Full Text
January 28th, 2020 Otsego County Justice Complex Feasibility Study Otsego County Justice Complex Feasibility Study Executive Summary 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Feasibility Study Goals and Objectives 2 • Goals: - Define a 20 & 30 Year Public Safety Complex and Probable Cost to address your current and future Public Safety space and facility needs. - Develop and Implement a Community Awareness Program to Inform, Obtain Input and Build Consensus for the Project. • Objectives: - Phase I: Strategic Planning Step 1: Planning Process/Methodology - Complete Step 2: Data Collection - Complete Step 3: Facility Criteria – Complete Step 4: Preliminary Report – In Process - Phase II: Conceptual Design Step 1: Develop Preliminary Design – Complete Step 2: Final Report – Complete - Phase III: Presentation Materials Graphic Presentation Materials – Complete Presentation Power Point – Compete - Phase IV: Community Awareness Assemble Public Relations Team Survey Public to Determine Attitudes, Issues and Concerns Develop Strategy to Address Public Concerns Conduct Public Meetings at Locations Throughout the County Develop Plan to React to Issues Raised During Community Awareness Efforts Feasibility Study = A 30,000 Foot “Big Picture” Perspective of Your Needs and Means to Achieve Them. ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Feasibility Study Approach and Methodology 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Feasibility Study Components 4 • Group 1 Components: - Complete Methodology Courts and Related Departments Sheriff’s Office/Jail • Group 2 Components: - Abbreviated Methodology (Definition of Potential Future Space Needs Only) A. Government • Not Included: - DHHS/Community Mental Health - Soil Conservation District • Buildings Included: - Courthouse/Government Center - Sheriff’s Office/Jail - Alpine Center • Study Components: A. Government 1. County Administration 2. County Clerk 3. County Commissioners 4. Equalization 5. Finance 6. Human Resource 7. Information Technology 8. Land Use Services 9. Maintenance 10. MSU Extension 11. Register of Deeds 12. Treasurer 13. Veterans Services/Housing B. Courts 14. Circuit Court 15. Court Administrator/Magistrate 16. District/Probate Court 17. Friend of Court 18. Probation/Parole 19. Prosecutor C. Sheriff’s Office/Jail 20. Sheriff 21. Jail 22. Work Camp 23. Civil Process/Court Security ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Population Projections Data Census Pop. 1880 1,974 — 1890 4,272 116.4% 1900 6,175 44.5% 1910 6,552 6.1% 1920 6,043 −7.8% 1930 5,554 −8.1% 1940 5,827 4.9% 1950 6,435 10.4% 1960 7,545 17.2% 1970 10,422 38.1% 1980 14,993 43.9% 1990 17,957 19.8% 2000 23,301 29.8% 2010 24,164 3.7% Est. 2018 24,665 2.1% Model 1: US Census Model 2: County Provided Data 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Population 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2018 2019 2029 2039 2049 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 10,422 14,993 17,957 23,301 24,164 24,665 2029 Exp: 39,988 Linear: 33,207 Power: 30,122 Log: 28,887 2039 Exp: 48,429 Linear: 35,933 Power: 32,885 Log: 29,114 2049 Exp: 56,813 Linear: 39,566 Power: 34,920 Log: 29,987 24,985 Linear Projection Logarithmic Projection Power Projection Exponential Otsego County Population Projection – Model 1 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Population 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2018 2019 2020 2029 2030 2035 2039 2040 2045 2049 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 10,422 14,993 17,957 23,30124,16424,665 25,046 27,446 28,605 29,659 30,468 2029 Exp: 26,112 Linear: 26,330 Power: 27,310 Log: 27,300 2039 Exp: 31,775 Linear: 29,944 Power: 31,662 Log: 29,874 2049 Exp: 37,884 Linear: 34,289 Power: 33,551 Log: 31,269 24,985 Linear Projection Logarithmic Projection Power Projection Exponential Otsego County Population Projection – Model 2 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Population Projections Summary Algorithm Type Model 1: US Census Model 2: County Provided 