← Back to Redmo, ND

Document Redmond_doc_13d7c274bb

Full Text

City of Redmond Notice of Application For more information about this project visit www.redmond.gov/landuseapps Project Description: Divide existing 2-lots into 6-lot subdivision. File Number: LAND-2016-01374 Project Name: Bridle Lodges Project Information Important Dates Application & Completeness Date: July 19, 2016 Notice of Application Date: August 2, 2016 To allow a minimum comment period as specified in RZC, the City will not issue a decision on this project prior to Aug 23, 2016. If date ends on a weekend or holiday comments are due on the next business day. Application Type: Land Division Short Subdivision Regulatory Information Zoning: Residential Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single-Family Urban Consistent with Comprehensive Plan: Yes Applicable Development Regulations: Redmond Municipal Code & Zoning Code Project Location: Site Address, If Applicable: 7014 132ND AVE NE Size of Subject Area in Acres: Sq.Ft. 0 Process Type: A Public Hearing is not required for this application type. Applicant: Joe Ferzli II (see attached flow chart) Public Comment Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the comment period required in RZC, will ensure comments are considered prior to issuing a decision and will allow staff and/or the applicant to address comments as early in the process as possible. In addition, persons who want to be informed of future actions or would like to become a party of record on this proposal must provide their name and mailing address to the project planner. Submit written comments or name and address to be added as a party of record to the City of Redmond Planning Department, Development Services Center 15670 NE 85th Street, P.O. Box 97010, Mail Stop 2SPL, Redmond, WA 98073-9710, or fax to [PHONE REDACTED]. The final decision on this proposal may be appealed according to the City appeal provision specified in RZC Chapter 21.76, Review Procedures. Required Studies: Existing Environmental Documents, relevant to this application: City Contact Information Project Planner Name: Heather Maiefski Phone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Required Permits, not a part of this application: Building Permits, Fire Permits, Public Works Permits Stormwater Report, Tree Health Assessment SEPA Checklist ---PAGE BREAK--- Public Comment Form Project Name: Bridle Lodges File Number: LAND-2016-01374 Contact Information Name: Phone: Email: Address: State: Zip Code: Comments (Attach additional sheets if necessary) ---PAGE BREAK--- VICINITY MAP Bridle Lodges Short Plat, LAND-2016-01374 Parcel Number: [PHONE REDACTED] and [PHONE REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Process Flow Chart for: Short Plat Applications Short Plats follow the Type II process. The Type II process includes review by the Technical Committee, with the Technical Committee as the decision maker. There is no public hearing requirement. A neighborhood meeting is highly recommended/encouraged by the City as part of the review process. ---PAGE BREAK--- If Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Cycle repeats until Technical Committee is ready to issue a decision Application Submitted 1st Technical Committee Review If Additional Information is needed Application resubmitted by applicant 2nd Technical Committee review Notice of Decision is mailed to Parties of Record Notice of Application Posted/Mailed 1 Neighborhood Meeting held 2 3 If appealed, Notice of Appeal Hearing Sent to Parties of Record 4 Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal 6 If Hearing Examiner’s Decision on Appeal is appealed to the City Council, notice of Closed Record City Council Appeal Hearing is sent to all parties entitled to participate in hearing 7 Closed Record City Council Appeal Hearing Held 8 Technical Committee requests Additional Information from applicant, OR is ready to issue a decision on the application Denotes Action Point for Interested Parties Denotes Applicant Action Denotes City Action Appeal Hearing Held 5 City Council issues decision on appeal 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Notes on Participation Points 1-9 #2-Neighborhood Meeting (notice sent 21 days in advance of meeting): Sent to: Applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet, as well as Parties of Record. Posted: On site, City Hall, Library Who May Participate? Any interested party may participate. Those who participate establish themselves as a Party of Record, but meeting attendance is not required to become a Party of Record if comments are submitted prior to decision being issued. Notice of Application for (completed within 14 days of application): Sent to: Applicant, property owners and residents within 500 feet Posted: On site, City Hall, Library, Internet. Who May Participate? Any interested party may submit comments prior to decision to establish themselves as Party of Record. You must become a Party of Record to reserve right to appeal the Technical Committee’s Decision. Although comments are accepted up until the decision is issued, submittal of comments during the 21 day comment period is encouraged to allow staff and/or the applicant to incorporate changes as early in the design process as possible. #3-Notice of Decision (sent the day of decision issuance): Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Can the decision be appealed? Yes, the Technical Committee decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. However only the applicant and Parties of Record can appeal. When must an appeal be submitted? Appeals must be submitted by 5:00 p.m. on the 14th day following the issuance of the decision. #4-Notice of Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing: Sent to: Applicant and Parties of Record Posted: No posting on site Hearing Examiner Appeal Hearing Held: Who can participate? The appellant, the applicant and the City shall be designated parties to the appeal. Each party may participate in the appeal hearing by presenting testimony or calling witnesses to present testimony. Interested persons, groups, associations, or other entities who have not appealed may participate only if called by one of the parties to present information; provided, that the Examiner may allow non-parties to present relevant testimony if allowed under the Examiner’s rules of procedure. #6-Hearing Examiner issues decision on appeal: When: The Decision is issued within 14 days after hearing Who receives the decision? Applicant , appellant and anyone who participated in the hearing Who can request reconsideration? Any person who participated in the hearing may file a request for reconsideration with the Hearing Examiner within 10 business days of the date of the Hearing Examiner’s decision. What if a Party of Record requests reconsideration? The Hearing Examiner shall act within 14 days after the filing of the request by either denying the request, issuing a revised decision, or calling for an additional public hearing. Can the Hearing Examiner Decision on the appeal be appealed to City Council? Yes, the decision on the appeal may be appealed within 14 days following the expiration of the reconsideration period. Only the City, project applicant or any person who participated in the appeal hearing may appeal. #7-Notice of City Council Closed Record Appeal Hearing: Sent to: The applicant, appellant and/or representatives of these parties Posted: No posting on site #8-City Council Closed Record Appeal Hearing Held: Who May Participate? The applicant, the appellant, the applicable department Director or representatives of these parties. #9-City Council issues decision: When: Typically within two weeks following the Closed Record Appeal Hearing. Notice Sent To: Applicant, Appellant and/or their representatives Appeal Provision: The final decision on the appeal is appealable to King County Superior Court within 21 days from issuance of Notice. To have standing to appeal, one must meet the criteria under the Land Use Petition Act ---PAGE BREAK--- Public Notice Tree Preservation Plan