Full Text
Municipal Stormwater Program Annual Progress Report 2012-2013 Permit Term 2008-2013 September 2013 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ii September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table of Contents Certification Statement Table of Contents ii Executive Summary ES-1 1.0 Stormwater Program Management and Report Introduction 1.1 Overview 1.2 Internal Program Coordination 1.3 Fiscal Analysis 1.4 Legal Authority 1.5 Annual Report Organization 2 Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections 2.1 Overview 2.2 Control 2.3 ID1 – Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Detection 2.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 2-1 2.3.2 Assessment 2-2 2.4 ID2 – Illicit Discharges Investigation and Clean-Up 2.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 2-6 2.4.2 Assessment 2-7 2.5 ID3–Illegal Connections Identification and Elimination 2-11 2.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation 2-11 2.5.2 Assessment 2-11 2.6 ID4 – Enforcement 2-15 2.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 2-15 2.6.2 Assessment 2-15 3. Public Outreach and Education 3.1 Overview 3.2 Control 3.3 PO1 – 24-hour Hotline Number 3.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 3-1 3.3.2 Assessment 3-1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto iii September 2013 Annual Progress Report 3.4 PO2 – Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Outreach 3.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 3-4 3.4.2 Assessment 3-4 3.5 PO3 – Industrial and Commercial Business Outreach 3.5.1 2008-2012 Implementation 3-5 3.5.2 Assessment 3-5 3.6 PO4 – Construction Outreach 3.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 3-8 3.6.2 Assessment 3-8 3.7 PO5 – Elementary School Outreach 3-10 3.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation 3-10 3.7.2 Assessment 3-10 3.8 PO6 – General Public Outreach, Education, and Participation 3-12 3.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation 3-12 3.8.2 Assessment 3-12 4. Municipal Operations Program Element 4.1 Overview 4.2 Control 4.3 MO1 – Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response 4.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-1 4.3.2 Assessment 4-2 4.4 MO2 – Pollution Prevention at City-Owned Facilities 4.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-4 4.4.2 Assessment 4-4 4.5 MO3 – Landscape and Pest Management 4.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-6 4.5.2 Assessment 4-6 4.6 MO4 – Storm Drain System Maintenance 4.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-8 4.6.2 Assessment 4-8 4.7 MO5 – Street Cleaning and Maintenance 4-17 4.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-17 4.7.2 Assessment 4-18 4.8 MO6 – Parking Infrastructure Maintenance 4-21 4.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-21 4.8.2 Assessment 4-21 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto iv September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4.9 MO7 – Emergency Procedures 4-23 4.9.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-23 4.9.2 Assessment 4-24 4.10 MO8 – Fire Department Activities 4-24 4.10.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-24 4.10.2 Assessment 4-24 4.11 MO9 – Training 4-25 4.11.1 2008-2013 Implementation 4-25 4.11.2 Assessment 4-26 5. Industrial and Commercial Businesses 5.1. Overview 5.2. Control 5.3. IC1 – Industrial and Commercial Business Database 5.3.1. 2008-2013 Implementation 5-1 5.3.2. Assessment 5-1 5.4. IC2 – Prioritization and Inspection 5.4.1. 2008-2013 Implementation 5-5 5.4.2. Assessment 5-5 5.5. IC3 – BMP Implementation at Businesses 5.5.1. 2008-2013 Implementation 5-9 5.5.2. Assessment 5-9 5.6. IC4 – Enforcement 5-11 5.6.1. 2008-2013 Implementation 5-11 5.6.2. Assessment 5-12 5.7. IC5 – Training 5-14 5.7.1. 2008-2013 Implementation 5-14 5.7.2. Assessment 5-15 6 Construction Program Element 6.1 Overview 6.2 Control 6.3 CO1 – Construction Program Legal Authority 6.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-1 6.3.2 Assessment 6-2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto v September 2013 Annual Progress Report 6.4 CO2 – Plan Review and Approval Process 6.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-3 6.4.2 Assessment 6-3 6.5 CO3 – Construction Projects Database 6.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-5 6.5.2 Assessment 6-5 6.6 CO4 – Pollution Prevention at Capital Improvement Projects 6.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-6 6.6.2 Assessment 6-6 6.7 CO5 – Construction Site BMP Implementation and Inspection 6-10 6.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-10 6.7.2 Assessment 6-10 6.8 CO6 – Enforcement 6-14 6.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-14 6.8.2 Assessment 6-14 6.9 CO7 – Training 6-16 6.9.1 2008-2013 Implementation 6-16 6.9.2 Assessment 6-16 7. Planning and Land Development Program Element 7.1 Overview 7.2 Control 7.3 LD1 – Incorporation of Water Quality Protection into Procedures and Policies 7.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 7-1 7.3.2 Assessment 7-2 7.4 LD2 – New Development Standards 7.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 7-3 7.4.2 Assessment 7-4 7.5 LD3 – Plan Review Sign-Off 7.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation 7-5 7.5.2 Assessment 7-5 7.6 LD4 – Maintenance Agreement and Transfer 7.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 7-7 7.6.2 Assessment 7-7 7.7 LD5 – Training 7-14 7.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation 7-14 7.7.2 Assessment 7-14 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto vi September 2013 Annual Progress Report 8. Water Quality Based Program Element 8.1 Overview 8.2 WQ1 – Discharge Characterization 8.2.1 2008-2013 Implementation 8-2 8.2.2 Assessment 8-2 8.3 WQ2 – Pesticide Plan 8.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 8-5 8.3.2 Assessment 8-5 8.4 WQ3 – Rockwell Assessment 8.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 8-9 8.4.2 Assessment 8-10 8.5 WQ4 – Peak Discharge Impact Study 8-13 8.5.1 2008-2013 8.5.2 8.6 WQ5 – Treatment Feasibility Study 8-19 8.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 8-19 8.6.2 Assessment 8-19 9. Monitoring Program Element 9.1 Overview 9.2 Monitoring Tasks 9.3 MP1 – Receiving Water Monitoring 9.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-1 9.3.2 Assessment 9-2 9.4 MP2 – Urban Discharge Monitoring 9-17 9.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-17 9.4.2 Assessment 9-17 9.5 MP3 – Detention Basin Monitoring 9-22 9.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-22 9.5.2 Assessment 9-22 9.6 MP4 – Dry Weather Characterization 9-26 9.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-26 9.6.2 Assessment 9-26 9.7 MP5 – Bioassessment Monitoring 9-29 9.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-29 9.7.2 Assessment 9-29 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto vii September 2013 Annual Progress Report 9.8 MP6 – BMP Effectiveness Study 9-30 9.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-30 9.8.2 Assessment 9-31 9.9 MP7 – Data Management 9-32 9.9.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-32 9.9.2 Assessment 9-32 9.10 MP8 – Training 9-33 9.10.1 2008-2013 Implementation 9-33 9.10.2 Assessment 9-33 10 Program Implementation, Evaluation and Reporting 10-1 10.1 Program Implementation 10-1 10.2 Identified Risk to Receiving Water Quality 10-1 10.3 Special Studies 10-2 10.4 Program Effectiveness Evaluation 10-2 10.5 Annual Progress Report 10-3 List of Appendices Appendix A - Stormwater Program Management and Report Introduction - City Department Organization Charts Appendix B - Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections - Illicit Discharge Call Statistics - Modesto Fire Department Hazmat Incidents with Detail Log - Illicit Discharge Map - SSO Discharge Map - Enforcement Response Plan Appendix C - Public Outreach and Education - Mobile Washers and Cleaners Spanish - FOG Spanish Appendix D - Municipal Operations Program Element - Modesto SSO-Backup Response Plan - SSO Cleanup Procedure ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto viii September 2013 Annual Progress Report - Storm Drain SOP - Modesto Pesticide Use - Contract Language - Addendum No. 1 - Modesto Landscape MP - Landscape Maintenance BMP - Landscape Maintenance BMP Spanish - Curb Markers - Special Event Guidelines - Special Event Permit - Storm Basins & Pump Stations - Storm Pump Station Volumes - Street Sweeping BMP - Street Maintenance BMP - Water Line Repair BMP - Curbs, Gutters, & Sidewalks BMP - Suggested EOP BMP - Non-Emergency Fire Fighting BMP - Illicit Discharge Cards Appendix E - Industrial and Commercial Businesses - SIC Codes - Facilities Subject to Inspection - 2012-2013 Facilities Inspected - Risk Commercial Industrial Appendix F - Construction Program Element - Plan Review Checklist - Active Construction Projects Database - Construction Site Inspection Checklist - Stormwater Device Inspection Checklist Appendix G - Planning and Land Development Program Element - Self-Certification - Certification of Maintenance - Treatment Control Inspection Appendix H - Water Quality Based Program Element There are no appendices for Section 8 Appendix I - Monitoring Program Element - 2012-2013 Dry Weather Data - 2012-2013 First Flush Data - Laboratory Data and Chains of Custody (available on CD only) - Weather Forecasts MID Rainfall 2012-13 ---PAGE BREAK--- Table of Contents City of Modesto ix September 2013 Annual Progress Report Weather 03 19 13 Weather 03 31 13 Weather 04 04 13 Weather Reports Post Storm 04 04 13 - Exceedance Notification - 2012-2013 Basin and Rockwell Sampling Data 2012-13 Basin Sampling & Rockwell Sampling Basin 8_2012 Basin 9_2012 Rockwell 8_2012 Rockwell 9_2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto x September 2013 Annual Progress Report List of Figures Section ID1 – Hotline Calls Regarding Water Pollution Complaints, By Reporting Year 2 ID2 – Materials Released 2 ID4 – Enforcement Actions, Number and Type, By Reporting Year 2 PO1 – Number and type of Hotline Calls 3 PO3 - Summary of Brochures Distributed with New Business Licenses 3 PO3 - Number of Brochures Distributed to Target Businesses 3 PO3 - Brochures Distributed During Stormwater Inspections 3 PO4 - Construction Tailgate Sessions 3 PO6 - Total Impressions Made 3 MO1 – Summary of SSOs 4 MO3 – Pesticide Active Ingredients Applied by City Departments and City-hired Landscapers 4 MO4 – Storm Drain Maintenance – Catch Basins 4 MO4 – Total Amount of Materials/Debris Removed From Catch Basins 4 MO4 – Pump Station Maintenance 4 MO5 – Street Sweeping 4 MO5 – Tons of Debris Removed/Curb Mile Swept 4 IC3 - Industrial and Commercial Business BMP Compliance 5 IC4 – Enforcement 5 IC4 - Referrals to Regional Water Board 5 IC5 - Training for Key Staff including Fire, Police and Municipal Operations 5 CO4 – Active CIP Construction Sites and Submittals of 6 CO5 – Construction Site BMP Implementation and Inspection (High Priority) 6 CO6 – Construction Enforcement Actions 6 WQ4 - Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2001 8 WQ4 – Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2002 8 WQ4 – Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2006 8 WQ4 – McClure Outfall into Dry Creek 8 WQ4 – Dry Creek Flooding at Moose Park 8 WQ4 – Dry Creek Erosion at Moose Park 8 WQ4 – Dry Creek Down 2006 8 WQ4 – Dry Creek Down 2012 8 MP1 - Receiving Water Sampling Locations 9 MP1 - FC / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - E.coli / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - Al / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - Copper / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - Zinc / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - Lead /TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - Turbidity / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - TDS / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - pH / TSS Correlation 9 MP1 - Iron / TSS Correlation 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xi September 2013 Annual Progress Report List of Tables Table 1-1: City Departments Associated with Stormwater Program Implementation Table 1-2: Primary Stormwater Program Contact Table 1-3: Fiscal Analysis Table 1-4: Summary of ROWD/SWMP/Annual Report Organization Table 2-1: Existing Control Measures for Illicit Discharges & Illegal Connections Table 2-2: Summary of Illicit Discharge Cases Reported/Referred to Outside Agencies Table 2-3: Summary of Potential Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Reported by Field Staff Table 2-4: Summary of Illicit Discharge Complaints, Verification of Complaints & Response Time Table 2-5: Summary of Materials Released During the Permit Term Table 2-6: Summary of Illicit Discharges by Type of Material Table 2-7: Number of Illegal Connections Identified by Planning/Land Development Reviews Table 2-8: Number of Illegal Connections Identified through Construction Project Inspections Table 2-9: Source and Nature of Illegal Connections Table 2-10: Summary of Illegal Connections Reported and Eliminated Table 2-11: Summary of Number and Type of Enforcement Actions Table 2-12: Summary of Repeat Offenders and Problem Areas Table 3-1: Existing Control Measures for Public Outreach and Education Table 3-2: Summary of Hotline Calls Received Table 3-3: Summary of Used Oil Collected for Recycling Table 3-4: Summary of Brochures Distributed to New Businesses Table 3-5: Summary of Brochures Distributed during Inspections Table 3-6: Summary of Brochures Distributed with Building Permit Approvals Table 3-7: Summary of Tailgate Sessions Table 3-8: Summary of 4th Grade Presentation Outreach Effort Table 3-9: Number of Impressions Made Table 3-10: Summary of Impressions by Target Audience Table 3-11: Summary of Outreach Materials and Available Languages Table 3-12: Grass-roots Clean-up Days and Accomplishments Table 4-1: Existing Control Measures for Municipal Operations Table 4-2: Summary of City Vehicles Equipped with Sand/Gravel Bags Table 4-3: Summary of Issues Identified During Annual Inspections of City-Owned IGP Facilities Table 4-4: Total Number of Existing City-Owned Facilities with Wash Areas Table 4-6: Summary of Landscape Maintenance Contractor Audits Table 4-7: Summary of the Number of Catch Basins and Priority ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xii September 2013 Annual Progress Report List of Tables Table 4-8: Summary of High and Medium Priority Cross-Pipe Cleaning Table 4-9: Summary of Catch Basin Markers Table 4-10: Catch Basin Marker Summary Statistics Table 4-11: Summary of Special Event Permits Table 4-12: Summary of Detention and Retention Basin Inspections Table 4-13: Summary of Street Sweeping Evaluation Table 4-14: Summary of Green Waste and Leaves Removed Table 4-15: Summary of City-Owned/Operated Public Parking Facilities Table 4-16: Summary of Parking Lot Inspections Table 4-17: Areas of Focus for the Municipal Operations Program Training Table 4-18: Summary of Training Sessions Conducted for Key Staff Table 4-19: Summary of Internal Training Survey Results Table 4-20: Summary of Wallet Card Distribution Table 5-1: Existing Control Measures for Industrial and Commercial Businesses Table 5-2: Industrial and Commercial Inventory Summary Table 5-3: Summary of Type of Industrial & Commercial Facilities in the Storm Water Inspection Inventory Table 5-4: Commercial and Industrial Facility Prioritization Summary Table 5-5: Results of Business Scheduled for Inspections Table 5-6: Summary of Scheduled Inspections Completed to Date. Table 5-7: Summary of Low Priority Business Inspections Completed to Date Table 5-8: Summary of Inspected Facilities Implementing Appropriate BMPs Table 5-9: Percentage of Inspected Facilities Implementing Appropriate BMPs Table 5-10: Summary of Enforcement Actions for the Permit Term Table 5-11: Areas of Focus for the Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program Training Table 6-1: Existing Control Measures for Construction Plan Review and Inspection Table 6-2: Summary of the Grading Permits Issued and Local Reviewed Table 6-3: Construction Sites Tracked in the City’s Database: Table 6-4: Summary of CIP Pre-Construction Meetings Table 6-5: Summary of CIPs Reviewed for Stormwater Requirement Compliance Table 6-6: Summary of CIP Construction Site Inspections Table 6-7: Summary of Low Priority Construction Site Inspections Table 6-8: Summary of the Number and Type of Referrals Made During the Reporting Period Table 6-9: Areas of Focus for the Construction Program Training Table 7-1: The Planning and Land Development Control Measures for the 2008-2013 Permit Term ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xiii September 2013 Annual Progress Report List of Tables Table 7-2: Summary of Internal and External Stakeholder Meetings Table 7-3: Summary of Reviewed Projects Table 7-4: Summary of Priority Projects Review Table 7-5: Summary of Maintenance Agreements Executed Table 7-6: Summary of Post Construction Treatment Control Self-Certifications Table 7-7: Summary of Post Construction Treatment Control Inspections Table 7-8: Summary of BMP Maintenance Conducted and Problems Identified* Table 7-9: Areas of Focus for the Planning and Land Development Program Training Table 8-1: Work Plan for Water Quality Table 8-2: Urban Runoff POC Monitoring Summary Table 8-3: Receiving Water POC Monitoring Summary Table 8-4: Summary of City Staff Attendance at UPC and IPM Meetings Table 8-5: Estimated Amount of Pesticides Dropped off at HHW Facility Table 8-6: Rockwell Assessment Sites for the 2008-2013 Permit Term Table 9-1: Existing Monitoring Program Tasks Table 9-2: Receiving Water Monitoring Locations Table 9-3: Receiving Water Sampling Constituent List Table 9-4: Summary of Sediment Toxicity Testing Table 9-5: Summary of Receiving Water WQO Exceedances Table 9-6: Urban Discharge Monitoring Locations Table 9-7: Summary of Urban Discharge WQO Exceedances Table 9-8: Detention Basins Monitoring Locations Table 9-9: Detention Basin Sampling Constituent List Table 9-10: Outfalls Greater than 24 Inches Monitored Table 9-11: Dry Weather Characterization Sampling Constituent List Table 9-12: Summary of Dry Weather Characterization of Outfalls Greater than 24 inches Table 9-13: Areas of Focus for the Monitoring Program Training List of Acronyms ADP Acoustic dopler profiler BAT Best available technology economically achievable BCT Best conventional pollutant control technology ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xiv September 2013 Annual Progress Report BOD Biochemical oxygen demand BMP Best Management Practice CASQA California Stormwater Quality Association CDFG California Department of Fish and Game CEDD Community and Economic Development Department CEHA California Environmental Health Association CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CIP Capital Improvement Project CO Construction Program COD Chemical oxygen demand DO Dissolved oxygen CSBP California Stream Bioassessment Procedures CTR California Toxics Rule CWEA California Water Environment Association DPR Department of Pesticide Regulation EIR Environmental Impact Report EPA Environmental Protection Agency ERP Enforcement Response Plan FPPP Facility Pollution Prevention Plan FRO First Responder Operational Greater Central Valley Collection System GIS Geographical information system HDP Heat dissipation probe HHW Household hazardous waste IC Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program ID Illicit Discharges and Illegal Discharge Program IPM Integrated Pest Management IWD Industrial Waste Division LD Planning and Land Development LID Low impact development LUP Linear underground/overhead projects MBAS Methylene blue active substances MEP Maximum extent practicable ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xv September 2013 Annual Progress Report MID Modesto Irrigation District MO Municipal Operations MP Monitoring Program MPN Most probable number MS4 Municipal storm separate storm sewer system N/A Not applicable NEAT Neighborhood Environmental Action Team NEC No Exposure Certification NOI Notice of Intent NOV Notice of Violation NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System NTU Nephelometric Turbidity Unit O&M Operations and Maintenance OP Organophosphate (pesticide) OSH Orchard Supply and Hardware PCO Pest control operator PO Public Outreach and Public Education Program POC Pollutant of concern POI Pollutant of interest QA/QC Quality Assurance/Quality Control RAP Rockwell Awareness Program RFP Request for Proposal RGO Retail gasoline outlet ROWD Report of Waste Discharge RWQE Report of Water Quality Exceedance SIC Standard Industrial Classification SSO Sanitary sewer overflow SSOP Site-specific operating procedure SWMP Stormwater Management Plan Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan TDS Total dissolved substances TFS Treatment Feasibility Study TIE Toxicity Identification Evaluation ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xvi September 2013 Annual Progress Report TMDL Total maximum daily load TOC Total organic carbon TPH Total petroleum hydrocarbons TRE Toxicity Reduction Evaluation TSS Total suspended solids UC University of California UPC Urban Pesticide Committee US United States USGS United States Geological Survey WDID Waste Discharge Identification WQ Water Quality-based Program WQF Water quality flow WQO Water quality objective WQV Water quality volume ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto xvii September 2013 Annual Progress Report ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Executive Summary This Annual Progress Report represents the fifth progress report under the City of Modesto’s stormwater permit (Order R5-2008-0092) that was issued on June 13, 2008, by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Following reissuance of the permit the City submitted an administrative draft Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) on December 1, 2008, which was subsequently revised based on comments and resubmitted on August 17, 2009. The SWMP was adopted by the in December 2009 (Resolution R5- 2009-0119). The City’s SWMP includes an Effectiveness Assessment Strategy, which is used to determine whether the City’s stormwater management program1 is achieving intended outcomes, and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality. Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the Control Measures and Program Elements. The effectiveness assessment is expected to change from year to year as new information is learned and trends are assessed. In this third year of the permit, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Level 1. Highlights of each Program Element and Monitoring Program for the reporting year 2012-2013 are noted below. Program Management Internal coordination with six major City departments (and numerous divisions) continued to result in effective implementation of the requirements of the stormwater management program. The current economic downturn continues to impact the City, in a similar manner as many other municipalities, and fewer resources were available to the stormwater program (and likewise for other City activities). As a result of this paradigm shift, City staff took over many of the tasks formally done by outside consultants. The estimated budget for the coming year shows reductions in several of the programs, but overall the budget is higher because of additional resources allocated for street cleaning and sweeping that support the stormwater program Control Measures. Program Management achievements were realized with the approval of the SWMP by the continued management of the overall program, and the development of the Annual Progress Report. The SWMP is organized around Program Elements which include: Program Management, Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections, Public Education and Outreach, Municipal Operations, Industrial and Commercial Businesses, Construction, Planning and Land Development, Water Quality Based Programs, and Monitoring. Internal coordination with major City departments (and numerous divisions) continued to result in effective implementation of the requirements of the stormwater management program. In addition to coordination with City Departments, City Staff took over many of the tasks of the management programs in response to several years of economic downturn. In 2012, the economy showed some signs of recovery. The economy continue to show size of improvement ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report as indicated by the recent California and Metro Forecast by the Business Forecasting Center at the University of the Pacific in Stockton which calls for real gross state product to grow by 2.5 percent in 2012 and 2013. This growth is ahead of the national average of 2 percent. In addition, California job growth is predicted to increase by 1.8 percent over the next two years compared to 1.5 percent nationally. Growth within the Modesto metropolitan area is expected to parallel California with an expected increase of 1.5 percent towards the end of 2013 with a steady increase in jobs with the construction and manufacturing industries of 5.4 and 2.4 percent respectively. Overall, job growth is expected to reduce the unemployment rate to 14.4 percent towards the end of 2013 and 11.9 percent by 20161. City Staff was able to manage all of the elements identified within the SWMP, and have maintained a budget for the last two years that was within The estimated budget for the coming year shows reductions in consulting services but overall the budget is higher because of additional resources allocated for street cleaning and sweeping that support the stormwater program Control Measures. Listed below are the accomplishments per section by City Staff during the permit term. SECTION 2 ILLICIT DISCHARGE AND ILLEGAL CONNECTIONS Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit term achievements associated with Section 2 Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connections. The full lists of permit achievements are listed in Section 2. ID1 – Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Detection The City maintained and advertised the 24-hour hotline over the permit term. (Level 1) Over the current permit term the hotline has received approximately 1,653 calls, including 789 calls from the public, 853 calls from City Staff, and 11 calls from outside agencies. (Level 1) Both Public and City Staff reports of water pollution have decreased each year. The decrease of calls is attributed to an increase of awareness based on the City’s outreach and training efforts. (Level 2) The Pollution Investigation Report was last revised in 2010 and reviewed each subsequent year. (Level 1) The City coordinated with 10 other City Divisions and three external agencies. (Level 1) Coordination and training was performed on response, ID/IC identification, and reporting. (Level 2) Reporting procedures were reviewed twice during the permit term. (Level 1) No illegal connections were discovered during the Dry Weather Monitoring. City Field Staff identified, illicit discharges, illegal connections and reported all incidents to the Stormwater Program. (Level 1) 1 http://www.cvbizjournal.com/local-news/forecast-calls-for-continued-slow-steady-economic-recovery-in- central-valley.html ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ID2 – Illicit Discharges Investigation and Clean-Up 100% of notifications/complaints of illicit discharges were investigated within one business day. (Level 1) City field staff verified a total of 1,322 illicit discharges during the permit term (to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year). (Level 1) Sources of illicit discharge reports include the hotline, various City Department/Divisions City staff developed and refined a PIR which is used exclusively. (Level 1) Abatement, containment and cleanup is coordinate between Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources (DER), the Fire Department, the Collection Division, Streets, Solid Waste and others that are needed to assist with an illicit discharge. (Level 1) An agreement is in place with DER Hazardous Materials Division. (Level 1) Illicit Discharges are recorded and mapped using the City’s Database and GIS mapping. (Level 1) The Database was audited and upgraded during the permit term. (Level 1 & 2) ID3–Illegal Connections Identification and Elimination Planning and Land Development department reviewed improvement plans for compliance with City of Modesto Stormwater requirements. (Level 1) Out of 169 plan sets were reviewed, one potential illegal connection was identified. (Level 1) 100% of identified potential illegal connections identified during plan review were required to undergo revisions. (Level 2) There were no illegal connections identified during construction inspections during the permit term. (Level 1) 10 potential illegal connections were identified during the permit term through investigations, and all were investigated within 21 days. (Level 1) 9 illegal connections were confirmed by investigation during the permit term. (Level 1) ID4 – Enforcement Numbers and types of enforcement were recorded in the City’s database. (Level 1) 807 total enforcement actions were taken during the permit term. (Level 1) Only two responsible parties were involved in three or more incidents over the permit term. (Level 2) Only two sites were impacted three or more times during the permit term. (Level 3) An audit of the tracking of enforcement actions was performed in the 2010/2011 permit year. (Level 1) 100% of the confirmed illegal connections were eliminated within 180 days. (Level 2) Modesto Municipal Code 5-10.501 Enforcement Powers gives the City the authority to enforce the Stormwater Management Program, including Cease and Desist orders 10.501(b)(5)]. City trained key staff in the illicit discharge and illegal connection program. (Level 1) Over the permit term 38 training sessions took place with 1,142 participants. (Level 1) Pre- and post- training test scores showed 7.5% to 37% aptitude improvement. (Level 2) The training strategy was reviewed twice during the permit term in 2008-2009 and 2010- 2011. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report City has ranked illicit discharges by risk to the receiving water quality, and has determined that private lateral and public sanitary sewer overflows are the largest risk to receiving water followed by hazardous material, organics and petroleum. (Level 1) SECTION 3 PUBLIC EDUCATION, OUTREACH, AND PARTICIPATION Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 3 Public Outreach and Education. The full list of permit achievements is listed in Section 3. PO1 – 24-hour Hotline Number The City received 2,810 calls through the hotline During the last two years, hotline reports of clogged catch basins have decreased by approximately 80% from the 2009/2010 report volume. This is attributed to increased efficiencies in the maintenance program, which has allowed for increased frequency of cleaning. Over the permit term, the reports of illicit discharges have decreased each year. This is attributed to an increased awareness through the City’s focused outreach materials. The City updated the website to include specific Environmental Compliance information that includes Stormwater BMP Brochures and the 24-hour hotline. Door hangers were distributed in areas where illicit discharges occurred as resources permitted. The City produced a Tale of Two Neighbors video 3,457 total BMP brochures were distributed during the permit term up to the 2011-2012 permit year which included translation of 17 types of out reach materials into Spanish. Workshops were held during the 2009-2010 year when the Construction General Permit was adopted which included 98 tailgate sessions with a total of 244 participants over the permit term. “Go with the Flow” video and activity booklet with corresponding questions from the video was developed and was supplied to the elementary schools. City outreach efforts are estimated to have made more than 111 million impressions during the permit term. The City conducted a public opinion survey in 2009-2010. 3,400 volunteers collected and removed more than 70 tons of litter and debris from Modesto neighborhoods, parks and trails. Advertisements, City utility bill inserts and participation in community events were used to promote the Used Oil Program during the permit term. PO2 – Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Outreach Door hangers were distributed in areas where illicit discharges occurred as resources permitted. (Level 2) During the permit term 704,182 gallons of used oil was collected and recycled. (Level 3) The City produced a Tale of Two Neighbors video. (Level 2) PO3 – Industrial and Commercial Business Outreach 380 target-specific brochures were distributed to businesses renewing or obtaining new business licenses over the permit term. (Level 1) The City distributed 9,645 general stormwater brochures to businesses renewing or obtaining new business licenses over the permit term. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report A BMP fact sheet for Mobile Washers and Cleaners was developed during the permit term, and was distributed during inspections. (Level 1) A BMP fact sheet was developed for Equipment Rentals, Kennels and Nurseries at the beginning of the permit term, was distributed to new businesses by the Business Licensing Division and made available on the City’s website. (Level 2) PO4 – Construction Outreach 11,828 total BMP brochures were distributed during the permit term. (Level 1) 362 BMP brochures were distributed during inspections over the permit term. (Level 2) 3,396 BMP brochures were distributed with building permit approvals. (Level 2) The City updated construction BMP brochures for revised Construction General Permit conditions during the permit term. (Level 1) Workshops were held during the 2009-2010 year when the Construction General Permit was adopted. (Level 1) 107 tailgate sessions were performed over the permit term which included 262 participants. (Level 2) The City determined that is preferable to continue its own school education program which allows the City staff to personalize the program to our needs and programs. PO5 – Elementary School Outreach The program goal of reaching 50% of the fourth graders (as a running two-year average) was achieved. “Go with the Flow” video and activity booklet with corresponding questions from the video was developed and was supplied to the elementary schools. PO6 – General Public Outreach, Education, and Participation City outreach efforts are estimated to have made more than 347 million impressions during the permit term. (Level 2) The City distributed outreach materials targeting automobile repair and maintenance, automobile washing, disposal of household hazardous waste, and home and garden care activities and product use. (Level 2) The City developed a wide range of outreach materials targeting swimming pool cleaning and training, fall season leaves pick up, home improvement and construction activities, and household chemical disposal. (Level 2) The City conducted public opinion surveys in 2009-2010. (Level 1) In addition to 17 types of outreach materials in languages other than English, the City completed translation into Spanish of the Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Fountain BMP brochure and the Landscaping and Pest Control Brochure. (Level 2) More than 8,000 volunteers collected and removed more than 87 tons of litter and debris from Modesto neighborhoods, parks and trails. (Level 4) Advertisements, City utility bill inserts and participation in community events were used to promote the Used Oil Program during the permit term. (Level 2) The City made presentations to the City Council during the permit term. The presentations provided an opportunity for the Stormwater Program to inform city leaders, elected representatives, and the public about the stormwater program including its achievements and funding needs. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report SECTION 4 MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 4 Municipal Operations. The full lists of permit achievements are listed in Section 4. MO1 – Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response The City revised the Sanitary Sewer Overflow & Backup Response Plan in 2010, and implemented the revised response plan during the 2010-2011 permit year. As of June 25, 2013, the Plan is again being reviewed for possible updates. (Level 1) The City implemented a Standard Operating Procedure for the cleaning of storm drains and rockwells following an SSO. (Level 1) The City equipped primary response vehicles with sandbags to address stormwater related issues. (Level 1) Approximately 22% of City owned field vehicles were equipped with sand/gravel bags over the permit term; these are limited to primary response vehicles. (Level 3) Private lateral and public SSOs remained the largest category of incidents categorized by the City (39% of the total in 2012-2013). This was attributed to increased awareness of SSOs. (Level 3) Approximately 48% of the estimated volume of sewage released was recovered and removed from the environment in 2012-2013 (9,973 gallons recovered out of 20,959 gallons released). (Level 4) MO2 – Pollution Prevention at City-Owned Facilities The City of Modesto completed construction of a new transit facility in September 2012. A was developed for this facility in November 2012. The City Bus Yard, Modesto City Airport, and new City of Modesto Bus Maintenance Facility were inspected for BMP implementation and compliance. (Level 1) for the Airport and Bus Yard were reviewed and revised. (Level 1) During the inspection of various City owned facilities during the permit term, 21 deficiencies were noted and all were corrected. (Level 3) All City-owned or operated vehicle/equipment wash areas are self-contained, equipped with a sand/oil separator and connected to the sanitary sewer. (Level 1) MO3 – Landscape and Pest Management The City tracks pesticides and fertilizers applied by City Departments and City hired contractors. (Level 1) The City has approximately 800 acres of parks, of which approximately 275 acres are subject to IPM protocols. (Level 1) 3,189 gallons and 1,533 pounds of active ingredients were applied over the permit term. (Level 1) Contract language requiring stormwater and receiving water protection as well as IPM was added in June 2010. (Level 3) The Landscape Management Plan, which is a component of the park planning documents, was deemed not to need revision after the adoption of the 2008-2013 permit. The City conducted audits of City-hired landscape maintenance contractors for compliance with pesticide use contract requirements. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report MO4 – Storm Drain System Maintenance The City developed procedures for reporting incorrect storm drain system information. (Level 1) Language has been added to contracts requiring contractors to use IPM methods in detention basins. (Level 3) The East Side Mosquito Abatement District control mosquitos in detention basins through the addition of mosquito fish and mosquito pellets which alter the pH of the water, making it uninhabitable to mosquitoes and their larvae. These practices replaced the use of mosquito oil. (Level 3) The City’s 10,320 catch basins were classified based on priority: 817 were classified as High Priority; 1,295 as Medium Priority; and 8,208 as Low Priority. (Level 1) The City established a catch basin cleaning schedule that identifies maintenance interval based on catch basin’s prioritization. (Level 3) 5,214 high priority catch basin inspections and cleanings were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) Approximately 65 tons of material/debris were removed from high priority catch basins. (Level 4) 5,180 medium priority catch basin inspections and cleanings were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) Approximately 103 tons of material/debris were removed from medium priority catch basins. (Level 4) 16,427 low priority catch basin inspections and cleanings were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) 361,471 lineal feet of high and medium priority pipe was cleaned over the permit term. (Level 4) The City audited the catch basin cleaning frequency during the 2009-2010 permit year. (Level 1) At the end of the latest reporting period, 100% of the City’s catch basins were labeled with markers. (Level 1) During the permit term, the City discontinued the practice of installing plastic markers, and now installs stainless steel plates, with every storm drain marker now strategically being replaced with new metal markers. (Level 1) 2,183 markers were replaced during the permit term. (Level 1) The City developed provision of the Special Event Permits that require management of trash and litter at special events which can be reasonably expected to generate trash and litter. (Level 1) 442 Special Events were required to obtain and comply with the City’s Special Use Permit. (Level 1) All basins are inspected every 3 months, and all pump stations are inspected on a basis. (Level 1) Over the permit term, 16 basin inspections required follow-up action. (Level 1) 111 inspections were performed on 25 pump stations over the permit term. (Level 1) 101 cleanings were performed on 25 pump stations over the permit term. (Level 1) 298 tons of material/debris were removed from the pump stations over the permit term. (Level 4) Inspection and cleaning records were reviewed during the 2010-2011 permit year. No deficiencies were found. (Level 1) The City developed a Standard Operating Procedure for cleaning positive storm drain catch basins and rockwells. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report MO5 – Street Cleaning and Maintenance 270,473 total curb miles have been swept during the permit term. (Level 1) 14,898 tons of debris have been removed by street sweeping during the permit term. (Level 4) The City reviewed curb and gutter during sweeping operations and during stormwater inspections. (Level 1) The City implemented BMPs for street sweeping activities including green waste pickup, storage and disposal. (Level 1) The City picked up and removed 84,224 tons of green waste and 68,355 tons of leaves during the permit term. (Level 4) BMPs were developed for street maintenance and small construction projects. (Level 3) Implementation of these BMPs were audited, with no major deficiencies notes. (Level 1) MO6 – Parking Infrastructure Maintenance Downtown parking lots are inspected and swept weekly or as needed. (Level 1) Each parking garage is inspected daily and are swept and pressure washed with a vacuum scrubber to remove oil and debris from the deck as needed (at least weekly). (Level 1) Deficiencies in cleaning are addresses as required. (Level 1) 22 smaller public parking lots associated with parks and community recreation facilities were inspected once per week and swept three times per year. However, due to budget constraints, sweeping of these lots has been discontinued and leaf/litter debris are cleaned up three times per year. The parks are still inspected weekly. (Level 1) 12,651 inspections of parking lots/garages were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) MO7 – EMERGENCY PROCEDURES No emergencies occurred during the permit term. BMPs were developed to minimize environmental damages. (Level 3) These BMPs were completed in May 2011 and forwarded to the Fire Marshall for inclusion in the updated Emergency Operations Plan (EOP); however, they have yet to be included into the EOP. (Level 3) MO8 – Fire Department Activities The Wastewater Division of Public Works established an agreement with the Fire Department for assistance when responding to illicit discharges in identification of unknown substances, which includes a five-step test to determine disposal of unknown substances. (Level 3) The Fire Department developed and implemented a series of BMPs to protect stormwater. (Level 3) Non-emergency fire fighting flows are addressed by a written procedure of Best Management Practices, which is current and enforced. (Level 3) MO9 – Training During the permit term, 7 key City Departments were trained on applicable stormwater topics. (Level 1) Pre- and post- training survey scores indicated an improvement in the subject area of 26.75%. (Level 2) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City distributes Illicit Discharge cards at all municipal stormwater training sessions. (Level 1) 646 wallet cards were distributed during the permit term. (Level 1) The City reviewed the municipal operations training manual, and incorporated printed material, slides, an informational video and pre- and post- tests to gauge the effectiveness of the training. (Level 1) SECTION 5 INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 5 Industrial and Commercial. The full list of permit achievements are listed in Section 5. IC1 – Industrial and Commercial Business Database The database inventory information is current as of June 30, 2013: (Level 1) a. 13 industrial facilities b. 544 commercial facilities c. 977 temporary or intermittent sources d. 198 facilities with NECs e. 473 facilities with no discharges f. 210 facilities to be inspected During the 2012-2013 year, businesses were reviewed for priority. (Level 1) The number of significant sources was increased as a result of auditing the database. (Level 1) The inventory of businesses that are included in the stormwater database for inspection is now 557. (Level 1) The inventory of businesses that are now considered intermittent, temporary, NEC or inactive is 1,648. (Level 1) The most common types of industrial and commercial facilities in the stormwater inspection inventory are: Restaurants (210 facilities), followed by Auto repair shops (63 facilities), and Auto dealers (31 facilities). (Level 1) The most common types of temporary or intermittent sources with identified facility types are: General building contractors (345 facilities) and Landscape installation/ maintenance (334 facilities). (Level 1) IC2 – Prioritization and Inspection The City prioritized businesses by activity type and then assesses the risk involving discharge and storm drainage system. (Level 1) Inspection frequencies were determined by business priority. (Level 1) Of the 13 industrial facilities included in the database, all 13 (100%) are prioritized for inspection. (Level 3) Of the 1,534 commercial facilities included in the database, 544 (35%) are prioritized for inspection. (Level 3) The City is developing an inventory of mobile washers in the 2012-2013 permit year. Results and recommendations will be reported and discussed in the 2012-2013 Annual Progress Report. (Level 1) 1,399 scheduled inspections (high priority) were identified. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Of these, 1,024 inspections have been completed as of the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. (Level 1) Of these, 967 inspections had a satisfactory result. (Level 3) 557 unscheduled inspections (low priority) were performed. (Level 1) As a result of the inspection, 14 facilities were upgraded to high priority. (Level 1) During 2012-2013 inspections, prioritization of each business was re-evaluated. Based on the inspections, 151 businesses were changed to low priority and were removed from the regular inspection schedule. They will remain in the database and will be treated as intermittent / temporary sources. (Level 1) Additional prioritization is planned for the 2012-2013 permit term, and will be included in the 2012-2013 Annual Progress Report. (Level 1) IC3 – BMP Implementation at Businesses Refer to Section 3 for BMP distribution information. During the permit term, the 1,062 inspected facilities were determined to be implementing appropriate BMPs. (Level 3) The number of inspections where appropriate BMPs were found at Retail gasoline outlets has increased from 64% during the 2011-2012 permit year to 100% during the 2012-2013 permit year. (Level 3) The City has developed a risk based assessment to evaluate the risk of facilities to receiving water quality. IC4 – Enforcement During the permit term, the City issued: 118 verbal warnings, 197 Notices of Violation, 11 Citations, and 27 written warnings. (Level 2) The annual total number of enforcement responses has varied over the permit term. (Level 2) Over the permit term, 8 significant violators of the Stormwater Ordinance were referred to the Regional Board. (Level 3) Over the permit term, 9 potential industrial general permit violators were referred to the Regional Board. (Level 3) IC5 – Training Over the permit term, 956 key staff has been trained. (Level 1) Refer to Section 4 for more detailed discussion and summary of municipal training. SECTION 6 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 6 Construction Program. The full lists of permit achievements are listed in Section 6. CO1 – Construction Program Legal Authority The City’s Land Development & Engineering revised the Erosion and Sediment Control Standards as part of the revisions made to the Guidance Manual for New Development and Redevelopment in 2010-2011. (Level 1) Review and update of the Municipal Code will be performed after the New Guidance Manual is adopted and approved by with Board approval tentatively scheduled for third quarter of 2013. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report CO2 – Plan Review and Approval Process The Environmental Compliance Section maintains a database to track plans reviewed and record selected BMP’s. (Level 1) The City reviewed and signed-off on grading and erosion plans and Construction during the permit term. (Level 1) 41 Grading Permits and 17,622 Building Permits were issued. (Level 1) 171 reviewed over this permit term. (Level 1) 41 met the City’s requirements during initial review. (Level 1) 149 met City requirements after revisions. (Level 3) City audited the grading notification process to ensure that all grading permits are tracked by the CEDD during 2010/2011. The audit confirmed the existing process captured most projects subject to stormwater regulations. (Level 1) The City audited the building permit process in May 2010 to ensure stormwater standards are being reviewed and met. A gap was identified regarding demolitions and the review process was altered to reroute demolitions to the Land Development Engineering Environmental Compliance (EC) Inspector for review. (Level 1) The City obtained access to Tidemark for the Stormwater Program staff during 2009/2010 and additional staff gained access during 2011/2012. CO3 – Construction Projects Database The City maintained Construction Projects Database which provides an inventory of projects tracking location, contact names, size, discharge location, selected post- construction BMPs, and construction site inspection dates and details. (Level 1) Over the permit term 219 private projects and 89 public projects were entered into the City’s Construction Project Database. (Level 1) The City audited its Construction Project Database during the 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 permit years. (Level 1) CO4 – Pollution Prevention at Capital Improvement Projects The City’s Land Development and Engineering Environmental Compliance Inspector or Construction Inspector attended all CIP pre-construction meetings with contractors and CIP inspectors during the permit term. (Level 1) The City reviewed applicable stormwater requirements for each CIP with the appropriate construction contractor(s) and developer(s). (Level 2) Over the permit term 32 CIP Construction were reviewed. (Level 1) 14 of the 32 reviewed CIP Construction met City and Construction General Permit Requirements on initial submission. (Level 1) 18 CIP Construction met City and Construction General Permit Requirements after review/revision. (Level 3) The City has developed Standard Specifications and notes for CIP design drawings that stipulate compliance with the Construction General Permit. (Level 2) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report During 2009/2010 the City updated standard contract language, to ensure that appropriate BMPs are required for all CIPs. (Level 1) 40 CIP Construction Sites were inspected during the permit term. (Level 1) 33 of the Inspected CIP Construction Sites were complying With (Level 3) 9 CIP Construction Site Enforcement Actions were taken over the permit term: 7 – Verbal and 2 - Field Notice of Violation. (Level 2) 0 Enforcement actions required beyond the 2 Field Notices of Violations. (Level 3) CO5 – Construction Site BMP Implementation and Inspection The City verbally informed City staff, developers, and contractors of the revised CASQA outline and referred to the CASQA document on plan check review transmittal letters. (Level 1) The Construction Projects Database was used to track compliance and enforcement at construction sites. (Level 1) The database tracks the construction site inspection activities including the violations noted and the corrective actions. (Level 1) The City audits the inspection database on an on-going basis to ensure the accuracy of the information. (Level 1) The City reviewed and revised the Standard Construction Site Inspection Checklist during the 2010-2011 permit year. (Level 1) 2,149 regular inspections of high priority sites were conducted. (Level 1) 55 follow-up inspections were conducted during the permit term. (Level 2) 100% were in compliance with City-required construction BMPs. (Level 3) Greater than 91% of inspected high priority sites were in Compliance with BMPs during regular inspections. (Level 3) 68 “as needed” inspections of low priority sites were conducted during the current permit term. (Level 1) 37 follow-up inspections were conducted during the current permit term. (Level 2) Greater than 88% of low priority construction sites were in compliance with City-required construction BMPs during the current permit term. (Level 3) CO6 – Enforcement 72 total enforcement actions were taken during the permit term. (Level 1) 5 of the 72 total enforcement actions resulted in legal action. (Level 3) The City reviewed the ERP and evaluated the enforcement triggers during the current term and determined that modifications were not necessary. (Level 1) 12 referrals were made to the Regional Board during the permit term. (Level 1) The inspection database was audited on an on-going basis throughout the current permit term. (Level 1) Contract language was revised in 2009-2010 to provide an enforcement process for city- owned projects. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report CO7 – Training The City identified areas of focus for key staff, which included Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs, development standards, Construction General Permit, Construction BMPs, BMP implementation, inspections and notifications. (Level 1) Training of key staff was conducted during the permit term, and is summarized in Section 4. (Level 1) The City reviewed its training strategy after the training conducted during 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 to assess the effectiveness of the message. (Level 2) Section 7 Planning and Land Development Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 7 Planning and Land Development. The full lists of permit achievements are listed in Section 7. LD1 – Incorporation of Water Quality Protection into Procedures and Policies The City reviewed the Master EIR to ensure that impacts on stormwater and non- stormwater runoff were evaluated. (Level 1) CEQA checklist was evaluated to ensure potential impacts were adequately addressed. (Level 1) The Director of Community & Economic Development has reviewed the existing General Plan language and determined that it adequately addresses the requirements of the City’s NPDES Permit. (Level 1) The Master EIR for the Modesto Urban Area was certified along with the General Plan update in October 2008. (Level 1) The next update to the General Plan is planned for 2013-2014. (Level 1) The CEQA Initial Study Template and Environmental Assessment Form of the Master EIR were revised to incorporate consideration for stormwater quality impacts and appropriate mitigation in October 2008. (Level 1) LD2 – New Development Standards The City’s 2011 Guidance Manual for New Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures was revised during the permit term to incorporate LID strategies. (Level 1) Stormwater treatment and source control sections have also been updated. (Level 1) The 2011 Guidance Manual was approved by the Regional Board on May 31, 2013 (Level The 2011Guidance Manual was adopted by the Modesto City Council on August 7, 2013. Stakeholder meetings were held as the document was being prepared, and further stakeholder meetings are planned now that the new development standards have been adopted. (Level 2) LD3 – Plan Review Sign-Off During the permit term, a total of 269 project plans were reviewed. (Level 1) 117 High Priority Development project plans were reviewed. (Level 1) 84 CIPs were reviewed. (Level 1) Priority projects reviewed during the permit term included 33 Parking Lots, 28 Commercial Developments, 19 Streets and Roads projects, 9 Restaurants, 9 Residential Subdivisions and 5 Retail Gas Outlets. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report LD4 – Maintenance Agreement and Transfer 54 Maintenance Agreements for priority projects were executed during the permit term. (Level 3) The City sent letters to the responsible party for operation and maintenance of post- construction treatment controls to notify the responsible party of required self- inspections. (Level 1) Owner-Operators of Post-Construction Treatment Control BMPs were required to self- certify and verify the maintenance of their treatment devices and return the Self- Certification Form to the City by April 30, 2013. (Level 2) The City tracked compliance with maintenance standards for post-construction BMPs maintained by the City and by private entities. (Level 3) 518 Owner-Operator Certifications were requested. (Level 3) 435 responded and reported that they were in compliance. (Level 3) When self-certification forms were not submitted, the City followed up with inspections. (Level 1) 17 issues were identified pertaining to media filtration devices. (Level 1) 2 issues were identified pertaining to infiltration basins. (Level 1) LD5 – Training The City identified areas of focus for training, which included stormwater maintenance agreement requirements, post-construction treatment controls, general stormwater quality issues, construction site BMPs, and new development standards. (Level 1) Training of key staff was conducted during the permit term, and is summarized in Section 4. (Level 2) The City reviewed its training strategy after the training conducted during 2010-2011 to assess the effectiveness of the message. (Level 1) Section 8 Water Quality Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 8 Water Quality. The full lists of permit achievements are listed in Section 8. WQ1 – Discharge Characterization During the 2008-2013 permit term, the City monitored stormwater discharges from urban runoff and receiving water as part of the Monitoring Program. (Level 1) Of the 10 POCs identified during the 2002-2007 permit term, 6 (lead, iron, total dissolved solids, diazinon, pH and turbidity) did not exceed receiving water quality objectives. (Level 4) Of the 10 POCs, 4 (Aluminum, Copper, Fecal Coliform and E.Coli) were reported to be present in concentrations that exceeded water quality objectives. (Level 1) Exceedances of receiving water quality objectives were reported to the Regional Board in accordance with the NPDES permit. (Level 1) WQ2 – Pesticide Plan The Pesticide Plan in closely integrated into the Municipal Operations Program Element (Section 4) and many of the outreach materials developed and distributed in the Public Outreach Education and Participation Program element address residential pesticide use. (Level 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City modified the Pesticide Control Operator contract language in June of 2010, tracked pesticide use by City-hired PCOs, compiled an inventory, and provided training (see Section (Level 3) The Stormwater Program participated in 1 of 5 UPC meetings and 9 of 20 IPM meetings during the permit term. (Level 1) During this permit term the City made 128,061 impressions regarding home and garden care activities and provided product use and provided fact sheets and other outreach materials that contained a less toxic pet control methods message. (Level 2) The City of Modesto conducted Pesticide Sales and Use Survey in 2010. Approximately 44% (177 of the 400) respondents indicated they use fertilizers or pesticides. Resident habits regarding disposal of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides were statistically comparable across the 2005, 2007 and 2010 surveys. (Level 1) The Landscape Management Plan specifically addresses pest control strategies outlined in IPM protocols including cultural controls. (Level 3) 25,336 pounds of Pesticides were dropped off at the County Household Hazardous Waste Facility in Modesto during the permit term. (Level 4) Information regarding pesticide disposal was available to the public from the City website. (Level 2) The City collaborated with stakeholders, which included the Modesto Irrigation District, the UPC, and the IPM group BASMAA over the permit term. (Level 1) The City conducted pesticide monitoring, including sediment toxicity during the permit term. (Level 1) During the permit term, it was determined that urban runoff did not contribute to water quality exceedances for Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos. Note: Chlorpyrifos exceeded WQO once during the permit term, in the 2009-2010 permit year, in the Dry Creek up and sampling locations, indicating that the receiving water was impacted prior to the City of Modesto discharge locations. There have been no exceedances reported for three permit years (2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013). (Level 4) WQ3 – Rockwell Assessment A groundwater flow model was developed for the City of Modesto to evaluate the flow direction and magnitude in the vicinity of selected rockwells. (Level 1) A total of 13 monitoring wells were advanced at six locations, including continuous monitoring instrumentation. (Level 1) As required by the SWMP, the monitoring wells were sampled four times, in August of 2011 and January, April and May of 2012. (Level 1) The analysis concluded that it is unlikely that the rockwells pose a significant risk of degradation of shallow groundwater quality in the Modesto area. (Level 4) WQ4 – Peak Discharge Impact Study A qualitative assessment of Dry Creek was conducted to determine the extent of erosion of natural stream channels and banks. (Level 1) A review of aerial photographs, show no discernible large scale changes to Dry Creek. (Level 1) Localized areas of erosion have been identified and will continue to be monitored for future evaluation (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report WQ5 – Treatment Feasibility Study A field investigation was conducted on April 29, and May 4, 2010, to characterize each storm drain system outfall. (Level 1) Forty outfalls that discharge directly into the receiving waters were evaluated. The numeric ratings were applied based upon the field investigations. Of the 40 outfalls investigated four were ranked with a score of 35 or more and will be prioritized for further evaluation. (Level 1) Complete results were submitted to the on June 29, 2010, followed by a Treatment Feasibility Study that was submitted in August, 2011. (Level 1) The Treatment Feasibility Study indicated that diversion of dry weather flow is not warranted at this time as pollutant loads from dry weather discharges are minimal, and removal of these loads from discharge to the receiving waters will have minimal to no impact on water quality; potential dry weather diversion volumes are small; and implementation of diversion alternatives are cost prohibitive for the minimal to no benefit received in improved water quality in Dry Creek or the Tuolumne River. (Level 4) Section 9 Monitoring Program Listed below is a summary of the 2008 - 2013 permit achievements associated with Section 9 Monitoring Program. The full lists of permit achievements are listed in Section 9. MP1 – Receiving Water Monitoring Receiving water monitoring was conducted in accordance with the NPDES permit. (Level 1) The Tuolumne River and Dry Creek up stream and locations were monitored in association with the first flush storm event, a wet event and once during dry weather. (Level 1) The Tuolumne River and Dry Creek up stream and locations were monitored for expanded constituent list during the 2011-2012 permit year. (Level 1) Short term chronic toxicity monitoring was conducted during the 2008-2009 and 2010- 2011 permit years. (Level 1) Toxicity testing in Dry Creek and Tuolumne River indicated toxicity for fathead minnow. During the permit term TIEs were not required, and no corresponding TRE Correction Action Reports were required. Baseline TIE 96-hour toxicity tests showed Fathead minnow survival was greater than 95% in undiluted sample water. Because the Baseline TIE toxicity tests failed to confirm initial toxicity, no further testing was conducted. (Level 6) No toxicity was present during the 2010-2011 water column toxicity monitoring. (Level 4) Sediment toxicity testing was conducted in 2008-2009 and 2011-2012. Sediment was collected from one dry weather monitoring event and from one post flush storm event. (Level 1) Receiving water monitoring resulted in exceedances of water quality objectives which were reported to the Regional Board during the permit term. (Level 1) Dry Creek water quality objectives were exceeded for aluminum, fecal coliform, specific conductance, copper (total) and copper (dissolved). (Level 1) Tuolumne River water quality objectives were exceeded for fecal coliform, copper (total) and turbidity. (Level 1) Reports of Water Quality Exceedances were prepared for each of the exceedances that occurred during this permit year. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-17 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Aluminum was reported to exceed WQO twice in 2010-2011 and 2011-2012, which is a 66% decrease from 2009-2010 permit year’s high of 6 exceedances. (Level 6) Fecal Coliform was reported to exceed WQO four times in 2011-2012, which is a 60% decrease from 2009-2010 permit year’s high of 10 exceedances (Level 6) The City experienced exceedances for Turbidity and D.O. in earlier monitoring years of the permit term. Neither of which were exceeded during the 2011-2012 or 2012-2013 permit years. (Level 6) MP2 – Urban Discharge Monitoring Urban runoff monitoring was conducted in accordance with the NPDES permit. (Level 1) Bodem Street and Scenic Road locations were monitored in association with the first flush storm event, a wet event and once during dry weather. (Level 1) Urban Runoff locations were monitored for expanded constituent list during the 2011- 2012 permit year. (Level 1) Toxicity monitoring of urban discharge locations was performed during 2008/2009, 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 permit years. (Level 1) No toxicity was observed. (Level 4) During the permit term, TIE was not required, and no corresponding TRE Correction Action Reports were required. (Level 4) Other than pH, there were no Tier I exceedances during the permit term. (Level 4) An analysis of these POCs’ relationship to TSS at the receiving water monitoring sites was conducted. (Level 1) The analysis indicated that the POCs considered were very weakly or not correlated to TSS. (Level 4) No Tier 1 exceedances occurred during the 2011-2012 permit year. (Level 5) During the permit term, water quality objectives were exceeded at both urban runoff locations for aluminum, copper (total and dissolved), dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, pH and Zinc. Bodem was reported to have exceeded WQO for specific conductance. (Level 1) Reports of Water Quality Exceedances were prepared for each of the exceedances that occurred during this permit year. (Level 1) The City re-evaluated the Tier 1 threshold concentrations and is proposing no changes to the thresholds at this time. (Level 1) MP3 – Detention Basin Monitoring The City of Modesto monitored the influent and effluent from the Orchard Park Basin and Carpenter Road Basin in the 2009-2010 permit year (10/13/09) and again in the 2011- 2012 permit year (10/05/11 and 10/07/11). (Level 1) Sediment monitoring was conducted for both basins 6/22/10 and 10/17/11. (Level 1) Additional sediment samples were collected from the Orchard Park Basin 2/2/12. (Level 1) Based on the single sample data point for influent and effluent for each basin, the data does not support a correlation for any of the pollutants of concern, except for Total Mercury. (Level 1) If we accept the single sample results for Total Mercury as representative, then the reduction in the Carpenter / Fire Science Basin Effluent would be approximately 49%. (Level 6) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-18 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Based on the data collected during this permit year, including low levels of total mercury, lower levels of methyl mercury present (at or just above method reporting limits), pH values reported from basin effluent, the potential for methyl mercury production is deemed to be low. (Level 6) MP4 – Dry Weather Characterization The City identified 12 outfalls that are greater than 24 inches. (Level 1) During the permit term, the City verified outfall location and size. (Level 1) A 42” outfall listed as “Yosemite Boulevard Corridor” was removed as it was determined to receive CalTrans highway SR132 storm water. (Level 1) A previously unidentified 54” outfall along Neece Drive was discovered during field investigation and has been added to the list. (Level 1) During the permit term, the Shackelford Area outfall was added to the list due to annexation of the area from Stanislaus County to the City of Modesto. (Level 1) The City monitored all 12 outfalls greater than 24” during the permit term; 10 had sufficient flow for sampling. (Level 1) The City monitored 49 rockwells and/or retention/detention basins during the 2012-2013 permit year; 13 had sufficient flow for sampling. (Level 1) MP5 – Bioassessment Monitoring The City fully evaluated the Bioassessment data collected during the previous permit term. (Level 1) Pacific EcoRisk completed the bioassessment data evaluation of the data collected in 2006 and 2007. (Level 6) The bioassessment data evaluation was submitted with the 2009-2010 Annual Progress Report. (Level 6) MP6 – BMP Effectiveness Study The City conducted a BMP effectiveness study on two treatment devices, a CONTECH StormVault and a Water Quality Detention Basin. (Level 1) Most data generated from the StormVault proved inconclusive with little parameters showing significant reduction. (Level 1) The StormVault’s fecal coliform counts were reduced by 62% and were below WQO upon exit. (Level 4) The City performed stormwater monitoring on the water quality detention basin (Fairview) located within Rancho Encantado Park. (Level 1) Analysis of the sampling data suggest significant removal of a number of pollutants and/or other constituents between the stormwater influent and the basin treated effluent: Average metals reduction – 21 % Oil & Grease reduction – 27 % TKN reduction – 88% TSS reduction – 36 % Turbidity – 25 % (Level 4) These preliminary results suggest that the biofiltration of pollutants through this water quality detention basin are an effective means of stormwater treatment to the maximum extent practicable. (Level 4) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto ES-19 September 2013 Annual Progress Report These preliminary results suggest that the biofiltration of pollutants through this water quality detention basin are an effective means of storm water treatment to the maximum extent practicable. MP7 – Data Management The City has implemented a database system to electronically store monitoring data. (Level 1) The City audits the data management system on an on-going basis using historical results do determine possible inaccuracies. (Level 1) MP8 – Training The City identified areas of focus for key staff involved in the Monitoring Program. (Level 1) The City conducted tailgate meetings for all staff involved in field activities before each sampling event. (Level 1) The City reviewed its training strategy annually and found that no further revision is necessary at this time. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 1-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 1.0 Stormwater Program Management and Report Introduction 1.1 OVERVIEW The Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) has been developed for and is implemented within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Modesto. The SWMP represents the five-year strategy for controlling the discharge of pollutants from the municipal storm drain system to the maximum extent practicable (MEP). The overall goal of the program is to reduce the degradation, by urban runoff, of the beneficial uses of natural resources of the metropolitan area of Modesto. These natural resources include the Tuolumne River, Dry Creek, and a regional groundwater aquifer. For the third-term municipal stormwater permit1 (2008-2013 Permit), the SWMP was revised. Following reissuance of the permit the City submitted an administrative draft SWMP on December 1, 2008, as required, which was revised, based on comments and resubmitted on August 17, 2009. The SWMP was adopted by the in December 20092. The SWMP for this permit term proposed a wide range of continuing and enhanced Best Management Practices (BMPs) and Control Measures, which were implemented over the period covered by the permit. These Control Measures will assist the City in improving the overall effectiveness of the stormwater program and focus on the specific activities. Where possible, Control Measures were developed to address specific pollutants of concern or sources to enhance pollution reduction and provide increased environmental benefit. The City has prepared and submitted Annual Progress Reports for each year of the permit term so far (2008-2009, 2009-2010, 2010-2011 and 2011-2012). This document incorporates information from each of the annual progress reports, and the results of the 2012-2013 permit year. 1.2 INTERNAL PROGRAM COORDINATION The City’s Public Works Department, Stormwater Management Program has primary responsibility for the development and implementation of the SWMP. Although administered and principally staffed by the Stormwater Management Program, the implementation of the SWMP requires the assistance of and close coordination with several other City departments and divisions including the following: Fire Department Police Department Community and Economic Development Public Works Operations and Maintenance Public Works Engineering and Transportation Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhoods City Attorney The City Divisions and Departments that have some responsibilities for the implementation of the Stormwater Program have been identified and are shown in the table below. An organization chart is also included. (Appendix A, City Department Organization Charts) 1 Order R5-2008-0092 2 Resolution R5-2009-0119 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 1-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 1-1: City Departments Associated with Stormwater Program Implementation City Department Program Elements Illicit Discharge & Illegal Connections Public Education & Public Outreach Municipal Operations Industrial & Commercial Businesses Construction Planning & Land Development Water Quality- Based Programs Fire Department X X Police Department X City Attorney X X X Community and Economic Development X X X X Public Works X X X X X X X Parks, Recreation, & Neighborhoods X X X X X X The designated stormwater program manager/staff who oversee the implementation of the SWMP and the day-to-day operations is listed in the table below. Table 1-2: Primary Stormwater Program Contact Name Thomas Sinclair Title Regulatory Environmental Compliance Manager Department/Division Public Works/Water Quality Control Address 1221 Sutter Ave., Modesto CA 95351 Phone Number (209) 577-6381 E-mail Address [EMAIL REDACTED] 1.3 FISCAL ANALYSIS The Fiscal Analysis includes the following: The City’s expenditures for the previous fiscal year; The City’s budget for the current fiscal year; and A description of the source of funds. The fiscal analysis for the City’s stormwater program is provided in the table below. All funds supporting the City’s stormwater program are derived from an enterprise fund. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 1-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 1-3: Fiscal Analysis 1 U = Information is unavailable Expenditures Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Expenditures Fiscal Year 2009-2010 Expenditures Fiscal Year 2010-11 Expenditure Fiscal Year 2011-12 Expenditure Fiscal Year 2012-13 Estimated Budget for Fiscal Year 2013-14 Program Management $93,109 $493,826 $197,689 $140,105 $90,768 $219,283 Illicit Discharge/Illegal Connections $201,135 $137,887 $129,421 $59,683 $39,135 $57,145 Public Outreach and Education $85,709 $70,819 $28,653 $38,510 $23,220 $11,500 Municipal Program $5,061 $4,737 $5,456 $22,414 $26,165 $26,060 Municipal Operations Corporation Yard1 Treatment BMP Maintenance1 Included in SD Maint. Included in SD Maint. Included in SD Maint. Included in SD Maint. Included in SD Maint. Included in SD Maint. Landscape and Pest Management $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Storm Drain System Maintenance (including catch basin cleaning) $1,789,279 $808,505 $957,698 $420,137 $449,052 $336,067 Street Cleaning & Leaf Pick-Up $496,918 $1,031,616 $498,933 $616,634 $608,812 $618,273 Solid Waste Collection $665,260 $1,076,040 $1,114,095 $1,015,993 $895,652 $1,087,184 Industrial and Commercial Businesses $628 $40,054 $42,634 $47,460 $49,812 $54,552 Construction $41,758 $35,657 $22,521 $22,414 $29,351 $37,142 Planning and Land Development $75,434 $51,284 $57,071 $29,933 $54,917 $31,690 Capital Improvement Projects $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,468,392 $0 Waer Quality Based Programs Pesticide Plan $1,514 $741 $741 $0 $0 $0 Monitoring Program Baseline Program $183,909 $22,774 $34,081 $75,539 $0 $0 Special Studies $31,689 $94,339 $21,496 $125,609 $16,429 $145,000 Training $14,791 $4,772 $4,757 $3,776 $547 $2,450 TOTAL $3,686,194 $3,873,051 $3,115,246 $2,618,207 $3,752,252 $2,626,346 Program Management ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 1-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 1.4 LEGAL AUTHORITY The 2008-2013 Permit requires that the City implement a stormwater management program to reduce the pollutants in stormwater discharges to the maximum extent practicable (MEP). Central to this program is the establishment and/or verification that the City has adequate legal authority to regulate the discharge of pollutants to the municipal storm drain system. To address stormwater quality issues, the City has broad legal authority from stormwater, wastewater, solid and hazardous materials regulations, and various public nuisance ordinances. The City’s current Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance (Stormwater Ordinance), as codified in Title 5, Chapter 10 of the Municipal Code, was originally adopted on November 19, 1996, and has since undergone several revisions updating the ordinance. The legal authority of the Stormwater Ordinance was initially developed to comply with 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 122.26(d)(2)(i)(A-F). City legal counsel issued a statement (included in the August 2009 SWMP revision) indicating the City has adequate legal authority to comply with the requirements of Order R5-2008-0092. 1.5 STORM WATER ANNUAL REPORT ORGANIZATION This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Table 1-4: Summary of ROWD/SWMP/Annual Report Organization Report Section Section Description Appendix - Executive Summary - Section 1 Program Management and Report Introduction A Section 2 Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connections B Section 3 Public Education, Outreach, and Participation C Section 4 Municipal Operations D Section 5 Industrial and Commercial Businesses E Section 6 Construction F Section 7 Planning and Land Development G Section 8 Water Quality-Based Programs H Section 9 Monitoring Programs I ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 2 Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections 2.1 Overview An illicit discharge (ID) is any discharge to the storm drain system that is prohibited under local, State, or Federal statutes, ordinances, codes, or regulations. The term “illicit discharge” includes non-stormwater discharges other than discharges pursuant to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, discharges that are identified within the Discharge Prohibitions section of the Permit, and discharges authorized by the Regional Water Board. Illegal connections are a subset of illicit discharges that are defined as an illegal and/or improper connection to a storm drain system or receiving water. Since illicit discharges (ID) and illegal connections (IC) can be a source of pollutants to the storm drain system, the City has developed a comprehensive program for detecting, responding to, investigating, and eliminating these types of connections/discharges in an efficient and effective manner. Additional information is included within each of the Program Control Measures. 2.2 Control Measures The Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Control Measures for the 2008-2013 permit term consist of the following: Table 2-1: Existing Control Measures for Illicit Discharges & Illegal Connections ID Control Measure ID1 Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Detection ID2 Illicit Discharge Investigation and Clean Up ID3 Illegal Connection Identification and Elimination ID4 Enforcement ID5 Training ID6 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy 2.3 ID1 – Illicit Discharge and Illegal Connection Detection 2.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation During this permit term, the Illicit Discharge program used a public hotline, dry weather field screening, and field crew inspections as the primary means for detecting and reporting illicit discharges and illegal connections. Public Reporting: The City established and maintained a 24-hour hotline, to encourage the public to report water pollution problems [[PHONE REDACTED]]. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Document and Track Complaints: The City used a standardized form to document and track complaints, and a database to manage the information. Coordinate with Other Agencies: The City coordinated with other City Departments and Agencies to coordinate response jurisdiction and provide training. Dry Weather Characterization: The City performed Dry Weather Characterization (see Section and follow up any illegal connections that were discovered during this process. Field Crew Inspection: As part of maintenance and field work, City field staff are trained to document observations and evidence of non-stormwater discharges or illegal dumping, and to notify the Stormwater Program for follow up investigation. 2.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements: The City maintained and advertised the 24-hour hotline over the permit term. (Level 1) Over the current permit term the hotline has received approximately 1,653 calls, including 789 calls from the public, 853 calls from City Staff, and 11 calls from outside agencies. (Level 1) Both Public and City Staff reports of water pollution have decreased each year. The decrease of calls is attributed to an increase of awareness based on the City’s outreach and training efforts. (Level 2) The Pollution Investigation Report was last revised in 2010 and reviewed each subsequent year. (Level 1) The City coordinated with 10 other City Divisions and three external agencies. (Level 1) Coordination and training was performed on response, ID/IC identification, and reporting. (Level 2) Reporting procedures were reviewed twice during the permit term. (Level 1) No illegal connections were discovered during the Dry Weather Monitoring. City Field Staff identified, illicit discharges, illegal connections and reported all incidents to the Stormwater Program. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Maintain 24-Hour Hotline The City established and maintained a 24-hour hotline for the 2008-2013 permit cycle (to date), to encourage the public to report water pollution problems. The phone number is: 209-577- 6200. During business hours the line is answered by City personnel, and after hours the calls are transferred to an answering service, 1-800-WE ANSWER, that contacts the stormwater program personnel. Caller information, including origin of call, reason for call, and where they learned of the hotline number, is tracked using the 1-800-WE ANSWER service. A summary of the hotline calls received is presented in Section 3. Document and Track Complaints The City uses a standardized form, the Pollution Investigation Report (PIR), to document and track complaints, including information regarding the origin of the complaint, so that the information is consistently entered into the City’s Illicit Discharge Database. The PIR form was developed in 1998 and updated in 2010. The graph below represents a breakdown, by year, of the total number of calls, received by the hotline. Represented are the calls placed by City staff, the public, and outside agencies during the current permit term. Coordinate with Other City Departments and Agencies During this permit cycle the City coordinated with internal City Departments and external agencies to accomplish the following: 410 552 261 185 245 212 188 141 127 121 195 361 118 56 123 3 3 2 2 1 0 100 200 300 400 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 ID1 - Hotline Calls Regarding Water Pollution Complaints, by Reporting Year Total # of Hotline Calls # Calls from Public # Calls from City Staff # Calls from Outside Agencies ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 1. Coordinated response jurisdiction for abandoned materials in alleys and public right-of- ways with Solid Waste Division, Streets Division and Fire Department. 2. Provided ongoing routine illicit discharge and cross connection training for Water Division, Building Inspectors, CIP Inspectors, NPU, Streets, Street Sweeping, Traffic Electrical, Traffic Ops., Curbs/gutters/sidewalks, and Police Department. 3. While no new protocols were developed during this reporting period there was a stronger emphasis on training to better identify illicit discharges and illegal connections and the methodology for reporting them. 4. Developed a reference brochure in the 2010-2011 permit year (Appendix D, Illicit Discharge Cards) for City departments and agencies to use to assist them with notification requirements for illicit discharges. 5. Directed emergency operators to prompt callers for information regarding spills or illicit discharges. Information regarding spills or illicit discharges has been better refined with the change in response providers to 1-800-WE ANSWER. 6. Performed illicit discharge notification training with field staff. During the 2008-2013 permit term (to date), the City coordinated (as described in above) with the following internal City Departments/Divisions: o Streets Division o Fire Department o Police Department o Solid Waste o Water Division o Collections Section o Community & Economic Development Department (CEDD) o Building Inspection Division o Construction Inspection Division o Neighborhood Preservation Unit (NPU) The City coordinated with the following external agencies: o Stanislaus County Department of Health and Environmental Resources (DER) o Regional Water Quality Control Board o Department of Fish and Game The following is a summary of illicit discharge cases that were reported to or referred to DER as County Jurisdiction or County Owned property during the permit term to date: Table 2-2: Summary of Illicit Discharge Cases Reported/Referred to Outside Agencies External Agency 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total Illicit Discharges Referred Stanislaus County DER 34 13 9 9 8 73 Regional Water Quality Control Board 34 30 12 5 2 83 Department of Fish and Game 2 1 1 1 1 6 TOTAL 70 44 22 15 11 162 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Public and Inter-Departmental Reporting Procedures During the 2010-2011 permit year, Stormwater Program staff performed an audit/review of the reporting procedures of other City departments to ensure Stormwater Program notification requirements are included. Stormwater Program staff periodically checks with the department contacts to ensure that staff understands the referral process. (All City staff and departments report illicit discharges and connections to the City hotline.) Follow up to Characterization Monitoring of Dry Weather Flows The City is required to conduct dry weather characterization monitoring, which is included in Section 9. No follow up action was required, as no illegal connections were discovered during monitoring. Field Crew Inspections and Documentation of Evidence of ID and IC The City field staff document field observations as part of maintenance and document evidence of non-stormwater discharges or illegal dumping. In addition, the City field staff report observed incidents of previous, current, or potential non-stormwater discharges, illegal dumping into the storm drain system and illegal connections as a part of its normal maintenance activities. Upon discovery, staff members notify the hotline for reporting and follow-up purposes. Once discovered, the illicit discharges or illegal connections are corrected or eliminated. The number of illicit discharges and illegal connections identified and reported by field staff during the permit term is listed below. A printout (Appendix B, Illicit Discharge Call Statistics) of the illicit discharge reports from the database is included. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 2-3: Summary of Potential Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Reported by Field Staff Source of Report Total Number of Illicit Discharges Identified and Reported Total Number of Illegal Connections Identified and Reported1 2008- 2009 Stormwater Program 195 3 Fire Department 46 - Other Departments 0 - Total 241 3 2009- 2010 Stormwater Program 188 1 Fire Department 7 0 Other Departments 173 2 Total 368 3 2010- 2011 Stormwater Program 34 1 Fire Department 2 0 Other Departments 85 0 Total 121 1 2011- 2012 Stormwater Program 23 1 Fire Department 3 0 Other Departments 64 2 Total 90 3 2012- 2013 Stormwater Program 31 0 Fire Department 4 0 Other Departments 115 1 Total 150 1 1 Does not include illegal connections detected during plan review. The above summary shows a decline in the total number of illicit discharges reported by field staff over the permit term 2.4 ID2 – Illicit Discharges Investigation and Clean-Up 2.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation Once an illicit discharge is discovered, the City responds accordingly. In responding, the City investigates and, if necessary, conducts clean-up efforts. Enforcement action is also pursued if a responsible party is identified. Response and Investigation: City staff responds to notification/complaints of illicit discharges within one business day. Stormwater Program field staff responds and provides an on-site assessment and initiates appropriate follow up action(s). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Cleanup: City staff coordinates activities to abate and contain illicit discharges, including hazardous substances, and follow up to ensure that the illicit discharge has been cleaned up. Record Keeping: The City’s Illicit Discharge Database is used to track the notification, response, and cleanup of illicit discharges reported to the City. The database is linked to the City’s GIS to identify spatial or temporal trends and target areas for outreach. 2.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements 100% of notifications/complaints of illicit discharges were investigated within one business day. (Level 1) City field staff verified a total of 1,322 illicit discharges during the permit term (to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year). (Level 1) Sources of illicit discharge reports include the hotline, various City Department/Divisions City staff developed and refined a PIR which is used exclusively. (Level 1) Abatement, containment and cleanup is coordinate between Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources (DER), the Fire Department, the Collection Division, Streets, Solid Waste and others that are needed to assist with an illicit discharge. (Level 1) An agreement is in place with DER Hazardous Materials Division. (Level 1) Illicit Discharges are recorded and mapped using the City’s Database and GIS mapping. (Level 1) The Database was audited and upgraded during the permit term. (Level 1 & 2) Respond to Reported Illicit Discharges City staff responds to notifications/complaints of illicit discharges within one business day. When a notification or complaint is received, the City responds and provides an on-site assessment. The investigation process includes determining whether the discharge is occurring on private or public property, whether the discharge is an authorized non-stormwater discharge, and whether the discharge is hazardous. If the illicit discharge is hazardous, the City crews follow appropriate protocols in notifying State and local agencies and protecting themselves from exposure. Reports of hazardous material discharges are directed to the local Fire Department for abatement and mitigation. (Appendix B, Modesto Fire Department Hazmat Incident with Detail) The total number of illicit discharges reported and verified, as well as the number of illicit discharges investigated within one business day, is included in the table below. Not all reports of illicit discharges are verifiable. There are times that the illicit discharge has ceased before the investigator arrives on the scene. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 2-4: Summary of Illicit Discharge Complaints, Verification of Complaints & Response Time Total Number of Illicit Discharge Complaints/ Notifications Reported1 Total Number of Illicit Discharges Verified Total Number of Complaints/Notifications Investigated within One Business Day1 2008-2009 410 [PHONE REDACTED]-2010 363 [PHONE REDACTED]-2011 261 [PHONE REDACTED]-2012 238 [PHONE REDACTED]-2013 245 205 245 1Total does not include complaints reported by the fire department During 2010-2011 permit year the City added a list of permitted discharges to the Pollution Investigation Report PIR. These permitted discharges are not included in the Summary of Materials Released as they are not considered a verified illicit discharge.¹ The City is investigating a methodology for quantifying discharges. Table 2-5 summarizes the types of materials involved in the reported incidents (Appendix B, Illicit Discharge Call Statistics) is provided below. Table 2-5: Summary of Materials Released During the Permit Term Type of Materials 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Construction Waste 21 16 5 13 17 Dirt (silt, mud, muddy water, rocks) 42 26 20 24 19 Paint 24 8 15 7 6 Petroleum products 41 42 34 29 30 Pool water 51 46 26 17 28 Sewage 100 98 67 69 78 Non-Permitted Water (oily water, soapy water, parking lot water etc.) 1 35 23 17 15 Organics - 25 12 15 4 Hazardous Material - 3 2 3 0 Solid Material - 28 6 5 2 Vehicle Waste - - 8 1 1 Not Categorized 111 - - - - TOTAL 391 327 218 200 200 Note: Illicit Discharges may involve more than one Type of Material. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Overall public outreach has been effective in reducing illicit discharges as shown in the graph below. Document Investigations of Illicit Discharges City staff uses the Pollution Investigation Report (PIR) to ensure consistent and accurate information is obtained from each investigation and all evidentiary requirements are met for potential enforcement action. The form is available on the shared drive that all ECS inspectors are able to access. Coordinate Illicit Discharge Clean-Up Activities City staff is required to coordinate activities to abate, contain, and clean up all illicit discharges, including hazardous substances, and follow up to ensure that the illicit discharge has been cleaned up. Maintain Agreement for Cleanup The City maintains an agreement with Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources Hazardous Division for cleanup and removal of hazardous materials. This agreement provides the means to restore the affected area and prevent further environmental degradation in the surrounding area of the incident. Record and Map Illicit Discharges Using the Illicit Discharge Database and GIS System The City’s Illicit Discharge Database is used to track the notification, response, and cleanup of illicit discharges reported to the City. Illicit Discharge locations are transferred to the City’s GIS 0 20 40 60 80 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report program to identify spatial or temporal trends and target areas for outreach. The maps (Appendix B, Illicit Discharge Map and SSO Discharge Map) were generated from a database report (Appendix B, Illicit Discharge Call Statistics) listing all of the illicit discharges that were identified during the reporting year. During the 2008-2013 permit term, the number of reported illicit discharges has reduced over time, as shown in tabular summary above. The following table summarizes illicit discharges over the permit cycle to date by type of material. Table 2-6: Summary of Illicit Discharges by Type of Material Private lateral and Public release of sewage has been identified as the most common illicit discharge (39% of all illicit discharges); followed by Petroleum products (15%) and Pool Water Audit Illicit Discharge Database During 2010-2011 the City audited the Illicit Discharge Database and found that it had reached its capacity for adding new fields and very near its capacity for recording and sorting data. The current database was in need of a way to track the quantity released and recovered during illicit discharges, adding these fields could have caused the database to fail. During the 2011- 2012 permit year the City transitioned to a newer database that can accommodate any new data fields that may be required for reporting purposes. Type of Materials % Sewage 39 Petroleum products 15 Pool water 14 Dirt 10 Not Categorized - Non-Permitted Water 8 Construction Waste 8 Paint 3 Organics 2 Solid Material 1 Vehicle Waste 1 Hazardous Material 0 TOTAL 100 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 2.5 ID3–Illegal Connections Identification and Elimination 2.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation In parallel with the City’s efforts to detect and eliminate illicit discharges, the City detects, investigates, and eliminates illegal connections to the storm drain system. 2.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements Planning and Land Development department reviewed improvement plans for compliance with City of Modesto Stormwater requirements. (Level 1) Out of 169 plan sets were reviewed, one potential illegal connection was identified. (Level 1) 100% of identified potential illegal connections identified during plan review were required to undergo revisions. (Level 2) There were no illegal connections identified during construction inspections during the permit term. (Level 1) 10 potential illegal connections were identified during the permit term through investigations, and all were investigated within 21 days. (Level 1) 9 illegal connections were confirmed by investigation during the permit term. (Level 1) Conduct Plan Reviews As part of the Planning and Land Development Program, the City conducts reviews of construction project plans, in part to assess compliance with the Stormwater Program requirements and identify potential illegal connections. The number of illegal connections identified through Planning and Land Development plan reviews is listed below. Table 2-7: Number of Illegal Connections Identified by Planning/Land Development Reviews Total Number of Plans Reviewed Total Number of Potential Illegal Connections Identified Total Number of Plans Requiring Revision to Eliminate Potential Illicit Connections 2008-2009 23 1 1 2009-2010 25 0 0 2010-2011 28 0 0 2011-2012 41 0 0 2012-2013 52 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Inspect Construction Projects City staff inspected construction projects to identify illegal connections. The number of illegal connections identified through construction project inspections is listed below. Table 2-8: Number of Illegal Connections Identified through Construction Project Inspections Source Total Number of Illegal Connections Identified 2008-2009 Construction Project Inspections 0 2009-2010 Construction Project Inspections 0 2010-2011 Construction Project Inspections 0 2011-2012 Construction Project Inspections 0 2012-2013 Construction Inspection Project 0 Investigate Illegal Connections City staff investigated and reported illegal connections within 21 days of the discovery of an illicit or illegal connection and determined the source of the connection, the nature of discharge through the connection, and the responsible party for the connection. During the 2008 to 2013 permit term to date, ten illegal connections were reported and investigated. Table 2-9: Source and Nature of Illegal Connections Permit year Source of Connection Nature of Discharge Number 2008-2009 Residential Muddy water 1 Residential Parking Lot runoff 2 Commercial Roof Runoff 3 2009-2010 Commercial Dairy & Irrigation runoff 4 Residential Runoff 5 Residential Pool water 6 2010-2011 Industrial Roof Runoff 7 2011-2012 Commercial Discharge from private rockwell 8 Residential Roof Runoff; Runoff; Pool water 9 2012-2013 Residential Runoff 10 Document Each Investigation Using Standardized Reporting Form City staff documented each investigation using the standardized reporting form to ensure that accurate information is obtained and all evidentiary requirements are met for potential enforcement action. Eliminate Each Illegal Connection within 180 Days After confirming an illegal connection, City staff eliminates it within 180 days, using enforcement ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report authority as needed. Mechanisms for elimination include permitting or plugging the illegal connection. The following table summarizes illegal connections reported and eliminated during the permit term (to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year). Table 2-10: Summary of Illegal Connections Reported and Eliminated Source Total Number of Illegal Connections Reported/ Detected Type of Illegal Connection Total Number of Illegal Connections Permitted Total Number of Illegal Connections Eliminated Mechanism by which Illegal Connection was Eliminated 2008- 2009 Field Staff 1 Cross- connection 0 1 Not tracked Hotline 2 Parking lot drain, Roof connection 0 2 Not tracked Plan Review 1 Gutter connection 0 1 Plan revised to eliminate Construction Inspection 0 - - - - Other 0 - - - - 2009- 2010 Field Staff 2 Pipe in Slough (Dairy Farm) and Pipe into Rockwell (Residential) 0 2 Referred to (Dairy) and Referred to Collections (Residential) Hotline 1 Gutter Connection 0 1 Owner notified to remove pipe Plan Review 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 2010- 2011 Field Staff 1 Roof drains connected to catch basin 1 0 Permitted Hotline 0 0 0 0 0 Plan Review 0 0 0 0 0 Construction Inspection 0 0 0 0 0 Other 0 0 0 0 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Source Total Number of Illegal Connections Reported/ Detected Type of Illegal Connection Total Number of Illegal Connections Permitted Total Number of Illegal Connections Eliminated Mechanism by which Illegal Connection was Eliminated 2011- 2012 Field Staff 2 Temporary gutter connection, curb cuts 0 2 Owner redirected to planter areas, owner asked to cease all non- stormwater discharges Hotline 0 - - - - Plan Review 0 - - - - Construction Inspection 0 - - - - Other 0 - - - - 2012- 2013 Field Staff 1 Residence draining water through sound wall onto City property causing flooding 0 Owner directed to discontinue using the illegal connection Hotline 0 - - - - Plan Review 0 - - - - Construction Inspection 0 - - - - Other 0 - - - - Provide Follow-up Investigation for Potential or Suspected Illegal Connections Identified during Dry Weather Characterization Monitoring The City annually conducts monitoring to characterize dry weather flows. The purpose of this monitoring program is to identify dry weather flows and potential illicit discharges. Details of the dry weather characterization are discussed in Section 9 of this Annual Report. No illegal connections were identified during Dry Weather Characterization Monitoring. Record and Map Illegal Connections Using the Illicit Discharge Database and GIS System As a part of the Illicit Discharge Database, the City records the illicit discharge locations and maps them on an annual basis to identify problem areas/responsible parties. The information is used to evaluate patterns and trends of illicit discharges and illegal connections with the objective of identifying priority areas. According to the map of illicit discharges (Appendix B, Illicit Discharge Map), reported discharges have been fairly evenly distributed throughout the City of Modesto, and do not show a particular concentration of illicit discharge locations. The reduction in reported illicit discharges is also fairly evenly distributed. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The addition of illegal connections does not provide any meaningful information to the City Stormwater program. 2.6 ID4 – Enforcement 2.