Document Woodburn_doc_0b1221052d

Final Decision Type II Staff Report: Preliminary Partition File number(s): PAR 2019-01 Related files: ANX 2017-05, PP 2017-01, PUD 2017-01, & SUB 2017-01 (collectively known as “Smith Creek Development”) Project name: Smith Creek Development: Phases 1A & 2A Date of decision: March 22, 2019 Date of mailing: March 25, 2019 Applicant: Hazel M. Smith Properties LLC Landowner: Hazel M. Smith Properties LLC Site location: 690 Ben Brown Lane Tax Lot(s): 052W13 00106 ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 2 of 15 Summary: The applicant applied for preliminary partition PAR 2019-01 (Exhibit 4; Attachment 101) in order to partition the subject property into three parcels: some of the Smith family homestead and outbuildings as Parcel 1, Smith Creek Development Phase 1A as Parcel 2, and Phase 3A as Parcel 3. Background The applicant through Stafford Land Company and Ordinance No. 2565 (2018) annexed territory including the subject property and obtained approval of a planned unit development (PUD), preliminary subdivision, and ancillary applications for the Smith Creek Development via the Final Order of November 14, 2018. As part of contract purchase agreement with the landowners to purchase subareas of the territory over time, the applicant had been adjusting lot lines under Marion County jurisdiction prior to annexation. The applicant had intended to complete the last one, Marion County PLA 17-035, but annexation occurred and the County ceased review. The applicant then applied to the City for this PAR 2019-01 and Property Line Adjustment (PLA) 2019-02, which is also related to the Smith Creek Development. The applicant’s purpose through the PAR and PLA is to adjust and create lot lines that align with the phase boundaries of the Smith Creek Development, which has nine phases as illustrated below in the excerpted Smith Creek Exhibit C-6 (Attachment 104) in blue dashed lines: ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 3 of 15 As noted at the top of this staff report / final decision, this PAR relates to Phases 1A and 2A. It also partitions the Smith family homestead from the southeast corner of Phase 1 so that it can continue after build-out of the Smith Creek Development. (The homestead is addressed by the City as 690 Ben Brown Lane.) Context The applicant is not proposing any development or the establishment of any new land uses as part of this PAR and is yet to apply for Smith Creek Development Phase 1A final plat following approval of SUB 2017-01. Condition PAR-3 memorializes this understanding and that this PAR in no way abrogates or supersedes the Smith Creek Final Order conditions of approval. Introduction The application submittal date is February 11, 2019, the completeness date is February 26, 2019, and the 120th day deadline for final action per Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 92.105 and 227.178 would have been June 26, 2019. The subject property is approximately 51.58 acres, generally west of the dead-end of Ben Brown Lane. According to the City geographic information system (GIS), the address of 690 Ben Brown Lane is with Tax Lot 052W13 00106 (Partition Plat No. 2018-075, Parcel however, the Marion County Assessor online GIS viewer shows Tax Lot 106 with no street address but that 690 Ben Brown Lane is with Tax Lot 052W13 00100 (Partition Plat No. 2018-075, Parcel Meanwhile, City GIS shows Tax Lot 100 as having the address of 105 Ben Brown Lane. Section references are to the Woodburn Development Ordinance (WDO). Staff finds that the application meets WDO provisions or can meet them with conditions and approves it with conditions. The next step is a final partition application per 5.01.06; see Note to the Applicant 1. Because it is a Type II administrative approval requiring no public hearing, this staff report serves as both a preliminary partition approval and public notice of final decision to owners of property within 250 feet of the subject property. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 4 of 15 Conditions of Approval PAR-1. Next Step: The applicant shall: a. Apply to the City for Partition Final Plat Approval per WDO 5.01.06 with materials prepared consistent with Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS) 92 and Marion County Surveyor standards; and b. Do so prior to applying for Subdivision Final Plat Approval for Smith Creek Development Phase 1A (SUB 2017-01). PAR-2. Recording: Upon City issuance of a Partition Final Plat Approval pursuant to WDO 5.01.06, the applicant shall: a. Record the approved plat with Marion County; and b. Do so prior to recording any of a Subdivision Final Plat Approval per WDO 5.01.06 or “Planned Unit Development (PUD), Final Plan Approval” per 5.01.07 for Smith Creek Development Phase 1A (SUB 2017-01). PAR-3. Relationship to Smith Creek Development: Approval of Preliminary Partition 2019-01 does not abrogate or