← Back to Redmo, ND

Document Redmond_doc_ebfc7ff3f9

Full Text

City of Redmond Notice of Application For more information about this project visit www.redmond.gov/landuseapps Project Information Important Dates Application & Completeness Date: July 23, 2018 Notice of Application Date: September 21, 2018 To allow a minimum comment period as specified in RZC, the City will not issue a decision on this project prior to Oct 12, 2018. If date ends on a weekend or holiday comments are due on the next business day. Regulatory Information Zoning: Overlake Comprehensive Plan Designation: Overlake Mixed Use Consistent with Comprehensive Plan: Yes Applicable Development Regulations: Redmond Municipal Code & Zoning Code Project Name: Esterra Park, Block 2A/2B Application Type: Land Division Binding Site Plan File Number: LAND-2018-00684 Project Description: The creation of park parcel and parcel for Esterra Park Block 2A/B and additional street right-of-way to create NE Shen St, Calder Ave NE and increases in NE Turing St and 152nd Ave NE. Project Location: Esterra Park Master Planned Area Site Address, If Applicable: 15300 NE TURING ST Size of Subject Area in Acres:7.46 Sq.Ft. 0 Process Type: A Public Hearing is not required for this application type. Applicant: Andy Paroline II (see attached flow chart) Public Comment Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the comment period required in RZC, will ensure comments are considered prior to issuing a decision and will allow staff and/or the applicant to address comments as early in the process as possible. In addition, persons who want to be informed of future actions or would like to become a party of record on this proposal must provide their name and mailing address to the project planner. Submit written comments or name and address to be added as a party of record to the City of Redmond Planning Department, Development Services Center 15670 NE 85th Street, P.O. Box 97010, Mail Stop 2SPL, Redmond, WA 98073-9710, or fax to [PHONE REDACTED]. The final decision on this proposal may be appealed according to the City appeal provision specified in RZC Chapter 21.76, Review Procedures. Required Studies: Existing Environmental Documents, relevant to this application: City Contact Information Project Planner Name: Cameron Zapata Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Required Permits, not a part of this application: Building Permits, Fire Permits, Site Plan Entitlement None None ---PAGE BREAK--- Public Comment Form Project Name: Esterra Park, Block 2A/2B File Number: LAND-2018-00684 Contact Information Name: Phone: Email: Address: State: Zip Code: Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary) ---PAGE BREAK--- Vicinity Map LAND-2018-00684, Esterra Park 2A/2B BSP Parcel Number(s): [PHONE REDACTED] Project Location ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF REDMOND BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LAND: 2013-01983 REC. NO. 20140331900001 BLOCK 8 BLOCK 6A BLOCK 10 BLOCK 5 (INCLUDES MASTER PLAN BLOCK 9) BLOCK 6B BINDING SITE PLAN 98102-3513 BUSH, ROED & HITCHINGS, INC. 2009 MINOR AVE. EAST SEATTLE, Washington LAND SURVEYORS & CIVIL ENGINEERS FAX# (206) 323-7135 (206) 323-4144 1-[PHONE REDACTED] NE 1/4, SW 1/4, SEC 23, TWP 25 N, RGE 5 E, W.M. CITY OF REDMOND KING COUNTY WASHINGTON SITE PLAN The building planned on Block 2B that is currently in review extends east over the dividing property line of Block 2A and 2B. The building must be contained within the parcel's boundary ---PAGE BREAK--- Process Flow Chart for: Binding Site Plan Applications Binding Site Plan applications follow the Type II process. The Type II process includes review by the Technical Committee, with the Technical Committee as the decision maker. There is no public hearing requirement. ---PAGE BREAK--- If Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Cycle repeats until Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Application Submitted 1st Technical Committee Review If Additional Information is needed Application resubmitted by applicant 2nd Technical Committee review Notice of Application Posted/Mailed 1 Technical Committee requests Additional Information from applicant, OR is ready to issue a decision on the application Denotes Action Point for Interested Parties Denotes Applicant Action Denotes City Action Notice of Decision is mailed to Parties of Record 2 If appealed, Notice of Appeal Hearing Sent to Parties of Record 3 Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal 5 If appealed, appealed to King County Superior Court 6 Appeal Hearing Held 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Notes on Participation Points 1-5 1. Notice of Application for (completed within 14 days of application): Sent to: Applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet Posted: On site, City Hall, Library, Internet. Who May Participate? Any interested party may submit comments prior to decision to establish themselves as Party of Record. You must become a Party of Record to reserve right to appeal the Technical Committee’s Decision. Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the 21 day comment period is encouraged to allow staff and/or the applicant to incorporate changes as early in the design process as possible. 2. Notice of Decision (sent the day of decision issuance): Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Can the decision be appealed? Yes, the Technical Committee decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. However only the applicant and Parties of Record can appeal. When must an appeal be submitted? Appeals must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 14th day following the issuance of the decision. 3. Notice of Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing: Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site 4. Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing Held: Who can participate? The appellant, the applicant and the City shall be designated parties to the appeal. Each party may participate in the appeal hearing by presenting testimony or calling witnesses to present testimony. Interested persons, groups, associations, or other entities who have not appealed may participate only if called by one of the parties to present information; provided, that the Examiner may allow non-parties to present relevant testimony if allowed under the Examiner’s rules of procedure. 5. Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal: When: The decision is issued within 10 days after hearing Who receives the decision? Applicant , appellant and anyone who participated in the hearing Who can request reconsideration? Any person who participated in the hearing may file a request for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner within 10 business days of the date of the Hearing Examiner’s decision. What if a Party of Record requests reconsideration? The Hearing Examiner shall act within 10 days after the filing of the request by either denying the request, issuing a revised decision, or calling for an additional public hearing. Can the Hearing Examiner Decision on the appeal be appealed to King County Superior Court? Yes, the decision on the appeal may be appealed within 21 days following the expiration of the reconsideration period. Only the City, project applicant or any person who participated in the appeal hearing may appeal.