Document Moscow_doc_8f69a6e810

AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM PLAN BETWEEN CITY OF MOSCOW, IDAHO AND KELLER ASSOCIATES INC. THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR COMPREHENSIVE SANITARY EWER SYSTEM PLAN (hereinafter "this Agreement"), made and entered into this £ day of 2009, by and between City of Moscow, Idaho, a municipal corporation of the State ofldaho, 06 ast Third Street, Moscow, Idaho, 83843 (hereinafter "CITY"), and KELLER ASSOCIATES, INC., an S-corporation of the State of Idaho, licensed to conduct business in the State of Idaho with offices at 131 SW 5lh Ave., Suite A, Meridian, Idaho (hereinafter "CONSULTANT"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, CITY intends to develop a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan (CSSP) intended to meet sewer system planning necessary to satisfY Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) guidelines for projected system growth, State Funding programs, and responsible stewardship of the public system and which is defined further herein below (hereinafter "the PROJECT"); and WHEREAS, CONSULTANT agrees to perform the various professional services required for the PROJECT; NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed that for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises between the parties hereto, that: SECTION 1 Scope of Work for Consulting Services CONSULTANT shall furnish the following consulting services for the PROJECT as outlined in Attachment of this Agreement, which is adopted and incorporated herein and as described generally below: Preparation of a Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan (hereinafter "CSSP") in accordance with the detailed Scope of Services and consistent with Idaho Department of Environmental Quality and State of Idaho codes and regulations. SECTION2 A. Fees and Conditions for Consulting Services Maximum Costs for Basic Consulting Services Under Section 1 of this Agreement. Compensation for services described in Section 1 shall be compensated as outlined in Attachment The total cost to CITY for Consulting Services for the PROJECT as described in Section 1, shall be an amount not to exceed two hundred nine thousand dollars ($209,000) for work performed by CONSULT ANT as shown in Attachment of this Agreement. In no case shall the amount paid to CONSULT ANT for work described in Section I be more than two hundred nine thousand dollars ($209,000), unless authorized in writing by the CITY. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- PAGE 1 OF 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- SECTION 3 A. Independent Contractor CITY and CONSULT ANT hereto warrant by their signature that no employer/employee relationship is established between CITY and CONSULT ANT by the terms of this Agreement. It is understood by the parties hereto that CONSULTANT is an independent contractor and, as such, neither it nor its employees, if any, are employees of CITY for purposes of tax, retirement system, or social security (FICA) withholding. B. Termination of Agreement This Agreement may be terminated by CONSULTANT upon thirty (30) days prior written notice, should CITY fail to substantially perform in accordance with its terms through no fault of CONSULTANT. CITY may terminate this Agreement with thirty (30) days notice without cause and without further liability to CONSULTANT except as designated by this Section. In the event of termination, CONSULT ANT shall be paid for services performed to termination date, including direct expense and including a percentage of the Fee set out in Section 2 of this Agreement, based upon the work completed. All materials Deliverables, whether partially or fully completed, related to the PROJECT produced by CONSULTANT as part of PROJECT services shall become the property of, and shall be surrendered to, CITY at or before such termination. However, the CITY agrees that all deliverables provided or prepared by the CONSULTANT are intended for the purposes of this Agreement only and any reuse or modification of the Deliverables by the CITY or others for any other project or purpose shall be at the CITY's or other's sole risk and without liability to the CONSULT ANT. CONSULTANT may retain copies of all deliverables for its records. C. Extent of Agreement This agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties hereto. D. Data of Record CITY shall make available to CONSULTANT all technical data of record in CITY's possession required by CONSULTANT relating to this PROJECT. E. Termination of the PROJECT If any portion of the PROJECT covered by this Agreement shall be suspended, abated, abandoned or terminated, CITY shall pay CONSULT ANT for the services rendered to the date of such suspended, abated, abandoned or terminated work; the payment to be based, insofar as possible, on the amounts established in this Agreement or, where this Agreement cannot be applied, the payment shall be based upon a reasonable estimate as mutually agreed upon between the two parties as to the percentage of the work completed. F. CITY's ResponsibiJity for Special Costs and Rights-of-Way CITY shall pay for all costs for obtaining licenses and permits that may be required by local, State, and Federal authorities; and shall be responsible for securing necessary land, easements, and rights­ of-way, where applicable. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- PAGE20F5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ' ' G. CONSULTANT's Errors and Omissions Professional Liability Insurance In performance of professional services, CONSULT ANT will use that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised under similar circumstances by members of the consulting profession; and no other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made in connection with rendering CONSULTANT's services. Should CONSULTANT or any of CONSULTANT's agents or employees be found to have been negligent in the performance of professional services from which CITY sustains damage, CONSULT ANT has obtained Errors and Omissions Professional Liability Insurance in the amount of One Million Dollars ,000,000), and said insurance shall be held active for a two year (minimum) period from the date of completion of the PROJECT. CITY shall receive notice of any pending termination of said insurance within five days of first notice to CONSULTANT. H. CONSULTANT's Additional Insurance CONSULT ANT shall maintain automobile insurance and statutory workers' compensation insurance coverage, employer's liability, and comprehensive general liability insurance coverage. The comprehensive general liability insurance shall have a minimum limit of Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) per claim and One Million Dollars ,000,000) aggregate, and CONSULTANT shall cause CITY to be named as an additional insured under said policy. I. Indemnification CONSULTANT agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to indemnify and hold harmless CITY against damages, liability and costs arising from the negligent acts of CONSULT ANT in the performance of professional services under this Agreement, to the extent that CONSULT ANT is responsible for such damages, liabilities and costs on a comparative basis of fault and responsibility between CONSULTANT and CITY. CONSULTANT shall not be obligated to indemnify CITY for CITY's own negligence. J. Costs and Attorney Fees In the event either party incurs legal expenses to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and other costs and expenses, whether the same are incurred with or without suit. K. Jurisdiction and Venue It is agreed that this Agreement shall be construed under and governed by the laws of the State of Idaho. In the event of litigation concerning it, it is agreed that proper venue shall be the District Court of the Second Judicial District of the State of Idaho, in and for the County of Latah. L. Binding of Successors CITY and CONSULTANT each bind themselves, their partners, successors, assigns, and legal representatives to the other parties to this Agreement and to the partner, successors, assigns and legal representatives of such other parties with respect to all covenants of this Agreement. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- PAGE30F 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- . ' M. Modification and Assignability of Agreement This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties concerning the PROJECT, and no statements, promises, or inducements made by either party, or agents of either party, are valid or binding unless contained herein. This Agreement may not be enlarged, modified, or altered except upon written agreement signed by the parties hereto. CONSULT ANT may not subcontract or assign their rights (including the right to compensation) or duties arising hereunder without the prior written consent and express authorization of CITY. Any such subcontractor or assignee shall be bound by all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement as if named specifically herein. N. CITY's Representatives CITY shall designate a representative authorized to act in behalf of CITY. The authorized representative shall examine the documents of the work as necessary, and shall render decisions related thereto in a timely manner so as to avoid unreasonable delays. 0. Conflict of Interest CONSULT ANT covenants that it presently has no interest and will not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in the PROJECT which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of services hereunder. CONSULTANT further covenants that, in performing this Agreement, it will employ no person who has any such interest. P. Non-Discrimination CONSULT ANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment on the basis of race, color, religion, creed, political ideals, sex, age, marital status, physical or mental handicap, or national origin. Q. Payment of CITY Established Living Wage I Minimum Wage Required. As a condition of this Agreement, Keller Associates shall pay to all laborers, mechanics, subcontractors, employees, agents, and assigns who perform services for CITY pursuant to this Agreement, working full time, the living wage I minimum wage established by Resolution 2006-18 or as established by duly adopted Resolution of the Moscow, Idaho CITY Council, whichever is greater, during the pendency of this Agreement. Such CITY living wage I minimum wage shall be that in effect on the date of execution of this Agreement. Failure to pay such living wage I minimum wage shall be considered to be a breach of this Agreement. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMEN1'- PAGE40F5 ---PAGE BREAK--- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date indicated above. CONSULTANT CITY Keller Associates City of Moscow, Idaho f--1 1-1; Rod Linja, PE-Prestdent ,2o__tl_. DATED this day of
at= ACKNOWLEDGMENT sTATE OF Idaho ) County ofą Ć _ ) ss: ) On this +h day of A l\ , 20o'i, before me, a Notary Public in and for said State, appeared Rod Linja, known to me o be the person named above and acknowledged that he executed the foregoing as the duly authorized representative of Keller Associates. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT- PAGES OF 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENT SCOPE OF WORK 1.0 Task 1 - PROJECT Management 1.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Meet with the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (hereinafter "DEQ") to determine DEQ expectations and share CITY planning approach. Create an acceptable approach for developing the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan (hereinafter "CSSP"), and determine if there are any special concerns or issues DEQ believes need to be addressed. Budget adjustments may be necessary if additional areas beyond the current scope of work and associated level of effort need to be addressed. 2. CONSULTANT and CITY staff will meet to initiate the PROJECT. The objectives of the meeting will include reviewing the study scope, budget, and schedule. 3. Organize and manage CONSULTANT PROJECT team and coordinate with CITY PROJECT manager. 4. Prepare PROJECT guide, including study scope, schedule and budget; PROJECT contacts and responsibilities; and updates to the guide as needed. 5. Prepare brief progress reports including the following: • Work Completed During the Month • Need for Additional Information/Reviews • Scope, Schedule, and Budget Issues and Changes • PROJECT completion status spreadsheet. 6. Prepare and submit invoices. 7. Prepare for and attend Technical Review Committee (TRC) meetings. 1.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Schedule PROJECT initiation meeting in Moscow 2. Review reports and requests for information 1.3 Assumptions 1 . PROJECT duration is anticipated to be from August 2009 through September 2010. 2. CONSULTANT PROJECT manager and PROJECT principal will attend DEQ and CITY PROJECT initiation meetings. For budgeting purposes, it is assumed that these meetings will be held the same day in Moscow. 3. Anticipate four TRC meetings. One or two representatives from the CONSULTANT team will be in attendance at these meetings. 4. CONSULTANT will manage work completed by any sub-consultant, including all work completed by USKH. Attachment Page 1 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1.4 Deliverables 1. Meetings - agendas, minutes, and action items 2. Five copies of a PROJECT guide, with updates as needed 3. PROJECT reports (PROJECT duration) 4. invoices (PROJECT duration) 2.0 Task 2- Introduction and Basis of Planning (CSSP Chapter 1) The Introduction and Basis of Planning establishes the planning constraints, clarifies the issues that will impact planning decisions, and provides a clear foundation for the development of the conveyance and capacity alternatives for the CITY. Some of the planning information required in this task will be available from the CITY's Comprehensive Water System Plan (CWSP) which is being developed concurrently with this process. This task will focus on the consolidation, completion, evaluation, and interpretation of existing information and data to define the drainage basins, existing system conditions, and assessment methodologies to be utilized in the development of the collection system model, system improvements analysis, and Capital Program recommendations. The Basis of Planning will be developed through the following activities: 2.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Describe purpose, scope and goals of the plan. 2. Prepare the background and system history. 3. Describe planning goals. 4. Describe the approach to addressing topography, soils, geography, precipitation, groundwater, and demographics. Use CWSP information, as applicable and available. 5. Define how the collection system will be evaluated and the definition of a capacity problem in the CITY. 2.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Work with CONSULTANT to provide historic perspective, planning goals, and supporting documentation and data necessary to develop Basis of Planning. 2. Provide related CWSP information from CONSULTANT. 2.3 Assumptions 1 . Special generators of flow (UI, medical facilities, schools, special event facilities, new service area growth, etc.) or anticipated major future economic impacts will be identified by the CITY, and flow rate data provided by the CITY, for incorporation into the analysis by CONSULTANT. 2.4 Deliverables 1. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 1 - Introduction and Basis for Planning. Attachment Page 2 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. Word document electronic file of the final CSSP Chapter 1 - Introduction and Basis for Planning. 