supersede any conditions of approval in the Smith Creek Development Final Order of November 14, 2018 that included Preliminary Subdivision SUB 2017-01. PAR-4. Frontage/public/street improvements: To meet WDO 3.01 were the Smith Creek Development Smith Creek Development Final Order of November 14, 2018 to expire without development of required frontage/public/street improvements: a. Any development, redevelopment, partition, or subdivision that a developer later proposes on any of the Preliminary Partition 2019-01 Parcels 1-3 shall be subject to 3.01 with the exemption from frontage/public/street improvements that WDO 3.01.01D. applies to “construction of a single-family dwelling” notwithstanding; and b. As part of a developer shall provide and improve any required new, extended, or widened rights-of-ways (ROWs) pursuant to the road and street classification of Woodburn Transportation System Plan (TSP) Figure 7-1 (2005) – or whatever such amended or new figure(s) the City had adopted following the 2019 update of the 2005 TSP – and the corresponding model/standard street cross section figures in 3.01 or custom cross section(s) through any of planned unit development (PUD) or Exception to Street Right of Way and Improvement Requirements (“Street Exception”; EXCP) discretionary review and approval. PAR-5. PUEs: To meet WDO 3.02.01, The applicant shall dedicate a public utility easement (PUE) five feet wide along each lot line abutting a public street including the dead-end of a public street, including unimproved street right-of-way (ROW) – specifically along the dead- ends of Ben Brown Lane, the unimproved ROW that divides Woodburn Senior Estates No. 7 Subdivision and Montebello 2 Subdivision, and Harvard Drive. PAR-6. Parcel 3 access easement: To meet WDO 3.04.01A.2., the applicant shall provide access to a public street by means of an access easement and maintenance agreement to the satisfaction of the Director, and revocable only with the concurrence of the Director. The applicant shall delineate an easement sixty-six (66) feet wide across PAR 2019-01 Parcel 2 to Parcel 3 to the benefit of Parcel 3, note it, and record such easement through the partition. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 5 of 15 Notes to the Applicant The following are not conditions of approval, but are important notes for the applicant to be aware of and follow for the site development as part of the permitting stage: 1. Time Limit: WDO 5.01.06A. requires for Partition and Subdivision Final Plat Approval that, “The final plat shall be submitted within two years of date of the initial approval and be in substantial conforms [sic] to all conditions of the preliminary approval.” However, because of the Smith Creek Development factor, conditions of approval of this PAR 2019-01 supersede this standard note; see Conditions PAR-1 & 2. 2. Issuing Authority: Per 5.01.06C., the Community Development Director is the signing authority for Mylar plat sheets. 3. Plat Tracker: The County maintains a plat tracking tool at . 4. Records: Staff suggests that the applicant and landowner retain a copy of this staff report / final decision. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 6 of 15 Analyses & Findings: This final decision analyzes the application materials and finds through statements how the application materials relate to and meet applicable provisions such as criteria, requirements, and standards. They confirm that a given standard is met or if not met, they call attention to it, suggest a remedy, and have a corresponding recommended condition of approval. Symbols aid locating and understanding categories of findings: Symbol Category Indication Requirement (or guideline) met No action needed Requirement (or guideline) not met Correction needed Requirement (or guideline) not applicable No action needed • Requirement (or guideline) met, but might become unmet because of condition applied to meet separate and related requirement that is not met • Plan sheets and/or narrative inconsistent • Other special circumstance benefitting from attention Revision needed for clear and consistent records Land Use & Zoning Comprehensive Plan Land Use Designation Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential Zoning District RMN, RSN, and RM zones Overlay District(s) None Existing Use(s) Single-family dwelling The lot is a legal lot of record: Partition Plat 2018-075, Parcel 2 (see Attachment 102). The applicable provisions appear in bold below. Preliminary Partition Provisions 2.02 Residential Zones Proposed Parcel 1, described in Attachment 101, includes an existing single-family house with the address of 690 Ben Brown Lane that is the Smith family homestead and zoned Nodal Multi- Family Residential (RMN). Table 2.02F describes site development standards for the RMN zone. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 7 of 15 Nodal Medium Density Residential (RMN) - Site Development Standards Table 2.02F Lot Area, Minimum (square feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home Interior or cul-de-sac lot 4, 000 1, 2 Corner lot 5, 000 2 Lot Width, Minimum (feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home Interior or cul-de-sac Lot 45 2 Corner lot 60 2 Lot Depth, Average (feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home or row house 80 2 Street Frontage, Minimum (feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility, group home, or multiple-family dwelling 2 Interior lot 20 Corner lot 35 Cul-de-sac lot 30 Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Minimum (feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home 20 2, 4 Side Setback, Minimum (feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home 5 2 Accessory structure Same as primary Rear Setback, Minimum (feet) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home Building height (feet) 16 or less 24 2, 6 more than 16 and less than 28 30 2, 6 28 or more 36 2, 6 Accessory structure 5 Setback to a Private Access Easement, Minimum (feet) 5 Lot Coverage, Maximum (percent) Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home Primary building height 16 feet or less 40 2 Primary building height more than 16 feet or less 35 2 Building Height, Maximum (feet) Primary structure 45 Features not used for habitation 70 Accessory structure 1512 1. Flag lots are not allowed in the RMN zone. 2. Child care facility for 12 or fewer children, group home for five or fewer persons 4. Measured from the Special Setback (Section 3.03.02), if any 6. With a maximum deviation of five feet from the setback standard 12. Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to specific development standards (see Section 2.07, Special Uses) ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 8 of 15 Regarding the existing farmhouse, proposed Parcel 1 creates no nonconformance in terms of lot size, lot dimensions, or street frontage. Because this partition application proposes no redevelopment or new development, the remaining provisions regarding setbacks, lot coverage, and building height are not applicable. The provisions are met for Parcel 1. The remainder of the subject property – Parcels 2 and 3 – is fallow farmland with no buildings and zoned Nodal Residential Single-Family (RSN). Nodal Residential Single-Family (RSN) - Site Development Standards Table 2.02C Lot Area, Minimum (square feet) Standard lot Interior or cul-de-sac lot 6,000 1 Corner lot Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home 2 8,000 Any other use 10,000 Lot Width, Minimum (feet) Standard lot Interior or cul-de-sac lot 50 Corner lot 80 Lot Depth, Average (feet) Standard lot 90 Street Frontage, Minimum (feet) Standard lot Interior or cul-de-sac lot 40 Corner lot Single-family dwelling, child care facility or group home 2 40 Any other use 50 Front Setback and Setback Abutting a Street, Minimum (feet) 20 3, 4 Front Porch Setback, Maximum (feet) 10 Side Setback, Minimum (feet) 5 7, 8 Rear Setback, Average (feet) Primary structure 20 or 0 5, 7, 10 Accessory structure 5 Setback to a Private Access Easement, Minimum (feet) 5 Lot Coverage, Maximum (percent) Primary building height 16 feet or less 40 9 Primary building height more than 16 feet 35 9 Accessory structure 25 of rear yard 6, 9, 11 Building Height, Maximum (feet) Primary structure 35 Features not used for habitation 70 Accessory structure 1511 ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 9 of 15 1. Flag lots are not allowed in the RSN zone. 2. Child care facility for 12 or fewer children, group home for five or fewer persons 3. Measured from the Special Setback (Section 3.03.02), if any 4. Infill lots between developed lots: average of abutting residential buildings, plus or minus 5 feet, but not less than 10 feet 5. With a maximum deviation of five feet from the setback standard 6. Accessory structures are included in the total lot coverage. 7. A house of worship shall be set back at least 20 feet from a property line abutting a residential zone or use. 9. Lot coverage limitations determined by setbacks for small lot and row house development 11. Accessory Dwelling Units are subject to specific development standards (see Section 2.07, Special Uses) Neither parcel creates nonconformance in terms of lot size, lot dimensions, or street frontage. Because this partition application proposes no new development on Parcels 2 and 3, the remaining provisions regarding setbacks, lot coverage, and building height are not applicable. The provisions are met for Parcels 2 and 3. 