2019 2029 2039 2049 2019 2029 2039 2049 Exponential 39,988 48,429 56,813 26,112 31,775 37,884 Linear Projection 33,207 35,933 39,566 26,303 29,944 34,289 Power Projection 30,112 32,885 34,290 27,310 31,662 33,551 Logarithmic Projection 24,995 28,887 29,114 29,987 24,995 27,300 29,874 31,269 Average 33,049 36,590 40,164 26,756 30,814 34,248 20 Year Planning Model 30 Year Planning Model Average 20, 30 Year Population Projection Based Upon County Provided Data * Planning Model is Utilized to Complete Staff and Space Projections, Evaluate/Confirm Staff and Architectural Space Conclusions 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Courts Summary 9 • Minor Deviations High and Low from Period Average. • No Apparent Relationship to Population Growth. • Recession Impacted Historic Trends. • Projection Modeling Does Not Indicate Probability/Necessity for Future Court within the Study Milestone Periods ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Jail Summary 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Jail Summary 11 Annual Jail Bookings Average Daily Bookings Average Length of Stay ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Jail Summary 12 • Preliminary Recommendation: 90 – 100 Beds • Final Recommendation: 120 – 170 Beds - Internal Expansion to 170 Beds Average Daily Population Comparative Counties Evaluation ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Preliminary Jail Beds Recommendation Total Recommended: 90 to 100 Beds Male Female Juvenile 70 to 75 20 to 25 0 • Current Capacity: 34 Beds • Recommendation considers potential future influences, classification and mental heath 13 Otsego County Jail Projection Modeling Adult Bookings, ALOS & ADP Projections: Detention Housing and Staff Projection Models 2039 2049 Annual Bookings Daily Bookings ALO S AD P CF Beds Annual Bookings Daily Bookings ALO S AD P CF Beds Model 1: 945 2.36 23.5 29 15% 33 963 2.43 23.5 29 15% 33 Model 2: 982 2.53 28 35 15% 40 1,028 2.55 31 36 15% 41 Model 3: 1,280 3.42 41 54 15% 62 1,480 3.95 42 66 15% 76 Average 1,069 2.77 30.8 39 15% 45 1,157 2.98 32.2 44 15% 50.2 Notes: Notes: Projected Annual Bookings Daily Booking = Annual Projected Bookings/365. ADP = Daily Booking Projections. Classification Factor (CF) = Beds = ADP X CF ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Final Jail Beds Recommendation 14 • Analytics – Final Recommendation It is believed that the 10-year collection period of data is unreliable for the following reasons: - Influences of the National and Local Economic Downturn. - Chronic Jail Overcrowding for more than a Decade. - Resultant changes in Law Enforcement and Judicial Procedures • Result: - Capacity of the Jail Size of the Judicial Functions Determined by a Combination of Data Analytics, Interviews with Justice and Law Enforcement Personnel, and Experience of the Study Team. - The goal is to Develop the most Efficient Public Safety Complex that Combines all County Justice, Law Enforcement and Corrections Functions into a Single Location. - Design Facilities that are Efficient, Adequately Staffed and Expandable in the Future with Minimal Staffing Impact. ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Recommendation Considerations 15 Impacts of Chronic Jail Overcrowding On Law Enforcement - “Community Policing is impaired when jail is overcrowded” - “One hand tied behind their back” - Citations in lieu of arrests - Many arrests not being made On the Jail - Persistent overcrowding - Lack of proper classification of inmates - Minor influences make huge impacts on the facility On the Courts - Inability to impose sanctions Offers no deterrence for: Probation violators Drug Court violators Non-payment of child support - Changes sentencing patterns On the Community - Public frustrated with violators not being punished - Little or no sanctions for violating the law - This word spreads very quickly in the criminal community - Minor infractions are ignored until they grow into major infractions - Some major infractions receive no jail time - Greater impact of transient community