a pace commensurate with home sales. Home sales within any one project can range from 3-10 per quarter, which would likely extend the process of home construction for several years.” There’s no written objection by the Public Works Department to the applicant’s narrative. Besides the usual three classes of basic public infrastructure – potable water, sanitary sewer, and stormwater management – there is however also the issue of public parkland. There isn’t enough public parkland in the north area of the city and UGB. Because parkland is a development issue, staff addresses parkland further under the Planned Unit Development Provisions section below. 35 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 8 of 56 Regarding public parkland, the proposed development doesn’t meet the criterion because it fails to provide adequate capacity regarding City public parkland. Because the issue is best understood in the context of development, see the Planned Unit Development Provisions below for further analysis and findings. 3. a. Examining the considerations under subsection a. because the Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the territory Low Density Residential, and the territory is to be designated with Residential Single Family (RS) base zoning district consistent with both the applicant’s request and Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1: 1) The territory to be annexed at its south and west boundaries meets the guideline that it “should be contiguous to the City on two or more sides”. 2) The applicant’s narrative 53) states: “The territory is designated by the Comprehensive Plan as ‘Low Density Residential’ land included in the ‘Buildable Lands Inventory.’ According to the City of Woodburn’s latest Housing Needs Analysis, the estimated housing need for single-family detached dwellings is 1,563 units. The proposed 154-lot PUD accounts for only 9.85 percent of the total need. Although the proposed 154-unit PUD is not phased, it’s important to note that the homebuilding process will not occur at once upon annexation. … The careful process of bringing the proposed 154-units on-line, through construction documentation and final approval stages, will not adversely impact the City’s a 5-year supply of Low Density Residential.” Staff concurs, with the exception that the proposal is 166 houses and so 10.6% of the estimated need of 1,563 houses. 3) The applicant’s narrative 53) states: “The subject territory is located within the City’s UGB and has been assigned the Low Density Residential designation in the Comprehensive Plan. As detailed in the previous sections of this report, the proposed PUD on the subject site includes its own water quality and detention facility that treats all stormwater associated with the site. The proposed street layout detailed with this PUD includes three future street connections extending north. These three street connections shrink superblocks while addressing Comprehensive Plan policies regarding street connectivity.” 36 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 9 of 56 There’s no written objection by the Public Works Department to the applicant’s narrative. 4) Regarding & the applicant’s narrative 4) states: “The proposed street layout detailed with this PUD includes three future street connections extending north. These three street connections shrink superblocks while addressing Comprehensive Plan policies regarding street connectivity.” Staff concurs and adds that the development proposes two street connections with N. Boones Ferry Road in conformance with Transportation System Plan (TSP) Figure 6 “Local Street Connectivity Plan”. These also provides better access for emergency vehicles. (The proposed Street would align with Trillium Place within ANX 2020-01 Trillium Reserve, Trillium Place itself being the outlet for the Olympic Street extension.) 5) The applicant asserts no unmet community need. Because these analyses and findings come before the first public hearing by the Planning Commission, it is yet unknown if annexation fulfills a substantial unmet community need because the City Council has not yet identified such a need. Examples of community needs include park space and conservation of significant natural or historic resources, and the corollary development includes Tracts I & K along the south that the developer is to improve and dedicate as City/public parkland. Note: As of March 16, 2021, Administration relayed through the Community Development Director to staff that the City Council may choose to interpret the timing of criterion C.3a5) such that between the timing of this writing and whenever the Council hearing would be, the Council would take action to identify a substantial unmet community need in such a way that the annexation criterion would apply to Dove Landing by the time of the public hearing – namely that lack of public parkland is a substantial unmet community need that the Dove Landing PUD could meet were it to dedicate Tracts I & K to the City as public parkland. Annexation of the subject territory demonstrates substantial conformance with the criteria. Regarding the applicant obtained the requisite written consent and such that no election is needed. 37 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 10 of 56 Regarding the applicant confirms the proposal includes no request to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use designation or upon annexation to designate the territory with a City base zoning district other than RS. (Pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1, RS is the only zoning district that implements the Low Density Residential designation.) Regarding the applicant need not address subsection 1. because the territory to be annexed includes adjacent ROW and because the public improvements including ROW and public utility easement (PUE) dedications that F. describes are addressed through development review, i.e. site plan review process, instead of annexation itself. The annexation fails to meet criteria C.1 & C2 because the applicant is indicating refusal to dedicate to the City public parkland from among the PUD common area open space tracts. (Staff applies conditions such that the development could fully meet the annexation criteria. See the Planned Unit Development Provisions section below for details.) 38 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 11 of 56 Zoning Map Change Provisions Zoning Map Change Provisions 5.04.04 A. Purpose: The purpose of an Owner Initiated Official Zoning Map Change is to provide a procedure to change the Official Zoning Map, in a manner consistent with the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. B. Criteria: The following criteria shall be considered in evaluating an Official Zoning Map Change; 1. Demonstrated need for the proposed use and the other permitted uses within the proposed zoning designation. 2. Demonstrated need that the subject property best meets the need relative to other properties in the existing developable land inventory already designated with the same zone considering size, location, configuration, visibility and other significant attributes of the subject property. 3. Demonstration that amendments which significantly affect transportation facilities ensure that allowed land uses are consistent with the function, capacity, and level of service of the facility identified in the Transportation System Plan. This shall be accomplished by one of the following: a. Limiting allowed land uses to be consistent with the planned function of the transportation facility; or b. Amending the Transportation System Plan to ensure that existing, improved, or new transportation facilities are adequate to support the proposed land uses consistent with the requirement of the Transportation Planning Rule; or, c. Altering land use designations, densities, or design requirements to reduce demand for automobile travel and meet travel needs through other modes of transportation. Staff interprets this section such that it applies only to rezoning – a change from one City zoning district to another. Because the zone change proposed through ZC 2020-02 comes with annexation in order to assign City zoning, and the proposed zoning districts comply with the Comprehensive Plan land use map designations, the criteria are not applicable. Not applicable. 39 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 12 of 56 Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District (RCWOD) Provisions RCWOD Provisions 2.05.05 Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District A. Purpose The Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District (RCWOD) is intended to conserve, protect and enhance significant riparian corridors, wetlands, and undeveloped floodplains in keeping with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. The RCWOD is further intended to protect and enhance water quality, prevent property damage during floods and storms, limit development activity in designated areas, protect native plant species, maintain and enhance fish and wildlife habitats, and conserve scenic and recreational values. B. Boundaries of the RCWOD 1. The RCWOD includes: a. Riparian corridors extending upland 50 feet from the top of the bank of the main stem of Senecal Creek and Mill Creek and those reaches of their tributaries identified as fish-bearing perennial streams on the Woodburn Wetlands Inventory Map; and b. Significant wetlands identified on the Woodburn Wetlands Inventory Map. Where significant wetlands are located fully or partially within a riparian corridor, the RCWOD shall extend 50 feet from the edge of the wetland; and c. The 100-year floodplain on properties identified as vacant or partly vacant on the 2005 Woodburn Buildable Lands Inventory. 2. The approximate boundaries of the RCWOD are shown on the Zoning Map. The precise boundaries for any particular lot should be verified by the property owner when making a land use application. Map errors may be corrected as provided in this Ordinance (Section 1.02.04). The subject property has a southerly east-west drainage way resulting from existing topography and that goes into a culvert under N. Boones Ferry Road. In response to the incompleteness letter of November 24, 2020 in which staff noted that the narrative omitted mention of RCWOD, the applicant submitted on January 15, 2021 as Exhibit K an RCWOD memo dated December 16, 2020 that concludes that RCWOD is not applicable. (Incidentally, no other overlay districts from 2.05 apply.) Not applicable. 40 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 13 of 56 Subdivision Preliminary Approval Provisions Subdivision Preliminary Approval Provisions 5.03.10 Subdivision Preliminary Approval A. Purpose: The purpose of a Type III Subdivision decision is to ensure that the division of properties into 4 or more lots complies with the standards of this Ordinance (Sections 2 and Subdivisions are allowed in all zones, provided the proposal meets applicable standards. B. Criteria: Preliminary approval of a Subdivision shall require compliance with the following: 1. That approval does not impede the future best use of the remainder of the property under the same ownership or adversely affect the safe and efficient development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto. 2. That the proposed development shall be served with city streets, water, sewer and storm drainage facilities with adequate capacity. 3. That the plan for the development takes into account topography, vegetation and other natural features of the site. 4. That adequate measures have been planned to alleviate identified hazards and limitations to development: a. For wetlands these shall be the measures required by the Division of State Lands for regulatory wetlands. b. For unstable areas, demonstration that streets and building sites are on geologically stable soil considering the stress and loads. 5. The preliminary plat complies with all applicable provisions of this Ordinance (Sections 2 and except where waived by variance. Because the subdivision is for planned unit development (PUD), which can and does modify WDO provisions, the criteria are met through the PUD provisions, including modification by PUD to establish a smaller minimum lot area standard. PUD: Staff further addresses WDO and modified subdivision standards below under the Planned Unit Development Provisions section. 41 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 14 of 56 Planned Unit Development Provisions Planned Unit Development Provisions 3.09 The purpose of this Section is to establish the requirements for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs). PUDs allow flexible development standards, unique street cross-sections, and more variety in permitted uses. They are especially appropriate when developing properties with unique topographic, geotechnical, or other constraints. They also encourage innovation and creative approaches for developing land. In exchange for the ability to modify development and use standards, PUDs must provide common open space and enhanced public amenities. PUD is a discretionary land use application type allowing developers to modify WDO provisions – such as getting smaller minimum lot areas and higher residential density – in exchange for a minimum area of open space, minimum common area improvements, and what the City interprets to mean “enhanced public amenities”. More to the point, the conditions of approval and the related 200 series of attachments establish PUD development standards and common area improvements. The developer is indicating refusal to dedicate to the City public parkland, namely Tracts I & K. Regarding the issue of parkland along with annexation criterion C.1 (Comprehensive Plan) and the staff note regarding criterion C.3a5) (Council identification of substantial unmet community need), obtaining parkland would meet Comprehensive Plan policies below, where italics indicate staff emphasis: Policy No. Page No. Policy G-1.18 29 Conversion of land within the boundary to urban uses shall be based on a consideration of: Orderly, economic provision for public facilities and services. G-2.1 32 For each proposed expansion of the City, Woodburn shall assess the proposal’s conformance with the City’s plans, and facility capacity and assess its impact on the community. G-2.2 32 Woodburn will achieve more efficient utilization of land within the City by: Incorporating all of the territory within the City limits that will be of benefit to the City. G-2.3 33 Woodburn will use annexation as a tool to guide: The efficient use and extension of City facilities and services. 42 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 15 of 56 Below are four images, a vicinity map, a vicinity map showing the location a parks map (Attachment 104B) reproduced at a small scale, and a close-up with the parks map: Image 102A - Vicinity map: Subject property in purple, City parks in green The vicinity map shows the subject property in purple in relation to City parks in green. 43 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 16 of 56 Image 102B - Dove Landing parkland The Dove Landing parkland map represents the City/pub parkland Tracts I & K, which total 8.32 acres, in dark green in relation to existing City parks in light green. Image 76A: Neighborhood Access Image 76B: Walkable Access Both excerpted from the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009), pp. 76-77 44 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 17 of 56 The Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009), pp. 76-77, includes the above two purple and yellow figures. The two pages are included as Attachment 104A. P. 77 describes access to parks and improving level of service and in the third paragraph refers to an ideal of a park within 1/3-mile from each home. Image 76A-1: Close-up of North UGB Neighborhood Access (Approximate area of Dove Landing outlined in green. Image 76B-1: Close-up of North UGB Walkable Access (Approximate area of Dove Landing outlined in green) Note that the parks plan assumed a larger north UGB expansion than the City later adopted. Both maps show how remote Dove Landing would be from existing parks were it to fail to dedicate Tracts I & K as parkland. Image 102C - Parks map “Street Index with Park Buffer” (cropped view of Attachment 104B) 45 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 18 of 56 This map shows City parks in dark green and walking distance buffers of ¼ and 1/3 miles (blue and gray respectively). Image 102D - Parks map “Street Index with Park Buffer”: North UGB close-up This map shows City parks and walking distance buffers of ¼ and 1/3 miles (blue and gray respectively) in a close-up of the north urban growth boundary (UGB). Image 102E-1 – Dove Landing close-up Image 102E-2 – Site plan marked with tracts to dedicate (as parkland) Compared with the Dove Landing site plan, the majority of lots would be beyond the outermost crow-fly buffer of the nearest park, which is Heritage Park. The walking distance of 0.7 miles more than twice exceeds the 0.33 mile buffer distance. Staff emphasizes that access to parks isn’t merely about proximity of future residents of Dove Landing to public parks, but also providing adequate parks level of service for existing residents based on the desires and 46 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 19 of 56 inadequacies that the Parks and Recreation Master Plan describes, in particular larger parks with regional facilities. The area north of OR 214, which lies between I-5 and N. Front Street, has only two public parks: Image 102F-1 - Senior Estates Park Image 102F-2 - Heritage Park The Marion County Assessor aerials are at the same scale relative to each other. The closest, Heritage Park at 2588 Jamestown Street, at 0.34 acres is the size of a house lot, contains a small playground and a small basketball court, and publicly visible only from a cul-de- sac and a side street. The walking distance from the SE corner of Dove Landing is 0.4 miles or 8 minutes at 3 miles per hour (mph). The next closest, Senior Estates Park (no address), is 4.01 acres, and contains a few minor improvements: paths and at least one dog waste station. The walking distance from the SE corner of Dove Landing is 0.7 miles or 14 minutes at 3 mph. 47 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 20 of 56 Neither park is a regional park. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009) indirectly defines such through description: “Multipurpose, large regional centers (65,000 to 125,000+ sq. ft.) for all ages/abilities with all amenities in one place” 35). The closest is Legion Park. The largest regional park, Centennial Park, is in the opposite area of the UGB from Dove Landing. As parks director, the Assistant City Administrator directed January 20, 2021 that Tracts I & K be public and conform to the general improvement concept of having a playground, paved recreational paths/trails, open grass play area, 1-2 picnic shelters, restrooms, benches, trash receptacles, and dog waste stations. Staff conditioned accordingly and vetted with him the details of Attachment 203. The City Council adopted the Parks and Recreation Master Plan via Ordinance No. 2458 on July 13, 2009 as part of the Comprehensive Plan per ordinance Section 2. In regards to aforementioned annexation criterion C.3a5), the plan identified substantial unmet community need, a need that applies to Dove Landing and that the PUD can address by dedicating Tracts I & K as parkland. Such parkland dedication and improvement furthers the Parks and Recreation Master Plan by:  Providing amenities that are higher rated by Figures 17 “Importance of outdoor recreation facilities to be added, expanded, or improved” 55) and 18 “Most important outdoor facilities to be added, expanded, or improved” 56)  Providing some of desired “improvements to parks and facilities” (pp. 5&6) o All parks: drinking fountains o General: additional trails, park benches  Serving “underserved portions of Woodburn … Geographic UGB expansion” 6)  Serving “Goal 5: Increase cost recovery and funding” 14) by obtaining free dedication of parkland through development, especially development with any of deviations, modifications, and variances subject to discretionary review, including PUD  Serving “Goal 8: Plan for community growth”, which includes the action steps of “considering requiring developers to develop dedicated parks” and “Look for park land in the areas of Woodburn that are anticipated to have rapid growth including east of I‐ 5” 22). The total 8.32 acres of Tracts I & K, with Tract K being the larger one at 7.2 acres, appeals to the Assistant City Administrator as parks director in that the size can easily fit regional facilities were the City to later construct or install them. The two tracts are 26.7% of the gross site area in the context of PUD standard of 30% open space. The remaining tracts as common areas compose the total of 33% per land use review plan Sheet 4 that the developer proposes as open space. 48 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 21 of 56 Dove Landing has 166 houses, constituting what staff considers a larger development. In short, Tracts I & K as City public parkland are public benefits commensurate with the PUD. Looking again to Comprehensive Plan policies, requiring public parkland meets: Policy No. Page No. Policy D-1.1 14 Residential areas should be designed around a neighborhood concept. Neighborhoods should be an identifiable unit bounded by arterials, non-residential uses, or natural features of the terrain. The neighborhood should provide a focus and identity within the community and should have a community facility, such as a school, park, or privately owned community facility to allow for interaction within the neighborhood. L-1.2 48 Where feasible, the City will acquire and develop neighborhood parks, trails, and open spaces through the development review process. L-1.4 48 To ensure walkability, the City will strive to provide parks, trails, and indoor facilities within one-third mile of Woodburn residents. Having mentioned earlier that the Council adopted the Parks and Recreation Master Plan via Ordinance No. 2458 on July 13, 2009 as part of the Comprehensive Plan per ordinance Section 2, staff adds that the ordinance also amended Comprehensive Plan policies to implement the parks plan – including by amending the above parks policies as shown in the excerpt below from the ordinance Attachment A, pages 1-2: This confirms beyond doubt that the policies serve to implement the parks plan. It also reinforces the application of Policy L-1.2 to developments including PUDs. 49 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 22 of 56 Here are the key WDO issues regarding the park dedication issue: 1. Commensurate public amenities are required for PUDs. A basic purpose of a PUD is to allow modifications to development standards (e.g. lot size and configuration) in exchange for enhanced public amenities and to obtain public amenities that are commensurate with and justify modifications to WDO provisions. 2. Annexations should meet unmet community needs. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, identifies a lack of public parkland as an unmet community need, and were the developer to not dedicate parkland it would exacerbate the deficiency. 3. Annexations are required to benefit the City and each approval requires a review to assess impact on the community. Comprehensive Plan Goal G-2 states that the City incorporate territory that will be of “benefit to the City”, and Policy G-2.1 confirms that, “For each proposed expansion of the City, Woodburn shall assess the proposal’s conformance with the City’s plans, and facility capacity and assess its impact on the community.” Not dedicating the parkland would worsen current parks level of service and adversely impact (i.e. harm) the community. 4. Park acquisition/development should occur concurrently with development: Council adoption of the parks plan also reinforced Comprehensive Plan Policy L-1.2 as applied to developments including PUDs: “Where feasible, the City will acquire and develop neighborhood parks, trails, and open spaces through the development review process.” Additional factors in support of about why parkland dedication is essential as part of this development are below: A. The developer already proposes the two tracts to be open space with park-like landscaping – a basic PUD standard is that 30% of the gross subject property area is to be common area, conventionally understood to be mostly open space. B. Tracts I & K can well serve as regional parks, and are commensurate with Dove Landing at least in terms of size – 8.32 out of 31.31 gross acres (26.7%) – and in relation to the proposal of 166 houses. C. To require dedication of two of the several open space tracts to the City as public land instead of to a private association as common area has no effect on providing the territory itself as open space – the developer wasn’t going to build housing on it anyway. D. The territory would remain just as open to residents of Dove Landing as parkland as it would were it to remain as private common area. E. An association would be spared maintenance responsibility with the territory as public parkland, and homeowners spared greater dues for such maintenance. F. If the City were to pass on obtaining the parkland now, the opportunity likely would disappear. In this case, though the tracts wouldn’t be developed with lots, it would become annexed private property having higher assessed value by being within city limits 50 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 23 of 56 and surrounded by development, raising the implied purchase price – were an association ever a willing seller or the City were ever willing to exercise eminent domain. 3.09.01 Allowable Types and Minimum Area of PUDs A. Transfer of Density PUD 1. A Transfer of Density PUD shall consist entirely of property in any residential zone, or in more than one residential zone. A Transfer of Density PUD may only be used to transfer residential density from undevelopable areas of a site (riparian corridor, floodplain, wetlands, unstable soils or slopes) to developable areas of a site, but not to increase the overall number of dwelling units allowed on the site. Note: This development option is often called cluster housing. 2. There is no minimum site area for a Transfer of Density PUD. B. Residential PUD 1. A Residential PUD shall consist entirely of property zoned RS, RM, RSN, RMN, R1S, or P/SP, or in more than one such zone. A PUD is not allowed in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD). 2. A Residential PUD shall contain a minimum of two acres. C. Mixed-Use PUD 1. A Mixed-Use PUD may consist of property in any zone or zones. A Mixed- Use PUD is not allowed in the Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District (NCOD). 2. A Mixed-Use PUD shall contain a minimum of three acres. The applicant’s narrative (October 29, 2020, p. 42) states “This PUD does not propose any density transfer.” Thus, the PUD of 166 houses appears to be a Residential PUD per subsection B. The PUD contains at least two acres and territory to be annexed and zoned RS. The provisions are met. 3.09.02 Allowed Uses A. Transfer of Density PUD Single-family dwellings, manufactured dwellings, duplexes, row houses, and multiple-family dwellings shall be allowed in a Transfer of Density PUD. B. Residential PUD Any use allowed in any residential zone shall be allowed in a Residential PUD (see Table 2.02A). No separate Conditional Use process shall be required for any use that is described in the Detailed Development Plan and the project narrative. C. Mixed-Use PUD … Because the proposal includes no density transfer, what would be a conditional use per the base zoning district, or more than one base zoning district, the provisions are not applicable. Not applicable. 51 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 24 of 56 3.09.03 Density Transfer A. Any PUD may be used to transfer residential density from undevelopable areas of a site (riparian corridor, floodplain, wetlands, unstable soils or slopes) to developable areas of a site. Up to 40 percent of the density may be transferred, except as provided in Sections B through G, below. No more than 100 percent of the density may be transferred. B. If the PUD dedicates to the City or provides an easement for a trail or bike path shown in any adopted City Plan, an additional 20 percent of the density may be transferred. C. If the PUD dedicates to the City property abutting a public park, the Commission may allow up to an additional 20 percent of the density to be transferred, commensurate with the amount and usability of the property dedicated. D. If the improved common area of the PUD is available for use by the public, the Commission may allow up to an additional 10 percent of the density to be transferred, commensurate with the amount and usability of the improved common area. The area must be permanently posted with a sign reading, “This common area is available for use by the public.” E. If the PUD plan proposes landscaping or buffering that exceeds the WDO minimum standards by at least 25 percent, the Commission may allow up to an additional 20 percent of the density to be transferred, commensurate with the amount, quality, and variety of the enhanced landscaping or buffering. F. If the PUD plan proposes stormwater mitigation measures that exceed minimum City standards by at least 25 percent, the Commission may allow up to an additional 10 percent of the density to be transferred, upon a recommendation by the Public Works Department. G. If the PUD plan proposes other environmental, sustainability, or architectural enhancements, the Commission may allow up to an additional 10 percent of the density to be transferred, commensurate with the amount, quality, and community benefit of the enhancements. Such enhancements may include, but are not limited to, solar heating or electrical generation, community gardens, public art, mitigation of off-site stormwater, and greywater diversion. Because the proposal includes no density transfer, the provisions are not applicable. Not applicable. 