Full Text
City of Redmond Notice of Application For more information about this project visit www.redmond.gov/landuseapps Project Description: Redevelopment of approximately 81 acres including demolition of 13 office buildings and constr of 17 new office buildings (approximately 2,094,000 sq. ft. an underground parking structure. Covered under SEPA Plan File Number: LAND-2018-01030 Project Name: Microsoft Refresh-Garage Project Information Important Dates Application & Completeness Date: October 23, 2018 Notice of Application Date: November 8, 2018 To allow a minimum comment period as specified in RZC, the City will not issue a decision on this project prior to November 29, 2018. If date ends on a weekend or holiday comments are due on the next business day. Application Type: Site Plan Entitlement Regulatory Information Zoning: Overlake Business and Advanced Technolog Comprehensive Plan Designation: Overlake Mixed Use Consistent with Comprehensive Plan: Yes Applicable Development Regulations: Redmond Municipal Code & Zoning Code Project Location: East side of 156th Ave. btwn NE 31st and NE 36th Site Address, If Applicable: 16061 NE 36TH WAY Size of Subject Area in Acres:81 Sq.Ft. 0 Process Type: A Public Hearing is required, however a date has yet to be determined. A Public Hearing notice will be sent in the future. Applicant: Michael Huey II (see attached flow chart) Public Comment Although comments are accepted up until close of pu hearing, submittal of comments during the comment period required in the RZC will ensure comments are considered prior to issuing a decision and will allow and/or the applicant to address comments as early in process as possible. The Technical Committee shall issue a recommendation until the end of the minimu comment period. In addition, persons who want to b informed of future actions or would like to become a of record on this proposal must provide their name a mailing address to the project planner. Submit writte comments or name and address to be added as a pa record to the City of Redmond Planning Department, Development Services Center 15670 NE 85th Street, Box 97010, Mail Stop 2SPL, Redmond, WA 98073-97 or fax to [PHONE REDACTED]. The final decision on this proposal may be appealed according to the City appe provision specified in RZC Chapter 21.76, Review Procedures. Required Studies: Existing Environmental Documents, relevant to this application: City Contact Information Project Planner Name: Gary Lee Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Required Permits, not a part of this application: Binding Site Plan, Building Permits, Fire Permits, Public Works Permits Stormwater Report, Traffic Study, Wetland Report Draft EIS, EIS Addendum, Final E ---PAGE BREAK--- Public Comment Form Project Name: Microsoft Refresh-Garage File Number: LAND-2018-01030 Contact Information Name: Phone: Email: Address: State: Zip Code: Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary) ---PAGE BREAK--- Vicinity Map LAND-2018-001030, Microsoft Refresh Garage Address: 3301 – 157th Ave NE Parcel Number(s): [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED], [PHONE REDACTED] Project Location ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Process Flow Chart for: Site Plan Entitlement Applications Site Plan Entitlement applications follow the Type II process. The Type II process includes review by the Technical Committee, with the Technical Committee as the decision maker. Design Review Board approval is typically required. There is no public hearing requirement. ---PAGE BREAK--- If Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Cycle repeats until Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Application Submitted 1st Technical Committee Review If Additional Information is needed Application resubmitted by applicant 2nd Technical Committee review Notice of Application Posted/Mailed 1 Technical Committee requests Additional Information from applicant, OR is ready to issue a decision on the application Denotes Action Point for Interested Parties Denotes Applicant Action Denotes City Action If Design Review Board Review is Required If DRB approval is required, there is typically at least one consultation meeting and one decision meeting to review and issue a decision on architectural, site and landscape design. The DRB decision is required prior to Technical Committee issuing a decision on project. The DRB decision is included in the decision issued by the Technical Committee 2 Notice of Decision is mailed to Parties of Record 3 If appealed, Notice of Appeal Hearing Sent to Parties of Record 4 Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal 6 If appealed, appealed to King County Superior Court 7 Appeal Hearing Held 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Notes on Participation Points 1-6 1. Notice of Application for (completed within 14 days of application): Sent to: Applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet Posted: On site, City Hall, Library, Internet. Who May Participate? Any interested party may submit comments prior to decision to establish themselves as Party of Record. You must become a Party of Record to reserve right to appeal the Technical Committee’s Decision. Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the 21 day comment period is encouraged to allow staff and/or the applicant to incorporate changes as early in the design process as possible. 2. Design Review Board Review (if required): Notice: Notices of DRB meetings are not provided on a project specific basis. However DRB meetings are held regularly on the 1st and 3rd Thursday evenings of each month (with some exceptions). Who May Participate? Any interested party may attend the Design Review Board meetings and may submit comments at the meetings. Can I appeal the Design Review Board’s Decision? The DRB decision and associated conditions are incorporated into the Technical Committee decision for the project. Therefore, if one wishes to appeal a DRB condition, one must wait until the Technical Committee issues the final decision on the project and follow the appeal procedures noted therein. 3. Notice of Decision (sent the day of decision issuance): Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Can the decision be appealed? Yes, the Technical Committee decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. However only the applicant and Parties of Record can appeal. When must an appeal be submitted? Appeals must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 14th day following the issuance of the decision. 4. Notice of Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing: Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site 5. Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing Held: Who can participate? The appellant, the applicant and the City shall be designated parties to the appeal. Each party may participate in the appeal hearing by presenting testimony or calling witnesses to present testimony. Interested persons, groups, associations, or other entities who have not appealed may participate only if called by one of the parties to present information; provided, that the Examiner may allow non-parties to present relevant testimony if allowed under the Examiner’s rules of procedure. 6. Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal: When: The decision is issued within 10 days after hearing Who receives the decision? Applicant , appellant and anyone who participated in the hearing Who can request reconsideration? Any person who participated in the hearing may file a request for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner within 10 business days of the date of the Hearing Examiner’s decision. What if a Party of Record requests reconsideration? The Hearing Examiner shall act within 10 days after the filing of the request by either denying the request, issuing a revised decision, or calling for an additional public hearing. Can the Hearing Examiner Decision on the appeal be appealed to King County Superior Court? Yes, the decision on the appeal may be appealed within 21 days following the expiration of the reconsideration period. Only the City, project applicant or any person who participated in the appeal hearing may appeal. ---PAGE BREAK--- NE 36TH STREET NE 31ST STREET BEL-RED ROAD 156TH AVE NE TREES TO BE RETAINED FUTURE BUILDING OUTLINE DA EXEMPT PROPERTIES TREES TO BE REMOVED MS REFRESH SITE BOUNDARY NORTH 0 400' SCALE: 1"=400'-0" 200' LEGEND TREE PRESERVATION NOTICE PROJECT NAME: MICROSOFT REFRESH ---PAGE BREAK--- TREES TO BE RETAINED IN REFRESH SITE MS REFRESH BOUNDARY DA EXEMPT PROPERTIES TREES TO BE REMOVED TREES TO BE RETAINED IN MAIN CAMPUS SE WETLANDS 396 MS CAMPUS DA BOUNDARY BUILDING 50 BUILDING 25 BUILDING 20 BUILDING 19 BUILDING 16, 17, 18 BUILDING 33 BUILDING 34 BUILDING 35 BUILDING 30, 31, 32 BUILDING 36 BUILDING 42, 43, 44 BUILDING 40, 41 BUILDING 27 BUILDING 28 BUILDING 26 BUILDING 22 148 97 77 91 BUILDING 21 370 354 121 184 231 [PHONE REDACTED] 835 BEL-RED BUFFER 354 NUMBER OF TREES TO BE RETAINED MS REFRESH SITE: TOTAL EXISTING TREES: 2302 TOTAL REMOVED TREES: 1975 TOTAL RETAINED TREES: 327 NORTH 0 600' SCALE: 1"=600'-0" 300' LEGEND TREE PRESERVATION NOTICE PROJECT NAME: MICROSOFT REFRESH TREES TO BE REMOVED 1975 TREES TO BE RETAINED 5101 TOTAL 7076 * % RETAINED 72% TREES IN DA AREA *PER MICROSOFT 2018 TREE COUNT NUMBER