← Back to Puyallup

Document Puyallup_doc_f952b06a13

Full Text

VI. Status Report Covering Calendar Yr: 2008 Jurisdiction Name: City of Puyallup PLEASE indicate reporting year and your jurisdiction in Line 1, above. PLEASE refer to the INSTRUCTIONS tab for assistance filling out this table. NOTE: Items that have future compliance dates must still be answered to indicate status. NOTE: Highlighted questions indicate permit requirements that are due for calendar year 2008. NOTE: For clarification on how to answer questions, place cursor over cells with red flags. PLEASE review your work for completeness and accuracy. Save this worksheet as you go! Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 1. Attached annual written update of Permittee’s Stormwater Management Program (SWMP), including applicable requirements under S5.A.2 and S9? Y City of Puyallup Stormwater Management Program 2. Attached a copy of any annexations, incorporations or boundary changes resulting in an increase or decrease in the Permittee’s geographic area of permit coverage during the reporting period, and implications for the SWMP as per S9.E.3? NA No annexations, incorporations or boundary changes during 2008. 3. Implemented an ongoing program for gathering, tracking, maintaining, and using information to evaluate SWMP development, implementation and permit compliance and to set priorities? (S5.A.3) Y 4. Began tracking costs or estimated costs of the development and implementation of the SWMP? (Required no later than January 1, 2009, S5.A.3.a) Y Page 1 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 5. SWMP includes an education program aimed at residents, businesses, industries, elected officials, policy makers, planning staff and other employees of the Permittee? (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1) NA Requirement is not yet due. 6. Distributed appropriate information to target audiences identified in the area served by the MS4? (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1.a) NA Requirement is not yet due. 6b. Please mark a Y next to audiences targeted in Y/N/NA box: y Requirement is not yet due. i General Public NA Requirement is not yet due. ii Home-based business NA Requirement is not yet due. iii Elected officials NA Requirement is not yet due. iv Developers NA Requirement is not yet due. v Contractors NA Requirement is not yet due. vi Permittee Employees NA Requirement is not yet due. vii Residents NA Requirement is not yet due. viii Businesses NA Requirement is not yet due. ix Policy makers NA Requirement is not yet due. x Engineers NA Requirement is not yet due. xi Property managers NA Requirement is not yet due. xii Homeowners NA Requirement is not yet due. xiii Mobile businesses NA Requirement is not yet due. xiv Industries NA Requirement is not yet due. xv Landscapers NA Requirement is not yet due. xvi Planning Staff NA Requirement is not yet due. 7. Tracked the types of public education and outreach activities implemented. (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1.c) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 2 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 7b. Number of activities implemented: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 8. Measured the understanding and adoption of the targeted behaviors among targeted audiences. (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1.b) NA Requirement is not yet due. 9. Provided opportunities for the public to participate in the decision making processes involving the development, implementation and updates of the Permittee’s SWMP? (Required by February 15, 2008, S5.C.2.a) Y 10. Developed and implemented a process for public involvement and consideration of public comments on the SWMP? (Required by February 15, 2008, S5.C.2.a) Y Utilized the Planning Commission to provide public involvment as well as public input. Posted the program on the City website including staff contact information. 11. Made the most current version of the SWMP available to the public. (S5.C.2.b) Y Available in the City Clerks office and also placed on the City's website. 12. Posted the SWMP and latest annual report on your website. (S5.C.2.b) Y SWMP was posted on City website. However, 2007 Annual Report form did not indicate that Annual Report was also to be posted. 12b. NOTE website address in Attachment field: y http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/ 13. Initiated or implemented an ongoing program to detect and remove illicit connections and illegal discharges into the Permittee’s MS4? (Required August 19, 2011, S5.C.3) NA Requirement is not yet due. 14. Developed and currently maintain a map of your MS4? (Required by February 15, 2011, S5.C.3.a) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 3 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 14b. Initiated a program to develop and maintain a map of all connections to the MS4 authorized or allowed by the Permittee after the Permit effective date? (S5.C.3.a.ii) Y The City has an interlocal agreement with Pierce County to assist with GIS mapping of the storm utility system. 15. Map shows the location of all known municipal separate storm sewer outfalls, receiving waters and structural stormwater BMPs owned, operated, or maintained by the Permittee? (Required by February 15, 2011, S5.C.3.a.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 16. Map shows all storm sewer outfalls with a 24 inch nominal diameter or larger, or an equivalent cross-sectional area for non-pipe systems and includes tributary conveyances, associated drainage areas and land use? (Required by February 15, 2011, S5.C.3.a.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 17. Map shows geographic areas served by the Permittee’s MS4 that do not discharge stormwater to surface waters? (Required by February 15, 2011, S5.C.3.a.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 18. Map has been made available upon request? (S5.C.3.a.iv) Y A hard copy of an autocad map is available to the public upon request. 19. Developed and implemented regulatory actions necessary to effectively prohibit non- stormwater, illegal discharges, and/or dumping into the Permittee’s MS4? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.3.b) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 4 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 20. Developed and implemented an ongoing program to detect and address non-stormwater discharges, spills, illicit connections and illegal dumping into the Permittee’s MS4? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c) NA Requirement is not yet due. 21. Developed procedures for locating priority areas likely to have illicit discharges, including at a minimum: evaluating land uses and associated business/industrial activities present; areas where complaints have been registered in the past; and areas with storage of large quantities of materials that could result in spills? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 22. Implemented field assessment activities, including visual inspection of priority outfalls identified during dry weather, and for the purposes of verifying outfall locations, identified previously unknown outfalls, and detected illicit discharges? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 23. Prioritized receiving waters for visual inspection? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.3.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 24. Conducted field assessments for three high priority water bodies? (Required by February 15, 2011, S5.C.3.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 5 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 25. Conducted field assessments on at least one high priority water body? (Required annually after February 15, 2011, S5.C.3.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 26. Developed and implemented procedures for characterizing the nature of, and potential public or environmental threat posed by, any illicit discharges found by or reported to the Permittee? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 27. Developed and implemented procedures for tracing the source of an illicit discharge; including visual inspections, and when necessary, opening manholes, using mobile cameras, collecting and analyzing water samples, and/or other detailed inspection procedures? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.iv) NA Requirement is not yet due. 28. Developed and implemented procedures for removing the source of the discharge, including notification of appropriate authorities; notification of the property owner; technical assistance for eliminating the discharge; follow-up inspections; and escalating enforcement and legal actions if the discharge is not eliminated? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.v.) NA Requirement is not yet due. 29. Informed public employees, businesses, and the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.d) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 6 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 30. Distributed appropriate information to target audiences identified pursuant to S5.C.1? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.d.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 31. Publicized a hotline or other local telephone number for public reporting of spills and other illicit discharges? (Required by February 15, 2009, S5.C.3.d.ii) NA Established hotline but did not begin tracking number of calls during 2008. 31b. Number of hotline calls received: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 31c. Number of follow-up actions taken in response to calls: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 32 Tracked the number and type of spills? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) NA Requirement is not yet due. 32b. Number of spills: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 33 Tracked the number of illicit discharges identified? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) NA Requirement is not yet due. 33b. Number of illicit discharges identified: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 34 Tracked the number of inspections made for illicit connections? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) NA Requirement is not yet due. 34b. Number of inspections: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 35 Received feedback from IDDE public education efforts? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) NA Requirement is not yet due. 36 Attached report on IDDE public education efforts? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.d, S5.C.3.e) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 7 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 37 Municipal field staff responsible for identification, investigation, termination, cleanup, and reporting of illicit discharges, improper disposal and illicit connections are trained to conduct these activities? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.3.f.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 37b. Number of trainings provided: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 37c. Number of staff trained: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 38 Provided follow-up training as needed to address changes in procedures, techniques or requirements? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.3.f.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 38b. Number of trainings provided: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 38c. Number of staff trained: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 39 Developed and implemented an ongoing training program on the identification of an illicit discharge/connection, and on the proper procedures for reporting and responding to the illicit discharge/ connection for all municipal field staff, which, as part of their normal job responsibilities, might come into contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection to the storm sewer system? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.3.f.ii.) NA Requirement is not yet due. 39b. Number of trainings provided: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 39c. Number of staff trained: 0 Requirement is not yet due. Page 8 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 40 Developed, implemented and enforced a program to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff to a regulated small MS4 from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4) NA Requirement is not yet due. 41 Applied stormwater runoff program to all sites that disturb a land area 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4) NA Requirement is not yet due. 42 Applied stormwater runoff program to private and public development, including roads? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4) NA Requirement is not yet due. 43 Applied the Technical Thresholds in Appendix 1 to all sites 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4) NA Requirement is not yet due. 44 Adopted and implemented regulatory mechanism (such as an ordinance) necessary to address run-off from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 9 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 45 Retained existing local requirements to apply stormwater controls at smaller sites or at lower thresholds than required pursuant to S5.C.4? (S5.A.4) Y Puyallup Municipal Code 21.10 46 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism includes the minimum requirements, technical thresholds, and definitions in Appendix 1 (or an equivalent approved by Ecology under the NPDES Phase I Municipal Stormwater Permit) for new development, redevelopment, and construction sites? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 47 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism includes exceptions and variance criteria equivalent to those in Appendix 1? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.i., and Section 6 of Appendix 1) NA Requirement is not yet due. 48 Were exceptions or variances to the minimum requirements in Appendix 1 granted? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.i., and Section 6 of Appendix 1) NA Requirement is not yet due. 48b. If so, how many were granted? 0 Requirement is not yet due. Page 10 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 49 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism includes a site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria that, when used to implement the minimum requirements in Appendix 1 (or equivalent approved by Ecology under the Phase I Permit) will protect water quality, reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable and satisfy the State requirement under Chapter 90.48 RCW to apply all known, available and reasonable methods of prevention, control and treatment (AKART) prior to discharge? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 49b. Cite documentation to meet this requirement in Attachment field: y Requirement is not yet due. 50 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism provides the legal authority, through the approval process for new development, to inspect private stormwater facilities that discharge to the Permittee’s MS4? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 11 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 51 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism allows non-structural preventive actions and source reduction approaches such as Low Impact Development (LID) Techniques to minimize the creation of impervious surfaces and minimize the disturbance of native soils and vegetation? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.iv) NA Requirement is not yet due. 52 If the ordinance or regulatory mechanism allows construction sites to apply the Erosivity Waiver in Appendix 1, Minimum Requirement does it include appropriate, escalating enforcement sanctions for construction sites that provide notice to the Permittee of their intention to apply the waiver but do not meet the requirements (including timeframe restrictions, limits on activities that result in non-stormwater discharges, and implementation of appropriate BMPs to prevent violations of water quality standards) to qualify for the waiver? (If waiver is allowed, the qualification is required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.a.v) NA Requirement is not yet due. 53 Developed and implemented a permitting process to address runoff from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities with plan review, inspection, and enforcement capability? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b) NA Requirement is not yet due. However, the City continues to implement current permitting, inspection and enforcement procedures in compliance with the Puyallup Municipal Code. Page 12 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 54 Applied permitting process to all sites that disturb a land area 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b) NA Requirement is not yet due. However, the City continues to implement current permitting, inspection and enforcement procedures in compliance with the Puyallup Municipal Code. 55 Reviewed Stormwater Site Plans for new development and redevelopment projects? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. However, the City continues to implement current permitting, inspection and enforcement procedures in compliance with the Puyallup Municipal Code. 55b. Number of site plans reviewed during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 56 Inspected, prior to clearing and construction, all known development sites that have a high potential for sediment transport as determined through plan review based on definitions and requirements in Appendix 7 Determining Construction Site Sediment Potential? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 56b. Number of qualifying sites inspected prior to clearing and construction during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 57 Inspected construction-phase stormwater controls at all known permitted development sites during construction to verify proper installation and maintenance of required erosion and sediment controls? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 13 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 57b. Number of sites inspected during the construction phase for the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 58 Enforced as necessary based on the inspection at new development and redevelopment projects? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 58b. Number of enforcement actions taken during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 59 Inspected qualifying permitted development sites upon completion of construction and prior to final approval or occupancy to ensure proper installation of permanent stormwater controls such as stormwater facilities and structural BMPs? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.iv and v) NA Requirement is not yet due. 59b. Number of qualifying sites known during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 59c. Number of qualifying sites inspected during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 60 Verified a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for maintenance is assigned for qualifying projects? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.iv) NA Requirement is not yet due. 61 Enforced regulations as necessary based on the inspection? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.iv) NA Requirement is not yet due. 61b. Number of enforcement actions taken during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. Page 14 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 62 Developed and implemented an enforcement strategy to respond to issues of non- compliance with the regulations for qualifying projects? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.b.vi) NA Requirement is not yet due. 63 Did the Permittee choose to allow construction sites to apply the Erosivity Waiver in Appendix 1, Minimum Requirement (S5.C.4.b.vii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 63b. If yes, how many waivers were allowed ? 0 Requirement is not yet due. 64 Developed and implemented a long-term operation and maintenance (O&M) program for post-construction stormwater facilities and BMPs? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c) NA Requirement is not yet due. 65 Adopted an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism that clearly identifies the party responsible for maintenance, requires inspection of facilities and establishes enforcement procedures? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 66 Inspected post-construction stormwater controls, including structural BMPs, at new development and redevelopment projects? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c) NA Requirement is not yet due. 66b. Number of sites inspected during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 66c. Number of structural BMPs inspected during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 66d. Number of enforcement actions taken during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. Page 15 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 67 Established maintenance standards that are as protective, or more protective, of facility function as those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 68 Performed timely maintenance as per S5.C.4.c.ii? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 68b. Attached documentation of any maintenance delays. (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 69 Annually inspected all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins) permitted by the Permittee according to S5.C.4.b. unless there are maintenance records to justify a different frequency? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 70 If using reduced inspection frequency, Attached documentation as per S5.C.4.c.iii? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 16 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 71 Inspected all new stormwater treatment and flow control facilities owned or operated, including catch basins, for new residential developments that are a part of a larger common plan of development or sale, every 6 months during the period of heaviest house construction 1 to 2 years following subdivision approval) to identify maintenance needs and enforce compliance with maintenance standards as needed? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.c.iv) NA Requirement is not yet due. 71b. Number of facilities inspected during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 72 Implemented a procedure for keeping records of inspections and enforcement actions by staff, including inspection reports, warning letters, notices of violations, other enforcement records, maintenance inspections and maintenance activities? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.d) NA Requirement is not yet due. 73 Provided copies of the Notice of Intent for Construction Activity and Notice of Intent for Industrial Activity to representatives of proposed new development and redevelopment? (S5.C.4.e) Y Notice of Intent forms are available at the City of Puyallup Permitting Counter and a DOE website link is referenced in the city's standard review comments. Page 17 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 74 All staff responsible for implementing the program to control stormwater runoff from new development, redevelopment, and construction sites, including permitting, plan review, construction site inspections, and enforcement were trained to conduct these activities? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.4.f) NA Requirement is not yet due. 74b. Number of trainings provided: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 74c. Number of staff trained: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 75 Developed and implemented an operations and maintenance (O&M) program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5) NA Requirement is not yet due. 76 Adopted maintenance standards as protective, or more protective, of facility function as those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.a) NA Requirement is not yet due. 77 Performed timely maintenance as per S5.C.5.a.ii? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.a.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 77b. Attached documentation of any maintenance delays. (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.a.ii) NA Requirement is not yet due. Page 18 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 78 Annually inspected and maintained all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins)? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.4.c.iii) NA Requirement is not yet due. 78b. Number of known facilities: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 78c. Number of facilities inspected during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 79 If using reduced inspection frequency, Attached documentation as per S5.C.5.a.ii? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.b) NA Requirement is not yet due. 80 Conducted spot checks of stormwater facilities after major storms? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.c) NA Requirement is not yet due. 80b. Number of known facilities: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 80c. Number of facilities inspected during the reporting period: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 81 Inspected municipally owned or operated catch basins at least once before the end of the Permit term? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.d) NA Requirement is not yet due. 81b. Number of known catch basins: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 81c. Number of inspections: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 81d. Number of catch basins cleaned: 0 Requirement is not yet due. Page 19 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 82 Established and implemented practices to reduce stormwater impacts associated with runoff from streets, parking lots, roads or highways owned or maintained by the Permittee, and road maintenance activities conducted by the Permittee? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.f) NA Requirement is not yet due. 83 Established and implemented policies and procedures to reduce pollutants in discharges from all lands owned or maintained by the Permittee and subject to this Permit, including but not limited to: parks, open space, road right- of-way, maintenance yards, and stormwater treatment and flow control facilities? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.g) NA Requirement is not yet due. 84 Initiated or implemented an operations and maintenance (O&M) program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.h.) NA Requirement is not yet due. 84b. Number of trainings provided: 0 Requirement is not yet due. 84c. Number of staff trained: 0 Requirement is not yet due. Page 20 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 85 Initiated or implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for all heavy equipment maintenance or storage yards, and material storage facilities owned or operated by the Permittee in areas subject to this Permit that are not required to have coverage under the Industrial Stormwater General Permit? (Required by February 15, 2010, S5.C.5.i) NA Requirement is not yet due. 86 Is there an approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) applicable to stormwater discharges from a MS4s owned or operated by the Permittee? N Clarks Creek TMDL was established after Permit was issued. 87 Complied with the specific requirements identified in Appendix 2? (S7.A) NA 88 Attached status report of TMDL implementation? (S7.A) NA 89 Where monitoring was required in Appendix 2, did you conduct the monitoring according to an approved Quality Assurance Project Plan? (S7.A) NA 90 Took appropriate action to correct or minimize the threat to human health or the environment or otherwise stop or correct the condition of any instances of non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this Permit, including discharges from the Permittee’s MS4 which may cause a threat to human heath or the environment? (G20.A) Y The existing truck wash facility at the City’s Corporate Yard was found to be plumbed improperly. The Puyallup City Council has taken the necessary measures to budget funds to correct the problem. Design of a new truck wash facility is scheduled to commence in January, 2010, with construction to take place in July, 2010. Page 21 of 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Question Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 90b. Attached a summary of the status of implementation of any actions taken pursuant to S4.F and any information from an assessment and evaluation procedures collected during the reporting period. (S4.F.2.d) NA 91 Notified Ecology of the failure to comply with the permit terms and conditions within 30 days of becoming aware of the non-compliance? (G20.B) NA 92 Notified Ecology immediately in cases where the Permittee becomes aware of a discharge from the Permittees MS4 which may cause or contribute to an imminent threat to human health or the environment? (G20.C) NA Page 22 of 22