Full Text
2013 Jurisdiction Name: City of Puyallup Y/N/ NA # Comments (50 word limit) Name of Attachment & Page if applicable 1. Attached annual written update of Permittee’s Stormwater Management Program (SWMP), including applicable requirements under S5.A.2 and S9? Y draft outline was presented at a public meeting held at the City Library on February 26, 2014. Public comment was solicited on the city's web site as well. 2014 52 pages 2. Attached a copy of any annexations, incorporations or boundary changes resulting in an increase or decrease in the Permittee’s geographic area of permit coverage during the reporting period, and implications for the SWMP as per S9.E.3? Y 1 annexation was made by the City in 2013. It encompassed the area commonly referred to as Orchard Hills, located in the 1900 block of Fruitland Avenue. annexation map 3. Implemented an ongoing program for gathering, tracking, maintaining, and using information to evaluate SWMP development, implementation and permit compliance and to set priorities? (S5.A.3) Y VI. Status Report Covering Calendar Yr: PLEASE indicate reporting year and your jurisdiction in Line 1, above. PLEASE refer to the INSTRUCTIONS tab for assistance filling out this table. NOTE: Items that have future compliance dates must still be answered to indicate status. NOTE: For clarification on how to answer questions, place cursor over cells with red flags. NOTE: Highlighted items indicate requirements that are due in 2010. PLEASE review your work for completeness and accuracy. Save this worksheet as you go! Question Page 1 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4. Began tracking costs or estimated costs of the development and implementation of the SWMP? (Required no later than January 1, 2009, S5.A.3.a) Y $2,399,891.89 was expended in 2012 towards NPDES compliance 2013 Compliance Costs, 1 page 5. SWMP includes an education program aimed at residents, businesses, industries, elected officials, policy makers, planning staff and other employees of the Permittee? (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1) Y Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 6. Distributed appropriate information to target audiences identified in the area served by the MS4? (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, Y Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 7. Tracked the types of public education and outreach activities implemented. (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1.c) Y Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 7b. Number of activities implemented: 29 Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 8. Measured the understanding and adoption of the targeted behaviors among at least one targeted audience in at least one subject area. (Required to begin by February 15, 2009, S5.C.1.b) Y Page 2 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 9. Provided opportunities for the public to participate in the decision making processes involving the development, implementation and updates of the Permittee’s (Required by February 15, 2008, S5.C.2.a) Y draft outline was presented at a public meeting held at the City Library on February 26,2014. Public comment was solicited on the city's web site as well. 2014 50 pages 10. Developed and implemented a process for public involvement and consideration of public comments on the (Required by February 15, 2008, S5.C.2.a) Y draft outline was presented at a public meeting held at the City Library on February 26,2014. Public comment was solicited on the city's web site as well. 2014 50 pages 11. Made the most current version of the SWMP available to the public. (S5.C.2.b) Y 2014 50 pages 12. Posted the SWMP and latest annual report on your website. (S5.C.2.b) Y 2014 50 pages 12b. NOTE website address in Attachment field: http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/services/ public-works/stormwater- management/clean-water-npdes/ 13. Initiated or implemented an ongoing program to detect and remove illicit connections and illegal discharges into the Permittee’s MS4? (Required August 19, 2011, S5.C.3) Y Adopted IDDE Program Guidance Manual (Center for Watershed Protection) 2004 EPA Cooperation Agreement X- 82907801-0 IDDE Manual 2006 Release, 195 pages 14. Developed and currently maintain a map of your MS4? (Required by February 16, 2011, S5.C.3.a) Y Inventory completed and available on GIS Data and map is regularly updated Page 3 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 14b. Initiated a program to develop and maintain a map of all connections to the MS4 authorized or allowed by the Permittee after the Permit effective date? (S5.C.3.a.ii) Y As built plans from private development and public projects are provided to Stormwater Collections upon project completion for field verification and input into the storm layer of GIS. 15. Map shows the location of all known municipal separate storm sewer outfalls, receiving waters and structural stormwater BMPs owned, operated, or maintained by the Permittee? (Required by February 16, 2011, S5.C.3.a.i) Y Inventory completed and available on GIS Data and map is regularly updated 16. Map shows all storm sewer outfalls with a 24 inch nominal diameter or larger, or an equivalent cross- sectional area for non-pipe systems and includes tributary conveyances, associated drainage areas and land use? (Required by February 16, 2011 S5 C 3 a i) Y Inventory completed and available on GIS Data and map is regularly updated 17. Map shows geographic areas served by the Permittee’s MS4 that do not discharge stormwater to surface waters? (Required by February 16, 2011, S5.C.3.a.iii) Y Inventory completed and available in GIS Data and map is regularly updated 18. Map has been made available upon request? (S5.C.3.a.iv) Y Map in current status is maintained on web site. Public Works can provide maps of smaller sections of the permit area upon request. http://www.cityofpuyallup.org/services/ public-works/stormwater-management/ Page 4 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 19. Developed and implemented regulatory actions necessary to effectively prohibit non-stormwater, illicit discharges into the Permittee’s MS4? