Full Text
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this ' dav of !tu*/7, tL;;C , 20 oS-: by and between the City of Moscow, whose address is PO Bom 9203, Moscow, ID 83843- 1703, hereinafter called the "Sponsor," and Riedesel & Associates, Inc., whose address is I l l Main St., Ste 310, Lewiston, ID 83501, hereinafter called the "Consultant." RATIFICATION The Idaho Transportation Department, representing the Federal Highway Administration on all local federal-aid highway projects, is authorized to ratify all agreements for engineering services entered into between sponsoring local agencies and their retained consultants. All references to State used hereafter shall denote the Idaho Transportation Department. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree as follows: The work covered by Agreement is for the following project: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO: KEY NO: FY06 Pavement Overlay, Moscow STP-0002 (125) 9680 I. SUBCONSUL T ANTS The Sponsor approves the Consultant's utilization of the following Subconsultants: Strata. II. AGREEMENT ADMINISTRA T!ON On behalf of the Sponsor this Agreement shall be administered by the State. The Agreement Administrator is Jerry Flatz, Local Highway Technical Assistance Council, 3330 Grace Street, Boise, ID 83703 (208) 344-0565; or an authorized representative. Ill. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT A. DESCRIPTION OF WORK The Consultant shall provide professional design services as outlined m the attachment(s) and as further described herein. 1. The following attachments are made a part of this Agreement: a. Attachment No. I. Attachment No. 1 is the negotiated Scope of Work with design assumptions, Man Day Estimate. Schedule, and Consultant CADD Specifications. !TO . Roadway Design . I Agreement#_ ,ot:>L l 1 = 2005-46 ---PAGE BREAK--- b. Attachment No. 2L. Attachment No. 2L is the Consultant Agreement Specifications which are generic to all agreements. In the case of discrepancy, this Agreement shall have precedence over Attachment No. I , and Attachment No. I shall have precedence over Attachment No. 2. 2. Aerial photography negatives and other items as identified in Section I, Paragraph 9 of the Consultant Agreement Specifications shall be sent to Greg Mead, Idaho Transportation Department, PO Box 71 29, Boise, lD 83707. 3. Per Diem will be reimbursed at the current approved rates. These rates are listed at http://WVvw.itd.idaho.gov/designlcau/policies/policies.htm. IV. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF SPONSOR AND/OR STATE The Sponsor and/or State shall provide to the Consultant, upon request, copies of any records, or data on hand which are pertinent to the work under this Agreement. V. TIME AND NOTICE TO PROCEED A. The Consultant shall start work under this Agreement no later than ten (I 0) calendar days from the receipt of the V.Titten NOTICE TO PROCEED. The Consultant shall complete all the milestones by the dates set out below: Milestone Concept Approval Environmental Clearance Final Design Review PS&E Submittal Date January 13, 2006 February 3, 2006 March 2, 2006 March 24, 2006 B. The Consultant shall remain available to perform additional work for an additional thirty (30) days or until the Agreement is closed out, whichever comes first. VJ. BASIS OF PAYMENT A. The basis of payment for this Agreement is cost plus fixed fee with an Agreement amount of Ninety-Two Thousand Dollars ($92,000). The amount is made up of a $92,000 Not-to-Exceed amount for performing all project development services. The Consultant agrees to accept as full compensation for all services rendered to the satisfaction of the Sponsor for the accomplishment of the project development, the actual cost plus the fixed fee or Not-to-Exceed Amount of$92.000, whichever is the lesser. 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- B. Cost Plus Fixed Fee Amount. The fixed fee shall be $6,090. C. Combined Overhead I. Consultant, Riedesel & Associates, Inc The combined overhead rate is 163.02 percent. 