3.01.01 Applicability A. Right-of-way standards apply to all public streets. B. Improvement standards apply to all public and private streets, sidewalks and bikeways. C. Functional standards are identified in the Woodburn TSP. D. This applies to all development, and is not limited to partitions, subdivisions, multi-family, commercial or industrial construction, or establishment of a manufactured dwelling or recreational vehicle park. Construction of a single-family dwelling or placement of a manufactured dwelling does not, for the purposes of this Section, constitute development, however, in no case can this type of development occur without minimal access as determined by the Director. The Smith Creek Development Final Order including its conditions of approval address the frontage/public/street improvement provisions of 3.01. The more directly relevant ones are Conditions G1, G2, G5, SUB-1, PP-1, PUD-9, PUD-10, T-BP1, T-A1, and PUD-13. Objective 1 The City’s first objective for this PAR is to condition it so that the developer or subsequent developers and homebuilders cannot construe it as abrogating or superseding the Smith Creek Development conditions. Staff applies Condition of Approval PAR-3. Objective 2 The second objective is, were the Smith Creek Development Final Order of November 14, 2018 to expire without final plat approval(s) and recordation(s) and development, to secure from ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 10 of 15 Stafford Land Company – or other developers and homebuilders to whom it might sell subareas – construction of frontage/public/street improvements that the WDO would require in the absence of the Smith Creek Development. Staff applies Condition of Approval PAR-4. The provisions are met with Conditions PAR-3 & 4. 3.02.01 Public Utility Easements A. The Director shall require dedication of specific easements for the construction and maintenance of municipal water, sewerage and storm drainage facilities located on private property. B. A five-foot wide public utility easement shall be dedicated along each lot line abutting a public street. C. As a condition of approval for development, including property line adjustments, partitions, subdivisions, design reviews, or Planned Unit Developments (PUDs), the Director may require dedication of public utility easements. The proposed partition (Exhibit 4; Attachment 101) illustrates and notes via Note 6 a 5-foot public utility easement (PUE) along the existing portion of Ben Brown Lane, the south side of which fronts proposed Parcel 1 and a small part of Parcel 2. However, additional PUEs are needed. First, 3.02.01B. includes the dead-end sides of street stubs. Second, however, additional PUEs are needed based on 3.01.05A.2.d.: “Provide either a one foot-reserve strip deeded to the City, or an alternative method for limiting access approved by the City, at the temporary end of the right-of-way.” Because staff believes reserve strips could complicate the partition into a de facto subdivision and because a PUE serves as the referenced “alternative method for limiting access”, the PUE is the tool to meet the reserve strip provision. Staff confirms that upon Smith Creek Phase 1A final plat the developer would record removal of these reserve strip PUEs because the WDO would no longer require them. Staff applies Condition of Approval PAR-5. The applicant needs to extend the 5-ft PUE north along the dead-end of Ben Brown Lane and to add 5-ft PUEs along the dead-ends of Harvard Drive and the unimproved ROW that divides Woodburn Senior Estates No. 7 Subdivision and Montebello 2 Subdivision. The provisions are met with Condition PAR-5. 3.02.03 Street Lighting A. Public Streets Public streets abutting a development shall be illuminated with street lights installed to the standards of the City and the electric utility. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 11 of 15 Because the applicant proposes no development including no new streets, and the subject property adjoins only street stubs, there is no existing or new street frontage along which to install lighting, and the provision is not applicable. The provision is not applicable. 3.02.04 Underground Utilities All permanent utility service to and within a development shall be underground, except where overhead high-voltage (35,000 volts or more) electric facilities exist. Because no development or redevelopment of electric power lines is proposed, the provision is not applicable. The provision is not applicable. 3.04 Vehicular Access 3.04.01 Applicability and Permit A. Street Access Every lot shall have: 1. Direct access to an abutting public street, or 2. Access to a public street by means of an access easement and maintenance agreement to the satisfaction of the Director, and revocable only with the concurrence of the Director. Proposed Parcel 1, which contains an existing single-family house, will maintain direct access to Ben Brown Lane, a public street. Parcel 3 meets neither subsection 1 or two above. The developer would establish street access for proposed 3 via the Smith Creek Development. Objectives 1 and 2 that staff describes for 3.01 apply here also. Were the Smith Creek Development fail to manifest, Parcel 3 would be landlocked and fail to conform with subsection 1 or 2. Staff applies Condition of Approval PAR-6. Per 3.04.01A.2., the applicant needs to revise the proposed partition to illustrate an access easement to the benefit of Parcel 2. There are two acceptable routes across Parcel 2 to Parcel 3: one from Ben Brown Lane and the other from Harvard Drive. The provisions are met with Condition PAR-6. 