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.3.b) Y Ordinance #2938 passed August 11, 2009, PMC 21.11 Puyallup Municipal Code 21.11 20. Developed and implemented an ongoing program to detect and address non-stormwater illicit discharges, including spills, and illicit connections into the Permittee’s MS4? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c) Y Under authority of PMC 21.11, Program framework developed from EPA model IDDE guideline manuals. Puyallup Municipal Code 21.11 21. Developed procedures for locating priority areas likely to have illicit discharges, including at a minimum: evaluating land uses and associated business/industrial activities present; areas where complaints have been registered in the past; and areas with storage of large quantities of Y Under authority of PMC 21.11, Program framework developed from EPA model IDDE guideline manuals. Puyallup Municipal Code 21.11 22. Implemented field assessment activities, including visual inspection of priority outfalls identified during dry weather, and for the purposes of verifying outfall locations, identified previously unknown outfalls, and detected illicit discharges? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.ii) Y Under authority of PMC 21.11, Program framework developed from EPA model IDDE guideline manuals. Puyallup Municipal Code 21.11 Page 5 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 23. Prioritized receiving waters for visual inspection? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.3.c.ii) Y Puyallup River Outfall #14(commercial) and Clarks Creek Outfall #24(high density residential) identified in future monitoring plan City of Puyallup City Future Stormwater Monitoring Plan, 9 pages 24. Conducted field assessments for three high priority water bodies? (Required by February 16, 2011, S5.C.3.c.ii) Y 25. Conducted field assessments on at least one high priority water body? (Required annually after February 16, 2011, S5.C.3.c.ii) Y 26. Developed and implemented procedures for characterizing the nature of, and potential public or environmental threat posed by, any illicit discharges found by or reported to the Permittee? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.iii) Y Developed and implemented Spill Response Plan with decision and phone trees IDDE Spill Response First Responder Decision Tree, 2 pages 27. Developed and implemented procedures for tracing the source of an illicit discharge; including visual inspections, and when necessary, opening manholes, using mobile cameras, collecting and analyzing water samples, and/or other detailed inspection procedures? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.c.iv) Y Under authority of PMC 21.11, Program framework developed from EPA model IDDE guideline manuals. Puyallup Municipal Code 21.11 Page 6 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 28. Developed and implemented procedures for removing the source of the discharge, including notification of appropriate authorities; notification of the property owner; technical assistance for eliminating the discharge; follow- up inspections; and escalating enforcement and legal actions if the discharge is not eliminated? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5 C 3 c v ) Y Under authority of PMC 21.11, Program framework developed from EPA model IDDE guideline manuals. Puyallup Municipal Code 21.11 29. Informed public employees, businesses, and the general public of hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of Y Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 30. Distributed appropriate information to target audiences identified pursuant to S5.C.1? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.d.i) Y Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 31. Publicized a hotline or other local telephone number for public reporting of spills and other illicit discharges? (Required by February 15, 2009, S5.C.3.d.ii) Y Phone number posted on website, [PHONE REDACTED] IDDE hotline 31b. Number of hotline calls received: 1 Total hotline calls received concerning IDDE in the City. 31c. Number of follow-up actions taken in response to calls: 1 Number of follow up actions taken from hotline calls. 32 Maintained a hotline or other reporting number for public reporting of illicit discharges, including spills? (Required by February 15 2009 Y Phone number posted on website, [PHONE REDACTED] IDDE hotline Page 7 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 32b. NOTE hotline number in Comments field Hotline Phone Number: (253) 770-3336 IDDE hotline 33 Tracked the number of illicit discharges, including spills, identified? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) Y 2013 IDDE Locations 33b. Number of illicit discharges identified: 28 34 Tracked the number of inspections made for illicit connections? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) Y 2013 IDDE Locations 34b. Number of inspections: 1 35 Received feedback from IDDE public education efforts? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.e) Y There was no feedback received from the IDDE public education efforts IN 2012. 