Full Text
City of Redmond Notice of Application For more information about this project visit www.redmond.gov/landuseapps Project Description: Three lot short plat File Number: LAND-2017-00548 Project Name: Holmgren Short Plat Project Information Important Dates Application & Completeness Date: June 12, 2017 Notice of Application Date: June 22, 2017 To allow a minimum comment period as specified in RZC, the City will not issue a decision on this project prior to Jul 13, 2017. If date ends on a weekend or holiday comments are due on the next business day. Application Type: Land Division Short Subdivision Regulatory Information Zoning: Residential Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single-Family Urban Consistent with Comprehensive Plan: Yes Applicable Development Regulations: Redmond Municipal Code & Zoning Code Project Location: 16130 NE 51ST ST Site Address, If Applicable: 0 No Address Size of Subject Area in Acres:.89 Sq.Ft. 0 Process Type: A Public Hearing is not required for this application type. Applicant: James Olsen II (see attached flow chart) Public Comment Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the comment period required in RZC, will ensure comments are considered prior to issuing a decision and will allow staff and/or the applicant to address comments as early in the process as possible. In addition, persons who want to be informed of future actions or would like to become a party of record on this proposal must provide their name and mailing address to the project planner. Submit written comments or name and address to be added as a party of record to the City of Redmond Planning Department, Development Services Center 15670 NE 85th Street, P.O. Box 97010, Mail Stop 2SPL, Redmond, WA 98073-9710, or fax to [PHONE REDACTED]. The final decision on this proposal may be appealed according to the City appeal provision specified in RZC Chapter 21.76, Review Procedures. Required Studies: Existing Environmental Documents, relevant to this application: City Contact Information Project Planner Name: Scott Reynolds Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Required Permits, not a part of this application: Building Permits, Fire Permits, Public Works Permits Stream Reconnaissance Report, Tree Health Assessment, Wetland Report SEPA Checklist ---PAGE BREAK--- Public Comment Form Project Name: Holmgren Short Plat File Number: LAND-2017-00548 Contact Information Name: Phone: Email: Address: State: Zip Code: Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary) ---PAGE BREAK--- Vicinity Map LAND-2017-00548, Holmgren Short Plat 16130 NE 51st Street Parcel Number(s): [PHONE REDACTED] & [PHONE REDACTED] Project Location ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Process Flow Chart for: Site Plan Entitlement Applications Site Plan Entitlement applications follow the Type II process. The Type II process includes review by the Technical Committee, with the Technical Committee as the decision maker. Design Review Board approval is typically required. There is no public hearing requirement. ---PAGE BREAK--- If Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Cycle repeats until Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Application Submitted 1st Technical Committee Review If Additional Information is needed Application resubmitted by applicant 2nd Technical Committee review Notice of Application Posted/Mailed 1 Notice of Decision is mailed to Parties of Record 3 If appealed, Notice of Appeal Hearing Sent to Parties of Record 4 Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal 6 If Hearing Examiner’s Decision on Appeal is appealed to the City Council, notice of Closed Record City Council Appeal Hearing is sent to all parties entitled to participate in hearing 7 Closed Record City Council Appeal Hearing Held 8 Technical Committee requests Additional Information from applicant, OR is ready to issue a decision on the application Denotes Action Point for Interested Parties Denotes Applicant Action Denotes City Action Appeal Hearing Held 5 City Council issues decision on appeal 9 If Design Review Board Review is Required If DRB approval is required, there is typically at least one consultation meeting and one decision meeting to review and issue a decision on architectural, site and landscape design. The DRB decision is required prior to Technical Committee issuing a decision on project. The DRB decision is included in the decision issued by the Technical Committee 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Notes on Participation Points 1-9 Notice of Application for (completed within 14 days of application): Sent to: Applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet Posted: On site, City Hall, Library, Internet. Who May Participate? Any interested party may submit comments prior to decision to establish themselves as Party of Record. You must become a Party of Record to reserve right to appeal the Technical Committee’s Decision. Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the 21 day comment period is encouraged to allow staff and/or the applicant to incorporate changes as early in the design process as possible. #3-Notice of Decision (sent the day of decision issuance): Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Can the decision be appealed? Yes, the Technical Committee decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. However only the applicant and Parties of Record can appeal. When must an appeal be submitted? Appeals must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 14th day following the issuance of the decision. #4-Notice of Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing: Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing Held: Who can participate? The appellant, the applicant and the City shall be designated parties to the appeal. Each party may participate in the appeal hearing by presenting testimony