3.0 Task 3 - Data Collection 3.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Prepare a summary of data and CSSP reference materials needed from the CITY. 2. Meet with CITY staff to tour sewer system pumping facilities and diversion manholes and review system condition and operational issues and concerns. Review available TV written logs to develop a general understanding of the issues and concerns encountered in the collection system. 3. Prepare a memorandum briefly summarizing existing conditions and operational issues. 4. Collect Field Data - Additional spot reviews will be completed in the field to ensure that all new improvements are recorded and added to the model. (Note: This task will be completed on a time and materials basis. Work will be coordinated with the CITY prior to completing additional field work. Where reasonable, the CITY may elect to complete these services to reduce PROJECT costs.) 5. Survey Field Locates - Information on the Collection system currently on file at the CITY includes data on pipe size, pipe material, and manhole ring and invert elevations. If additional information is required which cannot be provided by the CITY this task will conduct field survey of critical areas to update the data set for the system model. Survey will allow critical invert and rim elevations to be added to the model to improve accuracy. (Note: This task will be completed on a time and materials basis once the available data has been assessed. Work will be coordinated with the CITY prior to completing additional field work. Budget estimate assumes 1 0 field days for a combination of one- and two­ person survey crews plus 3 days of office data processing by a survey CAD operator). Survey data will be tied to the CITY's survey control network, including GPS and physical monumentation, as available. 6. In support of Task 8- System Analysis, identify locations where flow monitoring is needed for accurate calibration of the new hydraulic model. Scope and extent of monitoring will be determined based upon CONSULTANT's review of availability of data necessary to model calibration. Visit the site of proposed monitoring locations to investigate the suitability of the locations for monitoring purposes. Assist the CITY in the use of three CONSULTANT-provided Sigma 950 monitors. 3.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide the following source data, per the data and reference materials request associated with this chapter: map data layers in CAD or GIS format, CITY sewer service ordinances, CITY service agreements, related plans and studies, and collection system data such as pipe materials, pipe sizes, written TV logs of the collection system, and manhole invert and rim elevations. 2. Host a sewer system facilities tour for the PROJECT team. 3. Provide traffic control during field data collection process, if necessary. 4. Flow monitoring will be performed by CITY staff at locations identified by the CONSULTANT for the purpose of calibrating the new hydraulic model. Scope and extent Attachment Page 3 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- of monitoring will be determined based upon CONSULTANT's review of availability of data necessary to properly calibrate the model. 5. CITY staff will assist in traffic control and locating difficult to find manholes during survey efforts. Where practical, the CITY will provide staff support in gathering survey field data. 6. CITY staff will provide field checks of flow velocity and depth at each monitoring site at least two times per week. At least weekly, the flow metering data will be downloaded and forwarded to the CONSULTANT for review. 3.3 Assumptions 1. The data collection meeting and facilities tour site visit will be coordinated with PROJECT initiation meetings described in Task 1. 2. The CITY will provide the available requested sewer system data and reference materials within a four week period. 3. Elevations between surveyed points will be estimated based upon available data where survey data or record drawings are not provided. 4. Flow monitoring will be accomplished by the CITY utilizing the CITY's existing four flow monitors and three Sigma 950 flow monitors provided by the CONSULTANT. 5. Evaluation of the existing collection system includes an evaluation of representative video logs as determined and provided by the CITY for the collection system. Up to eight hours of video footage will be reviewed. Additionally, summary information gathered from a review of available paper copies of TV inspections will be provided. 6. Flow monitoring will be completed during two month long periods. The first period will begin during the dry weather conditions of late September to early October. The second period will begin in January or February of 2010 during typical wet weather and high flow events. It is anticipated that there will be approximately 12 separate monitoring locations (anticipate that two locations will not change during the one month flow monitoring periods, while the other locations will change after two weeks) and that the same locations will be monitored during both wet weather and dry weather periods. 7. Special modifications (such as construction of V-notch weirs) will not be necessary for flow monitoring. However, in the event that these are required, the CONSULTANT can assist the CITY is installing CITY owned V-notch weirs as an additional service. 3.4 Deliverables 1. Data and reference materials request summary. 2. Existing system conditions and operational issues memorandum. 3. Data to be included in GIS Database. 4. Spreadsheet summarizing system data collected through field investigation including flow monitoring. 4.0 Task 4- Sewer System Description (CSSP Chapter 2) 4.1 CONSULTANT Services Attachment Page 4 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1. Work with appropriate CITY staff to create a Sewer System Description. The following sewer system components will be described: • Ownership and Management • Overview - Drainage Basins • Collection and Conveyance Capacity • Lift Station descriptions (including location, condition, and hydraulic capacity) • Historic Pumping and Treatment • Waste Water Treatment Facilities (including treatment process, hydraulic capacity, constituents, and disposal) • System lnterties • Service Agreements (i.e. S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District) • Service Area - In State and Out of State (if applicable) 2. Using the existing ACAD format Sewer System Base Map create a GIS based system map for use in developing the collection system hydraulic model. This map shall include existing system, completed improvements, anticipated expansions, and knowledge of system condition obtained from CITY staff. 3. Utilize data collected in Task 3 for use in system map including zoning, ground elevations, land use, the existing collection system, and other appropriate information. 4. 2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide existing system data in the form of an ACAD base map (with associated attribute data including unique manhole IDs), manhole cards, lift station data, and other available information. 2. Work with the CONSULTANT team to create a Sewer System Description. 3. Review and comment on draft documents provided by CONSULTANT. 4.3 Assumptions 1. System data accuracy will be based upon available data from the CITY. Data gaps will be identified and CITY will determine the need to supplement data with field collection or confirmation. 2. Detailed system description information and maps judged to be important to system vulnerability will be summarized in a separate confidential memorandum to be provided only to personnel authorized by the Public Works Director. 