3.09.04 Conceptual Development Plan A. PUDs require both a Conceptual Development Plan and a Detailed Development Plan. These reviews may be accomplished sequentially or as a consolidated review, at the applicant’s discretion. B. A Conceptual Development Plan shall include drawings and a narrative describing the surrounding neighborhood, existing site conditions, general development areas, phasing, land uses, building envelopes, architectural theme, landscaping and buffering, streets, bicycle and pedestrian circulation, common areas, utility locations, sign theme, and other information the Director may deem necessary to convey the concept plan. The application materials indicate that the applicant seeks Conceptual Development Plan approval. 52 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 25 of 56 The provisions are met. 3.09.05 Detailed Development Plan A. PUDs require both a Conceptual Development Plan and a Detailed Development Plan. These reviews may be accomplished sequentially or as a consolidated review, at the applicant’s discretion. B. No building, grading, access, or other development permit may be issued until a Detailed Development Plan has been approved for at least one phase of the project. C. Buildings shown on a Detailed Development Plan are exempt from Design Review if they are in substantial conformity to the Detailed Development Plan (see Section 3.07.01.B). D. A Detailed Development Plan shall include drawings and a narrative sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the Conceptual Development Plan and any conditions of approval previously imposed. A Detailed Development Plan shall provide specific information regarding the site layout, architecture, and proposed amenities. A Detailed Development Plan that proposes land uses not in the Conceptual Development Plan or that deviates by more than ten percent from any development standard in the Conceptual Development Plan for any phase, or that does not meet the standards of this Section shall not be approved. The applicant may request that the decision-maker approve such a plan as an amended Conceptual Development Plan. The application materials indicate that the applicant seeks both PUD Conceptual Development Plan and Detailed Development Plan (DDP) approvals. Staff applies a PUD condition, similar to as was done for the Smith Creek PUD (ANX 2017-05) and is being done for Trillium Reserve PUD (ANX 2020-01), to conform to 5.01.07, the purpose of which is to ensure that the PUD is in substantial conformance with the conditions of the DDP approval. Staff applies a PUD condition for PUD Final Plan Approval process. 53 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 26 of 56 3.09.06 Development Standards A PUD is intended to allow flexibility in the development standards of Sections 2.02 through 2.04 and 3.01 through 3.10. The Detailed Development Plan may propose modified standards without a separate Variance. Any standard that is not proposed for modification shall apply to the PUD. The development standards stated below shall not be modified through the PUD process. A. Common area and density shall comply with Table 3.09A. Common Area and Density Standards for Planned Unit Developments Table 3.09A Transfer of Density Residential Mixed-Use Common Area, Minimum Four or fewer dwelling units All undevelopable site area Five or more dwelling units, or nonresidential uses 30 percent of gross site area, including all undevelopable site area 1 Improved Common Area, Minimum Four or fewer dwelling units None Five or more dwelling units 100 square feet per dwelling unit Nonresidential uses None None None Residential Density, Minimum (units per net acre) Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan2 Residential Density, Maximum (units per net acre) Not specified 4 1. At least one common area shall be sized to accommodate a circle 25 feet in diameter. 2. In residential zones only. There is no minimum for non-residential zones. 3. Child care facility for 13 or more children, group home for six or more persons. 4. The maximum density is determined by setbacks, off-street parking, open space, and other requirements. Pursuant to Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1, Note allowable densities may be increased through PUD above the maximum(s) of the base zone(s). First, before applying standards from the table, definitions from 1.02 are in order:  “Common area”: Not defined.  “Improved common area”: Not defined. However, the next section beyond Table 3.09A, which is 3.09.06B, states that, “Common areas are deemed improved if they are provided with benches, playground equipment, gazebos, picnic facilities, or similar amenities. Lawn area by itself does not constitute improvement. Trails or paths do not constitute improvement, unless they connect to the public trail system. Common meeting or recreation rooms are deemed to be improved common areas.” 54 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 27 of 56  “Open space, common”: “An area, feature, building or other facility within a development which has been dedicated in common to the ownership within the development, or to the public, specifically for the purpose of providing places for recreation, conservation or landscaping, and which is intended for the use of the residents and property owners of the development.”  “Open space, usable common”: “Common open space, the use of which conforms with use and development guidelines specified by the Woodburn Development Ordinance.” It appears that through the table, “common area” describes the same as “open space, common”. “Improved common area” could mean the same as “open space, usable common”, except that the definition is vague and refers to WDO guidelines and specifications that simply don’t exist except for 3.09.06B, so the description in 3.09.06B stands. Staff concludes that the City through PUD can define the details of what “improved common area” and “similar amenities” mean as standards and require that they be met. Staff concluded the same and acted accordingly for the Smith Creek PUD (ANX 2017-05) and is acting accordingly for the Trillium Reserve PUD (ANX 2020-01), for example. 55 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 28 of 56 Second, looking at the applicable standards from the table, they are as follows: Common Area, Minimum: Five or more dwelling units, or nonresidential uses 30 percent of gross site area, including all undevelopable site area1 1At least one common area shall be sized to accommodate a circle 25 feet in diameter. 30.0% of the subdivision gross area is (31.13 acres x 0.3) = 9.34 acres The applicant proposes 30% with common area tracts totaling 9.55 acres, excluding the stormwater detention pond. Including this pond equals 10.72 acres at 33%. Improved Common Area, Minimum: Five or more dwelling units 100 square feet per dwelling unit The next section beyond Table 3.09A, which is 3.09.06B, defines improved common area. At 166 dwellings, the improved common area min is 166 x 100 sq ft = 16,600 sq ft. It appears the playground (on Tract H) and the path pavement areas on several tracts together could meet the min in terms of area. However, see also the text past this table in “Table Supplement” Residential Density, Maximum (units per net acre) Pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan2 2In residential zones only. There is no minimum for non- residential zones. Through Policy Table 1 starting on plan p. 7, the table has a footnote stating, “Note: … Allowable densities may be increased through the discretionary planned unit development review process.” The proposal does so and proposes at least 6.8 dwelling units (DUs) per net acre. The conditioned development standards acknowledge such. Residential Density, Maximum (units per net acre) Not specified4 4The maximum density is determined by setbacks, off- street parking, open space, and other requirements. Pursuant The proposal is 166 houses on small lots equal to an average lot size of 6,406 sq ft and a density of 6.8 houses (dwelling units or DUs) per net acre. 56 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 29 of 56 to Comprehensive Plan Policy Table 1, Note allowable densities may be increased through PUD above the maximum(s) of the base zone(s). Additionally, Oregon House Bill (HB) 2001 (2019) and OAR 660- 046 took effect that require most cities including Woodburn to allow “middle housing” – duplexes, triplexes, quadplexes, cottage clusters, and townhouses – as follows: All middle housing types in areas zoned for residential use that allow for the development of detached single-family dwellings; and A duplex on each lot or parcel zoned for residential use that allows for the development of detached single-family dwellings. The max density is as follows: 27.2 DUs per net acre for the 166 lots to allow a theoretical maximum of four dwellings per lot composed of a combination of houses and middle housing. Note: Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) don’t count against max density, and the bulleted maximums exclude the golf course territory. In service of substantial conformance, a PUD condition establishes as a development standard min density equal to what’s proposed. Table Supplement However, per the purpose statement of 3.09, a PUD is to provide “enhanced public amenities”. 5.03.06B.6 is a Conceptual Development Plan approval criterion: “That the requested flexibility in development standards is justified by commensurate public benefits.” 57 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 30 of 56 First, staff applies Table 3.09A such that the PUD standards are a base and not exhaustive. Additionally, the table itself addresses common area, but doesn’t address the distinction of private common versus City/public area. Based on the 3.09 purpose statement and the Conceptual Development Plan criterion of 5.03.06B.6, any PUD should have more than the bare minimum per Table 3.09A. Besides off-street bicycle/pedestrian paths that are paved, the only proposed common area improvements are a playground on Tract H and a wood chip pedestrian path on Tracts I & K. The proposal provides no public access to the playground and provides public access to subdivision connection paths on Tracts B, D, & L-O (but not also It provides no access to the largest and park-like common area tracts, Tracts I & K. The proposal fails to provide enhanced public amenities. Second, the size of the subject property at 31.13 gross acres and the number of proposed dwellings, 166, are much larger than the minimum size for a PUD that ranges from 2-3 acres. The proposal fails to provide public amenities that are commensurate with the PUD modifications that the applicant requests. A PUD condition through Attachment 203 requires greater common area improvements, particularly for Tracts I & K, which the applicant proposes as common area, that the City is requiring through a PUD condition to be dedicated to the City as public parkland with some improvements. Conclusion Lastly, here staff addresses development standards in lieu of addressing them in the Subdivision Preliminary Approval Provisions section: A PUD condition establishes development standards, each on either modified by PUD or as in the WDO. Because the standards accommodate the proposed subdivision, the proposed subdivision meets them. The provisions are met. B. Improved Common Area 1. Common areas are deemed improved if they are provided with benches, playground equipment, gazebos, picnic facilities, or similar amenities. Lawn area by itself does not constitute improvement. Trails or paths do not constitute improvement, unless they connect to the public trail system. 2. Common meeting or recreation rooms are deemed to be improved common areas. 3. Improved common areas are subject to the performance guarantee provisions of Section 4.02.08. 58 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 31 of 56 Staff addressed this through 3.09.06A above. C. Streets 1. A PUD shall conform to and, where possible, enhance existing or planned vehicle, pedestrian and bicycle networks, including connections and functionality. Note: See Figures 7-1 (Functional Classification Designations), 7-3 (Pedestrian Plan), and 7-4 (Bicycle Plan) of the Transportation System Plan. 2. All streets shall be public. 3. Boundary and connecting streets shall use the street sections of Section 3.01.04. 4. Internal streets may use the street sections of Section 3.01.04, or the PUD may propose other street sections, provided that the streets: a. conform to the Oregon Fire Code (see Figures 3.04C and 3.04D) b. include sidewalks, and c. are constructed to the specifications of the Public Works Department. D. Parking If a front setback of less than 20 feet is proposed, the requirement of Section 3.05.03 for an improved parking pad for single-family and duplex dwellings may be satisfied by on-street parking or by a common off-street parking lot. E. Signs 1. A PUD may include a sign plan to require a common architectural design and location. 2. The standards of the Mixed Use Village (MUV) zone shall apply to commercial uses in the residential zones of a Mixed-Use PUD. The street improvements as proposed or conditioned meet or exceed 3.01, including Figures 3.01A, C, & G: Figure 3.01A – Internal, Boundary, and Connecting Streets 59 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 32 of 56 Top: Figure 3.01C – Minor Arterial (This applies to N. Boones Ferry Road.) Bottom: Figure 3.01G – Local Residential Street with Parking Both Sides, 60 Foot Right-of-Way (This applies to remaining streets.) Street improvements include wider sidewalks to encouraging walking and accommodate cyclists who feel safer on sidewalk. Off-street public improvements include in place of additional streets a few subdivision connection paths, bicycle/pedestrian paths through Tracts B, D, F, & L-O as shortcuts within the street network. Staff applies a PUD condition to specify street improvements. 3.09.09 Owners/Tenants Association Any land and structures not dedicated to the public, but reserved for the common use of the owners or tenants, shall be subject to control by an association of owners or tenants. Staff applies a PUD condition to ensure conformance. 60 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 33 of 56 3.09.10 Phasing A. A PUD may be developed in phases, pursuant to Section 5.03.05. B. Phases shall be functionally self-contained with regard to access, parking, utilities, open spaces, and similar physical features, and capable of occupancy, operation, and maintenance upon completion. C. The phased provision of common areas and improvements shall be roughly proportional to the development of housing and other elements intended for private ownership. D. At least one improved common area sized to accommodate a circle 25 feet in diameter shall be provided with the first phase. There’s no phasing. Not applicable. [Other] ORS 92.040(3) sets a 10-year expiration on development approvals in order to help with the issue of entitlement “vesting”. It also local governments to set shorter periods, and staff opts to do so in case the project begins to manifest during the 3-year land use approval window but slows down or stops afterwards. Condition SUB-1 sets an ultimate deadline. As an example, were another recession like the Great Recession to occur and lead to a “zombie” project, it would be clear when an apparently dormant project was dead. Staff applies a SUB condition to clarify the issue of “vesting”. A geotechnical or “geotech” report is necessary for subdivision improvements. It became necessary for Smith Creek Development building permits, and the master developer happened to have prepared one in keeping with private agreements with homebuilders and so was able to submit it on short notice. Thankfully, the report document no field conditions that needed correction. The Building Official thought Public Works handled Geotech reports, and this item isn’t a WDO requirement or a Planning Division policy item. So, staff established a condition that gets the developer to submit a copy prior to the City accepting subdivision improvements. Staff applies a SUB condition regarding a geotech report. PUD per the opening purpose statement of 3.09 refers to “enhanced public amenities”, which along with annexation as interpreted by staff includes upgrades to public works. The Public Works Department asked for what became Conditions PUD-PW1 & 2 to reinforce related items with the Public Works comments that are Attachment 102A. Staff mentions annexation again because public facilities, a.k.a. public works, with adequate capacity are an annexation criterion. 61 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 34 of 56 Staff applies Conditions PUD-PW1 & PUD-PW2 supporting Public Works Department desires regarding sanitary sewerage/sewer and stormwater management. PUD per the opening purpose statement of 3.09 refers to both “enhanced public amenities” and “unique street cross-sections”, which staff interprets to include what it considers “upgrades” such as wider sidewalk segments, more street trees, and traffic calming in the form of patterned poured concrete crosswalks as subtle visual reinforcement for drivers. Staff also accommodates some of the developer’s desires, such as to have bulb-outs or curb extensions at most of the proposed locations (all except the 4 along N. Boones Ferry Road, per Public Works Dept. request). There are also conditions clarifying vagueness or omissions in the WDO, such as that planter strips need to have grass and groundcover among the trees, not gravel or pebbles. Another two examples are to preserve trees and specifying how to implement dead-end street provisions of WDO 3.01.05A.2. Staff also notes for the developer, PUD is a tool for getting more lots and more houses than a standard subdivision in order to get greater profit. In exchange, the City gets enhanced public amenities. For example, staff interprets enhanced public amenities to include through easement public access to common area off-street bicycle/pedestrian paths where paths would not already be on City/public parkland. Staff applies PUD conditions requiring street improvements that meet or exceed the WDO or provide an enhanced public amenity in exchange for meeting a street standard. “Enhanced public amenities” includes common area and “off-street” improvements. Examples are to preserve trees outside ROW, specifying how to apply and remediate the RCWOD, and specifying common area improvements. Staff accommodates some of the developer’s desires by requiring common area improvements that are basically the same as what the developer proposed after many discussions with staff, the purpose being to have standards that remain clear to all heading into the final plat stage. Conditions also gain variety in trees, getting more evergreens, establishes a table of standards for off-street bicycle/pedestrian paths, and establishes a table of standards for public easements to secure public access to off-street bicycle/pedestrian paths and allow for future mid-block public utility corridors where and as needed. 62 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 35 of 56 Because proposed common areas are just that – private, not any City/public parkland to be dedicated – there is a condition reiterating that there needs to be maintenance association per WDO 3.09.09. Lastly, there is a condition reiterating that there needs to be PUD “Final Plan Approval” per WDO 5.01.07 so that outstanding details are deferred after land use approval, allowing the developer to proceed, but also securing between the developer and the City resolution of details before final plat approval by the City. Staff applies PUD conditions requiring common area improvements and public access to some improvements. Relating to annexation and more so PUD, a number of transportation conditions call out modest transportation improvements (or fees in-lieu where conditions of approval allow), all from the Transportation System Plan (TSP):  Wayfinding signage for people walking and cycling. The basic objective is that if people perceive they can walk and cycle more easily and safely, they’ll do so and drive less. This includes perceiving and getting to and from public parkland just off N. Boones Ferry Road. Based on input from the Assistant City Administrator as parks director about what a wayfinding installation would cost, staff discussions about conditioning of ANX 2019-01 Woodburn Eastside Apartments through Condition T-BP4, as well as ANX 2020-01 Trillium Reserve Condition T-BP2, staff applies the set figure of $1,500 per installation location.  School bus shelter. To further transportation demand management (TDM) through school bus service, the developer is to build or install a small school bus shelter on a common area tract closest to wherever the Woodburn School District bus would stop within or next to the development, the idea being that if there is a public visible and known waiting area sheltered from the elements, children and those parents who choose to accompany them are more likely to ride the school bus instead of parents driving them. Staff concludes by nothing that together Trillium Reserve and Dove Landing all but constitute the north area within the UGB, and it is necessary with development to obtain infrastructure concurrent with development of the north UGB. 63 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 36 of 56 Staff applies transportation conditions requiring the construction or funding of transportation improvements. 64 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 37 of 56 Remaining Provisions These are applicable provisions not already addressed in the application type provisions sections above. 4.01.07 Consolidated Applications An applicant may request, in writing, to consolidate applications needed for a single development project. Under a consolidated review, all applications shall be processed following the procedures applicable for the highest type decision requested. It is the express policy of the City that development review not be segmented into discrete parts in a manner that precludes a comprehensive review of the entire development and its cumulative impacts. The proposal is consolidated. 2.07 Special Uses There is no “community club building” (clubhouse). None apply. 3.01 Streets Long-range Planning TSP Figure 6 “Local Street Connectivity Plan” shows street connections into the north area of the urban growth boundary (UGB) that includes the subject property: 65 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 38 of 56 TSP Figure 6 There are two blue arrows, one each to N. Boones Ferry Road. The proposal conforms to Figure 6. 3.02 Utilities & Easements 3.02.01 A. The Director shall require dedication of specific easements for the construction and maintenance of municipal water, sewerage and storm drainage facilities located on private property. B. A five-foot wide public utility easement shall be dedicated along each lot line abutting a public street. C. As a condition of approval for development, including property line adjustments, partitions, subdivisions, design reviews, or Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), the Director may require dedication of public utility easements. Planning staff expects the Public Works Department during the final plat stage to ensure that the developer dedicates the minimum streetside PUEs, and the preliminary subdivision drawings indicate conformance with 3.02.01B. Regarding 3.02.01A & C, staff applies a PUD condition for additional public easements for public bicycle/pedestrian access and potential mid-block utility corridors. 66 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 39 of 56 3.04 Vehicular Access 3.04.03 Driveway Guidelines and Standards B. Joint Access 3. Every joint driveway or access between separate lots shall be established by an access easement and maintenance agreement to the satisfaction of the Director and revocable only with the concurrence of the Director. Staff declined to apply this to large and deep Lots 36-39. 3.04.05 Traffic Impact Analysis A. A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) may be required by the Director prior to the approval of a City access permit when the Director estimates a development proposal may generate either 100 or more additional, peak hour trips, or 1,000 or more additional daily trips, within ten years of a development application. The applicant submitted two exhibits as a TIA: the original TIA (Exhibit G, October 30, 2020) and an addendum (January 15, 2021). The TIA, limiting its conventional analysis to vehicle traffic only, assumed citywide growth in background vehicle traffic through 2022, specifically a compounded rate of 2.0% yearly (Exhibit G, p. 12, Table The TIA studied 9 intersections, the northernmost being N. Boones Ferry Road at Crosby Road and the southernmost N. Settlemier Avenue at Hayes Street. The traffic modeling distributed 20% of trips generated by development to north of the development (to and past Crosby Road) and 80% to the south. The TIA identified no vehicle trip reduction or transportation demand management (TDM) measures. Below are two images serving as vicinity maps of the intersections: 67 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 40 of 56 TIA: First 7 intersections studied TIA: Second 2 intersections studied: N. Boones Ferry Rd & Constitution Ave/Tukwila Dr and Tukwila & Hazelnut Dr TIA intersection locations map adapted from exhibits As of March 16, 2021, no agency including ODOT responded to notice of hearing with any written comment. The City contracted with a transportation consultant (from a company other than the one that prepared the applicant’s TIA) to review the TIA, rebut or affirm its conclusions, and advise staff. The consultant might participate in one or more of the public hearings. Boones Ferry Road & OR 214  The one studied intersection north of the project is outside the urban growth boundary (UGB).  South of the project, BFR & OR 214 is heavily trafficked at peak hours.  Of the studied intersections, the trips that the project would add show that BFR & OR 214 is the most trafficked.  Staff supposes that most of the generated trips are to and from I-5 (Portland and Salem), the back way to Salem along S. Settlemier Avenue and S. Boones Ferry Road and outer rural roads southwest of Woodburn, and central Woodburn. 68 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 41 of 56  The intersection includes a state highway under ODOT control (OR 214).  There are no specific plans in any foreseeable time horizon by ODOT to make major physical changes to the intersection or highway. Bicycle/Pedestrian & Transit In the interest of PUD per the purpose statement that opens 3.09 of providing enhanced public amenities, below are comprehensive plan policies that relate to infrastructure upgrades, enhanced public amenities, and improved traveling for those who walk, cycle, and ride transit. Policy Page No. What Related Conditions Address G-1.1 27 Expansion areas of the City are served by adequate public facilities and services. H-1.3 34 Develop a low stress network of bicycle lanes and routes that link major activity centers such as residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, commercial areas and employment centers. Identify off-street facilities in City greenway and park areas. Ensure all new or improved collector and arterial streets are constructed with bicycle lanes – specifically duly requiring frontage/street improvements and also conditioning wide sidewalk segments as a public bicycle/pedestrian path and planter strip segments that are wider and/or have more street trees than standard. The subdivision connection paths also serve. H-1.4 34 Develop a comprehensive network of sidewalks and off-street pathways. Identify key connections to improve pedestrian mobility within neighborhoods and link residential areas to schools, parks, places of employment and commercial areas. Ensure all new collector and arterial streets are constructed with sidewalks. Specifically, to do so by duly requiring frontage/street improvements, conditioning wide sidewalk segments as a public bicycle/pedestrian path and planter strip segments that are wider and/or have more street trees than standard, having the proposed subdivision connection paths, and having some bike parking. These are all to raise the attractiveness, ease, safety, and potential cyclists’ perception of safety of cycling. H-5.1 35 Implement, where appropriate, a range of potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of the transportation system by shifting single-occupant vehicle trips to other models and reducing automobile reliance at times of peak traffic volumes – specifically through Conditions T-BP1 & T-T1. Regarding off-site sidewalk, the Parks and Recreation Master Plan (2009) on p. 20 identifies the action steps of: 69 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 42 of 56  “Work with other City departments and community groups to ensure safe pedestrian access across physical barriers to parks and recreation facilities. Incorporate traffic calming strategies at access points to parks, open space, and trailheads. Incorporate traffic calming design techniques into design guidelines, as appropriate.”  “Work with the other City departments to provide safe and enjoyable sidewalks or sidepaths as routes to parks.” Additionally, the Assistant City Administrator as parks and recreation director on December 3, 2021 asked staff about and indicate interest in an improved route connecting the public parkland to be dedicated with the City sidewalk network. For these reasons, staff applies a condition that requires off-site sidewalk south to Hazelnut Drive. For these transportation reasons and based on the PUD, staff applies bicycle/pedestrian (T-B/P) and transit (T-T) conditions. Additional Issues: Transit Presently, the Woodburn Transit System (WTS) bus loops through east, central, and west Woodburn, but is yet to reach into the north UGB area: TSP Figure 7 (2019) Neither do Salem-Keizer Cherriots nor Canby Area Transit (CAT) serve it. 70 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 43 of 56 Staff discussed conditioning fees towards local and regional bus service and vanpooling, similar as for DR 2019-05 Allison Way Apartments (Condition T-T) and ANX 2019-01 Woodburn Eastside Apartments (recommended Condition T-T1). The Assistant City Administrator declined to support such for Dove Landing. Staff discussed potential T-T conditions that would have required a bus shelter or fee in-lieu and bicycle parking at two bus stops or fee(s) in-lieu and declined to apply them. As a concluding summary, a City objective for the development is to contribute towards increasing walking and cycling appeal and safety. To address transportation problems, staff applies transportation conditions. 3.06 Landscaping 3.06.02 General Requirements Staff expects the development to meet this section except where otherwise conditioned and will confirm such during PUD Final Plan Approval process. The requirement is met. 3.06.03 Landscaping Standards A. Street Trees The applicant proposes street trees that appear to meet the provisions. To secure a higher minimum amount of street trees, staff applies a PUD condition. Staff expects the development to meet the remainder of 3.06 except where otherwise conditioned. 3.06.05 Significant Trees on Private Property There might or might not be Significant Trees that are healthy and structurally sound enough and appear feasible to save within the tracts along the road. To secure tree preservation or fee in-lieu, staff applies a PUD condition. 71 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 44 of 56 Recommendation: Denial In short, because the developer is indicating refusal to dedicate to the City public parkland, staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the staff report and attachments and recommend denial to the City Council. Were the Planning Commission or City Council to instead pursue approval with conditions, then staff would recommend the specific conditions in the “Alternative: Approval with Conditions of Approval” section below. Alternative: Approval with Conditions of Approval Staff recommends approval of the consolidated applications based on the findings in the staff report and attachments, which are incorporated by this reference, as well as applying the following conditions of approval: General G1. As part of building permit application, the applicant shall submit revised site plans meeting the conditions of approval and obtain Planning Division approval through sign-off on permit issuance. G2. The applicant or successors and assigns shall develop the property in substantial conformance with the final plans submitted and approved with these applications, except as modified by these conditions of approval. Were the applicant to revise plans other than to meet conditions of approval or meet building code, even if Planning Division staff does not notice and signs off on building permit issuance, Division staff retains the right to obtain restoration of improvements as shown on an earlier land use review plan set in service of substantial conformance. G3. References: Attachment 201 serves as a dictionary or glossary defining certain abbreviations, acronyms, phrases, terms, and words in the context of the conditions of approval. The 200 series of attachments are as binding as the conditions of approval in the main body of the final decision. G4. Due dates / public improvements: a. By application: Unless a condition specifies otherwise, conditions inc. those relating to any of final subdivision, final partition, property line adjustment or lot consolidation recordation are due by building permit application. Prior to both any recordation of any final subdivision, final partition, or property line adjustment and building permit 72 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 45 of 56 application, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of an Address Assignment Request. b. By issuance: Unless a condition specifies otherwise, ROW and easement dedications and recordation(s), construction of frontage/street improvements, and construction of off- site, park, and other public improvements are due by building permit issuance. Where phasing is relevant, building permit issuance means issuance for the phase in which the conditioned improvement is located. G5. Recordation due dates: The applicant shall apply to the County for recordations of items that the City requires no later than six months prior to expiration of the land use approval as WDO 4.02.04B establishes, and shall complete recordations no later than three years past the land use “final decision” date. The due date to complete recordations shall not supersede when recordations are due relative to the building permit stage. G6. Fees: The developer shall pay fees per Attachment 206. Preliminary Subdivision 2020-01 SUB-1. Expiration: Based on ORS 92.040(3), development per the Council land use final decision may continue 3 years past the decision date, the 3-year approval period being established by WDO 4.02.04, as follows: a. Subdivision Final Plat: WDO 4.02.04B.2 shall mean that application to the City for final plat per WDO 5.01.06 occurs prior to 3 years past the final decision date. The developer shall name C-E streets beginning with those letters respectively, and shall apply to the City for final plat prior to applying to the County for recordation. b. Recordation with Marion County: Same as WDO 5.01.06C.1. (within 30 calendar days of the Director’s signature on the plat Mylar). c. Vesting: The decision is vested unless: The developer fails to meet subdivision and PUD requirements, resulting in the City being unable to authorize staff to sign a final plat Mylar by July 1, 2026; or There is no substantial construction (as defined through Condition G3) by July 1, 2026. SUB-2. Documents: a. Geotech report: Prior to final plat approval by the City, the developer shall submit to the Director a geotechnical report documenting that, whether or not the developer spreads any fill or spoil dirt across lots and tracts, soil is compacted and ready to accommodate the construction of buildings on lots and tracts proposed for development. 73 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 46 of 56 b. Plat: Upon recordation, the developer shall submit to PW and cc the Director Adobe PDFs of the subdivision plat and any and all ancillary documents necessary to conform to conditions of approval and not addressed on the face of the plat. Planned Unit Development 2020-01 PUD-PW1. Sanitary sewerage/sewer: a. Were PW to identify in writing a sewer deficiency at the Vanderbeck Lift Station and/or force main and sanitary sewer collection system at the applicable pump station to which sewage would flow from the subject property, to meet WDO 1.01.01B.2 the developer shall either: Construct improvements that remedy the reduction in sewer level of service that the subject project would cause; or Pay a sewer fee, if the Assistant City Administrator allows in writing, equal to one of the following as the City chooses: Two hundred percent (200%) of a licensed civil engineer’s cost estimate for a capital improvement project that would remedy the reduction in sewer level of service that the subject project would cause; or An amount equal to 50% of the sewer system development charge (SDC) in addition to, and not as a discount of, the SDC full rate that PW ordinarily assesses. b. Construction or payment shall be due prior to building permit issuance, and if payment, it shall be through fee assessment on and collection through the in-review building permit. Where applies, PW shall have established the SDC amount. PUD-PW2. Stormwater management: Prior to civil engineering plan approval through CEP review, the applicant shall provide to PW an Engineer Stamped Storm Drainage Hydraulic Analysis Report that existing private storm drainage systems have capacity to handle the additional flow from the Dove Landing Development, have the culvert pipe under each of BFR and Olympic have capacity to handle a 100 year base flood event, and to provide a final 100 year floodway, floodplain, and wetland delineation for this development. The applicant is responsible for correcting any capacity and/or deficiencies, including installing new or additional drainage systems, and/or attaining the right to increase stormwater flows into neighboring private stormwater systems. The applicant shall submit to PW an engineered stamped condition report of the existing storm collection system. PUD-PW3. Final Civil Plan Approval: Civil plans shall comply with current City standards, specifications and details, current Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction, current MUTCD and ADA requirements and Marion County requirements, as applicable. 74 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 47 of 56 PUD-1. Mods: The City approves PUD modifications only as written in conditions of approval and the 200 series of attachments, particularly Attachment 202. Other modifications that site plans imply are subject to later administrative approval or denial by the Director. PUD-2. ROWs: For BFR and the proposed local class streets, the developer shall dedicate ROWs that meet or exceed the min widths necessary to conform to WDO Figures 3.01C & G. PUD-3. Frontage/street improvements: These shall be as follows: a. BFR: Per WDO Fig. 3.01C except that planter strip shall be min 6½ ft wide inc. curb width. b. Planter strip remainder: Remaining ground not occupied by trees shall be planted with lawn grass. c. Sidewalks: Min 6 ft wide except wider as Exhibit PUD-3c supersedes. The BFR sidewalk dead-end(s) and Street west dead-end shall have ADA-compliant transitions spanning between sidewalk and road shoulder. If PW were to direct during CEP review that the road crossing of the culvert have curb-tight sidewalk, min width shall be 8 ft. Exhibit PUD-3c: Sidewalks (blue: min 8 ft wide) d. Overlap: The extra width of planter strip and sidewalk shall either overlap outside ROW into streetside PUE and where applicable Tracts I & K or come with additional ROW to accommodate them. Wider sidewalks shall not narrow planter strips. e. Street trees: Min numbers equal to block frontage ratios per Exhibit PUD-3e. 75 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 48 of 56 Exhibit PUD-3e: Street Tree Min No. (green: equal to 1 tree per 30 ft of block frontage) f. Electric power lines: Electric power lines, whether in or beyond ROW, shall be buried, including those that exist along the BFR frontage. g. Traffic calming: Bulb-outs / curb extensions: This condition approves them as land use review Sheet 5 illustrates, except the four along BFR. PW is prohibited post-approval from later eliminating or shrinking the remaining ones as to virtually eliminate them during CEP review and construction. The developer shall submit a fire truck turn radius plan confirming that the extensions are already designed for such if and when PW requests during CEP review. Crosswalks / pedestrian crossings along intersection legs per Exhibit PUD-3g shall be patterned poured concrete each min 8 ft wide. Exhibit PUD-3g: Patterned Poured Concrete Crosswalks (symbolized in blue) PUD-4. Streets, dead-end: Barricades/Signage: Based on WDO 3.01.05A.2b & c, the developer shall place: a. A barricade with sign at the south end of Street and each of the west end of & Streets; and b. A barricade at each of the north end of & Streets. 76 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 49 of 56 Consult PW for a barricade detail, and no later than CEP show both it and a modified version with a sign in conformance with 3.01.05A.2c. PUD-5. Tree preservation: The developer shall preserve trees per Attachment 205. PUD-6. Public parkland: The developer shall dedicate Tracts I & K to the City. Refer to Attachment 203 for required improvements. Exhibit PUD-6: Tracts to Dedicate to City (outlined in green) PUD-7. Environmental remediation: The developer shall remediate per Attachment 205, Part C. PUD-8. Lot and tract development standards: The standards shall be per Attachment 202. PUD-9. Common area improvements: Improvements shall be per Attachment 203. PUD-10. Association: The developer shall establish a maintenance association per Attachment 203, Part E. PUD-11. PUD Final Plan Approval Process: a. The developer shall conform to WDO 5.01.07, the purpose of which is to ensure that the PUD is in substantial conformance with the conditions of the PUD Detailed Development Plan (DDP) approval, including regarding street improvements, public improvements outside ROW if any, and common area improvements. The developer shall apply to the Director for PUD Final Plan Approval no later than when applying to PW for CEP review. b. Scope: The scope of DDP includes any topic for which any given final decision condition of approval, and any separate document it might reference, is too general to establish civil engineering standards and construction levels of detail. It also includes any topic or 77 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 50 of 56 situation for which no standard exists through previous adoption by PW. The Final Plan Approval process is to establish any and all design details deferred from land use review. c. CEP: The developer shall incorporate a PUD Final Plan Approval by the Director into CEP review by PW and the civil engineering plan set that PW would approve through CEP. Planned Unit Development 2020-01: Transportation T-BP1. Bicycle/pedestrian off-site improvements: The developer shall: a. TSP: Construct TSP project P45 (TSP p. 64 as Attachment 104A). b. Off-site sidewalk: BFR & Hazelnut: Objective: Manifest an improved ADA-compliant route linking BFR frontage west sidewalk through off-site sidewalk extension south to the intersection. Sidewalk: Construct a BFR sidewalk extension south from the frontage to either the north or south leg of the intersection, as PW directs, to the degree of conformance with WDO Fig. 3.01C sidewalk placement that west side ROW allows and in compliance with current ADA requirements and pedestrian safety requirements as PW determines. Crosswalk(s): Construct a marked crosswalk or crosswalks across BFR at the north, south, or both legs of the intersection, as PW directs, and one or more ADA-compliant ramps or transitions at the west landing(s). Details: What constitutes an “enhanced pedestrian crossing” per P45, “sidewalk” per and a “marked crosswalk” per and their corollary improvements is up to PW determination through CEP review; however, for P45 & there shall result a physical change to existing pavement and/or striping serving as an obvious indication for most pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers. c. Wayfinding: To further TDM, the developer shall do one of the following: install 3 min devices, such as signage, that provide wayfinding to bicycle routes, multi- use paths, parks, schools, and other essential destinations. If the developer were to opt for signage and assuming pole signage, sign face min dimensions shall be 2 ft by 1 ft and the placements shall be min: 1 sign face at or near the junction of a BFR sidewalk & an Street sidewalk; 1 face at or near the junction of a BFR sidewalk & a Street sidewalk; 1 face at or near the junction of a BFR sidewalk & a Hazelnut sidewalk; Note: The developer may mimic the typical wayfinding signage the City approved for the Mill Creek Greenway as Smith Creek Development (ANX 2017-05) adapted from the Regional Trails Signage Guidelines of The Intertwine Alliance, a trails coalition in the Portland metro area. Pay a fee in-lieu per Attachment 206. [TSP B40 “wayfinding”/P62] 78 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 51 of 56 T-T1. School bus shelter: To further TDM through bus transit, the developer shall build or install a school bus shelter on a common area tract closest to wherever the Woodburn School District bus would stop within or next to the development. Follow the direction of the school district, or absent that default to min 48 sq ft, 6 ft narrowest dimension, and 8 ft min height clearance. Affix a min 1½ by 1 ft sign face with text min 4-inch high indicating that the shelter is a school bus stop. The shelter may be on a public tract if the Assistant City Administrator allows and may be within a PUE if PW allows. One of the shelters otherwise conditioned can do double duty as the school bus top shelter if it continues to meet all the other conditioned requirements for that shelter. Applicant Identity Applicant Peter Ettro, Ettro Capital Management Applicant’s Representative Stacy Connery, AICP, VP/Planning Manager, Pacific Community Design Landowner(s) Christy Schultz, Manager, Schultz Farm LLC Notes to the Applicant The following are not planning / land use / zoning conditions of approval, but are notes for the applicant to be aware of and follow: 1. Records: Staff recommends that the applicant retain a copy of the subject approval. 2. Fences, fencing, & free-standing walls: The approval excludes any fences, fencing, & free- standing walls, which are subject to WDO 2.06 and the permit process of 5.01.03. 3. Signage: The approval excludes any private signage, which is subject to WDO 3.10 and the permit process of 5.01.10. 4. PLA Time Limit: WDO 4.02.04B. specifies that, “A final decision on any application shall expire within three years of the date of the final decision unless: 1. a building permit to exercise the right granted by the decision has been issued; 2. the activity approved in the decision has commenced; or 3. a time extension, Section 4.02.05, has been approved. Because unrecorded re-plats lingering indefinitely have burdened staff, a condition sets sooner time limits for subsection 2. to begin and finish recordation. 79 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 52 of 56 5. Mylar signature: The Community Development Director is the authority that signs plat Mylars and not any of the mayor, City Administrator, Public Works Director, or City Engineer. Only one City signature title block is necessary. 6. PLA Plat Tracker: Marion County maintains a plat tracking tool at . Use it to check on the status of a recordation request to the County. City staff does not track County plat recordation. 7. Technical standards: a. Context: A reader shall not construe a land use condition of approval that reiterates a City technical standard, such as a PW standard, to exclude remaining standards or to assert that conditions of approval should have reiterated every standard the City has in order for those standards to be met. b. Utilities: A condition involving altered or additional sidewalk or other frontage/street improvement that would in the field result in displacement or relocation of any of utility boxes, cabinets, vaults, or vault covers does not exempt the developer from having to move or pay to move any of these as directed by the City Engineer and with guidance from franchise utilities. 8. Other Agencies: The applicant, not the City, is responsible for obtaining permits from any county, state and/or federal agencies, which may require approval or permit, and must obtain all applicable City and County permits for work prior to the start of work and that the work meets the satisfaction of the permit-issuing jurisdiction. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) might require highway access, storm drainage, and other right-of-way (ROW) permits. All work within the public ROW or easements within City jurisdiction must conform to plans approved by the Public Works Department and must comply with a Public Works Right-of-Way permit issued by said department. Marion County plumbing permits must be issued for all waterline, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer work installed beyond the Public Right-of-Way, on private property. 9. Inspection: The applicant shall construct, install, or plant all improvements, including landscaping, prior to City staff verification. Contact Planning Division staff at least three City business days prior to a desired date of planning and zoning inspection of site improvements. This is required and separate from and in addition to the usual building code and fire and life safety inspections. Note that Planning staff are not primarily inspectors, do not have the nearly immediate availability of building inspectors, and are not bound by any building inspector’s schedule or general contractor convenience. 10. Stormwater management: The storm sewer system and any required on-site detention for the development must comply with the City Storm Water Management Plan, Public Works storm water practices and the Storm Drainage Master Plan. 80 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 53 of 56 11. Public Works Review: Staff performs final review of the civil plans during the building permit stage. Public infrastructure must be constructed in accordance with plans approved by the City, as well as current Public Works construction specifications, Standard Drawings, Standard Details, and general conditions of a permit type issued by the Public Works Department. 12. ROW: a. Dedication: The Public Works Department Engineering Division has document templates for ROW and easement dedications that applicants are to use. ROW – and public utility easement (PUE) – dedications are due prior to building permit issuance per Public Works policy. b. Work: All work within the public ROWs or easements within City jurisdiction must require plan approval and permit issuance from the Public Works Department. All public improvements construction work must be performed in accordance with the plans stamped “approved” by the City, and comply with the City’s Standard Specifications and Standard drawings. 13. Franchises: The applicant provides for the installation of all franchised utilities in any required easements. 14. Water: All water mains and appurtenances must comply with Public Works, Building Division, and Woodburn Fire District requirements. Existing water services lines that are not going to be use with this new development must be abandoned at the main line. The City performs required abandonment of existing water facilities at the water main with payment by the property owner. All taps to existing water mains must be done by a “Hot Tap” method and by approved City of Woodburn Contractors. The applicant shall install the proper type of backflow preventer for all domestic, lawn irrigation and fire sprinkler services. The backflow devices and meters shall be located near the city water main within an easement, unless approved otherwise by Public Works. Contact Byron Brooks, City of Woodburn Water Superintendent, for proper type and installation requirements of the backflow device at (503) 982-5380. 15. Grease Interceptor/Trap: If applicable, a grease trap would need to be installed on the sanitary service, either as a central unit or in a communal kitchen/food preparation area. Contact Marion County Plumbing Department for permit and installation requirements, (503) 588-5147. 16. Fire: Fire protection requirements must comply with Woodburn Fire District standards and requirements, including how the District interprets and applies Oregon Fire Code (OFC). Place fire hydrants within the public ROW or public utility easement and construct them in accordance with Public Works Department requirements, specifications, standards, and permit requirements. Fire protection access, fire hydrant locations and fire protection issues must comply with current fire codes and Woodburn Fire District standards. See City of 81 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 54 of 56 Woodburn Standard Detail No. 5070-2 Fire Vault. The fire vault must be placed within the public right-of-way or public utility easement. 17. SDCs: The developer pays System Development Charges prior to building permit issuance. Staff will determine the water, sewer, storm and parks SDCs after the developer provides a complete Public Works Commercial/Industrial Development information sheet. 18. Public Improvements Civil Plan Review: The process by which to receive, review, and approve drawings and other documents related to public improvements required by these conditions of approval may be paired with or incorporated into building permit review, or, if directed by the City Engineer, through a civil engineering plans (CEP) review process led by the Engineering Division. If opting for CEP, the applicant shall not only follow the direction of the Engineer Division, but also take some actions to facilitate tracking by Planning staff and coordination with Engineering: a. Cover letter: Upon submitting application to the Engineering Division, simultaneously alert the Planning Division through a cover letter to the attention of the Planning Division referencing the intended or, if known, actual submittal date as well as the project name, project phase, tax lot number(s), street address(es), and the land use / planning / zoning final decision conditions of approval that require the public improvement that is the subject of the civil engineering plans. Referencing conditions may be by quotation or citing the identification numbers T-A1). Identify the specific sheet (by number) or document page number that illustrates or notes how each subpart of a condition is met. b. Contact information: State the applicant’s name, company, phone number, e-mail, and desired date for City staff to respond with review comments. The cover letter may include these. c. Plan copies: Submit to the attention of the Planning Division at least two plan size copies of plan sets (24 by 36 inches). Within the cover sheet title block(s), include the phrase “civil engineering plans” or “public improvements civil plans”. Submit also Adobe PDFs using a fileshare service. d. Re-submittal fee: If there are multiple re-submittals, beginning with a third submittal / second revised submittal and continuing with each subsequent submittal, the applicant must pay through the Planning Division into City general revenue a fee of $100. Where public improvements involve the jurisdiction of an outside agency such as the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), the developer must account for that when interacting with the City Engineer and City Public Works Department process. 19. PUD Final Plan (FP) Approval Process: A. Context and project management: 1. The process by which to receive, review, and approve drawings and other documents related to public improvements required by these conditions of approval 82 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 55 of 56 may be paired with or incorporated into building permit review, or, if directed by the City Engineer, through a civil engineering plans (CEP) review process led by PW. 2. CEP remains the means for implementing final decision conditions of approval affecting street improvements, both surface and underground, and extending into PUEs. 3. The developer is project manager. Because PW establishes that CEP applicants have a single point of contact termed the “Engineer of Record”, the developer manages the engineer of record who handles the CEP and also interacts with the Planning Division regarding FP review. For Planning Division staff, the developer is the point of contact, namely whoever on the developer’s team the developer tasks with being the project manager. 