2. Subconsultant, Strata, Inc. The combined overhead rate is 137.09 percent. D. Reasonable increases in labor rates during the life of this Agreement will be accepted. Payroll additive rate, general administrative overhead rate, and unit prices are subject to adjustment during the life of this Agreement based on audit and negotiations. If the State approves an adjustment to the overhead rate or unit prices, the Consultant must then submit a written request to the Agreement Administrator requesting use of the approved rate(s) on this agreement. If the new rate(s) are accepted by the Agreement Administrator, they shall apply from the date the written request was made to the Agreement Administrator. An adjustment shall not change the Not-To Exceed amount of the Agreement. For projects f duration greater than two years, the Not-To-Exceed amount may be negotiated. In no case will rates be adjusted more than once per agreement year. E. PSA No. I is issued in the amount of$50,000 to begin the work of this Agreement. The remaining amount will be issued I;Y consecutive PSAs. ---PAGE BREAK--- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have set their hands on the day and year in this Agreement first Y.lritten above. RIEDESEL & ASSOCIATES, INC. Consultant APPROVED Stephen Bywater Deputy Attorney General May 19, 2003 hm:9680 LPA.doc By: CITY OF MOSCOW Sponsor IDAHO TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- SCOPE OF WORK FY06 Pavement Overlay, Moscow Project No. STP-0002(125) Key No. 9680 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Moscow has received federal funds to rehabilitate the following roads: 1. Joseph Street, from the bridge (M.P. 12.688) to 300' east of the Bridge (M.P. 12.631). 2. Third Street, from Monroe Street (M.P. 0.476) to Cleveland Street (M.P. 0.862) 3. Sixth Street, from Blaine Street (M.P. 0.750) to Mountain View Road (M.P. 1.001) 4. Lauder Street, from U.S. 95 (M.P. 0.484) to Taylor Street (M.P. 0.255) 5. Orchard Street, from F Street (M.P. 0.842) to Public Avenue (M.P. 0.992) 6. F Street, from Hayes Street (M.P. 0.702) to Orchard Street (M.P. 0.842) Due to the type of project and funding schedule, the project design will reflect the following assumptions: • This project will be completed following ITO's simple project design process. • Plans will be developed in accordance with Maintenance Project Plans (Section 890 in the ITO Design Manual) • Preliminary Design is excluded. • Right-of-Way plans are excluded. • All work will be completed within the existing pavement and rights-of-way. • A Programmatic Categorical Exclusion will be required for Environmental Clearance. • No Surveying will be completed, project plans will use mileposts as stationing. • The project will be completed in US Customary Units. • The Phase 1R, and a Combined Phase IIIN Materials Reports will be completed. • Pavement Marking plans will not be included in the plan set The Contractor will be responsible for replacing the pavement markings with temporary pavement markings and the City of Moscow will replace the striping. • No utility conflicts are anticipated, other than adjusting surface utilities (water valves, manhole lids etc.). • No utility plans will be prepared. ---PAGE BREAK--- TASK OUTLINE Task 1 Concept Report 1.1 Field Review: The Design Team (Riedesel & Associates, Inc. & sub-consultants) will review the project site with representatives from the City of Moscow. A separate field review will be completed by the Design Team to determine roadway widths and changes in the road segments. 1.2 Design Data and Criteria: The Design Team will obtain projected traffic volumes, construction plans and other pertinent information from ITO and the City of Moscow, to be used to complete the ITO 757 (ITO 783A). Riedesel and · Associates will coordinate with the City of Moscow while completing the concept report. Additional traffic counts are not anticipated as part of this project. 1.3 Evaluate Options: The Design Team will complete the ITO 758 (ITD-7838) Alternate Solutions and Costs form based on recommendations from the Phase 1 R Materials Report. Construction alternatives will be presented at this time. The conclusion of the report will be a recommendation of which option should move through the design process for each street segment. 