3.08.01 Requirements All partitions and subdivisions shall comply with the standards of ORS Chapter 92 and the Woodburn Development Ordinance. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 12 of 15 This final decision does not address the requirements of ORS 92 separately, because they are addressed through the review of WDO sections or addressed by the applicant either as part of the final partition or upon development applications. This decision establishes compliance or non-compliance with applicable WDO provisions. However, for clarity for future staff, staff cites two statutory provisions relating to preliminary land divisions about what regulations apply as time passes and when a decision expires: “92.040 Application for approval of subdivision or partition; tentative plan; applicability of local government laws. … After September 9, 1995, when a local government makes a decision on a land use application for a subdivision inside an urban growth boundary, only those local government laws implemented under an acknowledged comprehensive plan that are in effect at the time of application shall govern subsequent construction on the property unless the applicant elects otherwise. A local government may establish a time period during which decisions on land use applications under subsection of this section apply. However, in no event shall the time period exceed 10 years, whether or not a time period is established by the local government. [Amended by 1955 c.756 1973 c.696 1983 c.826 1989 c.772 1995 c.812 2005 c.22 §71]” Item is not applicable because the proposal is for partition, not subdivision. Regarding WDO 4.02.04B cited below establishes such a time period, which does not exceed 10 years. Incidentally, the Smith Creek Development Condition SUB-1 establishes a platting schedule, quoted below. The Council approval date of the final order was November 14, 2018. SUB-1. Expiration: The schedule in the table below allows for a due date more than three years past the Council approval date: Table SUB-1 Platting Schedule Phase Subdivision Final Plat Application to the City Recordation with Marion County 1A Same as WDO 4.02.04B.2., specifically, application to the City for final plat Same as WDO 5.01.06C.1. (within 30 calendar days of the Director’s signature on the plat mylar) 1B n/a because no subdivision proposed 2A four years past approval of the preliminary subdivision as dated in the final decision document 2B four years past 2C seven years past 3A five years past 3B five years past 4A seven years past 4B seven years past ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 13 of 15 To prevent this PAR from complicating the Smith Creek Development preliminary subdivision, staff applies Condition of Approval PAR-1b. The applicant needs to record a final plat for this PAR prior to recording the Smith Creek Development Phase 1A final plat. The provisions are met with Condition PAR-1b. 5.02.05 Partition, Preliminary Approval A. Purpose: The purpose of this Type II review is to ensure that partitions - the dividing of a single lot into 3 or less lots within one calendar year - comply with this Ordinance, with the Land Use and Development Standards and Guidelines (Sections 2 and and applicable Oregon State Statutes. B. Criteria: Preliminary approval of a partition requires compliance with the following: 1. The preliminary partition complies with all applicable provisions of this ordinance. 2. Approval does not impede the future best use of the remainder of the property under the same ownership or adversely affect the safe and efficient development of any adjoining land. 3. The proposed partition is served with City streets, water, sewer and storm drainage facilities with adequate capacity. 4. That the partition takes into account topography, vegetation and other natural features of the site. 5. That adequate measures have been planned to alleviate identified hazards and limitations to development: a. For regulatory wetlands, these shall be the measures required by the Division of State Lands. b. For unstable areas, demonstration that streets and building sites are on geologically stable soil considering the stress and loads to which the soil may be subjected. The proposal complies with B.1. as examined elsewhere throughout this staff report / final decision. Regarding B.2., the proposal partitions the subject property to accommodate retention of an existing single-family house while simultaneously preparing the rest of the property for the approved Smith Creek Development. Proposed