4. The developer shall be completely responsible for integrating staff directions found in FP documents issued by Planning Division staff into civil engineering plans that the engineering of record submits to PW. 5. If, when, and where conflicting directions arise between FP directions and CEP directions, the developer shall be responsible for communicating with formal cover or transmittal letters messages from the conflicting division to the other division, and shall communicate such. 6. The Planning Division observes the CEP for other projects has come after land use final decision and before the building permit stage. Except where otherwise conditioned, it’s up to the developer to determine when to submit for CEP and PUD Final Plan relative to each other to best meet this “context and project management” condition. B. PUD Final Plan review scope and result: 1. The scope of FP review includes any topic for which any given final decision condition of approval, and any separate document it might reference, is too general to establish civil engineering standards and construction levels of detail. It also includes any topic or situation for which no standard exists through previous adoption by PW or, where applicable, parks and recreation staff. It includes, as examples, pavement, game and sports courts and fields, buildings including pre- fabricated ones, playgrounds and other structures including pre-fabricated ones, exterior lights, landscaping, signage, and appurtenances such as benches, bicycle parking, dog waste stations, ornamental fountains, and water fountains, as well as materials, textures, colors, and model specifications. (Although in or partially in ROW, a bus shelter or shelters are to be subject to FP instead of CEP based on PW preference, unless PW were to direct the engineer of record to include such in CEP scope.) 2. There shall result an official version of a civil engineering plan set marked approved by PW that shows all common area improvements and all public improvements, including off-street public improvements, resulting from both FP review and CEP. It 83 ---PAGE BREAK--- Trillium Reserve ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report Attachment 102 Page 56 of 56 shall come to be prior to building permit application; however, PW is prohibited from approving any time prior to the developer paying conditioned fees related to CEP Planning Division review. C. Submittal directions FP review: 1. Due date: For CEP, none other than what PW might specify. For FP, original / 1st submittal is due whichever occurs earlier: When the developer applies for either CEP or final plat application to the City. 2. Cover letter: Upon submitting CEP application to PW, simultaneously alert the Planning Division through a cover letter to the attention of the Planning Division referencing the intended or, if known, actual submittal date as well as the project name, tax lot number(s), street address(es), and the land use final decision conditions of approval that require the public improvements that ares the subject of the civil engineering plans. Referencing conditions may be by quotation or citing the identification numbers T-A1). Identify the specific sheet (by number) or document page number that illustrates or notes how each part of a condition is met. 3. Contact information: State the applicant’s name, company, phone number, e-mail, and desired date for City staff to respond with review comments. The cover letter to the Planning Division may include these. The developer may submit to the Planning Division a copy of the stamped CEP application form submitted to PW if the form includes the required information. D. Site Plans: For CEP Planning Division review and FP: 1. CEP: Submit to the attention of the Planning Division at least 2 plan size copies of plan sets, one plotted at native scale (min 22 by 34 inches, max 24 by 36) and one at ledger (11 by 17). Within the cover sheet title block(s), include the anticipated date of submittal and the phrase “civil engineering plans”, “civil plans for CEP”, or “public improvements civil plans”. 2. FP: Submit to the attention of the Planning Division at least 6 plan size copies of plan sets, 3 plotted at native scale (min 22 by 34 inches, max 24 by 36) and 3 at ledger (11 by 17). Within the cover sheet title block(s), include the anticipated date of submittal. 3. Both: Fold the plan size sets if thin enough to do so. Submit also Adobe PDFs using a fileshare service. 84 ---PAGE BREAK--- Engineering & Project Delivery 190 Garfield Street ● Woodburn, Oregon 97071 Ph. 5030-982-5240 ● Fax [PHONE REDACTED] Public Works Comments ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, SUB 2020-03, ZC 2020-02 Schultz Farm _ Dove Landing PUD _ Land Use Application March 16, 2021 A. CONDITIONS OF LAND USE APPROVAL: 1. The Applicant, not the City, is responsible for obtaining any necessary permits from the State, Marion County, Oregon Division of State Lands, US Army Corps of Engineering and/or federal agencies that may require such permit or approval for the construction of this development. 2. Applicant to provide a final Engineer stamped storm drainage hydraulic analysis report for the detention and conveyance system. The storm drainage hydraulic analysis shall comply with Marion County, Oregon Division of State Lands, US Army Corps of Engineering and City’s requirements, as applicable. 3. Prior to land use approval, Applicant to provide an Engineering Certification that the proposed storm conveyance from the Dove Landing development will not increase the historical storm flows to the drainage system and will not increase the 100-year floodplain/floodway elevations or inundation boundaries on any properties. B. CONDITIONS TO BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO CIVIL PLANS APPROVAL: 1. If applicable, applicant to provide a copy of approved permit(s) from the Oregon Division of State Lands and US Army Corps of Engineering and Marion County, as applicable, if a permit shall be obtained for discharging storm drainage into state lands. This permit(s) shall be obtained prior to City approval of the Dove Landing PUD Civil Plans. 2. Applicant to provide a Flood Study Analysis (Hydraulic Model) for the future 100 year floodplain and floodway boundaries and inundation boundaries on the adjacent properties east of N Boones Ferry Road. The analysis shall reflect full- buildout conditions for the Dove Landing PUD development. 3. Applicant is responsible for correcting/upgrading any storm drainage capacity deficiencies, including upgrading private storm drainage systems or installing a new drainage system as per City’s requirements and per approved Storm Drainage Hydraulic Analysis Report. 85 Attachment 102A ---PAGE BREAK--- Engineering & Project Delivery 190 Garfield Street ● Woodburn, Oregon 97071 Ph. 5030-982-5240 ● Fax [PHONE REDACTED] 4. Applicant is responsible for correcting/upgrading the storm drainage pipes under N Boones Ferry Road if structural or capacity deficiencies are encountered during the Civil Plans review. 5. The applicant is responsible for potential improvements to the existing gravity main, located between the proposed connection to the existing main and the Vanderbeck Pump Station, due to the proposed development. Applicant is also responsible for upgrades to the Vanderbeck Pump Station and force main due to the applicant’s development. The City is collecting flow data on the existing gravity main by Vanderbeck Pump Station and information is expected to be provided to the applicant by late spring of 2021. 6. Applicant to provide a flexible pavement structured designed, for all new public streets, by a registered professional engineer using subgrade reaction appropriate for the site, traffic index, and a 20-year design life for pavement system. Structure thicknesses shall not be less than values form table on City of Woodburn Standard Detail No. 42001 ( Typical Pavement Structure). 7. Applicant is require to upgrade the existing cross-section of N Boones Ferry Road to the City’s minimum cross-section standards for a minor arterial, as applicable. 8. Applicant to provide for the installation of all franchise utilities and shall provide any required easements for these facilities. All permanent utility services to the development shall be underground. 9. A Department of Environmental Quality Erosion Control 1200C permit is required for this development prior to City issuance of approval civil plans. 10. All sewer mains are a gravity system and the termini of sewer lines locations and depths shall be such that it is suited for future extensions to adjoining areas. 11. On-site existing water wells and subsurface sewage disposal systems shall be abandoned by the applicant in accordance with all state regulations and requirements. 86 ---PAGE BREAK--- Engineering & Project Delivery 190 Garfield Street ● Woodburn, Oregon 97071 Ph. 5030-982-5240 ● Fax [PHONE REDACTED] 12. Final review of the Civil Plans will be done during the Subdivision Application for Construction. Public infrastructure will be constructed in accordance with plans approved by Public Works and Marion County (where applicable). 87 ---PAGE BREAK--- P STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD O STREET E STREET D STREET C STREET EAGLE DRIVE RAVEN STREET ROANOKE STREET ASTOR WAY FAIRWAY STREET BOGIE COURT CHAMPIONSHIP DRIVE HAZELNUT DRIVE 1 INCH = 200 FEET 200 100 200 SCALE 0 ELEVATIONS ARE BASED OFF OF MARION COUNTY CONTROL POINT NO. 9214, BEING A MARION COUNTY STAMPED MR 6 CR 513 BRASS CAP IN MONUMENT BOX SET IN PAVEMENT. ELEVATION DATUM: NGVD 29, ELEVATION = 181.174 CITY OF WOODBURN CITY OF WOODBURN CITY OF WOODBURN PORTLAND GENERAL ELECTRIC NORTHWEST NATURAL WOODBURN FIRE DISTRICT WOODBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT WOODBURN SCHOOL DISTRICT FRONTIER REPUBLIC SERVICES CENTURYLINK UTILITIES & SERVICES : WATER: STORM: SEWER: POWER: GAS: FIRE: POLICE: SCHOOL: PHONE: WASTE DISPOSAL: CABLE: BENCHMARK: APPLICANT: PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN , INC 12564 SW MAIN ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: CRAIG LARSON, PE CIVIL ENGINEER : PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN , INC 12564 SW MAIN ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: STACY CONNERY, AICP ERIC HAWKINSON PLANNER: LANCASTER MOBLEY 321 SW 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 400 PORTLAND, OR 97204 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: JESSICA HIJAR TRAFFIC ENGINEER : GEO CONSULTANTS NORTHWEST, INC. 2839 SE MILWAUKIE AVENUE PORTLAND, OREGON 97202 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: BRAD HUPY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER : 1 COVER SHEET 2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS BOONES FERRY 3 SITE AERIAL 4 CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5 SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN 6.1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 6.2 PRELIMINARY PLAT 7 GRADING PLAN 8 PRELIMINARY SANITARY PLAN 9 PRELIMINARY WATER PLAN 10.1 PRELIMINARY STORM PLAN 10.2 PRELIMINARY STORM PLAN 11 COMMON AREA AND OPEN SPACE PLAN 12.1 STREETS, PATHS, CROSS SECTIONS 12.2 STREETS, PATHS, CROSS SECTIONS BOONES FERRY 13.1 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 13.2 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 13.3 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 13.4 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 13.5 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 13.6 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 13.7 TREE PROTECTION PLAN 14.1 TREE INVENTORY 14.2 TREE INVENTORY 14.3 TREE INVENTORY 14.4 TREE INVENTORY 14.5 TREE INVENTORY 14.6 TREE INVENTORY 14.7 TREE INVENTORY SHEET INDEX: LEGEND: PROPERTY LINES PROJECT BOUNDARY GROSS ACREAGE: 31.86 AC PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN, INC 12564 SW MAIN ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: TRAVIS JANSEN, PLS, PE SURVEYOR: PACIFIC HABITAT SERVICES, INC. 9450 SW COMMERCE CIRCLE, SUITE 180 WILSONVILLE, OR 97070 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: JOHN VAN STAVEREN NATURAL RESOURCE CONSULTANT: ROW LINES PACIFIC COMMUNITY DESIGN , INC 12564 SW MAIN ST. TIGARD, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: KERRY LANKFORD, RLA, CLARB LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT : VICINITY MAP I-5 NE BOONES FERRY ROAD PROJECT SITE NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(1) COVER.dwg - SHEET: COVER Feb 09, 2021 - 4:52pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] TL 400 & 800 TOWNSHIP 5 SOUTH, RANGE 1 WEST, SEC. 6 W.M. MARION COUNTY , OREGON DOVE LANDING PUD OWNER: SCHULT= FARM, LLC 16710 NE BOONES FERRY ROAD WOODBURN, OREGON, 97071 CONTACT: CHRISTY SCHULT= ETTRO CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC 340 OSWEGO POINTE DRIVE LAKE OSWEGO, OREGON, 97034 [PHONE REDACTED] CONTACT: PETER ETTRO 1 COVER CROSBY ROAD NE MT HOOD AVENUE L1 STREET TREE PLANTING OPEN SPACE LOCATION PLAN L2 STREET TREE DETAILS AND NOTES L3 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN L4 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN L5 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN L6 PARK PLANTING PLAN L7 PARK DETAILS L8 POND PLANTING PLAN Attachment 103 Sheet 1 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 177 177 178 178 179 179 175 175 173 173 174 174 176 176 1 NE BOONES FERRY ROAD SEE EXISTING BOONES FERRY ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL SECTION FOR EXISTING ROADWAY 67.00' ROW 37.00' 30.00' EXISTING STORM CULVERT EXISTING STORM PIPE EXISTING CATCHBASIN COLLECTING RUNOFF FROM BOONES FERRY NE HAZELNUT DRIVE EXISTING PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES TO TO BE UNDERGROUNDED POWER POLE TO REMAIN POWER POLE TO REMAIN NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BOONES FERRY ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL R/W R/W 25.5' OPEN SPACE 11.0' TRAVEL LANE VARIES 67.0' RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING CENTERLINE 11.0' TRAVEL LANE VARIES 0.5' 0.5' 37.0' 30.0' 23.0' PAVED WIDTH 18.5' OPEN SPACE B1 1 INCH = 40 FEET 40 20 40 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(2) EXISTING CONDITIONS.dwg - SHEET: 2.2 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:52pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 2.2 BOONES FERRY CONDITIONS EXISTING EX AIR RELEASE VALVE EX BLOW-OFF EX WATER VALVE EX WATER METER EX FIRE HYDRANT EX STORM CLEANOUT EX AREA DRAIN EX SANITARY CLEANOUT EX STORM MANHOLE EX SANITARY MANHOLE EX GAS VALVE EX CABLE RISER EX TELEPHONE RISER EXISTING FENCE X EX TREES EX LIGHT POLE S C S D EX CURB INLET T EX BURIED POWER LINE EX GAS LINE EX WATER LINE EX STORM DRAIN EX SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LINES EX OVERHEAD POWER LINE EX TELEPHONE LINE EX CABLE TV LINE LEGEND EX 2-FOOT CONTOURS EX 10-FOOT CONTOURS EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING CENTERLINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING PAVEMENT EXISTING GRAVEL EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING NON-JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND TO BE FILLED EXISTING WETLAND BUFFER EXISTING WATERS EX TREES TO BE REMOVED FILLED WETLANDS NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING FILBERT TREES TO BE REMOVED. 2. FOR TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SEE SHEET 13.1-13.7. ---PAGE BREAK--- FUTURE TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT PROJECT BOUNDARY EXISTING TREE GROVE 1 INCH = 100 FEET 100 50 100 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(3) AERIAL.dwg - SHEET: 3 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:52pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 3 AERIAL SITE 90 ---PAGE BREAK--- PROJECT BOUNDARY 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 9 OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE STORM PROPOSED TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT PARK O STREET P STREET C STREET D STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD E STREET * * * * 70 68 67 66 65 64 63 58 61 60 59 56 57 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 43 46 45 44 41 42 40 131 130 129 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 TRACT O 100 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 TRACT N 101 115 24 32 25 33 26 34 27 28 29 30 23 31 148 135 147 134 146 133 153 145 132 152 144 151 143 150 137 149 136 5 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 8 16 1 9 17 2 10 18 3 11 19 4 12 20 160 161 154 162 155 163 156 164 157 165 158 166 159 139 140 141 142 138 39 TRACT F 35 36 37 38 TRACT K TRACT G TRACT H TRACT I TRACT C TRACT E TRACT J TRACT D TRACT B TRACT A 62 69 TRACT M 76 84 47 85 55 TRACT L 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 73 75 74 71 72 92 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 86 91 90 89 88 87 128 ALLEY 1 1 INCH = 100 FEET 100 50 100 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(4) CONCEPT SITE PLAN.dwg - SHEET: 4 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:53pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 4 ALTERNATIVE 2 SITE PLAN CONCEPT OPEN SPACE PARKS/TRAILS, LANDSCAPE TRACTS9.55 AC 30% STORMWATER FACILITY 1.17 AC 3% LAND USE - RESIDENTIAL AREA % SITE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS 10' MAJOR TRAIL GROSS SITE AREA 31.86 AC 100 % LEGEND - PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN 8' MINOR TRAIL 6' WOOD CHIP TRAIL FRONT LOADED - 40' X 110' LOT 39 FRONT LOADED - 40' X 96' LOT 35 REAR LOADED - 30' X 90' LOT 73 REAR LOADED - 35' X 90' LOT 19 TOTAL 166 SIDEWALKS AND PATHWAYS DENSITY GROSS AREA 31.86 AC - ROW 7.62 AC NET AREA 24.24 AC MIN. DENSITY -5.2 UNITS/AC X 24.24 AC = 126 UNITS MAX. DENSITY -7.26 UNITS/AC X 24.24 AC = 176 UNITS VEHICLE ELEMENTS PROPOSED ROAD CONNECTION CONNECTIVITY EXISTING COLLECTOR FUTURE ROAD CONNECTION * PROPOSED PUBLIC ALLEY ---PAGE BREAK--- O STREET P STREET C STREET D STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD E STREET OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE PARK OPEN SPACE STORM 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 5.00' PUE, TYP. 8.00' PUE, TYP. TL 051W06C-00900 TL 051W06C-01000 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT EXISTING STORM LINE THROUGH TRACT D WILL BE RE-ALIGNED 8.00' PUE, TYP. INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL THIS SHEET INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL THIS SHEET INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL THIS SHEET INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL THIS SHEET. INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL THIS SHEET. NE BOONES FERRY ROAD NE HAZELNUT DRIVE 5.00' PUE, TYP. INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL THIS SHEET 133 153 145 132 152 144 151 143 150 137 149 136 5 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 8 16 1 9 17 2 10 18 3 11 19 4 12 20 160 161 154 162 155 163 156 164 157 165 158 166 159 139 140 141 142 138 39 TRACT F 35 36 37 38 TRACT K TRACT G TRACT H TRACT I TRACT D TRACT B 62 69 TRACT M 76 84 47 85 55 TRACT L 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 73 75 74 71 72 115 24 32 25 33 26 34 27 28 29 30 23 31 148 135 147 134 146 70 68 67 66 65 64 63 58 61 60 59 56 57 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 43 46 45 44 41 42 40 131 130 129 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 TRACT O 100 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 TRACT N 101 92 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 86 91 90 89 88 87 128 TRACT C TRACT E TRACT J TRACT A ALLEY 1 O STREET D STREET 15.00' BUILDING 20.00' GARAGE 5.00' SIDE YARD 10.00' STREET SIDE YARD 15.00' REAR YARD 5.00' PUE, TYP. 10.00' PORCH 10.00' COVERED PORCH 24 23 24" 24" 1 1/2" R 2"B 2"B 2"B 5/8" 3/8" 1/2" TYP. 11 2" 3"C 2"B 2"B 2"B 2"B 3/4" (6X) 11 2" NOTE: ALL LETTERS TO BE BLACK ON A WHITE TYPE III RELECTIVE BACKGROUND. E STREET P STREET 8.00' BUILDING 20.00' GARAGE 7.00' STREET SIDE YARD 10.00' BUILDING 86 87 ALLEY A 0.50' SIDE YARD 5.50' SIDE YARD 15.00' BUILDING OVERHANG BUILDINGS SHOWN FOR VISUAL REFERENCE ONLY. THE BUILDER INTENDS TO USE THE CITY’S DESIGN STANDARDS (CHAPTER 3.07.03) WHEN PROPOSING ARCHITECTURE AT A LATER STAGE, TYPICAL OF ALL PROPOSED BUILDINGS SHOWN. 1 2 15.00' BUILDING 0.50' SIDE YARD 10.00' STREET SIDE YARD 15.00' REAR YARD 10.00' PORCH 10.00' COVERED PORCH 20.00' GARAGE 5.50' SIDE YARD O STREET 5.00' PUE, TYP. 1 INCH = 80 FEET 80 40 80 6C$/E 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(5) SPECIFIC SITE PLAN.dwg - SHEET: 5 Feb 09, 2021 - 5:14pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 5 SITE PLAN SPECIFIC EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED SIDEWALK PROPOSED A.C. PAVING LEGEND EXISTING SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED CENTERLINE EXISTING CENTERLINE VISION CLEARANCE TRIANGLE PROPOSED PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE EXISTING BOUNDARY LINE PROPOSED HANDICAP RAMP TYPICAL FRONT LOADED SETBACK - OPTION B PROPOSED STREET LIGHT FUTURE STREET CONNECTION SIGN TO BE MOUNTED ON PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT TYPICAL REAR LOADED SETBACK TYPICAL FRONT LOADED SETBACK - OPTION A ---PAGE BREAK--- TRACT M 1,350 SF TRACT N 1,350 SF 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' VARIES VARIES P STREET O STREET E STREET D STREET S01°51'52"W N88°59'51"W SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT STORM SEWER EASEMENT STORM SEWER EASEMENT STORM SEWER EASEMENT EX. UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE EASEMENT EX. PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 1001.19' 838.50' 838.50' 535.29' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 16.00' EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT (FOLLOWS EXISTING STORM LINE) PBPE OVER ENTIRETY PUBPE AND STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER ENTIRETY PBPE OVER ENTIRETY 40.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 15.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 35.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 15.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 40.0' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' S46°00'09"W 35.0' 30.0' S01°51'48"W 729.90' 30.0' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' S43°59'51"E S01°00'09"W 89.00' S01°00'09"W 1.00' 50.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 15.0' 110.0' 15.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' N46°00'09"E 30.0' 50.0' N01°00'09"E 1.00' N01°00'09"E 89.00' S01°00'09"W 96.00' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' N01°00'09"E 96.00' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' S01°00'09"W 96.00' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 45.0' 96.0' 45.0' 45.0' 96.0' 45.0' 40.0' N01°00'09"E 96.00' 40.0' S88°55'16"E 1373.8' 298.7' 23.0' 15.0' 46.7' 23 5,414 SF 148 3,840 SF 147 3,840 SF 146 3,840 SF 153 3,840 SF 145 4,320 SF 152 3,840 SF 144 4,320 SF 151 3,840 SF 143 3,840 SF 150 3,840 SF 149 3,840 SF 5 4,400 SF 13 4,400 SF 21 4,400 SF 6 4,400 SF 14 4,400 SF 22 5,414 SF 7 4,400 SF 15 4,400 SF 8 4,400 SF 16 4,400 SF 1 5,414 SF 9 4,400 SF 17 4,400 SF 2 4,400 SF 10 4,400 SF 18 4,400 SF 3 4,400 SF 11 4,400 SF 19 4,400 SF 4 4,400 SF 12 4,400 SF 20 4,400 SF 160 3,840 SF 161 3,840 SF 154 3,840 SF 162 3,840 SF 155 3,840 SF 163 3,840 SF 156 3,840 SF 164 3,840 SF 157 3,840 SF 165 3,840 SF 158 3,840 SF 166 3,840 SF 159 3,840 SF TRACT C 60 SF TRACT B 1,650 SF TRACT A 40 SF 62 2,700 SF 69 3,150 SF 76 2,700 SF 84 2,700 SF 85 3,514 SF 55 3,150 SF TRACT L 3,150 SF 83 2,700 SF 82 2,700 SF 81 2,700 SF 80 2,700 SF 79 2,700 SF 78 2,700 SF 77 2,700 SF 73 2,700 SF 75 3,150 SF 74 2,700 SF 71 2,700 SF 72 2,700 SF 70 3,150 SF 68 2,700 SF 67 2,700 SF 66 2,700 SF 65 2,700 SF 64 3,150 SF 63 2,700 SF 58 2,700 SF 61 2,700 SF 60 2,700 SF 59 2,700 SF 56 3,150 SF 57 2,700 SF 116 3,150 SF TRACT O 3,150 SF 100 2,700 SF 114 2,700 SF 113 2,700 SF 112 2,700 SF 111 2,700 SF 110 2,700 SF 109 2,700 SF 108 2,700 SF 107 3,150 SF 106 2,700 SF 105 2,700 SF 104 2,700 SF 103 2,700 SF 102 3,150 SF 101 3,150 SF 92 2,700 SF 99 2,700 SF 98 2,700 SF 97 2,700 SF 96 3,150 SF 95 2,700 SF 94 2,700 SF 93 2,700 SF 86 3,514 SF 91 2,700 SF 90 2,700 SF 89 2,700 SF 88 2,700 SF 87 2,700 SF 115 3,150 SF TRACT K 313,840 SF PBPE OVER ENTIRETY PBPE OVER ENTIRETY N88°59'51"W 40.01' 1.00' 40.00' N88°59'51"W 60.00' 60.00' S01°00'09"W 1.00' S01°00'09"W 89.00' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' S43°59'51"E S88°59'51"E 30.00' 35.0' N88°59'51"W S88°59'51"E S01°00'09"W N88°59'51"W N88°59'51"W S88°59'51"E 429.0' 40.0' 89.0' 70.0' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' S43°59'51"E 20.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 15.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 35.0' 35.0' 35.0' 35.0' 35.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 15.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 20.0' 70.0' PBPE OVER ENTIRETY S01°00'09"W ALLEY 1 S88°59'51"E PUBPE AND STORM WATER DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER ENTIRETY PBPE OVER ENTIRETY 20.00' 1 INCH = 50 FEET 50 25 50 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(6) PPLAT.dwg - SHEET: 6.1 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:54pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] MATCH SHEET 6.2 6.1 PLAT PRELIMINARY LEGEND PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PBPE PUBLIC BICYCLE/ PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT PUBPE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC BICYCLE/ PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT CAE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT TO BENEFIT TAX LOT 051W06C000900 TCE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO BENEFIT TAX LOT 051W06C000900 ---PAGE BREAK--- 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' P STREET O STREET C STREET C STREET O STREET P STREET 60.00' 60.00' 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE 5.00' PUE N88°59'51"W N88°27'56"W S85°36'39"E S80°05'15"E S88°55'21"E 1373.79' 9.00' ROW DEDICATION 67.00' 76.00' 9.00' ROW DEDICATION 9.00' ROW DEDICATION NE BOONES FERRY ROAD 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 15.00' EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENT 8.00' PUE 8.00' PUE 8.00' PUE PBPE OVER ENTIRETY STORMWATER FACILITY EASEMENT AND PBPE OVER ENTIRETY PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT OVER ENTIRETY EXISTING STORM LINE THROUGH TRACT D WILL BE RE-ALIGNED PBPE OVER ENTIRETY PBPE OVER ENTIRETY PBPE OVER ENTIRETY PUE 30' TCE 20' CAE TAX LOT 051W06C000900 90.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' R=380.0' L=7.3' D=1°05'45" CH=7.3' S88°26'59"E 22.7' 90.4' R=380.0' L=30.1' D=4°31'56" CH=30.1' S85°38'09"E 30.0' 35.0' R=380.0' L=45.6' D=6°52'30" CH=45.6' S79°55'55"E 30.0' 90.