1.4 Prepare and Submit Preliminary Concept Report: The Concept Report will be prepared including the ITO 783 Concept Signature Sheet, Concept Statement (including local contacts, prosecution of work, and bicycles and pedestrians), lTD Forms 757 & 758, the Preliminary Environmental 651 Form, and Vicinity Map. A detaſed cost estimate will be prepared. The ITO Form 1150 will be updated and included with the report. The Concept Preparation Checklist will be reviewed and completed before submittal to the City of Moscow and LHTAC. 1.5 Revise and Resubmit Concept Report: Comments from the concept review will incorporated into the report and be resubmitted to the City of Moscow and then to LHTAC for approval. 1.6 Consultation and Meetings: Consultation with Geotechnical Sub-consultant, LHTAC and the City of Moscow will be conducted on a basis throughout the Phase 1 R work. Attend one on-site kick off meeting as part of the Phase 1 R work. One review meeting is anticipated Task 2- Material Reports (See also Geotechnical Scope of Work) 2.1 Phase 1R Rehabilitation for Pavement Report The Phase 1 R Pavement Rehabilitation Report will be prepared by the Geotechnical Subconsultant with coordination by Riedesel and Associates to Key#9680 2 of7 Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- address pavement rehabilitation requirements for each of the 6 roadways. Riedesel and Associates scope of services for the Phase 1 R Report will include the following: A. Review Existing Information: Available information will be obtained and reviewed; including record drawings, maintenance records, discussions with City personnel, and other information that may be available. B. Conduct Visual Pavement Evaluation: A visual evaluation of the existing pavement conditions will be performed in conjunction with the Geotechnical Sub-consultant and the City of Moscow for use in the rehabilitation analysis. C. Rehabilitation Design Alternatives: Provide traffic data in terms of ESAL's or Traffic Index (TI) to Sub-consultant for pavement section design calculations. Riedesel and Associates, Inc., will also coordinate recommended alternatives with the City of Moscow and the rest of the Design Team. D. Draft Phase 1 R Report: Review and distribute the Draft Phase 1 R Report and prepare a summary of comments to Sub-consultant for revision. E. Revised Phase 1 R Report: Comments from the material 1 R review will be incorporated into the report and be resubmitted to the City of Moscow and forwarded to LHTAC for approval. F. Consultation and Meetings: Consultation with Sub-consultants, LHTAC and the City of Moscow will be conductƀ on a basis throughout the Phase 1 R work. Attending one on-site kick off meeting as part of the Phase 1 R work and one review meeting with the City of Moscow, LHTAC and Geotechnical Sub-consultant for the Phase 1 R Report. 2.2 Combined Phase IIIN Pavement Estimating and Special Provisions Report (See also Geotechnical Scope of Work) A Combined Phase Ill and V Pavement Estimating and Special Provisions Report will be prepared by Riedesel and Associates in coordination with the Geotechnical Sub-consultant for this project. Riedesel & Associates, Inc. scope of services for the Phase Ill and V will include the following: A. Draft Combined Phase IIIN Report: The data obtained in the Phase 1 R Report will be utilized to prepare the Combined Phase Ill and V Report. The Phase Ill portion of the report will be completed by Geotechnical Sub consultant. Riedesel and Associates will draft the typical sections for inclusion in the Phase Ill portion of the combined report. Key#9680 Riedesel and Associates will provide recommendations for preparation of the Phase V Special Provisions portion of the combined report. This portion of the 3 of7 Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- report will provide modifications to existing standard specifications, special provisions for materials and/or construction activities not covered in the standard specifications, and contractor notes, as appropriate. B. Revised Phase IIIN Report: Comments from the Phase IIIN report review will be incorporated into the report and be resubmitted to the City of Moscow and then forwarded to LHTAC for approval. C. Consultation and Meetings: Consultation with the Design Team, LHTAC and the City will be conducted on a frequent basis throughout the Combined Phase Ill and V work and includes one