Parcel 1 contains the existing single-family house and will comply with RMN zone standards and vehicular access standards. Proposed Parcel 2 provides for future development of Smith Creek Development Phase 1A, and proposed Parcel 3 provides for future development of Phase 2A. Regarding B.3., the existing single-family house in proposed Parcel 1 is served by Ben Brown Lane, a public street, and utilities via the Ben Brown Lane right-of-way (ROW). The applicant proposes no redevelopment for Parcel 1. On Parcels 2 and 3, the applicant proposes no new development. The lack of development makes new and extended infrastructure not applicable. However, as staff analyzed above for 3.04.01, were the Smith Creek Development to fail to manifest, Parcel 3 would be landlocked with no adjacency to a street or street stub and would preclude extension of infrastructure and services from a public ROW. Staff applied Condition PAR-6 that also addresses subsection B.3. ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 14 of 15 Regarding B.4., the subject property is flat farmland (except for the single-family house mentioned in B.2. above), thus it is devoid of wilderness or remaining natural features. Regarding B.5., staff identifies no hazards or limitations to the development. 5.a. and b. are not applicable because no wetlands exist, the ground is virtually flat with gentle slope towards the tributary of Mill Creek, and there is no evidence of unstable soil. (Though significant wetlands exist within the Smith Creek Development area, they lie outside the subject property, i.e. Parcels 1-3). The provisions are met. Conclusion Staff finds that the application meets WDO provisions or can meet them with conditions and approves it with conditions to clarify the final partition and platting stages, and accommodate the requests of the Public Works Department. Submitted by: Dan Handel, Associate Planner Affirmed, Colin Cortes, AICP, CNU-A, Senior Planner Attachments: 101. Proposed Partition Plat (Exhibit 4) 102. Partition Plat No. 2018-075 103. Marked Tax Map 05 2W 13 104. Smith Creek Development Exhibit C-6 Phasing Plan 105. Transportation System Plan Fig. 7-1 (2005) ---PAGE BREAK--- PAR 2019-01 Staff Report as Final Decision Page 15 of 15 Expiration: Per WDO 4.02.04B., a final decision expires within three years of the date of the final decision unless: 1. A building permit to exercise the right granted by the decision has been issued; 2. The activity approved in the decision has commenced; or 3. A time extension, Section 4.02.05, has been approved. Appeals: Per WDO 4.01.11E., the decision is final unless appealed pursuant to Oregon Revised Statutes (ORS), state administrative rules, and WDO 4.02.01. The appeal due date is twelve (12) days from the mailing date of this notice per 4.02.01B.1. A valid appeal must meet the requirements of 4.02.01. Any person who is adversely affected or aggrieved or who is entitled to written notice of the decision may appeal the decision. The decision will not become final until the period for filing an appeal to the City Council has expired, and it cannot be appealed directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). This document is a copy of the decision. A copy of the decision is also available for inspection at no cost, and the City would provide a copy at reasonable cost at the Community Development Department, City Hall, 270 Montgomery Street, Woodburn, OR 97071 during normal business hours. For questions or additional information, contact Vicki Spitznogle, Administrative Specialist, at (503) 982-5246 or [EMAIL REDACTED]. ---PAGE BREAK--- LINE # L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: HAZEL M. SMITH PROPERTIES LLC 33844 SE WHIT£ OAK RD. CORVAWS, OR 97333 il MONTEBELLO 2 S89"35'22"E 859.57' EXHIBIT 4 - PROPOSED PARTITION PLAT BEING A REPLAT OF PARCEL 2, PARTITION PLAT NO. 2018-075 SCALE: 1" = 200' DA TE: 02/05/2079 WOODBURN SENIOR ESTA TES NO. 7 S88"57'41"E 798.98' 0'34'49"E 23.62' N78'36'45"W 55.46' N83'20'58"W 57.50' ii 11 S1'02'19"W 99.84' S1"02'19"W 166.00' S1'02'19"W 25.00' DETAIL SCALE: 7" = 50' N89'35'22"W 655.59' S88"50' 46"E 80.00' N88'57'41"W 4.00' PARCEL 1 PLAT 2018-65 30' I ~I 22 V) I N89"40'17"W 126. 74' R 3903, P. 41, M.C.D.R 0"19'43"E 256.54' R. 3880. P. 479, M.C.D.R. N89"35'23"W 694.28' N0'24'38"E 2.00' N89"35'22"W 100.00' PARCEL 2 PLAT 2018-65 N68'10'11"W 58.53' N43'25'47"W 132.43' N30"13'54"W 94.03' PROPOSED PARCEL 3 18.41 ACRES N24"47'58"W 160.97' LINE TABLE LENGTH DIRECTION 210.90' S67'32'20"E CURVE TABLE s1•02•19.w 90_00, sss·57•41"E 495.96' _ } S52'07'00"E 71 38' JO' DRAINAGE EASEMENT N37'19'42"E 10.03' PER V. 616, P. 32, DEED RECORDS PROPOSED PARCEL 2 32.90 ACRES N27'18'29"W 66.00' N43'24'37"W 65.00' EASEMENT NOTES: N89"28'02"W 831.61' PARCEL 3 PARTITlON PLAT 94-110 S22'27'15"W 168.00' L=19.74' R=12.00' t.=094"15'05" CH=S65"19' 42"W, 17.59' L=17.96' R=12.00' t.