3. Invert and rim elevation for sanitary sewer pipelines six (6)-inches and larger will be added to the GIS base map utilizing available CITY provided data and information collected as part of Task 3.1.4 and 3.1.5. 4. GIS attribute data for the sanitary sewer pipelines will include pipe size, pipe age and material type as provided by the CITY. 4.4 Deliverables 1. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 2 - Sewer System Description. Attachment Page 5 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. Word document electronic file of the final CSSP Chapter 2 - Sewer System Description. 3. Confidential memorandum of vulnerable system details. 4. Full size GIS Base Map exhibit in appendices. 5.0 Task 5 - Service Area Policies, Plans, and Agreements (CSSP Chapter 3) 5.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Create up to four maps for this task showing the following: • Current CITY Limits (provided by others); • Current Area of CITY Impact boundary (provided by others); • The CITY's service area for the current, six year and twenty (20) year time frames. (developed in connection with the Comprehensive Water Plan); • University of Idaho and S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District sewer utility service areas; • Projected CITY growth areas for the six twenty (20), and fifty (50)+ year periods per the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (provided by others); • Current and projected zoning or land use within the CITY service area (developed in connection with Comprehensive Water Plan). 2. Summarize the CITY's sewer service ordinances and provide recommendations regarding possible revisions and updates. 3. Describe operations agreement with the S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District and current and projected impacts on CITY operations. 4. Describe University of Idaho and S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District sewer system interties with the CITY of Moscow collection system including information on drainage area of each intertie and nature of facilities served. Identify potential impacts to the CITY of Moscow system related to growth, maintenance, and general operations of both systems. 5. Summarize consistency with the CITY's land use plan, and note any differences. 5.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide the following source data, per the data and reference materials request associated with Task 3: CITY sewer service ordinances, CITY intertie agreements, Related plans, CITY Base Map/Parcel Map in ACAD electronic file format, Aerial Map, Utility Map, Land Use Maps (Current and future), Ul Water Rights, UIICITY Effluent Use Agreement, and S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District Agreements. 2. Review the draft CSSP chapter, including maps, and provide written comments. 5.3 Assumptions 1. Limited source data will be available beyond the twenty (20) year planning horizon. CONSULTANT shall collaborate with the Community Development Department and the Engineering Division to determine the data needed for the fifty (50)+ year vision in the Attachment Page 6 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Capital Plan. CITY will provide the projected growth amount and distribution of growth to be used in the study. 5.4 Deliverables 1. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 3 - Service Area Policies. 2. Word document electronic file of the final CSSP Chapter 3 - Service Area Policies. 6.0 Task 6- System Flow Projections (CSSP Chapter 4) 6.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Demographic Projections: Use demographic projections developed by others for the CITY's service area for three time periods: six (6)-years, twenty (20)-years, and fifty (50)+ year (build-out) of study area. Coordinate with CITY's Community Development Department and with the Comprehensive Water Plan which will spearhead this effort. Also assist in approximating build-out populations for the study area. Build-out populations or equivalent populations will be developed based on ultimate land use, typical densities, and service area developed in coordination with the CITY. 2. Analysis: The demographic projections will be matched to the CITY's existing and projected service area using appropriate analysis with input from the CITY's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The demographic projections will be divided into sub­ areas, such as drainage sub-basins, and current versus new service areas, as data allows. 3. Flow Characteristics: Summarize ten years (or a lesser amount if ten years is not available) of historical loading characteristics such as the number of connections by customer category, treatment, lift station operations, and peaking factors. A statistical analysis utilizing rain data and corresponding runoff flows will be considered in determining acceptable peak runoff values to be used in modeling. Utilize summary billing data by customer class, summary winter-time water demand data per acre for land use data, and water demand data for peak water users prepared by others as part of the comprehensive water plan. Flow characterization will also include a review of available flow data and pump run time data to generally characterize infiltration and inflow for sewer basins and the system as a whole. 4. University Flow Analysis: The CONSULTANT will review CITY provided daily water demand data to quantify water usage for the University and will utilize the previously completed JUS allocation study to distribute these demands as they relate to the sewer sheds. This data will serve as the base flow for the collection system and will complement flow monitoring data for the university. 5. Technical Memo: Prepare a Technical Memorandum for CITY review with summary tables and graphs of the demographic projections and historical supply characteristics. Edits and adjustments of this information shall occur before the data is used to develop the demand forecasts. 6. Demand Forecasts: Generate demand forecasts using the demographic projections for the six (6)-year, twenty (20)-year, and build-out time periods. The forecasts will be presented by billing category single family, multifamily, commercial) and additionally Attachment Page 7 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- will be divided into the same sub-areas as the demographic projections. The demand forecasts will include adjustments to reflect the CITY's conservation program (as provided by the CITY and in coordination with the comprehensive water plan). 7. Chapter: Prepare the associated chapter for inclusion in the CSSP. 6.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide data per the data and reference material request associated with Task 3. 2. Review the draft Technical Memorandum summarizing demographic projections and historical demand characteristics and provide written comments. 3. Review the draft CSSP chapter and provide written comments. 4. Provide information from comprehensive water plan. 5. Provide a copy of the University flow allocation study completed by JUB. 6. Provide in a spreadsheet format the daily water usage data for the university for 2007- 2009. 7. Coordinate with the University of Idaho and their campus master plan to determine the amount, type, associated flow rates, and distribution of growth anticipated for the University. 6.3 Assumptions 1. Limited source data will be available beyond the twenty (20) year planning horizon. CONSULTANT shall collaborate with the Community Development Department and the Engineering Division to determine the data needed for the build-out evaluation. 2. A coordination meeting will be held with the Community Development Department and the CONSULTANT for the Comprehensive Water Plan. This meeting will correspond with one of the four technical review committee meetings scheduled for the PROJECT. 