review meeting with the City of Moscow, Geotechnical Sub-consultant, and LHTAC for the Combined Phase IIIN Report. Task 3 -Environmental Clearance The project will not extend beyond the existing edge of pavement. As a result, the project should have minimal environmental impacts. An environmental evaluation will be developed to confirm that there are no environmental impacts. The environmental evaluation will include a "no-effecf' analysis regarding the species shown on the US Fish and Wildlife Services' threatened and endangered species list for Latah County. The environmental evaluation will include the following lTD forms; • lTD 654 Environmental Evaluation • ITD/SHPO Determination of Significance and Effect stating Criteria F for Sealant Projects. • lTD 2784 NPDES Storm Water Permits showing no ground area disturbed. • lTD 652 Hazardous Materials Administrative Review. Due to the lack of impacts, a Programmatic Categorical Exclusion is anticipated for this project. Due to work being limited to within the pavement edges, no Wetland Delineation, Archeological Evaluation, or Hazardous Waste Investigation will be completed for this project. This scope assumes one review and re-submittal to obtain environmental clearance. Consultation with the Design Team, LHTAC and the City will be conducted on a basis throughout the Combined Phase Ill and V work and includes one review meeting with the City of Moscow, Geotechnical Sub-consultant, and LHT AC for the Combined Phase IIIN Report. Task 4 - Final Roadway Design 4.1 Prepare Final Design Plans: Riedesel and Associates will prepare the final design plans. The final design plan will include, construction traffic control plan sheets, developed in accordance with the MUTCD and the lTD Design Manual. Key#9680 4of7 Revised 5111/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- The following final design drawings are anticipated in Maintenance Plan format using AutoCadd. Final Design No. Of Sheets Title SheeWicinity Map (8 Yz x 11) 1 Typical Sections x 11) 4 Summary of Quantities x 11) 1 Details x 11) 4 Plans w/ Construction Notes x 11 or 11 x 17) 6 Traffic Control Plans (Typical Layouts) x 11) 4 List of Standard Drawings (11 x 17) 2 Total Final Design Plan Sheets 22 4.2 Calculate Final Roadway Quantities: Final US Customary quantity estimates will be prepared and checked before being added to the summary sheets. Pavement section quantities will be calculated off the typical sections. 4.3 Prepare Special Provisions: Special provisions required for properly constructing the roadway improvements will be prepared. 4.4 Prepare Construction Cost Estimates: Estimated unit costs will be multiplied with the calculated roadway quantities using the "Estimator" computer program to develop an estimate of the construction cost. The unit costs will be reviewed and adjusted based on recent lTD unit bid prices and knowledge of local construction methods and costs. 4.5 Estimate Contract Time: The constructidn time will be estimated based on lTD's manual titled "Contract Time Determination in Project Development" and the Microsoft Project Scheduling program. 4.6 Storm Water Polution Prevention Plan items will be shown as details on the plan set. Special Provision items will be added to the proposal during the design process, if required. 4.7 Final Plan Assembly and Review: Final construction documents will be assembled and reviewed in-house, then submitted to the City of Moscow and LHTAC for review. The lead-time will be agreed upon in advance to accommodate the final design review conference. 4.8 Design and Hearing Waiver: LHTAC will prepare a one-page letter requesting Design Approval and Public Hearing Waiver. Key#9680 5 of7 Revised 5111/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- 4.9 Final Design Review Attendance: The final design review meeting will be attended by key project team members. Minutes will be prepared summarizing the review comments and discussions from this meeting. A master mark-up of the design plans and specifications will be developed incorporating the final design review comments. 4.10 Consultation and Meetings: Periodic project review meetings and correspondence will be continued throughout the final design phase. Task 5- PS&E Submittal 5.1 Final Plan Revisions: Required changes to the project plans will be made following the final design review. 