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Enforcement Control Measure establishes policies and procedures and outlines the progressive levels of enforcement applied to responsible parties not complying with City ordinances. By adopting and implementing a progressive enforcement policy, the City will ensure that the program is effective at reducing illicit discharges and illegal connections. 2.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2012 Permit Term Achievements Numbers and types of enforcement were recorded in the City’s database. (Level 1) 807 total enforcement actions were taken during the permit term. (Level 1) Only two responsible parties were involved in three or more incidents over the permit term. (Level 2) Only two sites were impacted three or more times during the permit term. (Level 3) An audit of the tracking of enforcement actions was performed in the 2010/2011 permit year. (Level 1) 100% of the confirmed illegal connections were eliminated within 180 days. (Level 2) Modesto Municipal Code 5-10.501 Enforcement Powers gives the City the authority to enforce the Stormwater Management Program, including Cease and Desist orders 10.501(b)(5)]. City trained key staff in the illicit discharge and illegal connection program. (Level 1) Over the permit term 38 training sessions took place with 1,142 participants. (Level 1) Pre- and post- training test scores showed 7.5% to 37% aptitude improvement. (Level 2) The training strategy was reviewed twice during the permit term in 2008-2009 and 2010- 2011. (Level 1) City has ranked illicit discharges by risk to the receiving water quality, and has determined that private lateral and public sanitary sewer overflows are the largest risk to receiving water followed by hazardous material, organics and petroleum. (Level 1) Implement Enforcement Response Plan (ERP) The ERP addresses enforcement issues related to illicit discharges and illegal connections. Track Enforcement Actions in Illicit Discharge Database The number and types of enforcement actions taken during the permit term are summarized below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 2-11: Summary of Number and Type of Enforcement Actions Type of Enforcement Action 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Verbal Warning 44 45 64 48 66 201 Administrative Enforcement Written Warning 93 60 66 37 28 256 Notice of Non- compliance/Violation 76 68 37 27 27 208 Administrative Citation 3 6 6 0 2 15 Notice and Order 1 0 0 0 0 1 Criminal Enforcement Infraction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Misdemeanor 0 0 0 0 0 0 Referral to Regional Board 2 7 0 0 0 9 TOTAL 219 186 173 112 117 807 The graph below represents a breakdown, by year, of the types of enforcement actions taken. 44 45 64 48 66 93 60 66 37 28 76 68 37 27 21 3 6 6 0 2 2 7 0 0 0 0 50 100 150 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Verbal Warning Written Warning Notice of Non-compliance/Violation Administrative Citation Referral to Regional Water Board ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 2-17 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 2-12: Summary of Repeat Offenders and Problem Areas Permit Year Number of Responsible Parties Involved in Three or More Incidents Number of Sites Impacted Three or More Times (list by Address) 2008-2009 0 0 2009-2010 2 1 (Foster Farms Dairy, 415 Kansas Avenue) 2010-2011 0 0 2011-2012 0 1 (1029 Ventura Drive) 2012-2013 0 0 Audit ERP The City conducted an audit of the ERP once during the permit term and it been summarized (Appendix B, Stormwater Enforcement Response Plan) into table form for use by inspectors in the field. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-1 September 2013 Annual Report 3. Public Outreach and Education 3.1 Overview The Public Outreach and Education Program Element will inform the community about how everyday activities can impact stormwater discharges and potentially result in adverse impacts to the local water bodies. The Program Element is designed to maximize the use of limited resources and to develop partnerships among stakeholders in the Modesto Urbanized Area. Local stewardship and partnerships among governmental agencies, schools, universities and private interests are vital components of this Program. Since everyday activities can potentially be a source of pollutants to the storm drain system, the City has developed a program to inform the public about the potential impacts that these activities may have on urban stormwater runoff and identify ways that the public can reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff (Section 3 of the SWMP). Additional information is included within each of the Program Control Measures. 3.2 Control Measures The Public Outreach and Education control measures for the 2008-2013 permit term consist of the following: Table 3-1 Existing Control Measures for Public Outreach and Education ID Control Measure PO1 24-hour Hotline Number PO2 Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Outreach PO3 Industrial and Commercial Business Outreach PO4 Construction Outreach PO5 Elementary School Outreach PO6 General Public Outreach, Education, and Participation PO7 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy 3.3 PO1 – 24-hour Hotline Number 3.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation The City has maintained a 24-hour hotline to facilitate public reporting of clogged basins, illicit discharges, illegal connections, and missing/damaged curb markers, and providing general stormwater information. This Control Measure also ensures that through the hotline, complaint information is forwarded to the appropriate contacts for follow-up and/or investigation. 3.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-2 September 2013 Annual Report The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements The City maintained a 24-hour hotline number over the permit term. (Level 1) The City received 2,810 calls through the hotline. (Level 3) During the last two years, hotline reports of clogged catch basins have decreased by approximately 80% from the 2009/2010 report volume. This is attributed to a 100-year storm that occurred during the 2009-2010 permit year, causing substantial street flooding throughout the City. (Level 2) Over the permit term, the reports of illicit discharges have decreased each year. This is attributed to an increased awareness through the City’s focused outreach materials. (Level 2) The number of calls requesting general stormwater information increased every year during the permit term, which is attributed to increased public awareness of stormwater issues and the City’s Stormwater program. (Level 2) During the permit term, the City promoted the 24-hour hotline by including it within public/business education materials, listing it on the website and including it within the government pages of the telephone book. (Level 2) The City updated the website to include specific Environmental Compliance information that includes Stormwater BMP Brochures, which include the 24-hour hotline. (Level 1) Maintain Hotline The City maintains a 24-hour hotline number. Once a complaint is received, City staff responds using the processes described within Section 2 of the SWMP. Each hotline call is documented on a standardized form, and the follow-up actions are noted in the Pollution Investigation Report. During this reporting period the City reviewed the hotline prompts and included questions regarding calls received from industrial/commercial businesses to assist hotline operator clearly identifying callers questions. The City tracked the types and numbers of calls to the hotline included the following general categories, as summarized in the following table, and represented graphically on the following page. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-3 September 2013 Annual Report Table 3-2: Summary of Hotline Calls Received Type of Problem Request Called into Hotline 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Clogged catch basins 153 783 150 160 472 Illegal discharges/illegal connections 410 363 258 252 252 Missing/damaged curb marker N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A General stormwater information 18 45 104 114 101 Total 581 1191 512 526 825 Update Hotline Number Information in public information and phone books If the hotline number changes, the City will update the public information and government pages in the phone book that advertise the number. The City promotes the 24-hour hotline by including it within public/business education materials, listing it on the website and including it within the government pages of the telephone book. During this reporting period the hotline number remained the same and no changes were required. 18 45 104 114 101 410 363 258 252 252 153 783 150 160 472 0 200 400 [PHONE REDACTED] 1200 1400 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 P01 - Number and Type of Hotline Calls Clogged catch basins Illegal discharges/illegal connections General stormwater information ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-4 September 2013 Annual Report 3.4 PO2 – Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Outreach 3.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Outreach Control Measure provides outreach materials to businesses, property owners, the general public, and elected officials about the hazards associated with illicit discharges and illegal connections. This measure also includes information about how improper disposal of wastes may ultimately lead to water quality degradation. 3.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements Door hangers were distributed in areas where illicit discharges occurred as resources permitted. (Level 2) During the permit term 704,182 gallons of used oil was collected and recycled. (Level 3) The City produced a Tale of Two Neighbors video. (Level 2) Distribute Door Hangers When possible, City staff distributed door hangers in areas susceptible to illicit dischargers or where catch basin curb markers were recently installed. During the 2012-2013 permit year, limited resources did not include this activity. Promote Used Oil Recycling Program The City promoted the used oil recycling program under the illicit discharge outreach element and the general public outreach, education and participation element. The City operates the Used Oil Recycling Program, which promotes “Only Rain Down the Drain” and “Recycle Used Oil Filters” awareness campaigns and provides opportunities for proper disposal of used oil and other wastes. Beginning this permit term the City began to assess the amount of used oil collected at certified collection centers for recycling to better understand the public participation in this program. A summary of the quantity of oil collected is provided below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-5 September 2013 Annual Report Table 3-3: Summary of Used Oil Collected for Recycling Drop Off Location 2008-2009 (gallons) 2009-2010 (gallons) 2010-2011 (gallons) 2011-2012 (gallons) 2012-2013 (gallons) All retail locations within City - Stanislaus County 268,454 85,570 92,751 111,563 100,557 County HHW facilities (used by City residents) 9,264 7,390 6,880 5,464 8,704 Residential Collection (Pick up by either Gilton or Bertolotti Waste) 1,247 1,806 1,756 1,420 1,356 Total Gallons Collected 278,965 94,766 101,387 118,447 110,617 3.5 PO3 – Industrial and Commercial Business Outreach 3.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation Since commercial and industrial businesses can be sources of stormwater pollutants, this Control Measure addresses informing business owners and operators about stormwater quality and impacts on water resources. Efforts are primarily targeted at specific business types. 3.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements 380 target-specific brochures were distributed to businesses renewing or obtaining new business licenses over the permit term. (Level 1) The City distributed 9,645 general stormwater brochures to businesses renewing or obtaining new business licenses over the permit term. (Level 1) A BMP fact sheet for Mobile Washers and Cleaners was developed during the permit term, and was distributed during inspections. (Level 1) A BMP fact sheet was developed for Equipment Rentals, Kennels and Nurseries at the beginning of the permit term, was distributed to new businesses by the Business Licensing Division and made available on the City’s website. (Level 2) Include BMP Fact Sheets with New Business Licenses The City includes appropriate BMP fact sheet(s) with new business licenses and provides them at the Community and Economic Development Department front counter. Beginning this permit term the City tracked the number of brochures distributed with new business licenses and a summary is provided below. In addition to distributing the business-specific brochures tracked below, the City also distributed 1,950 general stormwater brochures to as many businesses renewing or obtaining new business licenses over the permit year. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-6 September 2013 Annual Report Summary of Brochures Distributed Table 3-4: Summary of Brochures Distributed to New Businesses Type of Business 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Industrial Facilities 0 3 1 0 0 4 Automotive Body Shops 12 5 3 2 3 25 Automobile Dealers 12 10 14 14 16 66 Automotive Repair Shops 92 11 22 17 12 154 Dry Cleaners 15 2 0 1 0 18 Equipment Rentals 1 1 0 0 4 6 Kennels 24 4 1 0 3 32 Nurseries 5 0 1 0 2 8 Mobile Washers and Cleaners 44 7 19 6 6 82 Total Number of Fact Sheets Distributed 205 43 61 40 46 395 1929 1906 1954 1906 1950 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total Brochures with New Business Licenses ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-7 September 2013 Annual Report Distribute Brochures during Inspections The City distributed business-specific brochures during business inspections. 99 brochures were distributed during routine Stormwater inspections (note: 224 stormwater inspections were performed. Priority was changed on 151 of those inspections where it was found that a) business closed or b) there was no threat to storm drain system). Update BMP Fact Sheets and Workshops for Revised Industrial Permit The City updated the BMP fact sheet(s) to address the revised Industrial General Permit conditions, when it is adopted. This included developing a BMP fact sheet specifically for mobile washers and cleaners, as wells as For Equipment Rentals, Kennels and Nurseries. 205 43 61 40 46 0 50 100 150 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Number of Brochures Distributed to Target Businesses 0 0 85 220 99 0 50 100 150 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Brochures Distributed During Stormwater Inspections ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-8 September 2013 Annual Report The City is prepared to hold general industry workshops to educate businesses on the Industrial General Permit. The City anticipates holding this workshop following the adoption of the Industrial General Permit. 3.6 PO4 – Construction Outreach 3.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Construction Outreach Control Measure provides outreach and guidance to construction contractors and developers regarding stormwater quality issues. This Control Measure educates and informs construction contractors and developers about stormwater quality issues and impacts on water resources. 3.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements 11,828 total BMP brochures were distributed during the permit term. (Level 1) 362 BMP brochures were distributed during inspections over the permit term. (Level 2) 3,396 BMP brochures were distributed with building permit approvals. (Level 2) The City updated construction BMP brochures for revised Construction General Permit conditions during the permit term. (Level 1) Workshops were held during the 2009-2010 year when the Construction General Permit was adopted. (Level 1) 107 tailgate sessions were performed over the permit term which included 262 participants. (Level 2) The City determined that is preferable to continue its own school education program which allows the City staff to personalize the program to our needs and programs. Distribute BMP Brochures The City distributed construction BMP brochures to construction contractors and developers during construction site inspections and building permit approval. The City’s construction brochures describe BMPs that can be implemented for home repair and remodeling, general construction and site supervision, heavy equipment and earthmoving activities, roadwork and paving, fresh concrete and mortar application. Table 3-5: Summary of Brochures Distributed During Inspections Type of Brochures 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Home Repair and Remodeling 15 0 15 7 7 44 Construction General and Site Supervision 76 5 76 34 42 233 Heavy Equipment and Earthmoving 2 0 2 2 3 9 Roadwork and Paving 2 0 2 2 2 8 Fresh Concrete and Mortar Application 21 0 21 18 8 68 Total 116 5 116 63 62 362 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-9 September 2013 Annual Report Table 3-6: Summary of Brochures Distributed with Building Permit Approvals Type of Brochures 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Home Repair and Remodeling 207 334 3,707 3,233 3,023 10,504 Construction General and Site Supervision 123 60 87 54 268 592 Heavy Equipment and Earthmoving 21 25 4 45 41 136 Roadwork and Paving 0 25 3 8 14 50 Fresh Concrete and Mortar Application 10 60 10 54 50 184 Total 361 504 3,811 3,394 3,396 11,466 Update BMP Brochures The City updated the construction BMP Brochures following the adoption of the Construction General Permit. Conduct Construction General Permit Workshops The City held Construction General workshops that covered the revised Construction General Permit during the 2009-2010 year when the permit was adopted. Education and awareness of the new CGP has been ongoing during the ensuing years. Conduct Tailgate Sessions The City conducted periodic tailgate sessions with construction contractors. The City staff documented 9 tailgate sessions that included 18 construction contractors over the permit year. Table 3-7: Summary of Tailgate Sessions Date of Session 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Number of Tailgates 6 17 38 37 9 107 Total Number of Participants 29 38 83 94 18 262 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-10 September 2013 Annual Report 3.7 PO5 – Elementary School Outreach 3.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Elementary School Outreach Control Measure targets school-age children using presentations addressing stormwater quality issues. This Control Measure provides public school districts within the City with outreach materials and resources to educate school-age children about stormwater pollution. 3.7.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements The program goal of reaching 50% of the fourth graders (as a running two-year average) was achieved. “Go with the Flow” video and activity booklet with corresponding questions from the video was developed and was supplied to the elementary schools. Educate 50% of all 4th Graders every two years The City educated at least 50% of all 4th grade children every two years. The Elementary School Outreach has progressed and evolved around a pollution prevention video, Go with the Flow. Modesto elementary schools receive the video and corresponding educational packet at their resource centers. Each student receives an “Only Rain Down the Drain” activity booklet and sticker. Each teacher receives a packet of information on water, wastewater, stormwater, and water conservation information from the Department of Water Resources. Staff has 6 17 38 37 9 27 38 83 94 18 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Construction Tailgate Sessions Total Tailgate Sessions Number of Participants ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-11 September 2013 Annual Report compiled an email list of the fourth through sixth grade teachers and principals to assist in the ongoing efforts to inform school staff about the latest in pollution-prevention goals. The City has two separate opportunities to reach out to school programs: 1. Only Rain Down the Drain classroom presentation includes a five-question pre-test to measure students’ present knowledge of storm drain terms, and a post-test to measure the overall success of the presentation. 2. A water conservation/storm drain presentation classroom and assembly presentations regarding water conservation, storm drains, and pollution prevention are given to fourth through sixth graders. Summaries of the presentations provided during 2012-13 and the results of the pre-and post presentation surveys are provided below. Modesto has 23 elementary schools with an enrollment of approximately 1,591 4th graders, average of 69 students per school. It is difficult to get accurate records for each school, so an average was used. The City estimates that 62% of 4th graders were reached during the two-year cycle (2011-2012 & 2012-2013). Not all elementary schools participated in the outreach effort. Pre-tests are given and an overall percentage is used to evaluate the students’ knowledge prior to the presentation. Table 3-8: Summary of 4th Grade Presentation Outreach Effort 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total % of Total Number of Schools 12 6 18 78% Total Number of 4th Grade Students Reached 556 434 990 62% City staff has found it difficult to gain access to the various classrooms for a variety of reasons, including schedule conflicts, the schools have indicated that they do not have available curriculum time, and there are constraints on both the City resources and School resources. With the limited resources available to the City of Modesto and the Stormwater program, it has been observed that a significant amount of resources are expended attempting to schedule the presentations, performing the presentations and assessing the data from the presentations. In keeping with the paradigm of applying resources where they will address identified areas of risk to receiving water quality, it appears that a disproportional amount of time and effort is spent attempting to reach the goal of 50% of all 4th graders. It is proposed that stormwater program information continue to be made available to schools, without the requirement for City of Modesto staff to provide presentations. Make “Go with the Flow” Video Available The City has made “Go with the Flow” video and associated educational packet available for school assemblies and individual teachers. The Stormwater Program partnered with the Cities of Sacramento and Stockton Stormwater Programs to develop an 8-minute video titled “Go with the Flow” that depicts teenagers discussing topics such as the water cycle, stormwater, and pollution prevention activities. An activity booklet with corresponding questions from the video ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-12 September 2013 Annual Report was developed and was supplied to the elementary schools. The Go With the Flow video has been well received by administrators, teachers, and students. Evaluate Environmental Education Account The City is required to assess opportunities to support Environmental Education Account (EEA) established under Assembly Bill 1721 (2005) as an alternative to the School Outreach Program. Per the website EEA website, http://www.calepa.ca.gov/education/eei/ (which was accessed on April 14, 2009, when the evaluation was completed), the EEA program is in the 4th of seven phases of development. Currently they are developing a model curriculum. Subsequent phases will disseminate the model and provide professional development (phase assess the model (phase and support the ongoing operation of the program implementation (phase It appears that it will be several years before the model curriculum is turned into an in-place education program. Other MS4 stormwater programs were questioned on the implementation of the EEA as an alternate to running their own elementary school education, and of those surveyed none were using this as an alternative. The City also asked the chairpersons of the CASQA Legislation and Public Information and Participation Subcommittees, who reported that they were not aware of any stormwater program participating in the EEA program. The City determined that is preferable to continue its own school education program which allows the City staff to personalize the program to our needs and programs. And more importantly is providing the correct information on the Modesto program to each individual student (and their parents) now, as opposed to sometime in the future. 3.8 PO6 – General Public Outreach, Education, and Participation 3.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation The General Public Outreach, Education, and Participation Control Measure outlines the City’s efforts to educate the public on stormwater quality issues and encourage public participation in stormwater pollution prevention activities. Such outreach communicates the importance of stormwater quality protection and pollution prevention to the City’s residents 3.8.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements City outreach efforts are estimated to have made more than 347 million impressions during the permit term. (Level 2) The City distributed outreach materials targeting automobile repair and maintenance, automobile washing, disposal of household hazardous waste, and home and garden care activities and product use. (Level 2) The City developed a wide range of outreach materials targeting swimming pool cleaning and training, fall season leaves pick up, home improvement and construction activities, and household chemical disposal. (Level 2) The City conducted public opinion surveys in 2009-2010. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-13 September 2013 Annual Report In addition to 17 types of outreach materials in languages other than English, the City completed translation into Spanish of the Swimming Pool, Jacuzzi and Fountain BMP brochure and the Landscaping and Pest Control Brochure. (Level 2) More than 8,000 volunteers collected and removed more than 87 tons of litter and debris from Modesto neighborhoods, parks and trails. (Level 4) Advertisements, City utility bill inserts and participation in community events were used to promote the Used Oil Program during the permit term. (Level 2) The City made presentations to the City Council during the permit term. The presentations provided an opportunity for the Stormwater Program to inform city leaders, elected representatives, and the public about the stormwater program including its achievements and funding needs. (Level 1) Make Impressions Each Year The City uses a variety of strategies to make these impressions, such as updating advertising and promotional brochures and materials, coordinating with the Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Program to target areas of frequent illicit discharges by distributing multi-lingual brochures/flyers, expanding the locations where residential-related brochures are available, staffing public events (attend and distribute pollution prevention brochures and materials at various community events) and using various means to distribute educational brochures promoting the Used Oil Recycling Program, and continuing to update the website to include outreach material. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-14 September 2013 Annual Report Table 3-9: Number of Impressions Made Name of Educational Material 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish Growing a Healthy Garden to Manage Pest Naturally 60 111 359 5 327 1 0 0 40 26 Controlling Ants in Your House 7 61 118 29 93 16 42 0 123 47 Controlling Aphids in Your Garden 77 74 87 43 93 9 40 14 124 37 Keeping Fleas Off Your Pets and Out of Your Yard 60 9 90 33 76 4 14 0 74 39 Tips for a Healthy Beautiful Lawn 56 20 69 11 47 0 13 0 87 20 Keeping Mosquitoes Away From Your Yard 97 111 125 59 69 20 9 0 88 36 Tips for Wonderful Roses 60 91 43 9 37 0 0 0 83 28 Controlling Snails and Slugs in Your Garden 93 0 112 0 51 0 22 0 120 29 Living with Spiders, The Helpful Hunters 130 27 78 65 80 5 16 0 62 28 How To Control Weeds 10 66 52 33 28 0 7 0 48 28 Controlling Yellow jackets Around Your Home 59 27 104 74 45 2 10 0 47 26 Controlling Cockroaches 44 37 58 9 20 0 74 35 Use and Disposal of Pesticides 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pesticides and Water Quality 0 0 0 0 0 0 Finding a Pest Control Company 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pest Management Guide (Fan Style) 824 0 469 0 190 0 200 0 360 0 "Got Bugs? Get Answers" magnets with Our Water Our World website information 279 0 0 0 0 0 Booklet “The Healthy Home and Garden” 455 0 378 0 264 0 150 0 20 0 Stormwater BMPs for Home Repair and Remodeling 225 0 221 0 3,707 0 3,233 0 3,023 0 Stormwater BMPs for Fresh Concrete and Mortar Application 36 0 60 0 10 0 54 0 50 0 Pest Management Guides 200 0 250 0 200 0 200 0 200 0 Pest or Pals Booklet 190 0 92 0 0 0 102 0 50 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-15 September 2013 Annual Report Name of Educational Material 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish Pollution-Prevention Begins on Your Street (two sided with English and Spanish) 1,354 1,354 1,519 1,519 440 440 250 250 0 0 Auto Care/Used Oil Recycling 50 0 3,319 260 0 200 0 50 0 Parks and Recreation Dept Activities Guide "Recycling" 220,000 13,000 10,000 0 10,000 0 10,000 0 Brochure Sub Total 224,322 1,951 20,589 1,917 16,075 506 14,582 264 14,723 379 Video Go with the Flow Video 200 200 Utility Inserts “Pollution Prevention Begins With You”, “I Want You to Recycle Used Oil Filters”, “Waste Tire Recycling (2 inserts)”, “Fats, Oil and Grease Can IT Program” ads for City Pride C/W utility insert 1.575 M 1.575 M 1.575 M 1.575 M Promotional Materials Promotional Materials (folders, magnets, pencils, key chains, rulers, bags, backpacks, spoke sliders, highlighters, hand sanitizer, book covers, FOG can lids, wrist bands, tattoos, crayons) 3485 516 4,490 100 5,670 30 3,638 0 Advertisements MAX City Bus ads “Report Illegal Storm Drain Dumping; Take the Unwanted Products to the HHW Facility at 1716 Morgan Road” “Can You Live With the Things You Put Down the Drain? Remember We all Live Down Stream. Report Illegal Storm Drain Dumping”; The River Begins At Your Front Door” “Dispose of Grease Properly, Do Not Pour It Down the Drain. If You See a Wastewater Spill, Notify Immediately 577- 6200” 2.7M 21.74 M 43.80 M 109 M ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-16 September 2013 Annual Report Name of Educational Material 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish English Spanish MAX City Bus Stop Bench ads “Only Rain Down the Drain” “Report Polluters, call 577- 6200”. (Impressions are based on an approximate Traffic Pattern estimate of 10,000 impressions per day. This is approximately 5% of the population of Modesto.) 65.45 M 32.73 M 32.85 M 32.85M 0 0 TOTAL 224,322 1,951 69.75 M 2,433 55.49 M 606 78.24 M 32.85 M 110.59 M 379 The number of impressions is high due to the use of bus stop benches and MAX City Buses that promote “Only Rain Down the Drain,” 24 hour hotline and other environmental advertisements that are displayed on the side of the buses. Since the number of impressions is so far above the Stormwater Program goal of making 1,000,000 impressions per year, it is recommended that the resources spent on advertising be reduced. The City of Modesto can continue to meet the goal of 1,000,000 impressions per year, and can apply the resources toward activities that monitor or address identified risks to receiving water quality. 116,011,340 69,751,854 55,490,095 78,245,352 110,593,361 744,451 2,433 540 32,850,294 379 0 20,000,000 40,000,000 60,000,000 80,000,000 100,000,000 120,000,000 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total Impressions Made English Spanish ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-17 September 2013 Annual Report Distribute Outreach Materials Targeted at Residential Community Activities The City distributes outreach materials targeting the following residential community activities. For fiscal year 2012-2013 we are including utility billing inserts: automobile repair and maintenance, automobile washing, disposal of household hazardous waste paints, cleaning products), home and garden care activities and product use pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers). Table 3-10: Summary of Impressions by Target Audience Target Audience 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Automobile repair and maintenance 3,000 3,319 260 200 240,057 246,836 Automobile washing 3,000 0 440 250 57 3,747 Disposal of household hazardous waste 3,000 264,019 440 250 240,057 507,766 Home and garden care activities and product use 3,000 2,251 1,658 1,095 120,057 128,061 TOTAL 12,000 269,589 2,798 1,795 600,228 886,410 Develop Outreach Material for Targeted Residential Community Activities The City has developed outreach materials targeting the following residential community activities: Swimming pool cleaning and draining, Fall season leaves pick-up, Home improvement and construction activities, and Household chemical disposal. The City utilized various means of public outreach: Modesto Bee Bus Stop Benches (discontinued 2012-2013); Utility Inserts; Updated Website; and Bus Advertisements. Conduct Public Opinion Surveys The City conducted additional surveys to assess the effectiveness of the public outreach efforts. This survey process recognizes that the education program is continually refining messages to be communicated, evaluating the audiences to be reached, and identifying the most effective and cost efficient methods with which to communicate. To better understand the level of awareness in the community, the City conducted a baseline public opinion survey that was completed in May 2005. The survey results established a baseline for assessing public perceptions and behaviors related to stormwater quality management. A follow-up survey was completed in February 2007. The public opinion survey ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-18 September 2013 Annual Report was incorporated with City wide survey efforts for efficiency, logistical and budgetary reasons, which was completed in 2009-2010. The following is a summary of the 2009-2010 public opinion survey results: Reducing pollutants in stormwater runoff has increased in personal importance, from lowest of five in the baseline survey to third of five in the 2009-2010 survey results. Resident opinions about the pollution of Modesto’s underground water supplies have been largely consistent since the 1996 survey. When compared to the 2005 respondents, significantly fewer of the 2010 respondents mentioned oil as a substance that might pollute the city’s underground water supply. No statistically significant differences in the motor oil changing habits between surveys. Significantly more of the 2010 respondents mentioned that they store paint for later use, rather than disposing of paint at the collection facility. The City of Modesto will not be conducting another City wide survey during this permit term. Therefore there will not be a second survey conducted during the 2012-2013 permit year. Translate Outreach Material into Spanish and other Languages The City translated outreach material into Spanish and other languages for targeted outreach efforts. The City has developed or translated 17 types of outreach materials in languages other than English. Most commonly materials have been developed or translated into Spanish. One brochure has been translated into Spanish, Cambodian, Assyrian, and Vietnamese. During 2012-2013, the City completed translation into Spanish of the Mobile Washers brochure and a FOG brochure (Appendix C, Mobile Washers and Cleaners Spanish and FOG Spanish). Table 3-11: Summary of Outreach Materials and Available Languages Previously Translated during Permit Cycle Name of Outreach Material Target Audience/ Activity Languages Brochures Door Hanger – No Dumping / No Tire Residential community English, Spanish Household Hazardous Waste Residential community English, Spanish Pollution Prevention Begins on Your Street Residential community Homeowners Do-it-yourselfers English, Spanish Rockwell Drains Residential community English, Spanish, Vietnamese, Assyrian, Cambodian Swimming Pools, Jacuzzis & Fountains Pool companies, pool contractors, residents English, Spanish Landscaping and Pest Control Landscapers, Gardeners, Pest Control Companies, Residential Community English, Spanish ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-19 September 2013 Annual Report Previously Translated during Permit Cycle Name of Outreach Material Target Audience/ Activity Languages Brochures Fats, Oil and Grease Restaurants, Food Service Providers, Residential Community English, Spanish Mobile Washers Mobile Washing Companies (carpet cleaners, power washers, etc.) English, Spanish Other Promotional Materials for Used Oil & Filter Recycling Program and Stormwater Pollution Prevention (magnets, key chains, pencils) Residential community Do-it-yourselfers English, Spanish Flyers Door Hanger – No Dumping / No Tire Residential community English, Spanish Pollution Prevention Begins on Your Street Residential community English, Spanish Fact Sheets Controlling Ants in Your House (IPM) Residential community English, Spanish Controlling Aphids in Your Garden (IPM) Home gardeners English, Spanish Controlling Snails And Slugs In Your Garden (IPM) Home gardeners English, Spanish Controlling Yellow Jackets Around Your Home Residential community English, Spanish Finding A Pest Control Company Residential community English, Spanish Growing a Healthy Garden to Manage Pests Naturally (IPM) Residential community Home gardeners English, Spanish How To Control Weeds (IPM) Residential community English, Spanish Keeping Fleas Off Your Pets and Out of Your Yard (IPM) Animal owners Homeowners English, Spanish Keeping Mosquitoes Away From You and Your Yard (IPM) Residential community English, Spanish Living With Spiders: The Helpful Hunters (IPM) Residential community Home gardeners English, Spanish ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-20 September 2013 Annual Report Support Grass-root Neighborhood and Citizen Clean-up Days and Events Table 3-12: Grass-roots Clean-up Days and Accomplishments Clean-up Date Name of Event Number of Volunteers Amount of Litter and Debris Removed 4/25/2009 Lower Tuolumne River Parkway Cleanup (Sponsored by the Tuolumne River Trust) 50 Unknown 4/25/2009 Airport Neighborhood Clean- Up (Sponsored by the City of Modesto) 20 42.98 tons 5/9/2009 Tuolumne River Park/Morton Blvd 100 Unknown 5/16/2009 Airport Neighborhood Clean- up (Sponsored by Community Churches) 325 9.45 tons 6/6/2009 Virginia Corridor Clean-up 30 Unknown 9/12/2009 Tuolumne River Clean Up 95 400 lbs 9/12/2009 Hi-Tec Clean Up Coalition 25 30 bags of trash 12/10/2009 Weed and Seed Clean Up 25 100 lbs 5/22/2010 Green on the Stream Event 1000 Unknown 6/5/2010 Takin' it to the Street Clean Up Event 1000 Unknown 9/11/2010 Takin it to the Streets Community Service Day (Sponsored by the City of Modesto) 1000 23 tons 9/11/2010 Tuolumne River Clean Up (Sponsored by the Tuolumne River Trust) 300 1.5 tons 10/16/2010 Boyett B-Green Recycle E Waste (Sponsored in partnership with City of Modesto) Unknown Unknown 12/11/2010 Airport Neighborhood Winter Workday (Sponsored by the Tuolumne River Trust) 75 400 lbs 4/2/2011 Takin it to the Streets Spring Clean up (Sponsored by the City of Modesto) 1000 23 tons ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-21 September 2013 Annual Report Clean-up Date Name of Event Number of Volunteers Amount of Litter and Debris Removed 5/21/2011 Green on the Stream (Sponsored by the Tuolumne River Trust) 30 400 lbs 6/25/2011 Takin it to the Streets National Trails Day (Sponsored by the City of Modesto) 1000 23 tons 8/30/2011 Sea to Sky to Sea 150 400 lbs 9/17/2011 Takin it to the Streets Community Service Day (Sponsored by the City of Modesto) 50 2.0 tons 10/22/2011 Boyett Petroleum B Green Recycling Event / E Waste (Sponsored in partnership with City of Modesto) 30 1.5 tons 3/29/2012 Tuolumne River Clean Up at 7th Street Lion Bridge (Sponsored in partnership with Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources) Sheriff / Inmate labor 4.0 tons 4/21/2012 Earth Day in the Park (Sponsored by the City of Modesto) Recycling Collection / E Waste 100 2.0 tons 6/14/2012 Paddle to the Sea (Sponsored by the Tuolumne River Trust) 75 200 lbs 6/15/2012 Paddle to the Sea (Sponsored by the Tuolumne River Trust) 75 200 lbs 2011/2012 Tire Amnesty (Sponsored by City of Modesto Solid Waste) NA 1,859 tires (appx 19 tons) 9/29/12 Fall Tuolumne River Cleanup 250 10,000 lbs 4/20/13 Earth Day in the Part (sponsored by the City of Modesto) Recycling/E-waste Collection 100 8,260 lbs paper 5,400 lbs E-waste Unknown amount general recycling (recycled value $299.32 – donated to City of Modesto Dog Park) 4/27/13 Tuolumne River Cleanup between 7th and 9th Street Bridges >120 17,300 lbs 90 tires 40 shopping carts 4/27/13 West Modesto Neighborhood Cleanup 100 Debris unknown 200 tires 4/27/13 Love Modesto 4,000 Unknown ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 3-22 September 2013 Annual Report Clean-up Date Name of Event Number of Volunteers Amount of Litter and Debris Removed 6/4/13 Paddle to the Sea 45 50 lbs 6/5/13 Paddle to the Sea 45 50 lbs Make Presentations to City Council The City made presentations to the City Council including funding of programs, allocation of resources for special studies, updates during the permit term on the stormwater program progress. These presentations provide an opportunity for the Stormwater Program to inform city leaders, elected representatives, and the public about the stormwater program including its achievements and funding needs. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4. Municipal Operations Program Element 4.1 Overview As part of its normal operations, the City conducts a number of activities storm drain cleaning, street sweeping, etc.) that can generate or mobilize pollutants. The purpose of the Municipal Operations Program Element is to ensure that these operations and maintenance (O&M) activities are performed in a way that minimizes the pollutants generated as well as the potential for pollutants to enter the storm drain system. 4.2 Control Measures The Municipal Operations Control Measure for the 2008-2013 permit term consists of the following: Table 4-1: Existing Control Measures for Municipal Operations ID Control Measure MO1 Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan MO2 Pollution Prevention at City-owned Facilities MO3 Landscape and Pest Management MO4 Storm Drain System Maintenance MO5 Street Cleaning and Maintenance MO6 Parking Infrastructure Maintenance MO7 Emergency Procedures MO8 Fire Department Activities MO9 Training MO10 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy 4.3 MO1 – Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response 4.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation During this permit term, the Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) and Backup Response program was implemented to minimize the potential impacts from sanitary sewer overflows and spills to the storm drain system. Proper notifications to appropriate sewer and public health agencies and documentation are addressed. Response to an overflow or spill includes procedures for containing and cleaning up spills and leaks that enter the storm drain system. In addition, repair and remediation activities for the sanitary sewer are outlined in the SSO and Backup Response Plan. The performance standards for this Control Measure and the activities that have been initiated and/or completed during this reporting period are summarized below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. Table 4-17 of the August 2009 SWMP identified the effectiveness assessment questions required for the Municipal Operations Program. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements: The City revised the Sanitary Sewer Overflow & Backup Response Plan in 2010, and implemented the revised response plan during the 2010-2011 permit year. As of June 25, 2013, the Plan is again being reviewed for possible updates. (Level 1) The City implemented a Standard Operating Procedure for the cleaning of storm drains and rockwells following an SSO. (Level 1) The City equipped primary response vehicles with sandbags to address stormwater related issues. (Level 1) Approximately 22% of City owned field vehicles were equipped with sand/gravel bags over the permit term; these are limited to primary response vehicles. (Level 3) Private lateral and public SSOs remained the largest category of incidents categorized by the City (39% of the total in 2012-2013). This was attributed to increased awareness of SSOs. (Level 3) Approximately 48% of the estimated volume of sewage released was recovered and removed from the environment in 2012-2013 (9,973 gallons recovered out of 20,959 gallons released). (Level 4) Revise the Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) & Backup Response Plan In June 2006, the City developed and implemented a Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan (Appendix D, Modesto SSO-Backup Response Plan), which outlines and updates procedures to report and mitigate SSO incidents. The Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan was updated in May 2010. The main changes to the plan placed more decision making and response responsibility on the supervisor. Updates to contact information and other editorial changes were also made. The revised plan was implemented during the 2010-2011 permit year. As of June 25, 2013, the plan is again being reviewed for possible updates. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report A summary of SSOs over the permit term are listed in the figure below: Implement Sewer and Storm Drain Maintenance Procedures The City implemented sewer (Appendix D, SSO Cleanup Procedure) and storm drain maintenance procedures (Appendix D, Storm Drain SOP) to minimize potential overflows and infiltration of sewage into the storm drain system. Equip City-owned Vehicles with Spill Containment and Prevention Materials The City equips it primary response vehicles with sandbags to address stormwater related issues. The City also maintains sandbags at the City corporation yard and at the Sutter Water Quality Control Plant. These stockpiles can be accessed by City staff responding to incidents. A summary of the number of City-owned vehicles equipped with sandbags is provided below. Table 4-2: Summary of City Vehicles Equipped with Sand/Gravel Bags 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Number of City-Owned Field Vehicles (Trucks) 155 111 184 184 184 Number of City-owned Vehicles Equipped with Sand/Gravel Bags 38 40 41 41 41 100 94 66 68 76 12 67 57 61 58 50 19 6 4 15 38 7 3 3 3 0 20 40 60 80 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 MO1 - Summary of SSOs Total # of SSOs Total # of SSOs Fully Recovered Total # of SSOs Entered Rockwell/Basin Total # of SSOs Entered Receiving Water ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4.4 MO2 – Pollution Prevention at City-Owned Facilities 4.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Pollution Prevention at City-owned Facilities control measure ensures that the City implements BMPs to minimize/eliminate pollutants from City-owned facilities corporation yard, bus yard, Modesto City Airport). To further the framework provided by this control measure, stormwater Facility Pollution Prevention Plans or Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans are developed and maintained for the City’s vehicle maintenance facilities. 4.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements The City of Modesto completed construction of a new transit facility in September 2012. A was developed for this facility in November 2012. The City Bus Yard, Modesto City Airport, and new City of Modesto Bus Maintenance Facility were inspected for BMP implementation and compliance. (Level 1) for the Airport and Bus Yard were reviewed and revised. (Level 1) During the inspection of various City owned facilities during the permit term, 21 deficiencies were noted and all were corrected. (Level 3) All City-owned or operated vehicle/equipment wash areas are self-contained, equipped with a sand/oil separator and connected to the sanitary sewer. (Level 1) Develop for New Transit Facility A Construction on the new bus maintenance facility was completed in September 2012. The facility had originally planned to file a NONA due to the fact that it is designed in such a way that the runoff from a 100 year, 24-hour duration storm (16,939ft3) is fully contained on-site in underground french drains. The runoff is treated by a 16 cartridge Stormfilter vault and a 2 cartridge Stormfilter vault prior to discharge to the underground french drains. However, it was determined by the Regional Water Quality Control Board in October 2012 that bus maintenance facilities are currently ineligible for the no-exposure conditional exclusion under the 1997 IGP and, therefore, was required to file a NOI and develop a in November 2012. The City plans to file a NEC upon adoption of the new IGP in 2014. Review/Revise for City-owned Facilities 1) Three City-owned facilities are permitted under the California General Permit for Discharges of Stormwater Associated with Industrial Activities: the City Bus Yard (WDID 5S50I001992), the Modesto City Airport (WDID 5S50I001456), and the City of Modesto Bus Maintenance Facility WDID 5S50I023905 (NOI 11/2/12). According to the conditions of the Industrial General Permit these three facilities are inspected biennially for BMP implementation and compliance. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The for the Modesto City Airport was revised during the 2009-2010 reporting year and changes included: The airport relocated the sampling point to the southeast side of the airport to get a more representative sample that is not influenced by runoff from a nearby residential area. The for the new bus maintenance facility was developed and put into effect in November 2012 after it was discovered that the facility was not eligible for a NONA under the current IGP requirements. All buildings at the City Bus Yard were demolished in April 2013 and the facility received a NOT on 5/13/13. Table 4-3: Summary of Issues Identified During Annual Inspections of City-Owned IGP Facilities Facility 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 City Bus Yard WDID 5S50I001992 2 1 Not due for inspection 0 Not due for inspection Modesto City Airport WDID 5S50I001456 6 0 Not due for inspection 6 Not due for inspection City of Modesto Bus Maintenance Facility WDID 5S50I023905 n/a n/a n/a n/a 0 Require Wash Areas be Connected to Sanitary Sewer or Other Treatment Control BMP All City-owned and/or operated vehicle/equipment wash areas are self-contained, equipped with a sand/oil separator, and properly connected to the sanitary sewer. Stormwater Program staff coordinated with the Public Works Department to determine the level of pretreatment required for connecting vehicle and/or equipment wash areas to the sanitary sewer system. The wash areas are required to be either self-contained (through the implementation of BMPs) or connected to a sand/oil separator or alternative pre-treatment device and plumbed to the sanitary sewer. Table 4-4: Total Number of Existing City-Owned Facilities with Wash Areas 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total Number of CIPs Reviewed 10 11 10 18 24 Total Number of CIPs Reviewed with Vehicle or Equipment Wash Areas 0 1 0 0 0 Total Number of Existing Facilities with Vehicle or Equipment Wash Areas 3 3 3 4 4 Total Number of Existing Facilities with Vehicle or Equipment Wash Areas Connected to Sanitary Sewer or Self-contained 3 3 3 4 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4.5 MO3 – Landscape and Pest Management 4.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Landscape and Pest Management control measure is in place to minimize/eliminate pollutant discharges from the City’s usage and storage of fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. BMPs appropriate to this control measure promote the use of Integrated Pest Management (IPM), and retaining and planting of native plant species requiring less water and chemical augmentation to remain healthy. 4.