Document Woodburn_doc_2dd76610fc

– Page 7 – VOLUME II Technical Memorandums #1 - #6 ---PAGE BREAK--- APG Woodburn TSP 1/8/18 LAND US E PLANNING TRANS PORTATION PLANN ING PROJECT MANAG EMENT MEMORANDUM Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review Woodburn TSP DATE February 5, 2018 TO Project Management Team FROM Darci Rudzinski, Clinton “CJ” Doxsee, Kyra Schneider, Angelo Planning Group CC Matt Hughart, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. OVERVIEW This memorandum presents a review of existing plans, regulations, and policies that affect transportation planning in the City of Woodburn. The review explains the relationship between the documents and planning within the City’s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB), identifying key issues that will guide the Transportation System Plan (TSP) update process. This memorandum is intended to guide later decisions regarding selection of preferred transportation solutions and necessary amendments to related plan documents and regulations. Some documents included in this review establish transportation-related standards, targets, and guidelines with which the TSP update must be coordinate and consistent with; others contain transportation improvements that will need to be factored into the future demand modeling and otherwise reflected in the draft TSP update. Local policy and regulatory requirements described in this review – such as the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) – may be subject to recommended amendments in order to implement the recommendations of the updated TSP. This memorandum helps set the state for those potential amendments, which will be prepared as part of project implementation (Tasks 6 and The following plans were reviewed. Overview 1 Key Findings 3 Statewide Plans 3 Statewide Planning Goals 3 Oregon Transportation Plan (2006) 5 Oregon Highway Plan (1999, last amended 2015) 6 Policy 1A: State Highway Classification System 7 Policy 1C: State Highway Freight System 7 Policy 1D: Scenic Byways 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 2 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Policy 1F: Highway Mobility Standards Access Management Policy 8 Policy 1G: Major Improvements 9 Policy 2B: Off-System Improvements 10 Policy 2F: Traffic Safety 10 Policy 2G: Rail and Highway Compatibility 10 Policy 3A: Classification and Spacing Standards 10 Policy 4A: Efficiency of Freight Movement 11 Policy 4B: Alternative Passenger Modes 11 Policy 4D: Transportation Demand Management 11 Oregon Freight Plan (2011) 11 Oregon Public Transportation Plan (1997) 12 Oregon Rail Plan (2014) 13 Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2016) 13 Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan (2016) 14 Reduction Review Routes (ORS 366.215 & OAR 731-017) 15 Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012) (2011) 15 Access Management Rule (OAR 734-051) (2014) 16 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program 16 ODOT Highway Design Manual (2012) 17 Oregon Roadway Departure Implementation Plan (2017) 18 Oregon Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (2012) 19 Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Implementation Plan (2014) 19 2015 Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction, Standard Drawings, Standard Details 19 Regional Plans 19 Marion County Rural Transportation System Plan (2005, last amended in 2013) 20 Marion County Comprehensive Land Use Plan (1981, last amended in 2010) 20 City of Woodburn Plans 21 Comprehensive Plan (2012) 21 Urban Growth Coordination Agreement (2015) 22 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, Growth Management Goals and Policies Amendment 22 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and UGB Amendment Justification Studies (2000 – 2005) 24 City of Woodburn Local Wetlands Inventory and Riparian Assessment (2000) 24 Woodburn Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) and Development Strategy (EDS) Report (2001) 24 Technical Report 1, Buildable Lands Inventory (2005) 25 Technical Report 2, Woodburn Residential Lands Needs Analysis (2005) 25 Technical Report 3, Potential UGB Expansion Area Analysis Natural Resources Inventory (2002) 25 Citizen Involvement Report (2005) 25 City of Woodburn Periodic Review and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments Findings of Fact 26 City's Public Facilities Plan (2005) 26 Woodburn TSP (Volumes I and II) (2005) 26 Woodburn Transit Plan Update (2010) 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 3 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Highway 99E Corridor Plan (2012) 27 Woodburn Interchange Area Management Plan (2006) 27 Woodburn Downtown Development Plan Update (2010) 28 Woodburn Proposed Budget FY 2016-17 28 Woodburn Park Master Plans 31 Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update (2009) 31 Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan (2006) 32 Community Centers Feasibility Study (2007) 32 Legion Park & Settlemier Park Master Plans (2003) 32 City of Woodburn Addendum to the Marion County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan (2010) 33 Woodburn Target Industries Analysis (2016) 33 Woodburn Wastewater Facilities Plan (2010) 34 Woodburn Development Ordinance (2002, last amended in 2017) 34 Key Findings • The updated Oregon Highway Plan mobility policy (Policy 1F) embodies more flexibility for meeting “targets” for state highways. • Significant updates to the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan were adopted in 2016 and the Woodburn TSP update can benefit from new state policy. • The Transportation Planning Rule has been updated since the last Woodburn TSP update. • The TSP update’s regulatory review assesses Woodburn’s consistency with the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) and makes recommendations for policy and code amendments to ensure compliance. • There are a number of local plans that have been adopted subsequent to the 2005 TSP. For adopted plans that are not currently reflected in the TSP, policies, standards, and recommendations that have an impact on the transportation system will be considered for consistency as part of this TSP update. STATEWIDE PLANS Statewide Planning Goals The foundation of Oregon’s statewide land use planning program is a set of 19 Statewide Planning Goals. The goals express the state’s policies on land use and on related topics, such as citizen involvement, housing, and natural resources. Oregon’s statewide goals are achieved through local comprehensive planning, including the development and implementation of TSPs. All of Oregon’s Statewide Goals have an influence on transportation planning, either directly or indirectly. However only certain Goals directly apply to transportation planning at a local level; the Goals listed in Table 1 are most relevant to Woodburn’s TSP update. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 4 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Table 1: Statewide Planning Goals Statewide Planning Goal Relevancy to the Woodburn TSP Update Goal 1: Citizen Involvement Establishes citizen involvement as the primary goal of the land use planning process in Oregon. The Woodburn TSP Update process is guided by a robust public involvement plan that includes public involvement goals, identified affected and interested stakeholder and target audiences, and critical factors that will gage success. In addition, this project will be guided by citizen and technical advisory committees that will inform the TSP update throughout the course of the project. Goal 2: Land Use Planning Establishes a process and policy framework for all decisions and actions related to uses of land; ensures that such decisions and actions are premised on an adequate factual base. Existing and future transportation needs will be based on inventories of existing conditions, including existing and planned land uses, as well as improving efficient multi-modal connections to housing, public services, employment areas, and recreational opportunities (see Tech Memo Goal 5: Natural Resources, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Open Spaces Existing natural resources and environmental features influence the siting, construction, and cost of transportation improvements. Inventories of these resources illustrate and describe areas within Woodburn that may pose barriers to providing transportation access or improvements (see Tech Memo Goal 7: Natural Hazards The risk of natural hazards affects site selection and alignment decisions and design standards. Transportation improvement projects in Woodburn should avoid natural hazard areas, such as floodplains, to the extent feasible. Goal 9: Economic Development Addresses the need for a variety of economic opportunities in support of the health, welfare, and prosperity of Oregon’s citizens. The TSP Update process should be coordinated with current and planned economic development activities, such as the recent UGB expansion for the industrial reserve area. Goal 10: Housing Cities are required to anticipate ongoing needs for housing, and to provide adequate infrastructure to serve residential uses. Transportation facilities and project prioritization will be based, in part, on the demands generated by current and projected housing needs. Goal 11: Public Facilities and Services Local governments are required to provide adequate public facilities, including transportation facilities, in a timely and efficient manner. The TSP update will coordinate with or consider the provision of other public facilities consistent with adopted plans. Goal 12: Transportation Requires multi-modal transportation plans for transportation service providers that need to: ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 5 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Statewide Planning Goal Relevancy to the Woodburn TSP Update • Be based upon factual inventories, • Minimize adverse social, environmental, economic, and energy impacts, • Meet the needs of the transportation disadvantaged, • Facilitate the flow of goods and services, and • Be consistent with related local and regional plans. As described in more detail below, Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660, Division 12). Goal 13: Energy Conservation Land uses shall be managed and controlled to maximize the conservation of all forms of energy based upon sound economic principles. In transportation planning, this includes consideration of travel distances and mode share. Goal 14: Urbanization Requires UGBs to “provide an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land use.” Findings of feasibility of providing adequate transportation and other public facilities is required for expansion of UGB’s. Woodburn’s adoption of the UGB expansion was recently acknowledged, adding new urbanizing areas to the city. These areas are expected to be developed within the planning horizon and will require improved transportation facilities to accommodate expected planned growth. Project Relevance: The TSP update will be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals Oregon Transportation Plan (2006) The Oregon Transportation Plan (OTP) is the state’s long-range multi-modal transportation plan that addresses the future transportation needs of the State of Oregon through the year 2030. The primary function of the OTP is to establish goals, policies, strategies, and initiatives that are translated into a series of modal plans, such as the Oregon Highway Plan and Oregon Bike and Pedestrian Plan. The OTP considers all modes of Oregon’s transportation system, including Oregon’s airports, bicycle and pedestrian facilities, highways and roadways, pipelines, ports and waterway facilities, public transportation, and railroads. It assesses state, regional, and local public and private transportation facilities. In addition, the OTP provides the framework for prioritizing transportation improvements based on varied future revenue conditions, but it does not identify specific projects for development. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 6 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 The OTP provides broad policy guidance and sets seven overarching goals for the state.1 Through these goals and associated policies and strategies, the OTP emphasizes: • Maintaining and maximizing the assets in place. • Optimizing the performance of the existing system through technology. • Integrating transportation, land use, economic development, and the environment. • Integrating the transportation system across jurisdictions, ownerships, and modes. • Creating sustainable funding. • Investing in strategic capacity enhancements. The Implementation Framework section of the OTP describes the implementation process and how state multimodal, modal/topic plans, regional and local TSPs and master plans will further refine the OTP’s broad policies and investment levels. Local TSPs can further OTP implementation by defining standards, instituting performance measures, and requiring that operational strategies be developed. The last chapter of the OTP provides implementation and investment frameworks and key initiatives to be consulted in developing TSP projects and implementation measures. Project Relevance: The OTP’s Key Initiatives will guide the TSP update, specifically in the areas of system management, maximizing performance of the existing transportation system using technology and creative design solutions, pursuing sustainable funding sources, and investing strategically in capacity projects. Consistent with a central OTP policy, the TSP update will seek to maximize the performance of the existing local transportation system by the use of technology and system management before considering larger and costlier additions to the system. Oregon Highway Plan (1999, last amended 2015) The Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) is a modal plan of the OTP that guides Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT’s) Highway Division in planning, operations, and financing. Policies in the OHP emphasize the efficient management of the highway system to increase safety and to extend highway capacity, partnerships with other agencies and local governments, and the use of new techniques to improve road safety and capacity. These policies also link land use and transportation, set standards for highway performance and access management, and emphasize the relationship between state highways and local road, bicycle, pedestrian, transit, rail, and air systems. The following policies are relevant to the TSP update process. 1 The seven goals are Goal 1 – Mobility and Accessibility; Goal 2 – Management of the System; Goal 3 – Economic Vitality; Goal 4 – Sustainability; Goal 5 – Safety and Security; Goal 6 – Funding the Transportation System; and Goal 7 – Coordination, Communication, and Cooperation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 7 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Policy 1A: State Highway Classification System The OHP classifies the state highway system into four levels of importance: Interstate, Statewide, Regional, and District. ODOT uses this classification system to guide management and investment decisions regarding state highway facilities. The system guides the development of the facility plans, as well as ODOT’s review of local plan and zoning amendments, highway project selection, design and development, and facility management decisions including road approach permits. Interstate 5 Pacific Highway (OR-99E), Hillsboro-Silverton Highway (OR-214 and OR-219), and Woodburn-Estacada Highway (OR-211) are classified highways in the state classification system. The purpose and management objectives of these highways are provided in Policy 1A, as summarized below. • Interstate highways (I-5) provide connections between major cities in a state, regions of the state, and other states. A secondary function in urban areas is to serve regional trips within the urban area. Their primary objective is to provide mobility and, therefore, the management objective is to provide for safe and efficient high-speed continuous-flow operation in urban and rural areas. • Regional highways (OR-99E) typically provide connections and links to regional centers, Statewide or Interstate highways, or economic or activity centers of regional significance. The management objective for these facilities is to provide safe and efficient, high-speed, continuous-flow operation in rural areas and moderate to high-speed operations in urban and urbanizing areas. A secondary function is to serve land uses in the vicinity of these highways. • District highways (OR-211, OR-214, and OR-219) are facilities of county-wide significance and function largely as county and city arterials or collectors. They provide connections and links between small urbanized areas, rural centers, and urban hubs, and also serve local access and traffic. The management objective is to provide for safe and efficient, moderate to high-speed continuous-flow operation in rural areas reflecting the surrounding environment and moderate to low-speed operation in urban and urbanizing areas for traffic flow and for pedestrian and bicycle movements. The following classifications also apply in addition to the OHP Highway Classifications • I-5, OR-214 (between Woodland Avenue and Young St/Silverton Ave), and OR-99E (between Molalla Rd and Young St/Silverton Ave) are classified as part of the National Highway System (NHS) • OR-214 is also classified as an Oregon Scenic Byway. Policy 1C: State Highway Freight System The primary purpose of the State Highway Freight System is to facilitate efficient and reliable interstate, intrastate, and regional truck movement through a designated freight system. This freight system, made up of the Interstate Highways and select Statewide, Regional, and District Highways, includes routes that carry significant tonnage of freight by truck and serve as the primary interstate and intrastate highway freight connection to ports, intermodal terminals, and urban ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 8 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 areas. Highways included in this designation have higher highway mobility standards than other statewide highways. I-5 is a designated freight route. Policy 1D: Scenic Byways Several highways throughout the state have been designated Scenic Byways which have exceptional scenic value. To protect the scenic assets of its Scenic Byways, ODOT has developed guidelines for aesthetic and design elements within the public right-of-way that are appropriate for Scenic Byways. Highway 214, east of I-5 is designated as a State Scenic Byway. Policy 1F: Highway Mobility Standards Access Management Policy Policy 1F sets mobility standards for ensuring a reliable and acceptable level of mobility on the state highway system. The standards are used to assess system needs as part of long range, comprehensive planning transportation planning projects (such as an IAMP), during development review, and to demonstrate compliance with the TPR. Significant amendments to Policy 1F were adopted at the end of 2011. The 2011 revisions were made to address concerns that state transportation policy and requirements have led to unintended consequences and inhibited economic development. Policy 1F now provides a clearer policy framework for considering measures other than volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios for evaluating mobility performance. Also as part of these amendments, v/c ratios established in Policy 1F were changed from being standards to “targets.” These targets are to be used to determine significant effect pursuant to TPR Section -0060. The I-5 (Pacific Highway) IAMP, adopted before the revisions to Policy 1F, may benefit from being revisited to evaluate how changes to Policy 1F affect the area. Table 1 includes the mobility targets for the state facilities in the TSP study area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 9 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Table 2: Volume to Capacity Ratio Targets Outside Metro Policy 1G: Major Improvements This policy requires maintaining performance and improving safety on the highway system by improving efficiency and management on the existing roadway network before adding capacity. The state’s highest priority is to preserve the functionality of the existing highway system. Tools that could be employed to improve the function of the existing interchanges include access management, transportation demand management, traffic operations modifications, and changes to local land use designations or development regulations. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 10 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 After existing system preservation, the second priority is to make minor improvements to existing highway facilities, such as adding ramp signals, or making improvements to the local street network to minimize local trips on the state facility. The third priority is to make major roadway improvements such as adding lanes to increase capacity on existing roadways. As part of this TSP process, ODOT will work with Woodburn and other stakeholders to determine appropriate strategies and tools that can be implemented at the local level that are consistent with this policy. Policy 2B: Off-System Improvements This policy recognizes that the state may provide financial assistance to local jurisdictions to make improvements to local transportation systems if the improvements would provide a cost-effective means of improving the operations of the state highway system. As part of this TSP update process, ODOT will work with the City and project stakeholders to identify improvements to the local road system that support the planned land use designations in the study area and that will help preserve capacity and ensure the long-term efficient and effective operation of high functional class facilities. Policy 2F: Traffic Safety This policy emphasizes the state’s efforts to improve safety of all users of the highway system. Action 2F.4 addresses the development and implementation of the Safety Management System to target resources to sites with the most significant safety issues. The TSP update process will include citywide crash analysis to identify sites with a history of fatal and serious injury crashes and identify potential countermeasures to reduce crashes. Policy 2G: Rail and Highway Compatibility This policy recognizes the need to increase safety and transportation efficiency through the reduction and prevention of conflicts between railroads and highway users. Woodburn currently has three primary rail providers. Union Pacific and Portland & Western (PNWR) provide rail service through the City, with connections between Portland and Salem. Willamette Valley Railroad (WVR) provides a connection between Woodburn and Silverton. The Union Pacific railroad is classified as a Type I freight facility and handles the vast majority of freight rail traffic. In addition, Amtrak uses Union Pacific railroad facilities for two intercity routes – the Coast Starlight and Amtrak Cascade – however, neither service stops in Woodburn. Policy 3A: Classification and Spacing Standards State policy seeks to manage the location, spacing, and type of road intersections on state highways in a manner that ensures the safe and efficient operation of state highways consistent with their highway classification. Action 3A.2 calls for spacing standards to be established for state highways based on highway classification, type of area, and posted speed. Tables in OHP Appendix C present access spacing standards which consider urban and rural highway classification, traffic volumes, speed, safety, and operational needs. The access management spacing standards established in the OHP are implemented by access management rules in OAR 734, Division 51, addressed later in this report. The TSP update process will include an analysis of how existing ODOT arterials and collectors compare to these standards. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 11 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Policy 4A: Efficiency of Freight Movement Policy 4A emphasizes the need to maintain and improve the efficiency of freight movement on the state highway system. It seeks to balance the needs of long distance and through freight movements with local transportation needs on highway facilities in both urban and rural areas. I-5 is an OHP designated Freight Route. Policy 4B: Alternative Passenger Modes Policy 4B encourages the development of alternative passenger services and systems as part of broader corridor strategies. The policy promotes the development of alternative passenger transportation services located off the highway system to help preserve the performance and function of the state highway system. Mid-Columbia Council of Government’s Transportation Network (The Link), Columbia Area Transit, and Greyhound provide public transportation service in the study area. Improving safety, access, and mobility for pedestrians and bicyclists is an objective of this update process. Policy 4D: Transportation Demand Management This policy supports the efficient use of the state transportation system through investment in transportation demand management (TDM) strategies. Action 4D.1 calls for reducing peak period sing-occupancy vehicle travel and to move traffic demand out of the peak period so as to improve the flow of traffic on state highways. The TSP update process will review TDM strategies that can be adopted into the Woodburn Development Ordinance in the form of requirement for new developments and incentives for employers. Project Relevance: The TSP planning process will consider policies in the OHP for any improvements, modifications, or policies that would affect I-5, OR-99E, OR-211, OR-214, or OR-219. OHP policies provide guidance in developing recommended improvements that would impact the accessibility, mobility, or function of each highway. The TSP is being developed in coordination with ODOT so that projects, policies, and regulations proposed as part of the TSP will comply with or move in the direction of meeting the standards and targets established in the OHP related to safety, access, and mobility. Oregon Freight Plan (2011) The Oregon Freight Plan (OFP) is a modal plan of the OTP that implements the State’s goals and policies related to the movement of goods and commodities. Its purpose statement identifies that State’s intent to “improve freight connections to local, Native America, state, regional, national and global markets in order to increase trade-related jobs and income for workers and businesses.” The objectives of the plan include prioritizing and facilitating investments in freight facilities (including rail, marine, air, and pipeline infrastructure) and adopting strategies to maintain and improve the freight transportation system. The plan defines a statewide strategic freight network. I-5 and parallel railroads are designated as a strategic corridor in the OFP. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 12 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 The following policy and strategic direction provided in the OFP prioritizes preservation of strategic corridors as well as improvements to the supply chain achieved through coordination of freight and system management planning. • Strategy 1.2: Support freight access to the Strategic Freight System. This includes proactively protecting and preserving corridors designated as strategic. • Action 1.2.1. Preserve freight facilities included as part of the Strategic Freight System from changes that would significantly reduce the ability of these facilities to operate as efficient components of the freight system unless alternate facilities are identified or a safety-related need arises. • Strategy 2.4: Coordinate freight improvements and system management plans on corridors comprising the Strategic Freight System with the intent to improve supply chain performance. Project Relevance: Maintaining and enhancing efficiency of the truck and rail freight system in the study area will be an objective of the updated TSP. The project advisory committee include representatives from ODOT. Oregon Public Transportation Plan (1997) The Oregon Public Transportation Plan (OPTP) is the modal plan of the OTP that provides guidance for ODOT and public transportation agencies regarding the development of public transportation systems. The current guiding vision for the State is to create a: • A comprehensive, interconnected, and dependable public transportation system, with stable funding, that provides access and mobility in and between communities of Oregon in a convenient, reliable, and safe manner that encourages people to ride. • A public transportation system that provides appropriate service in each area of the state, including service in urban areas that is an attractive alternative to the single-occupant vehicle, and high-quality, dependable service in suburban, rural, and frontier (remote) areas. • A system that enables those who do not drive to meet their daily needs. • A public transportation system that plays a critical role in improving the livability and economic prosperity for Oregonians. The OPTP is currently being updated; a new plan is scheduled to be adopted by the Oregon Transportation Commission in Spring 2018. Project Relevance: The TSP will consider the needs of the transit system within City limits while developing recommended policies and projects related to improving transit service. In addition, the project technical advisory committee includes a representative of Woodburn Transit System service provider that will advise on transit improvements. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 13 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Oregon Rail Plan (2014) The Oregon State Rail Plan is a state modal plan under the OTP that addresses long-term freight and passenger rail planning in Oregon. The Plan provides a comprehensive assessment of the state’s rail planning, freight rail, and passenger rail systems. It identifies specific policies concerning rail in the state, establishes a system of integration between freight and passenger elements into the land use and transportation planning process, and calls for cooperation between state, regional, and local jurisdictions in planning for rail. Woodburn currently has three primary rail providers. Union Pacific and Portland & Western (PNWR) provide rail service through the City, with connections between Portland and Salem. Willamette Valley Railroad (WVR) provides a connection between Woodburn and Silverton. The Union Pacific railroad is classified as a Type I freight facility and handles the vast majority of freight rail traffic. In addition, Amtrak uses Union Pacific railroad facilities for the Coast Starlight and Amtrak Cascade passenger trains. There is no passenger service stop in Woodburn. Project Relevance: The TSP will consider the needs of the freight and passenger rail system within City limits while developing recommended policies and projects related to improving safety and mobility in the City. In addition, the project technical advisory committee includes ODOT representative that will advise on rail and freight interests. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (2016) The intent of the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan (OBPP) is to create a policy foundation that supports decision-making for walking and biking investments, strategies and programs that help to develop an interconnected, robust, efficient, and safe transportation system. The OBPP established the role of walking and biking as essential modes of travel within the context of the entire transportation system, and recognizes the benefit to the people and places in Oregon. The OBPP provides direction for what needs to be achieved, including 20 policies and associated strategies design to help develop, sustain, and improve walking and biking networks. It identifies nine goals based upon the broader goals of the OTP that reflect statewide values and desired accomplishments relating to walking and biking: • Goal 1: Safety • Goal 2: Accessibility and Connectivity • Goal 3: Mobility and Efficiency • Goal 4: Community and Economic Vitality • Goal 5: Equity • Goal 6: Health • Goal 7: Sustainability • Goal 8: Strategic Investment • Goal 9: Coordination, Cooperation, and Collaboration The OBPP also provides background information related to state and federal law, funding opportunities, and implementation strategies proposed by ODOT to improve bicycle and pedestrian transportation. It outlines the role that local jurisdictions play in the implementation of the Plan, ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 14 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 including the development of local pedestrian and bicycle plans as stand-along documents within TSPs. Project Relevance: The policies and design guidance in the OBPP apply to state highway facilities in Woodburn, which include: I-5, OR-99E, OR-211, OR-214, and OR-219 Policy and design guidance should also be considered in the TSP’s local street standards and the bicycle and pedestrian system components. In addition, the bicycle and pedestrian system components of the local TSP should reflect the goals, policies, and strategies for implementation identified in the OBPP. Woodburn should work with regional and state agencies to help identify gaps in the regional walking and biking network and prioritize projects accordingly. Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan (2016) An element of the OTP, the Oregon Transportation Safety Action Plan (TSAP) provides long-term goals, policies and strategies and near-term actions to eliminate deaths and life-changing injuries. The TSAP addresses all modes on all public roads in Oregon. Over the long term, the goals of the TSAP are: • Infrastructure – Develop and improve infrastructure to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries for users of all modes. • Healthy, Livable Communities – Plan, design, and implement safe systems. Support enforcement and emergency medical services to improve the safety and livability of communities, including improved health outcomes. • Technology – Plan, prepare for, and implement technologies (existing and new) that can affect transportation safety for all users. The Plan identifies actions that cities, including Woodburn, can take to increase transportation safety. They include adopting a Safe Communities Program and Safe Routes to School. The Safe Communities Program are collaborative partnership with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the ODOT to promote safety. The Safe Routes to School program is a local initiative supported by grant funding that targets safety improvements to encourage walking and biking to schools. In addition, the TSAP also identifies activities and roles for cities that can do to improve safety. They include: • Evaluate local spot-specific systemic safety needs; develop plans and programs to address needs. • Collaborate with the state and stakeholder partners to educate the public about transportation safety-related behavioral issues. • Integrate safety programming, planning, and policy into local planning. Project Relevance: The TSAP will be used as a resource to develop local goals, policies, and strategies while updating the TSP to increase safety in the City. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 15 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Reduction Review Routes (ORS 366.215 & OAR 731-017) ORS 366.215 states the Oregon Transportation Commission may not permanently reduce the vehicle-carrying capacity of specific state routes when improvement projects alter, relocate, change, or realign the facility. Exceptions are allowed if safety or access considerations require a reduction. Transportation improvements that are identified by ODOT as having the potential for a Reduction of Vehicle-Carrying Capacity are required to conduct a stakeholder forum. The stakeholder forum is intended to include representatives from a range of affected groups to discuss design issues with the planned improvements. Project Relevance: Analysis for the TSP update and final project recommendations will need to reflect state requirements for state facilities; the updated TSP will comply with Reduction Review Route standards for state facilities. Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-012) (2011) The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), OAR 660-012, implements Goal 12 (Transportation) of the statewide planning goals. The TPR contains numerous requirements governing transportation planning and project development, including the required elements of a TSP. In addition to plan development, the TPR requires each local government to amend its land use regulations to implement its TSP (-0045). It also requires local government to adopt land use or subdivision ordinance regulations consistent with applicable federal and state requirements: “to protect transportation facilities, corridors and sites for their identified functions.” Local compliance with -0045 provisions is achieved through a variety of measures, including access control requirements, standards to protect future operations of roads, and notice and coordinated review procedures for land use applications. Local development codes should also include a process to apply conditions of approval to development proposals, and regulations ensuring that amendments to land use designations, densities, and design standards are consistent with the functions, capacities, and performance standards of facilities identified in the TSP. The TPR does not regulate access management. ODOT adopted OAR 734-051 to address access management and it is expected that ODOT, as part of this project, will coordinate with the City in planning for access management on state roadways consistent with its Access Management Rule. See the review of OAR 734-051 in the next section for a review of these access management rules. Amendments to the TPR adopted in 2012 include new language in Section -0060 that allows a local government to exempt a zone change from the “significant effect” determination if the proposed zoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan map designation and the TSP. The amendments also allow a local government to amend a functional plan, comprehensive plan, or land use regulation without applying mobility standards (V/C, for example) if the subject area is within a designated multi-modal mixed-use area (MMA). Project Relevance: The TPR directs local TSP development and requires specific transportation elements be implemented in the local development ordinance. Local requirements such as access management, coordinated land use review procedures, and transportation facility standards and requirements are meant to protect road ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 16 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 operations and safety and provide for multi-modal access and mobility. Implementation measures that will be developed with the TSP update may entail proposed amendments to the Woodburn Development Ordinance to ensure consistency with TPR requirements as well as to reflect TSP recommendations. Access Management Rule (OAR 734-051) (2014)2 Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 734-051 defines the State’s role in managing access to highway facilities in order to maintain functional use and safety and to preserve public investment. OHP Policy 3A and OAR 734-051 set access spacing standards for driveways and approaches to the state highway system3. The most recent amendments presume that existing driveways with access to state highways have written permission from ODOT as required by ORS 734. The standards are based on state highway classification and differ depending on posted speed and average daily traffic volume. Project Relevance: Analysis for the TSP update and final project recommendations will need to reflect state requirements for state facilities; the updated TSP will comply or move in the direction of meeting access management standards for state facilities. Implementation measures that will be developed for the TSP update may entail amendments to the Land Use Development Ordinance to ensure that it is consistent with these access management requirements as well as TSP recommendations related to access management. Statewide Transportation Improvement Program The State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is the four-year programming and funding document for transportation projects and programs for state and regional transportation systems, including federal land and Indian reservation road systems, interstate, state, and regional highways, bridges, and public transit. It includes state- and federally-funded system improvements that have approved funding and are expected to be undertaken during the upcoming four-year period. The projects and programs undergo a selection process managed by ODOT Regions or ODOT central offices, a process that is held every two years in order to update the STIP. Project Relevance: The TSP update analysis will take into account projects that are programmed in the STIP. An expected outcome of this planning process is proposed recommendations to eventually amend the STIP to include projects from the updated TSP. The STIP projects will most likely involve improvements that are eligible for funding through the ODOT Enhance program, which awards funding through a competitive application process. 2 Amendments to OAR 734-051 were adopted in early 2014 based on passage of Senate Bill 1024 (2010, Senate Bill 264 (2011, and Senate Bill 408 (2014). The amendments were intended to allow more consideration for economic development when developing and implementing access management rules, and involved changes to how ODOT deals with approach road spacing, highway improvement requirements with development, and traffic impact analyses requirements for approach road permits. 3 ODOT Access Management Standards – OHP Appendix C Revisions to Address Senate Bill 264 (2011): http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/TD/TP/docs/ohp_am/apdxc.pdf ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 17 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 ODOT Highway Design Manual (2012) The 2012 Highway Design Manual provides ODOT with uniform standards and procedures for planning studies and project development for the state’s roadways. It is intended to provide guidance for the design of new construction; major reconstruction (4R); resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation (3R); or resurfacing (1R) projects. It is generally in agreement with the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) document A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets - 2011. However, sound engineering judgment must continue to be a vital part in the process of applying the design criteria to individual projects. The flexibility contained in the 2012 Highway Design Manual supports the use of Practical Design concepts and Context Sensitive Design practices. The Highway Design Manual is to be used for all projects that are located on state highways. National Highway System or Federal-aid projects on roadways that are under local jurisdiction will typically use the 2011 AASHTO design standards or ODOT 3R design standards. Table 3 shows which design standards are applicable for certain projects based on project type, and whether or not the project involves a state route. State and local planners will also use the manual in determining design requirements as they relate to the state highways in TSPs, Corridor Plans, and Refinement Plans. Some projects under ODOT roadway jurisdiction traverse across local agency boundaries. Some local agencies have adopted design standards and guidelines that may differ from the various ODOT design standards. Although the appropriate ODOT design standards are to be applied on ODOT roadway jurisdiction facilities, local agency publications and design practices can also provide additional guidance, concepts, and strategies related to roadway design. Table 3: Design Standards Selections Matrix, ODOT Highway Design Manual Project Type Roadway Jurisdiction State Highways Local Agency Roads Interstate (I-5) Urban State Highways (OR-99E, OR- 211, OR-214, OR-219) Rural State Highways Urban Rural Modernization/ Bridge New/Replacement ODOT 4R/New Freeway ODOT 4R/New Urban ODOT 4R/New Rural AASHTO Preservation/ Bridge Rehabilitation ODOT 3R Freeway ODOT 3R Urban ODOT 3R Rural AASHTO ODOT 3R Rural Preventive Maintenance 1R 1R 1R NA NA Safety- Operations- Miscellaneous/ Special Programs ODOT Freeway ODOT Urban ODOT Rural AASHTO ODOT 3R Rural The Highway Design Manual includes mobility standards related to project development and design that are applicable to all modernization projects, except for development review projects (see Table The v/c ratios in the Highway Design Manual are different than those shown in the Oregon ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 18 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Highway Plan (OHP). The v/c ratio values in the OHP are used to assist in the planning phase to identify future system deficiencies; the Highway Design Manual v/c ratio values provide a mobility solution that corrects those previously identified deficiencies and provides the best investment for the State over a 20-year design life. Table 4: 20-Year Design Mobility Standards (Volume/Capacity Ration 20 Year Design-Mobility Standards Highway Category Inside Urban Growth Boundary Non-MPO outside of STAs where non-freeway speed limit <45 mph Non-MPO where non- freeway speed limit >=45 Interstate Highways and Statewide (NHS) Expressways 0.70 0.65 Statewide (NHS) Non-Freight Routes and Regional or District Expressways 0.75 0.70 Regional Highways 0.75 0.75 District/Local Interest Roads 0.80 0.75 Project Relevance: The ODOT Highway Design Manual provides design standards on state roadways; analysis for the TSP update and final project recommendations will need to reflect state requirements for state facilities. Standards and guidelines adopted by Woodburn should be considered for additional guidance, concepts, and strategies for design. Oregon Roadway Departure Implementation Plan (2017) The Roadway Departure Implementation Plan provides specific information regarding roadway departure safety improvements to implement the current TSAP. It identifies the most cost-effective types of transportation improvements for reducing roadway departure crashes. The countermeasures that are generally considered to be the most effective are listed below. Each method is intended to address specific safety concerns and is considered a low-cost way to systematically reduce fatal and serious injury accidents. • Curve signing and marking • Center line rumble strips • Edge rumble strips • Delineation • High friction surface treatments. • Tree management • Shoulder widening Project Relevance: The Roadway Departure Implementation Plan identifies low cost, cost effective safety treatments (e.g. resurfacing, surface transportation projects) to ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 19 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 reduce the potential for future crashes. The TSP update will consider and incorporate safety treatments for transportation projects where crash history exists. Oregon Intersection Safety Implementation Plan (2012) The Intersection Safety Plan provides specific information and direction regarding intersection safety improvements to implement the current TSAP. It directs that the traditional approach of relying primarily on pursuing major improvements at high-crash intersections be complemented with an expanded systematic approach. This approach should involve deploying large numbers of relatively low-cost, cost-effective countermeasures at many targeted high-crash intersections and coordinating engineering, education, and enforcement (3E) initiatives on corridors with high numbers of severe intersection crashes. Project Relevance: Consistent with the State’s Transportation Safety Action Plan, the TSP consider corridors and appropriate countermeasures identified in the Intersection Safety Implementation Plan to reduce bicycle and pedestrian crashes. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Implementation Plan (2014) The Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Implementation Plan identifies priority locations and countermeasure options for reducing pedestrian and bicycle crashes. The Plan conducted a systemic planning process to create a prioritized list of candidate locations for safety improvement within each ODOT Region. It also provides recommendations on appropriate countermeasures to reduce crashes. Project Relevance: The TSP update will consider the corridors and priority locations within Woodburn, as well as the appropriate countermeasures, identified in the Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety Implementation Plan to ensure that planned projects will serve to reduce bicycle and pedestrian crashes. 2015 Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction, Standard Drawings, Standard Details The Oregon Standard Specifications for Construction includes, and provides assistance on the application and interpretation of, standard specifications and special provisions for project contracting with ODOT. The Standard Drawing and Standard Details are engineering manuals and tools that specify construction details for public works projects. Project Relevance: The TSP update will reference the specifications, drawings, and details for evaluating initial project cost estimates during the TSP update process. REGIONAL PLANS ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 20 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Marion County Rural Transportation System Plan (2005, last amended in 2013) The Marion County Rural Transportation System Plan (RTSP) is the County’s long-range plan for developing and managing its transportation system in rural areas (outside Urban Growth Boundaries). The TSP was adopted in 2005, and was last amended in 2013 with updated chapters 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and Appendix B. The Marion County Rural TSP provides the framework for developing an efficient, well-balanced, and cost-effective transportation system for areas outside of incorporated cities. Chapter 6 of the RTSP (updated in 2013) includes 2030 population forecasts generated by PSU for Marion County’s larger cities, including Woodburn. These population forecasts were used by County staff to project future traffic volumes for the year 2032 for roadways in rural Marion County. Chapter 8 of the Marion County Rural TSP was last updated in 2005 and lists the existing and future needs of the Marion County rural roadway system and the projects recommended to address those needs. In addition to County-recommended projects, it lists connectivity and modernization needs proposed by cities, including two projects proposed by Woodburn. Chapter 8 also identifies a state highway safety improvement needed at the interchange of I-5 and Highways 214 and 219 (also known as the Woodburn Interchange). The TSP notes that although the Woodburn Interchange is within the Woodburn UGB, transportation to and from rural areas of Marion County is affected by the issue. Chapter 8 also notes the need to improve regional passenger and freight mobility on I-5 through Woodburn by constructing new interchange and connector roads, as well as a recommended corridor study on Oregon 99E, which passes through Woodburn. In addition, Chapter 9 of the TSP makes recommendations regarding the expansion of public transit services along major corridors from, to, and through Woodburn, and Chapter 10 includes policies for coordinating access management and design standards for county roadways inside the UGB. Project Relevance: County transportation improvement projects will be reviewed and considered in the Woodburn TSP update. Recommendations in the updated TSP will need to be consistent with the County TSP; if necessary, needed refinements to the County plan will be identified and discussed as part of this update process. Marion County Comprehensive Land Use Plan (1981, last amended in 2010) The Marion County Comprehensive Plan was originally adopted in 1981 and last updated in September 2010. The Comprehensive Plan includes general transportation policies in the Transportation Element (Section E of Chapter II). More detailed transportation policies are included in the Marion County Rural Transportation System Plan, reviewed separately in this memorandum. Policies relevant to the Woodburn TSP update can be found in the Urbanization and Transportation chapters of the Marion County Comprehensive Plan. The Urbanization chapter contains transportation policies and coordination guidelines relating to street connectivity, transit, freight routes, and active transportation. The Transportation chapter contains policies for coordinating access management and design standards for county roadways inside the UGB. However, Transportation System Management (TSM) Policy 3 states that for County Roads within the UGB of a city that has adopted access spacing requirements (in their Transportation System Plan or other ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 21 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 official document) the County will use the City’s adopted spacing standards, unless in the County’s judgment they would not be appropriate. Because Woodburn has adopted access spacing requirements in the current TSP, the County’s spacing requirements would not apply within the city’s UGB. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will consider the relevant goals and policies in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan in the development of the updated TSP. CITY OF WOODBURN PLANS Comprehensive Plan (last amended 2016) The Woodburn Comprehensive Plan is the controlling land use document for the City and its Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The Comprehensive Plan has a chapter dedicated to Transportation Goals and Polices. There are seven Transportation Goals, each with between two and seven policies. The Comprehensive Plan includes other transportation-related policies in other chapters. An excerpt of all the Goals and Policies that are relevant to the Woodburn TSP update are provided in Attachment A. In general, goals and policies in Woodburn’s Comprehensive Plan provide guidance in the following areas. • The design and location relationship between land use development street classifications. • Guidance on the future land use development and transportation facility improvements for Highway 99E. • Growth management restrictions on Butteville Road NE and the Southwest Industrial Reserve area to protect future industrial development viability. • The multi-modal transportation system, including intra-city transit, complete bikeway network, improved sidewalk, and off-street pathway connections. • Coordination with Marion County and ODOT to improve safety, preserve capacity and accessibility, and construct needed street connections outside the UGB. • The design, safety, and function of streets in the Woodburn downtown area. In January 2016 the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) approved Woodburn's Comprehensive Plan Amendments, amending the UGB expansion and establishing an Urban Reserve Area. The UGB expansion consists of approximately 619 gross acres. This includes 190 acres for industrial use, 23 acres for commercial use and 406 acres for residential use. Part of the UGB amendment included the following conditions: • A twenty-year expansion limitation condition west of Butteville Road NE. • A twenty-year expansion limitation condition northeast of Highway 99E. • An Urban Reserve, consisting of 230 acres, east of the intersection of Butteville Road NE and Parr Road NE. In addition, the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan also included the following: ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 22 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Urban Growth Coordination Agreement (2015) The Urban Growth Coordination Agreement provides coordination and revision procedures and policies that, along with the policies of the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, serve as the basis for land use decisions within the Urban Growth Area and within the Urban Reserve Area. The Coordination Agreement establishes an Urban Reserve Area and two 20-year UGB expansion limitations (see Figure Coordination Policy and Procedure 10 discourages new public facilities in the Urban Growth Area without annexation into the City’s jurisdiction. 10. The City shall discourage the extension of public facilities into the Urban Growth Area without annexation. However, if the extension of public facilities into the Urban Growth Area is necessary because of an emergency, health hazard or the City determines it is otherwise desirable, the facilities may be extended subject to terms and conditions contained in a service contract between the City and the property owner. The Coordination Agreement also provides restrictions to Butteville Road NE to discourage urban traffic unrelated to planned and existing industrial uses in the immediate area and unrelated to agricultural uses west of Butteville Road.4 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan, Growth Management Goals and Policies Amendment As a result of the Urban Growth Coordination Agreement, the Growth Management Goals and Policies section of the Comprehensive Plan were amended to include additional policies to support the UGB expansion limitations (Policy G-1.20) shown in Figure 1 and establishing an Urban Reserve Area (Policy G-1.21) shown in Figure 2. Policy G-1.27 in the amended Comprehensive Plan discourages urban traffic on Butteville Road unrelated to planned and existing industrial uses in the immediate area and unrelated agricultural to agricultural uses to the west. 4 This portion of the Coordination Agreement was also adopted as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (Policy G- 1.27) as described below. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 23 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Figure 1: UGB Expansion Limitation Figure 2: Urban Reserve Project Relevance. The updated TSP is intended to be adopted as the transportation element of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, replacing the 2005 TSP. Recommendations resulting from the TSP update process will either be consistent with existing policies, including those identified in the appendix, or will inform updated policy language that will be proposed for adoption as part of the TSP update. Amendments to the Zoning and Land Use Development Ordinance will also ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 24 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 likely be needed in order to implement the updated TSP; proposed amendments will be based on existing, revised, or new policies related to, among other things, procedures, land use review coordination, strengthening multi-modal connectivity and access, and protection of transportation facilities. Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and UGB Amendment Justification Studies (2000 – 2005) The documents reviewed below include background studies and memoranda that are considered the principal documents used to support the amendments to Woodburn’s Comprehensive Plan and UGB in 2005. All the documents were reviewed for pertinent transportation-related policies or projects; however, only some documents include information that is relevant to Woodburn’s TSP update. In general, most of the recommendations from the effort that led to the 2005 amendments were related to land use, growth, and economic development. Although all these topics influence or are influenced by transportation planning, very little information was directly related to transportation. City of Woodburn Local Wetlands Inventory and Riparian Assessment (2000) The report is one of several background documents used to inform and support 2005 amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and UGB amendment. It includes the methods and results of a Local Wetlands Inventory (LWI) for land within the 2003 UGB.5 The LWI replaced the US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory and has been incorporated into the statewide wetlands inventory. Riparian assessments were also conducted as part of the report. Woodburn amended the WDO to comply with the safe harbor provisions for wetlands and riparian corridors through adopting the Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District (RCWOD) based on the results and inventories in this document. Woodburn Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) and Development Strategy (EDS) Report (2001) These documents form the foundation for the 2005 Comprehensive Plan and UGB expansion amendments. The EOA identified “target industries” based on Woodburn’s comparative economic advantages and local policy objectives and describe site requirements of each employment category. The City’s comparative advantages include the City’s I-5 location between Salem and Portland; the availability of large tracts of land with direct access to the I-5 interchange with Highway 214; and the City’s commitment to provide services to these sites. Multiple other documents were produced that refined the findings and recommendations of the EOA and EDS. They include: • Woodburn Population and Employment Projections (2002). The memorandum reviews the City’s population and employment forecasts and presents revised growth projections based on data from the EOA and EDS. In addition, it allocates employment projections and reviews impacts from forecasts. The memorandum suggests that Woodburn’s population and 5 Wetlands, stream corridors, floodplains and wildlife habitat for areas outside of the 2003 UGB were documented in Technical Report 3, Potential UGB Expansion Area Analysis, Natural Resources Inventory ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 25 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 employment growth would grow faster than the average for Marion County from 2000- 2020. • Woodburn Occupation/Wage Forecast (2003). The memorandum researches the impacts the City’s economic development strategies will have on household incomes. The memorandum suggests that a higher percentage of new jobs created in Woodburn between 2000 and 2020 will pay more than existing jobs, the impacts of which would create more demand on single-family housing in a broad range of prices. • Site Requirements for Woodburn Target Industries (2003). The memorandum researches the demand for non-residential land implied by the revised employment forecast and site needs for industries targeted as part of the City’s economic development strategy. The memorandum recommends about 370 acres of new development is needed between 2000 and 2020 and provides a range of required parcel sizes, from 0.5 acres to 100+ acres, necessary to attract businesses. It also identifies several industries that are reliant on transportation facilities, such as large printing and publishing firms, stone, clay, glass, and concrete manufacturers, and large warehousing. Technical Report 1, Buildable Lands Inventory (2005) The Technical Report determined the buildable land area, on a parcel-by-parcel bases, within the 2005 Woodburn UGB. The revisions in 2005 accounted for changes in the Comprehensive Plan and UGB amendment package, adopted in 2005. The study determined there are 679 vacant buildable acres of land for low, nodal-low, medium, and nodal-medium density residential uses. It also determined there are 459 vacant buildable acres of land for industrial and commercial uses. Technical Report 2, Woodburn Residential Lands Needs Analysis (2005) The Technical Report projects the land area needed for residential and public/semi-public uses for a planning period between 2003 and 2020. Two scenarios were presented for projected residential land needs; a base case scenario based historic trends and a modeled scenario based on projected income by age cohort, related to assumptions of types and cost for various housing types. The model scenario result suggested the additional total acreage needed to serve the 2020 growth projections would be approximately 339 acres across various residential plan designations. The report also recommends new overlay plan designations to implement the identified needed housing types and reduce the demand for needed acreage. These recommendations have been incorporated into in Woodburn’s current Comprehensive Plan and Development Ordinance. Technical Report 3, Potential UGB Expansion Area Analysis Natural Resources Inventory (2002) The Technical Report examined eight UGB expansion areas that extend approximately one-half mile outside of the 2002 UGB. The report considered factors such as agricultural and exceptions lands and natural resources to determine the amount of buildable land in each area. The information documented wetlands, stream corridors, floodplains, and wildlife habitat within the UGB study areas to identify which areas were most suitable to expand the UGB. Citizen Involvement Report (2005) The Citizen Involvement Report provides a summary of citizen involvement opportunities that occurred during the periodic review planning process. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 26 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 City of Woodburn Periodic Review and Urban Growth Boundary Amendments Findings of Fact The Findings of Facts provides a summary of new and amended ordinances and decisions, a comprehensive list of periodic review work tasks that were completed, and findings for compliance with state requirements. City's Public Facilities Plan (2005) The Public Facilities Plan (PFP) identifies major infrastructure projects necessary to serve the growth in Woodburn through the year 2020. PFP’s typically include four elements: Domestic Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Drainage, and Transportation. However, Woodburn’s PFP incorporates the 2005 TSP by reference and refers to it for information related to transportation project descriptions, location, timing, and costs necessary to serve land within the UGB. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will reflect the findings of the various studies and reports used to support the updated UGB boundary, as it related to multi-modal transportation facilities to serve areas where expected residential, commercial, and industrial growth is expected to occur. Woodburn TSP (Volumes I and II) (2005) The Woodburn TSP guides the management and development of appropriate transportation facilities in Woodburn, incorporating the community’s vision, while remaining consistent with state, regional, and local plans. The current plan was adopted in October of 2005. It contains transportation goals, policies, and strategies to address the city’s transportation needs. The TSP provides a plan for the development of the transportation system, which addresses improvements to roadways, new pedestrian and bicycle facilities, improvements in public transit service, and transportation demand management strategies. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review goals, objectives, standards, and recommended projects from the current plan and will determine what to retain or change in the updated TSP. This project will update transportation improvement projects for all modes, based on current and projected needs. Updated data, stakeholder and community involvement, and evaluation criteria will be used in making these determinations. Woodburn Transit Plan Update (2010) The Woodburn Transit Plan Update (TPU) was adopted in 2010 and guides the provision of transit services and facilities in Woodburn over 20 years. It is intended to supplement the 2005 TSP to ensure that transit is an integral component of the Woodburn’s multimodal transportation network. Recommendations in the TPU offer guidance on where transit infrastructure investments should be made, compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and connectivity to regional transit services. Key findings in the TPU were developed based on the review of related plans and documents, community and demographic trends, existing public transportation services, transit services of a similar scale, passenger surveys, and community input. These key findings are summarized in ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 27 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Chapter 8 of the TPU. Additionally, the TPU includes goals and objectives derived from key findings that are tailored to the provision of public transportation and include objectives that offer very specific guidelines for how to improve public transportation service, as well as a basic set of performance standards to guide operations. The TPU also identifies a set of potential service strategies based on the needs assessment and goals and objectives. The strategies, presented as options for improving the transit system in Woodburn, are prioritized based on how well they satisfy the 28 identified objectives. Project Relevance: The TPU was developed to serve as the transit element of the TSP and allow the City to make land use code and guideline revisions to ensure a safe and efficient public transportation system. The TSP update process will review relevant findings, goals, objectives, and policies related to transit; updated TSP policy will reflect and be consistent with the objectives of the TPU and proposed projects should be consistent with the TPU’s identified routes and service standards. Highway 99E Corridor Plan (2012) The Highway 99E Corridor Plan was developed to facilitate the revitalization of the corridor as a viable, safe, and sustainable business district. The project focused on Highway 99E corridor from the proposed southern Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (just south of Belle Passi Road) to the northern Urban Growth Boundary (near the intersection of Highway 99E and Carl Road, north of Industrial Way). It identifies needed transportation improvements, recommends appropriate land uses, and illustrates the urban design vision for the section of Highway 99E running through the City of Woodburn. The Corridor Plan also identifies the policies, regulations, and actions necessary to implement this vision. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review, and modify and/or incorporate as appropriate, the plan’s relevant transportation-related vision statements, goals, guiding principles, proposed improvements, access management strategies, and proposed implementation measures. Woodburn Interchange Area Management Plan (2006) The Woodburn Interchange Area Management Plan (IAMP) documents interchange management measures and summarizes information on the project’s background, purpose and need, relevant plans and policies, land use and environmental issues, transportation conditions and deficiencies, alternatives development and analysis, plan recommendations, public involvement, and implementation strategies. The stated purpose of the Woodburn Interchange Project was to improve the traffic flow and safety conditions of the existing I-5/Woodburn interchange, as the existing interchange does not meet current design and operational standards. The IAMP includes a set of approved project goals, as well as a set of recommendations and local and state implementation actions and responsibilities. Project Relevance: IAMP recommended amendments to the TSP will be considered, and the TSP update process will review the plan’s goals, recommendations, and implementation measures and consider what elements should be incorporated into the updated Woodburn TSP update. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 28 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Woodburn Downtown Development Plan Update (2010) The Woodburn Downtown Development Plan, updated in 2010, includes a framework plan for transportation improvements. These improvements focus on pedestrian and bicycle circulation, parking in Old Town, and streetscape enhancement concepts for three of the planning sub-districts (Old Town, the Gateway Subarea, and Young Street Corridor). The Plan’s study area encompasses important transportation facilities, including the Union Pacific Railroad, which provides both freight and Amtrak service, and North Front Street, South Front Street, and Young Street, which serve as gateways to downtown from Highways 214 and 99E.6 In addition to pedestrian and bicycle circulation improvements, parking, and streetscapes, the Plan addresses future rail transit and bus transit. The implementation chapter of the Plan includes a list of specific transportation projects (“Transportation that will support and provide enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access to the project area. To integrate the transportation improvements and street design concepts therein, the Plan also includes a list of potential amendments to the City’s TSP. Recommended projects and amendments include the identification of one-way streets and cross section standards for the Old Town Commercial street grid. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review, update as necessary, and incorporate where relevant, the plan’s goals, implementation measures, and recommended projects and amendments to the TSP. Woodburn Proposed Budget FY 2016-17 Woodburn’s Proposed FY 2016-17 Budget provides an outline and summary of the City’s total proposed budget, excluding transfers. The City’s proposed budget is balanced; however, it describes a sense of caution regarding the City’s financial capacity to maintain current levels of service in upcoming years. City's current and historic funding and sources Woodburn relies on two major sources of revenue to fund operations: property taxes and utility charges. These two revenue categories constitute more than 70 percent of the City’s operating revenues. Other revenues supplement City operations, including franchise fees (levied on utilities for use of public right-of-way), intergovernmental revenue (state shared revenue, liquor and cigarette taxes, transportation revenues), fees and charges (planning and engineering fees, recreation fees, business and solicitation registration fees), and fines (municipal court). These secondary revenue sources are critical to overall financial health of the City and are historically less volatile than other revenue sources. 6 Note that the 2012 Highway 99E Corridor Plan contains specific recommended improvements at Young Street and Highway 99E. See Figures 4 and 5. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 29 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Table 5: Transportation Related Funds Revenues & Expenditures (Total) FY 2013-14 Actual FY 2014-15 Actual FY 2015-16 Budget FU 2016-17 Proposed Transit Fund Revenues 752,574 1,174,532 684,750 754,750 Expenditures 624,811 1,034,507 684,750 754,750 Street Fund Revenues 4,296,805 5,001,328 5,065,034 4,801,497 Expenditures 1,536,183 2,035,284 5,065,034 4,801,497 Street & Storm Cap Const. Fund Revenues 773,933 179,375 345,000 2,995,000 Expenditures 595,781 113,938 345,000 3,506,000 Special Assessment Fund Revenues 1,041,261 1,051,658 1,071,849 80,500 Expenditures - - 1,071,849 80,500 Street SDC Fund Revenues 5,861,072 5,711,077 6,965,223 2,509,838 Expenditures 657,506 4,366,640 6,965,223 2,509,838 City's Capital Improvement Program The Proposed FY 2016-17 Budget lists all capital construction projects individually, including a specific scope and budget and project data sheets. All projects are budgeted for the full cost, even if ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 30 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 the project is expected to span multiple budget periods, to ensure enough budget is available should project schedules accelerate. A list of current year projects is included below, in Figure 3. Figure 3: Woodburn Current Year Projects Capital Improvement Plan for future Fiscal Years is shown in Figure 4. Figure 4: Capital Improvement Plan – FY 2017-18 to FY 2021-22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 31 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Woodburn Park Master Plans Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan Update (2009) The original City of Woodburn Parks and Recreation Master Plan was completed and adopted in October 1999. The stated intent of the plan update, adopted in 2009, was to continue to evaluate and develop a well-planned systemic approach to community parks and recreation needs by building on the community’s unique parks and recreation assets and identifying new opportunities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 32 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 The plan establishes a clear direction to guide city staff, advisory committees, and elected officials in their efforts to enhance the community’s parks system, open space, trails, recreation facilities, programs, and services. The Plan identifies the need for pedestrian crossings across transportation facilities such as I-5, train tracks, and major roads such as Mt. Hood Highway, as well as the need to work with the City to provide safe and enjoyable sidewalks or side paths as routes to parks. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review the plan’s applicable goals, strategies, and action steps and incorporate them into the Woodburn TSP update. Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan (2006) The Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan encompasses the Mill Creek corridor and tributaries, and includes a trail that runs the length of the city. The trail is multi-use and designed for bicycles, walkers, and light maintenance vehicles. The plan recommends seamlessly integrating the trail into the city’s existing roadside bicycle system. The City’s 1999 Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan Update includes policies stating that the City will manage the Mill Creek corridor as a public greenway and pathway that includes open space cycling and walking, nature study and recreation, and that that the City will seek dedication of floodplains and creek corridors for natural areas, neighborhood recreation areas, open space, and transportation. Additionally, the City’s TSP calls for utilization of the Mill Creek corridor and tributaries for non-motorized transportation, and the Marion County TSP includes a trail route along Mill Creek that would connect Woodburn with Gervais to the south and Hubbard and Aurora to the north through the continuation of Woodburn’s Mill Creek Greenway system. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review the plan’s applicable recommendations, consider the direction provided in other planning documents for the Mill Greek Greenway, and will recommend updated policy and projects consistent with City goals of enhancing multimodal access to this area. Community Centers Feasibility Study (2007) The Community Centers Feasibility Study explores the costs and opportunities for developing two community centers, an Arts & Cultural Community Center and a Recreation Center, in the City of Woodburn. Relevant recommendations include the addition of sidewalks along Oak Street during the expansion of the Woodburn Memorial Aquatic Center. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review the plan’s applicable recommendations and will ensure that multimodal access to community centers are planned for and implemented in the updated Woodburn TSP. Legion Park & Settlemier Park Master Plans (2003) Objectives of the Legion Park and Settlemier Park Master Plans included achieving community input and ownership; integrating the city's policies and long-range plans for parks; achieving universal access; balancing the local needs of the neighborhood with the preservation of natural resources; exploring ways to meet normal recreation needs with limited site areas; and addressing problematic management issues, such as maintenance issues and impacts to adjoining property ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 33 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 owners. Relevant recommendations in the plans relate to safety and include the evaluation of traffic speeds along Park Avenue in the Legion Park Master Plan. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will consider multimodal access to Legion Park and Settlemier Park and will reevaluate traffic safety issues in their vicinity. As relevant and necessary, the updated Woodburn TSP will include projects that support and enhance safe and efficient access to these parks. City of Woodburn Addendum to the Marion County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan (2010) Woodburn developed the addendum to the Marion County Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan in an effort to increase the community’s resilience to natural hazards. The addendum focuses on the natural hazards that could affect the city, including drought, flood, earthquake, landslide, volcano, wildfire, wind storm, and severe winter storm. The addendum provides a set of actions that aim to reduce the risks posed by natural hazards through education and outreach programs, the development of partnerships, and the implementation of preventative activities via the comprehensive plan, development code, public facilities plan, transportation system plan, or parks master plan. It includes a section profiling the city’s existing transportation system in the context of natural hazards resilience. The addendum also includes a review of the city’s existing relevant documents, including the current TSP. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review the plan’s applicable recommended mitigation action items and, where necessary, incorporate them into the Woodburn TSP update. Enhancing resiliency, including the Mitigation Plan actions related to improving transportation facilities, will be reflected in the goals and policies in the updated TSP; proposed projects in the updated TSP should be consistent with the Mitigation Plan’s objectives. Woodburn Target Industries Analysis (2016) The Woodburn Target Industries Analysis provides the City with a current independent analysis of Woodburn’s economy that identifies the City’s economic opportunities and the best use of the Southwest Industrial Reserve Area, as indicated by a target industry analysis. The analysis also considers target industries for three other sites: Stacy Allison Way, Commerce Way/Front Street, and Young Street/Highway 99. Woodburn is compared to Marion County and the Portland region— including Clackamas, Washington, and Multnomah Counties—and opportunities are examined in the context of Marion County’s economy. The report cites transportation infrastructure as one of the City’s disadvantages for economic development, identifying as barriers to development transportation access, upgrade, and improvement needs. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will consider the identified transportation-related barriers to development in this Analysis, specifically transportation access and improvement needs in association with economic development. Improving access and transportation conditions to important employment areas will be reflected in evaluation criteria and, ultimately, recommended projects in the updated TSP. ---PAGE BREAK--- Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) 34 of 34 APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 Woodburn Wastewater Facilities Plan (2010) The Woodburn Wastewater Facilities Plan identifies and addresses wastewater system improvements needed to continue reliable service to the area during the planning period. The report is divided into three volumes: Volume 1: Wastewater Treatment, Volume 2: Wastewater Collection and Transmission System, and Volume 3: Wastewater Rate and System Development Charge Study. Project Relevance: The TSP update process will review the plan’s relevant analyses and recommendations and incorporate them into the Woodburn TSP update where appropriate. Woodburn Development Ordinance (2002, last amended in 2017) The Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) was adopted in 2002 and was most recently amended in January 2017. It is intended to implement the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan in accordance with Oregon’s statewide planning goals and statutes, and to regulate development within city limits. The WDO contains several sets of requirements that address the relationship between land use development and transportation system development. A detailed review of WDO is provided in Attachment B. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-1 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies related to transportation Marion County Coordination Goals and Policies Goal C-1. To coordinate with Marion County regarding planning issues that extend beyond the boundaries of the City of Woodburn, including population allocations, amendments to acknowledged comprehensive plans and transportation system plans, and achievement of a compact urban growth form, as required by Statewide Planning Goals 2 (Land Use Planning and Coordination), 12 (Transportation) and 14 (Urbanization). Residential Land Use Goals and Policies Policies D-1.1 Residential areas should be designed around a neighborhood concept. Neighborhoods should be an identifiable unit bounded by arterials, non-residential uses, or natural features of the terrain. The neighborhood should provide a focus and identity within the community and should have a community facility, such as a school, park, or privately owned community facility to allow for interaction within the neighborhood. D-1.4 Streets in residential areas should be used by residents for access to collectors and arterials. Residential streets should be designed to minimize their use for through traffic. However, whenever possible, dead-end streets and cul-de-sacs should be avoided. D-1.8 High traffic generating non-residential uses should not be located in a manner that increases traffic flows on residential streets or residential collectors. However, designated neighborhood commercial centers in Nodal Development areas are exempt from this policy. D-1.11 Traffic from high density residential areas should have direct access to collector or arterial streets without having to utilize local reside7ntial streets to reach shopping and job centers. Industrial Development Goals and Policies Policies E-1.4 Industrial areas that are located adjacent to arterial streets or to residential areas should be controlled through site plan review and buffer zones to minimize the impact of industrial uses. Commercial Lands Goals and Policies Policies F-1.2 Lands for high traffic generating uses (shopping centers, malls, restaurants, etc.) should be located on well improved arterials. The uses should provide the necessary traffic control devices needed to ameliorate their impact on the arterial streets. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-2 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 F-1.6 Commercial office and other low traffic generating commercial retail uses can be located on collectors or in close proximity to residential areas if care in architecture and site planning is exercised. The City should ensure by proper regulations that any commercial uses located close to residential areas have the proper architectural and landscaping buffer zones. F-1.11 The Highway 99E commercial corridor south of Lincoln should be redeveloped over time with more intense mixed use development. The Mixed Use Village Overlay (MUVO) designates an area that is intended to promote efficient use of land and urban services; create a mixture of land uses that encourages employment and housing options in close proximity to one another; restrict land extensive commercial, storage, and industrial uses; and encourage pedestrian-oriented development. F-1.14 The City intends to beautify the Highway 99E commercial corridor through measures such as replacement of overhead power and telephone lines with underground utilities, enhancing street lighting in the corridor, providing for non-conforming sign amortization, providing enhanced streetscape furnishings in key pedestrian areas, and establishing a storefront improvement program. The City will explore options to fund such improvements, including its Capital Improvement Program, formation of a Local Improvement District, and Urban Renewal funds. Growth Management Goals and Policies1 Policies G-1.3 The City shall provide an interconnected street system to improve the efficiency of movement by providing direct linkages between origins and destinations. G-1.4 The City shall assure the provision of major streets as shown in the Transportation Systems Plan. The City shall hold development accountable for streets within and abutting the development. In addition, the policy of the City is to emphasize development outward in successive steps and phases that avoid unnecessary gaps in the development and improvement of the streets. G-1.10 Woodburn will ensure that land is efficiently used within the UGB by requiring master development plans for land within Nodal Development Overlay or Southwest Industrial Reserve overlay designations. Master plans shall address street connectivity and access, efficient provision of public facilities, and retention of large parcels for their intended purpose(s). G-1.27 Woodburn recognizes that residential uses present the most adverse conflicts with both agricultural practices and with many industrial uses, especially those that use trucks as part of their regular business practice. Woodburn and Marion County recognize that the land to the west of Butteville Road NE is a critical part of the irreplaceable land base of the region’s agricultural industry. Therefore, to minimize conflicts between urban and agricultural uses and to minimize conflicts between the industrial uses in Southwest Industrial Reserve and other urban uses, the City and County will: • Ensure that the design of any improvements to the portion of Butteville Road NE serving the Southwest Industrial Reserve not encourage any urban traffic unrelated to the industrial use in the immediate area and unrelated to agricultural uses west of Butteville Road. 1 Note, the policies shown in Growth Management Goals and Policies section reflects the 2016 amendments that resulted from Urban Growth Coordination Agreement. To date, these policies are not found in the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan available online. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-3 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 • As industrial development is planned for in the Southwest Industrial Reserve consideration shall be given to methods that mitigate impacts from development and adjacent agricultural activities. This can include buffers or increased setbacks along Butteville Road, provided that any buffers needed to reduce conflicts between the industrial uses and agricultural activity west of Butteville Road NE are located inside the UGB. Transportation Goals and Policies Woodburn amended its Transportation System Plan (TSP) in coordination with Marion County, the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) and the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) as part of its 2005 Periodic review package. The goals and policies listed below have been amended consistent with the 2005 TSP. A new “Marion County Coordination” subsection is added to ensure coordination with the Goals and Policies of the Marion County Growth Management Framework Plan. Goal H-1. Develop a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. Policies H-1.1 Develop an expanded intracity bus transit system that provides added service and route coverage to improve the mobility and accessibility of the transportation disadvantaged and to attract traditional auto users to use the system. H-1.2 Develop a plan for providing travel options between Woodburn and Portland or Salem, including intercity bus service and potential bus/carpool park-and-ride facilities. H-1.3 Develop a bikeway system that provides routes and facilities that allow bicyclists to travel from residential areas to schools, parks, places of employment, and commercial areas. Identify off-street facilities in City greenway and park areas. Ensure all new or improved collector and arterial streets are constructed with bicycle lanes. H-1.4 Identify sidewalk and off-street pathway improvements to improve pedestrian mobility within neighborhoods and between residential areas and schools, parks, places of employment, and commercial areas. Ensure all new or improved collector and arterial streets are constructed with sidewalks. Goal H-2. Develop a street system that will handle projected year 2020 traffic demands in the Woodburn area, and interconnects residential areas with employment centers, schools, parks, churches, and regional transportation facilities. Policies H-2.1 Develop an updated roadway functional classification plan for the Woodburn area that reflects the desired function of different roadways, and is consistent with current federal guidelines for the designation of major streets in an urban area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-4 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 H-2.2 Work with ODOT to develop and implement strategies for improving state facilities within the City. Develop a strategy for improving Oregon 219/214 and 211 through Woodburn, including added travel lanes, signalization, and access management. Work with ODOT to implement the Highway 99E Corridor Plan to improve Highway 99E. H-2.3 Identify new east-west and north-south collector/minor arterial streets within the City to relieve traffic demands on Oregon 219/214, 211, and 99E and coordinate with Marion County to construct the street connections needed outside of the urban growth boundary (UGB). Where development of new collector/minor arterial streets is not possible within the near future, such as when an alignment runs outside of the UGB, work with property owners during subdivision to provide local street connections to improve connectivity in the interim. H-2.4 Develop updated street design standards for arterials, collectors, and local streets H-2.5 Identify a final strategy for paving currently unimproved streets in the City. H-2.6 Identify the need for additional public parking provisions in Woodburn, including park-and-ride facilities, as well as a plan to support increased carpooling and transit use in the future. H-2.7 Develop a capital improvement program that fulfills the transportation goals established by the community. Goal H-3. Develop transportation improvements that address overall traffic safety in the Woodburn area. Policies H-3.1 Work with ODOT to improve safety on state facilities within the City. Develop access management strategies for Oregon 219/214 and 211 through Woodburn, particularly focusing on the section of Oregon 214 between Interstate 5 (I-5) and Cascade Drive. Work with ODOT and property owners through the redevelopment process to improve access management on Highway 99E in accordance with the access management strategies identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan. H-3.2 Develop a plan for improving pedestrian and bicycle safety for travel to and from local schools, commercial areas, and major activity centers. H-3.3 Identify street and railroad crossings in need of improvement, as well as those that should be closed or relocated. H-3.4 Develop a plan for designated truck routes through the City and a plan to handle truck and rail hazardous cargoes. Goal H-4. Develop a set of reliable funding sources that can be applied to fund future transportation improvements in the Woodburn area. Policies H-4.1 Evaluate the feasibility of the full range of funding mechanisms for transportation improvements. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-5 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 H-4.2 Evaluate the feasibility of instituting an added City gas tax for transportation improvements. H-4.3 Identify a traffic impact fee structure for new development in the Woodburn area to fund transportation improvements. Goal H-5. Develop amendments to City land use standards and ordinances to reduce travel demand and promote use of modes of transportation other than the automobile. Policies H-5.1 Identify a range of potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of the transportation system by shifting single-occupant vehicle trips to other models and reducing automobile reliance at times of peak traffic volumes. H-5.2 Identify revisions to the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance for compliance with the TPR. Goal H-6. Coordinate with Marion County in planning for a safe and efficient county-wide transportation system by: Encouraging use of alternative modes of transportation including mass transit, bicycling, walking and carpooling; and Addressing transportation needs appropriate to both urban and rural areas throughout the county. Policies H-6.1 Woodburn shall jointly plan with the county to meet the transportation needs in the future. The Marion County Transportation System Plan (TSP) will be designed to accommodate the forecast population, housing, and employment identified in the Framework Plan, except where modified by the Woodburn Economic Opportunities Analysis (EOA) and the acknowledged 2005 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan. Woodburn supports Marion County efforts to investigate countywide alternative transportation, such as inter-city transit, vanpooling, and passenger rail service serving the county and the Willamette Valley region. H-6.2 Woodburn will implement plans as provided in the Woodburn TSP. Except where topographical conditions or existing development make this standard impractical, new subdivisions and planned developments should have internal connectivity of at least 8 through streets per mile (roughly every 660 feet) for new development, and sufficient collector and arterial systems for local access. The TSP shall include a map depicting future street connections for areas to be urbanized. This is especially important in Nodal Development Overlay and Southwest Industrial Reserve overlay areas. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-6 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 When feasible, the County will utilize standards in the Woodburn TSP and Woodburn Development Ordinance for development that occurs on unincorporated lands within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary. H-6.3 Woodburn will support Marion County efforts to provide transit connections within and between cities. The Woodburn TSP shall include transportation plans for the Woodburn Transit System that is consistent with the population and employment projections in the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and coordinated with the “preferred alternative” found in the County Framework Plan. H-6.4 Woodburn should provide for a complementary mix of land uses and transportation systems by providing for mixed use development in the Downtown Development and Conservation (DDC) District, the Mixed Use Village (MUV), and the Nodal Development Overlay (NDO) districts. H-6.5 Woodburn shall consider traffic calming of through traffic in neighborhoods. Woodburn will coordinate with Marion County in making recommendations for methods and procedures for traffic calming that directly affects a county road, developing recommended best practices for methods, locations, and processes for traffic calming in both existing and new developments. H-6.6 Woodburn will coordinate with Marion County in planning for freight movement by both rail and truck. H-6.7 The Woodburn TSP shall include measures to improve the walking and biking environment by providing sidewalks in all new developments and by providing an interconnecting system of pedestrian connections. Designing for a comfortable and practical pedestrian environment is especially important in Downtown Woodburn and within the Nodal Development Overlay. Goal H-7. Coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to maintain highway and intersection capacity, safety and functionality by: Developing and adopting performance standards; and Prohibiting comprehensive plan amendments that do not meet adopted performance standards. Policies H-7.1 The Woodburn TSP shall implement an interchange management plan within the UGB based on potential and substantial adverse impacts to the I-5 Interchange. Peak hour trip generation estimates and numerical ceilings based on land uses permitted by the 2005 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan shall be determined for each designated sub-area. The City will coordinate with ODOT in monitoring trip generation impacts for each designated sub-area, considering the cumulative impacts of existing and new development. Transportation impact studies shall be required for subdivisions and planned developments, and for new commercial, industrial, public and multi-family residential development within designated sub-areas. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-7 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 Comprehensive Plan amendments that exceed the trip generation ceiling for a designated sub-area shall be prohibited. Comprehensive Plan amendments from Industrial to Commercial shall be prohibited, regardless of impact, within the SWIR Overlay. Woodburn shall provide ODOT with copies of transportation impact studies upon request, and as part of the Periodic Review process. Woodburn shall coordinate with ODOT, DLCD and Marion County to address potential service deficiencies affecting state highway facilities through the Periodic Review process. H-7.2 The City shall implement medium-term conservation measures to limit access to Highways 214 and 219. Such measures shall include, but shall not be limited to: Limitations or prohibition on private access within a quarter of mile east and west of interchange ramp terminals; Access controls on, public road approaches; and Raised medians from Woodland to Oregon Way along Highways 219 and 214. H-7.3 To ensure safety and long-range mobility on Highway 99E, the City shall be guided by the following access management objectives: Ensure that all properties are provided reasonable access to the public street network, including consideration of the economic development needs of each property. Driveways to commercial businesses on Highway 99E should be designed to allow for safe and comfortable passage, improving existing driveways to comply with ODOT design standards as opportunities arise. Consider locating business signage immediately adjacent to the side of driveways to improve the ability of drivers to locate them. Provide convenient accessways for pedestrians and bicycles between the Highway 99E commercial corridor and neighboring residential areas. Safe and convenient pedestrian walkways should be provided between business entrances and sidewalks along Highway 99E, minimizing conflicts between pedestrians and motor vehicles in parking lots. Consider prohibiting driveways or restricting turning movements to driveways adjacent to turning pockets at intersections where necessary to maintain safe highway operations. Seek opportunities to align driveways on opposite sides of roadways to avoid turning conflicts. Driveways to Highway 99E should maintain adequate intersection sight distance and at a minimum shall maintain safe stopping sight distance along the highway. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-8 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 Reduce access points over time to move in the direction of meeting ODOT’s adopted access management spacing standards for regional highways. Create shared access points to reduce the overall number of driveways along the Highway 99E corridor. Shared driveways must be supported through the establishment of easements allowing for travel between adjacent properties. Provide inter-parcel circulation through cross-over easements, frontage or backage roads, or shared parking lots where feasible. Utilize easements, frontage/backage roads, and lower classified city streets to allow for secondary access to facilitate large truck and emergency service vehicle circulation. Seek opportunities to enhance the connectivity of the local street system surrounding Highway 99E. H-7.4 The City will actively participate in developing strategies and solutions to mitigate impacts to property owners that may result from implementing future highway design and planned built improvements. Downtown Design Intermediate Term Goals and Policies Policies K-4.1 Evaluate alternative circulation patterns for traffic flow. Patterns of pedestrian circulation improved through the repair and/or replacement of sidewalks. A means of providing a sense of place within the downtown accomplished by replacing damaged sections of sidewalk with a decorative brick like pattern of surfacing. Pedestrian safety increased by carrying this surfacing pattern across the streets at each intersection thereby creating a different color and texture over which the automobiles travel. K-4.2 Improve vehicular and safety access into and out of Downtown by improving North and South Front Streets. K-5.2 Without an adequate system of underground irrigation within the DDCD, plans for landscaping not be as successful. The City will include in its Capital Improvement Programs plans to improve underground irrigation systems along streets and at intersections throughout the DDCD. K-5.3 Street lighting can be both ornamental and useful in making the downtown safe and attractive. Cooperation from both private and public interests can result in a street lighting plan that both serves a utility and attracts people to shop in and enjoy the downtown. K-8.2 The development standards and guidelines for the DDC district shall also encourage an enhanced street environment by providing building and streetscape designs of interest to pedestrians, such as locating buildings close to the street with parking areas behind or next to the building, limiting blank walls adjacent to the street, and requiring views into active areas of retail spaces. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A: Excerpt of Woodburn Comprehensive Plans Goals and Policies A-9 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/218 Open Space/Parks Goals and Policies L-1.7 To provide for a continuous public greenway and pathway system, it is the policy of the City to acquire privately-owned segments along Mill Creek, Goose Creek, and Senecal Creek and other stream corridors including the west tributary from Settlemier Park to Parr Road. It is the policy of the City to seek dedication of floodplains and creek corridors for natural areas, neighborhood recreation areas, open space and transportation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-1 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations OAR [PHONE REDACTED] Each local government shall amend its land use regulations to implement the TSP. The following transportation facilities, services and improvements need not be subject to land use regulations except as necessary to implement the TSP and, under ordinary circumstances do not have a significant impact on land use: Operation, maintenance, and repair of existing transportation facilities identified in the TSP, such as road, bicycle, pedestrian, port, airport and rail facilities, and major regional pipelines and terminals; Dedication of right-of-way, authorization of construction and the construction of facilities and improvements, where the improvements are consistent with clear and objective dimensional standards; Uses permitted outright under ORS 215.213(1)(m) through and 215.283(1)(k) through (n)1, consistent with the provisions of 660-012-00652; and Changes in the frequency of transit, rail and airport services. The WDO lists “Rights-of-way, easements and improvements for streets, water, sanitary sewer, gas, oil, electric and communication lines, stormwater facilities and pump stations” as a use in the three primary zones: Residential Zones (Table2.02A.B12), Commercial Zones (Table 2.03A.A3), Industrial Zones (Table 2.04A.A4). The use is permitted outright, subject to the general development standards of the WDO. Woodburn does not have zones for exclusive farm use, therefore does not apply. Recommendation: Existing code provisions meet this TPR requirement. No further changes to the code are recommended. To the extent, if any, that a transportation facility, service, or improvement concerns the application of a comprehensive plan provision or land use regulation, it may be allowed without further land use review if it is permitted outright or if it is subject to standards that do not require interpretation or the exercise of factual, policy or legal judgment. In the event that a transportation facility, service or improvement is determined to have a significant impact on land use or requires interpretation or WDO 4.01.07 (Consolidated Applications) allows applicants to submit required applications for a single development project as part of one submittal packet. 1 Climbing and passing lanes within the right of way existing as of July 1, 1987. Reconstruction or modification of public roads and highways, including the placement of utility facilities overhead and in the subsurface of public roads and highways along the public right of way, but not including the addition of travel lanes, where no removal or displacement of buildings would occur, or no new land parcels result. Temporary public road and highway detours that will be abandoned and restored to original condition or use at such time as no longer needed. Minor betterment of existing public road and highway related facilities such as maintenance yards, weigh stations and rest areas, within right of way existing as of July 1, 1987, and contiguous public-owned property utilized to support the operation and maintenance of public roads and highways. 2 OAR [PHONE REDACTED] (Transportation Improvements on Rural Lands); This rule identifies transportation facilities, services and improvements which may be permitted on rural lands consistent with Goals 3, 4, 11, and 14 without a goal exception. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-2 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations the exercise of factual, policy or legal judgment, the local government shall provide a review and approval process that is consistent with [PHONE REDACTED]. To facilitate implementation of the TSP, each local government shall amend regulations to provide for consolidated review of land use decisions required to permit a transportation project. WDO 4.01.14 (Public Notice) outlines City public notice requirements. The City is required to notify affected transportation facility and service providers (City, County, and State) at least 20 days before an initial public hearing (Type III & IV) or decision (Type II) when the application requires a Transportation Impact Analysis. Similarly, the City is required to send notice to the County and State at least 20 days before the initial public hearing for legislative decisions (Type Recommendation: Existing code provisions meet the TPR requirement. No further changes to the code are recommended. Local governments shall adopt land use or subdivision ordinance regulations, consistent with applicable federal and state requirements, to protect transportation facilities corridors and sites for their identified functions. Such regulations shall include: Access control measures, for example, driveway and public road spacing, median control and signal spacing standards, which are consistent with the functional classification of roads and consistent with limiting development on rural lands to rural uses and densities; WDO 3.01 (Streets) includes provisions and standards for streets. WDO 3.01.05 (Street Layout) requires blocks to be between 200 and 600 feet in length unless specific requirements are met. WDO 3.04 (Vehicular Access) provides procedures and standards for granting vehicular access to public streets. WDO 3.04.01 (Applicability and Permit) provides applicability standards, including how access permits are handled for City, County, and State facilities. WDO 3.04.03 (Driveway Guidelines and Standards) regulates the number, spacing, and type of driveways. Additional driveway standards for the Nodal Overlay District and Southwest Industrial Reserve are provided in WDO 2.05.04 (Nodal Overlay Districts) and WDO 2.05.06 (Southwest Industrial Reserve). WDO 2.05.04 prohibits direct access to public streets and requires access through alleys for anything other than single-family housing. WDO 2.05.06 requires access to be provided consistent with the TSP. Recommendation: Existing code provisions meet the TPR requirement. No further changes to the code are recommended. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-3 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations Standards to protect the future operations of roads, transitways and major transit corridors WDO 2.05.02 (Interchange Management Overlay District) requires a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for all land use applications within the overlay boundary. The TIA is required to meet City and ODOT requirements for approval. This Section also provides additional requirements that apply to Comprehensive Plan Map or Zoning Map amendments within the Interchange Management Area (IMA) that are intended to protect the nearby collectors and arterials as well as reserve the area for targeted employment opportunities. WDO 2.05.04 (Nodal Overlay Districts), WDO 2.05.05 (Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District), and WDO 2.05.06 (Southwest Industrial Reserve) requires amendments for the removal of the applicable overlay to demonstrate compliance with Goal 12 and Woodburn’s Comprehensive Plan. WDO 3.04.05 (Traffic Impact Analysis) requires a TIA when required by the Director for approval of an access permit when 100 or more peak hour trips or 1,000 or more daily trips are estimated to occur within 10 years. WDO 5.04 (Type IV Quasi-Judicial Decisions) provides decision criteria for various types of land use decisions, including amendments to the Comprehensive Plan – and by extension the TSP, which is an element of the Plan. Amendments that significantly affect a transportation facility are required to ensure the allowed land uses are consistent with the function, capacity, and level of service of the facility as identified in the TSP. It goes on to include methods by which consistency can be accomplished. WDO 4.01.17 (Types of Decisions) includes a description for Type V Legislative Decisions. It states the Legislative decisions involve “actions where the City Council amends the City’s land use regulations, comprehensive plan, Official Zoning Map or some other component of these documents.” The description is similar Type IV Decisions, which also involves actions on comprehensive plan amendments and Official Zoning Map amendments. Decision criteria for Type IV Decisions are provided in WDO 5.04 (described above), however the WDO does not include similar decision criteria for Type V Decisions. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-4 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations Recommendation: The City may want to consider expanding when a TIA is applicable to include all developments that are expected to reach the trip generation threshold, not just for those where access permits are requested. Measures to protect public use airports by controlling land uses within airport noise corridors and imaginary surfaces, and by limiting physical hazards to air navigation; Woodburn does not currently have, nor has plans to construct, an airport within the City’s UGB. Therefore, this requirement does not apply. A process for coordinated review of future land use decisions affecting transportation facilities, corridors or sites; See response to -0045(1)(c). A process to apply conditions to development proposals in order to minimize impacts and protect transportation facilities, corridors or sites; WDO 4.01.06 (Conditions of Approval) gives all City decision-making bodies the authority to impose conditions of approval reasonably related to impacts caused by development for all Type II, III, and IV land use decisions. Recommendation: Existing code provisions meet the TPR requirement. However, the City should consider identifying transportation-related improvements as potential conditions of approval, including specifically improvements that facilitate pedestrian and bicycle travel (see -0045(3)(c)). Regulations to provide notice to public agencies providing transportation facilities and services, MPOs, and ODOT of: Land use applications that require public hearings; Subdivision and partition applications; (C)Other applications which affect private access to roads; and (D)Other applications within airport noise corridor and imaginary surfaces which affect airport operations. See response to -0045(1)(c). Regulations assuring amendments to land use designations, densities, and design standards are consistent with the functions, capacities and performance standards of facilities identified in the TSP. See response to -0045(1)(b) and -0060. Local governments shall adopt land use or subdivision regulations for urban areas and rural communities as set forth below. The purposes of this section are to provide for safe and convenient pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular circulation consistent with access management standards and the function of affected streets, to ensure that ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-5 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations new development provides on-site streets and accessways that provide reasonably direct routes for pedestrian and bicycle travel in areas where pedestrian and bicycle travel is likely if connections are provided, and which avoids wherever possible levels of automobile traffic which might interfere with or discourage pedestrian or bicycle travel. Bicycle parking facilities as part of new multi-family residential developments of four units or more, new retail, office and institutional developments, and all transit transfer stations and park-and-ride lots. WDO 3.05.03 (Off-street Parking) requires all uses that are required to provide 10 or more off-street parking spaces and residential structures with four or more dwelling or living units to provide a bicycle rack within 50 feet of the main entrance. The required amount of bicycle parking is one space per ten vehicle spaces. Recommendation: Existing code provisions meet the TPR requirement. However, to encourage bicycle usage, the City should consider additional requirements for covered bicycle parking. On-site facilities shall be provided which accommodate safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access from within new subdivisions, multi-family developments, planned developments, shopping centers, and commercial districts to adjacent residential areas and transit stops, and to neighborhood activity centers within one-half mile of the development. Single-family residential developments shall generally include streets and accessways. Pedestrian circulation through parking lots should generally be provided in the form of accessways. "Neighborhood activity centers" includes, but is not limited to, existing or planned schools, parks, shopping areas, transit stops or employment centers; Bikeways shall be required along arterials and major collectors. sidewalks shall be required along arterials, collectors and most local streets in urban areas except that sidewalks are not required along controlled access roadways, such as freeways; Cul-de-sacs and other dead-end streets may be used as part of a development plan, consistent with the purposes set forth in this section; Local governments shall establish their own standards or criteria for providing streets and accessways consistent with the purposes of this section. Such measures may include but are not limited to: standards for On-site facilities WDO 2.05.04 (Nodal Overlay Districts), WDO 2.05.06 (Southwest Industrial Reserve) requires new development to create master development plans that include provisions for pedestrian and bicycle connections. WDO 3.07.05 (Standards for Medium Density Residential Buildings) includes provisions for pedestrian circulation to connect to other areas of the site and to other building entrances and adjacent streets. The provisions may or may not be required depending on the type of review (Type I, II, or III) chosen by the applicant. WDO 3.07.08 (Mixed Use Village Zone) requires on-site pedestrian circulation to connect all building entrances with adjacent sidewalks, on-site parking areas, and adjacent uses. WDO 3.07.09 (Nodal Neighborhood Commercial Zone) requires walkway connections between building entrances and the public street WDO 3.09.04 (Conceptual Development Plan) requires planned unit developments to include conceptual drawings showing bicycle and pedestrian circulation. WDO 3.09.06 (Development Standards) encourages ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-6 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations spacing of streets or accessways; and standards for excessive out-of- direction travel; Streets and accessways need not be required where one or more of the following conditions exist: Physical or topographic conditions make a street or accessway connection impracticable. Such conditions include but are not limited to freeways, railroads, steep slopes, wetlands or other bodies of water where a connection could not reasonably be provided; (ii) Buildings or other existing development on adjacent lands physically preclude a connection now or in the future considering the potential for redevelopment; or (iii) Where streets or accessways would violate provisions of leases, easements, covenants, restrictions or other agreements existing as of May 1, 1995, which preclude a required street or accessway connection. planned unit developments to enhance pedestrian and bicycle networks consistent with the TSP. Parking Lots WDO 3.05.02 (General Provisions) requires off-street parking areas to construct bumper guards or wheel barriers to prevent vehicles from obstructing access ways and rights-of-way. Other specific requirements related to pedestrian facilities in parking lots are not found. Bikeways and Sidewalks WDO 3.01.04 (Street Cross-Sections) provides standards, shown in Figures 3.01B – 3.01Q, that indicate what street elements are required for arterials, collectors, and access/commercial streets. Bike lanes are required on arterials and are optional on collectors. Bike lanes are not required on arterials and collectors located within the Historic Settlemier Transportation Corridor. Specific segments of Highway 99E have specific design standards found in Figures 3.01O – 3.01Q, all of which require bike lanes. Cul-de-sacs WDO 3.01.05 (Street Layout) limits the maximum length of cul-de-sac streets to 250 feet. The Director may require bikeway and pedestrian facilities to connect from one cul-de-sac to an adjacent cul-de-sac or street. Exceptions WDO 3.01.05 (Street Layout) allows exceptions to the block standards when natural topography, wetlands, significant habitat, bodies of water, or pre- existing development. WDO 5.02.04 (Exceptions to Street Right of Way and Improvement Requirements) and WDO 5.03.03 (Exceptions to Street Right of Way and Improvement Requirements) provide criteria for granting street design standards for Type II and III reviews. Recommendation: • The City may want to include pedestrian circulation standards that are applicable to larger parking lots in the Off-street Parking and ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-7 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations Loading requirements (WDO 3.05). The standards should be designed to enhance pedestrian safety and comfort. • Through the TSP update, the City will consider making bike lanes on collectors required, not optional. Off-site road improvements are otherwise required as a condition of development approval, they shall include facilities accommodating convenient pedestrian and bicycle and pedestrian travel, including bicycle ways on arterials and major collectors. [Note: Subsection defines safe and convenient.] See response to -0045(2)(e). Internal pedestrian circulation within new office parks and commercial developments shall be provided through clustering of buildings, construction of accessways, walkways and similar techniques. WDO 3.04.03 (Driveway Guidelines and Standards) requires all uses on a lot to have a common or interconnected off-street parking and circulation facility. WDO 3.07.08 (Mixed Use Village Zone) requires on-site pedestrian circulation for all buildings in the zone. Pedestrian circulation standards require walkway to connect all building entrances with sidewalk, on-site parking areas, and off-site adjacent uses. WDO 3.07.09 (Nodal Neighborhood Commercial Zone) site design guidelines require walkway connections between a building entrance the public street. Recommendation: On-site pedestrian circulation standards only apply to buildings in the Mixed Use Village Zone. The City should consider applying the same or similar standards to other zones that allow for office park and commercial uses such as the Downtown Development and Conservation Zone. To support transit in urban areas containing a population greater than 25,000, where the area is already served by a public transit system or where a determination has been made that a public transit system is feasible, local governments shall adopt land use and subdivision regulations as provided in below: Transit routes and transit facilities shall be designed to support transit use through provision of bus stops, pullouts and shelters, optimum road geometrics, The WDO does not currently include standards that specifically support the provision of transit facilities or transit routes. Similarly, the City’s current TSP does not identify major stops within the City and therefore does not have ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-8 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations on-road parking restrictions and similar facilities, as appropriate; New retail, office and institutional buildings at or near major transit stops shall provide for convenient pedestrian access to transit through the measures listed in and below. Walkways shall be provided connecting building entrances and streets adjoining the site; Pedestrian connections to adjoining properties shall be provided except where such a connection is impracticable. Pedestrian connections shall connect the on site circulation system to existing or proposed streets, walkways, and driveways that abut the property. Where adjacent properties are undeveloped or have potential for redevelopment, streets, accessways and walkways on site shall be laid out or stubbed to allow for extension to the adjoining property; In addition to and above, on sites at major transit stops provide the following: Either locate buildings within 20 feet of the transit stop, a transit street or an intersecting street or provide a pedestrian plaza at the transit stop or a street intersection; (ii) A reasonably direct pedestrian connection between the transit stop and building entrances on the site; (iii) A transit passenger landing pad accessible to disabled persons; (iv) An easement or dedication for a passenger shelter if requested by the transit provider; and Lighting at the transit stop. Local governments may implement and above through the designation of pedestrian districts and adoption of appropriate implementing measures regulating development within pedestrian districts. Pedestrian districts must comply with the requirement of above; related standards in the WDO. However, the City’s Architectural Design standards provides general requirements or guidelines for building orientation and connectivity that support on-site circulation and connectivity in the following zones: • Non-residential buildings subject to WDO 3.07.06 (Standards for Non-residential Structures in Residential, Commercial, and Public/Semi-public Zones) • All buildings subject to WDO 3.07.08 (Mixed-Use Village Zone) • All buildings subject to WDO 3.07.09 (Nodal Neighborhood Commercial Zone) The design standards for development within the zones listed above promote pedestrian-friendly, human-scaled urban areas and the City does not intend to designate specific pedestrian districts through the TSP update. Recommendation: The City should add transit supportive standards that apply to all buildings within the specified distance of major transit stops, where major transit is identified in the updated TSP. Designated employee parking areas in new developments shall provide preferential parking for carpools and vanpools; The WDO does not currently include standards for providing carpool or vanpool designated parking. Recommendation: The City should add standards to WDO 3.05 that specify ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-9 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations the applicability and design of carpool/vanpool parking. Existing development shall be allowed to redevelop a portion of existing parking areas for transit-oriented uses, including bus stops and pullouts, bus shelters, park and ride stations, transit-oriented developments, and similar facilities, where appropriate; The WDO does not currently include standards for converting existing parking areas to transit-oriented uses. Recommendation: The City may wish to add standards to WDO 3.05 that allow for existing parking areas to be converted to transit-oriented uses. Road systems for new development shall be provided that can be adequately served by transit, including provision of pedestrian access to existing and identified future transit routes. This shall include, where appropriate, separate accessways to minimize travel distances; The TSP update will identify existing and planned transit routes; the location and design of planned new roadways will be consistent with existing and planned transit service. Along existing or planned transit routes, designation of types and densities of land uses adequate to support transit. When updating the transit element of the TSP, the City has the opportunity to review existing land uses and consider land use changes that would support the viability of transit on existing or planned routes. In developing a bicycle and pedestrian circulation plan as required by 660-012- 0020(2)(d), local governments shall identify improvements to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian trips to meet local travel needs in developed areas. Appropriate improvements should provide for more direct, convenient and safer bicycle or pedestrian travel within and between residential areas and neighborhood activity centers schools, shopping, transit stops). Specific measures include, for example, constructing walkways between cul-de-sacs and adjacent roads, providing walkways between buildings, and providing direct access between adjacent uses. The TSP update will identify improvements to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian trips. This code audit summarizes bicycle and pedestrian improvements that are required through development review and approval, including the following: Walkways between cul-de-sacs and adjacent roads – See response and recommendations related to cul-de-sacs, Section -0045(3)(b). Walkways between buildings – See response and recommendations related to accessways, Section -0045(3)(e). Access between adjacent uses – See response and recommendations related to accessways, Section -0045(3)(e). Recommendation: Existing code provisions address this requirement. No changes to the code are recommended. Local governments shall establish standards for local streets and accessways that minimize pavement width and total ROW consistent with the operational needs of Local street standards for width and right-of-way are found in WDO 3.01.04 (Street Cross-Sections). Figures 3.01B – 3.01Q provide typical street cross- section standards for arterials, collectors, local streets, cul-de-sacs, and ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-10 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations the facility. The intent of this requirement is that local governments consider and reduce excessive standards for local streets and accessways in order to reduce the cost of construction, provide for more efficient use of urban land, provide for emergency vehicle access while discouraging inappropriate traffic volumes and speeds, and which accommodate convenient pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Notwithstanding section or of this rule, local street standards adopted to meet this requirement need not be adopted as land use regulations. alleys. ROW standards for local streets and cul-de-sacs range between 50-60 feet, depending on if parking is provided on one or both sides. Parking is required on one side, or both side if there is multifamily residential housing. Lane width 20 feet for two-way traffic. Standards for local streets also require sidewalks (5 feet) and planter strips (5.5 feet). ROW standards for alleys range between 16-20 feet, depending on if emergency access is required. Standards for sidewalks and planter strips are not included for alleys. Exceptions may be granted for local streets when connecting to existing substandard local streets or when conforming to an approved site development plan which determines it’s impractical to connect with existing streets because of a topographical or other existing land conditions. Such site development plans are required to be based on the volume of traffic, capacity for adjoining streets, and need for public convenience or safety. Recommendation: The TSP update process will evaluate the cross-sections established in the 2007 TSP to ensure that right-of-way and pavement dimensions are sufficient to serve the operational needs of each roadway functional classification without requiring excessive paved widths. The street standards should clarify pavement width for each cross-section. Standards should be made consistent between the updated TSP and development code. OAR [SSN REDACTED] Amendments to functional plans, acknowledged comprehensive plans, and land use regulations that significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility shall assure that allowed land uses are consistent with the identified function, capacity, and performance standards of the facility. Amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Map are reviewed through a Type IV (quasi-judicial) or a Type V (legislative) decision depending on the scope of the proposed amendment (WDO 4.01.17 – Type of Decisions). A Type IV decision is applicable when the amendments involve closely circumscribed factual circumstances or relatively small number of persons. A Type V decision is applicable when the amendment is “such a size, diversity of ownership or interest as to be legislative in nature under State law.” ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B: Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Regulatory Review B-11 Technical Memorandum Plans and Policy Review (DRAFT) APG Woodburn TSP 2/5/18 TPR Requirement Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) Recommendations WDO 5.04.02 (Comprehensive Plan Map Change, Owner Initiated) and WDO 5.04.04 (Official Zoning Map Change, Owner Initiated) requires Type IV Comprehensive Plan and land use standard amendments that significantly affect a transportation facility to mitigate for the impacts through prescribed standards. Standards for a Type V amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Map are not found in the WDO. Additional amendment standards that are applicable to specific Overlay zones are found in the respective sections. WDO 2.05.02 (Interchange Management Area Overlay District) provides additional standards for Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map amendments in the Overlay zone. Comprehensive Plan amendments are prohibited from increasing the net commercial land or defined traffic thresholds within the Overlay zone. WDO 2.05.04 (Nodal Overlay Districts) and WDO 2.05.06 (Southwest Industrial Reserve) requires amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning maps that remove the Overlay must demonstrate consistency with local, regional, and state goals and policies. WDO 2.05.05 (Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay) requires the Oregon Department of State Land be notified of plan and zone amendments that may affect any wetlands, creeks, or waterways. Recommendation: Existing code provisions address this requirement. No additional changes to the code are recommended. ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 2\2.4 TM 2 GOALS OBJECTIVES\21071 TM_2 GOALS OBJECTIVES EVALUATION CRITERIA_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #2 Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria Date: February 23, 2018 Project 21071 To: Chris Kerr and Eric Liljequist, City of Woodburn Dan Fricke, Oregon Department of Transportation Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Darci Rudzinski and CJ Doxsee, Angelo Planning Group Project: Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Subject: Tech Memo Goals, Objectives, and Evaluation Criteria This memorandum presents a draft set of goals and objectives that will be used to review and update Woodburn’s Transportation System Plan (TSP). The goals and objectives included in the current Comprehensive Plan and 2005 TSP were used as a basis to develop the goals and objectives with updates that reflect changes in state and local planning requirements as well as changes in demand for active modes of transportation (i.e. walking, biking, and riding transit). The goals and objectives will be used to guide the development and evaluation of potential solutions to address the needs, selection, and prioritization of preferred solutions for inclusion in the final plan. They will also inform recommendations for policy language that will serve as guidance for future land use decision making, such as approval criteria related zone change and comprehensive plan amendments. WOODBURN GOALS AND POLICIES BACKGROUND Woodburn’s existing 2005 TSP includes five goals with several corresponding policies. A review of these goals and policies indicate that they were created to focus on the creation of a multimodal transportation network, ensuring the roadway network is adequately sized to meet future demand, improving the safety of the transportation network, and finding funding sources to support the development of projects. Woodburn’s current Comprehensive Plan includes a copy of the 2005 TSP goals and policies as well as an additional two transportation goals – for a total of seven transportation goals – with corresponding policies. These additional two goals and policies focus on coordinating the transportation network with Marion County and ODOT. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon A more detailed review of several of the goals and policies indicates that many were created specifically for the development of the 2005 TSP and were ultimately accomplished when the TSP was adopted or are no longer relevant due to subsequent planning efforts or project implementation. As such, a fresh look at the goals and policies has been performed with suggested new language as summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1 – Review of Existing 2005 TSP Goals and Policies and Suggestion Revisions/New Language Existing 2005 TSP & Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Proposed TSP Goals and Objectives TSP Goal 1 Develop a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. Goal 1 – Multimodal Mobility Provide a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. Policies Objectives • Develop an expanded intracity bus transit system that provides added service and route coverage to improve the mobility and accessibility of the transportation disadvantaged and to attract traditional auto users to use the system. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** • Develop a plan for providing travel options between Woodburn and Portland or Salem, including intercity bus service and potential bus/carpool park-and-ride facilities. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** • Develop a bikeway system that provides routes and facilities that allow bicyclists to travel from residential areas to schools, parks, places of employment, and commercial areas. Identify off-street facilities in City greenway and park areas. Ensure all new collector and arterial streets are constructed with bicycle lanes. • Develop a comprehensive low stress network of bicycle lanes and routes that link major activity centers such as residential neighborhoods, schools, parks, commercial areas, and employment centers. • Identify sidewalk and off-street pathway improvements to improve pedestrian mobility within neighborhoods and between residential areas and schools, parks, places of employment, and commercial areas. Ensure all new collector and arterial streets are constructed with sidewalks. • Develop a comprehensive network of sidewalks and off-street pathways that improve pedestrian mobility within neighborhoods and link residential areas to schools, parks, commercial areas, and employment centers. • Maintain adequate intersection and roadway capacity on the key east-west and north-south arterials. TSP Goal 2 Develop a street system which will handle projected year 2020 traffic demands in the Woodburn area, and interconnects residential areas with employment centers, schools, parks, churches, and regional transportation facilities. Goal 2 - Connectivity Provide an interconnected street system that is adequately sized to accommodate existing and projected traffic demands in the Woodburn area. Policies Objectives • Develop an updated roadway functional classification plan for the Woodburn area that reflects the desired function of different roadways, and is consistent with current federal guidelines for the designation of major streets in an urban area. ***This is not necessary as a project objective as the 2005 TSP functional classification plan has essentially accomplished this.