5.2 Final Quantity and Estimate Change&: Required changes to the quantities and estimates will be made following the final design review. 5.3 Final Special Provision Changes: Required changes to the special provisions will be made following the final design review. 5.4 Final Contract Time Changes: Required changes to the contract time will be made following the final design review. 5.5 Final Changes: Required changes to the will be made · following the design review. 5.6 Regional Engineers File: Pertinent data from the design, materials, and environmental phases of the project will be compiled into a single file for use by the Regional Engineering Staff during the construction of the project. 5.7 Submit PS&E Package: The consultant team will submit the contract documents to LHTAC for review and advertisement. 5.8 Consultation and Meetings: Periodic project review meetings and correspondence will be continued throughout the PS&E design. Task 6- Project Management and Coordination The pavement overlay design is anticipated to require 7 months to complete. 6.1 Pre-Operation Conference: The Design Team's key personnel will meet with LHT AC and City of Moscow at a pre-operation conference to discuss the project scope of work, schedule, and issues of concern. Key Design Team members will tour the project site to reaffirm the essential aspects and issues of the project. Key#9680 6 of7 Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- 6.2 Prepare Progress Reports: Progress reports will be prepared and include ITO Form 771, the current PSA, the current invoice, applicable back up and a cover letter. 6.3 Prepare and Update Critical Path Diagram (CPO): A CPO schedule of the design will be prepared following the lTD design process. The schedule will be updated and submitted with the progress reports. 6.4 Project Administration: The project budget will be monitored, the project files will be set up and maintained, and the project team will be coordinated throughout the project design. Key#9680 7of7 Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- GEOTECHNICAL SCOPE OF WORK FY06 Pavement Overlay, City of Moscow Project No. STP-0002(125) Key No. 9680 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Moscow has received federal funds to rehabilitate the following roads: 1. Joseph Street, from the bridge (M.P. 12.688) to 300' east of the Bridge (M.P. 12.631). 2. Third Street, from Monroe Street (M.P. 0.476) to Cleveland Street (M.P. 0.862) 3. Sixth Street, from Blaine Street (M.P. 0.750) to Mountain View Road (M.P. 1.001) 4. Lauder Street, from U.S. 95 (M.P. 0.484) to Taylor Street (M.P. 0.255) 5. Orchard Street, from F Street (M.P. 0.842) to Public Avenue (M.P. 0.992) 6. F Street, from Hayes Street (M.P. 0.702) to Orchard Street (M.P. 0.842) TASK OUTLINE Task 2- Material Reports 2.1 Phase 1 R Rehabilitation for Pavement Report The Phase 1 R Pavement Rehabilitation Report will be prepared to address pavement rehabilitation requirements for each of the 6 roadways. In addition, the report will discuss the feasibility of overlay and other viable rehabilitation options such as pulverizing and mixing base material and/or reconstruction. The scope of services for the Phase 1 R Report will include the following: A. Review Existing Information: Available information will be obtained and reviewed; including record drawings, maintenance records, discussions with City personnel, and other information that may be available. B. Conduct Visual Pavement Evaluation: A visual evaluation of the existing pavement conditions will be performed for use in the rehabilitation analysis. The results of the visual evaluation will be summarized and included in the Phase 1 R Report. ---PAGE BREAK--- C. Subsurface Exploration: A subsurface exploration will be performed to determine pavement layer thicknesses, soil classifications, and obtain samples for laboratory testing. This scope of work includes initiating the field exploration activities by planning details of the exploration, mobilizing to the project, and coordinating the clearance of underground utilities at the proposed boring locations. A permit will be