=085"44'29" CH==S24'40'05"E, 16.33' -Li= SM/ TH OR (60' R/W) I Cl TY OF WOODBURN I R 2473, P. 338 I 106.93' S19'01'35"W CURVE # RADIUS LENGTH DELTA CHORD BEARING & DISTANCE JO' COMMUN!CATlONS LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT PERR 1766, P. 207, DEED RECORDS q) 2' COMMUN/CA TlONS LINE RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT PER R. 1766, P. 207, DEED RECORDS 71.00' N24'04'53"W Cl 633.00' 7.93' 00'43'05" S65'33'35"W 7.93' ~ 10' PGE EASEMENT PER V. 466, P. 636, DEED RECORDS 120.00' N83'27'14 "W C2 675.00' 6.76' 00'34'27" N05"35'24"E 6. 76' ~ 16' WATERLINE EASEMENT TO CITY OF WOODBURN PERR 1337, P. 576, DEED RECORDS 66.00' N79'54'32"W C3 553.00' 16.13' 01'40'16" S05"42'38"W 16.13' ~ 10' UTILITY EASEMENT TO DE TOM GENERAL PARTNERSHIP IN R 1326, P. 480. DEED RECORDS 75.58' N89"35'22"W C4 7027.52' 27.47' 00"13'26" S08"48'16"W 27.47' PROPOSED 5' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ; _ . BARKER J~ SURVEYING 3657 KASHMIR WAY SE SALEM, OREGON 97317 PHONE (503) 588-8800 FAX (503) 363-2469 EMAIL: INFOffl'IARKERWILSON.COM Attachment 101 ---PAGE BREAK--- Attachment 102 ---PAGE BREAK--- ^ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 R ! <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò R ! R ! <Ò <Ò <Ò R ! R ! R ! R ! <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò 399.96 150.18 726.07 AT WO ODBURN 428.30 343.17 1600 4.99 AC 506.42 352.95 262.62 15 10 429.82 320.85 506.42 1107.53 REPLAT 1500 264.52 10.44 AC 1088.29 204.03 LOTS 5 & 6 TRACT - 1' RESERVE STRIP 100.1 2 100.8 4 60.64 93.94 80.00 101.8 1 101.5 0 82.20 750.00 1303.53 15 554.16 152.08 301 859.57 35.34 43.06 707.16 300 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 8.10 AC P.P. 6.00 AC 470.58 433.73 470.58 470.58 2010-033 140.00 750.00 CS 36825 554.27 262.41 220.00 140.00 15.0 93.3 739.50 831.61 646.00 185.65 331.11 [PHONE REDACTED].54 PARCEL 3 PARCEL 2 12.31 AC 7.04 AC 830.00 836.29 830.00 745.00 1362.49 646.00 257.00 1743-0184 1344-0566 281.00 89.40 571.69 352.30 450.00 1218.72 105 900 6.31 600 1000 800 500 700 400 503.90 503.90 444.00 444.00 412.01 415.05 CS 20902 114.06 N89 39W 450 281.00 SW COR B BROWN'S 81.34 CS 36202 ADD'N 90.00 90.00 90.00 CS 34512 1593.01 CS 33929 1596.67 1600.72 90.00 33.38 FLOR A 90.00 60.01 S89 57 01E 700.65 60 674.22 60.00 1089.11 90.00 1146.68 71.35 23.84 44.62 68.07 68.00 98.57 6.34 46.00 46.00 93.66 21.69 25.00 113 .41 17.72 CH (1169.52) 1100 714.00 673.82 1213.45 660.14 802.31 935.55 64.87 CH (4281.42) 1200 480 60 ACCESS EASEMENT 1421.85 1421.85 1300 CS 19926 714.24 11.22 CH (740.54) 8.71 CH (574.86) 7.22 CH (478.52) 59.80 CH (3946.80) 760.65 H 60 60 WEST WA Y 60 STREET 60 KOTKA STREET 60 60 COZY 60 30 30 20 LEASURE 30 30 WEST 60 20 60 30 20 30 20 30 30 HAYES 30 STREET 20 WEST HAYES ST 30 60 20 DRIVE R=50' GARFIELD 60 STREET DRIVE STREET 60 60 30 DRIVE SMITH DE SANTIS MCLAUGHLIN 60 60 DRIVE 30 25 60 STREET HALL SETTLEMIER 25 57.5 25 60 MONTGO AVENUE 60 CLEVELAND 50 OAK 50 STREET SETTLEMIER 3RD SETTLEMIER PA 25 25 50 R=45 SMITH CT 60 AUSTIN AVE WORKMAN 50 60 SMITH 60 DRIV E DRIVE DRIVE WORKMAN 60 MCLAUGHLIN MAPLE ST 60 WORKMAN DRIVE SMITH DRIVE 60 60 60 50 60 SMITH DRIVE 50 50 50 CHERRY ST AVE 50 50 WOODCR E S T CT SETTLEMIER 45 60 40 TOUT STREET BEN 60 50 BROWN 55 60 45 50 WAY LANE 40 ST 60 55 45 ELANA 50 60 KELOWNA 50 50 50 50 ST FIRST FR 50 20 50 80 20 80 20 BOONES FERRY RD 40 BRADLEY ST 80 OGLE ST 80 UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 20 60 AKSENIA STREET LUBA STREET BRIDLEWOOD PA 60 LANE 50' PANA CT 50' PANA STREET R=55' 40 AVE WAY ST 80 80 50 60 20 FRONT ST ELANA 60 KELOWNA 50 60 55 SETTLEMIER 25 20 80 PARR 55 ROAD 80 50 60 40 60 50 60 50 BRIDLEWOOD LANE 40 KELOWNA CT 50 50 60 DRIVE UNION PACIFIC RAIROAD OGLE ST 50 BRANDYWINE CT 50 60 20 60 60' 34 80 34 COUNTRY LANE WAY ELANA 50' 60' 20 50' MR 38 50' R=49' DAHLIA AUTUMN 26' 50' 26' BLVD COUNTRY LANE COUNTRY LANE 50' F O XGL O V E 50' STREET 50' AV EN UE 50' TULIP STREET 50' VI N E AV E 50' 50' 50' TULIP AVE VINE AVE 60 MR 38 174 6 57 59. 74 HARVARD D 74 74 CENTER STREET 70 INTERSTATE 5 FWY 74 74 STACEY ALLISON WAY 74 100 74 60 EVERGR EEN R OAD STANF ORD ST STANFORD ST 50 60' DRIVE 60' CREIGHTON ST 50 BOEAN LANE EVERG REEN ROA D SKYLER DRIVE 60' HARVARD 60' DUKE ST R=55' 50 JONAH PLACE 60' 60' 60 60 WES T HAY ES S T . OREGON 50 WEST HAYES 30 74 50 STREET 50 60 50 50 E V ER GR EEN R O AD 50 CIRCLE GOLF COU RSE COLUMBIA DRIVE EVERGREEN BLVD 50 CREIGHTON ST 50 50 BAYLOR DRIVE 50 CLACKAMAS 50 30 DUKE ST GOLF CO URSE CASCADE 30 30 30 60 WEST HAYES 20 30 20 STREET 50 30 NELLIE MUIR GOLF COU RSE CIRCLE ELEMENTARY DRIVE SCHOOL CLACKAMAS CASCADE 74 74 STREET STUBB ROAD CR 517 PARR ACRES MOBILE HOME PARK 60 CR 517 CR 517 PARR PARR ROAD ROAD 60 70 70 70 HERITAGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 50 CENTENNIAL ROAD PARK PRIVATE ST UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD 80 60 50 CLACKAMAS CIRCLE GOLF COURSE CASCADE DRIVE 