*** • Develop a strategy for improving Oregon 219/214, 211, and 99E through Woodburn, including added travel lanes, signalization, and access management. Verify and Incorporate the relevant strategies and infrastructure projects from the existing TSP, I-5/OR 214 IAMP, and 99E Refinement Plan. • Identify new east-west and north-south collector/minor arterial streets within the City to relieve traffic demands on Oregon 219/214, 211, and 99E, and coordinate with Marion County to construct the street connections needed outside of the urban growth boundary (UGB). ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** • Develop updated street design standards for arterials, collectors, and local streets. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** • Identify a final strategy for paving currently unimproved streets in the City. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Existing 2005 TSP & Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Proposed TSP Goals and Objectives TSP Goal 3 Develop transportation improvements that address overall traffic safety in the Woodburn area. Goal 3 - Safety Provide a transportation system that enhances the safety and security of all transportation modes in the Woodburn area. Policies Objectives • Develop access management strategies for Oregon 219/214, 211, and 99E through Woodburn, particularly focusing on the section of Oregon 214 between Interstate 5 (I-5) and Cascade Drive, and Oregon 99E south of Lincoln Avenue. ***This is not necessary as a project objective as the recent I-5 IAMP and Highway 99E Corridor Plan developed access management improvements.*** • Develop a plan for improving pedestrian and bicycle safety for travel to and from local schools, commercial areas, and major activity centers. • Address existing and potential future safety issues by identifying high collision locations and locations near schools or with a history of fatal, severe injury, and/or pedestrian/bicycle-related crashes and developing strategies to address those issues. • Identify street and railroad crossings in need of improvement, as well as those that should be closed or relocated. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** • Develop a plan for designated truck routes through the City, and a plan to handle truck and rail hazardous cargoes ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** TSP Goal 4 Develop a set of reliable funding sources that can be applied to fund future transportation improvements in the Woodburn area. Goal 4 – Strategic Investment Provide a financially sustainable transportation system through responsible stewardship of assets and financial resources. Polices Objectives • Evaluate the feasibility of the full range of funding mechanisms for transportation improvements. • Identify new and innovative funding sources for transportation improvements • Preserve and maintain the existing transportation system assets to extend their useful life. TSP Goal 5 Develop amendments to City land use standards and ordinances to reduce travel demand and promote use of modes of transportation other than the automobile. Goal 5 – Land Use and Transportation Integration Review and update land use standards and ordinances to create a balanced built environment where existing and planned land uses are supported by an efficient multi-modal transportation system. Polices Objectives • Identify a range of potential Transportation Demand Management (TDM) strategies that can be used to improve the efficiency of the transportation system by shifting single-occupant vehicle trips to other modes and reducing automobile reliance at times of peak traffic volumes. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** • Identify revisions to the Woodburn Zoning Ordinance for compliance with the Transportation Planning Rule ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** Comprehensive Plan Goal H-6 Coordinate with Marion County in planning for a safe and efficient county-wide transportation system by: Encouraging use of alternative modes of transportation including mass transit, bicycling, walking and carpooling; and Addressing transportation needs appropriate to both urban and rural areas throughout the county. Goal 6 Develop a transportation system that is consistent with the City’s adopted comprehensive plan and adopted plans of state, regional, and other local jurisdictions. Polices Objectives H-6.2 Woodburn will implement plans as provided in the Woodburn TSP. Except where topographical conditions or existing development make this standard impractical, new subdivisions and planned developments should have internal connectivity of at least 8 through streets per mile (roughly every 660 feet) for new development, and sufficient collector and arterial systems for local access. The TSP shall include a map depicting future street connections for areas to be urbanized. This is especially important in Nodal Development Overlay and Southwest Industrial Reserve overlay areas. When feasible, the County will utilize standards in the Woodburn TSP and Woodburn Development Ordinance for Ensure consistency with State, regional, and local planning rules and regulations. Incorporate projects identified in other state, regional, or local plans Coordinate land use, financial, and environmental planning to prioritize strategic transportation investments ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Existing 2005 TSP & Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Proposed TSP Goals and Objectives development that occurs on unincorporated lands within the Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary. H-6.3 Woodburn will support Marion County efforts to provide transit connections within and between cities. The Woodburn TSP shall include transportation plans for the Woodburn Transit System that is consistent with the population and employment projections in the Woodburn Comprehensive Plan and coordinated with the “preferred alternative” found in the County Framework Plan. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** H-6.4 Woodburn should provide for a complementary mix of land uses and transportation systems by providing for mixed use development in the Downtown Development and Conservation (DDC) District, the Mixed Use Village (MUV), and the Nodal Development Overlay (NDO) districts. ***This is not necessary as a project objective as existing Woodburn planning documents have been updated to reflect this information.*** H-6.5 Woodburn shall consider traffic calming of through traffic in neighborhoods. Woodburn will coordinate with Marion County in making recommendations for methods and procedures for traffic calming that directly affects a county road, developing recommended best practices for methods, locations, and processes for traffic calming in both existing and new developments. See objective under Goal H-6.6 Woodburn will coordinate with Marion County in planning for freight movement by both rail and truck. ***Keep as currently written for project objective*** H-6.7 The Woodburn TSP shall include measures to improve the walking and biking environment by providing sidewalks in all new developments and by providing an interconnecting system of pedestrian connections. Designing for a comfortable and practical pedestrian environment is especially important in Downtown Woodburn and within the Nodal Development Overlay. ***This is not necessary as a project objective as existing Woodburn planning documents have been updated to reflect this information.*** Comprehensive Plan Goal H-7 Coordinate with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) to maintain highway and intersection capacity, safety and functionality by: Developing and adopting performance standards; and Prohibiting comprehensive plan amendments that do not meet adopted performance standards. See Goal 6 H-7.1 The Woodburn TSP shall implement an interchange management plan within the UGB based on potential and substantial adverse impacts to the I-5 Interchange. Peak hour trip generation estimates and numerical ceilings based on land uses permitted by the 2005 Woodburn Comprehensive Plan shall be determined for each designated sub- area. The City will coordinate with ODOT in monitoring trip generation impacts for each designated sub-area, considering the cumulative impacts of existing and new development. Transportation impact studies shall be required for subdivisions and planned developments, and for new commercial, industrial, public and multi-family residential development within designated sub-areas. Comprehensive Plan amendments that exceed the trip generation ceiling for a designated sub-area shall be prohibited. Comprehensive Plan amendments from Industrial to Commercial shall be prohibited, regardless of impact, within the SWIR Overlay. Woodburn shall provide ODOT with copies of transportation impact studies upon request, and as part of the Periodic Review process. Woodburn shall coordinate with ODOT, DLCD and Marion County to address potential service deficiencies affecting state highway facilities through the Periodic Review process. ***This is not necessary as a project objective as the recent I-5 IAMP and Highway 99E Corridor Plan developed access management improvements.*** H-7.2 The City shall implement medium-term conservation measures to limit access to Highways 214 and 219. Such measures shall include, but shall not be limited to: ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Existing 2005 TSP & Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Proposed TSP Goals and Objectives Limitations or prohibition on private access within a quarter of mile east and west of interchange ramp terminals; Access controls on, public road approaches; and Raised medians from Woodland to Oregon Way along Highways 219 and 214. H-7.3 To ensure safety and long-range mobility on Highway 99E, the City shall be guided by the following access management objectives: Ensure that all properties are provided reasonable access to the public street network, including consideration of the economic development needs of each property. Driveways to commercial businesses on Highway 99E should be designed to allow for safe and comfortable passage, improving existing driveways to comply with ODOT design standards as opportunities arise. Consider locating business signage immediately adjacent to the side of driveways to improve the ability of drivers to locate them. Provide convenient accessways for pedestrians and bicycles between the Highway 99E commercial corridor and neighboring residential areas. Safe and convenient pedestrian walkways should be provided between business entrances and sidewalks along Highway 99E, minimizing conflicts between pedestrians and motor vehicles in parking lots. Consider prohibiting driveways or restricting turning movements to driveways adjacent to turning pockets at intersections where necessary to maintain safe highway operations. Seek opportunities to align driveways on opposite sides of roadways to avoid turning conflicts. Driveways to Highway 99E should maintain adequate intersection sight distance and at a minimum shall maintain safe stopping sight distance along the highway. Reduce access points over time to move in the direction of meeting ODOT’s adopted access management spacing standards for regional highways. Create shared access points to reduce the overall number of driveways along the Highway 99E corridor. Shared driveways must be supported through the establishment of easements allowing for travel between adjacent properties. Provide inter-parcel circulation through cross-over easements, frontage or backage roads, or shared parking lots where feasible. Utilize easements, frontage/backage roads, and lower classified city streets to allow for secondary access to facilitate large truck and emergency service vehicle circulation. Seek opportunities to enhance the connectivity of the local street system surrounding Highway 99E. H-7.4 The City will actively participate in developing strategies and solutions to mitigate impacts to property owners that may result from implementing future highway design and planned built improvements. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon PROPOSED EVALUATION CRITERIA The proposed evaluation criteria are based on the proposed goals and policies. A qualitative process using the evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate potential modal solutions and prioritize projects developed through the TSP update. The rating method used to evaluate the alternatives is described below. ▪ Most Desirable: The concept addresses the criterion and/or makes substantial improvements in the criteria category. ▪ No Effect: The criterion does not apply to the concept or the concept has no influence on the criteria. ▪ Least Desirable: The concept does not support the intent of and/or negatively impacts the criteria category. At this level of screening, the criteria will not be weighted; the ratings will be used to inform discussions about the benefits and tradeoffs of each alternative. Table 1 presents the evaluation criteria that will be used to qualitatively evaluate the solutions developed through the TSP update. Objective Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Score Goal 1 Provide a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. Develop an expanded intracity bus transit system Project will expand and improve the bus transit system +1 Project will have no impact to the bus transit system 0 Project will negatively impact the bus transit system -1 Develop a comprehensive system of bicycle facilities Project will contribute to a comprehensive bicycle system +1 Project will not contribute to a comprehensive bicycle system 0 Project will impede a comprehensive bicycle system -1 Develop a comprehensive system of pedestrian facilities Project will contribute to a comprehensive pedestrian system +1 Project will not contribute to a comprehensive pedestrian system 0 Project will impede a comprehensive pedestrian system -1 Goal 2 Provide an interconnected street system that is adequately sized to accommodate existing and projected traffic demands in the Woodburn area. Develop new east-west and/or north-south collector/minor arterial streets within the City Project will result in new east-west and/or north-south connections +1 Project will have no impact on east-west and/or north-south connections 0 Project will result in increased traffic demands on OR 219/214 and 99E -1 Goal 3 Provide a transportation system that enhances the safety and security of all transportation modes in the Woodburn area. Address existing and potential future safety issues. Project will address existing or potential future safety issue +1 Project will have no impact on an existing or potential future safety issue 0 Project will worsen existing or potential future safety issue -1 Identify street and railroad crossings in need of improvement, as well as those that should be closed or relocated. Project will lead to the improvement, closure, or relocation of a rail crossing +1 Project will have no impact on rail crossings 0 Project will not improve rail crossings or will result in a new rail crossing -1 Develop a plan for designated truck routes through the City, and a plan to handle truck and rail hazardous cargoes Project will enhance truck and freight movements +1 Project will have no impact on truck and freight movements 0 Project will worsen truck and freight movements -1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Goal 4 Provide a financially sustainable transportation system through responsible stewardship of assets and financial resources. Identify new and innovative funding sources for transportation improvements Project is eligible for new and/or innovative funding +1 Project may not be eligible for new and/or innovative funding 0 Project is not eligible for new and/or innovative funding -1 Preserve and maintain the existing transportation system assets to extend their useful life Project will preserve and maintain the existing transportation system +1 Project will not impact the existing transportation system 0 Project will have a negative impact on the existing transportation system -1 Goal 5 – Land Use and Transportation Integration Review and update land use standards and ordinances to create a balanced built environment where existing and planned land uses are supported by an efficient multi-modal transportation system. ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 3\3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS INVENTORY ANALYSIS\FINAL\21071_TM3_EXISTING CONDITIONS INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #3 Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Date: March 29, 2019 Project 21071.3 To: Chris Kerr & Eric Liljequist, City of Woodburn Dan Fricke, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 Technical Advisory Committee and Community Advisory Committee From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittleson & Associates, Inc. Darci Rudzinski and Clinton “CJ” Doxsee, Angelo Planning Group Subject: Technical Memo Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis (Subtask 2.3) This memorandum documents the existing transportation network within the City of Woodburn and its urban growth boundary. Figure 1 illustrates the city boundary. The information presented in this memorandum will serve as a baseline for evaluating transportation system needs and identifying potential solutions for the Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. The information is based on an inventory of existing transportation facilities, discussions with City and Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) staff, and input from the project advisory committees and the general public. Consistent with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) [PHONE REDACTED], this inventory summarizes the characteristics, usage, performance, gaps, and deficiencies of the following transportation modes serving the City of Woodburn: ▪ Air System ▪ Bicycle System ▪ Marine System ▪ Pedestrian System ▪ Pipeline System ▪ Rail System ▪ Roadway System ▪ Transit System ▪ Truck Freight System ▪ Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) ▪ Transportation Demand Management (TDM) ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 2 Woodburn, Oregon CITY BACKGROUND AND HISTORY The City of Woodburn lies in the Willamette Valley in Marion County, approximately 30 miles south of Portland and approximately 20 miles north of Salem. As seen in Figure 1, several regional highways provide connections to other parts of the state, including Interstate-5, OR 211, OR 214, OR 219, and OR99E. Initially starting as land purchased for a tree nursery, construction of the railroad led to rapid development and incorporation as a city in 1889. Further growth occurred as additional tracks and I-5 were constructed. Based on information from the Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC), Woodburn has an estimated 2016 population of 24,795 people, comprising 7.4% of Marion County’s 333,950 residents. The community is known for its tourism, local events, and young and diverse population. Big attractions include the Woodburn Premium Outlets, several golf courses, Tulip Festival, Fiesta Mexicana, and the Woodburn Dragstrip with over 4.5 million visitors to the area each year. LANDS AND POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS Planning for a transportation system that meets the city’s goals and objectives requires a comprehensive understanding of land uses, population characteristics, and activity centers/destinations (such as schools, the library, City Hall, Community Center, parks, shopping centers, and other attractions). Information about Woodburn’s lands and population inventory has been included in Attachment A with a focus on the following specific information: ▪ Comprehensive Plan and Zoning summary  Comprehensive Plan Map  Zoning Map  Overlay Districts Map ▪ Vacant and Redevelopable Land summary  Vacant and Redevelopable Land Map  Opportunity Sites Map (Woodburn Target Industry Analysis, ECONorthwest, 2016) ▪ Natural Resource and Environmental Barriers summary  Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Map ▪ Activity Centers Summary  Activity Centers Map ▪ Historic and Projected Population Growth ▪ Environmental Justice summary ---PAGE BREAK--- ß/ 26 Woodburn Adair Village Albany Amity Aumsville Aurora Barlow Canby Carlton Dallas Detroit Donald Dundee Estacada Gates Gervais Idanha Independence Jefferson Keizer Lafayette Lyons McMinnville Mill City Millersburg Molalla Monmouth Newberg Salem Scio St. Paul Sublimity Turner Hubbard Mt. Angel Scotts Mills Oregon City Wilsonville Stayton Dayton Silverton vÍÎ 99W vÍÎ 213 vÍÎ 22 vÍÎ 226 vÍÎ 233 vÍÎ 221 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 173 vÍÎ 224 vÍÎ 51 vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99EB vÍÎ 47 vÍÎ 154 vÍÎ 551 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 194 vÍÎ 153 vÍÎ 164 vÍÎ 223 vÍÎ 18 vÍÎ 214 5 Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 1 C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\01 Regional Map.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Regional Map Woodburn, Oregon Marion County ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 4 Woodburn, Oregon WOODBURN’S EXISTING TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE Air System There are no airports located within the city limits. The closest airports include the Aurora State Airport (classified as a Urban General Aviation Airport) located approximately 8 miles to the north via OR 99E and OR 551 and the Mulino Airport located approximately 14 miles to the northeast via OR 211 and OR 213. Bicycle System The bicycle system within Woodburn consists of on-street bike lanes and shared roadways as well as a select number of multi-use pathways. These facilities provide local residents with the ability to access transit as well as local retail, commercial, recreational, and other land uses within Woodburn and neighboring cities by bike. In order to assess the adequacy of bicycle facilities in Woodburn, a Geographic Information System (GIS) data inventory was created to reflect recent aerial imagery of bike lanes and other bicycle facilities along the city’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets. Essential destinations and activity centers were identified in Attachment A to determine possible bicycle trip generators and to help prioritize potential improvements to the bicycle system. Figure 2 shows the existing bicycle facilities within Woodburn. Bicycle Facilities Bike lanes Bike lanes are dedicated portions of the roadway that are striped and allocated for bicycle travel. On- street bike lanes are currently provided along several major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets within the city including segments of OR 219/OR 214, Evergreen Road, Stacy Allison Way, Center Street, Country Club Road, Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue, Young Street, OR 99E, and Hardcastle Avenue. Separated Bike Path Separated bike lanes are bike lanes that have a buffer between the travel lane and the bike lane, which can include treatments such as planters, landscape strips, and striping. An off-street separated bike lane is provided along the south side of Parr Road, connecting Settlemier Avenue to Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School. ---PAGE BREAK--- k l 89:m 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 E BLAINE ST FRONT ST M ER IDIAN DR MCKEE SCHOOL RD A L E X AND R A AV HAZE L NUT D R P A R K C R N 2ND ST T U KWIL A D R LEARY RD J U N E WY C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR RA Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD MILL ST RYE ST KOI LN VERA LN PLUM LN OGLE ST STARK ST IDAHO DR TU L IP AV PALM A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y L P JORY ST CROS B Y RD HAWLEY ST ELANA WY COMMERCE WY BLAINE ST OXFORD S T PARR R D R O Y AV NATIONAL WY AZTEC DR SANTIAM DR WILL O W A V SALLAL R D JA M ES S T GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD QUINN RD KING WY W ORKMAN DR MCKINLEY ST KOENER RD G R EE N V I E W DR RANDOLPH RD LAUREL AV A L S E A L P EL M ST N 1ST ST W CLACKAMAS C R DECONINCK RD SERRES LN S CASCADE D R EAST HARDCASTLE RD ST LOUIS RD EVERGREEN BV DIMMICK LN STAFNEY LN ARNEY RD EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR INGALLS LN CARL RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R PA N A S T T R A C Y L N VI N E AV BRYAN ST AR N E Y LN O R EGON L P D E X TER LP C A SCA D E DR S M IT H DR D E ER R U N CHA T EAU D R JANS EN WY T U R NBERRY A V CAMAS ST PRINCETO N R D EVE RGR E E N R D TOMLIN AV N 3RD ST HOO P E R ST E C LACKAMAS C R MCLAUGHLIN D R GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR S HALI M A R L P O R E GON WY GATCH S T PARR RD COOLEY RD BROWN ST N 5T H S T PAR K AV PRO G R E SS WY WOODLAND AV ASTO R WY STUBB RD STACY ALLISON WY CROSBY RD H A Z E LN U T D R A R NEY RD LINC O LN S T S PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV S FRONT ST BOONES FERRY RD BUT TEVILLE RD N FRONT ST WILCO HY Y OUNG ST NEWB E RG H Y N PACIFIC HY EV E RGRE E N R D MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 2 k l 89:m Enhanced Crossing Bike Lane Multi-Use Pathway City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\02 Existing Bicycle Facilities.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Existing Bicycle Facilities Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 6 Woodburn, Oregon Bicycle Activity Bicycle counts were conducted at the study intersections in September and October 2017. 16-hour counts were conducted on a typical mid-week day when school was in session. All of the counts include the total number of bicyclists that entered the intersections in 15-minute intervals. The bicycle counts show a relatively low level of bicycle activity at the study intersections in general. It should be noted that while the peak hour for vehicular traffic typically occurs between 4:00 to 6:00 p.m., the peak hour for bicycle activity near schools and other activity centers typically occurs earlier in the day. The bicycle count data is shown in Table 1. Table 1: Bicycle Crossing Volumes at Study Intersections Map ID Intersection North/South Bicycle Volume East/West Bicycle Volume Bicycle Peak Hour 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 2 0 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue 0 1 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp 0 1 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp 0 1 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road 0 4 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road 0 2 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 1 1 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE 3 1 3:15 to 4:15 p.m. 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street 3 1 12:45 to 1:45 p.m. 10 Front Street/OR 214 1 1 5:15 to 6:15 p.m. 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 1 5 2:15 to 3:15 p.m. 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E 1 0 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road 2 0 10:15 to 11:15 a.m. 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street 4 3 12:30 to 1:30 p.m. 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street 2 5 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street 5 0 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street 5 1 12:15 to 1:15 p.m. 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue 4 2 11:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue 3 1 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street 3 1 2:30 to 3:30 p.m. 21 OR 99E/Young Street 0 5 11:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street 4 0 1:45 to 2:45 p.m. As shown in Table 1, the highest bicycle crossing volumes were observed at intersections located along Front Street near retail and commercial land uses. Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Analysis The bicycle facilities located along the city’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets were evaluated in an effort to identify potential issues that could be addressed as part of the TSP update. The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Analysis Procedures Manual (APM) provides a methodology for evaluating bicycle facilities within urban and rural environments called ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 7 Woodburn, Oregon Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS). As applied by ODOT, this methodology classifies four levels of traffic stress that a bicyclist can experience on the roadway, ranging from BLTS 1 (little traffic stress) to BLTS 4 (high traffic stress). A road segment that is rated BLTS 1 generally has low traffic volumes and travel speeds and is suitable for all cyclists, including children. A road segment that is rated BLTS 4 generally has high traffic volumes and travel speeds and is perceived as unsafe by most cyclists. Per the APM, BLTS 2 is considered a reasonable target for bicycle facilities due to its acceptability with the majority of cyclists. The BLTS score is determined based on the speed of the roadway, the number of travel lanes per direction, the presence and width of an on-street bicycle lane and/or adjacent parking lane, and several other factors. Figure 3 illustrates the results of the BLTS analysis for Woodburn’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets. The BLTS calculations are summarized in Attachment B. A majority of the segments rated BLTS 3 have striped bicycle lanes; however, the bike lanes are too narrow for roadways conditions. In order for these segments to be rated BLTS 2, the striped bicycle lanes would need to be widened/buffered to 7 feet and/or the posted speed limits would need to be as low as 30 mph. Other segments rated BLTS 3 were evaluated as shared roadways. In order for these segments to be rated BLTS 2, the speed would need to be as low as 25 mph. A majority of the segments rated BLTS 4 occur on segments without bike lanes and which were analyzed as shared roadways. In order for these segments to be rated BLTS 2, the speed would need to be as low as 25 mph. Several segments with striped bike lanes were rated BLTS 4; all of which are located on OR 99E. In order for these segments to be rated BLTS 2, the striped bicycle lanes would need to be widened/buffered to 7 feet and/or the posted speed limits would need to be as low as 30 mph. Enhanced facilities, such as separated bike facilities or multi-use paths, may also be needed in some areas where traffic volumes and/or travel speeds are high. It should also be noted that a majority of the shared roadway segments that were rated BLTS 2 could include signage and potentially striping to remind motorists to share the road. The signing and striping can also provide important wayfinding for cyclists to inform them of the preferred bicycle routes. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP N 1ST ST FRONT ST CH U RCH ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST NATIONAL WY DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GAR FIELD ST CONSTITUTION A V ORCHAR D L N EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STARK ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER R D NEKIA S T MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV W HAYES ST EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELA N A DR W LINCOLN ST N 3RD ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R JUNE W Y ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILSO N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST N 4TH ST N 2ND ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST J O NAH P L ARN EY LN WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V AL E L N MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GL A T T CR O X FO R D ST UNION SCHOOL RD THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD D R CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P O R E GON WY GATCH S T COOLEY RD N 5T H S T BROWN ST PAR K AV PRO G R E SS WY CROSBY RD PARR RD A RNEY RD WOODLAND AV STACY ALLISON WY ASTO R WY LINC O LN S T STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY S SETTLEMIER AV Y OUNG ST EVE R G REEN R D BOON ES FERRY R D S FRONT ST WILCO H Y MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD N FRONT ST MT HOOD AV N E W BERG HY Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 3 BLTS 1 BLTS 2 BLTS 3 BLTS 4 City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\03 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Existing Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 9 Woodburn, Oregon Existing Gaps and Deficiencies Streets with no bike lanes or intermittent bike lanes force bicyclists to share the travel lane with motor vehicles or use the shoulder if available. In many cases, this is not a desirable option for bicyclists due to narrow lane widths or uneven pavement conditions. Adequate bicycle facilities should be provided to allow for safe travel between neighborhoods and essential destinations. The following provides a summary of the existing gaps and deficiencies on the City’s major arterial, minor arterial, and service collector streets: ▪ OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue ▪ OR 214 from Progress Way to OR 99E ▪ OR 211 from east of OR 99E to east UGB limits ▪ Butteville Road from south UGB limits to north UGB limits ▪ Stacy Allison Way from Center Street to Evergreen Road ▪ Evergreen Road from Hayes Street to OR 214 ▪ Hayes Street from Evergreen Road to Settlemier Avenue ▪ Parr Road from east UGB limits to Settlemier Avenue ▪ Boones Ferry Road from Hazelnut Drive to north UGB limits ▪ Settlemier Avenue from south UGB limits Harrison Street (with an exception with a short segment of striped bike lanes just south of the railroad crossing) ▪ Harrison Street from Settlemier Avenue to Front Street ▪ Lincoln Street from Settlemier Avenue to east UGB limits ▪ Cleveland Street from Settlemier Avenue to OR 99E ▪ Front Street from Settlemier Avenue to north UGB limits ▪ Progress Way from OR 214 to Industrial Avenue ▪ Industrial Avenue from Progress way to OR 99E ▪ Cooley Road from Hardcastle Avenue to OR 211 ▪ Hardcastle Avenue from Front Street to Cooley Road ▪ Young Street from OR 99E to east UGB limits ▪ Brown Street from end of road to Cleveland Street ▪ OR 99E from south UGB limits to Lincoln Road ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 10 Woodburn, Oregon ROADWAY SYSTEM The roadway system within Woodburn includes private streets, city streets, state highways, and an interstate freeway. These types of facilities provide residents with the ability to access retail, commercial, recreational, and other land uses within Woodburn and neighboring cities by vehicle. This section describes how the system has been developed to date and provides a more detailed review of how it is used and operated. Jurisdiction Streets within Woodburn are owned and operated by the City of Woodburn, Marion County, and ODOT. Each jurisdiction is responsible for determining the functional classification of the streets, defining major design and multimodal features, and approving construction and access permits. Coordination is required among the jurisdictions to ensure that the streets are planned, operated, maintained, and improved to safely meet public needs. Figure 4 illustrates the jurisdiction (ownership and maintenance responsibilities) of streets within Woodburn. As shown, I-5, OR 219, OR 214, OR 211, and OR 99E are under the jurisdiction of ODOT along with the I-5 on- and off-ramps. All remaining streets within the city limits are under the jurisdiction of the City of Woodburn. With the exception of those streets that are under ODOT jurisdiction, Marion County has jurisdiction over streets that are outside the city limits but within the UGB. Functional Classification A street’s functional classification defines its role in the transportation system and reflects desired operational and design characteristics such as right-of-way requirements, pavement widths, pedestrian and bicycle features, and driveway (access) spacing standards. Figure 5 illustrates the functional classification of streets within Woodburn, which includes the following designations as defined by the current Woodburn TSP: ▪ Freeways – The primary function of the interstate is mobility, because freeways connect major cities, regions within Oregon, and other states, and serve as major freight routes. The freeway should provide “safe and efficient high-speed continuous flow.” The freeway has full access control with access limited to the interchange. Only motorized vehicle traffic is served. ▪ Major Arterials – Primary functions are to serve local and through traffic as it enters and leaves the urban area, connect Woodburn with other urban centers and regions, and provide connections to major activity centers within eh UGB. Emphasis should be on traffic flow, pedestrian and bicycle movements. On-street bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D REY W Y A ST OR E G ON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L YNN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFI ELD ST EAGLE DR JA N S EN WY STARK S T BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST TU L I P AV T E N OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD M I L LER F ARM R D M ERIDIA N DR S MITH DR LAUREL AV SALLAL RD W ILLOW AV ELA NA DR W LINCOLN S T B ST TOMLIN AV VA N D E RBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TRO O N AV J UNE W Y ST PANA S T ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BAYLOR DR PRIN CETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R FIR ST AS T OR W Y MCLAUGHLI N D R IR O NWOOD T R WILSON ST GRANT ST TU K W I LA DR LEARY RD H E R MAN SON ST N 6TH ST AR NEY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WA LT O N W Y QUINN RD MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D EER R U N UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD D R CASCA D E DR G R E E N V IEW DR KOI LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR OATS ST B L Y L P GOUDY GARDENS LN JORY ST KOTKA ST WORKMAN D R COMMERCE WY CH A T E A U DR BLAINE ST PARR RD R O Y A V CAMAS ST CROSBY RD GEORGE ST KOENER RD HO O P E R ST A L S EA L P ELM ST W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE D R GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S H ALI M A R L P H A Z E LN UT DR W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST LIN COL N ST O R E GON WY P ARK AV BROWN S T GA T C H ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARDCASTLE AV STACY ALLISON WY ARN E Y RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST WOODLAND A V ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO UNG S T EVERGREE N RD N SETT LEMIER AV MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY BO O NES FER R Y RD BUTTEVILLE RD S PACIFIC HY N FRONT ST S FRONT ST NEW B E R G HY MOLALLA RD WILCO HY Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 4 Roadway Jurisdiction ODOT Marion County City of Woodburn Private City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\04 Roadway Jurisdiction.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Roadway Jurisdiction Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAH L IA ST T I ER RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFI ELD S T DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZE L NU T DR J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST COUNT R Y C LUB RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PR I NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H ERMA NSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALTO N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV H I GH ST C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GL A T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JA M ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST LILAC WY EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP HARDCASTLE AV H A Z ELN U T D R O RE GON WY GATC H S T PARR RD W HAYES ST STACY ALLISON WY HARRISON ST BROWN ST L INCO L N ST E CLEVELAND ST PAR K AV WOODLAND AV ASTO R WY COOLEY RD HARVARD DR ARNE Y RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD CROSBY RD NEWBERG HY HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN R D N SETTL EMIER AV BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 5 Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Service Collector Access Street Local Street City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\05 Functional Roadway Classification.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Functional Roadway Classification Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 13 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Minor Arterials – Primary functions are to connection major activity centers and neighborhoods within the UGB and to support the major arterial system. Minor arterials should have a higher degree of access, shorter trip lesser traffic volumes, and lower travel speeds than major arterials. Like major arterials, emphasis should be on traffic flow, pedestrian and bicycle movements. On-street bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided. ▪ Service Collector - Primary function is to provide connections between neighborhoods and major activity centers and the arterial street system. Some degree of access is provided to adjacent properties, while maintaining circulation and mobility for all users. Service collectors carry lower traffic volumes at slower speeds than major and minor arterials. On- street bicycle lanes and sidewalks should be provided. ▪ Access Streets – Primary function is to connect residential neighborhoods with service collectors or arterials. On-street parking and access to adjacent properties is prevalent. Slower speeds should be provided to ensure community livability and safety for pedestrians and cyclists. In many cases, cyclists can “Share the road” with motor vehicles because of low traffic volumes and speeds. Sidewalks or pathways should be provided for pedestrians. ▪ Local Streets – Primary function is to provide direct access to adjacent land uses. Short roadway distances, slow speeds, and low traffic volumes characterize local streets. Cyclists can share the road with motor vehicles. Sidewalks or pathways should be provided for pedestrians. Table 2 summarizes the functional classifications of the major arterial, minor arterial, and service collector streets within Woodburn and identifies the overlapping ownership/maintenance and jurisdictional relationships that exist. The functional classifications used in local TSPs should be consistent with other regional planning efforts. As shown in Table 2, there are several streets that currently have conflicting classifications. National Highway System (NHS) The National Highway System (NHS)is designated by the US Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration and includes roadways that are “important to the nation’s economy, defense, and mobility.”1 Within Woodburn, I-5 is part of the Eisenhower Interstate System and OR 219, OR 214, and OR 99E are classified as MAP-21 NHS Principal Arterials. 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 14 Woodburn, Oregon Table 2: Functional Classification Comparison by Jurisdiction Roadway Jurisdiction Functional Classification Consistent between Jurisdictions? Woodburn Marion County Federal Butteville Road (north of OR 219 and south of OR 219) County Minor Arterial Major Collector Major Collector No Butteville Road (segment where aligned with OR 219) ODOT Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes OR 219 (Butteville Road to Woodland Avenue) ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial No OR 219 (Woodland Avenue to I-5) ODOT Major Arterial Principal Arterial No Woodland Avenue City Access Street Major Collector No Arney Road City/Private Service Collector Major Collector No I-5 ODOT Freeway Interstate Yes OR 214 (I-5 to OR 99E) ODOT Major Arterial Principal Arterial Yes OR 214 (OR 99E to UGB east limits) ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial No Stacy Allison Way City Service Collector Local No Center Street City Service Collector Local No Evergreen Road (OR 219 to Boean Lane) City Minor Arterial Major Collector No Evergreen Road (Boean Lane to end of road) City Minor Arterial Local No Harvard Drive City Access Street Local No Stubb Road County Access Street No Designation Local No Parr Road County/City Service Collector Major Collector Major Collector No Hayes Street City Service Collector Major Collector No Oregon Way City Access Street Major Collector No Astor Way City Access Street Major Collector No Country Club Road City Access Street Major Collector No Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue (north of Parr Road) County/City Minor Arterial Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue (south of Parr Road) County/City Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Arterial Yes Tukwila Drive City Access Street Major Collector No Hazelnut Drive City Access Street Major Collector No 5th Street City Access Street Major Collector No Harrison Street City Service Collector Major Collector No Lincoln Street County/City Service Collector Local Major Collector No Garfield Street City Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Young Street City Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Cleveland Street City Service Collector Major Collector No Front Street City Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Industrial Avenue City Service Collector Major Collector No Progress Way City Service Collector Major Collector No OR 211 ODOT Minor Arterial Minor Arterial Yes Park Avenue City Access Street Major Collector No Hardcastle Avenue County/City Service Collector No Designation Major Collector No Gatch Street City Access Street Major Collector No Brown Street City Service Collector Major Collector No OR 99E (north of OR 214 and south of Young Street) ODOT Major Arterial Minor Arterial No OR 99E (segment where aligned with OR 214) ODOT Major Arterial Principal Arterial No Cooley Road County Service Collector Local Major Collector No ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 15 Woodburn, Oregon Roadway Characteristics The characteristics of arterial and collector streets are summarized in Table 3. The data includes posted speed limits, number of lanes, on-street bike lanes, and on-street parking. These characteristics define roadway capacity and operating speeds through the street system, which affects travel path choices for drivers in Woodburn. Subsequent sections provide additional information on traffic volumes at select study intersections. Table 3: Existing Study Area Roadway Characteristics by Functional Classification Corridor Posted Speed [MPH] Number of Lanes On-street Bike Lanes On-street Parking Major Arterial OR 219/OR 214 (west UGB limits to OR 99E) 35/55 2-5 Partial No OR 211 (east of OR 99E) 35 2 No No OR 99E 35/45/55 2/5 Partial No OR 214 (east of OR 99E) 35 2 No No Minor Arterial Butteville Road 45/55 2 No No Evergreen Road 25 2 Partial Partial Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue 25/35/45 2/3 Partial No Front Street 25/30 2 No Partial Garfield Street 25 2 No Partial Young Street 35 2 Yes No Service Collector Arney Road 25/30 2 Yes No Stacy Allison Way 25 2 Partial No Center Street 25 2 Yes No Hayes Street 25 2 No No Parr Road 25 2 No No Harrison Street 25 2 No Partial Lincoln Street 25/30 2 No Partial Cleveland Street 25/30 2 No Partial Progress Way 25 2 No Yes Industrial Avenue 25 2 No Yes Hardcastle Avenue 25 2 Partial No Brown Street 25 2 No No Cooley Road 40 2 No No Access Street Woodland Avenue 25 2/Unmarked No Partial Harvard Drive 25 2 No Yes Stubb Road 25 Unmarked No No Oregon Way 25 2 No Partial Country Club Road 25 2 Partial Partial Astor Way 25 Unmarked No Yes Tukwila Drive 25 2 No No ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 16 Woodburn, Oregon Corridor Posted Speed [MPH] Number of Lanes On-street Bike Lanes On-street Parking Hazelnut Drive 25 2 Yes No 5th Street 25 2 No Partial Gatch Street 25 2 No Partial Park Avenue 25 2 No Yes Pavement Condition Woodburn evaluates the pavement condition of all City maintained streets on a rolling basis. A total of 62.20 miles were evaluated in between March 2009 and August 2015 and assigned a Pavement Conditions Index (PCI) value of 0 to 100 based on the pavement condition. A higher PCI value allows for more cost-effective treatments, such as slurry seals and thin overlays while a lower PCI (<50) may require more expensive treatments, such as thick overlays and full reconstruction. Attachment C contains historical PCI data and statistics that were provided by City staff. Traffic Operations Traffic operations were evaluated at 22 study intersections in accordance with the assumptions and methodologies identified in the methodology memo provided in Attachment D. Figure 6illustrates the location of the study intersections and the existing lane configurations. Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations Manual turning movement counts were conducted at the study intersections in September and October 2017 by ODOT. The counts were conducted on a typical mid-week day during the evening (4:00 to 6:00 p.m.) peak time period. The system-wide peak hour for the study intersections was identified as 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. Figure 6 provides a summary off the turning movement counts at the study intersections. The turning movement counts on ODOT facilities were seasonally adjusted to 30th highest hour volumes (30HV) in accordance with the methodology memo. Figure 7 and Table 4 summarizes the results of the traffic operations analysis at the study intersection under existing traffic conditions. Attachment E contains the year 2017 existing traffic conditions worksheets. ---PAGE BREAK--- H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\dwgs\figs\21071 Figures.dwg Aug 01, 2019 - 6:04pm - mmccormick Layout Tab: EX_Fig6 Existing Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices Woodburn, Oregon 6 Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update March 2019 Figure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 21 20 19 18 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19 20 21 22 18 17 16 15 14 5 Molalla Rd 219 N Front Ave Newberg Hwy Boones Ferry Rd Hardcastle Ave Young St E Cleveland St N 214 211 211 99E - STOP SIGN - TRAFFIC SIGNAL - STUDY INTERSECTIONS ---PAGE BREAK--- H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\dwgs\figs\21071 Figures.dwg Aug 01, 2019 - 6:04pm - mmccormick Layout Tab: EX_Fig7 Existing Traffic Operations Woodburn, Oregon 7 Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update March 2019 Figure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 21 20 19 18 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19 20 21 22 18 17 16 15 14 5 Molalla Rd 219 N Front Ave Newberg Hwy Boones Ferry Rd Hardcastle Ave Young St E Cleveland St N CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (TWSC) LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED/AWSC) / CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (TWSC) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED/AWSC) / CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL DELAY (TWSC) V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TWC = TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL AWSC= ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL 214 211 211 99E 236 133 78 114 205 114 98 575 307 107 622 78 LOS=F Del=>80 V/C=0.99 12 120 27 37 108 25 21 174 5 29 151 49 35 971 56 33 906 CM=NB LOS=B Del=14.2 V/C=0.09 10 147 36 24 134 23 12 105 13 31 115 51 LOS=B Del=14.2 12 20 5 65 16 86 117 956 25 16 827 56 LOS=B Del=14.6 V/C=0.59 128 113 96 144 129 65 LOS=B Del=11.6 57 663 792 215 84 60 CM=EB LOS=F Del=>50 V/C=>1.0 311 28 212 21 35 69 78 851 117 192 675 14 LOS=D Del=37.7 V/C=0.80 51 119 15 14 219 38 18 44 121 29 61 7 LOS=B Del=12.0 48 590 27 249 920 120 112 114 60 58 151 243 LOS=C Del=32.8 V/C=0.69 242 479 924 169 858 273 LOS=B Del=16.7 V/C=0.55 230 368 92 160 790 127 159 324 251 203 240 60 LOS=E Del=70.3 V/C=0.94 48 893 11 15 1277 86 79 8 59 21 7 22 LOS=B Del=13.4 V/C=0.77 483 250 609 336 641 474 LOS=B Del=14.0 V/C=0.55 15 3 91 23 4 63 12 639 54 106 822 17 CM=SB LOS=F Del=>50 V/C=0.96 54 870 70 60 1160 86 77 47 57 112 35 45 LOS=C Del=22.9 V/C=0.79 4 7 51 462 5 41 40 326 2 36 336 134 LOS=B Del=19.4 V/C=0.48 65 53 96 703 788 150 CM=SB LOS=F Del=>50 V/C=>1.0 50 101 33 4 119 85 67 81 56 52 70 8 LOS=B Del=11.5 16 11 29 37 28 38 35 641 39 48 718 43 LOS=B Del=13.5 V/C=0.70 7 78 16 47 84 17 14 138 15 45 83 42 LOS=B Del=11.0 CM=NB LOS=C Del=19.2 V/C=0.39 LOS=B Del=11.9 355 89 41 114 158 210 ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 19 Woodburn, Oregon Table 4: Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Map ID Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Delay (Sec) Volume/ Capacity (V/C) Mobility Target/ Operations Standard MOE Met? Agency Maximum Signalized Intersections 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue B 19.4 0.48 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp B 14.0 0.55 ODOT v/c 0.85 Yes 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp B 16.7 0.55 ODOT v/c 0.85 Yes 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road D 37.7 0.80 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road B 14.6 0.59 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE F >80 0.99 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street B 13.5 0.70 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E E 70.3 0.94 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue C 22.9 0.79 ODOT v/c 0.90 Yes 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street B 13.4 0.77 ODOT v/c 0.90 Yes 21 OR 99E/Young Street C 32.8 0.69 ODOT v/c 0.90 Yes Unsignalized Intersections 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 C 19.2 0.39 ODOT v/c 0.90 Yes 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 B 14.2 0.09 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 10 Front Street/OR 214 F >50 >1.0 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 F >50 0.96 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road B 12.0 - County LOS D and v/c 0.85 Yes 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street B 11.6 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street B 14.2 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street B 11.9 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street B 11.0 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue B 11.5 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street F >50 >1.0 ODOT v/c 0.90 No Notes: LOS = Intersection Level of Service (Signal), Critical Movement Level of Service (TWSC). Delay = Intersection Average vehicle delay (Signal), critical movement vehicle delay (TWSC). V/C = Intersection V/C (Signal) critical movement V/C (TWSC). MOE = Measure of Effectiveness As shown in Table 4, four of the study intersections currently do not operate acceptably per their respective mobility targets/operations standards. Additional information about the operations issues identified at these intersections is provided below. OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE currently operates at LOS F with a v/c ratio of 0.99, which exceeds the ODOT mobility target for the intersection. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 214 and high northbound and southbound left-turn volumes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 20 Woodburn, Oregon Front Street/OR 214 Front Street/OR 214 currently operates at LOS F with a v/c ratio of 1.27 for the critical southbound movements, which exceeds the ODOT mobility target for the intersection. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 214 that limit the gaps where the left-turn and right-turn volumes can turn from a shared lane. Park Avenue/OR 214 Park Avenue/OR 214 currently operates at LOS F with a v/c ratio of 0.95 for the critical southbound movement, which exceeds the ODOT mobility target for the intersection. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 214 that limit the gaps where southbound vehicles may enter the intersection. OR 99E/Cleveland Street OR 99E/Cleveland Street currently operates at LOS F with a v/c ratio of 1.16 for the critical eastbound movement, which exceeds the ODOT mobility target for the intersection. This primarily due to high through volumes on OR 99E that limit the gaps where the left-turn from Cleveland may enter the intersection. Queueing A queuing analysis was conducted at the signalized study intersections. Table 5 summarizes the 95th percentile queues during the weekday p.m. peak hour under existing traffic conditions. The vehicle queue and storage were rounded to the nearest 25-feet. The storage reflect the striped storage for each movement at the intersections. Table 5: Weekday PM Peak Hour Queuing Map ID Intersection Movement 95th Percentile Queue Storage Length (feet) Adequate? 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue EBL 50 225 Yes EBR <25 150 Yes WBL 50 225 Yes WBR <25 100 Yes NBL <25 100 Yes SBL 225 350 Yes 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp EBR <25 275 Yes WBR <25 525 Yes SBL 200 650 Yes SBR 125 425 Yes 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp EBR <25 575 Yes WBR m<25 400 Yes NBL 200 600 Yes NBR 175 275 Yes 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road EBL m75 175 Yes ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 21 Woodburn, Oregon Map ID Intersection Movement 95th Percentile Queue Storage Length (feet) Adequate? EBR 50 300 Yes WBL #200 375 Yes NBL #350 325 No NBR 50 325 Yes SBL 25 75 Yes SBR <25 75 Yes 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road EBL m<25 300 Yes WBL <25 175 Yes NBL 25 150 Yes SBL 75 50 No 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE EBL 150 250 Yes EBR 100 200 Yes WBL 175 225 Yes WBR 50 150 Yes NBL #450 275 No NBR 50 100 Yes SBL 175 175 No SBR 75 775 Yes 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street EBL <25 100 Yes WBL <25 150 Yes NBL 50 150 Yes SBL 50 50 Yes 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E EBL 200 250 Yes WBL #300 225 No NBL 125 250 Yes NBR m<25 200 Yes SBL #300 225 No 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue EBR <25 50 Yes WBR <25 75 Yes NBL m<25 75 Yes SBL m<25 75 Yes 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street WBR <25 50 Yes NBL m<25 75 Yes SBL m<25 100 Yes 21 OR 99E/Young Street EBL #200 25 No WBR 175 50 No NBL 25 50 Yes SBL m150 50 No Where WB = Westbound, SB = Southbound, EB = Eastbound, NB = Northbound, L = Left, R = Right 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. m: Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. As shown in Table 5, five study intersections currently have 95th percentile queues that exceed the stripped storage for the movements. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 22 Woodburn, Oregon Traffic Safety Intersection Crashes The crash history of the study intersections was reviewed in an effort to identify any potential safety issues that could be addressed as part of the TSP update. ODOT provided crash records for the five-year period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 for the 22 study intersections. The data provided by ODOT is summarized in Table 6. Table 6: Intersection Crash Summary (January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015) Map ID Intersection Crash Severity Crash Type Total Crashes Fatal Injury PDO1 Rear- end Turning Angle Ped Other2 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 0 1 7 4 1 0 0 3 8 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue 0 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 2 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp 0 10 11 18 0 0 0 3 21 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp 0 6 3 3 4 0 0 2 9 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road 0 22 20 16 20 3 1 2 42 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road 0 10 5 8 5 1 1 0 15 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 0 3 1 1 2 0 0 1 4 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE 0 4 3 2 3 1 0 1 7 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street 0 5 4 7 2 0 0 0 9 10 Front Street/OR 214 0 2 5 2 3 0 0 2 7 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 0 7 9 9 2 4 0 0 16 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E 0 16 19 25 5 1 2 2 35 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street 0 2 2 0 3 1 0 0 4 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street 0 3 2 1 0 4 0 0 5 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street 0 3 4 0 4 3 0 0 7 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue 0 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue 0 8 6 4 6 2 1 1 14 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street 0 5 5 5 4 0 1 0 10 21 OR 99E/Young Street 0 18 18 5 16 11 1 3 36 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street 0 12 9 4 13 3 0 1 21 1Property Damage Only 2Other includes head-on, sideswipe, no collision, and fixed object 3From ODOT Critical Crash Rate Calculator Critical crash rates were calculated for each of the study intersections following the analysis methodology presented in ODOT’s SPR 667 Assessment of Statewide Intersection Safety Performance. SPR 667 provides average crash rates at a variety of intersection configurations in Oregon based on number of approaches and traffic control types. The average crash rate represents the approximate number of crashes that are “expected” at a study intersection. The intersection critical crash rate ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 23 Woodburn, Oregon assessment for the study intersections is summarized in Table 7. Attachment C contains the crash data provided by ODOT and the critical crash rate worksheet. Table 7: Intersection Critical Crash Rate Assessment Map ID Intersection Total Crashes Critical Crash Rate by Intersection Critical Crash Rate by Volume Observed Crash Rate at Intersection Observed Crash Rate>Critical Crash Rate? 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 8 0.30 0.41 0.46 Yes 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue 2 0.72 0.37 0.08 No 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp 21 0.65 0.56 0.41 No 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp 9 0.64 0.55 0.17 No 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road 42 0.65 0.56 0.88 Yes 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road 15 0.67 0.43 0.37 No 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 4 0.24 0.44 0.11 No 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE 7 0.65 0.56 0.14 No 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street 9 0.70 0.45 0.29 No 10 Front Street/OR 214 7 0.25 0.45 0.21 No 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 1 0.34 0.45 0.47 Yes 12 OR 214/OR 211/99E 35 0.64 0.55 0.64 Yes 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road 0 0.43 0.35 0.00 No 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street 4 0.34 0.36 0.32 No 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street 5 0.44 0.35 0.39 Yes 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street 7 0.43 0.44 0.51 Yes 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street 2 0.47 0.38 0.19 No 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue 2 0.44 0.35 0.15 No 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue 14 0.65 0.56 0.29 No 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street 10 0.66 0.56 0.22 No 21 OR 99E/Young Street 36 0.65 0.56 0.73 Yes 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street 21 0.25 0.44 0.62 Yes As shown in Table 7, the observed crash rate at eight of the study intersections exceeds the critical crash rate by intersection type, by volume, or by both. Butteville Road/OR 219 The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a high percentage of rear-end crashes at the intersection. Of the four rear-end crashes observed in the five years of data, all four occurred on the south leg of the intersection as vehicles were exiting Butteville Road. Three of the crashes were caused by a driver following too closely. OR 214/Evergreen Road While there are a high number of reported crashes at the OR 214/Evergreen Road intersection, it should be noted that this intersection was upgraded as part of the I-5/OR 214 interchange ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 24 Woodburn, Oregon reconstruction project which was completed in 2016. All of the reported crash data precedes these improvements. Park Avenue/OR 214 The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a higher percentage of rear-end crashes at the intersection. Of the nine rear-end crashes observed in the five years of data, five occurred on the west leg of the intersection and four occurred on the east leg. Seven of the rear-end crashes were caused by a driver following too closely. OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a higher percentage of rear-end crashes at the intersection. Of the 25 rear-end crashes observed in the five years of data, seven occurred on both the east and west legs of the intersection, and 18 of the crashes were caused by a driver following too closely. Lincoln Street/Front Street The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a higher percentage of angle crashes at the intersection. Of the four angle crashes observed in the five years of data, three of the crashes were caused by a driver not yielding the right-of-way. Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a higher percentage of turning movement crashes at the intersection. Of the four turning movement crashes observed in the five years of data, all four involved vehicles traveling westbound from Young Street. OR 99E/Young Street The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a higher percentage of turning movement crashes at the intersection. Of the 16 rear-end crashes observed in the five years of data, six of the crashes involved eastbound through movements and six involved southbound left-turn movements. 12 of the crashes were caused by a driver not yielding the right-of-way. OR 99E/Cleveland Street The crash data summarized in Table 6 shows a higher percentage of turning movement crashes at the intersection. Of the 13 turning movement crashes observed in the five years of data, all 13 involved southbound through movements on OR 99E. All 13 turning movement crashes were caused by a driver failing to yield the right-of-way. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 25 Woodburn, Oregon Study Area Crashes The crash history of the overall study area was also reviewed in an effort to identify any potential systemic safety issues or issues with pedestrian and bicycle safety that could be addressed as part of the TSP update. Crash records were obtained from ODOT for the five-year period from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 for the overall study area. Figure 8 illustrates the location, severity, and type of crashes that occurred within the study area over the five-year period. Based on the data, a total of 1,096 crashes occurred within Woodburn, of which one resulted in a fatality, 529 resulted in injuries, and 566 resulted in property-damage-only. The fatal, severe injury, pedestrian, and bicycle crashes are described below. Fatal Injury Crashes One fatal injury crash occurred within the city over the last five-year period. The crash involved a pedestrian and is described below under the pedestrian crashes section. Severe Injury Crashes A total of 18 severe injury crashes (identified as crashes with type A injuries) occurred within the city over the last five-year period. Of the 18 severe injury crashes, seven involved a pedestrian. The pedestrian crashes are described below. The remaining 11 crashes occurred along I-5, OR 99E, Evergreen Road, Front Street, and Vanderbeck Lane. Five of the remaining crashes were caused by motorists not yielding right-of-way, two by motorists that passed a stop sign or flasher, two by motorists following too closely, one by driving faster than conditions allowed, and one made an improper turn. Pedestrian Crashes A total of 32 pedestrian-involved crashes occurred within Woodburn over the last five-year period. 15 of the crashes occurred along OR 99E, five along Evergreen Road, three along OR 214, two along Gatch Street, two along Cleveland Street, and one each on I-205, Arney Road, Astor Way, Harrison Street, and Brown Street. Of the five on Evergreen Road, three crashes occurred at the intersection with Stacy Allison Way. 22 crashes were caused by the motorist failing to yield the right-of-way, eight were caused by the non-motorist illegally present in the roadway, one motorist disregarded a traffic signal, and one non-motorist wore clothing that was not visible. All 32 pedestrian crashes involved at least one injury or fatality. Bicycle Crashes A total of 12 bicycle-related crashes occurred within the city of the last five-year period. Five of the crashed occurred along OR 214, three along Settlemier Avenue, two along OR 99E, and one each on Parr Road, Vanderbeck Lane, and Bridglewood Lane. Eight of the crashes were caused by the motorist not yielding the right-of-way, three by the non-motorist present illegally in the roadway, and one by the motorist driving too fast for the conditions. ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ¹ ¹l ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ ¹ l l l l l l l l l l ! ¹ ¹l 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L I P AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST COUNT R Y C LUB RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PR I NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST M E A D O W V AL E L N MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV H I GH ST D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD GESCHWILL LN SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY N 5T H S T PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVE R G REEN R D BOON ES FERRY R D N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 8 ! Fatal Crash !q Fatal Crash Ped Involved ! ¹ ¹l Fatal Crash Bike Involved ! Injury Crash ! ¹ ¹l Injury Crash Bike Involved !q Injury Crash Ped Involved ! PDO ! ¹ ¹l PDO Bike Involved !q PDO Ped Involved City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\08 Reported Crashes (2011 trhough 2015).mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Reported Crashes from 2011 to 2015 Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 27 Woodburn, Oregon 11 of the bicycle crashes involved at least one injury. The one fatal crash involved a cyclist near the intersection of OR 99E/Mount Jefferson Avenue. Conditions were reported as dark and rainy. The motorist did not yield the right-of-way and the non-motorist was also illegally in the roadway and wearing non-visible clothing. Safety Priority Index System The ODOT Statewide Priority Index System (SPIS) identifies sites along state highways where safety issues warrant further investigation. The SPIS is a method developed by ODOT for identifying hazardous locations on state highways through consideration of crash frequency, crash rate, and crash severity. Sites identified within the top 5 percent are investigated by ODOT staff and reported to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Per the most recent SPIS list, the OR 214/Evergreen Road intersection is identified by ODOT as within the top five percent of crash sites over the last five-year period. Several other locations within Woodburn are identified as within the top 10 percent of crash sites over the last five-year period including: ▪ I-5 from milepost 271.63 to milepost 271.76, including the interchange with OR 214 ▪ OR 99E/Tomlin Avenue ▪ OR 214 from milepost 36.77 to 36.95, including the I-5 interchange ▪ OR 214/Oregon Way ▪ OR 214 from milepost 39.15 to 39.26, close to OR 99E ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 28 Woodburn, Oregon PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM The pedestrian system within Woodburn consists of sidewalks and trails as well as marked and unmarked, signalized and unsignalized pedestrian crossings. These facilities provide local residents with the ability to access transit as well as local retail, commercial, recreational, and other land uses by foot. Safe and convenient pedestrian facilities are essential to a vibrant community and economy within the city. Pedestrian Facilities In order to assess the adequacy of bicycle facilities in Woodburn, a GIS data inventory was created to reflect of the presence of sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities along the city’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, access streets, and local streets. Figure 9 shows the existing pedestrian facilities within Woodburn. The following provides a summary of the facilities, including existing gaps and deficiencies. Sidewalks Sidewalks are currently provided along a majority of arterial and collector streets within the city as well as many local streets. However, there are gaps on some roadways such as the southern sections of 99E, a small segment of Evergreen Road (between Hayes Street and Stacy Allison Way), Hardcastle Avenue, Hayes Street, Settlemier Avenue (south of Front Street), and undeveloped portions of Boones Ferry Road. Sidewalks are provided in newer commercial and residential areas, while some older neighborhoods were developed without sidewalks. Crosswalks The majority of crosswalks throughout the city are located at intersections. At improved intersections, the crosswalks generally provide ADA-compliant curb ramps and are in acceptable conditions. Some crosswalk locations throughout the city need new striping. Shared-use Paths and Trails There are several shared-use paths and trails located in Woodburn as noted below. ▪ Mill Creek Greenway Trail – A portion of the Mill Creek Greenway trail has been constructed in the southern part of Woodburn as shown in Figure 9. This completed segment of trail currently connects Hermanson Street and the adjacent residential neighborhood to Cleveland Street along the Mill Creek. Future extensions of this trail are envisioned as part of the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- k l 89:m 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 E BLAINE ST FRONT ST MCKEE SCHOOL RD H A ZELNU T D R T U KWIL A D R LEARY RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MOUNTAIN VIEW LN RA Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD MILL ST RYE ST KOI LN VERA LN PLUM LN STARK ST IDAHO DR PALM A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y L P OGLE ST CROS B Y RD COMMERCE WY PARR R D R O Y AV NATIONAL WY AZTEC DR SANTIAM DR WILL O W A V SALLAL R D JA M ES S T QUINN RD KING WY MCKINLEY ST KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD LAUREL AV A L S E A L P EL M ST MCLAUGHLIN D R N 1ST ST W CLACKAMAS C R DECONINCK RD SERRES LN S CASCADE D R EAST HARDCASTLE RD ST LOUIS RD EVERGREEN BV DIMMICK LN STAFNEY LN ARNEY RD EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR INGALLS LN CARL RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R M ER IDIAN DR P A R K C R MI L L E R FARM RD N 2ND ST A ST CAROL ST T R A C Y L N BRYAN ST TU L IP AV AR N E Y LN O R EGON L P D E X TER LP JORY ST HAWLEY ST ELANA WY C A SCA D E DR S M IT H DR D E ER R U N CHA T EAU D R BLAINE ST OXFORD S T JANS EN WY T U R NBERRY A V CAMAS ST PRINCETO N R D EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD TOMLIN AV W ORKMAN DR G R EE N V I E W DR N 3RD ST HOO P E R ST E C LACKAMAS C R GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR S H ALIM A R L P PARR RD COOLEY RD BROWN S T ARNEY RD GATCH ST PRO G R E SS WY ASTO R WY STUBB RD STACY ALLISON WY CROSBY RD HARDCASTLE AV PARK AV WOODLAND AV N 5TH ST LINC O LN S T S PACIFIC HY BUT TEVILLE RD WILCO HY BOONES FERRY RD S FRONT ST Y O UNG S T NEWB E RG H Y EVER G R EEN R D N FRONT ST S SETTLEMIER AV MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 9 k l 89:m Enhanced Crossing Sidewalks Multi-Use Pathway City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\09 Existing Pedestrian Facilities.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Existing Pedestrian Facilities Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 30 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Senior Estates Park – A gravel trail exists within Senior Estates Park that is primarily used for recreation. However, it was included in this inventory as the trail has multiple connections to the adjacent residential neighborhood. ▪ Parr Road – A segment of Parr Road between Settlemier Avenue and Heritage Elementary School currently has a separated multi-use travelway. The travelway is located on the south side of Parr Road and is essentially a wide sidewalk that is set back from the older adjacent Parr Road sidewalk. It has been included in this inventory as a shared-use pathway given the number of students who use it to access Heritage Elementary School. Safe Routes to School Woodburn does not have a city-wide Safe Routes to School (SRTS) program, which is a program designed to encourage students to walk to school by improving infrastructure along streets that provide access to local schools as well as providing education programs, driver enforcement programs, and more. This TSP update will serve as a catalyst to begin discussions and implementation of a SRTS program in the city and identify infrastructure projects that will provide better access to local schools. Pedestrian Activity Pedestrian counts were conducted at the study intersections in September and October 2017. 16-hour counts were conducted on a typical mid-week day when school was in session. All of the counts include the total number of pedestrians that entered the intersections in 15-minute intervals. The pedestrian counts show a relatively low level of pedestrian activity at the study intersections in general. It should be noted that while the peak hour for vehicular traffic typically occurs between 4:00 to 6:00 p.m., the peak hour for pedestrian activity near schools and other activity centers typically occurs earlier in the day. The pedestrian count data is shown in Table 8. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 31 Woodburn, Oregon Table 8: PM Peak Hour Pedestrian Crossing Volumes at Study Intersections Map ID Intersection North/South Pedestrian Volume East/West Pedestrian Volume Pedestrian Peak Hour 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 2 0 1:00 to 2:00 p.m. 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue 0 1 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp 0 1 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp 0 1 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road 0 4 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road 0 2 10:30 to 11:30 a.m. 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 1 1 10:00 to 11:00 a.m. 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE 3 1 3:15 to 4:15 p.m. 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street 3 1 12:45 to 1:45 p.m. 10 Front Street/OR 214 1 1 5:15 to 6:15 p.m. 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 1 5 2:15 to 3:15 p.m. 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E 1 0 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road 2 0 10:15 to 11:15 a.m. 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street 4 3 12:30 to 1:30 p.m. 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street 2 5 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street 5 0 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street 5 1 12:15 to 1:15 p.m. 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue 4 2 11:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue 3 1 2:00 to 3:00 p.m. 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street 3 1 2:30 to 3:30 p.m. 21 OR 99E/Young Street 0 5 11:45 a.m. to 12:45 p.m. 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street 4 0 1:45 to 2:45 p.m. Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress Analysis The pedestrian facilities located along the city’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets were evaluated in an effort to identify potential issues that could be addressed as part of the TSP update. The APM provides a methodology for evaluating pedestrian facilities within urban and rural environments called Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS). As applied by ODOT, this methodology classifies four levels of traffic stress that a pedestrian can experience on the roadway, ranging from PLTS 1 (little traffic stress) to PLTS 4 (high traffic stress). A road segment that is rated PLTS 1 generally has low traffic volumes and travel speeds and has a sidewalk that is separated from vehicular traffic. These segments are generally suitable for all users, including children. A road segment that is rated PLTS 4 generally has high traffic volumes and travel speeds and is perceived as unsafe by most adults. Road segments rated PLTS 4 also include those with no sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities. Per the APM, PLTS 2 is considered a reasonable target for most pedestrian facilities due to its acceptability with the majority of people. The PLTS score is based on four criteria, including sidewalk condition, physical buffer type, total buffering width, and general land use. All four criteria are scored from 1 to 4 and the highest score ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 32 Woodburn, Oregon determines the overall score for the road segment. Figure 10 illustrates the results of the PLTS analysis for Woodburn’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets. Several road segments are rated PLTS 3 due to having curb-tight sidewalks on roadways with speeds of 30 mph or higher. In order for these segments to be rated LTS 2, the speeds would need to be reduced to 25 mph or a buffer would need to be installed between the sidewalk and vehicle travel lane. A majority of the segments rated PLTS 4 have no sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities to accommodate pedestrians. In order for these segments to be rated PLTS 2, sidewalks with appropriate sidewalk and buffer widths would need to be installed along the full length of the roadway. The PLTS calculations are summarized in Attachment B. Existing Gaps and Deficiencies Streets with no sidewalks or intermittent sidewalks force pedestrians to walk along the edge of the travel lane or use the shoulder if available. In many cases, this is not a desirable option for pedestrians due to narrow lane widths or uneven pavement conditions. Similarly, streets with no crosswalks or limited crosswalks force pedestrians to make unsafe or illegal crossings. Adequate pedestrian facilities should be provided to allow for safe travel between neighborhoods and essential destinations. The following provides a summary of the existing gaps and deficiencies in the existing pedestrian system: ▪ There are several major and minor arterial streets that currently do not have sidewalks along one or two sides of the roadway. These streets include:  OR 99E – intermittent gaps between Hardcastle Avenue and Young Street  OR 211 – east of June Way to east city limits  OR 214 – east of 993 to east city limits  OR 219 – west of Willow Street to west city limits  Butteville Road – south of OR 219 to south city limits  Evergreen Road – Stacy Allison Way to Hayes Street  Settlemier Avenue – Parr Road to Oak Street (east side)  Young Street – intermittent gaps between Front Street and 99E (south side)  Front Street – just north of Hazelnut Drive to north city limits (west side)  Boones Ferry Road – Hazelnut Drive to north city limits ▪ There are multiple gaps in the sidewalk network along the Service Collector facilities. Significant gaps include:  Hayes Street – Evergreen Road to Settlemier Avenue (north side)  Parr Road – Centennial Park to west city limits (north and south side)  Lincoln Street – Gatch Street to 99E (south side) ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP N 1ST ST FRONT ST CH U RCH ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST NATIONAL WY DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GAR FIELD ST CONSTITUTION A V ORCHAR D L N EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STARK ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER R D NEKIA S T MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV W HAYES ST EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST N 3RD ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R JUNE W Y ST P A NA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R C H ERRY ST WILSO N ST GRANT ST BRIDLEWOOD LN N 5TH ST N 4TH ST N 2ND ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST UNION SCHOOL RD THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P O R E GON WY GATCH S T COOLEY RD BROWN S T N 5T H S T PRO G R E SS WY WOODLAND AV CROSBY RD PARR RD A RNEY RD ASTO R WY LINC O LN S T STACY ALLISON WY STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY YOUNG ST E V ERGREEN RD BOONES FERRY RD WILCO H Y MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD N E W BERG HY MT HOOD AV N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 10 PLTS 1 PLTS 2 PLTS 3 PLTS 4 City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\10 Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Existing Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 34 Woodburn, Oregon  Hardcastle Avenue – Gatch Street to Park Street (south side)  Progress Way  Industrial Avenue ▪ There are also multiple local streets that currently do not have sidewalks along one or two sides of the roadway. These are primarily in the residential neighborhood located north of OR 214 and west of Astor Way. Other neighborhoods with intermittent sidewalks are located south of Cleveland Street and east of Ogle Street. PIPELINE SYSTEM There are no major pipeline transport facilities within the Woodburn UGB. RAIL SYSTEM Freight Rail Union Pacific Railroad operates a Class I rail line through Woodburn. These tracks parallel the east side of Front Street. A total of five at-grade crossings and one grade separated crossing exist along the rail line. Willamette Valley Railway operates a Shortline Railroad track that parallels the north side of Cleveland Street in the south side of town. A total of five public at-grade crossings exist along this rail line. In addition to these crossings, the rail line serves multiple local businesses along the corridor. Passenger Rail There are currently no passenger rail terminals in Woodburn. The closest passenger rail terminal is located in Salem, approximately 20 miles to the south. The Amtrak station in Salem operates from 6:30 AM to 4:30 PM. TRANSIT SYSTEM The public transit system within Woodburn consists of fixed-route and paratransit services as well as school and shuttle bus service. Woodburn Transit Service - Fixed-Route Service Woodburn Transit Service operates a fixed-route bus line in Woodburn, providing connections throughout town as shown in Figure 11. As shown, fixed-route transit service is provided along the major east-west corridors linking neighborhoods to all major retail and commercial areas. The route also connects to the Woodburn Memorial Transit Facility located off of OR 214. Service is provided from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM at approximately 1-hour headways. ---PAGE BREAK--- Iü 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV H I GH ST D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN P U B LI C R D JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PARK AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY N 5T H S T PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV BOON ES FERRY R D YO U NG ST EVE R G REEN R D GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 11 Woodburn Transit Stops Woodburn City Transit Loop Canby Area Transit (CAT) Stops Canby Area Transit (CAT) Routes Cherriots Transit Stops Cherriots Tranist Routes Iü Park N' Ride Lots City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\11 Transit Facilities.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Existing Transit Routes and Facilities Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 36 Woodburn, Oregon Dial-A-Ride Service Woodburn provides Dial-A-Ride service for people with disabilities and the elderly living within Woodburn who are not able to utilize the fixed route bus. The service operates Monday - Friday from 7:00 AM - 7:00 PM and utilizes a fully accessible van. The van provides door to door service for any purpose to any location within the Woodburn City limits. The Dial-A-Ride program also arranges for volunteer drivers to take elderly Woodburn residents and those with disabilities to medical appointments in all areas between Portland and Salem. Requests for service must be made at least one day in advance. Cherriots Regional Cherriots Regional operates the 10X Woodburn/Salem Express bus line that provides weekday service between Salem and Woodburn along the 99E corridor. Stops are located along Front Street, OR 214, Settlemier Avenue and Downtown Woodburn. Cherriots Regional also operates the 20X N. Marion Co./Salem Express bus line that provides weekday services between Salem, Silverton, and Woodburn. Stops are located along OR 214 and 99E. The service operates Monday – Friday from 7:30 AM – 7:00 PM with 2 to 2.5 hour headways. Canby Area Transit Canby Area Transit (CAT) operates the Route 99 bus line which provides daily bus service between Woodburn and Canby along the 99E corridor. The Woodburn stop is located near the 99E/OR 214 intersection. The service operates Monday – Friday from 6:30 AM – 8:00 PM with headways that range from 1 to 2.5 hours. Greyhound The Greyhound bus service provides a regional transportation option, with buses to Portland from Woodburn three times per day. The station is located on Front Street and is open from 9 a.m. to 8 p.m. everyday. Park-and-Rides The Woodburn Memorial Transit Facility (Park& Ride) is located off of Evergreen Road north of OR 214. Woodburn Transit Service regularly stops at the park & ride facility. The Cascades POINT bus service, operated by MTR Western in partnership with ODOT, makes 2 daily northbound stops and 2 daily southbound stops at the new transit facility. Riders can buy tickets to go as far as Eugene to the south, and Portland to the north. Schedule and ticket information is available at the website and the Amtrak Cascades site. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 37 Woodburn, Oregon Qualitative (Multimodal) Assessment for Transit Modes A transit qualitative multimodal assessment was conducted in accordance with the methodology described in ODOT’s APM. Transit factors that should be considered are frequency and on-time reliability, schedule speed/travel times, transit stop amenities, and connecting pedestrian/bicycle network. This methodology applies a rating system similar to that used for pavement conditions; excellent, good, fair, poor. Frequency and On-time Reliability From the user’s perspective, frequency determines how many times an hour a user has access to transit service, assuming that service is provided within acceptable walking distance and at the times the user wishes to travel. Frequency also helps determine the convenience of transit service to riders and is one component of overall transit trip time (helping to determine the wait time at a stop). Table 9 summarizes the ratings for frequency and on-time reliability for the three transit routes serving Woodburn. Table 9: Frequency and On-time Reliability Rating Provider Routes Service Frequency Rating Woodburn Transit Service City Loop 60 minutes1 Fair Cherriots Regional 10X Woodburn/Salem Express 120 to 150 minutes1 Poor Canby Area Transit 99 60 to 150 minutes1 Poor 1. No service is provided on Saturday or Sunday. All three routes that provide service to Woodburn operate on long headways that can create extended wait times at stops if users do not accurately time their travel. Schedule Speed/Travel Times Schedule speed and travel time refer to the time it takes to complete a transit route in full and the length of time between stops. Table 10 summarizes the ratings for schedule speed and travel time. Table 10: Schedule Speed/Travel Times Rating Provider Routes Number of Stops Route Travel Time Rating Woodburn Transit Service City Loop 53 (loop) 60 minutes Fair Cherriots Regional 10X Woodburn/Salem Express 7 (there and back) 50 minutes Fair Canby Area Transit 99 9 (there and back) 45 minutes Fair Woodburn Transit Service provides a loop route that goes to 53 stops in approximately 60 minutes. Cherriots Regional provides a bus route that goes out to Salem and back to Woodburn. In one direction, the route goes to 7 stops in approximately 50 minutes. Canby Area Transit provides a bus route that goes out to Oregon City Transit Center and back to Woodburn. In one direction, the route goes to 9 stops in approximately 45 minutes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 38 Woodburn, Oregon Transit Stop Amenities Amenities at transit stops, such as bus benches and bus shelters enhance a transit system and make it more user-friendly. Steps that can make this mode as comfortable and accommodating as possible may help encourage ridership. The Woodburn system as a whole has a mix of bus shelters and bus stops signs used to mark stops. Shelters are provided at locations such as the intersection of OR 214/OR 99E, Country Club Road near Astor Way, and at the Woodburn Premium Outlets. The rating for the system is fair. Connecting Pedestrian/Bicycle Network Pedestrian facilities are provided along all transit routes in Woodburn with the exception of Willow Avenue, a portion of County Club Road, and Princeton Road. There is a stop with a shelter near to the enhanced pedestrian crossing at the OR 214/Park Avenue intersection. Less of the transit route network is coordinated with the bike lane network, with the best connections provided along OR 214, Arney Road, and portions of Boones Ferry Road and OR 99E. Filling gaps existing bicycle networks would help create more of a network to support the transit system as well. The overall rating of the connection of the transit system to the pedestrian and bicycle network is fair. TRUCK FREIGHT SYSTEM Efficient truck movement plays a vital role in the economical movement of raw materials and finished products. The designation of freight routes provides for this efficient movement while at the same time maintaining neighborhood livability, public safety, and minimizing maintenance costs of the roadway system. Per the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP), the only designated freight route in Woodburn is I-5. In addition, OR 214 is designated a National Network Truck Route per ODOT TransGIS information online. Lastly, the current TSP identifies several freight routes and freight ways throughout Woodburn to facilitate the movement of freight in the city. Freight routes are shown on Figure 12. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER R D MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R MAYANNA D R ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H ERMA NSON S T N 6TH ST J O NAH P L ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V AL E L N MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV DE E R R UN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR N 3RD ST UNION SCHOOL RD THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBERG HY HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVE R G REEN R D GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BOON ES FERRY RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 12 ODOT Routes Freight Route National Network Truck Route City of Woodburn Routes Truck Route Truck Way City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\12 Freight Routes.mxd - jsommerville - 10:10 AM 2/20/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Freight Routes Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 40 Woodburn, Oregon TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) measures are designed to increase the efficiency and safety of the transportation system without physically increasing roadway capacity. Typical TSMO measures include Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) solutions, real-time traveler information, and services that respond quickly to traffic incidents. Based on discussions with City staff, there are no TSMO measures currently being employed in Woodburn. TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT The TPR requires all cities with populations greater than 25,000 people to develop a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan. TDM measures are designed to change travel behavior in order to reduce the need for more road capacity and improve performance of the road system. The TDM programs and strategies in Woodburn are primarily implemented though Woodburn Development Ordinance and include designating overlay districts that have vehicle trip budgets are specific areas in the city. REVIEW OF EXISTING FUNDING This section summarizes the existing transportation revenue sources and expenditure history for the City of Woodburn. Revenue The City of Woodburn has historically relied upon multiple revenue sources to fund the maintenance of its transportation network and make capital improvements. These local gas tax revenue, inter- governmental (primarily state gas tax revenue), franchise fees, and other miscellaneous revenue. Table 11 displays the total revenue by source used to fund transportation projects within Woodburn over the most recent seven years that comprehensive data was available. Table 11: City of Woodburn Revenue History Revenue Source FY 2016- 2017 FY 2015- 2016 FY 2014- 2015 FY 2013- 2014 FY 2012- 2013 FY 2011- 2012 FY 2010- 2011 Average Taxes $129,412 $115,692 $102,517 $101,761 $106,537 $182,109 $121,196 $122,746 Inter- Government $1,480,082 $1,454,076 $1,409,311 $1,384,277 $1,597,518 $1,312,024 $1,116,011 $1,393,328 Franchise $359,820 $357,983 $336,707 $360,046 $353,381 $326,713 $347,621 $348,896 Transportation SDC Fees $33,396 $183,698 $440,595 $521,933 $411,527 $400,172 $153,268 $306,370 Other $69,856 $59,518 $49,532 $319,086 $49,457 $88,767 $27,147 $94,766 Revenue Total $2,072,566 $2,170,967 $2,338,662 $2,687,103 $2,518,420 $2,309,785 $1,765,243 $2,266,107 Taxes = Local Gas Tax revenue Inter-Government = State Gas Tax, State Fund Exchange Other = Misc. revenue, interest income ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 41 Woodburn, Oregon Based on the information shown in Table 11, the City of Woodburn has generated an average of approximately $2,266,107 per year in total revenue for transportation-related maintenance/projects. Expenditures Table 12 displays the total expenditures on transportation related projects within the City of Woodburn over the last seven years. Table 12: City of Woodburn Expenditure History Revenue Source FY 2016- 2017 FY 2015- 2016 FY 2014- 2015 FY 2013- 2014 FY 2012- 2013 FY 2011- 2012 FY 2010- 2011 Average Personnel Services $540,373 $415,289 $394,646 $410,316 $424,937 $455,991 $447,503 $441,294 Materials & Services $509,435 $561,004 $641,713 $524,962 $501,421 $738,200 $649,795 $589,504 Debt Service $33,770 $35,020 $36,268 $37,520 $33,519 $34,278 $35,520 $35,128 Maintenance $42,839 $38,282 $56,387 $57,485 $64,336 $75,613 $62,051 $56,713 Street Construction/ Repair $397,429 $602,933 $5,089,965 $1,215,767 $1,210,247 $950,375 $1,048,338 $1,502,151 Expenditure Total $1,523,846 $1,652,528 $6,218,979 $2,246,050 $2,234,460 $2,254,457 $2,243,207 $2,624,790 Maintenance = road materials, signs, striping Street Construction/Repair = major repairs and construction Debt Service = Woodland Avenue/OR 219 Improvements Based on the information shown in Table 12, the City of Woodburn has spent an average of $2,624,790 per year on roadway related personnel/materials/debt service/maintenance/street construction/repair. The information shown in Table 11 and Table 12 were used to project the availability of future funding for transportation improvement projects as described below. Projected Transportation Funding Table 13 provides a summary of the potential future project funding (in year 2017 dollars) over the next five, ten, and twenty years based on historical average funding levels. Table 13: Future Transportation Funding Projections Average Annual 5-Year Forecast 10—Year Forecast 20-Year Forecast $2,624,790 $13,123,950 $26,247,900 $52,495,800 As shown in Table 13, it is anticipated that approximately $52,495,800 will be available for transportation roadway funding over the next 20 years using historical funding trends. It is anticipated that approximately half of this amount will be allocated for personnel costs, materials, debt service and maintenance of the system. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 42 Woodburn, Oregon Potential Funding Sources The projected transportation funding analysis shows that the City of Woodburn will have a limited source of funds that can solely dedicated to transportation-related capital improvement projects over the next twenty years. As such, Woodburn will likely need to seek additional funds via transportation improvement grants, partnerships with regional and state agencies, and other funding sources to help implement future transportation-related improvements. Table 14 identifies a list of potential Grant sources and Partnering Opportunities to consider during the course of the 20-year planning horizon. Following Table 14, Table 15 identifies a list of potential new funding sources for Woodburn to consider in an effort to bolster funds for additional capital improvement projects. ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 43 Woodburn, Oregon Table 14: Potential Grant Sources and Partnering Opportunities Funding Source Description Potential Facility Benefit Opportunities Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is Oregon’s 4-year capital improvement program for major state and regional transportation facilities. This scheduling and funding document is updated every two years. Projects included on the STIP are allocated into the five different ODOT regions. - Streets - Sidewalks - Bike lanes - Trails The next STIP (2018-2021) will be organized into two different categories that focus on projects that will fix/preserve the existing transportation network and enhance/improve the transportation network. Federal Funding Large trails or trail networks with a transportation purpose can compete for TIGER grant awards. Additional significant federal funding sources include TAP, STP and CMAQ. Depending upon the location and purpose, trails can also be funded by HUD CDBG funds, USDA rural development programs, or EPA funding. - Multi-Use Trails Projects in urban areas have traditionally been funded at a minimum of $10,000,000 and rural trails of lower project costs are considered for TIGER funding. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Program The Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Grant program ended as a standalone solicitation process in 2012. Grant monies are now distributed through the “Enhance” process in the STIP program noted above. See STIP above See STIP above. ATV Grant Program Operation and maintenance, law enforcement, emergency medical services, land acquisition, leases, planning, development and safety education in Oregon’s OHV (off-highway vehicle recreation areas). - Multi-Use Trails http://www.oregon.gov/oprd/ATV/pages/grants.aspx ---PAGE BREAK--- Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis Project 21071.3 March 29, 2019 Page 44 Woodburn, Oregon Table 15: Potential New Funding Sources for Consideration by the City of Woodburn Funding Source Description Potential Facility Benefit Opportunities User Fees Fees tacked onto a utility bill or tied to the annual registration of a vehicle to pay for improvements, expansion, and maintenance to the street system. This may be a more equitable assessment given the varying fuel efficiency of vehicles. Regardless of fuel efficiency, passenger vehicles do equal damage to the street system. Primarily Street Improvements The cost of implementing such a system could be prohibitive given the need to track the number of vehicle miles traveled in every vehicle. Additionally, a user fee specific to a single jurisdiction does not account for the street use from vehicles registered in other jurisdictions. Street Utility Fees/Road Maintenance Fee The fee is based on the number of trips a particular land use generates and is usually collected through a regular utility bill. For the communities in Oregon that have adopted this approach, it provides a stable source of revenue to pay for street maintenance allowing for safe and efficient movement of people, goods, and services. Preservation, restoration, and reconstruction of existing paved residential streets. Includes sidewalks, ramps, curbs and gutters, and utility relocation. Other cities have adopted street maintenance utility fees at varying amounts charged to residential meters. Woodburn could consider a similar program. Optional Tax A tax that is paid at the option of the taxpayer to fund improvements. Usually not a legislative requirement to pay the tax and paid at the time other taxes are collected, optional taxes are usually less controversial and easily collected since they require the taxpayer to decide whether or not to pay the additional tax. - Streets - Sidewalks - Bike lanes - Multi-Use Trails - Transit The voluntary nature of the tax limits the reliability and stableness of the funding source. Sponsorship Financial backing of a project by a private corporation or public interest group, as a means of enhancing its corporate image. - Multi-Use Trails Sponsorship has primarily been used by transit providers to help offset the cost of providing transit services and maintaining transit related improvements. Federal Funding Trails with a transportation purpose can compete for TIGER grant awards. Depending upon the location and purpose, trails can also be funded by HUD, CDBG funds, USDA rural development programs, or EPA funding. - Trails Projects in urban areas have traditionally been funded at a minimum of $10,000,000 and rural trails of lower project costs are considered for TIGER funding. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A Land & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 ---PAGE BREAK--- ANGELO PLANNING GROUP angeloplanning.com 921 SW Washington Street, Suite 468 p: [PHONE REDACTED] Portland, OR 97205 f: [PHONE REDACTED] LAND USE PLANNING TRANSPORTATION PLANN ING PROJECT MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) Woodburn TSP DATE February 15, 2018 TO Woodburn TSP Advisory Committee FROM Darci Rudzinski, Clinton “CJ” Doxsee, Angelo Planning Group CC Matt Hughart, Molly McCormick - Kittelson & Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION This memorandum provides lands and population inventory information to be included in Technical Memorandum Existing Conditions for the 2017 Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. This following information for the City of Woodburn is included: • Comprehensive Plan and Zoning • Vacant Land • Natural Resource and Environmental Barriers • Activity Centers • Historic and Project Population Growth COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING Land within the City of Woodburn Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and within city limits is subject to the City’s land use and development regulations. Land use regulations are implemented through the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO). The following is a summary of the permitted land uses in the city and the associated requirements that govern development and redevelopment. This overview is intended to provide an indication of the type and intensity of land uses that can be expected within the planning horizon, which in turn will have an impact on future traffic generation. The number of trips specific uses generate, and where those uses are located within the community, will have a bearing on planning for appropriate types of transportation solutions. Comprehensive Plan The Comprehensive Plan provides a long-term guide for where and how future development will occur. Figure 1 shows the Comprehensive Plan land use designations. The Comprehensive Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 2 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 designations inform which zoning districts can be applied to an area. There are six principal Comprehensive Plan map designations within the existing UGB; Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Industrial, Commercial, Open Space and Parks, and Public Use (see Figure The City’s UGB is larger than the city limits; there are large areas on the periphery of the current city limits that have Comprehensive Plan land use designations that will allow for future urban expansion. The designated Urban Growth Boundary Reserve located outside the UGB near Interstate 5. The UGB reserve area will be considered a high priority area for when expansion of the UGB is necessary. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST D ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST B ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P COOLEY RD W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R W HAYES ST HARDCASTLE AV L INCO L N ST PARK AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARVARD DR STACY ALLISON WY WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY HARRISON ST O RE GON WY A RNEY RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST GARFIELD ST N FRONT ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN R D Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 1 Comprehensive Plan Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Industrial Open Space and Parks Public Use Urban Growth Boundary Reserve City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary N:\Projects\024054 KAI Woodburn TSP\GIS\Existing Conditions\Comprehensive Plan.mxd - cdoxsee - 10:26 AM 2/15/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Comprehensive Plan Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 4 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 Zoning Figure 2 shows the location of zoning districts within the city limits. The City has 12 zones, including several commercial, industrial, and residential zoning districts. The City’s zoning requirements provide the allowed uses and associated development regulations. Allowed uses and development regulations for each of the City’s zones are provided for in the WDO and are summarized in Table 1. The City’s zoning is informed by the Comprehensive Plan designations; in the case of residential, commercial and industrial, multiple zones implement a single land use designation. Within the existing city limits, zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations. As with the Comprehensive Plan map, commercial uses are focused around major and minor arterials, industrial uses are separated on the edges of city limits and residential uses are dispersed throughout the city. Areas outside of the city limits but within the UGB will not be zoned for urban uses until they are annexed. Table 1: Zoning Summary ZONE DESCRIPTION RS Single Family Residential Standard density single-family residential development (typically 6,000 square foot lots). RSN Nodal Single Family Residential Row houses (attached single-family homes) and detached single-family homes on smaller lots (typically 4,000 square foot lots). R1S Retirement Community Single Family Residential Small lot residential development for seniors, allowing single- family homes on lots as small as 3,600 square feet. RM Medium Density Residential Multi-family dwellings and care facilities up to 16 units per net acre. RMN Nodal Multi-Family Residential Row houses, multi-family dwellings, and care facilities at higher densities than non-nodal zones. DDC Downtown Development Conservation The community’s retail core, providing for unique retail and convenient shopping. CG Commercial General Primary commercial area, providing for businesses required extensive land intensive outdoor storage and display of merchandise, equipment, or inventory. CO Commercial Office Office type development with limited retail activity. MUV Mixed Use Village Provides efficient use of land that promotes employment and housing through pedestrian-oriented development. ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 5 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 ZONE DESCRIPTION NNC Neighborhood Nodal Commercial Provides areas to meet shopping needs of nearby residents in compact commercial setting.* IL Light Industrial Industrial activities that include land-intensive activities. IP Industrial Park Light industrial activities in a park-like setting. P/SP Public and Semi-Public Public uses, parks, schools, and cemeteries. SWIR Southwest Industrial Reserve High technology and research development activities.** * Standards for Neighborhood Nodal Commercial (NNC) can be found in the WDO, however, there are currently no parcels within City limits that are zoned NNC. Standards for Southwest Industrial Reserve can be found in the WDO. However, the zoning designation will be applied to parcels identified as Southwest Industrial Reserve as shown in Figure 3 below once the area is within City limits. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST D ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST B ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P COOLEY RD W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R W HAYES ST HARDCASTLE AV L INCO L N ST PARK AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARVARD DR STACY ALLISON WY WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY HARRISON ST O RE GON WY A RNEY RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST GARFIELD ST N FRONT ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN R D Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 2 Zoning District CG - Commercial General CO - Commercial Office IP - Industrial Park IL - Light Industrial MUV - Mixed Use Village RS - Single Family Residential RSN - Nodal Single Family Residential R1S - Retirement Community Single Family Residential RM - Medium Density Residential RMN - Nodal Medium Density Residential P/SP - Public and Semi-Public DDC - Downtown Development and Conservation City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary N:\Projects\024054 KAI Woodburn TSP\GIS\Existing Conditions\Zoning.mxd - cdoxsee - 10:25 AM 2/15/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Woodburn Zoning Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 7 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 Overlays The WDO includes provisions for six different overlay districts that may apply to any portion of an existing underlying zoning district. Overlay districts provide regulations that are in addition to, or that modify existing zoning. Similar to how the zoning districts are organized, development regulations for each of the City’s overlay districts are provided in the WDO. The six overlay districts are summarized in Table 2. Table 2: Overlay Summary OVERLAY DESCRIPTION Gateway Commercial General Overlay District Allows for multi-family residential development in the CG zone. Prohibits specific uses and limits others. Interchange Management Overlay District Intended to preserve the long-term capacity of the I-5/Highway 214 Interchange. Complements provisions of the SWIR zone. Vehicle trip budget identifies the maximums amount of peak hour trips for each parcel within the IMA. Neighborhood Conservation Overlay District Intended to conserve the visual character and heritage of Woodburn’s oldest and most central neighborhood. Nodal Overlay District Allows for a mix of residential developments with limited commercial development and accessible parks with a pedestrian focus. Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District Intended to conserve, protect, and enhance significant riparian corridors, wetlands, and undeveloped floodplains. More information is provided in the Natural Resources and Environmental Barriers section below. Southwest Industrial Reserve Intended to protect suitable industrial sites in Southwest Woodburn, near I-5, for the exclusive use of targeted industries. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST D ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST B ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P COOLEY RD W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R W HAYES ST HARDCASTLE AV L INCO L N ST PARK AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARVARD DR STACY ALLISON WY WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY HARRISON ST O RE GON WY A RNEY RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST GARFIELD ST N FRONT ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN R D Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 3 Gateway Commercial General Interchange Management Area (IMA) Neighborhood Convservation Overlay District (NCOD) Nodal Overlay Districts Southwest Industrial Reserve (SWIR) Riparian Corridor Wetland Overlay District (RCWOD) City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary N:\Projects\024054 KAI Woodburn TSP\GIS\Existing Conditions\Overlay Districts.mxd - cdoxsee - 10:26 AM 2/15/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Overlay Districts Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 9 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 VACANT AND REDEVLOPABLE LAND Figure 4 shows vacant and redevelopable land within the UGB and City limits, by Comprehensive Plan Designation. All the land within the UGB and outside of City limits, except for areas subject to the City’s RCWOD overlay, is considered vacant or redevelopable over the planning horizon. Land within City limits is considered vacant as determined by Marion County’s tax assessment records. Figure 4 does not show redevelopable parcels within City limits. As shown, most of the vacant commercial areas are concentrated near I-5; the largest parcels of which are located on Stacy Allison Way. Other vacant commercial areas found adjacent to or near Highway 99E in the eastern portion of the city. There are large areas outside of City Limits, within the UGB, that are designated for Industrial uses. The redevelopable Industrial areas near I-5 are subject to the Southwest Industrial Reserve (SWIR) Overlay which regulate the amount and type of development that can occur. Within City limits, most of the vacant areas designated for industrial uses are located adjacent to Front Street or Highway 99E. As described in more detail below, vacant commercial and industrial parcels tend to be relatively large in size – generally larger than one acre – and have been studied in detail as part of the City’s Woodburn Target Industry Analysis.1 Vacant land designated Low Density Residential (LDR) or Medium Density Residential (HDR) vary greatly in size and are distributed throughout the UGB. Most of the vacant or redevelopable LDR and HDR areas are located outside of City limits in the southern portion of the UGB near Settlemier Avenue and in southwestern portion of the UGB near Evergreen Road and Parr Road. The majority of these areas are subject to the City’s Nodal Overlay Districts, which requires a master planning effort prior to annexation into City limits. Similarly, there is a large vacant LDR area near Settlemier Avenue and a vacant HDR area adjacent to Highway 99E, both in the southern part Woodburn’s City boundary. Table 3 provides a gross estimate of vacant or redevelopable land within the UGB and City limits. The amount of vacant land is potentially overestimated as deductions for public rights-of-way, private streets, and public utility easements have not been factored.2 As shown, the majority of vacant or redevelopable land within the UGB and City limits is designated for residential uses (641.6 acres of LDR areas and 180.2 acres for HDR areas). There is also a large amount of vacant or redevelopable areas designated for Industrial use; approximately 193 of the 307.6 acres is subject to the SWIR, which, as noted above, regulates the amount and type of development that can occur. 1 ECONorthwest, 2016 2 Portions of vacant or redevelopable parcels with the RCWOD Overlay were removed from the totals and were, overall, fairly minimal in size. ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 10 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 Table 3: Vacant Land by Comprehensive Plan Designation COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION VACANT LAND (ACRES) City Limits UGB Total Low Density Residential 70.0 571.6* 641.6 Medium Density Residential 30.7 149.5* 180.2 Commercial 84.2 65.4 149.6 Industrial 28.6 307.7 336.3 TOTAL 213.5 1,094.2 1,307.7 * Vacant land includes Nodal and non-Nodal Designations combined. The Woodburn Target Industry Analysis confirms that there are four Opportunity Sites – two commercial areas and two industrial areas – that are targeted for future development: Southwest Industrial Reserve Area, Stacy Allison Way, Commerce Way/Front Street Area, and Highway 99 and Young Street Commercial. Table 4 includes a summary description of these areas; Figure 5 illustrates their location. Table 4: Opportunity Sites OPPORTUNITY SITES SUMMARY Southwest Industrial Reserve Area The area is a 188-acre site in five parcels. It is currently outside of the city limits. The site is highly visible from I-5 and is within one-quarter mile of the I-5 interchange. It will be zoned Industrial once it is brought into City limits. Stacy Allison Way Area The area is a 47-acre site in eight parcels. The site is near I-5, being within one-quarter mile of the I-5 interchange. It is currently within City limits and zoned for Commercial General (CG). Commerce Way/Front Street Industrial Area The area is a 20-acre site in four parcels. The site adjacent to Highway 214 and approximately 1.7 miles from I-5. It is within City limits and zoned for Light Industrial (IL). Hwy 99 and Young Street Commercial Area The area is a 10-acre site in nine parcels. The site is visible from Highway 99. It is within City limits and zoned as Mixed-Use Village (MUV). ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST D ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST B ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P COOLEY RD W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R W HAYES ST HARDCASTLE AV L INCO L N ST PARK AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARVARD DR STACY ALLISON WY WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY HARRISON ST O RE GON WY A RNEY RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST GARFIELD ST N FRONT ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN R D Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 4 Within City Limits Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Industrial Open Space and Parks Public Use Urban Growth Boundary Reserve Within UGB (not inluding City Limits) Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Commercial Industrial Open Space and Parks Public Use Urban Growth Boundary Reserve Riparian Corridor Wetland Overlay District (RCWOD) City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary N:\Projects\024054 KAI Woodburn TSP\GIS\Existing Conditions\Vacant Land.mxd - cdoxsee - 10:25 AM 2/15/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Vacant and Redevelopable Land, by Comprehensive Plan Designation Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 12 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 Figure 5: Opportunity Sites (Woodburn Target Industry Analysis, ECONorthwest, 2016) ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 13 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL BARRIERS Existing natural resources and environmental features influence the siting, construction, and cost of transportation improvements. The following sections illustrate and describe areas within Woodburn that may pose barriers to providing transportation access or improvements. The inventory is based on available Geographic Information System (GIS) maps, previous reports, and known resource sites. Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay Riparian Corridors and Wetlands in Woodburn are regulated by the Riparian Corridor and Wetlands Overlay District (RCWOD), as shown in Figure 6. The purpose of the RCWOD is to conserve, protect, and enhance significant riparian corridors, wetlands, and undeveloped floodplains, as well as protect and enhance water quality, prevent property damage, and limit activity. The RCWOD is a combination of three different environmental constraints: riparian corridors, significant wetlands, and the 100-year floodplain. These are described as follows: • Riparian corridors extend approximately 50 feet from the top of the bank of the main stem of Senecal Creek and Mill Creek and those reaches of their tributaries identified as fish- bearing perennial streams on the Woodburn Wetlands Inventory Map. • Significant wetlands are those that have been identified on the Woodburn Wetlands Inventory Map. • The 100-year floodplain on properties identified as vacant or partly vacant on the 2005 Woodburn Buildable Land Inventory ACTIVITY CENTERS Within Woodburn city limits, land uses adjacent to Arterials and Collectors are generally automobile-oriented in nature, and include mostly industrial and commercial uses. Beyond the commercial areas, the designated land uses change to residential. Since the residential areas are segregated from the commercial areas, walking and bicycling to these locations becomes less convenient. Connecting residents and workers to services they use on a daily basis can be accomplished by well- considered land use planning. Activity centers where the transportation network should support multi-modal and accessible public transportation are shown in Figure 7. Key civic institutions such as Woodburn City Hall, the public library, and the U.S. Post Office, as well as the Woodburn Aquatic Center, are centrally located one block away from Front Street, a critical city arterial. Shopping centers, medical services, and schools and parks are generally dispersed throughout the city. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST D ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST B ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P COOLEY RD W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R W HAYES ST HARDCASTLE AV L INCO L N ST PARK AV BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARVARD DR STACY ALLISON WY WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY HARRISON ST O RE GON WY A RNEY RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST GARFIELD ST N FRONT ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN R D Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 6 Riparian Corridor Wetland Overlay District (RCWOD) City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary N:\Projects\024054 KAI Woodburn TSP\GIS\Existing Conditions\Environmental Barriers.mxd - cdoxsee - 10:25 AM 2/15/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Environmental Barriers Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R EGON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST D ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SM IT H DR LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST N 3 R D ST B ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV COUNTR Y CLUB RD LEASURE ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRINCETO N R D DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V ASTOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD HE R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E E R RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J G LA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCAD E D R G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAM ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD BL Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C HAT E A U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A L P ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P COOLEY RD W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R W HAY E S S T HARDCASTLE AV LINCOLN ST PAR K A V BROWN ST GAT C H S T PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARVARD DR STACY ALLISON WY WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY HARRISON ST O RE GON WY ARNE Y RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWB E RG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST BOON ES FERRY R D WILCO HY BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST GARFIELD ST N FRONT ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN R D Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 7 Activity Centers Àñ City Hall " ² ° Community Center s Golf Course ÂK Hospital IH Library õ ô ó Park ! ® Post Office ÅÃ Æ School c 5 Shopping Center City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary N:\Projects\024054 KAI Woodburn TSP\GIS\Existing Conditions\Activity Centers.mxd - cdoxsee - 10:25 AM 2/15/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Activity Centers Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 16 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 HISTORIC AND PROJECTED POPULATION GROWTH Historic and projected population information is from the Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC).3 The PRC publishes an annual Oregon Population Report that presents the population estimates for Oregon and its counties and incorporated cities. The most recent report provides population estimates up to the year 2016.4 Historic Population As shown in Table 5, the population in Woodburn has grown by approximately 710 people between 2010 and 2016 – approximately 3% growth over that time. By comparison, Marion County and Oregon have grown at a faster pace during the same period - approximately 4.7% and 6.2% growth respectively. Table 5: Population Research Center Annual Population Estimates 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 (REV) Oregon 4,076,350 4,013,845 3,962,710 3,919,020 3,883,735 3,857,625 3,837,300 Marion County 333,950 329,770 326,150 322,880 320,495 318,150 315,900 Woodburn 24,795 24,670 24,455 24,330 24,090 24,090 24,085 Older historical data is available through U.S. Census Population counts.5 As shown in Table 6, the population of Woodburn has grown by 10,676 people between 1990 and 2010 – approximately 80% growth. By comparison, Woodburn growth outpaced Marion County (38%) and Oregon (35%) by a wide margin over the same period of time. Table 6: U.S. Census Population 2010 2000 1990 Oregon 3,831,074 3,421,436 2,842,321 Marion 315,335 284,838 228,483 Woodburn 24,080 20,100 13,404 3 4 5 Ibid. ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 17 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 Projected Population Projected population is one of the primary tools for developing planning policies as well as determining future urban growth boundary expansions. PRC develops projected population forecasts based on historic and current trends, as well as assuming the likelihood of future events. Historically, Oregon law required counties to prepare coordinated population forecasts. In recent years, responsibility for coordinated population forecasting has been assigned to the PRC at Portland State University.6 Total population in Marion County and in Woodburn will likely grow at a faster pace in the near-term (2017 to 2035) compared to the long term. An aging population largely drives the tapering growth rates – a demographic trend which is expected to contribute to diminishing natural increase (more births than deaths). Even so, Woodburn’s total population is projected to increase by more than 7,976 over the next 18 years (2017-2035) and by more than 20,051 over the entire 50-year forecast period (2017-2067). Table 7: Projected Population and Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR) 2017 2035 2040 2067 SHARE OF COUNTY 2017 SHARE OF COUNTY 2035 SHARE OF COUNTY 2040 SHARE OF COUNTY 2067 Marion County 337,773 405,352 421,508 513,142 100% 100% 100% 100% Woodburn (UGB) 26,211 34,187 36,322 46,262 7.7% 8.2% 8.6% 8.0% ODOT’s Transportation Planning Analysis Unit (TPAU) also develops forecast models which project population by transportation analysis zone (TAZ). The previous transportation model – base year 2000 and future year of 2035 – is in the process of being updated with an interim year scenario for 2015 and a future year 2040 scenario to support the TSP update effort. Updates to the model are informed by PRC’s population forecasts; however, areas analyzed for purposes of trip generation analysis are not coterminous with the City’s UGB. 6 Oregon House of Representatives and Senate approved HB 2253, requiring the PRC to issue population forecasts for land use planning. ---PAGE BREAK--- Lands & Population Inventory to Support Tech Memo #3 (DRAFT) 18 of 18 APG Woodburn TSP February 15, 2018 Table 8: TPAU Forecast: Total of TAZ’s TPAU FORECAST 2035 2040 Population 46,309 XX Households 16,014 15,416 ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Justice Analysis The socio‐economically sensitive populations within Woodburn consist of minorities, elderly people (people 65 years of age or older), people with low‐income (people who earn 0 to 1.99 times the federal poverty level), and people with disabilities. 2010 census data for minorities and elderly people was collected at the census block level and shows the concentrations of these populations on an individual basis. Data for people with low income and people with disabilities was collected at the census block group level and shows the concentration of these populations as a percentage of the overall population. The data was combined with a general understanding of local conditions to ensure that the existing transportation system meets the needs of these individuals. Figure 8 through Figure 11 illustrate the populations within Woodburn. The socioeconomic conditions within the city will be considered in the development of the TSP update to ensure that the future transportation system meets the needs of the entire city while not creating adverse conditions for select population segments. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 MCKEE SCHOOL RD A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R E GON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T E N OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD S A LL AL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN T R OON AV HAZE L NU T DR JUNE W Y ST ST LOUIS RD PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST COU N T R Y CLUB RD BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PR I NCETON RD DOUD ST P A RK C R COZY W Y MAYANNA D R ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST N 4TH ST TUK W ILA DR LEARY RD H ERMA NSO N ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V AL E L N MARSHALL ST N CASCADE DR REED AV H I GH ST C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN MILL ST LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR MOUNTAIN VIEW LN CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN VERA LN JA M ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST LILAC WY EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B L Y L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST KOTK A ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD W HITNE Y LN GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R UNION SCHOOL RD W CLACKAMAS C R ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR INGALLS LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN DECONINCK RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R LI NCO L N ST O R EGON WY GAT C H S T PARR RD HARDCASTLE AV W HAY E S S T STACY ALLISON WY HARRISON ST BROWN ST E C LEVELAND ST PARK AV WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY COOLEY RD HARVARD DR ARNEY R D N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD CROSBY RD WILCO HY S SETTLEMIER AV N PACIFIC HY Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN R D GARFIELD ST N SETTLEMIER AV BUTTEVILLE RD MOLALLA RD S PACIFIC HY B OO NES FERR Y RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 8 Minority Percentage of Total Population 0% - 20% 21% - 40% 41% - 60% 61% - 80% 81% - 100% City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\08 Minority Population.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Census Table DEC_10_PL_P1 Minority Population Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 MCKEE SCHOOL RD A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R E GON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T E N OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD S A LL AL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN T R OON AV HAZE L NU T DR JUNE W Y ST ST LOUIS RD PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST COU N T R Y CLUB RD BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PR I NCETON RD DOUD ST P A RK C R COZY W Y MAYANNA D R ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST N 4TH ST TUK W ILA DR LEARY RD H ERMA NSO N ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V AL E L N MARSHALL ST N CASCADE DR REED AV H I GH ST C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN MILL ST LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR MOUNTAIN VIEW LN CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN VERA LN JA M ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST LILAC WY EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B L Y L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST KOTK A ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD W HITNE Y LN GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R UNION SCHOOL RD W CLACKAMAS C R ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR INGALLS LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN DECONINCK RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R LI NCO L N ST O R EGON WY GAT C H S T PARR RD HARDCASTLE AV W HAY E S S T STACY ALLISON WY HARRISON ST BROWN ST E C LEVELAND ST PARK AV WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY COOLEY RD HARVARD DR ARNEY R D N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD CROSBY RD WILCO HY S SETTLEMIER AV N PACIFIC HY Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN R D GARFIELD ST N SETTLEMIER AV BUTTEVILLE RD MOLALLA RD S PACIFIC HY B OO NES FERR Y RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 9 Percentage of People Aged 65 and Older 0% - 7% 8% - 19% 20% - 41% 42% - 75% 76% - 100% City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\09 Elderly Population.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Census Table DEC_10_SF1_P12 Elderly Population Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 MCKEE SCHOOL RD A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T E N OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM RD MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD S A LL AL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN T R OON AV HAZE L NU T DR JUNE W Y ST ST LOUIS RD PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST COU N T R Y CLUB RD BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PR I NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R COZY W Y MAYANNA D R ARLINGTON A V A STOR W Y IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST W HAYES ST T U K WILA DR LEARY RD H ERMA NSO N ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST N CASCADE DR REED AV H I GH ST C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GL A T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN MILL ST LINFIELD AV MOUNTAIN VIEW LN HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E N V IEW DR VI N E AV KOI LN VERA LN JA M ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST LILAC WY EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B L Y LP GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST KOTK A ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD WHIT N EY LN GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS C R ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR INGALLS LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN DECONINCK RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R LI NCO L N ST O RE GON WY GAT C H S T PARR RD HARDCASTLE AV W HAY E S S T STACY ALLISON WY HARRISON ST BROWN ST E C LEVELAND ST PARK AV WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY COOLEY RD HARVARD DR ARNEY R D N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD CROSBY RD WILCO HY S SETTLEMIER AV N PACIFIC HY Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN R D GARFIELD ST N SETTLEMIER AV BUTTEVILLE RD MOLALLA RD S PACIFIC HY B OO NES FERR Y RD S FRONT ST HIGHWAY 99E HY N FRONT ST NEWBERG HY MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 10 Count of people who earned between 0 and 1.99 times the federal Poverty Level in 1999 117 - 303 304 - 406 407 - 622 623 - 981 982 - 2004 City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\10 Low Income Population.