obtained from City of Moscow. as necessary, for drilling activities in the right of way. The exploration will generally include drilling one boring every 300 to 400 feet, or as street segments change, in alternating lanes of each of the 6 roadways to a depth of about 5 feet. This results in drilling 1 boring for Joseph Street, 5 borings for Third Street, 5 borings for Sixth Street, 4 borings for Lauder Street, 2 borings for Orchard Street, and 2 borings for F Street for a total of 20 borings. Pavement section layer thickness information will be determined in each of the borings for use in the analyses. Samples of base layers and subgrade will be obtained for laboratory testing. The borings will be logged by a field geologist or engineer as the drilling progresses. Traffic control will be provided during drilling activities based on an approved traffic control plan. as appropriate. Boring locations will be determined by approximate odometer measurements from existing project features such as roadway intersections. · D. Laboratory Testing: Laboratory te,sting will be conducted on representative samples obtained from the subsurface exploration, and will likely include: visual classifications, moisture content, gradation, Atterberg limits, moisture-density relationship, one R-value per street, pH and resistivity. E. Develop Rehabilitation Design Alternatives: Overlay and viable rehabilitation design alternatives, as appropriate will be developed based on the results of our existing information review, visual pavement evaluation, subsurface exploration, and laboratory testing. Traffic data in terms of ESAL's or Traffic Index (TI) will be provided by Riedesel and Associates. Design alternatives will be developed in general accordance with the ITO Materials Manual. Use of FWD data is not anticipated. A conventional reconstruction design alternative will also be evaluated based on the Materials Manual guidelines. F. Prepare Draft Phase 1R Report: The Draft Phase 1 R Report will be prepared in general accordance with lTD guidelines and will include overlay thickness requirements for each of the 6 roadways. Other viable pavement rehabilitation options and/or reconstructions options will be used in the life cycle cost comparison. The report will address Key#9680 Page 2 of 4 Geotechnical Scope of Work Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- applicable sections of Phase I and II Reports and include the results of our field and laboratory testing. Five copies of the draft report will be submitted for review by Riedesel and Associates and the City of Moscow, and then forwarded to LHTAC and ITO for review. A geologic map, geologic discussion, and soils profile will be excluded from the Phase 1 R Report. Contractor furnished sources will be utilized; therefore, aggregate source investigations, borrow and aggregate source plats and inventories will not be required. FWD will not be utilized for design. G. Prepare Final Phase 1R Report: Review comments will be discussed and incorporated in the final report, as appropriate. The report will include a summary sheet of the individual comments and action taken to address them. Five signed and sealed copies of the final report will be submitted to the City of Moscow for review and then forwarded to LHTAC for approval and inclusion with the Concept Report. H. Consultation and Meetings: Consultation with Riedesel and Associates, LHT AC and the City of Moscow will be conducted on a frequent basis throughout the Phase 1R work. This scope anticipates attending one on-site kick off meeting as part of the Phase 1 R work and one review meeting to discuss the comments the Phase 1R Report. I. Administration: Administration items include coordination, supervision and staffing of the project, preparation and review of invoices, and correspondence. 