on crime rate ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Michigan Jails Average 16 County Number County Name USCensus Population 2010 Jail Capacity Beds per 1000 Yr. Built / Renovated 1 Alcona 10,942 31 2.8 2 Alger 9,601 50 5.2 3 Allegan 111,408 225 2.0 4 Alpena 29,598 69 2.3 5 Antrim 23,580 56 2.4 6 Arenac 15,899 46 2.9 7 Baraga 8,860 26 2.9 8 Barry 59,173 97 1.6 9 Bay 107,771 249 2.3 10 Benzie 17,525 47 2.7 11 Berrien 156,813 341 2.2 12 Branch 45,248 240 5.3 13 Calhoun 136,146 630 4.6 14 Cass 52,293 116 2.2 15 Charlevoix 25,949 89 3.4 16 Cheboygan 26,152 83 3.2 17 Chippewa 38,520 179 4.6 18 Clare 30,926 178 5.8 19 Clinton 75,382 275 3.6 20 Crawford 14,074 53 3.8 21 Delta 37,069 198 5.3 22 Dickinson 26,168 71 2.7 23 Eaton 107,759 374 3.5 24 Emmet 32,694 103 3.2 25 Genesee 425,790 580 1.4 26 Gladwin 25,692 84 3.3 27 Gogebic 16,427 32 1.9 28 Grand Traverse 86,986 164 1.9 29 Gratiot 42,476 70 1.6 30 Hillsdale 46,688 67 1.4 31 Houghton 36,628 54 1.5 32 Huron 33,118 71 2.1 33 Ingham 280,895 444 1.6 34 Ionia 63,905 141 2.2 35 Iosco 25,887 63 2.4 36 Iron 11,817 50 4.2 37 Isabella 70,311 196 2.8 38 Jackson 160,248 432 2.7 39 Kalamazoo 250,331 482 1.9 40 Kalkaska 17,153 62 3.6 41 Kent 602,622 1478 2.5 42 Keweenaw 2,156 6 2.8 43 Lake 11,539 48 4.2 44 Lapeer 88,319 123 1.4 45 Leelanau 21,708 72 3.3 46 Lenawee 99,892 287 2.9 47 Livingston 180,967 411 2.3 48 Luce 6,631 4 0.6 49 Mackinac 11,113 28 2.5 50 Macomb 840,978 1438 1.7 51 Manistee 24,733 80 3.2 52 Marquette 67,077 160 2.4 53 Mason 28,705 1110 38.7 54 Mecosta 42,798 97 2.3 55 Menominee 24,029 50 2.1 56 Midland 83,629 274 3.3 57 Missaukee 14,849 40 2.7 58 Monroe 152,021 363 2.4 59 Montcalm 63,342 205 3.2 60 Montmorency 9,765 40 4.1 61 Muskegon 172,188 542 3.1 62 Newaygo 48,460 285 5.9 63 Oakland 1,202,362 1664 1.4 64 Oceana 26,570 66 2.5 65 Ogemaw 20,937 132 6.3 66 Ontonagon 6,780 19 2.8 67 Osceola 23,528 77 3.3 68 Oscoda 8,640 5 0.6 69 Otsego 24,164 34 1.4 70 Ottawa 263,801 4 0.0 71 Presque Isle 13,376 23 1.7 72 Roscommon 24,449 96 3.9 73 Saginaw 200,169 513 2.6 74 St. Clair 163,040 491 3.0 75 St. Joseph 61,295 165 2.7 76 Sanilac 43,114 175 4.1 77 Schoolcraft 8,485 28 3.3 78 Shiawassee 70,648 148 2.1 79 Tuscola 55,729 92 1.7 80 Van Buren 76,258 213 2.8 81 Washtenaw 344,791 425 1.2 82 Wayne 1,820,584 2981 1.6 83 Wexford 32,735 158 4.8 Average 119,071 259 3.2 Otsego County 2049 Required Beds 34,290 111 3.2 Otsego County 2019 Required Beds 24,995 81 3.2 Recent Jails 112,607 313 3.4 • Average of All Michigan Jails: 3.2 per 1,000 Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics – Local Michigan Jails 17 Legend 3.01/3.41 Beds Per Thousand Population ● Antrim ● Charlevoix ● Cheboygan ● Crawford ● Kalkaska ● Montgomery ● Oscoda 3.12 Beds Per Thousand Population ● Alpena ● Emmet ● Grand Traverse ● Iosco ● Missaukee ● Ogemaw ● Presque Isle ● Roscommon ● Wexford 3.2 Beds Per Thousand Population ● Allegan ● Branch ● Ingham ● Isabella ● Kalamazoo ● Lenawee ● Livingston ● Macomb ● Muskegon ● Saginaw ● Sanilac ● Shiawassee ● Washtenaw ● Wayne ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Analytics - Otsego County Final Recommendation 18 Model Description No. Beds Comments Model 1 Historical Data 10 yr. Projection 29 Invalid Model 2 Historical Data 5 yr. Projection 36 Invalid Model 3 Historical Data 3 yr. Projection 66 Invalid Model 4 Preliminary Recommendation – 11/7/19 90 - 100 Prelim. Model 5 Average of Current Michigan Jails 112 Model 6 Average of Current Surrounding Counties Jails 105-119 Model 7 Average of Northern Region Counties Jails 109 Model 8 Average of Most Recent Jails 168-185 Model 9 Interviews / Anecdotal Information Could now have 90-100 Potential probation violators 45 Work camp 20 Recent population has been over 70 145-150 Model 10 Historical Data / Interviews / Unaccounted Factors Potential legislative changes Classification of inmates 15% Mental Health inmates Increased charges due to room Enforcement of Sanctions Probation violators Drug Court violators Non-payment of child support Work camp participants Methadone clinics 140-175 4 