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: Census Table DEC_00_SF3_P088 Low-Income Population Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 99E vÍÎ 219 vÍÎ 214 vÍÎ 211 vÍÎ 214 MCKEE SCHOOL RD A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R E GON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFIE LD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T E N OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD S A LL AL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN T R OON AV HAZE L NU T DR JUNE W Y ST ST LOUIS RD PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST COU N T R Y CLUB RD BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PR I NCETON RD DOUD ST P A RK C R COZY W Y MAYANNA D R ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST N 4TH ST TUK W ILA DR LEARY RD H ERMA NSO N ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V AL E L N MARSHALL ST N CASCADE DR REED AV H I GH ST C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN MILL ST LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR MOUNTAIN VIEW LN CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN VERA LN JA M ES ST PLUM LN OGLE ST LILAC WY EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M A V OATS ST RAILROAD B L Y L P GOUDY GARDENS LN D E X TER LP JORY ST KOTK A ST W ORKMAN DR ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD W HITNE Y LN GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R UNION SCHOOL RD W CLACKAMAS C R ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR INGALLS LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN DECONINCK RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP W LINCOLN ST H A Z ELN UT D R LI NCO L N ST O R EGON WY GAT C H S T PARR RD HARDCASTLE AV W HAY E S S T STACY ALLISON WY HARRISON ST BROWN ST E C LEVELAND ST PARK AV WOODLAND AV ASTOR WY COOLEY RD HARVARD DR ARNEY R D N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD CROSBY RD WILCO HY S SETTLEMIER AV N PACIFIC HY Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN R D GARFIELD ST N SETTLEMIER AV BUTTEVILLE RD MOLALLA RD S PACIFIC HY B OO NES FERR Y RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2018 ¯ Figure 11 Number of Disabled Persons 18 and Older 45 - 150 151 - 250 251 - 350 351 - 500 >500 City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary C:\Users\jsommerville\Desktop\Local Project Folder\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\11 Population with Disabilities.mxd - jsommerville - 3:02 PM 2/19/2018 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: Census Table ACS_15_5YR_C21007 Population with Disabilities Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B Bicycle and Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress Methodology ---PAGE BREAK--- Level of Traffic Stress Calculations February 20, 2018 B-1 BICYCLE LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS The Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Analysis Procedures Manual (APM) provides a methodology for evaluating bicycle facilities within urban and rural environments called Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS). As applied by ODOT, this methodology classifies four levels of traffic stress that a bicyclist can experience on the roadway, ranging from BLTS 1 (little traffic stress) to BLTS 4 (high traffic stress). A road segment that is rated BLTS 1 generally has low traffic volumes and travel speeds and is suitable for all cyclists, including children. A road segment that is rated BLTS 4 generally has high traffic volumes and travel speeds and is perceived as unsafe by most cyclists. Per the APM, BLTS 2 is considered a reasonable target for bicycle facilities due to its acceptability with the majority of cyclists. The BLTS score is determined based on the speed of the roadway, the number of travel lanes per direction, the presence and width of an on-street bicycle lane and/or adjacent parking lane, and several other factors. For the analysis conducted in Woodburn, an initial inventory was supplemented with base assumptions to determine the BLTS values for roadways segments throughout the city. ▪ Bike lanes on major and minor arterials assumed to be six-feet-wide ▪ Bike lanes on arterials assumed to be five-feet-wide ▪ Parking lanes assumed to be five-feet-wide With the above widths defined and the presence of bike lanes and parking lanes noted via an inventory of the city’s roadways, BLTS values were determined for all major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access street in Woodburn. PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS The APM provides a methodology for evaluating pedestrian facilities within urban and rural environments called Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS). As applied by ODOT, this methodology classifies four levels of traffic stress that a pedestrian can experience on the roadway, ranging from PLTS 1 (little traffic stress) to PLTS 4 (high traffic stress). A road segment that is rated PLTS 1 generally has low traffic volumes and travel speeds and has a sidewalk that is separated from vehicular traffic. These segments are generally suitable for all users, including children. A road segment that is rated PLTS 4 generally has high traffic volumes and travel speeds and is perceived as unsafe by most adults. Road segments rated PLTS 4 also include those with no sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities. Per the APM, PLTS 2 is considered a reasonable target for most pedestrian facilities due to its acceptability with the majority of people. The PLTS score is based on four criteria, including sidewalk condition, physical buffer type, total buffering width, and general land use. All four criteria are scored from 1 to 4 and the highest score determines the overall score for the road segment. For the analysis conducted in Woodburn, an initial inventory was supplemented with base assumptions to determine the PLTS values for roadways segments throughout the city. ---PAGE BREAK--- Level of Traffic Stress Calculations February 20, 2018 B-2 ▪ Sidewalk condition was assumed to be fair unless a different condition was clearly visible via aerial imagery ▪ Sidewalks assumed to be six-feet-wide ▪ Landscape strips assumed to be six-feet-wide ▪ Striped shoulders assumed to be four-feet-wide ▪ Non-striped shoulders assumed to be zero-feet-wide With the above widths defined and an inventory of the city’s existing pedestrian facilities, PLTS values were determined for all major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access street in Woodburn. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment C Historical PCI Data and Statistics ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Woodburn City of Woodburn, OR Run Date: 12/31/2017 ---PAGE BREAK--- ACACIA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 319 ACACIA AVE 06/13/2011 80 PCI from Inspection 06/13/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 48 Yes AKSENI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 412 AKSENIA ST 07/14/2014 80 PCI from Inspection 07/14/2014 80 No 07/01/2014 79 No 06/22/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2004 86 Yes ALDERL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 306 ALDER LANE 03/13/2009 16 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 16 Yes 06/23/2003 35 Yes 07/01/1997 56 Yes ALETHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 362 ALETHA ST 03/13/2009 72 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 72 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 85 Yes ALEXAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 119A ALEXANDRA AVE 07/01/2015 100 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2015 100 2001 CITY MEASUREAD ADT No 03/13/2009 18 2001 CITY MEASUREAD ADT Yes 06/09/2003 46 2001 CITY MEASUREAD ADT Yes 07/01/1997 76 2001 CITY MEASUREAD ADT Yes ALEXAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 119B ALEXANDRA AVE 07/01/2015 100 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2015 100 ADT ON 4/7/2010 No 03/13/2009 22 ADT ON 4/7/2010 Yes 06/09/2003 31 ADT ON 4/7/2010 Yes 07/01/1997 57 ADT ON 4/7/2010 Yes ALEXAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 119C ALEXANDRA AVE 06/02/2015 100 PCI from Inspection 06/02/2015 100 No ALEXAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 121 ALEXANDRA CT 06/02/2015 100 PCI from Inspection 06/02/2015 100 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 1 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ALEXAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 121 ALEXANDRA CT 06/02/2015 100 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 24 Yes 06/09/2003 54 Yes 07/01/1997 77 Yes AMITYC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 172 AMITY CT 03/13/2009 51 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 51 Yes 06/23/2003 67 Yes 07/01/1997 62 Yes AMYCT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 123 AMY CT 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 64 Yes ANDREA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 419 ANDREA`S CT 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes ANNAST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 359 ANNA ST 03/13/2009 73 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 73 Yes 04/16/2008 80 No 06/09/2003 84 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes ARLING Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 426 ARLINGTON AVE 06/01/2009 76 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 76 ADT ON 9/3/2000 No 03/13/2009 75 ADT ON 9/3/2000 Yes 06/23/2004 89 ADT ON 9/3/2000 Yes ARNEYL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 431 ARNEY LN 08/04/2015 73 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 73 No 03/13/2009 85 Yes ARNEYR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 429A ARNEY RD 09/04/2015 27 PCI from Inspection 09/04/2015 27 ADT ON 7/31/2008 No 03/13/2009 54 ADT ON 7/31/2008 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 2 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ARNEYR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 429B ARNEY RD 08/04/2015 95 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 95 ADT ON 6/2/2009 No 06/01/2014 100 ADT ON 6/2/2009 No 03/13/2009 65 ADT ON 6/2/2009 Yes ARNEYR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 429C ARNEY RD 08/04/2015 95 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 95 ADT ON 11/21/2012 No 06/01/2014 100 ADT ON 11/21/2012 No 03/13/2009 63 ADT ON 11/21/2012 Yes ARTHUR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 221A ARTHUR ST 03/13/2009 10 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 10 Yes 06/23/2003 20 Yes 08/01/1997 12 Yes ARTHUR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 221B ARTHUR ST 06/10/2014 100 PCI from Inspection 06/10/2014 100 No ARTHUR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 221C ARTHUR ST 07/14/2014 44 PCI from Inspection 07/14/2014 44 No 03/13/2009 34 Yes 06/23/2003 67 Yes 08/01/1997 68 Yes AST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 153A A ST 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes AST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 153B A ST 03/13/2009 13 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 13 Yes 06/23/2003 30 Yes 07/01/1997 27 Yes ASTORC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 341 ASTOR CT 06/15/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/09/2003 88 Yes 07/01/1997 85 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 3 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ASTORW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 343A ASTOR WAY 07/14/2014 77 PCI from Inspection 07/14/2014 77 ADT ON 9/10/2010 = 1239 ADT ON 1/12/2012 = 1396 No PSL -Residental 25 MPH Type C curb & gutter No 06/04/2014 68 ADT ON 9/10/2010 = 1239 ADT ON 1/12/2012 = 1396 No PSL -Residental 25 MPH Type C curb & gutter No 03/13/2009 69 ADT ON 9/10/2010 = 1239 ADT ON 1/12/2012 = 1396 No PSL -Residental 25 MPH Type C curb & gutter Yes 06/09/2003 85 ADT ON 9/10/2010 = 1239 ADT ON 1/12/2012 = 1396 No PSL -Residental 25 MPH Type C curb & gutter Yes 07/01/1997 83 ADT ON 9/10/2010 = 1239 ADT ON 1/12/2012 = 1396 No PSL -Residental 25 MPH Type C curb & gutter Yes 01/01/1990 100 ADT ON 9/10/2010 = 1239 ADT ON 1/12/2012 = 1396 No PSL -Residental 25 MPH Type C curb & gutter No ASTORW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 343B ASTOR WAY 03/13/2009 71 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/09/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes 01/01/1990 100 No ASTORW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 343C ASTOR WAY 06/24/2010 80 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 80 No 03/13/2009 63 Yes 06/09/2003 80 Yes 07/01/1997 74 Yes AUDREY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 100A AUDREY WAY 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/09/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 69 Yes AUDREY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 100B AUDREY WAY 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 77 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 4 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- AUSTIN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 242 AUSTIN AVE 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/09/2003 36 Yes 07/01/1997 55 Yes AZTECD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 111 AZTEC DR 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes 06/23/2003 87 Yes 07/01/1997 81 Yes BARNST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 101 BARN ST 03/13/2009 87 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 87 Yes 06/09/2003 71 Yes 07/01/1997 65 Yes BAYLOR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 404A BAYLOR ST 07/10/2012 81 PCI from Inspection 07/10/2012 81 No 06/17/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes BAYLOR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 404B BAYLOR ST 07/10/2012 78 PCI from Inspection 07/10/2012 78 No 06/17/2011 77 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2004 91 Yes BENBRO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 207A BEN BROWN LANE 03/13/2009 73 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 73 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes BENBRO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 207B BEN BROWN LANE 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 75 Yes 07/01/1997 65 Yes BERNAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 365 BERNARD DR 06/24/2010 73 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 73 No 03/13/2009 72 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 5 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- BERNAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 365 BERNARD DR 06/24/2010 73 PCI from Inspection 04/16/2008 81 No 06/09/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes BIRDSE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 117 BIRDS EYE AVE 03/13/2009 29 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 29 Yes 06/23/2003 28 Yes 07/01/1997 43 Yes BLAINE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 145 BLAINE ST 07/06/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 07/06/2011 81 ADT ON 9/25/2000 No 03/13/2009 83 ADT ON 9/25/2000 Yes 06/05/2006 100 ADT ON 9/25/2000 No 06/23/2003 39 ADT ON 9/25/2000 Yes 07/01/1997 59 ADT ON 9/25/2000 Yes BOEAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 440 BOEAN LN 03/13/2009 95 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 95 Yes BOGIEC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 400 BOGIE CT 03/13/2009 68 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 68 Yes 06/23/2004 75 Yes BOONES Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 379C N BOONES FERRY RD 08/04/2015 72 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 72 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes BOSTON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 424 BOSTON ST 06/01/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2004 89 Yes BRADLE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 177 BRADLEY ST 06/21/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 79 ADT ON 5/8/2009 No 03/13/2009 81 ADT ON 5/8/2009 Yes 06/23/2003 80 ADT ON 5/8/2009 Yes 07/01/1997 83 ADT ON 5/8/2009 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 6 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- BRANDY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 203 BRANDYWINE CT 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 68 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes BRIDLE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 410A BRIDLEWOOD LN 07/14/2014 76 PCI from Inspection 07/14/2014 76 No 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 06/23/2004 90 Yes 04/06/2004 83 No BRIDLE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 410B BRIDLEWOOD LN 07/14/2014 77 PCI from Inspection 07/14/2014 77 ADT ON 1/27/2002 No 03/13/2009 81 ADT ON 1/27/2002 Yes 04/16/2008 85 ADT ON 1/27/2002 No 06/23/2004 88 ADT ON 1/27/2002 Yes 04/06/2004 83 ADT ON 1/27/2002 No BROADM Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 389 BROADMOORE PL 03/13/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes BROADW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 152A BROADWAY ST 03/13/2009 20 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 20 Yes 06/23/2003 20 Yes 07/01/1997 25 Yes BROADW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 152B BROADWAY ST 03/13/2009 43 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 43 Yes 06/23/2003 78 Yes 07/01/1997 74 Yes BROUGH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 340 BROUGHTON WAY 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 21 Yes 07/01/1997 29 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 7 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- BROWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 176A BROWN ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 53 Yes 06/23/2003 56 Yes 07/01/1997 68 Yes BROWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 176B BROWN ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 55 Yes 06/23/2003 64 Yes 07/01/1997 28 Yes BROWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 176C BROWN ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 68 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes BROWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 176D BROWN ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 95 Yes BROWNC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 164 BROWN CT 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 44 Yes 07/01/1997 31 Yes BRYANS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 144A BRYAN ST 06/28/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2011 81 ADT ON 4/27/2009 No 03/13/2009 82 ADT ON 4/27/2009 Yes 06/23/2003 90 ADT ON 4/27/2009 Yes 01/01/1998 100 ADT ON 4/27/2009 No 07/01/1997 75 ADT ON 4/27/2009 Yes BRYANS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 144B BRYAN ST 07/06/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 07/06/2011 81 ADT ON 4/29/1999 No 03/13/2009 83 ADT ON 4/29/1999 Yes 06/05/2006 100 ADT ON 4/29/1999 No 06/23/2003 43 ADT ON 4/29/1999 Yes 07/01/1997 31 ADT ON 4/29/1999 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 8 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- BST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 154 B ST 03/13/2009 36 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 36 ADT ON 7/23/2003 Yes 06/23/2003 77 ADT ON 7/23/2003 Yes 07/01/1997 81 ADT ON 7/23/2003 Yes BUNKER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 398 BUNKER AVE 06/01/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes CAHILL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 339 CAHILL WAY 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 30 Yes 07/01/1997 24 Yes CAMAS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 303 CAMAS ST 06/13/2011 80 PCI from Inspection 06/13/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2003 84 Yes 07/01/1997 84 Yes CAMELL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 347 CAMELLIA WAY 03/13/2009 74 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 74 Yes 06/09/2003 84 Yes 07/01/1997 84 Yes CAROLS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 132A CAROL ST 03/13/2009 18 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 18 Yes 06/09/2003 47 Yes 07/01/1997 58 Yes CAROLS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 132B CAROL ST 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 WIDTH VARIES Yes CEDARA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 318 CEDAR AVE 06/01/2009 77 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 77 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/23/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 69 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 9 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- CENTEN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 108 CENTENNIAL DR 06/23/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 98 Yes CENTER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 446 CENTER ST 08/16/2012 92 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 92 No 03/13/2009 96 Yes CHAMPI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 396 CHAMPIONSHIP DR 03/13/2009 73 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 73 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes CHARLE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 138 CHARLES ST 06/08/2015 45 PCI from Inspection 06/08/2015 45 No 03/13/2009 21 Yes 06/09/2003 32 Yes 07/01/1997 64 Yes CHURCH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 227A CHURCH ST 03/13/2009 20 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 20 Yes 06/23/2003 45 Yes 08/01/1997 38 Yes CHURCH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 227B CHURCH ST 03/13/2009 23 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 23 Yes 06/23/2003 33 Yes 08/01/1997 48 Yes CHURCH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 227C CHURCH ST 03/13/2009 64 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 64 Yes 06/23/2003 78 Yes 07/01/1997 79 Yes CITADE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 408 CITADEL ST 07/10/2012 84 PCI from Inspection 07/10/2012 84 No 06/20/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 10 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- CLACKA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 251 CLACKAMAS CIRCLE 03/13/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 27 Yes CLEMSO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 434 CLEMSON ST 03/13/2009 100 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 100 Yes CLEVEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 158A CLEVELAND ST 08/04/2015 61 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 61 No 06/24/2010 71 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes 01/01/1990 100 No CLEVEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 158B CLEVELAND ST 08/04/2015 68 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 68 ADT ON 9/9/2000 - 3,732 ADT ON 3/4/2001 - 1,285 No 06/01/2009 79 ADT ON 9/9/2000 - 3,732 ADT ON 3/4/2001 - 1,285 No 03/13/2009 77 ADT ON 9/9/2000 - 3,732 ADT ON 3/4/2001 - 1,285 Yes 06/23/2003 81 ADT ON 9/9/2000 - 3,732 ADT ON 3/4/2001 - 1,285 Yes 07/01/1997 86 ADT ON 9/9/2000 - 3,732 ADT ON 3/4/2001 - 1,285 Yes 01/01/1990 100 ADT ON 9/9/2000 - 3,732 ADT ON 3/4/2001 - 1,285 No CLEVEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 219A CLEVELAND ST 08/04/2015 85 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 85 No 08/11/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 68 Yes 06/28/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 24 Yes 08/01/1997 19 Yes CLEVEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 219B CLEVELAND ST 08/04/2015 85 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 85 No 08/11/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 29 Yes 06/23/2003 33 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 11 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- CLEVEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 219B CLEVELAND ST 08/04/2015 85 PCI from Inspection 08/01/1997 40 Yes CLEVEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 219C CLEVELAND ST 08/04/2015 85 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 85 ADT ON 9/12/2003 No 08/11/2010 100 ADT ON 9/12/2003 No 03/13/2009 38 ADT ON 9/12/2003 Yes 06/23/2003 77 ADT ON 9/12/2003 Yes 08/01/1997 73 ADT ON 9/12/2003 Yes COLEWO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 391 COLEWOOD DR 06/01/2009 77 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 77 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes COLONY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 355 COLONY ST 03/13/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes COLUMB Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 250 COLUMBIA DR 06/24/2010 72 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 72 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 24 Yes COMMER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 179 COMMERCE WAY 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes COMSTO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 414 COMSTOCK AVE 06/22/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes COMSTW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 415 COMSTOCK WY 06/22/2011 80 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 12 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- CONCOR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 423 CONCORD ST 06/01/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2004 85 Yes CONSTI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 356 CONSTITUTION AVE 03/13/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 89 Yes CONSTI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 356B CONSTITUTION AVE 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 04/16/2008 83 No 06/23/2004 87 Yes COOLEY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 463 COOLEY CT 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes CORBYS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 136 CORBY ST 07/06/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 07/06/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes 01/01/1995 100 No COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 322 COUNTRY CLUB RD 06/02/2015 60 PCI from Inspection 06/02/2015 60 ADT ON 8/30/2012 No 03/13/2009 63 ADT ON 8/30/2012 Yes 06/09/2003 76 ADT ON 8/30/2012 Yes 07/01/1997 71 ADT ON 8/30/2012 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 322A COUNTRY CLUB RD 03/13/2009 47 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 47 Yes 06/09/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 84 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 322B COUNTRY CLUB RD 03/13/2009 63 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 63 Yes 06/09/2003 79 Yes 07/01/1997 71 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 13 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 322C COUNTRY CLUB RD 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/09/2003 65 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 322D COUNTRY CLUB RD 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/09/2003 35 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 323 COUNTRY CLUB TERRACE 03/13/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/09/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 51 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 324 COUNTRY CLUB CT 07/01/2014 100 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 100 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 03/13/2009 35 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes 06/09/2003 29 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes 07/01/1997 18 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 342 COUNTRY CLUB CIRCLE 03/13/2009 34 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 34 Yes 06/09/2003 77 Yes 07/01/1997 76 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 428A COUNTRY LN 07/01/2014 86 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 86 ADT ON 8/25/2005 No 03/13/2009 89 ADT ON 8/25/2005 Yes 06/23/2004 92 ADT ON 8/25/2005 Yes COUNTR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 428B COUNTRY LN 07/01/2014 85 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 85 ADT ON 8/25/2005 - 186 ADT ON 4/20/2009- 844 No 03/13/2009 95 ADT ON 8/25/2005 - 186 ADT ON 4/20/2009- 844 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 14 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- COZYWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 260A COZY WAY 06/01/2009 79 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 79 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/09/2003 86 Yes 08/01/1997 96 Yes COZYWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 260B COZY WAY 03/13/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 84 Yes CREIGH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 405 CREIGHTON ST 08/16/2012 82 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 82 No 07/10/2012 80 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/23/2004 87 Yes CST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 155 C ST 06/21/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2003 82 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes DAHLIA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 462 DAHLIA ST 07/01/2014 86 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 86 ADT ON 4/20/2009 No 03/13/2009 92 ADT ON 4/20/2009 Yes DEERRU Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 171A DEER RUN ST 03/13/2009 39 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 39 Yes 06/23/2003 73 Yes 07/01/1997 69 Yes DEERRU Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 171B DEER RUN ST 06/01/2009 78 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 78 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/23/2003 87 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes DELLMO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 328A DELLMOOR WAY 03/13/2009 87 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 87 Yes 04/16/2008 91 No 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 33 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 15 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- DELLMO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 328A DELLMOOR WAY 03/13/2009 87 PCI from Inspection 07/01/1997 51 Yes DELLMO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 328B DELLMOOR WAY 03/13/2009 87 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 87 Yes 04/16/2008 91 No 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 40 Yes 07/01/1997 34 Yes DESANT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 258 DESANTIS DR 06/21/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 82 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/09/2003 92 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes DOGWOO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 348 DOGWOOD DR 06/24/2010 76 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 76 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/09/2003 86 Yes 07/01/1997 68 Yes DOUDST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 140 DOUD ST 03/13/2009 42 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 42 Yes 06/23/2003 64 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes DST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 156 D ST 03/13/2009 64 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 64 Yes 06/23/2003 78 Yes 07/01/1997 77 Yes DUKEST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 406 DUKE ST 08/16/2012 76 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 76 No 07/10/2012 74 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2004 83 Yes DUNNCT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 394 DUNN CT 03/13/2009 20 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 20 Yes 06/23/2004 29 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 16 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- EAGLED Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 397A EAGLE DR 03/13/2009 72 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 72 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes EAGLED Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 397B EAGLE DR 03/13/2009 74 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 74 Yes 06/23/2004 89 Yes ECOLAW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 337 ECOLA WAY 03/13/2009 88 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 35 Yes 07/01/1997 56 Yes EDGEWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 385 EDGEWATER DR 07/08/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 07/08/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes ELANAD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 202A ELANA DR 06/21/2011 75 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 75 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes ELANAD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 202B ELANA DR 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes ELANAW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 206 ELANA WAY 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 35 Yes 07/01/1997 54 Yes ELINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 110A E LINCOLN ST 07/01/2014 61 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 61 No 06/09/2014 46 No 03/13/2009 50 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 33 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 17 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ELINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 110B E LINCOLN ST 07/01/2014 74 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 74 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No 06/09/2014 64 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No 03/13/2009 67 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 04/16/2008 82 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No 06/09/2003 86 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 07/01/1997 43 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 01/01/1997 100 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No ELINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 110C E LINCOLN ST 07/01/2014 79 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 79 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb No 06/09/2014 70 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb No 07/08/2011 70 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb No 03/13/2009 71 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb Yes 04/16/2008 82 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb No 06/09/2003 86 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb Yes 07/01/1997 33 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb Yes 01/01/1997 100 PSL 20 MPH - School Zone Type C Curb No ELINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 110D E LINCOLN ST 07/01/2014 74 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 74 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No 06/09/2014 64 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No 03/13/2009 67 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 04/16/2008 82 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No 06/09/2003 86 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 07/01/1997 25 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 01/01/1997 100 PSL 25 MPH Type C curb No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 18 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ELMST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 148 ELM ST 03/13/2009 35 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 35 Yes 06/23/2003 69 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253A EVERGREEN RD 08/14/2012 89 PCI from Inspection 08/14/2012 89 No 07/10/2012 88 No 03/13/2009 92 Yes EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253B EVERGREEN RD 08/14/2012 87 PCI from Inspection 08/14/2012 87 No 07/10/2012 86 No 03/13/2009 90 Yes EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253C EVERGREEN RD 08/14/2012 73 PCI from Inspection 08/14/2012 73 No 06/01/2009 75 No 03/13/2009 73 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253D EVERGREEN RD 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes 04/16/2008 88 No 06/09/2003 92 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 25 Yes EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253E EVERGREEN RD 06/24/2015 52 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2015 52 ADT ON 9/5/2008 No 06/23/2015 49 ADT ON 9/5/2008 No 08/09/2012 44 ADT ON 9/5/2008 No 03/13/2009 22 ADT ON 9/5/2008 Yes 04/16/2008 65 ADT ON 9/5/2008 No 06/09/2003 71 ADT ON 9/5/2008 Yes 01/01/2000 100 ADT ON 9/5/2008 No 07/01/1997 51 ADT ON 9/5/2008 Yes 01/01/1991 100 ADT ON 9/5/2008 No EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253F EVERGREEN RD 06/02/2014 100 PCI from Inspection 06/02/2014 100 No 03/13/2009 62 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 19 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- EVERGR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 253F EVERGREEN RD 06/02/2014 100 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2003 86 Yes 08/01/1997 86 Yes FAIRWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 399 FAIRWAY ST 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes FAIRWO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 393A FAIRWOOD CRESCENT 06/01/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 82 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes FAIRWO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 393B FAIRWOOD CRESCENT 06/16/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes FIFTHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 235A FIFTH ST 06/24/2010 71 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 71 No 03/13/2009 70 Yes 06/23/2003 16 Yes 08/01/1997 19 Yes FIFTHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 235B FIFTH ST 03/13/2009 74 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 74 Yes 06/23/2003 14 Yes 08/01/1997 15 Yes FIFTHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 235C FIFTH ST 07/15/2011 100 PCI from Inspection 07/15/2011 100 No 03/13/2009 32 Yes 06/23/2003 15 Yes 08/01/1997 20 Yes FIFTHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 235D FIFTH ST 07/15/2011 100 PCI from Inspection 07/15/2011 100 No 03/13/2009 7 Yes 06/23/2003 24 Yes 08/01/1997 54 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 20 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- FIFTHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 235E FIFTH ST 07/15/2011 100 PCI from Inspection 07/15/2011 100 No 03/13/2009 18 Yes 06/23/2003 79 Yes 07/01/1997 69 Yes FILBER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 151 FILBERT ST 06/28/2011 85 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2011 85 No 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/23/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1998 100 No 07/01/1997 39 Yes FINZER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 338 FINZER WAY 03/13/2009 29 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 29 Yes 06/09/2003 48 Yes 07/01/1997 48 Yes FIR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 229A FIR ST 03/13/2009 3 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 3 Yes 06/23/2003 15 Yes 08/01/1997 18 Yes FOURTH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 234 FOURTH ST 06/21/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2003 30 Yes 08/01/1997 67 Yes FOXGLO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 461 FOXGLOVE ST 07/01/2014 91 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 91 ADT ON 4/15/2009 - 188 ADT ON 12/15/2010 - 150 No 03/13/2009 95 ADT ON 4/15/2009 - 188 ADT ON 12/15/2010 - 150 Yes GARDEN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 373 GARDEN WAY 06/24/2010 69 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 69 No 03/13/2009 68 Yes 06/09/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 72 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 21 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- GARFIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 222 GARFIELD ST 08/02/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 08/02/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 38 Yes 06/09/2003 76 Yes 08/01/1997 57 Yes GARFIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 222B GARFIELD ST 08/02/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 08/02/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 52 Yes 06/09/2003 85 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 08/01/1997 84 Yes GARFIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 222C GARFIELD ST 08/02/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 08/02/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 26 Yes 06/09/2003 69 Yes 08/01/1997 83 Yes GARFIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 222D GARFIELD ST 06/20/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/20/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/09/2003 27 Yes 08/01/1997 53 Yes GARFIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 222E GARFIELD ST 06/20/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/20/2011 77 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 08/01/1997 89 Yes GATCHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 135A GATCH ST 03/13/2009 49 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 49 Yes 06/26/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 79 Yes GATCHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 135B GATCH ST 06/11/2015 44 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 44 No 06/09/2014 43 No 03/13/2009 31 Yes 06/23/2003 66 Yes 07/01/1997 51 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 22 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- GATCHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 135C GATCH ST 06/11/2015 46 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 46 No 06/09/2014 45 No 03/13/2009 39 Yes 06/23/2003 70 Yes 07/01/1997 66 Yes GATCHS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 135D GATCH ST 06/11/2015 70 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 70 No 03/13/2009 74 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 35 Yes GEORGE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 116 GEORGE ST 03/13/2009 91 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 91 Yes 06/05/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 64 Yes 07/01/1997 64 Yes GLATTC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 372 GLATT CIRCLE 06/28/2013 53 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2013 53 ADT ON 9/7/2005 No 03/13/2009 39 ADT ON 9/7/2005 Yes 06/23/2003 76 ADT ON 9/7/2005 Yes 07/01/1997 73 ADT ON 9/7/2005 Yes GOOSEC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 366 GOOSE CREEK RD 06/01/2009 77 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 77 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes GOOSEH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 454 GOOSE HOLLOW CT 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes GRANTS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 224A GRANT ST 03/13/2009 19 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 19 Yes 06/23/2003 66 Yes 08/01/1997 65 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 23 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- GRANTS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 224B GRANT ST 07/01/2014 100 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 100 No 06/16/2014 100 No 03/13/2009 67 Yes 06/23/2003 80 Yes 08/01/1997 79 Yes GRAYST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 388 GRAYSTONE DR 07/08/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 07/08/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes GREENV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 103A GREENVIEW DR 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/09/2003 81 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes GREENV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 103B GREENVIEW DR 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/09/2003 68 Yes 07/01/1997 55 Yes GREENV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 104 GREENVIEW CT 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/09/2003 73 Yes 07/01/1997 68 Yes HALLST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 244 HALL ST 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes 06/23/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 78 Yes HAMPTO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 354 HAMPTON WAY 06/02/2015 81 PCI from Inspection 06/02/2015 81 No 06/24/2010 87 No 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 18 Yes 07/01/1997 32 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 24 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134A HARDCASTLE AVE 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/09/2003 98 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 38 Yes HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134B HARDCASTLE AVE 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/09/2003 98 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 58 Yes HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134C HARDCASTLE AVE 03/13/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/09/2003 98 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 84 Yes HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134D HARDCASTLE AVE 06/04/2015 68 PCI from Inspection 06/04/2015 68 No 06/03/2015 65 No 06/09/2014 60 No 03/13/2009 64 Yes 06/09/2003 85 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 85 Yes HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134E HARDCASTLE AVE 06/11/2015 31 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 31 ADT ON 1/25/1997 No 03/13/2009 56 ADT ON 1/25/1997 Yes 06/09/2003 89 ADT ON 1/25/1997 Yes 07/01/1997 82 ADT ON 1/25/1997 Yes 01/01/1993 100 ADT ON 1/25/1997 No HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134F HARDCASTLE AVE 06/11/2015 41 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 41 ADT ON 7/10/2008 - 3,724 ADT ON 10/20/2008 - 3,867 ADT ON 2/4/2009 No 06/09/2014 43 ADT ON 7/10/2008 - 3,724 ADT ON 10/20/2008 - 3,867 ADT ON 2/4/2009 No 03/13/2009 44 ADT ON 7/10/2008 - 3,724 ADT ON 10/20/2008 - 3,867 ADT ON 2/4/2009 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 25 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- HARDCA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 134F HARDCASTLE AVE 06/11/2015 41 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2003 74 ADT ON 7/10/2008 - 3,724 ADT ON 10/20/2008 - 3,867 ADT ON 2/4/2009 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes 01/01/1993 100 No HARRIS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 226A HARRISON ST 08/04/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 23 Yes 06/23/2003 57 Yes 08/01/1997 41 Yes HARRIS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 226B HARRISON ST 08/15/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 08/15/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 31 Yes 06/23/2003 45 Yes 08/01/1997 60 Yes HARRIS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 226C HARRISON ST 08/04/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 43 Yes 06/23/2003 21 Yes 08/01/1997 57 Yes HARVAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 402A HARVARD DR 08/16/2012 79 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 79 No 07/10/2012 77 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes HARVAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 402B HARVARD DR 08/16/2012 80 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 80 No 07/10/2012 79 No 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes HARVAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 402C HARVARD DR 06/20/2011 44 PCI from Inspection 06/20/2011 44 No 03/13/2009 46 Yes 06/23/2004 91 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 26 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- HAWLEY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 175A HAWLEY ST 03/13/2009 37 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 37 Yes 06/23/2003 70 Yes 07/01/1997 55 Yes HAWLEY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 175B HAWLEY ST 06/22/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 54 Yes HAWTHO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 311 HAWTHORNE CIRCLE 03/13/2009 25 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 25 Yes 06/23/2003 67 Yes 07/01/1997 79 Yes HAZELN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 370 HAZELNUT DR 08/23/2012 61 PCI from Inspection 08/23/2012 61 No 08/16/2012 45 No 03/13/2009 18 Yes 06/23/2004 59 Yes HAZELN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 370A HAZELNUT DR 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 86 Yes HAZELN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 370B HAZELNUT DR 08/16/2012 66 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 66 No 08/09/2012 54 No 03/13/2009 42 Yes 06/09/2003 84 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes HEATHE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 345 HEATHER WAY 06/15/2011 78 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 78 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/09/2003 86 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 27 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- HENRYS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 363A HENRYS BLVD 06/16/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 77 No 06/01/2009 77 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/09/2003 82 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes HENRYS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 363B HENRYS BLVD 06/16/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 77 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 84 Yes HERITA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 109 HERITAGE AVE 06/23/2011 78 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 78 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/09/2003 84 Yes 07/01/1997 85 Yes HERMAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 167A HERMANSON ST 03/13/2009 56 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 56 Yes 06/23/2003 72 Yes 07/01/1997 74 Yes HERMAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 167B HERMANSON ST 03/13/2009 43 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 43 Yes 06/23/2003 65 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes HERMAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 167C HERMANSON ST 06/22/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes HEROND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 392 HERON DR 06/16/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 28 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- HIGHST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 228A HIGH ST 03/13/2009 52 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 52 Yes 06/23/2003 50 Yes 08/01/1997 58 Yes HIGHST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 228B HIGH ST 03/13/2009 22 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 22 Yes 06/23/2003 29 Yes 08/01/1997 61 Yes HILLYE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 433 HILLYER LN 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes HOOPER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 441 HOOPER ST 08/16/2012 92 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 92 No 03/13/2009 95 Yes INDEPE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 381 INDEPENDENCE ST 03/13/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes INDEPE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 381B INDEPENDENCE ST 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes INDEPE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 382 INDEPENDENCE CT 03/13/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes INDUST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 376 INDUSTRIAL AVE 08/04/2015 77 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 77 ADT ON 5/9/2012 No 03/13/2009 83 ADT ON 5/9/2012 Yes 06/09/2003 92 ADT ON 5/9/2012 Yes 01/01/1999 100 ADT ON 5/9/2012 No 07/01/1997 34 ADT ON 5/9/2012 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 29 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- INGLEW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 387 INGLEWOOD LN 07/08/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 07/08/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes IRONWO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 390 IRONWOOD TER 06/16/2011 78 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 78 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2004 91 Yes JACOBS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 361 JACOB ST 06/01/2009 79 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 79 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes JAMESS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 122A JAMES ST 06/24/2010 58 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 58 No 03/13/2009 57 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 06/09/2003 91 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 63 Yes JAMESS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 122B JAMES ST 06/24/2010 70 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 70 No 03/13/2009 69 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 19 Yes JAMEST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 357 JAMESTOWN ST 03/13/2009 73 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 73 Yes 06/09/2003 86 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes JANAAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 166 JANA AVE 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 04/06/2004 93 No 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 30 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- JANAAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 166 JANA AVE 03/13/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 07/01/1997 61 Yes JANACT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 160 JANA CT 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 04/12/2004 93 No 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 56 Yes JANSEN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 350 JANSEN WAY 03/13/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 91 Yes 01/01/1995 100 No JOHNSO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 147A JOHNSON ST 03/13/2009 87 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 87 Yes 06/23/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1998 100 No 07/01/1997 71 Yes JOHNSO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 147B JOHNSON ST 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/23/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1998 100 No 07/01/1997 41 Yes JONAHP Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 438 JONAH PL 03/13/2009 95 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 95 Yes JORYST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 307 JORY ST 06/13/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/13/2011 77 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes JOYCES Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 149 JOYCE ST 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 31 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- JOYCES Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 149 JOYCE ST 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1998 100 No 07/01/1997 76 Yes JUDYST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 174A JUDY ST 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 55 Yes JUDYST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 174B JUDY ST 03/13/2009 88 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 80 Yes JULIEC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 173 JULIE CT 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 72 Yes JUNEWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 102A JUNE WAY 06/23/2011 84 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 84 No 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/09/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 80 Yes JUNEWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 102B JUNE WAY 06/23/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes KELOWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 204 KELOWNA CT 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 70 Yes 07/01/1997 75 Yes KELOWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 205 KELOWNA ST 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 32 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- KELOWN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 205 KELOWNA ST 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2003 49 Yes 07/01/1997 59 Yes KEVINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 124 KEVIN CT 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 73 Yes KINGWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 352A KING WAY 06/01/2009 78 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 78 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes 01/01/1992 100 No KINGWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 352B KING WAY 03/13/2009 36 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 36 Yes 06/09/2003 88 Yes 07/01/1997 84 Yes KINGWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 352C KING WAY 06/24/2010 70 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 70 No 03/13/2009 69 Yes 06/09/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes KINGWA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 352D KING WAY 03/13/2009 73 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 73 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/1999 100 No 07/01/1997 15 Yes KOFFLE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 131 KOFFLER AVE 03/13/2009 44 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 44 Yes 06/09/2003 69 Yes 07/01/1997 76 Yes KOTKAS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 247 KOTKA ST 03/13/2009 50 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 50 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 33 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- KOTKAS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 247 KOTKA ST 03/13/2009 50 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2003 62 Yes 07/01/1997 78 Yes LANDAU Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 115A LANDAU DR 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 Yes 06/05/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 77 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes LANDAU Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 115B LANDAU DR 06/23/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 82 No 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/05/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 71 Yes 07/01/1997 71 Yes LAUREL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 112 LAUREL AVE 03/13/2009 20 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 20 Yes 06/23/2003 39 Yes 07/01/1997 50 Yes LAWSON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 256 LAWSON AVE 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/09/2003 26 Yes 07/01/1997 65 Yes LEISUR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 245 LEASURE ST 07/01/2014 73 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 73 ADT ON 7/30/2002 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 06/24/2010 69 ADT ON 7/30/2002 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 03/13/2009 68 ADT ON 7/30/2002 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes 06/23/2003 81 ADT ON 7/30/2002 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes 07/01/1997 81 ADT ON 7/30/2002 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 34 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- LEXING Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 358 LEXINGTON CT 03/13/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes LILACW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 346 LILAC WAY 06/24/2010 70 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 70 No 03/13/2009 69 Yes 06/09/2003 81 Yes 07/01/1997 80 Yes LINDAS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 304 LINDA ST 03/13/2009 18 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 18 Yes 06/23/2003 59 Yes 07/01/1997 52 Yes LINFIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 437 LINFIELD AVE 03/13/2009 100 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 100 Yes LUBAST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 411 LUBA ST 07/01/2014 81 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 81 No 06/22/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes MAPLES Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 238 MAPLE ST 06/20/2011 80 PCI from Inspection 06/20/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 08/01/1997 40 Yes MAPLEW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 447 MAPLEWOOD CT 03/13/2009 78 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 78 Yes MARCEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 125 MAR CEL DR 03/13/2009 48 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 48 Yes 04/16/2008 76 No 06/09/2003 79 Yes 07/01/1997 65 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 35 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- MARCEL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 180 MAR CEL CT 03/13/2009 52 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 52 Yes 04/16/2008 66 No 06/09/2003 71 Yes 07/01/1997 54 Yes MARION Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 150A MARION ST 03/13/2009 88 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/23/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1998 100 No 07/01/1997 72 Yes MARION Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 150B MARION ST 06/28/2011 84 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2011 84 No 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/23/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1998 100 No 07/01/1997 33 Yes MARSHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 162 MARSHALL ST 06/24/2010 77 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 77 No 06/01/2009 76 No 03/13/2009 74 Yes 06/23/2003 74 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes MARYLY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 449 WAY 06/21/2011 84 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 84 No 03/13/2009 86 Yes MAYANN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 364 MAYANNA DR 07/01/2014 78 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 78 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 06/09/2014 68 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 06/24/2010 70 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 03/13/2009 69 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes 04/16/2008 80 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter No 06/09/2003 84 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes 07/01/1997 91 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type A curb & gutter Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 36 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- MCKINL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 146 MCKINLEY ST 06/03/2015 78 PCI from Inspection 06/03/2015 78 ADT ON 4/29/1999 No 07/06/2011 82 ADT ON 4/29/1999 No 03/13/2009 85 ADT ON 4/29/1999 Yes 06/05/2006 100 ADT ON 4/29/1999 No 06/23/2003 46 ADT ON 4/29/1999 Yes 07/01/1997 54 ADT ON 4/29/1999 Yes MCLAUG Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 241A MCLAUGHLIN DR 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/09/2003 64 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes MCLAUG Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 241B MCLAUGHLIN DR 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes 04/16/2008 77 No 06/09/2003 80 Yes 07/01/1997 75 Yes MCLAUG Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 241C MCLAUGHLIN DR 06/21/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 77 No 06/01/2009 78 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 89 Yes MCNAUG Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 302 MCNAUGHT ST 06/13/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/13/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2003 82 Yes 07/01/1997 85 Yes MEADOW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 170 MEADOWVALE LANE 03/13/2009 55 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 55 Yes 06/23/2003 74 Yes 07/01/1997 69 Yes MERICT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 455 MERIDIAN CT 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 37 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- MERIDI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 371A MERIDIAN DR 08/05/2012 87 PCI from Inspection 08/05/2012 87 No 06/01/2009 86 No 03/13/2009 86 Yes MERIDI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 371B MERIDIAN DR 08/05/2012 60 PCI from Inspection 08/05/2012 60 No 08/02/2012 45 No 03/13/2009 37 Yes 06/23/2003 68 Yes 07/01/1997 74 Yes MILLER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 367 MILLER FARM RD 06/01/2009 72 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 72 No 03/13/2009 69 Yes 04/16/2008 85 No 06/09/2003 88 Yes 07/01/1997 88 Yes MILLER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 369 MILLER CT 06/16/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 77 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes MILLST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 137 CHARLES CT 03/13/2009 69 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 69 WIDTH VARIES FROM 26 TO 48 FT Yes 06/09/2003 87 WIDTH VARIES FROM 26 TO 48 FT Yes 07/01/1997 90 WIDTH VARIES FROM 26 TO 48 FT Yes MONTGO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 221A MONTGOMERY ST 06/03/2015 52 PCI from Inspection 06/03/2015 52 No 03/13/2009 54 Yes 06/23/2003 59 Yes 08/01/1997 87 Yes MONTGO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 221B MONTGOMERY ST 06/21/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2003 31 Yes 08/01/1997 70 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 38 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- MTJEFF Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 117 MT. JEFFERSON AVE 03/13/2009 29 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 29 Yes 06/09/2003 68 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes MUIRFI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 386 MUIRFIELD LN 06/01/2009 77 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 77 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes MULBER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 344A MULLBERRY DR 03/13/2009 57 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 57 Yes 06/09/2003 75 Yes 07/01/1997 62 Yes MULBER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 344B MULLBERRY DR 02/23/2010 78 PCI from Inspection 02/23/2010 78 No 06/01/2009 78 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/09/2003 63 Yes 07/01/1997 71 Yes Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 320 ST 06/01/2009 78 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 78 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/23/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 39 Yes NATION Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 375A NATIONAL WAY 08/04/2015 40 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 40 No 10/10/2012 44 No 03/13/2009 16 Yes 06/09/2003 65 Yes 07/01/1997 61 Yes NATION Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 375B NATIONAL WAY 08/04/2015 51 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 51 No 08/14/2014 51 No 10/11/2012 46 No 03/13/2009 43 Yes 06/09/2003 61 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 39 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- NATION Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 375B NATIONAL WAY 08/04/2015 74 PCI from Inspection 07/01/1997 63 Yes NBOONES Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 379A N BOONES FERRY RD 06/09/2014 74 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2014 74 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,693 ADT ON 9/2/2010 No 03/13/2009 82 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,693 ADT ON 9/2/2010 Yes 06/23/2003 43 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,693 ADT ON 9/2/2010 Yes 07/01/1997 74 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,693 ADT ON 9/2/2010 Yes 01/01/1990 100 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,693 ADT ON 9/2/2010 No NBOONES Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 379B N BOONES FERRY RD 06/09/2014 70 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2014 70 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,603 ADT ON 9/2/2010 No 03/13/2009 79 ADT ON 11/12/2003 - 2,603 ADT ON 9/2/2010 Yes NCSCAD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 248B N CASCADE DR 03/13/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 80 Yes 04/16/2008 84 No 06/09/2003 92 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes NCSCAD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 248C N CASCADE DR 03/13/2009 46 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 46 WIDTH VARIES FROM 31 TO 36 FT Yes 04/16/2008 80 WIDTH VARIES FROM 31 TO 36 FT No 06/09/2003 83 WIDTH VARIES FROM 31 TO 36 FT Yes 07/01/1997 67 WIDTH VARIES FROM 31 TO 36 FT Yes NEKIAS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 308 NEKIA ST 06/13/2011 77 PCI from Inspection 06/13/2011 77 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes NEWPOR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 349A NEWPORT WAY 06/15/2011 76 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 76 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 40 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- NEWPOR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 349A NEWPORT WAY 06/15/2011 76 PCI from Inspection 07/01/1997 84 Yes 01/01/1991 100 No NEWPOR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 349B NEWPORT WAY 06/15/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/1999 100 No 07/01/1997 19 Yes NFIRST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 231B N FIRST ST 03/13/2009 54 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 54 Yes 06/23/2003 65 Yes 08/01/1997 66 Yes NFIRST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 231C N FIRST ST 03/13/2009 50 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 50 Yes 06/23/2003 45 Yes 08/01/1997 63 Yes NFIRST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 231D N FIRST ST 06/10/2015 45 PCI from Inspection 06/10/2015 45 No 06/09/2014 45 No 03/13/2009 16 Yes 06/23/2003 21 Yes 08/01/1997 37 Yes NFRONT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 200B N FRONT ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 48 Yes 06/23/2003 73 Yes 07/01/1997 83 Yes 01/01/1990 100 No NFRONT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 200C N FRONT ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 31 Yes 06/23/2003 19 Yes 07/01/1997 54 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 41 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- NFRONT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 200D N FRONT ST 02/17/2010 100 PCI from Inspection 02/17/2010 100 No 03/13/2009 45 Yes 06/23/2003 40 Yes 07/01/1997 38 Yes NFRONT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 200E N FRONT ST 08/07/2012 100 PCI from Inspection 08/07/2012 100 No 03/13/2009 19 Yes 06/23/2003 55 Yes 07/01/1997 50 Yes NFRONT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 200F N FRONT ST 08/07/2012 100 PCI from Inspection 08/07/2012 100 No 03/13/2009 15 Yes 06/23/2003 51 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes NONAME Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 456 NO NAME ST 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes NORTHC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 448 NORTH CT 03/13/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 84 Yes NSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232B N SECOND ST 06/09/2014 45 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2014 45 No 03/13/2009 18 Yes 06/23/2003 42 Yes 08/01/1997 50 Yes NSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232C N SECOND ST 06/09/2014 44 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2014 44 No 03/13/2009 22 Yes 06/23/2003 44 Yes 08/01/1997 55 Yes NSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232D N SECOND ST 06/09/2014 45 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2014 45 No 03/13/2009 19 Yes 06/23/2003 18 Yes 08/01/1997 25 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 42 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- NSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232E N SECOND ST 03/13/2009 17 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 17 Yes 06/23/2003 27 Yes 08/01/1997 62 Yes NSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232F N SECOND ST 06/10/2015 91 PCI from Inspection 06/10/2015 91 ADT ON 10/1/2012 No 06/09/2014 92 ADT ON 10/1/2012 No NSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232G N SECOND ST 06/10/2015 93 PCI from Inspection 06/10/2015 93 No 07/30/2014 100 No 06/09/2014 45 No NSETLR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 257B N SETTLEMIER AV 03/13/2009 78 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 78 Yes 04/16/2008 88 No 06/09/2003 92 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 57 Yes NSETLR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 257C N SETTLEMIER AV 03/13/2009 48 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 48 Yes 04/16/2008 81 No 06/09/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 87 Yes 01/01/1994 100 No NSETLR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 257D N SETTLEMIER AV 01/20/2015 60 PCI from Inspection 01/20/2015 60 ADT ON 8/30/2003 - 5,825 ADT ON 3/25/2010 No 03/13/2009 66 ADT ON 8/30/2003 - 5,825 ADT ON 3/25/2010 Yes 04/16/2008 81 ADT ON 8/30/2003 - 5,825 ADT ON 3/25/2010 No 06/09/2003 85 ADT ON 8/30/2003 - 5,825 ADT ON 3/25/2010 Yes 07/01/1997 87 ADT ON 8/30/2003 - 5,825 ADT ON 3/25/2010 Yes 01/01/1994 100 ADT ON 8/30/2003 - 5,825 ADT ON 3/25/2010 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 43 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- NSETLR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 257E N SETTLEMIER AV 03/13/2009 65 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 65 Yes 04/16/2008 81 No 06/09/2003 86 Yes 01/01/1999 100 No 07/01/1997 66 Yes NUGGET Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 417 NUGGET CT 06/22/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes OAKST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 218A OAK ST 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 51 Yes 08/01/1997 52 Yes OAKST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 218B OAK ST 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes 06/23/2003 20 Yes 08/01/1997 31 Yes OLIVEA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 317 OLIVE AVE 06/01/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 50 Yes OLYMPI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 452 OLYMPIC ST 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes ORCHAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 107A ORCHARD LANE 06/24/2011 86 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2011 86 No 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/09/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 98 Yes ORCHAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 107B ORCHARD LANE 06/23/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 82 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 44 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ORCHAR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 107B ORCHARD LANE 06/23/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2003 29 Yes 07/01/1997 35 Yes OREGON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 252 OREGON WAY 06/01/2009 79 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 79 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/09/2003 92 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes 01/01/1996 100 No OREGON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 254 OREGON CT 06/16/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes OXFORD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 407A OXFORD ST 08/16/2012 88 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 88 No 03/13/2009 100 Yes OXFORD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 407B OXFORD ST 08/16/2012 80 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 80 No 07/10/2012 78 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes PALMAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 316 PALM AVE 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 41 Yes PANACT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 427 PANA CT 07/01/2014 87 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 87 No 06/21/2011 88 No 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 45 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- PANAST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 413A PANA ST 07/01/2014 86 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 86 ADT ON 8/5/2005 No 03/13/2009 89 ADT ON 8/5/2005 Yes 06/23/2004 92 ADT ON 8/5/2005 Yes PANAST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 413B PANA ST 07/01/2014 78 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 78 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes PARADI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 444 PARADISE ST 07/10/2012 88 PCI from Inspection 07/10/2012 88 No 03/13/2009 96 Yes PARKAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 127A PARK AVE 08/04/2015 36 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 36 No 03/13/2009 50 Yes 06/09/2003 88 Yes 07/01/1997 78 Yes PARKAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 127B PARK AVE 08/04/2015 0 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 0 No 03/13/2009 17 Yes 06/09/2003 36 Yes 07/01/1997 61 Yes PARKAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 127C PARK AVE 08/04/2015 53 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 53 ADT ON 4/19/1998 - 1,615 ADT ON 10/19/2000 - 886 ADT ON 2/5/2004 - 1,269 ADT ON 6/2/2009 No 06/11/2015 50 ADT ON 4/19/1998 - 1,615 ADT ON 10/19/2000 - 886 ADT ON 2/5/2004 - 1,269 ADT ON 6/2/2009 No 03/13/2009 50 ADT ON 4/19/1998 - 1,615 ADT ON 10/19/2000 - 886 ADT ON 2/5/2004 - 1,269 ADT ON 6/2/2009 Yes 06/09/2003 77 ADT ON 4/19/1998 - 1,615 ADT ON 10/19/2000 - 886 ADT ON 2/5/2004 - 1,269 ADT ON 6/2/2009 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 46 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- PARKAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 127C PARK AVE 08/04/2015 67 PCI from Inspection 07/01/1997 81 ADT ON 4/19/1998 - 1,615 ADT ON 10/19/2000 - 886 ADT ON 2/5/2004 - 1,269 ADT ON 6/2/2009 Yes PARKAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 127D PARK AVE 08/04/2015 67 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 67 No 06/24/2010 71 No 03/13/2009 70 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 01/01/1999 100 No 07/01/1997 50 Yes PARKCI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 128 PARK CIRCLE 06/23/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 59 Yes PARKVI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 129 PARKVIEW CT 03/13/2009 52 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 52 Yes 06/09/2003 77 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes PARRRD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 201A PARR RD 08/04/2015 79 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 79 ADT ON 12/1/2003 No 03/13/2009 90 ADT ON 12/1/2003 Yes PATRIO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 422 PATRIOT ST 06/01/2009 80 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 04/16/2008 86 No 06/23/2004 89 Yes PAULIN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 113 PAULINE ST 03/13/2009 61 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 61 Yes 06/23/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 79 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 47 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- PAULUS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 395 PAULUS CT 06/01/2009 77 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 77 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/23/2004 82 Yes PRAIRI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 443 PRAIRIE ST 07/10/2012 88 PCI from Inspection 07/10/2012 88 No 03/13/2009 96 Yes PRINCE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 329A PRINCETON RD 07/01/2014 69 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 69 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type C curb No 03/13/2009 67 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 06/09/2003 89 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 07/01/1997 85 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type C curb Yes 01/01/1992 100 No PSL - Residental 25 MPH Type C curb No PRINCE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 329B PRINCETON RD 06/24/2010 76 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 76 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/09/2003 88 Yes 07/01/1997 85 Yes 01/01/1992 100 No PROGRE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 374A PROGRESS WAY 08/04/2015 73 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 73 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/09/2003 92 Yes 01/01/1999 100 No 07/01/1997 31 Yes 01/01/1996 100 No PROGRE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 374B PROGRESS WAY 08/04/2015 75 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 75 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 92 Yes 01/01/1999 100 No 07/01/1997 30 Yes 01/01/1996 100 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 48 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- QUAILR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 384 QUAIL RUN CIR 07/08/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 07/08/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes QUEENC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 130 QUEEN CITY BLVD 07/06/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 07/06/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes QUINNR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 330 QUINN RD 03/13/2009 26 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 26 Yes 04/12/2004 33 No 06/09/2003 33 Yes 07/01/1997 21 Yes QUINNR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 330A QUINN RD 03/13/2009 42 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 42 Yes 04/16/2008 65 No 04/12/2004 69 No 06/09/2003 67 Yes 07/01/1997 71 Yes QUINNR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 330B QUINN RD 03/13/2009 34 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 34 Yes 04/16/2008 27 No 04/12/2004 36 No 06/09/2003 36 Yes 07/01/1997 36 Yes RANDOL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 326 RANDOLPH RD 06/01/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 84 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 07/28/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 74 Yes 07/01/1997 66 Yes RANIER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 327A RAINIER RD 06/15/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 82 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 49 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- RANIER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 327A RAINIER RD 06/15/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2003 30 Yes 07/01/1997 43 Yes RANIER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 327B RAINIER RD 06/15/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 73 Yes 07/01/1997 67 Yes REEDAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 435 REED AVE 03/13/2009 100 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 100 Yes REVERE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 401 REVERE ST 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes ROANOK Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 425A ROANOKE ST 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 89 Yes ROANOK Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 425B ROANOKE ST 03/13/2009 79 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes ROBERT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 360 ROBERT ST 03/13/2009 77 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/09/2003 90 Yes 07/01/1997 95 Yes ROBINA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 430 ROBIN AVE 08/04/2015 45 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 45 ADT ON 7/31/2008 No 06/11/2015 43 ADT ON 7/31/2008 No 03/13/2009 44 ADT ON 7/31/2008 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 50 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- ROYAVE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 416 ROY AVE 06/22/2011 79 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 79 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes SALLAL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 331A SALLAL RD 06/01/2009 83 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 83 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 04/16/2008 89 No 07/28/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 41 Yes 07/01/1997 29 Yes SALLAL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 331B SALLAL RD 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 04/16/2008 89 No 07/28/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 24 Yes 07/01/1997 22 Yes SALLAL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 336 SALLAL CT 06/01/2009 83 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 83 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 07/28/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 44 Yes 07/01/1997 24 Yes SANTIA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 249 SANTIAM DR 03/13/2009 95 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 95 Yes 06/28/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 19 Yes 07/01/1997 21 Yes SAWGRA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 453 SAWGRASS ST 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes SBOONY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 380 S BOONES FERRY RD 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 WIDTH VARIES Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 Yes 06/17/2006 100 WIDTH VARIES Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 51 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- SBOONY Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 380 S BOONES FERRY RD 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2003 20 WIDTH VARIES Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 Yes 07/01/1997 27 WIDTH VARIES Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 Yes SCSCAD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 248A S CASCADE DR 06/24/2010 77 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 77 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 19 Yes SENECA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 161 SENECA CT 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 04/12/2004 93 No 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 53 Yes SENECA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 309A SENECAL CREEK DR 03/22/2016 60 PCI from Inspection 03/22/2016 60 ADT ON 9/16/1998 No 06/14/2011 65 ADT ON 9/16/1998 No 03/13/2009 65 ADT ON 9/16/1998 Yes 06/23/2003 81 ADT ON 9/16/1998 Yes 07/01/1997 81 ADT ON 9/16/1998 Yes SENECA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 309B SENECAL CREEK DR 03/22/2016 75 PCI from Inspection 03/22/2016 75 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes SFIRST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 231A S FIRST ST 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2003 89 Yes 08/01/1997 92 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 52 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- SFRONT Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 200A S FRONT ST 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 Yes 06/17/2006 100 Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 No 06/23/2003 20 Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 Yes 07/01/1997 27 Split From SFRONT200A 03/01/09 Yes SHENAN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 457 SHENANDOAH LN 06/24/2010 69 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 69 No 03/13/2009 69 Yes SILVER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 183A SILVERTON RD 03/13/2009 17 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 17 Yes 06/23/2003 17 Yes 07/01/1997 18 Yes SILVER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 183B SILVERTON RD 03/13/2009 67 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 67 Yes 06/23/2003 18 Yes 07/01/1997 18 Yes SIXTH Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 236A SIXTH ST 03/13/2009 37 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 37 Yes 06/23/2003 32 Yes 08/01/1997 80 Yes SKYLER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 439 SKYLER DR 03/13/2009 95 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 95 Yes SMITHC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 259 SMITH CT 03/13/2009 61 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 61 Yes 04/16/2008 83 No 06/09/2003 87 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes SMITHD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 239A SMITH DR 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/09/2003 72 Yes 07/01/1997 59 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 53 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- SMITHD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 239B SMITH DR 03/13/2009 52 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 52 Yes 04/16/2008 81 No 06/09/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 79 Yes SPRAGU Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 432 SPRAGUE LN 08/04/2015 66 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 66 No 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 72 Yes SSECND Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 232A S SECOND ST 03/13/2009 53 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 53 Yes 06/23/2003 44 Yes 08/01/1997 55 Yes SSETLR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 257A S SETTLEMIER AV 05/06/2013 59 PCI from Inspection 05/06/2013 59 ADT ON 8/13/1997 - 1,291 ADT ON 3/20/2001 - 4,947 ADT ON 8/22/2008 No 03/13/2009 60 ADT ON 8/13/1997 - 1,291 ADT ON 3/20/2001 - 4,947 ADT ON 8/22/2008 Yes 04/16/2008 84 ADT ON 8/13/1997 - 1,291 ADT ON 3/20/2001 - 4,947 ADT ON 8/22/2008 No 06/09/2003 89 ADT ON 8/13/1997 - 1,291 ADT ON 3/20/2001 - 4,947 ADT ON 8/22/2008 Yes 01/01/2000 100 ADT ON 8/13/1997 - 1,291 ADT ON 3/20/2001 - 4,947 ADT ON 8/22/2008 No 07/01/1997 46 ADT ON 8/13/1997 - 1,291 ADT ON 3/20/2001 - 4,947 ADT ON 8/22/2008 Yes STACYA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 255A STACY ALLISON WAY 08/16/2012 91 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 91 No 03/13/2009 95 Yes 04/16/2008 74 No 06/09/2003 81 Yes 07/01/1997 83 Yes STACYA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 255B STACY ALLISON WAY 08/16/2012 90 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 90 No 03/13/2009 96 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 54 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- STACYA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 255C STACY ALLISON WAY 08/16/2012 91 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 91 No 03/13/2009 95 Yes STANFI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 500 STANFIELD RD 07/10/2012 80 PCI from Inspection 07/10/2012 80 No 06/01/2009 84 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 07/28/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 36 Yes 07/01/1997 31 Yes STANFO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 403 STANFORD ST 08/16/2012 79 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 79 No 07/10/2012 77 No 06/01/2009 80 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2004 88 Yes STARKC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 163 STARK CT 03/13/2009 90 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 90 Yes 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 51 Yes STARKS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 159A STARK ST 06/01/2009 79 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 79 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 04/01/2004 93 No 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 59 Yes STARKS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 159B STARK ST 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 85 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 04/06/2004 93 No 06/23/2003 96 Yes 01/01/2002 100 No 07/01/1997 77 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 55 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- STARKS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 159C STARK ST 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Split From STARKS159C 03/01/09 Yes 06/23/2003 45 Split From STARKS159C 03/01/09 Yes 07/01/1997 63 Split From STARKS159C 03/01/09 Yes STARKS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 159D STARK ST 03/13/2009 54 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 54 Split From STARKS159C 03/01/09 Yes 06/23/2003 45 Split From STARKS159C 03/01/09 Yes 07/01/1997 63 Split From STARKS159C 03/01/09 Yes STEVEN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 305 STEVEN ST 03/13/2009 73 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 73 Yes 06/23/2003 82 Yes 07/01/1997 85 Yes Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300F S WOODLAND AVE 07/15/2012 81 PCI from Inspection 07/15/2012 81 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/28/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 34 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300G S WOODLAND AVE 07/15/2012 70 PCI from Inspection 07/15/2012 70 No 06/24/2010 71 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/23/2004 84 Yes SWEETW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 445 SWEETWATER AVE 08/16/2012 82 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 82 No 07/10/2012 81 No 03/13/2009 85 Yes SYCAMO Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 315 SYCAMORE AVE 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2001 100 No 07/01/1997 42 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 56 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- TENOAK Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 310A TEN OAKS LANE 08/04/2015 77 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 77 No 06/14/2011 80 No 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 79 Yes 06/23/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 95 Yes TENOAK Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 310B TEN OAKS LANE 08/04/2015 73 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 73 No 06/14/2011 76 No 03/13/2009 77 Yes 06/23/2003 84 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes THIRD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 233A THIRD ST 06/21/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/21/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2003 64 Yes 08/01/1997 68 Yes THIRD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 233B THIRD ST 06/01/2009 81 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 81 No 03/13/2009 80 Yes 06/23/2003 36 Yes 08/01/1997 46 Yes THIRD Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 233C THIRD ST 06/09/2014 43 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2014 43 ADT ON 8/13/2010 No 03/13/2009 30 ADT ON 8/13/2010 Yes 06/23/2003 55 ADT ON 8/13/2010 Yes 08/01/1997 70 ADT ON 8/13/2010 Yes THOMPS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 332A THOMPSON RD 03/13/2009 88 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 45 Yes 07/01/1997 40 Yes THOMPS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 332B THOMPSON RD 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 57 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- THOMPS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 332B THOMPSON RD 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2003 47 Yes 07/01/1997 21 Yes THOMPS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 332C THOMPSON RD 03/13/2009 88 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 81 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes THOMPS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 332D THOMPSON RD 03/13/2009 86 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 86 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 19 Yes 07/01/1997 39 Yes TIERRA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 126A TIERRA LYNN DR 03/13/2009 72 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 72 Yes 04/16/2008 82 No 06/09/2003 85 Yes 07/01/1997 82 Yes TIERRA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 126B TIERRA LYNN DR 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 85 Yes 04/16/2008 87 No 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 22 Yes TIERRA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 126C TIERRA LYNN DR 02/23/2010 76 PCI from Inspection 02/23/2010 76 No 03/13/2009 75 Yes 06/09/2003 95 Yes 01/01/2000 100 No 07/01/1997 66 Yes TIERRA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 181 TIERRA LYNN CT 03/13/2009 64 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 64 Yes 04/16/2008 77 No 06/09/2003 81 Yes 07/01/1997 59 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 58 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- TIERRA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 182 TIERRA CT 03/13/2009 59 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 59 Yes 04/16/2008 79 No 06/09/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 62 Yes TOMLIN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 114A TOMLIN AVE 06/23/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/23/2011 82 No 03/13/2009 85 Yes 06/05/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 57 Yes 07/01/1997 67 Yes TOMLIN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 114B TOMLIN AVE 03/13/2009 88 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 88 Yes 06/05/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 65 Yes 07/01/1997 64 Yes TOUTST Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 458 TOUT ST 03/13/2009 96 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 96 Yes TRACYL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 420 TRACY LN 06/16/2011 81 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 81 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 07/28/2004 100 No 07/28/2004 100 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes TROONA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 451A TROON AVE 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes TUKWIL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 368A TUKWILA DR 06/16/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes TUKWIL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 368B TUKWILA DR 06/16/2011 82 PCI from Inspection 06/16/2011 82 No 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 59 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- TUKWIL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 368C TUKWILA DR 03/13/2009 13 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 13 Yes 06/09/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 92 Yes TUKWIL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 368D TUKWILA DR 03/13/2009 35 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 35 Yes 06/09/2003 72 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes TUKWIL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 368E TUKWILA DR 06/24/2010 72 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 10/02/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 59 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes TUKWIL Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 368Z TUKWILA DR 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes TULIP Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 460 TULIP AVE 07/01/2014 91 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 91 ADT ON 4/15/2009 - 286 ADT ON 12/15/2010 No 03/13/2009 95 ADT ON 4/15/2009 - 286 ADT ON 12/15/2010 Yes TURNBE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 450 TURNBERRY AVE 03/13/2009 92 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 92 Yes UMPQUA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 333A UMPQUA RD 06/01/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 82 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 07/12/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 64 Yes 07/01/1997 58 Yes UMPQUA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 333B UMPQUA RD 06/01/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 06/01/2009 82 No 03/13/2009 81 Yes 07/12/2004 100 No PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 60 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- UMPQUA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 333B UMPQUA RD 06/01/2009 82 PCI from Inspection 06/09/2003 19 Yes 07/01/1997 31 Yes UMPQUA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 333C UMPQUA RD 06/24/2010 77 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 77 No 03/13/2009 76 Yes 06/09/2003 88 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes 01/01/1991 100 No UMPQUA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 335 UMPQUA CT 06/15/2011 80 PCI from Inspection 06/15/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 07/12/2004 100 No 06/09/2003 74 Yes 07/01/1997 61 Yes UMPQUA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 351 UMPQUA PL 03/13/2009 39 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 39 Yes 06/09/2003 75 Yes 07/01/1997 73 Yes VANDER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 353A VANDERBECK LN 03/13/2009 72 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 72 Yes 06/23/2004 90 Yes VANDER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 353B VANDERBECK LN 06/24/2010 72 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/23/2004 89 Yes VANDER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 353C VANDERBECK LN 06/24/2010 72 PCI from Inspection 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/23/2004 92 Yes VANDER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 353D VANDERBECK LN 03/13/2009 83 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/09/2003 94 Yes 07/01/1997 39 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 61 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- VANDER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 353E VANDERBECK LN 03/13/2009 89 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 89 Yes 06/12/2006 100 No 06/09/2003 20 Yes 07/01/1997 18 Yes VANDER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 353F VANDERBECK LN 03/13/2009 74 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 74 Yes 06/09/2003 91 Yes 07/01/1997 86 Yes 01/01/1992 100 No VANLIE Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 120 VAN LIEU CT 06/11/2015 100 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 100 No 03/13/2009 26 Yes 06/09/2003 63 Yes 07/01/1997 77 Yes VASSER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 409 VASSER ST 08/16/2012 81 PCI from Inspection 08/16/2012 81 No 07/10/2012 80 No 06/17/2011 80 No 03/13/2009 82 Yes 06/23/2004 95 Yes VINEAV Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 459 VINE AVE 07/01/2014 91 PCI from Inspection 07/01/2014 91 ADT ON 4/22/2009 No 03/13/2009 95 ADT ON 4/22/2009 Yes WALKER Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 168 WALKER CT 03/13/2009 84 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2003 89 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes WALTON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 334 WALTON WAY 03/13/2009 30 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 30 Yes 06/09/2003 61 Yes 07/01/1997 51 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 62 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- WARREN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 169A WARREN WAY 06/22/2011 56 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 56 No 03/13/2009 57 Yes 06/23/2003 75 Yes 07/01/1997 78 Yes WARREN Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 169B WARREN WAY 06/22/2011 83 PCI from Inspection 06/22/2011 83 No 03/13/2009 84 Yes 06/23/2003 82 Yes 07/01/1997 90 Yes WESTHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 223A W HAYES ST 03/13/2009 18 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 18 Yes 06/09/2003 45 Yes 07/01/1997 42 Yes WESTHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 223B W HAYES ST 03/13/2009 53 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 53 Yes 06/09/2003 76 Yes 07/01/1997 75 Yes WESTHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 223C W HAYES ST 06/28/2013 53 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2013 53 ADT ON 9/26/2003 - 2,671 ADT ON 5/23/2005 - 2,946 ADT ON 3/19/2008 - 5,821 ADT ON 4/10/2008 - 5,671 ADT ON 4/17/2012 No 03/13/2009 47 ADT ON 9/26/2003 - 2,671 ADT ON 5/23/2005 - 2,946 ADT ON 3/19/2008 - 5,821 ADT ON 4/10/2008 - 5,671 ADT ON 4/17/2012 Yes 04/16/2008 66 ADT ON 9/26/2003 - 2,671 ADT ON 5/23/2005 - 2,946 ADT ON 3/19/2008 - 5,821 ADT ON 4/10/2008 - 5,671 ADT ON 4/17/2012 No 06/09/2003 74 ADT ON 9/26/2003 - 2,671 ADT ON 5/23/2005 - 2,946 ADT ON 3/19/2008 - 5,821 ADT ON 4/10/2008 - 5,671 ADT ON 4/17/2012 Yes 07/01/1997 69 ADT ON 9/26/2003 - 2,671 ADT ON 5/23/2005 - 2,946 ADT ON 3/19/2008 - 5,821 ADT ON 4/10/2008 - 5,671 ADT ON 4/17/2012 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 63 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- WESTHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 223D W HAYES ST 06/28/2013 42 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2013 42 ADT ON 3/12/2008 - 5,571 ADT ON 4/10/2008 No 03/13/2009 25 ADT ON 3/12/2008 - 5,571 ADT ON 4/10/2008 Yes 04/16/2008 24 ADT ON 3/12/2008 - 5,571 ADT ON 4/10/2008 No 06/09/2003 46 ADT ON 3/12/2008 - 5,571 ADT ON 4/10/2008 Yes 07/01/1997 36 ADT ON 3/12/2008 - 5,571 ADT ON 4/10/2008 Yes WESTHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 223E W HAYES ST 06/28/2013 55 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2013 55 ADT ON 7/2/1998 No 03/13/2009 53 ADT ON 7/2/1998 Yes 04/16/2008 75 ADT ON 7/2/1998 No 06/09/2003 86 ADT ON 7/2/1998 Yes 07/01/1997 84 ADT ON 7/2/1998 Yes WESTHA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 223F W HAYES ST 06/28/2013 63 PCI from Inspection 06/28/2013 63 ADT ON 3/4/2001 No 03/13/2009 60 ADT ON 3/4/2001 Yes 06/09/2003 95 ADT ON 3/4/2001 Yes 01/01/2002 100 ADT ON 3/4/2001 No 07/01/1997 41 ADT ON 3/4/2001 Yes WESTLI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 246A W LINCOLN ST 03/13/2009 85 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 85 Yes 05/08/2006 100 No 06/23/2003 73 Yes 07/01/1997 78 Yes WESTLI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 246B W LINCOLN ST 03/13/2009 42 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 42 Yes 04/16/2008 75 No 06/09/2003 78 Yes 07/01/1997 74 Yes WESTLI Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 246C W LINCOLN ST 03/13/2009 83 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 83 Yes WILLAM Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 436 WILLAMETTE ST 03/13/2009 100 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 100 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 64 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- WILLIA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 133 WILLIAMS AVE 03/13/2009 42 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 42 Yes 06/09/2003 70 Yes 07/01/1997 56 Yes WILLOW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 301A WILLOW AVE 08/04/2015 67 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 67 ADT ON 1/10/1997 No 06/01/2009 73 ADT ON 1/10/1997 No 03/13/2009 71 ADT ON 1/10/1997 Yes 06/23/2003 95 ADT ON 1/10/1997 Yes 01/01/2001 100 ADT ON 1/10/1997 No 07/01/1997 53 ADT ON 1/10/1997 Yes WILLOW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 301B WILLOW AVE 08/04/2015 68 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 68 No 06/24/2010 73 No 06/01/2009 71 No 03/13/2009 69 Yes 06/23/2003 77 Yes 07/01/1997 83 Yes WILLOW Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 301C WILLOW AVE 08/04/2015 73 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 73 No 03/13/2009 78 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 81 Yes WILSON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 165A WILSON ST 03/13/2009 66 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 66 Yes 06/23/2003 75 Yes 07/01/1997 53 Yes WILSON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 165B WILSON ST 03/13/2009 33 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 33 Yes 06/23/2003 57 Yes 07/01/1997 74 Yes WILSON Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 165C WILSON ST 03/13/2009 34 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 34 Yes 06/23/2003 59 Yes 07/01/1997 49 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 65 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- WLINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 110E W LINCOLN ST 03/13/2009 59 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 59 Yes 04/16/2008 67 No 06/09/2003 75 Yes 08/01/1997 75 Yes WLINC Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 110F W LINCOLN ST 03/13/2009 35 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 35 Yes 04/16/2008 56 No 06/09/2003 67 Yes 08/01/1997 70 Yes WOODCR Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 217 WOODCREST CT 06/11/2015 0 PCI from Inspection 06/11/2015 0 No 03/13/2009 12 Yes 06/23/2003 24 Yes 07/01/1997 53 Yes WOODLA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300A WOODLAND AV 08/04/2015 46 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 46 ADT ON 6/18/2008 No 06/11/2015 44 ADT ON 6/18/2008 No 03/13/2009 27 ADT ON 6/18/2008 Yes 06/23/2003 75 ADT ON 6/18/2008 Yes 07/01/1997 44 ADT ON 6/18/2008 Yes WOODLA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300B WOODLAND AV 08/04/2015 66 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 66 ADT ON 11/16/2001 No 03/13/2009 72 ADT ON 11/16/2001 Yes 06/23/2003 84 ADT ON 11/16/2001 Yes 07/01/1997 80 ADT ON 11/16/2001 Yes WOODLA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300C WOODLAND AV 08/04/2015 0 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 0 No 03/13/2009 20 Yes 06/23/2003 37 Yes 07/01/1997 30 Yes WOODLA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300D WOODLAND AV 08/04/2015 68 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 68 No 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/23/2003 73 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 66 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- WOODLA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300D WOODLAND AV 08/04/2015 66 PCI from Inspection 07/01/1997 82 Yes WOODLA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 300E WOODLAND AV 08/04/2015 66 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 66 No 06/24/2010 72 No 03/13/2009 71 Yes 06/23/2003 83 Yes 07/01/1997 84 Yes WORKMA Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 240 WORKMAN DR 03/13/2009 83 PCI from Inspection 03/13/2009 83 Yes 06/09/2003 40 Yes 07/01/1997 51 Yes YOUNGS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 157A YOUNG ST 08/04/2015 84 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 84 ADT ON 7/24/2008 No 06/01/2010 100 ADT ON 7/24/2008 No 03/13/2009 38 ADT ON 7/24/2008 Yes 06/23/2003 56 ADT ON 7/24/2008 Yes 07/01/1997 64 ADT ON 7/24/2008 Yes YOUNGS Date Updated PCI Hist Comments 157B YOUNG ST 08/04/2015 84 PCI from Inspection 08/04/2015 84 ADT ON 7/24/2008 - 6,367 ADT ON 2/4/2009 No 06/01/2010 100 ADT ON 7/24/2008 - 6,367 ADT ON 2/4/2009 No 03/13/2009 47 ADT ON 7/24/2008 - 6,367 ADT ON 2/4/2009 Yes 06/23/2003 67 ADT ON 7/24/2008 - 6,367 ADT ON 2/4/2009 Yes 07/01/1997 66 ADT ON 7/24/2008 - 6,367 ADT ON 2/4/2009 Yes PCI History Printed: 04/01/2016 City of Woodburn 190 Garfield Street Woodburn, OR 97071 (503) 980-2408 Street ID Section ID Street Name Last Updated PCI Criteria: 67 SS1017 MTC StreetSaver ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment D Methodology Memo ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 2\FINAL\21071_METHODOLOGY MEMO_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Analysis Methodology and Assumptions Memorandum (Subtask 2.3) Date: February 21, 2018 Project #:21071.2 To: Chris Kerr, City of Woodburn Dan Fricke, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittleson & Associates, Inc. This memorandum documents the methodology and key assumptions to be used in preparation of analyses for the Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update. The methodology and assumptions included in this memorandum are based on guidance provided in the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Transportation System Plan Guidelines (2008, Reference the ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual (APM, Versions 1 and 2, Reference and direction provided by City and ODOT staff. The analyses described in this memorandum will help identify potential deficiencies in the transportation system, including: ▪ Traffic operations at the study intersections under existing and future traffic conditions, ▪ Traffic safety at the study intersections and along study area roadways, ▪ Gaps and deficiencies in the bicycle and pedestrian network, ▪ Gaps and deficiencies in transit service (service frequency, hours, coverage, etc.), and ▪ Gaps and deficiencies in other travel modes. This information will serve as a baseline for identifying a comprehensive list of needs and deficiencies to be addressed as part of the TSP update. It will also serve as a baseline for identifying and evaluating potential solutions and developing a prioritized list of improvements for the TSP update. STUDY INTERSECTIONS AND STUDY SEGMENTS The study intersections and segments for the Woodburn TSP Update were determined by the City and ODOT prior to the development of the scope of the work. There is a total of 22 study intersections located along City and ODOT facilities, including 11 signalized and 11 unsignalized intersections. There are three study segments. Traffic counts were conducted by the Oregon Department of Transportation in fall 2017 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon and consist of 16-hour and 96-hour1 counts, as noted in Table 1 and Table 2. The process for determining the seasonal adjustment factors in Table 1 is discussed in sections below. Table 1: Study Intersections Map ID Intersection Count Date Count Type Peak Hour Start Peak Hour TEV Seasonal Adjustment Factor 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 9/28/2017 16-hour 3:45 PM 822 1.16 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue 9/26/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 1,354 1.06 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 2,560 1.04 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 2,713 1.04 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:00 PM 2,487 1.06 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 2,093 1.06 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:45 PM 1,899 1.06 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,517 1.06 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:00 PM 1,602 1.06 10 Front Street/OR 214 10/5/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 1,733 1.09 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 9/28/2017 16-hour 3:45 PM 1,751 1.06 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E 9/26/2017 16-hour 3:30 PM 2,879 1.05 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road 10/3/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 736 N/A 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:45 PM 701 N/A 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 5:15 PM 795 N/A 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 770 N/A 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street 9/26/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 688 N/A 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue 9/28/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 804 N/A 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue 10/5/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,546 1.05 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street 10/5/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,405 1.05 21 OR 99E/Young Street 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,564 1.05 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 1,798 1.05 Table 2: Study Segments Map ID Intersection Count Date Count Type S1 Willow Avenue – Roadway Segment 9/25 – 9/28/2017 96-hour S2 Hayes Street – Roadway Segment 9/25 – 9/28/2017 84-hour S3 Gatch Street – Roadway Segment 9/25 – 9/28/2017 96-hour 1 Traffic counts collected on the Hayes Street roadway segment included 84 hours of data instead of 96 hours. It is assumed that there were technical difficulties at this location during data collection. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Peak Hour Development The traffic counts were reviewed to determine individual and system-wide peak hours for the operational analyses. The system-wide peak hour for the study intersections was identified as 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The system peak hour will be used to complete the operational analyses in order to accurately represent the overall peak period experienced on the Woodburn roadway system. Seasonal Factors 30th Hour Volumes (30 HV) for the Woodburn TSP Update will be developed based on the traffic counts collected at the study intersections and the application of seasonal adjustment factors consistent with the methodology identified in the APM. The APM outlines three methods for identifying seasonal adjustment factors for highway traffic volumes. All three methods utilize information provided by Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATRs) located in select locations throughout the State Highway System that collect traffic data 24-hours a day, 365 days a year. Each method was evaluated to determine the most appropriate method for the study intersections. Based on the evaluations, a combination of the On-Site ATR method and the Seasonal Trend Table method will be used to develop 30 HV volumes at the ODOT study intersections. The results of the evaluation are summarized below. On-Site ATR Method Based on conversations with ODOT staff and the APM, it was suggested that ATR 24-020 (located west of Woodburn on OR 219) and ATR 24-001 (located north of Woodburn on OR 99E) would be appropriate ATRs for seasonally adjusting the Butteville Road/OR 219 intersection and intersections along OR99E, respectively. The On-Site ATR Method adjustment factors for these ATRs are outlined in Table 3 below. Table 3: Seasonal Adjustment Factors using the On-Site ATR Method ATR Data Month 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Average1 Seasonal Adjustment Factor 24-020 Peak Month (July) 121 120 126 127 135 125 1.16 Count Month (September) 113 109 107 107 107 108 24-001 Peak Month (June/July/August) 111 113 112 112 115 112 1.05 Count Month (September) 106 105 109 107 110 107 1 Shaded values were dropped from the average calculations based on ODOT methodology Seasonal Trend Table Method The Seasonal Trend Table Method uses average values from the ATR Characteristic Table for each seasonal traffic trend. Based on a review of the regional and local traffic trends, a combination of the Interstate Non-Urbanized, Commuter, and Summer seasonal traffic trend values were used to determine the seasonal adjustment factors for the study intersections. Table 4 summarizes the average values for ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon the seasonal traffic trends during the count months of September and October and during the peak period as provided in the ODOT Seasonal Trend Table. Table 4: Season Adjustment Factors using the Seasonal Trend Table Trend Peak Period Seasonal Factor 15-September Seasonal Factor 01-October Seasonal Factor Seasonal Adjustment Factor (September) Average (September) Seasonal Adjustment Factor (October) Average (October) Interstate Non- Urbanized 0.8564 0.9458 N/A 1.1044 N/A N/A N/A Commuter 0.9037 0.9359 0.9431 1.0356 1.0633 1.0436 1.0878 Summer 0.8350 0.9110 0.9452 1.0910 1.1320 The seasonal adjustment factor shown in Table 4 for Interstate Non-Urbanized facilities (1.10) will be used to derive 30 HV volumes at the Interstate 5 (I-5) Ramp Terminals. An average of the seasonal adjustment factors for Commuter and Summer facilities will be used to derive 30 HV at all other ODOT study intersections, with 1.06 for locations with counts conducted in September and 1.09 for locations with counts conducted in October. Historical Factors All of the traffic counts were conducted in 2017; therefore, no historical factors are needed to adjust traffic volumes. Forecast Traffic Volumes Forecast traffic volumes for the Woodburn TSP Update will be developed for the study intersections based on the methodology identified in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design. The methodology combines the year 2017 30 HV traffic volumes developed at the study intersections with base year and future year 2035 traffic volume forecasts from the current Woodburn travel demand model developed by ODOT’s Transportation Planning and Analysis Unit (TPAU). Intersection Operational Standards The study intersections are a mix of ODOT and Woodburn facilities. The ODOT controlled intersections within the study area are located along I-5, OR 219, OR 214, OR 211, and OR 99E. ODOT uses volume-to- capacity (V/C) ratio to assess intersections operations. Table 6 of the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP, Reference 3) and Table 10-2 of the Oregon Highway Design Manual (HDM, Reference 4) provide maximum V/C ratios for all signalized and unsignalized intersections outside the Portland metropolitan area Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The OHP ratios are used to evaluate existing and future no-build conditions, while the HDM ratios are used in the creation of future TSP alternatives which involve projects along state highways. Table 5 summarizes the ODOT standards for the facilities being analyzed through the TSP update process. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Table 5: ODOT Operational Standards Roadway Posted Speed > 35 MPH State Classification System National Highway System National Network (Truck Route) OHP Freight Route OHP Mobility Targets HDM Standard OR 219 (Hillsboro- Silverton Highway 140) No/Yes1 District Yes/No2 No No 0.95/0.901 0.75/0.802 OR 214 (Hillsboro- Silverton Highway 140) No District Yes/No3 Yes No 0.95 0.80 OR 211 (Woodburn- Estacada Highway 161) No/Yes4 District No No No 0.95 0.75/0.80 OR 99E (Pacific Highway East 081) No/Yes5 Regional Highway Yes/No6 Yes No 0.90/0.85 0.75 I-5 Ramp Terminals (Pacific Highway 001) Yes7 Interstate Highway Yes Yes Yes 0.85 0.70 1 The posted speed limit on OR 219 transitions from 35 MPH east of Willow Avenue to 55 MPH west of Willow Avenue. Therefore, the study intersection of Butteville Road/OR 219 has a different set of OHP mobility standards as compared to all other study intersections along OR 219. 2 OR 219 transitions to part of the National Highway System east of Woodland Avenue. Therefore, the study intersections of Butteville Road/OR 219 and OR 219/Woodland Avenue have a different set of HDM standards as compared to all other study intersections along OR 219. 3 OR 214 transitions from being part of the National Highway System at milepost 39.31. 4 The posted speed limit on OR 211 transitions from 35 MPH west of Cooley Road to 45 MPH east of Cooley Road. 5 The posted speed limit on OR 99E transitions from 45 MPH north of Industrial Road to 35 MPH south of Industrial Road, to 45 MPH south of Cleveland Road, and to 55 MPH at milepost 33.34. 6 OR 99E is only identified as a National Highway System route between the mileposts of 31.70 and 32.87. 7 The non-freeway speed limits adjacent to the ramp terminals are less than 45 MPH. Marion County used the following mobility standards, as presented in the current Marion County Rural TSP 2005 Update: ▪ LOS D or better with a V/C ratio of 0.85 or better for signalized, all-way stop, and roundabout intersections. ▪ LOS E or better with a v/c ratio of 0.90 or better for other unsignalized intersections. ▪ LOS D or better with a v/c ratio of 0.60 or better for road segments. The City of Woodburn uses the following mobility standards, as presented in the current Woodburn TSP adopted in 2003: ▪ Level of Service (LOS) for signalized intersections ▪ V/C ratio less than 1.00 regardless of LOS ▪ V/C ratio of less than 0.90 on the critical movement should be maintained, provided the queues on the critical approach can be appropriately accommodated. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon ANALYSIS MODEL PARAMETERS The bullets below identify the proposed sources of data and methodologies to be used to analyze traffic conditions in Woodburn. Analyses of the study area and intersections will be conducted according to the most-recent version of the APM. 1. Intersection/Roadway Geometry (lane numbers and arrangements, cross-section elements, signal phasing, etc.) will be verified for consistency with previous work efforts, reviewed through aerial photography, and confirmed through a site visit. Available as-built data may also be used to verify existing roadway geometry. The analysis models will be built on scaled roadway line work from GIS or aerial photography. ODOT’s two-way stop-controlled intersection calculator tool will be used to calculate expected queue for two-way stop-controlled intersections. 2. Operational Data (such as posted speeds, intersection control, parking, right-turn on red, etc.) will be field verified. Data will be reviewed during a site visit and supplemented by available GIS data, aerials, and photos. 3. Peak Hour Factors (PHF) will be calculated for each intersection and applied to the existing conditions analyses. PHFs of 0.95 will be used for the future analysis for high-order facilities (arterials), with 0.90 applied to medium-order facilities (collectors) and 0.85 applied to local roads. If the existing PHF is greater than these default future values, the existing PHF will be applied. 4. Traffic Operations a. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) methodology will be used to analyze traffic operations at the signalized intersections while the HCM 2010 methodology will be used to analyze traffic operations at the unsignalized intersections. b. The existing and future no-build traffic operations analyses will use 9 software using HCM 2000 reports for signalized intersections and HCM 2010 reports for unsignalized intersections. Electronic 9 files shall be provided to ODOT for review. c. Queuing analysis methodology will be based on 95th percentile queue Microsimulation is not proposed as part of this long-range planning effort. SAFETY ANALYSES Safety analyses will include reviewing historical crash data and examining roadway crossings, as described in the following sections. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Crash Analyses The most recent five years of crash data will be reviewed at the study intersections and roadway segments identified through this planning process. The data will be analyzed for a variety of factors including type, severity, general conditions, and location to identify potential crash patterns or anomalies. Particular attention will be paid to the details of crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists. Study intersection crash rates and critical crash rates will be calculated based on the method outlined in Part B of the Highway Safety Manual. If a critical crash rate cannot be calculated due to limited data, the published 90th percentile rates in Table 4-1 of ODOT’s APM will be used for comparisons purposes. Project-area K-factors from 12+ hour counts will be used to convert short duration counts to daily traffic approach volumes. For all areas that exceed the critical crash rate or 90th percentile rate, we will identify and present crash patterns and potential projects, policies, or studies that could address reported crash types and patterns. Countermeasures suggested for mitigation will be identified as having crash reduction potential based on Crash Modification Factors from the Highway Safety Manual or FHWA’s online Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse with a star rating of 3 or better. All CMFs must have consistent volumes/parameters as the study intersections. NON-AUTOMOBILE ANALYSIS The existing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit network will be reviewed to identify gaps and deficiencies. A gap is defined as a missing link in the network, such as a missing sidewalk on a collector or arterial roadway. A deficiency, or obstacle, is defined as a bicycle or pedestrian facility that is not up to standards or sufficient to meet users’ needs. Examples of deficiencies include: ▪ On-street connection on a collector or arterial roadway that has a Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress rating greater than 2 (Interested but Concerned) ▪ Sidewalks that are too narrow to meet ADA standards or crossings without a curb ramp The multimodal analysis will be performed in accordance with the methodologies identified in Chapter 14 of the APM and identify the needs associated with public transportation, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities and services. The pedestrian and bicycle analyses will be supplemented by a Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS) analysis and a Bicycle Level of Traffic Street (BLTS) analysis, consistent with the APM. Both PLTS and BLTS methods group facilities into four different stress levels for segments, intersection approaches, and intersection crossings. Facilities with an LTS 1 rating have little to no traffic stress, require less attention, and are suitable for all users. Facilities with an LTS 2 rating have little traffic stress, but require more attention and therefore, may or may not be suitable for small children. Facilities with an LTS 3 rating have moderate traffic stress and are suitable for adults. Facilities with an LTS 4 rating have high traffic stress and are only suitable for able-bodied adults with limited options. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon NEXT STEPS We would like to request concurrence from TPAU and ODOT Region 2 on the methodology and key assumptions outlined in this memorandum. This memorandum is being provided prior to beginning the existing conditions analysis and conforms to the project scope. Please contact us with any questions or comments at your earliest convenience. REFERENCES 1. Oregon Department of Transportation. Transportation System Plan Guidelines, 2008. 2. Oregon Department of Transportation. Analysis Procedures Manual, 2012. 3. Oregon Department of Transportation. Oregon Highway Plan, 2012. 4. Oregon Department of Transportation. Highway Design Manual, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment E Existing 2017 Traffic Condition Worksheets ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 1: Butteville Rd & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP updated int1.syn 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 08/02/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 4.7 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 335 89 158 210 41 114 Future Vol, veh/h 335 89 158 210 41 114 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 15 21 18 29 31 15 Mvmt Flow 349 93 165 219 43 119 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 442 0 943 395 Stage 1 - - - - 395 - Stage 2 - - - - 548 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.71 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.71 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.71 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.779 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1038 - 259 627 Stage 1 - - - - 622 - Stage 2 - - - - 525 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1038 - 212 627 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 212 - Stage 1 - - - - 622 - Stage 2 - - - - 430 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 3.9 19.2 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 413 - - 1038 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.391 - - 0.159 - HCM Control Delay 19.2 - - 9.1 0 HCM Lane LOS C - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.8 - - 0.6 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 2: Woodland Ave & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 40 326 2 36 336 134 4 7 51 462 5 41 Future Volume (vph) 40 326 2 36 336 134 4 7 51 462 5 41 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1614 2866 976 1250 2866 1430 1662 1163 1490 1455 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1614 2866 976 1250 2866 1430 1662 1163 1490 1455 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 43 354 2 39 365 146 4 8 55 502 5 45 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 60 0 50 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 354 1 39 365 86 4 13 0 276 272 0 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 3% 16% 50% 33% 16% 4% 0% 50% 28% 6% 20% 11% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 4 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G 4.1 17.4 22.7 4.5 17.8 37.4 5.3 5.3 19.6 19.6 Effective Green, g 4.1 17.4 22.7 4.5 17.8 37.4 5.3 5.3 19.6 19.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.27 0.36 0.07 0.28 0.59 0.08 0.08 0.31 0.31 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 104 787 350 88 805 844 139 97 461 450 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.12 0.00 c0.03 c0.13 0.03 0.00 c0.01 0.19 c0.19 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.45 0.00 0.44 0.45 0.10 0.03 0.13 0.60 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 28.4 19.0 13.0 28.2 18.7 5.6 26.6 26.9 18.5 18.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 0.6 0.0 2.6 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.8 1.9 Delay 30.4 19.6 13.0 30.8 19.4 5.7 26.7 27.3 20.3 20.5 Level of Service C B B C B A C C C C Approach Delay 20.7 16.5 27.3 20.4 Approach LOS C B C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.48 Actuated Cycle Length 63.3 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 609 336 0 641 474 0 0 0 483 0 250 Future Volume (vph) 0 609 336 0 641 474 0 0 0 483 0 250 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 621 343 0 654 484 0 0 0 493 0 255 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 621 343 0 654 484 0 0 0 493 0 198 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 67.7 100.0 53.7 100.0 23.3 37.8 Effective Green, g 67.7 100.0 53.7 100.0 23.3 37.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 1.00 0.54 1.00 0.23 0.38 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1940 1255 1526 1173 631 480 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 0.23 c0.18 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 c0.41 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.27 0.43 0.41 0.78 0.41 Uniform Delay, d1 6.7 0.0 13.9 0.0 36.0 22.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 6.0 0.4 Delay 7.1 0.5 12.4 1.0 42.0 23.3 Level of Service A A B A D C Approach Delay 4.8 7.6 0.0 35.6 Approach LOS A A A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 924 169 0 858 273 242 0 479 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 924 169 0 858 273 242 0 479 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1104 1132 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1104 1132 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 962 176 0 894 284 252 0 499 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 83 83 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 963 176 0 894 284 227 182 176 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 68.2 100.0 68.2 100.0 22.8 22.8 22.8 Effective Green, g 68.2 100.0 68.2 100.0 22.8 22.8 22.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 1.00 0.68 1.00 0.23 0.23 0.23 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1954 1234 1858 1212 307 251 258 v/s Ratio Prot c0.34 0.33 v/s Ratio Perm 0.14 0.23 c0.17 0.16 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.14 0.48 0.23 0.74 0.72 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 7.6 0.0 7.5 0.0 35.8 35.7 35.3 Progression Factor 1.57 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 0.2 0.7 0.4 8.5 9.3 6.6 Delay 12.8 0.2 6.5 0.4 44.3 45.0 41.9 Level of Service B A A A D D D Approach Delay 10.8 5.0 43.7 0.0 Approach LOS B A D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.55 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.9% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 78 851 117 192 675 14 311 28 212 21 35 69 Future Volume (vph) 78 851 117 192 675 14 311 28 212 21 35 69 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1362 2842 1316 1409 2829 1446 1620 1262 1511 1651 1096 Flt Permitted 0.27 1.00 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 394 2842 1316 199 2829 1446 1620 1262 1511 1651 1096 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 80 877 121 198 696 14 321 29 219 22 36 71 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 82 0 1 0 0 0 155 0 0 67 Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 877 39 198 709 0 321 29 64 22 36 4 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 47.0 32.2 32.2 47.0 40.0 29.3 29.3 29.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 Effective Green, g 47.0 32.2 32.2 47.0 40.0 29.3 29.3 29.3 6.2 6.2 6.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.32 0.32 0.47 0.40 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 252 915 [PHONE REDACTED] 423 474 369 93 102 67 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.31 c0.11 0.25 c0.22 0.02 0.01 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.03 0.23 0.05 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.96 0.09 0.73 0.63 0.76 0.06 0.17 0.24 0.35 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 15.7 33.2 23.7 33.0 24.0 32.1 25.4 26.3 44.6 45.0 44.2 Progression Factor 1.02 0.91 1.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 19.4 0.4 7.6 2.3 7.3 0.0 0.2 1.0 1.5 0.3 Delay 16.5 49.7 44.1 40.6 25.2 39.4 25.5 26.5 45.6 46.5 44.5 Level of Service B D D D C D C C D D D Approach Delay 46.6 28.5 33.7 45.2 Approach LOS D C C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.80 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 117 956 25 16 827 56 12 20 5 65 16 86 Future Volume (vph) 117 956 25 16 827 56 12 20 5 65 16 86 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.87 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1553 2746 1471 2718 1525 1407 1385 1429 Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 0.20 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 392 2746 313 2718 1525 1407 1385 1429 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 122 996 26 17 861 58 12 21 5 68 17 90 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 78 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 1021 0 17 915 0 13 21 0 68 29 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 67.6 65.1 54.2 54.2 2.3 5.6 10.3 13.6 Effective Green, g 67.6 65.1 54.2 54.2 2.3 5.6 10.3 13.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.65 0.54 0.54 0.02 0.06 0.10 0.14 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 420 1787 198 1473 35 78 142 194 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.37 0.00 c0.34 0.01 c0.02 c0.05 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.16 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.57 0.09 0.62 0.37 0.27 0.48 0.15 Uniform Delay, d1 13.2 9.7 11.7 15.8 48.1 45.2 42.3 38.1 Progression Factor 0.47 0.63 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.8 0.1 2.0 4.8 1.4 1.8 0.3 Delay 6.4 6.9 11.8 17.8 52.9 46.6 44.2 38.4 Level of Service A A B B D D D D Approach Delay 6.9 17.7 48.7 40.6 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 14.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 7: Cascade Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 971 56 33 906 0 35 Future Vol, veh/h 971 56 33 906 0 35 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 130 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 19 17 10 23 0 24 Mvmt Flow 1033 60 35 964 0 37 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1095 0 - 548 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - - 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.3 - - 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 588 - 0 428 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 588 - - 427 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.4 14.2 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 427 - - 588 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.087 - - 0.06 - HCM Control Delay 14.2 - - 11.5 - HCM Lane LOS B - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.3 - - 0.2 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 8: Settlemier Ave/Boones Ferry Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 98 575 307 107 622 78 236 133 78 114 205 114 Future Volume (vph) 98 575 307 107 622 78 236 133 78 114 205 114 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.71 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1446 1458 1219 1484 1446 1115 1385 1483 1343 1458 1446 881 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1446 1458 1219 1484 1446 1115 1385 1483 1343 1458 1446 881 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 103 605 323 113 655 82 248 140 82 120 216 120 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 95 0 0 47 0 0 62 0 0 99 Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 605 228 113 655 35 248 140 20 120 216 21 Confl. Peds. 26 26 26 26 118 2 2 118 Heavy Vehicles 15% 20% 15% 12% 21% 22% 20% 18% 8% 14% 21% 20% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G 14.8 55.3 80.4 15.5 56.0 56.0 25.1 33.5 33.5 16.3 24.7 24.7 Effective Green, g 14.8 55.3 80.4 15.5 56.0 56.0 25.1 33.5 33.5 16.3 24.7 24.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.40 0.58 0.11 0.40 0.40 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.12 0.18 0.18 Clearance Time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.8 2.5 2.5 4.8 4.