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements The City tracks pesticides and fertilizers applied by City Departments and City hired contractors. (Level 1) The City has approximately 800 acres of parks, of which approximately 275 acres are subject to IPM protocols. (Level 1) 3,189 gallons and 1,533 pounds of active ingredients were applied over the permit term. (Level 1) Contract language requiring stormwater and receiving water protection as well as IPM was added in June 2010. (Level 3) The Landscape Management Plan, which is a component of the park planning documents, was deemed not to need revision after the adoption of the 2008-2013 permit. The City conducted audits of City-hired landscape maintenance contractors for compliance with pesticide use contract requirements. (Level 1) Implement Standardized Application Protocol The City implemented a standardized application protocol for routine and non-routine use of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. To measure use of landscape maintenance products, the City tracks: acreage of City Parks subject to IPM protocols; usage of pesticides, fertilizers and herbicides by individual City departments; and usage of pesticides by City contractors. To better determine pesticide use, beginning in 2008-2009, the City began tracking the active ingredients in the pesticides used in addition to the products names. The total amounts of active ingredients applied during the permit term are summarized below (Appendix D, Modesto Pesticide Use). Summary of Pesticide1 Active Ingredients Applied by City Departments and City-Hired Contractors ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 1Pesticides include herbicide, insecticides, fungicides, and rodenticides Review Municipal Code for Standardized Application Protocols The City reviewed the Municipal Code regarding the use of standardized application protocols for pesticide, herbicide, and fertilizer application contracts. The City has contract language regarding the use of standard application protocols for pesticide, herbicide, and fertilizer application. Contract language requiring stormwater and receiving water protection, as well as IPM, was added as an amendment in June 2010 (Appendix D, Contract Language and Addendum No.1). The contract language provides the mechanism and enforcement authority for the City to require the inclusion in contracts and compliance by contactors with the City’s standard pesticide/fertilizer application protocols and a change to the City’s municipal code was determined not to be needed. As discussed in Section 9, monitoring of receiving water over the permit term has shown that pesticides levels in discharges to receiving water are below water quality objectives. This is attributed to appropriate use of pesticides and the City of Modesto’s adoption of IPM protocols. Review/Revise Landscaping Management Plan and Park Master Plan The City reviewed its Landscaping Management Plan to promote the planting of native species, and minimize the use of water, pesticides, fertilizers, and herbicides (Appendix D, Modesto Landscape MP). The City’s General Plan, which serves as the overall park planning document, was revised in October 2008. The Landscape Management Plan, which is a component in the park planning documents, is expected to undergo revision during 2014-2015. 1062 178 689 859 401 233 513 174 280 333 0 200 400 [PHONE REDACTED] 1200 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 MO3 - Pesticide Active Ingredients Applied by City Departments and City-hired Landscapers Amount of Active Ingredient Applied (gallons) Amount of Active Ingredient Applied (pounds) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit City-Hired Landscape Maintenance Contractors The City requires contractors to abide by standardized pesticide application protocols. City departments and contractors are provided training through a best management practices fact sheet (Appendix D, Landscape Maintenance BMP and Landscape Maintenance BMP Spanish). The City conducted audits of City-hired landscape maintenance contractors to ensure they are complying with contract requirements regarding pesticide use: Table 4-6: Summary of Landscape Maintenance Contractor Audits Landscape Maintenance Contractor 2009-2010 2011-2012 Audit Results* City of Modesto Urban Forestry and Parks Department 4/3/2009 2/23/2012 This department follows County and State guidelines for all applications, storage, and disposal of pesticides. Valley Crest Golf Course Maintenance 4/28/2009 2/23/2012 This contractor abides by IPM concepts and adheres to national and local regulations with regards to material handling, storage, and application. Grover Landscaping 6/15/2010 2/23/2012 This contractor follows all State and County guidelines for herbicide application and all storage and disposal of materials is done at their own facilities, not City facilities. *Audit results were the same for 2009-2010 and 2011-2012 permit years. 4.6 MO4 – Storm Drain System Maintenance 4.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Storm Drain System Maintenance Control Measure provides for the long-term performance and integrity of the City’s storm drain system. The Control Measure addresses the prioritization of catch basins for cleaning and maintenance, catch basin placarding, special event requirements to prevent accumulation of trash and debris from catch basins, as well as record keeping tracking relevant program effectiveness data. 4.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements The City developed procedures for reporting incorrect storm drain system information. (Level 1) Language has been added to contracts requiring contractors to use IPM methods in detention basins. (Level 3) The East Side Mosquito Abatement District control mosquitos in detention basins through the addition of mosquito fish and mosquito pellets which alter the pH of the water, making it uninhabitable to mosquitoes and their larvae. These practices replaced the use of mosquito oil. (Level 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City’s 10,320 catch basins were classified based on priority: 817 were classified as High Priority; 1,295 as Medium Priority; and 8,208 as Low Priority. (Level 1) The City established a catch basin cleaning schedule that identifies maintenance interval based on catch basin’s prioritization. (Level 3) 5,214 high priority catch basin inspections and cleanings were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) Approximately 65 tons of material/debris were removed from high priority catch basins. (Level 4) 5,180 medium priority catch basin inspections and cleanings were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) Approximately 103 tons of material/debris were removed from medium priority catch basins. (Level 4) 16,427 low priority catch basin inspections and cleanings were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) 361,471 lineal feet of high and medium priority pipe was cleaned over the permit term. (Level 4) The City audited the catch basin cleaning frequency during the 2009-2010 permit year. (Level 1) At the end of the latest reporting period, 100% of the City’s catch basins were labeled with markers. (Level 1) During the permit term, the City discontinued the practice of installing plastic markers, and now installs stainless steel plates, with every storm drain marker now strategically being replaced with new metal markers. (Level 1) 2,183 markers were replaced during the permit term. (Level 1) The City developed provision of the Special Event Permits that require management of trash and litter at special events which can be reasonably expected to generate trash and litter. (Level 1) 442 Special Events were required to obtain and comply with the City’s Special Use Permit. (Level 1) All basins are inspected every 3 months, and all pump stations are inspected on a basis. (Level 1) Over the permit term, 16 basin inspections required follow-up action. (Level 1) 111 inspections were performed on 25 pump stations over the permit term. (Level 1) 101 cleanings were performed on 25 pump stations over the permit term. (Level 1) 298 tons of material/debris were removed from the pump stations over the permit term. (Level 4) Inspection and cleaning records were reviewed during the 2010-2011 permit year. No deficiencies were found. (Level 1) The City developed a Standard Operating Procedure for cleaning positive storm drain catch basins and rockwells. (Level 1) Develop Procedure for Reporting Incorrect Storm Drain System Information The City maintains a database to geographically locate and store catch basin information including the type of storm drain marker, and inspection dates. An Access Database tracks catch basin locations and inspection dates. A separate database tracks storm drain marker information. In previous permit years, when a catch basin was inspected and/or cleaned and it was noted that the storm drain marker needed to be replaced, the information was placed in the storm drain marker database and the marker was scheduled for replacement. However, since the City has chosen to upgrade all catch basin markers with ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report the new metal markers, every marker is currently in the process of being replaced block-book page by block-book page. In addition, the City’s Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has recently been updated. All catch basins and manholes in the GIS Database have been geographically located with surveying tools and locations have been updated in the database. Use Integrated Pest Management Methods for Detention Basins During the permit term, weeds in the basins were mostly controlled by spraying with herbicides. Currently, due to budget and staffing constraints the City does not anticipate the ability to change to practices. However, progress is being made to implement more IPM for basins. Removal of vegetation caused erosion problems within the basins, so the City has discontinued vegetation control on basin banks. Language has been added to the contracts requiring contractors to use IPM methods in detention basins. At this time, diseases and insects are not dealt with, and weeds are manually removed or sprayed with herbicides approved for aquatic use. Trees and shrubs are pruned by hand and “no-mow grass” is planted in several City basins. The East Side Mosquito Abatement District controls mosquitoes in detention basins through the addition of mosquito fish and mosquito pellets which alter the pH of the water, making it uninhabitable to mosquitoes and their larvae. These practices replace the use of mosquito oil. Herbicides used in basins are required to be approved for use in aquatic environments. This requirement has been included in the City’s contract language for pesticide application. Update Catch Basin Prioritization The City reviewed it prioritization based on the cleaning and inspections and is in the process of evaluating and implementing the following changes to the prioritization to better meet the program goals with available resources. Beginning in 2009-2010, the City further refined its catch basin prioritization method. Catch basins previously identified as high priority were split into two categories, high and medium priority. High priority catch basins were defined as those catch basins that drain to receiving waters and are located within one-half mile of the receiving water. Medium priority catch basins were defined as those that drain to receiving waters but are located more than one-half mile of the receiving water. All rockwells and catch basins leading to basins are considered low priority. During 2009-2010, it was established by the updated City GIS Database that the City had a total of 10,320 catch basins, of which 817 were classified as high priority (being within ½ mile of receiving waters). The table below summarizes the number of high, medium, and low priority catch basins. Table 4-7: Summary of the Number of Catch Basins and Priority Year Total Number of Catch Basins Total Number of High Priority Catch Basins (w/n ½ mile of receiving waters) Total Number of Medium Priority Catch Basins ½ mile to receiving waters) Total Number of Low Priority Catch Basins (rockwell or retention basin areas) 2008-2009 10,799 1,946 NA 8,853 2009-2010 10,3201 817 1,295 8,208 2010-2011 10,320 817 1,295 8,208 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Year Total Number of Catch Basins Total Number of High Priority Catch Basins (w/n ½ mile of receiving waters) Total Number of Medium Priority Catch Basins ½ mile to receiving waters) Total Number of Low Priority Catch Basins (rockwell or retention basin areas) 2011-2012 10,320 817 1,295 8,202 2012-2013 10,322 817 1,295 8,204 1 The number of catch basins was lowered due to information from field surveys conducted in 2009-2010. Clean Catch Basins According to Priority Schedule Under the new prioritization the City attempts to clean catch basins according to the following schedule: High priority – annually between August and November 1st Medium priority – annually between August and November 15th Low priority – other times during the year, but at a minimum of every two to five years Monitoring and sampling results (see Section 9) have not shown a correlation between catch basin cleaning and improvement in stormwater discharge quality. It may be effective to identify outfalls where discharges exceed receiving water quality objectives, and concentrate efforts in identified areas. In keeping with the City’s approach of applying resources to areas of identified risk to receiving water quality, the practice of catch basin cleaning and prioritization should be reviewed and revised as part of the special studies proposed in Section 8 of this document ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Summary of Priority Catch Basin Inspections and Cleaning Summary of Amount of Debris Removed From Catch Basins 10,799 10,320 10,320 10,320 10,320 1,946 817 817 817 817 1,946 817 817 817 817 1,295 1,295 1295 1,295 1,295 1,295 1295 1,295 8,853 8,208 8,208 8,202 8,204 3,127 2,904 3,019 3,748 3,629 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 MO4 - Storm Drain Maintenance - Catch Basins Total # of Catch Basins # High Priority Catch Basins (<1/2 mile from receiving water) # High Priority Catch Basins Inspected and Cleaned (Aug. 1 - Nov. 1) # Medium Priority Catch Basins (>1/2 mile from receiving water) # Medium Priority Catch Basins Inspected and Cleaned (Aug. 1 - Nov. 15) # Low Priority Catch Basins (rockwell/retention basin areas) # Low Priority Catch Basins Inspected and Cleaned 19.84 8.99 21.08 15.03 31.5 14.25 33.41 23.83 70.64 33.2 96.7 68.96 0 20 40 60 80 [PHONE REDACTED]-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 MO4 - Total Amount of Materials/Debris Removed From Catch Basins (tons) High Priority Catch Basins Medium Priority Catch Basins Low Priority Catch Basins ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 4-8: Summary of High and Medium Priority Cross-Pipe Cleaning High/Medium Priority (Positive Drainage) Storm Drain Cross-pipe Cleaning 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total length of laterals (linear feet) 68,000 (estimate) 90,258 (estimate) 90,258 90,258 Total length cleaned (linear feet) 68,000 (estimate) 90,258 76,308 126,905 (includes low priority) The City audited the catch basin cleaning frequency during 2009-2010, and found no significant issues with the procedure of tracking catch basin cleaning frequency. Similar to the catch basin cleaning, it may be more effective to identify outfalls where discharges exceed receiving water quality objectives, and concentrate efforts in identified areas. In keeping with the City’s approach of applying resources to areas of identified risk to receiving water quality, the practice of pipe cleaning and prioritization should be reviewed and revised as part of the special studies proposed in Section 8 of this document Maintain Catch Basin Curb Markers The City must maintain catch basin curb markers in at least 90% of the drainage area. The table below provides a summary of the catch basin inlets with the 24-hour hotline number. Table 4-9: Summary of Catch Basin Markers Year Total Number of Catch Basins Number of Catch Basins with Markers % of Catch Basins with Markers 2008-2009 10,799 10,799 100% 2009-2010 10,3201 9,800 95% 2010-2011 10,320 9,305 90.3% 2011-2012 10,320 9,734 94.3% 2012-2013 10,322 10,320 100% 1 The number of catch basins was lowered due to better information from field surveys conducted in 2009- 2010. Notify Stormwater Program of Missing or Damaged Curb Markers The City has a protocol for notifying the Stormwater Program when illegible catch basin markers are identified. Collection crews in the process of performing catch basin and rock well cleaning have notification forms that identify missing or damaged storm drain markers. These forms are forwarded to the Stormwater Program administrative staff for tracking and replacement scheduling. However, during this permit year, since the City has chosen to upgrade all catch basin markers with the new metal markers, every marker is currently in the process of being replaced block-book page by block-book page instead of forwarding forms for replacement scheduling. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report During this reporting period 0 notifications were received from field crews regarding illegible catch basin markers, as all markers are in the process of being replaced. Replace Illegible or Missing/Damaged Curb Markers The City is required to replace illegible or missing/damaged curb markers within 180 days. In early 2011, the City decided to replace the current curb markers with new stainless steel ones due to their lack of durability (Appendix D, Curb Markers). This replacement and purchase order was approved near the end of the reporting year, and installation of the new metal curb markers began on June 29, 2011. The City is currently installing/replacing all curb markers with the new stainless steel ones. Once installation of the currently reported missing markers is complete, the replacement of the old illegible markers will continue throughout the City. A summary of the replaced markers along with an overall summary of the catch basin markers is provided below. Table 4-10: Catch Basin Marker Summary Statistics 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total number of catch basins before reporting period 10,799 10,3201 10,320 10,320 10,320 Total number of catch basins marked prior to reporting period 10,799 10,320 9,800 9,314 9,734 Total number of new catch basins installed during reporting period 0 0 0 0 2 Total number of catch basins placarded for first time during reporting period 0 0 0 0 0 Total number of catch basins markers replaced during reporting period 496 0 9 755 923 Includes: New English placards installed on catch basins with Spanish placards 49 0 0 0 0 New Spanish placards installed on catch basins with English placards 165 0 0 0 0 Replacements (English) 177 0 9 705 923 Replacement (Spanish) 105 0 0 50 0 Total number of catch basins at the end of reporting period 10,799 10,320 10,320 10,320 10,322 Total number of catch basins marked at the end of the reporting period 10,799 9,800 9,314 9,734 10.320 Percentage of City catch basins placarded 100% 95% 90.3% 94.3% 100% 1 The number of catch basins was lowered due to better information from field surveys conducted in 2009-2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Notify Stormwater Program of Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Field crews are required to notify the Stormwater Program if they discover an illicit discharge or illegal connection. During the 2012-2013 permit term, 126 notifications were received from City field crews regarding illicit discharges or illegal connections. Collection systems field crews routinely look out for illicit discharge and illegal connections during routine maintenance activities as indicated in Section 2. Require Special Event Provisions The Environmental Compliance stormwater program has worked with the City of Modesto Entertainment Commission to include storm drain protection language (Appendix D, Special Event Guidelines) in all special event permits (Appendix D, Special Event Permit). These provisions are required of all special events, and random event inspections are conducted by staff of the stormwater program. The City developed provisions of the Special Event Permits that require the proper management of trash and litter at special events, which can be reasonably expected to generate trash and litter. The examples of the trash provisions include: Provide adequate receptacles for use by customers/visitors and workers/vendors; Provide routine removal throughout the event of filled trash receptacles, especially in food service and toilet areas; Provide routine litter removal during the event; Remove and properly dispose of all trash and litter immediately following the event; All festivals and public events must provide for recycling of any aluminum, glass, and plastic products distributed at the event. Recycling shall cover, at a minimum, the use of recycling containers in food service areas; Provide routine removal throughout the event of filled recycling receptacles, especially in food service areas; and Remove and transfer all recyclables to a recycling center following the event. Table 4-11: Summary of Special Event Permits Year Total Number of Events Required to Comply with the Special Use Provisions for Trash/Debris 2008-2009 93 2009-2010 75 2010-2011 85 2011-2012 90 (close estimate) 2012-2013 98 Implement Pump Station and Retention/Detention Basin Maintenance Program The City is required to inspect and maintain the pump stations, retention basins, and detention basins annually. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report In 2003, the City developed retention/detention basin maintenance procedures, which include inspection and maintenance frequencies as well as BMPs to prevent slope erosion. In April 2007, the City updated the inspection program to address maintenance and modification of existing basins and to address possible erosion control measures to prevent existing problems with larger basins. Pump stations and retention/detention basins are prioritized for maintenance. The City has 25 stormwater pump stations and 12 detention and 12 retention basins (Appendix D, Storm Basins & Pump Stations), which are all considered high priority. All basins are inspected every 3 months and all pump stations are inspected on a basis. The amount of debris removed from the pump stations is recorded. As part of the pump maintenance program the annual volume of water pumped at each station is tracked (Appendix D, Storm Pump Station Volumes). Table 4-12: Summary of Detention and Retention Basin Inspections Year Total Number of Detention and Retention Basins Total Number of Detention and Retention Basins Inspected (Annual Inspection) Total Number of Retention/Detention Basins Inspected After Significant Storms Number of Inspections that Identified Required Follow-up Action 2008- 2009 22 All basins are inspected every 3 months All basins are inspected every 3 months (a 3-month rotation) 2 2009- 2010 23 All basins are inspected every 3 months All basins are inspected every 3 months (a 3-month rotation) 4 2010- 2011 24 All basins are inspected every 3 months All basins are inspected every 3 months (a 3-month rotation) 3 2011- 2012 24 All basins are inspected every 3 months All basins are inspected every 3 months (a 3-month rotation) 7 2012- 2013 24 All basins are inspected every 3 months All basins are inspected every 3 months (a 3-month rotation) 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-17 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Summary of Pump Station Inspections Audit Pump Station and Retention/Detention Basin Cleaning Frequency The City performed an audit of pump station and retention/detention basin cleaning frequency during 2010-2011. The pump stations are visually inspected on a basis, and the basins are visually inspected quarterly. If inspections show a need for any follow-up actions, a work order sheet is filled out and the follow-up action is scheduled and completed. Inspection and cleaning records were reviewed during the 2010-2011 permit year. No deficiencies were found. Implement Storm Drain System Maintenance BMPs The City is required to implement protocols (BMPs) for storm drain system maintenance. The City developed a Standard Operating Procedure for cleaning positive drain storm drain catch basins and rockwells (Appendix D, Storm Drain SOP). The SOP provides step by step instruction to field crew on equipment operation, illicit discharge awareness, cleaning methods, and debris management. 4.7 MO5 – Street Cleaning and Maintenance 4.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Street Cleaning and Maintenance Control Measure helps to ensure that City streets are maintained and cleaned to reduce pollutants. 23 23 25 25 25 21 15 25 25 25 21 13 23 22 22 58.13 55.62 62.38 72.7 49.62 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 MO4 - Pump Station Maintenance Total # of Pump Stations Total # of Pump Stations Inspected Total # of Pump Stations Cleaned Amount of Material/Debris Removed (tons) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-18 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4.7.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements: 270,473 total curb miles have been swept during the permit term. (Level 1) 14,898 tons of debris have been removed by street sweeping during the permit term. (Level 4) The City reviewed curb and gutter during sweeping operations and during stormwater inspections. (Level 1) The City implemented BMPs for street sweeping activities including green waste pickup, storage and disposal. (Level 1) The City picked up and removed 84,224 tons of green waste and 68,355 tons of leaves during the permit term. (Level 4) BMPs were developed for street maintenance and small construction projects. (Level 3) Implementation of these BMPs were audited, with no major deficiencies notes. (Level 1) Street Sweeping Program The City implemented the street-sweeping program which addresses the Downtown Improvement District, Residential, Industrial and Commercial areas In 2008-2009 the City Council voted to change the street sweeping frequency due to budget limitations. During 2011-2012 the City evaluated the current street sweeping schedule and available budget. No changes were made. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-19 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Summary of Streets Swept and Material Removed The above figure shows that while the total miles of street sweeping has decreased over time (due to budgetary constraints), the total amount of debris removed by street sweeping has decreased by an even greater amount. The numbers show a marked decrease in the tons of debris removed per curb mile swept following the decrease in sweeping frequency, potentially indicating that an area that used to be swept more frequently is a major contributor of street debris. Summary of Tons of Debris Removed per Curb Mile Swept 71,618 69,065 67,931 69,669 57,468 48,950 55,757 54,600 53,698 10,474 9,102 8,950 9,225 3,014 3,710 2,860 2,618 2,696 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 2004-2005 2005-2006 2006-2007 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 MO5 - Street Sweeping Total Curb Miles Swept Total Amount Debris Removed by Street Sweeping (tons) 0.15 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.05 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 Tons of Debris Removed/Curb Mile Swept ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-20 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Streets and Street Segments to Assess Maintenance Frequency As shown in the following table, residential areas have received the most complaints during the 2008-2013 permit term. Table 4-13: Summary of Street Sweeping Evaluation Area Number of streets or segments observed/inspected Number of Complaints Received (flooding, excess debris in gutters) 2009-2010 Residential All More than 20 Downtown Improvement District All More than 10 Industrial All More than 10 Commercial All More than 10 2010-2011 Residential All 219 (estimate) Downtown Improvement District All 146 (estimate)- Industrial & Commercial All 2011-2012 Residential All 189 Downtown Improvement District All 132 Industrial & Commercial All 2012-2013 Residential All 189 Downtown Improvement District All 132 Industrial & Commercial All Implement BMPs for Street Sweeping Activities The City implemented BMPs for street sweeping activities including green waste pickup, storage, and disposal (Appendix D, Street Sweeping BMP). BMPs for street maintenance include the sweeping frequencies noted previously and the following: Street sweeping waste is properly collected and disposed of with no waste being discharged to the storm drain system; Water used for street sweeping is not discharged to the storm drain system; BMPs for green waste pickup, storage, and disposal include: Residents are informed that yard waste should be placed at least 1’ from the foot of the curb to allow storm and nuisance water to flow; where curbs do not exist, residents are told to place trimmings 1’ from point of low drainage; Residents informed that yard trimmings should not be placed near drains; City of Modesto streets are swept once/month within 48 hours of the collection of large yard trimmings; and Green waste is taken directly to the compost facility – no storage. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-21 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City picked up and removed 84,224 tons of green waste and 68,355 tons of leaves over the permit term. Table 4-14: Summary of Green Waste and Leaves Removed 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Green Waste Removed (tons) 14,102 14,966 18,813 18,292 18,051 84,224 Leaves Removed (tons) 15,750 13,050 15,800 13,590 10,165 68,355 Total Green Waste & Leaves (tons) 29,852 28,016 34,613 31,882 28,216 152,579 Implement BMPs for Street Maintenance and Small Construction Projects The City developed BMPs for street maintenance (Appendix D, Street Maintenance BMP), water line repair (Appendix D, Water Line Repair BMP) and small construction projects (Appendix D, Curbs, Gutters, & Sidewalks BMP) that include the following information: Saw cutting waste are recovered and disposed of properly; Concrete and other street and road maintenance materials are properly managed and not allowed to enter the storm drain system; and Concrete trucks and chutes are only washed out in designated areas and discharge is prohibited from entering the storm drain system, open ditches, streets, or catch basins. Audit Street/Sidewalk Small Construction Projects BMP Compliance BMPs have been identified for street/sidewalk small construction projects (see previous discussion). Audits of these projects for compliance with stormwater BMP requirements are completed through field observations and tailgate trainings. During the audit conducted during the 2009-2010 permit year, no major deficiencies were been noted. 4.8 MO6 – Parking Infrastructure Maintenance 4.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Parking Infrastructure Maintenance Control Measure helps to keep parking lots clear of debris and prevent excessive oil buildup. The Control Measure establishes a schedule of cleaning and inspecting parking lots. 4.8.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: Downtown parking lots are inspected and swept weekly or as needed. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-22 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Each parking garage is inspected daily and are swept and pressure washed with a vacuum scrubber to remove oil and debris from the deck as needed (at least weekly). (Level 1) Deficiencies in cleaning are addresses as required. (Level 1) 22 smaller public parking lots associated with parks and community recreation facilities were inspected once per week and swept three times per year. However, due to budget constraints, sweeping of these lots has been discontinued and leaf/litter debris are cleaned up three times per year. The parks are still inspected weekly. (Level 1) 12,651 inspections of parking lots/garages were performed over the permit term. (Level 1) Clean and Inspect Parking Infrastructure The City owns and maintains six parking lots and three public parking structures (garages). The garages are swept and pressure washed with a vacuum scrubber to remove oil and debris from the deck as needed (at least weekly). Parking lots are swept weekly or as needed. Each parking garage is inspected daily and each parking lot is inspected at least weekly, and deficiencies in cleaning are addressed as required. Unless under special circumstances materials present on parking decks that may not be discharged to the storm drains), cleaning crews utilize BMPs adsorbent rings) to prevent any discharges possibly resulting from cleaning activities. Weekly safety meetings are held for maintenance crews. Additionally, the Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Department is responsible for 22 smaller public parking lots associated with parks and community recreation facilities. Due to budget cuts the frequency of sweeping was reduced from to three times per year in July 2009, then completely removed due to further budget cuts during 2010-2011. Parks crews clean up litter and leaf debris three times per year, and the parking lots are inspected once per week, during the park inspections. Table 4-15: Summary of City-Owned/Operated Public Parking Facilities Parking Services Division Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Garages Lots Lots 11th Street 10th and I Street Beardbrook Park Mark Twain Park 9th Street 9th and I Street Beyer Park Mellis Park Tenth Street Place 10th and J Street Davis Park Moose Park County Library Modesto Center Plaza Downey Park Rose Park McHenry Mansion Museum East La Loma Park Sherwood Park Elk Park Fairway Park Marshall Park Senior Citizens Center John Thurman Field American Legion Hall ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-23 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Parking Services Division Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Garages Lots Lots Legion Park McHenry Mansion Tuolumne River Regional Park McHenry Museum Mancini Park Mary Grogan Community Park Table 4-16: Summary of Parking Lot Inspections Year Type Number Inspection Frequency Total Number of Inspections Total Inspections 2008-2009 Public Garages 3 Daily 1,095 2,603 Public Lots 6 Weekly 312 Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Lots 23 Weekly 1,196 2009-2010 Public Garages 3 Daily 1,095 2,499 Public Lots 6 Weekly 312 Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Lots 21 Weekly 1,092 2010-2011 Public Garages 3 Daily 1,095 2,499 Public Lots 6 Weekly 312 Parks, Recreation and Neighborhood Lots 21 Weekly 1,092 2011-2012 Public Garages 3 Daily 1,095 2,499 Public Lots 6 Weekly 312 Parks, Recreations and Neighborhood Lots 21 Weekly 1,092 2012-2013 Public Garages 3 Daily 1,095 2,551 Public Lots 6 Weekly 312 Parks, Recreations and Neighborhood Lots 22 Weekly 1,144 4.9 MO7 – Emergency Procedures 4.9.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Emergency Procedures Control Measure outlines the response process and responsibilities of the Stormwater Management Division following a natural disaster. These activities can not compromise public safety. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-24 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City has an Emergency Operations Plan in place. The plan outlines how the City will coordinate with other agencies as necessary to repair essential public services and infrastructure in a manner to minimize environmental damage, but does not compromise public health and safety in the event of emergency situations. The process of re-establishing public services is expected to reduce environmentally damaging runoff by the repair of municipal sewer and water lines. After utilities are repaired, environmental impacts are addressed. The Emergency Operations Plan is available on the City of Modesto website, at http://www.modestogov.com/mfd/downloads/emergency.asp. 4.9.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: No emergencies occurred during the permit term. BMPs were developed to minimize environmental damages. (Level 3) These BMPs were completed in May 2011 and forwarded to the Fire Marshall for inclusion in the updated Emergency Operations Plan (EOP); however, they have yet to be included into the EOP. (Level 3) Coordinate Repair of Public Services in the Event of Emergency Situations In the event of emergency situations, the City is required to coordinate with other agencies as necessary to repair essential public services and infrastructure in a manner that minimizes environmental damage but does not compromise public health and safety. No emergency situations occurred during the permit term. Develop BMPs to Minimize Environmental Damages The City is required to develop BMPs for emergency situations to minimize environmental damages without compromising public health and safety. The development of BMPs for emergency situations was not completed in 2008-2009 as planned and was rescheduled for 2009-2010. Development of these BMPs was completed in May 2011 and forwarded to the Fire Marshall having emergency preparedness responsibilities for inclusion into the updated Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) (Appendix D, Suggested EOP BMP). As of July 2013, the proposed BMPs have not been included into the City’s EOP, nor were they included in the Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, which works congruently with the City’s EOP, when its 5-year update was adopted by City Council on December 13, 2011. 4.10 MO8 – Fire Department Activities 4.10.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Fire Department Activities control measure details the plan to minimize potential impact of non-fire fighting flows to protect the storm drain system and the environment. 4.10.2 Assessment ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-25 September 2013 Annual Progress Report This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: The Wastewater Division of Public Works established an agreement with the Fire Department for assistance when responding to illicit discharges in identification of unknown substances, which includes a five-step test to determine disposal of unknown substances. (Level 3) The Fire Department developed and implemented a series of BMPs to protect stormwater. (Level 3) Non-emergency fire fighting flows are addressed by a written procedure of Best Management Practices, which is current and enforced. (Level 3) Identify and Implement Non-fire Fighting BMPs The City evaluated BMPs for non-fire fighting activities including: wash-down of driveways, cleaning tanks, and flushing pipes and hydrants. The Fire Department developed and implemented a series of BMPs to protect stormwater (Appendix D-19). These BMPs were officially adopted by the Fire Department on June 7, 2010, and include: wash-down of driveways, cleaning tanks, flushing pipes and hydrants, and training burns Implement Response Plan for Non-Emergency Flows In 2005, the City developed a response plan for non-emergency flows, which identified BMPs to minimize the impacts of non-emergency fire fighting flows to the environment. The City is required to incorporate the response plan for non-emergency fire fighting flows into the Modesto Fire Department procedures and implement them. These procedures are listed on the Fire Department’s intranet website. Non-emergency fire fighting flows are addressed by a written procedure of Best Management Practices (Appendix D, Non-Emergency Fire Fighting BMP), which is current and enforced. 4.11 MO9 – Training 4.11.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Training Control Measure is important to successful implementation of the Municipal Operations Program Element. An effective training program is one of the best pollution prevention BMPs that can be implemented because it prompts behavioral changes that are fundamentally necessary to protecting and improving water quality. Training for Municipal Operations Program Element is coordinated with the Illicit Discharges training. The training formats used may include field demonstrations, classroom, or tailgate sessions. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-26 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 4.11.2 Assessment This Annual Report incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2011-2012 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2011-2012 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: During the permit term, 7 key City Departments were trained on applicable stormwater topics. (Level 1) Pre- and post- training survey scores indicated an improvement in the subject area of 26.75%. (Level 2) The City distributes Illicit Discharge cards at all municipal stormwater training sessions. (Level 1) 646 wallet cards were distributed during the permit term. (Level 1) The City reviewed the municipal operations training manual, and incorporated printed material, slides, an informational video and pre- and post- tests to gauge the effectiveness of the training. (Level 1) Table 4-17: Areas of Focus for the Municipal Operations Program Training Target Audience Topics for Audience Public Works field crews Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan BMP implementation for street sweeping and road maintenance activities General storm water quality issues Pesticide use reduction and IPM Police and Fire Department personnel Response plan for non-fire fighting flows Notification processes for spills Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhoods field crews General storm water quality issues Pesticide use reduction and IPM Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources General storm water quality issues BMP implementation during emergency situations Conduct Training A summary of the training sessions conducted for key staff is provided below. Internal training modules and external training are listed. For the internal modules, pre- and post-training surveys are conducted to gauge the effectiveness of the training. A summary of the training survey results are noted. Pre-training surveys began in April 2010. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-27 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 4-18: Summary of Training Sessions Conducted for Key Staff Date of Training Title of Training Module Number of City Attendees Target Audience City Departments or Divisions 10/7/08 Stormwater Compliance Training for Municipal Operations 52 Public Works Field Crews - Utilities Public Works – Utilities; Field Crews and Supervisors 11/18/08 Illicit Discharge and Municipal Operations Training 45 Public Works Field Crews – Utilities and Transportation Water – Codoni Division; Pump and Repair Crews and Meter Readers 9/4/09 Illicit Discharge and Municipal Operations Training 46 Public Works Field Crews Urban Forestry; Street Sweepers, Tree Trimmers; Curbs, Gutters and Sidewalk Repair Crews; Garden Refuse Crews; and Supervisors 9/22/09 Modesto Local Government Update Luncheon Stormwater BMPs were included in the presentation 50 Police and Fire Department Police Department; Fire Department Code Enforcement 3/5/09 Illicit Discharge and Municipal Operations Training 18 Public Works Field Crews - Transportation Streets; Traffic; Electrical; Street Repair Crews; Street Light Crews; Street Sign Crews; Light and Controls Crews; and Transformer Crews 3/17/09 Illicit Discharge and Municipal Operations Training 20 Public Works Field Crews – Transportation Streets; Traffic; Electrical; Street Repair Crews; Street Light Crews; Street Sign Crews; Light and Controls Crews; and Transformer Crews 3/19/09 Got 54 Public Works Field Crews – Utilities Public Works - Utilities 4/23/09 Tailgate Training “SSO Response and Procedures” 8 Public Works Collections 9/2/09 Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 18 Field Crews Water Department 9/17/09 Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 25 Field Crews Water Department 10/6/09 Stormwater Regulations for Wastewater and Stormwater Collections 33 Field Crews Wastewater and Stormwater Collections ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-28 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Date of Training Title of Training Module Number of City Attendees Target Audience City Departments or Divisions May 2010 Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 110 Police Department Officers Police Department June 2010 Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 98 Fire Department Fire Department 3/1/10- 3/3/10 P3S – Long Beach 2 Various ECS, Stormwater Collections 3/30/10 New CGP Training 3 Various ECS 3/24/10 Got Workshop 8 Various ECS, Stormwater Collections 5/12/10 Code Enforcement Training >50 Various Various 6/16/10- 6/17/10 Got Workshop 1 Various ECS 8/3/10 – An overview of stormwater illicit discharges 4 Field Crews and Supervisors Collections 10/2/10 Municipal Stormwater Training 8 Field Crews CIP Inspectors 10/12/10 Municipal Stormwater Training 9 Field Crews Building Safety and NPU 1/12/11 Municipal Stormwater Training 49 Field Crews and Supervisors Streets/Traffic 5/17/11 FRA Training 31 Field Crews Collections 11/17/10 Stormwater Compliance on a Construction Site 9 Field Crews Environmental Compliance 3/15/11 Track Out – Construction’s Most Costly BMP Violation 8 Field Crews Environmental Compliance 3/15/11 – 3/17/11 QSP/QSD Training 2 QSP/QSD Candidates Environmental Compliance 4/15/11 An Intro to Monitoring Stormwater Runoff 6 Environmental Compliance 5/9/11 – 5/11/11 QSP/QSD Training 5 QSP/QSD Candidates Environmental Compliance 2/23/12 Municipal Stormwater Training 14 Field Crews and Supervisors Parks, Urban Forestry, City Contractors 6/20/12 Municipal Stormwater Training 30 Field Crews Collections ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-29 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Date of Training Title of Training Module Number of City Attendees Target Audience City Departments or Divisions 6/28/12 Municipal Stormwater Training 50 Field Crews Water May 2012 Municipal Stormwater Training 101 Field Crews Fire 12/6-8/11 24-Hour HAZWOPER Training 5 Field Crews Environmental Compliance 5/8/12 SSO Volume Estimation Part 1 5 Field Crews Environmental Compliance 5/14/12 Non-Potable Field Sampling and Collection 5 Field Crews Environmental Compliance 5/15/12 SSO Volume Estimation Part 2 5 Field Crews Environmental Compliance 7/10/12 Raincheck: Stormwater Pollution Prevention for MS4s + municipal training 11 Field Crews Water Division (Corp Yard) 3/6/13 IDDE: A Grate Concern + municipal training 17 Field Crews Building & CIP Inspectors, NPU 3/13/13 IDDE: A Grate Concern + municipal training 43 Field Crews Streets, Street Sweeping, Traffic Electrical, Traffic Operations, Curbs/Gutters/Sidewalks Crews 5/20/13 IDDE: A Grate Concern 164 Field Crews Police Department 1/20/13 8-Hour Online HAZWOPER Refresher 5 ECS Environmental Compliance Section (ECS) 5/23/13 Webinar: Clean Streets Mean Clean Streams 6 ECS Environmental Compliance Section (ECS) Table 4-19: Summary of Internal Training Survey Results Training Module Title and Date Total Number of Surveys Completed Average Pre- Training Survey Score Average Post- Training Survey Score % Difference between pre- and post- training Average 9/4/09 46 - 100% - 10/7/08 55 - 100% - 11/8/08 45 - 100% - 3/5/09 18 - 100% - 3/17/09 20 - 100% - ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-30 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Training Module Title and Date Total Number of Surveys Completed Average Pre- Training Survey Score Average Post- Training Survey Score % Difference between pre- and post- training Average 9/2/09 & 9/17/09 Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 43 - 91.6% - 10/6/09 - Stormwater Regulations for Wastewater and Stormwater Collections 33 69% 95% 26% May 2010 - Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 110 90.9% 98.4% 7.5% June 2010 - Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention 98 72.2% 92.4% 20.2% 8/3/10 – An Overview of Stormwater Illicit Discharges 25 55% 76% +21% 10/2/10 – Municipal Stormwater Training 8 47.5% 82.5% +35% 10/12/10 – Municipal Stormwater Training 9 83% 100% +17% 1/12/11 – Municipal Stormwater Training 49 55.5% 84.7% +29.2% 2/23/12 – Municipal Stormwater Training 14 52% 72% +20% 6/20/12 – Municipal Stormwater Training 30 74.38% 92.34% +17.96% 6/28/12 – Municipal Stormwater Training 50 54.42% 91.4% +36.98% May 2012 – Municipal Stormwater Training 101 65% 82% +17% 7/10/12 – Municipal Stormwater Training 11 66% 91% +25% 3/6/13 – Municipal Stormwater Training 17 58.5% 92.1% +33.3% 3/13/13 – Municipal Stormwater Training 43 56.1% 90.7% +34.6% 5/20/13 – Illicit Discharge Training 164 N/A 96.9% N/A ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-31 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The previous table suggests that over the permit term, trainee understanding of the subject area increased by an average of 26.75% based on pre- and post- training testing. Distribute Wallet Cards at Training The City distributes Illicit Discharge cards at all municipal stormwater training sessions. The cards list examples of illicit discharges and have the 24-hour hotline number (Appendix D, Illicit Discharge Cards). Table 4-20: Summary of Wallet Card Distribution Date of Training Staff Positions Trained City Departments or Divisions Number of Wallet Cards Distributed 9/2/09 Water Department Field Crews Water Department 18 9/17/09 Water Department Field Crews Water Department 25 May 2010 Police Department Officers Police Department 110 June 2010 Fire Department Fire Department 98 10/2/10 Field Crews CIP Inspectors 8 10/12/10 Field Crews and Supervisors Building Safety and NPU 9 1/12/11 Field Crews and Supervisors Streets/Traffic 49 2/23/12 Field Crews and Supervisors Parks, Urban Forestry, City Contractors 14 6/20/12 Field Crews and Supervisors Collections 30 6/28/12 Field Crews and Supervisors Water 50 7/10/12 Field Crews and Supervisors Water Division (Corp. Yard) 11 3/6/13 Field Crews and Supervisors Building & CIP Inspectors, NPU 17 3/13/13 Field Crews and Supervisors Streets, Street Sweeping, Traffic Electrical, Traffic Operations, Curbs/Gutters/Side walks Crews 43 5/20/13 Field Crews and Supervisors Police Department 164 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 4-32 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Review/Revise Training Strategy The City reviewed its training strategy annually and updated it as needed. Key considerations during the review and revision process include target audiences, expertise necessary, key message, existing modules, external opportunities for training, and the frequency at which the training should be provided. During the latest annual review, the municipal operations training program incorporated a PowerPoint presentation, informational video, and pre- and post-tests to gauge the effectiveness of the training. Wallet cards are handed out at all municipal operations trainings. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 5. Industrial and Commercial Businesses 5.1. Overview The Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program Element focuses on effectively eliminating unauthorized non-stormwater runoff and reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from industrial and commercial businesses. 5.2. Control Measures The Industrial and Commercial Businesses Control Measures for the 2008-2013 permit term consist of the following: Table 5-1: Existing Control Measures for Industrial and Commercial Businesses ID Control Measure IC1 Industrial and Commercial Business Database IC2 Prioritization and Inspection IC3 BMP Implementation at Business IC4 Enforcement IC5 Training IC6 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy In addition to the Control Measures listed above, a number of activities conducted by Public Outreach and Education (Section 3) support the Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program Element. 5.3. IC1 – Industrial and Commercial Business Database 5.3.1. 2008-2013 Implementation The Industrial and Commercial Business Database Control Measure ensures that the City develops and maintains a complete database of businesses that have the potential to impact stormwater or receiving water quality. The database inventory provides the basis for prioritization of businesses within the City and serves as a repository for all outreach to, inspection of, and notices for each facility. 5.3.2. Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements: The database inventory information is current as of June 30, 2013: (Level 1) o 13 industrial facilities o 544 commercial facilities o 977 temporary or intermittent sources o 198 facilities with NECs o 473 facilities with no discharges o 210 facilities to be inspected During the 2012-2013 year, businesses were reviewed for priority. (Level 1) The number of significant sources was increased as a result of auditing the database. (Level 1) The inventory of businesses that are included in the stormwater database for inspection is now 557. (Level 1) The inventory of businesses that are now considered intermittent, temporary, NEC or inactive is 1,648. (Level 1) The most common types of industrial and commercial facilities in the stormwater inspection inventory are: Restaurants (210 facilities), followed by Auto repair shops (63 facilities), and Auto dealers (31 facilities). (Level 1) The most common types of temporary or intermittent sources with identified facility types are: General building contractors (345 facilities) and Landscape installation/ maintenance (334 facilities). (Level 1) Update Database The City updated its database of commercial and industrial businesses with applicable new industrial and commercial businesses with the new business licensing issuance listing, pretreatment permits, and sanitary sewer permits. The City maintains an inventory database of commercial and industrial businesses, including those covered under the State General Industrial Stormwater Permit. The Stormwater Section is provided a new business license issuance listing on a weekly basis from the Business Licensing Section of the City. From this list, facilities are sub-divided into respective SIC code categories. If the SIC code corresponds to a NPDES Permit requirement, facilities are evaluated for entry into the Stormwater Program database. A summary of the inventory of industrial and commercial facilities and the temporary sources is provided below. A break down by type is provided for the commercial facilities and temporary sources. A summary of the SIC codes (Appendix E, SIC Codes) used to compile the list of commercial facilities, industrial facilities, and temporary sources is current as of June 30, 2013. These ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report codes are used to generate a list of the facilities subject to inspection and/or evaluation by the City. (Appendix E, Facilities Subject to Inspection) The list includes the name of the business, name and address of the owner/operator, whether the business has a stormwater permit (Industrial General Permit), or is a significant threat to receiving waters, and a description of the business activity. Table 5-2: Industrial and Commercial Inventory Summary Industrial Facilities1 Commercial Facilities (Significant Sources) Temporary or Intermittent Sources Total # of Facilities in Database 2008-2009 22 [PHONE REDACTED]-2010 20 [PHONE REDACTED]-2011 14 487 1,291 2011-2012 14 386 1,269 2012-2013 13 544 977 Total Number of Facilities with Non Exposure Certification (NEC) 2008-2009 0 43 NA 2009-2010 0 207 NA 2010-2011 0 254 NA 2011-2012 0 254 NA 2012-2013 0 198 NA Total Number of Facilities with No Discharge to Storm Drain System or Otherwise Inactive 2008-2009 0 574 NA 2009-2010 0 414 NA 2010-2011 0 383 NA 2011-2012 0 385 NA 2012-2013 0 473 NA Total Number of Facilities to be Inspected 2008-2009 22 321 3 2009-2010 18 460 0 2010-2011 14 487 0 2011-2012 14 386 0 2012-2013 7 203 NA2 1 Only includes industrial facilities with IGP coverage. 2 Not inspected. The current permit requires only list to be maintained in a City database. The City business licensing is the primary source of this list. If there is an illicit discharge incident, they are subsequently added to the inspection program. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 5-3: Summary of Type of Industrial & Commercial Facilities in the Storm Water Inspection Inventory Category Total Number of Facilities 2009-2010 Total Number of Facilities 2010-2011 Total Number of Facilities 2011-2012 Total Number of Facilities 2012-2013 Significant Sources Auto Body Shops 22 17 14 4 Auto Dealers 46 36 35 31 Auto Repair Shops 149 75 71 63 Dry Cleaners 23 16 16 10 Equipment Rentals 3 1 0 0 Kennels 6 1 1 2 Nurseries 5 4 0 0 Restaurants 535 254 198 210 Retail Gasoline Outlets 45 29 28 20 Industrial 20 14 14 13 Total 854 447 377 353 Temporary/Intermittent Sources1 Automotive Washing and Detailing 36 38 44 38 Carpet Cleaning 52 43 39 37 Commercial Pesticide Applicators 26 35 31 31 Concrete Pouring Contractors 52 57 46 41 Concrete Cutting 4 5 5 4 General Building Contractors 371 392 369 345 Landscape Installation/Maintenance 321 336 327 334 Paint Contractors 62 57 66 64 Portable Toilet Rental and Maintenance 11 11 11 21 Pressure Washing 4 4 2 6 Street Sweepers 2 2 4 6 Swimming Pool Contractors 9 15 15 16 Trucking Companies 43 34 32 34 Miscellaneous Businesses (SIC 1799) (508²) (545²) (553²) (5332) Total 993 1,029 991 977 1 Not inspected. The current permit requires only list to be maintained in a City database. The City business licensing is the primary source of this list. If there is an illicit discharge incident, they are subsequently added to the inspection program. ² SIC 1799 is a catchall category that includes residential and commercial business’s. The number was counted (533) but not included in the overall total. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Database for Accuracy The City audited the inventory to ensure that it remains accurate. Retail/Commercial businesses list assessed during inspections to determine accuracy of information provided through Business Licensing 5.4. IC2 – Prioritization and Inspection 5.4.1. 2008-2013 Implementation The Prioritization and Inspection Control Measure establishes prioritized businesses within the City for inspection and identifies the inspection requirements associated with the site visits. An effective inspection program ensures that businesses comply with the stormwater ordinances and permits. 5.4.2. Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements: The City prioritized businesses by activity type and then assesses the risk involving discharge and storm drainage system. (Level 1) Inspection frequencies were determined by business priority. (Level 1) Of the 13 industrial facilities included in the database, all 13 (100%) are prioritized for inspection. (Level 3) Of the 1,534 commercial facilities included in the database, 544 (35%) are prioritized for inspection. (Level 3) The City is developing an inventory of mobile washers in the 2012-2013 permit year. Results and recommendations will be reported and discussed in the 2012-2013 Annual Progress Report. (Level 1) 1,399 scheduled inspections (high priority) were identified. (Level 1) Of these, 1,024 inspections have been completed as of the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. (Level 1) Of these, 967 inspections had a satisfactory result. (Level 3) 557 unscheduled inspections (low priority) were performed. (Level 1) As a result of the inspection, 14 facilities were upgraded to high priority. (Level 1) During 2012-2013 inspections, prioritization of each business was re-evaluated. Based on the inspections, 151 businesses were changed to low priority and were removed from the regular inspection schedule. They will remain in the database and will be treated as intermittent / temporary sources. (Level 1) Additional prioritization is planned for the 2012-2013 permit term, and will be included in the 2012-2013 Annual Progress Report. (Level 1) Prioritize Businesses The City prioritized industrial and commercial businesses within the City’s jurisdiction consistent with the developed prioritization process. During the previous permit term, the City developed new procedures for prioritizing industrial and commercial businesses for inspection frequency. The City’s prioritization process primarily assigns priority by business type and then assesses ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report the risks involving discharge and storm drainage system. The City currently prioritizes the following businesses as high priority along with Industrial facilities permitted by the Industrial General Permit Auto Body Shops Auto Dealers Automobile Repair Shop Restaurants and Caterers Retail Gasoline Outlets Dry Cleaners Pet Kennels Equipment Rental Businesses Nurseries Industrial Facilities permitted by Industrial General Permit All other facilities are considered low priority. The City upgrades low priority facilities to high priority if there is evidence of incidents of illicit discharges. Facilities with no risk of discharge are not included in the inspection program. However, the City will inspect these facilities if illicit discharges are identified. High priority facilities are inspected twice during the course of the five-year permit term. Low priority facilities are inspected on an as needed basis (based on complaint or evidence of illicit discharges). Table 5-4: Commercial and Industrial Facility Prioritization Summary Category Total Number of Facilities Listed in Database Number of Facilities Prioritized for Inspection Industrial Facilities 13 13 Commercial Facilities (including temporary or intermittent sources) 1,534 544 Re-evaluate Prioritization Criteria The City re-evaluated the inspection priority of commercial and industrial businesses. During this permit cycle, the City plans to assess the prioritization approach based on what was learned during the first inspection cycle. Factors that may be considered include: prevalence of stormwater concerns identified during inspections by business type, location of business (e.g. in a positive storm drain area of the city vs. draining to rockwells, retention or detention basin). Explore Certification Requirement for Mobile Washers and Cleaners The City explored the creation of a certification requirement for mobile washers and cleaners. During the previous permit term businesses that use water in their daily operations, such a mobile washers and cleaner, were found to pose a potential threat to water quality. The City is developing an inventory of mobile washers in the 2012-2013 permit year. Results and recommendations will be reported and discussed in the 2012-2013 Annual Progress Report. Review/Revise Inspection Checklists The City reviewed the Inspection Checklist and revised it if necessary. The City developed an inspection checklist to ensure that inspectors conduct a thorough and consistent inspection. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Inspect High Priority Industries and Commercial Businesses The City inspected high priority industries and commercial businesses. Based upon the City’s prioritization process, high priority business, which are noted above, are inspected twice during the 5 year permit cycle with at least a one-year period between inspections. The City plans to conduct these inspections throughout the term of the permit. The facility inventory from 2008-2009 will be used as the baseline for assessing percentage completed, however as new high priority businesses open, they will be scheduled for a first round inspection within two years of being issued a license. A summary of the inspections (Appendix E, 2012-2013 Facilities Inspected) conducted during this last permit year is provided below. Table 5-5: Results of Business Scheduled for Inspections Category Number of Facilities Number of Facilities Inspected 2012/2013 Inspection Results Number of Inspections with Violations Noted (Fail Result) Number of Satisfactory Inspections (Pass Result) Common Cause of Violations1 Auto Repair Shops 63 35 0 35 Auto Body Shops 4 6 0 6 Auto Dealers 35 21 1 20 1 and 2 Restaurants 210 122 3 119 1 and 2 Dry Cleaners 10 9 0 9 Equipment Rentals 0 0 0 0 Kennels 2 2 0 2 Nurseries 0 1 0 1 Retail Gasoline Outlets 20 21 0 21 Industrial Facilities 13 7 0 7 Totals 357 224 4 220 1 Violation Codes 1. Failure to implement adequate BMPs 2. Illicit discharges/spills detected ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 5-6: Summary of Scheduled Inspections Completed to Date. Year Number of Facilities Scheduled for Inspection Number of Inspections Completed Number with Satisfactory Result Percent Completed 2008-2009 332 (baseline) 169 154 51 2009-2010 389 116 112 86 2010-2011 244 207 193 85 2011-2012 224 301 [PHONE REDACTED]-2013 210 231 225 110 Inspect Low Priority Industries and Commercial Businesses Based upon the City’s prioritization process, low priority businesses are inspected as needed. The City conducted these inspections throughout the term of the permit. Inspections are typically conducted when a discharge complaint is received. Industrial and commercial facilities are being reevaluated to assess and assign priority status. Facilities that do not discharge shall be reclassified as low priority as they pose little or no risk to receiving waters. A summary of low priority inspections conducted during 2012-2013 (Appendix E, 2012-2013 Facilities Inspected) is provided below. Low Priority sites are required to be inspected as needed. Most low priority businesses are mobile operations working in different locations throughout the City or those that have been designated low priority as they pose little or no risk to receiving waters. Inspections are typically conducted when a discharge complaint is received. During 2012-2013 inspections, prioritization of each business was re-evaluated. Based on the inspections, 151 businesses were changed to low priority and were removed from the regular inspection schedule. They will remain in the database and will be treated as intermittent / temporary sources. Table 5-7: Summary of Low Priority Business Inspections Completed to Date Year Number of Inspections Completed Number of Facilities Upgraded to High Priority 2008-2009 61 14 2009-2010 20 0 2010-2011 85 0 2011-2012 207 0 2012-2013 184 0 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 5.5. IC3 – BMP Implementation at Businesses 5.5.1. 2008-2013 Implementation The BMP Implementation at Businesses control measure allows the City to provide guidance to industrial and commercial businesses regarding BMP implementation. Although the City may provide guidance on BMP selection, the selection of specific BMPs for implementation is the responsibility of the business. The SWMP (August 2009) identified the following tasks for this control measure: Provide BMP fact sheets to appropriate businesses during site inspection. Verify, during inspections, that businesses are implementing appropriate BMPs. When data is available from Regional Water Board, evaluate benchmark data before and after industrial facility inspections. 5.5.2. Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2012 Permit Term Achievements Refer to Section 3 for BMP distribution information. During the permit term, the 1,062 inspected facilities were determined to be implementing appropriate BMPs. (Level 3) The number of inspections where appropriate BMPs were found at Retail gasoline outlets has increased from 64% during the 2011-2012 permit year to 100% during the 2012-2013 permit year. (Level 3) The City has developed a risk based assessment to evaluate the risk of facilities to receiving water quality. Provide BMP Fact Sheets during Site Inspections The City provided appropriate BMP fact sheets during site inspections. The Stormwater Program developed BMP fact sheets for the following business activities: Industrial Facilities Automobile Body Shops Automobile Dealers Automobile Repair Shops Dry Cleaners Mobile Washers and Cleaners Equipment Rentals Kennels Nurseries Details on the distribution of the fact sheets during inspections are provided in Section 3. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Verify Businesses Implement BMPs During inspections, City staff verifies that businesses are implementing appropriate BMPs. The inspection checklist used by City staff when inspecting businesses requires verification of appropriate BMPs. Table 5-8: Summary of Inspected Facilities Implementing Appropriate BMPs Type of Facility 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Auto Repair Shops 14 11 46 31 35 Auto Body Shops 9 1 10 9 6 Auto Dealers 24 2 12 30 20 Restaurants 94 71 83 152 120 Dry Cleaners 2 8 8 3 9 Equipment Rentals 1 0 2 1 - Kennels 0 4 1 7 2 Nurseries 0 3 2 3 1 Retail Gasoline Outlets 3 12 9 9 5 Other Facilities 61 0 27 27 5 Industrial Facilities 22 4 7 11 7 TOTAL 230 116 207 283 226 230 116 207 301 231 201 112 191 283 226 0 50 100 150 200 250 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Industrial and Commercial Business BMP Compliance Number of Facilities Inspected Number of Facilities BMP Compliant ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 5-9: Percentage of Inspected Facilities Implementing Appropriate BMPs Type of Facility 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Auto Repair Shops 100 98 91 94 100 Auto Body Shops 89 100 100 100 100 Auto Dealers 100 100 92 100 95 Restaurants 95 95 93 95 98 Dry Cleaners 100 100 88 100 100 Equipment Rentals 100 - 100 100 - Kennels - 100 100 100 100 Nurseries - 100 100 100 100 Retail Gasoline Outlets 100 100 89 64 100 Other Facilities 77 - 93 93 71 Industrial Facilities 59 100 86 92 100 The number of inspections where appropriate BMPs were found at Retail gasoline outlets has increased from 64% during the 2011-2012 permit year to 100% during the 2012-2013 permit year. The City has developed a risk based assessment (Appendix E, Risk Commercial Industrial) to evaluate the risk of facilities to receiving water quality. Evaluate Industrial Benchmark Data The City is required to evaluate industrial benchmark data when it is made available by the Regional Water Board. Periodically the Regional Water Board provides the City with information on industries within the City whose stormwater runoff exceeds the EPA Multi-Sector General Permit benchmarks values. In the coming permit term the City will attempt to use these data to assess improvements in runoff quality before and after facility inspections. 5.6. IC4 – Enforcement 5.6.1. 2008-2013 Implementation The Enforcement Control Measure describes the City’s policy for handling industrial and commercial businesses found to be out of compliance with local ordinances. The Control Measure outlines the process for the progressive levels of enforcement applied to facility operators not complying with City ordinances. The Control Measure also specifies the protocol for referring apparent violations of facilities subject to the State’s General Industrial Permit to the Regional Water Board. Enforcement actions range from issuance of verbal warnings, Notices of Violation, citations (1st offense $100; 2nd $250; 3rd $500), to Notice and Order Hearings for higher fines, and penalties from the City Attorney’s office. For repeat offenders or contractors that have not filed appropriate applications, the referral policy includes notifying the Regional Water Board. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 5.6.2. Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2012 Permit Term Achievements During the permit term, the City issued: 118 verbal warnings, 197 Notices of Violation, 11 Citations, and 27 written warnings. (Level 2) The annual total number of enforcement responses has varied over the permit term. (Level 2) Over the permit term, 8 significant violators of the Stormwater Ordinance were referred to the Regional Board. (Level 3) Over the permit term, 9 potential industrial general permit violators were referred to the Regional Board. (Level 3) Enforce Stormwater Response Plan During this term, the City conducted enforcement under the existing ERP, which was last updated in 2004-2005. The enforcement actions undertaken during the term are summarized below. Enforcement includes the Stormwater Inspection Program and the Illicit Discharge Program that responded to commercial / industrial illicit discharges. Table 5-10: Summary of Enforcement Actions for the Permit Term Type of Enforcement 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Verbal Warning 9 25 42 23 19 NOV 46 79 33 27 12 Citation 1 6 3 - 1 Written Warning 1 4 6 9 7 Total 57 114 84 59 39 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 1 The number of administrative remedies includes all inspections and illicit discharge calls to commercial/industrial industries, as well as violations noted during routine inspections. Refer Industrial General Permit Violators to Regional Water Board The City is required to refer industrial business violations to the Regional Water Board under three circumstances: If a facility fails to respond to progressive enforcement actions; If a facility receives a notice for a significant violation under the City’s stormwater ordinance; or If it is determined that a site should obtain coverage under the General Industrial Permit (non-filers). The City makes these referrals in writing within 30 days of the inspection that led to the notice of violation or the discovery of the non-filer. Referrals made during this reporting year are summarized below. 9 25 42 23 19 46 79 33 27 12 1 6 3 0 1 1 4 6 9 7 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 IC4 Enforcement Verbal Warning Notice of Violation (NOV) Citations Written Warnings Legal Action ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Summary of Referrals to Regional Water Board Audit Regional Water Board Referral Procedures The City audited the procedures for referring to the Regional Water Board of violations at industrial businesses covered by the Industrial General Permit. The purpose of this audit is to ensure that proper referral and notification to the Regional Board is occurring. Referrals need to be made within 30 days of the inspection that led to the NOV, and include the following information: Name of facility; Operator of facility; Owner of facility; Industrial activity or activities subject to the Industrial General Permit conducted at the facility; and Records of communication between the City and the facility owner and/or operator inspection report, NOV). Auditing the Regional Water Board referral procedures was not required during the 2012-2013 permit year. 5.7. IC5 – Training 5.7.1. 2008-2013 Implementation The Training control measure is important to successful implementation of the Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program Element. An effective training program is one of the best pollution prevention BMPs that can be implemented because it prompts behavioral changes that are fundamentally necessary to protect and improve water quality. Training for Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program Element is coordinated with the Illicit Discharges training. The training formats used may include field demonstrations, classroom, or tailgate sessions. 2 5 1 0 0 2 0 6 1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Referrals to Regional Water Board Significant Violation of Stormwater Ordinance Potential Industrial General Permit Non-Filer ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 5.7.2. Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements Over the permit term, 956 key staff has been trained. (Level 1) Refer to Section 4 for more detailed discussion and summary of municipal training. Table 5-11: Areas of Focus for the Industrial and Commercial Businesses Program Training Target Audience Topics for Audience Public Works inspector Stanislaus County restaurant inspectors Industrial General Permit Inspection Checklist Stormwater Response Plan Industrial and Commercial Business BMPs Solid Waste restaurant inspectors General stormwater awareness Inspection Checklist Stormwater Response Plan Restaurant-related BMPs Conduct Training The City conducted training for key staff involved in the industrial and commercial business program. Key staff and training topics are identified above. A summary of the training sessions conducted for key staff is provided below. More detailed information on internal training modules and external training are included in Section 4. Summary of Training conducted for Key Staff 64 285 166 195 246 0 50 100 150 200 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Training for Key Staff including Fire, Police and Municipal Operations Number of Attendees ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 5-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Review/Revise Training Strategy The City intended to review its training strategy every other year and update it as needed. The SWMP schedule indicated that this review would occur in 2008-2009, but also noted that the schedule might be adjusted to coordinate with other program elements. The City adjusted this review to better coordinate with the planned update of the new General Industrial Permit. Once the new General Industrial Permit is adopted, the City will review the industrial / commercial training programs. Key considerations during the review and revision process include target audiences, expertise necessary, key message, existing modules, external opportunities for training, and the frequency at which the training should be provided, which will be amended as required to reflect the new General Industrial Permit after it is adopted. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 6 Construction Program Element 6.1 Overview The Construction Program Element focuses on ensuring construction activities are performed in such a way as to minimize the pollutants generated and potential for pollutants to enter the storm drain system during all construction phases. 6.2 Control Measures The City has developed several Control Measures to ensure that the construction program requirements are effectively developed and implemented. For each Control Measure there are accompanying performance standards, which once accomplished, constitute compliance with the Permit requirements. The Construction Control Measures consist of the following: Table 6-1: Existing Control Measures for Construction Plan Review and Inspection ID Control Measure CO1 Construction Program Legal Authority CO2 Plan Review and Approval Process CO3 Construction Projects Database CO4 Pollution Prevention at Capital Improvement Projects CO5 Construction Site BMP Implementation and Inspection CO6 Enforcement CO7 Training CO8 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy In addition to the Control Measures listed above, a number of the activities conducted pursuant to the other program element requirements such as the Public Outreach and Education (Section and Planning and Land Development (Section support the Construction Program Element. 6.3 CO1 – Construction Program Legal Authority 6.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation The goal of this control measure is to ensure that the City has adequate legal authority to control pollutants from construction sites greater than or equal to one acre in size. In order to have adequate legal authority, the City previously adopted a Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance. Pursuant to this Ordinance, construction activities disturbing more than 50 cubic yards of material and clearing and grubbing more than 0.5 acres are required to obtain a Grading and Erosion Control Permit. The performance standards for this Control Measure and the activities that have been initiated and/or completed during this reporting period are summarized below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 6.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: The City’s Land Development & Engineering revised the Erosion and Sediment Control Standards as part of the revisions made to the Guidance Manual for New Development and Redevelopment in 2010-2011. (Level 1) Review and update of the Municipal Code will be performed after the New Guidance Manual is adopted and approved by with Board approval tentatively scheduled for third quarter of 2013. (Level 1) Revise Erosion and Sediment Control Standards The City revised the Erosion and Sediment Control Standards to reflect the new Construction General Permit and the City’s 2008-2013 Permit to: Update the Erosion and Sediment Control Best Management Practices (BMPs); Modify the Erosion and Sediment Control Standards to include references to Section 3 of the California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA) Construction BMP Handbook for selecting or comparing source control BMPs; and Introduce language into the Erosion and Sediment Control Standards that cross- references the City’s Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance. The City’s Land Development & Engineering revised the Erosion and Sediment Control Standards as part of the revisions made to the Guidance Manual for New Development and Redevelopment in 2010-2011. This revised manual has not been adopted yet as it is with the Regional Water Board in the public comment period. The revised Erosion and Sediment Control Standards and Guidance Manual have not been approved by the City Council. Revise Municipal Code The City is required to review and, if necessary, revise the municipal code to be consistent with the new Construction General Permit and the City’s 2008-2013 Permit. The review and update of the Municipal Code will be performed after the New Guidance Manual is adopted and approved by with Board approval tentatively schedule for third quarter of 2013. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 6.4 CO2 – Plan Review and Approval Process 6.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Plan Review and Approval Process control measure provides the Stormwater Program with the mechanism to review and approve construction plans that address sediment and erosion controls. 6.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 2008-2013 Permit Term Achievements: The Environmental Compliance Section maintains a database to track plans reviewed and record selected BMP’s. (Level 1) The City reviewed and signed-off on grading and erosion plans and Construction during the permit term. (Level 1) 41 Grading Permits and 17,622 Building Permits were issued. (Level 1) 171 reviewed over this permit term. (Level 1) 41 met the City’s requirements during initial review. (Level 1) 149 met City requirements after revisions. (Level 3) City audited the grading notification process to ensure that all grading permits are tracked by the CEDD during 2010/2011. The audit confirmed the existing process captured most projects subject to stormwater regulations. (Level 1) The City audited the building permit process in May 2010 to ensure stormwater standards are being reviewed and met. A gap was identified regarding demolitions and the review process was altered to reroute demolitions to the Land Development Engineering Environmental Compliance (EC) Inspector for review. (Level 1) The City obtained access to Tidemark for the Stormwater Program staff during 2009/2010 and additional staff gained access during 2011/2012. Maintain Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) Database to Track Plans Reviewed and Selected BMPs The City maintained a database to track plans reviewed and BMPs implemented at construction sites. The Environmental Compliance Section maintains a database to track plans reviewed and record selected BMP’s. Review and Sign-off on Grading and Erosion Plans and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans The City reviewed and signed-off on grading and erosion plans and Construction each permit year during the permit term. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report To improve the building permit process, improve communication, and ensure that stormwater plan review (Appendix F, Plan Review Checklist) occurs with each application for a demolition, grading, or building permit, the Environmental Compliance (EC) Inspector assigned to Land Development Engineering is located on the 3rd floor of City Hall in the Building Department area. Table 6-2: Summary of the Grading Permits Issued and Local Reviewed Number Issued Number of Applications Requiring Construction and Notices of Intent 1 Number of Local Construction Reviewed Number of Local Construction Meeting City Requirements on Initial Submission Number of Local Construction Meeting City Requirements after Revision Grading Permits 2008-2009 17 11 10 1 10 2009-2010 13 9 4 0 4 2010-2011 11 9 4 4 4 2011-2012 0 0 0 0 0 2012-2013 0 0 0 0 0 Building Permits 2008-2009 3,242 11 18 1 10 2009-2010 3,733 9 18 5 18 2010-2011 3,795 5 17 16 17 2011-2012 3,286 4 40 6 34 2012-2013 3,566 5 60 8 52 1 Multiple permits issued for single development sites. Construction provided for single master site Notes: Grading and Building Permits are usually combined into one “Building Permit” City owned CIP Project and Local are not included in the above numbers because the City does not issue permits for those projects. Audit Grading Permit Notification Process The City audited the grading notification process to ensure that all grading permits are tracked by the CEDD. In May of 2010 the ECS II Inspector Blair Bradley and Assistant Building Official, Jim Mack, performed an audit of the permitting process for projects subject to stormwater controls. The purpose of the audit was to verify the process and ensure projects were being captured and reviewed by the Land Development Engineering EC Inspector. The audit confirmed the existing process captured most projects subject to stormwater regulations. It was determined that the City needed to amend the construction definitions to include demolitions as specified in the state‘s CGP. Review/Revise Plan Review Checklist The City will review and revise the Plan Review Checklist after the New Guidance Manual is adopted and approved (during 2013-2014). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Building Permit Process The City audited the building permit process to ensure stormwater standards are being reviewed and met. The City completed this audit in May 2010. The Assistant Building Official and ECS Inspector II identified a gap regarding demolitions and altered review process to reroute demolitions to Land Development Engineering EC Inspector, for review. Obtain Access to Tidemark for Stormwater Program Staff The City obtained access to Tidemark for the Stormwater Program staff. Completed in 2009- 2010. Additionally three Environmental Compliance Inspectors obtained access in 2011-2012. 6.5 CO3 – Construction Projects Database 6.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Construction Projects Database control measure involves tracking construction sites from the planning stage to the final landscaping stage. Maintaining a database to track all stages of the construction process is the foundation of construction-related source identification and helps ensure that pollution prevention and source control are emphasized during all phases of the construction project. 6.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: The City maintained Construction Projects Database which provides an inventory of projects tracking location, contact names, size, discharge location, selected post- construction BMPs, and construction site inspection dates and details. (Level 1) Over the permit term 219 private projects and 89 public projects were entered into the City’s Construction Project Database. (Level 1) The City audited its Construction Project Database during the 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 permit years. (Level 1) Maintain Construction Projects Database The City maintained a Construction Projects Database. The Construction Projects Database provides an inventory of projects tracking location, contact names, size, discharge location, selected post-construction BMPs, and construction site inspection dates and details. The table below identifies the number of active projects listed in the Construction Projects Database (Appendix F, Active Construction Projects Database). Table 6-3: Construction Sites Tracked in the City’s Database: Construction Site Category Total Number of Active Construction Sites 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Private Projects 53 49 54 63 Public Projects 28 20 18 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Construction Projects Database The City is required to audit the Construction Projects Inventory database every two years starting in 2010-2011 to ensure that: Grading permits and permit issuance dates are recorded; The pertinent construction inventory database information post-construction BMPs) are transferred to the industrial/commercial/multifamily inventory database; and The plan review information is included and relates to the corresponding construction site inspection database. The audits conducted during the 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 permit terms confirmed the accuracy of the database and did not identify issues that needed further attention. 6.6 CO4 – Pollution Prevention at Capital Improvement Projects 6.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Pollution Prevention at Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs) control measure provides protocols to incorporate pollution prevention during the design and construction phases of CIPs. The City follows the Development Standard and Construction Program requirements for all CIPs and obtains coverage under the Construction General Permit for projects that disturb greater than or equal to one acre of land. 6.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: The City’s Land Development and Engineering Environmental Compliance Inspector or Construction Inspector attended all CIP pre-construction meetings with contractors and CIP inspectors during the permit term. (Level 1) The City reviewed applicable stormwater requirements for each CIP with the appropriate construction contractor(s) and developer(s). (Level 2) Over the permit term 32 CIP Construction were reviewed. (Level 1) 14 of the 32 reviewed CIP Construction met City and Construction General Permit Requirements on initial submission. (Level 1) 18 CIP Construction met City and Construction General Permit Requirements after review/revision. (Level 3) The City has developed Standard Specifications and notes for CIP design drawings that stipulate compliance with the Construction General Permit. (Level 2) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report During 2009/2010 the City updated standard contract language, to ensure that appropriate BMPs are required for all CIPs. (Level 1) 40 CIP Construction Sites were inspected during the permit term. (Level 1) 33 of the Inspected CIP Construction Sites were complying With (Level 3) 9 CIP Construction Site Enforcement Actions were taken over the permit term: 7 – Verbal and 2 - Field Notice of Violation. (Level 2) 0 Enforcement actions required beyond the 2 Field Notices of Violations. (Level 3) Attend Pre-Construction Meetings The City’s Land Development Engineering Environmental Compliance Inspector or the Stormwater Construction Inspector attended all pre-construction meetings with contractors and CIP inspectors. In 2009-2010 the City re-evaluated the need for the Stormwater Construction Inspector to attend the pre-construction meeting because they typically occur before the project has been submitted or approved. Without a this meeting is not a productive use of the Stormwater Construction Inspector’s time and it has been determined that the Stormwater Construction Inspector will only attend the pre-construction meetings if the Land Development Engineering Environmental Compliance Inspector can not attend. The Land Development Environmental Compliance Inspector will continue to attend the pre-construction meetings. The Stormwater Construction Inspector provides tailgate sessions (reported in Section 3 for all projects to review the if requested. Table 6-4: Summary of CIP Pre-Construction Meetings 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Number of CIP Pre-Construction Meetings 13 12 17 12 Number Attended by Land Development Environmental Compliance Inspector 11 11 12 10 Number Attended by Stormwater Construction Inspector or Supervisor 0 1 5 2 Review Stormwater Requirements for CIPs with Contractor The City’s Land Development Engineering Environmental Compliance Inspector verbally reviews applicable stormwater requirements for each CIP with contractors and developers during the pre-construction meeting. The City’s Stormwater Construction Inspector reviewed stormwater requirements at tailgate meetings with CIP inspectors and contractors. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report For CIPs One Acre or Greater, Review CIP Plans for Applicable Requirements to Comply with the Construction General Permit The City’s standard specifications for CIP stipulate compliance with the Construction General Permit. The City’s Land Development Engineering Environmental Compliance Inspector reviews all applicable plans for compliance with the Construction General Permit. Table 6-5: Summary of CIPs Reviewed for Stormwater Requirement Compliance 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Total Number of Active CIPs 16 21 19 39 34 Number of Active CIPs One Acre or Greater 11 8 7 9 7 For Projects One Acre or Greater Number of CIP Construction Reviewed 11 7 2 7 5 Number of CIP Construction Meeting City and Construction General Permit Requirements on Initial Submission 3 1 2 5 3 Number of CIP Construction Meeting City and Construction General Permit Requirements After Review/Revision 11 1 2 2 2 Incorporate Specifications and Notes in Design Drawings The City is required to incorporate the Standard Specifications and Notes into design drawings and the review of proposed design drawings to ensure implementation of Development Standards and construction BMPs. The City has developed Standard Specifications and notes for CIP design drawings that stipulate compliance with the Construction General Permit. The standard specifications are not on the actual design drawings, but they are in the standard contract for all CIP projects. Design drawings are reviewed for all projects greater than one acre to ensure compliance with the CGP. Design drawings for projects less than one acre are also reviewed for compliance with the City’s Stormwater ordinance. Update Standard Contract Language to Require BMPs for Applicable Projects The City updated its standard contract language in 2009-2010 for small (less than one-acre) and large CIP projects, after the Construction General Permit was adopted, to ensure the appropriate Construction BMPs are required for CIPs. Inspect CIP Construction Sites and Take Enforcement Actions The City inspected CIP construction sites to ensure compliance with and to take appropriate enforcement action, if necessary. A CIP construction inspector is assigned to the project and oversees all the construction related activities on site. If the CIP construction inspector reports non-compliance with stormwater requirements to the Stormwater Program, ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report then an inspection is conducted by the Stormwater Construction Inspector and the appropriate enforcement actions are taken. At a minimum, the Stormwater Construction Inspector inspects active CIP construction sites during the wet season and during the dry season. Since the Construction General Permit Order #2009-0009-DWQ (effective July 1, 2010) no longer designates wet or dry season in reference to inspection frequency, the City began inspecting CIP sites year around, but reverted back to during the wet season and during the dry season in March 2012 due to resources. The update of the CIP standard contract language included provisions for penalizing CIP contractors for failure to comply with the provisions of the contract. A summary of CIP construction sites (one acre or greater) inspections and enforcement action is provided below. Table 6-6: Summary of CIP Construction Site Inspections 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2012 Number of Active CIP Sites Greater than or Equal to One Acre 12 7 8 7 Number of CIP Construction Sites Inspected 17 9 7* Number of CIP Construction Sites Complying With 14 8 7* * One site was issued an Erosivity Waiver from the and was therefore exempt from GCP requirements. * Three sites were issued Erosivity Waivers from the and were therefore exempt from GCP requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 6.7 CO5 – Construction Site BMP Implementation and Inspection 6.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation This Control Measure focuses on inspection of construction sites and the proper implementation of construction site BMPs. The goals of this Control Measure are accomplished through the combined approach of: Educating contractors about sources of stormwater pollutants and the needs and requirements to implement BMPs for different construction-related activities; Reviewing grading, erosion control plans and building plans to ensure that stormwater controls have been adequately considered; and Ensuring through inspection and enforcement that contractors have a construction site and are implementing the identified BMPs. 6.7.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. 16 21 19 39 34 11 8 7 9 7 11 7 2 7 5 3 1 2 5 3 11 7 2 7 2 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 C04 Active CIP Construction Sites and Submittals of Total # of Active CIPs Total # of Active CIP Acre # of CIP Reviewed # of CIP Meeting City and Construction General Permit Requirements on Initial Submission # of CIP Meeting City and Construction General Permit Requirements After Review/Revision ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Permit Term Achievements: The City verbally informed City staff, developers, and contractors of the revised CASQA outline and referred to the CASQA document on plan check review transmittal letters. (Level 1) The Construction Projects Database was used to track compliance and enforcement at construction sites. (Level 1) The database tracks the construction site inspection activities including the violations noted and the corrective actions. (Level 1) The City audits the inspection database on an on-going basis to ensure the accuracy of the information. (Level 1) The City reviewed and revised the Standard Construction Site Inspection Checklist during the 2010-2011 permit year. (Level 1) 2,149 regular inspections of high priority sites were conducted. (Level 1) 55 follow-up inspections were conducted during the permit term. (Level 2) 100% were in compliance with City-required construction BMPs. (Level 3) Greater than 91% of inspected high priority sites were in Compliance with BMPs during regular inspections. (Level 3) 68 “as needed” inspections of low priority sites were conducted during the current permit term. (Level 1) 37 follow-up inspections were conducted during the current permit term. (Level 2) Greater than 88% of low priority construction sites were in compliance with City-required construction BMPs during the current permit term. (Level 3) Alert Stakeholders when the CASQA Template is Revised The Construction General Permit Order #2009-0009-DWQ became effective on July 1, 2010. The City verbally informed City staff, developers, and contractors of the revised CASQA outline and referred to the CASQA document on plan check review transmittal letters. The City plans to formally notify the construction and development community through an updated fact sheet once the New Guidance Manual is adopted and approved. Track Construction Site Compliance The City used the Construction Projects Database to track compliance and enforcement at construction sites. Review/Revise Standard Construction Site Inspection Checklist The City reviewed the Standard Construction Site Inspection Checklist in 2010-2011, after the adoption of the revised Construction General Permit. (Appendix F, Construction Site Inspection Checklist and Stormwater Device Inspection Checklist) The checklist was revised to address inspection at high priority sites. Maintain Construction Inspection Database The City maintains the Construction Inspection Database, which tracks the construction site inspection activities including the violations noted and the corrective actions taken. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Construction Inspection Database The City is auditing the Construction Inspection Database to ensure accuracy of the records on an on-going basis. Inspect High Priority Sites The City inspected high priority sites according to the following schedule: Inactive and stabilized construction sites – once per month during the wet and dry season Construction sites discharging to Dry Creek or the Tuolumne River – biweekly during the wet season and during the dry season Other construction sites – during the wet season and once during the dry season All construction sites one acre or greater are designated as high priority and they are inspected as noted above to ensure that they are in compliance with the City’s Ordinances and applicable standards. Additional inspections are conducted as time allows or as a follow-up if violations were present during the previous inspection. The City revised the frequency of construction site inspections to align with the Construction General Permit Order #2009-0009-DWQ that became effective on July 1, 2010. The current permit no longer designates sites as high or low priority; instead sites are assigned Risk Levels 2, or 3) in determining the inspection frequency, site requirements, etc. The new permit also no longer designates wet or dry season. Low priority sites were added to the inspection frequency specified above. The City began inspecting sites year around, but reverted back to during the wet season and during the dry season in March 2012 due to staffing issues. The following exhibit summarizes high priority site inspections during the permit term. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Inspect Low Priority Sites The City inspected low priority sites as needed on a complaint basis. All construction sites less than one acre in size with pollutant generating activities are designated as low priority and inspected on an as-needed basis. Table 6-7: Summary of Low Priority Construction Site Inspections Type of Activity 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Number of Active Low Priority Construction Sites1 53 37 43 33 65 Number of Low Priority Construction Sites in Compliance with City-required Construction BMPs 38 31 43 28 65 Number of Initial Inspections Conducted 38 14 5 5 6 Number of Follow-up Inspections Conducted 5 7 2 2 21 1 Total includes CIPs and private projects Coordinate with Building Inspectors to Report Stormwater-Related Violations The Stormwater Program coordinated with the Building Department to help ensure consistency in notification to the Stormwater Program regarding potential stormwater violations at construction sites. Building inspectors inspect all construction projects requiring a building permit. The City plans to conduct additional training after the New Guidance Manual is adopted and approved. 55 44 29 29 21 794 594 285 208 268 15 11 13 14 2 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 [PHONE REDACTED]-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 C05 Construction Site BMP Implementation and Inspection (High Priority) # of High Priority Construction Sites # of Regular Inspections Conducted # of Follow-up Inspections Conducted ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 6.8 CO6 – Enforcement 6.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Enforcement control measure and accompanying legal authority to execute it are important tools for providing a fair and equitable approach to bringing contractors and developers into compliance with Municipal Code requirements. Enforcement actions may include issuance of verbal warnings, Notices of Violations (NOVs), administrative citations, and/or stop work orders. A referral policy is in place to notify the Regional Water Quality Control Board of repeat violators, first violations at high risk sites, or contractors that have not filed appropriate applications for Construction General Permit coverage. 6.8.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: 72 total enforcement actions were taken during the permit term. (Level 1) 5 of the 72 total enforcement actions resulted in legal action. (Level 3) The City reviewed the ERP and evaluated the enforcement triggers during the current term and determined that modifications were not necessary. (Level 1) 12 referrals were made to the Regional Board during the permit term. (Level 1) The inspection database was audited on an on-going basis throughout the current permit term. (Level 1) Contract language was revised in 2009-2010 to provide an enforcement process for city- owned projects. (Level 1) Implement Enforcement Response Plan The City continues to implement the 2004 Enforcement Response Plan (ERP). A summary of the numbers and types of enforcement actions taken during this reporting period is provided below. This table does not include the enforcement actions taken at CIPs, which are reported above. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Modify Enforcement Response Plan to Evaluate Triggers, Referral Processes, and Establish Non-Compliance Deterrent The City reviews the ERP and evaluates the enforcement triggers on an on-going basis and determined that modifications were not necessary. Refer Appropriate Construction Violations to Regional Water Quality Control Board The City is required to refer appropriate construction site violations to the in writing within 30 days after a third-level enforcement or significant violation in the ERP is issued or when it is determined that a site should obtain Construction General Permit coverage (non- filers). During the permit term, the City referred construction sites to the within the 30-day time period as required. Some referrals varied from this schedule due to the nature of the violation and type of response involved. Table 6-8: Summary of the Number and Type of Referrals Made During the Reporting Period Cause of Referral 2008- 2009 2009- 2010 2010- 2011 2011- 2012 2012- 2013 Three Significant Violations 0 0 3 1 0 Potential Non-Filers 2 1 4 0 0 Significant Violation at High Risk Site in Flood Plain or Proximity to Receiving Water 1 0 0 0 0 12 7 3 2 4 16 8 9 1 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 C06 Construction Enforcement Actions Verbal Warnings Field Notice of Violation (NOV) Stop Work Orders Citations ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Audit Construction Inspection Database for Accuracy During the permit term, the City audited the Construction Inspection Database every year, even though the SWMP (August 2009) indicated that every two years was sufficient to ensure accuracy of enforcement action records. The annual audits indicated that the well-established database records were accurate, and no areas were identified for further action. Based on this, it is recommended that the database be audited a minimum of once during the 2013-2018 permit term. Develop Enforcement Process for City-Operated Projects City Stormwater Construction Inspectors provided verbal information on stormwater requirements and enforcement at the preconstruction meetings, weekly construction project meetings as requested by CIP construction inspection staff and at tailgate sessions at City- operated projects as necessary. Contract language was revised in 2009-2010 to provide the enforcement process for city-owned projects. 