to 5 beds per 1000 pop. Model 11 Proposed Recommendation 120-170 Internal Expansion to 168 • Preliminary Recommendation: 90 – 100 Beds • Final Recommendation: 120 – 170 Beds ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Space Terminology 19 Net Square Feet (NSF) = Area defining the interior dimension of a space. Department Gross Square Feet (DGSF) = NSF + Walls defining the spaces and internal circulation within a department to access each space. Building Gross Square Feet (BGSF) = DGSF + General Circulation to access each Department and the width of exterior walls. Grossing Factor: a multiplier applied to the NSF to determine a DGSF planning area and to DGSF to define the BGSF. ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Space Standards 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Existing Facility Plans – Courthouse/Government Center 21 Ground Floor Plan First Floor Plan • Total Existing Building Gross Square Feet: 31,580 BGSF ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 22 Existing Facility Plans - Alpine Center First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Work Camp First Floor Area Summary • 1st Floor: 18,431 BGSF • 2nd Floor: 11,605 BGSF • 3rd Floor: 11,605 BGSF • 4th Floor: 11,605 BGSF Total Existing Building Gross Square Feet BGSF: 53,246 BGSF Fourth Floor ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Michigan Department of Corrections: Codes and Standards A. Security Garage B. Safety Vestibule C. Processing Area D. Detoxification Cells E. Holding Cells F. Processing Storage G. Control Centers H. Corrections Officer Duty Stations I. Housing J. Food Preparation and Service Area K. Public Lobby or Waiting Area L. Visiting Accommodations M. Laundry N. Day Rooms O. Multi-Purpose Room P. Outside Exercise Area Q. Medical Examination and Treatment Room R. Administrative and Clerical Space S. Security Perimeter Walls T. Inmate Classification Area U. Inmate Program Areas V. Elevator W. Exits 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Michigan Department of Corrections: Inmate Housing • High Security Cells - > 10% capacity - > 72 sq. ft. of floor space - Combination plumbing fixture - Perforated steel-bottomed bed - Steel table, seat, mirror • Medium Security Cells - > 52 sq. ft. of floor area - > 72 sq. ft. of floor area - Double-bunking statute: > 65 sq. ft. of floor area and additional dayroom space = 20 sq. ft./inmate - Multiple-occupancy statute: > 52 sq. ft. of floor area/inmate additional dayroom space = 20 sq. ft./inmate • Low Security Areas - > 52 sq. ft. of floor area (cell) if a dayroom is provided and directly accessible - > 72 sq. ft. of floor space (cell) if no dayroom is provided - Double-bunking statute: same as medium security areas - Multiple-occupancy statute: same as medium security areas • Double-bunking - Shall not exceed 75% of the total rated capacity • Dormitory Capacity - Shall not exceed 40% of the total rated capacity 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Otsego County Jail Deficiencies Summary • Security Garage - Inadequate space – Dangerous for staff. Pull in back out, not drive through • Processing Area - Marginally Compliant - In Corridor, no security • Detoxification/Holding Cells - Limited isolation flexibility, no padded cells, poor condition and visible from – Staff Intensive. 25 • Control Centers - Building configuration requires 2 minimum - staff intensive Limited Visibility of jail • Housing - Double bunking exceeds 75% of rated capacity - Limited cells, Approximately 75% dorms - Limited Classification Capability • Program Spaces - Extremely limited, very small multipurpose space ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Otsego County Jail Deficiencies Summary • Visiting Accommodations - Marginal attorney visitation, in M/P - Only one non-contact visitation booth • Dayrooms - Only 1 Dayroom, Dayrooms in Dormitory - Very limited for capacity • Medical Examination and Treatment Rooms - Adequate, but difficult to supervise, includes Medical Providers office and storage • Administrative and