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 153 577 702 164 580 447 249 355 322 170 255 155 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 0.41 0.06 c0.08 c0.45 c0.18 0.09 0.08 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.03 0.01 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.67 1.05 0.32 0.69 1.13 0.08 1.00 0.39 0.06 0.71 0.85 0.14 Uniform Delay, d1 60.1 42.1 15.4 59.7 41.8 25.9 57.2 44.5 40.9 59.3 55.6 48.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 10.1 50.8 0.2 10.5 78.3 0.1 55.6 0.5 0.1 11.7 21.7 0.3 Delay 70.2 93.0 15.6 70.2 120.1 26.0 112.8 45.1 41.0 71.0 77.4 48.8 Level of Service E F B E F C F D D E E D Approach Delay 66.5 104.4 80.1 68.2 Approach LOS E F F E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 80.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length 139.6 Sum of lost time 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 9: 5th St/Meridian Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 35 641 39 48 718 43 16 11 29 37 28 38 Future Volume (vph) 35 641 39 48 718 43 16 11 29 37 28 38 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.91 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1484 1437 1338 1428 1216 1153 1281 1359 Flt Permitted 0.29 1.00 0.33 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.73 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 447 1437 464 1428 912 1153 985 1359 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 36 654 40 49 733 44 16 11 30 38 29 39 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 27 0 0 36 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 693 0 49 776 0 16 14 0 38 32 0 Confl. Peds. 9 33 33 9 18 4 4 18 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 12% 20% 27% 24% 22% 10% 33% 50% 26% 29% 4% 22% Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 67.5 64.0 67.5 64.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 Effective Green, g 67.5 64.0 67.5 64.2 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.75 0.71 0.75 0.71 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.08 Clearance Time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 5.3 2.5 5.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 372 1020 381 1017 76 97 83 114 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.48 c0.00 c0.54 0.01 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.09 0.02 c0.04 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.68 0.13 0.76 0.21 0.14 0.46 0.28 Uniform Delay, d1 4.2 7.3 3.7 8.2 38.5 38.2 39.3 38.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 2.5 0.1 4.2 1.0 0.5 2.9 1.0 Delay 4.3 9.8 3.8 12.3 39.5 38.7 42.2 39.7 Level of Service A A A B D D D D Approach Delay 9.5 11.8 38.9 40.6 Approach LOS A B D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 13.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.70 Actuated Cycle Length 90.1 Sum of lost time 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 10: OR 214 & Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 17 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 96 703 788 150 65 53 Future Vol, veh/h 96 703 788 150 65 53 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 0 0 8 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Yield - None Storage Length 130 - - 60 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 21 18 18 30 24 Mvmt Flow 102 748 838 160 69 56 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 846 0 - 0 1798 846 Stage 1 - - - - 846 - Stage 2 - - - - 952 - Critical Hdwy 4.35 - - - 6.7 6.44 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.7 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.7 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.425 - - - 3.77 3.516 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 701 - - - 75 331 Stage 1 - - - - 377 - Stage 2 - - - - 334 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 701 - - - ~ 63 328 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 63 - Stage 1 - - - - 374 - Stage 2 - - - - 283 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.3 0 257.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 701 - - - 99 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.146 - - - 1.268 HCM Control Delay 11 - - - 257.8 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - - 8.7 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 11: Park Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 12.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 639 54 106 822 17 15 3 91 23 4 63 Future Vol, veh/h 12 639 54 106 822 17 15 3 91 23 4 63 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 14 14 0 4 22 0 0 0 0 22 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 90 - - 185 - - - - - - - 55 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 23 16 9 23 38 0 0 10 9 25 7 Mvmt Flow 13 702 59 116 903 19 16 3 100 25 4 69 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 926 0 0 776 0 0 1942 1931 746 1960 1952 939 Stage 1 - - - - - - 772 772 - 1150 1150 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 1170 1159 - 810 802 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 - - 4.19 - - 7.1 6.5 6.3 7.19 6.75 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.75 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.75 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 - - 2.281 - - 3.5 4 3.39 3.581 4.225 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 710 - - 810 - - 50 67 401 46 56 313 Stage 1 - - - - - - 395 412 - 234 247 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 237 272 - 364 365 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 695 - - 810 - - 30 55 396 29 46 305 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - 30 55 - 29 46 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 382 399 - 229 211 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 150 232 - 265 353 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1.1 104.7 114.7 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 139 695 - - 810 - - 31 305 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.862 0.019 - - 0.144 - - 0.957 0.227 HCM Control Delay 104.7 10.3 - - 10.2 - 335.3 20.2 HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 5.6 0.1 - - 0.5 - - 3.3 0.9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 159 324 251 203 240 60 230 368 92 160 790 127 Future Volume (vph) 159 324 251 203 240 60 230 368 92 160 790 127 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1326 2906 2639 1054 1374 2927 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1326 2906 2639 1054 1374 2927 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 166 338 261 211 250 62 240 383 96 167 823 132 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 200 0 7 0 0 0 65 0 9 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 166 338 61 211 306 0 240 383 31 167 946 0 Confl. Peds. 5 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 17% 18% 20% 24% 25% 40% 11% 26% 38% 21% 10% 19% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G 23.3 30.5 30.5 23.3 30.5 14.4 40.7 41.8 15.5 41.8 Effective Green, g 23.3 30.5 30.5 23.3 30.5 14.4 40.7 41.8 15.5 41.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.23 0.11 0.31 0.32 0.12 0.32 Clearance Time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 254 347 285 240 311 321 826 338 163 941 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.23 c0.16 c0.23 c0.08 0.15 0.12 c0.32 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.97 0.21 0.88 0.98 0.75 0.46 0.09 1.02 1.00 Uniform Delay, d1 49.6 49.4 40.1 52.0 49.5 56.0 35.9 30.8 57.2 44.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 0.71 0.32 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.9 41.1 0.4 28.4 46.5 7.8 1.6 0.5 77.1 30.5 Delay 55.5 90.5 40.5 80.4 96.0 73.3 27.2 10.2 134.3 74.6 Level of Service E F D F F E C B F E Approach Delay 65.8 89.7 40.3 83.5 Approach LOS E F D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 70.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 13: Boones Ferry Rd & Crosby Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 5 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 44 121 29 61 7 51 119 15 14 219 38 Future Vol, veh/h 18 44 121 29 61 7 51 119 15 14 219 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 39 23 6 31 20 86 22 13 27 36 13 16 Mvmt Flow 19 47 129 31 65 7 54 127 16 15 233 40 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.5 10.6 11.3 13.4 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 28% 10% 30% 5% Vol Thru, % 64% 24% 63% 81% Vol Right, % 8% 66% 7% 14% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 185 183 97 271 LT Vol 51 18 29 14 Through Vol 119 44 61 219 RT Vol 15 121 7 38 Lane Flow Rate 197 195 103 288 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.31 0.313 0.178 0.455 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.674 5.787 6.218 5.678 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 634 621 577 634 Service Time 3.71 3.824 4.262 3.71 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.311 0.314 0.179 0.454 HCM Control Delay 11.3 11.5 10.6 13.4 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1.3 1.3 0.6 2.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 14: Front St & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 6 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.6 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 129 65 128 113 96 144 Future Vol, veh/h 129 65 128 113 96 144 Peak Hour Factor 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 Heavy Vehicles, % 12 28 15 19 22 24 Mvmt Flow 154 77 152 135 114 171 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 11.4 11.1 12.4 HCM LOS B B B Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 66% 40% Vol Thru, % 53% 0% 60% Vol Right, % 47% 34% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 241 194 240 LT Vol 0 129 96 Through Vol 128 0 144 RT Vol 113 65 0 Lane Flow Rate 287 231 286 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.39 0.348 0.424 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.889 5.418 5.338 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 729 656 669 Service Time 2.976 3.514 3.428 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.394 0.352 0.428 HCM Control Delay 11.1 11.4 12.4 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1.9 1.6 2.1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 15: Front St & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 7 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh14.2 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 105 13 31 115 51 10 147 36 24 134 23 Future Vol, veh/h 12 105 13 31 115 51 10 147 36 24 134 23 Peak Hour Factor 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 25 31 16 25 18 30 13 28 54 20 9 Mvmt Flow 16 142 18 42 155 69 14 199 49 32 181 31 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 12.5 14 14.4 15.3 HCM LOS B B B C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 5% 9% 16% 13% Vol Thru, % 76% 81% 58% 74% Vol Right, % 19% 10% 26% 13% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 193 130 197 181 LT Vol 10 12 31 24 Through Vol 147 105 115 134 RT Vol 36 13 51 23 Lane Flow Rate 261 176 266 245 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.45 0.315 0.447 0.454 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.217 6.461 6.043 6.68 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 574 552 591 536 Service Time 4.303 4.558 4.13 4.766 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.455 0.319 0.45 0.457 HCM Control Delay 14.4 12.5 14 15.3 HCM Lane LOS B B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 1.3 2.3 2.3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 16: Front St & Garfield St/Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 8 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.9 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 21 174 5 29 151 49 12 120 27 37 108 25 Future Vol, veh/h 21 174 5 29 151 49 12 120 27 37 108 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 20 40 38 23 14 25 15 22 19 18 24 Mvmt Flow 23 189 5 32 164 53 13 130 29 40 117 27 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.5 13 11.4 11.4 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 8% 10% 13% 22% Vol Thru, % 75% 87% 66% 64% Vol Right, % 17% 3% 21% 15% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 159 200 229 170 LT Vol 12 21 29 37 Through Vol 120 174 151 108 RT Vol 27 5 49 25 Lane Flow Rate 173 217 249 185 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.286 0.338 0.408 0.301 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.95 5.602 5.895 5.87 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 603 641 610 612 Service Time 3.999 3.648 3.938 3.919 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.287 0.339 0.408 0.302 HCM Control Delay 11.4 11.5 13 11.4 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 1.5 2 1.3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 17: Front St & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 9 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 11 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 14 138 15 45 83 42 7 78 16 47 84 17 Future Vol, veh/h 14 138 15 45 83 42 7 78 16 47 84 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 0.77 Heavy Vehicles, % 14 23 13 11 28 14 43 18 50 9 21 12 Mvmt Flow 18 179 19 58 108 55 9 101 21 61 109 22 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 11.1 10.9 10.9 11.1 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1NBLn2 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 8% 0% 8% 26% 32% Vol Thru, % 92% 0% 83% 49% 57% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 9% 25% 11% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 85 16 167 170 148 LT Vol 7 0 14 45 47 Through Vol 78 0 138 83 84 RT Vol 0 16 15 42 17 Lane Flow Rate 110 21 217 221 192 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5 Degree of Util 0.208 0.032 0.327 0.326 0.3 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.772 5.589 5.429 5.32 5.615 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 531 640 661 676 640 Service Time 4.508 3.324 3.463 3.353 3.649 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.207 0.033 0.328 0.327 0.3 HCM Control Delay 11.3 8.5 11.1 10.9 11.1 HCM Lane LOS B A B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 0.1 1.4 1.4 1.3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 18: Settlemier Ave & Parr Road/Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 10 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh11.5 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 67 81 56 52 70 8 50 101 33 4 119 85 Future Vol, veh/h 67 81 56 52 70 8 50 101 33 4 119 85 Peak Hour Factor 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 Heavy Vehicles, % 49 27 21 25 37 12 14 9 21 0 21 28 Mvmt Flow 83 100 69 64 86 10 62 125 41 5 147 105 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.3 12.2 10.6 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 33% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 3% 0% Vol Thru, % 67% 0% 0% 59% 0% 90% 97% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 41% 0% 10% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 151 33 67 137 52 78 123 85 LT Vol 50 0 67 0 52 0 4 0 Through Vol 101 0 0 81 0 70 119 0 RT Vol 0 33 0 56 0 8 0 85 Lane Flow Rate 186 41 83 169 64 96 152 105 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util 0.344 0.064 0.174 0.301 0.131 0.186 0.263 0.171 Departure Headway (Hd) 6.647 5.682 7.582 6.405 7.327 6.953 6.236 5.872 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 541 629 473 560 489 515 576 610 Service Time 4.398 3.433 5.331 4.154 5.08 4.706 3.987 3.622 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.344 0.065 0.175 0.302 0.131 0.186 0.264 0.172 HCM Control Delay 12.9 8.8 11.9 11.9 11.2 11.3 11.2 9.8 HCM Lane LOS B A B B B B B A HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 0.2 0.6 1.3 0.4 0.7 1 0.6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 77 47 57 112 35 45 54 870 70 60 1160 86 Future Volume (vph) 77 47 57 112 35 45 54 870 70 60 1160 86 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1493 1227 1479 1206 1363 2671 1458 2736 Flt Permitted 0.57 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.14 1.00 0.24 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 873 1227 902 1206 204 2671 369 2736 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 82 50 61 119 37 48 57 926 74 64 1234 91 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 49 0 0 39 0 4 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 132 12 0 156 9 57 996 0 64 1321 0 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 91.4 85.7 91.4 82.1 Effective Green, g 25.1 25.1 25.1 25.1 91.4 85.7 91.4 82.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.70 0.66 0.70 0.63 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 168 236 174 [PHONE REDACTED] 307 1727 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.37 0.01 c0.48 v/s Ratio Perm 0.15 0.01 c0.17 0.01 0.16 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.05 0.90 0.04 0.25 0.57 0.21 0.77 Uniform Delay, d1 49.9 42.7 51.2 42.7 19.7 12.0 6.9 17.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.42 0.85 0.72 0.99 Incremental Delay, d2 20.4 0.1 39.8 0.1 0.4 1.2 0.1 1.8 Delay 70.3 42.8 90.9 42.7 8.6 11.4 5.1 18.8 Level of Service E D F D A B A B Approach Delay 61.6 79.6 11.2 18.2 Approach LOS E E B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 79 8 59 21 7 22 48 893 11 15 1277 86 Future Volume (vph) 79 8 59 21 7 22 48 893 11 15 1277 86 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1291 1434 1124 1446 2629 1288 2724 Flt Permitted 0.82 0.76 1.00 0.13 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1082 1128 1124 203 2629 351 2724 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 9 63 22 7 23 51 950 12 16 1359 91 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 20 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 136 0 0 29 4 51 962 0 16 1448 0 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 20.4 20.4 20.4 96.1 89.1 96.1 90.9 Effective Green, g 20.4 20.4 20.4 96.1 89.1 96.1 90.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.74 0.69 0.74 0.70 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 169 177 [PHONE REDACTED] 309 1904 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 c0.37 0.00 c0.53 v/s Ratio Perm c0.13 0.03 0.00 0.18 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.16 0.02 0.26 0.53 0.05 0.76 Uniform Delay, d1 52.9 47.4 46.3 7.4 10.1 8.3 12.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.07 0.75 1.25 0.55 Incremental Delay, d2 22.8 0.3 0.0 0.4 1.0 0.0 2.1 Delay 75.7 47.7 46.4 8.3 8.6 10.4 8.9 Level of Service E D D A A B A Approach Delay 75.7 47.1 8.6 8.9 Approach LOS E D A A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 13.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.77 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 112 114 60 58 151 243 48 590 27 249 920 120 Future Volume (vph) 112 114 60 58 151 243 48 590 27 249 920 120 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1222 1321 1463 1293 1179 2700 1373 2759 Flt Permitted 0.42 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.22 1.00 0.37 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 543 1321 1094 1293 271 2700 531 2759 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 115 61 59 153 245 48 596 27 252 929 121 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 16 0 0 0 89 0 2 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 160 0 0 212 156 48 621 0 252 1044 0 Confl. Peds. 4 4 1 2 2 1 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 36% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 41% 22% 27% 21% 18% 19% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 88.5 72.1 88.5 82.7 Effective Green, g 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 88.5 72.1 88.5 82.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.68 0.55 0.68 0.64 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 116 284 235 [PHONE REDACTED] 467 1755 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.01 0.23 0.07 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm c0.21 0.19 0.12 0.14 c0.30 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.56 0.90 0.56 0.21 0.41 0.54 0.59 Uniform Delay, d1 50.6 45.6 49.7 45.5 8.1 16.7 16.5 13.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.41 1.31 Incremental Delay, d2 74.9 2.1 33.6 2.1 0.4 0.8 0.6 1.0 Delay 125.5 47.6 83.3 47.6 8.5 17.6 23.9 19.1 Level of Service F D F D A B C B Approach Delay 78.1 64.2 16.9 20.0 Approach LOS E E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 22: OR 99E & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 12.3 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 84 60 57 663 792 215 Future Vol, veh/h 84 60 57 663 792 215 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 110 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 21 35 31 25 29 16 Mvmt Flow 91 65 62 721 861 234 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1463 549 1096 0 - 0 Stage 1 979 - - - - - Stage 2 484 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.22 7.6 4.72 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.22 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.22 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.71 3.65 2.51 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 100 404 488 - - - Stage 1 284 - - - - - Stage 2 534 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 79 403 488 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 79 - - - - - Stage 1 284 - - - - - Stage 2 420 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 148.6 2.2 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 488 - 79 403 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.127 - 1.156 0.162 - - HCM Control Delay 13.4 1.2 243.5 15.7 - - HCM Lane LOS B A F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - 6.7 0.6 - - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 2: Woodland Ave & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 43 354 2 39 365 146 4 63 276 276 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.44 0.01 0.23 0.45 0.14 0.02 0.32 0.59 0.59 Control Delay 35.5 24.7 0.0 36.3 24.2 1.5 34.8 17.8 27.0 26.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.5 24.7 0.0 36.3 24.2 1.5 34.8 17.8 27.0 26.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 63 0 14 65 0 2 3 98 96 Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 141 0 54 143 19 12 43 228 227 Internal Link Dist (ft) 439 969 574 512 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 140 225 95 110 340 Base Capacity (vph) 629 2127 [PHONE REDACTED] 1340 [PHONE REDACTED] 1082 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.17 0.00 0.08 0.17 0.11 0.00 0.09 0.25 0.26 Intersection Summary ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 2 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 621 343 654 484 493 255 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.27 0.43 0.41 0.78 0.48 Control Delay 7.8 0.5 13.3 1.2 44.9 17.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.8 0.5 13.3 1.2 44.9 17.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 0 94 0 152 76 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 0 150 6 193 134 Internal Link Dist (ft) 969 680 Turn Bay Length (ft) 270 525 650 425 Base Capacity (vph) 1941 1255 1527 1173 962 601 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.27 0.43 0.41 0.51 0.42 Intersection Summary ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 3 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 963 176 894 284 227 265 259 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.14 0.48 0.23 0.74 0.79 0.76 Control Delay 15.0 0.2 7.6 0.4 49.3 37.5 34.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.0 0.2 7.6 0.4 49.3 37.5 34.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 243 0 85 0 144 107 96 Queue Length 95th (ft) 353 0 278 m0 198 186 170 Internal Link Dist (ft) 680 816 933 Turn Bay Length (ft) 565 405 600 275 Base Capacity (vph) 1955 1234 1859 1212 479 461 471 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.14 0.48 0.23 0.47 0.57 0.55 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 4 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 80 877 121 198 710 321 29 219 22 36 71 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.91 0.23 0.75 0.60 0.76 0.06 0.42 0.20 0.30 0.31 Control Delay 15.7 43.1 9.8 48.5 25.5 46.4 27.4 6.8 46.9 49.5 3.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 15.7 43.1 9.8 48.5 25.5 46.4 27.4 6.8 46.9 49.5 3.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 212 3 91 235 187 13 0 13 22 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m67 #417 59 #194 318 #345 37 58 37 53 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 816 528 708 401 Turn Bay Length (ft) 175 310 375 325 330 70 70 Base Capacity (vph) 341 963 [PHONE REDACTED] 423 474 524 234 255 303 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.23 0.91 0.23 0.75 0.60 0.76 0.06 0.42 0.09 0.14 0.23 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 5 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 122 1022 17 919 13 26 68 107 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.53 0.07 0.56 0.13 0.27 0.50 0.39 Control Delay 4.9 6.9 11.9 15.6 45.0 44.1 54.8 15.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.9 6.9 11.9 15.6 45.0 44.1 54.8 15.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 9 52 4 189 8 13 42 9 Queue Length 95th (ft) m15 m112 17 298 26 39 82 60 Internal Link Dist (ft) 528 586 584 244 Turn Bay Length (ft) 305 185 150 55 Base Capacity (vph) 407 1941 316 1629 244 229 221 334 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.30 0.53 0.05 0.56 0.05 0.11 0.31 0.32 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 8: Settlemier Ave/Boones Ferry Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 6 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 103 605 323 113 655 82 248 140 82 120 216 120 v/c Ratio 0.67 1.05 0.41 0.69 1.13 0.17 1.00 0.39 0.21 0.71 0.85 0.48 Control Delay 82.5 92.3 6.5 81.8 118.0 7.8 113.5 50.9 10.8 82.0 84.4 15.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 82.5 92.3 6.5 81.8 118.0 7.8 113.5 50.9 10.8 82.0 84.4 15.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 92 ~610 37 101 ~703 2 ~234 108 0 108 192 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 161 #942 108 173 #1045 40 #459 198 48 181 #326 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1985 1344 5001 6623 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 190 225 150 285 110 175 775 Base Capacity (vph) 260 577 797 267 579 490 249 355 384 262 312 276 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 1.05 0.41 0.42 1.13 0.17 1.00 0.39 0.21 0.46 0.69 0.43 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 9: 5th St/Meridian Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 7 Lane Group EBL EBT WBL WBT NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 694 49 777 16 41 38 68 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.65 0.12 0.72 0.17 0.27 0.36 0.38 Control Delay 3.0 12.4 3.2 15.2 40.9 22.8 47.5 26.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.0 12.4 3.2 15.2 40.9 22.8 47.5 26.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 214 4 268 8 6 20 15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 427 14 #621 29 36 53 56 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1344 2218 301 478 Turn Bay Length (ft) 100 150 150 60 Base Capacity (vph) 601 1077 577 1073 313 418 340 493 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.64 0.08 0.72 0.05 0.10 0.11 0.14 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 8 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 166 338 261 211 313 240 383 96 167 955 v/c Ratio 0.65 0.97 0.54 0.88 0.99 0.75 0.46 0.24 1.02 1.01 Control Delay 61.8 91.7 9.2 85.2 95.7 78.1 28.0 3.2 132.8 74.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 61.8 91.7 9.2 85.2 95.7 78.1 28.0 3.2 132.8 74.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 129 284 0 171 258 84 52 16 ~149 ~472 Queue Length 95th (ft) 208 #478 77 #300 #452 137 122 m19 #296 #609 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1924 [PHONE REDACTED] Turn Bay Length (ft) 260 215 250 190 220 Base Capacity (vph) 278 347 485 263 317 346 825 404 163 949 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.97 0.54 0.80 0.99 0.69 0.46 0.24 1.02 1.01 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 9 Lane Group EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 132 61 156 48 57 1000 64 1325 v/c Ratio 0.79 0.20 0.90 0.16 0.24 0.56 0.20 0.76 Control Delay 79.5 4.8 96.5 2.2 6.1 12.4 5.0 20.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 79.5 4.8 96.5 2.2 6.1 12.4 5.0 20.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 105 0 127 0 4 361 8 597 Queue Length 95th (ft) #181 19 #231 6 m9 498 m10 m632 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3911 440 1076 1586 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 80 85 85 Base Capacity (vph) 204 355 211 [PHONE REDACTED] 367 1753 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.17 0.74 0.14 0.23 0.56 0.17 0.76 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 10 Lane Group EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 156 29 23 51 962 16 1450 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.16 0.09 0.24 0.52 0.05 0.75 Control Delay 75.4 46.3 0.7 7.5 10.3 6.7 10.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 75.4 46.3 0.7 7.5 10.3 6.7 10.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 109 21 0 10 134 2 102 Queue Length 95th (ft) 181 48 0 m23 434 m6 306 Internal Link Dist (ft) 4110 594 2344 1076 Turn Bay Length (ft) 50 85 100 Base Capacity (vph) 255 247 [PHONE REDACTED] 393 1927 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.12 0.07 0.17 0.52 0.04 0.75 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Existing Year 2017 Conditions 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour C:\Users\mmccormick\Desktop\working 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/19/2018 Page 11 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT Lane Group Flow (vph) 113 176 212 245 48 [PHONE REDACTED] v/c Ratio 0.97 0.59 0.90 0.67 0.21 0.41 0.55 0.59 Control Delay 125.0 47.3 86.7 32.8 9.1 18.2 22.9 21.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 125.0 47.3 86.7 32.8 9.1 18.2 22.9 21.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 93 117 172 100 12 155 59 455 Queue Length 95th (ft) #198 187 #278 187 28 218 m151 548 Internal Link Dist (ft) 3376 [PHONE REDACTED] Turn Bay Length (ft) 30 40 60 60 Base Capacity (vph) 144 365 290 [PHONE REDACTED] 461 1781 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.78 0.48 0.73 0.58 0.18 0.41 0.55 0.59 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment F ODOT Crash Data ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Boones Ferry Rd & Crosby Rd January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: TOTAL FINAL TOTAL Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Boones Ferry Rd / Settlemier Ave & OR 214 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2013 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 5 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 YEAR: 2011 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 FINAL TOTAL 0 4 3 7 1 5 2 4 3 7 0 1 0 8 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Boones Ferry Rd / Settlemier Ave & OR 214 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 02557 N N INTER CROSS Y FIX OBJ Y 08/03/2012 01 CLR N NONE 040 MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE FIX E Fri 040 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 N HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 6P MN PDO 37.87 DAY N 0 CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 047,080,081 01 017 05 SETTLEMIER AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.04 -122 51 34.65 14 00012 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 01/03/2012 07 CLR N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W BOONES FERRY RD W WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 37.87 DAY N 0 CAR 37 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.14 -122 51 35.96 NONE STOP 02 0 E 004 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 38 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 83924 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 10/14/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR E Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W BOONES FERRY RD W WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 37.87 DAY N 0 CAR 53 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.04 -122 51 34.65 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 46 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F N-RES 14 02839 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 07/28/2015 08 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 1 1 NO RPT TURN W Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 N BOONES FERRY RD CN WOODBURN 0 9A MN INJ 37.87 DAY N 0 SEMI TOW 49 DRVR OR-Y 006 08 000 01 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.04 -122 51 34.65 NONE TURN-R 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 N CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 03 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 14 00211 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 01/21/2011 04 RAIN N NONE MARION Y N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN N Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W BOONES FERRY RD CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN INJ 37.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.04 -122 51 34.65 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 45 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR>25 14 03856 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 08/25/2013 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NO RPT TURN N Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W BOONES FERRY RD CN WOODBURN 0 3A MN INJ 37.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 097 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.04 -122 51 34.65 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Boones Ferry Rd / Settlemier Ave & OR 214 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 47 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 02 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 14 02927 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 08/29/2013 04 RAIN N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Thu 013 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E BOONES FERRY RD CN WOODBURN 0 5A MN INJ 37.87 DAWN N 1 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJB 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 58.04 -122 51 34.65 52 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 F NONE 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 45 DRVR NONE 000 00 000 INJB 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 S 00 PRVTE 012 N CAR 45 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Butteville Rd & OR 219 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 1 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SIDESWIPE - MEETING 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 1 3 4 0 3 1 2 2 4 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2014 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2014 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SIDESWIPE - MEETING 2012 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2011 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 1 7 8 0 6 2 4 4 8 0 1 0 2 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Butteville Rd & OR 219 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 06 00137 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 01/14/2014 07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 COUNTY REAR N Tue 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S UN 0 7P MN PDO 36.02 DARK N 0 CAR 27 DRVR SUSP 026 07 000 06 NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE STOP 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 012 S CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 06 02907 N N INTER 3-LEG Y FIX OBJ Y 09/04/2011 30,03 CLR N NONE 088 MARION N N 01 0 1 STATE FIX N Sun 088 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S N 0 10P MN PDO 36.02 DARK N 0 CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 050,021,081 30,03 000 05 NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE PRKD-P 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 032 S CAR 06 02466 N N INTER 3-LEG N Y 07/26/2012 01 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT SS-M W Thu 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 007 E E 0 7A MN PDO 36.02 DAY N 0 CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 047,080 01 000 06 NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 06 02702 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 08/19/2011 07 CLR N NONE 013 MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR N Fri 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 S S 0 1P MN PDO 36.02 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE STOP 02 0 N 013 00 PRVTE 011 S CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 N 00 PRVTE 022 S CAR 28 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 16 01065 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 03/23/2015 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR N Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN RENTL 000 S S 0 10A MN INJ 36.02 DAY N 0 CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Butteville Rd & OR 219 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 012 S CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 17 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 16 03986 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 10/16/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR N Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S S 0 6A MN PDO 36.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 57 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE STOP 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 012 S CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 F UNK 16 01241 N N INTER 3-LEG N N 04/06/2015 10 CLR N NONE 128 MARION 01 0 1 NONE SS-M S Mon 128 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 N CN 0 5P MN PDO 36.02 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 079,080 10 000 02 WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE 02 0 N 128 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 40 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 16 00038 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 01/05/2015 02 RAIN N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NONE TURN S Mon 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W CN 0 1A MN PDO 36.02 DARK N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 028 02 000 03 WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 014000100S00 45 9 4.13 -122 53 47.58 NONE 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 N CAR 36 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Cascade Dr & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 2014 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 3 1 4 0 2 2 4 0 4 0 0 0 3 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cascade Dr & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 03549 N N INTER 3-LEG N N 10/10/2014 13 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE SS-O W Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E CASCADE DR E WOODBURN 0 10A MN INJ 37.27 DAY N 0 CAR 43 DRVR OR-Y 045 13 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.25 -122 52 14.70 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 43 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 05096 N N INTER 3-LEG N BIKE N 12/19/2015 02 CLD N 110 MARION N N 1 CITY TURN Sat WET N STOP SIGN CASCADE DR S WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 37.27 DAY N 0 66 BIKE 062 110 00 047 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJB 01 M 01 W E No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.25 -122 52 14.70 NONE TURN-R 01 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 027 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00038 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 01/05/2012 02 RAIN N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Thu 00 WET N NONE PRVTE 015 S CASCADE DR W WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 37.27 DAY N 0 CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 05 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.25 -122 52 14.70 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03176 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 08/21/2015 07 CLR N NONE 004 MARION N Y 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W CASCADE DR W WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 37.27 DAY N 0 CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.25 -122 52 14.70 NONE STOP 02 0 E 004 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Cleveland St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: 2013 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 2013 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 2012 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 FINAL TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cleveland St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 16 03169 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 09/19/2012 03 CLR N NONE CLEVELAND ST N N 01 0 CITY ANGL NW Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SE CN FRONT ST 0 2P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 55 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 01 F 1 No 45 8 28.16 -122 51 29.35 OR<25 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 19 NONE DRVR OR-Y 021 03 000 01 F OR<25 16 03925 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 11/06/2013 02 RAIN N NONE CLEVELAND ST 01 0 NONE ANGL SE Wed 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CN FRONT ST 0 6P INJ DUSK N 0 CAR 27 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 01 F 1 No 45 8 28.16 -122 51 29.35 OR<25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 015 NE CAR 30 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Cleveland St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 3 0 3 0 2 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 3 1 4 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 4 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 HEAD-ON 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 3 2 5 0 2 3 4 1 5 0 0 0 0 5 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 4 3 7 0 3 4 6 1 7 0 0 0 6 YEAR: 2013 1 1 2 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 ANGLE 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 1 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 1 1 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 1 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 1 3 4 0 2 2 2 2 4 0 0 0 1 FINAL TOTAL 0 12 9 21 0 10 11 15 6 21 0 0 0 16 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cleveland St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 03231 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 09/25/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Tue 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST NE WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.97 DAY Y 0 CAR 74 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M UNK No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 012 NE CAR 47 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 03452 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP Y 10/14/2011 01,07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR NE Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW CLEVELAND ST SW WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 46 DRVR OR-Y 047,026 01,07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 013 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 28 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 NE 00 PRVTE 022 SW CAR 63 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02897 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1STOP N 08/25/2014 25 CLR N NONE 022 MARION N N 01 1 1 STATE HEAD SW Mon 022 25 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST SW WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 017,080 00 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 03691 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 10/21/2014 07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR NE Tue 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW CLEVELAND ST SW WOODBURN 0 8A MN PDO 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 16 01803 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 05/18/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR S Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 N CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 9A MN PDO 32.97 DAY Y 0 CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 03 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 F 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cleveland St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 012 N CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 M UNK 14 00345 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 02/05/2011 02 RAIN N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Sat 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN INJ 32.97 DAWN N 0 CAR 37 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 01942 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 06/17/2011 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03267 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 09/30/2011 02 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE ANGL SW Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 32.97 DUSK N 0 CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 22 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03678 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 10/31/2012 02 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Wed 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 015 NW CAR 17 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04313 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 12/17/2012 02 RAIN N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN NE Mon 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 32.97 DLIT N 0 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 00 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cleveland St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03675 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH Y 10/22/2013 02,30 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Tue 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 32.97 DLIT N 0 CAR 44 DRVR OR-Y 050 30 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 18 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 015 NW CAR 68 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04090 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 11/18/2013 02 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE ANGL SW Mon 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 56 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 01485 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 05/05/2014 02 RAIN N NONE 082 MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Mon 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 32 DRVR NONE 028 082 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 46 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 67 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 M 14 02391 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 07/18/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 27 DRVR SUSP 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE TURN-R 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 17 PSNG 000 00 000 NONE 02 F 14 03383 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 09/30/2014 02 CLD N NONE 082 MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Tue 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN PDO 32.97 DAWN N 0 CAR 53 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cleveland St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 4 A G E S E X UNKN TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 UNKN 000 NW UNKNOWN 00 DRVR UNK 028 082 02 000 NONE 01 U UNK 14 03859 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 10/31/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE TURN SW Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 00 DRVR UNK 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04281 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 11/28/2014 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Fri 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 9A MN PDO 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 03 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M 16 01249 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 04/07/2015 02 RAIN N NONE 087 MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Tue 087 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 32.97 DLIT N 0 CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SW 087 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 16 03274 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 08/31/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 16 DRVR N-VAL 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 73 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M N-RES 16 04071 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 10/22/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 21 DRVR SUSP 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Cleveland St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 5 A G E S E X NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 03317 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 09/26/2013 03 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY ANGL SW Thu 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CLEVELAND ST CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 32.97 DAY N 0 CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJA 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 8.64 -122 50 42.25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 021 03 000 INJC 01 M OR>25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Country Club Rd / Oregon Way & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 2 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2013 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 ANGLE 4 0 4 0 2 2 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 6 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 5 0 5 0 3 2 5 0 5 0 0 0 8 YEAR: 2011 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 2 2 4 0 3 1 4 0 4 0 1 0 3 FINAL TOTAL 0 10 5 15 0 10 5 15 0 15 0 1 0 15 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Country Club Rd / Oregon Way & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 01824 N N INTER CROSS Y FIX OBJ N 06/07/2011 12 CLR N NONE 040,059,053 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY FIX E Tue 040,059,053 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 69 DRVR OR-Y 080,081 12 028 05 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 75 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 M 14 80211 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 03/03/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E COUNTRY CLUB RD E WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 23 DRVR OTH-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 01875 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 06/07/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 10A MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 03493 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 10/16/2012 07 CLD N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E COUNTRY CLUB RD E WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 0 W 013 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 39 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 W 00 PRVTE 022 E CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 46 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 14 04404 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/21/2012 07 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 46 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 32 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 40 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Country Club Rd / Oregon Way & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X 14 01292 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/23/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 6P MN PDO 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR>25 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 F 14 03347 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 10/06/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 1 N 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 40 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR>25 14 01799 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 06/03/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 0 E 013 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 E 00 PRVTE 022 W CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03551 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 10/12/2013 07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Sat 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 8A MN PDO 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M 14 03821 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 11/11/2011 04 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE TURN W Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 02 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Country Club Rd / Oregon Way & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 53 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02358 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 06/24/2015 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E COUNTRY CLUB RD CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 68 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 74 DRVR OR-Y 020,004 04 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 04095 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 07/30/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT TURN W Thu 00 DRY N PRVTE 000 E COUNTRY CLUB RD CN WOODBURN 0 10A MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 54 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 35 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 63 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 03457 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 09/10/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION Y TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN N Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W COUNTRY CLUB RD CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 73 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 37 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 01723 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 05/23/2012 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL E Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 03 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 NONE 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 N CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 05 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 M 14 04253 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/02/2013 02 CLR N NONE MARION Y 01 0 1 CITY TURN N Mon 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 37.14 DAY N 0 CAR 80 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 OREGON WAY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.38 -122 52 23.90 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Country Club Rd / Oregon Way & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 4 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 N CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 47 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 ANGLE 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 NON-COLLISION 0 4 4 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 8 3 11 0 7 4 8 3 11 0 0 0 0 18 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 10 7 17 0 13 4 14 3 17 0 0 0 21 YEAR: 2014 1 3 4 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 2 4 6 0 4 2 4 2 6 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2013 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 PEDESTRIAN 2 2 4 0 4 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 3 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 4 2 6 0 5 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 6 YEAR: 2012 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BACKING 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 NON-COLLISION 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 3 4 7 0 4 3 5 2 7 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2011 1 4 5 0 3 1 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 5 REAR-END 2 4 6 3 5 1 4 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 3 8 11 3 8 2 9 2 11 0 0 0 7 FINAL TOTAL 0 22 25 47 3 34 12 36 11 47 0 0 0 40 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 02454 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 06/30/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR UN Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 UN EVERGREEN RD UN WOODBURN 0 10A MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 46 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 UN 00 PRVTE 011 UN CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 04428 N N INTER CROSS N PED N 12/09/2013 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY PED E Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 N EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 59 DRVR OR-Y 029 02 000 05 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.53 28 PED 000 00 035 INJA 01 M 01 S N 14 02656 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 08/16/2011 07 UNK N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Tue 00 UNK N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 36 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03164 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 09/09/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 32 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 12 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 09 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 03 M 05 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 04 F 06 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 05 M 14 01171 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/05/2012 07 CLD N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 022 E EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 40 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE 03 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M NONE STOP 04 0 W 013 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 14 02253 N N INTER CROSS N OVERTURN N 07/11/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION N N STOP 01 0 1 CITY NCOL E Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 011 W EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 48 DRVR OR-Y 043 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 14 04185 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 11/26/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.53 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJA 01 M OR<25 73 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 14 04540 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/16/2014 27,07 CLD N NONE 116 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD E WOODBURN 0 10P MN PDO 37.02 DARK N 0 CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 016,026 116 27,07 038 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 54 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02946 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 08/19/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 43 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 46 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR>25 14 03651 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 10/30/2011 07 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 2P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 16 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 02364 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 07/19/2012 07 CLR N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 7P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 60 PSNG 000 00 000 INJA 02 F NONE STOP 02 0 E 013 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 E 00 PRVTE 022 W CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02695 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/10/2013 07 CLR N NONE 013 MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.53 NONE STOP 02 0 E 013 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 36 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 E 00 PRVTE 022 W CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02823 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/21/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Wed 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.53 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 69 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 00430 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 02/07/2014 07 SNOW N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Fri 00 SNO N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 4 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 38 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 02287 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 07/10/2014 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 8A MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OTH-Y 026 07 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 012 W CAR 43 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02960 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/05/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD W WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03040 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 09/13/2011 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN S Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 N EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 23 DRVR OTH-Y 020 04 000 01 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJB 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 45 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M N-RES 14 00386 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/03/2012 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 10P MN INJ 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 020 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 21 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 01910 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-OTHER N 06/09/2012 08 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN S Sat 00 DRY N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 006 08 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 5 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 17 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 01776 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 05/16/2015 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY ANGL N Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 9A MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 83 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 02012 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 06/05/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION Y 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 43 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 83 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 02934 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 08/04/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 11P MN INJ 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 03313 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 09/01/2015 02 CLR N NONE 087 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Tue 087 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 087 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 84 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 04302 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 11/04/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION Y U-TURN 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 6 A G E S E X NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 74 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00448 N N INTER CROSS N S-1TURN N 02/12/2011 08 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 1 1 NO RPT TURN S Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 37.02 DLIT N 0 SEMI TOW 24 DRVR OTH-Y 006 08 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 M OR<25 14 00748 N N INTER CROSS N S-1TURN N 03/08/2011 27,06 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-R 01 1 1 CITY TURN S Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN PDO 37.02 DUSK N 0 SEMI TOW 57 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 031 W CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 016,031 27,06 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 F 14 02649 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 08/15/2011 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 94 DRVR OR-Y 004,020 04 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00633 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 02/28/2013 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 41 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.53 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 62 DRVR OTH-Y 004,028 02 000 INJC 01 M N-RES 14 00511 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 02/13/2014 04 CLD N NONE MARION Y 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Thu 00 WET N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 43 DRVR NONE 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 33 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 7 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 F 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M 14 03889 N N INTER 3-LEG N N 11/01/2014 07 CLD N NONE MARION Y 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 042 07 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 65 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02576 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 07/08/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 11A MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 41 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 03023 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 08/09/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 11P MN PDO 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 58 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 32 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03582 N N INTER CROSS N NON-COLL N 09/19/2015 26 CLR N NONE 092,001 MARION Y 01 0 1 CITY NCOL E Sat 092 26 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 007 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 11A MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 58 DRVR OR-Y 000 26 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJB 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 14 03695 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 09/26/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION Y 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJB 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 30 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 F 02 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 03 F 03 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 04 M 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 05 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 8 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 58 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 54 PSNG 028 02 000 INJB 02 F 14 04378 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 11/07/2015 02 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sat 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 26 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 16 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 03 M NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 05 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 14 04387 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 11/07/2015 02 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sat 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 62 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04534 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 11/17/2015 02 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 11A MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 45 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 05001 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/13/2015 02 RAIN N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN S Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 59 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 03 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA INJA 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 27 DRVR NONE 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 9 A G E S E X 14 01124 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 04/10/2011 04 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 53 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 04 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE TURN-L 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 04063 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 11/30/2012 04 RAIN N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 9P MN PDO 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 28 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 21 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 NONE 01 F OR>25 14 00105 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 01/05/2013 07 CLR N NONE 004 MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 37.02 DLIT N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 07 000 04 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.53 NONE STOP 02 0 W 004 00 PRVTE 013 S CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02511 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 07/28/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S EVERGREEN RD CN WOODBURN 0 11A MN PDO 37.02 DAY N 0 CAR 75 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 04 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.52 -122 52 32.54 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Garfield St / Young St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 2014 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2013 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2012 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 2011 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 3 4 7 0 6 1 6 1 7 0 0 0 3 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Garfield St / Young St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 16 03912 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 11/18/2012 08 CLD N NONE FRONT ST TURN-L 01 0 NO RPT TURN SE Sun 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE SE GARFIELD ST 0 7P PDO DLIT N 0 CAR 33 NONE DRVR OTH-Y 002,007 08 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.17 -122 51 24.33 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 011 SE CAR 00 NONE DRVR UNK 000 00 000 01 U UNK 16 02533 N N INTER CROSS N O-OTHER N 07/28/2013 03 CLR N NONE FRONT ST TURN-L 01 0 NO RPT TURN NE Sun 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NW CN GARFIELD ST 0 5P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 38 NONE DRVR NONE 021 03 000 02 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.17 -122 51 24.33 UNK NONE TURN-R 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 71 INJB DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 16 02324 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 07/20/2011 02 CLR N NONE FRONT ST 01 0 NO RPT ANGL SW Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NE CN GARFIELD ST 0 6P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 50 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.21 -122 51 24.29 OR<25 NONE 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 26 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 16 02900 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 08/01/2015 02 CLR N NONE 091 FRONT ST N N 01 0 CITY ANGL SE Sat 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NW CN GARFIELD ST 0 4P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 92 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.16 -122 51 24.34 OR<25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE 091 CAR 19 NONE DRVR NONE 028 02 000 01 M N-RES 23 INJA PSNG 000 00 000 02 M 16 01607 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 05/15/2014 02 CLR N NONE FRONT ST N N 01 0 CITY ANGL SW Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CN YOUNG ST 0 3P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 18 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.16 -122 51 24.34 OR<25 NONE 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 46 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 16 03447 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 09/10/2015 02 CLR N NONE 091 FRONT ST N N 01 0 CITY TURN NE Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW CN YOUNG ST 0 8A PDO DAY N 0 CAR 15 NONE DRVR NONE 028 02 000 02 01 F 1 No 45 8 32.16 -122 51 24.34 OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Garfield St / Young St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 2 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 SE 091 CAR 44 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 16 00794 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 03/02/2012 03 CLR N NONE FRONT ST 01 0 NONE TURN NE Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW CN YOUNG ST 0 4P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 19 NONE DRVR OR-Y 021 03 000 04 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.17 -122 51 24.33 OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 40 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Gatch St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2014 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 SIDESWIPE - MEETING 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2013 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 2013 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 3 2 5 0 4 1 4 1 4 0 1 0 3 FINAL TOTAL 0 6 6 12 0 10 1 8 4 7 0 1 0 7 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Gatch St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 17 01430 Y N N PRKD MV N 05/02/2014 32,05 CLR N NONE GATCH ST N N 01 0 CITY SS-M SW Fri 00 DRY N NONE (NONE) PRVTE 000 NE NE CLEVELAND ST 170 10P PDO DLIT N CAR 34 NONE DRVR OR-Y 052,080 32,05 000 07 01 M 1 No 45 8 17.05 -122 50 58.29 (02) OR<25 NONE PRKD-P 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 008 SW CAR 17 04373 N N ALLEY N ANGL-OTH N 11/06/2015 02,17 CLR N NONE GATCH ST TURN-L 01 0 CITY TURN NE Fri 00 DRY N NONE (NONE) PRVTE 000 W NE JOHNSON ST 117 12P INJ DAY N CAR 50 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02,17 028 08 01 M 1 No 45 8 28.40 -122 50 52.40 (02) OR<25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 62 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 17 01304 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 04/22/2014 02 CLR N NONE GATCH ST Y TURN-L 01 0 CITY TURN E Tue 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CN JOHNSON ST 0 3P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 18 NONE DRVR NONE 004,028 02 000 04 01 M 1 No 45 8 27.06 -122 50 52.79 OR<25 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 18 INJB DRVR NONE 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 17 04220 N N ALLEY N S-1TURN N 11/23/2014 06 UNK N NONE GATCH ST 01 0 NONE TURN S Sun 00 UNK N UNKNOWN (NONE) PRVTE 000 N S LINCOLN ST 216 1P PDO DAY N CAR 76 NONE DRVR OR-Y 032 06 000 08 01 M 1 No 45 8 32.26 -122 50 52.07 (02) OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 019 N CAR 00 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F UNK 17 04132 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 11/21/2013 03 CLR N NONE GATCH ST Y N 01 0 CITY ANGL S Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 N CN LINCOLN ST 0 5P PDO DUSK N 0 CAR 36 NONE DRVR NONE 021 03 000 01 01 F 1 No 45 8 34.48 -122 50 52.53 OR<25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 47 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 17 00662 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/23/2012 02 CLR N NONE GATCH ST TURN-L 01 0 NONE ANGL SW Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S CN LINCOLN ST 0 7A PDO DAY N 0 CAR 20 NONE DRVR OR-Y 017,028 02 000 02 01 M 1 No 45 8 34.48 -122 50 52.53 OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Gatch St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 2 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 34 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 17 00634 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 02/19/2015 02 CLD N NONE GATCH ST TURN-L 01 0 NONE TURN S Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E CN LINCOLN ST 0 6A INJ DAWN N 0 CAR 47 INJC DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 03 01 M 1 No 45 8 34.45 -122 50 52.52 OR<25 00 INJC PSNG 000 00 000 02 U UNKN 02 0 E 00 UNKN 000 W UNKNOWN 00 NONE DRVR UNK 000 00 000 01 U UNK 16 04165 N N INTER 4-LEG N PED N 12/05/2012 02 CLR N NONE GATCH ST N N 01 0 CITY PED NW Wed 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 SE SE YOUNG ST 0 5P INJ DLIT N 0 CAR 49 NONE DRVR OR-Y 029 02 000 05 01 F 1 No 45 8 20.53 -122 50 55.94 OR<25 09 INJB PED 000 00 000 UNK 01 M 01 NE SW 16 02202 N N INTER 4-LEG Y FIX OBJ N 07/06/2012 10 CLR N NONE 040,058 GATCH ST 01 0 NO RPT FIX NW Fri 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 SE SE YOUNG ST 0 040,058 5P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 28 NONE DRVR OR-Y 080,081 10 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 20.53 -122 50 55.94 OR<25 17 01492 N N N PED N 05/04/2012 02,18,19 RAIN N NONE GATCH ST N N 01 0 CITY PED NE Fri 00 WET N NONE (NONE) PRVTE 000 SW SW YOUNG ST 125 2P INJ DAY N CAR 34 NONE DRVR N-VAL 000 00 000 08 01 F 1 No 45 8 19.01 -122 50 56.72 (02) OR<25 05 INJB PED 063,028 02,18,19 043 01 F 04 NW SE 16 00396 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 02/03/2012 07 CLR N NONE GATCH ST N N 01 0 CITY REAR SE Fri 00 DRY N NONE PRVTE 000 NW NW YOUNG ST 0 8A INJ DAY N 0 CAR 20 NONE DRVR OR-Y 043,042 07 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 20.53 -122 50 55.94 OR<25 25 INJC PSNG 000 00 000 02 M NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 006 NW CAR 57 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 16 04173 N N ALLEY N ANGL-OTH N 11/25/2013 02 CLR N NONE GATCH ST 01 0 CITY ANGL SE Mon 00 DRY N NONE (NONE) PRVTE 000 NW NW YOUNG ST 357 4P PDO DAY N CAR 18 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 08 01 M 1 No 45 8 22.30 -122 51 0.33 (02) OR>25 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 018 SW CAR 18 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Hardcastle Ave & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2014 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 2011 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 2 2 4 0 4 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 4 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hardcastle Ave & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 17 04535 N N INTER 3-LEG N TRAIN N 12/15/2011 14 CLD N NONE 015,017 FRONT ST N N TURN-L 01 0 CITY ANGL E Thu 00 DRY N WW W/ GATE PRVTE 013 NE E HARDCASTLE AVE 0 017 10A PDO DAY N 0 CAR 84 NONE DRVR N-VAL 009,025 14 000 05 01 M 1 No 45 8 45.42 -122 51 7.99 N-RES 16 03189 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 09/21/2012 07 CLR N NONE FRONT ST 01 0 NONE REAR NE Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW SW HARDCASTLE AVE 0 7A INJ DAY N 0 CAR 48 NONE DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 01 F 1 No 45 8 45.41 -122 51 8.01 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 34 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 14 INJC PSNG 000 00 000 02 M 11 INJC PSNG 000 00 000 03 F 16 01785 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 04/04/2014 02 CLR N NONE FRONT ST TURN-L 01 0 NONE TURN SW Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 E CN HARDCASTLE AVE 0 8P PDO DUSK N 0 CAR 23 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 01 M 1 No 45 8 45.24 -122 51 8.05 OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 30 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 16 01427 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 04/20/2015 02 CLR N NONE FRONT ST 01 0 CITY TURN NE Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW CN HARDCASTLE AVE 0 8A INJ DAY N 0 CAR 18 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 02 01 M 1 No 45 8 45.24 -122 51 8.05 OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 24 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Hardcastle Ave & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2014 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 2 2 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 0 3 3 1 3 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2013 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 BACKING 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2013 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 2 0 2 0 0 2 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 3 0 3 0 1 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 5 YEAR: 2011 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 2 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 2 FINAL TOTAL 0 8 6 14 1 9 4 10 4 14 0 0 0 10 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hardcastle Ave & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 02654 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/15/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE NE WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 65 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 03101 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 09/15/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE NE WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR>25 35 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M 14 00270 N N INTER CROSS N O-1STOP N 01/25/2013 10 CLR N NONE MARION BACK 01 0 1 NONE BACK NE Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW HARDCASTLE AVE NE WOODBURN 0 6P MN PDO 32.19 DLIT N 0 CAR 50 DRVR OR-Y 011 10 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02887 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/26/2013 32 RAIN N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Mon 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE NE WOODBURN 0 9P MN INJ 32.19 DLIT N 0 CAR 37 DRVR SUSP 052,026 32 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 50 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 02443 Y Y INTER CROSS N PED N 07/29/2011 02,10 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY PED N Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S HARDCASTLE AVE SW WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 71 DRVR UNK 029 02 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 06 PED 000 00 035 INJA 01 F 01 E W ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hardcastle Ave & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X 14 03196 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/17/2015 17,29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR NE Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW HARDCASTLE AVE SW WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 026 17,29 028 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 35 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 04513 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 12/26/2011 02 CLD N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NONE TURN W Mon 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 016 NE HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 12P MN PDO 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00345 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 01/29/2012 04 RAIN N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 STATE TURN SW Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 22 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR>25 55 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 04386 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 12/20/2012 08 CLD N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NONE TURN W Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN INJ 32.19 DAWN N 0 CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 12 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 UNKN 000 W CAR 00 DRVR UNK 097 00 000 NONE 01 U UNK 14 05280 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/30/2015 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Wed 00 UNK N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 86 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hardcastle Ave & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X 14 00948 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 03/28/2013 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 9A MN PDO 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 43 DRVR NONE 000 00 000 02 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 F NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 16 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03222 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 09/19/2014 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT ANGL SW Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 32.19 DAY N 0 CAR 49 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00625 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 02/22/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sat 00 DRY N PRVTE 000 NE HARDCASTLE AVE CN WOODBURN 0 9P MN PDO 32.19 DLIT N 0 CAR 17 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 04 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 43.03 -122 50 11.43 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Hayes St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 1 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 2015 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 0 2 2 0 1 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 1 4 5 0 3 2 5 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 2 6 8 0 5 2 7 1 5 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2013 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 2 3 5 0 5 0 5 0 4 0 1 0 2 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PARKING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 2 1 3 0 1 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 3 FINAL TOTAL 0 7 13 20 0 14 4 17 3 14 0 3 0 8 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hayes St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 17 00394 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/03/2012 03 CLR N NONE CASCADE DR 01 0 NONE ANGL W Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E CN W HAYES ST 0 3P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 87 NONE DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 02 01 M 1 No 45 8 46.35 -122 52 14.94 OR<25 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 75 NONE DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 01 F OR<25 17 00153 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 01/16/2011 03 CLD N NONE EVERGREEN RD 01 0 CITY TURN N Sun 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S CN HAYES ST 0 1P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 42 NONE DRVR OTH-Y 021 03 000 04 01 F 1 No 45 8 50.71 -122 52 32.62 N-RES NONE TURN-L 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 015 N CAR 87 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 87 INJB PSNG 000 00 000 02 F 17 01321 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 04/16/2014 03 CLR N NONE EVERGREEN RD 01 0 NO RPT ANGL N Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S CN HAYES ST 0 9P INJ DLIT N 0 CAR 00 NONE DRVR UNK 021 03 000 04 01 U 1 No 45 8 50.61 -122 52 32.71 UNK NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 43 INJB DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 19 00676 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/03/2011 02 UNK N NONE HAYES ST 01 0 NONE ANGL NW Thu 00 UNK N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SE CN 5TH ST 0 3P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 74 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 01 F 1 No 45 8 42.64 -122 51 35.76 OR<25 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 015 SW CAR 54 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 F OR<25 17 00097 N N Y FIX OBJ N 01/11/2015 17 FOG N NONE 091 HAYES ST N N 01 0 CITY FIX SE Sun 00 WET N NONE (NONE) PRVTE 000 NW SE CLACKAMAS CIR 48 091 2A INJ DLIT N CAR 31 INJC DRVR OR-Y 081 17 028 05 01 M 1 No 45 8 47.64 -122 52 22.94 (02) OR<25 17 00201 N N ALLEY N S-OTHER N 01/20/2014 29 CLR N NONE HAYES ST Y TURN-L 01 0 NO RPT TURN S Mon 00 DRY N UNKNOWN (NONE) PRVTE 019 E W COZY WAY 224 4P INJ DAY N CAR 22 INJC DRVR OR-Y 019,042 29 000 07 01 F 1 No 45 8 46.17 -122 52 1.89 (02) OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 019 E CAR 70 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hayes St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 2 16 00785 N N N PRKD MV N 03/04/2012 02 CLR N NONE HAYES ST PARKNG 01 0 NONE PARK NE Sun 00 DRY N UNKNOWN (NONE) PRVTE 008 SW NE FRONT ST 69 11A PDO DAY N CAR 48 NONE DRVR OR-Y 018,028 02 000 07 01 M 1 No 45 8 34.58 -122 51 21.35 (02) OR<25 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 53 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 16 03141 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 09/14/2013 07 CLD N NONE HAYES ST 01 0 CITY REAR SW Sat 00 DRY N NONE PRVTE 000 NE NE SETTLEMIER AVE 0 12P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 34 NONE DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 44.61 -122 51 39.01 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 012 NE CAR 47 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 16 00871 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 03/17/2014 07 CLR N NONE HAYES ST N N 01 0 CITY REAR SW Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE NE SETTLEMIER AVE 0 5P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 41 NONE DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 44.63 -122 51 38.96 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 012 NE CAR 24 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 01 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 02 M 16 02138 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 06/28/2013 07 CLR N NONE HAYES ST 01 0 NONE REAR NE Fri 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 SW SW SETTLEMIER AVE 0 3P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 40 NONE DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 45.75 -122 51 38.62 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 012 SW CAR 22 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 16 00416 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-STP Y 02/06/2014 01 SNOW N NONE 124 HAYES ST N N TURN-R 01 0 CITY TURN NW Thu 00 SNO N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE NW SETTLEMIER AVE 0 124 4P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 42 NONE DRVR OR-Y 047,080 01 017 06 01 M 2 No 45 8 45.72 -122 51 38.66 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 011 NW CAR 47 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 16 01186 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 04/13/2014 02 CLR N NONE HAYES ST Y 01 0 CITY TURN SW Sun 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CN SETTLEMIER AVE 0 6P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 19 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 01 F 1 No 45 8 44.63 -122 51 38.96 OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hayes St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 3 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 22 NONE DRVR N-VAL 004,028 02 000 01 F OR<25 16 03655 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 10/17/2014 02 RAIN N NONE HAYES ST Y TURN-L 01 0 CITY TURN NE Fri 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NW CN SETTLEMIER AVE 0 5P PDO DAY Y 1 CAR 33 NONE DRVR NONE 000 00 000 02 01 F 1 No 45 8 45.72 -122 51 38.66 OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 018 SE CAR 25 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 F OR<25 01 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 02 M 16 01675 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 05/25/2011 07 CLD N NONE HAYES ST 01 0 CITY REAR SW Wed 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 NE CN SETTLEMIER AVE 0 5P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 17 NONE DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 03 01 F 1 No 45 8 45.78 -122 51 38.61 OR<25 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 52 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 17 03105 N N N S-1STOP N 09/08/2014 07 CLR N NONE HAYES ST 01 0 NONE REAR E Mon 00 UNK N UNKNOWN (NONE) PRVTE 000 W W SMITH DR 78 7A PDO DAY N CAR 20 NONE DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 08 01 F 1 No 45 8 46.00 -122 51 54.26 (02) OR<25 UNKN STOP 02 0 E 00 UNKN 011 W UNKNOWN 00 NONE DRVR UNK 000 00 000 01 U UNK 17 03309 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 09/25/2013 02 CLR N NONE HAYES ST TURN-L 01 0 NO RPT TURN W Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 S CN SMITH DR 0 6P INJ DAY N 0 CAR 18 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 01 M 1 No 45 8 45.99 -122 51 52.77 OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 53 INJB DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 01 F N-RES 17 93317 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 09/26/2013 02 CLR N NONE HAYES ST 01 0 CITY TURN N Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 S CN SMITH DR 0 6P PDO DAY N 0 CAR 18 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 02 01 M 1 No 45 8 45.99 -122 51 52.77 OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 53 NONE DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 01 F N-RES ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Hayes St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 4 17 01934 N N ALLEY N S-1TURN N 06/11/2014 06 CLR N NONE W HAYES ST Y 01 0 CITY TURN W Wed 00 DRY N NONE (NONE) PRVTE 000 E E CASCADE DR 482 2P PDO DAY N CAR 17 NONE DRVR OR-Y 032 06 000 05 01 M 1 No 45 8 46.17 -122 52 8.09 (02) OR<25 NONE TURN-L 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 019 E OTHER 47 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 19 00639 N N INTER 3-LEG Y FIX OBJ N 02/20/2015 16 CLR N NONE 062 W HAYES ST 01 0 CITY FIX UN Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 UN N W HARVARD DR 0 062 2A PDO DLIT N 0 CAR 30 NONE DRVR EXP 081 16 025 06 01 F 1 No 45 8 50.64 -122 52 44.37 OR<25 19 03646 N N Y FIX OBJ N 10/20/2013 27 CLR N NONE 040,062 W HAYES ST N N 01 0 CITY FIX W Sun 00 DRY N UNKNOWN (NONE) PRVTE 000 E E W HARVARD DR 300 040,062 6P INJ DAY N CAR 27 INJC DRVR NONE 016,080,081 27 017 07 01 M 1 No 45 8 50.77 -122 52 39.82 (02) OR<25 04 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Lincoln St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: 2015 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 2015 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2011 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 ANGLE 2011 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 3 FINAL TOTAL 0 3 2 5 0 4 1 3 2 5 0 0 0 4 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Lincoln St & Front St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 17 04338 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/18/2012 10 CLD N NONE 013 FRONT ST 01 0 CITY REAR NE Tue 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW SW LINCOLN ST 0 7A INJ DAWN N 0 CAR 26 NONE DRVR OTH-Y 017,026 10 000 06 01 M 1 No 45 8 37.96 -122 51 17.19 N-RES NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW 013 CAR 24 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 NE 00 PRVTE 022 SW CAR 51 INJC DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR>25 16 02629 Y N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 08/13/2011 33,03 CLD N NONE 040,062,100 FRONT ST 01 0 CITY ANGL SW Sat 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE CN LINCOLN ST 0 3A INJ DLIT N 0 CAR 20 NONE DRVR OR-Y 051,021 33,03 000 01 01 M 1 No 45 8 37.97 -122 51 17.17 OR<25 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 39 INJB DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 34 INJB PSNG 000 00 000 02 M 16 00113 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 01/11/2012 02 CLR N NONE FRONT ST 01 0 NO RPT ANGL NE Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW CN LINCOLN ST 0 11A PDO DAY N 0 CAR 35 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 01 F 1 No 45 8 37.96 -122 51 17.19 OR<25 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 015 NW CAR 63 NONE DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 01 M OR<25 16 01519 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 04/26/2015 02 CLR N NONE FRONT ST N N 01 0 CITY ANGL SE Sun 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NW CN LINCOLN ST 0 9A PDO DAY N 0 CAR 46 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 01 M 1 No 45 8 37.92 -122 51 17.14 OR<25 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 25 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 16 01818 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 06/06/2011 03 CLR N NONE FRONT ST N N 01 0 CITY ANGL SE Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW CN LINCOLN ST 0 9A INJ DAY N 0 CAR 32 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 01 M 1 No 45 8 37.97 -122 51 17.17 OR<25 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 21 INJC DRVR OTH-Y 021 03 000 01 F N-RES ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Lincoln St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2014 TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2013 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2012 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2011 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 2011 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 2 FINAL TOTAL 0 5 5 10 2 6 4 7 3 10 0 0 0 8 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Lincoln St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 01142 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/11/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST NE WOODBURN 0 8A MN PDO 32.41 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 04507 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/31/2012 07 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST NE WOODBURN 0 11A MN PDO 32.41 DAY N 0 CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 NONE STOP 02 1 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE SEMI TOW 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03475 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 10/06/2014 07 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST NE WOODBURN 0 11A MN INJ 32.41 DAY N 0 CAR 91 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 58 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F UNKN STOP 02 0 SW 00 UNKN 011 NE UNKNOWN 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 U UNK 14 01354 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/28/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Thu 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST SW WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 32.41 DAY Y 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 05 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 04 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 14 03639 N N INTER CROSS N PED N 10/16/2014 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY PED SW Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E LINCOLN ST SW WOODBURN 0 7A MN INJ 32.41 DAY N 0 CAR 31 DRVR OTH-Y 029 02 000 05 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 48 PED 000 00 000 INJB 01 F 01 E W ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Lincoln St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X 14 00295 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 01/24/2012 07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR NE Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW LINCOLN ST SW WOODBURN 0 6A MN INJ 32.41 DLIT N 0 CAR 67 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 013 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 NONE STOP 03 1 NE 00 PRVTE 022 SW SEMI TOW 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 00560 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 02/22/2013 02 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE TURN SW Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 32.41 DLIT N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M UNK No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 NONE TURN-L 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03572 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 10/14/2013 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 32.41 DAY N 0 CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 NONE TURN-L 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 57 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 00267 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 01/25/2013 04 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE LINCOLN ST CN WOODBURN 0 11A MN INJ 32.41 DAY N 0 CAR 48 DRVR SUSP 020 04 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 00 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 59 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 04927 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/08/2015 02 RAIN N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW LINCOLN ST CN WOODBURN 0 10P MN PDO 32.41 DLIT N 0 CAR 56 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 33.48 -122 50 20.08 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Lincoln St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Meridian Dr / 5th St & OR 214 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 REAR-END 2015 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2014 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2014 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2013 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 2 1 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2012 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2011 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 2011 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 FINAL TOTAL 0 5 4 9 0 6 3 9 0 9 0 0 0 8 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Meridian Dr / 5th St & OR 214 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 03173 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 09/20/2012 07,27 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Thu 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 NE HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 17 DRVR OR-Y 043,016,026 07,27 000 06 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 04354 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 11/06/2014 07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 10A MN PDO 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 22 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F UNK 14 03664 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 10/31/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR W Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 07 000 06 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 38 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 06 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 14 03944 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 11/05/2014 07 CLD N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR NW Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE HILLSBORO-SILV HY SE WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 36 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 5TH ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE STOP 02 0 NW 013 00 PRVTE 011 SE CAR 63 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 NW 00 PRVTE 022 SE CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 022 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 05032 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/14/2015 32,07 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 STATE REAR NW Mon 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SE HILLSBORO-SILV HY SE WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 052,026 32,07 000 06 5TH ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 22 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Meridian Dr / 5th St & OR 214 January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 012 SE CAR 78 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 74 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 03281 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 09/23/2013 07 RAIN N NONE 013 MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR E Mon 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE STOP 02 0 E 013 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 78 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 E 00 PRVTE 022 W CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F UNK 14 01209 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/09/2012 07,10 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR NE Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 02 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 38 DRVR OR-Y 009 10 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04500 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/14/2013 04 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Sat 00 DRY N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 SW HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 75 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 74 DRVR OR-Y 020,004 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02339 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 07/13/2013 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Sat 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 SW HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN INJ 38.13 DAY N 0 CAR 74 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 04 MERIDIAN DR WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 1.51 -122 51 15.64 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 21 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 OR 214 & Front - Hood CN January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/07/2017 YEAR: 2015 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2013 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2012 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BACKING 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 BACKING 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 2 1 2 1 3 0 0 0 2 FINAL TOTAL 0 2 5 7 0 4 3 5 2 7 0 0 0 4 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/7/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & Front - Hood CN January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 03866 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH Y 11/02/2013 01 CLD N NONE 124 MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Sat 124 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 NE FRONT - HOOD CN E WOODBURN 0 9A MN INJ 38.56 DAY N 1 CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 047,080 01 000 06 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 7.03 -122 50 46.33 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR>25 40 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 14 02979 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 09/08/2011 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN NE Thu 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 W FRONT - HOOD CN CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN PDO 38.56 DAWN N 1 CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 7.03 -122 50 46.33 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04060 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 10/22/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W FRONT - HOOD CN CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 38.56 DAWN N 1 CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 02 HILLSBORO-SILV HY WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 7.03 -122 50 46.33 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 28 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 ANGLE 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 BACKING 1 7 8 2 6 2 6 2 8 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 3 8 11 3 7 4 8 3 11 0 0 0 6 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 HEAD-ON 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 PEDESTRIAN 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 6 REAR-END 2014 TOTAL 0 4 1 5 0 4 1 5 0 5 0 0 0 10 YEAR: 2013 4 4 8 0 6 2 5 3 8 0 0 0 0 5 REAR-END 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 5 5 10 0 7 3 6 4 10 0 0 0 6 YEAR: 2012 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2011 3 2 5 0 3 2 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 4 REAR-END 0 2 2 0 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 3 4 7 0 3 4 3 4 7 0 0 0 4 FINAL TOTAL 0 16 19 35 3 23 12 24 11 35 0 0 0 27 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 02222 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 07/05/2014 07 CLR N NONE 013 MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Sat 00 DRY N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 NE HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 46 DRVR NONE 043,026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 013 00 PRVTE 012 NE CAR 32 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 08 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 11 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 03 F 04 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 04 M 23 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 05 F NONE STOP 03 0 SW 00 PRVTE 022 NE CAR 73 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 02591 N N INTER CROSS N O-1STOP N 08/02/2014 10 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY HEAD NE Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 36 DRVR SUSP 080 10 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 56 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 03793 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 10/26/2014 07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR SW Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M UNK No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 37 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02858 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 07/24/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 UNK MN PDO 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M UNK ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X 14 03475 Y N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 09/11/2015 07 CLR N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE HILLSBORO-SILV HY NE WOODBURN 0 8P MN PDO 31.70 DLIT N 1 CAR 67 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 013 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 022 NONE 01 F OR<25 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M UNKN STOP 03 0 SW 00 UNKN 011 NE CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 U UNK 14 03823 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 11/12/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR N Mon 00 DRY N R-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 S WOODBURN-ESTACADA H S WOODBURN 0 8A MN PDO 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 011 S CAR 65 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 00115 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP Y 01/11/2013 01 SLT N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR N Fri 00 ICE N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S WOODBURN-ESTACADA H S WOODBURN 0 4A MN INJ 31.70 DLIT N 1 CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 047,026 01 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 011 S CAR 36 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 00538 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 02/20/2013 27 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR N Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 S WOODBURN-ESTACADA H S WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 31.70 DUSK N 1 CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 016,026 27 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 011 S CAR 62 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M N-RES 14 02555 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 07/29/2013 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-R 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY SW WOODBURN 0 9A MN PDO 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 03 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 00208 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 01/21/2011 07 CLD N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Fri 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY SW WOODBURN 0 10A MN INJ 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 32 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 09 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 63 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 02716 N N INTER CROSS N PED N 08/13/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY PED SE Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 015 NW HILLSBORO-SILV HY SW WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 57 DRVR OR-Y 029 02 000 09 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 38 PED 000 00 000 INJC 01 F 01 E W 14 03521 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 10/10/2013 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN INJ 31.70 DAWN N 1 CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 01709 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 05/11/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 CITY TURN N Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H CN WOODBURN 0 12P MN PDO 31.70 DAY N 1 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 02 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE 02 1 N 00 PRVTE 000 S SEMI TOW 30 DRVR OTH-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M N-RES 14 04469 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 11/13/2015 27,04 RAIN N NONE 013 MARION 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 31.70 DLIT N 0 CAR 68 DRVR OR-Y 016,020 27,04 038 02 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 70 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F NONE 02 0 N 013 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 49 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 022 INJC 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 4 A G E S E X 10 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M 17 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 03 M NONE 03 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 71 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00703 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 03/03/2011 04 RAIN N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN E Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE WOODBURN-ESTACADA H CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN PDO 31.70 DAWN N 1 CAR 54 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 5 A G E S E X 14 01047 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/06/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 9A MN PDO 39.27 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.70 -122 49 53.90 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 64 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 00013 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 01/04/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 7P MN INJ 39.28 DLIT N 1 CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.68 -122 49 53.14 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 14 00688 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 03/05/2013 07 RAIN N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR S Tue 00 WET N R-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY SW WOODBURN 0 6P MN PDO 39.29 DUSK N 1 CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 09 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 013 W CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 01463 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 05/08/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NONE REAR S Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY SW WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 76 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 09 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 013 W CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 51 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 01920 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 06/12/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 0 1 NONE REAR SW Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY SW WOODBURN 0 11A MN PDO 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 07 000 09 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 63 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 6 A G E S E X 14 00457 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 02/12/2011 08 RAIN N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN W Sat 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 39.29 DLIT N 1 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 001,007 08 000 05 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE TURN-L 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02293 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 07/17/2011 32,07 RAIN N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 STATE REAR E Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 2P MN PDO 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 23 DRVR SUSP 052,043,026 32,07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02573 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/10/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 90 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 43 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 81 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 01912 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 06/10/2012 27 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 16 DRVR OTH-Y 016,026 27 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F N-RES No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 00603 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 02/09/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 UNK MN PDO 39.29 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 29 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 45 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M UNK ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 7 A G E S E X 14 01653 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 05/07/2015 07 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 2P MN PDO 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 05183 N N INTER CROSS N O-1STOP N 12/23/2015 10 RAIN N NONE MARION N N BACK 01 0 1 CITY BACK W Wed 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 39.29 DAY N 1 CAR 58 DRVR OR-Y 011 10 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 161 WOODBURN-ESTACADA CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 8 A G E S E X 14 04291 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/13/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 9P MN PDO 0.00 DLIT N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OTH-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 17 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 00037 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 01/04/2013 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 0.00 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 38 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 M OR<25 14 02652 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/09/2013 07 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 0.00 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 44 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 01950 N N INTER CROSS N PED N 06/13/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-R 01 0 1 CITY PED N Fri 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 10A MN INJ 0.00 DAY N 1 CAR 17 DRVR OR-Y 029 02 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 15 PED 000 00 000 INJB 01 M 01 N S 16 01257 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/08/2015 07 CLD N NONE 054 MARION N N 01 1 1 CITY REAR W Wed 054 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 7A MN INJ 0.00 DAY N 0 SEMI TOW 67 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 47 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 16 01315 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/12/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR W Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 5P MN PDO 0.00 DAY N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 161 WOODBURN-ESTACADA CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING OR 214 & OR 211 & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 9 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 49 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 16 01586 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 04/18/2015 29 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 0.00 DUSK N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 21 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 16 01713 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 05/12/2015 07 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E WOODBURN-ESTACADA H E WOODBURN 0 11A MN PDO 0.00 DAY N 1 CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 PACIFIC HY 99E WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 016100100S00 1 45 9 4.66 -122 49 52.38 NONE STOP 02 1 W 00 PRVTE 011 E SEMI TOW 23 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Park Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 ANGLE 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 2015 TOTAL 0 2 2 4 0 3 1 3 1 4 0 0 0 3 YEAR: 2014 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2013 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 4 REAR-END 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 3 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 3 2 5 0 4 1 4 1 5 0 0 0 12 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2011 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 2 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2011 TOTAL 0 0 3 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 7 9 16 0 14 2 14 2 16 0 0 0 17 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Park Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 00703 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 02/27/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Mon 00 DRY N SP PED SIG PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE STOP 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR>25 14 04196 N N INTER 3-LEG N N 11/26/2013 32,13 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY SS-O W Tue 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 052,045 32,13 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 000 E CAR 40 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 61 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 09 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 03 F 01 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 04 M 32 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 05 F 14 02443 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 07/22/2014 07 CLR N NONE 089 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Tue 089 24 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 026 07 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE STOP 02 0 W 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 59 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 01827 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 05/20/2015 29 CLR N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Wed 00 DRY N SP PED SIG PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 11A MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 36 DRVR OR-Y 026 29 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 02 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M NONE STOP 02 0 W 004 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 89 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03207 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 08/24/2015 07 CLR N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR W Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY E WOODBURN 0 1P MN INJ 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 37 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Park Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 W 004 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 70 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 64 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 04441 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 12/23/2011 27 CLR N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR E Fri 00 DRY N SP PED SIG PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 11A MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 44 DRVR OR-Y 016,026 27 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE STOP 02 0 E 004 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 62 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 00314 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 01/28/2013 07 RAIN N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR E Mon 00 WET N SP PED SIG PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 2P MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE STOP 02 0 E 004 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02198 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 07/02/2013 07,27 CLR N NONE 004 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Tue 00 DRY N SP PED SIG PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 41 DRVR OTH-Y 043,016,026 07,27 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE STOP 02 0 E 004 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 38 DRVR EXP 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR>25 20 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 03 F 14 02895 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 08/25/2014 07 CLR N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR E Mon 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY W WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 31 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE STOP 02 0 E 004 00 PRVTE 011 W CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 01908 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1STOP N 06/14/2011 07 CLR N NONE 004 MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR W Tue 00 DRY N REG-SIGN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 85 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 01 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Park Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 W 004 00 PRVTE 011 E CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02597 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 08/04/2013 03 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Sun 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 10P MN PDO 38.82 DLIT N 0 CAR 49 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 46 DRVR OR-Y 021 03 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 01091 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 03/25/2015 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL W Wed 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 38.82 DAY Y 0 CAR 55 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 02 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 019 S CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02760 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 08/16/2013 32,02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN S Fri 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 23 DRVR N-VAL 052,004,028 32,02 000 03 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 53 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 M OR<25 45 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 F 14 02254 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 07/14/2011 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL E Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 S CAR 59 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 01690 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 05/22/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN W Thu 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 S HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN PDO 38.82 DAY N 0 CAR 78 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 04 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Park Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 4 A G E S E X NONE 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 55 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00462 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 02/08/2015 02 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT ANGL E Sun 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 3A MN PDO 38.82 DLIT Y 0 CAR 49 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 PARK AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 5.57 -122 50 27.82 NONE 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 019 S CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Parr Rd & Settlemier Ave January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 08/31/2017 YEAR: 2015 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 YEAR: 2014 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 ANGLE 2014 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 FINAL TOTAL 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 3 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 8/31/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Parr Rd & Settlemier Ave January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 16 04688 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 12/27/2014 27,03 RAIN N NONE PARR ST N N 01 0 CITY ANGL E Sat 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W CN SETTLEMIER AVE 0 5P INJ DLIT N 0 CAR 32 NONE DRVR OR-Y 016,021 27,03 030 03 01 M 1 No 45 8 9.29 -122 51 54.33 OR<25 01 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 02 F NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 64 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 51 INJB PSNG 000 00 000 02 F 18 INJB PSNG 000 00 000 03 F 16 01296 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 04/10/2015 27,02 CLR N NONE 093 PARR ST N N TURN-R 01 0 CITY TURN SW Fri 00 DRY N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W CN SETTLEMIER AVE 0 7A INJ DAY N 0 CAR 21 NONE DRVR OR-Y 016,028 093 27,02 038 03 01 F 1 No 45 8 9.25 -122 51 54.35 OR<25 01 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 02 M NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 32 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 M OR<25 32 INJC PSNG 000 00 000 02 F ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Willow St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2014 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2014 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2013 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BACKING 2013 TOTAL 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 YEAR: 2012 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 REAR-END 2012 TOTAL 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 FINAL TOTAL 0 1 2 3 0 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 0 1 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Willow St January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 03967 N N INTER 3-LEG N S-1TURN Y 11/06/2014 30,27,07 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY REAR E Thu 00 WET N STOP SIGN PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 36.24 DAY N 0 CAR 58 DRVR OR-Y 016,050,042 30,27,07 038 04 WILLOW AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.49 -122 53 31.34 NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Woodland Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2014 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 FINAL TOTAL 0 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Woodland Ave & OR 214 Hillsboro-Silverton Hwy (140) January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 01097 N N INTER 3-LEG N ANGL-OTH N 04/05/2014 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE ANGL W Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 E HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 10A MN PDO 36.52 DAY N 0 CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 01 WOODLAND AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.71 -122 53 10.85 NONE 02 0 S 00 PRVTE 000 N CAR 00 DRVR UNK 097 00 000 NONE 01 M UNK 14 00672 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 02/27/2014 08 CLR N NONE MARION U-TURN 01 0 1 NONE TURN W Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 W HILLSBORO-SILV HY CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 36.52 DLIT N 0 CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 008,006 08 000 03 WOODLAND AVE WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 9 3.71 -122 53 10.85 NONE TURN-L 02 0 N 00 PRVTE 000 W CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 M UNK ---PAGE BREAK--- OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CRASH SUMMARIES BY YEAR BY COLLISION TYPE PAGE: 1 Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 COLLISION TYPE FATAL CRASHES NON- FATAL CRASHES PROPERTY DAMAGE ONLY TOTAL CRASHES PEOPLE KILLED PEOPLE INJURED DRY SURF WET SURF DAY DARK INTER- SECTION INTER- SECTION RELATED OFF- ROAD TRUCKS CDS150 09/06/2017 YEAR: 2015 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 3 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 REAR-END 2 3 5 2 2 3 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 2 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2015 TOTAL 0 4 4 8 2 4 4 4 4 8 0 0 0 5 YEAR: 2014 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 3 ANGLE 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 PEDESTRIAN 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 REAR-END 0 3 3 0 2 1 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2014 TOTAL 0 4 3 7 0 4 3 4 3 7 0 0 0 6 YEAR: 2013 3 0 3 0 3 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 4 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 FIXED / OTHER OBJECT 1 1 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2013 TOTAL 0 4 2 6 0 5 1 5 1 6 0 1 0 5 YEAR: 2012 0 2 2 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 1 1 2 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 1 2 3 0 1 2 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2012 TOTAL 0 2 6 8 1 4 3 4 4 8 0 0 0 2 YEAR: 2011 0 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 ANGLE 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 BACKING 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 REAR-END 3 0 3 0 3 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 5 TURNING MOVEMENTS 2011 TOTAL 0 4 3 7 0 6 1 4 3 7 0 0 0 6 FINAL TOTAL 0 18 18 36 3 23 12 21 15 36 0 1 0 24 Disclaimer: A higher number of crashes may be reported as of 2011 compared to prior years. This does not reflect an increase in annual crashes. The higher numbers result from a change to an internal departmental process that allows the Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit to add previously unavailable, non-fatal crash reports to the annual data file. Please be aware of this change when comparing pre-2011 crash statistics. ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 1 A G E S E X 14 00833 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 03/06/2015 08 FOG N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 1 1 CITY TURN NE Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E NE WOODBURN 0 8A MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 SEMI TOW 35 DRVR SUSP 006 08 000 05 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-R 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 02 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 14 03671 Y N INTER CROSS N PED N 10/18/2014 04,18,19 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY PED SW Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E NE WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 49 PED 020 04,18,19 000 INJA 01 M 01 SE NW 14 04645 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/23/2014 07 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY REAR SW Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E NE WOODBURN 0 8A MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 57 DRVR OR-Y 043,026 07 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE STOP 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 011 NE CAR 26 DRVR NONE 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 49 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 04655 N N INTER CROSS Y FIX OBJ N 12/27/2013 26 CLR N NONE 092,053 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY FIX SW Fri 092,053 26 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 007 NE PACIFIC HY 99E SW WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 080,081 00 000 05 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 14 02317 N N INTER N ANGL-OTH N 07/19/2011 02 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE ANGL SE Tue 00 DRY N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 018 NW PACIFIC HY 99E SW WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 32.87 DAY Y 0 CAR 45 DRVR OR-Y 028 02 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 42 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 02917 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 09/04/2011 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR NE Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E SW WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 01 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 2 A G E S E X NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 15 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F 14 04058 N N INTER CROSS N O-1STOP N 11/30/2011 10 CLR N NONE MARION N N BACK 01 0 1 CITY BACK SW Wed 00 DRY N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E SW WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 46 DRVR OTH-Y 011 10 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 26 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 02074 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 06/24/2012 07 UNK N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE REAR NE Sun 00 UNK N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E SW WOODBURN 0 1P MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 81 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 02750 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 08/16/2012 07 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NO RPT REAR NE Thu 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E SW WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 32 DRVR OR-Y 026 07 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJB 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE STOP 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03288 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-STP N 09/23/2014 08 RAIN N NONE MARION N N TURN-R 01 0 1 CITY TURN NW Tue 00 WET N L-GRN-SIG PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E NW WOODBURN 0 9P MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 001 08 000 06 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE STOP 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 012 NW CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 04255 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/11/2011 02 CLD N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 32.87 DUSK N 0 CAR 50 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 3 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 20 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 19 PSNG 000 00 000 INJB 02 F NONE STOP 03 0 SE 00 PRVTE 022 NW CAR 35 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 00726 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/29/2012 04 SNOW N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE ANGL NW Wed 00 SNO N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN PDO 32.87 DAWN N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 00 DRVR UNK 097 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00929 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 03/16/2012 06 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 1 1 NO RPT SS-O NE Fri 00 DRY N UNKNOWN PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 10A MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 SEMI TOW 58 DRVR OTH-Y 001 00 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M N-RES No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-R 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 031 SE CAR 62 DRVR OR-Y 031 06 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 03306 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 10/01/2012 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE ANGL NW Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 UNK MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 020 04 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 U UNK No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 44 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00659 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/21/2015 04 CLR N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL NE Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 9A MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 41 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NW 013 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 58 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 61 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 4 A G E S E X NONE STOP 03 0 SE 00 PRVTE 011 NW CAR 36 DRVR NONE 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00968 N N INTER CROSS N O-OTHER N 03/20/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN NE Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 86 DRVR UNK 028,004 02 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 UNKN TURN-R 02 0 NE 00 UNKN 000 SE UNKNOWN 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 04079 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 10/23/2015 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL NE Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN INJ 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 37 DRVR NONE 020 04 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 04841 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/05/2015 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN NE Sat 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 3A MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 43 DRVR OR-Y 028,004 02 000 02 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 00 DRVR UNK 000 00 000 NONE 01 M UNK 14 00439 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 02/11/2011 02 CLD N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN SW Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 8P MN INJ 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 32 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 29 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 F NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 52 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJB 01 F OR<25 14 02471 N N INTER 3-LEG N O-1 L-TURN N 08/01/2011 02 CLR N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SE Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 12P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 41 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 5 A G E S E X NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 013 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 16 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 SW 00 PRVTE 022 NE CAR 34 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 04074 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 11/30/2011 04 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY ANGL NW Wed 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 7A MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 57 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 59 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 00348 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 01/29/2012 04 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE TURN SW Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 19 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-L 02 0 NW 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 30 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 02 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 02 M 03 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 F 14 01642 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 05/16/2012 02 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN SE Wed 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 2P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 33 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJC 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 SE CAR 48 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 00044 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 01/04/2013 04 CLR N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY ANGL SE Fri 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 44 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 SW 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 39 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 15 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 6 A G E S E X 04 PSNG 000 00 000 NO<5 03 M 14 04221 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 11/23/2014 02 CLR N NONE MARION TURN-L 01 0 1 NONE TURN SW Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 00 DRVR UNK 028,004 02 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 18 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 04119 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 12/02/2012 02 RAIN N NONE MARION N N TURN-L 01 0 1 CITY TURN SE Sun 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 7P MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 21 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 61 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 00397 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 02/07/2013 02 CLD N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE TURN NE Thu 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN PDO 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 45 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR>25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 23 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 02249 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH Y 07/07/2013 04,30 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL NE Sun 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 37 DRVR NONE 020,050 04,30 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 28 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 14 02560 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 07/30/2013 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL NE Tue 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 6A MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 29 DRVR OR-Y 020 04 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJB 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 63 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 081 PACIFIC HIGHWAY EAST CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 7 A G E S E X 14 03162 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 09/16/2013 02 CLD N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Mon 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 5P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 27 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 24 PSNG 000 00 000 INJC 02 M NONE TURN-L 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 85 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 M OR>25 14 00937 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 03/22/2014 04 CLR N NONE MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL SE Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 6P MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 CAR 22 DRVR SUSP 097 00 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJC 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 NE 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 16 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 NONE 01 M OR<25 14 03676 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 10/18/2014 02 FOG N NONE MARION 01 0 1 NONE TURN NE Sat 00 DRY N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 10P MN PDO 32.87 DLIT N 0 CAR 24 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 21 DRVR OR-Y 004,028 02 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 14 04658 N N INTER CROSS N O-1 L-TURN N 11/23/2015 04 RAIN N NONE MARION 01 0 1 CITY TURN NE Mon 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 4P MN INJ 32.87 DUSK N 0 CAR 71 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA INJB 01 F OR<25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-L 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NE CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 097 00 000 NONE 01 F OR>25 14 05162 N N INTER CROSS N S-OTHER N 12/22/2015 08 CLD N NONE MARION TURN-R 01 1 1 CITY TURN E Tue 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 SW PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 8A MN INJ 32.87 DAY N 0 SEMI TOW 61 DRVR OR-Y 006 08 000 04 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 M OR>25 No 008100100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE TURN-R 02 0 E 00 PRVTE 000 SW CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG COUNTY CITY URBAN AREA RD# FC CMPT/MLG MILEPNT LRS CONN # FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ# RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CNTL OFFRD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE 140 HILLSBORO-SILVERTON CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT CONTINUOUS SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 PAGE: 8 A G E S E X 14 00379 N N INTER CROSS N ANGL-OTH N 02/06/2014 04 SNOW N NONE 013 MARION N N 01 0 1 CITY ANGL SW Thu 013 00 SNO N TRF SIGNAL PRVTE 000 NE PACIFIC HY 99E CN WOODBURN 0 3P MN INJ 39.31 DAY N 0 CAR 20 DRVR OTH-Y 020 04 000 03 YOUNG ST WOODBURN UA NONE 01 F OR<25 No 014000100S00 1 45 8 13.29 -122 50 38.07 NONE 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 000 NW CAR 25 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 03 0 NE 013 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 60 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 INJC 01 M OR<25 NONE STOP 04 0 NE 00 PRVTE 011 SW CAR 51 DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 NONE 01 F OR<25 ---PAGE BREAK--- SER# INVEST UNLOC? S P E E D A L C D R U G S S C H L W O R K DATE DAY/TIME LAT/LONG FC DISTNC CITY STREET FIRST STREET SECOND STREET INTERSECTION SEQ # RD CHAR DIRECT LOCTN INT-TYP (MEDIAN) LEGS (#LANES) INT-REL TRAF- CONTL OFF-RD WTHR SURF LIGHT CRASH TYP COLL TYP V# SPCL USE TRLR QTY OWNER VEH TYPE MOVE FROM TO P# PRTC TYPE INJ LICNS RES PED LOC ERROR ACTN EVENT CAUSE CITY OF WOODBURN, MARION COUNTY CDS380 9/6/2017 OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION - TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT DIVISION TRANSPORTATION DATA SECTION - CRASH ANALYSIS AND REPORTING UNIT URBAN NON-SYSTEM CRASH LISTING Young St & OR 99E January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2015 A G E S E X PAGE: 1 16 04984 N N INTER CROSS N S-1STOP N 12/11/2015 29 RAIN N UNKN PACIFIC HY 99E 01 0 NONE REAR SE Fri 00 WET N TRF SIGNAL UNKN 000 NW NW YOUNG ST 0 7P PDO DLIT N 0 UNKNOWN 00 NONE DRVR UNK 026 29 000 06 01 U 1 No 45 8 13.30 -122 50 38.09 UNK NONE STOP 02 0 SE 00 PRVTE 011 NW CAR 29 NONE DRVR OR-Y 000 00 000 01 F OR<25 03 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 02 M 01 NO<5 PSNG 000 00 000 03 F ---PAGE BREAK--- LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST NONE 000 NO ACTION OR NON-WARRANTED SKIDDED 001 SKIDDED ON/OFF V 002 GETTING ON OR OFF STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE LOAD OVR 003 OVERHANGING LOAD STRUCK ANOTHER VEHICLE, ETC. SLOW DN 006 SLOWED DOWN AVOIDING 007 AVOIDING MANEUVER PAR PARK 008 PARALLEL PARKING ANG PARK 009 ANGLE PARKING INTERFERE 010 PASSENGER INTERFERING WITH DRIVER STOPPED 011 STOPPED IN TRAFFIC NOT WAITING TO MAKE A LEFT TURN STP/L TRN 012 STOPPED BECAUSE OF LEFT TURN SIGNAL OR WAITING, ETC. STP TURN 013 STOPPED WHILE EXECUTING A TURN EMR V PKD 014 EMERGENCY VEHICLE LEGALLY PARKED IN THE ROADWAY GO A/STOP 015 PROCEED AFTER STOPPING FOR A STOP SIGN/FLASHING RED. TRN A/RED 016 TURNED ON RED AFTER STOPPING 017 LOST CONTROL OF VEHICLE EXIT DWY 018 ENTERING STREET OR HIGHWAY FROM ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY ENTR DWY 019 ENTERING ALLEY OR DRIVEWAY FROM STREET OR HIGHWAY STR ENTR 020 BEFORE ENTERING ROADWAY, STRUCK PEDESTRIAN, ETC. ON SIDEWALK OR SHOULDER NO DRVR 021 CAR RAN AWAY - NO DRIVER PREV COL 022 STRUCK, OR WAS STRUCK BY, VEHICLE OR PEDESTRIAN IN PRIOR COLLISION BEFORE ACC. STABILIZED STALLED 023 VEHICLE STALLED OR DISABLED DRVR DEAD 024 DEAD BY UNASSOCIATED CAUSE FATIGUE 025 FATIGUED, SLEEPY, ASLEEP SUN 026 DRIVER BLINDED BY SUN 027 DRIVER BLINDED BY HEADLIGHTS ILLNESS 028 PHYSICALLY ILL THRU MED 029 VEHICLE CROSSED, PLUNGED OVER, OR THROUGH MEDIAN BARRIER PURSUIT 030 PURSUING OR ATTEMPTING TO STOP A VEHICLE PASSING 031 PASSING SITUATION PRKOFFRD 032 VEHICLE PARKED BEYOND CURB OR SHOULDER CROS MED 033 VEHICLE CROSSED EARTH OR GRASS MEDIAN X N/SGNL 034 CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT X W/ SGNL 035 CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT DIAGONAL 036 CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY BTWN INT 037 CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS DISTRACT 038 DRIVER'S ATTENTION DISTRACTED W/TRAF-S 039 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC A/TRAF-S 040 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC W/TRAF-P 041 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC A/TRAF-P 042 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC PLAYINRD 043 PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD PUSH MV 044 PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER WORK ON 045 WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER W/ TRAFIC 046 NON-MOTORIST WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC. WITH TRAFFIC A/ TRAFIC 047 NON-MOTORIST WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC. FACING TRAFFIC LAY ON RD 050 STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY ENT OFFRD 051 ENTERING / STARTING IN TRAFFIC LANE FROM OFF ROAD MERGING 052 MERGING SPRAY 055 BLINDED BY WATER SPRAY ---PAGE BREAK--- LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE ACTION CODE TRANSLATION LIST OTHER 088 OTHER ACTION UNK 099 UNKNOWN ACTION ---PAGE BREAK--- CAUSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION CAUSE CODE NO CODE 00 NO CAUSE ASSOCIATED AT THIS LEVEL TOO-FAST 01 TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEED POSTED SPEED NO-YIELD 02 DID NOT YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY PAS-STOP 03 PASSED STOP SIGN OR RED FLASHER DIS SIG 04 DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL LEFT-CTR 05 DROVE LEFT OF CENTER ON TWO-WAY ROAD; STRADDLING IMP-OVER 06 IMPROPER OVERTAKING TOO-CLOS 07 FOLLOWED TOO CLOSELY IMP-TURN 08 MADE IMPROPER TURN DRINKING 09 ALCOHOL OR DRUG INVOLVED OTHR-IMP 10 OTHER IMPROPER DRIVING MECH-DEF 11 MECHANICAL DEFECT OTHER 12 OTHER (NOT IMPROPER DRIVING) IMP LN C 13 IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES DIS TCD 14 DISREGARDED OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE WRNG WAY 15 WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROAD; WRONG SIDE DIVIDED ROA FATIGUE 16 DRIVER DROWSY/FATIGUED/SLEEPY ILLNESS 17 PHYSICAL ILLNESS IN RDWY 18 NON-MOTORIST ILLEGALLY IN ROADWAY NT VISBL 19 NON-MOTORIST NOT VISIBLE; NON-REFLECTIVE CLOTHING IMP PKNG 20 VEHICLE IMPROPERLY PARKED DEF STER 21 DEFECTIVE STEERING MECHANISM DEF BRKE 22 INADEQUATE OR NO BRAKES 24 VEHICLE LOST LOAD OR LOAD SHIFTED TIREFAIL 25 TIRE FAILURE PHANTOM 26 PHANTOM / NON-CONTACT VEHICLE INATTENT 27 INATTENTION NM INATT 28 NON-MOTORIST INATTENTION F AVOID 29 FAILED TO AVOID VEHICLE AHEAD SPEED 30 DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED RACING 31 SPEED RACING (PER PAR) CARELESS 32 CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) RECKLESS 33 RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) AGGRESV 34 AGGRESSIVE DRIVING (PER PAR) RD RAGE 35 ROAD RAGE (PER PAR) VIEW OBS 40 VIEW OBSCURED USED MDN 50 IMPROPER USE OF MEDIAN OR SHOULDER FAIL LN 51 FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE OFF RD 52 RAN OFF ROAD COLLISION TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION COLL CODE & OTH MISCELLANEOUS - BACK BACKING 0 PED PEDESTRIAN 1 ANGL ANGLE 2 HEAD HEAD-ON 3 REAR REAR-END 4 SS-M SIDESWIPE - MEETING 5 SS-O SIDESWIPE - OVERTAKING 6 TURN TURNING MOVEMENT 7 PARK PARKING MANEUVER 8 NCOL NON-COLLISION 9 FIX FIXED OBJECT OR OTHER OBJECT CRASH TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION CRASH TYPE & OVERTURN OVERTURNED 0 NON-COLL OTHER NON-COLLISION 1 OTH RDWY MOTOR VEHICLE ON OTHER ROADWAY 2 PRKD MV PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 TRAIN RAILWAY TRAIN 6 BIKE 7 ANIMAL ANIMAL 8 FIX OBJ FIXED OBJECT 9 OTH OBJ OTHER OBJECT A ANGL-STP ENTERING AT ANGLE - ONE VEHICLE STOPPED B ANGL-OTH ENTERING AT ANGLE - ALL OTHERS C FROM SAME DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT D S-1TURN FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE TURN, ONE STRAIGHT E S-1STOP FROM SAME DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED F S-OTHER FROM SAME DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS, INCLUDING PARKING G FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - BOTH GOING STRAIGHT H O-1 L-TURN FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ONE LEFT TURN,ONE STRAIGHT I O-1STOP FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION - ONE STOPPED J O-OTHER FROM OPPOSITE DIRECTION-ALL OTHERS INCL. PARKING ---PAGE BREAK--- DRIVER LICENSE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC LIC CODE 0 NONE NOT LICENSED (HAD NEVER BEEN LICENSED) 1 OR-Y VALID OREGON LICENSE 2 OTH-Y VALID LICENSE, OTHER STATE OR COUNTRY 3 SUSP SUSPENDED/REVOKED DRIVER RESIDENCE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC RES CODE 1 OR<25 OREGON RESIDENT WITHIN 25 MILE OF HOME 2 OR>25 OREGON RESIDENT 25 OR MORE MILES FROM HOME 3 OR-? OREGON RESIDENT - UNKNOWN DISTANCE FROM HOME 4 N-RES NON-RESIDENT 9 UNK UNKNOWN IF OREGON RESIDENT ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR CODE SHORT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION NONE 000 NO ERROR WIDE TRN 001 WIDE TURN CUT CORN 002 CUT CORNER ON TURN FAIL TRN 003 FAILED TO OBEY MANDATORY TRAFFIC TURN SIGNAL, SIGN OR LANE MARKINGS L IN TRF 004 LEFT TURN IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC L PROHIB 005 LEFT TURN WHERE PROHIBITED FRM WRNG 006 TURNED FROM WRONG LANE TO WRONG 007 TURNED INTO WRONG LANE ILLEG U 008 U-TURNED ILLEGALLY IMP STOP 009 IMPROPERLY STOPPED IN TRAFFIC LANE IMP SIG 010 IMPROPER SIGNAL OR FAILURE TO SIGNAL IMP BACK 011 BACKING IMPROPERLY (NOT PARKING) IMP PARK 012 IMPROPERLY PARKED UNPARK 013 IMPROPER START LEAVING PARKED POSITION IMP STRT 014 IMPROPER START FROM STOPPED POSITION IMP LGHT 015 IMPROPER OR NO LIGHTS (VEHICLE IN TRAFFIC) INATTENT 016 INATTENTION (FAILURE TO DIM LIGHTS PRIOR TO 4/1/97) UNSF VEH 017 DRIVING UNSAFE VEHICLE (NO OTHER ERROR APPARENT) OTH PARK 018 ENTERING/EXITING PARKED POSITION W/ INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE; OTHER IMPROPER PARKING MANEUVER DIS DRIV 019 DISREGARDED OTHER DRIVER'S SIGNAL DIS SGNL 020 DISREGARDED TRAFFIC SIGNAL RAN STOP 021 DISREGARDED STOP SIGN OR FLASHING RED DIS SIGN 022 DISREGARDED WARNING SIGN, FLARES OR FLASHING AMBER DIS OFCR 023 DISREGARDED POLICE OFFICER OR FLAGMAN DIS EMER 024 DISREGARDED SIREN OR WARNING OF EMERGENCY VEHICLE DIS RR 025 DISREGARDED RR SIGNAL, RR SIGN, OR RR FLAGMAN REAR-END 026 FAILED TO AVOID STOPPED OR PARKED VEHICLE AHEAD OTHER THAN SCHOOL BUS BIKE ROW 027 DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY OVER NO ROW 028 DID NOT HAVE RIGHT-OF-WAY PED ROW 029 FAILED TO YIELD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO PEDESTRIAN PAS CURV 030 PASSING ON A CURVE PAS WRNG 031 PASSING ON THE WRONG SIDE PAS TANG 032 PASSING ON STRAIGHT ROAD UNDER UNSAFE CONDITIONS PAS X-WK 033 PASSED VEHICLE STOPPED AT CROSSWALK FOR PEDESTRIAN PAS INTR 034 PASSING AT INTERSECTION PAS HILL 035 PASSING ON CREST OF HILL N/PAS ZN 036 PASSING IN "NO PASSING" ZONE PAS TRAF 037 PASSING IN FRONT OF ONCOMING TRAFFIC CUT-IN 038 CUTTING IN (TWO LANES - TWO WAY ONLY) 039 DRIVING ON WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD (2-WAY UNDIVIDED ROADWAYS) THRU MED 040 DRIVING THROUGH SAFETY ZONE OR OVER ISLAND F/ST BUS 041 FAILED TO STOP FOR SCHOOL BUS ---PAGE BREAK--- ERROR CODE TRANSLATION LIST ERROR CODE SHORT DESCRIPTION FULL DESCRIPTION F/SLO MV 042 FAILED TO DECREASE SPEED FOR SLOWER MOVING VEHICLE TOO CLOSE 043 FOLLOWING TOO CLOSELY (MUST BE ON OFFICER'S REPORT) LN 044 STRADDLING OR DRIVING ON WRONG LANES IMP CHG 045 IMPROPER CHANGE OF TRAFFIC LANES WRNG WAY 046 WRONG WAY ON ONE-WAY ROADWAY; WRONG SIDE DIVIDED ROAD BASCRULE 047 DRIVING TOO FAST FOR CONDITIONS (NOT EXCEEDING POSTED SPEED) OPN DOOR 048 OPENED DOOR INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE IMPEDING 049 IMPEDING TRAFFIC SPEED 050 DRIVING IN EXCESS OF POSTED SPEED RECKLESS 051 RECKLESS DRIVING (PER PAR) CARELESS 052 CARELESS DRIVING (PER PAR) RACING 053 SPEED RACING (PER PAR) X N/SGNL 054 CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, NO TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT X W/SGNL 055 CROSSING AT INTERSECTION, TRAFFIC SIGNAL PRESENT DIAGONAL 056 CROSSING AT INTERSECTION - DIAGONALLY BTWN INT 057 CROSSING BETWEEN INTERSECTIONS W/TRAF-S 059 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER WITH TRAFFIC A/TRAF-S 060 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON SHOULDER FACING TRAFFIC W/TRAF-P 061 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT WITH TRAFFIC A/TRAF-P 062 WALKING, RUNNING, RIDING, ETC., ON PAVEMENT FACING TRAFFIC PLAYINRD 063 PLAYING IN STREET OR ROAD PUSH MV 064 PUSHING OR WORKING ON VEHICLE IN ROAD OR ON SHOULDER WORK IN RD 065 WORKING IN ROADWAY OR ALONG SHOULDER LAY ON RD 070 STANDING OR LYING IN ROADWAY NM IMP USE 071 IMPROPER USE OF TRAFFIC LANE BY NON-MOTORIST ELUDING 073 ELUDING / ATTEMPT TO ELUDE F NEG CURV 079 FAILED TO NEGOTIATE A CURVE FAIL LN 080 FAILED TO MAINTAIN LANE OFF RD 081 RAN OFF ROAD NO CLEAR 082 DRIVER MISJUDGED CLEARANCE OVRSTEER 083 OVER-CORRECTING NOT USED 084 CODE NOT IN USE OVRLOAD 085 OVERLOADING OR IMPROPER LOADING OF VEHICLE WITH CARGO OR PASSENGERS UNA DIS TC 097 UNABLE TO DETERMINE WHICH DRIVER DISREGARDED TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE ---PAGE BREAK--- LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION EVENT CODE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST FEL/JUMP 001 OCCUPANT FELL, JUMPED OR WAS EJECTED FROM MOVING VEHICLE INTERFER 002 PASSENGER INTERFERED WITH DRIVER BUG INTF 003 ANIMAL OR INSECT IN VEHICLE INTERFERED WITH DRIVER PED 004 PEDESTRIAN INDIRECTLY INVOLVED (NOT STRUCK) SUB-PED 005 "SUB-PED": PEDESTRIAN INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. BIK 006 INDIRECTLY INVOLVED (NOT STRUCK) HITCHIKR 007 HITCHHIKER (SOLICITING A RIDE) TOW 008 PASSENGER OR NON-MOTORIST BEING TOWED OR PUSHED ON CONVEYANCE ON/OFF V 009 GETTING ON/OFF STOPPED/PARKED VEHICLE (OCCUPANTS ONLY; MUST HAVE PHYSICAL CONTACT W/ VEHIC SUB OTRN 010 OVERTURNED AFTER FIRST HARMFUL EVENT MV PUSHD 011 VEHICLE BEING PUSHED MV TOWED 012 VEHICLE TOWED OR HAD BEEN TOWING ANOTHER VEHICLE FORCED 013 VEHICLE FORCED BY IMPACT INTO ANOTHER VEHICLE, OR PEDESTRIAN SET MOTN 014 VEHICLE SET IN MOTION BY NON-DRIVER (CHILD RELEASED BRAKES, ETC.) RR ROW 015 AT OR ON RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY (NOT LIGHT RAIL) LT RL ROW 016 AT OR ON LIGHT-RAIL RIGHT-OF-WAY RR HIT V 017 TRAIN STRUCK VEHICLE V HIT RR 018 VEHICLE STRUCK TRAIN HIT RR CAR 019 VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD CAR ON ROADWAY JACKNIFE 020 JACKKNIFE; TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE STRUCK TOWING VEHICLE TRL OTRN 021 TRAILER OR TOWED VEHICLE OVERTURNED CN BROKE 022 TRAILER CONNECTION BROKE DETACH TRL 023 DETACHED TRAILING OBJECT STRUCK OTHER VEHICLE, NON-MOTORIST, OR OBJECT V DOOR OPN 024 VEHICLE DOOR OPENED INTO ADJACENT TRAFFIC LANE WHEELOFF 025 WHEEL CAME OFF HOOD UP 026 HOOD FLEW UP LOAD SHIFT 028 LOST LOAD, LOAD MOVED OR SHIFTED TIREFAIL 029 TIRE FAILURE PET 030 PET: CAT, DOG AND SIMILAR LVSTOCK 031 STOCK: COW, CALF, BULL, STEER, SHEEP, ETC. HORSE 032 HORSE, MULE, OR DONKEY HRSE&RID 033 HORSE AND RIDER GAME 034 WILD ANIMAL, GAME (INCLUDES BIRDS; NOT DEER OR ELK) DEER ELK 035 DEER OR ELK, WAPITI ANML VEH 036 ANIMAL-DRAWN VEHICLE CULVERT 037 CULVERT, OPEN LOW OR HIGH MANHOLE ATENUATN 038 IMPACT ATTENUATOR PK METER 039 PARKING METER CURB 040 CURB (ALSO NARROW SIDEWALKS ON BRIDGES) JIGGLE 041 JIGGLE BAR OR TRAFFIC SNAKE FOR CHANNELIZATION GDRL END 042 LEADING EDGE OF GUARDRAIL GARDRAIL 043 GUARD RAIL (NOT METAL MEDIAN BARRIER) BARRIER 044 MEDIAN BARRIER (RAISED OR METAL) WALL 045 RETAINING WALL OR TUNNEL WALL BR RAIL 046 BRIDGE RAILING OR PARAPET (ON BRIDGE OR APPROACH) BR ABUTMNT 047 BRIDGE ABUTMENT (INCLUDED "APPROACH END" THRU 2013) BR COLMN 048 BRIDGE PILLAR OR COLUMN BR GIRDR 049 BRIDGE GIRDER (HORIZONTAL BRIDGE STRUCTURE OVERHEAD) ISLAND 050 TRAFFIC RAISED ISLAND GORE 051 GORE POLE UNK 052 POLE – TYPE UNKNOWN POLE UTL 053 POLE – POWER OR TELEPHONE ST LIGHT 054 POLE – STREET LIGHT ONLY TRF SGNL 055 POLE – TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND PED SIGNAL ONLY SGN BRDG 056 POLE – SIGN BRIDGE STOPSIGN 057 STOP OR YIELD SIGN OTH SIGN 058 OTHER SIGN, INCLUDING STREET SIGNS HYDRANT 059 HYDRANT ---PAGE BREAK--- LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION EVENT CODE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST MARKER 060 DELINEATOR OR MARKER (REFLECTOR POSTS) MAILBOX 061 MAILBOX TREE 062 TREE, STUMP OR SHRUBS VEG OHED 063 TREE BRANCH OR OTHER VEGETATION OVERHEAD, ETC. WIRE/CBL 064 WIRE OR CABLE ACROSS OR OVER THE ROAD TEMP SGN 065 TEMPORARY SIGN OR BARRICADE IN ROAD, ETC. PERM SGN 066 PERMANENT SIGN OR BARRICADE IN/OFF ROAD SLIDE 067 SLIDES, FALLEN OR FALLING ROCKS FRGN OBJ 068 FOREIGN OBSTRUCTION/DEBRIS IN ROAD (NOT GRAVEL) EQP WORK 069 EQUIPMENT WORKING IN/OFF ROAD OTH EQP 070 OTHER EQUIPMENT IN OR OFF ROAD (INCLUDES PARKED TRAILER, BOAT) MAIN EQP 071 WRECKER, STREET SWEEPER, SNOW PLOW OR SANDING EQUIPMENT OTHER WALL 072 ROCK, BRICK OR OTHER SOLID WALL IRRGL PVMT 073 OTHER BUMP (NOT SPEED BUMP), POTHOLE OR PAVEMENT IRREGULARITY (PER PAR) OVERHD OBJ 074 OTHER OVERHEAD OBJECT (HIGHWAY SIGN, SIGNAL HEAD, ETC.); NOT BRIDGE CAVE IN 075 BRIDGE OR ROAD CAVE IN HI WATER 076 HIGH WATER SNO BANK 077 SNOW BANK LO-HI EDGE 078 LOW OR HIGH SHOULDER AT PAVEMENT EDGE DITCH 079 CUT SLOPE OR DITCH EMBANKMENT OBJ FRM MV 080 STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER OBJECT SET IN MOTION BY OTHER VEHICLE (INCL. LOST LOADS) FLY-OBJ 081 STRUCK BY ROCK OR OTHER MOVING OR FLYING OBJECT (NOT SET IN MOTION BY VEHICLE) VEH HID 082 VEHICLE OBSCURED VIEW VEG HID 083 VEGETATION OBSCURED VIEW BLDG HID 084 VIEW OBSCURED BY FENCE, SIGN, PHONE BOOTH, ETC. WIND GUST 085 WIND GUST IMMERSED 086 VEHICLE IMMERSED IN BODY OF WATER FIRE/EXP 087 FIRE OR EXPLOSION FENC/BLD 088 FENCE OR BUILDING, ETC. OTHR CRASH 089 CRASH RELATED TO ANOTHER SEPARATE CRASH TO 1 SIDE 090 TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON DIVIDED ROADWAY ALL ROUTED TO ONE SIDE BUILDING 091 BUILDING OR OTHER STRUCTURE PHANTOM 092 OTHER (PHANTOM) NON-CONTACT VEHICLE CELL PHONE 093 CELL PHONE (ON PAR OR DRIVER IN USE) VIOL GDL 094 TEENAGE DRIVER IN VIOLATION OF GRADUATED LICENSE PGM GUY WIRE 095 GUY WIRE BERM 096 BERM (EARTHEN OR GRAVEL MOUND) GRAVEL 097 GRAVEL IN ROADWAY ABR EDGE 098 ABRUPT EDGE CELL 099 CELL PHONE USE WITNESSED BY OTHER PARTICIPANT UNK FIXD 100 FIXED OBJECT, UNKNOWN TYPE. OTHER OBJ 101 NON-FIXED OBJECT, OTHER OR UNKNOWN TYPE TEXTING 102 TEXTING WZ WORKER 103 WORK ZONE WORKER ON VEHICLE 104 PASSENGER RIDING ON VEHICLE EXTERIOR PEDAL PSGR 105 PASSENGER RIDING ON MAN 106 PEDESTRIAN IN NON-MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR MTR 107 PEDESTRIAN IN MOTORIZED WHEELCHAIR OFFICER 108 LAW ENFORCEMENT / POLICE OFFICER SUB-BIKE 109 "SUB-BIKE": INJURED SUBSEQUENT TO COLLISION, ETC. N-MTR 110 NON-MOTORIST STRUCK VEHICLE S CAR VS V 111 STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) STRUCK VEHICLE V VS S CAR 112 VEHICLE STRUCK STREET CAR/TROLLEY (ON RAILS OR OVERHEAD WIRE SYSTEM) S CAR ROW 113 AT OR ON STREET CAR OR TROLLEY RIGHT-OF-WAY RR EQUIP 114 VEHICLE STRUCK RAILROAD EQUIPMENT (NOT TRAIN) ON TRACKS GPS 115 DISTRACTED BY NAVIGATION SYSTEM OR GPS DEVICE OTH 116 DISTRACTED BY OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICE RR GATE 117 RAIL CROSSING DROP-ARM GATE ---PAGE BREAK--- LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESCRIPTION EVENT CODE EVENT CODE TRANSLATION LIST JNT 118 EXPANSION JOINT JERSEY BAR 119 JERSEY BARRIER WIRE BAR 120 WIRE OR CABLE MEDIAN BARRIER FENCE 121 FENCE OBJ IN VEH 123 LOOSE OBJECT IN VEHICLE STRUCK OCCUPANT SLIPPERY 124 SLIDING OR SWERVING DUE TO WET, ICY, SLIPPERY OR LOOSE SURFACE (NOT GRAVEL) 125 SHOULDER GAVE WAY BOULDER 126 ROCK(S), BOULDER (NOT GRAVEL; NOT ROCK SLIDE) LAND SLIDE 127 ROCK SLIDE OR LAND SLIDE CURVE INV 128 CURVE PRESENT AT CRASH LOCATION HILL INV 129 VERTICAL GRADE / HILL PRESENT AT CRASH LOCATION CURVE HID 130 VIEW OBSCURED BY CURVE HILL HID 131 VIEW OBSCURED BY VERTICAL GRADE / HILL WINDOW HID 132 VIEW OBSCURED BY VEHICLE WINDOW CONDITIONS SPRAY HID 133 VIEW OBSCURED BY WATER SPRAY ---PAGE BREAK--- FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION TRANSLATION LIST DESCRIPTION FUNC CLASS 01 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 02 RURAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 06 RURAL MINOR ARTERIAL 07 RURAL MAJOR COLLECTOR 08 RURAL MINOR COLLECTOR 09 RURAL LOCAL 11 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - INTERSTATE 12 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER FREEWAYS AND EXP 14 URBAN PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL - OTHER 16 URBAN MINOR ARTERIAL 17 URBAN MAJOR COLLECTOR 18 URBAN MINOR COLLECTOR 19 URBAN LOCAL 78 UNKNOWN RURAL SYSTEM 79 UNKNOWN RURAL NON-SYSTEM 98 UNKNOWN URBAN SYSTEM 99 UNKNOWN URBAN NON-SYSTEM HIGHWAY COMPONENT TRANSLATION LIST DESCRIPTION CODE 0 MAINLINE STATE HIGHWAY 1 COUPLET 3 FRONTAGE ROAD 6 CONNECTION 8 HIGHWAY - OTHER INJURY SEVERITY CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE 1 KILL FATAL INJURY 2 INJA INCAPACITATING INJURY - BLEEDING, BROKEN BONES 3 INJB NON-INCAPACITATING INJURY 4 INJC POSSIBLE INJURY - COMPLAINT OF PAIN 5 PRI DIED PRIOR TO CRASH 7 NO<5 NO INJURY - 0 TO 4 YEARS OF AGE LIGHT CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE 0 UNK UNKNOWN 1 DAY DAYLIGHT 2 DLIT DARKNESS - WITH STREET LIGHTS 3 DARK DARKNESS - NO STREET LIGHTS 4 DAWN DAWN (TWILIGHT) 5 DUSK DUSK (TWILIGHT) MEDIAN TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE 0 NONE NO MEDIAN 1 SOLID MEDIAN BARRIER 2 DIVMD EARTH, GRASS OR PAVED MEDIAN MILEAGE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST LONG DESCRIPTION CODE 0 REGULAR MILEAGE T TEMPORARY Y SPUR Z OVERLAPPING ---PAGE BREAK--- LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE MOVEMENT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 0 UNK UNKNOWN 1 STRAIGHT AHEAD 2 TURN-R TURNING RIGHT 3 TURN-L TURNING LEFT 4 U-TURN MAKING A U-TURN 5 BACK BACKING 6 STOP STOPPED IN TRAFFIC 7 PRKD-P PARKED - PROPERLY 8 PRKD-I PARKED - IMPROPERLY LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE PARTICIPANT TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 0 OCC UNKNOWN OCCUPANT TYPE 1 DRVR DRIVER 2 PSNG PASSENGER 3 PED PEDESTRIAN 4 CONV PEDESTRIAN USING A PEDESTRIAN CONVEYAN 5 PTOW PEDESTRIAN TOWING OR TRAILERING AN OBJ 6 BIKE 7 BTOW TOWING OR TRAILERING AN O 8 PRKD OCCUPANT OF A PARKED MOTOR VEHICLE 9 UNK UNKNOWN TYPE OF NON-MOTORIST LONG DESCRIPTION CODE PEDESTRIAN LOCATION CODE TRANSLATION LIST 00 AT INTERSECTION - NOT IN ROADWAY 01 AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE CROSSWALK 02 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, OUTSIDE CROSSWALK 03 AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY, XWALK AVAIL 04 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN ROADWAY 05 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON SHOULDER 06 NOT AT INTERSECTION - ON MEDIAN 07 NOT AT INTERSECTION - WITHIN TRAFFIC RIGHT-OF-WAY 08 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE PATH OR PARKING LANE 09 NOT-AT INTERSECTION - ON SIDEWALK 10 OUTSIDE TRAFFICWAY BOUNDARIES 13 AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE LANE 14 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN BIKE LANE 15 NOT AT INTERSECTION - INSIDE MID-BLOCK CROSSWALK 16 NOT AT INTERSECTION - IN PARKING LANE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE ROAD CHARACTER CODE TRANSLATION LIST 0 UNK UNKNOWN 1 INTER INTERSECTION 2 ALLEY DRIVEWAY OR ALLEY 3 STRAIGHT ROADWAY 4 TRANS TRANSITION 5 CURVE CURVE (HORIZONTAL CURVE) 6 OPENAC OPEN ACCESS OR TURNOUT 7 GRADE GRADE (VERTICAL CURVE) 8 BRIDGE BRIDGE STRUCTURE 9 TUNNEL TUNNEL LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 000 NONE NO CONTROL 001 TRF SIGNAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS 002 FLASHING BEACON - RED (STOP) 003 FLASHING BEACON - AMBER (SLOW) 004 STOP SIGN STOP SIGN 005 SLOW SIGN SLOW SIGN 006 REG-SIGN REGULATORY SIGN 007 YIELD YIELD SIGN 008 WARNING WARNING SIGN 009 CURVE CURVE SIGN 010 SCHL X-ING SCHOOL CROSSING SIGN OR SPECIAL SIGNAL 011 OFCR/FLAG POLICE OFFICER, FLAGMAN - SCHOOL PATROL 012 BRDG-GATE BRIDGE GATE - BARRIER 013 TEMP-BARR TEMPORARY BARRIER 014 NO-PASS-ZN NO PASSING ZONE 015 ONE-WAY ONE-WAY STREET 016 CHANNEL CHANNELIZATION 017 MEDIAN BAR MEDIAN BARRIER 018 PILOT CAR PILOT CAR 019 SP PED SIG SPECIAL PEDESTRIAN SIGNAL 020 X-BUCK CROSSBUCK 021 THR-GN-SIG THROUGH GREEN ARROW OR SIGNAL 022 L-GRN-SIG LEFT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 023 R-GRN-SIG RIGHT TURN GREEN ARROW, LANE MARKINGS, OR SIGNAL 024 WIGWAG WIGWAG OR FLASHING LIGHTS W/O DROP-ARM GATE 025 X-BUCK WRN CROSSBUCK AND ADVANCE WARNING 026 WW W/ GATE FLASHING LIGHTS WITH DROP-ARM GATES 027 OVRHD SGNL SUPPLEMENTAL OVERHEAD SIGNAL (RR XING ONLY) 028 SP RR STOP SPECIAL RR STOP SIGN 029 ILUM GRD X ILLUMINATED GRADE CROSSING 037 RAMP METER METERED RAMPS 038 RUMBLE STR RUMBLE STRIP 090 L-TURN REF LEFT TURN REFUGE (WHEN REFUGE IS INVOLVED) 091 R-TURN ALL RIGHT TURN AT ALL TIMES SIGN, ETC. 092 EMR SGN/FL EMERGENCY SIGNS OR FLARES 093 ACCEL LANE ACCELERATION OR DECELERATION LANES 094 R-TURN PRO RIGHT TURN PROHIBITED ON RED AFTER STOPPING ---PAGE BREAK--- 095 BUS BUS STOP SIGN AND RED LIGHTS 099 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN OR NOT DEFINITE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE VEHICLE TYPE CODE TRANSLATION LIST 00 PDO NOT COLLECTED FOR PDO CRASHES 01 CAR PASSENGER CAR, PICKUP, LIGHT DELIVERY, ETC. 02 BOBTAIL TRUCK TRACTOR WITH NO TRAILERS (BOBTAIL) 03 FARM FARM TRACTOR OR SELF-PROPELLED FARM EQUIPMENT 04 SEMI TOW TRUCK TRACTOR WITH TRAILER/MOBILE HOME IN TOW 05 TRUCK TRUCK WITH NON-DETACHABLE BED, PANEL, ETC. 06 MOPED MOPED, MINIBIKE, SEATED MOTOR SCOOTER, MOTOR BIKE 07 SCHL BUS SCHOOL BUS (INCLUDES VAN) 08 OTH BUS OTHER BUS 09 DIRT BIKE 10 OTHER OTHER: FORKLIFT, BACKHOE, ETC. 11 MOTRHOME MOTORHOME 12 TROLLEY MOTORIZED STREET CAR/TROLLEY (NO RAILS/WIRES) 13 ATV ATV 14 MOTORIZED SCOOTER (STANDING) 15 SNOWMOBILE SNOWMOBILE 99 UNKNOWN UNKNOWN VEHICLE TYPE LONG DESCRIPTION SHORT DESC CODE WEATHER CONDITION CODE TRANSLATION LIST 0 UNK UNKNOWN 1 CLR CLEAR 2 CLD CLOUDY 3 RAIN RAIN 4 SLT SLEET 5 FOG FOG 6 SNOW SNOW 7 DUST DUST 8 SMOK SMOKE 9 ASH ASH ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 4\4.1 FUTURE CONDITIONS AND ALT DEV AND ANALYSIS\FINAL\21071_TM4_FUTURE CONDITIONS_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #4 Future Systems Conditions Date: March 29, 2019 Project 21071.4 To: Chris Kerr & Eric Liljequist, City of Woodburn Michael Duncan, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 Technical Advisory Committee and Community Advisory Committee From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittleson & Associates, Inc. Subject: Technical Memo Future Systems Conditions (Subtask 4.1) This memorandum documents the future transportation system conditions within the City of Woodburn and its urban growth boundary. The information presented in this memorandum will serve as a baseline for evaluating transportation system needs and identifying potential solutions for the Transportation System Plan (TSP) update, in coordination with the analysis conducted under existing system conditions in Technical Memo Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis. FUTURE TRAVEL FORECASTING PROCESS Woodburn’s 2040 traffic volume forecasts were developed using the following steps and components: ▪ Woodburn’s travel demand forecast model was updated and used as the main tool to project future travel conditions on the study area infrastructure. ▪ The travel demand model was refined to reflect existing and fiscally constrained future circulation infrastructure. ▪ Portland State University Population Research Center (PRC) population forecast and employment data for the year 2040 were incorporated into the travel demand model based on feedback from city staff. Woodburn Travel Demand Model A travel demand forecast model was originally built for the City of Woodburn’s existing transportation system plan. Using the expertise of the Oregon Department of Transportation’s (ODOT) Transportation Planning Analysis Unit (TPAU), this forecasting model was updated and used to help identify future travel demand through the year 2040. The model includes all state highways, and local arterials, collectors, and significant local streets within and surrounding the TSP study area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 2 Woodburn, Oregon Land Use Forecasts Land use plays an important role in developing a comprehensive transportation system. The amount of land that is planned to be developed, the type of land uses, and how the land uses are mixed together have a direct impact on how the transportation system will function in the future. Based on feedback from city and project team staff, land use assumptions for base and future year conditions were incorporated into the travel demand model. The data includes base year 2015 and forecast year 2040 population, household, and employment estimates for the city by Transportation Analysis Zone (TAZ). There are 137 TAZs included within the Woodburn travel demand model. Figures 1, 2, and 3 illustrate the TAZs and the population, household, and employment changes expected between base year 2015 and forecast year 2040. Table 1 summarizes the overall system TAZ data for base year 2015 and forecast year 2040 conditions. As shown in Table 1, the growth in population and households over the 25-year period is expected to be approximately 2% per year while the growth in employment is expected to be closer to 3% per year. Table 1: Woodburn UGB Land Use Summary Land Use 2015 2040 Change Percent Change Population 25,610 38,802 +13,192 +51.5% Households 8,428 12,428 +4,000 +47.5% Employment 10,452 17,748 +7,296 +69.8% As land uses change in proportion to each other (i.e. there is a significant increase in employment relative to household growth), there will be a shift in the overall operation of the transportation system. Retail land uses generate a higher number of trips per acre of land than residential and other land uses. The location and design of retail land uses in a community can greatly affect transportation system operation. Additionally, if a community is homogeneous in land use character (i.e. all employment or all residential), the transportation system must support significant trips coming to or from the community rather than within the community. Typically, there should be a mix of residential, commercial, and employment type land uses so that some residents may work and shop locally, reducing the need for residents to travel long distances. The data shown in Table 1 indicates that significant growth is expected in Woodburn in the coming years, particularly employment opportunities. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R E GON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST TIERRA LYNN D R AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOH NSON ST GARFIE L D ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JANS E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILL ER FARM RD MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELA N A DR W LINCOLN ST T OMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TRO ON AV HAZE L NU T DR J U N E WY ST PANA ST OAK ST COUNTRY C L U B RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R MAYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST T U K WILA DR LEARY RD H E RMA NSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V A L E LN MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV C O UN T RY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN C A N B Y L P LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAMES S T PLUM LN OGLE ST IDAHO DR EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN JORY ST WORKMAN D R ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD ROY A V NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD STANFIELD R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH R D HOO P E R ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST LI NCOL N ST O R E GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GA TCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD WOO DLAND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBERG HY HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV BOON E S FERRY R D WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST 3 7 12 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 Woodburn TSP Update February 2019 ¯ Figure 1 H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM4\TAZ Population No Build.mxd - mmccormick - 11:24 AM 2/4/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation, TPAU Net Difference in Population by TAZ (2015 - 2040) Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet Change in Population from 2015 to 2040 by TAZ < 101 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 500 > 500 Urban Growth Boundary TAZ Number 100 ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R E GON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST TIERRA LYNN D R AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOH NSON ST GARFIE L D ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JANS E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILL ER FARM RD MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELA N A DR W LINCOLN ST T OMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TRO ON AV HAZE L NU T DR J U N E WY ST PANA ST OAK ST COUNTRY C L U B RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R MAYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST T U K WILA DR LEARY RD H E RMA NSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V A L E LN MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV C O UN T RY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN C A N B Y L P LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAMES S T PLUM LN OGLE ST IDAHO DR EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN JORY ST WORKMAN D R ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD ROY A V NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD STANFIELD R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH R D HOO P E R ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST LI NCOL N ST O R E GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GA TCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD WOO DLAND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBERG HY HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV BOON E S FERRY R D WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST 3 7 12 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 Woodburn TSP Update February 2019 ¯ Figure 2 H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM4\TAZ Households No Build.mxd - mmccormick - 11:24 AM 2/4/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation, TPAU Net Difference in Households by TAZ (2015 - 2040) Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet TAZ Number 100 Change in Households from 2015 to 2040 by TAZ < 51 51 - 100 101 - 250 251 - 300 > 300 Urban Growth Boundary ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST O R E GON LP FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST TIERRA LYNN D R AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOH NSON ST GARFIE L D ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION AV EAGLE DR JANS E N WY STAR K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U LI P AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD MILL ER FARM RD MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELA N A DR W LINCOLN ST T OMLIN AV V ANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TRO ON AV HAZE L NU T DR J U N E WY ST PANA ST OAK ST COUNTRY C L U B RD LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY K ING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R MAYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLI N DR IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST T U K WILA DR LEARY RD H E RMA NSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD M E A D O W V A L E LN MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV C O UN T RY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN C A N B Y L P LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JAMES S T PLUM LN OGLE ST IDAHO DR EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN JORY ST WORKMAN D R ELANA WY COMMERCE WY C H A T E A U DR BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD ROY A V NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD STANFIELD R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH R D HOO P E R ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD S HALI M A R LP H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST LI NCOL N ST O R E GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GA TCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD WOO DLAND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBERG HY HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV Y O UNG S T EVE R G REEN RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV BOON E S FERRY R D WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST 3 7 12 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 Woodburn TSP Update February 2019 ¯ Figure 3 H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM4\TAZ Employment No Build.mxd - mmccormick - 11:25 AM 2/4/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation, TPAU Net Difference in Employment by TAZ (2015 - 2040) Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet Change in Employees from 2015 to 2040 by TAZ < 51 51 - 100 101 - 300 301 - 500 > 500 Urban Growth Boundary TAZ Number 100 ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 6 Woodburn, Oregon FUTURE NO-BUILD SCENARIO The following sections summarize the additional analysis completed under the future no-build scenario conditions. Multi-modal Future Analysis Although Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress (BLTS) analysis, Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS) analysis, and qualitative multimodal assessment for transit modes were completed under existing conditions in Technical Memo Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis, these methodologies do not rely on volume characteristics to complete the analyses. Therefore, the no-build scenario that does not propose geometric, posted speed, illumination, or other physical changes to the transportation system does not alter the results of these assessments. All modal systems will be further analyzed for needs and potential alternative solutions in Technical Memo Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program. Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress Analysis Figure 4 illustrates the results of the BLTS analysis for Woodburn’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets. The BLTS calculations are summarized in Technical Memo Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis. A majority of the segments rated BLTS 3 have striped bicycle lanes; however, the bike lanes are too narrow for roadways conditions. Several segments with striped bike lanes were rated BLTS 4 due to a lack of buffering and/or speed conditions; all of which are located on OR 99E. Other segments evaluated as shared roadways were rated BLTS 3 or BLTS 4 due to speed conditions. Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress Analysis Figure 5 illustrates the results of the PLTS analysis for Woodburn’s major arterial, minor arterial, service collector, and access streets, which is unchanged from the existing conditions results. The PLTS calculations are summarized in Technical Memo Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis. Several road segments are rated PLTS 3 due to having curb-tight sidewalks on roadways with speeds of 30 mph or higher. In order for these segments to be rated LTS 2, the speeds would need to be reduced to 25 mph or a buffer would need to be installed between the sidewalk and vehicle travel lane. A majority of the segments rated PLTS 4 have no sidewalks or other pedestrian facilities to accommodate pedestrians. In order for these segments to be rated PLTS 2, sidewalks with appropriate sidewalk and buffer widths would need to be installed along the full length of the roadway. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST N 1ST ST FRONT ST CHURCH ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST NATIONAL WY DAH L IA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOH NSON ST GAR FIELD ST CONSTITUTION A V ORCHAR D L N EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STARK ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER R D NEKIA S T MILLE R FARM RD MERIDIA N DR SMITH D R LAUREL AV W HAYES ST EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST N 3RD ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST N 4TH ST N 2ND ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GL A T T CR OXFORD ST THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R EE NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN JA M E S ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WORKMAN D R WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P O R E GON WY GATCH S T COOLEY RD BROWN ST PAR K AV PRO G RE S S WY WOODLAND AV CROSBY RD A RNEY RD ASTOR WY LINC OLN S T PARR RD STUBB RD STACY ALLISON WY HIGHWAY99EHY SSETTLEMIERAV Y OUNG S T EVER GREE NRD BOON E SFERRYR D S FRONT ST WILCO H Y MOLALLAR D BUTTEVILLE RD N FRONT ST N E W BERGHY MT HOOD AV Woodburn TSP Update February 2019 ¯ Figure 4 BLTS 1 BLTS 2 BLTS 3 BLTS 4 City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\04 Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress - 2040 no build.mxd - mmccormick - 12:05 AM 2/21/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Bicy cle Le ve l of Traffic Stre ss Analy sis – Future Ye ar 2040 No-build Woodburn, Ore gon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST N 1ST ST FRONT ST CHURCH ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST NATIONAL WY DAH L IA ST T IE R R A LYNN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA R D CARL RD JOH NSON ST GAR FIELD ST CONSTITUTION A V ORCHAR D L N EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STARK ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER RD NEKIA S T MILLE R FARM RD MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV W HAYES ST EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST N 3RD ST TOMLIN AV V A NDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST P A NA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R C H ERRY ST WILS O N ST GRANT ST BRIDLEWOOD LN N 5TH ST N 4TH ST N 2ND ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN RA Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST UNION SCHOOL RD THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN MILL ST LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN P U B LI C R D JA M E S ST PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN EVERGREEN BV S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P O R E GON WY GATCH S T COOLEY RD BROWN S T PRO G RE S S WY WOODLAND AV CROSBY RD PARR RD ASTOR WY LINC OLN S T STACY ALLISON WY A RNEY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY99EHY YOUNG ST E V ERGREENRD BOONES FERRY RD WILCO H Y MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD N E W BERGHY MT HOOD AV N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update February 2019 ¯ Figure 5 PLTS 1 PLTS 2 PLTS 3 PLTS 4 City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\05 Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress - 2040 no build.mxd - mmccormick - 12:08 AM 2/21/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn Pedestrian Lev el of Traffic Stress Analysis – Fu tu re Year 2040 No-bu ild Woodbu rn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 9 Woodburn, Oregon Qualitative (Multimodal) Assessment for Transit Modes A transit qualitative multimodal assessment was conducted in accordance with the methodology described in ODOT’s APM. Transit factors that should be considered are frequency and on-time reliability, schedule speed/travel times, transit stop amenities, and connecting pedestrian/bicycle network. This methodology applies a rating system similar to that used for pavement conditions; excellent, good, fair, poor. Frequency and On-time Reliability From the user’s perspective, frequency determines how many times an hour a user has access to transit service, assuming that service is provided within acceptable walking distance and at the times the user wishes to travel. Frequency also helps determine the convenience of transit service to riders and is one component of overall transit trip time (helping to determine the wait time at a stop). Table 2 summarizes the ratings for frequency and on-time reliability for the three transit routes serving Woodburn. Table 2: Frequency and On-time Reliability Rating Provider Routes Service Frequency Rating Woodburn Transit Service City Loop 60 minutes1 Fair Cherriots Regional 10X Woodburn/Salem Express 120 to 150 minutes1 Poor Canby Area Transit 99 60 to 150 minutes1 Poor 1. No service is provided on Saturday or Sunday. All three routes that provide service to Woodburn operate on long headways that can create extended wait times at stops if users do not accurately time their travel. Schedule Speed/Travel Times Schedule speed and travel time refer to the time it takes to complete a transit route in full and the length of time between stops. Table 3 summarizes the ratings for schedule speed and travel time. Table 3: Schedule Speed/Travel Times Rating Provider Routes Number of Stops Route Travel Time Rating Woodburn Transit Service City Loop 53 (loop) 60 minutes Fair Cherriots Regional 10X Woodburn/Salem Express 7 (there and back) 50 minutes Fair Canby Area Transit 99 9 (there and back) 45 minutes Fair Woodburn Transit Service provides a loop route that goes to 53 stops in approximately 60 minutes. Cherriots Regional provides a bus route that goes out to Salem and back to Woodburn. In one direction, the route goes to 7 stops in approximately 50 minutes. Canby Area Transit provides a bus route that goes out to Oregon City Transit Center and back to Woodburn. In one direction, the route goes to 9 stops in approximately 45 minutes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 10 Woodburn, Oregon Future Traffic Operations Traffic operations were evaluated at 22 study intersections in accordance with the assumptions and methodologies identified in the methodology memo provided in Attachment as well as the updated July 2018 Version 2 of ODOT’s Analysis Procedures Manual (APM) Section 5.9. Forecast Traffic Volumes and Peak Hour Operations Forecast traffic volumes were developed for the study intersections based on the existing traffic counts and information provided in the Woodburn travel demand model. The travel demand model provides base year 2015 and forecast year 2040 traffic volume projections that reflect anticipated land use changes and planned transportation improvements within the study area. The forecast traffic volumes were developed by applying the post-processing methodology presented in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design, in conjunction with engineering judgment and knowledge of the study area. Attachment contains the travel demand model data provided by TPAU. Figure 6 illustrates the location and no-build lane configurations of the study intersections. Figure 7 illustrates the year 2040 forecast traffic volumes at the study intersections during the weekday p.m. peak hour. Figure 7 and Table 4 summarize the results of the future traffic operations analysis at the study intersections under year 2040 traffic conditions. Attachment contains the year 2040 future no-build traffic conditions worksheets. As shown in Table 4, 14 study intersections are forecast to exceed their acceptable mobility standards and targets under year 2040 forecast traffic conditions. Four of these intersections were also exceeding their mobility standards and targets under existing conditions. Additional information about the operations issues identified at these study intersections is provided below. ---PAGE BREAK--- H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\dwgs\figs\21071 Figures.dwg Aug 01, 2019 - 6:05pm - mmccormick Layout Tab: FT_Fig6 Future No-Build Scenario Lane Configurations and Traffic Control Devices Woodburn, Oregon 6 Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update March 2019 Figure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 22 21 20 19 18 17 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 19 20 21 22 18 17 16 15 14 5 Molalla Rd 219 N Front Ave Boones Ferry Rd Hardcastle Ave Young St E Cleveland St N 214 211 211 99E - STOP SIGN - TRAFFIC SIGNAL - STUDY INTERSECTIONS Newberg Hwy Newberg Hwy Newberg Hwy Butteville Rd Woodland Ave Crosby Rd Evergreen Rd Cascade Dr Parr Rd ---PAGE BREAK--- 22 21 20 19 18 12 11 10 8 H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\dwgs\figs\21071 Figures.dwg Aug 01, 2019 - 6:06pm - mmccormick Layout Tab: FT_Fig7 Future Year 2040 No-Build Traffic Operations Woodburn, Oregon 7 Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update March 2019 Figure N CM = CRITICAL MOVEMENT (TWSC) LOS = INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE (SIGNALIZED/AWSC) / CRITICAL MOVEMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE (TWSC) Del = INTERSECTION AVERAGE CONTROL DELAY (SIGNALIZED/AWSC) / CRITICAL MOVEMENT CONTROL DELAY (TWSC) V/C = CRITICAL VOLUME-TO-CAPACITY RATIO TWC = TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL AWSC= ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL 2 7 9 13 14 15 16 17 254 121 48 104 200 181 168 669 383 79 752 80 LOS=F Del=>80 V/C=>1.0 6 197 89 156 203 16 8 130 2 77 136 [PHONE REDACTED] 341 15 1541 CM=NB LOS=D Del=32.7 V/C=0.53 57 228 48 6 209 25 19 145 109 64 167 20 LOS=D Del=34.1 22 27 9 95 22 [PHONE REDACTED] 41 27 1494 76 LOS=E Del=59.7 V/C=>1.0 128 141 98 145 157 65 LOS=B Del=12.5 82 917 1176 245 87 84 CM=EB LOS=F Del=>50 V/C=>1.0 530 25 320 19 33 72 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 LOS=F Del=>80 V/C=>1.0 8 115 12 43 260 22 37 76 80 45 46 34 LOS=B Del=13.4 82 789 40 265 1252 146 159 180 121 95 223 281 LOS=F Del=>80 V/C=>1.0 [PHONE REDACTED] 272 1392 450 LOS=C Del=31.6 V/C=0.94 242 495 158 234 971 114 155 401 262 334 288 92 LOS=F Del=>80 V/C=>1.0 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 108 11 90 27 11 26 LOS=D Del=38.9 V/C=>1.0 717 363 [PHONE REDACTED] 733 LOS=B Del=19.4 V/C=0.86 58 6 123 10 4 77 17 674 129 97 946 9 CM=NB LOS=F Del=>50 V/C=>1.0 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 80 55 67 147 43 53 LOS=D Del=35.3 V/C=1.00 3 6 92 759 2 29 25 461 1 41 640 262 LOS=C Del=31.0 V/C=0.68 92 95 128 805 970 170 CM=SB LOS=F Del=>50 V/C=0.98 109 191 57 10 228 266 225 247 132 108 237 24 LOS=F Del=>50 12 14 50 66 36 28 29 716 31 96 842 90 LOS=C Del=25.0 V/C=0.89 16 206 37 68 217 25 17 146 28 85 90 51 LOS=C Del=19.2 150 245 330 331 LOS=D Del=31.4 1 2 7 9 13 17 16 15 14 5 Molalla Rd 219 N Front Ave Boones Ferry Rd Hardcastle Ave Young St E Cleveland St 214 211 211 99E Newberg Hwy Newberg Hwy Newberg Hwy Butteville Rd Woodland Ave Crosby Rd Evergreen Rd Cascade Dr Parr Rd - INTERSECTION DOES MEET TARGET/STANDARD - INTERSECTION DOES NOT MEET TARGET/STANDARD 3 4 5 6 5 6 8 10 11 12 18 19 20 21 22 3 4 CM=NB LOS=F 239 143 Del=>50 V/C=>1.0 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 13 Woodburn, Oregon Table 4: Future Year 2040 Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Map ID Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Delay (Sec) Volume/ Capacity (V/C) Mobility Target/ Operations Standard Target/ Standard Met? Agency Maximum Signalized Intersections 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue C 31.0 0.68 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp B 19.4 0.86 ODOT v/c 0.85 No 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp C 31.6 0.94 ODOT v/c 0.85 No 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road F >80.0 1.15 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road E 59.7 1.01 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE F >80.0 1.17 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street C 25.0 0.89 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E F >80.0 1.22 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue D 35.3 1.00 ODOT v/c 0.90 No 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street D 38.9 1.02 ODOT v/c 0.90 No 21 OR 99E/Young Street F >80.0 1.15 ODOT v/c 0.90 No Unsignalized Intersections 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 F >50.0 2.17 ODOT v/c 0.90 No 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 D 32.7 0.53 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes 10 Front Street/OR 214 F >50.0 3.37 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 F >50.0 4.11 ODOT v/c 0.95 No 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road B 13.4 - County LOS D and v/c 0.85 Yes 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street B 12.5 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street D 34.1 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street D 31.4 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street C 19.2 - City v/c 0.90 Yes 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue F >50.0 - City v/c 0.90 No 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street F >50.0 7.27 ODOT v/c 0.90 No Notes: LOS = Intersection Level of Service (Signal), Critical Movement Level of Service (TWSC). Delay = Intersection Average vehicle delay (Signal), critical movement vehicle delay (TWSC). V/C = Intersection V/C (Signal) critical movement V/C (TWSC). MOE = Measure of Effectiveness Butteville Road/OR 219 The unsignalized northbound Butteville Road approach to the Butteville Road/OR 219 intersection is forecast to operate over capacity. Heavy east-west through volumes on OR 214 are projected to result in limited gaps where the left-turn and right-turn volumes can turn from a shared lane. The Butteville Road approach is currently stop-controlled, so some form of intersection traffic control may be looked at as part of the future solutions assessment. ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 14 Woodburn, Oregon OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp is forecast to operate at LOS C with a v/c ratio of 0.86, which exceeds the ODOT mobility target for the intersection. While the intersection is not meeting the 0.85 mobility target, the intersection is forecast to still have available capacity. As such, mitigation measures that involve physical improvements may not be necessary. OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp is forecast to operate at over capacity conditions with a v/c ratio of 0.94. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 214. OR 214/Evergreen Road OR 214/Evergreen Road is forecast to operate at over capacity conditions with a v/c ratio of 1.15. As the main portal to the retail, industrial, and growing residential areas south of OR 214 and east of I-5, traffic demands on Evergreen Road are projected to exceed the capacity of the OR 214/Evergreen Road intersection. As residential areas grow south of OR 214 and east of I-5, additional connections and alternative routing opportunities are likely going to be needed to help disperse this future demand from Evergreen Road while still connecting to the I-5 corridor. OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road is forecast to operate at capacity with a v/c ratio of 1.01. This is primarily due to high east-west through volumes on OR 214. OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE/N Settlemier Avenue OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE/N Settlemeier Avenue is forecast to operate at over capacity conditions with a v/c ratio of 1.17. These conditions are primarily due to high through volumes on OR 214 and high northbound left-turn volumes from N Settlemier Avenue. A second eastbound through lane was identified in the existing Woodburn TSP as a long-term improvement for this intersection. This potential mitigation as well as other capacity enhancement measures will be a focus of the future solutions analysis. Front Street/OR 214 The unsignalized southbound Front Street approach to the Front Street/OR 214 intersection is forecast to operate over capacity. Heavy east-west through volumes on OR 214 are projected to result in limited gaps where the left-turn and right-turn volumes can turn from a shared lane. The Front Street approach is currently stop-controlled, so some form of intersection traffic control may be looked at as part of the future solutions assessment. The existing Woodburn TSP identified signalization of this intersection as a long-term improvement. ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 15 Woodburn, Oregon Park Avenue/OR 214 The unsignalized northbound Park Avenue approach to the Park Avenue/OR 214 intersection is forecast to operate over capacity. The Park Avenue approaches are currently stop-controlled, so some form of intersection traffic control may be looked at as part of the future solutions assessment. The existing Woodburn TSP identified signalization of this intersection as a long-term improvement. OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E is forecast to operate over capacity with a v/c ratio of 1.22. This is primarily due to high east-west through volumes on OR 214/OR 211, westbound left-turn volumes on OR 211, and high southbound through volumes on OR 99E. The existing Woodburn TSP identified the provision of a southbound right-turn lane on 99E and a second westbound left-turn lane on OR 211 as long-term improvements. Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue The Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F with a critical movement v/c ratio of 1.24. Significant growth projections in south Woodburn will require a reassessment of this intersection from a traffic control perspective. The existing Woodburn TSP identified the provision of an eastbound right-turn lane on Parr Road as long-term improvements. OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue is forecast to operate at capacity with a v/c ratio of 1.00. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 99E. Additional capacity enhancements to the Hardcastle Avenue approaches will need to be looked at as part of the future solutions assessment. No improvements have been identified in the existing TSP. OR 99E/Lincoln Street OR 99E/Lincoln Street is forecast to operate over capacity with a v/c ratio of 1.02. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 214 and southbound on OR 99E. Additional capacity enhancements to the Lincoln Street approaches will need to be looked at as part of the future solutions assessment. No improvements have been identified in the existing TSP. OR 99E/Young Street OR 99E/Young Street is forecast to operate over capacity with a v/c ratio of 1.15. This is primarily due to high through volumes on OR 99E and on the westbound approach. The Highway 99E Corridor Plan identified restriction of certain turn movements at the surrounding intersections as a near-term safety improvement and eventual closure of nearby connections as a long-term safety improvement. In the near-term, the plan identified restricting movements to right-in, right-out only access at the OR 99E/Silverton Avenue intersection and right-in only at the Young Street/Birds Eye Avenue. The long-term ---PAGE BREAK--- Future Systems Conditions Project 21071.4 March 29, 2019 Page 16 Woodburn, Oregon vision is to completely close those two intersections to simplify turning movements and access in this block and free up land for potential future development. OR 99E/Cleveland Street The unsignalized eastbound approach to the OR 99E/Cleveland Street intersection is forecast to operate at LOS F and over capacity. This primarily due to high through volumes on OR 99E that limit the gaps where the left-turn movement from Cleveland Street may enter the intersection. The existing Woodburn TSP and the Highway 99E Corridor Plan identified signalization of this intersection as a long-term improvement. In addition, the Highway 99E Corridor Plan identified the continuation of a two-way left- turn lane south of Cleveland Street. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A Methodology Memo ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 2\FINAL\21071_METHODOLOGY MEMO_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Analysis Methodology and Assumptions Memorandum (Subtask 2.3) Date: February 21, 2018 Project #:21071.2 To: Chris Kerr, City of Woodburn Dan Fricke, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittleson & Associates, Inc. This memorandum documents the methodology and key assumptions to be used in preparation of analyses for the Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update. The methodology and assumptions included in this memorandum are based on guidance provided in the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Transportation System Plan Guidelines (2008, Reference the ODOT Analysis Procedures Manual (APM, Versions 1 and 2, Reference and direction provided by City and ODOT staff. The analyses described in this memorandum will help identify potential deficiencies in the transportation system, including: ▪ Traffic operations at the study intersections under existing and future traffic conditions, ▪ Traffic safety at the study intersections and along study area roadways, ▪ Gaps and deficiencies in the bicycle and pedestrian network, ▪ Gaps and deficiencies in transit service (service frequency, hours, coverage, etc.), and ▪ Gaps and deficiencies in other travel modes. This information will serve as a baseline for identifying a comprehensive list of needs and deficiencies to be addressed as part of the TSP update. It will also serve as a baseline for identifying and evaluating potential solutions and developing a prioritized list of improvements for the TSP update. STUDY INTERSECTIONS AND STUDY SEGMENTS The study intersections and segments for the Woodburn TSP Update were determined by the City and ODOT prior to the development of the scope of the work. There is a total of 22 study intersections located along City and ODOT facilities, including 11 signalized and 11 unsignalized intersections. There are three study segments. Traffic counts were conducted by the Oregon Department of Transportation in fall 2017 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon and consist of 16-hour and 96-hour1 counts, as noted in Table 1 and Table 2. The process for determining the seasonal adjustment factors in Table 1 is discussed in sections below. Table 1: Study Intersections Map ID Intersection Count Date Count Type Peak Hour Start Peak Hour TEV Seasonal Adjustment Factor 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 9/28/2017 16-hour 3:45 PM 822 1.16 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue 9/26/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 1,354 1.06 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 2,560 1.04 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 2,713 1.04 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:00 PM 2,487 1.06 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 2,093 1.06 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:45 PM 1,899 1.06 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,517 1.06 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:00 PM 1,602 1.06 10 Front Street/OR 214 10/5/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 1,733 1.09 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 9/28/2017 16-hour 3:45 PM 1,751 1.06 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E 9/26/2017 16-hour 3:30 PM 2,879 1.05 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road 10/3/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 736 N/A 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:45 PM 701 N/A 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 5:15 PM 795 N/A 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 770 N/A 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street 9/26/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 688 N/A 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue 9/28/2017 16-hour 5:00 PM 804 N/A 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue 10/5/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,546 1.05 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street 10/5/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,405 1.05 21 OR 99E/Young Street 9/26/2017 16-hour 4:30 PM 2,564 1.05 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street 9/28/2017 16-hour 4:15 PM 1,798 1.05 Table 2: Study Segments Map ID Intersection Count Date Count Type S1 Willow Avenue – Roadway Segment 9/25 – 9/28/2017 96-hour S2 Hayes Street – Roadway Segment 9/25 – 9/28/2017 84-hour S3 Gatch Street – Roadway Segment 9/25 – 9/28/2017 96-hour 1 Traffic counts collected on the Hayes Street roadway segment included 84 hours of data instead of 96 hours. It is assumed that there were technical difficulties at this location during data collection. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Peak Hour Development The traffic counts were reviewed to determine individual and system-wide peak hours for the operational analyses. The system-wide peak hour for the study intersections was identified as 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. The system peak hour will be used to complete the operational analyses in order to accurately represent the overall peak period experienced on the Woodburn roadway system. Seasonal Factors 30th Hour Volumes (30 HV) for the Woodburn TSP Update will be developed based on the traffic counts collected at the study intersections and the application of seasonal adjustment factors consistent with the methodology identified in the APM. The APM outlines three methods for identifying seasonal adjustment factors for highway traffic volumes. All three methods utilize information provided by Automatic Traffic Recorders (ATRs) located in select locations throughout the State Highway System that collect traffic data 24-hours a day, 365 days a year. Each method was evaluated to determine the most appropriate method for the study intersections. Based on the evaluations, a combination of the On-Site ATR method and the Seasonal Trend Table method will be used to develop 30 HV volumes at the ODOT study intersections. The results of the evaluation are summarized below. On-Site ATR Method Based on conversations with ODOT staff and the APM, it was suggested that ATR 24-020 (located west of Woodburn on OR 219) and ATR 24-001 (located north of Woodburn on OR 99E) would be appropriate ATRs for seasonally adjusting the Butteville Road/OR 219 intersection and intersections along OR99E, respectively. The On-Site ATR Method adjustment factors for these ATRs are outlined in Table 3 below. Table 3: Seasonal Adjustment Factors using the On-Site ATR Method ATR Data Month 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Average1 Seasonal Adjustment Factor 24-020 Peak Month (July) 121 120 126 127 135 125 1.16 Count Month (September) 113 109 107 107 107 108 24-001 Peak Month (June/July/August) 111 113 112 112 115 112 1.05 Count Month (September) 106 105 109 107 110 107 1 Shaded values were dropped from the average calculations based on ODOT methodology Seasonal Trend Table Method The Seasonal Trend Table Method uses average values from the ATR Characteristic Table for each seasonal traffic trend. Based on a review of the regional and local traffic trends, a combination of the Interstate Non-Urbanized, Commuter, and Summer seasonal traffic trend values were used to determine the seasonal adjustment factors for the study intersections. Table 4 summarizes the average values for ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon the seasonal traffic trends during the count months of September and October and during the peak period as provided in the ODOT Seasonal Trend Table. Table 4: Season Adjustment Factors using the Seasonal Trend Table Trend Peak Period Seasonal Factor 15-September Seasonal Factor 01-October Seasonal Factor Seasonal Adjustment Factor (September) Average (September) Seasonal Adjustment Factor (October) Average (October) Interstate Non- Urbanized 0.8564 0.9458 N/A 1.1044 N/A N/A N/A Commuter 0.9037 0.9359 0.9431 1.0356 1.0633 1.0436 1.0878 Summer 0.8350 0.9110 0.9452 1.0910 1.1320 The seasonal adjustment factor shown in Table 4 for Interstate Non-Urbanized facilities (1.10) will be used to derive 30 HV volumes at the Interstate 5 (I-5) Ramp Terminals. An average of the seasonal adjustment factors for Commuter and Summer facilities will be used to derive 30 HV at all other ODOT study intersections, with 1.06 for locations with counts conducted in September and 1.09 for locations with counts conducted in October. Historical Factors All of the traffic counts were conducted in 2017; therefore, no historical factors are needed to adjust traffic volumes. Forecast Traffic Volumes Forecast traffic volumes for the Woodburn TSP Update will be developed for the study intersections based on the methodology identified in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design. The methodology combines the year 2017 30 HV traffic volumes developed at the study intersections with base year and future year 2035 traffic volume forecasts from the current Woodburn travel demand model developed by ODOT’s Transportation Planning and Analysis Unit (TPAU). Intersection Operational Standards The study intersections are a mix of ODOT and Woodburn facilities. The ODOT controlled intersections within the study area are located along I-5, OR 219, OR 214, OR 211, and OR 99E. ODOT uses volume-to- capacity (V/C) ratio to assess intersections operations. Table 6 of the Oregon Highway Plan (OHP, Reference 3) and Table 10-2 of the Oregon Highway Design Manual (HDM, Reference 4) provide maximum V/C ratios for all signalized and unsignalized intersections outside the Portland metropolitan area Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The OHP ratios are used to evaluate existing and future no-build conditions, while the HDM ratios are used in the creation of future TSP alternatives which involve projects along state highways. Table 5 summarizes the ODOT standards for the facilities being analyzed through the TSP update process. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Table 5: ODOT Operational Standards Roadway Posted Speed > 35 MPH State Classification System National Highway System National Network (Truck Route) OHP Freight Route OHP Mobility Targets HDM Standard OR 219 (Hillsboro- Silverton Highway 140) No/Yes1 District Yes/No2 No No 0.95/0.901 0.75/0.802 OR 214 (Hillsboro- Silverton Highway 140) No District Yes/No3 Yes No 0.95 0.80 OR 211 (Woodburn- Estacada Highway 161) No/Yes4 District No No No 0.95 0.75/0.80 OR 99E (Pacific Highway East 081) No/Yes5 Regional Highway Yes/No6 Yes No 0.90/0.85 0.75 I-5 Ramp Terminals (Pacific Highway 001) Yes7 Interstate Highway Yes Yes Yes 0.85 0.70 1 The posted speed limit on OR 219 transitions from 35 MPH east of Willow Avenue to 55 MPH west of Willow Avenue. Therefore, the study intersection of Butteville Road/OR 219 has a different set of OHP mobility standards as compared to all other study intersections along OR 219. 2 OR 219 transitions to part of the National Highway System east of Woodland Avenue. Therefore, the study intersections of Butteville Road/OR 219 and OR 219/Woodland Avenue have a different set of HDM standards as compared to all other study intersections along OR 219. 3 OR 214 transitions from being part of the National Highway System at milepost 39.31. 4 The posted speed limit on OR 211 transitions from 35 MPH west of Cooley Road to 45 MPH east of Cooley Road. 5 The posted speed limit on OR 99E transitions from 45 MPH north of Industrial Road to 35 MPH south of Industrial Road, to 45 MPH south of Cleveland Road, and to 55 MPH at milepost 33.34. 6 OR 99E is only identified as a National Highway System route between the mileposts of 31.70 and 32.87. 7 The non-freeway speed limits adjacent to the ramp terminals are less than 45 MPH. Marion County used the following mobility standards, as presented in the current Marion County Rural TSP 2005 Update: ▪ LOS D or better with a V/C ratio of 0.85 or better for signalized, all-way stop, and roundabout intersections. ▪ LOS E or better with a v/c ratio of 0.90 or better for other unsignalized intersections. ▪ LOS D or better with a v/c ratio of 0.60 or better for road segments. The City of Woodburn uses the following mobility standards, as presented in the current Woodburn TSP adopted in 2003: ▪ Level of Service (LOS) for signalized intersections ▪ V/C ratio less than 1.00 regardless of LOS ▪ V/C ratio of less than 0.90 on the critical movement should be maintained, provided the queues on the critical approach can be appropriately accommodated. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 6 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon ANALYSIS MODEL PARAMETERS The bullets below identify the proposed sources of data and methodologies to be used to analyze traffic conditions in Woodburn. Analyses of the study area and intersections will be conducted according to the most-recent version of the APM. 1. Intersection/Roadway Geometry (lane numbers and arrangements, cross-section elements, signal phasing, etc.) will be verified for consistency with previous work efforts, reviewed through aerial photography, and confirmed through a site visit. Available as-built data may also be used to verify existing roadway geometry. The analysis models will be built on scaled roadway line work from GIS or aerial photography. ODOT’s two-way stop-controlled intersection calculator tool will be used to calculate expected queue for two-way stop-controlled intersections. 2. Operational Data (such as posted speeds, intersection control, parking, right-turn on red, etc.) will be field verified. Data will be reviewed during a site visit and supplemented by available GIS data, aerials, and photos. 3. Peak Hour Factors (PHF) will be calculated for each intersection and applied to the existing conditions analyses. PHFs of 0.95 will be used for the future analysis for high-order facilities (arterials), with 0.90 applied to medium-order facilities (collectors) and 0.85 applied to local roads. If the existing PHF is greater than these default future values, the existing PHF will be applied. 4. Traffic Operations a. The 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) methodology will be used to analyze traffic operations at the signalized intersections while the HCM 2010 methodology will be used to analyze traffic operations at the unsignalized intersections. b. The existing and future no-build traffic operations analyses will use 9 software using HCM 2000 reports for signalized intersections and HCM 2010 reports for unsignalized intersections. Electronic 9 files shall be provided to ODOT for review. c. Queuing analysis methodology will be based on 95th percentile queue Microsimulation is not proposed as part of this long-range planning effort. SAFETY ANALYSES Safety analyses will include reviewing historical crash data and examining roadway crossings, as described in the following sections. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Crash Analyses The most recent five years of crash data will be reviewed at the study intersections and roadway segments identified through this planning process. The data will be analyzed for a variety of factors including type, severity, general conditions, and location to identify potential crash patterns or anomalies. Particular attention will be paid to the details of crashes involving pedestrians and bicyclists. Study intersection crash rates and critical crash rates will be calculated based on the method outlined in Part B of the Highway Safety Manual. If a critical crash rate cannot be calculated due to limited data, the published 90th percentile rates in Table 4-1 of ODOT’s APM will be used for comparisons purposes. Project-area K-factors from 12+ hour counts will be used to convert short duration counts to daily traffic approach volumes. For all areas that exceed the critical crash rate or 90th percentile rate, we will identify and present crash patterns and potential projects, policies, or studies that could address reported crash types and patterns. Countermeasures suggested for mitigation will be identified as having crash reduction potential based on Crash Modification Factors from the Highway Safety Manual or FHWA’s online Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse with a star rating of 3 or better. All CMFs must have consistent volumes/parameters as the study intersections. NON-AUTOMOBILE ANALYSIS The existing pedestrian, bicycle, and transit network will be reviewed to identify gaps and deficiencies. A gap is defined as a missing link in the network, such as a missing sidewalk on a collector or arterial roadway. A deficiency, or obstacle, is defined as a bicycle or pedestrian facility that is not up to standards or sufficient to meet users’ needs. Examples of deficiencies include: ▪ On-street connection on a collector or arterial roadway that has a Bicycle Level of Traffic Stress rating greater than 2 (Interested but Concerned) ▪ Sidewalks that are too narrow to meet ADA standards or crossings without a curb ramp The multimodal analysis will be performed in accordance with the methodologies identified in Chapter 14 of the APM and identify the needs associated with public transportation, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities and services. The pedestrian and bicycle analyses will be supplemented by a Pedestrian Level of Traffic Stress (PLTS) analysis and a Bicycle Level of Traffic Street (BLTS) analysis, consistent with the APM. Both PLTS and BLTS methods group facilities into four different stress levels for segments, intersection approaches, and intersection crossings. Facilities with an LTS 1 rating have little to no traffic stress, require less attention, and are suitable for all users. Facilities with an LTS 2 rating have little traffic stress, but require more attention and therefore, may or may not be suitable for small children. Facilities with an LTS 3 rating have moderate traffic stress and are suitable for adults. Facilities with an LTS 4 rating have high traffic stress and are only suitable for able-bodied adults with limited options. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Update Project #:21071.2 February 21, 2018 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon NEXT STEPS We would like to request concurrence from TPAU and ODOT Region 2 on the methodology and key assumptions outlined in this memorandum. This memorandum is being provided prior to beginning the existing conditions analysis and conforms to the project scope. Please contact us with any questions or comments at your earliest convenience. REFERENCES 1. Oregon Department of Transportation. Transportation System Plan Guidelines, 2008. 2. Oregon Department of Transportation. Analysis Procedures Manual, 2012. 3. Oregon Department of Transportation. Oregon Highway Plan, 2012. 4. Oregon Department of Transportation. Highway Design Manual, 2012. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B Travel Demand Model Data ---PAGE BREAK--- 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 0 2998 220 220 52 77 734 608 310 296 231 292 353 243 469 521 133 87 2992 0 0 3049 244 175 38 35 108 172 51 54 16 20 5 9 18 19 537 654 697 687 28 34 126 165 3 3 79 106 92 121 102 133 89 98 57 40 39 49 95 120 157 51 49 56 37 32 54 69 77 60 173 90 60 91 153 165 6 7 134 82 631 445 15 17 84 117 25 35 61 27 4 2 6 6 32 17 24 19 125 169 60 84 47 51 130 156 197 150 106 82 95 130 7 9 38 54 60 39 80 65 75 93 51 58 76 85 43 32 29 39 7 10 34 47 57 66 35 64 97 93 55 68 58 64 14 31 11 15 51 58 176 161 32 45 49 60 14 17 27 28 107 123 313 332 180 158 0 0 11 15 12 10 36 28 73 50 53 71 30 41 130 131 32 43 48 29 36 48 20 29 41 48 82 88 12 17 3 4 76 96 34 24 17 24 29 32 19 17 8 4 6 6 1 1 10 10 20 20 252 148 62 91 82 119 18 29 20 35 21 25 137 184 11 35 5 8 2 2 117 73 0 0 24 39 39 63 43 68 53 61 16 25 2 4 6 9 9 8 6 7 17 16 8 8 1 1 2 3 4 6 1 1 24 32 3 2 1 2 41 67 3 4 2 3 42 58 81 92 1 1 0 0 0 0 15 23 22 33 42 40 116 81 23 12 7 3 9 6 44 72 1 1 48 31 178 98 12 9 16 19 34 45 39 40 22 25 43 54 4 5 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 43 116 41 101 91 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 801 2992 2190 2998 808 3049 809 2240 816 3056 0 0 105 76 76 105 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 76 64 85 428 443 392 398 68 115 211 182 45 31 7 4 15 17 0 0 0 0 15 17 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 17 0 0 0 0 39 63 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 117 73 0 0 84 60 50 64 25 35 460 433 421 458 133 87 139 96 6 4 108 172 38 35 317 234 257 401 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 9 309 229 234 317 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 19 213 288 306 232 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 54 51 357 287 0 0 357 287 334 354 203 300 0 0 175 244 437 298 110 121 93 178 334 354 0 0 93 178 476 445 93 178 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 427 618 0 191 413 604 600 426 202 237 559 249 422 334 426 600 334 422 158 180 967 843 455 [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] 1078 1112 404 1305 786 43 0 1262 1345 [PHONE REDACTED] 1050 [PHONE REDACTED] 1070 357 338 479 498 469 478 11 15 237 202 192 230 52 51 52 52 4 5 0 0 4 5 91 101 96 87 133 118 583 597 4 6 188 228 2 2 96 139 106 103 52 77 734 608 738 615 25 22 220 220 257 401 286 410 606 627 606 627 606 627 318 368 463 433 615 738 767 678 117 84 365 314 77 52 309 385 770 683 17 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 309 385 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 25 779 701 18 26 0 0 26 18 26 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 139 139 107 139 107 0 0 79 119 119 79 384 316 435 463 107 139 779 701 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 139 0 0 26 18 18 26 0 0 0 0 134 82 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 124 147 9 17 31 45 73 74 73 74 355 379 124 147 0 0 7 4 0 0 0 0 31 45 268 143 363 302 197 252 0 0 119 79 21 37 72 107 165 153 165 153 0 0 15 17 15 17 419 291 330 374 86 398 392 121 19 18 21 37 19 18 363 302 2 1 266 254 255 268 255 268 266 254 34 43 244 222 244 222 11 15 182 211 0 0 0 0 182 211 182 211 0 0 259 280 0 0 0 0 259 280 922 748 0 0 259 280 0 0 299 303 40 57 50 36 36 50 916 742 85 115 120 95 1 1 1 1 22 24 24 23 68 115 17 25 56 0 56 0 0 56 43 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 115 49 49 0 0 49 56 36 50 0 0 36 50 0 0 68 114 496 532 50 36 50 36 43 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 50 56 65 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 114 43 60 1 1 0 0 56 65 23 24 496 532 415 421 43 97 164 78 72 59 91 100 106 106 100 585 506 834 534 106 100 398 409 0 0 59 91 54 43 73 79 834 950 1 1 97 164 60 77 77 60 0 0 7 11 53 81 756 792 146 139 792 756 149 236 609 559 490 568 141 112 874 700 189 130 150 245 504 529 568 490 840 720 0 0 189 130 141 112 305 320 353 339 27 20 1 1 7 12 0 0 554 671 754 664 169 125 60 77 0 0 150 245 562 500 51 47 169 114 705 739 717 676 67 32 661 736 129 532 736 541 611 592 635 178 125 12 11 721 635 42 32 116 95 67 32 0 0 35 40 0 0 57 57 664 578 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 664 578 839 672 150 197 32 24 10 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 93 94 67 154 272 0 0 100 98 572 489 0 0 0 0 157 166 123 107 57 66 66 57 310 296 177 124 1 1 2 4 141 245 269 129 279 149 64 58 95 68 68 95 68 95 0 0 41 36 0 0 583 597 40 35 35 40 0 0 16 21 63 48 0 1 124 241 0 0 177 124 465 489 423 391 218 283 132 126 4 3 29 38 0 0 864 703 28 26 438 464 14 14 29 38 29 31 218 283 21 17 121 119 54 41 479 517 29 31 121 119 40 57 468 491 0 0 697 873 852 680 2 0 120 120 46 49 254 312 344 342 345 348 509 510 159 178 29 39 39 29 344 342 302 313 41 29 391 423 395 349 29 31 1 15 134 120 643 607 54 56 152 130 88 123 87 124 10 7 80 82 198 252 28 23 110 151 46 49 0 0 44 61 68 93 0 0 159 178 0 0 64 35 35 64 0 0 57 66 75 111 0 0 69 63 1 1 183 251 30 33 180 156 27 16 16 27 56 52 7 14 11 13 18 21 144 120 117 123 123 132 38 40 85 92 291 257 387 394 28 23 804 667 97 71 101 123 3 4 183 251 7 14 1 1 97 71 35 34 0 0 97 71 374 383 21 29 1 1 59 42 0 0 0 0 54 38 12 10 12 10 4 3 159 178 0 0 33 72 173 203 136 134 0 0 1 1 0 0 7 14 376 385 0 0 291 257 0 0 32 42 4 4 375 384 2 2 0 0 0 0 30 34 13 17 39 72 176 172 805 650 269 240 22 18 0 0 153 180 0 0 4 4 2 2 191 196 0 0 375 384 39 72 0 0 19 19 25 58 4 5 27 21 9 14 23 57 89 104 76 91 55 26 34 33 55 28 162 150 139 122 36 52 379 372 191 196 2 2 7 12 7 12 133 118 104 123 4 1 16 15 3 7 12 11 16 8 857 725 41 37 164 153 3 2 4 1 17 27 582 616 201 164 0 0 153 180 32 23 118 112 9 8 3 2 33 31 20 25 88 82 206 169 293 309 13 6 6 9 0 13 129 108 831 705 76 81 38 45 53 41 0 0 582 616 18 5 34 44 588 616 2 3 0 0 65 62 615 646 5 5 818 701 146 124 189 153 624 664 0 0 624 664 57 80 48 39 194 158 89 45 130 151 0 0 0 0 0 0 48 39 0 0 0 0 48 24 624 664 0 0 0 0 48 39 40 51 0 0 4 3 0 0 836 718 17 19 112 111 0 0 0 0 20 35 35 20 108 124 40 24 70 35 30 21 160 138 661 601 40 24 0 0 0 0 547 619 48 59 0 0 0 0 848 720 10 7 29 18 5 9 123 85 46 99 40 51 1 5 136 179 0 0 0 0 181 164 25 21 0 0 136 179 804 687 45 34 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 96 103 85 61 309 293 348 340 50 46 27 18 53 117 0 0 120 107 72 50 218 253 622 544 583 673 27 18 35 11 11 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 582 675 0 0 34 24 13 8 70 53 92 57 38 136 684 704 347 304 39 40 292 237 19 32 0 0 11 35 1 1 33 23 1 1 1 1 114 112 77 103 167 152 1 1 167 152 0 0 0 0 260 288 48 41 55 55 16 23 54 30 18 0 249 307 307 249 303 241 4 8 18 0 698 714 10 14 9 12 14 11 136 198 191 116 698 714 27 32 65 32 619 653 316 343 191 116 41 67 16 23 23 16 0 0 295 384 52 32 12 0 16 11 91 62 0 0 33 28 0 0 94 154 88 54 250 367 52 32 0 0 16 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 292 231 10 10 593 524 366 247 243 353 32 42 0 0 18 19 35 25 25 35 0 0 31 25 112 113 103 105 11 8 16 25 48 86 558 497 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 68 407 420 529 504 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 4 391 442 83 55 83 55 80 128 91 60 37 21 0 0 37 21 0 0 0 0 91 60 0 0 91 60 91 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 313 433 185 65 460 460 237 227 0 0 71 69 93 68 58 45 35 22 69 71 48 34 0 0 58 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 46 86 48 0 0 48 86 0 94 49 46 25 49 24 237 227 422 292 18 0 144 190 46 25 46 25 0 537 487 43 32 40 28 28 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 40 0 0 0 0 28 40 0 0 0 0 28 40 0 0 28 40 469 521 7 6 332 313 150 124 82 105 10 12 0 0 10 12 0 0 10 12 0 0 0 0 133 118 28 36 0 0 36 28 36 28 153 165 165 153 39 24 1 1 0 0 20 16 180 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 18 0 0 23 15 65 80 314 297 2 4 365 314 104 106 103 106 131432647 131432648 131432649 131434628 131434629 131434631 131434632 131434635 131436657 131436658 131436659 131436660 131436661 131436662 131436663 131436664 131436665 131436666 131436667 131436668 131436671 131436672 131436674 131436675 131436677 131439247 131439248 131440555 131608070 131608071 131608072 131608603 131608610 131608615 131608624 131608625 131608626 131608627 131608628 131608629 131608632 131608633 131608634 131608635 131608636 131608637 131608638 131608640 131608641 131608642 131608644 131608645 131608646 131608647 131608648 131608652 131608653 131608655 131608656 131608661 131608663 131608664 131608665 131608666 131608667 131608668 131608669 131608670 131608672 131608673 131608674 131608675 131608676 131608677 131608678 131608679 131608680 131608681 131608682 131608683 131608684 131608685 131608686 131608687 131608689 131608690 131608691 131608692 131608693 131608694 131608695 131608699 131608700 131608702 131608703 131610225 131610248 131610249 131620821 131620830 131620838 131620839 131620841 131620842 131620844 131620845 131620847 131620851 131620852 131620853 131620854 131620857 131620858 131620859 131620860 131620861 131620862 131620863 131620864 131620865 131620867 131620869 131620870 131620872 131620873 131620874 131620875 131620876 131620877 131620879 131620881 131620882 131620883 131620884 131620885 131620886 131620887 131620889 131620890 131620891 131620892 131620893 131620894 131620895 131620896 131620897 131620899 131620900 131620902 131620903 131620904 131620905 131620907 131620909 131620910 131620911 131620912 131620914 131620915 131620916 131620918 131620919 131620920 131620921 131620922 131620923 131620924 131620926 131620929 131620931 131620932 131620933 131620935 131620936 131620937 131620938 131620940 131620941 131620942 131620944 131620947 131620948 131620949 131620951 131620953 131620954 131620956 131620957 131620958 131620959 131620961 131620962 131620963 131620964 131620965 131620967 131620968 131620969 131620970 131620971 131620972 131620973 131620975 131620976 131620977 131620978 131620979 131620980 131620981 131620982 131620983 131620984 131620985 131620987 131620988 131620989 131620990 131620991 131620992 131620993 131620994 131620995 131620996 131620997 131620998 131620999 131621000 131621001 131621002 131621003 131621007 131621009 131621010 131621011 131621012 131621013 131621015 131621016 131621017 131621018 131621019 131621020 131621021 131621022 131621023 131621024 131621025 131621026 131621027 131621028 131621029 131621032 131621033 131621034 131621035 131621036 131621037 131621038 131621040 131621041 131621042 131621044 131621046 131621047 131621048 131621049 131621050 131621051 131621052 131621053 131621054 131621055 131621056 131621057 131621058 131621059 131621060 131621061 131621062 131621063 131621064 131621066 131621067 131621068 131621069 131621071 131621072 131621073 131621074 131621075 131621076 131621077 131621078 131621079 131621080 131621081 131621083 131621084 131621085 131621089 131621090 131621091 131621092 131621093 131621094 131621095 131621096 131621098 131621101 131621103 131621106 131621107 131621108 131621109 131621111 131621112 131621113 131621116 131621119 131621121 131621122 131621123 131621124 131621125 131621126 131621127 131621128 131621129 131621130 131621131 131621132 131621133 131621134 131621135 131621136 131621137 131621138 131621139 131621140 131621141 131621143 131621144 131621145 131621146 131621148 131621151 131621152 131621153 131621156 131621157 131621158 131621159 131621160 131621161 131621162 131621164 131621167 131621168 131621169 131621170 131621171 131621172 131621174 131621175 131621177 131621178 131621179 131621180 131621181 131621182 131621184 131621185 131621186 131621187 131621188 131621189 131621190 131621191 131621193 131621195 131621196 131621197 131621198 131621199 131621201 131621202 131621203 131621204 131621205 131621206 131621208 131621209 131621210 131621211 131621212 131621213 131621214 131621215 131621216 131621217 131621218 131621219 131621220 131621221 131621222 131621223 131621224 131621225 131621226 131621228 131621229 131621230 131621231 131621232 131621234 131621235 131621236 131621237 131621238 131621239 131621240 131621241 131621242 131621243 131621244 131621245 131621246 131621247 131621249 131621250 131621251 131621252 131621255 131621256 131621258 131621259 131621260 131621261 131621262 131621263 131621264 131621266 131621267 131621268 131621269 131621270 131621274 131621275 131621277 131621278 131621279 131621280 131621282 131621283 131621284 131621285 131621286 131621287 131621288 131621291 131621292 131621293 131621295 131621297 131621299 131621300 131621301 131621302 131621303 131621304 131621305 131621306 131621307 131621308 131621309 131621310 131621314 131621315 131621316 131621317 131621318 131621320 131621322 131621323 131621324 131621325 131621327 131621328 131621329 131621330 131621331 131621332 131621334 131621336 131621337 131621338 131621339 131621340 131621343 131621345 131621346 131621347 131621348 131621351 131621352 131621353 131621354 131621355 131621357 131621358 131621362 131621364 131621366 131621368 131621369 131621370 131621372 131621373 131621375 131630509 131630510 131630512 131630540 131630545 131630546 131630547 131630582 131630589 131630591 131630689 131630740 131630773 131631314 131631968 131631970 131631971 131632137 131632163 131632187 131632188 131632253 131632257 131632275 131632303 131632307 131632308 131632337 131632366 131632526 131632880 131632883 131633472 131635087 131635089 131635107 131636050 131636051 131636052 131636053 131636054 131636055 131636232 131636233 131636234 131639881 131641096 131641912 131641913 131641914 131641915 131641916 131641918 131641919 131641920 131641921 131641922 131641923 131641924 131641925 131641926 131641927 131641928 131641929 131641930 131641931 131641932 131641934 131641935 131641937 131641938 131642294 131642295 131644420 131644421 131644422 131644423 131644424 131644425 131644426 131644427 131644428 131644429 131644434 131644435 131644436 131644437 131644438 131645962 131645963 131645964 131645966 131645967 131645968 131645970 131645971 131645972 131645973 131645974 131647756 131647757 131647758 131647759 131647762 131647763 131647764 131647765 131647766 131647767 131647770 131647771 131647773 131955100 131955101 131955102 131955103 131955104 131955105 131955106 131955107 131955111 131955112 131955113 131955127 131955147 131955148 131955149 131955151 131959357 131959358 131967756 131993768 131993779 131993780 131993789 131993790 131993792 131993793 131993794 131993795 131993796 131993797 131993833 131993834 131993855 131993856 131993857 131993863 131993869 131993880 131993882 131993887 131993888 132214627 132226076 132226079 132226080 132226081 132226082 132226083 132226084 132226085 132226086 132226087 132226088 132226089 132226090 132226091 132226092 132226093 132226094 132226095 132226096 132226097 132226098 132226099 132226100 132226101 132226102 132226103 132226104 Abc ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 0 4347 275 275 64 96 917 760 485 466 254 321 618 426 697 768 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 0 4421 317 227 47 44 149 237 145 169 38 46 5 7 21 25 574 695 824 844 29 34 125 172 60 83 57 76 89 121 94 129 60 70 163 119 38 50 93 123 175 61 93 124 16 22 36 46 70 56 209 117 71 116 122 132 48 51 186 121 784 573 20 21 80 114 22 32 95 43 3 2 7 8 44 26 139 102 113 153 55 76 42 48 102 136 146 110 36 27 127 182 7 8 66 91 111 84 98 68 107 117 100 113 97 113 51 45 30 41 24 16 36 50 70 72 37 60 81 94 66 76 61 71 11 21 10 12 41 46 212 233 54 44 95 121 9 14 28 32 134 149 297 321 235 159 281 134 13 16 45 25 56 123 135 130 69 81 31 43 81 99 96 62 67 56 59 77 22 32 49 61 66 76 12 17 4 4 116 116 85 57 73 96 43 44 31 26 7 4 5 5 23 17 56 47 56 49 274 187 70 95 74 119 27 40 37 41 10 19 190 270 14 39 79 97 29 43 113 108 0 0 20 32 33 55 39 61 179 239 43 71 88 146 6 9 93 110 9 9 15 15 6 7 83 99 2 3 3 5 1 1 22 30 208 140 1 2 17 29 3 4 2 3 187 126 101 147 85 126 0 0 94 39 13 22 22 35 41 47 188 160 12 6 23 17 22 15 107 178 1 1 62 41 85 56 6 5 61 48 54 59 82 60 35 36 86 85 4 5 67 46 0 0 157 242 116 56 0 1 0 0 197 161 89 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3140 1198 4338 3525 4347 822 3882 4421 540 3212 1219 4431 0 0 158 84 84 158 0 0 0 0 0 0 82 84 57 134 459 471 374 439 56 50 158 168 36 34 58 9 11 19 0 0 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 19 0 0 0 0 33 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 113 108 0 0 76 55 50 59 20 32 533 547 534 532 183 119 188 127 5 3 149 237 47 44 194 453 463 289 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 7 187 447 453 194 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 25 410 141 162 434 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 169 145 307 604 0 0 307 604 408 405 167 290 0 0 227 317 372 579 45 162 122 129 408 405 0 0 122 129 567 452 122 129 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 672 913 0 241 550 791 643 742 434 542 822 0 534 640 742 643 640 534 [PHONE REDACTED] 1436 [PHONE REDACTED] 1651 [PHONE REDACTED] 1768 1211 0 1880 1768 1198 2047 1346 2047 2168 [PHONE REDACTED] 1938 [PHONE REDACTED] 1929 394 399 336 333 544 558 13 16 542 434 395 360 114 143 140 112 6 6 0 0 6 6 87 89 83 80 384 392 665 669 5 6 391 357 237 363 166 282 297 146 64 96 917 760 928 772 36 35 275 275 463 289 338 291 623 496 623 496 623 496 421 418 482 358 772 928 957 835 114 80 389 390 96 64 365 396 963 842 21 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365 396 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 22 970 859 18 84 0 0 84 18 84 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 87 87 107 87 107 0 0 96 98 98 96 416 313 410 511 107 87 970 859 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 87 0 0 84 18 18 84 0 0 0 0 186 121 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 121 93 6 15 34 36 61 132 61 132 463 429 121 93 0 0 58 9 0 0 0 0 34 36 333 174 451 399 193 200 0 0 98 96 51 78 102 88 132 122 132 122 0 0 11 19 11 19 454 291 330 391 109 439 374 98 14 11 45 57 72 86 14 11 451 399 2 1 272 262 264 274 264 274 272 262 24 27 259 246 259 246 9 12 168 158 0 0 0 0 168 158 168 158 0 0 270 291 0 0 0 0 [PHONE REDACTED] 940 0 0 270 291 0 0 395 372 119 163 32 25 25 32 1147 932 85 118 123 93 3 1 1 3 24 28 28 24 56 50 14 22 124 0 0 0 124 33 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 85 117 93 93 0 0 93 124 25 32 0 0 25 32 0 0 53 49 546 597 32 25 32 25 33 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 47 61 72 0 0 0 0 0 0 53 49 31 42 1 2 0 0 61 72 25 30 546 597 459 534 73 80 96 92 100 68 81 122 135 135 122 788 612 981 695 135 122 514 503 0 0 68 81 85 86 102 94 981 1154 2 2 80 96 56 70 102 100 57 45 5 8 63 73 1449 1530 [PHONE REDACTED] 1449 536 562 915 969 557 617 68 65 973 757 267 225 143 169 728 760 [PHONE REDACTED] 941 0 0 267 225 68 65 474 494 635 587 37 28 2 2 6 9 0 0 675 903 873 719 232 155 100 102 0 0 143 169 804 882 48 42 252 [PHONE REDACTED] 1026 916 76 131 886 940 193 694 940 623 685 579 609 131 94 258 227 12 7 772 609 9 6 76 71 76 34 0 97 31 61 0 0 37 35 735 574 0 0 0 97 13 19 19 13 [PHONE REDACTED] 913 110 146 30 22 7 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 68 75 217 196 505 557 112 81 114 108 630 573 0 0 0 0 104 100 149 134 70 72 72 70 485 466 217 190 41 37 3 6 500 508 528 474 550 508 71 61 129 87 87 129 87 129 0 0 32 38 0 0 665 669 61 31 31 61 0 0 19 24 73 62 1 1 474 493 112 81 217 190 621 621 629 569 400 421 137 136 4 3 41 55 112 81 1138 945 31 23 590 597 11 9 41 55 47 46 400 421 35 18 126 142 42 26 616 639 47 46 220 204 142 138 601 629 0 0 930 1153 1128 911 18 12 203 193 36 48 430 422 255 253 257 261 671 648 391 429 30 41 41 30 254 253 222 219 32 34 569 629 596 537 47 46 11 13 201 188 752 727 65 29 175 149 108 144 112 139 16 24 59 50 399 395 28 24 135 167 36 48 0 0 61 74 77 96 0 0 377 429 15 0 60 37 37 60 0 0 70 72 87 117 0 0 129 119 11 5 391 395 27 24 196 173 34 26 41 34 30 39 1 2 43 18 22 23 180 154 155 184 166 193 67 70 99 122 519 416 313 384 28 24 1086 930 140 101 146 156 20 23 391 395 1 2 11 5 140 101 23 30 13 15 140 101 308 354 20 29 1 2 84 60 0 0 0 0 91 66 6 7 6 7 4 3 377 429 0 0 74 114 365 332 197 184 13 15 11 5 15 13 14 17 301 353 0 0 519 416 0 0 61 76 12 12 300 352 11 5 0 0 0 0 51 59 25 32 76 108 [PHONE REDACTED] 900 502 401 18 16 0 0 366 423 0 0 12 12 11 5 443 380 0 0 300 352 76 108 0 0 53 64 65 86 5 8 26 21 10 10 63 85 125 136 116 142 84 48 36 28 76 48 361 275 162 147 77 96 295 329 443 380 5 3 4 7 4 7 154 142 163 198 2 2 37 43 17 23 29 25 10 6 1142 1003 51 50 362 280 5 1 3 2 53 25 0 0 795 830 383 320 0 0 366 423 33 22 140 137 8 7 5 1 27 24 16 21 76 66 412 345 715 690 24 17 15 22 0 12 [PHONE REDACTED] 987 104 96 32 41 72 72 8 5 787 825 18 9 35 46 789 819 2 3 0 0 34 56 806 815 7 9 1106 982 192 174 428 364 828 809 11 0 828 820 69 67 60 63 435 373 86 42 164 191 0 0 0 0 0 0 60 63 5 8 0 11 23 19 828 820 0 0 0 0 60 63 56 60 0 0 4 4 0 0 1136 1009 26 31 164 186 0 0 0 0 37 41 41 37 158 198 40 23 68 35 38 27 394 335 824 802 40 23 0 0 0 0 782 809 18 11 0 0 0 0 1162 1006 9 6 40 27 6 11 120 75 91 175 56 60 2 4 189 267 0 0 0 0 404 355 19 10 0 0 [PHONE REDACTED] 952 59 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 345 317 60 37 690 715 769 721 48 43 26 18 92 169 0 0 122 115 79 54 575 605 821 772 826 879 26 18 39 14 14 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 830 871 0 0 28 21 13 7 75 56 89 61 70 176 1066 971 445 429 82 60 373 325 18 29 0 0 14 39 1 1 28 20 1 1 1 1 506 562 523 492 607 573 1 1 607 573 0 0 0 0 516 502 220 230 114 97 18 26 57 30 19 0 333 383 383 333 379 327 4 7 19 0 1095 991 20 30 5 6 10 8 146 213 [PHONE REDACTED] 991 27 29 57 27 1002 973 630 599 185 111 17 29 18 26 26 18 0 0 620 656 43 27 14 0 18 12 95 70 0 0 30 27 0 0 93 154 126 76 514 620 43 27 0 0 18 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 321 254 47 56 1012 896 593 429 426 618 123 96 0 0 11 14 32 22 22 32 0 0 38 31 519 484 172 351 448 304 43 71 63 115 902 846 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 87 693 688 760 728 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 58 9 500 511 98 53 98 53 78 136 75 46 61 31 40 25 86 72 0 0 0 0 75 46 0 0 75 46 75 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 40 0 0 598 577 20 57 557 541 283 287 0 0 52 75 79 37 38 22 40 15 75 52 37 35 0 0 38 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 38 115 63 0 0 63 115 0 93 54 38 24 56 30 283 287 303 344 11 230 77 313 38 24 38 24 0 780 710 141 148 94 118 118 94 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 94 0 0 0 0 118 94 0 0 0 0 118 94 0 0 118 94 697 768 9 9 321 297 0 0 375 458 336 262 25 45 0 0 25 45 0 0 25 45 0 0 0 0 384 392 123 56 0 0 56 123 56 123 122 132 132 122 33 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 46 38 235 159 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 0 0 22 13 68 98 488 467 2 3 389 390 149 358 358 149 146 297 620 514 149 358 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 670 670 670 670 385 385 385 Volume PrT [veh] (AP) 0 500 1000 2000 > Volume PrT [veh] (AP) 0 1108 2215 4431 Abc ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment C Year 2040 Traffic Conditions Analysis Worksheets ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 1: Butteville Rd & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build__updated int1.syn 9 Report Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 08/02/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 162 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 239 143 330 331 150 245 Future Vol, veh/h 239 143 330 331 150 245 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - - - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 15 21 18 29 31 15 Mvmt Flow 249 149 344 345 156 255 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 398 0 1355 323 Stage 1 - - - - 323 - Stage 2 - - - - 1032 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.71 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.71 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.71 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.779 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1079 - ~ 143 689 Stage 1 - - - - 673 - Stage 2 - - - - 304 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1079 - ~ 87 689 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 87 - Stage 1 - - - - 673 - Stage 2 - - - - 184 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.9 $ 581.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 190 - - 1079 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.166 - - 0.319 - HCM Control Delay $ 581.6 - - 9.9 0 HCM Lane LOS F - - A A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 32.4 - - 1.4 - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 2: Woodland Ave & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 25 461 1 41 640 262 3 6 92 759 2 29 Future Volume (vph) 25 461 1 41 640 262 3 6 92 759 2 29 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1162 1490 1477 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1162 1490 1477 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 27 501 1 45 696 285 3 7 100 825 2 32 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 59 0 93 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 27 501 0 45 696 226 3 14 0 429 428 0 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 3% 16% 50% 33% 16% 4% 0% 50% 28% 6% 20% 11% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 4 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G 4.4 30.6 38.5 7.6 33.8 77.8 7.9 7.9 44.0 44.0 Effective Green, g 4.4 30.6 38.5 7.6 33.8 77.8 7.9 7.9 44.0 44.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.29 0.36 0.07 0.32 0.73 0.07 0.07 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 66 822 352 89 908 1043 123 86 615 609 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.17 0.00 c0.04 c0.24 0.09 0.00 c0.01 0.29 c0.29 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.07 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.61 0.00 0.51 0.77 0.22 0.02 0.17 0.70 0.70 Uniform Delay, d1 49.8 32.8 21.8 47.7 32.8 4.6 45.8 46.3 25.8 25.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.0 1.6 0.0 3.3 4.3 0.1 0.1 0.7 3.2 3.4 Delay 52.8 34.4 21.8 51.0 37.1 4.7 45.8 46.9 29.0 29.3 Level of Service D C C D D A D D C C Approach Delay 35.3 28.7 46.9 29.2 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.68 Actuated Cycle Length 106.6 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.3% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 999 447 0 1073 733 0 0 0 717 0 363 Future Volume (vph) 0 999 447 0 1073 733 0 0 0 717 0 363 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1019 456 0 1095 748 0 0 0 732 0 370 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1019 456 0 1095 748 0 0 0 732 0 361 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 59.8 100.0 45.8 100.0 31.2 45.7 Effective Green, g 59.8 100.0 45.8 100.0 31.2 45.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.31 0.46 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1713 1255 1301 1173 845 580 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 c0.39 c0.27 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.36 c0.64 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.36 0.84 0.64 0.87 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 12.5 0.0 23.9 0.0 32.4 20.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.07 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.8 2.9 1.1 9.2 1.8 Delay 14.1 0.8 28.6 1.1 41.6 22.4 Level of Service B A C A D C Approach Delay 10.0 17.4 0.0 35.2 Approach LOS A B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1464 272 0 1392 450 393 0 683 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1464 272 0 1392 450 393 0 683 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1107 1132 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1107 1132 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1525 283 0 1450 469 409 0 711 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 17 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1525 283 0 1450 469 368 358 360 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 56.9 100.0 56.9 100.0 34.1 34.1 34.1 Effective Green, g 56.9 100.0 56.9 100.0 34.1 34.1 34.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1630 1234 1550 1212 460 377 386 v/s Ratio Prot 0.53 c0.53 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.39 0.27 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.23 0.94 0.39 0.80 0.95 0.93 Uniform Delay, d1 19.9 0.0 19.9 0.0 29.9 32.1 31.8 Progression Factor 1.43 1.00 0.92 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 9.3 0.3 5.1 0.3 9.4 33.0 29.1 Delay 37.7 0.3 23.2 0.3 39.2 65.1 61.0 Level of Service D A C A D E E Approach Delay 31.8 17.6 55.2 0.0 Approach LOS C B E A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 530 25 320 19 33 72 Future Volume (vph) 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 530 25 320 19 33 72 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1363 2842 1316 1409 2835 1373 1390 1262 1511 1651 1096 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 139 2842 1316 176 2835 1373 1390 1262 1511 1651 1096 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 1526 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 546 26 330 20 34 74 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 126 0 1 0 0 0 238 0 0 69 Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1526 87 330 1297 0 284 288 92 20 34 5 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 48.6 33.8 33.8 48.6 41.3 27.8 27.8 27.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 Effective Green, g 48.6 33.8 33.8 48.6 41.3 27.8 27.8 27.8 6.1 6.1 6.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.34 0.34 0.49 0.41 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 156 960 [PHONE REDACTED] 381 386 350 92 100 66 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.54 0.18 c0.46 0.21 c0.21 0.01 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.07 0.42 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.54 1.59 0.20 1.23 1.11 0.75 0.75 0.26 0.22 0.34 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 19.8 33.1 23.5 39.3 29.4 32.9 32.9 28.1 44.7 45.0 44.3 Progression Factor 0.90 0.99 1.04 0.87 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 267.2 0.4 112.5 52.7 7.3 7.3 0.3 0.9 1.5 0.3 Delay 18.8 299.8 24.8 146.8 76.4 40.2 40.2 28.4 45.5 46.5 44.6 Level of Service B F C F E D D C D D D Approach Delay 254.7 90.7 35.9 45.2 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 145.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 153 1644 41 27 1494 76 22 27 9 95 22 126 Future Volume (vph) 153 1644 41 27 1494 76 22 27 9 95 22 126 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.87 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1554 2747 1471 2720 1525 1396 1385 1427 Flt Permitted 0.07 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 123 2747 125 2720 1525 1396 1385 1427 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 159 1712 43 28 1556 79 23 28 9 99 23 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 8 0 0 115 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 1755 0 28 1632 0 23 29 0 99 39 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 66.0 62.0 53.4 53.4 5.3 6.1 11.4 12.2 Effective Green, g 66.0 62.0 53.4 53.4 5.3 6.1 11.4 12.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.62 0.53 0.53 0.05 0.06 0.11 0.12 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 261 1703 120 1452 80 85 157 174 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.64 0.01 c0.60 0.02 c0.02 c0.07 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.33 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.61 1.03 0.23 1.12 0.29 0.34 0.63 0.22 Uniform Delay, d1 32.8 19.0 19.3 23.3 45.5 45.0 42.3 39.6 Progression Factor 0.39 1.25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 16.4 0.7 65.4 1.4 1.7 7.0 0.5 Delay 13.0 40.2 20.0 88.7 47.0 46.7 49.3 40.1 Level of Service B D C F D D D D Approach Delay 37.9 87.6 46.8 43.7 Approach LOS D F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 59.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 7: Cascade Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1241 341 15 1541 0 131 Future Vol, veh/h 1241 341 15 1541 0 131 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 130 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 19 17 10 23 0 24 Mvmt Flow 1320 363 16 1639 0 139 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1685 0 - 843 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - - 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.3 - - 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 342 - 0 266 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 342 - - 265 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.2 32.7 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 265 - - 342 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.526 - - 0.047 - HCM Control Delay 32.7 - - 16 - HCM Lane LOS D - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.8 - - 0.1 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 8: Settlemier Ave/Boones Ferry Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 168 669 383 79 752 80 254 121 48 104 200 181 Future Volume (vph) 168 669 383 79 752 80 254 121 48 104 200 181 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.70 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1446 1458 1214 1484 1446 1111 1385 1483 1343 1458 1446 868 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1446 1458 1214 1484 1446 1111 1385 1483 1343 1458 1446 868 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 177 704 403 83 792 84 267 127 51 109 211 191 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 94 0 0 48 0 0 39 0 0 158 Lane Group Flow (vph) 177 704 309 83 792 36 267 127 12 109 211 33 Confl. Peds. 26 26 26 26 118 2 2 118 Heavy Vehicles 15% 20% 15% 12% 21% 22% 20% 18% 8% 14% 21% 20% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G 21.2 63.4 88.5 13.0 55.2 55.2 25.1 34.2 34.2 15.7 24.8 24.8 Effective Green, g 21.2 63.4 88.5 13.0 55.2 55.2 25.1 34.2 34.2 15.7 24.8 24.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.44 0.61 0.09 0.38 0.38 0.17 0.24 0.24 0.11 0.17 0.17 Clearance Time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.8 2.5 2.5 4.8 4.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 210 636 739 132 549 422 239 349 316 157 246 148 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.48 0.07 0.06 c0.55 c0.19 0.09 0.07 c0.15 v/s Ratio Perm 0.18 0.03 0.01 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.84 1.11 0.42 0.63 1.44 0.08 1.12 0.36 0.04 0.69 0.86 0.22 Uniform Delay, d1 60.4 41.0 14.9 63.8 45.1 28.9 60.1 46.5 42.9 62.5 58.5 51.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 24.9 68.6 0.3 7.9 209.3 0.2 93.3 0.5 0.0 11.6 24.0 0.5 Delay 85.3 109.6 15.2 71.7 254.4 29.0 153.4 46.9 42.9 74.1 82.6 52.5 Level of Service F F B E F C F D D E F D Approach Delay 76.6 218.8 110.3 69.5 Approach LOS E F F E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 122.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17 Actuated Cycle Length 145.3 Sum of lost time 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 9: 5th St/Meridian Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 29 716 31 96 842 90 12 14 50 66 36 28 Future Volume (vph) 29 716 31 96 842 90 12 14 50 66 36 28 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1484 1443 1339 1423 1213 1152 1280 1427 Flt Permitted 0.19 1.00 0.27 1.00 0.71 1.00 0.71 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 300 1443 377 1423 912 1152 963 1427 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 30 731 32 98 859 92 12 14 51 67 37 29 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 46 0 0 26 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 762 0 98 949 0 12 19 0 67 40 0 Confl. Peds. 9 33 33 9 18 4 4 18 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 12% 20% 27% 24% 22% 10% 33% 50% 26% 29% 4% 22% Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 72.6 65.4 72.6 69.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 Effective Green, g 72.6 65.4 72.6 69.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 10.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.67 0.74 0.71 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 Clearance Time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 5.3 2.5 5.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 263 [PHONE REDACTED] 95 120 100 148 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.53 c0.02 c0.67 0.02 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.08 0.19 0.01 c0.07 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.79 0.28 0.94 0.13 0.16 0.67 0.27 Uniform Delay, d1 7.3 11.4 5.7 12.6 39.8 39.9 42.2 40.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 5.2 0.3 17.0 0.4 0.5 14.8 0.7 Delay 7.4 16.6 6.0 29.6 40.2 40.4 57.0 41.1 Level of Service A B A C D D E D Approach Delay 16.3 27.4 40.3 49.1 Approach LOS B C D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.89 Actuated Cycle Length 97.8 Sum of lost time 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 10: OR 214 & Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 101.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 128 805 970 170 92 95 Future Vol, veh/h 128 805 970 170 92 95 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 0 0 8 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Yield - None Storage Length 130 - - 60 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 21 18 18 30 24 Mvmt Flow [PHONE REDACTED] 181 98 101 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1040 0 - 0 2169 1040 Stage 1 - - - - 1040 - Stage 2 - - - - 1129 - Critical Hdwy 4.35 - - - 6.7 6.44 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.7 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.7 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.425 - - - 3.77 3.516 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 588 - - - ~ 43 254 Stage 1 - - - - 302 - Stage 2 - - - - 272 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 588 - - - ~ 33 252 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 33 - Stage 1 - - - - 300 - Stage 2 - - - - 207 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 1.8 0 $ 1214 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 588 - - - 59 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.232 - - - 3.372 HCM Control Delay 13 - - 1214 HCM Lane LOS B - - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.9 - - - 21 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 11: Park Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 140.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 674 129 97 946 9 58 6 123 10 4 77 Future Vol, veh/h 17 674 129 97 946 9 58 6 123 10 4 77 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 14 14 0 4 22 0 0 0 0 22 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 90 - - 185 - - - - - - - 55 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 23 16 9 23 38 0 0 10 9 25 7 Mvmt Flow 19 741 [PHONE REDACTED] 10 64 7 135 11 4 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1053 0 0 896 0 0 2145 2130 826 2182 2196 1071 Stage 1 - - - - - - 863 863 - 1262 1262 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 1282 1267 - 920 934 - Critical Hdwy 4.19 - - 4.19 - - 7.1 6.5 6.3 7.19 6.75 6.27 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.75 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.1 5.5 - 6.19 5.75 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.281 - - 2.281 - - 3.5 4 3.39 3.581 4.225 3.363 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 635 - - 729 - - ~ 36 50 360 32 39 262 Stage 1 - - - - - - 352 374 - 202 218 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 205 242 - 315 316 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 622 - - 729 - - ~ 18 41 355 15 32 256 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 18 41 - 15 32 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 337 358 - 195 185 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 112 206 - 186 302 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1 $ 1565.9 91.4 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 50 622 - - 729 - - 18 256 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 4.11 0.03 - - 0.146 - - 0.855 0.331 HCM Control Delay $ 1565.9 11 - - 10.8 - 451.6 25.9 HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - - F D HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 22.8 0.1 - - 0.5 - - 2.2 1.4 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 155 401 262 334 288 92 242 495 158 234 971 114 Future Volume (vph) 155 401 262 334 288 92 242 495 158 234 971 114 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1311 2906 2639 1054 1374 2950 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1311 2906 2639 1054 1374 2950 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 161 418 273 348 300 96 252 516 [PHONE REDACTED] 119 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 199 0 9 0 0 0 115 0 7 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 418 74 348 387 0 252 516 50 244 1123 0 Confl. Peds. 5 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 17% 18% 20% 24% 25% 40% 11% 26% 38% 21% 10% 19% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.6 38.5 39.4 15.5 39.4 Effective Green, g 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.6 38.5 39.4 15.5 39.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 347 285 263 307 326 781 319 163 894 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.28 c0.26 c0.30 c0.09 0.20 c0.18 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.58 1.20 0.26 1.32 1.26 0.77 0.66 0.16 1.50 1.26 Uniform Delay, d1 47.4 49.8 40.5 52.2 49.8 56.1 40.0 33.1 57.2 45.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.30 0.93 0.59 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.9 116.3 0.5 169.5 140.6 7.0 2.7 0.7 253.0 124.4 Delay 50.3 166.0 41.1 221.7 190.4 79.9 39.9 20.2 310.3 169.7 Level of Service D F D F F E D C F F Approach Delay 104.1 205.0 47.2 194.7 Approach LOS F F D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 141.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.22 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 13: Boones Ferry Rd & Crosby Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 5 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh13.4 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 37 76 80 45 46 34 8 115 12 43 260 22 Future Vol, veh/h 37 76 80 45 46 34 8 115 12 43 260 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 39 23 6 31 20 86 22 13 27 36 13 16 Mvmt Flow 39 81 85 48 49 36 9 122 13 46 277 23 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 12.3 11.1 10.8 16 HCM LOS B B B C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 6% 19% 36% 13% Vol Thru, % 85% 39% 37% 80% Vol Right, % 9% 41% 27% 7% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 135 193 125 325 LT Vol 8 37 45 43 Through Vol 115 76 46 260 RT Vol 12 80 34 22 Lane Flow Rate 144 205 133 346 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.236 0.347 0.229 0.558 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.91 6.078 6.209 5.814 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 606 591 577 619 Service Time 3.96 4.124 4.262 3.853 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.238 0.347 0.231 0.559 HCM Control Delay 10.8 12.3 11.1 16 HCM Lane LOS B B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 1.5 0.9 3.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 14: Front St & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 6 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.5 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 157 65 128 141 98 145 Future Vol, veh/h 157 65 128 141 98 145 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 12 28 15 19 22 24 Mvmt Flow 185 76 151 166 115 171 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 12.5 12.1 13 HCM LOS B B B Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 71% 40% Vol Thru, % 48% 0% 60% Vol Right, % 52% 29% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 269 222 243 LT Vol 0 157 98 Through Vol 128 0 145 RT Vol 141 65 0 Lane Flow Rate 316 261 286 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.445 0.409 0.444 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.067 5.644 5.589 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 712 637 646 Service Time 3.094 3.673 3.615 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.444 0.41 0.443 HCM Control Delay 12.1 12.5 13 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 2 2.3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 15: Front St & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 7 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh34.1 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19 145 109 64 167 20 57 228 48 6 209 25 Future Vol, veh/h 19 145 109 64 167 20 57 228 48 6 209 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 25 31 16 25 18 30 13 28 54 20 9 Mvmt Flow 22 171 128 75 196 24 67 268 56 7 246 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 29.8 27.3 46.1 29.5 HCM LOS D D E D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 17% 7% 25% 3% Vol Thru, % 68% 53% 67% 87% Vol Right, % 14% 40% 8% 10% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 333 273 251 240 LT Vol 57 19 64 6 Through Vol 228 145 167 209 RT Vol 48 109 20 25 Lane Flow Rate 392 321 295 282 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.875 0.724 0.679 0.691 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.041 8.111 8.281 8.804 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 451 446 434 409 Service Time 6.107 6.181 6.354 6.878 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.869 0.72 0.68 0.689 HCM Control Delay 46.1 29.8 27.3 29.5 HCM Lane LOS E D D D HCM 95th-tile Q 9.1 5.7 4.9 5.1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 16: Front St & Garfield St/Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 8 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh31.4 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 8 130 2 77 136 146 6 197 89 156 203 16 Future Vol, veh/h 8 130 2 77 136 146 6 197 89 156 203 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 20 40 38 23 14 25 15 22 19 18 24 Mvmt Flow 9 141 2 84 148 159 7 214 97 170 221 17 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 15.6 36.6 24.2 37.9 HCM LOS C E C E Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 2% 6% 21% 42% Vol Thru, % 67% 93% 38% 54% Vol Right, % 30% 1% 41% 4% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 292 140 359 375 LT Vol 6 8 77 156 Through Vol 197 130 136 203 RT Vol 89 2 146 16 Lane Flow Rate 317 152 390 408 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.662 0.346 0.818 0.835 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.514 8.19 7.546 7.379 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 479 437 480 489 Service Time 5.586 6.28 5.608 5.445 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.662 0.348 0.813 0.834 HCM Control Delay 24.2 15.6 36.6 37.9 HCM Lane LOS C C E E HCM 95th-tile Q 4.8 1.5 7.8 8.3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 17: Front St & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 9 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh19.2 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 146 28 85 90 51 16 206 37 68 217 25 Future Vol, veh/h 17 146 28 85 90 51 16 206 37 68 217 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 14 23 13 11 28 14 43 18 50 9 21 12 Mvmt Flow 20 172 33 100 106 60 19 242 44 80 255 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 15.9 17.3 18.9 22.9 HCM LOS C C C C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 7% 0% 9% 38% 22% Vol Thru, % 93% 0% 76% 40% 70% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 15% 23% 8% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 222 37 191 226 310 LT Vol 16 0 17 85 68 Through Vol 206 0 146 90 217 RT Vol 0 37 28 51 25 Lane Flow Rate 261 44 225 266 365 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5 Degree of Util 0.567 0.08 0.445 0.514 0.679 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.812 6.622 7.128 6.965 6.7 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 460 538 503 516 536 Service Time 5.589 4.398 5.213 5.046 4.773 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.567 0.082 0.447 0.516 0.681 HCM Control Delay 20.4 10 15.9 17.3 22.9 HCM Lane LOS C A C C C HCM 95th-tile Q 3.4 0.3 2.3 2.9 5.1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 18: Settlemier Ave & Parr Road/Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 10 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh72.3 Intersection LOS F Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 225 247 132 108 237 24 109 191 57 10 228 266 Future Vol, veh/h 225 247 132 108 237 24 109 191 57 10 228 266 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 49 27 21 25 37 12 14 9 21 0 21 28 Mvmt Flow 265 291 155 127 279 28 128 225 67 12 268 313 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 111.9 48.1 74.5 41 HCM LOS F E F E Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 36% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 4% 0% Vol Thru, % 64% 0% 0% 65% 0% 91% 96% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 35% 0% 9% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 300 57 225 379 108 261 238 266 LT Vol 109 0 225 0 108 0 10 0 Through Vol 191 0 0 247 0 237 228 0 RT Vol 0 57 0 132 0 24 0 266 Lane Flow Rate 353 67 265 446 127 307 280 313 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util 1.01 0.174 0.804 1.216 0.381 0.89 0.755 0.812 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.812 9.793 11.28 10.103 11.287 10.907 10.162 9.778 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 339 369 323 361 321 335 358 372 Service Time 8.512 7.493 8.98 7.803 8.987 8.607 7.862 7.478 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.041 0.182 0.82 1.235 0.396 0.916 0.782 0.841 HCM Control Delay 85.9 14.5 47.5 150.2 20.8 59.4 38.3 43.4 HCM Lane LOS F B E F C F E E HCM 95th-tile Q 11.4 0.6 6.7 18.4 1.7 8.5 6 7.1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 80 55 67 147 43 53 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 Future Volume (vph) 80 55 67 147 43 53 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1498 1227 1479 1206 1363 2667 1458 2738 Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.14 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 834 1227 902 1206 90 2667 218 2738 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 59 71 156 46 56 77 1188 107 80 1546 106 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 0 0 43 0 5 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 16 0 202 13 77 1290 0 80 1648 0 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 86.5 79.2 86.5 77.3 Effective Green, g 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 86.5 79.2 86.5 77.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.67 0.61 0.67 0.59 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 192 283 208 [PHONE REDACTED] 214 1628 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.48 0.02 c0.60 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.01 c0.22 0.01 0.31 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.06 0.97 0.05 0.52 0.79 0.37 1.01 Uniform Delay, d1 46.5 39.0 49.6 38.9 41.3 19.2 11.3 26.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.73 1.18 1.13 Incremental Delay, d2 14.5 0.1 53.9 0.1 1.6 2.9 0.1 10.1 Delay 61.0 39.0 103.4 38.9 35.3 16.9 13.4 39.9 Level of Service E D F D D B B D Approach Delay 53.7 89.4 18.0 38.7 Approach LOS D F B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 108 11 90 27 11 26 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 Future Volume (vph) 108 11 90 27 11 26 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1288 1406 1124 1446 2629 1289 2720 Flt Permitted 0.82 0.73 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.17 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1078 1064 1124 75 2629 226 2720 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 12 96 29 12 28 85 1219 15 18 1673 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 201 0 0 41 6 85 1234 0 18 1800 0 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 26.4 26.4 26.4 90.1 83.1 90.1 81.2 Effective Green, g 26.4 26.4 26.4 90.1 83.1 90.1 81.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.69 0.64 0.69 0.62 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 218 216 [PHONE REDACTED] 213 1698 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.47 0.00 c0.66 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.04 0.01 0.36 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.19 0.02 0.59 0.73 0.08 1.06 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 42.9 41.5 26.4 15.9 15.6 24.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.43 0.81 1.32 0.66 Incremental Delay, d2 40.3 0.3 0.0 3.4 2.0 0.0 32.5 Delay 91.1 43.2 41.5 41.2 15.0 20.7 48.7 Level of Service F D D D B C D Approach Delay 91.1 42.5 16.6 48.4 Approach LOS F D B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 159 180 121 95 223 281 82 789 40 265 1252 146 Future Volume (vph) 159 180 121 95 223 281 82 789 40 265 1252 146 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1222 1304 1457 1293 1179 2697 1374 2765 Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 386 1304 696 1293 123 2697 369 2765 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 161 182 122 96 225 284 83 797 40 268 1265 147 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 0 65 0 3 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 286 0 0 321 219 83 834 0 268 1406 0 Confl. Peds. 4 4 1 2 2 1 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 36% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 41% 22% 27% 21% 18% 19% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.7 Effective Green, g 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.63 0.51 0.63 0.57 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 102 346 184 [PHONE REDACTED] 352 1567 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 0.04 0.31 0.09 c0.51 v/s Ratio Perm 0.42 c0.46 0.17 0.32 c0.39 v/c Ratio 1.58 0.83 1.74 0.64 0.57 0.60 0.76 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 47.8 44.9 47.8 42.2 16.8 22.5 28.9 24.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.35 1.37 Incremental Delay, d2 301.8 14.5 356.6 3.4 4.4 2.0 0.9 0.9 Delay 349.6 59.4 404.3 45.7 21.3 24.4 39.9 34.8 Level of Service F E F D C C D C Approach Delay 159.9 236.0 24.1 35.6 Approach LOS F F C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 81.