36 Attached report on IDDE public education efforts? (Required by August 19, 2011, S5.C.3.d, S5.C.3.e) Y Public Education and Outreach Summary, 6 pages 37 Municipal field staff responsible for identification, investigation, termination, cleanup, and reporting of illicit discharges, improper disposal and illicit connections are trained to conduct these activities? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.3.f.i) Y IDDE First Responder Training was provided on August 11, 2009 to 8 selected staff members by Brown & Caldwell IDDE First Responder Training, 2 pages 37b. Number of trainings provided: 1 IDDE First Responder Training was provided on August 11, 2009 to 8 selected staff members by Brown & Caldwell IDDE First Responder Training, 2 pages Page 8 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 37c. Number of staff trained: 8 IDDE First Responder Training was provided on August 11, 2009 to 8 selected staff members by Brown & Caldwell IDDE First Responder Training, 2 pages 38 Provided follow-up training as needed to address changes in procedures, techniques or requirements? (Required by August 15, 2009, S5.C.3.f.i) Y No additional training identified as of report date. 38b. Number of trainings provided: 0 No additional training identified as of report date. 38c. Number of staff trained: 0 No additional training identified as of report date. Page 9 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 39 Developed and implemented an ongoing training program on the identification of an illicit discharge/connection, and on the proper procedures for reporting and responding to the illicit discharge/ connection for all municipal field staff, which, as part of their normal job responsibilities, might come into contact with or otherwise observe an illicit discharge or illicit connection to the storm sewer system? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5 C 3 f ii ) Y Initial training provided by Brown and Caldwell on January 20th and 27th, 2011. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Awareness Training, 14 pages 39b. Number of trainings provided: 2 Initial training provided by Brown and Caldwell on January 20th and 27th, 2011. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Awareness Training, 14 pages 39c. Number of staff trained: 78 Initial training provided by Brown and Caldwell on January 20th and 27th, 2011. Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Awareness Training, 14 pages 40 Developed, implemented and enforced a program to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff to a regulated small MS4 from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4) Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one acre. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages Page 10 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 41 Applied stormwater runoff program to all sites that disturb a land area 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 42 Applied stormwater runoff program to private and public development, including roads? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4) Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one acre. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 43 Applied the Technical Thresholds in Appendix 1 to all sites 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger common plan of the development or sale? (Required by February 16, Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one acre. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 44 Adopted and implemented regulatory mechanism (such as an ordinance) necessary to address run-off from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.a) Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one acre. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 45 Retained existing local requirements to apply stormwater controls at smaller sites or at lower thresholds than required pursuant to S5.C.4? (S5.A.4) Y Ordinance adopting 2005 DOE manual requires sites less than 1 acre to continue following the 1990 King County Manual Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages Page 11 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 46 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism includes the minimum requirements, technical thresholds, and definitions in Appendix 1 (or an equivalent approved by Ecology under the NPDES Phase I Municipal Y Ordinance 2951 adopting 2005 DOE manual requires sites over 1 acre to apply thresholds. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 47 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism includes exceptions and variance criteria equivalent to those in Appendix 1? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.a.i., and Y Ordinance 2951 adopted exemptions of Appendix 1 Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 48 Were exceptions or variances to the minimum requirements in Appendix 1 granted? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.a.i., and Section 6 of Appendix 1) N None in private development or associated with public rights-of- way. 48b. If so, how many were granted? 0 Dev Svc - none Public Wks - none Page 12 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 49 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism includes a site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria that, when used to implement the minimum requirements in Appendix 1 (or equivalent approved by Ecology under the Phase I Permit) will protect water quality, reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable and satisfy the State requirement under Chapter 90.48 RCW to apply all known, available and reasonable methods of prevention, control and treatment (AKART) prior to discharge? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5 C 4 ii) Y Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 49b. Cite documentation to meet this requirement in Attachment field: Ordinance 2951 adopted Stormwater Manual for Western Washington including site planning process and BMP selection and design criteria. 2005 Stormwater Manual for Western Washington 50 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism provides the legal authority, through the approval process for new development, to inspect private stormwater facilities that discharge to the Permittee’s MS4? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.a.iii) Y Article VI Enforcement and System Protection of Stormwater Management Chapter 21.10 contains enforcement provisions. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages Page 13 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 51 The ordinance or other enforceable mechanism allows non-structural preventive actions and source reduction approaches such as Low Impact Development (LID) Techniques to minimize the creation of impervious surfaces and minimize the disturbance of native soils and vegetation? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.a.iv) Y Section 21.10.210 Low Impact Development section of Stormwater Management Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 52 If the ordinance or regulatory mechanism allows construction sites to apply the Erosivity Waiver in Appendix 1, Minimum Requirement does it include appropriate, escalating enforcement sanctions for construction sites that provide notice Y Adjustments, exceptions and variances may be granted pursuant to the criteria set forth in the 2005 Stormwater Manual. The developer shall, pursuant to Section 1.6.3 of the 2005 Stormwater Manual, demonstrate that adjustment, exception or variance will not adversely impact PMC 21.10 53 Developed and implemented a permitting process to address runoff from new development, redevelopment and construction site activities with plan review, inspection, and enforcement capability? (Required by February 16 2010 S5 C 4 b) Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one acre. Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages Page 14 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 54 Applied permitting process to all sites that disturb a land area 1 acre or greater, including projects less than one acre that are part of a larger Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 55 Reviewed Stormwater Site Plans for new development and redevelopment projects? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.b.i) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 55b. Number of site plans reviewed during the reporting period: 407 Dev Svc = 407 Public Wks = 0 56 Inspected, prior to clearing and construction, all known development sites that have a high potential for sediment transport as determined through plan review based on definitions and requirements in Appendix 7 Determining Construction Site Sediment Potential? (Required by February 16 2010 S5 C 4 b ii) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 56b. Number of qualifying sites inspected prior to clearing and construction during the reporting period: 17 Dev Svc = 17 Public Wks = 0 Page 15 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 57 Inspected construction-phase stormwater controls at all known permitted development sites during construction to verify proper Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 57b. Number of sites inspected during the construction phase for the reporting period: 17 Dev Svc =32 Public Wks = 0 58 Enforced as necessary based on the inspection at new development and redevelopment projects? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.b.iii) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 58b. Number of enforcement actions taken during the reporting period: 0 Dev Svc - none Public Wks - none 59 Inspected qualifying permitted development sites upon completion of construction and prior to final approval or occupancy to ensure proper installation of permanent stormwater controls such as stormwater facilities and structural BMPs? (Required by February 16, 2010 S5 C 4 b iv and v) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 59b. Number of qualifying sites known during the reporting period: 17 Dev Svc = 17 Public Wks = 0 Page 16 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 59c. Number of qualifying sites inspected during the reporting period: 17 Dev Svc = 17 Public Wks = 0 60 Verified a maintenance plan is completed and responsibility for maintenance is assigned for qualifying projects? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.b.iv) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 61 Enforced regulations as necessary based on the inspection? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.b.iv) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 61b. Number of enforcement actions taken during the reporting period: 0 Dev Svc - None Public Wks - None 62 Developed and implemented an enforcement strategy to respond to issues of non-compliance with the regulations for qualifying projects? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.b.vi) Y Dev Svc - Yes Public Wks - Yes 63 Did the Permittee choose to allow construction sites to apply the Erosivity Waiver in Appendix 1, Minimum Requirement (S5.C.4.b.vii) N Dev Svc - None Public Wks - None 63b. If yes, how many waivers were allowed ? 