Clerical Space - Marginal, lack storage, some spaces are significantly undersized 26 • Multipurpose Room/ Outdoor Recreation - Small Outdoor Recreation, No Indoor Recreation • Inmate Classification - No Dedicated Space, Utilize Booking • Correctional Officer Duty Stations - Work space is marginal and no storage • Public Lobby/Waiting - Very small vestibule, limited lobby size ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Modern Jail Design Concepts 27 Cell Pod First Floor Cell Pod Mezzanine Level Cell Pod Elevated Control Room Cell Pod Elevated Control Room Typical Cell Block Typical Cell Block Typical Cell interior Indoor/Outdoor Recreation Continuous Rear Chase ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail Cell Pod Mezzanine Level 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 29 Typical Cell Block ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 30 Modern Courtroom Design ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 31 Projection Modeling – 2019 Architectural Space Program • 2019 Architectural Space Program utilized to develop Staff and Space Projection Models. A. Government 1. County Administrator N/A 3.0 8 1,052 1,368 Refer to each Department/Division 2. County Clerk N/A 2.5 13 1,782 2,317 Refer to each Department/Division 3. County Commissioners N/A 10.0 8 1,692 2,200 Refer to each Department/Division 4. Equalization Department N/A 3.0 8 628 722 Refer to each Department/Division 5. Finance N/A 2.0 8 772 1,004 Refer to each Department/Division 6. Human Resources N/A 1.5 7 732 952 Refer to each Department/Division 7. Information Technology N/A 2.0 7 958 1102Refer to each Department/Division 8. Land Use Services N/A 6.5 15 1,336 1,737 Refer to each Department/Division 9. Maintenance N/A 3.0 7 788 1,024 Refer to each Department/Division 10. MSU Extension N/A 5.5 13 1,750 2,013 Refer to each Department/Division 11. Register of Deeds N/A 1.0 10 750 975 Refer to each Department/Division 12. Treasurer N/A 4.0 12 1,112 1,279 Refer to each Department/Division 13. Veterans Affairs N/A 2.5 8 840 1,092 Refer to each Department/Division 14. Support Space N/A 0.0 16 3,363 4,540 Assumes reduced width of corridors Subtotal 46.5 140 17,555 22,322 Refer to each Department/Division Building Gross Square Feet 5% 23,439 Existing BGSF: 31,580 B. Courts 1.46th Circuit Court N/A 8.0 24 5,601 6,441 Refer to each Department/Division 2.Court Administrator/ Magistrate N/A 2.0 6 728 946 Refer to each Department/Division 3.7A District Court N/A 5.0 20 3,614 4,156 Refer to each Department/Division 4.Friend of Court N/A 5.5 11 1,228 1,596 Refer to each Department/Division 5.Probation/Parole N/A 2.0 8 983 1,278 Refer to each Department/Division 6.Prosecutor N/A 7.5 14 1,741 2,263 Refer to each Department/Division 7.Court Clerks N/A 4.0 9 925 1,203 Refer to each Department/Division 8. Support Space N/A 0.0 23 3,638 4,184 Refer to each Department/Division Subtotal 34.0 115.0 18,458 22,067 Building Gross Square Feet 5% 23,171 C. Sheriff's Office/Jail 1. Sheriff's Office 0.1Public N/A 0.0 12 974 1,120 Refer to each Department/Division 0.2Executive Administration N/A 3.0 13 1,577 2,050 Refer to each Department/Division 0.3Patrol N/A 11.0 18 2,515 3,270 Includes Court Security and Civil Processing Staff 0.4Detectives/Investigations N/A 1.0 19 2,045 2,454 Refer to each Department/Division 0.5911/Dispatch N/A 0.0 0 0 0Refer to each Department/Division 0.6EOC/EMA N/A 0.0 0 0 0Refer to each Department/Division Subtotal 15.0 62 7,111 8,894 Refer to each Department/Division 2. Jail 0.1Administration/Work camp N/A 14.0 10 987 1,283 Refer to each Department/Division 0.2Intake/Booking N/A 0.0 26 4,885 5,618 Staff included in C.2, 0.1 0.3Medical N/A 0.0 9 727 836 Includes Nurse staff 0.4Kitchen/Laundry N/A 1.0 14 2,214 2,768 Refer to each Department/Division 0.5Confinement Housing N/A 0.0 44 7,139 9,995 Staff included in C.2,0.1 0.6Program N/A 0.0 2 240 276 Refer to each Department/Division 0.7Support Space N/A 0 6 720 828 Refer to each Department/Division Subtotal 15.0 111 16,912 21,603 Refer to each Department/Division