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 30.0' 90.0' 35.0' 90.1' 30.0' 91.6' 30.0' 22.7' R=360.0' L=7.3' D=1°09'24" CH=7.3' N88°25'09"W 94.8' 30.0' R=360.0' L=30.1' D=4°47'07" CH=30.1' N85°26'54"W 97.9' 30.0' R=360.0' L=45.7' D=7°16'05" CH=45.6' N79°25'18"W 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 40.0' 96.0 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' 40.0' 96.0' 40.0' R=470.0' L=14.6' D=1°47'09" CH=14.6' N88°06'17"W 96.1' R=374.0' L=14.7' D=2°14'40" CH=14.6' S87°52'31"E 25.4' 25.4' R=470.0' L=40.1' D=4°53'28" CH=40.1' N84°45'58"W 96.8' R=374.0' L=40.2' D=6°09'27" CH=40.2' S83°40'28"E 77.2' R=374.0' L=49.1' D=7°31'27" CH=49.1' S76°50'01"E R=470.0' L=48.2' D=5°52'28" CH=48.2' N79°23'00"W R=20.0' L=30.9' D=88°29'55" CH=27.9' N32°11'49"W R=20.0' L=27.3' D=78°16'21" CH=25.2' S27°05'02"E S12°03'09"W 46.39' R=230.0' L=44.4' D=11°03'00" CH=44.3' S06°31'39"W 79.2' R=20.0' L=38.8' D=111°08'12" CH=33.0' S56°34'15"W R=470.0' L=68.4' D=8°20'02" CH=68.3' N63°41'39"W R=530.0' L=59.7' D=6°27'14" CH=59.7' N62°45'15"W 202.0' R=470.0' L=46.8' D=5°42'23" CH=46.8' S64°18'17"E R=530.0' L=44.1' D=4°46'07" CH=44.1' S63°50'09"E R=530.0' L=72.4' D=7°49'29" CH=72.3' N69°53'36"W N73°48'21"W 157.90' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' N28°48'21"W 119.6' R=11420.9' L=40.4' D=0°12'10" CH=40.4' N16°17'44"E R=20.0' L=31.3' D=89°47'50" CH=28.2' N61°17'44"E S73°48'21"E 184.33' R=470.0' L=54.5' D=6°38'53" CH=54.5' S70°28'54"E R=470.0' L=42.6' D=5°11'14" CH=42.5' S69°06'41"E 203.7' 40.0' 218.1' R=470.0' L=44.2' D=5°23'24" CH=44.2' S63°49'22"E 184.9' 40.0' R=470.0' L=13.1' D=1°36'02" CH=13.1' S60°19'39"E R=530.0' L=32.2' D=3°28'44" CH=32.2' S61°16'00"E 163.6' 40.0' R=530.0' L=43.7' D=4°43'17" CH=43.7' S65°22'00"E 146.1' 40.0' R=530.0' L=38.0' D=4°06'39" CH=38.0' S69°46'58"E R=20.0' L=25.4' D=72°50'26" CH=23.7' S35°25'04"E 113.5' S01°00'09"W 1.00' 50.0' R=20.0' L=33.7' D=96°30'02" CH=29.8' N49°15'10"E R=530.0' L=37.9' D=4°05'34" CH=37.9' S84°32'36"E 110.5' 60.0' N01°00'09"E 1.00' 92.5' R=530.0' L=22.3' D=2°24'28" CH=22.3' S87°47'37"E 17.7' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 15.0' 110.0' 15.0' 40.0' 40.0' 110.0' 40.0' 40.0' R=230.0' L=73.0' D=18°11'42" CH=72.7' S02°57'18"W R=170.0' L=54.0' D=18°11'42" CH=53.8' S02°57'18"W 91.3' R=20.0' L=36.4' D=104°23'03" CH=31.6' S64°14'40"W R=470.0' L=17.3' D=2°06'43" CH=17.3' N62°30'27"W R=530.0' L=114.3' D=12°21'15" CH=114.1' N67°37'43"W N73°48'21"W 183.54' R=20.0' L=31.7' D=90°42'20" CH=28.5' N28°27'11"W R=11420.9' L=36.1' D=0°10'53" CH=36.1' N16°59'25"E 242.7' 156.5' 94.9' S12°03'09"W 1.00' 51.7' 114.5' 28.1' R=230.0' L=73.0' D=18°11'42" CH=72.7' N02°57'18"E R=170.0' L=54.0' D=18°11'42" CH=53.8' N02°57'18"E 53.9' N12°03'09"E 1.00' 24 4,400 SF 32 4,400 SF 25 4,400 SF 33 4,403 SF 26 4,400 SF 34 6,657 SF 27 4,400 SF 28 4,400 SF 29 4,400 SF 30 4,400 SF 31 4,400 SF 135 3,840 SF 134 3,840 SF 133 3,855 SF 132 5,529 SF 137 3,840 SF 136 3,840 SF 139 3,840 SF 140 3,840 SF 141 3,840 SF 138 3,840 SF 39 8,450 SF TRACT F 15,664 SF 35 6,824 SF 36 6,181 SF 37 6,961 SF 38 7,786 SF TRACT G 50,810 SF TRACT H 25,417 SF TRACT I 48,558 SF TRACT D 1,650 SF 47 3,150 SF 54 2,700 SF 53 2,700 SF 52 2,700 SF 51 3,150 SF 50 2,700 SF 49 2,700 SF 48 2,700 SF 43 2,700 SF 46 2,700 SF 45 2,700 SF 44 3,150 SF 41 2,704 SF 42 2,700 SF 40 4,033 SF 131 3,864 SF 130 2,891 SF 129 2,792 SF 127 3,150 SF 126 2,700 SF 125 2,700 SF 124 3,150 SF 123 2,700 SF 122 2,700 SF 121 2,700 SF 120 3,150 SF 119 2,700 SF 118 2,700 SF 117 2,700 SF 128 2,722 SF 142 3,840 SF TRACT K 313,840 SF N88°59'51"W 60.00' 60.00' S80°05'15"E 60.04' 60.04' TRACT E 60 SF TRACT J 60 SF R=470.0' L=17.2' D=2°06'03" CH=17.2' S72°45'19"E S73°48'21"E 157.90' R=20.0' L=31.4' D=90°00'00" CH=28.3' N61°11'39"E 28.7' R=1471.5' L=28.0' D=1°05'28" CH=28.0' N16°44'23"E 9.4' R=1462.5' L=30.4' D=1°11'26" CH=30.4' S16°47'22"W S16°11'39"W 248.30' R=11429.9' L=174.9' D=0°52'36" CH=174.9' S16°37'57"W 9.2' N88°59'51"W S01°00'09"W R=470.0' L=42.6' D=5°11'14" CH=42.5' S69°06'41"E 9.9' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 23.5' R=530.0' L=11.5' D=1°14'20" CH=11.5' S88°22'41"E R=530.0' L=30.0' D=3°14'52" CH=30.0' S86°08'05"E R=530.0' L=30.2' D=3°15'44" CH=30.2' S82°52'48"E R=530.0' L=30.4' D=3°17'16" CH=30.4' S79°36'18"E R=530.0' L=11.5' D=1°14'31" CH=11.5' S77°20'25"E R=20.0' L=31.8' D=91°13'42" CH=28.6' N57°40'00"E 35.0' R=170.0' L=32.8' D=11°03'00" CH=32.7' N06°31'39"E 74.7' R=20.0' L=28.6' D=82°02'47" CH=26.3' N40°01'15"W R=470.0' L=27.9' D=3°24'21" CH=27.9' N82°44'49"W R=470.0' L=30.0' D=3°39'43" CH=30.0' N86°16'51"W R=470.0' L=7.3' D=0°53'09" CH=7.3' N88°33'17"W 22.7' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' 35.0' 30.0' 30.0' 30.0' ALLEY 1 N01°00'09"E S88°59'51"E S88°59'51"E N88°59'51"W N88°59'51"W 20.00' 1 INCH = 50 FEET 50 25 50 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(6) PPLAT.dwg - SHEET: 6.2 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:54pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] MATCH SHEET 6.1 6.2 PLAT PRELIMINARY LEGEND PUE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PBPE PUBLIC BICYCLE/ PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT PUBPE PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC BICYCLE/ PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT CAE CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT TO BENEFIT TAX LOT 051W06C000900 TCE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT TO BENEFIT TAX LOT 051W06C000900 ---PAGE BREAK--- OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE PARK OPEN SPACE STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITY BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION = 167.0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W/S SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS MAXIMUM STORM COVER 13' MAXIMUM STORM COVER 15' MINIMUM STORM COVER 3.5' MINIMUM STORM COVER 3.5' LOTS MAY NEED WEEPHOLES TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY LOTS MAY NEED WEEPHOLES TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY EMERGENCY OVERFLOW DRAINAGE PATH CONNECTION POINT IE=166.21 STORM LINE CRITICAL PATH AT 0.34% SLOPE WITH 0.1' OF DROP IN MANHOLE D SD SD SD SD EXISTING 24" STORM LINE TO BE RE-ROUTED BUILD MANHOLE OVER EXISTING 24" STORM LINE CONSTRUCT DITCH INLET IN EXISTING DITCH TO COLLECT RUNOFF FROM SOUTH CONSTRUCT DITCH INLET IN EXISTING DITCH TO COLLECT RUNOFF FROM NORTH BUILD CONCRETE CULVERT FOR TRACT G RUNOFF SS SS SD STORM SEWER TO BE EXTENDED TO PROPERTY LINE FOR FUTURE CONNECITON STORM SEWER TO BE EXTENDED TO PROPERTY LINE FOR FUTURE CONNECITON STORM SEWER TO BE EXTENDED TO PROPERTY LINE FOR FUTURE CONNECITON EXISTING 24" STORM RE-ROUTE PATH EXISTING 24" STORM RE-ROUTE PATH SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD 115 24 32 25 33 26 34 27 28 29 30 23 31 148 135 147 134 146 92 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 86 91 90 89 88 87 128 70 68 67 66 65 64 63 58 61 60 59 56 57 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 43 46 45 44 41 42 40 131 130 129 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 TRACT O 100 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 TRACT N 101 133 153 145 132 152 144 151 143 150 137 149 136 5 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 8 16 1 9 17 2 10 18 3 11 19 4 12 20 160 161 154 162 155 163 156 164 157 165 158 166 159 139 140 141 142 138 39 TRACT F 35 36 37 38 TRACT K TRACT G TRACT H TRACT I TRACT C TRACT E TRACT J TRACT D TRACT B TRACT A 62 69 TRACT M 76 84 47 85 55 TRACT L 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 73 75 74 71 72 O STREET P STREET E STREET D STREET C STREET O STREET P STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD NE HAZELNUT DRIVE ALLEY 1 W W W W W W W CONNECTION POINT IE=166.21 D SD SD SD SD SD SD SD EXISTING 24" STORM LINE TO BE RE-ROUTED PARALLEL 23" CULVERTS CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE AND GO EAST UNDER BOONES FERRY ROAD END POINTS UNKNOWN CONNECT EXISTING 24" STORM LINE RE-ROUTE BY BUILDING MANHOLE OVER EXISTING 24" CULVERT EXISTING 24" CONCRETE CULVERT IE IN= 169.93 EXISTING 24" CONCRETE CULVERT DAYLIGHT IE OUT= 169.43 EXISTING CATCH BASIN RIM = 169.26 IE OUT= 165.81 PARALLEL 23" CULVERTS CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM MANHOLE AND GO EAST UNDER BOONES FERRY ROAD END POINTS UNKNOWN EXISTING 24" CONCRETE PIPE DAYLIGHT IE IN= 170.04 DOVE LANDING POND OUTALL 1 INCH = 80 FEET 80 40 80 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(10) PSD.dwg - SHEET: 10.1 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:55pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 10.1 PLAN STORM SEWER PRELIMINARY PROPOSED THRUST BLOCK PROPOSED AIR RELEASE VALVE EX AIR RELEASE VALVE PROPOSED BLOW-OFF EX BLOW-OFF PROPOSED WATER VALVE EX WATER VALVE PROPOSED WATER METER EX WATER METER PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT EX FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED STORM CLEANOUT EX STORM CLEANOUT EX CATCH BASIN PROPOSED SANITARY CLEANOUT EX SANITARY CLEANOUT EX STORM MANHOLE PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE EX SANITARY MANHOLE PROPOSED SANITARY MANHOLE EX BURIED POWER LINE EX GAS LINE PROPOSED WATER LINE EX WATER LINE EX STORM DRAIN PROPOSED STORM DRAIN EX SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LINES EX OVERHEAD POWER LINE EX TELEPHONE LINE EX CABLE TV LINE D C D S C XT S XCOM XOH XE XSD XW W XG LEGEND XSS SS SD EXISTING WETLAND EXISTING WATERS EXISTING DEGRADED BUFFER EXISTING GOOD BUFFER PROPOSED BUFFER EXISTING SIGNIFICANT TREE GROVE STORM OUTFALL CONNECTION BOONES FERRY DETAIL SCALE: 1" = 10' ---PAGE BREAK--- O STREET P STREET C STREET D STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD E STREET OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE STORM FUTURE TUKWILA DEVELOPMENT 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 9 182 180.5 179 177.5 PARK ALLEY 1 70 68 67 66 65 64 63 58 61 60 59 56 57 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 43 46 45 44 41 42 40 131 130 129 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 TRACT O 100 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 TRACT N 101 133 153 145 132 152 144 151 143 150 137 149 136 5 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 8 16 1 9 17 2 10 18 3 11 19 4 12 20 160 161 154 162 155 163 156 164 157 165 158 166 159 139 140 141 142 138 39 TRACT F 35 36 37 38 TRACT K TRACT G TRACT H TRACT I TRACT C TRACT E TRACT J TRACT D TRACT B TRACT A 62 69 TRACT M 76 84 47 85 55 TRACT L 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 73 75 74 71 72 92 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 86 91 90 89 88 87 128 115 24 32 25 33 26 34 27 28 29 30 23 31 148 135 147 134 146 1 INCH = 80 FEET 80 40 80 SCALE 0 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(11) OPEN SPACE PLAN.dwg - SHEET: 11 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:55pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 SITE PLAN OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE AREA % SITE PEDESTRIAN ELEMENTS 10' MAJOR TRAIL OPEN SPACE TARGET 9.57 AC 30% GROSS SITE AREA 31.86 AC 100 % LEGEND - PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN 8' MAJOR TRAIL 6' WOOD CHIP TRAIL PRIVATE PARK TRACT H 0.58 AC 2% OPEN SPACE TRACT K 7.20 AC 23% OPEN SPACE ALL OTHER TRACTS 1.79 AC 5% OPEN SPACE AREA % SITE STORM FACILITY 1.17 AC 4% ---PAGE BREAK--- O STREET P STREET E STREET A B2 A A A A A C C1 NORTHERLY LINE OF URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY D STREET C STREET O STREET P STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD D1 D E E E E F F F F F F F F F INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL, SEE SHEET 5.1 INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL, SEE SHEET 5.1 INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL, SEE SHEET 5.1 INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL, SEE SHEET 5.1. INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL, SEE SHEET 5.1. NE HAZELNUT DRIVE E1 INSTALL STREET BARRICADE PER MARION COUNTY PERMANENT BARRICADE UNIT DETAIL, SEE SHEET 5.1 F D1 G E 133 153 145 132 152 144 151 143 150 137 149 136 5 13 21 6 14 22 7 15 8 16 1 9 17 2 10 18 3 11 19 4 12 20 160 161 154 162 155 163 156 164 157 165 158 166 159 139 140 141 142 138 39 TRACT F 35 36 37 38 TRACT K TRACT G TRACT H TRACT I TRACT C TRACT E TRACT J TRACT D TRACT B TRACT A 62 69 TRACT M 76 84 47 85 55 TRACT L 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 73 75 74 71 72 70 68 67 66 65 64 63 58 61 60 59 56 57 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 43 46 45 44 41 42 40 131 130 129 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 TRACT O 100 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 TRACT N 101 115 24 32 25 33 26 34 27 28 29 30 23 31 148 135 147 134 146 92 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 86 91 90 89 88 87 128 ALLEY 1 NOT TO SCALE LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET WITH PARKING BOTH SIDES A R/W R/W 60.0' RIGHT OF WAY 1.0' 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' PARKING 6.5' PLANTER 5.0' WALK 34.0' PAVED WIDTH 0.5' CURB 5.0' PUE 1.0' 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' PARKING 6.5' PLANTER 5.0' WALK 0.5' CURB 5.0' PUE 2.5% 2.5% NOT TO SCALE LOCAL RESIDENTIAL 3/4 STREET C R/W R/W 40.0'-45.2' RIGHT OF WAY 1.0' 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' PARKING 6.5' PLANTER 5.0' WALK 27.0' PAVED WIDTH 0.5' CURB 5.0' PUE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 0'-5.2' OPEN SPACE 2.5% 2.5% 2.0' GRAVEL NOT TO SCALE MAJOR TRAIL 1.5% 46.7' TRACT D 10.0' CONCRETE PATH 18.7' STREET TREE 18.0' STREET TREE NOT TO SCALE MINOR TRAIL 1.5% 15.0' TRACT E 8.0' CONCRETE PATH 3.5' 3.5' NOT TO SCALE WOOD CHIP TRAIL VARIES F 6.0' WOOD CHIP PATH NOT TO SCALE LOCAL RESIDENTIAL 3/4 STREET C1 R/W R/W 40.0'-45.2' RIGHT OF WAY 1.0' 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 7.0' PARKING 6.5' PLANTER 5.0' WALK 25.0' - 27.0' PAVED WIDTH 0.5' CURB 5.0' PUE 10.0' TRAVEL LANE 0'-5.2' OPEN SPACE 2.5% 2.5% 2.0' GRAVEL NOT TO SCALE MAJOR TRAIL 1.5% 35.0' TRACT D1 10.0' CONCRETE PATH 17.5' STREET TREE 7.5' STREET TREE NOT TO SCALE PRIVATE ALLEY G R/W R/W 20.0' RIGHT OF WAY 16.5' PAVED WIDTH 2.5% 1.25' MOUNTABLE CURB 1.25' MOUNTABLE CURB 9.5' TRAVEL LANE 9.5' TRAVEL LANE 2.5% NOT TO SCALE MINOR TRAIL 1.5% VARIES MIN. 29.1' TRACT E1 8.0' CONCRETE PATH VARIES MIN. 12.6' 8.5' NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(12) CIRC.dwg - SHEET: 12.1 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:55pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] LEGEND: E ROAD SECTION TYPE SEE SHEET 5.1 FOR DETAILS PROJECT BOUNDARY URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY 1 INCH = 80 FEET 80 40 80 SCALE 0 12.1 & CROSS SECTIONS STREETS, PATHS, ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.0' NOT TO SCALE BOONES FERRY ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL FULL BUILDOUT B R/W R/W 69.0' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 0.5' 12.0' TRAVEL LANE 6.0' BIKE LANE 6.0' PLANTER 8.0' WALK 48.0' PAVED WIDTH 0.5' CURB 8.0' PUE 0.5' 6.0' PLANTER 8.0' WALK 0.5' CURB 8.0' PUE 12.0' TRAVEL LANE 6.0' BIKE LANE FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT 2.5% VARIES 9.0' DEDICATION 78.0' RIGHT OF WAY CL SAWCUT EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT 12.0' TRAVEL LANE 5.0' VARIES NE BOONES FERRY ROAD B2 EXISTING DRIVEWAY FOR NEIGHBORING LOT EXISTING DRIVEWAY FOR NEIGHBORING LOT TO BE MAINTAINED EXISTING STRIPING PROPOSED SAWCUT LINE NE HAZELNUT DRIVE END OF IMPROVEMENTS END OF IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED STRIPING EXISTING STRIPING PROPOSED STRIPING EXISTING WALKWAY FOR NEIGHBORING LOT TO BE MAINTAINED ASPHALT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION CONNECTION ASPHALT PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION CONNECTION EXISTING STRIPING 3:1 PAVEMENT TRANSITION 3:1 PAVEMENT TRANSITION EXISTING STRIPING TRACT F TRACT G 120' TAPER FOR LANE NARROWIN PROPOSED STRIPING 6.0' NOT TO SCALE BOONES FERRY ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL HALF STREET B2 R/W R/W 67.0' EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY 0.5' 6.0' PLANTER 8.0' WALK 0.5' CURB 8.0' PUE 18.0' TRAVEL LANE 2.5% 9.0' DEDICATION 76.0' RIGHT OF WAY CL SAWCUT EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT 5.0' VARIES 25.5' OPEN SPACE VARIES 11.0' TRAVEL LANE 0.5' 35.5' PAVED WIDTH 2.0' 6.0' BIKE LANE 2.5% 2.5% NOT TO SCALE EXISTING BOONES FERRY ROAD MINOR ARTERIAL R/W R/W 25.5' OPEN SPACE 11.0' TRAVEL LANE VARIES 67.0' RIGHT OF WAY EXISTING CENTERLINE 11.0' TRAVEL LANE VARIES 0.5' 0.5' 37.0' 30.0' 23.0' PAVED WIDTH 18.5' OPEN SPACE B1 NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(12) CIRC.dwg - SHEET: 12.2 Feb 09, 2021 - 4:55pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] LEGEND: E ROAD SECTION TYPE SEE SHEET 5.1 FOR DETAILS PROJECT BOUNDARY URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY 12.2 BOONERS FERRY & CROSS SECTIONS STREETS, PATHS, 1 INCH = 40 FEET 40 20 40 SCALE 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O SEE SHEET 13.2 SEE SHEET 13.3 SEE SHEET 13.3 SEE SHEET 13.4 SEE SHEET 13.4 SEE SHEET 13.5 SEE SHEET 13.5 SEE SHEET 13.6 SEE SHEET 13.7 SEE SHEET 13.6 O O O O O O 71002 71003 71004 71005 71006 71007 71008 71009 LEGEND DECIDUOUS CONIFEROUS EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING TREE TO BE RETAINED WITH ROOT PROTECTION ZONE CIRCLE. TREES CLASSIFIED AS SIGNIFICANT ARE SHOWN WITH RED ROOT PROTECTION ZONE CIRCLES. SEE TREE INVENTORY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TREE PROTECTION FENCING PER DTL 1, SHEET 13.1 TREE NUMBER O O O O SCALE 0 1 INCH 0 )EET 0 40 0 GENERAL NOTES: 1. REFER TO "ATTACHMENT A: EXISTING TREE INVENTORY DATA" PREPARED BY MORGAN HOLEN & ASSOCIATES FOR ROOT PROTECTION ZONE DIMENSIONS. 2. SEE SHEET 2 FOR EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TAX MAP INFORMATION. 3. SEE SHEET 7 FOR THE PROPOSED GRADING PLAN AND RETAINING WALL LOCATIONS. 4. SEE SHEETS 8-10 FOR THE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN. 5. SEE SHEETS L1 -L8 FOR LANDSCAPE PLAN. 1. PRECONSTRUCTION CONFERENCE. THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL BE ON SITE TO DISCUSS METHODS OF TREE REMOVAL AND TREE PROTECTION PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 2. ROOT PROTECTION ZONE. THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE IS DEFINED BY A CIRCLE OF PROTECTION EQUAL TO ONE FOOT PER INCH OF TRUNK DIAMETER FOR ON-SITE TREES AND EQUAL TO THE DRIPLINE OF TREE CANOPIES FOR OFF-SITE TREES. WHERE FEASIBLE, TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE RPZ AS A MINIMUM. IF WORK MUST ENCROACH INTO THE RPZ, PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE OPENED OR ADJUSTED IF THE PROJECT ARBORIST DETERMINES THAT THE TREES WILL NOT BE UNDULY DAMAGED. THE LOCATION OF THE RPZ IS SHOWN ON THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. 3. PROTECTION FENCING. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN, ALL TREES TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED BY 5-FOOT TALL 2-INCH MESH CHAIN LINK FENCING SECURED TO 1.5-INCH DIAMETER STEEL OR ALUMINUM POSTS PLACED NO FURTHER THAN 8-FEET ON CENTER. 4. EROSION CONTROL. WHERE NEEDED, EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL ONLY BE INSTALLED OUTSIDE OF THE RPZ OF PROTECTED TREES. 5. ROOT PROTECTION ZONE MAINTENANCE AND PROHIBITIONS. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL NOT BE MOVED, REMOVED OR ENTERED BY EQUIPMENT EXCEPT UNDER DIRECTION OF THE PROJECT ARBORIST. NO SOIL COMPACTION, MATERIALS OR SPOILS STORAGE SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE RPZ. WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION FROM THE PROJECT ARBORIST, NONE OF THE FOLLOWING SHALL OCCUR WITHIN THE RPZ OF ANY PROTECTED TREE: a. GRADE CHANGE OR CUT AND FILL; b. NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES; c. UTILITY OR DRAINAGE FIELD PLACEMENT; OR d. VEHICLE MANEUVERING. THE RPZ MAY BE ENTERED FOR TASKS LIKE SURVEYING, MEASURING AND SAMPLING. FENCES MUST BE CLOSED UPON COMPLETION OF THESE TASKS. CONSTRUCTION THAT IS NECESSARY WITHIN THE RPZ SHALL BE PERFORMED UNDER ARBORIST SUPERVISION. 6. DEBRIS PILE REMOVAL. EXISTING PILES OF EXCESS DIRT AND DEBRIS WITHIN THE RPZ SHALL BE CAREFULLY REMOVED BY HAND AND WITH HAND TOOLS OR WITH A SMALL RUBBER-TRACKED MACHINE OPERATING UNDER ARBORIST SUPERVISION. COORDINATE WITH THE PROJECT ARBORIST PRIOR TO OPENING TREE PROTECTION FENCING TO RESTORE NATIVE GRADE IN THESE AREAS. THE APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF THE DEBRIS PILES IS SHOWN ON THE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN. 7. TREE REMOVAL. WITHIN THE RPZ OF TREES TO REMAIN, CLEARLY MARK TREES APPROVED FOR REMOVAL WITH PAINT OR FLAGGING. DIRECTIONALLY FELL OR SURGICALLY REMOVE TREES TO AVOID CONTACT OR OTHERWISE PREVENT DAMAGE TO THE TRUNKS AND BRANCHES OF TREES TO BE RETAINED. NO VEHICLES OR HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHIN THE RPZ DURING TREE REMOVAL OPERATIONS. TREE REMOVAL SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED TREE SERVICE. 8. STUMP REMOVAL. WITHIN THE RPZ OF TREES TO REMAIN, STUMPS OF TREES PLANNED FOR REMOVAL SHALL REMAIN IN THE GROUND WHERE FEASIBLE. OTHERWISE, STUMPS MAY BE REMOVED BY STUMP GRINDING UP TO SIX INCHES BELOW THE GROUND SURFACE OR EXTRACTED FROM THE GROUND UNDER PROJECT ARBORIST SUPERVISION. 9. POST-CLEARING TREE ASSESSMENT. ONCE THE TREES APPROVED FOR REMOVAL HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND THE SITE IS STAKED AND PREPARED FOR CONSTRUCTION, COORDINATE WITH THE PROJECT ARBORIST TO REASSESS THE REMAINING TREES IN TERMS OF EXPOSURE FROM ADJACENT TREE REMOVAL AND SUITABILITY FOR PRESERVATION. IF ADDITIONAL TREES ARE DETERMINED TO BE STRUCTURALLY UNSOUND OR HAZARDOUS, THE ARBORIST SHALL DOCUMENT RECOMMENDATIONS AND ADDITIONAL NON-SIGNIFICANT TREES MAY BE REMOVED IF AUTHORIZED BY CITY STAFF. 10. PRUNING. PRUNING MAY BE NEEDED TO PROVIDE CLEARANCE TO AVOID CROWN DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION OR TO REMOVE DEAD AND DEFECTIVE BRANCHES FOR SAFETY. THE PROJECT ARBORIST CAN HELP IDENTIFY IF AND WHERE PRUNING IS RECOMMENDED ONCE TREES RECOMMENDED FOR REMOVAL HAVE BEEN REMOVED AND THE SITE IS STAKED AND PREPARED FOR CONSTRUCTION. PRUNING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A QUALIFIED TREE SERVICE. 11. EXCAVATION. EXCAVATION WITHIN THE RPZ SHALL BE AVOIDED IF ALTERNATIVES ARE AVAILABLE. IF EXCAVATION WITHIN THE RPZ IN UNAVOIDABLE, THE PROJECT ARBORIST SHALL EVALUATE THE PROPOSED EXCAVATION TO DETERMINE METHODS TO MINIMIZE IMPACTS TO TREES. ALL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE RPZ SHALL BE UNDER THE ON-SITE TECHNICAL SUPERVISION OF THE PROJECT ARBORIST. 12. WOODCHIP PATH. CHAIN LINK TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE OPENED WHERE THE WOOD CHIP PATH IS PROPOSED TO MEANDER THROUGH THE RPZ. COORDINATE WITH THE PROJECT ARBORIST TO FIELD-FIT AND STAKE THE FINAL ALIGNMENT. ONCE THE ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED, WORK MAY PROCEED WITH A SMALL RUBBER-TRACKED MACHINE USING A FLAT BLADE BUCKET IF TEMPORARY ORANGE PLASTIC MESH FENCING IS FIRST INSTALLED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF THE PROPOSED PATH WITHIN THE RPZ ALLOWING UP TO TWO FEET OF ROOM TO WORK ON EITHER SIDE, IN ORDER TO CREATE A PHYSICAL BARRIER LIMITING THE MACHINE'S ACTIVITY TO THE PATH ALIGNMENT. IF NO TEMPORARY ORANGE PLASTIC MESH FENCING WILL BE INSTALLED, PATH CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROCEED BY HAND AND WITH HAND TOOLS AND WHEEL BARROWS ONLY. EITHER WAY, CAREFULLY REMOVE THE UPPERMOST ORGANIC MATTER ALONG THE PATH ALIGNMENT (NO EXCAVATION). THE EXCESS MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED OUTSIDE OF THE RPZ. ONCE THE PATH IS CLEARED, PLACE A LAYER OF PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ON THE GROUND SURFACE AND TOP THE FABRIC WITH 4-INCHES OF WOOD CHIPS, BUILDING UP FROM NATIVE GRADE. 13. LANDSCAPING. FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION AND PRIOR TO LANDSCAPING, THE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE REMOVED. IVY SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM TREE TRUNKS BY HAND AND WITH HAND TOOLS ONLY. WHERE LANDSCAPING IS DESIRED, APPLY APPROXIMATELY 3-INCHES OF MULCH BENEATH THE DRIPLINE OF PROTECTED TREES, BUT NOT DIRECTLY AGAINST TREE TRUNKS. SHRUBS AND GROUND COVER PLANTS MAY BE PLANTED WITHIN TREE PROTECTION AREAS BY HAND AND FIELD-FITTED TO AVOID TREE ROOT IMPACTS. IF IRRIGATION IS USED, USE DRIP IRRIGATION ONLY BENEATH THE DRIPLINES OF PROTECTED TREES; INSTALL DRIP IRRIGATION LINES ON THE GROUND SURFACE AND COVER WITH MULCH (NO TRENCHING TO INSTALL IRRIGATION LINES BENEATH PROTECTED TREE DRIPLINES). DRIP LINE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (NOT TO SCALE) 1 TREE PROTECTION DETAIL 8' TYP TO BE PROTECTED FENCE SHALL IDEALLY BE LOCATED AT THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE CRITICAL ROOT ZONE. SEE TREE PROTECTION PLAN THIS SHEET 5' CHAIN LINK FENCING. 2" MESH CHAIN LINK SECURED TO 1-1/2" DIA STEEL OR ALUMINUM POSTS NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\142001.(13) TREE PROTECT.dwg - SHEET: 13.1 Feb 09, 2021 - 5:09pm cll [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE 1/15/2021 LANDING PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 13.1 PLAN PRESERVATION TREE MORGAN HOLEN & ASSOCIATES, LLC. MORGAN HOLEN, CONSULTING ARBORIST [PHONE REDACTED] [EMAIL REDACTED] PROJECT ARBORIST: TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS: ---PAGE BREAK--- O STREET P STREET C STREET D STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD E STREET W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W/S SYMBOL COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME: SIZE AND DESCRIPTION QTY 64 TILFORD RED MAPLE / ACER RUBRUM 'TILFORD' : 2" CAL., B&B 64 KWANZAN CHERRY / PRUNUS SERRULATA 'KWANZAN': 2" CAL., B&B 24 GOLDENRAIN TREE / KOELREUTERIA PANICULATA: 2" CAL., B&B 39 23 CHANTICLEER PEAR / PYRUSN CALLERYANA 'GLEN'S FORM' : 2" CAL., B&B 17 HEDGE MAPLE / ACER CAMPESTRE: 2" CAL., B&B STREET TREE LEGEND LAWN- SEED WITH GRASS SEED: SUPREME MIX PRO-TIME 309 (SUPREME MIX) GRASS SEED BY HOBBS AND HOPKINS, LTD. AT A RATE OF 8LBS/1000 SQUARE FEET. GERLING RED MAPLE / ACER RUBRUM 'GERLING' : 2" CAL., B&B RIVERS PURPLE BEECH / FAGUS SYLVATICA 'RIVERSII': 2" CAL., B&B 9 42,454 SF MATURE HEIGHT SMALL TREES LARGE TREES 35' HT 35' HT 30' HT 30' HT 40' HT 30' HT 50' HT NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.STREET TREE - L1.dwg - SHEET: L1 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:42pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] STREET TREE - PLANTING & OPEN SPACE LOCATION PLAN 1 INCH 80 FEET 80 40 80 SCALE 0 1 L1 PLAN LOCATION & OPEN SPACE PLANTING STREET TREE OPEN SPACE AREA 1 PARK SEE SHEET L6 POND SEE SHEET L8 OPEN SPACE AREA 4 OPEN SPACE AREA 2 OPEN SPACE AREA 3 OPEN SPACE AREA 5 STREET LIGHT-TYP. ---PAGE BREAK--- KELSEY'S DWARF RED-OSIER DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA 'KELSYI' : 2 GAL. COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME: SIZE & DESCRIPTION AREAS 1,2 AND 3 OPEN SPACE PLANTING LEGEND: TREES SYMBOL COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME: SIZE & DESCRIPTION SHRUBS SYMBOL DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS / PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES 'HAMELN': 2 GAL., 24" O.C. EDDIE'S WHITE WONDER DOGWOOD / CORNUS 'EDDIE'S WHITE WONDER: 2" CAL., B&B PAPERBARK MAPLE / ACER GRISEUM : 2" CAL., B&B COMPACT HEAVENLY BAMBOO / NANDINA DOMESTICA 'GULF STREAM': 2 GAL. NORTHERN LIGHTS HAIR GRASS / DESCHAMPSIA CESPITOSA 'NORTHER LIGHTS'': 1 GAL. MAY NIGHT SAGE / SALVIA SYLVESTRIS 'MAY NIGHT': 1 GAL., 18"- O.C. 1 INCH 20 FEET 20 10 20 SCALE 0 L3 PLAN PLANTING OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE AREA 2 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN- AREA 1 1 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN- AREA 2 2 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN- AREA 3 3 OPEN SPACE AREA 1 OPEN SPACE AREA 3 GENERAL NOTES: OPEN SPACE PLAN 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY WITH OWNER AND UTILITY COMPANIES THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE IN THE FIELD THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR NOT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UTILITY PROTECTION SERVICE 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE FINISH SURFACE, GRADES, TOPSOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH. DO NOT START ANY WORK UNTIL UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. VERIFY LIMITS OF WORK BEFORE STARTING. 3. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT ALL DAMAGES TO EXISTING CONDITIONS AND INCONSISTENCIES WITH PLANS TO ODR. 4. ALL PLANT MASSES TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN A BARK MULCH BED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5. BED EDGE TO BE NO LESS THAN 12" AND NO MORE THAN 18" FROM OUTER EDGE OF PLANT MATERIAL BRANCHING. WHERE GROUND-COVER OCCURS, PLANT TO LIMITS OF AREA AS SHOWN. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS AND ALL LAWN AREAS. 7. CONTRACTOR TO FINE GRADE AND ROCK-HOUND ALL TURF AREAS PRIOR TO SEEDING, TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH AND CONTINUAL SURFACE, FREE OF IRREGULARITIES (BUMPS OR DEPRESSIONS) & EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL OR DEBRIS. 8. QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE INTENDED TO ASSIST CONTRACTOR IN EVALUATING THEIR OWN TAKE-OFFS AND ARE NOT GUARANTEED AS ACCURATE REPRESENTATIONS OF REQUIRED MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HIS BID QUANTITIES AS REQUIRED BY THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER LABELED ON THE PLANT TAG AND THE QUANTITY OF GRAPHIC SYMBOLS SHOWN, THE GRAPHIC SYMBOL QUANTITY SHALL GOVERN. 9. COORDINATE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION WITH INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. 10. WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE TREES INDICATED ON THE TREE REMOVAL PLAN, CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE ODR. EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AS DIRECTED BY THE ODR. 11. WHERE PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS OCCUR UNDER EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES OR CROWD EXISTING TREES, NOTIFY ODR TO ADJUST TREE LOCATIONS. 12. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PERIOD BEGINS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE COMPLETION OF ALL PLANTING OPERATIONS AND WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO THE ODR. MAINTAIN TREES, SHRUBS, LAWNS AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE OR 90 DAYS AFTER NOTIFICATION AND ACCEPTANCE, WHICHEVER IS LONGER. 