Full Text
City of Redmond Notice of Application For more information about this project visit www.redmond.gov/landuseapps Project Description: 3rd Amendment to Taylor DA: clarify parcel coverage language to match DA maps and legal descriptions to include Lot & of Short Plat. File Number: LAND-2018-00304 Project Name: Taylor Development Amendment #3 Project Information Important Dates Application & Completeness Date: April 12, 2018 Notice of Application Date: April 27, 2018 To allow a minimum comment period as specified in RZC, the City will not issue a decision on this project prior to May 18, 2018. If date ends on a weekend or holiday comments are due on the next business day. Application Type: Development Agreement Regulatory Information Zoning: Manufacturing Park Comprehensive Plan Designation: Manufacturing Park Consistent with Comprehensive Plan: Yes Applicable Development Regulations: Redmond Municipal Code & Zoning Code Project Location: 188TH AVE NE Site Address, If Applicable: 18795 NE 73RD ST Size of Subject Area in Acres:60.62 Sq.Ft. 0 Process Type: A Public Hearing is not required for this application type. Applicant: Kevin O'Brien V (see attached flow chart) Public Comment Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the comment period required in RZC, will ensure comments are considered prior to issuing a decision and will allow staff and/or the applicant to address comments as early in the process as possible. In addition, persons who want to be informed of future actions or would like to become a party of record on this proposal must provide their name and mailing address to the project planner. Submit written comments or name and address to be added as a party of record to the City of Redmond Planning Department, Development Services Center 15670 NE 85th Street, P.O. Box 97010, Mail Stop 2SPL, Redmond, WA 98073-9710, or fax to [PHONE REDACTED]. The final decision on this proposal may be appealed according to the City appeal provision specified in RZC Chapter 21.76, Review Procedures. Required Studies: Existing Environmental Documents, relevant to this application: City Contact Information Project Planner Name: Heather Maiefski Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Required Permits, not a part of this application: Building Permits, Fire Permits, Public Works Permits, Site Plan Entitlement None SEPA Checklist II ---PAGE BREAK--- Public Comment Form Project Name: Taylor Development Amendment #3 File Number: LAND-2018-00304 Contact Information Name: Phone: Email: Address: State: Zip Code: Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary) ---PAGE BREAK--- Vicinity Map LAND-2018-00304, Union Hill Corporate Campus DA Parcel Number(s): [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], 07250669142 Project Location ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Process Flow Chart for: Administrative Amendment to Development Agreement Applications Administrative Amendment to Development Agreement follow the Type II process. The Type II process includes review by the Technical Committee, with the Technical Committee as the decision maker. Design Review Board approval is typically required for new construction or additions to commercial or multifamily development proposals. There is no public hearing requirement. ---PAGE BREAK--- If Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Cycle repeats until Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Application Submitted 1st Technical Committee Review If Additional Information is needed Application resubmitted by applicant 2nd Technical Committee review Notice of Application Posted/Mailed* 1 Notice of Decision is mailed to Parties of Record 3 If appealed, Notice of Appeal Hearing Sent to Parties of Record 4 Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal 6 If appealed, appealed to King County Superior Court 7 Technical Committee requests Additional Information from applicant, OR is ready to issue a decision on the application Denotes Action Point for Interested Parties Denotes Applicant Action Denotes City Action Appeal Hearing Held 5 If Design Review Board Review is Required If DRB approval is required, there is typically at least one consultation meeting and one decision meeting to review and issue a decision on architectural, site and landscape design. The DRB decision is required prior to Technical Committee issuing a decision on project. The DRB decision is included in the decision issued by the Technical Committee 2 *Notice is only required If additional square footage is proposed ---PAGE BREAK--- Notes on Participation Points 1-6 1. Notice of Application for (completed within 14 days of application): Sent to: Applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet Posted: On site, City Hall, Library, Internet. Who May Participate? Any interested party may submit comments prior to decision to establish themselves as Party of Record. You must become a Party of Record to reserve right to appeal the Technical Committee’s Decision. Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the 21 day comment period is encouraged to allow staff and/or the applicant to incorporate changes as early in the design process as possible. 2. Design Review Board Review (if required): Notice: Notices of DRB meetings are not provided on a project specific basis. However DRB meetings are held regularly on the 1st and 3rd Thursday evenings of each month (with some exceptions). Who May Participate? Any interested party may attend the Design Review Board meetings and may submit comments at the meetings. Can I appeal the Design Review Board’s Decision? The DRB decision and associated conditions are incorporated into the Technical Committee decision for the project. Therefore, if one wishes to appeal a DRB condition, one must wait until the Technical Committee issues the final decision on the project and follow the appeal procedures noted therein. 3. Notice of Decision (sent the day of decision issuance): Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Can the decision be appealed? Yes, the Technical Committee decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. However only the applicant and Parties of Record can appeal. When must an appeal be submitted? Appeals must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 14th day following the issuance of the decision. 4. Notice of Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing: Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site 5. Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing Held: Who can participate? The appellant, the applicant and the City shall be designated parties to the appeal. Each party may participate in the appeal hearing by presenting testimony or calling witnesses to present testimony. Interested persons, groups, associations, or other entities who have not appealed may participate only if called by one of the parties to present information; provided, that the Examiner may allow non-parties to present relevant testimony if allowed under the Examiner’s rules of procedure. 6. Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal: When: The decision is issued within 10 days after hearing Who receives the decision? Applicant , appellant and anyone who participated in the hearing Who can request reconsideration? Any person who participated in the hearing may file a request for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner within 10 business days of the date of the Hearing Examiner’s decision. What if a Party of Record requests reconsideration? The Hearing Examiner shall act within 10 days after the filing of the request by either denying the request, issuing a revised decision, or calling for an additional public hearing. Can the Hearing Examiner Decision on the appeal be appealed to King County Superior Court? Yes, the decision on the appeal may be appealed within 21 days following the expiration of the reconsideration period. Only the City, project applicant or any person who participated in the appeal hearing may appeal.