6.9 CO7 – Training 6.9.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Training control measure is important to successful implementation of the Construction Program Element. An effective training program is one of the best pollution prevention BMPs that can be implemented because it prompts behavioral changes that are fundamentally necessary to protecting and improving water quality. Objectives for training include: Promote effective implementation of the SWMP Create a cohesive stormwater training program that will prompt behavioral changes needed to protect and improve water quality Increase general understanding of water pollution problems and pollution prevention techniques Increase specific knowledge of the SWMP and its requirements; and Conduct training for employees who are responsible for construction activities. The training formats used may include field demonstrations, classroom, or tailgate sessions. 6.9.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements: The City identified areas of focus for key staff, which included Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs, development standards, Construction General Permit, Construction BMPs, BMP implementation, inspections and notifications. (Level 1) Training of key staff was conducted during the permit term, and is summarized in Section 4. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 6-17 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City reviewed its training strategy after the training conducted during 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 to assess the effectiveness of the message. (Level 2) Table 6-9: Areas of Focus for the Construction Program Training Target Audience Topics for Audience Public Works design staff, building inspectors, construction inspectors, and stormwater construction inspectors Erosion and Sediment Control BMPs Development Standards Construction General Permit Construction BMP requirements Community and Economic Development General stormwater quality issues at construction sites Construction BMP implementation Information to be recorded on inspection forms Notification procedure for stormwater violations to the Stormwater Program Conduct Training The City is required to conduct training for key staff involved in the construction program. Key staff and training topics are identified above. The City will train every two years at a minimum and training may be coordinated with other program elements. Training was conducted in 2010- 2011 and 2012-2013. A summary of training sessions, attendees, and performance is included in Section 4. Review/Revise Training Strategy The City reviews its training strategy on an on-going basis and updated it as needed. Key considerations during the review and revision process include target audiences, expertise necessary, key message, existing modules, external opportunities for training, and the frequency at which the training should be provided. A review was conducted in 2010-2011 and 2012-2013, and no revisions were made to the training strategy. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 7. Planning and Land Development Program Element 7.1 Overview The Planning and Land Development Program Element ensures that the impacts from new development on stormwater quality are limited through implementation of site planning, design practices and post-construction controls. The general strategy for development is to avoid, minimize, and mitigate the potential adverse impacts to stormwater. Long-term stormwater impacts from development can also be reduced by requiring ongoing operation and maintenance of selected post-construction treatment controls. The City has developed a comprehensive program to establish the necessary policies and procedures in order to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from new development. As a part of this program, the City revised the Guidance Manual for New Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures (2011 Guidance Manual). This 2011 Guidance Manual was approved by the on May 31, 2013, adopted by the Modesto City Council on August 7, 2013, and the appropriate municipal codes related to new construction will be amended as required in 2013-2014. 7.2 Control Measures Table 7-1: The Planning and Land Development Control Measures for the 2008-2013 Permit Term: ID Control Measure LD1 Incorporation of Water Quality Protection into City Procedures and Policies LD2 New Development Standards LD3 Plan Review Signoff LD4 Maintenance Agreement and Transfer LD5 Training LD6 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy In addition to the Control Measures listed above, activities conducted pursuant to the Public Education and Outreach (Section Construction (Section and other Stormwater Program elements also support and provide guidance for the Planning and Land Development Program. 7.3 LD1 – Incorporation of Water Quality Protection into Procedures and Policies 7.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation This Control Measure ensures the consideration of water quality and watershed management in land development by incorporating them into the City’s General Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report. Integration of stormwater quality and watershed principles into the City’s General Plan can serve as the basis for directing future planning and development in order to minimize the ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report negative impacts of urban development on the aquatic environment. In addition, the CEQA process should provide for consideration of water quality impacts and provide for appropriate mitigation measures. 7.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The City reviewed the Master EIR to ensure that impacts on stormwater and non- stormwater runoff were evaluated. (Level 1) CEQA checklist was evaluated to ensure potential impacts were adequately addressed. (Level 1) The Director of Community & Economic Development has reviewed the existing General Plan language and determined that it adequately addresses the requirements of the City’s NPDES Permit. (Level 1) The Master EIR for the Modesto Urban Area was certified along with the General Plan update in October 2008. (Level 1) The next update to the General Plan is planned for 2013-2014. (Level 1) The CEQA Initial Study Template and Environmental Assessment Form of the Master EIR were revised to incorporate consideration for stormwater quality impacts and appropriate mitigation in October 2008. (Level 1) Revise General Plan The City is required to revise the General Plan to incorporate watershed management and water quality protection principles in the following sections: Land Use – (Chapter III) Housing – (Chapter IV) Conservation – (Chapters IV and V) Open Space – Chapter (VII) The General Plan contains policies that address how the City will direct development efforts, with consideration for social, economic, and environmental impacts. The City also recognizes that opportunities exist to address and further develop water quality and watershed protection principles when the General Plan is modified. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report In October 2008, the City Council updated and certified the General Plan and associated Master Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Section V.E of the General Plan and Sections V.9.1 and V.10.1 of the Master EIR were updated to address provisions of the 2002-2007 Permit. The full General Plan and Master EIR are available on the City’s web site at http://www.modestogov.com/ced/documents/planning_general-plan-meir.asp. The next update is planned for 2013-2014, now that the 2011 Guidance Manual has been approved and adopted. The Director of Community & Economic Development has reviewed the existing General Plan language and determined that it adequately addresses the requirements of the City’s NPDES Permit. Review/Revise Master Environmental Impact Report The City is required to review the Master EIR to ensure that impacts on stormwater and non- stormwater runoff are adequately considered. The Master EIR for the Modesto Urban Area General Plan revision was certified along with the General Plan update in October 2008. The Master EIR will be revised, as necessary, in the next update. Review/Revise CEQA Documents The City is required to review/revise CEQA documents in order to determine what potential impacts a proposed development project could have on the environment. The CEQA Initial Study Template and Environmental Assessment Form of the Master EIR were revised to incorporate consideration for stormwater quality impacts and appropriate mitigation in October 2008. The CEQA Initial Study Template and Environmental Assessment Form of the Master EIR will be revised, as necessary, in the next update. Provide Draft General Plan Amendments to the Regional Water Board The City is required to provide the Regional Water Board with draft General Plan Revisions. The next update is planned for 2013-2014, now that the 2011 Guidance Manual has been approved and adopted. 7.4 LD2 – New Development Standards 7.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation The New Development Standard control measure ensures that effective post-construction controls are required during the planning stages for development projects that pose potential water quality threats. The past Development standards were adopted in July 2001, and the past Guidance Manual was adopted in July 2002. The Guidance Manual was revised in 2011, approved by the on May 31, 2013, and adopted by the Modesto City Council on August 7, 2013. These ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report documents were updated during this permit term to meet the expanded requirements of the 2008-2013 permit. 7.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The City’s 2011 Guidance Manual for New Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures was revised during the permit term to incorporate LID strategies. (Level 1) Stormwater treatment and source control sections have also been updated. (Level 1) The 2011 Guidance Manual was approved by the Regional Board on May 31, 2013 (Level The 2011Guidance Manual was adopted by the Modesto City Council on August 7, 2013. Stakeholder meetings were held as the document was being prepared, and further stakeholder meetings are planned now that the new development standards have been adopted. (Level 2) Convene Guidance Manual Revision Stakeholder Group Comments from Stakeholders were incorporated into the revised 2011 Guidance Manual for New Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures prior to submittal to the Regional Board. The City’s Guidance Manual for New Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures update was completed in the 2010/2011 program year, approved in the 2012-2013 program year, and adopted in the 2013-2014 program year. The City held stakeholder meetings during the development of Guidance Manual revisions: Table 7-2: Summary of Internal and External Stakeholder Meetings Date of Meeting Type of Stakeholders 10-Mar-10 Internal City & LWA External Both 8-Apr-10 Internal City & LWA External Both 15-Apr-10 Internal External Both City, LWA & Stakeholders Now that the 2011 Guidance Manual has been adopted, the City will schedule Stakeholder meetings to review LID changes that were incorporated into the New Development Standards. Revise City Guidance Manual The Guidance Manual for New Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures (Guidance Manual) and Standard Specifications are the means used to ensure that effective post- ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report construction BMP controls are considered and incorporated during the planning process for Capital Improvement Plan projects and private projects. The City’s Guidance Manual for Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures has been revised to incorporate LID strategies. Stormwater treatment and source control sections have also been updated. The revised Guidance Manual was approved by the Regional Water Quality Control Board on May 31, 2013, adopted by the Modesto City Council on August 7, 2013. Now that the City Council has adopted the updated 2011 Guidance Manual, it will be implemented in 2013-2014. Review/Revise Standard Specifications The City is required to review, and revise if necessary, Standard Specification sections affected by changes in the Guidance Manual, and revised Construction and Industrial General Permits, when adopted. 7.5 LD3 – Plan Review Sign-Off 7.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Plan Review Sign-off control measure ensures that stormwater quality controls are considered throughout the development plan review and approval process. The City must conduct comprehensive reviews of development plans in order to ensure that development projects properly address stormwater BMPs. 7.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements During the permit term, a total of 269 project plans were reviewed. (Level 1) 117 High Priority Development project plans were reviewed. (Level 1) 84 CIPs were reviewed. (Level 1) Priority projects reviewed during the permit term included 33 Parking Lots, 28 Commercial Developments, and 19 Streets and Roads projects, 9 Restaurants, 9 Residential Subdivisions and 5 Retail Gas Outlets. (Level 1) Review and Sign-Off on Development Plans The City provided an Environmental Compliance Inspector II to the Land Development Engineering Department for plan review and sign-off on development plans. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 7-3: Summary of Reviewed Projects Reporting Period Total Number of Project Plans Reviewed Total Number of High Priority Developments Project Plans Total Number of CIPs 2008-2009 39 29 16 2009-2010 44 27 17 2010-2011 35 13 10 2011-2012 601 20 17 2012-2013 913 284 24 Total 269 117 84 1Total of 17 CIP and 43 private development projects combined 2Total of 5 CIP and 15 private development Priority Projects combined 3Total of 24 CIP and 67 private development projects combined 4Total 0f 5 CIP and 23 private development projects combined Table 7-4: Summary of Priority Projects Review Priority Project Category 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Commercial Developments acre impervious) 11 6 5 4 2 Automotive Repair Shops 0 0 0 0 0 Retail Gasoline Outlets 0 1 1 1 2 Restaurants 0 2 1 3 3 Parking Lots 5,000 SF or 25 spaces) 3 6 6 8 10 Streets and Roads acre paved surface) 3 12 0 2 2 Home Subdivisions 10 units) 3 0 0 2 4 Review/Revise Stormwater Plan Check Transmittal The Stormwater Plan Check Transmittal will be revised in 2013-2014, with the implementation of the updated Guidance Manual for Development Stormwater Quality Control Measures. Audit Notification Process for Building and Grading Permits The City plans to audit the notification process to ensure that the Stormwater Program is being notified of building and grading permits being issued during the 2013-2014 permit year. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 7.6 LD4 – Maintenance Agreement and Transfer 7.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Maintenance Agreement and Transfer control measure ensures that post-construction stormwater controls will remain permanently effective upon project completion for all priority development projects. This agreement is required when a developer, maintenance district, homeowners association, etc., is responsible for the continued operation and maintenance of a post-construction treatment control. 7.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements 54 Maintenance Agreements for priority projects were executed during the permit term. (Level 3) The City sent letters to the responsible party for operation and maintenance of post- construction treatment controls to notify the responsible party of required self- inspections. (Level 1) Owner-Operators of Post-Construction Treatment Control BMPs were required to self- certify and verify the maintenance of their treatment devices and return the Self- Certification Form to the City by April 30, 2013. (Level 2) The City tracked compliance with maintenance standards for post-construction BMPs maintained by the City and by private entities. (Level 3) 518 Owner-Operator Certifications were requested. (Level 3) 435 responded and reported that they were in compliance. (Level 3) When self-certification forms were not submitted, the City followed up with inspections. (Level 1) 17 issues were identified pertaining to media filtration devices. (Level 1) 2 issues were identified pertaining to infiltration basins. (Level 1) Require Maintenance Agreement in Priority Projects The City requires maintenance agreements for priority development projects that are installing stormwater devices. Table 7-5: Summary of Maintenance Agreements Executed Project Name Location (address, or Lat/Long) Original Owner Responsible Party for Maintenance Agreement Type of Treatment Control (T1–T13) Treatment Control Model Date of Agreement Execution 2008-2009 Avalon Health Care 1900 Coffee Rd Avalon Realty- Modesto Hy- Thomas Paget Stormfilters by Contech 4 CBSF filter cartridge 7/2/2008 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Lond, LLC Vintage Fair Mall Expansion 3401 Dale Road Macerich Village Faire, LP Macerich Village Faire, LP Retention Basin 7/22/2008 IHOP Post-Fire Reconstruction 2098 W Orangeburg Daniels /Zalcman Investment Co. Peter W Brown, Manager Stormfilters by Contech 3 CBSF filter cartridge 7/22/2008 Sylvan Union School District Kitchen 2908 Coffee Road Sylvan Union School District Stanislaus County Sylvan Union School District Stanislaus County Stormfilters by Contech 8’ X 14’ Vault (16) filter cartridges 8/15/2008 St. Joseph’s Church 1813 Oakdale Road Pastor of St. Joseph’s Church Director of Operations or Pastor St Joseph’s Church Stormfilters by Contech 48” MHSF filter cartridges 8/20/2008 821 Oates Court Warehouses 821 Oates Court Marvin & Buzz Oates Development Buzz Oates Development, LP Stormfilters by Contech & 2 Grass Swales 1 DSCB filter cartridge, 1 MHSF filter cartridge 8/27/2008 Walgreens 3019 Floyd Ave Best Modesto Partners Scott Best Stormfilter by Contech 1 MHSF filter cartridge 9/11/2008 Hope Village Subdivision 0 Houser Lane Habitat For Humanity Anita Hellam Stormfilters by Contech 3 CBSF filter cartridge 10/23/2008 Gallo Winery Parking Lot Expansion 600 Yosemite Blvd. E & J Gallo Winery John Bosara Stormfilter by Contech & Grass Filter Strip 1 CBSF cartridge filter 11/26/2008 West Campus Business Center 1565 Cummins Dr Mastagni & Aderholt, J.T. Venture Phillip Mastagni Stormfilter by Contech & 4 Grass Swales 1 CBSF filter cartridge 12/11/2008 Greek Orthodox Church Parking Lot 313 Tokay Ave Greek Orthodox Church Greek Orthodox Church Grass Swale 12/24/2008 Northpointe Shopping Center NE Corner Pelandale & Chapman Pelandale Development LLC Welsh Properties Stormfilters by Contech Vault (39) filter cartridges 4/01/2009 Yosemite Retail 3401 Yosemite Blvd Jose & Carmen Carranza Jose Carranza Stormfilters by Contech & Grass Swale 2 CBSF filter cartridges, 3 CBSF 5/26/2009 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report filter cartridge 2009-2010 CVS Pharmacy 1700 McHenry Ave McHenry Modesto, LLC McHenry Modesto, LLC Stormfilter by Contech 3CBSF-1- S & 1 CBSF-2-S 7/6/2009 Jack In the Box 2301 Crows Landing Road Jack in the Box, Inc. Mike Hogenboom Stormfilter by Contech 1 MHSF- 3-C 7/6/2009 Sylvan School District Corporation Yard 2908 Coffee Road Sylvan Union School District Sylvan Union School District Stormfilter by Contech 1 MHSF- 3-C & 1 CBSF-1-S 7/24/2009 Los Amigos parking Lot Expansion 1700 Crows Landing Road Francisco Chavez Francisco Chavez Grass Swale 9/4/2009 Parking Lot Expansion 605 Sylvan Ave Sylvan Union School District Sylvan Union School District 1 Grass Swale & Stormfilter by Contech 1 CBSF-1- S 9/18/2009 Big Valley Grace Church 4040 Tully Road Big Valley Grace Church John Fraioli Stormfilter by Contech 1 CBSF-1- S 11/13/2009 Modesto Irrigation District (MID) Service Center Entrance 929 Woodland Ave MID MID Stormfilter by Contech 1 MHSF- 5-C 1/6/2010 HAP Partners New Warehouse 1705 Reliance Street HAP Partners HAP Partners Grass Swale 1/6/2010 Valley Builders Exchange Parking Lot 1118 Kansas Ave Karen Bowden Karen Bowden Stormfilter by Contech 1 CBSF-1- S 2/12/2010 Vintage Fair Christian Center 300 Trask Lane Vintage Fair Christian Center Vintage Fair Christian Center Stormfilter by Contech 1 CBSF-2- S 3/11/2010 Krishnamoorthi Office Bldg 2220 E. Orangeburg Krishnamoorthi 2009 Trust Krishnamoorthi 2009 Trust Stormfilter by Contech 1 CBSF-5- S 3/19/2010 Calvary Baptist Church 1732 Miller Ave Calvary Baptist Church Dennis Moon Grass Swale 6/2/2010 ARCO AM/PM 2301 Crows Landing Road Tejpal S. Mehroke & Lehmber Singh Tejpal S. Mehroke Stormfilter by Contech 1 MHSF- 4-C 6/22/2010 2010-2011 Golden Corral Restaurant 3737 McHenry Avenue Golden Corral LLC, Seth Elder Seth Elder 3 grass swales & 1 grass basin N/A 3/29/2011 Golden Valley Health Center Parking Lot 1500 & 1510 Florida Scott Penner Scott Penner, Facilities Director Stormfilters by Contech 3 CBSF-1- S 5/9/2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ARCO AM/PM 2600 Coffee Road Chandi & Dhanda Nirmal Singh, President Stormfilters by Contech 2 CBSF-2- S 12/6/2010 2011-2012 Free Methodist Church 1520 Rose Avenue IQ Building and Engineering Don Davis Baysaver Filter Stormwater Treatment System 1 Cartridge 8/17/2011 Taco Bell 3601 Yosemite David Olson David Olson 2 Stormfilters by Contech CBSF-1-S 12/7/2011 Valley Retina Medical Office Building 200 East Granger Dr. Shi-Hwa William Chang Dr. Shi-Hwa William Chang Retention Basin N/A 1/11/2012 Doctors Medical Center Parking Lot 1441 Florida Ave. Doctors Medical Center of Modesto Doctors Medical center of Modesto 2 Stormfilters by Contech CBSF-1-S 3/12/2012 Farm Labor Housing 1540 W Hatch Road Housing Authority of Stanislaus County Housing Authority of Stanislaus County 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF-1-S 3/21/2012 VA Building 1225 Oakdale Road California Gold Medical Offices, LLC Mark Patterson Baysaver Filter Stormwater Treatment System 4 Cartridge 3/29/2012 Archway Commons 1101 Carver Road Archway Commons, LLP Archway Commons, LLP Infiltration Trenches with Grass Filter Strips, Porous Pavement N/A 5/16/2012 Mc Donalds 901 N Carpenter Road Mc Donald’s Corporation, A Deleware Corporation Mc Donalds Corporation 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF-2-S 6/29/2012 2012-2013 Meadow Glen Supportive Housing 605 E Coolidge Housing Authority of Stanislaus County Housing Authority of Stanislaus County 2 Grass Swales N/A 7/27/2012 Mc Donalds 3801 Yosemite Blvd. McDonalds Corporation Mc Donalds Corporation 1 Stormfilter by Contech MHSF-2-S 8/17/2012 Brahaman Culture Center 2325 Coffee Road Brahaman Maha Saba USA Rudra Dutt Sharma Kristar Flo- Gard Perk Filter 1 Cartridge 10/12/2012 Gallo Parking Lot 833 Yosemite & 107 Los Palmas E & J Gallo Winery E & J Gallo Winery 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF-2-S 10/12/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Gallo Parking Lot 108 & 112 Los Flores E & J Gallo Winery E & J Gallo Winery 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF-1-S 10/12/2012 ARCO AM/PM 2924 McHenry Ave Fattal, Inc Odette Fattal 2 Stormfilters by Contech CBSF- 1-S & CBSF-2-S 10/24/2013 Truck Parking Lot 400 7th Street Vladimir & Anita Rodriguez Vladimir & Anita Rodriguez 1 Sand Filter N/A 10/24/2013 Mercedes Benz Auto Dealership 3900 McHenry Ave. Sydney Ann Embry, Leighton J Smith & Murdock Smith Sydney Ann Embry 2 Stormfilters by Contech (2)CBSF- 2-S 11/30/2012 Valley Builders Exchange Parking Lot Expansion 1118 Kansas Ave. Valley Builders Exchange Valley Builders Exchange 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF-1-S 12/20/2012 In N Out Burger 1616 Sisk Road In & Out Burgers In & Out Burgers 6 Filterra Bioretention Systems N/A 1/14/2013 Bennett Place Housing 421 Lincoln Ave Stanislaus County Affordable Housing Corp Stanislaus County Affordable Housing Corp. 2 Stormfilters by Contech CBSF- 1-S 1/14/2013 Dentist Office 500 Standiford Ave. Callin & Carolyn Lee Callin & Carolyn Lee 2 Stormfilters by Contech CBSF- 1-S 3/7/2013 Dollar General Store 1539 Yosemite Ave. Sarah S. Lara Bryan Barry Embree Asset Group 1 Baysaver Bayfilter PUF-5-7- 2-EMC 4/8/2013 Stanislaus Foods New Office 134 12th Street Stanislaus Food Products Co. Stanislaus Food Products Co. 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF- 1-S 4/17/2013 Cal Mex Meats 921 8th Street Cal mex Meat Company Fernando Arredondo 2 Stormfilters by Contech CBSF- 2-S 4/24/2013 Texas Roadhouse Restaurant 3037 Sisk Road Sanders Properties Steve Sanders 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF-1-S 5/3/2013 Gallo Spirits Parking Lot 200 Yosemite Blvd E & J Gallo Winery E & J Gallo Winery 1 Stormfilter by Contech CBSF- 2-S 5/9/2013 Send Inspection Letter to Parties Responsible for Post-Construction Treatment Controls The City sent letters to the responsible party for operation and maintenance of post-construction treatment controls to notify the responsible party of required self-inspections (Appendix G, Self- Certification). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Develop Post-Construction Treatment Control BMP Maintenance Self-Certification Program Owner-Operators of Post-Construction Treatment Control BMPs were required to self-certify and verify the maintenance of their treatment devices and return the Self-Certification Form to the City by April 30, 2013 (Appendix G, Certification of Maintenance). Table 7-6: Summary of Post Construction Treatment Control Self-Certifications Owner/Operator Certifications Respondents 2010-2011 Respondents 2011-2012 Respondents 2012-2013 Number of Owner/Operator Certifications Requested 203 162 153 Number of Owner/Operator Certifications Received 144 151 140 Number of Owner/Operator Certifications Received 1st Mailing Not Tracked 92 109 Number Reporting Compliance 144 151 140 Number of Owner/Operator Certifications Received 2nd Mailing Not Tracked 43 No 2nd mailing Number Reporting BMP Problems 0 0 0 Number of NOV’s issued for Non-Compliance / No Response 0 27 31 Number of Citations issued for Non-Compliance / No Response 0 12 11 Number of Self Certifications not received prior to Fiscal Year End¹ 15 3 7 ¹Progressive Enforcement is Ongoing Inspect Post Construction Treatment Controls when Self Certification is not Received The City inspected post-construction treatment controls when the responsible party failed to submit the required self-certification (Appendix G, Treatment Control Inspection). Table 7-7: Summary of Post Construction Treatment Control Inspections Inspections 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Number of Post-Construction Treatment Controls Inspected 37 5 0 Number of Follow-up Inspections 0 0 0 Number of Inspections Found with Treatment Controls / Device Maintained in accordance with Maintenance Agreement 22* 1 0 Number of Inspections Sites/Controls Failing to Comply with Maintenance Agreement / No Maintenance Evident 15 4 0 Number of Inspections Discovering Site Not Built / Treatment Device Not Required 22 7 0 * First year of program implementation, so the City extended the grace period as much as possible. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Review/Revise Maintenance Agreement The City revised the Stormwater Treatment Device Access & Maintenance Agreement to incorporate LID strategies and the revised Agreement was approved by the City Attorney. The revised Agreement will be implemented now that the 2011 Guidance Manual has been approved and adopted. Track Compliance with Maintenance Standards and Problems Identified by Type of Practice and Maintenance Responsibility The City tracked compliance with maintenance standards for post-construction BMPs maintained by the City and by private entities. Private entity information comes from the self- certification forms and from inspections when these forms are not submitted. Table 7-8: Summary of BMP Maintenance Conducted and Problems Identified* Type of BMP Required Maintenance Conducted (Yes/No) Problem(s) Identified 2010-2011 Problem(s) Identified 2011-2012 Problem(s) Identified 2012-2013 City Maintained BMPs Vegetative Swales Yes 0 0 0 Filter Strips Yes 0 0 0 Media Filtration Devices Yes 0 0 0 Surface Infiltration Trench Yes 0 0 0 Infiltration Basin Yes 0 0 0 Porous Paving Blocks Yes 0 0 0 Extended Detention/Retention Basins Yes 0 0 0 Privately Maintained BMPs Vegetative Swales Yes 0 1 0 Filter Strips Yes 0 0 0 Media Filtration Devices Yes 14 3 0 Surface Infiltration Trench Yes 0 0 0 Infiltration Basin Yes 1 1 0 Porous Paving Blocks Yes 0 0 0 Extended Detention/Retention Basins Yes 0 0 0 * 2010-2011 first year of program implementation Develop GIS or Other Electronic Tracking System for Projects Conditioned with Post- Construction Treatment Control The Environmental Compliance Inspector II assigned to Land Development Engineering is currently working with the GIS Coordinator to develop a layer for post-construction stormwater treatment control BMPs on individual parcels. This will require the inspector to visit each post construction treatment control with a GPS device to obtain Mapping-Grade Coordinates for each ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report treatment device. Due to resource issues, this mapping has been deemed a low priority, and will be updated as City staff visit sites, over time. 7.7 LD5 – Training 7.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Training control measure is important to successful implementation of the Planning and Land Development Program Element. An effective training program is one of the best pollution prevention BMPs that can be implemented because it prompts behavioral changes that are fundamentally necessary to protecting and improving water quality. The overall goals and objectives of the training program for the SWMP are to: • Promote effective implementation of the SWMP • Create a cohesive stormwater training program that will prompt behavioral changes needed to protect and improve water quality • Increase general understanding of water pollution problems and pollution prevention techniques • Increase specific knowledge of the SWMP and its requirements • Conduct training for employees who are responsible for activities related and relevant to the Planning and Land Development Program. 7.7.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The City identified areas of focus for training, which included stormwater maintenance agreement requirements, post-construction treatment controls, general stormwater quality issues, construction site BMPs, and new development standards. (Level 1) Training of key staff was conducted during the permit term, and is summarized in Section 4. (Level 2) The City reviewed its training strategy after the training conducted during 2010-2011 to assess the effectiveness of the message. (Level 1) Table 7-9: Areas of Focus for the Planning and Land Development Program Training Target Audience Topics for Audience Public Works inspectors Parks, Recreation, and Neighborhood field staff Stormwater maintenance agreement requirements Post-construction treatment controls Public Works design staff Community and Economic Development Department (CEDD) staff General stormwater quality issues at Construction site BMPs Stormwater maintenance agreement requirements Post-construction treatment controls New Development Standards LID Standards and BMPs ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 7-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Conduct Training The City conducted training for key staff involved in the construction program. Key staff and training topics are identified above. A summary of training sessions, attendees, and performance is included in Section 4. Review/Revise Training Strategy The City reviews its training strategy on an on-going basis and updated it as needed. Key considerations during the review and revision process include target audiences, expertise necessary, key message, existing modules, external opportunities for training, and the frequency at which the training should be provided. A review was conducted in 2010-2011, and no revisions were made to the training strategy. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 8. Water Quality Based Program Element 8.1 Overview During the Permit term, Water Quality Based Program Elements were developed and/or updated to address specific pollutants of concern (POCs) that were identified as impacting or potentially impacting local receiving water quality. The following POCs were identified during the 2002-2007 permit term: Aluminum (total) Copper (total) Lead (total) Iron (total) Total Dissolved Solids Diazinon E-coli Fecal Coliform pH Turbidity During the 2008-2013 permit term, the following specific work plans were developed: Table 8-1: Work Plan for Water Quality ID Work Plan WQ1 Discharge Characterization WQ2 Pesticide Plan WQ3 Rockwell Assessment WQ4 Peak Discharge Impact Study WQ5 Treatment Feasibility Study WQ6 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy As described in the previously submitted ROWD, the City of Modesto is proposing a modified approach for the 2013-2018 permit term that would allow for a prioritization of water quality issues, and allow resources to be applied to areas of identified risk to receiving water quality objectives. The Water Quality Monitoring Program (Section 9) identifies the POCs that will drive the implementation of the SWMP for the next permit term. Based on the Water Quality Monitoring results during the 2008-2013 permit term, no new POCs have been identified, and dissolved copper has been identified as pollutant of interest (POI). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 8.2 WQ1 – Discharge Characterization 8.2.1 2008-2013 Implementation Once a POC has been identified and determined to be from a controllable source, a work plan is developed and implemented to address the POC or water quality issue to minimize its potential for discharge in stormwater or impact on the receiving waters. The evaluation and prioritization of stormwater pollutants directly relies upon the data collected in the control measures MP1 and MP2 of the Monitoring Program. 8.2.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements During the 2008-2013 permit term, the City monitored stormwater discharges from urban runoff and receiving water as part of the Monitoring Program. (Level 1) Of the 10 POCs identified during the 2002-2007 permit term, 6 (lead, iron, total dissolved solids, diazinon, pH and turbidity) did not exceed receiving water quality objectives. (Level 4) Of the 10 POCs, 4 (Aluminum, Copper, Fecal Coliform and E.Coli) were reported to be present in concentrations that exceeded water quality objectives. (Level 1) Exceedances of receiving water quality objectives were reported to the Regional Board in accordance with the NPDES permit. (Level 1) Monitor Stormwater Discharges The City monitored stormwater discharges as part of the Monitoring Program (see Section Evaluate Monitoring Data to Identify and Prioritize POCs and POIs The City evaluated stormwater discharge monitoring data to identify POCs and POIs. On a regular basis the City compares urban discharge monitoring data to Water Quality Standards to identify pollutants of interest, and evaluates the following: ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Pollutants listed as causing impairment in the San Joaquin River and Lower Tuolumne River and present in the stormwater discharge; Pollutants causing toxicity in urban runoff or local receiving waters; Pollutants identified in urban runoff that may cause or contribute to exceedances of water quality standards in the Central Valley Region Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) and California Toxics Rule (CTR); Issues of significant public or regulatory concern; and Controllability of urban runoff pollutants through implementation of available control practices. The following POCs were identified during the 2002 – 2007 permit cycle: aluminum (total), copper (total), lead (total), iron (total), total dissolved solids, diazinon, E.coli, fecal coliform, pH and Turbidity. Storm runoff samples collected from the Tuolumne River were reported to be below or within range of WQOs, with the exception of fecal coliform. During the 2012-2013 permit year, fecal coliform and copper levels were reported to exceed WQO for Dry Creek and both urban runoff sampling locations. DO level within Dry Creek was reported to be below the WQO acceptable range; however, both urban sites did not prove to be a contributing factor. Aluminum Aluminum concentrations exceeded WQO in the Dry Creek up and down stream sampling locations, which may indicate that the receiving water is impacted by sources up stream of the City of Modesto discharges. The WQO exceedance was reported during the dry weather monitoring event, not during storm events. The City of Modesto will continue to monitor aluminum concentrations. Copper Total and dissolved copper concentrations exceeded WQO in the Dry Creek sampling location, which may indicate that the receiving water is impacted by urban runoff. For the second straight year, dissolved copper reported levels above the WQO and shall continue as a pollutant of interest. The City of Modesto will continue to monitor copper concentrations, and will evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs during the next permit year. Fecal Coliform/ E. Coli Fecal coliforms and E. Coli concentrations have exceeded WQO in the Dry Creek sampling locations, which may indicate that the receiving water is impacted by urban runoff. There are also transient population issues and encampments which can impact water quality. Fecal coliform and E. Coli was detected above WQO for the Tuolumne River for the November 29, 2012 first flush sample. Fecal coliform may be elevated due to the confluence of Dry Creek and the Tuolumne River. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 8-2: Urban Runoff POC Monitoring Summary Previous Term Identified POCs (2002-2007) 2008/2009 Exceeded WQOs 2009/2010 Exceeded WQOs 2010/2011 Exceeded WQOs 2011/2012 Exceeded WQOs 2012/2013 Exceeded WQOs Aluminum (Total) X X X X X Copper (Total) X X X X X Lead (Total) Iron (Total) TDS Diazinon E. Coli X X X X X Fecal Coliform X X X X X pH X Turbidity Table 8-3: Receiving Water POC Monitoring Summary Previous Term Identified POCs (2002-2007) 2008/2009 Exceeded WQOs 2009/2010 Exceeded WQOs 2010/2011 Exceeded WQOs 2011/2012 Exceeded WQOs 2012/2013 Exceeded WQOs Aluminum (Total) X X X X X Copper (Total) X X X X Lead (Total) Iron (Total) TDS Diazinon Fecal Coliform X X X X X Chlorpyrifos X pH X Turbidity The City of Modesto will continue to monitor POC concentrations, and will evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs during the next permit year. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Based on the monitoring results from the 2008-2013 permit term, the following POCs were not reported to be present in concentrations above receiving water quality objectives, and as such are recommended that the following POCs be downgraded to POIs: Lead (total) Iron (total) TDS Diazinon Chlorpyrifos* pH** *Chlorpyrifos exceeded WQO once during the permit term, in the 2009-2010 permit year, in the Dry Creek up and sampling locations, indicating that the receiving water was impacted prior to the City of Modesto discharge locations. There have been no exceedances reported for three permit years (2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013). **pH exceeded WQO once during the permit term (2011-2012 permit year) in the Tuolumne up and sampling locations, indicating that the receiving water was impacted prior to the City of Modesto discharge locations. There have been no other exceedances reported during the 2008-2013 permit term. As POIs, the City would continue to monitor these pollutants during the upcoming permit term, but may reduce frequency of analysis to a minimum of annually, provided the concentrations remain below water quality objectives. The following POCs and POIs have been identified for monitoring during the 2013-2018 permit term: POIs: Lead (total), Iron (total), TDS (total), Diazinon, Chlorpyrifos, Copper (dissolved) and pH POCs: Aluminum (total), Copper (total), Fecal Coliform, E.Coli, 8.3 WQ2 – Pesticide Plan 8.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Pesticide Plan is a strategy to address diazinon as a POC and Chlorpyrifos as a potential POC. This work plan included quantifying pesticide loadings, identifying and assessing sources of pesticides, determining available control strategies for identified sources, identifying methods to evaluate control strategies, and developing an implementation plan. 8.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The Pesticide Plan in closely integrated into the Municipal Operations Program Element (Section 4) and many of the outreach materials developed and distributed in the Public Outreach Education and Participation Program element address residential pesticide use. (Level 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City modified the Pesticide Control Operator contract language in June of 2010, tracked pesticide use by City-hired PCOs, compiled an inventory, and provided training (see Section (Level 3) The Stormwater Program participated in 1 of 5 UPC meetings and 9 of 20 IPM meetings during the permit term. (Level 1) During this permit term the City made 128,061 impressions regarding home and garden care activities and provided product use and provided fact sheets and other outreach materials that contained a less toxic pet control methods message. (Level 2) The City of Modesto conducted Pesticide Sales and Use Survey in 2010. Approximately 44% (177 of the 400) respondents indicated they use fertilizers or pesticides. Resident habits regarding disposal of fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides were statistically comparable across the 2005, 2007 and 2010 surveys. (Level 1) The Landscape Management Plan specifically addresses pest control strategies outlined in IPM protocols including cultural controls. (Level 3) 25,336 pounds of Pesticides were dropped off at the County Household Hazardous Waste Facility in Modesto during the permit term. (Level 4) Information regarding pesticide disposal was available to the public from the City website. (Level 2) The City collaborated with stakeholders, which included the Modesto Irrigation District, the UPC, and the IPM group BASMAA over the permit term. (Level 1) The City conducted pesticide monitoring, including sediment toxicity during the permit term. (Level 1) During the permit term, it was determined that urban runoff did not contribute to water quality exceedances for Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos. Note: Chlorpyrifos exceeded WQO once during the permit term, in the 2009-2010 permit year, in the Dry Creek up and sampling locations, indicating that the receiving water was impacted prior to the City of Modesto discharge locations. There have been no exceedances reported for three permit years (2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013). (Level 4) Modify PCO Contract Language & Track PCO Contractor Pesticide Use The City modified the PCO contract language in June of 2010 and included a copy with the 2009 -2010 Annual Report. The pesticide use is tracked, and is provided in the Municipal Operations Program Element, Section 4. Maintain Pesticide Use Inventory The City maintains an inventory of the pesticides used by City Departments. Again, this control measures is an element of the Municipal Operations Program element. The City compiles an internal inventory on pesticide use by all internal departments, divisions, and other operational units. The Stormwater Program coordinates with each City department/division/operational unit to ensure that pesticide use is being tracked. Each Department is required to report the amount of each pesticide used annually, which is incorporated into a database that is used to track pesticide use by specific departments. The database is updated annually. Promote Usage of Less Toxic Alternatives The City promotes usage of less toxic alternatives in City applications and contracting pest control services. The City drafted a Landscape Management Plan with the purpose of providing ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report standard protocols for administering and applying pesticides and herbicides in the public right- of-way or at other City-owned/operated facilities. In addition, the Landscape Management Plan also provides a framework for implementation of the IPM program. Once the Landscape Management Plan is finalized, copies will be distributed to all prospective City departments that participate in pesticide, herbicide, or fertilizer application. Staff who apply pesticides receive annual training that includes information regarding less toxic methods of pest prevention and control (including IPM). This training is conducted together with proper use and disposal training under the Pesticide Materials and Uses section of the Pesticide Plan. Participate in UPC and IPM Meetings City staff participates in Urban Pesticide Committee (UPC) and IPM meetings. City staff maintains up-to-date information regarding pesticide control by attending the UPC meetings. The UPC is a group sponsored by the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board and is comprised of local and regional stormwater agencies, EPA, County Agricultural Commissioners, wastewater treatment plants, pesticide manufacturers, the Central Valley and San Francisco Bay Regional Water Boards, DPR, and other interested parties. The meetings held by the UPC provide an exchange of information, tracking of pesticide-related projects occurring in California, research on the pesticides most likely to replace diazinon and Chlorpyrifos in the marketplace, regulatory issues, etc. The UPC was coordinated locally in part by a grant for the Urban Pesticide Pollution Prevention (UP3) Project. In 2012, the UP3 grant was no longer funded and thus no committee meetings were held during the 2012-2013 permit term. City staff attended Pesticide Applicators Professional Association (PAPA), Target Chemical and local area meetings held by the Stanislaus County Ag offices. Table 8-4: Summary of City Staff Attendance at UPC and IPM Meetings Participation by City Staff 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Total number of UPC Meetings 3 2 0 Number of UPC meetings attended by Stormwater Program 1 0 0 Total number of IPM Meetings 9 11 11 Number of IPM meetings attended by Stormwater Program 4 5 6 For Residential Users, the City developed and distributes a pesticide fact sheet for household chemicals and pesticides. The pesticides fact sheet is posted on the City’s website: http://www.ci.modesto.ca.us/pwd/utilities/wastewater/pollution/ During this permit term the City made 128,061 impressions regarding home and garden care activities and product use and provided fact sheets and other outreach materials that contained a less toxic pest control methods message. The pesticides fact sheet is posted on the City’s website. The details of the number of and type of each outreach material (or impression) are listed in Section 3. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Conduct Pesticide Sales and Use Surveys The City of Modesto conducted Pesticide Sales and Use Survey in 2010. The pesticide related questions were incorporated into the 2010 Stormwater Awareness Survey that was conducted by Godbe Research in June of 2010. The results of this survey were reported in the 2009/2010 Annual Report. Implement Landscape Management Plan The Landscape Management Plan specifically addresses pest control strategies outlined in IPM protocols including cultural controls. The City has also incorporated many other IPM strategies from the Landscape Management Plan. Coordinate with HHW Program A summary of the amount of pesticides disposed of through the HHW program is provided below. The County HHW program accepts HHW from all county residents and does not separately track whether drop-offs are made by Modesto residents. However the County’s permanent facility is located within the City Modesto, so while all county residents may use the facility there is a higher likelihood that city residents are primary users of the facility. Mobile collection events are provided in other Stanislaus County cities. An estimate of the total amount of pesticides dropped off at the County HHW facility in Modesto is provided below. The County did not specifically track the amount pesticides dropped off. This was a new item to be tracked with the 2008-2013 Permit and the City is still transitioning its tracking systems. Table 8-5: Estimated Amount of Pesticides Dropped off at HHW Facility 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 Amount of Pesticides dropped off at the County HHW facility in Modesto 7,470 pounds 3,022 pounds 4,923 pounds 4,405 pounds 5,516 pounds Maintain Pesticide Disposal Information on City Website Information on proper disposal is posted on the City’s website and updated as necessary. In addition to other information on the less toxic use of pesticides, during the permit term the city provide the following information regarding disposal of pesticides on its website. Proper Pesticide Disposal: When you have finished using a chemical pesticide, clean up properly so that pesticides stay out of the storm drains, waterways, and sewers. Follow label instructions. Pesticides will remain in the bottom of your applicator when you finish spraying, even when you do a great job of estimating the quantity. Dilute these residues with clean water and re-spray in your garden until the solution is used up. Then dilute again and re-spray or broadcast on the ground. Finally, do this a third time. Be sure that this spray can't drain into the street or gutter. Never rinse containers into the gutter (part of the storm drain system) or household drains (to the sewer system). Take unwanted pesticides or pesticide containers to a Cities and County of Stanislaus Household Hazardous Waste Collection Event. Call (209) 525-4123 for more information and a schedule. Never throw pesticides or containers with pesticides into the garbage. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report http://www.modestogov.com/pwd/utilities/wastewater/pollution/ Participate in TMDL Efforts The City is not aware of any pending TMDL efforts that will affect their program at this time. Collaborate with Stakeholders The City collaborated with stakeholder groups and other Stormwater Management Agencies. The City collaborated with the Modesto Irrigation District, the UPC, and the IPM group BASMAA. Pesticide Monitoring The City conducted pesticide monitoring in urban runoff and the receiving waters. Consistent with the previous Pesticide Plan, monitoring for diazinon and Chlorpyrifos was conducted at the upstream and receiving water locations in Dry Creek and the Tuolumne River; and at the urban runoff locations; Bodem Street and Scenic Drive. During the 2008-2013 Permit term, sediment from the receiving water and urban runoff monitoring locations will be analyzed for pyrethroid pesticides during the routine monitoring events. Sediment toxicity monitoring will be performed in the second and fourth years of the permit term using the amphipod Hyalella azteca, which is sensitive to pyrethroids. Chlorinated pesticides, organophosphate pesticides (other than diazinon and Chlorpyrifos), and herbicides will be monitored at the receiving water and urban runoff monitoring locations during the fourth year of the permit term. Details on the Monitoring Program Element, including the monitoring for pesticides are discussed in Section 9. Assess whether Urban Stormwater Runoff Contributes to any Exceedances of Water Quality Standards for Diazinon and Chlorpyrifos The City routinely evaluates the monitoring data to determine whether runoff is causing or contributing to an exceedance of water quality standards. Chlorpyrifos and diazinon were established as Pollutants of Concern by the permit because of the established TMDL for these two constituents. The City’s Stormwater Management Plan identified a process to determine whether a POC is causing or contributing to an exceedance of water quality standards, which is summarized in Section 9. During this reporting period chlorpyrifos and diazinon were not detected above the WQO in any of the urban runoff or receiving water monitoring locations, with the exception of Chlorpyrifos, which exceeded WQO once during the permit term, in the 2009- 2010 permit year, in the Dry Creek up and sampling locations, indicating that the receiving water was impacted prior to the City of Modesto discharge locations. There have been no exceedances reported for three permit years (2010-2011, 2011-2012 and 2012-2013). 