6.4 Deliverables 1. Word document electronic files of draft and final Technical Memorandum summarizing demographic projections and historical demand characteristics. 2. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 4 - System Demand Projections. 3. Word document electronic file of the final CSSP Chapter 4 - System Demand Projections. 7.0 Task 7 - Water Reclamation and Reuse Options (CSSP Chapter 5) 7.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Describe the history and present configuration of the joint CITY of Moscow/University of Idaho wastewater reuse program. 2. Summarize past water reclamation and reuse analysis studies completed for the CITY. Attachment Page 8 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3. Describe potential for reuse water to offset a portion of projected domestic water demand. Existing information will be summarized based upon the CITY's current program with the University of Idaho. This summary will include description of the potential water reclamation demands (currently planned and future planned irrigation sites), facility elements and design criteria, permitting considerations, estimated cost, and other relevant information. CONSULTANT will also describe common implementation issues associated with reuse projects for CITY consideration. Information will be coordinated with the comprehensive water plan. 4. Assess the potential for the addition of package wastewater treatment facilities to be located at strategic points throughout the collection system. Such facilities would be placed to provide treated effluent to large irrigation sites such as the proposed Ballfields Complex, Schools, Parks, Sport Fields, and portions of the CITY which could benefit from a reuse water supply facility. Assessment of up to three sites shall include identification of potential service area for each proposed facility. 5. Assess the potential for a package wastewater treatment facility which would serve the South Fork Palouse River drainage basin in lieu of a lift station and force main delivery of wastewater to the existing WWTP. Review shall include estimation and comparison of costs associated with the package facility and the lift station/force main option. 6. Perform a general assessment of the type of package wastewater treatment facility which would best fit the identified locations and reuse water demands. 7. Using the 2002 JUB Engineering Report, update the opinions of probable cost for the reuse distribution system alternative for conveying reuse water from the existing treatment site to strategic use locations within the CITY. Develop a plausible alternative with opinion of probable cost associated with a reuse distribution system that would take advantage of scalping facilities located at strategic locations along the collection system. 8. Develop Table of recommended Capital Improvements for inclusion in final CIP listing. Scheduling of CIP items will take into account the CITY's street overlay and improvement program as well as other scheduled capital projects. 9. Assess and quantify potential reductions in potable water consumption related to each identified reuse facility. 10. Document the status of the existing Ul interties and agreements and their potential impact on the ability of the CITY to provide service to current and future service areas with existing and proposed conveyance system. 7.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide available information regarding existing WWTP effluent reuse program with the University of Idaho including existing reuse agreement and Ul water right. 2. Review the draft CSSP chapter and provide written comments. 7.3 Assumptions 1. The CITY will provide available wastewater reuse system production data, UIICITY effluent reuse agreement, and Ul water rights information. 2. Water demands for large green spaces to be considered for reuse will be calculated by others. Attachment Page 9 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3. To be conservative, future wastewater flows will be calculated as if there were no reduction in flows resulting from water conservation. 7.4 Deliverables 1. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 5 - Water Reclamation and Reuse Options 2. Word document electronic files of the final CSSP Chapter 5 - Water Reclamation and Reuse Options 8.0 Task 8 - System Analysis (CSSP Chapter 6) 8.1 CONSULTANT Services- Hydraulic Computer Model 8.1.1 Model Acquisition and Calibration Develop a PC based computer model that can be used for planning, flow analysis, and sizing of facilities. The model will include all the CITY's drainage basins and all pipelines six (6)-inches and larger. This task includes the following: 1 . At the kick-off meeting discuss with the CITY the needs and preferences with regard to the selection of a sewer system model. CONSULTANT shall develop a shortlist of 3 candidate modeling applications based upon the outcome of the discussion. 2. Using information collected in CONSULTANT's previous experience and discussion with CITY Staff; thoroughly evaluate each of the three candidate modeling applications and make recommendations to the CITY in a Model Selection Summary Memorandum, identifying the merits of each program in matrix form. 3. Participate in a scheduled conference call with CITY of Moscow staff to review recommendations. 4. Obtain the current sewer system data from the existing Hydra Model, ACAD base maps, manhole cards, and collected field data. Previous modeling was performed for the Wastewater Treatment Plant facility plan, but has not been updated since 2000. Use the system update information obtained in Task 3. 5. Construct Existing Conditions Model a. Construct hydraulic model using collection system data developed in Task 3. The model will be developed using the CITY acquired software. b. Apply flow loads to model using assumptions described in the Basis of Planning (Task 2) c. Identify network data gaps that may include missing elevation (rim, invert), geometry (pipe/manhole), and pumping characteristics by listing missing data for the CITY to determine and provide to CONSULTANT to complete the model. 6. Model Calibration a. The existing condition model will be calibrated utilizing flow monitoring (Task 3) available pump run time I flow data, and wastewater treatment plant flow data. b. Provide assistance, as needed, for the selection of sites for calibration flow measurements. c. In line flow meters will be used to collect flow data to assist in the calibration process. Attachment Page 10 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- d. Using collected flow monitoring data, calibrate the hydraulic model for current conditions in both dry and wet weather. The model will be calibrated for peak flow and volume. 7. Populate the database with physical attributes of manholes, pipes, diversions, interties, pumping, and other hydraulic appurtenances deemed hydraulically connected to the CITY interceptors. 8. Refine the operation of the model so that it will work in peak flow and extended period simulation modes. 9. Provide one day in training in the operation of the modeling software. 1 0. Utilizing CITY provided field data, calibrate in accordance with standard practices for the industry. 