Total 30.0 173 24,023 30,497 Refer to each Department/Division Building Gross Square Feet (Included in DGSF) 5% 32,022 Department: All - Summary Division: All - Summary Ref. Component 2019 Program Staff No. of Spaces Total NSF Total DGSF A. Government Subtotal 46.5 140 17,555 22,322 Building Gross Square Feet 5% 23,439 B. Courts Subtotal 34.0 115 18,458 22,067 Building Gross Square Feet 5% 23,171 C. Sheriff's Office/Jail Subtotal 30.0 173 24,023 30,497 Building Gross Square Feet 5% 32,022 Total 110.5 428 60,036 74,886 Total BGSF 121,496 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 32 Projection Modeling - Government • Existing Courthouse/Government Center: 31,580 BGSF • Projection Modeling: - 2039: 29,381 BGSF - 2049: 31,199 BGSF ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 33 Projection Modeling – Courts, Sheriff’s Office/Jail ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 34 Projection Modeling Summary Component 2019 2039 (Model 1 - Power) 2049 (Model 1 - Power) Staff DGSF Staff DGSF Staff DGSF A. Government 46.5 22,233 57.3 29,381 60.8 31,199 B. Courts 34.0 22,067 44.8 29,045 47.5 30,842 C. Sheriff’s Office/Jail 30.0 30,497 39.5 40,139 41.9 42,623 Total 110.5 74,797 141.6 98,565 150.2 104,664 Total B. Courts and C. Sheriff’s Office/Jail 64 52,564 84.3 69,184 89.4 73,465 • Does Not Include DHHS/Community Mental Health. • 2019 Architectural Space Program utilized to develop Staff and Space Projection Models. • Existing Courthouse/Government Center: 31,580 BGSF. - Government Component Projection Modeling done to test potential of existing Courthouse/Government Center to accommodate future Government Space Needs. • Projection Modeling Used to Evaluate Staff and Architectural Space Programming. ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 35 Parking Projections - 2049 NCUF: Non-Concurrent Use Factor = Assumes that not all Parking is Required Simultaneously Component Subtotal NCUF 2049 A. Government N/A N/A N/A B. Courts 163.5 75% 125.5 C. Sheriff’s Office and Jail 53.0 75% 47.0 Total 217 75% 173 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 36 Conceptual Design ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 37 Conceptual Design – Alpine Center First Floor Second Floor Third Floor Work Camp First Floor Area Summary • 1st Floor: 18,431 BGSF • 2nd Floor: 11,605 BGSF • 3rd Floor: 11,605 BGSF • 4th Floor: 11,605 BGSF Total BGSF: 53,246 BGSF Fourth Floor ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 38 Conceptual Design – Alpine Center General Issues - Lack of Convenience / Efficiency Confusing to the Public Multiple separate public entries not connected No interior connections to disparate areas of the facility Courts are housed in two separate locations Facility is much larger (area) than required by the County Must renovate the entire facility in order to use the area needed General lack of security Inconvenience of construction/moving during renovations Not all of the building is required Why Discontinue use of the Alpine Center? Physical Condition Site - Several safety ADA compliance issues in parking lot - Parking locations are not convenient - New sidewalks are required Architectural /Structural - Needs new roof - Needs masonry tuck pointing - Needs window replacement - Remove window a/c units - Space use /configuration Not conducive to efficient space utilization Requires complete reconfiguration of interior M/E/P - Entire plumbing system requires replacement Piping nearly completely plugged and deteriorated - Entire HVAC system requires replacement Need to remove all window a/c units - Entire electrical system requires replacement ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 39 Otsego Street (Dog Park) Site Selection – Site Advantages • Close Proximity to County Building • Easily Identifiable Site Location • Adequate Area to Accommodate Both Facilities, Parking and Future Expansion • Neighborhood Improvement / Investment ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 40 Conceptual Site Diagram ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 