8.4 WQ3 – Rockwell Assessment 8.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Rockwell Assessment Plan is a study designed to determine the effectiveness of the City’s rockwells in removing pollutants in urban runoff and protecting groundwater quality. The ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Rockwell Assessment Plan builds on the assessment and monitoring that was conducted during the 2002-2007 Permit term. 8.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements A groundwater flow model was developed for the City of Modesto to evaluate the flow direction and magnitude in the vicinity of selected rockwells. (Level 1) A total of 13 monitoring wells were advanced at six locations, including continuous monitoring instrumentation. (Level 1) As required by the SWMP, the monitoring wells were sampled four times, in August of 2011 and January, April and May of 2012. (Level 1) The analysis concluded that it is unlikely that the rockwells pose a significant risk of degradation of shallow groundwater quality in the Modesto area. (Level 4) Identify Candidate Rockwells The City identified six City-owned rockwells for the 2008-2013 assessment. The sites were selected based upon the predominant land use draining to the rockwell. Access to the rockwells was the primary consideration. The six sites selected by the City are located within the public right of way and allow for safe access by field teams during the course of the study. The rockwell sites, which were listed in the draft August 2009 SWMP, are identified below. Table 8-6: Rockwell assessment Sites for the 2008-2013 Permit Term Rockwell site Type 1901 Lifetime Drive Residential 1428 July Court 1801 Reliance Court Industrial 1000 Oates Court Carpenter Road Commercial 3838 Coralwood Road Gather Background Data & Evaluate Hydrogeologic Conditions Relevant information and details on the hydrogeology and groundwater quality, such as those developed by USGS, and the groundwater model developed for the Central Valley by the USGS will also be reviewed. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Available flow and water quality data from USGS and DWR have been collected for the City of Modesto and surrounding areas. The gathered information includes data that have been collected in different wells for a period of time spanning over 40 years and from wells are screened at different depths allowing a characterization of both shallow and deep aquifers. This evaluation revealed the influence that the impermeable Corcoran layer has on the behavior of the entire system. USGS reports such as Phillips et al. (2007) and Jurgens et al. (2008) and the new Central Valley Hydrologic Model (Faunt et al., 2009) were reviewed to collect existing information on the geology and hydrogeology of the area. A groundwater flow model has been developed for the city of Modesto to evaluate flow direction and magnitude in the vicinity of the six selected rockwells. The model has been implemented on the base of the USGS model for the Eastern San Joaquin valley (Phillips et al., 2007), but, considering the final goal of the project, the grid has been significantly refined to better represent the flow around the rockwells. The each grid (model cell) of the original model was a 400 m2, while the grid that has been used in the refined Modesto model is about 25 m2. The model results were used to decide the location of the new monitoring wells that will be installed closed to the six selected rockwells; the aim was two new monitoring wells to be installed at each location, one up gradient and one down gradient with respect to the rockwell. This will allow evaluation of actual impact of the rockwell on the shallow aquifer. Install Groundwater Monitoring Wells A total of thirteen monitoring wells were constructed at the six aforementioned locations within the City. Each of the six sites had two wells, one up gradient from the rockwell and one down gradient; with the exception of the Carpenter Basin rockwell which had three wells, up, down and mid gradient. Drilling began on August 19, 2010 with total depths of all wells ranging from 50 to 71 feet. Final development of all wells concluded on August 5, 2011. Install Continuous Monitoring Instrumentation The City provided instrumentation to one down gradient monitoring well for each type of rockwell (residential, industrial, and commercial) with probes for the continuous measurement of temperature, water depth, nitrate, and pH. While nitrate was proposed in the SWMP for each type of well, upon further evaluation it was determined that the sensors were not as robust as the general parameter sensors and would require a significantly higher investment to ensure proper ongoing calibrations. A nitrate sensor will be install on one well to test the technology. Conduct Field Sampling Each groundwater well was sampled four times during the permit term; two sampling events at each groundwater well during the wet season immediately following a storm event, and two sampling events during the dry season. City staff conducted field sampling of groundwater monitoring wells four times during this permit year: August 17 – 18, 2011 (dry weather sampling) January 23 – 24, 2012 (wet weather sampling) April 2 – 3, 2012 (wet weather sampling) May 23 – 24, 2012 (dry weather sampling) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Annually Report Collected Data The City collected data during the 2011-2012 permit year and submitted the results as part of the annual report for that year. Analyze Monitoring Data to Determine Rockwell Effectiveness The following is an excerpt from the Rockwell Assessment Summary Report Section 4 Analysis of Rockwell Effectiveness, which was submitted during the 2012-2013 permit year: The purpose of this Rockwell Assessment was to evaluate potential risks to shallow groundwater from the discharge of urban runoff into rockwells. In particular, the assessment was designed to assess the risk of discharging pesticides, salts, and nitrates to the shallow groundwater and whether rockwells in certain urban land-uses (i.e. residential, commercial, or industrial) posed a greater risk (if any) to shallow groundwater quality. Data from urban runoff monitoring was assumed to be representative of the quality of runoff entering the rockwells. No constituents of concern in urban runoff exceeded groundwater quality objectives. In general, urban discharge was found to be of higher quality than groundwater for most constituents evaluated in this study, particularly nitrates and salts. This indicates that infiltration of runoff from rockwells could actually improve salt and nitrate concentrations through dilution. Though high nitrate and EC levels are present at some sites at concentrations exceeding the groundwater quality objectives, the highest concentrations at these sites were consistently observed at the up-gradient wells, indicating that localized areas of high nitrates or salts are likely due to other influences such as legacy nitrates and evapo- concentration of salts from previous land uses. There was no correlation between high constituent concentrations in groundwater and a particular land-use type or season. Unlike urban runoff, which is typically higher in salts and nitrates during dry-weather and lower during wet-weather, there was not any obvious trend in the groundwater grab samples between wet and dry events, indicating that rockwells are not significantly impacting shallow groundwater at any of the sites. The evidence of this report indicates: Urban runoff in the study area is of high quality for the selected constituents of concern. At study sites where groundwater EC and nitrate-nitrite (as N) concentrations exceeded water quality objectives, the concentrations are lower down-gradient of the rockwells. EC levels may decrease during periods of wet weather. Pesticides were not detected in groundwater or urban runoff. Constituent concentrations in ground water are not higher for a particular land-use. In summary, it is concluded that it is unlikely that the rockwells pose a significant risk of degradation of shallow groundwater quality in the Modesto area. Submit Final Evaluation Report The City completed the final Rockwell Assessment Report in July of 2012; a copy of this report was sent to In addition to the final evaluation report, the following were also included: Locations of the rockwells Locations of the groundwater wells Results of the field sampling and continuous monitoring ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Evaluation of the relationship of the rockwell assessment to any on-going USGS studies in the Modesto area Contour maps of the piezometric head and concentrations of the groundwater constituents 8.5 WQ4 – Peak Discharge Impact Study 8.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Peak Discharge Impact Study is designed to determine the extent of erosion of natural stream channels and banks caused by urban runoff. This work plan also evaluates peak flow control and determines number criteria to prevent or minimize erosion of natural stream channels and banks caused by urban runoff. 8.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements A qualitative assessment of Dry Creek was conducted to determine the extent of erosion of natural stream channels and banks. (Level 1) A review of aerial photographs, show no discernible large scale changes to Dry Creek. (Level 1) Localized areas of erosion have been identified and will continue to be monitored for future evaluation (Level 1) Complete Peak Discharge Impact Study The performance standards for this Control Measure and the activities that have been initiated and/or completed during this reporting period are summarized below. One-third of the City area is drained by a centralized storm drain system, which drains to Dry Creek and the Tuolumne River. Since most storm drain system outfalls discharge to Dry Creek and the Tuolumne River has a large watershed with few outfalls, the Peak Discharge Impact Study is focused on Dry Creek. Due to resource limitations, the City of Modesto was unable to perform a land use analysis or hydrological assessment as part of the Peak Discharge Impact Study. The City focused on a qualitative assessment of Dry Creek through the use of large scale aerial photographs and specific localized changes witnessed in the field. Using the City of Modesto’s Geographic Information System (GIS), the following aerial photographs from 2001 – 2010 were compared in order to determine if large scale changes in ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Dry Creek had occurred. The Dry Creek monitoring locations have been provided as a reference points (Figure 8-7) Figure 8-7: Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2001 Figure 8-8: Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2002 Dry Creek Up Dry Creek Down ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Figure 8-9: Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2006 Figure 8-10: Aerial Photograph of Dry Creek 2010 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report No large scale changes in Dry Creek have been observed throughout the 2001 -2010 aerial photographs. The City of Modesto has reviewed field notes, photographs and historical observations from 2006 till present in order to document small scale changes along Dry Creek. During periods of peak discharge, the volume of stormwater runoff from large outfalls into Dry Creek has potential to cause localized erosion. Field crews inspected all outfalls >24” and found that the inclusion of forebays, baffles and riprap significantly reduced the velocity of the outfall discharge and minimized erosion of the surrounding area (example Figure 8-11). Figure 8-11: McClure outfall into Dry Creek Localized areas of erosion were observed along the Dry Creek banks in Moose Park. This area is prone to heavy flooding during the winter months and large populations of ground squirrels have contributed to the degradation of the stabilized bank. (Figures 8-12 & 8-13) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-17 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Figure 8-12: Dry Creek flooding at Moose Park Figure 8-13: Dry Creek erosion at Moose Park ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-18 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Another area along Dry Creek which has undergone some significant changes, as observed by Modesto field crews, is in the vicinity of the Dry Creek down monitoring location. The location is located at Beard Brook and Tuolumne River Regional Parks; approximately ¼ mile from the confluence of Dry Creek and Tuolumne River. In 2006, numerous trees along the banks were uprooted and fell into Dry Creek (Figure 8-14). Without the trees to stabilize the soil, the banks along the area have continued to erode where Dry Creek makes sharp turns (Figure 8-15). Figure 8-14: Dry Creek Down 2006 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-19 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Figure 8-15: Dry Creek Down 2012 The City of Modesto will continue to monitor areas of erosion along Dry Creek and the Tuolumne River and assess if urban runoff is a contributing factor. 8.6 WQ5 – Treatment Feasibility Study 8.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The Treatment Feasibility Study (TFS) was designed to investigate the feasibility of diverting dry weather discharges to the sanitary sewer system or treatment control BMPs. The storm drain system collects stormwater and excess water from irrigation and other urban runoff, which may result in pollutant mobilization through the storm drain system and into the receiving waters. 8.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008-2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements A field investigation was conducted on April 29, and May 4, 2010, to characterize each storm drain system outfall. (Level 1) Forty outfalls that discharge directly into the receiving waters were evaluated. The numeric ratings were applied based upon the field investigations. Of the 40 outfalls ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-20 September 2013 Annual Progress Report investigated four were ranked with a score of 35 or more and will be prioritized for further evaluation. (Level 1) Complete results were submitted to the on June 29, 2010, followed by a Treatment Feasibility Study that was submitted in August, 2011. (Level 1) The Treatment Feasibility Study indicated that diversion of dry weather flow is not warranted at this time as pollutant loads from dry weather discharges are minimal, and removal of these loads from discharge to the receiving waters will have minimal to no impact on water quality; potential dry weather diversion volumes are small; and implementation of diversion alternatives are cost prohibitive for the minimal to no benefit received in improved water quality in Dry Creek or the Tuolumne River. (Level 4) Review Existing Information The first milestone of this study was to compile and review existing information on the City’s storm drainage system, including the watershed areas, storm drain outfall locations; and sanitary sewer system. The City maintains a GIS program that includes information regarding watershed areas, storm drain system, location of outfalls, and sanitary sewer system. This information was compiled and reviewed prior to conducting field investigations. Existing information was collected for field verification and to identify data gaps that need to be filled during the field investigation. During this task the City identified that the list of outfalls in the SWMP was incomplete and updated information was obtained from the City‘s GIS department. Complete Field Investigations The second milestone of this study is to conduct a field investigation to characterize each storm drain system outfalls. A field investigation was conducted on April 29, and May 4, 2010, to characterize each storm drain system outfall. The following information was verified and/or collected for each outfall: Pump station capacity and piping arrangement (if applicable) – storm pumps, dry weather pump(s), and above and below ground piping arrangement; Site characteristics – landscaping, nearby land uses, available land on-site, location of manholes, site constraints (e.g. overhead power lines, underground utilities), site accessibility, and right-of-way availability/accessibility; Receiving water characteristics – tidal influence, location of outfalls, size of outfalls, and other general observations; and Sanitary sewer line location – size of nearby sanitary sewer lines, location of manholes, and right-of-way availability/accessibility. Submit List of Prioritized Outfalls Information collected from the review of existing information and the field investigation was used to perform an initial planning level evaluation to determine if it is technically feasible to divert dry weather discharges to the sanitary sewer system or to treatment control BMPs, and to prioritize outfalls that may be technically feasible diversion candidates for further study. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 8-21 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Technical feasibility of dry weather discharge diversion options was determined according to the following criteria: Outfall size; Receiving water impact; Proximity to sanitary sewer system line; Proximity to cannery segregation line Available space for equipment and infrastructure; Power source capacity and spatial proximity; Overall ease of implementation; and Public acceptance. A numeric ranking system was developed for the evaluation, with a total of 40 points available. An outfall was prioritized for further evaluation engineering study) if it received a total of 75% or more of the available points 30 out of 40 points). Forty outfalls that discharge directly into the receiving waters were evaluated. The numeric ratings were applied based upon the field investigations. Of the 40 outfalls investigated four were ranked with a score of 35 or more and will be prioritized for further evaluation. Complete results were submitted to the on June 29, 2010. The Treatment Feasibility Study Report determined that the one of the identified priority outfalls (End of North McClure Road, south of Dry Creek outfall) was not feasible because MID also discharges significant quantities of irrigation water through the outfall, and diversion of that flow to the sanitary sewer system is technically infeasible due to capacity issues. While diversion of dry weather discharge for the remaining three outfalls to the sanitary sewer system may be technically feasibility, further study of these locations was not warranted. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 9. Monitoring Program Element 9.1 Overview The Permit requires the continued implementation of a water quality monitoring program. The specific requirements of the water quality monitoring program are detailed in the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP) and are summarized in the sections below. The monitoring elements were designed to characterize trends over long-term periods and to identify specific POCs. The results of the water quality monitoring analysis in this section and the identification of the POCs assist the City in establishing the priorities for the Stormwater Program and to target future implementation measures to reduce pollutant loadings and protect and enhance the beneficial uses of local receiving waters. This is discussed further in the subsequent sections of the ROWD. A review of the MRP efforts conducted from the beginning of the 2008-2013 permit term is presented in this section. Data collected during this time period are also compared to historic program data. 9.2 Monitoring Tasks The monitoring program tasks for the 2008-2013 permit term consist of the following: Table 9-1 Existing Monitoring Program Tasks ID Monitoring Tasks MP1 Receiving Water Monitoring MP2 Urban Discharge Monitoring MP3 Detention Basin Monitoring MP4 Dry Weather Characterization MP5 Bioassessment Monitoring MP6 BMP Effectiveness Study MP7 Data Management MP8 Training MP9 Effectiveness Assessment Strategy 9.3 MP1 – Receiving Water Monitoring 9.3.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the Receiving Water Monitoring task is to characterize the water quality of the Tuolumne River and Dry Creek at upstream and locations relative to the City. This task also includes monitoring for diazinon and chlorpyrifos (the Tuolumne River is 303(d)-listed for these pesticides); monitoring sediment toxicity; and monitoring water column toxicity. If toxicity is observed, further tests are conducted to attempt to determine the cause. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 9.3.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. The Effectiveness Assessment Strategy for the 2008-2013 permit term is used to determine whether the Program Elements are achieving intended outcomes and ultimately, whether continued implementation will result in maintaining or improving water quality (CASQA, 2007). Outcome levels are used to categorize and describe the desired results of goals of the control measures and Program Elements. There are six outcome levels as defined by the CASQA Program Effectiveness Assessment Guidance. Although the effectiveness assessment may change from year to year as new information is learned, the assessment will initially focus on Outcome Levels 1-4. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements Receiving water monitoring was conducted in accordance with the NPDES permit. (Level 1) The Tuolumne River and Dry Creek up stream and locations were monitored in association with the first flush storm event, a wet event and once during dry weather. (Level 1) The Tuolumne River and Dry Creek up stream and locations were monitored for expanded constituent list during the 2011-2012 permit year. (Level 1) Short term chronic toxicity monitoring was conducted during the 2008-2009 and 2010-2011 permit years. (Level 1) Toxicity testing in Dry Creek and Tuolumne River indicated toxicity for fathead minnow. During the permit term TIEs were not required, and no corresponding TRE Correction Action Reports were required. Baseline TIE 96-hour toxicity tests showed Fathead minnow survival was greater than 95% in undiluted sample water. Because the Baseline TIE toxicity tests failed to confirm initial toxicity, no further testing was conducted. (Level 6) No toxicity was present during the 2010-2011 water column toxicity monitoring. (Level 4) Sediment toxicity testing was conducted in 2008-2009 and 2011-2012. Sediment was collected from one dry weather monitoring event and from one post flush storm event. (Level 1) Receiving water monitoring resulted in exceedances of water quality objectives which were reported to the Regional Board during the permit term. (Level 1) Dry Creek water quality objectives were exceeded for aluminum, fecal coliform, specific conductance, copper (total) and copper (dissolved). (Level 1) Tuolumne River water quality objectives were exceeded for fecal coliform, copper (total) and turbidity. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Reports of Water Quality Exceedances were prepared for each of the exceedances that occurred during this permit year. (Level 1) Aluminum was reported to exceed WQO twice in 2010-2011 and 2011-2012, which is a 66% decrease from 2009-2010 permit year’s high of 6 exceedances. (Level 6) Fecal Coliform was reported to exceed WQO four times in 2011-2012, which is a 60% decrease from 2009-2010 permit year’s high of 10 exceedances (Level 6) The City experienced exceedances for Turbidity and D.O. in earlier monitoring years of the permit term. Neither of which were exceeded during the 2011-2012 or 2012-2013 permit years. (Level 6) Table 9-2: Receiving Water Monitoring Locations Tuolumne River Upstream Tuolumne River The site is located upstream of the Mitchell Road Bridge and east of the City airport and is accessible from the Tuolumne River Regional Park (TRRP) north parking lot, adjacent to the airport. At this location, the river is relatively narrow, deep, and fast flowing. Grab samples are collected at an equivalent mid-stream, mid- depth location directly from shore using a grab pole or portable pump with Teflon tubing. Direct submersion from the shore is also acceptable if safety conditions permit. The site is located at the Carpenter Road Bridge on the northern bank of the river and is wider and shallower than the upstream location. Mid-stream sampling is not possible from the shore. Samples are taken as close to mid-stream, mid-depth as safely as possible. Dry Creek Upstream Dry Creek The upstream Dry Creek location access point is just upstream from the Claus Road Bridge through a residential area north of the river. Dry Creek is narrow and densely tree-lined for most of its course through the City and upstream of the City. At this location the side- slopes are steep and access may be limited during severe weather or saturated soil conditions. The site is located near the confluence of Dry Creek with the Tuolumne River. The access point is through the south entrance to Beard Brook Park. At this location, the creek is approximately 25 feet wide. Samples are taken from the shore under most conditions. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-4 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Figure 9-1. Receiving Water, Detention Basin, and Urban Runoff Monitoring Locations Water Quality Parameters Water quality parameters with monitoring requirements in the receiving water are listed in the table below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-5 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 9-3: Receiving Water Sampling Constituent List Constituent Analytical Method Minimum Level Units Bacteriological E. coli SM 9221E 20 MPN/100 mL Fecal coliform SM 9221E 20 MPN/100 mL Conventional Dissolved oxygen SM 4500-O-G 5 mg/L Oil and grease EPA 1664 5 mg/L pH SM 4500-HB 0.1 Std. units Temperature SM 2550B None °C General Alkalinity SM 2320B 2 mg/L Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) SM 5210 2 mg/L Chemical oxygen demand (COD) SM 5220D 20-900 mg/L Nitrate-nitrite (as N) SM 4500-NO3-F 0.1 mg/L Specific conductivity SM 2550B 1 μmhos/cm Total ammonia (as N) SM 4500-NH3-D 0.1 mg/L Total dissolved solids (TDS) SM 2540C 2 mg/L Total hardness (as CaCO3) SM 2340B 2 mg/L Total Kjehldahl nitrogen (TKN) SM 4500-N-Org-D 0.1 mg/L Total organic carbon (TOC) SM 5310C 1 mg/L Total phosphorus SM 4500-P-F 0.05 mg/L Total suspended solids (TSS) SM 2540D 2 mg/L Turbidity SM 2130B 0.1 NTU Metals Aluminum, Dissolved EPA 200.8 50 μg /L Aluminum, Total EPA 200.8 50 μg/L Copper, Dissolved EPA 200.8 0.5 μg/L Copper, Total EPA 200.8 0.5 μg/L Iron, Total EPA 200.8 100 μg/L Lead, Dissolved EPA 200.8 0.5 μg/L Lead, Total EPA 200.8 0.5 μg/L Mercury, Total EPA 1631E 0.5 ng/L Zinc, Total EPA 200.8 1 μg/L Methyl mercury EPA 1630 0.05 ng/L Organophosphate Pesticides Chlorpyrifos EPA 614 0.01 μg/L Diazinon EPA 614 0.05 μg/L ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-6 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Summaries of all data discussed in Section 9 are included in Appendix I; data spreadsheets are included in Excel format (Appendix I, 2012-2013 Dry Weather Data and 2012-2013 First Flush Data) and on the report compact disk (CD). Laboratory data reports are in (Appendix I, Laboratory Data and Chains of Custody); however due to the size of these reports they are only included on the report CD. The City developed and uses a detailed Sampling and Analysis Plan as part of the Sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SSOP). All sampling is performed using clean sampling techniques according to the EPA Method 1669. Prior to the start of each monitoring event, City staff reviews both the Sampling and Analysis Plan along with the SSOP for each monitoring location. Conduct Receiving Water Monitoring The City conducted three receiving water monitoring events each year*: early in the rainy season, mid-to-late in the rainy season (also referred to as dormant season), and dry weather season. Monitoring was conducted in coordination with urban discharge monitoring at the following locations: Tuolumne River (upstream): 11/04/08, 1/24/09, 5/27/09, 1/13/10, 2/05/10, 6/09/10, 10/30/10, 11/20/10, 2/16/11, 6/21/11, 10/04/11, 1/20/12, 5/16/12, 11/27/12, 6/4/13 Tuolumne River 11/04/08, 1/24/09, 5/27/09, 6/16/09, 10/13/09, 1/13/10, 6/09/10, 10/30/10, 11/20/10, 2/16/11, 6/21/11, 11/05/11, 1/21/12, 5/17/12, 11/29/12, 6/5/13 Dry Creek (upstream): 11/04/08, 5/27/09, 10/13/09, 1/13/10, 2/5/10, 6/09/10, 10/30/10, 11/20/10, 2/16/11, 6/21/11, 6/28/11, 10/4/11, 5/16/12, 6/4/13 Dry Creek 1/24/09, 6/16/09, 10/13/09, 1/13/10, 6/09/10, 11/21/10, 2/16/11, 6/21/11, 6/28/11, 10/05/11, 1/21/12, 5/17/12, 11/29/12, 6/5/13 In accordance with the permit, monitoring for expanded constituents was conducted during the 2011-2012 permit year. * The mid-to-late rainy season sampling event was not conducted during the 2012-2013 permit year due to seasonably low rainfall amounts and unpredictable weather forecasting. Attempts to coordinate a predictable 72 hour / 0.25” targeted storm event were unsuccessful. (Appendix I, Weather Forecasts) Conduct Water Column Toxicity Monitoring The City conducted water column toxicity monitoring during the 2008-2009, 2010-2011 and 2012-2013 permit years (every other year). The City collected samples and conducted short-term chronic toxicity at the receiving water locations. Conduct a TIE if Toxicity is Present The City is required to conduct a Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) if toxicity testing indicates that samples are significantly toxic to either test species. In the event that samples are significantly toxic to either test species, the City will immediately conduct at Phase I TIE on the toxic samples. In the event that there is 50% mortality in both species the TIE will be conducted using both Fathead minnows and water fleas. TIEs will be conducted by Pacific EcoRisk or another qualified consultant. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-7 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Toxicity testing in Dry Creek (06/19/09) and Tuolumne River (all three sampling events) indicated toxicity for fathead minnow. Baseline TIEs were conducted for each of these events. In each of these Baseline TIE 96-hour toxicity tests, Fathead minnow survival was greater than 95% in undiluted sample water. Because the Baseline TIE toxicity tests failed to confirm initial toxicity, no further testing was conducted. Analytical results are available on the report CD. No toxicity was present during the 2012-2013 water column toxicity monitoring. Conduct TRE, if TIE Identifies Toxicant The City is required to conduct a Toxicity Reduction Evaluation (TRE) whenever a TIE identified a toxicant and submit a TRE Corrective Action Report. Once the source of toxicity is identified, the City will conduct a TRE as specified in the permit and will submit a TRE Corrective Action Report for the Executive Officer’s approval as part of the Annual Report. The TIE did not identify a source of toxicity so a TRE was not performed. During the permit term no TRE Correction Action Reports were required. Conduct Correlation Analysis of POCs to TSS The City is required to perform an analysis of the correlation between the pollutants of concern (POCs) and TSS loadings. The analyzed POCs included: total aluminum, total copper, total iron, total lead, total dissolved solids, diazinon, Escherichia coli, fecal coliform, pH, and turbidity. An analysis of these POCs’ relationship to TSS at the receiving water monitoring sites was conducted. The analysis indicated that most POCs considered were very weakly or not correlated to TSS. Lead and zinc showed slight correlation to TSS; however, as mentioned in Section 8, these have been proposed to be downgraded to POIs since elevated levels have not been reported in this permit term. POCs versus TSS correlation plots are shown below: ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-8 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-9 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-10 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-11 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-12 September 2013 Annual Progress Report ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-13 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Conduct Sediment Toxicity Monitoring The City is required to perform sediment toxicity testing at the City’s receiving water locations to determine the significance of the increase in urban pyrethroid usage, and assess management practice effectiveness. Sediment toxicity testing was conducted in 2008-2009 and 2011-2012 permit year of the permit term. Sediment samples were collected from one dry weather monitoring event and from one post flush storm event. (A post flush event is defined as within two weeks of a qualifying storm event.) The testing included two sets of sediment toxicity tests on the freshwater species Hyaella azteca (10-day survival and growth tests) accompanied by TOC and grain size analyses. Table 9-4: Summary of Sediment Toxicity Testing Date Monitoring Event Location % Survival 2008-2009 Post-Flush Dry Creek Up 100% 2008-2009 Post-Flush Dry Creek Down 100% 2008-2009 Post-Flush Tuolumne River Up 100% 2008-2009 Post-Flush Tuolumne River Down 100% 2008-2009 Dry Weather Dry Creek Up 70% 2008-2009 Dry Weather Dry Creek Down 55% 2008-2009 Dry Weather Tuolumne River Up 100% 2008-2009 Dry Weather Tuolumne River Down 62.5% 10/18/2011 Post-Flush Dry Creek Up 92.5% 10/18/2011 Post-Flush Dry Creek Down 80% 10/18/2011 Post-Flush Tuolumne Up 80% 10/18/2011 Post-Flush Tuolumne Down 95% 5/21/12 Dry Weather Tuolumne Up 97.5% 5/21/12 Dry Weather Tuolumne Down 100% Notify Regional Water Board of Water Quality Objective (WQO) Exceedances in the Receiving Water The City is required to evaluate the monitoring results to determine whether the WQOs are exceeded in the receiving water and, starting in the year 2009-2010, it will also be required to notify the Regional Water Board within 48 hours of receiving the data indicating an exceedance. (Appendix I, Exceedance Notification) A summary of WQO exceedances observed in the 2012-2013 receiving water monitoring events is included in the table below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-14 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 9-5: Summary of Receiving Water WQO Exceedances Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location WQO Date RWQE Submitted Aluminum 1,100 µg/L 05/27/09 Dry Creek Up 750 µg/L Aluminum 1,100 µg/L 10/13/09 Dry Creek Down 750 µg/L Aluminum 1,900 µg/L 10/13/09 Dry Creek Down 750 µg/L Aluminum 1,300 µg/L 01/13/10 Dry Creek Up 750 µg/L Aluminum 830 µg/L 02/05/10 Dry Creek Up 750 µg/L Aluminum 1,700 µg/L 06/09/10 Dry Creek Up 750 µg/L Aluminum 1,600 µg/L 06/09/10 Dry Creek Down 750 µg/L Aluminum 1300 µg/L 06/21/11 Dry Creek Up 750 µg/L 07/27/11 Aluminum 1700 µg/L 06/21/11 Dry Creek Down 750 µg/L 07/27/11 Aluminum 840 µg/L 5/16/12 Dry Creek Up 750 µg/L 8/23/12 Aluminum 1,200 µg/L 5/17/12 Dry Creek Down 750 µg/L 8/23/12 Aluminum 1,850 µg/L 6/5/13 Dry Creek Down 750 µg/L Copper (total) 6.8 µg/L 01/24/09 Dry Creek Down 6.6 µg/L Copper (total) 7.9 µg/L 10/13/09 Tuolumne River Down 6.6 µg/L Copper (total) 21 µg/L 10/13/09 Dry Creek Down 6.6 µg/L Copper (total) 10 µg/L 1/21/12 Dry Creek Down 6.6 µg/L 3/27/12 Copper (total) 7.2 µg/L 5/17/12 Dry Creek Down 6.6 µg/L 8/23/12 Copper (total) 8.6 µg/L 11/29/12 Dry Creek Down 6.6 µg/L 2/04/13 Copper (dissolved) 11 µg/L 10/13/09 Dry Creek Down 6.6 µg/L Copper (dissolved) 8 µg/L 1/21/12 Dry Creek Down 6.3 µg/L 3/27/12 Dissolved Oxygen 6.77 mg/L 05/27/09 Dry Creek Down >7.0 mg/L Dissolved Oxygen 6.48 05/27/09 Dry Creek UP >7.0 mg/L ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-15 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location WQO Date RWQE Submitted Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 5.94 mg/L 10/30/10 Dry Creek Up 7.0 mg/L 12/12/10 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 4.87 mg/L 10/30/10 Dry Creek Down 7.0 mg/L 12/12/10 Dissolved Oxygen (DO) 3.2 mg/L 11/29/12 Dry Creek Down 7.0 mg/L 2/04/13 Fecal Coliform 17,000 MPN/100 mL 11/04/08 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 2,200 MPN/100 mL 11/04/08 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 1,200 MPN/100 mL 11/04/08 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 490 MPN/100 mL 05/27/09 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 2,300MPN/100 mL 01/24/09 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 500 MPN/100 mL 01/24/09 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 490 MPN/100 mL 05/27/09 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 230 MPN/100 mL 05/27/09 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 500 MPN/100 mL 10/13/09 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 3,000 MPN/100 mL 10/13/09 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 300 MPN/100 mL 10/13/09 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 17,000 MPN/100 mL 10/13/09 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 450 MPN/100 mL 01/13/10 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 170,000 MPN/100 mL 01/13/10 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 8,000 MPN/100 mL 01/13/10 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 230 MPN/100 mL 06/09/10 Tuolumne River Down 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 490 MPN/100 mL 06/09/10 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100 mL Fecal Coliform 330 MPN/100mL 10/30/10 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100mL 12/12/10 Fecal Coliform 7800 MPN/100mL 10/30/10 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 12/12/10 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-16 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location WQO Date RWQE Submitted Fecal Coliform 1800 MPN/100mL 10/30/10 Tuolumne Down 200 MPN/100mL 12/12/10 Fecal Coliform 490 MPN/100mL 11/20/10 Tuolumne Down 200 MPN/100mL Fecal Coliform 11000 MPN/100mL 11/21/10 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL Fecal Coliform 3300 MPN/100mL 02/16/11 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 04/06/11 Fecal Coliform 450 MPN/100mL 06/21/11 Dry Creek Up 200 MPN/100mL 07/27/11 Fecal Coliform 1015 MPN/100mL 06/21/11 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 07/27/11 Fecal Coliform 330 MPN/100mL 06/28/11 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 07/27/11 Fecal Coliform 17,000 MPN/100mL 10/05/11 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 12/05/11 Fecal Coliform 4,600 MPN/100mL 10/05/11 Tuolumne Down 200 MPN/100mL 12/05/11 Fecal Coliform 4,900 MPN/100mL 1/21/12 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 3/27/12 Fecal Coliform 625 MPN/100mL 5/17/12 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 8/23/12 Fecal Coliform 17,000 MPN/100mL 11/29/12 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL 2/04/13 Fecal Coliform 295 MPN/100mL 11/29/12 Tuolumne Down 200 MPN/100mL 2/04/13 Fecal Coliform 260 MPN/100mL 6/5/13 Dry Creek Down 200 MPN/100mL Specific Conductance 1,152 µmhos/cm 11/4/08 Dry Creek Down 700 µmhos/cm Specific Conductance 1,125 µmhos/cm 11/4/08 Dry Creek Up 700 µmhos/cm Turbidity 13 NTU 10/13/09 Tuolumne River Down 5.3 NTU Turbidity 50 NTU 10/13/09 Dry Creek Down 5.3 NTU Turbidity 6.53 NTU 1/13/10 Tuolumne River Down 5.3 NTU Turbidity 5.24 NTU 02/05/10 Tuolumne River Down 5.3 NTU ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-17 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 9.4 MP2 – Urban Discharge Monitoring 9.4.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the Urban Discharge Monitoring task is to characterize urban runoff discharged directly to surface receiving waters within the City limits. Urban runoff in the City flows to both rockwells and receiving waters. For the purpose of this task, urban discharge monitoring generally refers to monitoring of urban runoff to surface receiving waters. This task also includes monitoring for diazinon and chlorpyrifos, which are listed on the 303(d) list as impairing the Tuolumne River; and monitoring water column toxicity, which if found, the cause of the toxicity is determined. 9.4.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements Urban runoff monitoring was conducted in accordance with the NPDES permit. (Level 1) Bodem Street and Scenic Road locations were monitored in association with the first flush storm event, a wet event and once during dry weather. (Level 1) Urban Runoff locations were monitored for expanded constituent list during the 2011-2012 permit year. (Level 1) Toxicity monitoring of urban discharge locations was performed during 2008/2009, 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 permit years. (Level 1) No toxicity was observed. (Level 4) During the permit term, TIE was not required, and no corresponding TRE Correction Action Reports were required. (Level 4) Other than pH, there were no Tier I exceedances during the permit term. (Level 4) An analysis of these POCs’ relationship to TSS at the receiving water monitoring sites was conducted. (Level 1) The analysis indicated that the POCs considered were very weakly or not correlated to TSS. (Level 4) No Tier 1 exceedances occurred during the 2011-2012 permit year. (Level 5) During the permit term, water quality objectives were exceeded at both urban runoff locations for aluminum, copper (total and dissolved), dissolved oxygen, fecal coliform, pH and Zinc. Bodem was reported to have exceeded WQO for specific conductance. (Level 1) Reports of Water Quality Exceedances were prepared for each of the exceedances that occurred during this permit year. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-18 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City re-evaluated the Tier 1 threshold concentrations and is proposing no changes to the thresholds at this time. (Level 1) Table 9-6: Urban Discharge Monitoring Locations Bodem Street Scenic Road The Bodem Street line drains the McHenry Avenue Corridor, a mostly residential/commercial area. The 84-inch drain pipe invert is approximately 20 feet below grade. The maintenance access is within the traveled roadway of a two-lane bi-directional street with moderate traffic. The discharge point to Dry Creek is in Moose Park with a limited number of additional contributions to the discharge line of the monitoring location. The Scenic Drive line drains urban runoff from the Sonoma residential neighborhood. The 36-inch pipe is 10 feet below grade. The maintenance access is located in the traveled roadway of a four- lane bi-directional street with heavy, fast- moving traffic. Access to the discharge point to Dry Creek is through a private residential property. Water quality parameters with monitoring requirements in the urban discharge are the same as constituents monitored in the receiving water and are listed in Section 9.3 Conduct Urban Discharge and Flow Monitoring The City conducted three urban discharge monitoring events each year (first flush, mid- to-late season, and dry weather) in coordination with the receiving water monitoring at the following locations: Bodem Street Scenic Drive Conduct a TIE if Toxicity is Present The City is required to conduct a Toxicity Identification Evaluation (TIE) if toxicity testing indicates that samples are significantly toxic to either test species. In the event that samples are significantly toxic to either test species, the City will immediately conduct at Phase I TIE on the toxic samples. In the event that there is 50% mortality in both species the TIE will be conducted using both Fathead minnows and water fleas. TIEs will be conducted by Pacific EcoRisk or another qualified consultant. During the permit term, no toxicity was reported in data; thus TIE was not required. Since no TIE was required, no corresponding TRE Correction Action Reports were required. Conduct Correlation Analysis of POCs to TSS The City is required to perform an analysis of the correlation between the pollutants of concern (POCs) and TSS loadings. Refer to Correlation Analysis and figures presented above, with receiving water data discussion. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-19 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Evaluate Data and Report Tier 1 or Water Quality Exceedances The City is required to evaluate data and report Tier 1 threshold exceedances to the Regional Water Board within 48 hours if needed. As shown in the Summary of Urban Discharge WQO Exceedances table below, with the exception of pH, no Tier 1 exceedances occurred during the permit term. Starting in the 2009-2010 permit year, the City evaluated the monitoring results to determine whether the urban runoff discharges are causing or contributing to an exceedance of water quality objectives in the receiving water. A summary of WQO exceedances observed in the 2008-2013 urban discharge monitoring events is included in the table below. Table 9-7: Summary of Urban Discharge WQO Exceedances Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location Tier 1 Thresholds WQO Aluminum (µg/L) 2,300 11/03/08 Bodem 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1,500 1/23/09 Bodem 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 770 1/23/09 Scenic 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 2,200 10/13/09 Scenic 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 2,800 10/13/09 Bodem 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1,100 10/13/09 Scenic 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1,200 10/13/09 Bodem 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1,400 2/16/11 Bodem 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 800 2/16/11 Scenic 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1100 10/05/11 Bodem 3,140 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 800 10/05/11 Scenic 3,140 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 2000 1/21/12 Bodem 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1440 1/21/12 Scenic 3,410 750 Aluminum (µg/L) 1600 11/28/12 Bodem 3,410 750 Copper, total (µg/L) 6.8 5/27/09 Bodem 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 34 11/03/08 Bodem 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 18 1/23/09 Bodem 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 27 11/03/08 Scenic 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 14 1/23/09 Scenic 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 72 10/13/09 Scenic 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 45 10/13/09 Bodem 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 9.45 10/30/10 Bodem 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 25 02/16/11 Bodem 98.3 6.8 Copper, total (µg/L) 19 02/16/11 Scenic 98.3 6.8 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-20 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location Tier 1 Thresholds WQO Copper, total (µg/L) 8 6/21/11 Scenic 98.3 6.8 Copper (total) (µg/L) 19 10/05/11 Bodem 98.3 6.6 Copper (total) (µg/L) 19 10/05/11 Scenic 98.3 6.6 Copper (total) (µg/L) 28.5 1/21/12 Bodem 98.3 6.6 Copper (total) (µg/L) 24 1/21/12 Scenic 98.3 6.6 Copper (total) (µg/L) 36 11/28/12 Bodem 98.3 6.6 Copper (total) (µg/L) 22 11/28/12 Scenic 98.3 6.6 Copper (total) (µg/L) 12 6/05/13 Bodem 98.3 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 16 11/03/08 Bodem - 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 7.6 1/23/09 Bodem - 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 12 11/03/08 Scenic - 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 8.4 1/23/09 Scenic - 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 22 10/13/09 Scenic - 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 30 10/13/09 Scenic - 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 6.9 10/30/10 Bodem 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 24 2/16/11 Bodem 6.6 Copper, dissolved (µg/L) 16 2/16/11 Scenic 6.6 Copper (dissolved) (µg/L) 17 10/05/11 Bodem - 6.3 Copper (dissolved) (µg/L) 9.4 10/05/11 Scenic - 6.3 Copper (dissolved) (µg/L) 19 1/21/12 Bodem - 6.3 Copper (dissolved) (µg/L) 8 1/21/12 Scenic - 6.3 Copper (dissolved) (µg/L) 19 11/28/12 Bodem - 6.3 Copper (dissolved) (µg/L) 15 11/28/12 Scenic - 6.3 Dissolved oxygen 6.59 mg/L 5/27/09 Bodem - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 2.3 mg/L 5/27/09 Scenic - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 6.69 mg/L 11/03/08 Scenic - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 5.05 10/30/10 Bodem - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 3.12 10/30/10 Scenic - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 4.38 6/21/11 Scenic - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 6.92 mg/L 6/05/13 Bodem - >7.0 mg/L Dissolved oxygen 3.56 mg/L 6/05/13 Scenic - >7.0 mg/L Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 2,600 10/13/09 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 3,000 10/13/09 Bodem 50,000 200 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-21 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location Tier 1 Thresholds WQO Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 2,300 1/13/10 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 33,000 1/03/10 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 780 6/09/10 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 450 6/09/10 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) <18,000 10/30/10 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 40,000 10/30/10 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 110,000 11/20/10 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 1,100 11/20/10 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 13,000 2/16/11 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 4,500 2/16/11 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 4,900 2/16/11 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 680 6/21/11 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 1,400 6/21/11 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 7,900 10/05/11 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 3,300 10/05/11 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 4,750 1/21/12 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 790 1/21/12 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 2739 5/17/12 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 1310 5/17/12 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 5400 5/25/12 Bodem* 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 3300 5/25/12 Scenic* 50,000 200 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-22 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Concentration Sample Date / Location Tier 1 Thresholds WQO Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 70000 11/28/12 Bodem 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 9200 11/28/12 Scenic 50,000 200 Fecal Coliform (MPN/100mL) 310 6/05/13 Bodem 50,000 200 Mercury, total (µg/L) 0.06 11/03/08 Bodem - 0.05 pH (Std. Units) 6.12 5/27/09 Scenic 6.5 to 8.5 >6.5 pH (Std. Units) 4.04 02/16/11 Bodem 6.5 to 8.5 >6.5 Specific conductance (µmhos/cm) 1,290 5/27/09 Bodem - 700 Zinc, total (µg/L) 170 11/03/08 Bodem - 66 µg/L Zinc, total (µg/L) 100 1/23/09 Bodem - 66 µg/L Zinc, total (µg/L) 71 11/03/08 Scenic - 66 µg/L Zinc, total (µg/L) 110 2/16/11 Bodem - 66 µg/L Zinc, total (µg/L) 130 10/05/11 Bodem - 61 Zinc, total (µg/L) 76 10/05/11 Scenic - 61 Zinc, total (µg/L) 145 1/21/12 Bodem - 61 Zinc, total (µg/L) 798 1/21/12 Scenic - 61 *Fecal coliform was resampled on 5/25/12 at the urban discharge locations; sample results from 5/17/12 were suspect due to laboratory error, but were included to show comparison. The City re-evaluated the Tier 1 threshold concentrations that were established in the SWMP based on the monitoring data collected since the thresholds were developed. Based on review of current permit year data, the city is proposing no changes to the thresholds at this time. 9.5 MP3 – Detention Basin Monitoring 9.5.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the Detention Basin Monitoring task is to evaluate the effectiveness of detention basins at removing pollutants of concern. Detention basin influent and effluent water quality samples are collected during flow events and sediment chemistry samples are collected at multiple locations in each detention basin during non-storm conditions. 9.5.