13. REMOVE EXISTING WEEDS FROM PROJECT SITE PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF ORGANIC AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZER. APPLY AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZER PER THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SOIL ANALYSIS FROM THE SITE. 14. BACK FILL MATERIAL FOR TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING SHALL CONTAIN: ONE PART FINE GRADE COMPOST TO ONE PART TOPSOIL BY VOLUME, BONE MEAL PER MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATION, AND SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION. 15. GROUND COVERS AND PERENNIALS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH A MAXIMUM 2 INCH COVER OF BARK MULCH WITH NO FOLIAGE COVERED. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE REJECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THESE ITEMS MAY BE REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS. 17. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE NURSERY GROWN WITH HEALTHY ROOT SYSTEMS AND FULL BRANCHING, DISEASE AND INSECT FREE AND WITHOUT DEFECTS SUCH AS SUN SCALD, ABRASIONS, INJURIES AND DISFIGUREMENT. 18. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE SIZE AND QUANTITY SPECIFIED. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR SUB-STANDARD RESULTS CAUSED BY REDUCTION IN SIZE AND/OR QUANTITY OF PLANT MATERIALS. 19. LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE PROVIDED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGNED BY CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR WILL PROVIDE MATERIALS AND INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION OF THE WATER METER. O STREET O STREET O STREET P STREET P STREET D STREET WALK WALK WALK WOODCHIP TRAIL WOODCHIP TRAIL WALK WALK WALK NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.OPENSPACE PLANTING.dwg - SHEET: L3 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:39pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- 4 6 1 INCH = 40 FEET 40 20 40 6C$/E 0 L4 PLAN PLANTING OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN- AREA 4- A 1 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN- AREA 4-B 2 POND SEE SHEET L8 PARK SEE SHEET L6 P STREET P STREET C STREET P STREET WALK WALK WALK NOTE: SEE SHEET L5 FOR AREA 4 PLANT LEGEND BENCH WOODCHIP TRAIL- 5' WIDE BENCH WOODCHIP TRAIL- 5' WIDE WOODCHIP TRAIL- 5' WIDE BENCH WOODCHIP TRAIL- 5' WIDE WOODCHIP TRAIL- 5' WIDE EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.OPENSPACE PLANTING.dwg - SHEET: L4 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:40pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- LOW GROW NATIVE SEED MIX EVERGREEN TREES - 6' HGT. SHADE TREES - 2" CAL. / SPACING VARIES EMERALD VASE LACEBARK ELM / ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'EMERALD VASE' RED SUNSET MAPLE / ACER RUBRUM 'FRANKSRED' ENGLISH OAK / QUERCUS ROBUR WHITE OAK / QUERCUS ALBA RED OAK / QUERCUS RUBRA AMERICAN HOPHORNBEAM / OSTRYA VIRGINIANA BLOODGOOD LONDON PLANETREE - PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 'BLOODGOOD' LEYLAND CYPRESS / CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDII PYRAMIDAL ATLAS CEDAR / CEDRUS ATLANTICA 'FASTIGIATA' INCENSE CEDAR / CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS COLUMNAR EASTERN WHITE PINE / PINUS STROBUS FASTIGIATA DOUGLAS FIR / PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII: WESTERN WHITE PINE / PINUS MONTICOLA: WESTERN RED CEDAR / THUJA PLICATA DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS /PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES ' HAMLEN' BLUE OAT GRASS / HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS PURPLE FOUNTAIN GRASS /PENNISETUM SETACEUM 'RUBRUM' "MASSACHUSETTS KINNIKINICK' / ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 'MASS.' BEARBERRY COTONEASTER / COTONEASTER DAMMERI SCARLET MEIDILAND ROSE / ROSA MEIDILAND 'MEIKROTAL' 'CRIMSON BARBERRY / BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON COMPACT JAPANESE HOLLY /ILEX CRENATA 'COMPACTA' DAVID VIBURNUM / VIBURNUM DAVIDII AZALEA / VARIES ISANTI REDOSER DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA 'ISANTI' ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA / SPIREA BUMALDA 'ANTHONY WATERER' FINE LAWN, SEED SMALL ORNAMENTAL TREES- 2" CAL. SPACING VARIES CHINESE REDBUD / CERCIS CHINENSIS CAPITAL SELECT FLOWERING PEAR / PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CAPITAL' CHINESE KOUSA DOGWOOD / CORNUS KOUSA 'CHINENSIS' JAPANESE MAPLE / ACER PALMATUM YOSHINO FLOWERING CHERRY / PRUNUS X YEDOENSIS VINE MAPLE / ACER CIRCINATUM LAWN SALAL / GAULTHERIA SHALLON OREGON GRAPE / MAHONIA NERVOSA SNOWBERRY / ALBA PACIFIC NINEBARK / PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS RED TWIG DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA SHINY LEAF SPIRAEA / SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA RED FLOWERING CURRENT / RIBES SANGUINEUM INDIAN HAWTHORNE / RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA "MINOR" OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL / PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS "OTTO LUYKEN" AREAS 4 AND 5 OPEN SPACE PLANTING LEGEND: GRASSES, GROUNDCOVERS AND SHRUBS- 2 GAL. LOW GROW MEADOW MIX SUNMARK SEEDS / NATIVE RIPARIAN MIX: 1-LB PER 1,000 S.F. - OR APPROVED EQUAL SUNMARK SEEDS / NATIVE POLLINATOR SEED MIX: 1-LB PER 1,000 S.F. 1 INCH 20 FEET 20 10 20 SCALE 0 L5 PLAN PLANTING OPEN SPACE OPEN SPACE AREA 5 OPEN SPACE PLANTING PLAN- AREA 5 1 1" ROOT BALL DIAMETER OF 30" MIN. L5 3 DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL + 12" DEPTH ROOTBALL NOTE: OF ROOT BALL 2 X DIAMETER 1 1/2 X ROOT CONIFER TREE GUYING DETAIL L5 2 BALL DEPTH SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL L5 1 'CHAIN LOCK" TREE TIES OR BLACK FLEX GARDEN HOSE COVERING TWIST STRANDS AROUND EACH OTHER MIN. 3 GUYS @ 120° APART SET ROOT CROWN NO MORE THAN ABOVE FINISHED GRADE MULCH AS SPECIFIED KEEP MULCH CLEAR OF TRUNK BASE CUT AND REMOVE TWINE AND BURLAP FROM TOP AND SIDES OF ROOTBALL. (REMOVE ALL WIRE BASKET) 2 x 2 WOOD STAKES OR METAL TREE ANCHORS AS APPROVED. AMENDED NATIVE SOIL / BACKFILL PLANTING MIX PER SPECIFICATIONS TILLED, AMENDED, AND MOUNDED NATIVE SUBSOIL 1. TIE COLORED P.V.C. RIBBON ON WIRE GUYS. (MIN. 1 PER GUY.)) 2. IN LAWN AREAS CUT TREE CIRCLE AT 12' RADIUS FROM TRUNK. MULCH AS SPECIFIED, KEEP MULCH CLEAR OF SHRUB STEM BASE BACKFILL SOIL FINISHED GRADE SCARIFY EDGES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE O STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.OPENSPACE PLANTING.dwg - SHEET: L5 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:40pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] WALK ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 9 182 180.5 179 177.5 HALF BASKETBALL COURT TRASH RECEPTACLE BENCH PLAY AREA 775 SF PLAY AREA 290 SF 20 X 20 SHELTER PICNIC TABLE BENCH PLAY PLAZA BENCH GRILL TRASH 5' WIDE CONCRETE PATH NATIVE PLANTING NATIVE PLANTING LAWN LAWN BIKE RACK DRINKING FOUNTAIN PLAY BALANCE CURB 6"-12" HEIGHT SNAGS WITH BIRDHOUSES POND OVERLOOK STADIUM STEPS SEATING WALL PLAZA SEATWALL SHRUBS - 2 GAL. EVERGREEN TREES - 6' HGT. PARK PLANT LEGEND: SHADE TREES - 2' CAL. / SPACING VARIES EMERALD VASE LACEBARK ELM / ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'EMERALD VASE' RED SUNSET MAPLE / ACER RUBRUM 'FRANKSRED' ENGLISH OAK / QUERCUS ROBUR WHITE OAK / QUERCUS ALBA RED OAK / QUERCUS RUBRA AMERICAN HOPHORNBEAM / OSTRYA VIRGINIANA BLOODGOOD LONDON PLANETREE - PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 'BLOODGOOD' LEYLAND CYPRESS / CUPRESSOCYPARIS LEYLANDII PYRAMIDAL ATLAS CEDAR / CEDRUS ATLANTICA 'FASTIGIATA' INCENSE CEDAR / CALOCEDRUS DECURRENS COLUMNAR EASTERN WHITE PINE / PINUS STROBUS FASTIGIATA DOUGLAS FIR / PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII: WESTERN WHITE PINE / PINUS MONTICOLA: WESTERN RED CEDAR / THUJA PLICATA DWARF FOUNTAIN GRASS /PENNISETUM ALOPECUROIDES ' HAMLEN' BLUE OAT GRASS / HELICTOTRICHON SEMPERVIRENS PURPLE FOUNTAIN GRASS /PENNISETUM SETACEUM 'RUBRUM' "MASSACHUSETTS KINNIKINICK' / ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 'MASS.' BEARBERRY COTONEASTER / COTONEASTER DAMMERI SCARLET MEIDILAND ROSE / ROSA MEIDILAND 'MEIKROTAL' 'CRIMSON BARBERRY / BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'CRIMSON COMPACT JAPANESE HOLLY /ILEX CRENATA 'COMPACTA' DAVID VIBURNUM / VIBURNUM DAVIDII AZALEA / VARIES ISANTI REDOSER DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA 'ISANTI' ANTHONY WATERER SPIREA / SPIREA BUMALDA 'ANTHONY WATERER' FINE LAWN, SEED SMALL ORNAMENTAL TREES- 2" CAL. SPACING VARIES CHINESE REDBUD / CERCIS CHINENSIS CAPITAL SELECT FLOWERING PEAR / PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CAPITAL' CHINESE KOUSA DOGWOOD / CORNUS KOUSA 'CHINENSIS' JAPANESE MAPLE / ACER PALMATUM YOSHINO FLOWERING CHERRY / PRUNUS X YEDOENSIS VINE MAPLE / ACER CIRCINATUM LAWN SALAL / GAULTHERIA SHALLON OREGON GRAPE / MAHONIA NERVOSA SNOWBERRY / ALBA PACIFIC NINEBARK / PHYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS RED TWIG DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA SHINY LEAF SPIRAEA / SPIRAEA BETULIFOLIA RED FLOWERING CURRENT / RIBES SANGUINEUM INDIAN HAWTHORNE / RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA "MINOR" OTTO LUYKEN LAUREL / PRUNUS LAUROCERASUS "OTTO LUYKEN" ORNAMENTAL GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVERS - 2 GAL. NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.PARK PLANTING.dwg - SHEET: L6 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:41pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 1,1C+ 20)EE7 20 10 20 SCALE 0 L6 PLAN PLANTING PARK PARK PLANTING PLAN 1 POND SEE SHEET L8 O STREET C STREET P STREET ---PAGE BREAK--- NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.PARK PLANTING.dwg - SHEET: L7 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:41pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] L7 DETAILS PARK BENCH L7 1 TRASH RECEPTICALE L7 3 PICNIC TABLE L7 4 20' X 20' SHELTER L7 5 DRINKING FOUNTAIN L8 6 GRILL L9 7 BIKE RACK L7 2 PLAY EQUIPMENT L7 8 BALL TOSS PLAY BOULDER HOPSCOTCH LADY BUG STEPPERS LOG CRAWL LOG STEPPERS CLIMBING LOGS ---PAGE BREAK--- 182 180.5 179 177.5 3 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 SNOWBERRY / ALBUS: #2 CONTAINER. DOUGLAS SPIREA / SPIREA DOUGLASII: #2 CONTAINER ISANTI REDOSER DOGWOOD / CORNUS SERICEA 'ISANTI' : #2 CONTAINER BLACK HAWTHORNE / CRATAEGUS DOUGLASII: 3 GAL / 4' HT. RED ALDER / ALNUS RUBRA : 2" CALIPER, B&B PACIFIC NINEBARK / PYSOCARPUS CAPITATUS: #2 CONTAINER COSTAL WILLOW / SALIX CAROLINIANA: #2 CONTAINER SITKA WILLOW / SALIX SITCHENSIS: #2 CONTAINER TREES REDTWIG DOGWOOD /CORNUS STOLONIFERA: #2 CONTAINER POND PLANTING LEGEND SYMBOL COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME: SIZE AND DESCRIPTION SHRUBS SYMBOL COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME: SIZE AND DESCRIPTION QUANTITY MOCK-ORANGE / PHILADELPHUS LEWISII: #2 CONTAINER PACIFIC WILLOW / SALIX LSIANDRA: #2 CONTAINER CLUSTERED ROSE / ROSA PISOCARPA: #2 CONTAINER WESTERN RED CEDAR / THUJA PLICATA: 3 GAL. / 4' HT. OREGON ASH / FRAXINUS LATIFOLIA: 3 GAL. / 4' HT. BIGLEAF MAPLE / ACER 3 GAL. / 4' HT. WESTERN WHITE PINE / PINUS MONTICOLA : 3 GAL. / 4' HT. MALUS FUSCA / OREGON CRABAPPLE: 3 GAL. / 4' HT. SUNMARK SEEDS / NATIVE SWALE MIX: 1-LB PER 1,000 S.F. SUNMARK SEEDS / SHRUB SWAMP MIX: 1-LB PER 1,000 S.F. OR APPROVED EQUAL POND NATIVE GRASS MIX COMMON NAME / BOTANICAL NAME: SIZE AND DESCRIPTION POND BOTTOM PLANTINGS SYMBOL ALASKAN YELLOW CEDAR / CUPRESSUS NOOTKATENSIS : 8' HT. NO. DATE: REVIEWED BY: TYPE: PROJECT NO.: DATE REVISIONS DESCRIPTION N:\proj\142-001\09 Drawings\03 Planning\Sheets - Planning Submittal\Landscape\142001.POND PLANTING.dwg - SHEET: L8 Feb 02, 2021 - 3:42pm kel [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] PRE PLANNING 142-001 DOVE LANDING 1/15/2021 PUD 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 [PHONE REDACTED] 1 INCH 20 FEET 20 10 20 SCALE 0 L8 PLAN PLANTING POND PARK SEE SHEET L6 POND PLANTING PLAN 1 8 7 1 2 3 ENTRY MONUMENT 4 5 6 STORM WATER POND LEGEND NATIVE PLANTING ROCK MOUNDS HIGH) DOWN WOODY DEBRIS AND ROOT WADS VERTICAL SNAGS AT VARYING HEIGHTS HIGH) POND BOTTOM GRASS PLANTING SNAGS DOWN WOODY DEBRIS ROCK MOUND 8 3 4 BIRD AND BAT HOUSES ON SELECTED SNAGS VERTICAL SNAGS WITH BIRD & BAT HOUSES 6 P STREET O STREET NE BOONES FERRY ROAD Attachment 103 Sheet 19 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 190 GARFIELD STREET WOODBURN, OR 97071 October 13, 2020 Attn: Eric Hawkinson, Planner Pacific Community Design 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 Re: Annexation Certification Subject Property: N/A Marion County Tax Map: Tax Lot 051W06C000400 & Tax Lot 051W06C000800 This letter is to certify that the City of Woodburn has no capacity issue with the public wastewater treatment facility or public water treatment facility. However, the subject property is not adjacent to an existing collection system for water, wastewater or a public storm sewer collection system. The requirements for these collection facilities would still need to be determined. The capacity analysis, design and installation would be the responsibility of the applicant/property owner. If you have any questions, please contact me at [PHONE REDACTED]. Sincerely, Dago Garcia, P.E. City Engineer City of Woodburn 107 Attachment 103A ---PAGE BREAK--- P a g e 1 I 1 Woodburn School District 1390 Meridian Drive, Woodburn, OR 97071 Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] October 5, 2020 Erik Hawkinson Pacific Community Design 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, Oregon 97223 Re: Annexation for tax lots 051W06C000400 and 800 (154 single-family units) located adjacent to 16710 Boones Ferry Road NE Mr. Hawkinson: In response to your request, Woodburn School District has determined that your planned annexation located adjacent to 16710 Boones Ferry Road, will impact our schools in our district. However, we believe we will be able to accommodate the growth. Thank you, Casey Woolley Director of Safety and Operations Woodburn School District 108 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Colin Cortes From: James Gibbs <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Monday, October 5, 2020 10:37 AM To: Eric Hawkinson Subject: RE: Woodburn Annexation SPL: Tax Lots 051W06C000400 and 800 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Eric, This tax lot for single family housing addition/expansion development is acceptable and will be supported by Woodburn Fire District. We would just need to ensure that all fire lane/access and water supply requirements are met along with any building official and fire code construction permit requirements are met. James Gibbs Fire Marshal Woodburn Fire District 1776 Newberg Hwy Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 982‐2360 [EMAIL REDACTED] From: Eric Hawkinson [mailto:[EMAIL REDACTED]] Sent: Friday, October 02, 2020 1:38 PM To: James Gibbs Subject: RE: Woodburn Annexation SPL: Tax Lots 051W06C000400 and 800 This email is from an EXTERNAL sender. Exercise caution when opening attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. Thanks James, The City of Woodburn has specifically asked us to obtain a Service Provider Letter from the Woodburn Fire Department. So perhaps that’s an email or written approval you can issue as well? Please let me know what else you would need to see in order to make that determination. Regards, Eric From: James Gibbs <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2020 12:26 PM 109 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 To: Eric Hawkinson Subject: RE: Woodburn Annexation SPL: Tax Lots 051W06C000400 and 800 Woodburn Public Works is the department you would need to coordinate with to ensure you have all the information for your annexation application and SPL. From: Eric Hawkinson [mailto:[EMAIL REDACTED]] Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2020 4:04 PM To: James Gibbs Subject: Woodburn Annexation SPL: Tax Lots 051W06C000400 and 800 This email is from an EXTERNAL sender. Exercise caution when opening attachments or click links from unknown senders or unexpected email. Good afternoon Jim, I’m emailing regarding an City of Woodburn annexation application our client is pursuing for Tax Lots Tax Lots 051W06C000400 and 800 (see attached Tax Map), approximately 31.13 acres. As part of that process, we need to coordinate with Woodburn Public Works to obtain an SPL. The property would become proposed for RS single‐family zoning. Can you please let me know what additional materials you need in order to issue an SPL? Thank you, Eric Hawkinson Planner Phone: (503) 941-9484 12564 SW Main Street Tigard, OR 97223 www.pacific-community.com  Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail 110 ---PAGE BREAK--- ‐ 76 ‐ City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Maps and Perspectives for the City of Woodburn Thumbnails of the target scores inset and excerpts from some of the maps and perspectives are shown here for convenience only – the reader should refer to the full maps in Appendix IV for complete information and clarity. Perspective A: Neighborhood Access to All Components This perspective show how the City is providing service at a neighborhood level. This is defined by having services within one mile radius from your home with a higher value placed on the services that are available within walking distance, or one‐third mile. A majority of residents have neighborhood access to some services. Woodburn has concentrations of service in the core of the downtown of Woodburn. Large contributors to this concentration of service include Settlemier Park, the Woodburn Memorial Aquatic Center, and the numerous small parks in this area. Service decreases further from downtown which generally corresponds to a decreased population density and development pattern. Table 12 provides a numeric summary of the GRASP® Perspective showing percentages of area that either have no service, service that is below the target level or service that meets or exceeds targets that correspond to residential service models. In this analysis, residents that have access to the equivalent of a park with four components and a trail within a one‐third mile from their home are receiving service at residential target levels. Within the corporate limit the City of Woodburn provides some service at a neighborhood level to 99.9% of its residents. Of those that have access to some service 81.9% of those have access to service that meets or exceeds target residential levels, and 18.1% have access to service, but not service that is meeting residential targets. Compared to the corporate limit service levels for the existing Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and proposed UGB decline around the edges of the city where residential properties are just beginning to develop. Table 12: Perspective A ‐ Neighborhood Access to All Components, Overall Statistics Total Acres Percent of Area With LOS Average LOS Per Acre Served Percent Total Area Below Target Minimum Score Percent Total Area Above Target Minimum Score Boundary ‐ Corporate Woodburn 3416 99.9% 153.1 18.1% 81.8% Boundary ‐ Existing UGB Woodburn 634 100.0% 119.6 27.8% 72.2% Boundary ‐ Planned UGB Woodburn 1016 98.8% 41.2 88.7% 10.1% Entire Area 5066 99.7% 126.6 33.5% 66.2% 111 Attachment 104A ---PAGE BREAK--- ‐ 77 ‐ City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update Perspective B: Walkable Access to all Components This Perspective shows the level of service provided to the community at a walkable level. All components are shown and each has only a one‐third mile buffer which equates to about a 10 minute walk. These buffers have been truncated at the primary barriers. Scores within the buffers are equal to the base score for the components, calculated as described in Appendix V, and doubled to reflect the walkable access, as was done on Perspective A. In a sense, this is Perspective A with the one‐mile buffers removed. In this Perspective, more gaps in service appear, including the downtown area that was well covered in first perspective. Like Perspective A, concentrations in service are located around Settlemier, Senior Estates, and Burlingham Parks. In addition the affect of the barriers is highlighted in this perspective. The presence of safe and comfortable routes to parks can increase recreation opportunities dramatically. Walkability is especially important to consider as the City looks to providing service to the youth and elderly as these are the parts of the community that often do not have access to cars. Although gaps in walkable service do appear, Table 13 shows that 72% of the corporate boundary has access to parks and recreation facilities within a one‐third mile of their homes. However only 15% of that area has service that meets or exceeds the target minimum score. This indicates that, while the City’s number and distribution of parks come close to meeting needs, improvements need to be made to the parks to provide the target LOS. Like Perspective A target scores for residential areas reflect the equivalent of a park with four components and a trail within a one‐third mile from each home. Improvements can be made to these areas with low LOS by removing barriers to pedestrian access, improving existing facilities, and adding components within parks. In addition to improving LOS by improving and adding parks, Woodburn can increase the overall walkable LOS by adding multi‐use trails. Although currently there are no multi‐use trails within the community, the City of Woodburn does have one trail project that is in the planning and construction phase along the Mill Creek drainage. Aside from being a popular facility, trails also increase LOS, bridge pedestrian barriers, and thus increasing the overall walkability of the community. 112 ---PAGE BREAK--- Library Square Burlingham Park Heritage Park Senior Estates Park Legion Park N Front St Park Nelson Park Alvah Cowan Park Park Settlemier Park Locomotive Park North Hermanson Park Centennial Park Middle Hermanson Park South Hermanson Park Senecal Creek Park Downtown Plaza Park Mill Creek Greenway Mill Creek Greenway Hermanson Pond OGA Golf Course Senior Estates Golf Course A A B B C C D D E E F F G G H H 8 8 7 7 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 City of Woodburn I Legend Centerlines Streams Railroad City Limits Urban Growth Boundary City Right-of-Way Assessor Taxlots Parks Golf Courses 1/4 mile buffer 1/3 mile buffer 0 925 Feet Disclaimer: This map is a graphic representation using the most current information available (Taxlots provided by Marion County GIS). However, it should not be considered accurate for scaling. Last updated and printed on August 13, 2020 City of Woodburn Street Index With Park Buffers Street Name Location Street Name Location Street Name Location Street Name Location Street Name Location 1ST ST 4E-5E C (Cont) H (Cont) M (Cont) S (Cont) 1ST ST 5D, 5E CHRISTIANSEN AV 5F-6F HARRISON ST 4D, 4E MILLER CT 3E SILVERTON AV 6F 2ND ST 5D, 3E-5E CHURCH ST 3D, 3E-4E HARVARD DR 3C-5C MILLER FARM RD 2E-3E SKYLER DR 4C 2ND ST 5D CITADEL ST 4C HARVEST WY 5D-6D MILLER RD NE 8E SMITH CT 4D 2ND ST NE 2B CLACKAMAS CR 4C, 4D HAWLEY ST 5E-6E MOLALLA RD NE 3G, 3H SMITH DR 4D-5D 3RD ST 4D-5D, 3E-4E CLACKAMAS CR 4C HAWTHORNE CR 2B MONTANA DR 3C SPRAGUE LN 2C-3C 3RD ST 5D CLEMSON ST 4C-5C HAYES ST 5E MONTGOMERY ST 4D-5D, 5E STACY ALLISON WY 4B-5B, 3C-4C 4TH ST 4D, 4E CLEVELAND ST 5E-6E, 6F HAYES ST 4C, 4D, 4E MOUNTAIN VIEW LN NE 1B STAFNEY LN NE 3A, 3B-4B 5TH ST 3E-4E, 4D CLEVELAND ST 4D-5D, 5E HAZELNUT DR 2E-3E, 3F MT HOOD AV 3F, 3G STANFIELD RD 3D 6TH ST 4D, 3E-4E COLEWOOD DR 2E HEATHER WY 1D-2D MT JEFFERSON AV 3F, 3G-4G STANFORD ST 4C 7TH ST 4E COLONY ST 2E HEMLOCK CR 2C MUIRFIELD LN 2E, 2F STARK CT 5E A COLUMBIA DR 4C-5C HENRYS BV 3E MULBERRY DR 1D-2D STARK ST 5D, 5E-6E A CT 5E COMMERCE WY 3E-4E, 3F HERITAGE AV 4G ST 3B, 3C STATE HY 219 1A-2A, 2B-3B A ST 5D, 5E COMSTOCK AV 6D, 6E HERMANSON ST 6E N STEVEN ST 2B, 2C ACACIA AV 3B COMSTOCK WY 6E HERON DR 2E NATIONAL WY 2G-3G STUBB RD NE 5C-6C AKSENIA ST 6D CONCORD ST 2E HIGH ST 3E-4E NEKIA ST 2C SUNFLOWER ST 6D ALASKA DR 3C CONSTITUTION AV 2D, 2E HIGHWAY 99E 1G-2G, 1H NEWBERG HY 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, 3F SWEETWATER AV 5B, 5C ALDER LN 2B, 2C COOLEY CT 4G HILLYERS LN 3C NEWPORT WY 1D SYCAMORE AV 3B ALETHA ST 3D, 3E COOLEY RD NE 3G-4G HOOPER ST NE 5B, 5C NO NAME ST 4E T ALEXANDRA AV 3F-4F CORBY ST 4E I NO NAME ST NE 8H TEN OAKS LN NE 1B-2B ALEXANDRA CT 3F-4F COUNTRY CLUB CR 2D IDAHO DR 3C NORTH CT 4D THOMPSON RD 2D-3D ALSEA LOOP 1D COUNTRY CLUB CT 3C INDEPENDENCE AV 2D, 2E NOVAYA LN NE 7E THORN ST 5D AMERICAN AV 3C COUNTRY CLUB RD 3C, 2D-3D, 2E INDEPENDENCE CT 2E NUGGET CT 6E TIERRA CT 4F AMITY CT 6E COUNTRY CLUB TR 2C-3C, 2D-3D INDUSTRIAL AV 2G O TIERRA LYNN CT 4F AMY CT 3F COUNTRY LN 6D INGLEWOOD LN 2F OAK ST 5D, 5E TIERRA LYNN DR 3F-4F ANDREA'S CT 5D, 5E COZY WY 4D IRIS ST 6D OATS ST 5D TOM TENNANT DR 3C ANNA ST 3D CREIGHTON ST 4C IRONWOOD TR 2E, 2F OGLE ST 5D-6D, 5E TOMLIN AV 5F ARLINGTON AV 2D, 2E CRESTLINE ST 3G J OLIVE AV 3B TOOZE AV 5E ARNEY LN NE 2C CROSBY RD NE 1E, 1F, 1G JACOB ST 3D OLYMPIC ST 2E TOUT ST 5D ARNEY RD 2C-3C CUPID CT 4E JAMES ST 4F ORCHARD LN 4G TRACY LN 2E ARNEY RD NE 2C, 1D-2D D JAMESTOWN ST 2E OREGON CT 4C TROON AV 2E, 2F ARTHUR ST 4D, 4E-5E D ST 5E JANA AV 6E OREGON LP 2C-3C TUKWILA DR 2E, 2F ASTOR CT 3D DAHLIA ST 6D JANA CT 6E OREGON WY 3C-4C, 3D TULIP AV 6D ASTOR WY 2D-3D DAYLILY ST 6D JANSEN WAY 1D OSWALD ST 4E-5E TURNBERRY AV 2E, 2F AUDREY WY 3G-4G DE SANTIS DR 4D JANSEN WY 1D-2D OXFORD ST 4C U AUSTIN AV 4D DEER RUN 6E JENSEN RD NE 8A, 8B P UMPQUA CT 3D AUTUMN BV 6D DEL SOL CT 4F JOHNSON ST 5E, 5F PACIFIC CT NE 1G UMPQUA PL 2D AZTEC DR 5F DELLMOOR WY 3D JONAH PL 4C PACIFIC HY 4F-6F, 2G-4G UMPQUA RD 1D-3D B DEXTER LOOP 1D JORY ST 2B, 2C PACIFIC HY 6E-8E, 6F UNION SCHOOL RD NE 6H-7H B ST 5E DIMMICK LN NE 1H JOYCE ST 5F PALAMINO AV 5B, 5C V BARLEY ST 5D DOGWOOD DR 2D JUDY ST 6E PALM AV 3B VAN LIEU CT 4F BARN ST 4G DOUD ST 4E-5E JULIE CT 6E PANA CT 6D VANDERBECK LN 2D, 2E BAYLOR DR 4C-5C DUKE ST 4C JUNE CR 4G PANA ST 6D VASSER ST 5C BELLE PASSI RD NE 8D, 8E DUNN CT 4F JUNE WY 3G-4G PARADISE ST 5C VERA LN NE 2B BEN BROWN LN 5D E JUNIPER CR 2C-3C PARK AV 3F-4F VINE AV 6D BENTGRASS AV 5D EAGLE DR 2E K PARK CR 3F WALKER CT 6E BERNARD DR 3D, 3E EAGLE DR 2D KELOWNA CT 6D PARKVIEW CT 4F WALTON WY 2D-3D BIRDS EYE AV 6F ECOLA WY 3D KELOWNA ST 5D-6D PARR RD NE 6B, 6C, 6D WARREN WY 6E BLAINE ST 5E, 5F EDGEWATER DR 2F KENNEDY ST 4F, 4G PATRICK WY 2G WASHINGTON DR 2C BLAINE ST 5F ELANA DR 6D KEVIN CT 3F PATRIOT ST 2D WHEAT ST 5D-6D BLUEGRASS ST 5D ELANA WY 6D KING WY 1D-2D PAULINE ST 5F WILCO HY NE 6F, 6G-7G, 7H-8H BLY LOOP 1D ELANA WY 5D KOENER RD NE 7F, 7G PAULUS CT 6E WILLAMETTE ST 4C-5C BOEAN LN 4C ELM ST 5F KOFFLER AV 4F PAYNE ST 5E WILLIAMS AV 4F BOGIE CT 2E EVERGREEN BV 5C KOI LN NE 1B PINE CR 2C WILLOW AV 2B-3B, 2C BOONES FERRY RD 2E-3E EVERGREEN BV 4C KOTKA ST 4D PLUM AV NE 1B WILSON ST 5E-6E BOONES FERRY RD 8C, 6D-8D EVERGREEN RD 4C L PLUM LN NE 1B WOODCREST CT 5D BOONES FERRY RD NE 1E-2E EVERGREEN RD 3C LANDAU DR 5F PORTLAND RD NE 8D, 8E WOODLAND AV 1C-3C BOSTON ST 2D EVERGREEN RD 4C-5C LAUREL AV 5F PRAIRIE ST 5B WOODLAND AV 3B, 3C BRADLEY ST 5D-6D, 6E F LAWSON ST 3C PRINCETON RD 2D-3D WORKMAN DR 4D-5D BRANDYWINE CT 6D FAIRWAY ST 2E LE BRUN RD NE 5A, 5B PROGRESS WY 2F-3F, 2G YEW ST 4E BRIDLEWOOD LN 6D FAIRWOOD CRESCENT DR 2E LEARY RD NE 1A-2A PUBLIC RD NE 1C YOUNG ST 5E, 5F-6F BROADMORE PL 2E FESCUE AV 5D LEASURE ST 3D-4D Q BROADWAY ST 5E FILBERT ST 5E LEXINGTON CT 2E QUAIL RUN CR 2F BROUGHTON WY 3D FINZER WY 3D LILAC WY 1D-2D QUEEN CITY BV 4F BROWN CT 5E FIR ST 3E-4E LINCOLN RD 5F QUINN RD 2D-3D BROWN ST 6D-7D, 5E-6E FOXGLOVE ST 6D LINCOLN RD NE 5F, 5G, 4H-5H R BRYAN ST 4F-5F FRONT ST 3E-5E, 2F-3F, 1G-2G LINCOLN ST 4E-5E, 4F-5F RAILROAD AV NE 2B BUNKER AV 2E FRONT ST 5D-6D, 5E LINCOLN ST 4D, 4E RAINIER RD 3C, 3D BUTTEVILLE RD NE 1B-8B, 1C FRONT ST NE 2B, 1G LINDA ST 2B, 2C RANDOLPH RD 2D-3D C G LINFIELD AV 5C RAY J GLATT CR 3E C ST 5E GARDEN WY 2D LUBA ST 6D REDWOOD LN NE 2B CAHILL WY 3D GARFIELD ST 4D, 4E-5E M REED AV 4C CALIFORNIA DR 3C GATCH ST 4E-5E MAPLE ST 5D REVERE ST 2D CAMAS ST 2B, 2C GEORGE ST 6F MAPLEWOOD CT 4D ROANOKE ST 2D CAMELLIA WY 1D-2D GESCHWILL LN NE 8E, 8F MAR CEL CT 4F ROBERT ST 3D CANBY LOOP 1D GILBERT PL NE 2E MAR CEL DR 4F ROBIN AVE 3C CARL RD NE 1G-2G, 2H GOOSE CREEK RD 3E MARION ST 5E, 5F ROY AV 6E CAROL ST 4F-5F GOOSE HOLLOW CT 3E MARSHALL ST 5E-6E RYE ST 5D CARSON CT NE 2B GOUDY GARDENS LN NE 1G, 1H WY 6D S CASCADE DR 4D GRANITE ST 3G-4G MAYANNA DR 3D, 3E SALLAL CT 3D CASCADE DR 3D-4D GRANT ST 4E MCCORMICK ST NE 2B SALLAL RD 2D-3D CASCADE DR 4D-5D GRAYSTONE DR 2E-3E, 2F MCKEE SCHOOL RD NE 7H-8H SANTIAM DR 5C, 5D CEDAR AV 3B GREENVIEW CT 4G MCKINLEY ST 5F SENECA CT 5E-6E CENTENNIAL DR 4G GREENVIEW DR 4G MCLAUGHLIN DR 4D-5D SENECAL CREEK DR 1B, 1C CENTER ST NE 4C H MCNAUGHT RD 2B-3B, 3C SERRES LN NE 6F, 6G CHAMPIONSHIP DR 2E HALL ST 3D-4D MEADOW DR NE 4G, 4H SETTLEMIER AV 4D, 3E-4E CHARLES CT 4E HAMPTON WY 2D MEADOWVALE LN 6E SETTLEMIER AV 4D-6D CHARLES ST 4E HARDCASTLE AV 4E, 4F, 4G MERIDIAN CT 2E SEVEN OAKS LN N 1B-2B CHATEAU DR NE 2H HARDCASTLE RD NE 4G MERIDIAN DR 2E-3E SEVEN OAKS LN S 2B CHERRY ST 5D HARDEL CT NE 1F MILL ST 4E SHENANDOAH LN 2F 113 Attachment 104B ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 T R A C Y L N C A N B Y L P MILL ST RYE ST KOI LN VERA LN HI GH ST PLUM LN N 2ND ST STARK ST IDAHO DR BRYAN ST TU L IP AV HIGHWAY 99E HY OATS ST RAILROAD O R EGON L P JORY ST OGLE ST HAWLEY ST ELANA WY C A SCA D E DR S M ITH DR D E E R RU N CHA T EAU D R OXFORD S T JANS EN WY T U R NBERRY A V TU KWIL A DR R O Y AV NATIONAL WY AZTEC DR SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST WILLO W A V SALLAL RD W H ITNE Y LN H A ZELNU T D R STANFIELD R D JAM E S ST BLAINE ST EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KING WY TOMLIN AV W ORKMAN DR MCKINLEY ST KOENER R D G R EE N V I E W DR N 3RD ST LAUREL AV HO O PER ST LEARY RD EL M ST E C LACKAMAS C R MCLAUGHLIN D R N 1ST ST EAST LI NCOLN RD W CLACKAMA S CR E LLIOTT PRAIRIE RD COMMERCE WY SERRES LN S CASCADE D R EAST HARDCASTLE RD BOONES FERRY RD GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR 219 DIMMICK LN STAFNEY LN MOLALLA RD UNION SCHOOL RD FRONT ST ARNEY RD MEADOW DR CROSBY RD BUTTEVILLE RD INGALLS LN PARR RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD CARL RD WILCO HY ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD BROWN ST PARK AV H ARRISON ST ASTOR W Y W H A Y E S ST ORE G ON WY LINCOLN ST TUK W IL A DR N 5TH ST E CLEVELAND ST GA T CH S T H A Z E LN U T DR HARDCASTLE AV COOLEY RD STUBB RD WOODLAND AV STACY ALLISON WY PROGRESS WY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV WILCO HY NE W B ER G HY N PACIFIC HY PARR R D N FRONT ST E BLAINE ST A ST HIGHWAY 99E HY FRONT ST JUDY ST RYE ST TIE R RA LYNN DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD EAGLE DR J A N SEN W Y STA R K ST TU L I P AV T E N OAKS LN MIL L E R FAR M RD ME R ID IAN DR BUTTEVILLE RD SMITH D R SALLAL RD WILL OW AV W LINCOLN ST VA N D ERBECK LN AL E X A NDR A A V JUNE WY BOONES FE R R Y RD ST PANA ST COUNT R Y CLUB RD K ING WY PRINC ETON RD MAYANNA D R IRO NWOOD T R LEARY RD H E RMA N SO N ST N 6TH ST MO LALLA RD A R NE Y L N N 1ST ST N 2ND ST R EED AV HI G H ST ST LOUI S RD CROSBY RD MOUNTAIN VIEW LN DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV KOI LN UNION SCHOOL RD OGLE ST EAST LIN COLN RD OATS ST B L Y L P JORY ST ARBOR GROVE RD R O Y AV CAMAS ST WHITN EY LN GEORGE ST KOENER RD 219 RANDOLPH R D HO O P E R ST A L S EA L P ELM ST W CLACKAMAS CR ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE D R GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD LE BRUN RD W HAYES ST WOODLAND AV LINC OLN ST BR OW N ST GATCH S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARDCASTLE AV STACY ALLISON WY ARN E Y R D COOLEY RD ASTOR WY PROGRESS WY STUBB RD BOO NES FERRY RD Y O UNG ST N FRONT ST S SETTLEMIER AV S FRONT ST EV ERG R EE N R D N SE TTLEMIER AV MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S PACIFIC HY v ÍÎ 219 5 Woodburn TSP Update September 2019 ¯ Figure 2 Existing Roadway Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Service Collector Access Street Future Roadway Future Major Arterial Future Minor Arterial Future Service Collector Future Access Street Future Local Industrial City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TSP\02 Functional Roadway Classification.mxd - mmccormick - 5:25 PM 9/16/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Functional Roadway Classification Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet Note: Future roadway alignments are approximate and subject to further refinement. 