50 50 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 CLACKAMAS CIRCLE 50 50 EVERGREEN BLVD COLUMBIA DRIVE BAYLOR DRIVE 50 50 SANTIAM DRIVE 50 50 30 50 60 OXFORD ST 60 OXFORD STREET 60 50 60 CITADEL ST 60 REED AVENUE 60 R=58 EVE RG REE N ROA D 50 CLEMSON STREET HARVARD DRIVE VASSER ST 60 WILLAMETTE ST 60 LINFIELD AVENUE 60 60 50 60 74 PALIMINO AVE 60 ST 60 PARADISE ST PRAIRIE 60 60 SWEETWATER AVENUE R=40 ROAD 74 30 30 40 40 174 100 60 HOOPER STACEY ALLISON WAY 60 EVERGREEN 7 60 RAILROAD SW COR G LEASURE DLC 78 NW COR J B DUCHAME DLC 80 12 11 1/4 COR 13 14 12 7 13 18 SW COR A DUBOIS DLC 98 1/4 COR CTR SEC 1/4 COR SE COR RS OF T ROY DLC 82 N'LY NW COR P RAYMOND DLC 88 SW COR M LORE DLC 61 SE COR M LORE DLC 61 NE COR M FOISEY DLC 104 W'LY NW COR P RAYMOND DLC 88 13 14 23 24 18 13 1/4 COR 19 24 103 03 93 0 103 03 03 0 103 00 03 0 103 03 03 0 103 00 03 0 103 03 03 0 1001 PARCEL 1 PARCEL 2 38.45 AC 1.75 AC P.P. 2017-054 513.88 30.05 300.33 267.84 282.83 267.80 486.71 897.92 504.02 280.94 105 PARCEL 2 45.18 AC 393.44 10.00 330.97 211.54 23.62 65.00 119.85 420.24 160.97 247.98 71.00 7.93 2.00 694.28 100.00 290.31 100 PARCEL 1 4.92 AC 211.00 211.58 NOTE: ASSESSED WITH TAXLOT 4100 ON MAP 05 1W 18BC SE COR A DUBOIS DLC 98 P.P. 2018-065 P.P. 1994- 110 106 107 PARCEL 2 PARCEL 3 51.58 AC 44.82 AC 798.98 480.00 259.68 479.84 168.00 104.41 194.66 596.87 386.97 67.62 210.90 106.93 56.46 150.95 313.84 495.96 71.38 41.21 90.00 25.00 80.00 99.84 55.78 166.00 P.P. 2018-075 SEE MAP 052W12C SEE MAP 052W12DC SEE MAP 052W12DD SEE MAP 051W07CC SEE MAP 051W18BA SEE MAP 051W18BD SEE MAP 051W19B SEE MAP 052W23 SEE MAP 052W24 SEE MAP 052W11 SEE MAP 052W14 SEE MAP 051W18CA SEE MAP 051W18C 18BB 18CB 12CD 13AB 13BA 13BC 13BD 18BC 18CC 13AA MARION COUNTY, OREGON SEC 13 T5S R2W W.M. WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 SCALE 1" = 400' FOR ADDITIONAL MAPS VISIT OUR WEBSITE AT www.co.marion.or.us DISCLAIMER: THIS MAP WAS PREPARED FOR ASSESSMENT PURPOSES ONLY 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 WOODBURN WOODBURN 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 05 2W 13 LEGEND LINE TYPES CORNER TYPES Section Corner <Ò 15 16 21 22 Waterline - Non Railroad Centerline Historical Boundary Easement Taxcode Line Map Boundary Road Right-of-Way Taxlot Boundary Railroad Right-of-Way Private Road ROW Subdivision/Plat Waterline - Taxlot NUMBERS Tax Code Number 000 00 00 0 All acres listed are Net Acres, excluding any portions of the taxlot within public ROWs Acreage Tick Marks: A tick mark in the road indicates that the labeled dimension extends into the public ROW 0.25 AC NOTES 200.00 175.00 PLOT DATE: 2/26/2019 CANCELLED NUMBERS 101 102A2 104 [PHONE REDACTED] R ! DLC Corner <Ò 1/4 Section Cor. Ð 1/16TH Section Cor. ATTACHMENT 103 ---PAGE BREAK--- STAFFORD PHASING 6, 5/29/2018 6:12:28 AM ATTACHMENT 104 ---PAGE BREAK--- ROBIN WOODLAND CLUB COUNTRY COUNTRY CLUB MERIDIAN LINCOLN LINCOLN Oregon 214 PARR CROSBY STACY ALLISON A 6TH ARNEY BOONES FERRY HERITAGE SHENANDOAH EAST HARDCASTLE JULIE KOFFLER HENRYS COUNTRY STAFNEY CARSON FESCUE DUNN LAUREU MULBERRY MCCORMICK BUNKER CAHILL LANDAU 6TH GARDEN ANNA WARREN LUBA GREENVIEW KOERNER TEN OAKS KELOWNA CONSTITUTION DEER RUN CLACKAMAS EAGLE MAYANNA PLUM SANTIAM VERA WOODBURN-HUBBARD STEVEN NEKIA GOUDY GARDENS FINZER LILAC GEORGE EVERGREEN THOMPSON IRONWOOD JUDY OREGON NO NA CAROL MCLAUGHLIN CAMAS JANA LEASURE OATS CORBY JORY ALEXANDRA DOUD WHITNEY RYE SILVERTON LINDA MEADOW AZTEC INDUSTRIAL BRYAN C HAWLEY TUKWILA WORKMAN ROY COLUMBIA HARRISON SERRES PANA COMMERCE QUINN HALL TOMLIN PUBLIC JUNE KING STUBB VANDERBECK JAMES PRINCETON CLEVELAND UMPQUA GARFIELD D CARL 4TH EAST LINCOLN PROGRESS ELM ELANA SALLAL BOONES FERRY RAINIER WILSON BROWN BELLE PASSI COOLEY B 5 CASCADE SMITH WOODLAND STARK HAZELNUT BLAINE CROSBY CLEVELAND ASTOR HARDCASTLE GATCH WILLOW LEBRUN SETTLEMIER PARK PARR OGLE YOUNG HAYES 5TH A ARNEY 3RD LINCOLN 2ND 1ST BUTTEVILLE FRONT Oregon 219 Oregon 219 Oregon 211 Oregon 214 Oregon 99 E CHERRY Figure 7-1 Functional Classification Designations City of Woodburn TSP Legend Existing Facility Freeway Major Arterial Minor Arterial Service Collector Access Street Proposed New Facility Minor Arterial Service Collector Access Street Railroad Historic Settlemier Transportation Corridor Urban Growth Boundary Proposed Urban Growth Boundary 0 2,500 Feet Note Roadway facilities shown outside the UGB are recommended, not planned facilities in the TSP, and are logical extensions and improvements to the planned roadway network. Land use decisions to authorize these as planned facilities and improvements would occur as part of a subsequent UGB amendment adding these areas or a subsequent amendment to the TSP. New facilities are only represented conceptually, actual alignment likely to vary. File Path: \\rosa\proj\ODOT\185701\GIS\data\MapDocuments\ReportFigures\7-01_funct_class.mxd, Date: 01 11, 2005 9:35:17 AM ATTACHMENT 105