0 Dev Svc - None Public Wks - None Page 17 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 64 Developed and implemented a long- term operation and maintenance (O&M) program for post- construction stormwater facilities and BMPs? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.c) Y Dev Svc - The city requires the developer to execute an inspection and maintenance agreement that is binding on all subsequent owners of land served by the private stormwater facility. Public Wks - NA Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement 65 Adopted an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism that clearly identifies the party responsible for maintenance, requires inspection of facilities and establishes enforcement Y In February 2010 the City adopted new regulations incorporating the DOE Manual for sites greater than one acre. Existing regulations in place prior to February 2010 remain for sites less than one Ordinance 2951 - Chapter 21.10 Stormwater Management, 16 pages 66 Inspected post-construction stormwater controls, including structural BMPs, at new development and redevelopment projects? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.c) Y 66b. Number of sites inspected during the reporting period: 17 66c. Number of structural BMPs inspected during the reporting period: 327 66d. Number of enforcement actions taken during the reporting period: 0 There were no enforcement actions taken or required during the reporting period. Page 18 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 67 Established maintenance standards that are as protective, or more protective, of facility function as those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington? (Required by February 16 2010 S5 C 4 c ii) Y Adopted OM BMPs from 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual. Schedule and tracking with CMMS 68 Performed timely maintenance as per S5.C.4.c.ii? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.c.ii) Y Adopted OM BMPs from 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual. Schedule and tracking with CMMS 68b. Attached documentation of any maintenance delays. (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.c.ii) NA Not Applicable 69 Established program to annually inspect all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins) permitted by the Y Adopted OM BMPs from 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual. Schedule and tracking with CMMS Page 19 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 70 If using reduced inspection frequency, Attached documentation as per S5.C.4.c.iii? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.c.iii) NA Not Applicable 71 Inspected all new stormwater treatment and flow control facilities owned or operated, including catch basins, for new residential developments that are a part of a larger common plan of development or sale, every 6 months during the period of heaviest house construction 1 to 2 years following subdivision approval) to identify maintenance needs and enforce compliance with maintenance standards as needed? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.c.iv) NA No projects fitting this description were started or completed during this reporting period. Page 20 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 71b. Number of facilities inspected during the reporting period: 0 No projects fitting this description were started or completed during this reporting period. 72 Implemented a procedure for keeping records of inspections and enforcement actions by staff, including inspection reports, warning letters, notices of violations, other enforcement records, maintenance inspections and maintenance activities? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.4.d) Y 73 Provided copies of the Notice of Intent for Construction Activity and Notice of Intent for Industrial Activity to representatives of proposed new development and redevelopment? (S5.C.4.e) Y Dev Svc - Applicants are advised that a Construction Stormwater General Permit shall be obtained from the DOE if any land disturbing activities will disturb one or more acres of land, or are part of a larger common plan of development or sale that will ultimately disturb one or more acres of land. Public Wks - These documents are filled out for all Public road projects and submitted if they apply http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/st ormwater/construction/ Page 21 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 74 All staff responsible for implementing the program to control stormwater runoff from new development, redevelopment, and construction sites, including permitting, plan review, construction site inspections, and enforcement were trained to conduct these activities? (Required by February 16, 2010 S5 C 4 f) Y Dev Svc; CESCL training has been provided for all field and inspection staff. Public Wks - same CESCL Training 74b. Number of trainings provided: 2 There was 1 (one) CESCL training update provided for staff 74c. Number of staff trained: 5 Dev Svc - Update for Dev Svc staff provided in 2012 Public Works- staff trained in 2009 no update for PW staff CESCL Training 75 Developed and implemented an operations and maintenance (O&M) program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations? (Required by February 16, 2010, Y Adopted OM BMPs from 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual. Schedule and tracking with CMMS Operation and Maintenance BMPs Checklist, 72 pages Page 22 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 76 Adopted maintenance standards as protective, or more protective, of facility function as those specified in Chapter 4 of Volume V of the 2005 Stormwater Management Manual for Western Washington ? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.a) Y Adopted OM BMPs from 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual. Schedule and tracking with CMMS Operation and Maintenance BMPs Checklist, 72 pages 77 Performed timely maintenance as per S5.C.5.a.ii? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.a.ii) Y Adopted OM BMPs from 2005 WSDOE Stormwater Manual. Schedule and tracking with CMMS Operation and Maintenance BMPs Checklist, 72 pages 77b. Attached documentation of any maintenance delays. (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.a.ii) NA There were no maintenance delays during the permit period. 78 Designed a program to annually inspect and maintained all stormwater treatment and flow control facilities (other than catch basins)? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.c.iii) Y 78b. Number of known facilities: 84 Facility List, 3 pages 78c. Number of facilities inspected during the reporting period: 84 Facility List, 3 pages 79 If using reduced inspection frequency, Attached documentation as per S5.C.5.a.ii? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.b) NA Not Applicable Page 23 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 80 Conducted spot checks of stormwater facilities after major storms? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.c) Y 80b. Number of known facilities: 84 Facility List, 3 pages 80c. Number of facilities inspected during the reporting period: 84 No events defined as major storm, i.e. 24-hour, 10 year recurrence, which is approximately 3" in 24 hours 81 Inspected municipally owned or operated catch basins at least once before the end of the Permit term? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.d) Y 81b. Number of known catch basins: 5876 81c. Number of inspections: 110 81d. Number of catch basins cleaned: 801 Page 24 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 82 Established and implemented practices to reduce stormwater impacts associated with runoff from streets, parking lots, roads or highways owned or maintained by the Permittee, and road maintenance activities conducted by the Permittee? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.f) Y 83 Established and implemented policies and procedures to reduce pollutants in discharges from all lands owned or maintained by the Permittee and subject to this Permit, including but not limited to: parks, open space, road right-of-way, maintenance Y 84 Implemented an operations and maintenance (O&M) program that includes a training component and has the ultimate goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.h.) Y 84b. Number of trainings provided: 1 84c. Number of staff trained: 1 Page 25 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 85 Public Works Facility, 61 pages Parks Facility, 58 pages WWTP Facility, 61 pages 86 Is there an approved Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) applicable to stormwater discharges from a MS4s owned or operated by the Permittee? NA Not Applicable 87 Complied with the specific requirements identified in Appendix 2? (S7.A) NA Not Applicable 88 Attached status report of TMDL implementation? (S7.A) NA Not Applicable 89 Where monitoring was required in Appendix 2, did you conduct the monitoring according to an approved Quality Assurance Project Plan? (S7.A) NA Not Applicable 90 Took appropriate action to correct or minimize discharges into or from the MS4 which may constitute a threat to human health, welfare, or the environment? (G3) NA Not Applicable Implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan for all heavy equipment maintenance or storage yards, and material storage facilities owned or operated by the Permittee in areas subject to this Permit that are not required to have coverage under the Industrial Stormwater General Permit? (Required by February 16, 2010, S5.C.5.i) Y All (Public Works Facility, Parks, and WWTP) for the City of Puyallup facilities have been updated as of 2/6/12 Page 26 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 90b. Attached a summary of the status of implementation of any actions taken pursuant to S4.F and the status of any monitoring, assessment, or evaluation efforts conducted during the reporting period? (S4.F.3.d) NA Not Applicable 91 Notified Ecology of the failure to comply with the permit terms and conditions within 30 days of becoming aware of the non- compliance? (G20) NA Not Applicable 92 Notified Ecology immediately in cases where the Permittee becomes aware of a discharge from the Permittees MS4 which may cause or contribute to an imminent threat to human health or the environment? NA There were no qualifying events during the reporting period. 93 Attached a summary of identified barriers to the use of low impact development (LID) and measures to address the barriers (Required to be submitted by March 31, 2011, S9.E.4.a) Y LID Current Practice and Barriers to Implementation, 15 pages Page 27 of 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- 94 Attached a report describing LID practices currently available and that can be reasonably implemented, potential or planned non-structural actions and LID techniques to prevent stormwater impacts, goals and metrics to identify, promote, measure LID; and schedules to require and implement non- structureal and LID techniques on a broader scale (Required to be submitted by March 31, 2011, S9 E 4 b) Y LID Current Practice and Barriers to Implementation, 15 pages Page 28 of 28