11. Utilize model to determine approximate remaining capacity of existing interceptors and the number of "upstream" equivalent residential single family units that could be accommodated in the future. Modeling Scenarios The following base simulations will be run: Description Facilities Model Demand Purpose Existing Peak Existing Extended 2009 Peak Day Evaluate existing peak Hour Period with Diurnal hour conditions and Curve identify deficiencies 2010 CIP Peak 2010 CIP Extended 201 0 Peak Day Develop Cl P for Hour Period with Diurnal existing peak hour Curve deficiencies 2030 Peak Hour 2010 CIP Extended 2030 Peak Day Evaluate 2030 peak Period with Diurnal hour conditions w/2009 Curve Cl P improvements and identify deficiencies 2030 CIP Peak 2030 CIP Extended 2030 Peak Day Determine CIP for Hour Period with Diurnal 2030 peak hour Curve deficiencies 2015 CIP Peak 2015 CIP Extended 2015 Peak Day Identify portions of Hour Period with Diurnal 2030 CIP needed to Curve meet 2015 peak hour conditions Build-out of Major Extended Peak Day with To site and size Study Area Interceptors Period Diurnal Curve pipelines and ultimate and pump size of pump stations. stations Additional simulations will be run as needed to address analysis and assessments identified in this Task. Attachment Page 1 1 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 8.1.2System Physical Capacity Analysis Conveyance System Capacity Analysis 1 . Use the calibrated hydraulic model to evaluate the existing collection system to determine capacity to convey wastewater under normal and peak flow conditions. Identify system deficiencies and improvements necessary to resolve them. Specifically assess ability of system to convey flow from new developments on the edge of the CITY through the existing pipe network. 2. Use model to assess the potential to pass flows from outside the S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District through the District infrastructure to provide service to the South Fork Palouse River Basin upstream of the District. Analysis to consider need and options for dedicated main to bypass District facilities. 3. Use model to determine necessary system modifications/additions to meet projected growth and system demand for the six and twenty (20) year planning horizons. Findings shall be the basis of recommended Capital Improvement Plan. 4. Use model to assess potential need for major system improvements anticipated to be necessary to meet system demands beyond the twenty (20) year CIP planning horizon. This assessment is meant to be general in nature and only to address significant system improvements which may be identified during the course of the review of the six and twenty (20) year planning horizons. 5. Utilize model to assess current Capital Improvement Program projects to determine if they should continue to be included in the program. 6. Develop Table of recommended Capital Improvements for inclusion in final ClP listing. Scheduling of CIP items will take into account the CITY's street overlay and improvement program as well as other scheduled capital projects. 7. Develop drawing that shows the locations of the CIP items included in the final list. 8. Develop a comprehensive summary of the modeling results including model documentation and model use to be placed in an appendix. Lift Stations Capacity Analysis 1 . This task will include lift station analysis and recommendations for improvement. In addition, the interviews will provide a general review of four existing CITY lift stations. The CONSULTANT will analyze each for capacity and recommend improvements as necessary. This section will include a brief discussion of the alternatives modeled and a comparison of dry and wet weather flow characteristics (i.e. How 1/1 was modeled and incorporated in the system evaluation). 2. Discuss with CITY staff discuss known problems I issues. Use field collected data to evaluate pumping capacities and pump performance. 3. Utilize hydraulic model to evaluate the capacity of each existing and proposed lift station and compare it to the projected demands for the six and twenty (20) year planning horizons. Evaluation shall include force main capacity and discharge condition. Identify deficiencies and potential solutions for all lift stations, force mains, and receiving systems. 4. Assess the existing capacity and operation of the South Lift Station and the Southeast Lift Station with respect to providing service to the South Fork Palouse River drainage basin. Determine sufficiency of South Lift Station to serve the basin Attachment Page 12 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- upstream to Robinson Park Road without the Southeast Lift Station or other stations in the basin. 5. Determine means of providing service to the South Fork Palouse River basin of US95 to the Washington State border. Assessment shall define potential service basin, location and sizing of lift station, and potential route of force main. Assess alternative of a package Wastewater Treatment Plant near the Washington State border to serve this basin. 6. Develop listing of recommended lift station, force main, receiving system, and package WWTP improvements for the Capital Improvements Plan. 8.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Participate in meeting with CONSULTANT to discuss model selection parameters. 2. Review and comment on Model Selection Summary Memorandum. 3. Provide available data on existing system and system improvements. 4. Provide flow data from each pumping station and treatment plant influent flow meter for the last 5 years as requested by the CONSULTANT, to the extent data are available. 5. Provide available as-built records and ACAD data with physical attributes of the collection system. Provide O&M data such as pump curves. 6. Assist CONSULTANT in field verification of model by providing any available system flow monitoring or operation and maintenance data. This effort will also include installation of pressure gages (if they do not already exist) in the discharge lines of lift stations. 7. Assist in developing modeling assumptions and scenarios. 8. Review and comment on modeling results. 9. Review and comment on draft documents provided by CONSULTANT. 8.3 Assumptions 1. Software acquisition shall be made by CITY during Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer System Plan development with recommendations from CONSULTANT on available options. Model shall utilize purchased software. 2. Model contains necessary pipes, manholes, pumps, force mains, and interties. 3. Detailed system description information or maps judged to be important to system vulnerability will be summarized in a separate confidential memorandum to be provided only to personnel authorized by the Public Works Director. 4. Three candidate modeling software applications will be included in the Model Selection Summary Memorandum, no more than 5 pages in length, and intended to only document the decision process, not to be a comprehensive review of all features and benefits of every software system available. 5. Key features of the candidate modeling applications should include the following: a. Direct integration into geographic information system (GIS) b. Linking with data stored in the CITY maintenance management system. Currently this link is limited and the data is available in an Access data base. c. Cost d. User friendliness Attachment Page 1 3 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- e. Current Users (sanitary sewer applications) 6. Criteria for model selection will be divided into four categories: a. General requirements: Initial cost, features included in pricing, and user friendliness b. Training: Technical Support and Maintenance Costs, Training Costs c. Interfacing capability: Interface with CITY of Moscow data d. Hydraulic simulation capability: Flexibility of model to output data into various formats, ability to identify deficiencies, output profile data, simulate diurnal flows, and handle surcharging and flow routing in gravity piping systems 7. The CITY's existing Hydra model of the Sanitary Sewer system was developed for the Wastewater Treatment Plant Facilities Plan and has not been updated since 2000. Data utilized from this model shall be confirmed and updated to represent the current system. 8. It is anticipated that flow metering data, pump "run time" data for each pumping station, influent flow meter for the treatment plant, and the supplementary flow monitoring data developed in Task 5 of this PROJECT will be the primary source for model calibration. 