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - No Build 22: OR 99E & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP no build.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 10/09/2018 Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 117.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 87 84 82 917 1176 245 Future Vol, veh/h 87 84 82 917 1176 245 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 110 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 21 35 31 25 29 16 Mvmt Flow 95 91 89 997 1278 266 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2089 774 1546 0 - 0 Stage 1 1412 - - - - - Stage 2 677 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.22 7.6 4.72 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.22 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.22 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.71 3.65 2.51 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 36 278 309 - - - Stage 1 161 - - - - - Stage 2 418 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 13 277 309 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 13 - - - - - Stage 1 161 - - - - - Stage 2 148 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s$ 1739.9 7.1 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 309 - 13 277 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.288 - 7.274 0.33 - - HCM Control Delay 21.3 5.8$ 3396.4 24.3 - - HCM Lane LOS C A F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - 12.9 1.4 - - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 4\4.2 ALT ANALYSIS AND FUNDING\FINAL\21071_TM5_ALT ANALYSIS AND FUNDING_FINAL.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #5 Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Date: June 7, 2019 Project 21071.4 To: Chris Kerr & Eric Liljequist, City of Woodburn Michael Duncan, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 Technical Advisory Committee and Community Advisory Committee From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittleson & Associates, Inc. Subject: Technical Memo Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program (Subtask 4.2) This memorandum identifies potential alternatives to address the issues identified in Tech Memo 3: Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis and Tech Memo 4: Future Systems Conditions. Attachment contains a menu of potential solutions that can be used to address many of these needs identified in this memo. The solutions include those related to the following: ▪ Auto-related Alternatives ▪ Street Connectivity and Extension Plan ▪ Transportation System Management and Operations ▪ Access Management and Spacing ▪ Bicycle ▪ Pedestrian ▪ Multi-Use Paths ▪ Transit ▪ Intermodal Route Connectivity ▪ Rail ▪ Freight ▪ Safe Routes to School ▪ Safety ▪ Funding Programs The solutions include potential policies, plans, programs, and projects for inclusion in the Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. These solutions were reviewed by the project Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), Community Advisory Committee (CAC), and general public to determine if they should move forward into the Draft TSP update and to identify the highest priorities for limited funding. AUTO-RELATED ALTERNATIVES Streets serve a majority of all trips within Woodburn across all travel modes. In addition to motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, and public transit riders use streets to access areas locally and regionally. This section summarizes the solutions considered for implementation within the City of Woodburn and the ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 2 Woodburn, Oregon potential alternatives proposed at specific locations to address existing gaps and deficiencies in the auto system and future needs. Solutions Considered The following provides a description of different solutions considered for the auto system. Street Connectivity Solutions Although the Woodburn’s downtown is largely built on a grid system, much of the residential neighborhood, commercial, and industrial development throughout the city has resulted in a network of cul-de-sacs and stubs streets. These streets can be desirable to residents because they can limit traffic speeds and volumes on local streets, but cul-de-sacs and stub streets result in longer trip distances, increased reliance on arterials for local trips, and limited options for people to walk and bike to the places they want to go. The future street system needs to balance the benefits of providing a well-connected grid system with the connectivity challenges in the city due to I-5 and railroads running through the city and existing development. Incremental improvements to the street system can be planned carefully to provide route choices for motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians while accounting for potential neighborhood impacts. In addition, the quality of the transportation system can be improved by making connectivity improvements to the pedestrian and bicycle system separate from street connectivity, as discussed through solutions presented in later sections. The following are potential connectivity solutions that can be applied in the City of Woodburn. ▪ Re-designate a roadway with a higher or lower functional classification to improve the order and function of the roadway ▪ Construct a new roadway or extend an existing roadway to improve connectivity within an area of the city Capacity-Based Solutions Turn Lanes Separate left- and right-turn lanes, as well as two-way left-turn lanes can provide separation between slowed or stopped vehicles waiting to turn and through vehicles. The design of turn lanes is largely determined based on a traffic study that identifies the storage length needed to accommodate vehicle queues. Turn lanes are commonly used at intersections where the turning volumes warrant the need for separation. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 3 Woodburn, Oregon Traffic Signals Traffic signals allow opposing streams of traffic to proceed in an alternating pattern. National and state guidance indicates when it is appropriate to install traffic signals at intersections. When used, traffic signals can effectively manage high traffic volumes and provide dedicated times in which pedestrians and cyclists can cross roadways. Because they continuously draw from a power source and must be periodically re-timed, signals typically have higher maintenance costs than other types of intersection control. Signals can improve safety at intersections where signal warrants are met, however, they may result in an increase in rear-end crashes compared to other solutions. Signals have a significant range in costs depending on the number of approaches, how many through and turn lanes each approach has, and if it is located in an urban or rural area. The cost of a new traffic signal ranges from approximately $250,000 in rural areas to $500,000 in urban areas. Signal Timing/Phasing Modifications Signal retiming and optimization offers a relatively low-cost option to increase system efficiency. Retiming and optimization refers to updating timing plans to better match prevailing traffic conditions and coordinating signals. Timing optimization can be applied to existing systems or may include upgrading signal technology, such as signal communication infrastructure, signal controllers, or cabinets. Signal retiming can reduce travel times and be especially beneficial to improving travel time reliability. In high pedestrian or desired pedestrian areas, signal retiming can facilitate pedestrian movements through intersections by increasing minimum green times to give pedestrians time to cross during each cycle, which may create additional delay for other intersection users. Signals can also facilitate bicycle movements with the inclusion of bicycle detectors. Signal upgrades often come at a higher cost than signal timing and phasing modifications and usually require further coordination between jurisdictions. However, upgrading signals provides the opportunity to incorporate advanced signal systems to further improve the efficiency of a transportation network. Strategies include coordinated signal operations across jurisdictions, centralized control of traffic signals, adaptive or active signal control, and transit or freight signal priority as further described in the Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) section. These advanced signal systems can reduce delay, travel time, and the number of stops for transit, freight, and other vehicles. In addition, these systems may help reduce vehicle emissions and improve travel time reliability. Roundabouts Roundabouts are circular intersections where entering vehicles yield to vehicles already in the circle. They are designed to slow vehicle speeds to 20 to 30 mph or less before they enter the intersection, which promotes a more comfortable environment for pedestrians, bicyclists, and other non-motorized users. Roundabouts have fewer conflict-points and have been shown to reduce the severity of crashes, as compared to signalized intersections. Roundabouts can be more costly to design and install when compared to other intersection control types, but they have a lower operating and maintenance cost ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 4 Woodburn, Oregon than traffic signals. Topography must be carefully evaluated in considering a roundabout, given that slope characteristics at an intersection may render a roundabout infeasible. The cost of a new roundabouts ranges from approximately $2 million to $4 million depending upon the number of lanes and the slope conditions. Traffic Signal Roundabout Through Lanes When the demand per lane on a roadway segment has reached saturation, a potential solution is to construct additional through lanes. Although this theoretically adds capacity to the corridor, added lanes can allow latent demand from the system to show an increase in demand. Added lanes may also create induced demand where drivers see that roadway as less of a barrier with its increased capacity, drawing in additional new demand and potentially maintaining or worsening the rate of congestion. When a roadway does not have a consistent number of travel lanes per direction along a corridor, an added through lane may provide a consistent cross-section allowing for less weaving by vehicles traveling the corridor. Potential Improvements The following improvements have been organized by location. Where there are multiple improvements, the improvements shown in bold text were identified as the preferred improvement based on an evaluation of environmental, engineering, land use “fatal flaws”, and anticipated funding capacity as well as discussions with the project team, advisory committees, and the general public. Figure 1 illustrated the roadway system needs discussed below. Attachment contains the year 2040 future capacity-based alternatives traffic conditions worksheets. ---PAGE BREAK--- @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ @ èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí èéëìí 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY HIGHWAY 99E HY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR BUTTEVILLE RD BOONES FE RRY RD SMIT H D R CROSBY RD LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST WILCO HY MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST PORT LAND RD THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MOLALLA RD MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LI NCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V ARBOR GROVE RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD 219 RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN PARR RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BR O WN ST GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD EAST LINCOLN RD BOONES FERRY R D NEWBER G H Y S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER GREE N RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 1 ä New Local Street Connection ! Enhanced Traffic Control/Geometric Enhancements èéëìí Traffic Signal Installation/Modification @ Intersection Exceeds Standard in 2040 Street Design Need Connectivity Need City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM5\01 Roadway System Needs.mxd - mmccormick - 2:35 PM 8/2/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Roadway System Needs Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ä ä ä ! ! ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ää ä ä ä ää ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 6 Woodburn, Oregon Street Connectivity Improvements Arterial/Collector/Access Street Connectivity Needs The following identifies potential connectivity improvements for collector and arterial-level roadways, including potential changes to the city’s functional classification plan. ▪ Re-designate Ben Brown Lane as an Access Street from Settlemier Avenue to Elans Way. Extend Ben Brown Lane to Evergreen Road as an Access Street as part of future residential development ▪ Construct the Southern Arterial from Evergreen Road to OR 99E (2 lanes) ▪ Extend Evergreen Road south to Parr Road ▪ Extend Stacy Allison Way south to Parr Road ▪ Extend Brown Street south to the South Arterial ▪ Extend Woodland Avenue west to Butteville Road through future development Local Street Connectivity Needs The local street system within Woodburn’s existing residential area is largely built-out. However, there are a number of residentially zoned areas that could experience future low-density residential growth in the southwest, south, and southeast parts of the City. Within these areas, there are opportunities for new local streets that could improve access and circulation for all travel modes. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the local street connections. Capacity-Based Improvements Upgrade/widen Roadway The following identifies potential roadway segments to upgrade to their determined functional classification standard or to widen to construct additional travel lanes. ▪ Widen OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane (state highway) ▪ Widen OR 214 from Cascade Drive to OR 99E to include two lanes in each direction and a two- way left-turn lane, including changes to signal timing as appropriate (state highway) ▪ Widen OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern UGB to provide a two-way left-turn lane and wider shoulders, including impacts to the railroad crossing (in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) (state highway) ▪ Upgrade Parr Road to service collector urban standards (country roadway) ▪ Upgrade Butteville Road south of OR 219 to minor arterial urban standards (county roadway) ▪ Upgrade Brown Street to service collector urban standards (city roadway) ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 7 Woodburn, Oregon Butteville Road/OR 219 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue is forecast to not meet the ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.90 under future 2040 conditions. The critical northbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 100 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if/when warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout. ▪ Install an uncoordinated traffic signal with actuated timing (if/when warranted). Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Install a traffic signal with westbound turn lane 0.86 20.0 C OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.85 under future 2040 conditions. While the intersection is not meeting the 0.85 mobility target, the intersection is forecast to still have available capacity. As such, mitigation measures that involve physical improvements may not be necessary. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 120 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 150 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. This is an unlikely timing scenario based on current ODOT signal timing practices for a city the size of Woodburn. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Signal retiming – 120 second cycle length 0.82 21.7 C Signal retiming – 150 second cycle length 0.78 24.6 C ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 8 Woodburn, Oregon OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.85 under future 2040 conditions. The critical westbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 20 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 120 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 150 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. This is an unlikely timing scenario based on current ODOT signal timing practices for a city the size of Woodburn. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Signal retiming – 120 second cycle length 0.92 32.8 C Signal retiming – 150 second cycle length 0.91 36.5 D OR 214/Evergreen Road OR 214/Evergreen Road is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.95 under future 2040 conditions. The critical eastbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 250 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 120 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 150 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. This is an unlikely timing scenario based on current ODOT signal timing practices for a city the size of Woodburn. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Signal retiming – 120 second cycle length 1.12 104.4 F Signal retiming – 150 second cycle length 1.13 93.8 F ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 9 Woodburn, Oregon OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.95 under future 2040 conditions. The critical westbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 80 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 120 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. ▪ Increase the cycle length from 100 to 150 seconds and optimize the signal timing. The expectation is that all signalized intersections from the I-5 Southbound Ramp to Oregon Way will have increased cycle and continue to operate in coordination. This is an unlikely timing scenario based on current ODOT signal timing practices for a city the size of Woodburn. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Signal retiming – 120 second cycle length 0.94 32.3 C Signal retiming – 150 second cycle length 0.88 26.2 C OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE/N Settlemier Avenue OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE/N Settlemeier Avenue is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.95 under future 2040 conditions. The critical westbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 250 seconds per vehicle. See the OR 214 widening improvement earlier in this section for the preferred alternative at this intersection. OR 214/Front Street OR 214/Front Street is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.95 under future 2040 conditions. The critical southbound movements are forecast to experience average delays greater than 300 seconds per vehicle. In addition to the below improvement, see the OR 214 widening improvement for another alternative at this intersection. ▪ Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if/when warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout. ▪ Install a traffic signal with actuated timing (if/when warranted). Similar to other signalized intersections along the segment of OR 214 between Cascade Drive and OR 99E, this improvement is proposed as an uncoordinated signalized intersection. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Install a traffic signal 0.91 21.8 C ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 10 Woodburn, Oregon OR 214/Park Avenue OR 214/Park Avenue is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.95 under future 2040 conditions. The critical northbound and southbound left-turn movements are forecast to experience average delays greater than 300 seconds per vehicle. In addition to the below improvement, see the OR 214 widening improvement for another alternative at this intersection. ▪ Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if/when warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout. ▪ Install a traffic signal with actuated timing (if/when warranted). Similar to other signalized intersections along the segment of OR 214 between Cascade Drive and OR 99E, this improvement is proposed as an uncoordinated signalized intersection. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Install a traffic signal 0.92 23.7 C OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.95 under future 2040 conditions. The critical southbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 120 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Install a second left-turn lane on the southbound approach, install a second receiving lane on the east leg, and update signal timing. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Turn lane and signal retiming 1.19 112.7 F Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue is forecast to not meet the City’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.90 under future 2040 conditions. The critical eastbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 100 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if/when warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout. ▪ Install an uncoordinated traffic signal with actuated timing (if/when warranted). Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Install a traffic signal 0.85 17.1 B ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 11 Woodburn, Oregon OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.90 under future 2040 conditions. The critical southbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 30 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Reconfigure the westbound approach to have a separate left-turn lane and a shared through- right turn lane. ▪ In addition to reconfiguring the westbound approach, install a separate right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Review and update signal timing as needed. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Reconfigure east leg 0.95 26.7 C Turn lane and reconfigure east leg 0.90 24.3 C OR 99E/Lincoln Street OR 99E/Lincoln Street is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.90 under future 2040 conditions. The critical southbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 40 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Install a shared through-right turn lane on the eastbound approach and reconfigure the existing approach lane as a separate left-turn lane. ▪ In addition to reconfiguring the eastbound approach, install a separate right-turn lane on the southbound approach. Review and update signal timing as needed. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Reconfigure west leg 0.92 18.8 B Turn lane 0.86 16.2 B OR 99E/Young Street OR 99E/Young Street is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.90 under future 2040 conditions. The critical southbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 30 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Install a third westbound lane to provide separate left, thru, and right turn lanes. Implement protected-permissive left-turn phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Turn lane and signal phasing updates 0.98 41.3 D ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 12 Woodburn, Oregon OR 99E/Cleveland Street OR 99E/Cleveland Street is forecast to not meet ODOT’s operating standard of a v/c less than 0.90 under future 2040 conditions. The critical westbound through movement is forecast to experience average delays greater than 80 seconds per vehicle. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Install intersection capacity improvement such as a traffic signal (if/when warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout. Similar to other signalized intersections along OR 99E, one potential improvement is proposed as a coordinated signalized intersection with a cycle length of 130 seconds. Solution V/C Delay (seconds) LOS Install a traffic signal 0.76 9.3 A Modeled Alternative Packages The above potential capacity-based improvements were explored using the volumes developed from the 2040 no-build travel demand model output provided by TPAU, as described in Technical Memorandum Future Systems Conditions. Forecast traffic volumes were developed for the study intersections based on the existing traffic counts and information provided in the Woodburn travel demand model. The travel demand model provides base year 2015 and forecast year 2040 traffic volume projections that reflect anticipated land use changes and any funded transportation improvements within the study area. The forecast traffic volumes were developed by applying the post- processing methodology presented in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 255 Highway Traffic Data for Urbanized Area Project Planning and Design, in conjunction with engineering judgment and knowledge of the study area. Output for three additional model alternatives were provided through the Woodburn travel demand model to understand the traffic impacts of constructing specific connectivity projects in Woodburn. Attachment contains the travel demand model data provided by TPAU for the three additional alternatives. The improvements included in each alternative are described below. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 13 Woodburn, Oregon Modeled Improvement Alternative 1 Alternative 1 focused on widening sections of the OR 214 and OR 99E corridors to provide consistent cross-sections, minimize weaving, and limit bottlenecks for through traffic on the major east-west and north-south connections. The following capacity-based improvements were modeled as part of Alternative 1: ▪ Widen OR 219 from Butteville Road to Woodland Avenue to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane ▪ Widen OR 214 from Cascade Drive to OR 99E to include two lanes in each direction and a two- way left-turn lane ▪ Widen OR 99E from Young Street to southern UGB to provide a two-way left-turn lane and wider shoulders (in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) Although this alternative provided more capacity along the OR 214 and OR 99E corridors, portions of those segments were found to experience more delay compared to the no-build scenario. This may be due to latent demand within the larger roadway network. All study intersections that were forecast to not meet standards in the no-build scenario were found to continue to not meet standards in Alternative 1. Modeled Improvement Alternative 2 Alternative 2 builds upon the projects in Alternative 1 with the inclusion of major roadway connectivity projects in the developing segments of western Woodburn. The following additional improvements were modeled as part of Alternative 2: ▪ Construct a grid system of access and local streets as development occurs in the UGB expansion area between Stacy Allison Way and Settlemier Avenue to the north of Parr Road ▪ Extend Evergreen Road south to Parr Road ▪ Extend Stacy Allison Way south to Parr Road ▪ Extend Woodland Avenue west to Butteville Road through future development Similar to Alternative 2, study intersections continue to not meet standards with these improvements in place, although intersections along Front Avenue and OR 99E experience a small decrease in demand and delay. Better collector-level connectivity will provide some route alternatives for the anticipated growth in southwest Woodburn, but the main east-west travel corridors are forecast to continue to experience capacity constraints and congestion at major intersections. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 14 Woodburn, Oregon Alternative 3 Alternative 3 incorporates a new southern arterial, which has been a planned east-west connection in south Woodburn for over a decade. In addition to all improvements modeled in Alternatives 1 and 2, Alternative 3 includes: ▪ A new two-lane arterial roadway that would be developed along the south UGB boundary connecting Parr Road (at Evergreen Road) to OR 99E. Based on the Woodburn travel demand model output, all regionally significant study intersections continue to not meet standards with the inclusion of the southern arterial. Although it provides a needed east-west alternative to OR 214, the southern arterial lacks a direct connection to I-5, limiting its effectiveness as a regional east-west alternative. However, such a connection would provide an important east-west alternative for Woodburn that would greatly benefit all new industrial and residential development in the growing southwest portion of the City. Table 1 summarizes the results of the future alternatives traffic operations analysis at the study intersections under year 2040 traffic conditions. Attachment contains the year 2040 future alternatives traffic conditions worksheets. As shown in Table 1, 14 study intersections were forecast to exceed their acceptable mobility standards and targets under year 2040 no-build forecast traffic conditions. The same study intersections, with the exception of Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue, are forecast to also not meet standards under the three alternative scenarios modeled. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 15 Woodburn, Oregon Table 1: Alternatives Comparison - Weekday PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Map ID Intersection Mobility Target/ Operations Standard Target/ Standard Met? Agency Maximum 2040 No-Build Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Signalized Intersections 2 OR 219/Woodland Avenue ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes Yes Yes Yes 3 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp ODOT v/c 0.85 No No No No 4 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp ODOT v/c 0.85 No No No No 5 OR 214/Evergreen Road ODOT v/c 0.95 No No No No 6 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road ODOT v/c 0.95 No No No No 8 OR 214/Boones Ferry Road NE ODOT v/c 0.95 No No No No 9 OR 214/Meridian Drive/5th Street ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes Yes Yes Yes 12 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E ODOT v/c 0.95 No No No No 19 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue ODOT v/c 0.90 No No No No 20 OR 99E/Lincoln Street ODOT v/c 0.90 No No No No 21 OR 99E/Young Street ODOT v/c 0.90 No No No No Unsignalized Intersections 1 Butteville Road/OR 219 ODOT v/c 0.90 No No No No 7 Cascade Drive/OR 214 ODOT v/c 0.95 Yes Yes Yes Yes 10 Front Street/OR 214 ODOT v/c 0.95 No No No No 11 Park Avenue/OR 214 ODOT v/c 0.95 No No No No 13 Boones Ferry Road NE/Crosby Road County LOS D and v/c 0.85 Yes Yes Yes Yes 14 Hardcastle Avenue/Front Street City v/c 0.90 Yes Yes Yes Yes 15 Lincoln Street/Front Street City v/c 0.90 Yes Yes Yes Yes 16 Garfield Street/Young Street/Front Street City v/c 0.90 Yes Yes Yes Yes 17 Cleveland Street/Front Street City v/c 0.90 Yes Yes Yes Yes 18 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue City v/c 0.90 No No No Yes 22 OR 99E/Cleveland Street ODOT v/c 0.90 No No No No Notes: LOS = Intersection Level of Service (Signal), Critical Movement Level of Service (TWSC). Delay = Intersection Average vehicle delay (Signal), critical movement vehicle delay (TWSC). V/C = Intersection V/C (Signal) critical movement V/C (TWSC). MOE = Measure of Effectiveness ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 16 Woodburn, Oregon TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies are two complementary approaches to managing transportation and maximizing the existing system. Together, these strategies are referred to as Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO). TDM addresses the demand on the system: the number of vehicles traveling on the roadways each day. TDM alternatives include any method intended to shift travel demand from single occupant vehicles to non-auto modes or carpooling, travel along less congested roadways, or at less congested times of the day. TSM addresses the supply of the system: using strategies to improve the system efficiency without increasing roadway widths or building new roads. TSM alternatives are focused on improving operations by enhancing capacity during peak times, typically with advanced technologies to improve traffic operations. The following section provides an overview of a broad range of TSMO measures that are being implemented and considered in Oregon and identifies and explains those that are most applicable to the City of Woodburn. Solutions Considered Successful implementation of TSMO strategies relies on the participation of a variety of public and private entities. Strategies can be implemented by the city, a neighborhood, or particular employer. In addition, they can be categorized as policies, programs, or physical infrastructure investments. Table 2 provides a summary of potential measures that can be implemented within Woodburn and which entities are generally in the position to implement each one. As the city continues to grow and redevelop over the next 10 to 20 years, the applicability of these strategies can be further reviewed. Additional information on potential strategy implementation within Woodburn is discussed below. The following section provides more detail on policy, programming, and infrastructure TSMO strategies that may be effective for managing transportation demand and increasing system efficiency in the City of Woodburn, especially within the next 10 to 20 years. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 17 Woodburn, Oregon Table 2: Transportation System Management and Transportation Demand Management Strategies TSMO Strategy TDM or TSM? Type of Investment City State Transit Provider Employers Developers Parking management TSM/TDM Policy P S S S Limited/flexible parking requirements TDM Policy P S S Access management TSM/TDM Policy/ Infrastructure P P Connectivity standards TSM/TDM Policy/ Infrastructure P P Congestion pricing TSM/TDM Policy/ Infrastructure P P Flexible Work Shifts TDM Program/Policy S P Frequent transit service TDM Program S P Free or subsidized transit passes TDM Program S P Collaborative Marketing TDM Program S S S S Preferential carpool parking TDM Program S P Carpool match services TDM Program S S Parking cash out TDM Program S P Carsharing program support TDM Program S P P Bicycle facilities TDM Infrastructure P S S S S Pedestrian Facilities TDM Infrastructure P S S S S Regional ITS TSM Infrastructure S P Regional traffic management TSM Infrastructure S P Advanced signal systems TSM Infrastructure S P Real time traveler data TSM Infrastructure S P Arterial corridor management TSM Infrastructure S P P: Primary role S: Secondary/Support role Programming Programming solutions can provide effective and low-cost options for reducing transportation demand. Some of the most effective programming strategies can be implemented by employers and are aimed at encouraging non-single occupancy vehicle (SOV) commuting. These strategies are discussed below. Carpool/Vanpool Match Services A rideshare/carpool program, run by public agencies and/or employers, coordinates regional commuters to find other commuters with similar routes to work. The program could allow commuters to connect and coordinate with others on locations, departure times, and driving responsibilities. Local employers can also play a role in encouraging an agency-run carpooling program by sharing information about the program, providing preferential carpool parking, and allowing employees to have flexibility in workday schedules. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 18 Woodburn, Oregon Preferential Carpool/Vanpool Parking A rideshare/carpool program, run by public agencies and/or employers, coordinates regional commuters to find other commuters with similar routes to work. The program could allow commuters to connect and coordinate with others on locations, departure times, and driving responsibilities. Local employers can also play a role in encouraging an agency-run carpooling program by sharing information about the program, providing preferential carpool parking, and allowing employees to have flexibility in workday schedules. Collaborative Marketing Public agencies, local business owners and operators, developers, and transit service providers can collaborate on marketing to get the word out to residents about transportation options that provide an alternative to single-occupancy vehicles. Free or Subsidized Transit Passes Local business owners and operators may work with the City or transit service providers to provide transit fare subsidies that support an alternative to single-occupancy vehicles. Work Schedule Flexibility Local business owners and operators may allow employees to have flexibility in workday schedules to alleviate demand during peak travel periods. Potential implementations include changing shift schedules to occur outside peak travel periods and allowing employees to work at home one day a week. Policy Policy solutions can be implemented by cities, counties, regions, or at the statewide level. Regional and state-level policies will affect transportation demand in Woodburn, but local policies can also have an impact. These policies are discussed below. Limited and/or Flexible Parking Requirements Cities set policies related to parking requirements for new developments. In order to allow developments that encourage multi-modal transportation, cities can set parking maximums and low minimums and/or allow for shared parking between uses. Cities can also provide developers the option to pay in-lieu fees instead of constructing additional parking. This option provides additional flexibility to developers that can increase the likelihood of development, especially on smaller lots where surface parking would cover a high portion of the total property. Cities can also set policies that require provision of parking to the rear of buildings, allowing buildings in commercial areas to directly front the street. This urban form creates a more appealing environment ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 19 Woodburn, Oregon for walking and window-shopping. In-lieu parking fees support this type of development for parcels that do not have rear- or side-access points. Parking Management Parking plays a large role in transportation demand management, and effective management of parking resources can encourage use of non-single occupancy vehicle modes. Cities can tailor policies to charge for public parking in certain areas or impose time limits on street parking in retail centers. Cities can also monitor public parking supply and utilization in order to inform future parking strategy. Access Management Access management describes a practice of managing the number, placement, and allowed movements at intersections and driveways that provide access to adjacent land uses. Access management policies can be important tools to improve transportation system efficiency by limiting the number of opportunities for turning movements on to or off of certain streets. In addition, well deployed access management strategies can help manage travel demand by improving travel conditions for pedestrians and bicycles. Eliminating the number of access points on roadways allows for continuous sidewalk and bicycle facilities and reduces the number of potential interruptions and conflict points between pedestrians, bicyclists, and motor vehicles. Access management is typically adopted as a policy in development guidelines. It can be extremely difficult to implement an access management program once properties have been developed along a corridor. Cooperation among and involvement of relevant government agencies, business owners, land developers, and the public is necessary to establish an access management plan that benefits all roadway users and businesses. Additional information on potential access management solutions is provided in a following section. Commercial and Mixed-use Nodes Land use plays a huge role in effected transportation impacts and needs. By establishing neighborhood commercial and mixed-use nodes that are equipped with direct sidewalk connections, bus stop provisions, and proper building orientation, a city can create opportunities to travel via modes other than a single-occupancy vehicle. Signal Systems Improvements Signal retiming and optimization offers a relatively low-cost option to increase system efficiency. Retiming and optimization refers to updating timing plans to better match prevailing traffic conditions and coordinating signals. Timing optimization can be applied to existing systems or may include upgrading signal technology, such as signal communication infrastructure, signal controllers, or cabinets. Signal retiming can reduce travel times and be especially beneficial to improving travel time reliability. In high pedestrian or desired pedestrian areas, signal retiming can facilitate pedestrian ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 20 Woodburn, Oregon movements through intersections by increasing minimum green times to give pedestrians time to cross during each cycle, eliminating the need to push pedestrian crossing buttons. Signals can also facilitate bicycle movements with the inclusion of bicycle detectors. Signal upgrades often come at a higher cost and usually require further coordination between jurisdictions. However, upgrading signals provides the opportunity to incorporate advanced signal systems to further improve the efficiency of a transportation network. Strategies include coordinated signal operations across jurisdictions, centralized control of traffic signals, adaptive or active signal control, and transit or freight signal priority. These advanced signal systems can reduce delay, travel time and the number of stops for transit, freight, and other vehicles. In addition, these systems may help reduce vehicle emissions and improve travel time reliability. The following signal system solutions have been identified for consideration within Woodburn: ▪ In addition to the above potential capacity-based improvements to the intersections along OR 99E, there is the potential to coordinate the traffic signals from Hardcastle Avenue to Young Street (or to the future Cleveland Street traffic signal) in coordination with ODOT. ▪ Truck signal priority systems use sensors to detect approaching heavy vehicles and alter signal timings to improve truck freight travel. While truck signal priority may improve travel times for trucks, its primary purpose is to improve the overall performance of intersection operations by clearing any trucks that would otherwise be stopped at the intersection and subsequently have to spend a longer time getting back up to speed. Implementing truck signal priority requires additional advanced detector loops, usually placed in pairs back from the approach to the intersection. Real-Time Transit Information Transit agencies or third-party sources can disseminate both schedule and system performance information to travelers through a variety of applications, such as in-vehicle, wayside, or in-terminal dynamic message signs, as well as the Internet or wireless devices. Coordination with regional or multimodal traveler information efforts can increase the availability of this transit schedule and system performance information. TriMet is one example of an agency that has implemented this through its Transit Tracker system. These systems enhance passenger convenience and may increase the attractiveness of transit to the public by encouraging travelers to consider transit as opposed to driving alone. They do require cooperation and integration between agencies for disseminating the information, which may or may not be applicable for a transit system the size of Woodburn’s. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 21 Woodburn, Oregon Potential Improvements ▪ Lead or provide support of potential TSM and TDM strategies within the City ▪ Promote a regional carpool/vanpool program ▪ Establish carpool/vanpool matching programs for ride-sharing ▪ Establish carpool parking programs ▪ Identify opportunities for collaborative marketing with local business owners and operators, developers, and transit service providers ▪ Provide transit fare subsidies ▪ Schedule shift changes to occur outside of peak travel periods ▪ Allow employees to work at home one day a week ▪ Update the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO) to limit and/or allow for flexible parking requirements ▪ Develop access management standards for city streets that reflect the functional classification of the roadway – Additional information on potential access management measures is provided below ▪ Establish neighborhood commercial and mixed-use nodes within the City ▪ Implement truck signal priority at key signalized intersections along OR 214 and OR 99E ▪ Work with ODOT to develop and implement a Traffic Management Plan for the OR 99E corridor that responds to increased congestion resulting from incidents on I-5 and regional events ACCESS MANAGEMENT AND SPACING The Oregon Highway Plan (OHP) defines access management as a set of measures regulating access to streets, roads, and highways, from public roads and private driveways. Measures may include but are not limited to restrictions on the siting of interchanges, restrictions on the type and amount of access to roadways, and use of physical controls, such as signals and channelization including raised medians, to reduce impacts of approach road traffic on the main facility. The OHP requires that new connections to arterials and state highways be consistent with designated access management categories. The intent of this requirement is to provide guidance on the spacing of future extensions and connections along existing and future streets that are needed to provide reasonably direct routes for bicycle and pedestrian travel. Solutions Considered The TSP should identify access management techniques and strategies that help to preserve transportation system investments and guard against deteriorations in safety and increased congestion. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 22 Woodburn, Oregon The City’s approach to access management should balance the need for land use activities and property parcels to be served with appropriate access while preserving safe and efficient movement of traffic. Access management solutions include: ▪ Setting city-wide access spacing standards according to a roadway’s functional classification; ▪ Obtaining special area designations along ODOT facilities that have alternative access spacing standards; ▪ Defining a variance process for when the standard cannot be met; and, ▪ Establishing an approach for access consolidation over time to move in the direction of the standards at each opportunity. Access Spacing Standards ODOT Standards Oregon Administrative Rule 734, Division 51 establishes procedures, standards, and approval criteria used by ODOT to govern highway approach permitting and access management consistent with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS), Oregon Administrative Rules (OAR), statewide planning goals, acknowledged comprehensive plans, and the OHP. The OHP serves as the policy basis for implementing Division 51 and guides the administration of access management rules, including mitigation and public investment, when required, to ensure highway safety and operations pursuant to this division. Access management standards for approaches to state highways are based on the classification of the highway and highway designation, type of area, and posted speed. Future developments along these corridors (new development, redevelopment, zone changes, and/or comprehensive plan amendments) will be required to meet the OHP access management policies and standards. Table 3 summarizes ODOT’s current access management standards for roadways within the Woodburn UGB per the OHP. Table 3: ODOT Access Spacing Standards within Woodburn UGB Corridor To/From Highway Classification Posted Speed (MPH) Spacing Standards (Feet)1 Hillsboro-Silverton Highway 140: OR 219 West UGB limits to Woodland Avenue District Highway 55 700 Hillsboro-Silverton Highway 140: OR 214 Woodland Avenue to OR 99E District Highway 35 350 Hillsboro-Silverton Highway 140: OR 99E OR 214/OR 211 to Young Street District Highway 35 350 Hillsboro-Silverton Highway 140: OR 214 East of OR 99E District Highway 35 350 Woodburn-Estacada Highway 161: OR 211 East of OR 99E District Highway 35 350 Pacific Highway 081: OR 99E North of OR 214/OR 211 Regional Highway 35/45 350/500 Pacific Highway 081: OR 99E South of Young Street Regional Highway 35/45/55 350/500/990 1 These access management spacing standards do not apply to approaches in existence prior to April 1, 2000 except as provided in OAR 734-051- 5120(9). ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 23 Woodburn, Oregon City Standards Access spacing standards for approaches to City streets are based on the roadway functional classification. WDO Section 3.04.03 Table 3.04A shows the minimum separation of a driveway from another intersection (street or driveway). The minimum separation for major arterials, minor arterials, and service collectors are 300 feet, 245 feet, and 50 feet, respectively. WDO Section 3.01.05 outlines that a block length should be between 200 and 600 feet long. In addition to adopting access spacing standards, the City could adopt a policy that requires access be taken from lower classification streets whenever possible. Access Spacing Variances Access spacing variances may be provided to parcels whose highway/street frontage, topography, or location would otherwise preclude issuance of a conforming permit and would either have no reasonable access or cannot obtain reasonable alternate access to the public road system. In such a situation, a conditional access permit may be issued by ODOT or the City, as appropriate, for a connection to a property that cannot be accessed in a manner that is consistent with the spacing standards. The permit can carry a condition that the access may be closed at such time that reasonable access becomes available to a local public street. The approval condition might also require a given land owner to work in cooperation with adjacent land owners to provide either joint access points, front and rear cross-over easements, or a rear access upon future redevelopment. The requirements for obtaining a deviation from ODOT’s minimum spacing standards are documented in OAR [PHONE REDACTED]. For streets under the City‘s jurisdiction, the City may reduce the access spacing standards at the discretion of the City Engineer if the following conditions exist: ▪ Joint access driveways and cross access easements are provided in accordance with the standards; ▪ The site plan incorporates a unified access and circulation system in accordance with the standards; ▪ The property owner enters into a written agreement with the City that pre-existing connections on the site will be closed and eliminated after construction of each side of the joint use driveway; and/or, ▪ The proposed access plan for redevelopment properties moves in the direction of the spacing standards. The City Engineer may modify or waive the access spacing standards for streets under the City’s jurisdiction where the physical site characteristics or layout of abutting properties would make development of a unified or shared access and circulation system impractical, subject to the following considerations: ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 24 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Unless modified, application of the access standard will result in the degradation of operational and safety integrity of the transportation system. ▪ The granting of the variance shall meet the purpose and intent of these standards and shall not be considered until every feasible option for meeting access standards is explored. ▪ Applicants for variance from these standards must provide proof of unique or special conditions that make strict application of the standards impractical. Applicants shall include proof that:  Indirect or restricted access cannot be obtained;  No engineering or construction solutions can be applied to mitigate the condition; and,  No alternative access is available from a road with a lower functional classification than the primary roadway. No variance shall be granted where such hardship is self-created. Consistency between access spacing requirements and exceptions in the TSP and GMC is an important regulatory solution to be addressed as part of this TSP update. Access Consolidation through Management From an operational perspective, access management measures limit the number of redundant access points along roadways. This enhances roadway capacity, improves safety, and benefits circulation. Enforcement of the access spacing standards should be complemented with provision of alternative access points. Purchasing right-of-way and closing driveways without a parallel road system and/or other local access could seriously affect the viability of the impacted properties. Thus, if an access management approach is taken, alternative access should be developed to avoid “land-locking” a given property. As part of every land use action, the City should evaluate the potential need for conditioning a given development proposal with the following items in order to maintain and/or improve traffic operations and safety along the arterial and collector roadways. ▪ Providing access only to the lower classification roadway when multiple roadways abut the property. ▪ Provision of crossover easements on all compatible parcels (considering topography, access, and land use) to facilitate future access between adjoining parcels. ▪ Issuance of conditional access permits to developments having proposed access points that do not meet the designated access spacing policy and/or have the ability to align with opposing driveways. ▪ Right-of-way dedications to facilitate the future planned roadway system in the vicinity of proposed developments. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 25 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Half-street improvements (sidewalks, curb and gutter, bike lanes/paths, and/or travel lanes) along site frontages that do not have full build-out improvements in place at the time of development. Exhibit 1 illustrates the application of cross-over easements and conditional access permits over time to achieve access management objectives. The individual steps are described in Table 4. As illustrated in the exhibit and supporting table, by using these guidelines, all driveways along the highways can eventually move in the overall direction of the access spacing standards as development and redevelopment occur along a given street. Table 4: Example of Crossover Easement/Indenture/Consolidation Step Process 1 EXISTING – Currently Lots A, B, C, and D have site-access driveways that neither meet the access spacing criteria of 500 feet nor align with driveways or access points on the opposite side of the highway. Under these conditions motorists are into situations of potential conflict (conflicting left turns) with opposing traffic. Additionally, the number of side-street (or site-access driveway) intersections decreases the operation and safety of the highway 2 REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT B – At the time that Lot B redevelops, the City would review the proposed site plan and make recommendations to ensure that the site could promote future crossover or consolidated access. Next, the City would issue conditional permits for the development to provide crossover easements with Lots A and C, and ODOT/City would grant a conditional access permit to the lot. After evaluating the land use action, ODOT/City would determine that LOT B does not have either alternative access, nor can an access point be aligned with an opposing access point, nor can the available lot frontage provide an access point that meets the access spacing criteria set forth for segment of highway. 3 REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT A – At the time Lot A redevelops, the City/ODOT would undertake the same review process as with the redevelopment of LOT B (see Step however, under this scenario ODOT and the City would use the previously obtained cross-over easement at Lot B consolidate the access points of Lots A and B. ODOT/City would then relocate the conditional access of Lot B to align with the opposing access point and provide and efficient access to both Lots A and B. The consolidation of site-access driveways for Lots A and B will not only reduce the number of driveways accessing the highway, but will also eliminate the conflicting left-turn movements the highway by the alignment with the opposing access point. 4 REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT D – The redevelopment of Lot D will be handled in same manner as the redevelopment of Lot B (see Step 2) 5 REDEVELOPMENT OF LOT C – The redevelopment of Lot C will be reviewed once again to ensure that the site will accommodate crossover and/or consolidated access. Using the crossover agreements with Lots B and D, Lot C would share a consolidated access point with Lot D and will also have alternative frontage access the shared site-access driveway of Lots A and B. By using the crossover agreement and conditional access permit process, the City and ODOT will be able to eliminate another access point and provide the alignment with the opposing access points. 6 COMPLETE – After Lots A, B, C, and D redevelop over time, the number of access points will be reduced and aligned, and the remaining access points will meet the access spacing standard. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 26 Woodburn, Oregon Exhibit 1: Cross Over Easement ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 27 Woodburn, Oregon Potential Improvements ▪ Develop city-wide access spacing standards according to a roadway’s functional classification ▪ Define a variance process for when the standard cannot be met (see above) ▪ Establish an approach for access consolidation over time to move in the direction of the standards at each opportunity (see above). Cross-over easements should be provided on all compatible parcels (topography, access, and land use) to facilitate future access between adjacent parcels and inter-parcel circulation. ▪ Investigate and implement opportunities to provide alternative access to nonstate facilities when reasonable access can occur (consistent with the State’s Division 51 access management standards) ▪ Consider opportunities to restrict certain turning movements at accesses (such as a right in- right out access) ▪ Through development, half-street improvements (sidewalks, curb and gutter, bicycle lanes/paths, and/or travel lanes) should be provided along all site frontages that do not have full buildout improvements in place at the time of development ▪ Through development, right-of-way dedications should be provided to facilitate the future planned transportation system in the vicinity of the proposed development BICYCLE SYSTEM AND CONNECTIVITY Bicycle facilities are the elements of the transportation system that enable people to travel safely and efficiently by bike. These include facilities along key roadways shared lane pavement markings, on-street bike lanes, and separated bike facilities) and facilities at key crossing locations enhanced bike crossings). These also include end of trip facilities (e.g. secure bike parking, changing rooms, and showers at worksites); however, these facilities are addressed through the development code. Each facility plays a role in developing a comprehensive bicycle system. Solutions Considered This section summarizes the solutions considered for implementation within the City of Woodburn to address existing gaps and deficiencies in the bicycle system and future needs. Alternative Routes Designate an alternative route along a parallel street that provides a more comfortable environment for cyclists with the same level of connectivity. The alternative route could be identified by wayfinding signs, which could also be used to identify essential destinations that can be reached by the route. The alternative route may provide shared-lane pavement markings and signs, on-street bike lanes, or other bicycle facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 28 Woodburn, Oregon Shared Lane Pavement Markings and Signs Shared‐lane pavement markings (often called “sharrows”) are not a bicycle facility, but a tool designed to help accommodate bicyclists on roadways where bike lanes are desirable but infeasible to construct. Sharrows indicate a shared roadway space for cyclists and motorists and are typically centered in the travel lane or approximately four feet from the edge of the travelway. Sharrows are suitable on roadways with relatively low travel speeds (<35 mph) and low ADT (<3,000 ADT); however, they may also be used to transition between discontinuous bicycle facilities. Sharrows could be applied along a variety of streets within Woodburn where room for on-street bike lanes is limited. On-Street bike lanes On-street bike lanes are striped lanes on the roadway dedicated for the exclusive use of cyclists. Bike lanes are typically placed at the outer edge of pavement (but to the inside of right‐turn lanes and/or on‐street parking). Bicycle lanes can improve safety and security of cyclists and (if comprehensive) can provide direct connections between origins and destinations. On-street bike lanes could be applied along a variety of streets within Woodburn where space allows. Separated Bike Facilities Separated bike facilities include buffered bike lanes and separated bike lanes, or cycle tracks. Buffered bike lanes are on-street bike lanes that include an additional striped buffer of typically 2-3 feet between the bicycle lane and the vehicle travel lane and/or between the bicycle lane and the vehicle parking lane. They are typically located along streets that require a higher level of separation to improve the comfort of bicycling. Separated bike lanes, also known as cycle tracks, are bicycle facilities that are separated from motor vehicle traffic by a buffer and a physical barrier, such as planters, flexible posts, parked cars, or a mountable curb. One-way separated bike lanes are typically found on each side of the street, like a standard bike lane, while a two-way separated bike lanes are typically found on one side of the street. On-street Bike Lanes Buffered Bike Lanes ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 29 Woodburn, Oregon Enhanced Crossings Enhanced bicycle crossing facilities enable cyclists to safely cross streets, railroad tracks, and other transportation facilities. Planning for appropriate bicycle crossings requires the community to balance vehicular mobility needs with providing crossing locations that the desired routes of cyclists. Enhanced bicycle crossings include: ▪ Bike Boxes – designated space at an intersection that allows cyclists to wait in front of motor vehicles while waiting to turn or continue through the intersection. ▪ Two-Stage Left-turn Boxes – designated space at a signalized intersection outside of the travel lane that provides cyclists with a place to wait while making a two-stage left-turn. ▪ Pavement marking through intersections – pavement markings that extend and bike lane through an intersection. ▪ Bike Only Signals – A traffic signal that is dedicated for cyclists ▪ Bicycle Detection – Vehicle detection for bicycles Additional information on the enhanced bicycle crossing treatments is provided in Attachment Wayfinding Signs Wayfinding signs are signs located along roadways or at intersections that direct bicyclists towards destinations in the area and/or to define a bicycle route. They typically include distances and average walk/cycle times. Wayfinding signs are generally used on primary bicycle routes and multi-use paths. Potential Improvements The following improvements have been organized by streets segment, intersection, and off-street improvements. Where there are multiple improvements, the improvement shown in bold text was identified as the preferred improvement based on an evaluation of environmental, engineering, land use “fatal flaws” and anticipated funding capacity as well as discussions with the project team, advisory committees, and the general public. Figure 2 illustrates the bicycle system needs discussed below. Street Segment Improvements The following street segment improvements have been organized by functional classification. Major Arterials Major arterials provide bicycle connectivity between urban centers and regions within the Woodburn UGB. The following provides a summary of the bicycle improvements along major arterial streets. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 E BLAINE ST MCKEE SCHOOL RD N CASCADE DR SHEN A N D OAH LN PLUM LN RAILROAD WHITNE Y LN T U K WILA DR R O Y AV J AM E S ST DIMMICK LN STAFNEY LN ARNEY RD EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR CROSBY RD LE BRUN RD PA N A ST T R A CY L N KOI LN PRINCETON RD MER I D I A N DR COUNTRY CL U B RD LEARY RD W LINCOLN ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN GAR FIE LD ST C A N B Y L P MILL ST RYE ST VI N E AV VERA LN HI GH ST LILAC WY STARK ST IDAHO DR BRYAN ST N FRO N T S T T U L IP AV JA N S E N W Y PAL M A V OATS ST BL Y L P O REGON L P DEX TER LP JORY ST OGLE ST HAWLEY ST ELANA WY C A SCA D E D R S M ITH DR D E ER R UN CHA TEAU D R OXFORD S T T U R NBERRY A V NATIONAL WY N 2ND ST AZTEC DR SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST WILLO W A V SALLAL RD H A ZELNU T DR STANFIELD R D BLAINE ST EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD QUINN RD KING WY TOMLIN AV W ORKMAN DR MCKINLEY ST KOENER RD G R EE N V I E W DR N 3RD ST RANDOLPH RD LAUREL AV HOO P E R ST A L S E A LP EL M ST E C LACKAMAS C R MCLAUGHLIN D R N 1ST ST W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD COMMERCE WY SERRES LN S CASCADE D R EAST HARDCASTLE RD ST LOUIS RD GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR FRONT ST UNION SCHOOL RD INGALLS LN PARR RD CARL RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD P I N E C R SHA LIM A R LP O R E GON WY CROSBY RD A RNEY RD H A Z E L NUT D R W HAYE S S T LINCO LN S T BROWN ST PARK AV ASTOR WY GA T CH S T WOODLAND AV PARR RD HARDCASTLE AV STUBB RD STACY ALLISON WY P RO GRESS WY BOONES FER RY RD Y OUNG ST S PACIFIC HY BUTTEVILLE RD N FRONT ST MT HOOD AV NE W BERG HY MOLALLA RD WILCO HY Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 2 ä New Street Connection Existing Bike Lane Bike Lane Need Bike Lane Need (Future Roadway) Shared Street Need Shared Street Need (Future Roadway) Existing Multi-Use Pathway Multi-Use Pathway Opportunity City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM5\02 Bicycle System Needs.mxd - mmccormick - 9:33 PM 6/3/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Bicycle System Needs Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 31 Woodburn, Oregon OR 219/OR 214 OR 219/OR 214 currently has a varying cross-section from Butteville Road to OR 99E, with existing bike lanes provided from Willow Avenue to Progress Way. Where there are existing bike lanes on OR 219/OR 214, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. For these segments, this is primarily due to the relatively high travel speeds and narrow bike lanes along the roadway. On the segments without bike lanes, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is also currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ OR 219/OR 214 from Willow Avenue to Progress Way o Widen roadway and widen bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ OR 214 from Progress Way to OR 99E o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway OR 99E OR 99E currently has a varying cross-section, with existing bike lanes provided from the northern UGB to Lincoln Street and the five-lane roadway transitioning to two lanes south of the City Boundary. Where there are existing bike lanes on OR 99E, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. For these segments, this is primarily due to the relatively high travel speeds and narrow bike lanes along the roadway. On the segments without bike lanes, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is also currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ OR 99E from northern UGB to Lincoln Street o Widen roadway and widen bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 32 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway OR 214, Facing West OR 99E, Facing North Minor Arterials Minor arterials support bicycle access and circulation within Woodburn, particularly those that are served by local transit service. The following provides a summary of the bicycle improvements along minor arterial streets. OR 219 from Western UGB to Butteville Road OR 219 currently does not have bicycle facilities, and the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Butteville Road/OR 219 from Northern UGB to Southern UGB The segment of Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to southern UGB currently does not have bicycle facilities, and the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 33 Woodburn, Oregon Evergreen Road from OR 214 to Hayes Street The segment of Evergreen Road from OR 214 to Hayes Street does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low travel speeds along the roadway. Although the segment is adequate based on the BLTS analysis, it is a gap in the bike network of existing bike lanes. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue currently has a varying cross-section, with existing bike lanes provided from Hazelnut Drive to Harrison Street. Where there are existing bike lanes along the roadway, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. For these segments, this is primarily due to the relatively high travel speeds and narrow bike lanes. On the segments without bike lanes and with posted speeds greater than 25 MPH, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is also currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. On the segments without bike lanes and with posted speeds of 25 MPH, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive o Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit o Install shared lane pavement marking and signs o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue from Hazelnut Drive to Harrison Street o Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit o Reduce the travel lane width and widen bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and widen bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Settlemier Avenue from Harrison Street to railroad tracks o Install shared lane pavement marking and signs ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 34 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Boones Ferry Road from Dahlia Street to southern UGB o Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit o Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Front Street Front Street does not have bicycle facilities. The BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway alternatives between being suitable and NOT being suitable for most cyclists, based on the posted speed limit. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit ▪ Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Garfield Street Garfield Street currently does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Garfield Street from 3rd Street to Front Street o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Garfield Street from Smith Drive to 3rd Street o Install shared lane pavement marking and signs Young Street Young Street currently has bike lanes on both sides of the roadway; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively high travel speeds and narrow bike lanes along the roadway. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit ▪ Widen roadway and widen bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 35 Woodburn, Oregon OR 211 OR 211 (east of OR 99E) currently does not have bicycle facilities, and the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently NOT suitable for most cyclists. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit ▪ Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Service Collectors Service collectors serve an important function for bicycle access and circulation within Woodburn and may provide direct access to essential destinations, such as schools, parks, churches, and commercial areas. The following provides a summary of the bicycle improvements along service collector streets. Arney Road from Robin Avenue to OR 219 The segment of Arney Road from Robin Avenue to OR 219 currently does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install shared lane pavement marking and signs Stacy Allison Way from Evergreen Road to Center Street The segment of Stacy Allison Way from Evergreen Road to Center Street currently does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Although the segment is adequate based on the BLTS analysis, it is a gap in the bike network of existing bike lanes. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Enhance the parallel route of Harvard Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen Road. Install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Hayes Street Hayes Street does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 36 Woodburn, Oregon Although the segment is adequate based on the BLTS analysis, it is a gap in the bike network of existing bike lanes. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Cascade Drive o Install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Hayes Street from Cascade Drive to Settlemier Avenue o Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Parr Road from Western UGB to Western City Boundary The segment of Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary currently does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Although the segment is adequate based on the BLTS analysis, it is a gap in the bike network of existing/planned bike lanes and multi-use paths. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Reduce the travel lane width and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Lincoln Street Lincoln Street currently does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install shared lane pavement marking and signs Cleveland Street Cleveland Street currently does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install shared lane pavement marking and signs Hardcastle Avenue Hardcastle Avenue does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Although the segment is adequate based on the BLTS analysis, it is a gap in the bike network of existing bike lanes. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 37 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Install shared lane pavement marking and signs ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Brown Street Brown Street does not have bicycle facilities; however, the BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is currently suitable for most cyclists. This is primarily due to the relatively low speeds along the roadway. Although the segment is adequate based on the BLTS analysis, it is a gap in the bike network of existing/planned bike lanes. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install shared lane pavement marking and signs ▪ Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Cooley Road Cooley Road does not have bicycle facilities. The BLTS analysis indicates that the roadway is NOT suitable for most cyclists, primarily due to the posted speed limit. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Cooley Road from OR 211 to Aubrey Way o Widen roadway and install bike lanes on both sides of the roadway o Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit ▪ Cooley Road from Aubrey Way to Hardcastle Avenue o Install bike lane striping on both sides of the roadway o Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit Stacy Allison Way, Facing South Hardcastle Avenue, Facing East ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 38 Woodburn, Oregon Access Streets Access streets also serve an important function for bicycle access and circulation within Woodburn and may provide direct access to essential destinations. The following provides a summary of the bicycle improvements along access streets. The types of treatments considered along these roadways include shared pavement markings and signs and wayfinding signs to essential destinations. ▪ Stubb Road ▪ Astor Way ▪ Tukwila Drive from Boones Ferry Road to Hazelnut Drive ▪ 5th Street ▪ Gatch Street ▪ Park Avenue Local Streets Local streets play an important role in providing bicycle connectivity within the city and providing direct access to adjacent land uses. The following local streets have been identified as playing a critical role in providing connectivity to essential destinations. The types of treatments considered along these roadways include shared pavement markings and signs and wayfinding signs to essential destinations. ▪ Evergreen Road from Country Club Court to OR 214 ▪ Country Club Road from Evergreen Road to Astor Way ▪ Cascade Drive ▪ Smith Drive from Hayes Street to Garfield Street ▪ Meridian Drive PEDESTRIAN SYSTEM AND CONNECTIVITY Pedestrian facilities are the elements of the transportation system that enable people to walk safely and efficiently between neighborhoods, retail centers, employment areas, and transit stops. These include facilities for pedestrian movement along key roadways sidewalks, multi-use paths, and trails) and for safe roadway crossings crosswalks, crossing beacons, pedestrian refuge islands). Each facility plays an important role in developing a comprehensive pedestrian network. Solutions Considered This section summarizes the solutions considered for implementation within the City of Woodburn to address existing gaps and deficiencies in the pedestrian system and future needs. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 39 Woodburn, Oregon Sidewalks Sidewalks are the fundamental building blocks of the pedestrian system. They enable people to walk comfortably, conveniently, and safely from place to place. They also provide an important means of mobility for people with disabilities, families with strollers, and others who may not be able to travel on an unimproved roadside surface. Sidewalks are usually 6 to 8-feet wide and constructed from concrete. They are also frequently separated from the roadway by a curb, landscaping, and/or on-street parking. Sidewalks are widely used in urban and suburban settings. Ideally, sidewalks could be provided along both sides of the roadway; however, some areas with physical or right-of-way constraints may require that sidewalk be located on only one side. Sidewalk solutions include: ▪ Fill in the gaps ▪ Install sidewalks on one-side of the roadway ▪ Install sidewalks on both sides of the roadway ▪ Re-construct existing sidewalks with appropriate width and buffer ▪ Improve existing sidewalks with appropriate lighting Sidewalk Improvements Sidewalk Improvements Accessways Non-vehicular connections between cul-de-sacs and adjacent roadways can significantly reduce travel distances for pedestrians, thereby encouraging more people to walk. Woodburn has a few existing accessways that create connections between neighborhoods and pedestrian and bicycle routes. Potential new connections could use existing City right-of-way between cul-de-sacs or unconnected roadways to provide a paved path, unpaved path, or trail for non-motorized use. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 40 Woodburn, Oregon Multi-use Paths and Trails Multi-use paths are paved, bi-directional trails that can serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. Multi-use paths and trails can be constructed adjacent to roadways where the topography, right-of-way, or other issues don’t allow for the construction of sidewalks and bike facilities. A minimum width of 10 feet is recommended for low-pedestrian/bicycle-traffic contexts; 12 to 20 feet should be considered in areas with moderate to high levels of bicycle and pedestrian traffic. Multi-use paths can be used to create longer-distance links within and between communities. They play an integral role in recreation, commuting, and accessibility due to their appeal to users of all ages and skill levels. Accessways Multi-use Paths and Trails Enhanced Pedestrian Crossings Pedestrian crossing facilities enable pedestrians to safely cross streets, railroad tracks, and other transportation facilities. Planning for appropriate pedestrian crossings requires the community to balance vehicular mobility needs with providing crossing locations for desired routes of walkers. Enhanced pedestrian crossing treatments include: ▪ Median refuge islands ▪ High visibility pavement markings and signs ▪ Rapid rectangular flashing beacons (RRFB) ▪ Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons ▪ Curb extensions ▪ Pedestrian signals  Pedestrian countdown heads  Leading Pedestrian interval Many of the treatments listed above can be applied together at one crossing location to further alert drivers of the presence of pedestrians in the roadway. See Attachment for a detailed description of enhanced pedestrian crossing treatments. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 41 Woodburn, Oregon Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing with Enhanced Pedestrian Crossing with Pedestrian Signal Potential Improvements The following improvements have been organized by streets segment, intersection, multi-use pathways, and off-street improvements. Where there are multiple improvements, the improvements shown in bold text were identified as the preferred improvement based on an evaluation of environmental, engineering, land use “fatal flaws” and anticipated funding capacity as well as discussions with the project team, advisory committees, and the general public. Figure 3 illustrates the pedestrian system needs discussed below. Street Segment Improvements The following street segment improvements have been organized by functional classification. Major Arterials Major arterials provide pedestrian connectivity between urban centers and regions within the Woodburn UGB. The following provides a summary of the pedestrian improvements along major arterial streets. OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue The segment of OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue currently does not have sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ▪ Install new landscape strips and sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- 89:q 89:q89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q 89:q k l 89:m 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 O REGON L P FRONT ST E BLAINE ST LEARY RD A R N E Y L N MOUNTAIN VIEW LN S M I T H DR C H A T E A U DR EAST LINCOLN RD PARR RD CAMAS ST SALLAL R D SERRES LN S CASCADE D R DIMMICK LN ARNEY RD MEADOW DR CROSBY RD CARL RD JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P A R K C R MCLAUG H LI N DR N 1ST ST OATS ST B L Y L P JORY ST QUINN R D T OMLIN AV HO O PER ST ELM ST ST LOUIS RD STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN S H ALI M A R LP WILLO W AV OAK ST STARK S T P U B LI C R D T U L I P AV PAL M AV OGLE ST D E E R R U N N 2ND ST JA M E S S T BLAINE ST N 3RD ST LAUREL AV A L S E A L P DECONINCK R D GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR UNION SCHOOL RD PARR RD CROSBY RD L INCOLN S T ARNE Y RD N 5TH ST BRO W N ST INDUSTRIAL AV STUBB RD WOODLAND A V PROGRESS WY BOON ES FERR Y RD MT HOOD AV WILCO HY S PACIFIC HY N FRONT ST BUTTEVILLE RD Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 3 ä New Accessway ä New Street Connections k l 89:m Existing Enhanced Crossing 89:q Enhanced Crossing Opportunity Existing Sidewalks Fill in Existing Sidewalk Gaps Sidewalk Need Sidewalk Need (Future Roadway) Existing Multi-Use Pathway Multi-Use Pathway Opportunity Transit Stops City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM5\03 Pedestrian System Needs.mxd - mmccormick - 9:47 PM 6/3/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Pedestrian System Needs Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 43 Woodburn, Oregon OR 99E OR 99E currently has continuous sidewalks along both sides of the roadway from northern UGB to Lincoln Street. From Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary, there are several gaps in the sidewalks. South of the southern City Boundary, there are currently no sidewalks. The PLTS analysis indicates that the roadway may not be suitable for all pedestrians along the entirety of the corridor. This is primarily due to sidewalk gaps, poor pavement condition, lack of a buffer, and/or limited street lighting. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ OR 99E from northern UGB to Lincoln Street o Evaluate light levels and install street lighting ▪ OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary o Remove the existing sidewalks and install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway o Remove the existing sidewalks and install new landscape strips and sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ▪ OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB o Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway o Install new landscape strips and sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Minor Arterials Minor arterials support pedestrian access and circulation within Woodburn, particularly those that are served by local transit service. The following provides a summary of the pedestrian improvements along arterial streets. Butteville Road/OR 219 from Northern UGB to Southern UGB Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to southern UGB currently does not have sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ▪ Install new landscape strips and sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Evergreen Road There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Evergreen Road from Stacy Allison Way to Boean Lane. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway from Stacy Allison Way to Boean Lane ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 44 Woodburn, Oregon Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue Segments of Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue currently do not have sidewalks. The PLTS analysis indicates that the roadway may not be suitable for all pedestrians along the entirety of the corridor. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive o Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ▪ Settlemier Avenue from Oak Street to Parr Road o Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ▪ Boones Ferry Road from Parr Road to southern UGB o Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Front Street Front Street does not have sidewalks from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Young Street There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Young Street from Front Street to OR 99E. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway OR 211 from OR 99E to Eastern City Boundary/UGB OR 211 does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ▪ Install new landscape strips and sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 45 Woodburn, Oregon Settlemier Avenue, Facing North Young Street, Facing East Service Collectors Service collectors also serve an important function for pedestrian access and circulation within Woodburn and may provide direct access to essential destinations, such as schools, parks, churches, and commercial areas. The following provides a summary of the pedestrian improvements along service collector streets. Hayes Street There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Front Street. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway Parr Road Parr Road does not have sidewalks from western UGB to western City Boundary. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ▪ Install new landscape strips and sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Lincoln Street There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Lincoln Street from Cascade Drive to OR 99E. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 46 Woodburn, Oregon Industrial Avenue Industrial Avenue does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Progress Way Progress Way does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Hardcastle Avenue There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Hardcastle Avenue from Front Street to Cooley Road. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway Brown Street There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Brown Street from Cleveland Street to end of roadway. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway Cooley Road There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Cooley Road from Front Street to OR 99E. The PLTS analysis indicates that the roadway may not be suitable for all pedestrians along the entirety of the corridor. This is primarily due to sidewalk gaps, lack of a buffer, and/or limited street lighting. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway ▪ Evaluate light levels and install street lighting Access Streets Access streets also serve an important function for pedestrian access and circulation within Woodburn and may provide direct access to essential destinations. The following provides a summary of the pedestrian improvements along collector streets. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 47 Woodburn, Oregon Woodland Avenue Woodland Avenue does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway from Jory Street to Arney Road Stubb Road Stubb Road does not have sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Oregon Way Oregon Way does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Hazelnut Drive There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Hazelnut Drive from Graystone Drive to Front Street. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway from Graystone Drive to Front Street Gatch Street There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Gatch Street from Hardcastle Road to Cleveland Street. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway Park Avenue Park Avenue does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 48 Woodburn, Oregon Gatch Street, Facing North Hazelnut Drive, Facing East Local Streets Local streets provide direct access to essential destinations throughout Woodburn, such as schools, parks, churches, and commercial areas. Typically, continuous pedestrian facilities should be provided along at least one side of each street to ensure adequate access for pedestrians. Willow Avenue Willow Avenue does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway from McNaught Road to OR 219 ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway from McNaught Road to OR 219 Cascade Drive Cascade Drive does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Leasure Street Leasure Street does not have sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 49 Woodburn, Oregon Church Street Church Street does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway from Leasure Street to Settlemier Avenue ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway from Leasure Street to Settlemier Avenue Garfield Street Garfield Street does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway from Smith Drive to Settlemier Avenue ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway from Smith Drive to Settlemier Avenue Smith Drive Smith Drive does not have sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway from Hayes Street to Garfield Street ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway from Hayes Street to Garfield Street Ben Brown Lane There are several gaps in the sidewalks along Ben Brown Lane. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Fill in the gaps along both sides of the roadway Oak Street Oak Street does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 50 Woodburn, Oregon Ogle Street Ogle Street does not have sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Stark Street Stark Street does not have continuous sidewalks. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered along the roadway: ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along one side of the roadway ▪ Install new sidewalks of appropriate width along both sides of the roadway Pedestrian Crossing Improvements Front Street/Lincoln Street There are enhanced pedestrian crossings on the north, south, and west legs of the intersection. The east leg intersects the railroad. Therefore, the following improvement is being considered: ▪ Construct ADA-compliant ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection Front Street/Young Street There are enhanced pedestrian crossings on the north, south, and west legs of the intersection. The east leg intersects the railroad. Therefore, the following improvement is being considered: ▪ Construct ADA-compliant ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection Cascade Drive/Hayes Street The Cascade Drive/Hayes Street intersection is an important connection for those traveling between Hayes Street and OR 214. There are no enhanced crossings on Hayes Street at intersection roadways that provide direct access to OR 214. In addition, the Nellie Muir Elementary School is located southeast of the intersection. ▪ Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing to facilitate movement across Hayes Street ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 51 Woodburn, Oregon Park Avenue/Legion Park Driveway Legion Park is one of the largest parks in Woodburn; however, there are not enhanced pedestrian crossing within the vicinity of the site. ▪ Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing to facilitate movement across Park Avenue OR 214/N Bulldog Drive The OR 214/N Bulldog Drive intersection has an existing pedestrian crossing on the east leg of OR 214 that serves the Woodburn High School. As described in the 2017 Woodburn Pedestrian Plan, the crossing is well utilized by students during both the morning and afternoon peak periods correlating to the school day. ▪ Update the existing crossing to an enhanced pedestrian crossing with a pedestrian hybrid beacon coordinated with the surrounding traffic signals to facilitate pedestrian movements across OR 214 while still allowing vehicular movements along OR 214. This treatment would require approval by the State Traffic-Roadway Engineer. Hazelnut Drive/Broadmoor Place Accessway Hazelnut Drive provides an east-west connection of Boones Ferry Road and Front Street north of OR 214. It also serves as the northern boundary to the Woodburn High School. There are no enhanced crossings on Hazelnut Drive. ▪ Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing to facilitate movement across Hazelnut Drive OR 99E OR 99E is an important north-south connection running the length of Woodburn near the eastern edge of the city. It supports commercial uses and provides access to numerous businesses along the corridor as well as providing connectivity to northern and southern industrial uses and downtown Woodburn to the west. Woodburn conducted a study of the OR 99E corridor in 2012 to support the revitalization of the corridor as a business district. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered, all of which would require approval by the State Traffic-Roadway Engineer: ▪ Install curb extensions on minor street legs of intersections (curb extensions to shorten pedestrian crossing distances parallel to OR 99E, not for crossing of OR 99E) between Arlington Street and Cleveland Street (up to 8 locations). Potential locations include: ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 52 Woodburn, Oregon o Alexandria Avenue o James Street o Williams Street o Blaine Street o Aztec Drive o Laurel Avenue o Tomlin Avenue ▪ Install countdown pedestrian timers and construct ADA enhancements at key signalized intersections along OR 99E In addition to the 2012 Highway 99E Corridor Plan, the 2017 Woodburn Pedestrian Plan identified the following new crossing locations along OR 99E, envisioned to include raised median refuge islands, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and potentially RRFB treatments: ▪ North of Williams Street ▪ Between NE Laurel Avenue and Tomlin Avenue ▪ Between Blaine Street and Aztec Drive ▪ North of Mount Jefferson Avenue ▪ North of James Street Multi-use Pathway Improvements Woodburn prepared a master plan in 2007 that outlines a multi-use path system running along Mill Creek and its northern and western tributaries. In addition to these planned facilities, several other potential multi-use path opportunities have been identified. The following are locations where multi- use path opportunities have been identified: ▪ Mill Creek Greenway ▪ Mill Creek Greenway – Northern tributary ▪ Mill Creek Greenway – Western tributary ▪ Evergreen Road extension south to planned Mill Creek Greenway ▪ North-south connection on Hardcastle Avenue and Lincoln Street west of Washington Elementary School ▪ Extension south of planned Mill Creek Greenway to Belle Passi Road ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 53 Woodburn, Oregon Off-street Improvements The following off-street improvements consist of pedestrian accessways and mid-block crossings. Accessway Connections to OR 99E As part of the study conducted along OR 99E, the following accessway connections to OR 99E are being considered: ▪ June Way, may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E ▪ Johnson street ▪ Elm Street, may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E ▪ Wilson Street ▪ Hawley Street, may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E A Street Accessway Right of way between A Street and Cleveland Street has been preserved; however, a new roadway connection may not be feasible. In addition, the planned Mill Creek Greenway will run east-west between the two roadways. Therefore, the following improvement is being considered: ▪ Install a new accessway that connects A Street north to Cleveland Street and/or Mill Creek Greenway (western tributary). Mill Creek Greenway Mid-block Crossings As part of the planned Mill Creek Greenway multi-use path, the following mid-block crossings have been identified: ▪ Young Street ▪ Hazelnut Drive ▪ Bulldog Drive (two crossing locations) ▪ OR 214 (state highway) ▪ Hardcastle Avenue ▪ Lincoln Street ▪ Cleveland Street (including railroad crossing) ▪ Ben Brown Lane extension ▪ Settlemier Avenue ▪ Parr Road ▪ Front Street (including railroad crossing) ▪ Meridian Drive ▪ Boones Ferry Road ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 54 Woodburn, Oregon If and when the Mill Creek Greenway multi-use path is constructed, high-visibility enhanced pedestrian crossings should be considered at the above locations where the multi-use path intersects roadways. Depending on the classification and characteristics of the roadway, the enhanced crossing may include a median refuge island, high visibility pavement markings and signs, RRFB’s, pedestrian hybrid beacons, curb extensions, and/or pedestrian signals. A Street Accessway, Facing North June Way Accessway, Facing West SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL The access and connectivity needs for a safe routes to school program have been considered above in the bicycle and pedestrian system sections. The schools in Woodburn are listed below with their primary access and connecting streets identified. To see the potential improvements that will benefit each school, review the projects described in the previous sections. Woodburn High School (1785 N Front Street) Direct access and local connectivity are provided by OR 214, Front Street, Hazelnut Drive, and the planned Mill Creek Greenway multi-use path and its northern tributary extension. Washington Elementary School (777 E Lincoln Street) Direct access and local connectivity are provided by Hardcastle Avenue, Lincoln Street, Gatch Street, Park Avenue, and potential multi-use pathway opportunities to the west. Nellie Muir Elementary School (1800 W Hayes Street) Direct access and local connectivity are provided by Hayes Street, Cascade Drive, Leasure Street, Garfield Street, Smith Drive, and Settlemier Avenue. A pedestrian crossing opportunity on Hayes was identified to benefit this school and the surrounding area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 55 Woodburn, Oregon Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School (440/450 Parr Road) Direct access and local connectivity are provided by Parr road, the planned Mill Creek Greenway western tributary extension, Boones Ferry Road/Settlenier Avenue, and Front Street. Lincoln Elementary School and French Prairie Middle School (1041/1025 N Boones Ferry Road) Direct access and local connectivity are provided by Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue, OR 214, and the planned Mill Creek Greenway northern tributary extension. St. Luke’s School (529 Harrison Street) Direct access and local connectivity are provided by Harrison Street, 5th Street, and Front Street. TRANSIT SYSTEM Public transit can provide important connections to destinations for people that do not drive or bike and can provide an additional option for all transportation system users for certain trips. Public transit links to walking, bicycling, or driving trips: users can walk to and from transit stops and their homes, shopping, or work places; people can drive to park-and-ride locations to access a bus; or people can bring their bikes on transit vehicles and bicycle from a transit stop to their final destination. Providing transit service in smaller cities is generally led by a local or regional transit agency and is dependent on having the land use and densities that can support service. The city can plan for transit- supportive land use patterns and support future transit viability by designing and building streets that will comfortably accommodate transit stops and include the right-of-way that could allow for transit stops to be located as close as possible to important destinations. At a minimum, a transit stop should be well-signed and have a comfortable space to wait. Benches and shelter from the weather can improve user comfort and including bike parking near bus stops allows people the option to leave their bike at one trip-end instead of bringing it on the bus. Service Coverage Service Coverage is a measure of the area within walking distance of transit service. Areas must be within 1/4-mile of a bus stop (or service route if there are no designated stops) or 1/2 mile of a transit station to be considered an area served by transit. As with the other availability measures, service coverage does not provide a complete picture of transit availability by itself, but when combined with frequency and hours of service, it helps identify the number of opportunities people have to access transit from different locations. Service coverage evaluates the percentage of transit-supportive areas—areas that would typically produce the majority of a system’s ridership—that are served by transit. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 56 Woodburn, Oregon To qualify as a transit-supportive area (TSA) one of the following thresholds must be met: ▪ Minimum population density of 3 households/gross acre; or ▪ Minimum job density of 4 employees/gross acre. Service coverage is an all-or-nothing issue for transit riders—either service is available for a particular trip or it is not. As a result, there is no direct correlation between service coverage and what a passenger would experience for a given trip. Rather, service coverage reflects the number of potential trip origins and destinations available to potential passengers. Figure 4 displays the existing transit-supportive areas and service coverage in Woodburn. Areas defined as transit supportive that have service are shown in blue. Areas defined as transit supportive but lacking service are shown in gray. Areas that have transit service, but do not qualify as a TSA, are shown in tan. A majority of the areas shown in gray would require additional transit routes or the development of new pathway connections (increasing the area that is within ¼ mile walking distance) to existing transit routes to be served. Future Transit Service Coverage The future transit level-of-service analysis assumes that existing service frequencies, service hours, and service coverage is the same in the future. The only difference is the population and employment growth assumptions included in the regional traffic model for 2040 and the resulting transit supportive areas. Figure 5 displays the future transit-supportive areas and service coverage based on existing transit service. As shown, the number of transit supportive areas is expected to increase. While many of these areas are expected to be served by existing transit services, the remaining areas will require additional service routes or connections to existing routes in order to be served. ---PAGE BREAK--- Iü 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBER G H Y HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER GREE N RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BOON E S FERRY R D BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 4 Woodburn Transit Stops Woodburn City Transit Loop Canby Area Transit (CAT) Canby Area Transit (CAT) Cherriots Transit Stops Cherriots Tranist Routes Iü Park N' Ride Lots Quarter Mile Walkshed from Transit Stops Served Transit Supportive Transit Supportive TAZs City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM5\04 Existing Transit-supportive Areas.mxd - mmccormick - 9:48 PM 6/3/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Existing Transit-supportive Areas Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Iü 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBER G H Y HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER GREE N RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BOON E S FERRY R D BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 5 Woodburn Transit Stops Woodburn City Transit Loop Canby Area Transit (CAT) Canby Area Transit (CAT) Cherriots Transit Stops Cherriots Tranist Routes Iü Park N' Ride Lots Quarter Mile Walkshed from Transit Stops Served Transit Supportive Transit Supportive TAZs City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM5\05 Future Transit-supportive Areas.mxd - mmccormick - 9:49 PM 6/3/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Future Transit-supportive Areas Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 59 Woodburn, Oregon Solutions Considered This section summarizes the solutions considered for implementation within the City of Woodburn to address existing gaps and deficiencies in the transit system and future needs. New or Re-routed Fixed-Route Service Fixed-route service enhancement can include: ▪ Increase the service frequency by reducing headways or time between arrivals ▪ Increase hours of service by providing service earlier in the morning and/or later in the evening ▪ Increase service coverage by re-routing existing service or implementing new service Stop Enhancements Transit stops are designated locations where residents can access local transit service. Transit stops are normally located at major intersections. The types of amenities provided at each transit stop (i.e. pole, bench, shelter, ridership information, trash receptacles) tend to reflect the level of usage. Potential stop enhancements include: ▪ Pole and bus stop sign – All bus stops require a pole and bus stop sign to identify the bus stop location. ▪ Bus stop shelters ▪ Seating ▪ Trash cans ▪ Lighting Park-and-Ride Facilities Park-and-ride facilities provide parking for people who wish to transfer from their personal vehicle to public transportation or carpools/vanpools. Park-and-rides are frequently located near major intersections, at commercial centers, or on express and commuter bus routes. It is Oregon state policy to encourage the development and use of park-and-ride facilities at appropriate urban and rural locations adjacent to or within the highway right-of-way. Park-and-ride facilities can provide an efficient method to provide transit service to low density areas, connecting people to jobs, and providing an alternate mode to complete long-distance commutes. Park-and-ride facilities may be either shared-use, such as at a school or shopping center, or exclusive- use. Shared-use facilities are generally designated and maintained through agreements reached between the local public transit agency or rideshare program operator and the property owner. Shared lots can save the expense of building a new parking lot, increase the utilization of existing spaces, and ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 60 Woodburn, Oregon avoid utilization of developable land for surface parking. In the case of shopping centers, the presence of a shared-use park-and-ride has frequently been shown to be mutually beneficial, as park-and-riders tend to patronize the businesses in the center. Potential Improvements New, Enhanced, or Re-routed Service The following opportunities are being considered for new, enhanced, or re-routed service to address the need for additional service coverage within the surrounding area: ▪ Woodburn fixed route enhancement opportunities o Increase frequency to 30 minutes o Provide Saturday service o Provide Sunday service o Convert existing route to two-way operations o Separate route into two routes with one-way operations o Separate route into two routes with two-way operations o Add a new fixed route in City center (30-minute frequency to major local destinations) o Restructure the “long” loop, expanded to serve the neighborhood in southeast Woodburn ▪ New or re-routed service to provide service to o Parr Road corridor via an extension of Evergreen Road o Crosby Road corridor o Butteville Road corridor o Employment center southwest of I-5/OR 214 interchange o Woodburn Industrial Park along the Progress Way and Industrial Avenue corridors o Gateway subarea Avenue ▪ New service o Provide peak-only employer shuttles o Establish a free shuttle between the Woodburn Company Stores and Downtown Woodburn, hourly during peak shopping and entertainment hours ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 61 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Intercity service opportunities o Coordinate transfers between the different agency services in Woodburn o Provide a stop in Woodburn for SMART Route 1X o Provide service to downtown Salem (and east to State offices) - incorporate a stop at the planned Park & Ride for the SMART express route between Wilsonville and Salem o Provide service to Portland - connect to TriMet via the Tualatin Park-and-Ride, directly into downtown Portland, to the Westside Express Service (southern terminus at Wilsonville SMART Central), or the MAX Orange Line light rail service o Provide a new demand-responsive service to Hubbard one day per week o Provide service to WES station in Wilsonville Stop Enhancements Woodburn City Transit should evaluate signage at all bus stops to verify that they are visible and accessible. Static bus route information should be provided at each bus stop. In addition, the following bus stops are being considered for shelter installation due to adequate ridership volumes: ▪ Bus stop ID: 755016, Walmart ▪ Bus stop ID: 20419, Garfield Street Other Transit Improvements ▪ Investigate transferring the paratransit system to a local social service agency INTERMODAL ROUTE CONNECTIVITY The majority of the needs for intermodal route connectivity and access have been considered above in the bicycle, pedestrian, transit, and auto-related system sections. By providing a connected system by each mode and identifying crossing and multi-use pathway opportunities, the overall transportation system of Woodburn becomes further connected and has overlap between modes. Improved transit access and service will allow users from different areas of the city to more easily reach transit, while a connected bicycle and pedestrian network will support their first-mile, last-mile needs. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 62 Woodburn, Oregon Potential Improvements In addition to the improvements identified in earlier sections, the following improvements are being considered to enhance intermodal route connectivity in Woodburn: ▪ Provide wayfinding to bike routes, multi-use paths, trails (as constructed), parks, schools, and other essential destinations ▪ Provide bike racks at bus stops RAIL Union Pacific Railroad operates a Class I rail line through Woodburn. These tracks parallel the east side of Front Street. A total of five at-grade crossings and one grade separated crossing exist along the rail line. Willamette Valley Railway operates a Shortline Railroad track that parallels the north side of Cleveland Street in the south side of town. A total of five public at-grade crossings exist along this rail line. In addition to these crossings, the rail line serves multiple local businesses along the corridor. Currently, there are no passenger rail terminals in Woodburn. Potential Improvements The following improvements are being considered for the rail system in Woodburn: ▪ Investigate the opportunity to remove private grade railroad crossings by providing alternative access to parcels as development and redevelopment occurs ▪ Establish a downtown Amtrak passenger rail stop along Front Street in downtown Woodburn, potentially as a public-private partnership at the property adjacent to Locomotive Park ▪ Explore a passenger rail stop if commuter rail is extended between Wilsonville and Beaverton down to Salem FREIGHT Freight Mobility and Reliability Solutions No specific solutions have been identified to address freight mobility and reliability within the City, with the exception of the TSMO solutions identified above for truck signal priority and the capacity-based solutions identified below at several key intersections along OR 219/OR 214 and OR 99E. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 63 Woodburn, Oregon Freight Mobility and Reliability Improvements No specific improvements have been identified to address freight mobility and reliability within the City, with the exception of the TSMO improvements identified above for truck signal priority and the capacity-based improvements identified below at several key intersections along OR 219/OR 214 and OR 99E. SAFETY Traffic safety plays an important role in determining the most appropriate solutions for a given gap or deficiency, particularly in areas where real or perceived safety risks may prevent people from using more active travel modes, such as walking, biking, and taking transit. The real or perceived safety risks may reflect the crash history of an area or the physical and/or operational characteristics of the roadways (narrow travel lanes, winding curves, steep grades, high traffic volumes, high travel speeds, lots of heavy vehicles, etc.). Several methodologies have been developed to analyze and identify solutions for addressing traffic safety within an area. Many of which are documented in the Highway Safety Manual (HSM) as well as several other resources developed by ODOT for addressing safety along roadway segments, at intersections, and for pedestrian and bicyclists. Solutions Considered This section summarizes the solutions considered for implementation within the City of Woodburn to address real or perceived safety issues along roadway segments, at intersections, and/or for pedestrians and bicyclists. Note: many of the solutions overlap, which illustrates how some solutions address multiple safety issues. Roadway Segments There are a variety of potential safety solutions that can be applied within Woodburn to address systemic crashes that occur along roadway segments, such as sideswipe and run off the road crashes as well as general speeding and other driver behaviors. ▪ Enhanced signs and pavement markings for curves (with and without flashing beacons) ▪ Rumble strips (e.g. centerline, shoulder line, and edge line) ▪ Tree/vegetation removal ▪ Traffic calming ▪ Enhanced enforcement ▪ Road diet ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 64 Woodburn, Oregon Intersections There are a variety of potential safety solutions that can be applied within Woodburn to address systemic crashes that occur at intersections, such as angle crashes, turning movement crashes, rear- end crashes, and crashes that involve other travel modes. The solutions include: ▪ Enhanced signs and pavement markings (e.g. stop signs, warning signs, and/or beacons) ▪ Signal improvements (e.g. signal timing, signal phasing) ▪ Left-turn phasing (e.g. permitted, protected, permitted-protected) ▪ Enhanced enforcement ▪ Pedestrian and bicycle improvements (see below) ▪ Intersection lighting ▪ Traffic calming Pedestrian and Bicycle There are a variety of potential safety solutions that can be applied within Woodburn to address pedestrian and bicycle safety. The following provides a summary of the solutions by traffic control. Signalized intersections Pedestrian Safety Solutions ▪ Street lighting ▪ Right-turn channelization ▪ Countdown pedestrian heads ▪ Leading pedestrian interval ▪ Left-turn phasing ▪ Vehicle turning movement restrictions Bicycle Safety Solutions ▪ Street lighting ▪ Bicycle signal ▪ Bicycle detection ▪ Pavement markings ▪ Right-turn channelization ▪ Leading bicycle interval ▪ Left-turn phasing ▪ Vehicle turning movement restrictions ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 65 Woodburn, Oregon Unsignalized intersections Pedestrian Safety Solutions ▪ Street lighting ▪ Enhanced crossing treatments ▪ Reduced curb radii ▪ Pedestrian refuge island or median ▪ Speed reduction treatments ▪ Vehicle turning movement restrictions Bicycle Safety Solutions ▪ Street lighting ▪ Enhanced crossing treatments ▪ Reduced curb radii ▪ Skip Striping ▪ Supplemental signs and markings ▪ Bicycle boulevards ▪ Longitudinal bike stencil ▪ Speed reduction treatments ▪ Vehicle turning movement restrictions ▪ Strip bike lanes Roadway segment – No traffic control Pedestrian Safety Solutions ▪ Street lighting ▪ Access management ▪ Sidewalks Street lighting ▪ Enhanced mid-block crossing treatments ▪ Road diet ▪ Pedestrian refuge island or median Bicycle Safety Solutions ▪ Access management ▪ Bicycle route signage ▪ Longitudinal bike stencil ▪ Cycle tracks ▪ Dynamic warning signs ▪ Enhanced mid-block crossing treatments ▪ Street lighting ▪ Restrict on-street parking ▪ Road diet ▪ Refuge Island or median Potential Improvements A majority of the safety improvements are addressed within previous sections of this memorandum for the pedestrian, bicycle, and motor vehicle systems, with the exception of the safety improvements at a few key intersections and roadways as described below. OR 219/Butteville Road (southern intersection) The crash rate at the southern OR 219/Butteville Road intersection currently exceeds the critical crash rate. The crash data shows a trend for rear-end crashes at the intersection. Of the 4 rear-end crashes ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 66 Woodburn, Oregon observed in the five years of data, all occurred on the south leg of the intersection as vehicles were exiting Butteville Road. The following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Realign OR 219 to improve intersection(s) with Butteville Road ▪ Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal [if/when warranted], roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) OR 219/Butteville Road (northern intersection) The following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal [if/when warranted], roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) Front Street/Lincoln Street The crash rate at the Front Street/Lincoln Street intersection currently exceeds the critical crash rate. The crash data shows a trend for angle crashes at the intersection. Of the four angle crashes observed in the five years of data, three of the crashes were caused by a driver not yielding the right-of-way. The following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Enhanced signs and pavement markings (e.g. stop signs, warning signs, and/or beacons) Front Street/Young Street/Garfield Street The crash rate at the Front Street/Young Street/Garfield Street intersection currently exceeds the critical crash rate. The crash data shows a trend for turning movement crashes at the intersection. Of the four turning movement crashes observed in the five years of data, all four involved vehicles traveling westbound from Young Street The following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping in correlation to the railroad tracks. Provide clarification for westbound drivers trying to proceed through the intersection OR 99E/Tomlin Avenue The OR 99E/Tomlin Avenue intersection is identified within the top 10 percent of crash sites over the last five-year period in the ODOT Statewide Priority Index System. The following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Restrict the southbound left-turn movement ▪ Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping, including any sight distance constraints ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 67 Woodburn, Oregon Butteville Road/Parr Road The following improvements are being considered at the intersection: ▪ Reconstruct the intersection due to grades on approaches OR 99E The following improvements are being considered at the intersection based on the study conducted on the corridor: ▪ Update roadway lighting to meet ODOT roadway lighting standards ▪ OR 99E between Young Street and Cleveland Street o Restrict left-turn movements and eventually close the Silverton Avenue intersection on OR 99E and vacate the segment of Silverton Avenue between OR 99E and Birds Eye Avenue o Restrict left-turn movements onto Birds Eye Avenue from Hillsboro Silverton Highway and eventually close the Birds Eye Avenue intersection on Hillsboro Silverton Highway and vacate the segment of Birds Eye Avenue between Hillsboro Silverton Highway and Silverton Avenue City-wide A number of safety issues have been identified throughout the planning process along key corridors throughout the city, including OR 99E, OR 219/OR214, Front Street, Evergreen Road, and others. While several projects have been identified along each of these corridors that will address some of the safety concerns, other concerns may not be addressed. Therefore, the following improvements are being considered to address safety issues throughout the city: ▪ Evaluate traffic safety along OR 99E, OR 219/OR214, Front Street, Evergreen Road, and other key corridors to identify appropriate countermeasures. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 68 Woodburn, Oregon FUNDING PROGRAMS Revenue The City of Woodburn has historically relied upon multiple revenue sources to fund the maintenance of its transportation network and make capital improvements. These local gas tax revenue, inter- governmental (primarily state gas tax revenue), franchise fees, and other miscellaneous revenue. Table 5 displays the total revenue by source used to fund transportation projects within Woodburn over the most recent seven years that comprehensive data was available. Table 5: City of Woodburn Revenue History Revenue Source FY 2016- 2017 FY 2015- 2016 FY 2014- 2015 FY 2013- 2014 FY 2012- 2013 FY 2011- 2012 FY 2010- 2011 Average Taxes $129,412 $115,692 $102,517 $101,761 $106,537 $182,109 $121,196 $122,746 Inter- Government $1,480,082 $1,454,076 $1,409,311 $1,384,277 $1,597,518 $1,312,024 $1,116,011 $1,393,328 Franchise $359,820 $357,983 $336,707 $360,046 $353,381 $326,713 $347,621 $348,896 Transportation SDC Fees $33,396 $183,698 $440,595 $521,933 $411,527 $400,172 $153,268 $306,370 Other $69,856 $59,518 $49,532 $319,086 $49,457 $88,767 $27,147 $94,766 Revenue Total $2,072,566 $2,170,967 $2,338,662 $2,687,103 $2,518,420 $2,309,785 $1,765,243 $2,266,107 Taxes = Local Gas Tax revenue Inter-Government = State Gas Tax, State Fund Exchange Other = Misc. revenue, interest income Based on the information shown in Table 5, the City of Woodburn has generated an average of approximately $2,266,107 per year in total revenue for transportation-related maintenance/projects. Potential Funding Sources The projected transportation funding analysis shows that the City of Woodburn will have a limited source of funds that can solely dedicated to transportation-related capital improvement projects over the next twenty years. As such, Woodburn will likely need to seek additional funds via transportation improvement grants, partnerships with regional and state agencies, and other funding sources to help implement future transportation-related improvements. Table 6 identifies a list of potential Grant sources and Partnering Opportunities to consider during the course of the 20-year planning horizon. Following Table 6, Table 7 identifies a list of potential new funding sources for Woodburn to consider in an effort to bolster funds for additional capital improvement projects. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 69 Woodburn, Oregon Table 6: Potential Grant Sources and Partnering Opportunities Funding Source Description Potential Facility Benefit Opportunities Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) is Oregon’s 4-year capital improvement program for major state and regional transportation facilities. This scheduling and funding document is updated every two years. Projects included on the STIP are allocated into the five different ODOT regions. - Streets - Sidewalks - Bike lanes - Trails The next STIP (2018-2021) will be organized into two different categories that focus on projects that will fix/preserve the existing transportation network and enhance/improve the transportation network. Federal Funding Large trails or trail networks with a transportation purpose can compete for TIGER grant awards. Additional significant federal funding sources include TAP, STP and CMAQ. Depending upon the location and purpose, trails can also be funded by HUD CDBG funds, USDA rural development programs, or EPA funding. - Multi-Use Trails Projects in urban areas have traditionally been funded at a minimum of $10,000,000 and rural trails of lower project costs are considered for TIGER funding. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Program The Oregon Pedestrian and Bicycle Grant program ended as a standalone solicitation process in 2012. Grant monies are now distributed through the “Enhance” process in the STIP program noted above. See STIP above See STIP above. ATV Grant Program Operation and maintenance, law enforcement, emergency medical services, land acquisition, leases, planning, development and safety education in Oregon’s OHV (off-highway vehicle recreation areas). - Multi-Use Trails http://www.oregon.gov/oprd/ATV/pages/grants.aspx Table 7: Potential New Funding Sources for Consideration by the City of Woodburn Funding Source Description Potential Facility Benefit Opportunities User Fees Fees tacked onto a utility bill or tied to the annual registration of a vehicle to pay for improvements, expansion, and maintenance to the street system. This may be a more equitable assessment given the varying fuel efficiency of vehicles. Regardless of fuel Primarily Street Improvements The cost of implementing such a system could be prohibitive given the need to track the number of vehicle miles traveled in every vehicle. Additionally, a user fee specific to a single jurisdiction does not account for the street use from vehicles registered in other jurisdictions. ---PAGE BREAK--- Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program Project 21071.4 June 7, 2019 Page 70 Woodburn, Oregon efficiency, passenger vehicles do equal damage to the street system. Street Utility Fees/Road Maintenance Fee The fee is based on the number of trips a particular land use generates and is usually collected through a regular utility bill. For the communities in Oregon that have adopted this approach, it provides a stable source of revenue to pay for street maintenance allowing for safe and efficient movement of people, goods, and services. Preservation, restoration, and reconstruction of existing paved residential streets. Includes sidewalks, ramps, curbs and gutters, and utility relocation. Other cities have adopted street maintenance utility fees at varying amounts charged to residential meters. Woodburn could consider a similar program. Optional Tax A tax that is paid at the option of the taxpayer to fund improvements. Usually not a legislative requirement to pay the tax and paid at the time other taxes are collected, optional taxes are usually less controversial and easily collected since they require the taxpayer to decide whether or not to pay the additional tax. - Streets - Sidewalks - Bike lanes - Multi-Use Trails - Transit The voluntary nature of the tax limits the reliability and stableness of the funding source. Sponsorship Financial backing of a project by a private corporation or public interest group, as a means of enhancing its corporate image. - Multi-Use Trails Sponsorship has primarily been used by transit providers to help offset the cost of providing transit services and maintaining transit related improvements. Federal Funding Trails with a transportation purpose can compete for TIGER grant awards. Depending upon the location and purpose, trails can also be funded by HUD, CDBG funds, USDA rural development programs, or EPA funding. - Trails Projects in urban areas have traditionally been funded at a minimum of $10,000,000 and rural trails of lower project costs are considered for TIGER funding. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A Pedestrian and Bicycle Crossing Treatments ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071.4 February 2019 Page A-1 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon PEDESTRIAN CROSSING TREATMENTS Pedestrian crossing facilities enable pedestrians to safely cross streets, railroad tracks, and other transportation facilities. Planning for appropriate pedestrian crossings requires the community to balance vehicular mobility needs with providing crossing locations that the desired routes of walkers. Unmarked Crosswalks Under Oregon law, pedestrians have the right-of-way at all unsignalized intersections. On narrow, low‐speed streets unmarked crosswalks are generally sufficient for pedestrians to cross the street safely, as the low‐speed environment makes drivers more responsive to the presence of pedestrians. However, drivers are less likely to yield to pedestrians at unmarked crosswalks on high‐ speed and/or high‐volume roadways, even when the pedestrian has stepped onto the roadway. In these situations, enhanced pedestrian crossing facilities are needed to remind drivers that they must yield when pedestrians are present. Marked Crosswalks Marked crosswalks are painted roadway markings that indicate the location of a crosswalk to motorists. Marked crosswalks can be accompanied by signs, curb extensions and/or median refuge islands, and may occur at intersections or at mid‐block locations. Research has shown that marked crosswalks in certain situations do not improve pedestrian safety and can even make it worse. Recent research indicates that on multi‐lane roadways (more than two lanes), marked crosswalks should not be installed without accompanying treatments, such as Rectangular Rapid Flash Beacons or Pedestrian Hybrid beacons. Median refuge islands are another accompanying treatment that may be used for marked crosswalks on multi- lane roadways to although the pedestrian to make a two-stage crossing and focus on one direction at a time. Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) are user-actuated amber lights that have an irregular flash pattern similar to emergency flashers on police vehicles. These supplemental warning lights are used at unsignalized intersections or mid-block crosswalks to improve safety for pedestrians using a crosswalk. could be used at any unsignalized intersection or mid- block crossing where warrants require a higher level of crosswalk protection. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071.4 February 2019 Page A-2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon A Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (sometimes called a HAWK signal) is a user-actuated signal that is unlit when not in use. It begins with a yellow light alerting drivers to slow, and then displays a solid red light requiring drivers to remain stopped while pedestrians cross the street. The beacon then shifts to flashing red lights to signal that motorists may proceed, after stopping, and after pedestrians have completed their crossing. A Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon can be used at mid-block crossings or, in some cases, at unsignalized intersections (the MUTCD suggests that the beacons be located at least 100-feet from an intersection). Pedestrian Hybrid Beacons could be used at any unsignalized intersection or mid-block crossing where warrants require a higher level of crosswalk protection. Pedestrian Signal Pedestrian Signals provide pedestrians with a signal- controlled crossing at a mid-block location or, in some cases at a previously stop-controlled intersection where pedestrian volumes warrant full signalization (the MUTCD no longer allows half signals at intersections). The signal remains green for the mainline traffic movements until actuated by a pushbutton to call a red signal for traffic. They are typically located at midblock crossings with high pedestrian or bicycle demand and/or high traffic volumes, such as where multi-use paths intersect with roadways. Pedestrian Countdown Heads Pedestrian Countdown heads inform pedestrians of the time remaining to cross the street with a countdown timer at the signalized crossing. The countdown should include enough time for a pedestrian to cross the full length of the street, or in rare cases, reach a refuge island. The 2009 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) requires all new pedestrian signals, and any retrofitted signals to include pedestrian countdown signals. Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Leading pedestrian intervals allow pedestrians to start crossing the street at a signalized intersections five to seven seconds before conflicting vehicles are given a green light and allowed to enter the intersection. They are most commonly used at signalized intersections where left- or right-turning vehicles interfere with pedestrian crossing movements. LPI could be applied at all existing or potential future traffic signals to improve crossing conditions for pedestrians. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071.4 February 2019 Page A-3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Geometric Considerations There are a number of geometric enhancements that can be considered at pedestrian crossings that may be implemented in conjunction with previously discuss treatments. Curb Extensions Curb extensions create additional space for pedestrians at crosswalks and allow pedestrians and vehicles to better see each other. Curb extensions are typically installed at intersections and midblock crossings located along roadways with on-street parking to help reduce crossing distances and the amount of exposure pedestrians have to vehicle traffic. Curb extensions can narrow the vehicle path, slow down traffic, and prohibit fast turns. Curb extensions could be applied along any street where on- street parking is allowed or where there is sufficient shoulder width so the curb extension does not conflict with on-street bike lanes. Raised Median Island Raised median islands provide a protected area in the middle of the roadway where pedestrians can stop while crossing the street. Raised median islands allow pedestrians to complete two-stage crossings if needed. Raised median islands can narrow the vehicle path and slow down traffic along the roadway. Raised median islands could be applied along any street where they would not interfere with turning movements at driveways and intersecting roadways. Other Considerations Street Furniture and Lighting Street furniture includes pedestrian seating, information / wayfinding structures, and trash cans. Street furniture and lighting can be used to enhance the pedestrian experience and encourage pedestrian activity on a street. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071.4 February 2019 Page A-4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Bicycle Crossing Treatments Pavement Markings Through Intersections Pavement markings can be extended through the intersection for bicyclists. Green paint can be used in “conflict zones” where vehicles and bicycles may cross paths in intersections, at driveways, or at right-turn pockets. These pavement marking are typically used at signalized intersections to emphasize a connection in a larger bicycle network. They could be used along at all signalized intersections and in other select “conflict zones”. Bike Box Bicycle boxes are designated spaces at signalized intersections, placed between a set-back stop bar and the pedestrian crosswalk, that allow bicyclists to queue in front of motor vehicles at red lights. Bike boxes are typically used at signalized intersections to facilitate turn movements as well as other movements for cyclists. Two-Stage Left-Turn Bike Box Two-stage left-turn bike boxes allow bicyclists to safely and comfortably make left-turns at multilane intersections from a right-side bicycle lane or cycle track. Bicyclists arriving on a green light travel into the intersection and pull out into the two-stage turn queue box away from through-moving bicycles and in front of cross street traffic, where they can wait to proceed through on the side-street green signal. Two-stage left-turn bike boxes can be applied at signalized intersections to improve bicycle crossing conditions. Bike only signal Bicycle-only signals can be used at intersections to provide a separate signal phase that is dedicated to bicyclists. At this stage, the MUTCD does not allow bicycle signal to operation concurrent with permissive vehicle phases. ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071.4 February 2019 Page A-5 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Bicycle Detection Many traffic signals along are actuated, meaning that green indication is given to a movement when a vehicle is detected. However, actuating a signal as a cyclist can be difficult. Bicycle detection allows cyclists to actuate the traffic signal from the bicycle lane with a detector that is calibrated to recognize a bicycle. Pavement markings could be added to show cyclists where to stand to actuate a signal. Bicycle detection is typically applied at signalized intersections that accommodate bicycles and can be used at all of the signalized intersection to improve bicycle crossing conditions. Other Considerations Bicycle Parking Bicycle parking facilities provide safe and secure places for people to park their bicycles. The most common bicycle parking facility is the “staple”, which provides space for up to two bicycles and is typically located along the side of the road in a commercial area or near the main entrance to a building. Bicycle parking could be applied along streets located adjacent to commercial properties. Wayfinding Signs Wayfinding signs are signs located along roadways or at intersections that direct bicyclists towards destinations in the area and/or to define a bicycle route. They typically include distances and average walk/cycle times. Wayfinding signs are generally used on primary bicycle routes and multiuse paths. ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B Year 2040 Auto-related Improvement Worksheets ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 1: Butteville Rd & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 08/02/2019 Page 1 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 239 143 330 331 150 245 Future Volume (vph) 239 143 330 331 150 245 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.92 Flt Protected 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1417 1409 1357 1300 Flt Permitted 1.00 0.48 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (perm) 1417 714 1357 1300 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 249 149 344 345 156 255 RTOR Reduction (vph) 37 0 0 0 99 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 361 0 344 345 312 0 Heavy Vehicles 15% 21% 18% 29% 31% 15% Turn Type NA Perm NA Prot Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 Actuated Green, G 29.7 29.7 29.7 16.0 Effective Green, g 29.7 29.7 29.7 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.29 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 769 387 736 380 v/s Ratio Prot 0.26 0.25 c0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.48 v/c Ratio 0.47 0.89 0.47 0.82 Uniform Delay, d1 7.7 11.0 7.7 18.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 21.1 0.5 13.3 Delay 8.1 32.2 8.1 31.3 Level of Service A C A C Approach Delay 8.1 20.1 31.3 Approach LOS A C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length 54.7 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.6% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 999 447 0 1073 733 0 0 0 717 0 363 Future Volume (vph) 0 999 447 0 1073 733 0 0 0 717 0 363 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1019 456 0 1095 748 0 0 0 732 0 370 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1019 456 0 1095 748 0 0 0 732 0 345 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 75.6 120.0 60.7 120.0 35.4 50.8 Effective Green, g 75.6 120.0 60.7 120.0 35.4 50.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 1.00 0.51 1.00 0.29 0.42 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1805 1255 1437 1173 799 538 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 c0.39 c0.27 0.27 v/s Ratio Perm 0.36 c0.64 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.36 0.76 0.64 0.92 0.64 Uniform Delay, d1 12.7 0.0 23.8 0.0 40.9 27.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.3 0.8 1.8 1.2 15.1 2.3 Delay 14.0 0.8 26.0 1.2 55.9 29.7 Level of Service B A C A E C Approach Delay 9.9 15.9 0.0 47.1 Approach LOS A B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 21.