Full Text
Larry Flack Runberg Architecture Group 1 Yesler Way Seattle, WA 98104 Mike Hubbard Capstone Partners 601 Union #4200 Seattle, WA 98101 Kristen Lundquist Brumbaugh&Associates 600 North 85th Street, Suite 102 Seattle, WA 98103-3826 ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2A 2B DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 15300 NE TURING ST, REDMOND, WA 98052 01/03/ 2019 ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 3 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD COMMENTS DESIGN BOARD COMMENTS, 11/15/2018 IMAGE FROM DRB3 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENTS BOARD COMMENTS: THE BOARD REQUESTED SOME ADDITIONAL STUDY OF THE METAL CLADDING COLORS ALONG WITH ACTUAL MATERIAL SAMPLES 2 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES BOARD COMMENTS: THE BOARD REQUESTED THAT DIFFERENT OPTIONS FOR ROOFLINE MODULATION BE STUDIES AND PRESENTED AT DRB4 FOR APPROVAL 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 4 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES ROOF MODULATION: RZC 21.60.040.B.3.II The width of any continuous flat roofline should not extend more than 100 feet without modulation. Modulation should consist of either one or a combination of the following treatments: A..For flat roofs or facades with a horizontal eave, fascia, or parapet with at least an eight- foot return, the minimum vertical dimension of roofline modulation is the greater of two feet or one-tenth multiplied by the wall height (finish grade to top of wall) if the segment is 50 feet or less, or at least four feet if the segment is more than 50 feet in length. ROOFLINES GREATER THAN 100 FEET NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION - DRB3 DESIGN ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 5 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES PROPOSED AREAS OF ROOFLINE MODULATION LOCATIONS OF CANTED FRAME/CORNICE ROOFLINES LESS THAN 100 FEET MODULATED FRAME ELEMENTS PREFERRED SOLUTION FOR ROOFLINE MODULATION INTRODUCED CANTED FRAME/CORNICE ELEMENTS 2.4a O.1 S.4a 1.5b S.2 2.4b 2.6b 1.4b 2.5a 2.3 2.2 2.1b 2.2 2.8a O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 1.11 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.4 O.4 O.1 O.1 O.9 1.17a O.3a O.3b O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 O.1 1.11 1.1a 1.1a 1.1a 1.1a 1.1a 1.1a 1.1a 1.1a S.3 S.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.12b 1.1b 1.1b 1.8b S.2 1.1b 1.7 1.1b 1.1b 1.3b 1.3b 1.14 S.2 1.2 O.2b S.2 S.2 1.2 O.6 1.6 O.5 O.6 1.6 O.6 1.6 S.2 1.1b O.1 1.1b O.1 1.1b STOR. STOR. STOR. STOR. O.1 O.1 1.1a O.1 1.3a ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 6 PREFERRED ROOFLINE MODULATION - CANTED FRAME ALTERNATIVE ROOFLINE MODULATION - POPPED-UP FRAME 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 7 PREFERRED ROOFLINE MODULATION - CANTED FRAME ALTERNATIVE ROOFLINE MODULATION - POPPED-UP FRAME 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 8 PREFERRED ROOFLINE MODULATION - CANTED FRAME ALTERNATIVE ROOFLINE MODULATION - POPPED-UP FRAME 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 9 PREFERRED ROOFLINE MODULATION - CANTED FRAME 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 10 1 ROOFLINE MODULATION STUDIES REQUESTED STUDY TO ELIMINATE THE BAND AT TOP LEVEL PREFERRED SCHEME - CANTED FRAME ALTERNATIVE STUDY - ELIMINATION OF BAND AT TOP LEVEL ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 11 PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 12 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT 9 EXTERIOR MATERIALS - DRB3 ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 13 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT EXTERIOR MATERIALS - DRB3 BOARD COMMENTS: 1. PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW OF CORTEN FRAME ADJACENT TO STRATA BANDING 2. THE BOARD REQUESTED MORE CONTRASTING SIDING COLORS AS PRESENTED IN DRB2 3. CONSIDER SHIFTING STRATA COLORS WITH A LIGHTER COLOR AT THE TOP ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 14 COLOR STUDY 1. CHAMPAGNE - VINTAGE 9 VINTAGE 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 15 COLOR STUDY 1. CHAMPAGNE - VINTAGE APPLICANT RESPONSE: 1. STUDIED PROVIDING MORE CONTRAST BETWEEN STRATA COLORS 2. PROVIDED CONSISTENT SPANDREL COLOR AT WINDOWS IN STRATA - CREATING A VERTICAL ELEMENT - GROUNDING THE BUILDING 3. CHANGED WINDOW FRAME FROM ALMOND TO WHITE. BRIGHTENING THE BUILDING AND RELATING TO THE FRAMED ELEMENTS AND CURTAIN WALL. 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 16 9 ZACTIQUE 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT PREFERRED SCHEME - COLOR STUDY 2. CHAMPAGNE - ZACTIQUE ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 17 BOARD COMMENTS: 1. PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW OF CORTEN FRAME ADJACENT TO STRATA BANDING 2.THE BOARD REQUESTED MORE CONTRASTING 3. CONSIDER SHIFTING STRATA COLORS WITH A LIGHTER COLOR AT THE TOP 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT PREFERRED SCHEME - COLOR STUDY 2. CHAMPAGNE - ZACTIQUE ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 18 BOARD COMMENTS: 1. PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW OF CORTEN FRAME ADJACENT TO STRATA BANDING 2.THE BOARD REQUESTED MORE CONTRASTING 3. CONSIDER SHIFTING STRATA COLORS WITH A LIGHTER COLOR AT THE TOP 2 EXTERIOR MATERIAL REFINEMENT COLOR STUDY 3. CHAMPAGNE - ZACTIQUE (LIGHTER COLOR AT TOP STRATA) ---PAGE BREAK--- DESIGN REVIEW MEETING 4 I ESTERRA PARK - BLOCK 2 01/03/19 19 THANK YOU!