9. The sewer collection system model will be developed for gravity sewers with a diameter of six inches and greater, and all pump stations and force mains. 10. Data gaps in the collection system will be discussed with the CITY and determined whether additional field information will need to be obtained by the CONSULTANT or reasonable modeling assumptions can be made. 11. An assumed rate of Infiltration/Inflow will be used in the model and proportioned across the CITY. Areas with disproportionately high infiltration will be identified using flow meter data and pump run time data. 12. CONSULTANT will use similar flow projections and hydraulic data that may be available for input from other systems that discharge into the CITY system (i.e. Ul). 13. All model data will be provided in the database format of the selected modeling software. 14. The existing conditions model will be used as the basis to determine priorities for near term improvements. 1 5. Electrical metering data is accessible for recording measurements during pump tests at each lift station. 8.4 Deliverables The following products will be created during this task. Some will be produced by CONSULTANT and others will be produced by the CITY 8.4.1 CONSULTANT Deliverables 1 . Recommendations on available hydraulic modeling software in Model Selection Summary Memorandum. 2. Conveyance system adequacy analysis by sub-basin with recommendations for Capital Improvements Plan, as needed. 3. Results of assessment and recommendations regarding the S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District conveyance system including description of physical characteristics, ability to convey projected future flows, and recommendations regarding continued operation as an independent District. Attachment Page 14 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4. Lift Station adequacy analysis by station with recommendations for Capital Improvements, as needed. 5. Capital improvement table that contains all improvements recommended through twenty (20)-year planning horizon. 6. Model outputs for use in developing capital improvement program (tables and maps). 7. Summary of Power Consumption Assessment process, findings, and recommendations. 8. Completed operational hydraulic model of the CITY's Sanitary Sewer Collection and Conveyance system. 9. One-day staff training session for the model. 1 0. Excel Spreadsheet with listing and notes of each site visit, calculated hydraulic capacity and recommended improvements of each lift station. 1 1 . Word document electronic files of draft Modeling Documentation Appendix - Modeling Documentation. 12. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 6 - System Analysis. 1 3. Word document electronic files of final Modeling Documentation Appendix ­ Modeling Documentation. 14. Word document electronic files final CSSP Chapter 6 - System Analysis. 1 5. Limited release Technical memorandum of vulnerable system details. 8.4.2 CITY Deliverables 1 . Hydraulic Computer modeling software capable of simulating the Moscow Sewer collection system in both steady state and extended period simulation modes. 2. Data regarding equipment and facilities energy consumption and operations. 3. Previous available flow and modeling data in electronic and hardcopy format for CITY of Moscow Service Area. 9.0 Task 9 - Capital Improvement Plan (CSSP Chapter 7) 9.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Recommend improvements for the sewer collection and conveyance system as determined from the system modeling and evaluation. The recommended improvements will be prioritized and a Capital Improvement Plan prepared with a description of the recommended system improvements, a capital improvement schedule, projected costs, and recommendations for implementation. Allocate the recommended capital improvements between expenditures for system expansion (growth) versus expenditures for enhancing the current system. 2. Work with the CITY during a workshop to discuss and develop project evaluation, screening and prioritization criteria to be used in the selection of and prioritization of projects. The contents of the CIP table and project sheets will also be reviewed and refined at this workshop. This workshop will correspond with one of the technical review committee meetings identified in Task 1 . Attachment Page 1 5 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3. Describe the CIP prioritization process, project justification and description. 4. Work with CITY staff to organize and summarize system pipe age and condition information to help evaluate remaining pipe life throughout the system. 5. As other project information is made available by the CITY, sewer CIP projects will be scheduled to coordinate with other CITY utility and street improvement projects in the same areas to minimize overall infrastructure improvement costs. 6. Identify improvements needed in the S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District to allow conveyance of flows through the District infrastructure or through a dedicated bypass system. 7. Prepare a standard cost estimating methodology that will be used to compare and evaluate project alternatives. Costs will be updated to account for changes in schedule. 8. Apply a standardized cost apportionment methodology to each recommended CIP project which describes the estimated cost of the project in a cost per sewer service connection. These values will be used for comparison of alternatives and prioritization of projects within the confines of the Plan. 9. Prepare a CIP spreadsheet system that can be used to describe and sort projects by date, schedule, priority, or type. Each project in the spreadsheet will be linked to a project sheet that describes the project and project justification. 1 0. Outline and summarize the schedule of capital improvement projects in a summary table by year for the first five years, in five year increments for the next fifteen (15) years, and projects beyond the twenty (20) year time frame. Develop a system exhibit that identifies projects and timeframe for implementation. 11. Describe long-term strategies for a fifty (50)-year system vision. It is expected that details of these strategies will be refined in subsequent CSSP updates. 9.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Work with CONSULTANT team to evaluate alternatives and select CIP projects. 2. Help to select project prioritization criteria 3. Provide recent CITY water project bid tabulations to be used in developing the cost estimating tool. 4. Review and comment on draft documents provided by CONSULTANT. 9.3 Assumptions 1. CITY will provide available similar project cost information to help establish cost models. 2. Since CONSULTANT has no control over the cost of labor, materials, equipment, or services furnished by others, or over the CITY's and other contractor's methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, the CONSULTANT cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or actual construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable construction cost prepared by the CONSULTANT. 9.4 Deliverables 1. Draft and final CIP Microsoft Excel spreadsheets containing project cost estimates. Attachment Page 1 6 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 7 - Capital Improvement Plan 3. Word document electronic files of the final CSSP Chapter 7 - Capital Improvement Plan 4. Map of CITY collection and conveyance system showing locations of projects identified in the CIP table with attached project number for ease in cross-referencing. 