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.82 Actuated Cycle Length 120.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1464 272 0 1392 450 393 0 683 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1464 272 0 1392 450 393 0 683 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1107 1132 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1107 1132 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1525 283 0 1450 469 409 0 711 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 21 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1525 283 0 1450 469 368 354 356 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 71.5 120.0 71.5 120.0 39.5 39.5 39.5 Effective Green, g 71.5 120.0 71.5 120.0 39.5 39.5 39.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1707 1234 1623 1212 444 364 372 v/s Ratio Prot 0.53 c0.53 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.39 0.27 0.32 0.31 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.23 0.89 0.39 0.83 0.97 0.96 Uniform Delay, d1 21.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 37.1 39.7 39.4 Progression Factor 1.43 1.00 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.8 0.3 4.2 0.5 11.8 39.3 34.9 Delay 35.8 0.3 19.5 0.5 49.0 79.0 74.3 Level of Service D A B A D E E Approach Delay 30.2 14.8 67.6 0.0 Approach LOS C B E A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length 120.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 530 25 320 19 33 72 Future Volume (vph) 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 530 25 320 19 33 72 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1363 2842 1316 1409 2835 1373 1390 1261 1511 1651 1095 Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 132 2842 1316 124 2835 1373 1390 1261 1511 1651 1095 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 1526 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 546 26 330 20 34 74 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 110 0 1 0 0 0 246 0 0 70 Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1526 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 284 288 84 20 34 4 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 65.6 47.8 47.8 65.6 58.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 Effective Green, g 65.6 47.8 47.8 65.6 58.4 30.4 30.4 30.4 6.5 6.5 6.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.40 0.40 0.55 0.49 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.05 0.05 0.05 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 146 1132 [PHONE REDACTED] 347 352 319 81 89 59 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.54 c0.19 0.46 0.21 c0.21 0.01 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.28 0.08 0.51 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.58 1.35 0.20 1.28 0.94 0.82 0.82 0.26 0.25 0.38 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 19.5 36.1 23.6 47.7 29.2 42.2 42.2 35.8 54.4 54.8 53.9 Progression Factor 0.98 0.94 1.24 0.90 0.79 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.8 159.0 0.3 137.2 6.6 13.6 13.4 0.3 1.2 2.0 0.4 Delay 20.9 193.2 29.6 179.9 29.6 55.8 55.6 36.1 55.6 56.8 54.2 Level of Service C F C F C E E D E E D Approach Delay 166.1 60.0 48.5 55.1 Approach LOS F E D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 100.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.12 Actuated Cycle Length 120.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 153 1644 41 27 1494 76 22 27 9 95 22 126 Future Volume (vph) 153 1644 41 27 1494 76 22 27 9 95 22 126 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.87 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1554 2747 1471 2720 1525 1396 1385 1427 Flt Permitted 0.07 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 113 2747 91 2720 1525 1396 1385 1427 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 159 1712 43 28 1556 79 23 28 9 99 23 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 0 120 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 1755 0 28 1633 0 23 28 0 99 34 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 84.8 80.8 72.2 72.2 8.7 5.4 13.3 10.0 Effective Green, g 84.8 80.8 72.2 72.2 8.7 5.4 13.3 10.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.67 0.60 0.60 0.07 0.05 0.11 0.08 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 231 1849 100 1636 110 62 153 118 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.64 0.01 c0.60 0.02 c0.02 c0.07 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.42 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.95 0.28 1.00 0.21 0.46 0.65 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 35.0 17.7 17.6 23.8 52.4 55.9 51.1 51.7 Progression Factor 0.38 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 1.5 1.1 21.8 0.7 3.9 8.0 1.0 Delay 14.0 17.6 18.8 45.6 53.1 59.7 59.1 52.6 Level of Service B B B D D E E D Approach Delay 17.3 45.1 57.2 55.2 Approach LOS B D E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 32.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.94 Actuated Cycle Length 120.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 10: OR 214 & Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 128 805 970 170 92 95 Future Volume (vph) 128 805 970 170 92 95 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.93 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (prot) 1330 1446 1483 1212 1253 Flt Permitted 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 Satd. Flow (perm) 232 1446 1483 1212 1253 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) [PHONE REDACTED] 181 98 101 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 20 45 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) [PHONE REDACTED] 161 154 0 Confl. Peds. 8 8 Heavy Vehicles 25% 21% 18% 18% 30% 24% Turn Type Perm NA NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 4 8 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 Actuated Green, G 61.2 61.2 61.2 61.2 14.7 Effective Green, g 61.2 61.2 61.2 61.2 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.18 Clearance Time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 169 1054 1081 884 219 v/s Ratio Prot 0.59 c0.70 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.59 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.81 0.95 0.18 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 7.4 7.5 10.1 3.5 32.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 23.5 4.9 17.4 0.1 9.9 Delay 31.0 12.4 27.5 3.6 42.4 Level of Service C B C A D Approach Delay 14.9 24.0 42.4 Approach LOS B C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 21.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length 83.9 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 11: Park Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 17 674 129 97 946 9 58 6 123 10 4 77 Future Volume (vph) 17 674 129 97 946 9 58 6 123 10 4 77 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.93 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.96 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1525 1389 1517 1419 1451 1490 1293 Flt Permitted 0.18 1.00 0.25 1.00 0.89 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 283 1389 405 1419 1313 1160 1293 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 19 741 [PHONE REDACTED] 10 64 7 135 11 4 85 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 82 0 0 0 72 Lane Group Flow (vph) 19 877 0 107 1050 0 0 124 0 0 15 13 Confl. Peds. 4 14 14 4 22 22 Confl. Bikes 4 Heavy Vehicles 9% 23% 16% 9% 23% 38% 0% 0% 10% 9% 25% 7% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G 63.2 63.2 63.2 63.2 12.3 12.3 12.3 Effective Green, g 63.2 63.2 63.2 63.2 12.3 12.3 12.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.76 0.15 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 214 1051 306 1074 193 170 190 v/s Ratio Prot 0.63 c0.74 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.26 c0.09 0.01 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.83 0.35 0.98 0.64 0.09 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 2.6 6.7 3.4 9.5 33.5 30.8 30.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 5.8 0.7 21.9 7.1 0.2 0.1 Delay 2.8 12.5 4.0 31.4 40.7 31.0 30.8 Level of Service A B A C D C C Approach Delay 12.3 28.9 40.7 30.8 Approach LOS B C D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 23.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length 83.5 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 155 401 262 334 288 92 242 495 158 234 971 114 Future Volume (vph) 155 401 262 334 288 92 242 495 158 234 971 114 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1311 2906 2639 1064 2665 2950 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1311 2906 2639 1064 2665 2950 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 161 418 273 348 300 96 252 516 [PHONE REDACTED] 119 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 164 0 9 0 0 0 115 0 7 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 418 109 348 387 0 252 516 50 244 1123 0 Confl. Peds. 5 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 17% 18% 20% 24% 25% 40% 11% 26% 38% 21% 10% 19% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G 18.9 32.5 32.5 27.5 41.1 10.5 35.5 39.5 14.5 39.5 Effective Green, g 18.9 32.5 32.5 27.5 41.1 10.5 35.5 39.5 14.5 39.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.21 0.32 0.08 0.27 0.30 0.11 0.30 Clearance Time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 206 370 304 283 414 234 720 323 297 896 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.28 c0.26 0.30 c0.09 0.20 0.09 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.09 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.78 1.13 0.36 1.23 0.94 1.08 0.72 0.16 0.82 1.25 Uniform Delay, d1 53.6 48.8 40.2 51.2 43.2 59.8 42.7 33.1 56.5 45.2 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.18 0.85 0.62 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 17.3 86.9 0.8 130.4 28.6 70.3 4.1 0.7 16.5 123.2 Delay 70.9 135.6 40.9 181.6 71.7 140.9 40.2 21.2 73.0 168.5 Level of Service E F D F E F D C E F Approach Delay 93.0 123.1 64.1 151.5 Approach LOS F F E F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 112.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.19 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 18: Settlemier Ave & Parr Road/Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 225 247 132 108 237 24 109 191 57 10 228 266 Future Volume (vph) 225 247 132 108 237 24 109 191 57 10 228 266 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1112 1312 1320 1278 1540 1198 1454 1104 Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 0.41 1.00 0.75 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 633 1312 568 1278 1180 1198 1430 1104 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Adj. Flow (vph) 265 291 155 127 279 28 128 225 67 12 268 313 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 34 0 0 6 0 0 0 43 0 0 200 Lane Group Flow (vph) 265 412 0 127 301 0 0 353 24 0 280 113 Confl. Peds. 4 11 11 4 22 4 4 22 Heavy Vehicles 49% 27% 21% 25% 37% 12% 14% 9% 21% 0% 21% 28% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 Actuated Green, G 24.3 24.3 24.3 24.3 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 Effective Green, g 24.3 24.3 24.3 24.3 18.2 18.2 18.2 18.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 304 631 273 614 425 431 515 397 v/s Ratio Prot 0.31 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm c0.42 0.22 c0.30 0.02 0.20 0.10 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.65 0.47 0.49 0.83 0.06 0.54 0.28 Uniform Delay, d1 11.7 9.9 8.8 8.9 14.7 10.5 12.8 11.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.8 2.4 1.3 0.6 12.9 0.1 1.2 0.4 Delay 34.5 12.3 10.0 9.5 27.7 10.6 14.0 11.9 Level of Service C B B A C B B B Approach Delay 20.6 9.7 24.9 12.9 Approach LOS C A C B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 17.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.85 Actuated Cycle Length 50.5 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 80 55 67 147 43 53 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 Future Volume (vph) 80 55 67 147 43 53 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1497 1227 1464 1343 1363 2667 1458 2738 Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.15 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1097 1227 846 1343 106 2667 234 2738 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 59 71 156 46 56 77 1188 107 80 1546 106 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 57 0 35 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 14 156 67 0 77 1291 0 80 1649 0 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 90.5 83.4 90.5 81.3 Effective Green, g 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 90.5 83.4 90.5 81.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.70 0.64 0.70 0.63 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 219 245 169 [PHONE REDACTED] 229 1712 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.03 c0.48 0.02 c0.60 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.01 c0.18 0.30 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.06 0.92 0.25 0.48 0.75 0.35 0.96 Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 42.1 51.0 43.8 37.6 16.2 9.3 22.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.91 1.20 1.05 Incremental Delay, d2 6.2 0.1 47.2 0.4 1.3 2.5 0.1 2.2 Delay 54.1 42.2 98.2 44.1 33.2 17.3 11.1 26.2 Level of Service D D F D C B B C Approach Delay 50.2 76.8 18.2 25.5 Approach LOS D E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 27.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 108 11 90 27 11 26 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 Future Volume (vph) 108 11 90 27 11 26 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1379 1173 1406 1124 1446 2629 1288 2720 Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.19 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1060 1173 1122 1124 105 2629 254 2720 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 12 96 29 12 28 85 1219 15 18 1673 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 82 0 0 0 24 0 1 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 26 0 0 41 4 85 1233 0 18 1801 0 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 97.6 93.4 97.6 89.3 Effective Green, g 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 97.6 93.4 97.6 89.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75 0.72 0.75 0.69 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 154 170 163 [PHONE REDACTED] 224 1868 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.03 c0.47 0.00 c0.66 v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.04 0.00 0.36 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.15 0.25 0.02 0.52 0.65 0.08 0.96 Uniform Delay, d1 53.3 48.6 49.3 47.6 15.8 9.7 9.6 18.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.43 1.21 0.53 Incremental Delay, d2 16.9 0.3 0.6 0.0 1.3 1.1 0.0 7.7 Delay 70.2 48.9 49.9 47.7 16.1 15.1 11.7 17.8 Level of Service E D D D B B B B Approach Delay 59.9 49.0 15.1 17.7 Approach LOS E D B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 159 180 121 95 223 281 82 789 40 265 1252 146 Future Volume (vph) 159 180 121 95 223 281 82 789 40 265 1252 146 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1222 1304 1249 1562 1293 1179 2697 1374 2765 Flt Permitted 0.38 1.00 0.26 1.00 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.20 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 485 1304 346 1562 1293 99 2697 283 2765 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 161 182 122 96 225 284 83 797 40 268 1265 147 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 19 0 0 0 100 0 3 0 0 7 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 161 285 0 96 225 184 83 834 0 268 1405 0 Confl. Peds. 4 4 1 2 2 1 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 36% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 41% 22% 27% 21% 18% 19% Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 8 4 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G 36.9 29.4 36.9 26.4 26.4 75.1 50.6 75.1 67.8 Effective Green, g 36.9 29.4 36.9 26.4 26.4 75.1 50.6 75.1 67.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.23 0.28 0.20 0.20 0.58 0.39 0.58 0.52 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 197 294 150 317 [PHONE REDACTED] 369 1442 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 c0.22 0.04 0.14 0.04 c0.31 0.14 c0.51 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.37 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.82 0.97 0.64 0.71 0.70 0.71 0.79 0.73 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 41.5 49.9 37.7 48.2 48.1 21.6 35.1 33.5 30.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.17 0.98 0.57 0.52 Incremental Delay, d2 22.4 44.3 9.0 6.6 7.6 11.1 4.1 2.6 9.9 Delay 63.9 94.2 46.6 54.8 55.7 36.3 38.6 21.8 25.7 Level of Service E F D D E D D C C Approach Delay 83.7 54.0 38.4 25.1 Approach LOS F D D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 40.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 18.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 1 22: OR 99E & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 12 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 87 84 82 917 1176 245 Future Volume (vph) 87 84 82 917 1176 245 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1374 1086 2639 2545 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.63 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1374 1086 1680 2545 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 95 91 89 997 1278 266 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 81 0 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 95 10 0 1086 1534 0 Confl. Peds. 1 1 1 Confl. Bikes 2 Heavy Vehicles 21% 35% 31% 25% 29% 16% Turn Type Prot Perm Perm NA NA Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G 14.3 14.3 107.7 107.7 Effective Green, g 14.3 14.3 107.7 107.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.83 0.83 Clearance Time 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) [PHONE REDACTED] 2108 v/s Ratio Prot c0.07 0.60 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 c0.65 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.08 0.78 0.73 Uniform Delay, d1 55.3 52.0 5.4 4.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 Incremental Delay, d2 8.0 0.3 4.4 0.9 Delay 63.3 52.3 9.8 3.1 Level of Service E D A A Approach Delay 57.9 9.8 3.1 Approach LOS E A A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 9.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service A HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.76 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 8.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 2 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 999 447 0 1073 733 0 0 0 717 0 363 Future Volume (vph) 0 999 447 0 1073 733 0 0 0 717 0 363 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1019 456 0 1095 748 0 0 0 732 0 370 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1019 456 0 1095 748 0 0 0 732 0 335 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 96.0 150.0 82.0 150.0 45.0 59.5 Effective Green, g 96.0 150.0 82.0 150.0 45.0 59.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.30 0.40 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1834 1255 1553 1173 813 504 v/s Ratio Prot 0.36 c0.39 c0.27 0.26 v/s Ratio Perm 0.36 c0.64 v/c Ratio 0.56 0.36 0.71 0.64 0.90 0.66 Uniform Delay, d1 15.1 0.0 25.1 0.0 50.4 37.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.03 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.8 1.3 1.3 13.0 3.0 Delay 16.3 0.8 27.0 1.3 63.4 40.0 Level of Service B A C A E D Approach Delay 11.5 16.6 0.0 55.5 Approach LOS B B A E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 24.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.78 Actuated Cycle Length 150.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 2 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1464 272 0 1392 450 393 0 683 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1464 272 0 1392 450 393 0 683 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.98 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1106 1131 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1106 1131 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1525 283 0 1450 469 409 0 711 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 19 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1525 283 0 1450 469 368 356 358 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 89.7 150.0 89.7 150.0 51.3 51.3 51.3 Effective Green, g 89.7 150.0 89.7 150.0 51.3 51.3 51.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 1.00 0.60 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1713 1234 1629 1212 461 378 386 v/s Ratio Prot 0.53 c0.53 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.39 0.27 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.23 0.89 0.39 0.80 0.94 0.93 Uniform Delay, d1 25.9 0.0 25.9 0.0 44.7 47.9 47.6 Progression Factor 1.39 1.00 0.76 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5.7 0.3 4.2 0.5 9.0 31.5 28.0 Delay 41.9 0.3 23.8 0.5 53.7 79.4 75.5 Level of Service D A C A D E E Approach Delay 35.4 18.1 69.7 0.0 Approach LOS D B E A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 36.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length 150.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 2 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 530 25 320 19 33 72 Future Volume (vph) 81 1480 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 530 25 320 19 33 72 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1363 2842 1316 1409 2835 1373 1390 1259 1511 1651 1095 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 146 2842 1316 92 2835 1373 1390 1259 1511 1651 1095 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 84 1526 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 546 26 330 20 34 74 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 0 0 0 0 247 0 0 70 Lane Group Flow (vph) 84 1526 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 284 288 83 20 34 4 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 86.5 64.5 64.5 86.5 77.0 37.7 37.7 37.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 Effective Green, g 86.5 64.5 64.5 86.5 77.0 37.7 37.7 37.7 8.3 8.3 8.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.43 0.43 0.58 0.51 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 161 1222 [PHONE REDACTED] 345 349 316 83 91 60 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 0.54 c0.20 0.46 0.21 c0.21 0.01 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.27 0.10 c0.58 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.52 1.25 0.23 1.34 0.89 0.82 0.83 0.26 0.24 0.37 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 21.7 42.8 27.0 60.5 32.8 53.0 53.0 45.0 67.8 68.3 67.2 Progression Factor 1.10 0.94 1.07 0.74 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 115.1 0.4 166.6 4.5 14.3 14.3 0.3 1.1 1.9 0.4 Delay 25.0 155.2 29.4 211.6 21.8 67.3 67.4 45.3 68.9 70.2 67.5 Level of Service C F C F C E E D E E E Approach Delay 134.5 60.3 59.3 68.5 Approach LOS F E E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 90.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.13 Actuated Cycle Length 150.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 2 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 153 1644 41 27 1494 76 22 27 9 95 22 126 Future Volume (vph) 153 1644 41 27 1494 76 22 27 9 95 22 126 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.87 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1554 2747 1471 2719 1525 1396 1385 1427 Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 137 2747 106 2719 1525 1396 1385 1427 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 159 1712 43 28 1556 79 23 28 9 99 23 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 9 0 0 119 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 1755 0 28 1633 0 23 28 0 99 35 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 110.2 106.2 97.6 97.6 9.8 7.1 16.2 13.5 Effective Green, g 110.2 106.2 97.6 97.6 9.8 7.1 16.2 13.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.71 0.65 0.65 0.07 0.05 0.11 0.09 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 219 1944 105 1769 99 66 149 128 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 c0.64 0.01 c0.60 0.02 c0.02 c0.07 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.47 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.90 0.27 0.92 0.23 0.43 0.66 0.27 Uniform Delay, d1 39.4 17.7 17.4 22.9 66.5 69.5 64.3 63.7 Progression Factor 0.62 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.0 0.8 1.0 9.6 0.9 3.3 9.6 0.8 Delay 25.5 13.0 18.4 32.5 67.4 72.7 73.9 64.5 Level of Service C B B C E E E E Approach Delay 14.0 32.2 70.7 68.2 Approach LOS B C E E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 26.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length 150.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 2 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 80 55 67 147 43 53 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 Future Volume (vph) 80 55 67 147 43 53 72 1117 101 75 1453 100 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.92 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1497 1227 1464 1343 1363 2667 1458 2771 1196 Flt Permitted 0.71 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.15 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1097 1227 846 1343 133 2667 234 2771 1196 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 59 71 156 46 56 77 1188 107 80 1546 106 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 57 0 35 0 0 4 0 0 0 35 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 144 14 156 67 0 77 1291 0 80 1546 71 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 2 6 2 Actuated Green, G 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 90.5 83.4 90.5 81.3 81.3 Effective Green, g 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 90.5 83.4 90.5 81.3 81.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.70 0.64 0.70 0.63 0.63 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 219 245 169 [PHONE REDACTED] 229 1732 747 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.03 c0.48 0.02 c0.56 v/s Ratio Perm 0.13 0.01 c0.18 0.27 0.22 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.66 0.06 0.92 0.25 0.43 0.75 0.35 0.89 0.10 Uniform Delay, d1 47.9 42.1 51.0 43.8 32.2 16.2 9.3 20.6 9.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.92 1.16 1.10 0.74 Incremental Delay, d2 6.2 0.1 47.2 0.4 0.9 2.5 0.1 0.8 0.0 Delay 54.1 42.2 98.2 44.1 29.3 17.4 10.8 23.4 7.2 Level of Service D D F D C B B C A Approach Delay 50.2 76.8 18.1 21.9 Approach LOS D E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 26.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Solutions 2 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP int alternatives 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 02/18/2019 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 108 11 90 27 11 26 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 Future Volume (vph) 108 11 90 27 11 26 80 1146 14 17 1573 123 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.96 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1379 1173 1406 1124 1446 2629 1288 2748 1244 Flt Permitted 0.73 1.00 0.77 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.18 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1060 1173 1122 1124 134 2629 247 2748 1244 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 115 12 96 29 12 28 85 1219 15 18 1673 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 82 0 0 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 32 Lane Group Flow (vph) 115 26 0 0 41 4 85 1234 0 18 1673 99 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 2 Actuated Green, G 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 97.6 90.6 97.6 88.8 88.8 Effective Green, g 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 97.6 90.6 97.6 88.8 88.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.75 0.70 0.75 0.68 0.68 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 154 170 163 [PHONE REDACTED] 241 1877 849 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.03 c0.47 0.00 c0.61 v/s Ratio Perm c0.11 0.04 0.00 0.31 0.05 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.75 0.15 0.25 0.02 0.45 0.67 0.07 0.89 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 53.3 48.6 49.3 47.6 11.9 11.3 10.3 16.7 7.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.67 0.69 1.39 0.64 1.32 Incremental Delay, d2 16.9 0.3 0.6 0.0 0.9 1.4 0.1 3.9 0.1 Delay 70.2 48.9 49.9 47.7 20.8 9.2 14.3 14.5 9.5 Level of Service E D D D C A B B A Approach Delay 59.9 49.0 9.9 14.2 Approach LOS E D A B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 16.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment C TPAU Travel Demand Model Alternatives Data ---PAGE BREAK--- 4431 0 0 4347 275 275 917 760 4 46 254 321 618 426 697 768 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 0 1 317 227 47 44 149 237 149 171 34 45 5 7 21 25 575 696 824 844 29 34 125 171 60 83 56 76 89 121 94 129 60 70 163 119 38 50 93 123 174 61 93 124 16 22 36 46 70 56 209 117 53 96 140 152 48 51 186 121 786 574 20 21 80 114 22 32 95 43 3 2 7 8 44 26 139 103 113 153 55 76 42 48 102 136 146 110 36 27 127 182 7 8 66 91 111 84 98 68 107 117 100 113 95 107 53 51 30 41 24 16 36 50 70 82 37 50 81 94 65 76 61 74 11 17 10 12 41 46 237 218 30 59 95 121 10 14 28 32 134 149 297 321 236 159 281 134 13 16 30 44 71 104 49 72 135 130 69 81 31 43 81 99 96 62 67 56 59 77 22 32 49 61 65 76 12 17 4 4 115 116 86 57 73 96 43 44 31 26 7 4 5 5 23 17 56 47 56 49 273 187 70 95 74 119 27 40 33 41 14 19 189 267 15 43 79 97 29 43 113 108 0 0 19 32 33 55 39 61 179 238 43 71 88 146 6 9 93 110 9 9 15 15 6 7 83 99 2 3 3 5 1 1 22 30 208 140 1 2 17 29 3 5 2 3 187 126 101 147 85 126 0 0 94 39 13 22 22 35 41 47 121 96 187 160 12 6 23 17 22 15 107 178 1 1 62 41 85 56 6 5 61 48 54 59 82 60 35 36 86 85 4 5 67 46 0 0 157 242 115 56 0 1 0 0 197 161 89 87 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 0 419 419 419 651 651 651 651 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 332 189 0 0 0 510 509 0 276 189 332 348 3 467 98 13 22 0 11 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 159 0 34 0 0 1 20 140 152 104 71 104 71 0 71 408 0 0 0 30 44 0 30 0 30 262 458 375 0 297 9 768 93 0 93 0 0 93 0 0 93 0 0 0 0 0 93 115 93 148 710 0 24 24 319 214 275 254 279 30 24 53 0 119 0 64 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 34 54 16 22 39 58 0 254 545 21 610 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 46 46 0 46 0 0 44 7 22 46 120 69 45 45 480 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 729 689 88 0 0 0 845 0 119 64 71 305 323 487 31 0 32 22 12 612 0 95 618 [PHONE REDACTED] 56 254 321 0 0 0 12 0 28 619 76 154 93 0 27 0 70 12 0 28 654 0 18 26 29 111 597 626 974 28 29 27 992 111 213 8 6 5 30 992 0 7 327 333 383 333 0 30 26 97 229 512 0 0 0 573 1 1 573 494 499 1 1 20 28 1 1 43 0 29 325 60 429 972 169 61 56 7 21 0 879 0 0 0 0 43 15 18 888 774 829 551 54 114 121 0 163 18 43 666 714 36 302 0 0 0 0 54 951 263 188 0 14 338 0 0 263 4 0 60 169 92 75 11 27 6 1005 0 0 11 17 817 0 0 23 824 798 802 318 27 35 23 192 159 33 41 0 0 0 180 31 1005 0 4 0 60 63 0 0 0 830 18 23 7 8 63 0 0 0 0 185 43 352 430 63 60 65 830 0 822 343 [PHONE REDACTED] 8 7 829 49 0 3 822 46 8 828 12 76 41 95 983 132 11 22 16 640 334 414 65 21 24 1 7 8 138 21 374 0 0 311 840 0 23 3 1 275 50 999 8 23 23 42 40 1 196 143 7 7 3 374 338 96 148 274 357 52 28 50 141 130 78 10 21 26 7 79 62 0 100 361 0 374 5 12 12 0 374 0 16 396 899 324 430 100 32 59 0 0 5 361 12 75 0 412 0 362 17 13 5 15 180 312 113 0 380 3 7 6 7 66 0 0 0 60 2 1 29 363 101 15 30 23 101 5 2 374 424 22 152 101 931 24 28 393 412 110 70 181 171 155 23 16 2 39 33 35 26 181 183 24 374 5 124 0 100 82 0 50 37 50 0 380 0 0 80 75 0 22 153 24 374 50 24 126 130 161 27 733 194 11 45 46 551 617 35 205 245 30 41 380 625 619 243 246 238 402 22 198 13 910 1139 0 578 581 155 210 45 596 596 26 147 16 402 45 55 9 554 23 31 1127 79 121 55 3 141 402 583 578 193 79 121 425 1 1 63 24 0 0 60 31 60 643 0 37 0 130 130 88 130 61 74 421 380 449 5 3 38 193 466 485 70 82 134 121 0 0 585 113 79 444 207 75 0 0 0 0 6 22 [PHONE REDACTED] 689 13 19 2 0 0 689 36 0 60 0 0 117 178 71 6 725 7 231 93 [PHONE REDACTED] 293 1160 117 1162 1213 220 42 987 229 0 69 155 762 963 0 9 1 28 588 494 66 230 0 945 1118 560 762 229 230 761 66 634 1091 1131 443 1602 [PHONE REDACTED] 76 8 10 71 70 153 1 1179 92 86 84 0 523 121 750 656 121 121 84 101 91 153 429 595 30 25 73 0 2 44 106 60 0 0 0 73 58 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 25 25 595 106 0 34 0 34 124 93 0 93 93 118 85 0 0 0 46 0 124 124 22 107 60 24 27 1 1 93 118 932 34 25 163 389 0 305 0 940 1155 305 0 0 305 0 207 207 0 0 207 174 12 9 238 238 29 256 286 287 287 256 286 1 399 11 52 44 27 11 12 116 423 112 335 431 19 19 0 140 140 106 50 71 87 0 270 399 175 36 0 0 2 0 155 412 61 56 61 36 7 155 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 21 14 0 150 0 0 0 0 859 150 415 420 333 344 71 87 0 111 111 150 0 0 0 14 14 0 21 14 859 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 378 0 0 0 0 0 20 842 378 64 348 80 835 957 928 386 400 507 507 507 286 317 275 35 772 760 96 191 276 282 363 0 0 410 6 643 366 80 89 6 0 6 130 127 133 414 438 16 510 [PHONE REDACTED] 473 1905 214 2118 1331 419 1198 0 1950 1653 558 1653 [PHONE REDACTED] 236 803 943 677 612 780 804 567 236 909 672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 143 106 469 553 143 0 0 388 143 165 531 317 0 307 388 442 342 0 442 342 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 272 171 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 223 281 7 0 0 0 0 317 286 44 237 3 127 119 501 497 30 60 55 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 0 0 19 2 33 174 107 399 463 71 50 82 0 0 0 0 104 78 104 0 4431 1219 3212 558 4421 3863 788 4347 3559 4338 1198 3140 0 0 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4431 0 0 4347 275 275 917 760 4 46 254 321 618 426 697 768 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 0 1 317 227 47 44 149 237 149 170 34 45 5 7 21 25 574 695 824 844 29 34 125 171 60 83 56 76 89 121 94 129 60 70 164 120 38 50 93 123 174 61 93 124 16 22 36 46 70 56 209 117 53 99 140 149 48 51 185 121 783 572 20 21 80 114 22 32 94 43 3 2 7 8 44 26 138 101 113 153 55 76 42 48 101 136 145 109 36 27 126 182 7 8 66 90 110 83 97 67 106 116 100 112 95 107 53 50 29 41 24 16 36 50 70 82 37 50 81 94 65 75 61 74 11 17 10 12 41 46 232 217 35 61 95 121 9 14 29 32 135 150 297 321 236 159 278 133 13 16 35 48 68 101 49 72 135 130 68 81 31 43 81 99 95 62 67 56 58 77 22 31 49 61 65 76 12 17 4 4 115 116 85 57 73 95 43 43 30 26 7 4 5 5 23 17 55 47 55 49 272 186 69 94 74 118 27 40 20 39 27 20 194 282 10 27 101 122 9 21 113 108 0 0 19 32 33 55 39 61 178 238 43 71 88 146 6 9 92 109 9 9 15 15 6 7 84 99 2 3 3 5 1 1 22 30 222 150 1 2 17 29 3 4 2 3 198 133 102 149 88 128 0 0 93 38 13 22 22 35 41 46 120 95 185 158 12 5 23 17 21 15 107 177 1 1 62 41 85 56 6 5 61 48 54 58 81 61 35 36 86 85 4 5 67 46 0 0 161 246 116 56 0 1 0 0 202 164 90 87 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 0 352 352 352 651 651 651 651 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 6 6 12 7 231 93 0 0 0 517 373 0 155 93 230 344 3 467 97 13 22 0 11 12 0 81 386 386 0 81 0 13 146 13 34 6 12 0 1 20 140 149 182 82 182 82 13 82 372 0 386 374 386 0 374 0 374 220 477 390 0 297 9 768 98 0 98 0 0 98 0 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 98 121 98 142 710 0 24 24 322 228 274 254 281 30 24 54 0 119 0 63 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 34 54 16 22 38 58 0 254 543 21 611 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 46 46 0 46 0 0 47 7 23 46 120 69 45 45 476 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 728 687 87 0 0 0 838 0 119 63 71 231 269 368 31 0 32 22 12 475 0 100 618 [PHONE REDACTED] 55 254 321 0 0 0 12 0 27 624 75 154 92 0 27 0 69 12 0 27 660 0 18 26 29 110 607 651 965 27 29 26 973 110 232 8 6 5 29 973 0 7 326 332 382 332 0 30 26 96 126 537 0 0 0 399 1 1 399 363 428 1 1 20 28 1 1 27 0 29 324 61 428 954 152 61 56 7 21 0 853 0 0 0 0 27 10 18 861 754 803 370 54 110 103 0 145 18 43 492 476 63 124 241 0 0 0 0 54 923 274 194 0 27 305 0 0 274 4 157 60 149 63 75 11 27 6 977 0 0 14 31 790 0 0 23 800 792 802 284 27 30 23 172 130 20 39 0 0 0 160 30 974 0 4 0 60 63 0 0 0 805 26 24 7 0 63 0 0 0 0 167 37 305 376 63 59 71 805 0 797 297 [PHONE REDACTED] 8 6 799 66 0 3 798 46 8 801 3 76 40 101 953 126 11 21 18 449 293 364 65 21 30 2 7 8 135 21 205 0 0 274 805 0 33 5 2 268 50 969 9 19 23 36 29 3 183 140 7 7 3 304 395 95 145 260 309 43 28 46 128 126 72 10 21 26 7 74 58 0 100 417 0 304 4 12 12 0 205 0 16 368 869 255 321 100 32 59 0 0 4 417 12 74 0 384 0 416 18 13 5 16 190 261 112 0 203 3 7 6 7 66 0 0 0 60 2 1 29 418 101 16 29 23 101 5 2 322 330 22 138 101 901 24 28 445 384 110 68 177 167 148 24 16 2 38 54 79 26 178 177 24 322 4 111 0 96 82 0 50 37 50 30 203 0 0 77 75 0 59 149 24 323 49 24 122 126 155 72 739 180 13 44 46 523 581 41 275 330 29 41 232 566 556 315 330 310 350 59 184 12 881 1093 0 524 529 121 195 44 537 527 25 131 17 311 44 55 9 497 24 33 1082 78 113 55 3 124 311 557 521 182 78 113 345 1 1 63 24 0 0 60 31 60 647 0 37 0 130 130 87 130 61 74 390 349 368 5 3 38 182 466 485 70 82 135 172 0 0 578 96 78 443 157 75 0 0 0 0 6 22 [PHONE REDACTED] 664 13 19 0 0 0 664 35 0 60 0 0 13 56 70 6 700 6 220 91 [PHONE REDACTED] 264 1141 13 1016 1125 209 42 907 220 0 69 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 9 1 28 587 494 66 221 0 916 1073 582 759 220 221 785 66 664 1011 [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] 73 8 11 74 70 147 1 1207 92 86 81 0 533 126 785 680 126 126 81 100 90 147 423 596 30 25 74 0 2 42 102 57 0 0 0 74 59 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 25 25 596 102 0 33 0 33 124 93 0 93 93 118 85 0 0 0 44 0 124 124 21 103 58 24 28 1 1 93 118 929 33 25 164 396 0 310 0 936 1144 310 0 0 310 0 188 188 0 0 188 171 12 9 225 225 28 242 289 291 291 242 289 1 395 11 52 47 29 11 12 114 424 112 333 430 18 18 0 140 140 104 50 72 87 0 270 395 177 37 0 0 2 0 155 408 61 56 61 37 7 155 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 21 14 0 150 0 0 0 0 859 150 415 423 337 343 72 87 0 111 111 150 0 0 0 14 14 0 21 14 859 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 374 0 0 0 0 0 20 842 374 64 344 80 835 957 928 390 393 507 507 507 287 317 275 35 772 760 96 75 155 281 284 466 152 289 6 647 402 78 90 11 0 11 340 350 347 292 312 16 512 [PHONE REDACTED] 507 1850 350 2200 1344 352 1198 0 1963 1594 558 1594 [PHONE REDACTED] 224 697 821 555 475 656 803 566 238 913 675 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139 117 457 556 139 0 0 397 139 160 530 317 0 298 397 441 341 0 441 341 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 271 171 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 223 280 7 0 0 0 0 317 285 44 237 3 127 119 497 498 28 60 55 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 2 33 171 103 399 465 72 65 82 0 0 0 0 105 78 105 0 4431 1219 3212 558 4421 3863 855 4347 3492 4338 1198 3140 0 0 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4431 0 0 4347 275 275 917 760 4 46 254 321 618 426 697 768 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 0 1 317 227 47 44 149 237 149 171 34 45 5 7 21 25 574 695 824 844 29 34 125 171 60 83 56 76 88 121 94 129 60 70 164 120 38 50 93 123 174 61 93 124 16 22 36 46 70 56 209 117 53 96 140 152 48 51 185 121 782 572 20 21 80 114 22 32 94 43 3 2 7 8 44 26 138 101 113 153 55 76 42 48 101 136 145 109 36 27 126 182 7 8 66 90 110 83 97 67 106 116 100 112 95 107 53 50 29 41 24 16 36 50 70 82 37 50 81 94 65 75 61 74 11 17 10 12 41 46 233 221 34 56 95 121 9 14 29 32 135 150 297 321 236 159 278 133 13 16 35 48 68 101 49 72 135 130 68 81 31 43 81 99 95 62 67 56 58 77 22 31 49 61 65 76 12 17 4 4 115 116 85 57 73 95 43 43 30 26 7 4 5 5 23 17 55 47 55 49 272 186 69 94 74 118 27 40 33 38 14 21 194 282 10 27 101 122 9 21 113 108 0 0 19 32 33 55 39 61 178 238 43 71 88 146 6 9 92 109 9 9 15 15 6 7 84 99 2 3 3 5 1 1 22 30 222 150 1 2 17 29 3 4 2 3 198 132 102 149 88 128 0 0 94 38 13 22 22 35 41 46 120 95 185 158 12 5 22 17 21 15 107 177 1 1 62 41 85 56 6 5 61 48 54 58 81 61 35 36 86 85 4 5 67 46 0 0 161 246 116 57 0 1 0 0 202 164 90 87 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 0 352 352 352 651 651 651 651 19 11 28 18 73 7 0 6 6 12 7 182 70 0 0 0 498 351 18 121 79 182 341 3 467 97 13 22 0 11 12 0 79 385 385 0 79 0 8 146 13 34 6 12 0 1 20 140 152 181 76 181 76 8 76 366 0 385 372 380 0 372 0 372 217 476 390 0 297 9 768 85 0 85 0 0 85 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 85 102 85 121 710 0 23 23 304 215 274 254 273 30 23 52 0 118 0 64 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 34 54 16 22 38 58 0 254 551 21 611 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 46 46 0 46 0 0 43 7 22 46 120 68 45 45 476 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 728 687 87 0 0 0 816 22 118 64 71 228 220 346 31 0 32 22 12 486 0 87 618 [PHONE REDACTED] 55 254 321 0 0 0 12 0 27 610 75 154 92 0 27 0 69 12 0 27 641 0 18 26 29 110 583 569 959 27 29 26 970 110 232 8 6 5 29 970 0 7 326 332 382 332 0 30 26 96 125 458 0 0 0 377 1 1 377 341 379 1 1 20 28 1 1 27 0 29 324 61 428 951 150 61 56 7 21 0 854 0 0 0 0 27 10 18 862 754 804 368 54 111 103 0 143 18 44 493 444 65 111 237 0 0 0 0 54 925 278 197 0 14 301 0 0 278 4 161 60 147 68 75 11 27 6 979 0 0 14 27 792 0 0 23 801 787 797 280 27 30 23 170 134 33 38 0 0 0 158 30 975 0 4 0 60 63 0 0 0 806 26 24 7 0 63 0 0 0 0 164 37 313 371 63 59 71 806 0 798 305 [PHONE REDACTED] 8 6 800 65 0 3 799 46 8 803 4 76 40 101 954 138 11 21 18 438 292 362 65 21 30 2 7 8 147 21 189 0 0 274 807 0 33 5 2 272 50 970 9 18 22 36 29 3 183 152 7 7 3 298 400 95 157 264 311 43 28 46 128 124 73 10 21 26 7 74 58 0 101 421 0 298 4 12 12 0 189 0 16 384 870 249 300 101 32 59 0 0 4 421 12 74 0 400 0 422 18 13 4 16 190 255 112 0 188 3 7 6 7 66 0 0 0 60 2 1 29 422 101 16 30 23 101 4 2 317 314 22 137 101 901 24 28 449 400 110 63 173 162 147 24 18 2 39 62 80 26 178 171 24 317 4 110 0 91 82 0 50 37 50 36 188 0 0 71 75 0 63 144 24 317 49 24 117 121 149 74 751 179 17 44 46 524 590 38 286 339 29 41 224 556 557 339 339 334 344 63 183 12 881 1093 0 525 520 105 195 44 551 524 25 131 16 305 44 55 9 511 24 32 1081 77 113 55 3 123 305 571 536 182 77 113 350 1 1 63 24 0 0 60 31 60 631 0 37 0 130 130 87 130 61 74 380 339 372 5 3 38 182 466 485 70 82 135 176 0 0 575 95 77 456 133 75 0 0 0 0 6 22 [PHONE REDACTED] 661 13 19 0 0 0 661 35 0 60 0 0 7 55 70 6 696 6 220 91 [PHONE REDACTED] 258 1130 7 55 1007 1110 209 42 893 220 0 69 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 9 1 28 587 494 66 221 0 916 1073 582 759 220 221 785 66 664 991 [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] 73 8 10 71 70 147 1 1208 92 86 81 0 534 126 787 681 126 126 81 100 90 147 421 595 30 25 74 0 2 42 102 57 0 0 0 74 59 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 44 25 25 595 102 0 33 0 33 124 93 0 93 93 118 85 0 0 0 44 0 124 124 21 103 58 24 28 1 1 93 118 929 33 25 164 397 0 311 0 936 1144 311 0 0 311 0 189 189 0 0 189 171 12 9 226 226 28 244 289 291 291 244 289 1 395 11 52 43 27 11 12 116 423 112 328 425 18 18 0 140 140 107 50 70 87 0 270 395 177 37 0 0 2 0 155 408 61 56 61 37 6 155 0 0 0 0 121 0 0 21 14 0 150 0 0 0 0 859 150 408 420 333 338 70 87 0 111 111 150 0 0 0 14 14 0 21 14 859 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 374 0 0 0 0 0 20 842 374 64 341 80 835 957 928 386 392 503 503 503 280 313 275 35 772 760 96 65 121 273 281 459 156 298 6 631 398 78 90 11 0 11 337 350 344 301 353 16 516 [PHONE REDACTED] 506 1850 350 2199 1344 352 1198 0 1939 1594 558 1594 [PHONE REDACTED] 215 691 832 588 486 690 795 568 227 904 677 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 141 102 473 554 141 0 0 391 141 163 532 317 0 304 391 440 339 0 440 339 149 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 269 169 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 278 7 0 0 0 0 313 283 44 237 3 127 119 497 494 28 60 55 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 55 0 0 18 0 0 0 18 0 0 18 2 33 171 103 394 464 71 63 82 0 0 0 0 105 77 105 0 4431 1219 3212 558 4421 3863 855 4347 3492 4338 1198 3140 0 0 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment D Year 2040 Alternatives Worksheets ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 1: Butteville Rd & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 08/02/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 172.2 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 387 128 349 335 108 333 Future Vol, veh/h 387 128 349 335 108 333 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 15 21 18 29 31 15 Mvmt Flow 403 133 364 349 113 347 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 536 0 1546 470 Stage 1 - - - - 470 - Stage 2 - - - - 1076 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.71 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.71 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.71 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.779 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 956 - ~ 108 568 Stage 1 - - - - 573 - Stage 2 - - - - 289 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 956 - ~ 67 568 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 67 - Stage 1 - - - - 573 - Stage 2 - - - - 179 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 5.6 $ 631.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 201 - - 956 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.285 - - 0.38 - HCM Control Delay $ 631.6 - - 11.1 - HCM Lane LOS F - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 37 - - 1.8 - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 2: Woodland Ave & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 49 659 1 39 658 243 5 7 88 729 3 43 Future Volume (vph) 49 659 1 39 658 243 5 7 88 729 3 43 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1163 1490 1468 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1163 1490 1468 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 53 716 1 42 715 264 5 8 96 792 3 47 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 56 0 89 0 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 53 716 0 42 715 208 5 15 0 428 412 0 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 3% 16% 50% 33% 16% 4% 0% 50% 28% 6% 20% 11% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 4 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G 7.3 34.9 42.9 7.5 35.1 79.2 8.0 8.0 44.1 44.1 Effective Green, g 7.3 34.9 42.9 7.5 35.1 79.2 8.0 8.0 44.1 44.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.31 0.39 0.07 0.32 0.71 0.07 0.07 0.40 0.40 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 106 901 376 84 906 1020 119 83 591 583 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.25 0.00 c0.03 0.25 0.08 0.00 c0.01 c0.29 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.79 0.00 0.50 0.79 0.20 0.04 0.18 0.72 0.71 Uniform Delay, d1 50.1 34.8 20.9 49.9 34.6 5.3 47.9 48.4 28.3 28.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.7 5.3 0.0 3.4 5.0 0.1 0.1 0.8 4.1 3.6 Delay 52.8 40.1 20.9 53.3 39.6 5.4 48.0 49.2 32.4 31.6 Level of Service D D C D D A D D C C Approach Delay 40.9 31.3 49.1 32.0 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.69 Actuated Cycle Length 111.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1156 462 0 1077 715 0 0 0 719 0 360 Future Volume (vph) 0 1156 462 0 1077 715 0 0 0 719 0 360 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1180 471 0 1099 730 0 0 0 734 0 367 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1180 471 0 1099 730 0 0 0 734 0 358 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 59.7 100.0 45.7 100.0 31.3 45.8 Effective Green, g 59.7 100.0 45.7 100.0 31.3 45.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.60 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.31 0.46 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1711 1255 1298 1173 848 582 v/s Ratio Prot 0.41 c0.39 c0.27 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.38 c0.62 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.38 0.85 0.62 0.87 0.62 Uniform Delay, d1 13.8 0.0 24.0 0.0 32.4 20.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.3 0.9 3.1 1.1 9.1 1.7 Delay 16.1 0.9 29.1 1.1 41.5 22.1 Level of Service B A C A D C Approach Delay 11.8 17.9 0.0 35.0 Approach LOS B B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 19.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.1% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1602 298 0 1375 427 396 0 680 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1602 298 0 1375 427 396 0 680 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1107 1132 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1107 1132 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1669 310 0 1432 445 412 0 708 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1669 310 0 1432 445 372 362 363 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 56.7 100.0 56.7 100.0 34.3 34.3 34.3 Effective Green, g 56.7 100.0 56.7 100.0 34.3 34.3 34.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 1.00 0.57 1.00 0.34 0.34 0.34 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1625 1234 1545 1212 463 379 388 v/s Ratio Prot c0.58 0.53 v/s Ratio Perm 0.25 0.37 0.28 0.33 0.32 v/c Ratio 1.03 0.25 0.93 0.37 0.80 0.96 0.94 Uniform Delay, d1 21.6 0.0 19.8 0.0 29.8 32.1 31.8 Progression Factor 1.34 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 26.1 0.3 5.1 0.3 9.5 34.5 29.7 Delay 55.0 0.3 23.9 0.3 39.3 66.6 61.5 Level of Service E A C A D E E Approach Delay 46.4 18.3 55.8 0.0 Approach LOS D B E A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 37.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 82 1601 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 484 24 322 22 30 73 Future Volume (vph) 82 1601 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 484 24 322 22 30 73 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1363 2842 1316 1409 2835 1373 1391 1262 1511 1651 1096 Flt Permitted 0.09 1.00 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 130 2842 1316 163 2835 1373 1391 1262 1511 1651 1096 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 85 1651 [PHONE REDACTED] 14 499 25 332 23 31 75 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 98 0 1 0 0 0 248 0 0 71 Lane Group Flow (vph) 85 1651 89 296 1314 0 259 265 84 23 31 5 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 51.3 36.5 36.5 51.3 44.1 25.2 25.2 25.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 Effective Green, g 51.3 36.5 36.5 51.3 44.1 25.2 25.2 25.2 6.0 6.0 6.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.36 0.36 0.51 0.44 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 155 1037 [PHONE REDACTED] 345 350 318 90 99 65 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.58 0.16 c0.46 0.19 c0.19 0.02 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.24 0.07 0.40 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.55 1.59 0.19 1.10 1.05 0.75 0.76 0.26 0.26 0.31 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 18.5 31.8 21.6 39.3 27.9 34.5 34.6 30.0 44.9 45.0 44.4 Progression Factor 0.85 0.95 0.95 0.79 0.69 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 267.5 0.2 52.7 25.6 8.5 8.6 0.3 1.1 1.3 0.3 Delay 16.5 297.9 20.7 83.9 45.0 43.0 43.2 30.3 46.0 46.3 44.7 Level of Service B F C F D D D C D D D Approach Delay 258.5 52.2 38.1 45.3 Approach LOS F D D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 137.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.17 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 151 1784 44 33 1484 84 25 34 12 103 24 113 Future Volume (vph) 151 1784 44 33 1484 84 25 34 12 103 24 113 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.88 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1554 2747 1471 2719 1525 1391 1385 1433 Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 131 2747 135 2719 1525 1391 1385 1433 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 157 1858 46 34 1546 88 26 35 12 107 25 118 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 12 0 0 101 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 157 1903 0 34 1631 0 26 36 0 107 42 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 62.7 58.5 50.1 50.1 6.0 6.7 14.1 14.8 Effective Green, g 62.7 58.5 50.1 50.1 6.0 6.7 14.1 14.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.58 0.50 0.50 0.06 0.07 0.14 0.15 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 261 1606 123 1362 91 93 195 212 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.69 0.01 c0.60 0.02 c0.03 c0.08 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.30 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.60 1.18 0.28 1.20 0.29 0.39 0.55 0.20 Uniform Delay, d1 35.5 20.8 21.7 24.9 45.0 44.7 40.0 37.4 Progression Factor 0.38 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 83.8 0.9 96.1 1.3 1.9 2.5 0.3 Delay 13.9 106.6 22.6 121.1 46.2 46.6 42.5 37.7 Level of Service B F C F D D D D Approach Delay 99.5 119.1 46.5 39.8 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 102.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 7: Cascade Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1499 277 37 1593 0 119 Future Vol, veh/h 1499 277 37 1593 0 119 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 130 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 19 17 10 23 0 24 Mvmt Flow 1595 295 39 1695 0 127 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1891 0 - 947 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - - 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.3 - - 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 282 - 0 224 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 282 - - 224 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.5 40.1 HCM LOS E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 224 - - 282 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.565 - - 0.14 - HCM Control Delay 40.1 - - 19.8 - HCM Lane LOS E - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 3.1 - - 0.5 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 8: Settlemier Ave/Boones Ferry Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 199 744 476 61 836 58 359 113 42 77 167 219 Future Volume (vph) 199 744 476 61 836 58 359 113 42 77 167 219 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.83 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1446 2771 1216 1484 2748 1114 1385 1483 1357 1458 1446 1024 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1446 2771 1216 1484 2748 1114 1385 1483 1357 1458 1446 1024 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 209 783 501 64 880 61 378 119 44 81 176 231 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 119 0 0 39 0 0 33 0 0 195 Lane Group Flow (vph) 209 783 382 64 880 22 378 119 11 81 176 36 Confl. Peds. 26 26 26 26 118 2 2 118 Heavy Vehicles 15% 20% 15% 12% 21% 22% 20% 18% 8% 14% 21% 20% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G 23.2 64.7 90.1 9.5 51.0 51.0 25.4 34.3 34.3 12.7 21.6 21.6 Effective Green, g 23.2 64.7 90.1 9.5 51.0 51.0 25.4 34.3 34.3 12.7 21.6 21.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.46 0.64 0.07 0.36 0.36 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.15 0.15 Clearance Time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.8 2.5 2.5 4.8 4.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 239 1278 781 100 999 405 250 362 331 132 222 157 v/s Ratio Prot c0.14 0.28 0.09 0.04 c0.32 c0.27 0.08 0.06 c0.12 v/s Ratio Perm 0.23 0.02 0.01 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.61 0.49 0.64 0.88 0.05 1.51 0.33 0.03 0.61 0.79 0.23 Uniform Delay, d1 57.1 28.3 13.0 63.7 41.8 29.0 57.4 43.5 40.3 61.4 57.1 52.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 27.7 1.2 0.4 11.7 9.8 0.1 250.0 0.4 0.0 7.0 16.9 0.5 Delay 84.8 29.6 13.4 75.4 51.5 29.1 307.4 43.9 40.3 68.4 74.1 52.5 Level of Service F C B E D C F D D E E D Approach Delay 31.9 51.7 227.7 62.9 Approach LOS C D F E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 71.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length 140.2 Sum of lost time 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 99.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 9: 5th St/Meridian Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 20 767 31 111 891 71 11 10 55 55 28 20 Future Volume (vph) 20 767 31 111 891 71 11 10 55 55 28 20 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1484 2743 1338 2709 1235 1163 1285 1461 Flt Permitted 0.25 1.00 0.31 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.71 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 398 2743 431 2709 943 1163 966 1461 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 20 783 32 113 909 72 11 10 56 56 29 20 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 49 0 0 17 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 20 813 0 113 977 0 11 17 0 56 32 0 Confl. Peds. 9 33 33 9 18 4 4 18 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 12% 20% 27% 24% 22% 10% 33% 50% 26% 29% 4% 22% Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 40.5 35.0 40.5 38.7 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Effective Green, g 40.5 35.0 40.5 38.7 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.64 0.55 0.64 0.61 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 Clearance Time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 5.3 2.5 5.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 284 1511 353 1650 118 146 121 184 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.30 c0.03 c0.36 0.01 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.18 0.01 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.07 0.54 0.32 0.59 0.09 0.12 0.46 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 9.1 4.7 7.6 24.5 24.6 25.8 24.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.9 0.3 0.3 2.0 0.3 Delay 4.5 9.8 5.1 8.5 24.8 24.9 27.8 25.1 Level of Service A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 9.7 8.2 24.9 26.5 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.58 Actuated Cycle Length 63.5 Sum of lost time 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 10: OR 214 & Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 47.6 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h [PHONE REDACTED] 133 62 95 Future Vol, veh/h [PHONE REDACTED] 133 62 95 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 0 0 8 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Yield - None Storage Length 130 - - 60 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 21 18 18 30 24 Mvmt Flow [PHONE REDACTED] 141 66 101 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1104 0 - 0 1850 556 Stage 1 - - - - 1104 - Stage 2 - - - - 746 - Critical Hdwy 4.6 - - - 7.4 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.45 - - - 3.8 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 510 - - - ~ 48 422 Stage 1 - - - - 225 - Stage 2 - - - - 363 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 510 - - - ~ 33 419 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 33 - Stage 1 - - - - 223 - Stage 2 - - - - 253 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.2 0 $ 681.6 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 510 - - - 75 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.298 - - - 2.227 HCM Control Delay 15 - - 681.6 HCM Lane LOS C - - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - - - 15.5 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 11: Park Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 51.7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 675 123 95 968 10 59 6 126 10 4 77 Future Vol, veh/h 17 675 123 95 968 10 59 6 126 10 4 77 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 14 14 0 4 22 0 0 0 0 22 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 90 - - 185 - - - - - - - 55 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 23 16 9 23 38 0 0 10 9 25 7 Mvmt Flow 19 742 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 65 7 138 11 4 85 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1079 0 0 891 0 0 1626 2149 452 1694 2210 563 Stage 1 - - - - - - 861 861 - 1282 1282 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 765 1288 - 412 928 - Critical Hdwy 4.28 - - 4.28 - - 7.5 6.5 7.1 7.68 7 7.04 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.68 6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.68 6 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.29 - - 2.29 - - 3.5 4 3.4 3.59 4.25 3.37 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 602 - - 714 - - 69 49 533 56 32 457 Stage 1 - - - - - - 321 375 - 165 194 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 366 237 - 569 297 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 589 - - 714 - - ~ 41 40 526 31 26 446 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 41 40 - 31 26 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 307 358 - 159 165 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 241 202 - 398 284 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1 $ 558.4 47.4 HCM LOS F E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 104 589 - - 714 - - 29 446 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 2.018 0.032 - - 0.146 - - 0.531 0.19 HCM Control Delay $ 558.4 11.3 - - 10.9 - - 225.5 15 HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 17.7 0.1 - - 0.5 - - 1.7 0.7 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 156 403 261 329 294 92 247 494 156 234 966 117 Future Volume (vph) 156 403 261 329 294 92 247 494 156 234 966 117 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1312 2906 2639 1054 1374 2948 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1312 2906 2639 1054 1374 2948 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 162 420 272 343 306 96 257 515 [PHONE REDACTED] 122 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 197 0 8 0 0 0 114 0 7 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 163 420 75 343 394 0 257 515 49 244 1121 0 Confl. Peds. 5 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 17% 18% 20% 24% 25% 40% 11% 26% 38% 21% 10% 19% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.7 38.5 39.3 15.5 39.3 Effective Green, g 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.7 38.5 39.3 15.5 39.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 347 285 263 307 328 781 318 163 891 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 0.28 c0.26 c0.30 c0.09 0.20 c0.18 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.06 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.59 1.21 0.26 1.30 1.28 0.78 0.66 0.15 1.50 1.26 Uniform Delay, d1 47.5 49.8 40.6 52.2 49.8 56.1 40.0 33.2 57.2 45.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.93 0.60 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.1 118.5 0.5 161.7 149.5 7.7 2.8 0.7 253.0 125.3 Delay 50.6 168.3 41.1 214.0 199.3 78.9 40.0 20.7 310.3 170.7 Level of Service D F D F F E D C F F Approach Delay 105.4 206.0 47.3 195.5 Approach LOS F F D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 142.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.23 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 13: Boones Ferry Rd & Crosby Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 5 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.2 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 26 48 44 34 46 32 9 128 12 47 242 27 Future Vol, veh/h 26 48 44 34 46 32 9 128 12 47 242 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 39 23 6 31 20 86 22 13 27 36 13 16 Mvmt Flow 28 51 47 36 49 34 10 136 13 50 257 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.6 10.5 10.3 14.2 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 6% 22% 30% 15% Vol Thru, % 86% 41% 41% 77% Vol Right, % 8% 37% 29% 9% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 149 118 112 316 LT Vol 9 26 34 47 Through Vol 128 48 46 242 RT Vol 12 44 32 27 Lane Flow Rate 159 126 119 336 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.243 0.21 0.197 0.515 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.522 6.009 5.957 5.52 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 651 598 603 659 Service Time 3.552 4.043 3.992 3.52 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.244 0.211 0.197 0.51 HCM Control Delay 10.3 10.6 10.5 14.2 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 0.8 0.7 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 14: Front St & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 6 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.4 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 143 62 131 147 102 141 Future Vol, veh/h 143 62 131 147 102 141 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 12 28 15 19 22 24 Mvmt Flow 168 73 154 173 120 166 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 12.1 12.2 12.9 HCM LOS B B B Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 70% 42% Vol Thru, % 47% 0% 58% Vol Right, % 53% 30% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 278 205 243 LT Vol 0 143 102 Through Vol 131 0 141 RT Vol 147 62 0 Lane Flow Rate 327 241 286 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.456 0.378 0.44 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.02 5.644 5.536 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 723 637 652 Service Time 3.02 3.677 3.562 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.452 0.378 0.439 HCM Control Delay 12.2 12.1 12.9 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 2.4 1.8 2.2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 15: Front St & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 7 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh36.5 Intersection LOS E Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 20 155 127 68 155 19 57 225 50 6 206 22 Future Vol, veh/h 20 155 127 68 155 19 57 225 50 6 206 22 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 25 31 16 25 18 30 13 28 54 20 9 Mvmt Flow 24 182 149 80 182 22 67 265 59 7 242 26 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 36.4 27.1 48.4 29.7 HCM LOS E D E D Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 17% 7% 28% 3% Vol Thru, % 68% 51% 64% 88% Vol Right, % 15% 42% 8% 9% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 332 302 242 234 LT Vol 57 20 68 6 Through Vol 225 155 155 206 RT Vol 50 127 19 22 Lane Flow Rate 391 355 285 275 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.886 0.798 0.668 0.686 Departure Headway (Hd) 8.162 8.081 8.445 8.974 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 441 448 427 402 Service Time 6.235 6.157 6.529 7.061 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.887 0.792 0.667 0.684 HCM Control Delay 48.4 36.4 27.1 29.7 HCM Lane LOS E E D D HCM 95th-tile Q 9.3 7.2 4.7 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 16: Front St & Garfield St/Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 8 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh33.2 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 7 118 1 76 141 148 6 191 88 168 208 17 Future Vol, veh/h 7 118 1 76 141 148 6 191 88 168 208 17 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 20 40 38 23 14 25 15 22 19 18 24 Mvmt Flow 8 128 1 83 153 161 7 208 96 183 226 18 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 15.1 37.7 23.4 42 HCM LOS C E C E Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 2% 6% 21% 43% Vol Thru, % 67% 94% 39% 53% Vol Right, % 31% 1% 41% 4% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 285 126 365 393 LT Vol 6 7 76 168 Through Vol 191 118 141 208 RT Vol 88 1 148 17 Lane Flow Rate 310 137 397 427 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.647 0.314 0.829 0.868 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.515 8.258 7.518 7.314 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 480 433 480 496 Service Time 5.585 6.349 5.577 5.377 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.646 0.316 0.827 0.861 HCM Control Delay 23.4 15.1 37.7 42 HCM Lane LOS C C E E HCM 95th-tile Q 4.5 1.3 8.1 9.2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 17: Front St & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 9 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh18.7 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 18 148 29 81 88 52 15 196 33 68 217 26 Future Vol, veh/h 18 148 29 81 88 52 15 196 33 68 217 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 14 23 13 11 28 14 43 18 50 9 21 12 Mvmt Flow 21 174 34 95 104 61 18 231 39 80 255 31 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 15.7 16.7 18 22.4 HCM LOS C C C C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 7% 0% 9% 37% 22% Vol Thru, % 93% 0% 76% 40% 70% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 15% 24% 8% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 211 33 195 221 311 LT Vol 15 0 18 81 68 Through Vol 196 0 148 88 217 RT Vol 0 33 29 52 26 Lane Flow Rate 248 39 229 260 366 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5 Degree of Util 0.536 0.071 0.448 0.498 0.673 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.776 6.587 7.026 6.891 6.625 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 462 541 509 520 542 Service Time 5.551 4.362 5.104 4.967 4.695 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.537 0.072 0.45 0.5 0.675 HCM Control Delay 19.3 9.9 15.7 16.7 22.4 HCM Lane LOS C A C C C HCM 95th-tile Q 3.1 0.2 2.3 2.7 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 18: Settlemier Ave & Parr Road/Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 10 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh64.3 Intersection LOS F Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 193 231 123 110 237 22 112 185 60 10 231 264 Future Vol, veh/h 193 231 123 110 237 22 112 185 60 10 231 264 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 49 27 21 25 37 12 14 9 21 0 21 28 Mvmt Flow 227 272 145 129 279 26 132 218 71 12 272 311 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 95.3 46.2 69.7 40.2 HCM LOS F E F E Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 38% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 4% 0% Vol Thru, % 62% 0% 0% 65% 0% 92% 96% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 35% 0% 8% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 297 60 193 354 110 259 241 264 LT Vol 112 0 193 0 110 0 10 0 Through Vol 185 0 0 231 0 237 231 0 RT Vol 0 60 0 123 0 22 0 264 Lane Flow Rate 349 71 227 416 129 305 284 311 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util 0.992 0.181 0.703 1.153 0.386 0.878 0.759 0.8 Departure Headway (Hd) 10.717 9.691 11.14 9.965 11.208 10.833 10.094 9.711 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 342 373 325 362 324 338 360 376 Service Time 8.417 7.391 8.935 7.76 8.908 8.533 7.794 7.411 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.02 0.19 0.698 1.149 0.398 0.902 0.789 0.827 HCM Control Delay 80.8 14.5 36.7 127.2 20.8 57 38.5 41.7 HCM Lane LOS F B E F C F E E HCM 95th-tile Q 11 0.7 5 16.3 1.8 8.2 6 6.9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 78 55 68 151 40 52 68 1118 103 73 1449 91 Future Volume (vph) 78 55 68 151 40 52 68 1118 103 73 1449 91 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1499 1227 1478 1206 1363 2666 1458 2740 Flt Permitted 0.55 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.14 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 844 1227 904 1206 92 2666 220 2740 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 59 72 161 43 55 72 1189 110 78 1541 97 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 0 0 42 0 5 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 142 17 0 204 13 72 1294 0 78 1635 0 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 30.3 30.3 30.3 30.3 86.2 80.1 86.2 77.0 Effective Green, g 30.3 30.3 30.3 30.3 86.2 80.1 86.2 77.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.66 0.62 0.66 0.59 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 196 285 210 [PHONE REDACTED] 203 1622 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.49 0.02 c0.60 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.01 c0.23 0.01 0.28 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.06 0.97 0.05 0.48 0.79 0.38 1.01 Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 38.8 49.4 38.6 41.1 18.6 11.2 26.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.71 1.15 1.13 Incremental Delay, d2 11.7 0.1 53.6 0.0 1.2 2.7 0.1 8.7 Delay 57.7 38.8 103.1 38.7 34.0 15.9 13.0 38.6 Level of Service E D F D C B B D Approach Delay 51.4 89.4 16.9 37.4 Approach LOS D F B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 34.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 110 11 91 27 11 26 78 1143 14 17 1571 122 Future Volume (vph) 110 11 91 27 11 26 78 1143 14 17 1571 122 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1288 1406 1124 1446 2629 1289 2720 Flt Permitted 0.82 0.73 1.00 0.05 1.00 0.17 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1078 1064 1124 75 2629 227 2720 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 117 12 97 29 12 28 83 1216 15 18 1671 130 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 21 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 4 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 205 0 0 41 6 83 1231 0 18 1797 0 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 26.6 26.6 26.6 89.9 82.9 89.9 81.1 Effective Green, g 26.6 26.6 26.6 89.9 82.9 89.9 81.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.69 0.64 0.69 0.62 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 220 217 [PHONE REDACTED] 214 1696 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.47 0.00 c0.66 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.04 0.01 0.36 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.19 0.03 0.58 0.73 0.08 1.06 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 42.8 41.3 25.6 16.0 15.7 24.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.44 0.81 1.31 0.67 Incremental Delay, d2 41.1 0.3 0.0 3.1 2.0 0.0 32.3 Delay 91.8 43.1 41.4 40.1 15.0 20.7 48.6 Level of Service F D D D B C D Approach Delay 91.8 42.4 16.6 48.3 Approach LOS F D B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 38.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.02 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 160 180 121 95 225 280 83 789 40 265 1251 149 Future Volume (vph) 160 180 121 95 225 280 83 789 40 265 1251 149 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1222 1304 1457 1293 1179 2697 1374 2763 Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.10 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 382 1304 697 1293 122 2697 369 2763 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 162 182 122 96 227 283 84 797 40 268 1264 151 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 0 65 0 3 0 0 7 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 162 286 0 0 323 218 84 834 0 268 1408 0 Confl. Peds. 4 4 1 2 2 1 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 36% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 41% 22% 27% 21% 18% 19% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.7 Effective Green, g 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.63 0.51 0.63 0.57 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 101 346 184 [PHONE REDACTED] 352 1566 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 0.04 0.31 0.09 c0.51 v/s Ratio Perm 0.42 c0.46 0.17 0.33 c0.39 v/c Ratio 1.60 0.83 1.76 0.64 0.58 0.60 0.76 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 47.8 44.9 47.8 42.2 17.0 22.5 28.9 24.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.35 1.37 Incremental Delay, d2 312.9 14.5 361.3 3.4 4.9 2.0 0.9 0.9 Delay 360.6 59.4 409.1 45.6 21.9 24.4 39.9 35.0 Level of Service F E F D C C D C Approach Delay 164.1 239.3 24.2 35.7 Approach LOS F F C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 82.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.1% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 1 22: OR 99E & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 1.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 12.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 86 84 80 919 1180 237 Future Vol, veh/h 86 84 80 919 1180 237 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 110 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 21 35 31 25 29 16 Mvmt Flow 93 91 87 999 1283 258 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2085 772 1541 0 - 0 Stage 1 1412 - - - - - Stage 2 673 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.22 7.6 4.72 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.22 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.22 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.71 3.65 2.51 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 36 279 310 - - - Stage 1 161 - - - - - Stage 2 421 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 13 278 310 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ~ 78 - - - - - Stage 1 161 - - - - - Stage 2 155 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 143.4 6.9 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 310 - 78 278 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.281 - 1.198 0.328 - - HCM Control Delay 21.1 5.7 259.8 24.2 - - HCM Lane LOS C A F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.1 - 7 1.4 - - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 1: Butteville Rd & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 08/02/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 54.8 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 392 115 231 340 103 233 Future Vol, veh/h 392 115 231 340 103 233 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 15 21 18 29 31 15 Mvmt Flow 408 120 241 354 107 243 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 528 0 1303 468 Stage 1 - - - - 468 - Stage 2 - - - - 835 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.71 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.71 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.71 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.779 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 963 - 154 569 Stage 1 - - - - 574 - Stage 2 - - - - 380 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 963 - 115 569 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 115 - Stage 1 - - - - 574 - Stage 2 - - - - 285 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4 223.8 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 257 - - 963 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.362 - - 0.25 - HCM Control Delay 223.8 - - 10 - HCM Lane LOS F - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 18.7 - - 1 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 2: Woodland Ave & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 32 589 1 34 565 262 3 5 85 753 2 25 Future Volume (vph) 32 589 1 34 565 262 3 5 85 753 2 25 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1162 1490 1479 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1162 1490 1479 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 35 640 1 37 614 285 3 5 92 818 2 27 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 69 0 85 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 35 640 0 37 614 216 3 12 0 425 421 0 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 3% 16% 50% 33% 16% 4% 0% 50% 28% 6% 20% 11% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 4 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G 4.7 30.6 38.4 5.4 31.3 74.3 7.8 7.8 43.0 43.0 Effective Green, g 4.7 30.6 38.4 5.4 31.3 74.3 7.8 7.8 43.0 43.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.30 0.37 0.05 0.30 0.72 0.08 0.08 0.42 0.42 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 73 848 362 65 868 1028 125 87 620 615 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.22 0.00 c0.03 0.21 0.09 0.00 c0.01 c0.29 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.75 0.00 0.57 0.71 0.21 0.02 0.14 0.69 0.68 Uniform Delay, d1 48.1 32.9 20.4 47.8 31.9 4.8 44.2 44.6 24.6 24.6 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 4.2 0.0 9.0 2.9 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.9 2.9 Delay 51.7 37.1 20.4 56.8 34.9 4.9 44.3 45.1 27.5 27.5 Level of Service D D C E C A D D C C Approach Delay 37.9 26.6 45.1 27.5 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length 103.3 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1112 462 0 1081 715 0 0 0 774 0 307 Future Volume (vph) 0 1112 462 0 1081 715 0 0 0 774 0 307 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1135 471 0 1103 730 0 0 0 790 0 313 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1135 471 0 1103 730 0 0 0 790 0 305 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 58.4 100.0 44.4 100.0 32.6 47.1 Effective Green, g 58.4 100.0 44.4 100.0 32.6 47.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.33 0.47 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1673 1255 1261 1173 883 598 v/s Ratio Prot 0.40 c0.39 c0.29 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.38 c0.62 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.38 0.87 0.62 0.89 0.51 Uniform Delay, d1 14.3 0.0 25.3 0.0 32.1 18.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.2 0.9 3.6 1.0 11.5 0.5 Delay 16.6 0.9 31.6 1.0 43.5 18.9 Level of Service B A C A D B Approach Delay 12.0 19.4 0.0 36.5 Approach LOS B B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1663 248 0 1399 472 384 0 693 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1663 248 0 1399 472 384 0 693 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1106 1132 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1106 1132 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1732 258 0 1457 492 400 0 722 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1732 258 0 1457 492 360 377 365 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 56.0 100.0 56.0 100.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Effective Green, g 56.0 100.0 56.0 100.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1604 1234 1526 1212 472 387 396 v/s Ratio Prot c0.60 0.53 v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.41 0.27 0.34 0.32 v/c Ratio 1.08 0.21 0.95 0.41 0.76 0.97 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 22.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 28.8 32.0 31.2 Progression Factor 1.36 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 44.4 0.3 9.0 0.5 6.9 38.4 26.4 Delay 74.3 0.3 28.7 0.5 35.7 70.4 57.6 Level of Service E A C A D E E Approach Delay 64.7 21.6 55.0 0.0 Approach LOS E C D A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.04 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 85 1491 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 556 24 291 17 35 73 Future Volume (vph) 85 1491 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 556 24 291 17 35 73 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1363 2842 1316 1409 2836 1373 1389 1262 1511 1651 1096 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 143 2842 1316 181 2836 1373 1389 1262 1511 1651 1096 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 88 1537 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 573 25 300 18 36 75 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 155 0 1 0 0 0 214 0 0 70 Lane Group Flow (vph) 88 1537 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 298 300 86 18 36 5 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 47.5 32.8 32.8 47.5 40.1 28.8 28.8 28.8 6.2 6.2 6.2 Effective Green, g 47.5 32.8 32.8 47.5 40.1 28.8 28.8 28.8 6.2 6.2 6.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.33 0.33 0.48 0.40 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 932 [PHONE REDACTED] 395 400 363 93 102 67 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.54 0.17 c0.42 c0.22 0.22 0.01 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.08 0.39 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.56 1.65 0.24 1.19 1.05 0.75 0.75 0.24 0.19 0.35 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 19.4 33.6 24.5 39.3 29.9 32.4 32.3 27.2 44.5 45.0 44.2 Progression Factor 0.89 0.94 1.03 0.80 0.72 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 292.6 0.1 88.3 23.2 7.6 7.3 0.2 0.7 1.5 0.3 Delay 17.6 324.1 25.5 119.7 44.9 40.0 39.7 27.5 45.3 46.5 44.5 Level of Service B F C F D D D C D D D Approach Delay 268.6 60.6 35.7 45.2 Approach LOS F E D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 143.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.16 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 138 1640 54 47 1391 89 31 49 18 104 32 100 Future Volume (vph) 138 1640 54 47 1391 89 31 49 18 104 32 100 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.89 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1554 2740 1471 2718 1525 1391 1385 1449 Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 130 2740 139 2718 1525 1391 1385 1449 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 144 1708 56 49 1449 93 32 51 19 108 33 104 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 15 0 0 92 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 144 1762 0 49 1538 0 32 55 0 108 45 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 62.2 56.3 50.4 50.4 9.4 7.9 13.4 11.9 Effective Green, g 62.2 56.3 50.4 50.4 9.4 7.9 13.4 11.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.56 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.08 0.13 0.12 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 248 1542 148 1369 143 109 185 172 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.64 0.02 c0.57 0.02 c0.04 c0.08 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.29 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.58 1.14 0.33 1.12 0.22 0.51 0.58 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 33.7 21.9 21.2 24.8 41.9 44.2 40.7 40.1 Progression Factor 0.38 1.05 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 65.1 1.0 65.7 0.6 2.7 3.9 0.6 Delay 13.1 88.1 22.2 90.5 42.5 46.9 44.5 40.7 Level of Service B F C F D D D D Approach Delay 82.4 88.4 45.5 42.4 Approach LOS F F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 81.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 7: Cascade Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1347 283 30 1519 0 117 Future Vol, veh/h 1347 283 30 1519 0 117 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 130 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 19 17 10 23 0 24 Mvmt Flow 1433 301 32 1616 0 124 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1736 0 - 869 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - - 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.3 - - 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 326 - 0 255 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 326 - - 255 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 31.9 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 255 - - 326 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.488 - - 0.098 - HCM Control Delay 31.9 - - 17.2 - HCM Lane LOS D - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.5 - - 0.3 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 8: Settlemier Ave/Boones Ferry Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 183 750 428 71 860 69 328 119 49 92 177 206 Future Volume (vph) 183 750 428 71 860 69 328 119 49 92 177 206 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.82 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1446 2771 1215 1484 2748 1114 1385 1483 1357 1458 1446 1022 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1446 2771 1215 1484 2748 1114 1385 1483 1357 1458 1446 1022 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 789 451 75 905 73 345 125 52 97 186 217 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 112 0 0 46 0 0 40 0 0 183 Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 789 339 75 905 27 345 125 12 97 186 34 Confl. Peds. 26 26 26 26 118 2 2 118 Heavy Vehicles 15% 20% 15% 12% 21% 22% 20% 18% 8% 14% 21% 20% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G 22.1 64.0 89.3 10.4 52.3 52.3 25.3 33.4 33.4 14.3 22.4 22.4 Effective Green, g 22.1 64.0 89.3 10.4 52.3 52.3 25.3 33.4 33.4 14.3 22.4 22.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.45 0.63 0.07 0.37 0.37 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.8 2.5 2.5 4.8 4.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 226 1256 [PHONE REDACTED] 412 248 351 321 147 229 162 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.28 0.08 0.05 c0.33 c0.25 0.08 0.07 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.20 0.02 0.01 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.85 0.63 0.44 0.69 0.89 0.07 1.39 0.36 0.04 0.66 0.81 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 57.9 29.5 13.2 63.8 41.7 28.6 57.9 44.9 41.5 61.1 57.3 51.7 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 25.2 1.3 0.3 15.2 10.2 0.1 198.9 0.5 0.0 9.2 18.8 0.5 Delay 83.2 30.8 13.5 79.0 51.9 28.8 256.8 45.3 41.5 70.2 76.2 52.2 Level of Service F C B E D C F D D E E D Approach Delay 32.4 52.2 184.7 64.6 Approach LOS C D F E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 65.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length 141.1 Sum of lost time 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.1% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 9: 5th St/Meridian Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 22 792 32 108 932 73 12 11 55 54 27 21 Future Volume (vph) 22 792 32 108 932 73 12 11 55 54 27 21 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1484 2743 1338 2710 1235 1163 1285 1450 Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 0.30 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.71 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 376 2743 417 2710 942 1163 965 1450 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 22 808 33 110 951 74 12 11 56 55 28 21 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 49 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 22 839 0 110 1022 0 12 18 0 55 31 0 Confl. Peds. 9 33 33 9 18 4 4 18 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 12% 20% 27% 24% 22% 10% 33% 50% 26% 29% 4% 22% Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 41.9 36.4 41.9 40.1 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Effective Green, g 41.9 36.4 41.9 40.1 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.56 0.65 0.62 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 5.3 2.5 5.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 273 1538 347 1674 116 143 118 178 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.31 c0.03 c0.38 0.02 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.18 0.01 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.55 0.32 0.61 0.10 0.13 0.47 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 9.0 4.6 7.6 25.3 25.3 26.5 25.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.8 0.4 1.0 0.3 0.3 2.1 0.3 Delay 4.5 9.8 5.0 8.6 25.6 25.6 28.6 25.8 Level of Service A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 9.6 8.3 25.6 27.3 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length 64.9 Sum of lost time 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 10: OR 214 & Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 53.2 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h [PHONE REDACTED] 125 59 100 Future Vol, veh/h [PHONE REDACTED] 125 59 100 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 0 0 8 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Yield - None Storage Length 130 - - 60 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 21 18 18 30 24 Mvmt Flow [PHONE REDACTED] 133 63 106 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1143 0 - 0 1911 576 Stage 1 - - - - 1143 - Stage 2 - - - - 768 - Critical Hdwy 4.6 - - - 7.4 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.45 - - - 3.8 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 491 - - - ~ 43 409 Stage 1 - - - - 214 - Stage 2 - - - - 353 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 491 - - - ~ 29 406 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 29 - Stage 1 - - - - 212 - Stage 2 - - - - 238 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.3 0 $ 772 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 491 - - - 70 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.321 - - - 2.416 HCM Control Delay 15.8 - - - $ 772 HCM Lane LOS C - - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - - - 16.3 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 11: Park Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 48.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 698 117 99 998 10 53 5 125 11 4 76 Future Vol, veh/h 17 698 117 99 998 10 53 5 125 11 4 76 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 14 14 0 4 22 0 0 0 0 22 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 90 - - 185 - - - - - - - 55 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 23 16 9 23 38 0 0 10 9 25 7 Mvmt Flow 19 767 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 58 5 137 12 4 84 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1112 0 0 910 0 0 1673 2212 462 1748 2271 580 Stage 1 - - - - - - 883 883 - 1324 1324 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 790 1329 - 424 947 - Critical Hdwy 4.28 - - 4.28 - - 7.5 6.5 7.1 7.68 7 7.04 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.68 6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.68 6 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.29 - - 2.29 - - 3.5 4 3.4 3.59 4.25 3.37 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 585 - - 702 - - 64 45 525 51 29 445 Stage 1 - - - - - - 311 367 - 155 184 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 354 226 - 560 290 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 573 - - 702 - - ~ 37 36 518 28 23 434 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 37 36 - 28 23 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 297 350 - 149 155 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 230 190 - 392 277 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1 $ 549.4 58.3 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 101 573 - - 702 - - 26 434 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.991 0.033 - - 0.155 - - 0.634 0.192 HCM Control Delay $ 549.4 11.5 - - 11.1 - - 276.2 15.3 HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 17 0.1 - - 0.5 - - 2 0.7 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 169 414 260 307 310 93 248 478 144 235 939 129 Future Volume (vph) 169 414 260 307 310 93 248 478 144 235 939 129 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1315 2906 2639 1054 1374 2939 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1315 2906 2639 1054 1374 2939 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 431 271 320 323 97 258 498 150 245 978 134 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 191 0 8 0 0 0 105 0 8 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 431 80 320 412 0 258 498 45 245 1104 0 Confl. Peds. 5 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 17% 18% 20% 24% 25% 40% 11% 26% 38% 21% 10% 19% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.7 38.5 39.3 15.5 39.3 Effective Green, g 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.7 38.5 39.3 15.5 39.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 347 285 263 308 328 781 318 163 888 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.29 c0.24 c0.31 c0.09 0.19 c0.18 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.63 1.24 0.28 1.22 1.34 0.79 0.64 0.14 1.50 1.24 Uniform Delay, d1 48.0 49.8 40.7 52.2 49.8 56.1 39.7 33.1 57.2 45.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.91 0.54 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.7 131.1 0.6 127.0 171.8 8.1 2.7 0.6 255.6 118.8 Delay 52.6 180.8 41.3 179.3 221.5 79.3 39.0 18.5 312.9 164.2 Level of Service D F D F F E D B F F Approach Delay 112.1 203.3 47.1 191.0 Approach LOS F F D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 141.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.22 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 13: Boones Ferry Rd & Crosby Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 5 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.1 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 48 45 33 45 30 9 130 13 46 242 27 Future Vol, veh/h 25 48 45 33 45 30 9 130 13 46 242 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 39 23 6 31 20 86 22 13 27 36 13 16 Mvmt Flow 27 51 48 35 48 32 10 138 14 49 257 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.6 10.4 10.3 14.2 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 6% 21% 31% 15% Vol Thru, % 86% 41% 42% 77% Vol Right, % 9% 38% 28% 9% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 152 118 108 315 LT Vol 9 25 33 46 Through Vol 130 48 45 242 RT Vol 13 45 30 27 Lane Flow Rate 162 126 115 335 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.247 0.209 0.19 0.513 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.501 5.995 5.963 5.508 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 653 599 602 660 Service Time 3.529 4.03 3.999 3.508 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.248 0.21 0.191 0.508 HCM Control Delay 10.3 10.6 10.4 14.2 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 1 0.8 0.7 2.9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 14: Front St & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 6 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.2 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 137 62 131 143 103 139 Future Vol, veh/h 137 62 131 143 103 139 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 12 28 15 19 22 24 Mvmt Flow 161 73 154 168 121 164 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.9 12.7 HCM LOS B B B Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 69% 43% Vol Thru, % 48% 0% 57% Vol Right, % 52% 31% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 274 199 242 LT Vol 0 137 103 Through Vol 131 0 139 RT Vol 143 62 0 Lane Flow Rate 322 234 285 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.446 0.365 0.436 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.983 5.617 5.516 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 725 641 655 Service Time 2.992 3.647 3.525 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.444 0.365 0.435 HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.9 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 1.7 2.2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 15: Front St & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 7 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh20.2 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 24 151 56 54 146 41 22 210 37 12 198 25 Future Vol, veh/h 24 151 56 54 146 41 22 210 37 12 198 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 25 31 16 25 18 30 13 28 54 20 9 Mvmt Flow 28 178 66 64 172 48 26 247 44 14 233 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 18.6 18.9 21.7 21.2 HCM LOS C C C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 8% 10% 22% 5% Vol Thru, % 78% 65% 61% 84% Vol Right, % 14% 24% 17% 11% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 269 231 241 235 LT Vol 22 24 54 12 Through Vol 210 151 146 198 RT Vol 37 56 41 25 Lane Flow Rate 316 272 284 276 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.628 0.543 0.558 0.587 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.149 7.195 7.083 7.644 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 500 497 505 470 Service Time 5.246 5.293 5.179 5.744 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.632 0.547 0.562 0.587 HCM Control Delay 21.7 18.6 18.9 21.2 HCM Lane LOS C C C C HCM 95th-tile Q 4.3 3.2 3.4 3.7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 16: Front St & Garfield St/Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 8 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh23.9 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 192 3 67 174 102 9 171 73 104 180 21 Future Vol, veh/h 12 192 3 67 174 102 9 171 73 104 180 21 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 20 40 38 23 14 25 15 22 19 18 24 Mvmt Flow 13 209 3 73 189 111 10 186 79 113 196 23 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 17.1 30.4 19.9 24.5 HCM LOS C D C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 4% 6% 20% 34% Vol Thru, % 68% 93% 51% 59% Vol Right, % 29% 1% 30% 7% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 253 207 343 305 LT Vol 9 12 67 104 Through Vol 171 192 174 180 RT Vol 73 3 102 21 Lane Flow Rate 275 225 373 332 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.568 0.47 0.762 0.676 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.433 7.517 7.361 7.345 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 484 479 492 491 Service Time 5.493 5.58 5.413 5.401 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.568 0.47 0.758 0.676 HCM Control Delay 19.9 17.1 30.4 24.5 HCM Lane LOS C C D C HCM 95th-tile Q 3.5 2.5 6.6 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 17: Front St & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 9 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh15.2 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 134 25 75 87 50 13 168 29 62 187 24 Future Vol, veh/h 16 134 25 75 87 50 13 168 29 62 187 24 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 14 23 13 11 28 14 43 18 50 9 21 12 Mvmt Flow 19 158 29 88 102 59 15 198 34 73 220 28 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 13.5 14.4 14.9 17 HCM LOS B B B C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 7% 0% 9% 35% 23% Vol Thru, % 93% 0% 77% 41% 68% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 14% 24% 9% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 181 29 175 212 273 LT Vol 13 0 16 75 62 Through Vol 168 0 134 87 187 RT Vol 0 29 25 50 24 Lane Flow Rate 213 34 206 249 321 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5 Degree of Util 0.437 0.059 0.374 0.442 0.56 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.384 6.199 6.532 6.374 6.279 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 488 577 550 564 578 Service Time 5.13 3.945 4.583 4.422 4.279 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.436 0.059 0.375 0.441 0.555 HCM Control Delay 15.8 9.3 13.5 14.4 17 HCM Lane LOS C A B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 2.2 0.2 1.7 2.2 3.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 18: Settlemier Ave & Parr Road/Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 10 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh44.3 Intersection LOS E Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 109 177 178 110 156 9 152 149 66 5 195 146 Future Vol, veh/h 109 177 178 110 156 9 152 149 66 5 195 146 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 49 27 21 25 37 12 14 9 21 0 21 28 Mvmt Flow 128 208 209 129 184 11 179 175 78 6 229 172 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 69.6 21.6 50.5 21.8 HCM LOS F C F C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 50% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 3% 0% Vol Thru, % 50% 0% 0% 50% 0% 95% 97% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 50% 0% 5% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 301 66 109 355 110 165 200 146 LT Vol 152 0 109 0 110 0 5 0 Through Vol 149 0 0 177 0 156 195 0 RT Vol 0 66 0 178 0 9 0 146 Lane Flow Rate 354 78 128 418 129 194 235 172 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util 0.915 0.18 0.364 1.038 0.364 0.528 0.593 0.415 Departure Headway (Hd) 9.561 8.478 10.219 8.943 10.393 10.042 9.328 8.956 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 382 426 355 409 348 361 391 405 Service Time 7.261 6.178 7.875 6.599 8.093 7.742 7.028 6.656 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.927 0.183 0.361 1.022 0.371 0.537 0.601 0.425 HCM Control Delay 58.7 13 18.6 85.2 18.9 23.4 24.7 17.9 HCM Lane LOS F B C F C C C C HCM 95th-tile Q 9.5 0.6 1.6 13.5 1.6 2.9 3.7 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 78 56 67 150 41 52 68 1086 102 73 1396 90 Future Volume (vph) 78 56 67 150 41 52 68 1086 102 73 1396 90 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1500 1227 1478 1206 1363 2666 1458 2740 Flt Permitted 0.55 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.07 1.00 0.15 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 846 1227 903 1206 107 2666 233 2740 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 60 71 160 44 55 72 1155 109 78 1485 96 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 54 0 0 42 0 5 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 143 17 0 204 13 72 1259 0 78 1578 0 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 30.3 30.3 30.3 30.3 86.2 80.1 86.2 77.0 Effective Green, g 30.3 30.3 30.3 30.3 86.2 80.1 86.2 77.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.66 0.62 0.66 0.59 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 197 285 210 [PHONE REDACTED] 211 1622 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.47 0.02 c0.58 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.01 c0.23 0.01 0.27 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.06 0.97 0.05 0.45 0.77 0.37 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 46.0 38.8 49.4 38.6 39.6 18.2 10.9 25.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.71 1.07 1.10 Incremental Delay, d2 11.8 0.1 53.6 0.0 1.1 2.5 0.1 2.9 Delay 57.8 38.8 103.1 38.7 31.5 15.4 11.7 31.0 Level of Service E D F D C B B C Approach Delay 51.5 89.4 16.3 30.0 Approach LOS D F B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 105 11 91 28 10 25 76 1114 15 16 1527 113 Future Volume (vph) 105 11 91 28 10 25 76 1114 15 16 1527 113 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1286 1419 1124 1446 2628 1289 2722 Flt Permitted 0.82 0.72 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.18 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1079 1058 1124 90 2628 239 2722 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 112 12 97 30 11 27 81 1185 16 17 1624 120 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 199 0 0 41 5 81 1200 0 17 1741 0 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 26.2 26.2 26.2 90.3 83.3 90.3 81.7 Effective Green, g 26.2 26.2 26.2 90.3 83.3 90.3 81.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.69 0.64 0.69 0.63 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 217 213 [PHONE REDACTED] 222 1710 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.46 0.00 c0.64 v/s Ratio Perm c0.18 0.04 0.00 0.33 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.19 0.02 0.53 0.71 0.08 1.02 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 43.1 41.6 19.7 15.4 14.9 24.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.55 0.80 1.32 0.66 Incremental Delay, d2 38.3 0.3 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 18.6 Delay 89.1 43.4 41.7 32.5 14.2 19.6 34.4 Level of Service F D D C B B C Approach Delay 89.1 42.7 15.3 34.3 Approach LOS F D B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.98 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 149 180 120 99 221 277 81 773 42 262 1225 137 Future Volume (vph) 149 180 120 99 221 277 81 773 42 262 1225 137 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1222 1305 1453 1293 1179 2695 1374 2767 Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.46 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 382 1305 682 1293 134 2695 378 2767 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 151 182 121 100 223 280 82 781 42 265 1237 138 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 0 65 0 3 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 151 285 0 0 323 215 82 820 0 265 1369 0 Confl. Peds. 4 4 1 2 2 1 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 36% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 41% 22% 27% 21% 18% 19% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.8 Effective Green, g 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.63 0.51 0.63 0.57 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 101 346 180 [PHONE REDACTED] 357 1570 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 0.03 0.30 0.09 c0.49 v/s Ratio Perm 0.40 c0.47 0.17 0.31 c0.38 v/c Ratio 1.50 0.82 1.79 0.63 0.55 0.60 0.74 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 47.8 44.9 47.8 42.1 15.9 22.3 28.6 24.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.34 1.36 Incremental Delay, d2 267.6 14.3 378.8 3.1 3.2 1.9 1.9 1.8 Delay 315.3 59.1 426.6 45.2 19.1 24.2 40.3 34.4 Level of Service F E F D B C D C Approach Delay 144.3 249.5 23.7 35.4 Approach LOS F F C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 82.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 2 22: OR 99E & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 2.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.7 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 78 79 76 910 1175 218 Future Vol, veh/h 78 79 76 910 1175 218 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 110 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 21 35 31 25 29 16 Mvmt Flow 85 86 83 989 1277 237 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2057 759 1515 0 - 0 Stage 1 1397 - - - - - Stage 2 660 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.22 7.6 4.72 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.22 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.22 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.71 3.65 2.51 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 38 285 319 - - - Stage 1 164 - - - - - Stage 2 428 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 16 284 319 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 86 - - - - - Stage 1 164 - - - - - Stage 2 180 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 101.1 6.2 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 319 - 86 284 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.259 - 0.986 0.302 - - HCM Control Delay 20.2 5 180 23.1 - - HCM Lane LOS C A F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 5.6 1.2 - - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 1: Butteville Rd & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 08/02/2019 Page 1 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 66.9 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 389 119 258 343 101 244 Future Vol, veh/h 389 119 258 343 101 244 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 0 - 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 96 96 96 96 96 96 Heavy Vehicles, % 15 21 18 29 31 15 Mvmt Flow 405 124 269 357 105 254 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 529 0 1362 467 Stage 1 - - - - 467 - Stage 2 - - - - 895 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.28 - 6.71 6.35 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.71 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.71 - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.362 - 3.779 3.435 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 962 - 141 570 Stage 1 - - - - 575 - Stage 2 - - - - 355 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 962 - ~ 102 570 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 102 - Stage 1 - - - - 575 - Stage 2 - - - - 256 - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 4.4 274.1 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 243 - - 962 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.479 - - 0.279 - HCM Control Delay 274.1 - - 10.2 - HCM Lane LOS F - - B - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 21 - - 1.1 - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 2: Woodland Ave & OR 219 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 33 584 1 33 593 257 3 5 79 744 2 28 Future Volume (vph) 33 584 1 33 593 257 3 5 79 744 2 28 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.86 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (prot) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1162 1490 1477 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 Satd. Flow (perm) 1614 2866 975 1250 2866 1430 1662 1162 1490 1477 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 36 635 1 36 645 279 3 5 86 809 2 30 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 1 0 0 65 0 80 0 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 36 635 0 36 645 214 3 11 0 421 419 0 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 3% 16% 50% 33% 16% 4% 0% 50% 28% 6% 20% 11% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA pm+ov Split NA Split NA Protected Phases 5 2 8 1 6 4 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G 4.7 30.4 38.1 5.3 31.0 73.3 7.7 7.7 42.3 42.3 Effective Green, g 4.7 30.4 38.1 5.3 31.0 73.3 7.7 7.7 42.3 42.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.05 0.30 0.37 0.05 0.30 0.72 0.08 0.08 0.41 0.41 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 4.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 74 852 363 64 869 1025 125 87 616 611 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 0.22 0.00 c0.03 c0.23 0.09 0.00 c0.01 0.28 c0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.00 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.75 0.00 0.56 0.74 0.21 0.02 0.13 0.68 0.69 Uniform Delay, d1 47.6 32.4 20.1 47.3 32.0 4.8 43.8 44.1 24.5 24.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.6 3.9 0.0 8.9 3.8 0.1 0.1 0.5 2.9 2.9 Delay 51.2 36.3 20.1 56.2 35.8 4.9 43.8 44.6 27.3 27.4 Level of Service D D C E D A D D C C Approach Delay 37.1 27.6 44.6 27.4 Approach LOS D C D C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.65 Actuated Cycle Length 102.2 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 3: OR 219/OR 214 & I-5 Southbound Ramp Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 2 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1091 462 0 1081 715 0 0 0 774 0 307 Future Volume (vph) 0 1091 462 0 1081 715 0 0 0 774 0 307 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1255 2842 1173 2710 1271 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1113 471 0 1103 730 0 0 0 790 0 313 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1113 471 0 1103 730 0 0 0 790 0 305 Confl. Peds. 5 2 2 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 16% 0% 17% 24% 0% 0% 0% 19% 0% 17% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Prot custom Protected Phases 2 6 4 4 5 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G 58.4 100.0 44.4 100.0 32.6 47.1 Effective Green, g 58.4 100.0 44.4 100.0 32.6 47.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 1.00 0.44 1.00 0.33 0.47 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 6.0 4.0 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1673 1255 1261 1173 883 598 v/s Ratio Prot 0.39 c0.39 c0.29 0.24 v/s Ratio Perm 0.38 c0.62 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.38 0.87 0.62 0.89 0.51 Uniform Delay, d1 14.2 0.0 25.3 0.0 32.1 18.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.10 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 2.1 0.9 3.7 1.0 11.5 0.5 Delay 16.3 0.9 31.5 1.0 43.5 18.9 Level of Service B A C A D B Approach Delay 11.7 19.4 0.0 36.5 Approach LOS B B A D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.88 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 13.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 4: I-5 Northbound Ramp & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1642 248 0 1398 472 385 0 692 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1642 248 0 1398 472 385 0 692 0 0 0 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.91 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.99 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.87 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1106 1132 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 2866 1234 2725 1212 1350 1106 1132 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1710 258 0 1456 492 401 0 721 0 0 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1710 258 0 1456 492 361 376 365 0 0 0 Confl. Peds. 4 3 3 4 2 2 Heavy Vehicles 0% 16% 18% 0% 22% 20% 17% 0% 23% 0% 0% 0% Turn Type NA Free NA Free Perm NA Perm Protected Phases 2 6 8 Permitted Phases Free Free 8 8 Actuated Green, G 56.1 100.0 56.1 100.0 34.9 34.9 34.9 Effective Green, g 56.1 100.0 56.1 100.0 34.9 34.9 34.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 1.00 0.56 1.00 0.35 0.35 0.35 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 4.0 6.0 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1607 1234 1528 1212 471 385 395 v/s Ratio Prot c0.60 0.53 v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 0.41 0.27 0.34 0.32 v/c Ratio 1.06 0.21 0.95 0.41 0.77 0.98 0.92 Uniform Delay, d1 21.9 0.0 20.7 0.0 28.9 32.1 31.3 Progression Factor 1.38 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 38.5 0.3 8.7 0.5 7.0 39.0 26.8 Delay 68.8 0.3 28.4 0.5 35.9 71.2 58.1 Level of Service E A C A D E E Approach Delay 59.8 21.4 55.5 0.0 Approach LOS E C E A Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 44.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.03 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 9.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 5: Evergreen Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 84 1468 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 556 24 290 17 36 72 Future Volume (vph) 84 1468 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 556 24 290 17 36 72 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1363 2842 1316 1409 2836 1373 1389 1262 1511 1651 1096 Flt Permitted 0.10 1.00 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.95 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 143 2842 1316 182 2836 1373 1389 1262 1511 1651 1096 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 0.97 Adj. Flow (vph) 87 1513 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 573 25 299 18 37 74 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 160 0 1 0 0 0 213 0 0 69 Lane Group Flow (vph) 87 1513 [PHONE REDACTED] 0 298 300 86 18 37 5 Confl. Peds. 3 3 1 4 4 1 Heavy Vehicles 22% 17% 13% 18% 17% 23% 15% 8% 16% 10% 6% 34% Turn Type D.P+P NA Perm D.P+P NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 47.4 32.6 32.6 47.4 40.0 28.8 28.8 28.8 6.3 6.3 6.3 Effective Green, g 47.4 32.6 32.6 47.4 40.0 28.8 28.8 28.8 6.3 6.3 6.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.47 0.33 0.33 0.47 0.40 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.06 0.06 0.06 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 158 926 [PHONE REDACTED] 395 400 363 95 104 69 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.53 c0.18 0.42 c0.22 0.22 0.01 c0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.22 0.08 0.40 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.55 1.63 0.24 1.22 1.05 0.75 0.75 0.24 0.19 0.36 0.07 Uniform Delay, d1 19.4 33.7 24.7 39.2 30.0 32.4 32.3 27.2 44.4 44.9 44.1 Progression Factor 0.89 0.94 1.04 0.81 0.73 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 285.7 0.1 102.7 24.7 7.6 7.3 0.2 0.7 1.5 0.3 Delay 17.7 317.5 25.8 134.3 46.6 40.0 39.7 27.5 45.1 46.4 44.4 Level of Service B F C F D D D C D D D Approach Delay 262.2 65.4 35.7 45.1 Approach LOS F E D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 142.0 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.15 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 6: Oregon Way/Country Club Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 5 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 143 1618 48 38 1391 85 33 49 17 102 28 108 Future Volume (vph) 143 1618 48 38 1391 85 33 49 17 102 28 108 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.88 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1554 2743 1471 2719 1525 1393 1385 1440 Flt Permitted 0.08 1.00 0.09 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 131 2743 136 2719 1525 1393 1385 1440 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 149 1685 50 40 1449 89 34 51 18 106 29 112 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 4 0 0 14 0 0 100 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 1733 0 40 1534 0 34 55 0 106 42 0 Confl. Peds. 2 1 1 2 Heavy Vehicles 7% 20% 42% 13% 22% 6% 9% 21% 20% 20% 7% 7% Turn Type D.P+P NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 6 6 Actuated Green, G 62.3 57.9 49.8 49.8 9.4 7.9 13.3 11.8 Effective Green, g 62.3 57.9 49.8 49.8 9.4 7.9 13.3 11.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.58 0.50 0.50 0.09 0.08 0.13 0.12 Clearance Time 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 6.2 2.5 6.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 259 1588 126 1354 143 110 184 169 v/s Ratio Prot 0.07 c0.63 0.01 c0.56 0.02 c0.04 c0.08 0.03 v/s Ratio Perm 0.29 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.58 1.09 0.32 1.13 0.24 0.50 0.58 0.25 Uniform Delay, d1 33.5 21.1 21.7 25.1 42.0 44.2 40.7 40.1 Progression Factor 0.38 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 42.4 1.1 69.7 0.6 2.6 3.5 0.6 Delay 12.9 65.7 22.8 94.8 42.6 46.8 44.3 40.6 Level of Service B E C F D D D D Approach Delay 61.5 93.0 45.4 42.2 Approach LOS E F D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 72.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length 100.0 Sum of lost time 16.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 7: Cascade Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 1337 274 29 1501 0 117 Future Vol, veh/h 1337 274 29 1501 0 117 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 2 2 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - - 130 - - 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 19 17 10 23 0 24 Mvmt Flow 1422 291 31 1597 0 124 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 1716 0 - 859 Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy - - 4.3 - - 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.3 - - 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 332 - 0 259 Stage 1 - - - - 0 - Stage 2 - - - - 0 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 332 - - 259 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - Stage 1 - - - - - - Stage 2 - - - - - - Approach EB WB NB HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.3 31.1 HCM LOS D Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT Capacity (veh/h) 259 - - 332 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.481 - - 0.093 - HCM Control Delay 31.1 - - 17 - HCM Lane LOS D - - C - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 2.4 - - 0.3 - ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 8: Settlemier Ave/Boones Ferry Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 181 749 421 72 858 70 324 119 49 93 176 201 Future Volume (vph) 181 749 421 72 858 70 324 119 49 93 176 201 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.83 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1446 2771 1217 1484 2748 1115 1385 1483 1357 1458 1446 1025 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1446 2771 1217 1484 2748 1115 1385 1483 1357 1458 1446 1025 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow (vph) 191 788 443 76 903 74 341 125 52 98 185 212 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 117 0 0 47 0 0 40 0 0 178 Lane Group Flow (vph) 191 788 326 76 903 27 341 125 12 98 185 34 Confl. Peds. 26 26 26 26 118 2 2 118 Heavy Vehicles 15% 20% 15% 12% 21% 22% 20% 18% 8% 14% 21% 20% Turn Type Prot NA pm+ov Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 5 2 3 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 4 Actuated Green, G 22.0 60.6 86.0 12.2 50.8 50.8 25.4 33.3 33.3 14.4 22.3 22.3 Effective Green, g 22.0 60.6 86.0 12.2 50.8 50.8 25.4 33.3 33.3 14.4 22.3 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.43 0.62 0.09 0.36 0.36 0.18 0.24 0.24 0.10 0.16 0.16 Clearance Time 4.5 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 4.8 2.5 2.5 4.8 4.8 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 228 1203 [PHONE REDACTED] 406 252 354 323 150 231 163 v/s Ratio Prot c0.13 0.28 0.08 0.05 c0.33 c0.25 0.08 0.07 c0.13 v/s Ratio Perm 0.19 0.02 0.01 0.03 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.66 0.43 0.59 0.90 0.07 1.35 0.35 0.04 0.65 0.80 0.21 Uniform Delay, d1 57.0 31.2 14.0 61.2 42.0 28.9 57.0 44.1 40.8 60.1 56.5 50.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 22.3 1.7 0.3 5.6 11.8 0.1 182.7 0.4 0.0 8.8 17.3 0.5 Delay 79.3 32.9 14.3 66.8 53.8 29.0 239.8 44.6 40.8 68.9 73.8 51.4 Level of Service E C B E D C F D D E E D Approach Delay 33.3 53.0 172.7 63.2 Approach LOS C D F E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length 139.5 Sum of lost time 19.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 9: 5th St/Meridian Dr & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 7 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 21 794 32 108 933 71 12 10 55 55 27 21 Future Volume (vph) 21 794 32 108 933 71 12 10 55 55 27 21 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.94 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1484 2743 1338 2710 1235 1163 1285 1450 Flt Permitted 0.24 1.00 0.29 1.00 0.73 1.00 0.71 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 376 2743 415 2710 942 1163 966 1450 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 0.98 Adj. Flow (vph) 21 810 33 110 952 72 12 10 56 56 28 21 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 49 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 21 841 0 110 1021 0 12 17 0 56 31 0 Confl. Peds. 9 33 33 9 18 4 4 18 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 12% 20% 27% 24% 22% 10% 33% 50% 26% 29% 4% 22% Turn Type D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Perm NA Perm NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 4 Actuated Green, G 42.0 36.5 42.0 40.2 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Effective Green, g 42.0 36.5 42.0 40.2 8.1 8.1 8.1 8.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.56 0.65 0.62 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Clearance Time 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Vehicle Extension 2.5 5.3 2.5 5.3 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 273 1537 345 1673 117 144 120 180 v/s Ratio Prot 0.00 0.31 c0.03 c0.38 0.01 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.05 0.18 0.01 c0.06 v/c Ratio 0.08 0.55 0.32 0.61 0.10 0.12 0.47 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 4.4 9.1 4.7 7.6 25.3 25.3 26.5 25.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.8 0.4 1.0 0.3 0.3 2.1 0.3 Delay 4.5 9.8 5.0 8.7 25.6 25.6 28.6 25.8 Level of Service A A A A C C C C Approach Delay 9.7 8.3 25.6 27.3 Approach LOS A A C C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 10.4 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.59 Actuated Cycle Length 65.1 Sum of lost time 15.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 10: OR 214 & Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 52.5 Movement EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h [PHONE REDACTED] 124 58 100 Future Vol, veh/h [PHONE REDACTED] 124 58 100 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 8 0 0 8 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - Yield - None Storage Length 130 - - 60 0 - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 0 - 0 - Grade, % - 0 0 - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 94 94 94 94 94 94 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 21 18 18 30 24 Mvmt Flow [PHONE REDACTED] 132 62 106 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1144 0 - 0 1915 576 Stage 1 - - - - 1144 - Stage 2 - - - - 771 - Critical Hdwy 4.6 - - - 7.4 7.38 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 6.4 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 6.4 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.45 - - - 3.8 3.54 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 490 - - - ~ 43 409 Stage 1 - - - - 214 - Stage 2 - - - - 352 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 490 - - - ~ 29 406 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - ~ 29 - Stage 1 - - - - 212 - Stage 2 - - - - 235 - Approach EB WB SB HCM Control Delay, s 2.4 0 $ 765.4 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt EBL EBT WBT WBR SBLn1 Capacity (veh/h) 490 - - - 70 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.326 - - - 2.401 HCM Control Delay 15.9 - - 765.4 HCM Lane LOS C - - - F HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.4 - - - 16.2 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 11: Park Rd & OR 214 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 48.3 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 698 115 98 1000 10 53 5 125 11 4 76 Future Vol, veh/h 17 698 115 98 1000 10 53 5 125 11 4 76 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 0 14 14 0 4 22 0 0 0 0 22 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 90 - - 185 - - - - - - - 55 Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 91 Heavy Vehicles, % 9 23 16 9 23 38 0 0 10 9 25 7 Mvmt Flow 19 767 [PHONE REDACTED] 11 58 5 137 12 4 84 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1114 0 0 907 0 0 1671 2211 461 1748 2269 581 Stage 1 - - - - - - 882 882 - 1324 1324 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 789 1329 - 424 945 - Critical Hdwy 4.28 - - 4.28 - - 7.5 6.5 7.1 7.68 7 7.04 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.68 6 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.68 6 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.29 - - 2.29 - - 3.5 4 3.4 3.59 4.25 3.37 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 584 - - 704 - - 64 45 526 51 30 445 Stage 1 - - - - - - 312 367 - 155 184 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 354 226 - 560 291 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 572 - - 704 - - ~ 37 36 519 28 24 434 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - - - ~ 37 36 - 28 24 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 298 350 - 149 155 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 230 191 - 392 278 - Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 0.2 1 $ 549.4 55.8 HCM LOS F F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SBLn1 SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 101 572 - - 704 - - 27 434 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 1.991 0.033 - - 0.153 - - 0.611 0.192 HCM Control Delay $ 549.4 11.5 - - 11 - - 261.2 15.3 HCM Lane LOS F B - - B - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 17 0.1 - - 0.5 - - 1.9 0.7 Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 12: OR 99E & OR 214/OR 211 Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 8 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 169 414 260 307 310 93 248 478 144 235 939 129 Future Volume (vph) 169 414 260 307 310 93 248 478 144 235 939 129 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1315 2906 2639 1054 1374 2939 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1421 1483 1218 1341 1315 2906 2639 1054 1374 2939 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Adj. Flow (vph) 176 431 271 320 323 97 258 498 150 245 978 134 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 191 0 8 0 0 0 105 0 8 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 176 431 80 320 412 0 258 498 45 245 1104 0 Confl. Peds. 5 5 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 17% 18% 20% 24% 25% 40% 11% 26% 38% 21% 10% 19% Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA custom Prot NA Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 2 Actuated Green, G 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.7 38.5 39.3 15.5 39.3 Effective Green, g 25.5 30.5 30.5 25.5 30.5 14.7 38.5 39.3 15.5 39.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.23 0.11 0.30 0.30 0.12 0.30 Clearance Time 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 5.5 Vehicle Extension 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.5 3.0 5.2 5.2 3.0 5.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 278 347 285 263 308 328 781 318 163 888 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 0.29 c0.24 c0.31 c0.09 0.19 c0.18 c0.38 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.04 v/c Ratio 0.63 1.24 0.28 1.22 1.34 0.79 0.64 0.14 1.50 1.24 Uniform Delay, d1 48.0 49.8 40.7 52.2 49.8 56.1 39.7 33.1 57.2 45.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.27 0.92 0.54 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.7 131.1 0.6 127.0 171.8 8.1 2.7 0.6 255.6 118.8 Delay 52.6 180.8 41.3 179.3 221.5 79.2 39.0 18.5 312.9 164.2 Level of Service D F D F F E D B F F Approach Delay 112.1 203.3 47.1 191.0 Approach LOS F F D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 141.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.22 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 20.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 13: Boones Ferry Rd & Crosby Rd Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 5 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 12 Intersection LOS B Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 46 42 32 43 32 9 128 12 47 241 27 Future Vol, veh/h 25 46 42 32 43 32 9 128 12 47 241 27 Peak Hour Factor 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Heavy Vehicles, % 39 23 6 31 20 86 22 13 27 36 13 16 Mvmt Flow 27 49 45 34 46 34 10 136 13 50 256 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 10.5 10.3 10.2 14 HCM LOS B B B B Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 6% 22% 30% 15% Vol Thru, % 86% 41% 40% 77% Vol Right, % 8% 37% 30% 9% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 149 113 107 315 LT Vol 9 25 32 47 Through Vol 128 46 43 241 RT Vol 12 42 32 27 Lane Flow Rate 159 120 114 335 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.241 0.2 0.187 0.51 Departure Headway (Hd) 5.478 5.986 5.923 5.479 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 656 600 606 664 Service Time 3.504 4.018 3.956 3.479 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.242 0.2 0.188 0.505 HCM Control Delay 10.2 10.5 10.3 14 HCM Lane LOS B B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 0.9 0.7 0.7 2.9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 14: Front St & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 6 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh12.1 Intersection LOS B Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 134 61 132 143 103 139 Future Vol, veh/h 134 61 132 143 103 139 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 12 28 15 19 22 24 Mvmt Flow 158 72 155 168 121 164 Number of Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 Approach WB NB SB Opposing Approach SB NB Opposing Lanes 0 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left NB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 0 1 Conflicting Approach WB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 0 HCM Control Delay 11.8 11.9 12.7 HCM LOS B B B Lane NBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 0% 69% 43% Vol Thru, % 48% 0% 57% Vol Right, % 52% 31% 0% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 275 195 242 LT Vol 0 134 103 Through Vol 132 0 139 RT Vol 143 61 0 Lane Flow Rate 324 229 285 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.446 0.358 0.435 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.968 5.614 5.501 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Cap 728 642 658 Service Time 2.977 3.644 3.51 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.445 0.357 0.433 HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.8 12.7 HCM Lane LOS B B B HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 1.6 2.2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 15: Front St & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 7 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh19.1 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 23 149 47 52 145 46 20 206 37 14 191 25 Future Vol, veh/h 23 149 47 52 145 46 20 206 37 14 191 25 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 25 25 31 16 25 18 30 13 28 54 20 9 Mvmt Flow 27 175 55 61 171 54 24 242 44 16 225 29 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 17.4 18.3 20.4 20.1 HCM LOS C C C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 8% 11% 21% 6% Vol Thru, % 78% 68% 60% 83% Vol Right, % 14% 21% 19% 11% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 263 219 243 230 LT Vol 20 23 52 14 Through Vol 206 149 145 191 RT Vol 37 47 46 25 Lane Flow Rate 309 258 286 271 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.605 0.509 0.55 0.566 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.036 7.116 6.931 7.528 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 511 502 517 476 Service Time 5.119 5.204 5.016 5.616 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.605 0.514 0.553 0.569 HCM Control Delay 20.4 17.4 18.3 20.1 HCM Lane LOS C C C C HCM 95th-tile Q 4 2.8 3.3 3.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 16: Front St & Garfield St/Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 8 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh23.5 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 200 4 70 178 97 10 171 73 93 175 20 Future Vol, veh/h 13 200 4 70 178 97 10 171 73 93 175 20 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Heavy Vehicles, % 10 20 40 38 23 14 25 15 22 19 18 24 Mvmt Flow 14 217 4 76 193 105 11 186 79 101 190 22 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 17.4 30.5 19.9 22.8 HCM LOS C D C C Lane NBLn1 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 4% 6% 20% 32% Vol Thru, % 67% 92% 52% 61% Vol Right, % 29% 2% 28% 7% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 254 217 345 288 LT Vol 10 13 70 93 Through Vol 171 200 178 175 RT Vol 73 4 97 20 Lane Flow Rate 276 236 375 313 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util 0.569 0.488 0.764 0.642 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.418 7.442 7.334 7.382 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 486 484 491 488 Service Time 5.479 5.505 5.388 5.44 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.568 0.488 0.764 0.641 HCM Control Delay 19.9 17.4 30.5 22.8 HCM Lane LOS C C D C HCM 95th-tile Q 3.5 2.6 6.6 4.5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 17: Front St & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 9 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh15.3 Intersection LOS C Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17 140 27 71 92 45 16 171 29 59 186 26 Future Vol, veh/h 17 140 27 71 92 45 16 171 29 59 186 26 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 14 23 13 11 28 14 43 18 50 9 21 12 Mvmt Flow 20 165 32 84 108 53 19 201 34 69 219 31 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1 1 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 13.8 14.4 15.3 17 HCM LOS B B C C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1WBLn1 SBLn1 Vol Left, % 9% 0% 9% 34% 22% Vol Thru, % 91% 0% 76% 44% 69% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 15% 22% 10% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 187 29 184 208 271 LT Vol 16 0 17 71 59 Through Vol 171 0 140 92 186 RT Vol 0 29 27 45 26 Lane Flow Rate 220 34 216 245 319 Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5 Degree of Util 0.454 0.059 0.394 0.438 0.557 Departure Headway (Hd) 7.423 6.231 6.554 6.444 6.286 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 486 574 548 558 574 Service Time 5.167 3.975 4.601 4.488 4.327 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.453 0.059 0.394 0.439 0.556 HCM Control Delay 16.2 9.4 13.8 14.4 17 HCM Lane LOS C A B B C HCM 95th-tile Q 2.3 0.2 1.9 2.2 3.4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 18: Settlemier Ave & Parr Road/Front St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 10 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh32.1 Intersection LOS D Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 105 172 144 105 159 10 136 149 66 5 173 139 Future Vol, veh/h 105 172 144 105 159 10 136 149 66 5 173 139 Peak Hour Factor 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Heavy Vehicles, % 49 27 21 25 37 12 14 9 21 0 21 28 Mvmt Flow 124 202 169 124 187 12 160 175 78 6 204 164 Number of Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 Approach EB WB NB SB Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Approach SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 2 2 2 2 HCM Control Delay 42.6 20.7 40.1 19.1 HCM LOS E C E C Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 EBLn2WBLn1WBLn2 SBLn1 SBLn2 Vol Left, % 48% 0% 100% 0% 100% 0% 3% 0% Vol Thru, % 52% 0% 0% 54% 0% 94% 97% 0% Vol Right, % 0% 100% 0% 46% 0% 6% 0% 100% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 285 66 105 316 105 169 178 139 LT Vol 136 0 105 0 105 0 5 0 Through Vol 149 0 0 172 0 159 173 0 RT Vol 0 66 0 144 0 10 0 139 Lane Flow Rate 335 78 124 372 124 199 209 164 Geometry Grp 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Degree of Util 0.851 0.174 0.339 0.892 0.34 0.527 0.519 0.389 Departure Headway (Hd) 9.142 8.079 9.874 8.635 9.9 9.548 8.927 8.554 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 396 444 364 420 363 378 404 420 Service Time 6.891 5.826 7.622 6.383 7.654 7.302 6.679 6.306 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.846 0.176 0.341 0.886 0.342 0.526 0.517 0.39 HCM Control Delay 46.5 12.5 17.6 50.9 17.7 22.5 21 16.7 HCM Lane LOS E B C F C C C C HCM 95th-tile Q 8.1 0.6 1.5 9.3 1.5 2.9 2.9 1.8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 19: OR 99E & Hardcastle Ave Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 9 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 78 55 67 150 41 52 68 1087 102 73 1396 90 Future Volume (vph) 78 55 67 150 41 52 68 1087 102 73 1396 90 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.97 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1499 1227 1478 1206 1363 2666 1458 2740 Flt Permitted 0.54 1.00 0.59 1.00 0.08 1.00 0.15 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 839 1227 905 1206 108 2666 234 2740 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 83 59 71 160 44 55 72 1156 109 78 1485 96 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 55 0 0 42 0 5 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 142 16 0 204 13 72 1260 0 78 1578 0 Confl. Peds. 6 6 6 6 3 3 3 3 Heavy Vehicles 16% 9% 19% 13% 15% 21% 22% 23% 21% 14% 20% 21% Turn Type Perm NA Perm Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 30.1 30.1 30.1 30.1 86.4 80.3 86.4 77.2 Effective Green, g 30.1 30.1 30.1 30.1 86.4 80.3 86.4 77.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.66 0.62 0.66 0.59 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 194 284 209 [PHONE REDACTED] 212 1627 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.47 0.02 c0.58 v/s Ratio Perm 0.17 0.01 c0.23 0.01 0.27 0.23 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.06 0.98 0.05 0.45 0.77 0.37 0.97 Uniform Delay, d1 46.2 38.9 49.6 38.8 39.4 18.0 10.8 25.