114 Attachment 105A ---PAGE BREAK--- ää ä ä ä ää ä ä ä ä ää ä ää ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 ) ) A U D R E Y WY A ST HIGHWAY 99E HY FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST D A HLI A ST TIERRA LYN N D R AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T E N OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR BUTTEVILLE RD SMIT H D R CROSBY RD LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY BOONES F ER RY RD ST PANA ST OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY PRINCET O N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST J O NAH P L ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST MOLA LLA RD WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST WILCO HY N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN R A Y J GLA T T CR N 3RD ST PORT LAND RD THOMPSON RD ELLIOTT PRAIRIE RD CAROL ST ST LO U I S RD LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN J A ME S S T PLUM LN UNION SCHOOL RD OGLE ST EAST LI NCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST ELANA WY COMMERCE WY BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V ARBOR GROVE RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST W H ITNEY LN GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD 219 RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS C R ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN PARR RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN S T GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD H ARRISON ST W OODL AND AV ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD EAST LINCOLN RD BOONES FER RY RD NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER G REE N RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update September 2019 ¯ Figure 6 ä Future Local Street Connection Future Roadway City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TSP\06 Local Street Connectivity Plan.mxd - mmccormick - 5:46 PM 9/16/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Local Street Connectivity Plan Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet Note: Future roadway alignments are approximate and subject to further refinement. 115 Attachment 105B ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 201 Page 1 of 3 ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Attachment 201: Dictionary & Glossary This document defines and explains abbreviations, acronyms, phrases, and words particularly in the context of conditions of approval.  “ADA” refers to the federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  “Alley” means the same as in WDO 1.02. See also “Shared rear lane” below.  “BFR” refers to N. Boones Ferry Road.  “CAE” refers to cross access easement.  “CC&Rs” refers to covenants, conditions, and restrictions in the context of private contract among an association of owners and/or tenants within a PUD or a conventional subdivision with common area improvements.  “Central block” refers to the block bound by & Streets.  “CEP” refers to civil engineering plan review, which is a review process independent of land use review led by the Community Development Department Planning Division and that is led by the Public Works Department Engineering Division through any application forms, fees, and review criteria as the Division might establish. A staff expectation is that CEP follows land use review and approval, that is, a final decision, and precedes building permit application.  “County” refers to Marion County.  “Director” refers to the Community Development Director.  “exc.” means excluding.  “ft” refers to feet.  “Hazelnut” refers to Hazelnut Drive.  “max” means maximum.  “min” means minimum.  “Modal share” means the percentage of travelers using a particular type of transportation or number of trips using a type, as examples walking, cycling, riding transit, and driving.  “Modal shift” means a change in modal share.  “MUTCD” refers to Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices of the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S. DOT) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).  “NE means northeast.  “NW” means northwest.  “OAR” refers to Oregon Administrative Rules.  refers to on-center spacing, such as of trees or shrubs.  “ODOT” refers to the Oregon Department of Transportation.  “ORS” refers to Oregon Revised Statutes. 116 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 201 Page 2 of 3  “PBPE” refers to a public bicycle/pedestrian easement that grants pedestrian and cyclist access along sidewalk that overlaps private property or along an off-street bicycle/pedestrian path on private property. It substitutes for a PUBPE. “PLA” refers to property line adjustment.  “PU” refers to plant unit as WDO Table 3.06B describes.  “PUBPE” refers to a PUE adapted to grant pedestrian and cyclist access along sidewalk that overlaps private property (“roadside” or “streetside” PUBPE) or along an off-street bicycle/pedestrian path on private property (“off-street” PUBPE). A PBPE may substitute.  “PUD” refers to planned unit development.  “PUE” refers to public utility easement, whether along and abutting public ROW (“roadside” or “streetside” PUE) or extending into or across the interior of private property (“off-street” PUE). In the context of property line adjustment, partition, or subdivision, the developer records through the plat with drawings and notes on the face of the plat. Absent this context, recordation is separate from land use review pursuant to a document template or templates established by PW. PW is the project manager for receiving, reviewing, accepting, obtaining City Council approval for, and recording public easement materials that a developer submits.  “PW” refers to Public Works (the department) or on rare occasion public works (civil infrastructure) depending on context.  “RCWOD”, pronounced by City staff as “R quad”, refers to the Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District that WDO 2.05.05 describes.  “Root barrier” refers to that illustrated by PW SS&Ds, Drawing No. 1 “Street Tree Planting New Construction”.  “ROW” refers to right-of-way.  “RPZ” refers to root protection zone in the context of tree preservation.  “SDCs” refers to system development charges, also known as impact fees.  “SE” means southeast.  “SDA” refers to site development area, the entire territory that is the subject of the land use application package.  “Shared rear lane” refers to what resembles and functions like an alley, but isn’t public ROW.  “sq ft” refers to square feet.  “SS&Ds” refers to PW standard specifications and drawings.  “Street trees” refer to trees that conform to the WDO, including 3.06.03A and Tables 3.06B & C, and that have root barriers where applicable per PW Drawing No. 1 “Street Tree Planting New Construction”.  “Substantial construction” means that all grading necessary to accommodate full construction of both public improvements and common area improvements is complete, the developer constructed and dedicated all required public improvements, and the developer improved and dedicated all required common area tracts. 117 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 201 Page 3 of 3  “SW” means southwest.  “TCE” refers to temporary construction easement.  “Tot.” means total.  “TPU” means the Transit Plan Update Approved Final Report dated November 8, 2010.  “TDM” refers to transportation demand management, which means according to the TSP 82), “a policy tool as well as a general term used to describe any action that removes single occupant vehicle trips from the roadway during peak travel demand periods”, and according to Wikipedia as of October 13, 2020, “the application of strategies and policies to reduce travel demand, or to redistribute this demand in space or in time.”  “TSP” means the Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP).  “UGB” means urban growth boundary.  “Walkway” refers to what would otherwise be called sidewalk except the paved walking surface is on private property outside of any of ROW or an easement granting public access.  “WDO” refers to the Woodburn Development Ordinance.  “WFD” refers to the Woodburn Fire District.  “WTS” refers to the Woodburn Transit System.  “w/i” means within.  “w/o” means without.  “VCA” refers to vision clearance area as WDO 1.02 and 3.03.06 establish or as a specific condition establishes. 118 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 1 of 8 ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Attachment 202: Lot & Tract Development Standards Introduction This attachment establishes PUD lot and tract development standards and could serve as a standalone document for both homebuilders and Planning Division review of building permits assuming the developer will have constructed all public and common area improvements and/or paid fees in-lieu, obtained final plat approval by the City, have had the Director sign the Mylar, and recorded the plat. “WDO” refers to the Woodburn Development Ordinance, last amended via Ordinance No. 2579 adopted April 13, 2020. Refer to Attachment 201 for a dictionary/glossary, including other acronyms and abbreviations. For improvements that the City requires of common area and City/public tracts, see Attachment 203. Part A. Lot Development Standards Tables PUD 2020-02 Dove Landing PUD Development Standards for Lots Abutting Alley or Shared Rear Lane Table 202A-1 Lot Area, Min (sq ft) Interior, flag or cul-de-sac lot 2,700 Corner lot Single-family dwelling 3,500 Child care facility or group home 2 Per WDO Middle housing: duplex, triplex, quadplex, townhouse, or cottage cluster Same as required for single- family dwelling Any other use Per WDO Lot Width, Min (ft) Interior, flag or cul-de-sac lot 27 Corner lot 35 Lot Depth, Average (ft) 90 Interior or cul-de-sac lot 25 Single-family dwelling 25 119 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 2 of 8 Street Frontage Min (ft) Corner lot Middle housing: duplex, triplex, quadplex, townhouse, or cottage cluster Same as required for single- family dwelling Any other use Per WDO Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Min (ft) – exc. streetside porch or roofed patio 7 11 Side Setback, Min (ft) – exc. garage Primary structure 5 11, except that each lot may have zero lot line development along one side lot line Accessory structure Rear Setback See “Setback Abutting an Alley or Shared Rear Lane below. Setback Abutting an Alley or Shared Rear Lane for Both Primary & Accessory Structures, Min (ft) – exc. garage and carport Either 1 11 or where there is a required PUE on the lot alongside shared rear lane then equal to PUE Garage and Carport Setback, Min (ft) Either 1 or a full 15 ft. Also, in lieu of a two-car wide garage, two one-car wide garages – or a one-car wide garage and a carport – may be paired with one garage or carport at 1 ft and the other garage at 15 ft. Setback to a Streetside Porch, Roofed Patio, Balcony, or Open-Air Veranda, Min (ft) 5 Setback to a Private Access Easement, Min (ft) 1 Lot Coverage, Max 65 Streetside Porch or Roofed Patio, Min Per Table 202A-3. Building Height, Max (ft) Per WDO 11. Encroachments and projections into setback minimums remain permissible per WDO 3.03.03A, D & F; 3.03.04A; and 3.03.05A. 120 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 3 of 8 PUD 2020-02 Dove Landing PUD Development Standards for Lots with Conventional Access Table 202A-2 Lot Area, Min (sq ft) Interior, flag or cul-de-sac lot 3,500 1 Corner lot Single-family dwelling 4,300 1 Child care facility or group home 2 Per WDO Middle housing: duplex, triplex, quadplex, townhouse, or cottage cluster Same as required for single- family dwelling Any other use Per WDO Lot Width, Min (ft) Interior, flag or cul-de-sac lot 35 Corner lot 43 Lot Depth, Average (ft) 96 Street Frontage Min (ft) Interior or cul-de-sac lot 25 Corner lot Single-family dwelling 25 Middle housing: duplex, triplex, quadplex, townhouse, or cottage cluster Same as required for single- family dwelling Any other use Per WDO Flag lot Per each pole if poles of adjacent flag lots are paired: 7½; Per independent pole: 11 Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Min (ft) – exc. garage and carport and streetside porch or roofed patio 11 11 Side Setback, Min (ft) – exc. garage Primary structure 5 11, except that each lot may have zero lot line development along one side lot line Accessory structure Rear Setback, Average (ft) Primary structure 15 7, 11 Accessory structure Per WDO Garage and Carport Setback, Min (ft) Garage 19 Carport 2 121 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 4 of 8 Setback to a Streetside Porch or Roofed Patio, Min (ft) 5 Setback to a Private Access Easement, Min (ft) 1 Lot Coverage, Max 65 Building Height, Max (ft) Per WDO 1. Per WDO Table 2.02B Footnote 1 5. A front setback applies to only to the pole. A flag is considered to have three sides and a rear. 7. Per WDO Table 2.02B Footnote 7 11. Encroachments and projections into setback minimums remain permissible per WDO 3.03.03A, D & F; 3.03.04A & C, and 3.03.05A-D. 122 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 5 of 8 PUD 2020-02 Dove Landing PUD Related Development Standards Table 202A-3 Residential Density, Min (units per net acre) 6.8 Walkways Each dwelling shall have a paved walkway connecting front door landing and sidewalk distinct from driveway and parking pad. Paved w/ bricks, concrete pavers, patterned poured concrete, or combination. Min 4 ft wide. Min width may narrow to 3½ where walkway is flush w/ driveway. Driveway widths (For parking space/stall dimensions, see Parking spaces/stalls below.) Access management A lot that abuts both any of an alley, shared rear lane, or flag lot pole, and one or more streets is prohibited from a driveway approach / apron / curb cut along the street or streets. Min (ft) 8 Max (ft) Alley/shared rear lane Equal to lot width Street 16 Parking spaces/stalls Ratio Per WDO Table 3.05A Parking pads (WDO 3.05.03F.1b) Number, Min Alley/shared rear lane: none Street: 1 Dimensions, Min (ft) Alley/shared rear lane: 8 by 15 Street: 8 by 18 Stalls within a garage and/or carport Number, Min 2, either both garaged or as both a carport and garage on the same lot. Dimensions, Min (ft) 8 by 18, exc. fixed encroachments such as door swings and water heaters The 5-ft parking setback of WDO 3.05.02E does not apply. Streetside porches and roofed patios Applies to lots abutting an alley, shared rear lane, or flag lot pole; corner lots; and specific lots per Footnote 3. Number, Min 1 per lot Dimensions, Min Floor area*: 106 sq ft Narrowest*: 8½ ft Street exposure: 8½ ft length/width Height clearance: 8 ft *Measured to edges of porch flooring or patio slab. Flooring Brick, concrete pavers, poured concrete slab, linoleum, or fiber cement or wood plank. Columns/posts Per Footnote 1. Delineation Per Footnote 2. 123 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 6 of 8 1. Ornamental columns. If the streetside porch or roofed patio provides one or more columns as corner supports, the columns must be ornamental by meeting one of the following standards. Wrought iron style porch supports do not meet this standard: a. Large columns that are divided visually into clear areas of capital, shaft, and base. Large rectilinear columns are min 8 by 8 inches, and large rounded columns have a diameter min 8 inches; or b. Groupings of 2, 3, or 4 small columns divided visually into clear areas of capital, shaft, and base. Small rectilinear columns are min 4 by 4 inches, and small rounded columns have a diameter min 4 inches. 2. Delineation includes any of balustrade, fall protection, wood fencing, and metal or wood railings and is required. 3½ ft high max. 4 ft wide max passage allowed. Fencing or railing with top member flat and min 3 inches wide. A second horizontal member below the top member (to allow affixing, hanging, or threading items below the top member). Part B. Architecture: This section shall apply to lots and supersede any conflict w/ WDO 3.07.03. 1. Both Lots Abutting Alley or Shared Rear Lane & Lots with Conventional Access: a. Roof pitch of site-built dwellings min 6:12; eaves not required to project from zero lot line. b. Masonry cladding, if any, in a horizontal band or bands, not as multi-story vertical bands. c. On a corner lot along the second frontage, windows min 10% of facade wall surface. d. Windows square or vertically proportioned; may be grouped into horizontal bands. Horizontal proportion allowed if having grilles or muntins dividing lights or panes to be vertical proportion. 2. Lots Abutting Alley or Shared Rear Lane a. House having an entrance on a street-facing façade and that is within or next to the required streetside porch or roofed patio. b. Applies to any houses that are two or more stories or one story w/ attic story: House front having a bay or box window min 2 ft deep, 5 ft wide, and with ceiling height min 7 ft. Dimensions assume box; bay may have angled sides and a sloped roof if exceeding min dimensions. House fronts facing south or west may substitute the window for balcony or open-air veranda. Balcony min 6½ ft deep and 81 sq ft and either w/ recess min 2 ft or house roof overhang or balcony roof min 2 ft deep and 10 ft wide. Veranda min 81 sq ft, extending to min two of outer edges of porch or patio, and roofed. Fall protection having top member flat and min 3 inches wide. c. Applies to all corner lot houses: The second lot frontage façade shall have a bay or box window per the dimensions of b. above. 124 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 7 of 8 3. Lots with Conventional Access: The facade containing the vehicular entrance for an attached garage shall be one of the following: a. Face away from street min 90°; or b. Max 20 ft wide along ground floor total facade width facing a street, and max a percentage of the total facade of the structure facing the street, including second stories, dormers, eyebrows, and gable ends. Percentage is 66.7% for a one-story structure and 50% for a structure of two or more stories. Part C. Tract Development Standards 1. Driveway approaches / aprons / curb cuts: min. 8 ft wide, and max. 10 ft wide. 2. Fencing: Stormwater facilities: max. 3½ ft high, if any fencing proposed for such facilities. 3. Tract G is limited to one driveway apron serving the stormwater facility and, if proposed, shall be on a frontage other than BFR. A Tract H driveway that serves access across that tract to the Tract G storm water facility may substitute for a Tract G driveway. 4. City/public tracts: The City may apply development standards relating to the P/SP zoning district instead of the RS zoning district assuming a given WDO standard doesn’t conflict with a PUD standard. Part D. Lighting: a. Applicability: Permanent exterior lighting outside of ROW. Lots: For fixtures located facing any of ROW, streets, alleys, shared rear lanes, flag lot pole shared driveways, and common area tracts, whether on buildings or structures or in yards. Tracts: For fixtures located facing any of ROW, streets, alleys, shared rear lanes, flag lot pole shared driveways, and common area tracts, whether on buildings or structures or in yards, and including floodlights and lighting of permanent signage. Sports field lighting must be full cut-off from emitting light both above a horizontal plane parallel with the ground and beyond vertical planes flush with the field boundaries. The City may require separate review and approval of sports field lighting. b. Standards: If proposed, exterior light fixtures shall be full cut-off or fully shielded and shall not be visible beyond a line 3½ ft above the applicable lot line or tract boundary. They shall be limited in height – as measured to the underside of a fixture – as follows: 125 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 202 Page 8 of 8 Wall: Exterior wall-mounted fixtures shall be 8 ft max above finished grade. (This height limit is not applicable to emergency egress lighting and permanent wall signs allowed through WDO 3.10 were they to have interior illumination.) Parking pole: On tracts, exterior pole-mounted fixtures within 4 ft of or in parking, loading, and vehicular circulation areas shall be 14½ ft high max above vehicular finished grade. Other pole: On lots and tracts, other exterior pole-mounted fixtures, if any, shall be 8 ft high max above grade. c. Conformance: Demonstrate through building permit review. The Planning Division may require inspection to be scheduled evening or night. Part E. VCA WDO 3.03.06 is hereby modified such that: 1. The alley part of Fig 3.03A shall apply to also any shared rear lane, except that VCA triangles shall measure min 5 by 5 ft for any of alleys and shared rear lanes. 2. Regarding the street corner part of Fig. 3.03A, VCA triangles shall measure min 15 by 15 ft, except that for the four corner lots within the central block (Lots 40, 85, 86, & 131), Fig. 3.03B shall apply instead. Part F. Signage WDO 3.10 is hereby modified such that for City/public tracts, the City may apply sign regulations relating to the P/SP zoning district instead of the RS zoning district. 126 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 1 of 8 ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Attachment 203: Common Area Improvements & Public Easements Introduction This attachment establishes PUD common area tract improvements and types and placements of public easements. Refer to Attachment 201 for a dictionary/glossary, including other acronyms and abbreviations. For lot and tract development standards, see Attachment 202. Part A. Common area improvements: Amenities / appurtenances / street furniture / support facilities Common area and off-street public improvements are per the table below: Table 203A. Common Area Improvements Improvement Type Min Number Placements Details Benches 9 Tract K: 4, all along paths and one each at east, middle east, middle west, and west. Place along paths and sidewalks, set back 2 ft min, and on at least 6 by 4 ft of asphalt, brick, concrete pavers, or poured concrete. If brick or pavers, pour concrete for bench post footings. 6 ft width min; 75% min of them having backs. For public parkland, the City spec model (with back) is Dumor Bench 88-60PL in “cedar” color and with support posts in black; for Tract C and Trillium Way ROW, this model is the standard. Other: 1 each Tracts F, H, I, L, & O Picnic benches 3 Tract I: 1. Place in shelters. Min 1 shall be ADA-accessible from a sidewalk or path. For public parkland, the City spec is Tree Top Products 46” SuperSaver Commercial Square Picnic Table in black (SKU 1WG5685-KB), and the Tract K: 2. 127 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 2 of 8 Table 203A. Common Area Improvements Improvement Type Min Number Placements Details standard ADA model is SKU #1WG5686-BK. Bicycle parking 16 stalls Tract H: 4 Each facility with at least 6 by 2 ft per stall paved with asphalt, bricks, concrete pavers, or poured concrete pad. If bricks or pavers, pour concrete for the rack footings. Place all along paths and sidewalks. If along sidewalk, set back the stalls 2 ft and pave a 4-ft wide walkway between sidewalk and edge of stalls. Cover/sheltering: At least 2 (1 U- rack) shall be covered from precipitation. Min height clearance 7 ft. The roof shall extend min 2 ft past stall edges. For public parkland, the City spec is Oregon Corrections Enterprises [OCE] “single bike rack” powder coated black, either model #718- 013-006 or #718-012-006 depending on mounting. See OCE parks and recreation catalog p. 15. For Tract C and Trillium Way ROW, this model is the standard. Tract I: 2 Tract K: 10 Dog waste stations 2 Tract I: 1 For public parkland, the City spec model is Mutt-Mitt Mini Dog Waste Station 1000/1002 in green; for Tract C, this model is the standard. Tract K: 1 Paths Within this Attachment 203, see Part C. Playground 1 Either option: Option A: Tract K As the Assistant City Administrator directs. Option B: Tract H As proposed and with public access easement across the tract. Plaza 1 Tract I: 1, flush with sidewalk at SE corner of & Streets. Paved min 300 sq ft, 12 ft narrowest dimension. Restrooms 1 pair Tract K For public parkland, the City recommended model is Public 128 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 3 of 8 Table 203A. Common Area Improvements Improvement Type Min Number Placements Details Restroom co. model PS-022-CE-ST with “CMU combo finish” and “standing seam metal” roof. Colors:  Roof: green;  Walls: green on bottom split- face CMU, either cream or grayish white elsewhere;  Doors: green. Drinking fountains: On the front of the building, wall mount a pair of fountains, one fountain being ADA-compliant. The recommended model is Haws 1011 Barrier-Free Dual Wall Mount Fountain. Trash receptacles 3 Tract I: 1 For public parkland, the City spec model for the trash receptacle is Dumor 41-40PL-RC 40-gallon in “cedar” color and with support post in black; for Tract C, this model is the standard. Tract K: 2 Seat walls (optional) No min; max per notes. n/a For any tract with 2 or more benches, the developer may substitute a bench with a seat wall 6 ft wide minimum by 1½ ft deep and high, the height including a cap or lip of smoother concrete. Shelters 1 or 2 Tract K: Choice of either 1 large or a combo of 1 medium and 1 small. Gazebos, pavilions, or shelters each with min 10 ft height clearance. Large equals min 900 sq ft, medium equals 600, and small equals 300. Narrowest dimension is 30 ft for large, 24 for medium, and 14 for small. Any post base with protruding bolts/screws must be guarded or housed for trip and cut safety. If a shelter floor level is at grade, place an ADA-compliant picnic bench. Provide a walkway min 4 ft 129 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 4 of 8 Table 203A. Common Area Improvements Improvement Type Min Number Placements Details wide between each shelter and any of a sidewalk or path. Include weatherized flip cap electric outlets, min 4 for large shelter or min 2 for the medium shelter. There is no City spec. The applicant may duplicate or mimic either the shelter model proposed on land use review Sheet L7, Detail 5 or the model in the Smith Creek Development Phase 1A plaza at Ben Brown Lane & Kirksey Street (Western Wood Structures, Inc., building permit 971-20-000134- STR), which is 600 sq ft at 24 narrowest dimension. Signage 1 A park identification monument sign as the Assistant City Administrator directs or fee in-lieu per Attachment 206. Administrative minor adjustment by the Director to common area improvement location or placement is permissible. 