or calling witnesses to present testimony. Interested persons, groups, associations, or other entities who have not appealed may participate only if called by one of the parties to present information; provided, that the Examiner may allow non-parties to present relevant testimony if allowed under the Examiner’s rules of procedure. #2-Design Review Board Review (if required): Notice: Notices of DRB meetings are not provided on a project specific basis. However DRB meetings are held regularly on the 1st and 3rd Thursday evenings of each month (with some exceptions). Who May Participate? Any interested party may attend the Design Review Board meetings and may submit comments at the meetings. Can I appeal the Design Review Board’s Decision? The DRB decision and associated conditions are incorporated into the Technical Committee decision for the project. Therefore, if one wishes to appeal a DRB condition, one must wait until the Technical Committee issues the final decision on the project and follow the appeal procedures noted therein. #9-City Council issues decision: When: Typically within two weeks following the Closed Record Appeal Hearing. Notice Sent To: Applicant, Appellant and/or their representatives Appeal Provision: The final decision on the appeal is appealable to King County Superior Court within 21 days from issuance of Notice. To have standing to appeal, one must meet the criteria under the Land Use Petition Act #7-Notice of City Council Closed Record Appeal Hearing: Sent to: The applicant, appellant and/or representatives of these parties Posted: No posting on site #6-Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal: When: The decision is issued within 14 days after hearing Who receives the decision? Applicant , appellant and anyone who participated in the hearing Who can request reconsideration? Any person who participated in the hearing may file a request for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner within 10 business days of the date of the Hearing Examiner’s decision. What if a Party of Record requests reconsideration? The Hearing Examiner shall act within 14 days after the filing of the request by either denying the request, issuing a revised decision, or calling for an additional public hearing. Can the Hearing Examiner Decision on the appeal be appealed to City Council? Yes, the decision on the appeal may be appealed within 14 days following the expiration of the reconsideration period. Only the City, project applicant or any person who participated in the appeal hearing may appeal. #8-City Council Closed Record Appeal Hearing Held: Who May Participate? The applicant, the appellant, the applicable department Director or representatives of these parties. ---PAGE BREAK--- This approval is for the design concept only. These plans appear to be in conformance with the City Of Redmond design standards for construction. This approval shall not be construed as authorizing construction not in accordance with applicable City standards. The City reserves the right to require revisions to the approved plans to assure conformance with City of Redmond design standards for construction at any time that it is discovered that the proposed construction does not otherwise meet the applicable construction standards. The owner is required to provide designs and plans in accordance with applicable City standards and assures that construction is accomplished in accordance with those standards. The owner and/or design engineer and/or developer may be required to make necessary approved field revisions to correct any errors or omissions found on the approved plan. APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION FOR: Linda E. De Boldt, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Redmond Date: Plan Check Engineer: Planning: Trans / Engr: Fire: Utility: Storm: SCALE: 1" = 20' TREE PRESERVATION PLAN LANDMARK TREE TO BE REMOVED LANDMARK TREE TO BE RETAINED SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE RETAINED SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE REMOVED LEGEND NOTES 1. FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION REGARDING THE TREES, PLEASE SEE ARBORIST REPORT BY GREENFOREST INCORPORATED. 2. DEAD AND UNHEALTHY TREES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM COUNTS. CLEARING LIMITS CITY OF REDMOND CODE REFERENCES RZC 21.72.060 - 35% OF EXISTING SIGNIFICANT (HEALTHY) TREES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE - SIDEWALKS & UTILITIES MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN DRIP-LINE OF A PROTECTED TREE - THE ADMINISTRATOR MAY ALLOW CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OR ALTERATION OF GRADES WITHIN 5' OF DRIP-LINE OF A PROTECTED TREE . RZC 21.72.080 - SIGNIFICANT TREES WILL BE REPLACED AT A 1:1 RATIO - LANDMARK TREES WILL BE REPLACED AT A 1:3 RATIO - REPLACEMENT TREE SIZING: - DECIDUOUS 2.5" MIN CALIPER - EVERGREEN 6' HT MIN. RZC 21.72.070 - PLEASE REFER THIS CHAPTER TO ENSURE TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE PROPERLY PROTECTED. SUMMARY OF ON-SITE TREE RETENTION TREE TYPE REMOVAL TOTAL RETAINED LANDMARK (OVER 30" DBH) SIGNIFICANT - 30" DBH) TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED (SIGNIFICANT - 1:1 LANDMARK - 3:1) 14 100% 10 72% 4 28% 0 0% 5 36% 5 36% 9 64% 5 36% 4 28% 17 REPLACEMENT TREE CALCULATIONS SIGNIFICANT TREES REMOVED: 5 (REPLACED AT 1:1 RATIO) SIGNIFICANT TREES TO BE REPLACED: 5 LANDMARK TREES REMOVED: 4 (REPLACED AT 3:1 RATIO) LANDMARK TREES TO BE REPLACED: 12 TOTAL REQUIRED REPLACEMENT TREES: 17 OFFSITE TREE X X SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE RETAINED (TYP.) 5' BUILDING SETBACK FROM RETAINED TREE DRIPLINE (TYP.) 5' BUILDING SETBACK FROM TREE DRIPLINE SIGNIFICANT TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) LANDMARK TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) OFFSITE TREE (TYP.) X X X X X XX X X