Full Text
Brief Project Description (includng bridge replacement type) Realistic Start Dates (Month, Year): Preliminary Engineering Right of Way Purchases Construction Federal Highway Bridge Program Project Application Please send copies of the latest inventory and inspection reports, load ratings summary, accident data, any other pertinent information, and electronic photos (640 x 480 pixels minumum .jpg) with this questionnaire by the due date specified in the cover letter. PE Costs (approx 25% total) Right of Way Costs Construction Costs If a Rehabilitation, what would be the Replacement cost for that same structure (including PE, Right of Way, and Construction)? Rehabilitation/Replacement/Seismic/Paint/Scour Projects: Replacement Candidate Rehabilitation Candidate Scour Mitigation Agency Name: Bridge Name: Bridge Number: Contact Person: Phone: Sufficiency Rating: Structure ID: Pick one of the following: ( - Seismic Retrofit Painting Width (Curb to Curb) Proposed Length: Inflation Factor per year, based on projected Ad date below) Mobilization (10%) Contingency (15%) Construction Engineering (18%) ) (Purchases, Relocations and Construction Easement) (Soils, Environmental, Design Documents, Plans Preparation, etc.) (Environmental mitigation, approach costs structure costs, etc.) Provide comments below * Project cost estimates may be updated on this form until August 30, 2012. Total Rehabilitation/Replacement/Preventative Maintenance Project Costs:* Projected Advertising Date (Year): City of Puyallup Puyallup River Milklke Puyallup4 Mark Palmer 3606 435 15.32 SD 08360800 253 The proposed project is a post tensioned bridge with a cast-in-place deck. The span configuration will be 96 ft, 96 ft, 200 ft, and 80 ft (S to $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $6,000,000 6/2013 1/2015 6/2015 34 472 $1,080,000 $900,000 $600,000 $1,500,000 $12,580,000 2015 ---PAGE BREAK--- Comments The current Milwaukee Bridge is exhibiting cracking and other deficiencies. The current load rating is 15.32 and it is structurally deficient (SD). The bridge was also posted with load restrictions in 2009. It has been determined the expected life span is 10 years The City of Puyallup needs to replace the current structure with one which will meet current AASHTO bridge standards and will better serve the citizens of Puyallup. Also, scour had been a problem in the past ont he existing bridge, so it would be desireable to reconfigure the new bridge to minimize scour issues. The estimate is one of two structure types proposed by our consultant engineering firm, Sargent Engineers, Inc. in conjunction with Grey and Osborne, Inc. The City of Puyallup is in the initial phase of design consideration for this project.