41 Conceptual First Floor Plan Diagram ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 42 Conceptual Second Floor Plan Diagram ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 43 Conceptual Exterior Image Studies ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 44 Conceptual Exterior Image Studies ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 45 Conceptual Design – Statement of Probable Cost Factors • Hard Construction - Demolition - New Construction - Site Improvements - Assumes Construction Manager Project Delivery System - Contingencies Appropriate for the Level of Design Completed • Soft Costs Construction Related - Site Survey - Subsurface Soils Investigation/Geotechnical Report - Architectural/Engineering Fees and Reimbursable - CM Fees - Financing and Legal Costs - Builders Risk Insurance - Bid Advertising - Permitting - Contingencies and Inflation • Soft Costs Occupancy Related - IT, Audio/Visual - Furniture and Equipment - Telephone - Cleaning/Maintenance Supplies - Appliances - Moving/Relocation Expenses - Contingencies and Inflation - 5% Owner Contingency • Currently Not Included: - Cost of Courthouse/Government Center Renovation ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 46 Statement of Probable Cost - Example ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 47 Statement of Probable Cost Summary Component Total Project Budget Range of Probable Cost Low Mean High A. Sheriff's Office/Jail Hard Construction Cost $16,402,486 $17,732,417 $19,062,348 Soft Cost Construction Related $2,165,287 $2,340,851 $2,516,415 Soft Cost Occupancy Related $713,584 $771,442 $829,300 Subtotal $19,281,357 $20,844,710 $22,408,063 Owner Project Contingency 2.0% $385,627 $416,894 $448,161 Total Project Budget $19,666,984 $21,261,604 $22,856,224 B. Courthouse Hard Construction Cost $6,619,348 $7,156,051 $7,692,755 Soft Cost Construction Related $983,568 $1,063,316 $1,143,065 Soft Cost Occupancy Related $551,339 $596,042 $640,746 Subtotal $8,154,254 $8,815,410 $9,476,566 Owner Project Contingency 2.0% $163,085 $176,308 $189,531 Total Project Budget $8,317,340 $8,991,718 $9,666,097 C. Sheriff's Office/Jail and Courthouse Hard Construction Cost $22,412,608 $24,229,846 $26,047,085 Soft Cost Construction Related $3,162,074 $3,418,458 $3,674,842 Soft Cost Occupancy Related $1,461,502 $1,580,003 $1,698,503 Subtotal $27,036,184 $29,228,307 $31,420,430 Owner Project Contingency 2.0% $540,724 $584,566 $628,409 Total Project Budget $27,576,907 $29,812,873 $32,048,838 ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 48 2022 Jail Operational Budget Budget Item 2020 Budget Analysis 2022 Budget QTY Unit Unit Cost QTY Unit Unit Cost Inflation Factor % Total Staff Salary $1,101,684.00 18 EA $573,742.63 23 EA $ 1,397,172.13 1.042 $1,455,853.35 Estimated Revenues $ 102,500.00 13 EA $102,500.00 13 EA $ 102,500.00 1.042 $ 106,805.00 Appropriations $ 593,316.58 32,113 EA $ 53,570.87 38,374 EA $ 731,784.68 1.04 $ 762,519.63 Total Operation Budget $1,592,500.58 32,118 EA $524,813.50 38,384 EA $2,026,456.80 1.04 $ 2,111,567.99 • Anticipated Operational Cost Increase: $519,067.41 - Increased Number of Inmates – Clothing, Bedding, etc. - Increased Number of Jail Staff – Salaries, Benefits, etc. - Increased Size of Facility – Utilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 49 Anticipated Project Schedule • Design: - Schematic Design: 2 to 3 Months - Design Development: 2 to 3 Months - Construction Documents: 3 to 4 Months • Bidding and Construction: - Bidding: 1 to 2 Months - Construction: 16 to 18 Months Anticipated Total Project Duration: 24 to 30 Months ---PAGE BREAK--- Information provided by Daviess County Jail 50 Recommendation & Next Step Considerations • Recommendations - CJCC Approves a Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. • Next Steps: - Draft Ballot Language. - Board of County Commissioners Approve or Deny Feasibility Study and Millage Recommendation. - File Ballot Language with County Clerk. - Begin Public Awareness and Education Process. - Voting on Millage.