10.0 Task 10- Financial Assessment (CSSP Chapter 8) 10.1 CONSULTANT Services The financial program will be included in the Comprehensive Plan document as follows: 1. Past and Present Financial Condition - a summary of the sewer utility financial performance for the past six years and documentation of outstanding long-term debt and bonding capacity will be prepared by others. The CONSULTANT will summarize this information and describe current contractual agreements with the S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District and their impact on CITY finances. 2. Capital Financing Alternatives and Approaches - Identify capital financing. Identify and document Capital Funding Assistance Programs - Available State and Federal grant and loan programs. 3. Recommended Financial Strategy - Recommend a financial strategy addressing funding sources, basic financial policies, rates and charges, and the ongoing financial relationship with the S.E. Moscow Water & Sewer District. 10.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide financial, budgeting, rate and customer reports in Microsoft Excel spreadsheet(s). Assist the CONSULTANT in identifying which expenses are applicable to the collection system and which expenses are applicable to the treatment system. 2. Review and comment on draft documents provided by CONSULTANT. 10.3 Assumptions 1. The tasks above assume that CONSULTANT will participate in two meetings as part of this effort. 2. This task is meant to be a minimal effort task in order to summarize the existing Sewer Fund financial condition. Determining a new rate for the utility will be a future effort under a separate scope of services. Work completed under this task and the development of the Capital Improvement Plan will be the foundation for the future rate study and applicable to future work. 10.4 Deliverables 1. Word document and Excel spreadsheet electronic files of the preliminary and final Draft CSSP Chapter 8 - Financial Assessment 2. Word document and Excel spreadsheet electronic files of the final CSSP Chapter 8 - Financial Assessment Attachment Page 1 7 of 1 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- . ' 11.0 Task 11- Environmental Information Document {Optional Task) 11.1 CONSULTANT Services 1. Complete an Environmental Information Document (EID) following the outline provided by IDEQ. This document will be a standalone document that can be included as an appendix to the planning study. The document will include discussions of alternatives (including the no action alternative), correspondence with various cultural and environmental agencies/jurisdictions, and a brief discussion of environmental impact mitigation measures. 2. Provide a draft public notice that could be used for the CITY. 3. Attend a public meeting to discuss alternatives and receive public input. 11.2 CITY Responsibilities 1. Provide floodplain and sensitive areas data as available. 2. Review and comment on draft documents provided by CONSULTANT. 11.3 Assumptions 1. CONSULTANT will participate in public outreach meetings. 2. No archeological, wetland delineation, or other field work will be completed. If these services are needed, they would be completed as an additional service on a time and materials basis. 3. Public comment and public hearing periods will coincide with the public hearing requirements for the planning document. 4. The environmental will include those priority improvements anticipated to be completed during the first five years of implementation of the comprehensive sanitary sewer plan. 11.4 Deliverables 1. Word document electronic files of the preliminary and final EID. 12.0 Task 12- Draft and Final CSSP Assembly 12.1 CONSULTANT Services 1 . Assemble Preliminary Draft Plan for CITY Review and Final Draft Plan for Submittal to appropriate agencies and Public Participation process. a. Draft plan will be updated per CITY review comments and final draft plan prepared for submittal to IDEQ. b. Assemble the draft chapters and supporting memoranda into the draft CSSP and appendices document. The document will be assembled into two loose-leaf, three­ ring binders with dividers. Minor changes are anticipated from the draft and final chapters prepared for Tasks 1-11. c. Provide data on computer analysis of the collection system. d. Provide the following deliverables to the CITY: Attachment Page 18 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1) Three preliminary draft bound sets of the document with each set bound in two three-ring binders - one with the draft Sewer Plan and one with Plan appendices. 2) Five final draft sets of the document for agency review if needed or WRIA 34 Planning Unit if appropriate including plan and appendices. 2. Public Participation Process a. Prepare for and attend one public open house session to present the draft plan, address comments and questions, and document public input. b. Summarize public input and make recommendations to CITY on potential modifications to the draft plan. 3. Respond to CITY and Public Comments and Assemble Final Plan for CITY Approval. a. Prepare an Executive Summary of the plan to be included at the front of the plan document (5 - 10 pages). b. Assemble the final chapters and supporting memoranda into the final CSSP and appendices document. The document will be assembled into two loose-leaf, three­ ring binders with dividers. c. Detailed system description information or maps judged to be important to system vulnerability will be summarized in a separate confidential memorandum to be provided only to personnel authorized by the Public Works Director. d. CONSULTANT Presentation to CITY Council for Plan Adoption. CONSULTANT will prepare presentations and exhibit maps for CITY staff to review utilizing information derived under Task activities described above, finalize presentations per CITY comments, and present information at a council workshop. e. Provide the following deliverables to the CITY: 13.0 1) Copy ready original paper copy of document. 2) Ten (1 0) bound sets of the document with each set bound in two three-ring binders - one with the Sewer Plan and one with Plan appendices. 3) Ten (10) compact disk PDF file copies of the Sewer plan and appendices. 4) Three compact disk Word/Excel files copies of the Sewer plan and appendices. 5) Printed exhibits for workshop. Management Reserve As provided in the PROJECT budget up to ten thousand dollars 0,000) has been set aside for optional services. Optional services must be authorized in writing by the CITY after the CITY has requested the CONSULTANT has prepared a supplemental services scope and budget, and the CITY has agreed to the scope and budget. Attachment Page 19 of 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- A TI ACHMENT ENGINEERING COMPENSATION The CONSULT ANT will be compensated a lump sum amount of one hundred seventy nine thousand nine hundred dollars ($179,900) for all tasks described in Attachment excluding Tasks 3. 1 3 . 1 1 1 and 13. Tasks 3.1.4, 3.1.5, 1 1 and 13 will be paid for on a time and materials basis with a total additional service budget of twenty-nine thousand one hundred dollars ($29, 100). The following table summarizes how these budget amounts were determined. Individual budget amounts for the time and material tasks may be exceeded provided that the total additional service budget amount is not exceeded without prior written authorization from the City. Task Type Amount Task 1: Project Management LS $ 22,700 Task 2: Introduction and Basis of Planning LS $ 2,800 Task 3: Data Collection LS $ 19,400 Tasks 3.1.4 and 3.1.5 - Data collection T&M $ 14,900 Task 4: Sewer System Description LS $ 13,900 Task 5: Service Area Policies, Plans, and Agreements LS $ 5,900 Task 6: System Flow Projections LS $ 5,400 Task 7: Water Reclamation and Reuse Options LS $ 23,000 Task 8: System Analysis LS $ 63,600 Task 9: Capital Improvement Plan LS $ 5,500 Task 10: Financial Assessment LS $ 1,600 Task 11: Environmental Information Document T&M $ 4,200 Task 12: Draft and Final CSSP Assembly LS $ 16,100 Task 13: Management Reserve (T&M) T&M $ 10,000 TOTAL $ 209,000 Attachment Page 1 of 1