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.70 1.07 1.10 Incremental Delay, d2 12.6 0.1 54.9 0.0 1.0 2.5 0.1 2.7 Delay 58.8 39.0 104.5 38.8 31.3 15.2 11.6 30.5 Level of Service E D F D C B B C Approach Delay 52.2 90.5 16.0 29.6 Approach LOS D F B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.97 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 80.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 20: OR 99E & Lincoln St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 10 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 106 11 93 28 10 25 77 1115 15 16 1528 112 Future Volume (vph) 106 11 93 28 10 25 77 1115 15 16 1528 112 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.98 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1286 1419 1124 1446 2628 1289 2722 Flt Permitted 0.82 0.72 1.00 0.06 1.00 0.18 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1080 1056 1124 89 2628 238 2722 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 113 12 99 30 11 27 82 1186 16 17 1626 119 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 22 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 0 3 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 202 0 0 41 5 82 1201 0 17 1742 0 Confl. Peds. 10 10 6 6 6 6 Confl. Bikes 1 1 Heavy Vehicles 19% 50% 25% 5% 57% 29% 15% 26% 40% 29% 21% 15% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 8 4 1 6 5 2 Permitted Phases 8 4 4 2 6 Actuated Green, G 26.4 26.4 26.4 90.1 83.1 90.1 81.4 Effective Green, g 26.4 26.4 26.4 90.1 83.1 90.1 81.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.69 0.64 0.69 0.63 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 219 214 [PHONE REDACTED] 221 1704 v/s Ratio Prot 0.04 c0.46 0.00 c0.64 v/s Ratio Perm c0.19 0.04 0.00 0.34 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.19 0.02 0.54 0.72 0.08 1.02 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 43.0 41.5 20.1 15.6 15.0 24.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.54 0.80 1.32 0.65 Incremental Delay, d2 39.5 0.3 0.0 2.0 1.9 0.0 19.9 Delay 90.3 43.3 41.5 33.0 14.4 19.8 35.8 Level of Service F D D C B B D Approach Delay 90.3 42.6 15.6 35.6 Approach LOS F D B D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 31.7 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 21: OR 99E & Young St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2000 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 11 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) 151 179 118 98 221 279 80 771 41 264 1225 139 Future Volume (vph) 151 179 118 98 221 279 80 771 41 264 1225 139 Ideal Flow 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 1750 Total Lost time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frpb, ped/bikes 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Flpb, ped/bikes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1222 1306 1454 1293 1179 2696 1374 2766 Flt Permitted 0.30 1.00 0.47 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.26 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 384 1306 694 1293 134 2696 380 2766 Peak-hour factor, PHF 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 Adj. Flow (vph) 153 181 119 99 223 282 81 779 41 267 1237 140 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 18 0 0 0 65 0 3 0 0 6 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 282 0 0 322 217 81 817 0 267 1371 0 Confl. Peds. 4 4 1 2 2 1 Confl. Bikes 1 Heavy Vehicles 36% 22% 30% 33% 12% 15% 41% 22% 27% 21% 18% 19% Turn Type Perm NA Perm NA Perm D.P+P NA D.P+P NA Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 6 2 Actuated Green, G 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.9 Effective Green, g 34.5 34.5 34.5 34.5 82.0 66.5 82.0 73.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.27 0.63 0.51 0.63 0.57 Clearance Time 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 Vehicle Extension 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 4.6 2.5 4.6 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 101 346 184 [PHONE REDACTED] 358 1572 v/s Ratio Prot 0.22 0.03 0.30 0.09 c0.50 v/s Ratio Perm 0.40 c0.46 0.17 0.31 c0.38 v/c Ratio 1.51 0.81 1.75 0.63 0.54 0.59 0.75 0.87 Uniform Delay, d1 47.8 44.7 47.8 42.2 15.9 22.3 28.5 24.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.35 1.36 Incremental Delay, d2 275.7 13.3 359.0 3.3 3.2 1.9 1.9 1.7 Delay 323.5 58.1 406.7 45.5 19.1 24.1 40.3 34.4 Level of Service F E F D B C D C Approach Delay 147.7 238.1 23.7 35.3 Approach LOS F F C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 80.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service F HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.14 Actuated Cycle Length 130.0 Sum of lost time 13.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn TSP Update Future Year 2040 Conditions - Scenario 3 22: OR 99E & Cleveland St Weekday PM Peak Hour H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP scenario 3.syn 9 Report; HCM 2010 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. 01/10/2019 Page 11 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 8.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 78 79 75 907 1173 217 Future Vol, veh/h 78 79 75 907 1173 217 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 1 1 0 0 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 110 0 - - - - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 21 35 31 25 29 16 Mvmt Flow 85 86 82 986 1275 236 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 2050 757 1512 0 - 0 Stage 1 1394 - - - - - Stage 2 656 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 7.22 7.6 4.72 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.22 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.22 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.71 3.65 2.51 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 38 286 320 - - - Stage 1 164 - - - - - Stage 2 430 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver ~ 16 285 320 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 87 - - - - - Stage 1 164 - - - - - Stage 2 186 - - - - - Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 98.8 6.1 0 HCM LOS F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT EBLn1 EBLn2 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 320 - 87 285 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.255 - 0.975 0.301 - - HCM Control Delay 20.1 4.9 175.5 23 - - HCM Lane LOS C A F C - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1 - 5.5 1.2 - - Notes Volume exceeds capacity Delay exceeds 300s Computation Not Defined All major volume in platoon ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document n/a Major Arterials OR 219/OR 214 from Willow Avenue to Progress Way Widen roadway and widen bike lanes Y Y Y Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Current TSP Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y OR 214 from Progress Way to OR 99E Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Current TSP Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y OR 99E from northern UGB to Lincoln Street Widen roadway and widen bike lanes Y Y Y Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $ Highway 99E Corridor Plan Widen roadway and install bike lanes Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Minor Arterials OR 219 from western UGB to Butteville Road Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to southern UGB Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Evergreen Road from OR 214 to Hayes Street Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ BLTS Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Boones Ferry Road/Settlemier Avenue from Hazelnut Drive to Harrison Street Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ BLTS Reduce lane width and widen bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and widen bike lanes Y Y Y Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Settlemier Avenue from Harrison Street to railroad tracks Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Current TSP Boones Ferry Road from Dahlia Street to southern UGB Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Front Street Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ Current TSP Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Garfield Street from 3rd Street to Front Street Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Downtown Development Plan Garfield Street from Smith Drive to 3rd Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Young Street Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $  Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y OR 211 Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ BLTS Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes Y Y Y Service Collectors Bicycle System Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution Air System ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution Arney Road from Robin Avenue to OR 219 Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Stacy Allison Way from Evergreen Road to Center Street Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Current TSP Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y Enhance the parallel route of Harvard Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen Road. Install buffered bike lanes on both sides of the roadway Y Y Y  Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Cascade Drive Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $  Current TSP Hayes Street from Cascade Drive to Settlemier Avenue Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary Reduce lane width and install bike lanes N N Y $ Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Lincoln Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Cleveland Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Hardcastle Avenue Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Current TSP Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y Brown Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y Cooley Road from OR 211 to Aubrey Way Widen roadway and install bike lanes Y Y Y  Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ BLTS Cooley Road from Aubrey Way to Hardcastle Avenue Install bike lane striping N N Y $  Perform an engineering study to consider reduction of the posted speed limit N N Y $ Access Streets Stubb Road Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Astor Way Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Tukwila Drive from Boones Ferry Road to Hazelnut Drive Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  5th Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Current TSP Gatch Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Park Avenue Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Local Streets Evergreen Road from Country Club Court to OR 214 Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Country Club Road from Evergreen Road to Astor Way Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Cascade Drive Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Smith Drive from Hayes Street to Garfield Street Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Meridian Drive Install shared lane markings and signs N N Y $  Current TSP n/a Major Arterials OR 219 from Butteville Road to Woodland Avenue Install new sidewalks N N Y  Install new sidewalks with landscaping Y Y Y OR 99E from northern UGB to Lincoln Street Evaluate light levels and install street lighting N N Y $  OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary Install new sidewalks N N Y  Install new sidewalks with landscaping Y Y Y OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB Install new sidewalks N N Y  Install new sidewalks with landscaping Y Y Y Minor Arterials Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to southern UGB Install new sidewalks N N Y $  Install new sidewalks with landscaping N N Y Evergreen Road Fill in the gaps N N Y  Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Install new sidewalks on one side N N Y $  Settlemier Avenue from Oak Street to Parr Road Install new sidewalks on one side N N Y $  Marine System Pedestrian System ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution Boones Ferry Road from Parr Road to southern UGB Install new sidewalks N N Y $  Front Street from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Install new sidewalks on one side N N Y $  Young Street Fill in the gaps N N Y $  OR 211 Install new sidewalks N N Y  Install new sidewalks with landscaping Y Y Y Service Collectors Hayes Street Fill in the gaps N N Y  Parr Road Install new sidewalks N N Y  Install new sidewalks with landscaping Y Y Y Lincoln Street Fill in the gaps N N Y  Industrial Avenue Install new sidewalks N N Y $  Progress Way Install new sidewalks N N Y  Hardcastle Avenue Fill in the gaps N N Y  Brown Street Fill in the gaps N N Y  Cooley Road Fill in the gaps N N Y  Evaluate light levels and install street lighting N N Y $ Access Streets Woodland Avenue from Jory Street to Arney Road Install new sidewalks on one side N N Y $  Stubb Road Install new sidewalks N N Y $  Oregon Way from Country Club Road to OR 214 Install new sidewalks N N Y  Hazelnut Drive from Graystone Drive to Front Street Fill in the gaps N N Y  Gatch Street Fill in the gaps N N Y $  Park Avenue from Hardcastle Avenue to Lincoln Street Install new sidewalks on one side N N Y $  Local Streets Willow Avenue from McNaught Road to OR 219 Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides Y Y Y  Cascade Drive Install new sidewalks N N Y $  Leasure Street Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides Y Y Y  Church Street from Leasure Street to Settlemier Avenue Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides Y Y Y  Garfield Street from Smith Drive to Settlemier Avenue Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides Y Y Y  Smith Drive from Hayes Street to Garfield Street Install new sidewalks on one side N N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides N Y Y  Ben Brown Lane Fill in the gaps Y N Y $  Oak Street Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $  Ogle Street Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides Y Y Y  Stark Street Install new sidewalks on one side Y N Y $ Install new sidewalks on both sides Y Y Y  Intersections Front Street/Young Street Construct ADA-complaint ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection N Y Y $  Downtown Development Plan Front Street/Lincoln Street Construct ADA-complaint ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection N Y Y $  Downtown Development Plan Cascade Drive/Hayes Street Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing N N Y $  Park Avenue/Legion Park Driveway Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing N N Y $  Hazelnut Drive/Broadmoor Place Accessway Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing N N Y $  OR 99E from OR 214 to Young Street Install enhanced pedestrian crossings along OR 99E at every major intersection between OR 214 and Young Street N N Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan OR 99E Install countdown pedestrian timers and construct ADA enhancements at all signalized intersections along OR 99E N Y Y $  Highway 99E Corridor Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution OR 99E from Arlington Street to Nelson Lane Install curb extensions along OR 99E at every major intersection between Arlington Street and Nelson Lane (up to 15 locations). Potential locations include: o Alexandria Avenue o James Street o Williams Street o Blaine Street o Aztec Drive o Laurel Avenue o Tomlin Avenue N Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Multi-Use Pathways Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to southern UGB Widen roadway and install widen shoulders Y Y Y Marion County TSP (Figure 9-1) Mill Creek corridor Construct the Mill Creek Greenway Y Y Y  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek corridor Mill Creek Greenway – Northern tributary Y Y Y  Mill Creek corridor Mill Creek Greenway – Western tributary Y Y Y  Mill Creek corridor Evergreen Road extension south to planned Mill Creek Greenway Y Y Y  Mill Creek corridor North-south connection on Hardcastle Avenue and Lincoln Street west of Washington Elementary School Y Y Y  Mill Creek corridor Extend Mill Creek corridor off-street pathway to Belle Passi Road Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Safe Routes to School See Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Off-street Improvements June Way Accessway to OR 99E (near the Audrey Way intersection) Accessway Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Johnson Street Accessway to OR 99E Accessway Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Elm Street Accessway to OR 99E Accessway Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Wilson Street Accessway to OR 99E Accessway Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Hawley Street Accessway to OR 99E Accessway (possibly part of future street extension) Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan A Street Accessway to Cleveland Street Accessway Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Young Street At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Downtown Development Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Hazelnut Drive At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Bulldog Drive - East At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at OR 214 At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Hardcastle Avenue At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Lincoln Street At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Cleveland Street and railroad tracks At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Ben Brown Lane At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Settlemier Avenue At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Parr Road At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Front Street and railroad tracks At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Bulldog Drive - West At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Meridian Drive At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan Mill Creek Greenway crossing at Boones Ferry Road At-grade mid-block crossing treatment Y Y Y $  Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan n/a Front Street Establish a downtown Amtrak passenger rail stop along Front Street in downtown Woodburn, potentially as a public- private partnership at the property adjacent to Locomotive Park Y Y Y  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Front Street and Cleveland Street Investigate the opportunity to remove private grade railroad crossings by providing alternative access to parcels as development and redevelopment occurs Y Y Y $  Current TSP Pipeline System Rail System ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution Butteville Road, north of OR 219 Explore a passenger rail stop if commuter rail is extended between Wilsonville and Beaverton down to Salem Y Y Y Current TSP Access Management City-wide Develop city-wide access spacing standards according to a roadway’s functional classification N N Y $  Current TSP and Highway 99E Corridor Plan City-wide Investigate and implement opportunities to provide alternative access to nonstate facilities when reasonable access can occur (consistent with the State’s Division 51 access management standards) N N Y $  Current TSP City-wide Through development, right-of-way dedications should be provided to facilitate the future planned transportation system in the vicinity of the proposed development N N Y  Current TSP City-wide Through development, half-street improvements (sidewalks, curb and gutter, bicycle lanes/paths, and/or travel lanes) should be provided along all site frontages that do not have full buildout improvements in place at the time of development N N Y $  Current TSP City-wide Define a variance process for when the standard cannot be met N N Y $  City-wide Establish an approach for access consolidation over time to move in the direction of the standards at each opportunity (see above). Cross-over easements should be provided on all compatible parcels (topography, access, and land use) to facilitate future access between adjacent parcels and inter- parcel circulation. N N Y $  City-wide Consider opportunities to restrict certain turning movements at accesses (such as a right in-right out access) N N Y $  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Street Connectivity South Arterial Construct the Southern Arterial from Evergreen Road to OR 99E (2 lanes) Y Y Y  current TSP, Woodburn proposed in Marion County TSP (Table 8- 18) Evergreen Road Extend south to Parr Road Y Y Y  Current TSP Stacy Allison Drive Extend south to Parr Road Y Y Y  Current TSP Brown Street Extend south to the South Arterial Y Y Y  Current TSP Woodland Avenue Extend west to Butteville Road through future development Y Y Y  Ben Brown Lane from Settlemier Avenue to Elans Way Re-designate Ben Brown Lane as an Access Street N N N $  Ben Brown Lane Extend Ben Brown Lane to Evergreen Road as an Access Street as part of future residential development Y Y Y  Capacity OR 219 from Butteville Road to Woodland Avenue Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane Y Y Y  Current TSP OR 214 from Cascade Drive to OR 99E Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane Y Y Y  Current TSP OR 99E from Young Street to south UGB Widen roadway to provide a continuous two-way left-turn lane and wider shoulders (in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) Y Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Parr Road Upgrade to service collector urban standards Y Y Y  Current TSP Butteville Road, south of OR 219 Upgrade to minor arterial urban standards Y Y Y  Current TSP Brown Street Upgrade to service collector urban standards Y Y Y  Current TSP OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp Intersection Signal retiming N Y N $  Establish alternative mobility standards N N N $  Roadway System ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp Intersection Signal retiming N Y N $  Establish alternative mobility standards N N N $  OR 214/Evergreen Road Intersection Signal retiming N Y N $  OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road Intersection Signal retiming N Y N $  OR 214/Front Street Ramp Intersection Install a traffic signal Y Y Y  Current TSP OR 214/Park Street Intersection Install a traffic signal Y Y Y  Current TSP OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E Intersection Reconfigure southbound approach to have two turn-lanes and the east leg to have two receiving lanes, including signal retiming Y Y Y  Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue Intersection Install a traffic signal Y Y Y  OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue Intersection Reconfigure the westbound approach to incorporate one left- turn lane and one thru-right turn lane Y Y Y  Reconfigure the westbound approach to incorporate one left- turn lane and one thru-right turn lane and install a separate right-turn lane on the southbound approach, including signal retiming Y Y Y OR 99E/Lincoln Street Intersection Reconfigure the eastbound approach to incorporate one left- turn lane and one thru-right turn lane Y Y Y  Reconfigure the eastbound approach to incorporate one left- turn lane and one thru-right turn lane and install a separate right-turn lane on the southbound approach, including signal retiming Y Y Y OR 99E/Young Street Intersection Install a third westbound lane to provide separate left, thru, and right turn lanes. Implement protected-permissive left- turn phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches. Y Y Y $  Highway 99E Corridor Plan OR 99E/Cleveland Street Intersection Install a traffic signal, including OR 99E coordination N Y Y $  Current TSP Butteville Road/OR 219 Intersection Install a traffic signal Y Y Y  Safety Butteville Road/Parr Road Rebuild intersection due to grades on approaches Y Y Y  from Marion County TSP (Table 8-5) Southern OR 219/Butteville Road Realign OR 219 to improve intersection(s) with Butteville Road Y Y Y  from Marion County TSP (Table 8-20) Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) Y Y Y  Current TSP Northern OR 214/Butteville Road Intersection Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) Y Y Y  Current TSP OR 99E Update roadway lighting to meet ODOT roadway lighting standards Y Y Y $  Highway 99E Corridor Plan OR 99E access between Young Street and Cleveland Street Restrict certain turning movements N Y Y $ Highway 99E Corridor Plan Close street accesses and potential lot consolidation N Y Y  Highway 99E Corridor Plan Front Street/Lincoln Street Intersection Enhanced signs and pavement markings (e.g. stop signs, warning signs, and/or beacons) N N Y $  Front Street/Young Street/Garfield Street Intersection Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping in correlation to the railroad tracks. Provide clarification for westbound drivers trying to proceed through the intersection Y Y Y $  OR 99E/Tomlin Avenue Restrict the southbound left-turn movement N N Y $ Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping, including any sight distance constraints Y Y Y $  City-wide Evaluate traffic safety along OR 99E, OR 219/OR214, Front Street, Evergreen Road, and other key corridors to identify appropriate countermeasures N Y Y $  Transit System ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution Service Enhancements Woodburn Fleet Purchase of Category B and C vehicles (1 each) for use in the City's expanded transit services. (100% funding level 2020- 21) N N Y $  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Woodburn Fleet Purchase a Category B vehicle that will replace the second oldest full size vehicle in the WTS fleet; will be used for the City's existing local fixed route circulator. (130% funding level 2021) N N Y $  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Woodburn Fixed Route Addition of weekend service for Woodburn Transit Service fixed route and paratransit services (Sat. 9am-5pm, Sun.9am- 3pm) by up to 2,156 revenue hours (FY20-21). (100% funding level 2020-21) N N Y  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Woodburn Fixed Route Modify the existing 60 minute fixed route loop; add an additional 30 minute route that will serve high frequency stops on weekdays (7am-7pm) within the Woodburn city limits. Total additional service will be up to 6,192 revenue hours (FY20-21). (100% funding level 2020-21) N N Y  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Woodburn Fixed Route Modify the existing 60-min. fixed route by adding a new 30 min. route that serves high frequency stops (up to 1,456 revenue hours); this service will operate Saturdays (9am- 5pm) and Sundays (9am-3pm). Also includes Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service. (130% funding level 2020-21) N N Y  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Woodburn Fixed Route Increase frequency to 30 minutes N N Y  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update (Figure 2-1) Woodburn Fixed Route Provide Saturday service N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn Fixed Route Provide Sunday service N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn Fixed Route Convert existing route to two-way operations N N Y from Woodburn Transit Plan Update (Figure 2-1) Separate route into two routes with one-way operations N N Y Separate route into two routes with two-way operations N N Y  Add a new fixed route in City center (30-minute frequency to major local destinations) N N Y $ from Woodburn Transit Plan Update (Figure ES-2 and 10-2) Restructure "long" loop, expanded to serve the neighborhood in southeast Woodburn N N Y $ from Woodburn Transit Plan Update (Figure ES-2 and 10-2) Parr Road corridor via an extension of Evergreen Road New or re-routed service (as growth occurs) N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Crosby Road corridor New or re-routed service (as growth occurs) N N Y $ from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Butteville Road corridor New or re-routed service (as growth occurs) N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Employment center southwest of I-5/OR 214 interchange New or re-routed service (as growth occurs) N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn Industrial Park along the Progress Way and Industrial Avenue corridors New or re-routed service (as growth occurs) N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Gateway subarea New or re-routed service. Refocus local and regional transit service in the Gateway subarea (between Front Street and Mill Creek) to support a mixed-use district N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn Company Stores Establish a free shuttle between the Woodburn Company Stores and Downtown Woodburn, hourly during peak shopping and entertainment hours N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review City-wide Peak-only employer shuttle N N Y from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - chapter 10 Intercity Service Enhancements Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Expand service for up to 7,557 revenue hours on urban & rural Regional services. Includes startup costs for hiring new employees, and coordination of schedules with connecting services. Also establishes a Youth fare category (ages 6-18). (100% funding level 2020-21) N N Y  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution Keizer to Wilsonville Establish one new Regional route from Keizer to Wilsonville with a stop at the Woodburn Memorial Park and Ride. Increase service on weekdays by 30 percent on urban & rural Regional services by up to 5,245 revenue hours. (130% funding level 2020-21) N N Y  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Add Saturday service to urban & rural Cherriots Regional services with up to 3,919 revenue hours of new service (FY20- 21). Includes coordination of schedules with other connecting services. (100% funding level 2020-21) N N Y $  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Add 30 percent more Saturday service to urban & rural Regional services by up to 215 revenue hours (FY20-21). In FY21, adds 6 holidays to the same routes. Includes coordination of schedules with connecting services. (130% funding level 2020-21) N N Y $  from Ted at Cherriots as part of the STIF application for the 2019-21 biennium City-wide Coordinate transfers between the different agency services in Woodburn N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn Provide a stop in Woodburn for SMART Route 1X N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn to Salem Provide service to downtown Salem (and east to State offices): Incorporate a stop at the planned Park & Ride for the SMART express route between Wilsonville and Salem N Y Y  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn to Portland Provide service to Portland - connect to TriMet via the Tualatin Park-and-Ride, directly into downtown Portland, to the Westside Express Service (southern terminus at Wilsonville SMART Central), or the MAX Orange Line light rail service. N Y Y from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review Woodburn to Hubbard Provide a new demand-responsive service to Hubbard one day per week N Y Y from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - chapter 10 Woodburn to Wilsonville Provide service to WES station in Wilsonville N N Y from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - chapter 10 Stop Enhancements City-wide Post static bus route information at bus stops N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update Stop 755016: Walmart New shelter N N Y $  Stop 20419: Garfield Street New shelter N N Y $  Park-and-Ride Facilities n/a Other Transit Solutions City-wide Investigate transferring the paratransit system to a local social service agency N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review n/a Intermodal Route Connectivity City-wide Provide wayfinding to bike routes, multi-use paths, trails (as constructed), parks, schools, and other essential destinations N N Y $  City-wide Provide bike racks at bus stops N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update TSMO City-wide Lead or provide support of potential TSM and TDM strategies N N Y $  City-wide Identify opportunities for collaborative marketing with local business owners and operators, developers, and transit service providers N N Y $  City-wide Update the Woodburn Development Ordinance to limit and/or allow for flexible parking requirements N N Y $  City-wide Develop access management standards that reflect functional classification of the roadway N N Y $  City-wide Implement truck signal priority at all signalized intersections along OR 214 and OR 99E N Y Y $  City-wide Promote regional carpool/vanpool program N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update (Figure ES-2) Truck Freight System Other Solutions ---PAGE BREAK--- Environmental Impacts Engineering Challenges Land Use Consistency Project Cost document Location Solutions Preliminary Screening Preliminary Preferred Solution City-wide Provide transit fare subsidies N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review City-wide Establish carpool matching programs for ride-sharing N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review City-wide Establish carpool parking programs N N Y $  Current TSP City-wide Schedule shift changes to occur outside of peak travel periods N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review City-wide Allow employees to work at home one day a week N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review City-wide Establish neighborhood commercial and mixed-use nodes within the City N N Y $  from Woodburn Transit Plan Update - other plan review OR 99E Work with ODOT to develop and implement a Traffic Management Plan for the OR 99E corridor that responds to increased congestion resulting from incidents on I-5 and regional events N Y Y $  Highway 99E Corridor Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: H:\21\21071 - WOODBURN TSP UPDATE\TASK 5\5.1 PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES\FINAL\21071_TM6_PREFERRED ALTERNATIVES_FINAL UP.DOCX TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #6 Preferred Alternatives Date: June 7, 2019 Project 21071.5 To: Chris Kerr & Eric Liljequist, City of Woodburn Michael Duncan, Oregon Department of Transportation, Region 2 Technical Advisory Committee and Community Advisory Committee From: Matt Hughart and Molly McCormick, Kittleson & Associates, Inc. Subject: Technical Memo Preferred Alternatives (Subtask 5.1) The purpose of this memorandum is to identify the projects included in the planned and financially constrained transportation systems for the Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) update. Previous technical memorandums documented existing and future transportation system needs, see Tech Memo 3: Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis and Tech Memo 4: Future Systems Conditions, and potential solutions to address the needs, see Tech Memo 5: Alternatives Analysis and Funding Program. The consultant team combined the information provided in these and other technical memorandums to develop projects for the planned transportation system and identify priorities for the financially constrained transportation system based on the TSP goals and objectives and evaluation criteria, see Tech Memo 2: Project Goals and Objectives and Evaluation Criteria. The information provided in this memorandum was revised based on input from the project team and the general public. The projects identified in this memorandum for the planned and financially constrained transportation systems will be incorporated in the Woodburn TSP update. PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA AND PRIORITIZATION The project evaluation criteria were used to evaluate projects included in the planned transportation system and identify priorities for the financially constrained transportation system. The projects were identified as high, medium, and low priority projects based on how well they address the goals of the TSP update. The goals are documented in Tech Memo 2 and summarized below. ▪ Goal I: Multimodal Mobility – Provide a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. ▪ Goal II: Connectivity – Provide an interconnected street system that is adequately sized to accommodate existing and projected traffic demands in the Woodburn area. ▪ Goal III: Safety – Provide a transportation system that enhances the safety and security of all transportation modes in the Woodburn area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 2 Woodburn, Oregon ▪ Goal IV: Strategic Investment – Provide a financially sustainable transportation system through responsible stewardship of assets and financial resource. ▪ Goal V: Land Use and Transportation Integration – Review and update land use standards and ordinances to create a balanced built environment where existing and planned land uses are supported by an efficient multi-modal transportation system. ▪ Goal VI: Coordination – Develop a transportation system that is consistent with the City’s adopted comprehensive plan and adopted plans of state, regional, and other local jurisdictions. The evaluation criteria are included in Attachment A. Attachment A also indicates how the evaluation criteria were used to evaluate and prioritize the projects. A summary of the evaluations for the plan projects is included in Attachment B. PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES Planning level cost estimates were developed for the projects based on average unit costs for similar projects within the Pacific Northwest. The cost estimates help provide a realistic plan that reflects the City’s financial forecast. The financially constrained plan was developed by identifying forecasted transportation funding (documented in Tech Memo 3: Existing Conditions Inventory and Analysis) and selecting higher priority projects from the planned system that can be funded with forecasted funds. TRANSPORTATION FUNDING The TSP will include a planned transportation system, which identifies all of the projects and programs needed to address all of the transportation needs within the city, and a financially constrained transportation system, which identifies the projects and programs the City anticipates being able to fund over the next 20 years. The amount of local funds available for capital projects in the TSP is estimated to be approximately $26.2 million or roughly $1.31 million per year.1 1 This number does not include potential additional funding from state and federal grants such as the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). While it is likely that these funds will be used to fund some transportation improvements within the city over the next 20 years, these funding sources are not accounted for in the City’s revenue forecast because of the uncertainty in acquiring them. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 3 Woodburn, Oregon PLANNED TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM COST SUMMARY Table 1 provides a summary of the full cost of the planned and financially constrained transportation systems. As shown, the full cost of the planned system is approximately $129.3 million over the 20-year period, including $26.2 million in high priority projects, $101.6 million in medium priority projects, and $1.5 million in low priority projects. Based on the anticipated funds available for capital improvement projects, the financially constrained plan includes all of the high priority projects. This leaves no forecasted funding for the City to complete medium and low priority projects over the 20-year period. Table 1: Planned Transportation System Cost Summary Project Type High Priority (Financially Constrained Plan Projects) (0-5 years) Medium Priority (5-10 years) Low Priority (10-20 years) Total Planned Transportation System Bicycle $8,125,000 $11,915,000 $100,000 $20,140,000 Pedestrian $6,750,000 $10,300,000 $285,000 $17,335,000 Roadway $9,200,000 $73,140,000 $500,000 $82,840,000 Safety $2,100,000 $5,360,000 $100,000 $7,560,000 Transit $100,000 $15,000 $115,000 TDM1 $25,000 $100,000 $315,000 $440,000 Land Use $50,000 $50,000 Access Management $125,000 $125,000 Rail $10,000 $15,000 $25,000 Total $26,200,000 $100,925,000 $1,505,000 $128,630,000 Available Funding Total $6,550,000 $6,550,000 $13,100,000 $26,200,000 TDM: Transportation Demand Management 1: Includes annual costs occurred every year. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 4 Woodburn, Oregon BICYCLE PLAN On-street bike lanes and other bicycle facilities are currently provided on a few roadways within the city. Therefore, the bicycle plan includes several projects along the city’s Major and Minor Arterial and Service Collector streets for connectivity throughout the city. The bicycle plan also includes projects on access and local street that provide direct access to essential destinations. Table 2 identifies the bicycle plan projects for the Woodburn TSP update. As shown, the projects are separated based on roadway classification. The priorities shown in Table 2 are based on the project evaluation criteria as well as input from the project team and the general public. The cost estimates are based on average unit costs for roadway improvements. Figure 1 illustrates the location of the bicycle plan projects. Table 2: Bicycle Plan Projects Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 Major Arterials B1 OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R22 B2 OR 214 from Progress Way to OR 99E Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R32 B3 OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R42 B4 OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R42 Minor Arterials B5 OR 219 from western UGB to Butteville Road Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium $650,000 B6 Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to OR 219 Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium $3,200,000 B7 Butteville Road from OR 219 to southern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium Cost included in R62 B8 Evergreen Road from OR 214 to Hayes Street Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $500,000 B9 Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $500,000 B10 Settlemier Avenue from Harrison Street to railroad tracks Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School, Heritage Elementary School, Valor Middle School, and St. Luke's School Medium $25,000 B11 Boones Ferry Road from Dahlia Street to southern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $1,500,000 B12 Front Street from northern UGB to Boones Ferry Road Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School, Heritage Elementary School, Valor Middle School, and St. Luke's School High $8,050,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 5 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 B13 Garfield Street from 3rd Street to Front Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. Low $10,000 B14 Garfield Street from Smith Drive to 3rd Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. Low $10,000 B151 Young Street Study Perform a corridor evaluation that would consider design treatments to improve bicycle comfort and safety such as striping, signing, and wayfinding Medium $15,000 B16 OR 211 from OR 99E to eastern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT Medium $1,000,000 Service Collectors B17 Arney Road from Robin Avenue to OR 219 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs in coordination with ODOT Low $5,000 B18 Harvard Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen Road Bike lanes Enhance the parallel route of Harvard Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen Road in place of Stacy Allison Way. Install buffered bike lane striping on both sides of the roadway Medium $15,000 B19 Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Cascade Drive Bike lanes Install bike lane striping. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Medium $35,000 B20 Hayes Street from Cascade Drive to Settlemier Avenue Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Medium $3,000,000 B21 Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes. This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School High Cost included in R52 B22 Lincoln Street from Cascade Drive to Front Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School Medium $20,000 B23 Lincoln Street from Front Street to OR 99E Bike lanes Install bike lane striping. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School High $55,000 B24 Cleveland Street from Front Street to OR 99E Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $15,000 B25 Hardcastle Avenue from Front Street to OR 99E Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School High $15,000 B26 Brown Street from Cleveland Street to end of roadway Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $20,000 B27 Cooley Road from OR 211 to Aubrey Way Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes Medium $1,300,000 B28 Cooley Road from Aubrey Way to Hardcastle Avenue Bike lanes Install bike lane striping Medium $15,000 Access Streets B29 Stubb Road from Harvard Drive to Parr Road Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low Cost included in R262 B30 Astor Way from Country Club Road to OR 214 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $15,000 B31 Tukwila Drive from Boones Ferry Road to Hazelnut Drive Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $5,000 B32 5th Street from OR 214 to Garfield Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for St Luke's School Medium $20,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 6 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 B33 Gatch Street from Hardcastle Road to Cleveland Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School Medium $15,000 B34 Park Avenue from OR 214 to Lincoln Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School Medium $20,000 B35 Evergreen Road from Country Club Court to OR 214 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $10,000 Local Streets B36 Country Club Road from Evergreen Road to Astor Way Bike lanes Install bike lane striping Medium $40,000 B37 Cascade Drive from OR 214 to Hayes Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Medium $10,000 B38 Smith Drive from Hayes Street to Garfield Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School Medium $5,000 B39 Meridian Drive from Hazelnut Drive to OR 214 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs Low $10,000 B401 City-wide Wayfinding Provide wayfinding to bike routes, multi-use paths, parks, schools, and other essential destinations Medium $30,000 TOTAL High Priority Costs $8,125,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $11,915,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $100,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $20,140,000 1. Project not shown on Bicycle Plan Map. 2. Cost estimates are not included for projects that would be completed as part of a roadway project, such as locations where additional roadway width is needed to install bike lanes. The cost for these projects is included in the corresponding roadway projects described later in the memo. 3. The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes, and other characteristics. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV W HAYES ST EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEX AN D RA A V OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN R EED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN PLUM LN N CASCADE DR OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST LINCOLN ST O R EGON WY PAR K AV PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD HARRISON ST BROWN ST G ATCH S T W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY COOLEY RD PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBER G H Y HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY YO U NG ST WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BOONES F ERRY RD S SETTLEMIER AV EVER GREE N RD N FRONT ST BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST B3 B16 B1 B6 B20 B19 B28 B5 B36 B23 B2 B18 B8 B4 B9 B27 B12 B7 B21 B11 B39 B17 B25 B22 B13 B34 B10 B38 B33 B14 B31 B24 B29 B26 B32 B37 B30 B35 Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 1 Bike Lanes Shared Street Future Roadway (See Roadway Plan Projects map for associated bicycle enhancements) City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM6\Bicycle Projects.mxd - jsommerville - 4:43 PM 6/6/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Bicycle Plan Projects Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 8 Woodburn, Oregon PEDESTRIAN PLAN A majority of city streets currently have sidewalks on at least one side of the roadway. The pedestrian plan includes several projects to construct new sidewalks where they are lacking and to fill in the gaps in the existing sidewalks along the city’s streets. Although many of the pedestrian projects are located on Service Collector streets or higher, a few local street pedestrian projects are included to provide access to essential destinations such as schools, parks, churches, etc. The pedestrian plan also includes several enhanced pedestrian crossings as well as multi-use paths and accessways that augment and support the pedestrian system. Table 3 identifies the pedestrian plan projects for the Woodburn TSP update. As shown, the projects are separated into projects based on roadway classification, as well as projects at intersections and in other locations throughout the city. The priorities shown in Table 3 are based on the project evaluation criteria as well as input from the project team and the general public. The cost estimates are based on average unit costs for roadway improvements. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the pedestrian plan projects. Table 3: Pedestrian Plan Projects Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 Major Arterials P1 OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R22 P2 OR 99E from northern UGB to Lincoln Street Street lighting Evaluate light levels and install street lighting in coordination with ODOT Medium $700,000 P3 OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary New sidewalks Remove existing sidewalks and install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R42 P4 OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT Medium Cost included in R42 Minor Arterials P5 Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to OR 219 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT Medium $1,500 ,000 P6 Butteville Road from OR 219 to southern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium Cost included in R62 P7 Evergreen Road from Stacy Allison Way to Boean Lane Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps High $200,000 P8 Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $150 ,000 P9 Settlemier Avenue from Oak Street to Parr Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School, Heritage Elementary School, and Valor Middle School High $300,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 9 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 P10 Boones Ferry Road from Parr Road to southern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks. This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School High $800,000 P11 Front Street from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $400,000 P12 Young Street Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps Medium $200,000 P13 OR 211 from OR 99E to eastern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT Medium $500,000 Service Collectors P14 Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Settlemier Avenue Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School High $600,000 P15 Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary New sidewalks Install new sidewalks. This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School High Cost included in R52 P16 Lincoln Street from Cascade Drive to OR 99E Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School High $450,000 P17 Industrial Avenue from Progress Way to OR 99E New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium $500,000 P18 Progress Way from Industrial Avenue to OR 214 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium $850,000 P19 Hardcastle Avenue from Front Street to Cooley Road Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School High $450,000 P20 Brown Street from Cleveland Street to end of roadway Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps Medium Cost included in R72 P21 Cooley Road from OR 211 to Hardcastle Avenue Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps Medium $650,000 Access Streets P22 Woodland Avenue from Jory Street to Arney Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $250,000 P23 Stubb Road from Harvard Drive to Parr Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium Cost included in R262 P24 Oregon Way from Country Club Road to OR 214 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks Medium $250,000 P25 Hazelnut Drive from Graystone Drive to Front Street Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $150,000 P26 Gatch Street from Hardcastle Road to Cleveland Street Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School High $350,000 P27 Park Avenue from Hardcastle Avenue to Lincoln Street New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School High $65,000 Local Streets P28 Willow Avenue from McNaught Road to OR 219 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on both sides Medium $350,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 10 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 P29 Cascade Drive from OR 214 to Hayes Street New sidewalks Install new sidewalks. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School High $400,000 P30 Ben Brown Lane from end of roadway to Boones Ferry Road Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps Medium $200,000 P31 Oak Street from Boones Ferry Road to Front Street New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $150,000 P32 Ogle Street from Cleveland Street to Boones Ferry Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side Medium $900,000 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements P33 Front Street/Young Street Enhanced crossing Construct ADA-complaint ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection Medium $15,000 P34 Front Street/Lincoln Street Enhanced crossing Construct ADA-complaint ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection. This project improves safe routes to school for St Luke's School High $15,000 P35 Cascade Drive/Hayes Street Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School High $65,000 P36 Park Avenue/Legion Park Driveway Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves access to Legion Park Medium $65,000 P37 Hazelnut Drive/Broadmoor Place Accessway Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $65,000 P38 OR 214/N Bulldog Drive Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, update the existing crossing to an enhanced pedestrian crossing with a pedestrian hybrid beacon coordinated with the surrounding traffic signals in coordination with ODOT. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $150,000 P39 OR 99E from OR 214 to Young Street Enhanced crossing – Signalized intersection As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, install countdown pedestrian timers and construct ADA enhancements at key signalized intersections along OR 99E in coordination with ODOT, including: • OR 214/OR 211 • Hardcastle Avenue • Lincoln Road • Young Street Medium $605,000 P40 OR 99E from OR 214 to Young Street Enhanced crossing As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, install curb extensions on minor street legs of intersections (curb extensions to shorten pedestrian crossing distances parallel to OR 99E, not for crossing of OR 99E) between Arlington Street and Cleveland Street (up to 8 locations) in coordination with ODOT. Potential locations include: • Alexandria Avenue • James Street • Williams Street • Blaine Street • Aztec Drive • Laurel Avenue • Tomlin Avenue Medium $950,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 11 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 P41 OR 99E, north of Williams Street Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). High $75,000 P42 OR 99E, between NE Laurel Avenue and Tomlin Avenue Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). High $75,000 P43 OR 99E, between Blaine Street and Aztec Drive Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). High $75,000 P44 OR 99E, north of Mount Jefferson Avenue Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). Medium $75,000 P45 OR 99E, north of James Street Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). Medium $75,000 P46 Boones Ferry Road/Constitution Avenue/Tukwila Drive Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $65,000 Multi-use Pathways P47 Mill Creek Greenway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan, construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: • Hazelnut Drive • Bulldog Drive (east crossing) • OR 214 (state highway) • Hardcastle Avenue • Lincoln Street • Young Street • Cleveland Street and railroad tracks This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $2,000,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 12 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 P48 Mill Creek Greenway – Northern tributary Multi-use pathway As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan, construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: • Bulldog Drive (west crossing) • Meridian Drive • Boones Ferry Road This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School, Lincoln Elementary School, and French Prairie Middle School Medium $700,000 P49 Mill Creek Greenway – Western tributary Multi-use pathway As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan, construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: • Parr Road • Ben Brown Lane • Settlemier Avenue • Front Street and railroad tracks This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School Medium $900,000 P50 Evergreen Road Multi-Use Path Multi-use pathway Construct a multi-use path extending from Evergreen Road south to planned Mill Creek Greenway Medium $150,000 P51 Washington Elementary School Multi-Use Path Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, construct a north-south multi-use path connection between Hardcastle Avenue and Lincoln Street, west of Washington Elementary School. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School Medium $90,000 P52 Mill Creek Greenway - Southern extension Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, construct extension of Mill Creek Greenway multi-use path to Belle Passi Road Medium $90,000 P53 Evergreen Road Pedestrian Connection Multi-use pathway Construct a connection between the Evergreen Road multi-use path and pedestrian facilities that are part of future development to the south Medium $20,000 P54 Centennial Park Pedestrian Connection Multi-use pathway Construct a connection between the Centennial Park multi-use path and pedestrian facilities that are part of future development to the west Medium $20,000 P55 Santiam Drive Pedestrian Connection Multi-use pathway Construct a connection between Santiam Drive and pedestrian facilities that are part of future development to the south Medium $20,000 Off-street Improvements P56 June Way Accessway Accessway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E (near the Audrey Way intersection), may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E Low $80,000 P57 Johnson Street Accessway Accessway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E Low $45,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 13 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate3 P58 Elm Street Accessway Accessway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E, may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E Low $25,000 P59 Wilson Street Accessway Accessway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E Low $55,000 P60 Hawley Street Accessway Accessway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E (possibly part of future street extension), may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E Low $55,000 P61 A Street Accessway Accessway Install a new accessway that connects A Street north to Cleveland Street and/or Mill Creek Greenway (western tributary). Low $25,000 P621 City-wide Wayfinding Provide wayfinding to bike routes, multi-use paths, parks, schools, and other essential destinations Medium $30,000 TOTAL High Priority Costs $6,750,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $10,300,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $285,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $17,335,000 1. Project not shown on Pedestrian Plan Map 2. Cost estimates are not included for projects that would be completed as part of a roadway project, such as locations where roadway widening will relocate the curb and require new sidewalks to be installed. The cost for these projects is included in the corresponding roadway projects described later in the memo. 3. The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes, and other characteristics. ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 ä ä P54 P55 ä P53 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST D A HLIA ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA R D CARL RD JO H NSON ST GARFI ELD S T CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST RAINIER R D MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST T OMLIN AV V A NDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN REED AV CA S C A D E DR D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR UNION SCHOOL RD OXFORD ST ST LOUIS RD THOMPSON RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN P U B LI C R D PLUM LN N CASCADE DR OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD GESCHWILL LN ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A ZEL NU T DR W HAYES ST LINC O LN ST O RE GON WY PARK AV PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST HARDCASTLE AV STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD W LINCOLN ST HARRISON ST BRO W N ST G ATCH S T W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD AST O R WY COOLEY RD N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY CROSBY RD STUBB RD HIGHWAY 99E HY NEWBERG HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N SETTLEMIER AV BOON E S FERRY R D YO U NG ST GARFIELD ST WILCO HY N PACIFIC HY MOLALLA RD EVE R G REEN RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST BUTTEVILLE RD P33 P34 P35 P36 P37 P46 P42 P43 P41 P45 P38 P44 P61 P58 P57 P59 P60 P56 P39-40 P52 P51 P50 P49 P48 P47 P3 P13 P1 P9 P5 P31 P10 P27 P18 P23 P24 P29 P4 P32 P28 P11 P6 P15 P17 P22 P8 P12 P7 P14 P16 P19 P25 P26 P30 P20 P21 P2 Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 2 ! ! ! Enhanced Crossing Accessway Enhanced Crossing Corridor Mutli-use Pathway New Sidewalks Sidewalks - Fill in Gaps Street Lighting Future Roadway (See Roadway Plan Projects map for associated pedestrian enhancements) City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM6\Pedestrian Projects.mxd - mmccormick - 8:11 AM 6/7/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 Oregon Statewide Lambert Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Pedestrian Plan Projects Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 15 Woodburn, Oregon ROADWAY PLAN The street system within Woodburn is largely built-out within the city boundary, and there are few opportunities to construct new roadways unless initiated by new development and zone changes. However, there are several operational issues under existing and projected future traffic conditions. Therefore, the roadway plan includes projects based on street system connectivity, capacity of key intersections and segments, and safety. Functional Classification The proposed change to the functional classification of roadways within Woodburn was determined based on a review of the existing Woodburn TSP and expected development in southwest Woodburn. Table 4 summarizes the proposed change in functional classification. Table 4: Proposed Change in Functional Classification Street Segment Existing Classification Future Classification Ben Brown Lane Settlemier Avenue to Elans Way Local Access Street System Connectivity As indicated above, the street system within Woodburn is largely built-out. Therefore, there are limited opportunities for new arterial, Service Collector, or Access Streets. However, there are opportunities for new local streets in select areas throughout the city that could improve access and circulation for all travel modes. Figure 3 illustrates the general location of the local street connections identified for the Woodburn TSP update. Roadway alignments for each connection are not provided as they are anticipated to be determined as part of future development. Table 5 summarizes the connections and identifies their priority based on the project evaluation criteria. Costs are not provided for these projects as they are anticipated to be constructed by future development. Any local street connectivity projects that are desired to be city-initiated projects should be identified as a high priority and included in the cost- constrained plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 16 Woodburn, Oregon Table 5: Street Connections by Priority Project Number Location Type Description Priority SC1 Southeast Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs Medium SC2 South Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs Medium SC3 Southwest Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs Medium SC4 North Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs Medium ---PAGE BREAK--- ää ä ä ä ää ä ä ä ä ää ä ää ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä ä 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST D A HLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST S 3 RD ST N 5TH ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN R A Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBER G H Y HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER GREE N RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BOONES FE RRY RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 3 ä SC1 Southeast New Connections ä SC2 South New Connections ä SC3 Southwest New Connections ä SC4 North New Connections Future Roadway City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM6\Local Street Connectivity.mxd - jsommerville - 4:43 PM 6/6/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Local Street Connectivity Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 18 Woodburn, Oregon Roadway Capacity The roadway capacity projects developed for the Woodburn TSP update are summarized in Table 6 and shown in Figure 4. These projects are intended to address existing and projected future transportation system needs for motor vehicles as well as all other modes of transportation that depend on the roadway system for travel, such as pedestrians, bicyclists, transit users, and truck freight. Table 6: Roadway Plan Projects Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate2 R1 Southern OR 219/Butteville Road Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) in coordination with ODOT High $2,750,000 R2 OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Road Street design Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane (in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) in coordination with ODOT High $1,700,000 (Cost includes B1 and P1) R3 OR 214 from Cascade Drive to OR 99E Street design Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane, including changes to signal timing as appropriate, in coordination with ODOT (and in conjunction with bicycle facility improvements) Medium $20,300,000 (Cost includes B2) R4 OR 99E from Lincoln Street to south UGB Street design As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, widen roadway to provide a continuous two-way left-turn lane and wider shoulders, including changes to signal timing as appropriate, in coordination with ODOT (and in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) Medium $12,300,000 (Cost includes B3, B4, P3, and P4) R5 Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary Street design Upgrade to Service Collector urban standards including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements Low $01 (Project includes B21 and P15) R6 Butteville Road from OR 219 to southern UGB Street design Upgrade to Minor Arterial urban standards including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements Low $01 (Project includes B7 and P6) R7 Brown Street from Comstock Avenue to end of roadway Street design Upgrade to Service Collector urban standards including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements Low $01 (Project includes P20) R8 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT Medium $15,000 R9 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT Medium $15,000 R10 OR 214/Evergreen Road Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT Medium $15,000 R11 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT Medium $15,000 R12 OR 214/Front Street Ramp Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout in coordination with ODOT Medium $500,000 R13 OR 214/Park Street Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout in coordination with ODOT Medium $500,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 19 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate2 R14 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Install a second left-turn lane on the southbound approach, install a second receiving lane on the east leg, and update signal timing in coordination with ODOT Medium $900,000 R15 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout Low $500,000 R16 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Reconfigure the westbound approach to incorporate one left-turn lane and one thru-right turn lane in coordination with ODOT Medium $20,000 R17 OR 99E/Lincoln Street Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Install a shared through-right turn lane on the eastbound approach and reconfigure the existing approach lane as a separate left-turn lane in coordination with ODOT Medium $500,000 R18 OR 99E/Young Street Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, install a third westbound lane to provide separate left, thru, and right turn lanes in coordination with ODOT. Implement protected-permissive left-turn phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches. Medium $550,000 R19 OR 99E/Cleveland Street Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout in coordination with ODOT. Consideration should be given to railroad preemption and the proximity to the signalized intersection at OR 99E and Young Street. Medium $500,000 R20 Ben Brown Lane New roadway Extend Ben Brown Lane to Evergreen Road as an Access Street Medium $5,100,000 R21 Evergreen Road New roadway Extend south to Parr Road High $4,750,000 R22 Stacy Allison Way New roadway Extend south to UGB Medium $7,300,000 R23 Brown Street New roadway Extend south to the South Arterial Medium $800,000 R24 Woodland Avenue New roadway Extend west to Butteville Road Medium $2,450,000 R25 East-west Connection in Southwest Woodburn New roadway Construct a new Local Industrial Street connecting the southern extensions of Stacy Allison Way and Evergreen Road Medium $1,800,000 R26 Stubb Road from Harvard Drive to Parr Road Street design and new roadway Upgrade the existing roadway to Access Street standards and extend north to Harvard Drive including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements Medium $1,900,000 R27 North-south Connection in Southwest Woodburn New roadway Construct a new Access Street connecting Hayes Street to Stubb Street Medium $5,150,000 R28 OR 99E/Industrial Avenue Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Evaluate the intersection layout, control, signing, and striping, including any sight distance constraints in coordination with ODOT Medium $100,000 R29 South Arterial New roadway Construct the Southern Arterial from Evergreen Road to OR 99E (2 lanes) Medium $12,250,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 20 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate2 R30 Woodland Avenue Curve Modification Intersection - geometric considerations Modify the intersection layout to address truck turning movement constraints Medium $100,000 R31 George Street/Hillsboro Silverton Highway Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, close vehicular access to George Street from Hillsboro Silverton Highway when future local street access is provided to the east Medium $60,000 TOTAL High Priority Costs $9,200,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $73,140,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $500,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $82,840,000 1. Project to be funded by others 2. The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes, and other characteristics. ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T IE R R A LYNN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JO H NSON ST GAR FIELD ST DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JANS EN WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL RD WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV V A NDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXAN D RA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR REED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST UNION SCHOOL RD THOMPSON RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN P U B LI C R D PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S E A LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST W LINCOLN ST L INCO L N ST OR EG ON WY PAR K AV BRO W N ST GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD WOO DLAND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBER G H Y HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER GREE N RD GARFIELD ST N SETTL EMIER AV WILCO HY BOON E S FERRY R D MOLALLA RD BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST R8 R9 R10 R11 R12 R13 R14 R15 R16 R17 R18 R19 R28 R1 R30 R31 R23 R26 R21 R24 R25 R22 R20 R27 R29 R4 R3 R7 R2 R6 R5 R26 Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 4 ! ! ! Intersection - Geometric Considerations ! ! ! Traffic Signal New Roadway Roadway Widening/Modernization City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM6\Roadway Plan Projects.mxd - mmccormick - 7:43 AM 6/7/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Roadway Plan Projects Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 22 Woodburn, Oregon Traffic Safety Traffic safety has a significant impact on how people use the transportation system within Woodburn, particularly in areas where real or perceived safety risks prevent people from using more active travel modes, such as walking, biking, and taking transit. The traffic safety solutions identified in Tech Memo 5 are largely focused on systemic issues that occur along roadways and at intersections throughout the city. Table 6 identifies the traffic safety projects that will be included in the Woodburn TSP update. Additional safety projects and improvements were identified as part of the pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and motor vehicle plans earlier in this memorandum. Figure 5 illustrates the traffic safety plan projects. Table 7: Traffic Safety Projects Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate2 S1 Southern OR 219/Butteville Road Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) if/when warranted and in coordination with ODOT High Cost included in R1 S2 Northern OR 214/Butteville Road Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) if/when warranted and in coordination with ODOT Medium $500,000 to $2,000,0001 S3 Front Street/Lincoln Street Intersection Intersection Enhanced signs and pavement markings (e.g. stop signs, warning signs, and/or beacons) Medium $50,000 S4 Front Street/Young Street/Garfield Street Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping in correlation to the railroad tracks. Provide clarification for westbound drivers trying to proceed through the intersection Medium $100,000 S5 OR 99E Lighting As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, update roadway lighting to meet ODOT roadway lighting standards in coordination with ODOT Medium $2,150,000 S6 OR 99E access between Young Street and Cleveland Street Intersection As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT: Restrict left-turn movements and eventually close the Silverton Avenue intersection on OR 99E and vacate the segment of Silverton Avenue between OR 99E and Birds Eye Avenue Restrict left-turn movements onto Birds Eye Avenue from Hillsboro Silverton Highway and eventually close the Birds Eye Avenue intersection on Hillsboro Silverton Highway and vacate the segment of Birds Eye Avenue between Hillsboro Silverton Highway and Silverton Avenue Medium $60,000 S7 OR 99E/Tomlin Avenue Intersection - geometric considerations Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping in coordination with ODOT, including any sight distance constraints. Consider restricting the southbound left-turn movement High $100,000 S8 Butteville Road/Parr Road Intersection - geometric considerations Modify intersection to address existing sight distance and geometric limitations Medium $100,000,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 23 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Type Description Priority Cost Estimate2 S9 City-wide Study Evaluate traffic safety along OR 99E, OR 219/OR214, Front Street, Evergreen Road, and other key corridors to identify appropriate countermeasures Low $100,000 S10 Settlemier Avenue/Hayes Street Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) High $500,000 to $2,000,0001 TOTAL High Priority Costs $2,100,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $5,360,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $100,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $7,560,000 1. A cost estimate range is provided to allow for a design project to determine the appropriate intersection control using additional data, such as right-of-way information and surrounding environmental conditions. $500,000 is the planning-level cost estimate if a traffic signal is determined, and $2,000,000 is the planning-level cost estimate if a roundabout is determined. The higher cost estimate was included in all totals. 2. The cost estimates presented to not include costs associated with right-of-way acquisition due to its high variability depending on location, parcel sizes, and other characteristics. ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 99E v ÍÎ 219 v ÍÎ 214 v ÍÎ 211 v ÍÎ 214 A U D R E Y WY A ST BARLEY ST FRONT ST CORBY ST JUDY ST RYE ST DAHLI A ST T I E R RA L Y NN DR AZTEC DR UMPQUA RD CARL RD JOHNSON ST GARFI ELD S T DELLMOOR WY CONSTITUTION A V EAGLE DR JA N S E N WY STA R K ST BRYAN ST HAWLEY ST T U L IP AV T EN OAKS LN E BLAINE ST R AINIER RD MILLE R FARM R D MERIDIA N DR SMIT H D R LAUREL AV EAST HARDCASTLE RD SALLAL R D WILLO W AV ELAN A D R W LINCOLN ST TOMLIN AV VANDERBECK LN MCKEE SCHOOL RD TR OON AV HAZ E LNU T D R J U N E WY ST PANA ST ALEXANDRA AV OAK ST LEASURE ST BROADWAY ST FINZER WY KING WY BAYLOR DR PRI NCETON RD DOUD ST P A R K C R M AYANNA DR ARLINGTON A V A STOR WY MCLAUGHLIN D R IR O NWOOD T R WILS O N ST GRANT ST S 3 RD ST W HAYES ST TUK W IL A DR LEARY RD H E R M ANSON ST N 6TH ST CHURCH ST ARN EY LN N 1ST ST N 2ND ST WALT O N W Y STEVEN ST QUINN RD C O U N T R Y CLUB T R MARSHALL ST MOUNTAIN VIEW LN N CASCADE DR R EED AV D E ER RUN C OU N TRY LN R A Y J GLA T T CR OXFORD ST N 3RD ST THOMPSON RD UNION SCHOOL RD ST LOUIS RD CAROL ST LINDA ST MCKINLEY ST T R A C Y L N HALL ST BRADLEY ST DIMMICK LN LINFIELD AV HARVARD DR CASCA D E DR G R E E NVIEW D R VI N E AV KOI LN PLUM LN OGLE ST EAST LINCOLN RD MEADOW DR PAL M AV OATS ST RAILROAD B LY L P GOUDY GARDENS LN DE X TER LP JORY ST WHITNE Y LN ELANA WY COMMERCE WY CHA TEA U D R BLAINE ST T U R NBERRY A V PARR RD R O Y AV NATIONAL WY SANTIAM DR CAMAS ST CROSBY RD EV E RGR E E N R D GEORGE ST MCNAUGHT RD KOENER RD RANDOLPH RD HO O PER ST A L S EA LP ELM ST E C LACKAMAS C R W CLACKAMAS CR DECONINCK RD ARNEY RD SERRES LN S CASCADE DR GESCHWILL LN S COLUMBIA DR STAFNEY LN INGALLS LN JENSEN RD BELLE PASSI RD ARBOR GROVE RD LE BRUN RD P I N E C R S HALI M A R L P H A Z ELN UT D R HARDCASTLE AV W HAYES ST L INCO L N ST O RE GON WY PAR K AV BROWN ST GATCH ST PARR RD E CLEVELAND ST STACY ALLISON WY HARVARD DR A RNEY RD COOLEY RD HARRISON ST W OODL AND AV COUNTRY CLUB RD ASTOR WY N 5TH ST PROGRESS WY INDUSTRIAL AV CROSBY RD STUBB RD NEWBER G H Y HIGHWAY 99E HY S PACIFIC HY MT HOOD AV N PACIFIC HY S SETTLEMIER AV YO U NG ST EVER GREE N RD N SE TTLEMIER AV WILCO HY MOLALLA RD BOON E S FERRY R D BUTTEVILLE RD S FRONT ST N FRONT ST S1 S2 S3 S4 S6 S7 S8 S10 S5 Woodburn TSP Update June 2019 ¯ Figure 5 ! ! ! Intersection ! ! ! Intersection - Geometric Considerations Safety Study Corridor Lighting Future Roadway City Boundary Urban Growth Boundary H:\21\21071 - Woodburn TSP Update\gis\TM6\Traffic Safety Projects.mxd - jsommerville - 4:45 PM 6/6/2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 HARN StatePlane Oregon North FIPS 3601 Feet Intl Data Source: City of Woodburn, Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic Safety Projects Woodburn, Oregon 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 Feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 25 Woodburn, Oregon TRANSIT PLAN Public transit can provide important connections to destinations for people that do not drive or bike and can provide an additional option for all transportation system users. Public transit complements walking, bicycling, or driving trips: users can walk to and from transit stops and their homes, shopping or work places, people can drive to park-and-ride locations to access a bus, or people can bring their bikes on transit vehicles and bicycle from a transit stop to their final destination. Providing transit service in smaller cities is generally led by a local or regional transit agency and relies on appropriate land uses and densities that can support transit service. The city can plan for transit- supportive land use patterns and support future transit viability by designing and building streets that will comfortably accommodate transit stops and include the right-of-way that could allow for transit stops to be located as close as possible to important destinations in the city. At a minimum, a transit stop should be well-signed and have a comfortable space to wait. Benches and shelter from the weather can improve user comfort and including bike parking near bus stops allows people to leave their bike at one trip-end instead of taking it with them on the bus. Public transit service within Woodburn is provided by Woodburn Transit Service, supplemented by regional service provided by Cherriots Regional and Canby Area Transit. In addition to coordinating as needed with local and regional transit agencies to help implement their planned service enhancements, the City of Woodburn can support improved transit service by providing easy and safe walking and bicycling connections between key roadways, neighborhoods, and local destinations; by providing amenities, such as shelters and benches, at transit stops; by encouraging an appropriate mix and density of uses that support public transit; and by providing and planning for park-and-ride locations. Table 8 summarizes the transit plan identified for Woodburn. Table 8: Transit Plan Project Number Location Agency Responsible Description Priority Cost Estimate T1 Woodburn Fleet Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Purchase of Category B and C vehicles (1 each) for use in the City's expanded transit services. (100% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T2 Woodburn Fleet Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Purchase a Category B vehicle that will replace the second oldest full-size vehicle in the WTS fleet; will be used for the City's existing local fixed route circulator. (130% funding level 2021) Medium $5,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 26 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Agency Responsible Description Priority Cost Estimate T3 Woodburn Fixed Route Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Addition of weekend service for Woodburn Transit Service fixed route and paratransit services (Sat. 9am-5pm, Sun.9am-3pm) by up to 2,156 revenue hours (FY20-21). (100% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T4 Woodburn Fixed Route Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Modify the existing 60-minute fixed route loop; add an additional 30-minute route that will serve high frequency stops on weekdays (7am-7pm) within the Woodburn city limits. Total additional service will be up to 6,192 revenue hours (FY20-21). (100% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T5 Woodburn Fixed Route Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Modify the existing 60-min. fixed route by adding a new 30 min. route that serves high frequency stops (up to 1,456 revenue hours); this service will operate Saturdays (9am- 5pm) and Sundays (9am-3pm). Also includes Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service. (130% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T6 Woodburn Fixed Route Woodburn Transit Increase frequency of existing route to 30 minutes Medium $01 T7 Woodburn Fixed Route Woodburn Transit Convert existing route to two-way operations Medium $01 T8 City-wide Woodburn Transit Work with Woodburn Transit as growth occurs to provide new or re-routed service to other areas of Woodburn including: • Parr Road via an extension of Evergreen Road • Crosby Road • Butteville Road • The employment center southwest of the I- 5/OR 214 interchange • Woodburn Industrial Park along the Progress Way and Industrial Avenue corridors • Gateway subarea between Front Street and Mill Creek • Neighborhoods in southeast Woodburn Medium $5,000 T9 Woodburn Company Stores Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to establish a free shuttle between the Woodburn Company Stores and Downtown Woodburn, hourly during peak shopping and entertainment hours Medium $5,000 T10 City-wide Woodburn Transit Coordinate with Woodburn Transit and major employers to establish a peak-only employer shuttle Medium $5,000 T11 Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Cherriots Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Expand service for up to 7,557 revenue hours on urban & rural Regional services. Includes startup costs for hiring new employees, and coordination of schedules with connecting services. Also establishes a Youth fare category (ages 6-18).(100% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 27 Woodburn, Oregon Project Number Location Agency Responsible Description Priority Cost Estimate T12 Keizer to Wilsonville Cherriots Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Establish one new Regional route from Keizer to Wilsonville with a stop at the Woodburn Memorial Park and Ride. Increase service on weekdays by 30 percent on urban & rural Regional services by up to 5,245 revenue hours. (130% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T13 Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Cherriots Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Add Saturday service to urban & rural Cherriots Regional services with up to 3,919 revenue hours of new service (FY20-21). Includes coordination of schedules with other connecting services. (100% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T14 Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Cherriots Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Add 30 percent more Saturday service to urban & rural Regional services by up to 215 revenue hours (FY20-21). In FY21, adds 6 holidays to the same routes. Includes coordination of schedules with connecting services. (130% funding level 2020-21) Medium $5,000 T15 City-wide Woodburn Transit and Cherriots Coordinate transfers between the different agency services in Woodburn Medium $5,000 T16 Woodburn Cherriots Coordinate with Cherriots to provide a stop in Woodburn for SMART Route 1X, providing service to WES station in Wilsonville and downtown Salem Medium $5,000 T17 Woodburn to Portland Cherriots Coordinate with Cherriots to consider further new service connections for Woodburn including: • Service to Portland - connect to TriMet via the Tualatin Park-and-Ride, directly into downtown Portland, or the MAX Orange Line light rail service. • Demand-responsive service to Hubbard one day per week Medium $5,000 T18 City-wide Woodburn Transit and Cherriots Evaluate all bus stops to verify static bus route information signage is visible and accessible and that bike racks are available at major bus stops Medium $25,000 T19 Stop 755016: Walmart Woodburn Transit New shelter Low $5,000 T20 Stop 20419: Garfield Street Woodburn Transit New shelter Low $5,000 T21 City-wide Woodburn Transit Investigate transferring the paratransit system to a local social service agency Low $5,000 TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $100,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $15,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $115,000 1. Project to be funded by others. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 28 Woodburn, Oregon TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS (TSMO) PLAN Transportation System Management and Operations (TSMO) is a set of integrated transportation solutions intended to improve the performance of existing transportation infrastructure. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and Transportation System Management (TSM) strategies are two complementary approaches to managing transportation and maximizing the efficiency of the existing system. TDM addresses the demand on the system: the number of vehicles traveling on the roadways each day. TDM measures include any method intended to shift travel demand from single occupant vehicles to non-auto modes or carpooling, travel at less congested times of the day, etc. TSM addresses the supply of the system: using strategies to improve the system efficiency without increasing roadway widths or building new roads. TSM measures are focused on improving operations by enhancing capacity during peak times, typically with advanced technologies to improve traffic operations. Transportation System Management (TSM) Transportation System Management (TSM) focuses on low cost strategies that can be implemented within the existing transportation infrastructure to enhance operational performance. Finding ways to better manage transportation while maximizing urban mobility and treating all modes of travel as a coordinated system is a priority. TSM strategies include traffic signal timing and phasing, traffic signal coordination, traffic calming, access management, local street connectivity and intelligent transportation systems (ITS). Traffic signal coordination and ITS typically provide the most significant tangible benefits to the traveling public. The primary focus of TSM measures are region-wide improvements, however there are a number of TSM measures that could be used in a smaller-scale environment such as within the City of Woodburn. TSM projects and programs that are recommended for the City of Woodburn to explore include the following: ▪ Update signal timing plans and coordinate signals to better match prevailing traffic conditions o OR 99E from Hardcastle Avenue to Young Street (or to the potential future Cleveland Street traffic signal) is one candidate corridor for coordination, as identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan ▪ Implement truck signal priority at key signalized intersections along OR 214 and OR 99E ▪ Work with ODOT to develop and implement a Traffic Management Plan for the OR 99E corridor that responds to increased congestion resulting from incidents on I-5 and regional events, as identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 29 Woodburn, Oregon Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Transportation Demand Management (TDM) is a policy tool as well as a general term used to describe any action that removes single occupant vehicle trips from the roadway during peak travel demand periods. As growth in the City of Woodburn occurs, the number of vehicle trips and travel demand in the area will also increase. The ability to change a user’s travel behavior and provide alternative mode choices will help accommodate this potential growth in trips. Tech Memo 5 identifies several policies and programs that may be effective for managing transportation demand in the City of Woodburn, especially within the next 10 to 20 years. Table 10 summarizes the strategies that best meet the goals and objectives of the TSP update. As with all new public and private investments, the implementation of TDM strategies is sure to draw opposition from some. Given Woodburn’s lack of experience with TDM strategies, it is important that decision-makers understand their long-term costs and benefits and are able evaluate these along-side arguments from opponents in achieving outcomes that best reflect the City’s vision and goals while effectively reducing travel demand. Table 9: Transportation Demand Management Program Strategies Program/Project Number Name Description Priority Cost Estimate TDM1 Carpool/Vanpool Match Services Coordinate a rideshare/carpool/vanpool program that regional commuters can use to find other commuters with similar routes to work Low $5,000/year TDM2 Carpool/Vanpool Parking Program Coordinate with employers to designate carpool/vanpool preferential parking Low $5,000/year TDM3 Collaborative Marketing Work with nearby cities, employers, transit service providers, and developers to collaborate on marketing for transportation options that provide an alternative to single-occupancy vehicles Medium $5,000/year TDM4 Limited and/or Flexible Parking Requirements Update the Woodburn Development Ordinance to include strategies that encourage multi-modal transportation High $25,000 TDM5 Parking Management Modify the City’s current parking policy to allow for the potential to charge for parking Low $10,000 TDM6 Transit Fare Subsidies Work with Woodburn Transit to provide transit fare subsidies Low $5,000 TDM7 Employer TDM Measures Work with employers to encourage TDM measures such as allowing employees to work at home one day a week and scheduling shift changes to occur outside of peak travel periods Low $5,000/year TOTAL High Priority Costs $25,000 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $100,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $315,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $440,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 30 Woodburn, Oregon Other potential TDM projects include: ▪ Encourage the development of high-speed communication in all part of the city (fiber optic, digital cable, DSL, etc). The objective would be to allow employers and residents the maximum opportunity to rely upon other systems for conducting business and activities than the transportation system during peak periods. ▪ Encourage developments that effectively mix land uses to reduce vehicle trip generation. These plans may include development linkages (particularly non-auto) that support greater use of alternative modes. Land Use The types and intensities of land uses are closely correlated with travel demand. Land use patterns in many areas of the city are suburban in nature with low densities throughout the city and more industrial and commercial uses in the eastern part of the city near OR 99E. In the future the city will continue to have a mixture of housing and industrial densities, as well as areas of mixed-use development a mix of residential, retail, commercial and/or office uses). Tech Memo 5 identifies several land use strategies that could be implemented in Woodburn. Table 11 summarizes the strategies that best meet the goals and objectives of the TSP update. Table 10: Land Use Projects Project Number Name Description Priority Cost Estimate LU1 Commercial and Mixed-use Nodes Establish neighborhood commercial and mixed-use nodes within the city Low $25,000 LU2 Alternative Mobility Standards Work with ODOT to develop alternative mobility standards at the I-5 interchange ramps Low $25,000 LU3 Right-of-way Dedications Through development, right-of-way dedications should be provided to facilitate the future planned transportation system in the vicinity of the proposed development Low $01 LU4 Half-street Improvements Through development, half-street improvements (sidewalks, curb and gutter, bicycle lanes/paths, and/or travel lanes) should be provided along all site frontages that do not have full buildout improvements in place at the time of development High $01 TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $50,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $50,000 1. Project to be funded by others. ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 31 Woodburn, Oregon Access Management Plan Access management is a set of measures regulating access to streets, roads, and highways, from public roads and private driveways. Access management is a policy tool which seeks to balance mobility, the need to provide efficient, safe and timely travel with the ability to allow access to individual properties. Proper implementation of access management techniques should guarantee reduced congestion, reduced accident rates, less need for roadway widening, conservation of energy, and reduced air pollution. Measures may include but are not limited to restrictions on the type and amount of access to roadways, and use of physical controls, such as signals and channelization including raised medians, to reduce impacts of approach road traffic on the main facility. Numerous driveways or street intersections increase the number of conflicts and potential for collisions and decrease mobility and traffic flow. The City of Woodburn, as with every city, needs a balance of streets that provide access with streets that serve mobility. Tech Memo 5 identifies a number of potential access management techniques and strategies that help to preserve transportation system investments and guard against deteriorations in safety and increased congestion. Table 12 summarizes the projects that best meet the goals and objectives of the TSP update. Table 11: Access Management Projects Project Number Name Description Priority Cost Estimate AM1 Access Spacing Standard Modification Develop access management standards that reflect functional classification of the roadway and that coordinate with the ODOT standards that regulate several major roadways in Woodburn Low $25,000 AM2 Alternative Access Investigate and implement opportunities to provide alternative access to nonstate facilities when reasonable access can occur (consistent with the State’s Division 51 access management standards) Low $25,000 AM3 Access Variance Process Define a variance process for when the standard cannot be met Low $25,000 AM4 Access Consolidation Establish an approach for access consolidation over time to move in the direction of the standards at each opportunity. Cross-over easements should be provided on all compatible parcels (topography, access, and land use) to facilitate future access between adjacent parcels and inter-parcel circulation. Low $25,000 AM5 Access Movement Restrictions Consider opportunities to restrict certain turning movements at accesses (such as a right in-right out access) Low $25,000 TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $125,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $125,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Preferred Alternatives Project 21071.5 June 7, 2019 Page 32 Woodburn, Oregon OTHER Other modes and systems examined through the TSP update process include air, marine, pipeline, rail and truck freight. With the exception of the rail system, no planned projects have been identified for inclusion in the TSP update. Rail Through review of previous planning efforts, Tech Memo 5 identifies a several projects to be considered for the rail system in Woodburn. Table 13 summarizes the projects that best meet the goals and objectives of the TSP update. Table 12: Rail Projects Project Number Location Description Priority Cost Estimate RA1 Front Street Establish a downtown Amtrak passenger rail stop along Front Street in downtown Woodburn, potentially as a public-private partnership at the property adjacent to Locomotive Park Low $10,000 RA2 Front Street and Cleveland Street Investigate the opportunity to remove private grade railroad crossings by providing alternative access to parcels as development and redevelopment occurs Medium $10,000 RA3 Butteville Road, north of OR 219 Explore a passenger rail stop if commuter rail is extended between Wilsonville and Beaverton down to Salem Low $5,000 TOTAL High Priority Costs $0 TOTAL Medium Priority Costs $10,000 TOTAL Low Priority Costs $15,000 TOTAL Program Costs (20 years) $25,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment A Project Evaluation Criteria ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 7 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon PROPOSED EVALUATION CRITERIA The proposed evaluation criteria are based on the proposed goals and policies. A qualitative process using the evaluation criteria will be used to evaluate potential modal solutions and prioritize projects developed through the TSP update. The rating method used to evaluate the alternatives is described below.  Most Desirable: The concept addresses the criterion and/or makes substantial improvements in the criteria category.  No Effect: The criterion does not apply to the concept or the concept has no influence on the criteria.  Least Desirable: The concept does not support the intent of and/or negatively impacts the criteria category. At this level of screening, the criteria will not be weighted; the ratings will be used to inform discussions about the benefits and tradeoffs of each alternative. Table 1 presents the evaluation criteria that will be used to qualitatively evaluate the solutions developed through the TSP update. Objective Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Score Goal 1 Provide a multimodal transportation system that avoids or reduces a reliance on one form of transportation and minimizes energy consumption and air quality impacts. Develop an expanded intracity bus transit system Project will expand and improve the bus transit system +1 Project will have no impact to the bus transit system 0 Project will negatively impact the bus transit system -1 Develop a comprehensive system of bicycle facilities Project will contribute to a comprehensive bicycle system +1 Project will not contribute to a comprehensive bicycle system 0 Project will impede a comprehensive bicycle system -1 Develop a comprehensive system of pedestrian facilities Project will contribute to a comprehensive pedestrian system +1 Project will not contribute to a comprehensive pedestrian system 0 Project will impede a comprehensive pedestrian system -1 Goal 2 Provide an interconnected street system that is adequately sized to accommodate existing and projected traffic demands in the Woodburn area. Develop new east-west and/or north-south collector/minor arterial streets within the City Project will result in new east-west and/or north-south connections +1 Project will have no impact on east-west and/or north-south connections 0 Project will result in increased traffic demands on OR 219/214 and 99E -1 Goal 3 Provide a transportation system that enhances the safety and security of all transportation modes in the Woodburn area. Address existing and potential future safety issues. Project will address existing or potential future safety issue +1 Project will have no impact on an existing or potential future safety issue 0 Project will worsen existing or potential future safety issue -1 Identify street and railroad crossings in need of improvement, as well as those that should be closed or relocated. Project will lead to the improvement, closure, or relocation of a rail crossing +1 Project will have no impact on rail crossings 0 Project will not improve rail crossings or will result in a new rail crossing -1 Develop a plan for designated truck routes through the City, and a plan to handle truck and rail hazardous cargoes Project will enhance truck and freight movements +1 Project will have no impact on truck and freight movements 0 Project will worsen truck and freight movements -1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Woodburn Transportation System Plan Update Project 21071 February 23, 2018 Page 8 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Portland, Oregon Goal 4 Provide a financially sustainable transportation system through responsible stewardship of assets and financial resources. Identify new and innovative funding sources for transportation improvements Project is eligible for new and/or innovative funding +1 Project may not be eligible for new and/or innovative funding 0 Project is not eligible for new and/or innovative funding -1 Preserve and maintain the existing transportation system assets to extend their useful life Project will preserve and maintain the existing transportation system +1 Project will not impact the existing transportation system 0 Project will have a negative impact on the existing transportation system -1 Goal 5 – Land Use and Transportation Integration Review and update land use standards and ordinances to create a balanced built environment where existing and planned land uses are supported by an efficient multi-modal transportation system. TBD ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment B Project Evaluation Matrix ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Bicycle System Major Arterials B1 OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium B2 OR 214 from Progress Way to OR 99E Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium B3 OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium B4 OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install buffered bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Minor Arterials B5 OR 219 from western UGB to Butteville Road Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 650 B6 Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to OR 219 Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 3,200 B7 Butteville Road from OR 219 to southern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ B8 Evergreen Road from OR 214 to Hayes Street Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 B9 Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 B10 Settlemier Avenue from Harrison Street to railroad tracks Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School, Heritage Elementary School, Valor Middle School, and St. Luke's School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 25 B11 Boones Ferry Road from Dahlia Street to southern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 1,500 B12 Front Street from northern UGB to Boones Ferry Road Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School, Heritage Elementary School, Valor Middle School, and St. Luke's School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 8,050 B13 Garfield Street from 3rd Street to Front Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 10 B14 Garfield Street from Smith Drive to 3rd Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 10 B15 Young Street Study Perform a corridor evaluation that would consider design treatments to improve bicycle comfort and safety such as striping, signing, and wayfinding 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 15 B16 OR 211 from OR 99E to eastern UGB Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 1,000 Service Collectors B17 Arney Road from Robin Avenue to OR 219 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs in coordination with ODOT 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 5 B18 Harvard Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen Road Bike lanes Enhance the parallel route of Harvard Drive from Stacy Allison Way to Evergreen Road in place of Stacy Allison Way. Install buffered bike lane striping on both sides of the roadway 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 15 B19 Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Cascade Drive Bike lanes Install bike lane striping. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 Medium $ 35 B20 Hayes Street from Cascade Drive to Settlemier Avenue Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 Medium $ 3,000 B21 Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes. This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High - $ B22 Lincoln Street from Cascade Drive to Front Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 20 B23 Lincoln Street from Front Street to OR 99E Bike lanes Install bike lane striping. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 55 B24 Cleveland Street from Front Street to OR 99E Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 15 B25 Hardcastle Avenue from Front Street to OR 99E Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 20 B26 Brown Street from Cleveland Street to end of roadway Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 20 B27 Cooley Road from OR 211 to Aubrey Way Bike lanes Widen roadway and install bike lanes 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 1,300 B28 Cooley Road from Aubrey Way to Hardcastle Avenue Bike lanes Install bike lane striping 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 15 Access Streets B29 Stubb Road from Harvard Drive to Parr Road Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low B30 Astor Way from Country Club Road to OR 214 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 15 B31 Tukwila Drive from Boones Ferry Road to Hazelnut Drive Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 5 B32 5th Street from OR 214 to Garfield Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for St Luke's School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 20 Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number B33 Gatch Street from Hardcastle Road to Cleveland Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 15 B34 Park Avenue from OR 214 to Lincoln Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 20 B35 Evergreen Road from Country Club Court to OR 214 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 10 Local Streets B36 Country Club Road from Evergreen Road to Astor Way Bike lanes Install bike lane striping 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 40 B37 Cascade Drive from OR 214 to Hayes Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 10 B38 Smith Drive from Hayes Street to Garfield Street Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 5 B39 Meridian Drive from Hazelnut Drive to OR 214 Shared street Install shared lane markings and signs 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 10 B40 City-wide Wayfinding Provide wayfinding to bike routes, multi-use paths, trails (as constructed), parks, schools, and other essential destinations 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 30 Pedestrian System Major Arterials P1 OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Avenue New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium P2 OR 99E from Lincoln Street to southern City Boundary New sidewalks Remove existing sidewalks and install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium P3 OR 99E from southern City Boundary to southern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium Minor Arterials P4 Butteville Road/OR 219 from northern UGB to OR 219 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 1,500 P5 Butteville Road from OR 219 to southern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ P6 Evergreen Road from Stacy Allison Way to Boean Lane Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 200 P7 Boones Ferry Road from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 150 P8 Settlemier Avenue from Oak Street to Parr Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School, Heritage Elementary School, and Valor Middle School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 300 P9 Boones Ferry Road from Parr Road to southern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks. This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 800 P10 Front Street from northern UGB to Hazelnut Drive New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 400 P11 Young Street Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 200 P12 OR 211 from OR 99E to eastern UGB New sidewalks Install new sidewalks in coordination with ODOT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 Service Collectors P13 Hayes Street from Harvard Drive to Settlemier Avenue Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 600 P14 Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary New sidewalks Install new sidewalks. This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High - $ P15 Lincoln Street from Cascade Drive to OR 99E Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 450 P16 Industrial Avenue from Progress Way to OR 99E New sidewalks Install new sidewalks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 P17 Progress Way from Industrial Avenue to OR 214 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 850 P18 Hardcastle Avenue from Front Street to Cooley Road Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 450 P19 Brown Street from Cleveland Street to end of roadway Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ P20 Cooley Road from OR 211 to Hardcastle Avenue Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 650 Access Streets P21 Woodland Avenue from Jory Street to Arney Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 250 P22 Stubb Road from Harvard Drive to Parr Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium P23 Oregon Way from Country Club Road to OR 214 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 250 P24 Hazelnut Drive from Graystone Drive to Front Street Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 150 P25 Gatch Street from Hardcastle Road to Cleveland Street Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 350 P26 Park Avenue from Hardcastle Avenue to Lincoln Street New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 65 Local Streets P27 Willow Avenue from McNaught Road to OR 219 New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on both sides 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 350 ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number P28 Cascade Drive from OR 214 to Hayes Street New sidewalks Install new sidewalks. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 400 P29 Ben Brown Lane from end of roadway to Boones Ferry Road Sidewalks - Fill in gaps Fill in the gaps 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 200 P30 Oak Street from Boones Ferry Road to Front Street New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 150 P31 Ogle Street from Cleveland Street to Boones Ferry Road New sidewalks Install new sidewalks on one side 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 900 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements P32 Front Street/Young Street Enhanced crossing Construct ADA-complaint ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 Medium $ 15 P33 Front Street/Lincoln Street Enhanced crossing Construct ADA-complaint ramps and sidewalks on the east leg of the intersection. This project improves safe routes to school for St Luke's School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 15 P34 Cascade Drive/Hayes Street Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves safe routes to school for Nellie Muir Elementary School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 65 P35 Park Avenue/Legion Park Driveway Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves access to Legion Park 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 Medium $ 65 P36 Hazelnut Drive/Broadmoor Place Accessway Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 65 P37 OR 214/N Bulldog Drive Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, update the existing crossing to an enhanced pedestrian crossing with a pedestrian hybrid beacon coordinated with the surrounding traffic signals in coordination with ODOT. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School High $ 150 P38 OR 99E from OR 214 to Young Street Enhanced crossing - Signalized intersection As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, install countdown pedestrian timers and construct ADA enhancements at key signalized intersections along OR 99E in coordination with ODOT, including: o OR 214/OR 211 o Hardcastle Avenue o Lincoln Road o Young Street 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 650 P39 OR 99E from OR 214 to Young Street Enhanced crossing As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, install curb extensions on minor street legs of intersections (curb extensions to shorten pedestrian crossing distances parallel to OR 99E, not for crossing of OR 99E) between Arlington Street and Cleveland Street (up to 8 locations) in coordination with ODOT. Potential locations include: o Alexandria Avenue o James Street o Williams Street o Blaine Street o Aztec Drive o Laurel Avenue o Tomlin Avenue 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 Medium $ 950 P40 OR 99E, north of Williams Street Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). High $ 75 P41 OR 99E, between NE Laurel Avenue and Tomlin Avenue Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). High $ 75 P42 OR 99E, between Blaine Street and Aztec Drive Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). High $ 75 ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number P43 OR 99E, north of Mount Jefferson Avenue Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). Medium $ 75 P44 OR 99E, north of James Street Enhanced crossing As identified in the Woodburn OR 214/OR 99E Pedestrian Safety Study, install an enhanced pedestrian crossing in coordination with ODOT, that may include raised median refuge island, sidewalk infill, supplemental street lighting, and a potential RRFB (RRFB cost not included). Medium $ 75 P45 Boones Ferry Road/Constitution Avenue/Tukwila Drive Enhanced crossing Install an enhanced pedestrian crossing. This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 3 High $ 65 Multi-Use Pathways P46 Mill Creek Greenway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plan, construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: o Hazelnut Drive o Bulldog Drive (east crossing) o OR 214 (state highway) o Hardcastle Avenue o Lincoln Street o Young Street o Cleveland Street and railroad tracks This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 High $ 2,000 P47 Mill Creek Greenway – Northern tributary Multi-use pathway As identified in the Mill Creek Greenway Master Plane, construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: o Bulldog Drive (west crossing) o Meridian Drive o Boones Ferry Road This project improves safe routes to school for Woodburn High School, Lincoln Elementary School, and French Prairie Middle School 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 Medium $ 700 P48 Mill Creek Greenway – Western tributary Multi-use pathway Construct a multi-use path including at-grade mid-block crossing treatments at the following street connections: o Parr Road o Ben Brown Lane o SeElemier Avenue o Front Street and railroad tracks This project improves safe routes to school for Heritage Elementary School and Valor Middle School 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 Medium $ 900 P49 Evergreen Road Multi-Use Path Multi-use pathway Construct a multi-use path extending from Evergreen Road 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 150 P50 Washington Elementary School Multi-Use Path Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, construct a north-south multi-use path connection between Hardcastle Avenue and Lincoln Street, west of Washington Elementary School. This project improves safe routes to school for Washington Elementary School 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 90 P51 Mill Creek Greenway - Southern extension Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, construct extension of Mill Creek Greenway multi-use path to Belle Passi Road 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 90 P52 Evergreen Road Pedestrian Connection Multi-use pathway Construct a connection between the Evergreen Road multi- use path and pedestrian facilities that are part of future development to the south 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 20 P53 Centennial Park Pedestrian Connection Multi-use pathway Construct a connection between the Centennial Park multi- use path and pedestrian facilities that are part of future development to the west 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 20 P54 Santiam Drive Pedestrian Connection Multi-use pathway Construct a connection between Santiam Drive and pedestrian facilities that are part of future development to the south 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number P55 June Way Accessway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E (near the Audrey Way intersection), may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 80 P56 Johnson Street Accessway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 45 P57 Elm Street Accessway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E, may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 25 P58 Wilson Street Accessway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 55 P59 Hawley Street Accessway Multi-use pathway As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT, install a new accessway to OR 99E (possibly part of future street extension), may not connect directly as it runs parallel to OR 99E 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 55 P60 A Street Accessway Multi-use pathway Install a new accessway that connects A Street north to Cleveland Street and/or Mill Creek Greenway (western tributary). 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 25 P61 City-wide Wayfinding Provide wayfinding to bike routes, multi-use paths, trails (as constructed), parks, schools, and other essential destinations 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 30 Roadway System Street Connectivity SC1 Southeast Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ SC2 South Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ SC3 Southwest Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ SC4 North Woodburn New connection Fill in the local street network as low-density residential growth occurs 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium - $ Capacity R1 Southern OR 219/Butteville Road Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 High $ 2,750 R2 OR 219 from Butteville Road to Willow Road Street design Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane (in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 High $ 1,700 R3 OR 214 from Cascade Drive to OR 99E Street design Widen roadway to include two lanes in each direction and a two-way left-turn lane, including changes to signal timing as appropriate, in coordination with ODOT (and in conjunction with bicycle facility improvements) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 20,300 R4 OR 99E from Lincoln Street to south UGB Street design As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, widen roadway to provide a continuous two-way left-turn lane and wider shoulders, including changes to signal timing as appropriate, in coordination with ODOT (and in conjunction with pedestrian and bicycle facility improvements) 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 12,300 R5 Parr Road from western UGB to western City Boundary Street design Upgrade to Service Collector urban standards including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Low - $ R6 Butteville Road from OR 219 to southern UGB Street design Upgrade to Minor Arterial urban standards including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Low - $ R7 Brown Street from Comstock Avenue to end of roadway Street design Upgrade to Service Collector urban standards including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Low - $ R8 OR 214/I-5 Southbound Ramp Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 15 R9 OR 214/I-5 Northbound Ramp Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 15 R10 OR 214/Evergreen Road Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 15 R11 OR 214/Oregon Way/Country Club Road Intersection Traffic signal Investigate corridor signal timing and coordination adjustments in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 15 R12 OR 214/Front Street Ramp Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number R13 OR 214/Park Street Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 R14 OR 214/OR 211/OR 99E Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Install a second left-turn lane on the southbound approach, install a second receiving lane on the east leg, and update signal timing in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 900 R15 Parr Road/Settlemier Avenue Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capcity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Low $ 500 R16 OR 99E/Hardcastle Avenue Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Reconfigure the westbound approach to incorporate one left- turn lane and one thru-right turn lane in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 20 R17 OR 99E/Lincoln Street Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Install a shared through-right turn lane on the eastbound approach and reconfigure the existing approach lane as a separate left-turn lane in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 R18 OR 99E/Young Street Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Install a third westbound lane to provide separate left, thru, and right turn lanes in coordination with ODOT. Implement protected-permissive left-turn phasing on the eastbound and westbound approaches. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 550 R19 OR 99E/Cleveland Street Intersection Traffic signal Install intersection capacity improvement such as traffic signal (if warranted), turn lanes, or roundabout in coordination with ODOT. Consideration should be given to railroad preemption and the proximity to the signalized intersection at OR 99E and Young Street. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 500 R20 Ben Brown Lane New roadway Extend Ben Brown Lane to Evergreen Road as an Access Street 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium 5,100 $ R21 Evergreen Road New roadway Extend south to Parr Road 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 High 4,750 $ R22 Stacy Allison Way New roadway Extend south to UGB 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium 7,300 $ R23 Brown Street New roadway Extend south to the South Arterial 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium 800 $ R24 Woodland Avenue New roadway Extend west to Butteville Road 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 Medium 2,450 $ R25 East-west Connection in Southwest Woodburn New roadway Construct a new Local Industrial Street connecting the southern extensions of Stacy Allison Way and Evergreen Road 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 Medium 1,800 $ R26 Stubb Road from Harvard Drive to Parr Road Street design and new roadway Upgrade the existing roadway to Access Street standards and extend north to Harvard Drive including bicycle and pedestrian enhancements 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 Medium 1,900 $ R27 North-south Connection in Southwest Woodburn New roadway Construct a new Access Street connecting Hayes Street to Stubb Street 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 Medium 5,150 $ R28 OR 99E/Industrial Avenue Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Evaluate the intersection layout, control, signing, and striping, including any sight distance constraints in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 100 R29 South Arterial New roadway Construct the Southern Arterial from Evergreen Road to OR 99E (2 lanes) 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 Medium $ 12,250 R30 Woodland Avenue Curve Modification Intersection - geometric considerations Modify the intersection layout to address truck turning movement constraints 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 Medium $ 100 R31 George Street/Hillsboro Silverton Highway Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, close vehicular access to George Street from Hillsboro Silverton Highway when future local street access is provided to the east Medium $ 60 Safety S1 Southern OR 219/Butteville Road Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) if/when warranted and in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 High S2 Northern OR 214/Butteville Road Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) if/when warranted and in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 Medium $ 2,000 S3 Front Street/Lincoln Street Intersection Intersection Enhanced signs and pavement markings (e.g. stop signs, warning signs, and/or beacons) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 50 S4 Front Street/Young Street/Garfield Street Intersection Intersection - geometric considerations Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping in correlation to the railroad tracks. Provide clarification for westbound drivers trying to proceed through the intersection 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 100 S5 OR 99E Lighting As identified in the Highway 99E Corridor Plan, update roadway lighting to meet ODOT roadway lighting standards in coordination with ODOT 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 2,150 ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number S6 OR 99E access between Young Street and Cleveland Street Intersection As identified in teh Highway 99E Corridor Plan and in coordination with ODOT: Restrict left-turn movements and eventually close the Silverton Avenue intersection on OR 99E and vacate the segment of Silverton Avenue between OR 99E and Birds Eye Avenue Restrict left-turn movements onto Birds Eye Avenue from Hillsboro Silverton Highway and eventually close the Birds Eye Avenue intersection on Hillsboro Silverton Highway and vacate the segment of Birds Eye Avenue between Hillsboro Silverton Highway and Silverton Avenue 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 Medium $ 60 S7 OR 99E/Tomlin Avenue Intersection - geometric considerations Evaluate the intersection layout, signing, and striping in coordination with ODOT, including any sight distance constraints. Consider restricting the southbound left-turn movement 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 3 High $ 100 S8 Butteville Road/Parr Road Intersection - geometric considerations Modify intersection to address existing sight distance and geometric limitations 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Medium $ 1,000 S9 City-wide Study Evaluate traffic safety along OR 99E, OR 219/OR214, Front Street, Evergreen Road, and other key corridors to identify appropriate countermeasures 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Low $ 100 S10 Settlemier Avenue/Hayes Street Intersection - geometric considerations Enhanced traffic control (traffic signal, roundabout, or other appropriate geometric enhancements) 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 3 High $ 2,000 Transit System Service Enhancements T1 Woodburn Fleet Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Purchase of Category B and C vehicles (1 each) for use in the City's expanded transit services. (100% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T2 Woodburn Fleet Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Purchase a Category B vehicle that will replace the second oldest full size vehicle in the WTS fleet; will be used for the City's existing local fixed route circulator. (130% funding level 2021) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T3 Woodburn Fixed Route Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Addition of weekend service for Woodburn Transit Service fixed route and paratransit services (Sat. 9am-5pm, Sun.9am-3pm) by up to 2,156 revenue hours (FY20-21). (100% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T4 Woodburn Fixed Route Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Modify the existing 60 minute fixed route loop; add an additional 30 minute route that will serve high frequency stops on weekdays (7am-7pm) within the Woodburn city limits. Total additional service will be up to 6,192 revenue hours (FY20-21). (100% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T5 Woodburn Fixed Route Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Modify the existing 60-min. fixed route by adding a new 30 min. route that serves high frequency stops (up to 1,456 revenue hours); this service will operate Saturdays (9am-5pm) and Sundays (9am-3pm). Also includes Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service. (130% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T6 Woodburn Fixed Route Increase frequency of existing route to 30 minutes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium - $ T7 Woodburn Fixed Route Convert existing route to two-way operations 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium - $ ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number T8 City-wide Work with Woodburn Transit as growth occurs to provide new or re-routed service to other areas of Woodburn including: o Parr Road via an extension of Evergreen Road o Crosby Road o BuEeville Road o The employment center southwest of the I-5/OR 214 interchange o Woodburn Industrial Park along the Progress Way and Industrial Avenue corridors o Gateway subarea between Front Street and Mill Creek o Neighborhoods in southeast Woodburn 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T9 Woodburn Company Stores Coordinate with Woodburn Transit to establish a free shuttle between the Woodburn Company Stores and Downtown Woodburn, hourly during peak shopping and entertainment hours 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T10 City-wide Coordinate with Woodburn Transit and major employers to establish a peak-only employer shuttle 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ Intercity Service Enhancements T11 Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Expand service for up to 7,557 revenue hours on urban & rural Regional services. Includes startup costs for hiring new employees, and coordination of schedules with connecting services. Also establishes a Youth fare category (ages 6-18). (100% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T12 Keizer to Wilsonville Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Establish one new Regional route from Keizer to Wilsonville with a stop at the Woodburn Memorial Park and Ride. Increase service on weekdays by 30 percent on urban & rural Regional services by up to 5,245 revenue hours. (130% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T13 Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Add Saturday service to urban & rural Cherriots Regional services with up to 3,919 revenue hours of new service (FY20-21). Includes coordination of schedules with other connecting services. (100% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T14 Urban and Rural Cherriots Regional Services Coordinate with Cherriots to deliver service enhancements funded through the STIF: Add 30 percent more Saturday service to urban & rural Regional services by up to 215 revenue hours (FY20-21). In FY21, adds 6 holidays to the same routes. Includes coordination of schedules with connecting services. (130% funding level 2020-21) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T15 City-wide Coordinate transfers between the different agency services in Woodburn 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T16 Woodburn Coordinate with Cherriots to provide a stop in Woodburn for SMART Route 1X, providing service to WES station in Wilsonville and downtown Salem 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ T17 Woodburn to Portland Coordinate with Cherriots to consider further new service connections for Woodburn including: o Service to Portland - connect to TriMet via the TualaLn Park-and-Ride, directly into downtown Portland, or the MAX Orange Line light rail service. o Demand-responsive service to Hubbard one day per week 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Medium 5 $ Stop Enhancements T18 City-wide Evaluate all bus stops to verify static bus route information signage is visible and accessible and that bike racks are available at major bus stops 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium 25 $ T19 Stop 755016: Walmart New shelter 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low 5 $ T20 Stop 20419: Garfield Street New shelter 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low 5 $ Other Transit Solutions T21 City-wide Investigate transferring the paratransit system to a local social service agency 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low 5 $ TSMO TDM ---PAGE BREAK--- Connectivity Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective A Objective B Objective C Objective A Objective B Location/Name Type Description Evaluation Criteria Priority Cost (1000s) Multimodal Mobility Safety Strategic Investment Total Project Number TDM1 Carpool/Vanpool Match Services Coordinate a rideshare/carpool/vanpool program that regional commuters can use to find other commuters with similar routes to work 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 100 $ TDM2 Carpool/Vanpool Parking Program Coordinate with employers to designate carpool/vanpool preferential parking 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 100 $ TDM3 Collaborative Marketing Work with nearby cities, employers, transit service providers, and developers to collaborate on marketing for transportation options that provide an alternative to single-occupancy vehicles 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Medium 100 $ TDM4 Limited and/or Flexible Parking Requirements Update the Woodburn Development Ordinance to include strategies that encourage multi-modal transportation 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 High 25 $ TDM5 Parking Management Modify the City’s current parking policy to allow for the potential to charge for parking 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low 10 $ TDM6 Transit Fare Subsidies Work with Woodburn Transit to provide transit fare subsidies 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Low 5 $ TDM7 Employer TDM Measures Work with employers to encourage TDM measures such as allowing employees to work at home one day a week and scheduling shift changes to occur outside of peak travel periods 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 100 $ Land Use LU1 Commercial and Mixed-use Nodes Establish neighborhood commercial and mixed-use nodes within the city 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 25 $ LU2 Alternative Mobility Standards Work with ODOT to develop alternative mobility standards at the I-5 interchange ramps 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 25 $ LU3 Right-of-way Dedications Through development, right-of-way dedications should be provided to facilitate the future planned transportation system in the vicinity of the proposed development 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low - $ LU4 Half-street Improvements Through development, half-street improvements (sidewalks, curb and gutter, bicycle lanes/paths, and/or travel lanes) should be provided along all site frontages that do not have full buildout improvements in place at the time of development 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 High - $ Access Management AM1 Access Spacing Standard Modification Develop access management standards that reflect functional classification of the roadway and that coordinate with the ODOT standards that regulate several major roadways in Woodburn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 25 $ AM2 Alternative Access Investigate and implement opportunities to provide alternative access to nonstate facilities when reasonable access can occur (consistent with the State’s Division 51 access management standards) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Low 25 $ AM3 Access Variance Process Define a variance process for when the standard cannot be met 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Low 25 $ AM4 Access Consolidation Establish an approach for access consolidation over time to move in the direction of the standards at each opportunity. Cross-over easements should be provided on all compatible parcels (topography, access, and land use) to facilitate future access between adjacent parcels and inter-parcel circulation. 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Low 25 $ AM5 Access Movement Restrictions Consider opportunities to restrict certain turning movements at accesses (such as a right in-right out access) 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Low 25 $ Other Solutions Rail System RA1 Front Street Establish a downtown Amtrak passenger rail stop along Front Street in downtown Woodburn, potentially as a public-private partnership at the property adjacent to Locomotive Park 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 10 $ RA2 Front Street and Cleveland Street Investigate the opportunity to remove private grade railroad crossings by providing alternative access to parcels as development and redevelopment occurs 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 Medium 10 $ RA3 Butteville Road, north of OR 219 Explore a passenger rail stop if commuter rail is extended between Wilsonville and Beaverton down to Salem 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Low 5 $