2.2 • Combined Phase IIIN Pavement Estimating and Special Provisions Report A Combined Phase IIIN Pavement Estimating and Special Provisions Report will be prepared for this project. The scope of services will include the following: A. Prepare Draft Combined Phase IIIN Report: The data obtained in the Phase 1 R Report will be utilized to prepare the Combined Phase Key#9680 I liN Report. The Phase Ill portion of the report will include materials and estimating data for the project. Riedesel and Associates will draft the typical sections for inclusion in the Phase Ill portion of the combined report. In addition, this scope includes close coordination with Riedesel and Associates, during preparation the Phase V Special Provisions portion of the combined report. This portion of the report will provide Page 3 of4 Geotechnical Scope of Work Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- modifications to existing standard specifications, special provisions for materials and/or construction activities not covered in the standard specifications, and contractor notes, as appropriate. The draft report will be prepared in general accordance with the Materials Manual. Five copies of the draft report will be submitted for review by Riedesel & Associates, Inc. and the City of Moscow and then forwarded to LHTAC and ITO. B. Prepare Final Combined Phase IIW Report: Review comments will be discussed and incorporated in the final combined report. The report will include a summary sheet of the individual comments and action taken to address them. Five signed and sealed copies of the final report will be submitted for Riedesel & Associates, Inc. and City review and then svbmitted to LHTAC and ITO for approval. C. Consultation and Meetings: Consultation with Riedesel and Associates, LHTAC and the City will be conducted on a frequent basis throvghout the Combined Phase IIIN work. One review meeting is anticipated with LHTAC for the Combined Phase I liN Report. D. Administration: Administration items include coordination, supervision and staffing of the project, preparation and review of invoices, and correspondence. 2.3 Final Design Review Finally this scope includes review of the project plans and specifications and attend the final design review meeting to discuss geotechnical /materials related aspects of the design. A letter outlining the results of the reviews and discussions will be prepared and submitted to Riedesel and Associates for incorporation in the design. Key#9680 Page4 of4 Geotechnical Scope of Work Revised 5/11/05 ---PAGE BREAK--- I Exhibit òFY06 Pavement Overtay STP-ll002(125); Key 9680 Labor Estimate-Design 1 Concept Report 1.1 Fteld Review 1.2 Desian Data and Crtteria 1.3 Evaluate 0 tions 1.4 Prepare and Submit Preliminary Concept Repor 1.5 Revise and Resubmit Con t R ort 1.6 Consuflation & Meetió 1 !TOTAL - CONCEPT REPORT 2 Material$ Reports 2. 'hase W for t Report A :ew I B I lrnl Phase 11 f.t. P- i- I Pllase IIIN : . )Report , !Meetings 2 I TOTAL - MATERIALS REPORTS 3 EnvironmentaJ Clearance 3ITOTAL • ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE Fee Est Rev 6--9..05.XLS; Design I Riedesel & Associates, Inc. Total Proj. Manager Proj. Engineer Design Eng. Technician Proj. Su!Veyor Survey Crew Clerical L-O.ys L-DaY!_ L-O.ys L-Davs L-O.ys L·Davs L-Davs L-Days 2 1 1 1.25 0.25 1 2.5 0.5 1 1 3.25 0.25 0.5 1 1 0.5 1.25 0.25 025 0.5 0.25 1.5 0.75 0.75 0 11.75 I 2.75 3.75 3 1.5 0 0 0.75 Total Proj. Manager Proj. Engineer Design Eng. Technician Proj. Surveyor Survey ôrew Clerical L-1 •ys L-Days L-Days . . ' , . 0 025 !5 0.25 0.25 r· • 0. rs 0.5 9.5 I 2.25 I 4.5 L-Days L-Days , . , 0.5 1 . 0.25 I 1.5 I 1.25 L-Days , . I 0 I L-Davs L-Days , 0 I 0 Total Proj. Manager Proj. Engineer Design Eng. Technician Proj. Surveyor SufVey Crew Clerical 7.25 2.25 0 3.75 0.25 1 of B 6/9/2005 I ---PAGE BREAK--- I Exhibit "A"ŋFY06 Pavement Overlay STP-0002(125); Key 9680 tabor Estimate-Design 4 Final Design 4.1 Pre are Final n Plans 4.2 Calculate Flnal Roa Quantities 4.3 Prepare Special Provisions 4.4 Pre re Construction cost Estimate 4.5 Estimate Contract lime 4.6 Stom Water Pollution Prevention Plan 4.7 Final Plan Assemblv and Review 4.8 Desl n & Hearin Waiver 4.9 Anal Design Review 4.10 Consultation & Meetlnas 4 lTOTAL ·FINAL DESIGN 5 PS&E. Submittal I luanti'es >oecial. ( :eo 'S&EChanoes 5 ITOTAL • PS&E Submittal 6 Project Management & Coordlnaton 'eports Riedesel & Associates, Inc. Total Proj. Manager Proj. Engineer Design Eng. Technician Proj. Surveyor Survey Crew Clerical L-Days L-Days L-Days L-Oays L-Days L-Days L-Days L-Days 25 1 3 5 16 2.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 5.5 0.5 1.