130 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 5 of 8 Part B. Common area improvements: landscaping: 1. Bark dust: Excepting Class F paths, 5.0% max of landscaped area may be bark dust or wood chip. 2. Tree species: WDO Table 3.06C is hereby modified by PUD to allow anywhere within the development (outside of ROW) any tree species that isn’t invasive and within ROW any tree species that isn’t invasive and is a cultivar barren of fruit, nuts, and seed pods. 3. Evergreen: 15 min of trees new to the site and outside of ROW. The 15 shall be min 1 of the following coniferous or evergreen species: Cedar, Western Red Madrone, Pacific Douglas-Fir Oak, Oregon White Fir, Grand Pine, Ponderosa; and Hemlock, Western Yew, Pacific 4. Tracts: Screening: Evergreen hedge or shrubbery shall be screen at-grade electrical and mechanical equipment along their sides, excepting the side intended for technician access. 5. Complementary trees: On Tracts F, G, H, I, & K, every yard abutting a street shall have a loose row of trees that complements the row of street trees. Along each frontage, a min number equal to and placed at an approximate average o.c. spacing of 1 per 30 ft of frontage, and with trees new to the site placed at least 4 ft from edge of sidewalk and 16 ft max from ROW. For Tract I, if and where a plaza is required the developer may site trees farther away along the plaza edge. 6. Other plants: On any tract, also plant 80 PUs of any min 3 non-invasive species of shrubbery most likely to attract honeybees, having identified such species on a landscape plan. 7. Path furniture zone trees: Table 203B. Path Furniture Zone Trees Tract Trees Min. No. Details K Equal to 1 per 15 ft of path [100] Approximate o.c. placements of 1 per 30 ft along path. All other tracts Equal to 1 per 30 ft of path [ Mostly west side placements. 131 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 6 of 8 Part C. Bicycle/Pedestrian Paths 1. Classes: Table 203C-1. Path Classes Class Width (ft) Pavement Furniture Zones (ft) B 10 Asphalt or concrete 6 inc 2-ft shoulder C 8 6 inc 2-ft shoulder; in constrained mid-block tracts, 5 ft one side inc 1-ft shoulder F 5 None; bark dust or wood chip None 2. Placements: Table 203C-2. Path Placements Tract Min. Class Placement Reference B 1 C W/ west furniture zone. “Path B” D 1 “Path D” F 1 Min 8 ft from west tract boundary. “Path F” I 1 F Per Assistant City Administrator. “Path I” K 1 w/ 4 spurs B; spurs C Generally straight between east sidewalk and west tract boundary. Site as far north as 8 ft south of the south lot lines and as far south as to have its south furniture zone flush with the north boundary of the northernmost existing drainage easement. Site north middle east segment 8 ft from Lot 142 west line. A spur from north middle east segment to south tract boundary adjacent to NE corner of Tax Lot 051W06CD01700. “Path K” or “main path” L 1 B Min 6 ft from east tract boundary. “Path L” O 1 “Path O” M 1 C W/ a west furniture zone. “Path M” N 1 “Path N” 3. Basic standards: a. Pavement: Asphalt: min 4 inches of hot mix asphalt (Level 3) atop min 8 inches of 1-inch minus crushed aggregate base course. ADA-compliant. Concrete: Same as PW construction standards for sidewalk. b. Shoulders: Gravel, if any, within shoulders shall be placed so that the finished grade of the gravel shall be shallow sloped such that, at the path, the gravel is min. 1 inch below the path finished grade and, at 2 ft from path edge, it’s min 2 inches below path finished grade. 132 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 7 of 8 Part D. Public Easements In addition to standard streetside PUEs per WDO 3.02.01B, based on WDO 3.02.01C the developer shall dedicate public easements as follows: 1. Granting bicycle/pedestrian access: a. Wherever sidewalk overlaps any streetside PUE and Tracts I & K; b. Tracts B, D, F, L, M, N, O; c. Tract H, required at all only for Table 203A, Playground Option B; and d. Tract (central block alley/shared rear lane). 2. Off-street PUEs: a. Tract F, arrange so that PUE min width 16 ft abuts Tax Lot 051W06C000900 west lot line; b. Tract L, arrange so that PUE min width 16 ft allows tract path to have trees both sides. c. Tract O, arrange same as for L. d. Tract (central block alley/shared rear lane). Applies if PW declines to accept as ROW: Both tract and PUE min width 16 ft; if tract wider, easements(s) flush one side min; Travel way pavement min width 14 ft. Asphalt, bricks, concrete pavers, poured concrete, or combination. Depths per WDO 3.04.04; 1 ft shoulders each side. May be grass, grass w/ “grasscrete”, brick, concrete pavers, or poured concrete as long as any pavement doesn’t duplicate that of the travel way. Gravel prohibited; and The two end driveway curb cuts limited to max width 14 ft. 3. Bus: On Tract F as follows: Along BFR, allowing for a bus shelter pad extending beyond ROW and a shelter. Per Assistant City Administrator direction or default easement min 20 ft wide along BFR. 4. CAE: On Tract F as follows: Min width 21 ft w/ TCE extending 5 ft sides that expires upon driveway/drive aisle construction. Place between Tax Lot 900 and Street w/ west side aligned with a point 5 ft east of Tax Lot 900 west lot line. New trees prohibited. 133 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 203 Page 8 of 8 Part E. Association / HOA To meet WDO 3.09.09, there shall be an association of owners and/or tenants as follows: 1. Prior to conveying land ownership of any tract, the developer shall establish an association, such as homeowners association (HOA), pursuant to ORS 94 and other applicable statutes. 2. The association shall assume maintenance of improvements on common area tracts, inc. stormwater facilities; repair, replace, and restore improvements; identify and make clear to owners association duties; and levy assessments to owners in a fair, transparent, and written way. (If the association ceases to exist resulting in a tract or tracts no longer having an existing owner for a year or more based on the Oregon Secretary of State Corporation Division business registry, and where this provision does not conflict with ORS or OAR, the City shall have right of first refusal to acquire the property in coordination with the Marion County Assessor’s Office.) 3. Documents: The developer shall provide copies of articles of incorporation, bylaws, and CC&Rs for the association to the Assistant City Attorney and Director for review upon final plat application to the City or earlier if ORS 94.565(2) requires. Bylaws and/or CC&Rs shall describe the responsibilities of the association to maintain common area improvements, and bylaws and CC&Rs shall reiterate that because of ORS 94.626, any dissolution would not also dissolve obligations. To this end, the corporation shall comply with applicable statutes and the administrative rules of the Oregon Secretary of State Corporation Division. Documents shall also conform to Oregon House Bill (HB) 2001 (2019), Section 13 10), regarding “middle housing”. The above would continue to apply were the developer to either establish multiple associations or make use of an existing association related to adjacent existing development. The developer shall provide copies of articles of incorporation, bylaws, and CC&Rs for the multiple associations or these documents amended to conform to conditions of approval. 134 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 205 Page 1 of 6 ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Attachment 205: Tree Protection & Environmental Remediation Part A. Tree preservation 1. East: Objective: To preserve most of the trees within the small forest across BFR, & ROWs and Tracts F, G, & I, with focus on Tracts F & G. Exhibit 205A1 Marion County Assessor’s Office aerial view of subject property east area at BFR Exhibit 205A1 Google Street View NW to small forest 135 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 205 Page 2 of 6 Street improvements, inc. both frontage and off-site improvements, shall preserve to the max extent feasible trees that lie within future planter strips and along the other side of sidewalks. The developer shall provide more detail, including the trees identified for preservation and removal, through a tree preservation plan specific to street improvements through CEP. Exception: The developer may be able to except from preservation one or more trees from an approved CEP tree preservation plan if providing for arborist examination during street improvements construction, the arborist documents why and how preservation is not physically feasible, the developer submits such documentation simultaneously to the Director and PW, and the Director approves such documentation prior to removal. 2. SW: Development shall preserve the trees that land use review Sheet 13.1 illustrates to be retained and shall partially retain those that the supplemental arborist memo of January 6, 2021 submitted January 15 summarizes to retain by creating snags out of trees 70522 and 70523 by reducing their heights to max 15 ft and girdling the trunks. Any removal would trigger a tree removal fee / preservation fee in-lieu per Attachment 206. 3. Protection during construction: The developer shall follow this Attachment 205, Part B. Part B. Tree preservation During Construction Tree preservation: Protection during construction: The applicant shall protect the preserved trees pursuant similar to City of Portland Title 11.60.030, specifically either the subsections set of C.1.a.(1), and C.1.b., & f. (clear and objective) and or, the subsections set of C.2.a., & d.-f. (arborist’s discretion) and D. as modified below and shall do so between Design Review approval and issuance of certificate of occupancy (C of C. Protection methods. The Tree Plan shall show that the contractor adequately protects trees to be preserved during construction using one of the methods described below: 1. Clear & Objective Path. a. A root protection zone is established as follows: For trees on the development site - a minimum of 1 foot radius (measured horizontally away from the face of the tree trunk) for each inch of tree diameter (see Figure 80-2) 136 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 205 Page 3 of 6 Figure 80-2 Root Protection Zone Existing encroachments into the root protection zone, including structures, paved surfaces and utilities, may remain. New encroachments into the root protection zone are allowed provided: the area of all new encroachments is less than 25 percent of the remaining root protection zone area when existing encroachments are subtracted; and no new encroachment is closer than 1/2 the required radius distance (see Figure 60-1); 137 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 205 Page 4 of 6 Figure 60-1 Permissible RPZ Encroachments b. Protection fencing Protection fencing consisting of a minimum 6-foot high metal chain link construction fence, secured with 2-foot metal posts shall be established at the edge of the root protection zone and permissible encroachment area on the development site. Existing structures and/or existing secured fencing at least 3½ feet tall can serve as the required protective fencing. 138 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 205 Page 5 of 6 When a root protection zone extends beyond the development site, protection fencing is not required to extend beyond the development site. Existing structures and/or existing secured fencing at least 3½ feet tall can serve as the required protective fencing. e. The following is prohibited within the root protection zone of each tree or outside the limits of the development impact area: ground disturbance or construction activity including vehicle or equipment access (but excluding access on existing streets or driveways), storage of equipment or materials including soil, temporary or permanent stockpiling, proposed buildings, impervious surfaces, underground utilities, excavation or fill, trenching or other work activities; and f. The fence shall be installed before any ground disturbing activities including clearing and grading, or construction starts; and shall remain in place until final inspection by Planning Division staff. 2. Arborist’s Discretion. When the prescriptive path is not practicable, the applicant may propose alternative measures to modify the clear and objective root protection zone (RPZ), provided the following standards are met: a. The alternative RPZ is prepared by an arborist who has visited the site and examined the specific tree’s size, location, and extent of root cover, evaluated the tree’s tolerance to construction impact based on its species and health, identified any past impacts that have occurred within the root zone, and forwarded a report through the developer to Planning Division staff; b. The arborist has prepared a plan providing the rationale used to demonstrate that the alternate method provides an adequate level of protection based on the findings from the site visit described above; 139 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 205 Page 6 of 6 d. If the alternative methods require the arborist be on site during construction activity, the applicant shall submit a copy of the contract for those services prior to permit issuance and a final report from the arborist documenting the inspections and verifying the viability of the tree(s) prior to final inspection by the Planning Division; e. If the alternative tree protection method involves alternative construction techniques, an explanation of the techniques and materials used shall be submitted; f. The arborist shall sign the tree preservation and protection plan and include contact information. D. Changes to tree protection. Changes to the tree protection measures during the course of the development may be approved as a revision to a permit provided that the change is not the result of an unauthorized encroachment into a root protection zone (RPZ), and the applicant demonstrates that the tree protection standards of this Section continue to be met. When an unauthorized encroachment has occurred, the City may pursue an enforcement action or other remedy. Part C. Environmental Remediation This applies to all tracts, unless otherwise specified. The developer shall: 1. Invasive plant removal: Eradicate invasive creepers, groundcover, shrubbery, vines, and weeds that might exist, at min any of the following species: Himalaya blackberry (Rubus armeniacus) English ivy (Hedera helix) Common reed (Phragmites australis) Giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) Gorse (Ulex europaeus) Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) Old man's beard (Clematis vitalba) Ribbongrass (Phalaris arundinacea var. Picta) Water primrose (Ludwigia hexapetala, peploides) Yellow flag or yellow water iris (Iris pseudacorus) 2. Grass: Where removal of invasive plants or the unintended effect of nearby construction results in bare ground, plant lawn grass, wild grass, or a combination. 140 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 206 Page 1 of 2 ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing PUD: Attachment 206: Conditioned Fees All of the following conditioned fees are due as applicable, whether or not mentioned directly by a condition of approval. Refer to Condition G3 for a dictionary/glossary, including acronyms and shorthand text. Part A. Fee Provisions 1. Any and all conditioned fees are in addition to, and not in place or as discounts of, any existing charge or fee however termed ordinarily assessed based on any existing ordinance, resolution, or administrative policy, inc. adopted fee schedules. If and when the City amends any ordinance, resolution, or administrative policy, inc. a fee schedule, to increase a charge or fee that is both the same kind of charge or fee that is conditioned, the amended charge or fee amount would exceed the amount conditioned, and the increase takes effect before the conditioned fee is due, then the developer shall pay the greater amount. 2. Payments of conditioned fees shall reference a final decision case file number and the condition of approval letter/number designation, be it in a check memo field or through a cover or transmittal letter. For administrative and logistical details of such fee payments, the developer is to contact and administrative assistant or similar position in either PW or the Community Development Dept. as applicable. For all administrative and logistical questions about fee payment, the developer is to contact the permit/planning technician at (503) 982-5246 and refer to this attachment within the ANX 2020-03 Dove Landing final decision. For payment method policy details, the developer is to contact the Finance Department at (503) 982-5222, option zero, for payment method policy details. 141 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANX 2020-03, PUD 2020-02, etc. Staff Report / Final Decision Attachment 206 Page 2 of 2 Part B. Fee Table Table 206B. Conditioned Fees Condition Reference Fee Type Amount Context Timing Staff Tracking: PUD-5 Tree removal Preservation fee in-lieu Trees 70522 & 70523 $500 per tree If not reduced to “snags” per Attachment 205, Part A. Final plat approval by the City G6 through this Attachment 206 CEP: Review by Planning Division; and PUD Final Plan Approval review $250; $327 Original/1st submittal; each subsequent inc. deferral/piecemeal Before final plat approval by the City Inspections by Planning Division $75; $327 1st inspection or each subsequent Subdivision improvements and building permit T-BP1 c. Wayfinding signage fee in-lieu $1,500 per location Regardless of number of sign faces that would’ve been at a location Final plat approval by the City Attachment 203 Park identification monument sign fee in-lieu $5,000 Assistant City Administrator discretion Final plat approval by the City G6 through this Attachment 206 Bond / bonding / performance guarantee: construction $250 per request Covers submittal of written request and draft materials. Applies also to deferred/piecemeal submittals. Were the developer to request and if City is willing to consider a request 142 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item Agenda Item Review: City Administrator CityAttorney___x__ Finance__x___ April 26, 2021 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council, through City Administrator FROM: Anthony Turley, Finance Director SUBJECT: Establishment of the American Rescue Plan Fund RECOMMENDATION: Approve the attached resolution authorizing the City Administrator to establish the American Rescue Plan Fund. BACKGROUND: On March 11, 2021 President Biden signed into law the American Rescue Plan (ARP). The ARP allocates $1.9 trillion to COVID-19 relief and economic recovery. The City of Woodburn has been allocated $5.36 million. The distribution of the funds will occur over the next two fiscal years, $2.7 million this year and the balance in next fiscal year. The grant money will be distributed to the City through the State, however, the State cannot place any additional restrictions on the use of the funds nor keep any portion of the distribution. Oregon budget law, ORS 294.480 provides that a supplemental budget is required when a change to the adopted budget is necessary due to “unforeseen circumstances”. Budget law provides for exceptions to the requirements of a supplemental budget under ORS 294.326(3) when the unforeseen circumstance is due to certain conditions including “specific purpose grants and gifts.” When those conditions occur, the City Council can approve the appropriation of the funds and establish the required fund via a resolution. The Grant to the City by the Federal Government (Grantor) is a specific purpose grant and is subject to the exception noted above. DISCUSSION: As required by budget law, upon acceptance of the grant the City will establish a separate fund. For accounting purposes, it is designated as a “special 143 ---PAGE BREAK--- Honorable Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 Page 2 revenue fund” to ensure the proper use of the proceeds as designated by the grantor. The fund’s name will be the American Rescue Plan Fund (Fund 136) and the purpose of the fund is to account for the revenue and approved expenditures of the grant as designated by the grantor The grant proceeds will be deposited within the City’s interest bearing account (Local Government Investment Pool). Any interest earnings from the donation proceeds will be allocated and credited to the American Rescue Plan fund. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The establishment of a new fund in the City’s current fund structure should have no direct impact on current operations nor will the management of the ongoing special revenue fund have a significant impact on Finance staff. For the 2020-2021 Fiscal Year the American Rescue Plan Fund will appropriate revenues in the amount of $2,700,000. Because the distribution of money will happen in May or June the entire appropriation will be held in contingency. 144 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 1 – COUNCIL BILL NO. 3148 RESOLUTION NO. 2168 COUNCIL BILL NO. 3148 RESOLUTION NO. 2168 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN FUND AND APPROVING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 WHEREAS, the City desires to accept a grant from the Federal Government to fund the City’s recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic; and WHEREAS, the City is willing and able to comply with the requirements of uses of the proceeds as designated by the grantor; and WHEREAS, the City will establish a special revenue fund to account for the proceeds and uses of the grant; and WHEREAS, ORS 294.480(1) permits supplemental budgets when “an occurrence of condition which had not been ascertained at the time of the preparation of a budget for the current year or current budget period which requires a change in financial planning”; and WHEREAS, ORS 294.326(3) provides exceptions to supplemental budget requirements when specific circumstances are met, including the receipt of specific purpose grants and gifts that have been designated by the grantor or donor; and WHEREAS, the establishment of the American Rescue Plan Fund and appropriations for the fund comply with ORS 294.326(3); NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY OF WOODBURN RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to the applicable ORS provisions cited above, the City Council hereby authorizes the establishment of the American Rescue Plan Fund and approves the appropriations for FY 2020-2021 in amounts listed in Exhibit A. Approved as to Form: City Attorney Date APPROVED: Eric Swenson, Mayor Passed by the Council Submitted to the Mayor 145 ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 2 – COUNCIL BILL NO. 3148 RESOLUTION NO. 2168 Approved by the Mayor Filed in the Office of the Recorder ATTEST: Heather Pierson, City Recorder City of Woodburn, Oregon 146 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn American Rescue Plan Fund FY 2020-2021 Category Original Supplemental Revised Federal Grants - (2,700,000) (2,700,000) Contingency - 2,700,000 2,700,000 Exhibit A 147 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item Agenda Item Review: City Administrator City Attorney Finance April 26, 2021 TO: Mayor, City Council (acting as the Local Contract review Board) through City Administrator THROUGH: Marty Pilcher, Chief of Police FROM: Andy Shadrin, Lieutenant SUBJECT: Surplus Vehicle Disposal RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Administrator to dispose of surplus vehicles that are currently in the inventory of the Woodburn Police Department. BACKGROUND: The Police Department currently has two canine patrol vehicles, 3 Kawasaki and one Ford F150 pickup in our inventory that are now surplus vehicles. The three and the two K9 vehicles have been replaced with new equipment. The pickup is no longer able to support the department’s needs and will eventually be replaced. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the City’s Public Contracting Ordinance (Ord. 2381) Section 8, The City Administrator shall have the authority to dispose of surplus property and abandoned personal property not owned by the City by any means determined to be in the best interests of the City, including but not limited to, transfer to other departments, government agencies, non- profit organizations, sale, trade, auction, or destruction; provided however, that disposal of personal property having residual value of more than $10,000 shall be subject to authorization by the Local Contract Review Board. All of the information regarding our surplus fleet was provided to Gresham Ford for a trade in evaluation. In total, Gresham Ford has offered to take all of the vehicle in on trade and hold the value as a trade credit for $25,600. Due to the 148 ---PAGE BREAK--- Mayor and City Council April 26, 2021 Page 2 fact, Gresham Ford is part of the Oregon Cooperate Purchasing Program; the Police Department will use the trade credit towards the next vehicle purchase. Gresham Ford is currently searching for a vehicle in order for the Police Department to purchase. However, given the pandemic, current inventory is limited. Gresham Ford will hold onto the trade credit until a suitable vehicle can be found. FINANCIAL IMPACT: At this time, there is no financial impact to the City. Once a suitable vehicle is located, the Police Department will be able to use the trade credit and if necessary use current funds within the budget to purchase a vehicle. The expected purchase should be completed by June 30, 2021. 149 ---PAGE BREAK--- Integrity ˖ Courage ˖ Pride ˖ Respect ˖ Accountability ˖ Service W WOODBURN POLICE DEPARTMENT 1060 Mt. Hood Avenue, Woodburn, Oregon 97071 Phone: (503) 982-2345 FAX: (503) 982-2370 MEMORANDUM April 6, 2021 To: Scott Derickson Subject: Elimination of Surplus Vehicles Over the years, the Woodburn Police Department has continued to update its vehicle inventory. The six vehicles listed were purchased with general funds. Due to the age and condition of the vehicles, they are no longer able to remain in service for the Woodburn Police Department or the City of Woodburn. Below is a list of vehicles I am recommending be removed from our inventory. Vehicles 2009 Kawasaki Concourse 14 X3. 2015 Ford Explorer patrol vehicle (K9) X2 2004 Ford F150 Once approved for release, Gresham Ford has offered to take the vehicles in trade for the agreed upon price of $25,600 for all six vehicles. The trade credit will be applied to a future purchase from Gresham Ford. Marty Pilcher Chief of Police 150 ---PAGE BREAK--- Integrity ˖ Courage ˖ Pride ˖ Respect ˖ Accountability ˖ Service TRANSFER OF VEHICLE TITLE TRANSFEROR: City of Woodburn 270 Montgomery Street Woodburn, Oregon 97071 TRANSFEREE: Gresham Ford 1999 East Powell Blvd Gresham, Oregon 97080 Vehicle Description Estimated Value Status 2009 Kawasaki Concourse 14 (X3) $6600 City Owned 2004 Black F150 $6000 City Owned 2015 Ford Explorer K9 (X2) $13,000 City Owned TRANSFEROR, as owner of the above-described vehicles, transfers ownership of the vehicle to TRANSFEREE for the total sum of $25,600. TRANSFEROR hereby releases all ownership rights in the above-described vehicle upon signing the back of the vehicle’s title, making the necessary odometer disclosure, and delivering the vehicle’s title to the TRANSFEREE. TRANSFEROR agrees to notify the Oregon State DMV of this transfer within ten (10) days, per the requirements of ORS 803.112. TRANSFEROR declares that the statements contained herein are true and correct to the best of its knowledge and belief. Scott Derickson, Woodburn City Administrator Date TRANSFEREE hereby accepts full liability for the above-described vehicle and any third-party liability incurred from the vehicle’s use from the date of transfer. TRANSFEREE agrees to apply for transfer the vehicle’s title with the Oregon State DMV within thirty (30) days of this transfer, per the requirements of ORS 803.090. 151 ---PAGE BREAK--- Integrity ˖ Courage ˖ Pride ˖ Respect ˖ Accountability ˖ Service TRANSFEREE acknowledges receipt of this Transfer of Vehicle Title and understands that there is no guarantee or warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the above- described vehicle. The Transferee also understands this vehicle does not have an engine installed. It is also understood that the above-described vehicle is transferred in “AS-IS” condition. Gresham Ford Representative Date 152