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 3 1 0.5 0.5 1.25 0.25 1 3 0.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 0 2.5 0.5 0.5 1 0.5 2 1 1 0 I 46.25 I 4 I 8.25 I 14 I 19 I 0 I 0 I 1 L:;VU ProLT::ser ProLS:Rleer Dekl 10 Eng. Prot:Lor SuZri aM rew Clerical IYS L·Davs 0.25 0.75 0.25 o. 0.25 1. 1 1. 0.5 0. 9.25 2.5 2.25 2 0 0 1.5 Total Proj. Manager Proj. Engineer Design Eng. TNOPan Prot!QLOf Suzz.;:ew Clerical L·Davs L-Davs • avs L-Davs L-Davs 0,5 ' 6 )TOTAL· PROJECT MANAGEMENT & COCRO) 6.5 1.5 3 0 0 0 0 2 SUMMARY ··RT • · NAL 5 & 6 r& Fee Est Rev &-9-05.XLS: Design Total Proj. Manager Proj. Engineer Design Eng. Technician Proj. Surveyor Survey Crew Clerical L-Days Lei ays L..[)ays L-0, ays L ys L avs ays L·l ays 11.75 75 3.75 '5 25 '.25 2. 0. '5 46.25 8 . 9.25 1 2. 15 6.5 L5 90.5 12.5 24.25 20.75 2 .5 2of8 619/2005 I ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit "A•..J=Yoo Pavement OVerlay STP-0002(125); Key 9680 Labor EstimateŒDeslgn SALARY COSTS B. Pavro!l Bufden & Fringe Benefit Costs % rndi...ct Labor, Ovemead & Fee C. RxedFee 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Mitea Motel & per diem Misc. Materials & Printing Geotechnical Sub-Consultant Prepared by: Riedesel & Associates, InC. 1 1 1 Main street Lewiston, Idaho 63551 9JL QrC - Fee Est Rev 6œ9..05.XLS; Deslgn X X X 100.0 194.0 166.0 220.0 0.0 0.0 44.0 lŔHours X L·Hom X L-Hours X l-Hour& X L-Hours X l-Hours X l·Hours X $35.00 0 $30.50 / $28.25 $21.33 $11 .25 / TOTAL DIRECT PAYROLL TOTAL PAYROLL BURDEN & FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS 1 1 1 1 Fee= TOTAL FIXED FEE TOTAl lABOR I PAYROLL I FIXED FEE X $ 388.80 • X • X $ 200.00 X . $34,Q3 .39 = X = X • X = X • TOTAL OUT -OF-POCKET COSTS 3 of8 Riedesel & Assqdales, Inc. • • • hour= hour hOUr hour hour • $3,500.00 $5,917.00 $4,689.50 $4,692.60 $495.00 s1s,294.1o I I $31.45324! $31,453.24 i/ 12% $ $ $ $6.069.68 $56,837.02 / 388.80 - 200.00 $ 34,Q3U9 $ - $ . $ . $ . I s s• 62U-I 619/2005 ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit "N-FY06 Pavement Overlay STP-0002(125): Key9680 Labor Estimate-Materials 2 Materials Reports 2 fTOTAL - MATERIALS REPORTS-Days MATERIALS SALARY COSTS A. Summarv of labor-Day Costs 1 Prin a! 2 Sr. Engineer 3 Geologist • Draftsman 5 Surve or 6 Clerical 7 TBD 8. Payroll Burden & Fringe Benefit Costs # l'ndirect labor, Overhead & Fee c. Fixed Fee D. Out-of-Pocket Costs 1 Mileaue 2 Motel&Ý diem 3 Misc. Materials & Printing • oration EXPenses- drill subcontractor 5 Traffic Control 6 1 Exploration Expenses 7 Laboratorv testln - Unit Rates 8 Fee Est Rev 6-9-05.XLS; Materials Total 43.5 2.625 15.75 13.5 2.625 0 9 Prinipal 2.625 L-Days L-Days L-Days L-Days L-Oays L-Days L-Oays Sr. Engineer Geologist Draftsman 15.75 X X X 21.0 126.0 108.0 21.0 0.0 72.0 106. 13.5 2.625 L-HO!JrsX $45.00 l-Hoursx $38.67 L-Hoursx $19.25 L-Hoursx $15.75 L-Hoursx L-Hours X $13.00 L-Hoursx TOTAL DIRECT PAYROLL TOTAL PAYROLL BURDEN & FRINGE BENEFIT COSTS 370 1 1 1 2 1 1 Fee =I TOTAL FIXED FEE TOTAL LABOR I I FIXED FEE X X X X X X X X 4 of8 = = " TOTAL OUT-DF.POCKET COSTS ESTIMATED DESIGN FEE STRATA Surveyor Clerical TBD 0 9 0 hour= $945.00 hour= $4,872.42 hour= $2,079.00 hour= $330.75 hour= $938.00 hour= $0.00 $9,163.171 .I .7c; I I s1a,eauj1/;?1 St'c I, 79 1o%l c·O i: ², ::23):'1K $ 148.00 $ - $ 801.00 $ 3,950.00 $ 2,460.00 $ 265.00 $ 3 000.00 $ - I $ 10.62-l.ee I 61912005 ---PAGE BREAK--- B 9 " 13 >4 " 19 F " ŊM·yj_ " !rar*.Mlme ")'p;;;-ilmr;;a·ry Enginaer\ng to proceed Conc6Jpt Prupare nr.d Submit Conn)J)I Rwiew Rovb:t and Resubmtt Concept FiRğI Coru;epl Rovim¥ Concept AppmviOII Final Design F'iv.ptml and Sulxnit firm! Design P1ans Design AppmvÐl & Hearir\{l Waiver hnl De.si{Jn Submi(h'l Revinw Final fk•sign Review MeQting PrepMH PS&E PSSE 8ubrnitt1>l Materials Prep;;r<; ie'J< Reviso and Resubmit the Phas;J JR Phnse 1 R Revfcw aDd Aprroval Pl'epNB ili1d Subrnil th8 Phase ill! V Materials Report f'An1bin0d Phase W I V RĠA"krw 24 Xs ·l Redw and Resubmit the Combined Phase 1111 V Pha:8e IWV Review afJd Ap()ll)Vnl Environmental Clearance 2i\ PrDparo EnvirCnlal Evahmkm 27 En,·ironmmil Evab8!irm RĢwiew mod Ap;:>nwal £ nvim1vnen!al Cl0arittme 0 RoliedUpCritk.afTask ʼn SpiLt Group By Summary f_j 0 In· Svmmay fl " RoMed Up Mi!es!Ofle External Tasks mosww trad