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-23 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Permit Term Achievements The City of Modesto monitored the influent and effluent from the Orchard Park Basin and Carpenter Road Basin in the 2009-2010 permit year (10/13/09) and again in the 2011-2012 permit year (10/05/11 and 10/07/11). (Level 1) Sediment monitoring was conducted for both basins 6/22/10 and 10/17/11. (Level 1) Additional sediment samples were collected from the Orchard Park Basin 2/2/12. (Level 1) Based on the single sample data point for influent and effluent for each basin, the data does not support a correlation for any of the pollutants of concern, except for Total Mercury. (Level 1) If we accept the single sample results for Total Mercury as representative, then the reduction in the Carpenter / Fire Science Basin Effluent would be approximately 49%. (Level 6) Based on the data collected during this permit year, including low levels of total mercury, lower levels of methyl mercury present (at or just above method reporting limits), pH values reported from basin effluent, the potential for methyl mercury production is deemed to be low. (Level 6) Table 9-8: Detention Basins Monitoring Locations Orchard Park Basin Carpenter Road Basin The Orchard Park Basin is located at Merle Avenue near Bailey Drive. This basin receives primarily residential runoff from a drainage area of approximately 480 acres. The basin has a single inlet and a single outlet pipe, which discharges, via pump, to MID Lateral Number 3. The Carpenter Road detention basin is located on Brink Avenue. near Fire Science Lane. This basin receives runoff from approximately 97 acres consisting of light industrial and commercial land uses. The basin has a single inlet and single discharge pipe. The storm water is pumped to a discharge point approximately 2,400 feet northeast into Modesto Irrigation District (MID) Lateral 3. Table 9-9: Detention Basin Sampling Constituent List Constituent Analytical Method Conventional and General Parameters Turbidity (water) SM 2310B/Field Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) (water) SM 2540C Total Suspended Solids (TSS) (water) SM 2540D Bacteria E-coli (water) SM 9221E Fecal coliform (water) SM 9221E Metals Arsenic, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Barium, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Chromium, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-24 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Analytical Method Copper, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Lead, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Mercury, Total (water/sediment) EPA 1631E/EPA 7410 Methyl mercury (water) EPA 1630 Nickel, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Selenium, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Silver, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Zinc, Total (water/sediment) EPA 200.8/EPA 6010 Hydrocarbons Total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons (TPPH) (water/sediment) EPA 8015M/SM 5520 Total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) (water/sediment) EPA 8015M/SM 5520 Organophosphate Pesticides Diazinon (water) EPA 614 Chlorpyrifos (water) EPA 614 Sediment toxicity Amphipod survival Hyaella azteca (10-day survival and growth) Total organic carbon Sediment grain size EPA 600/R-99/064 Conduct Detention Basin Monitoring The City of Modesto monitored selected detention basins per the SWMP during this permit year: Orchard Park and Carpenter Road detention basin influent was monitored 10/5/2011; Orchard Park and Carpenter Road detention basin effluent was monitored 10/7/2011; sediment samples were collected 10/17/2011 from both basins, and resampling of sediment from Orchard Park basin was conducted 02/02/2012. Evaluate POC Removal Efficiency For each basin, the influent analytical data was compared to effluent data to estimate removal efficiencies of the detention basins. Based on the single sample data point for influent and effluent for each basin, the data does not support a correlation for any of the pollutants of concern, except for Total Mercury. For the Carpenter / Fire Science basin, Total Mercury concentration in the basin influent was reported to be 5.73 ng/L, and 2.9 ng/L in the basin effluent. If we accept the single sample results for Total Mercury as representative, then the reduction in the Carpenter / Fire Science Basin Effluent would be approximately 49%. It is the City of Modesto’s opinion that the data does not support further correlation for estimating removal efficiencies. Evaluate Potential for Methyl Mercury Production For each basin, the reported influent concentration of Methyl Mercury was compared to the reported effluent concentration. For the Carpenter / Fire Science detention basin, the influent concentration was reported to be 0.06 ng/L, and the effluent concentration was reported to be 0.07 ng/L. Both of these values are close to the Reporting Limit of ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-25 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 0.05 ng/L, and are deemed not appropriate for further analysis. The Methyl Mercury influent concentration for the Orchard Park basin was reported to be 0.1 ng/L and the effluent concentration was reported to be 0.12 ng/L. These values were reported with different degrees of significance (significant figures). If we accept the lesser, then the values are the same (0.1 ng/L). While the single sample results for Methyl Mercury do not provide relevant information regarding methyl mercury production within the basins, studies have indicated that rates of Mercury methylation have been found to increase with decreasing pH. The pH of effluent reported during sampling activities at the Carpenter / Fire Science basin was 9.09. This basic pH may be interpreted as a contra-indicator to the methylation process. The pH of effluent from the Orchard Park basin effluent was reported to be 6.74. While this is acidic, it does not represent the level of acidification required to support or promote the methylation process. Based on the data collected during this permit year, including low levels of total mercury, lower levels of methyl mercury present (at or just above method reporting limits), pH values reported from basin effluent, the potential for methyl mercury production is deemed to be low. In the 2009-2010 annual report, the City described the steps to evaluate data: Compare concentrations of mercury forms and other potential explanatory variables in inflows and outflows. Methyl mercury concentrations in both basins are very close to reporting limits, considering significant digits, they are the same. Mercury concentrations in both basins are reduced in the effluent. Compare concentrations of mercury forms in detention basins to other monitoring stations‘ data. Detention basins had lower total mercury and methyl mercury concentrations than other urban runoff, higher total mercury concentrations than receiving waters, and similar methyl mercury concentrations as receiving waters. Evaluate the available data with various methyl mercury-specific models. Bioavailable fraction of mercury was found to change inconsistently between inflow and outflow (decrease through Orchard Park; increase through Carpenter Road), be higher in Orchard Park than in Carpenter Road, and yet be lower in basin outflows than most other mercury sources. Initiate an analysis of possible correlations with total mercury and methyl mercury concentrations in basin inflow and outflow. Based on the limited data, it does appear that ratios of methyl mercury:total mercury, total mercury:TSS, and methyl mercury:TSS vary little between inflows and outflows at each basin, but that values for the two basins are significantly different. These initial results point to land use effects as a primary determinant of inflow methyl mercury levels and sedimentation rates in the basins as a primary treatment process. Compare sediment samples to water column conditions. The water column samples were found to be 6-10 times greater in total mercury content than the basin sediments, presumably because of the smaller grain size in water column samples would have a greater affinity for mercury. Basin sediment levels of total mercury were well below freshwater sediment quality guidelines. In consideration of these factors, the City of Modesto has chosen at this time not to pursue additional data such as Flow rate (compare the relative load of basin outflows to ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-26 September 2013 Annual Progress Report other urban areas and to the receiving waters), dissolved organic carbon in inflow and outflow (for Water Environment Research Federation bioavailable mercury fraction model); and Grain size distribution in inflow, outflow, and sediment samples (compare and normalize suspended sediment samples to bed sediment samples). The City of Modesto may choose to re-evaluate the potential for methyl mercury production at a later date. 9.6 MP4 – Dry Weather Characterization 9.6.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of this monitoring element is to identify dry weather flows and potential illicit discharges. The City conducted dry weather field monitoring to characterize the dry weather urban discharge entering the storm drain system, rockwells, and retention/detention basins. 9.6.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The City identified 12 outfalls that are greater than 24 inches. (Level 1) During the permit term, the City verified outfall location and size. (Level 1) A 42” outfall listed as “Yosemite Boulevard Corridor” was removed as it was determined to receive CalTrans highway SR132 storm water. (Level 1) A previously unidentified 54” outfall along Neece Drive was discovered during field investigation and has been added to the list. (Level 1) During the permit term, the Shackelford Area outfall was added to the list due to annexation of the area from Stanislaus County to the City of Modesto. (Level 1) The City monitored all 12 outfalls greater than 24” during the permit term; 10 had sufficient flow for sampling. (Level 1) The City monitored 49 rockwells and/or retention/detention basins during the 2012-2013 permit year; 13 had sufficient flow for sampling. (Level 1) Monitoring Locations To characterize the impact of dry weather flows on surface waters, the City monitored all outfalls at least once during the 2008-2013 Permit term. Dry weather sampling sites for the positive storm drain system were selected at storm drain outfalls greater than 24 inches in diameter or at the nearest manhole upstream of the outfall. There are 12 outfalls that are greater than 24 inches (tabulated below). The Shackelford Area outfall was added to the list this year due to the annexation of the area from Stanislaus County to the City of Modesto. To characterize the impact of dry weather flows on groundwater, the City will monitor at least 20 representative rockwells and/or ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-27 September 2013 Annual Progress Report retention/detention basins (residential, industrial, commercial, and/or mixed use) during the 2008-2013 Permit term. Table 9-10: Outfalls Greater than 24 Inches Monitored Outfall Designation Watershed/Drainage Area Outfall Location (Designation Number) Drainage Area (acres) Pipe Diameter (inches) Land Use Tuolumne River Ninth Street Seventh Street Bridge ([PHONE REDACTED]) 1,000 4 ft x 12 ft rectangular Commercial, Residential, Industrial, Park Ustick Neighborhood Crater/Ustick (804090101) 170 36 Residential Ustick Neighborhood Crater/Seine (504091401) 30 Residential Shackelford Area Zeff Road ([PHONE REDACTED]) 30 Residential, Commercial, Industrial West Side Area Neece Dr / Muni ([PHONE REDACTED]) 54 Residential, Park Dry Creek McHenry Avenue Corridor Moose Park footbridge ([PHONE REDACTED]) 850 68 Residential, Commercial Sonoma Neighborhood McGuire Drive ([PHONE REDACTED]) 415 42 Residential, School Fara Biundo Neighborhood Claus Road ([PHONE REDACTED]) 320 48 Residential, Commercial, Industrial Dry Creek Meadows McClure Road ([PHONE REDACTED]) 270 66 Residential, Commercial La Loma Neighborhood N/A ([PHONE REDACTED]) 115 30 Residential Riverside Neighborhood N. Riverside Dr. (Not in GIS) 110 30 Residential, Park Scenic Drive Corridor Coffee Road ([PHONE REDACTED]) 80 36 Residential, Commercial, Park Table 9-11: Dry Weather Characterization Sampling Constituent List Constituent Analytical Method Minimum Level Units Field Parameters pH Field/SM 4500-HB 0-14 Std. units Temperature Field/SM 2550B None °C Specific conductance Field/SM 2510B 1 μmhos/cm μmhos/sec Dissolved oxygen Field/SM 4500-O-G 5 mg/L Chlorine (Total Residual) Field 0.1 mg/L ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-28 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Constituent Analytical Method Minimum Level Units Turbidity Field/SM 2310B 0.1 NTU Laboratory Analyses Bacteriological E. coli SM 9221E 20 MPN/100 mL Fecal coliform SM 9221E 20 MPN/100 mL Conventional and General Total dissolved solids (TDS) SM 2540C 2 mg/L Methylene blue active substances (MBAS) EPA 425.1 0.5 mg/L Oil and grease EPA 1664 5 mg/L Phenols EPA 420.4 0.1 mg/L Metals Aluminum, Total EPA 200.8 50 μg/L Copper, Total EPA 200.8 0.5 μg/L Iron, Total EPA 200.8 100 μg/L Lead, Total EPA 200.8 0.5 μg/L Verify Outfalls The City is required to verify outfalls (location and size). The City researched via GIS and conducted field observations of all outfalls during the Treatment Feasibility Study. The table of outfalls listed above reflects current data as of August 2010. A 42” outfall listed as “Yosemite Boulevard Corridor” in previous annual reports was determined to have taken storm water from CalTrans highway SR132; therefore, it should not have been included in the City’s monitoring plan and was subsequently removed. A previously unidentified 54” outfall along Neece Dr was discovered during field investigations and has been added to the list. Conduct Dry Weather Characterization Monitoring The City is required to conduct dry weather characterization monitoring at 20% of the outfalls greater than 24 inches per year and 20 rockwells or detention basins. This monitoring was not conducted during the 2008-2009 permit year. The following table includes a summary of the monitoring conducted during the 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 permit years. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-29 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Table 9-12: Summary of Dry Weather Characterization of Outfalls Greater than 24 inches Date Monitored &Sampled Outfall Location Drainage Area (acres) Land Use 6/22/10 7th Street 6/22/10 Crater & Seine Residential 6/22/10 Crater & Ustick 170 Residential 6/22/10 Moose Park 850 Residential, Commercial 6/22/10 Scenic & McGuire 415 Residential, School 06/23/11 La Loma Neighborhood 115 Residential 06/21/12 West Side Area Residential, Park 06/21/12 Dry Creek Meadows 270 Residential, Commercial 06/21/12 Riverside Neighborhood 110 Residential, Park The remaining outfalls (Shackelford Area and Scenic Drive Corridor) were monitored during the 2012-2013 permit year; however, due to insufficient flows, they were not sampled. The results of these sampling events have been submitted in previous annual reports. During the 2012-2013 permit year, the City monitored 24 retention/detention basins and 25 rockwells; of those with sufficient flows, 7 retention/detention basins and 6 rockwells were sampled. (Appendix I, 2012-2013 Basin and Rockwell Sampling Data) 9.7 MP5 – Bioassessment Monitoring 9.7.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the Bioassessment Monitoring task is designed to assess the biological integrity of the receiving water and physical/habitat conditions not detected by chemical and physical water quality analyses. The SWMP (August 2009) established the level of effort required for this task: Fully evaluate bioassessment data collected under the previous Permit. Report results and evaluation in the 2009-2010 Annual Progress Report. 9.7.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-30 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Permit Term Achievements The City fully evaluated the Bioassessment data collected during the previous permit term. (Level 1) Pacific EcoRisk completed the bioassessment data evaluation of the data collected in 2006 and 2007. (Level 6) The bioassessment data evaluation was submitted with the 2009-2010 Annual Progress Report. (Level 6) Evaluate Bioassessment Data The City fully evaluated the Bioassessment data collected during the previous permit term. Pacific EcoRisk completed the bioassessment data evaluation of the data collected in 2006 and 2007. An excerpt of the report conclusions are noted here. The Dry Creek at Claus Road reach ranked as ‘suboptimal’ for physical habitat quality in 2006 and 2007, primarily due to a relatively straight channel, moderate levels of sediment deposition, moderate percentage of vegetation on the banks, and a relatively narrow riparian corridor. The Dry Creek at Beard Brook Park reach ranked as ‘marginal’ in 2006 and ‘suboptimal’ in 2007. The 2006 habitat ranking was primarily due to a low epifaunal substrate low benthic habitat complexity), increased channel alteration rip-rap), moderate sediment deposition, and reduced vegetative protection of the banks, resulting in reduced bank stability at this site and limited riparian vegetation; it is important to note that the habitat was likely influenced by scouring storm events and water backing up into the site from the Tuolumne. The increased habitat quality recorded for Dry Creek at Beard Brook Park in 2007 was due primarily to improved epifaunal substrate, bank stability, and riparian vegetation zone. Caution should also be used when making any conclusions about habitat and biological metric differences between the 2006 and 2007 sampling since the 2006 samples were collected in the summer (due to non-wadeable conditions in the spring) and the 2007 samples were collected in the spring; any differences in these two years could be due to seasonal differences alone. The bioassessment data evaluation was submitted with the 2009-2010 Annual Progress Report. 9.8 MP6 – BMP Effectiveness Study 9.8.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the BMP Effectiveness Study task is to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment control BMPs with the objectives of: Monitor the reduction of pollutants of concern in storm water from a minimum of one BMP that has been properly installed within the year preceding monitoring. Monitoring shall be continued until the effectiveness of the BMP can be determined; Evaluate the requirements for and installation and maintenance cost of each BMP; and ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-31 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Develop recommendations for appropriate BMPs for the reduction of pollutants of concern in storm water in the Modesto Urbanized Area. 9.8.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The City conducted a BMP effectiveness study on two treatment devices, a CONTECH StormVault and a Water Quality Detention Basin. (Level 1) Most data generated from the StormVault proved inconclusive with little parameters showing significant reduction. (Level 1) The StormVault’s fecal coliform counts were reduced by 62% and were below WQO upon exit. (Level 4) The City performed stormwater monitoring on the water quality detention basin (Fairview) located within Rancho Encantado Park. (Level 1) Analysis of the sampling data suggest significant removal of a number of pollutants and/or other constituents between the stormwater influent and the basin treated effluent: Average metals reduction – 21 % Oil & Grease reduction – 27 % TKN reduction – 88% TSS reduction – 36 % Turbidity – 25 % (Level 4) These preliminary results suggest that the biofiltration of pollutants through this water quality detention basin are an effective means of stormwater treatment to the maximum extent practicable. (Level 4) These preliminary results suggest that the biofiltration of pollutants through this water quality detention basin are an effective means of storm water treatment to the maximum extent practicable. Identify BMP Studies The City is required to identify the BMP studies that it will conduct or participate in during the permit term. An agreement for a cooperative study with the City of Stockton could not be achieved during this permit term. With approval, the City of Modesto conducted its own BMP effectiveness study on two treatment devices: A proprietary storm water treatment device, CONTECH StormVault, which was installed in a residential area in 2005 and; ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-32 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City of Modesto’s only Water Quality Detention Basin installed in a residential area in 2006 Participate In BMP Effectiveness Studies The City conducted two BMP effectiveness studies. As described in the 2010-2011 annual report, on 3/16/11 the City performed storm water monitoring on the CONTECH StormVault located at the 1400 block of Christiansen Dr. Pollutant removal efficiency was analyzed through sampling data collected at the inlet of the treatment device and upon exit before entering the City’s MS4. Most data proved inconclusive with little parameters showing significant reduction. Potential cause may be attributed to low flow through the unit due to minimal rainfall on that particular day. However, fecal coliform counts were reduced by 62% and were below WQO upon exit. On 3/24/11 the City performed storm water monitoring on the water quality detention basin (Fairview) located within Rancho Encantado Park. Similar to the Stormvault monitoring, samples were taken on the influent to the basin and then on the pump station effluent to the City’s MS4. Analysis of the sampling data suggest significant removal of a number of pollutants and/or other constituents between the storm water influent and the basin treated effluent: Average metals reduction – 21 % Oil & Grease reduction – 27 % TKN reduction – 88% TSS reduction – 36 % Turbidity – 25 % These preliminary results suggest that the biofiltration of pollutants through this water quality detention basin are an effective means of storm water treatment to the maximum extent practicable. 9.9 MP7 – Data Management 9.9.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the Data Management task is to develop and implement a standard/system to electronically store data collected from the City’s various monitoring efforts. The SWMP (August 2009) established the level of effort required for this monitoring task: Develop and implement a database system to electronically store monitoring data. The database system will include database standards, quality control criteria, and monitoring submittal protocols. Audit data management standard/system once during the 2008-2013 Permit term to check for accuracy. 9.9.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-33 September 2013 Annual Progress Report Permit Term Achievements The City has implemented a database system to electronically store monitoring data. (Level 1) The City audits the data management system on an on-going basis using historical results do determine possible inaccuracies. (Level 1) Develop and Implement Data Management Standard/System The City currently contracts with Lablite, which maintains the City’s monitoring data in a spreadsheet-based database. The database system includes database standards, quality control criteria, and monitoring submittal protocols. Audit Data Management System The City of Modesto Water Quality Control Laboratory maintains the data within Lablite and regularly queries the data for comparison to historical values. All outliers are scrutinized for accuracy. Changes to the database system are tracked via an audit report generated from Lablite. Automatically downloaded data from contract labs into the database system are compared to hard copy reports of analysis. The City of Modesto Water Quality Control Laboratory is in the process of developing a more formalized auditing procedure which will include following samples from chain of custody and/or field notes to reports of analysis. 9.10 MP8 – Training 9.10.1 2008-2013 Implementation The purpose of the Training task is to train field and office personnel regarding successful implementation of the Monitoring Program Element. The overall goals and objectives of the training program for the Monitoring Program are to: Promote effective implementation of the SWMP; Create a cohesive storm water training program that supports the proper collection and analysis of storm water monitoring samples; and Increase specific knowledge of the SWMP and its requirements. 9.10.2 Assessment This Annual Report document incorporates activities and results up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. When “permit term” is used, it is intended to reflect the 2008- 2013 permit term up to the end of the 2012-2013 permit year. This is typical for all programs in this document. Permit Term Achievements The City identified areas of focus for key staff involved in the Monitoring Program. (Level 1) The City conducted tailgate meetings for all staff involved in field activities before each sampling event. (Level 1) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 9-34 September 2013 Annual Progress Report The City reviewed its training strategy annually and found that no further revision is necessary at this time. (Level 1) Table 9-13: Areas of Focus for the Monitoring Program Training Target Audience Topics for Audience Field Sampling Staff General storm water program information Clean sampling techniques Field log documentation Downloading data from data loggers Calibration and use of field equipment ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 10-1 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 10 Program Implementation, Evaluation and Reporting 10.1 Program Implementation The SWMP (Sections 2-9) is structured to identify activities to be implemented, time schedule for implementation, and responsible parties for implementing the activities. 10.2 Identified Risk to Receiving Water Quality In December 2012 the City of Modesto submitted the Draft ROWD/SWMP/Annual Report that proposed a risk based model in an effort to quantify risk to receiving water quality. This risk-based approach will allow the City to allocated resources to monitor and address areas directly related to receiving water quality. The City of Modesto is based on generating a numerical value using the formula below: Significant Score = (Probability) * (Significance) * [(weight factors) * (rating)] Probability was ranked as 1 through 4 as defined below Probability 1 = Impact fully mitigated Probability 2 = Impact controlled by procedures and engineering controls Probability 3 = Procedures and inspections have not been fully implemented there is a history of failure Probability 4 = Aspect is not fully mitigated, impact could have serious consequences Significance was ranked as 1 through 4 as defined below Significance 1 = less than 25% of total occurrence Significance 2 = between 25% and 50% of total occurrence Significance 3 = between 50% and 75% of total occurrence Significance 4 = greater than 75% of total occurrence Weight factor was defined as the percent of the following Hazard = 30% Volume = 20% BMPs containment = 10% Potential Impact to Water Quality = 10% Overall impact to Environment = 10% Impact to facility or system = 10% Impact to Community = 10% Rating was defined as 1 through 3 Low Impact = 1 Moderate impact = 2 Significant Impact = 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 10-2 September 2013 Annual Progress Report This risk model will allow the City of Modesto rank potential risk to receiving water and identify potential action items as listed below: Level 1 Risk = Action item, review BMPs Level 2 Risk = Action item, review BMPs and public outreach Level 3 Risk = Action items, review BMPs, public outreach, SOPs Level 4 Risk = Action items, review BMPs, public outreach, engineering controls, and SOPs The goal of the risk based model is to shift additional resources to risk level 3 and 4 as listed in the Draft ROWD/SWMP/Annual Report that was submitted in December 2012 for the following sections: Illicit Discharges Municipal Programs Industrial and Commercial Business Construction Planning and Land Development 10.3 Special Studies As discussed in Section 8, the following Water Quality Based issues have been identified during the 2008-2013 permit term, and are proposed for study during the 2013- 2018 permit term: WQ1 – Discharge Characterization: Continue Discharge Characterization, to evaluate and prioritize pollutants in stormwater discharge and to identify/evaluate POCs and POIs based on data collected as described in Section 9. WQ2 – Fecal Coliform Study: Fecal Coliform has been identified as a POC during previous permit terms, and concentrations in receiving waters continue to exceed WQOs. WQ3 – Aluminum and Copper Study: Aluminum and Copper have been identified as POCs during previous permit terms, and continue to be an issue in Dry Creek. The City proposes applying the risk-based approached outlined in Section 10.2 (above) to address these issues for the upcoming permit term. 10.4 Program Effectiveness Evaluation The City of Modesto has identified 2013-2018 Proposed Performance Standards and Implementation Schedules at the end of Sections 2 through 9 in the Draft ROWD/SWMP/Annual Report. An Annual Progress Report will be prepared at the end of each permit year which will summarize the activities and achievements for each Section, and will include a summary of the effectiveness assessment for each performance standard. Based on the results of the activities and effectiveness assessments, the City may propose adjustments to the SWMP for the coming permit year(s). ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto 10-3 September 2013 Annual Progress Report 10.5 Annual Progress Report An Annual Progress Report will typically be submitted by September 1st of each year. The reporting format reflects the format of the proposed 2013-2018 SWMP. The purpose of the Annual Progress Report is to document the activities and accomplishments and present results from activities implemented by the City. Updates, improvements, or revisions to the SWMP may also be proposed in the Annual Progress Report. The Annual Progress Report will contain the following: Executive summary Summary of effectiveness assessments for each performance standard for each control measure, grouped by Section. Evaluation of effectiveness for the control measures proposed in Sections 2 through 9, and proposed revisions for future permit years. Status update on Special Studies proposed in Section 8. Comparison of analytical data from monitoring proposed in Section 9 to water quality objectives/standards. Summary of monitoring data (may be presented in the body of the document, in the appendices or attached in electronic format). Summary of recommendation for revisions to the SWMP based on adaptive management. ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix A Stormwater Program Management and Report Introduction City Department Organization Charts ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix B Illicit Discharges and Illegal Connections Illicit Discharge Call Statistics Modesto Fire Department Hazmat Incidents with Detail Log Illicit Discharge Map SSO Discharge Map Enforcement Response Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- 7/1/2013 15:07 CITY OF MODESTO ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SYSTEM Page 1 CALL STATISTICS REPORT COMPLAINTS FROM 7/1/2012 - 6/30/2013 CASE NO. RECV-DT Column1 STAT PROGRAM SOURCE TAKEN-BY 1ST INSP ADDRESS #DAYS POLLUTANT REL UNITS REC ECS2012-00130 07/11/2012 NPU UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 07/11/2012 1705 CARVER COURT 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00131 07/11/2012 BUILDING DEPT CLO STORM OTH FLDOB 07/11/2012 905 MIDDLECOFF AVE 1 WASTEWATER 200.00 GAL 150.00 ECS2012-00132 07/11/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 07/11/2012 725 MCHENRY AVE 1 WASTEWATER 200.00 GAL 200.00 ECS2012-00133 07/14/2012 SOLID WASTE CLO STORM PARKS ANSSV 07/14/2012 1121 HAMMOND STREET 1 WASTEWATER 100.00 GAL 100.00 ECS2012-00134 07/15/2012 UNF STORM CITZN ANSSV 07/15/2012 4004 LAMARCK AVENUE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00135 07/12/2012 CLO STORM BLD FDESK 07/12/2012 112 PLEASANT STREET 1 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00136 07/24/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 07/24/2012 2048 MARLOW ST 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00137 07/23/2012 DER CLO STORM COLL FDESK 07/23/2012 1100 HARON LANE 1 GREASE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00138 07/24/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 07/24/2012 2833 MARBLE DRIVE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00139 07/30/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 07/30/2012 1819 1/2 MILLER AVENUE 1 WASHWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00140 07/27/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 07/27/2012 720 DEL REY AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2012-00141 07/30/2012 CLO STORM COLL ANSSV 07/30/2012 521 14TH STREET 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2012-00142 08/01/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 08/01/2012 1400 COFFEE RD 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00143 08/07/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 08/07/2012 301 BODEM STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00144 08/06/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 08/06/2012 2105 LINCOLN OAK DRIVE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00145 08/08/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 08/08/2012 914 6TH STREET 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2012-00146 08/12/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 08/12/2012 416 KAVANAGH AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 100.00 GAL 100.00 ECS2012-00147 08/13/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 08/13/2012 509 BODEM STREET 1 WASTEWATER 2.00 GAL 2.00 ECS2012-00148 08/13/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 08/13/2012 1405 DUSTIN COURT 0 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00149 08/14/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 08/14/2012 700 H STREET 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00150 08/09/2012 SOLID WASTE CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 08/09/2012 412 ALGEN CT 1 ANIMAL FECES 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00151 08/16/2012 SOLID WASTE UNF STORM CED FLDOB 08/16/2012 150 LAS FLORES CT` 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00152 08/14/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 08/14/2012 607 7TH STREET 1 CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00153 08/19/2012 CLO STORM COLL ANSSV 08/19/2012 2301 COSTON AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 390.00 GAL 390.00 ECS2012-00154 08/17/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 08/17/2012 109 ORANGE AVENUE 1 LANDSCAPE WATER PERMITTED 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00155 08/15/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 08/15/2012 1325 BROUGHTON PLACE 1 WASHWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00156 08/08/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 08/08/2012 110 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 GREASE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00157 08/23/2012 CLO STORM WATER FDESK 08/23/2012 1521 CARLISLE DRIVE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00158 08/22/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 08/22/2012 621 MAYFLOWER STREET 1 DIATOMACEOUS EARTH 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00159 08/24/2012 UNF SEWER COLL FDESK 08/24/2012 568 S RIVERSIDE DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00160 08/30/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 08/30/2012 2417 NICKERSON DRIVE, SUITE 4 1 CEMENT 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00161 08/30/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 08/30/2012 2001 MAJESTIC OAK COURT 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00162 08/28/2012 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 08/28/2012 146 JAMES STREET 1 WASTEWATER 1.00 GAL 1.00 ECS2012-00163 08/27/2012 CLO SEWER CITZN ANSSV 08/27/2012 107 S RIVERSIDE DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 779.00 GAL 779.00 ECS2012-00164 09/04/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 09/04/2012 101 MORTON BOULEVARD 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00165 09/02/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 09/02/2012 1917 MOUNT VERNON 1 WASTEWATER 263.00 GAL 263.00 ECS2012-00166 09/09/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 09/09/2012 3716 POINSETTIA DR 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00167 09/10/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 09/10/2012 247 KIMBLE STREET 1 WASTEWATER 25.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2012-00168 09/10/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 09/10/2012 3825 TAHITI LANE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00169 09/17/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 09/17/2012 924 INEZ DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2012-00170 09/19/2012 CLO STORM WATER OEMP 09/19/2012 920 D STREET 1 HYDRAULIC OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00171 09/19/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 09/19/2012 4021 HERTIAGE CT 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00172 09/14/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 09/14/2012 3616 SEMINOLE LANE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00173 09/25/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 09/25/2012 413 RIVERSIDE DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00174 09/25/2012 CLO STORM COLL OECS 09/25/2012 200 YOSEMITE BOULEVARD 1 MUDDY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00175 09/30/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 09/30/2012 805 TULLY ROAD 1 WASTEWATER 2.00 GAL 2.00 ECS2012-00176 09/29/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 09/29/2012 3112 WOLLAM DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2012-00177 09/28/2012 REF STORM CITZN OEMP 09/28/2012 1920 MARLENE COURT 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00178 09/27/2012 NPU CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 09/27/2012 1102 DIABLO AVENUE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00179 10/02/2012 CLO SEWER COLL FDESK 10/02/2012 812 SUTTER AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 1.00 GAL 1.00 ECS2012-00180 10/04/2012 DER & BLDG CLO SEWER ECS FLDOB 10/04/2012 1601 BOISE AVENUE 1 DIRT 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00181 10/03/2012 UNF STORM STREETS FDESK 10/03/2012 938 CROWS LANDING ROAD 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00182 10/08/2012 CLO STORM WATER FDESK 10/08/2012 821 MUIR ROAD 1 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- ECS2012-00183 10/11/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 10/11/2012 142 E COOLIDGE AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2012-00184 10/11/2012 DER & BLDG CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 10/11/2012 3100 MCGERRY STREET 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2012-00185 10/11/2012 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 10/11/2012 202 E FAIRMONT AVENUE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00186 10/13/2012 CLO STORM EMPL ANSSV 10/13/2012 446 ROSELAWN AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 7,540.00 GAL 1,092.00 ECS2012-00187 10/12/2012 DER & BLDG CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 10/12/2012 801 10TH STREET 1 WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00188 10/12/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 10/12/2012 3024 TULLY ROAD 1 CEMENT 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00189 10/16/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 10/16/2012 810 WRIGHT STREET 1 WASTEWATER 82.00 GAL 82.00 ECS2012-00190 10/16/2012 UNF STORM CITZN OEMP 10/16/2012 1025 SONOMA AVENUE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00191 10/15/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 10/15/2012 1030 HUNTINGTON DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00192 10/12/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 10/12/2012 616 ZINNIA WAY 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00193 10/21/2012 UNF STORM CITZN ANSSV 10/21/2012 2021 MARLOW STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00194 10/17/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 10/17/2012 1217 JILL LANE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00195 10/17/2012 UNF STORM WATER OECS 10/17/2012 1220 JILL LANE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00196 10/17/2012 UNF STORM WATER OECS 10/17/2012 1224 JILL LANE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00197 10/17/2012 CLO STORM MFD FDESK 10/17/2012 3459 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 ANTIFREEZE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00198 10/20/2012 CAL TRANS UNF STORM MFD ANSSV 10/20/2012 2549 YOSEMITE BLVD 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00199 10/28/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 10/28/2012 3848 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 1.00 GAL 1.00 ECS2012-00200 10/28/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 10/28/2012 1121 MORRIS AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2012-00201 10/25/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 10/25/2012 2441 IVES ST 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 5.00 ECS2012-00202 10/28/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 10/28/2012 1606 ARDMOR AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 25.00 GAL 25.00 ECS2012-00203 10/25/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 10/25/2012 3250 DALE ROAD 1 WASHWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00204 10/30/2012 CLO STORM COLL OEMP 10/30/2012 2344 ST LAWRENCE LANE 1 CONCRETE WASHWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00205 10/30/2012 CLO STORM STREETS FDESK 10/30/2012 3832 HONEY CREEK DRIVE 1 PAINT 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00206 11/02/2012 CLO STORM EMPL FDESK 11/02/2012 2337 ORCHARD VIEW CIRCLE 1 POTABLE WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00207 11/02/2012 WATER DIVISION CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 11/02/2012 1313 BUCCANEER CT 1 GRASS, YARD DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00208 11/06/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 11/06/2012 3011 DELTA AVENUE 1 TRANSMISSION FLUID 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00209 11/02/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 11/02/2012 207 MORRIS AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2012-00210 11/05/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 11/05/2012 2432 HOWE WAY 1 CARPET CLEANER WASTEWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00211 11/12/2012 UNF STORM CITZN ANSSV 11/12/2012 302 COVENA AVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00212 11/14/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 11/14/2012 1725 BARBARA WAY 1 WASTEWATER 100.00 GAL 100.00 ECS2012-00213 11/18/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 11/18/2012 3205 CLOGSTON WAY 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00214 11/24/2012 STREETS CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 11/24/2012 2817 VESTRELLA AVENUE 1 ALGAE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00215 11/21/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 11/21/2012 1235 MAGNOLIA AVENUE 1 CEMENT 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00216 11/21/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 11/21/2012 723 NEEDHAM STREET 1 ANTIFREEZE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00217 11/19/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 11/19/2012 156 ROCKY LANE 1 WASTEWATER 200.00 GAL 200.00 ECS2012-00218 11/19/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 11/19/2012 203 MORRIS AVE 1 WASTEWATER 200.00 GAL 200.00 ECS2012-00219 11/29/2012 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 11/29/2012 7001 JENNINGS RD 1 DECAYING ORGANIC MATTER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00220 11/30/2012 SOLID WASTE UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 11/30/2012 2021 MARLOW STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00221 11/26/2012 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 11/26/2012 236 SIERRA MADRE DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2012-00222 12/06/2012 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 12/06/2012 1513 ROBERTSON ROAD 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00223 12/03/2012 UNF STORM CITZN OEMP 12/03/2012 4220 KEEPSAKE CT 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00224 12/03/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 12/03/2012 4220 KEEPSAKE CT 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00225 12/06/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 12/06/2012 4220 KEEPSAKE CT 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00226 12/07/2012 NPU CLO STORM MPD ANSSV 12/07/2012 901 E WHITMORE AVENUE 1 PERMITTED WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2012-00227 12/04/2012 WATER DIVISION CLO STORM COLL OEMP 12/04/2012 602 2ND STREET 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 STREETS ECS2012-00228 12/07/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 12/07/2012 320 MELROSE ST 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2012-00229 11/27/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 11/27/2012 1309 ENSENADA DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2012-00230 12/09/2012 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 12/09/2012 1401 ENSENADA DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 5.00 ECS2012-00231 12/19/2012 CLO STORM COLL OEMP 12/19/2012 1905 E ORANGEBURG AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 75.00 GAL 75.00 ECS2013-00001 12/21/2012 CLO STORM STREETS FLDOB 12/21/2012 4201 FARA BIUNDO DRIVE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00002 12/18/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 12/18/2012 415 N MORTON BLVD 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2013-00003 12/18/2012 DER & BLDG UNF SEWER MFD FDESK 12/18/2012 3848 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00004 12/26/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 12/26/2012 445 MAPLE STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00005 12/28/2012 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 12/28/2012 208 ASH STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00006 12/31/2012 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 12/31/2012 2031 CROWS LANDING ROAD 1 WASHWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00007 12/17/2012 CLO SEWER MAINT FDESK 12/17/2012 435 COLLEGE AVENUE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00008 12/19/2012 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 12/19/2012 4004 BALLEN CT 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2013-00009 01/01/2013 CLO STORM COLL ANSSV 01/01/2013 CARPENTER ROAD BRIDGE 1 MUD & SILT 0.00 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- ECS2013-00010 12/28/2012 CONSTRUCTION ACLO STORM COLL OEMP 12/28/2012 1921 HUNT AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 30.00 GAL 30.00 ECS2013-00011 01/04/2013 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 01/04/2013 3833 WESSON RANCH ROAD 1 CARPET CLEANER WASTEWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00012 01/02/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 01/02/2013 3128 GIBSON WAY 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00013 01/02/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/02/2013 2829 NORA LANE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00014 01/04/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 01/04/2013 1982 CROWS LANDING ROAD 1 MUD & SILT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00015 01/04/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 01/04/2013 1982 CROWS LANDING ROAD 1 MUD & SILT 0.00 0.00 STREETS ECS2013-00016 01/08/2013 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 01/08/2013 1501 COFFEE RD 1 PARKING LOT WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00017 01/07/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/07/2013 341 LEON AVE 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 2.00 ECS2013-00018 01/14/2013 REF STORM STANCO OECS 01/14/2013 624 AVON STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00019 01/12/2013 WATER DIVISION CLO STORM CITZN FLDOB 01/12/2013 917 SUSAN LEE LANE 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2013-00020 01/08/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/08/2013 1002 YOSEMITE BLVD 1 WASTEWATER 1.00 GAL 1.00 ECS2013-00021 01/11/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/11/2013 2748 EL PASADO DRIVE 1 MOTOR OIL LEAKS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00022 01/12/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 01/12/2013 144 WOODROW AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 200.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2013-00023 01/13/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 01/13/2013 1605 NIAN WAY 1 WASTEWATER 25.00 GAL 25.00 ECS2013-00024 01/13/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 01/13/2013 1602 OAKWOOD DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 25.00 ECS2013-00025 01/14/2013 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 01/14/2013 1401 MORADA DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00026 01/16/2013 STREETS CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/16/2013 608 16TH STREET 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 5.00 ECS2013-00027 01/17/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/17/2013 1929 SNYDER AVENUE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00028 01/16/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/16/2013 3612 SHADY VALLEY COURT 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00029 01/19/2013 CLO STORM PARKS OEMP 01/19/2013 1129 WOODMAN WAY 1 HYDRAULIC OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00030 01/22/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 01/22/2013 3308 CHANDON DRIVE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00031 01/22/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 01/22/2013 1932 DEBONAIRE DRIVE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00032 01/25/2013 CLO STORM STREETS FLDOB 01/25/2013 604 DUNCAN AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2013-00033 01/28/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/28/2013 721 STANDIFORD AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 500.00 GAL 500.00 ECS2013-00034 01/20/2013 CLO STORM MPD ANSSV 01/20/2013 1316 YOSEMITE BOULEVARD 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00035 02/07/2013 FISH & GAME CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/07/2013 1200 S CARPENTER ROAD 1 WASTEWATER 4,300.00 GAL 1,700.00 ECS2013-00036 02/07/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 02/07/2013 1312 RANDY AVENUE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00037 02/05/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/05/2013 502 COLLEGE AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 100.00 GAL 100.00 ECS2013-00038 01/28/2013 CLO STORM EMPL OEMP 01/28/2013 1229 BRIGHTON AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 720.00 GAL 720.00 ECS2013-00039 02/01/2013 CLO STORM COLL OEMP 02/01/2013 2324 APACHE LANE 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 5.00 ECS2013-00040 02/04/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/04/2013 1733 IDALOU AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 250.00 GAL 250.00 ECS2013-00041 01/30/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/30/2013 1829 WALPOLE DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00042 02/06/2013 CLO SEWER COLL OEMP 02/06/2013 3807 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 DEGREASER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00043 02/12/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 02/12/2013 1502 KINGSLAND LANE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00044 01/25/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 01/25/2013 3333 CARVER ROAD 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00045 01/26/2013 CLO STORM EMPL OEMP 01/26/2013 430 SMITH AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 8.30 GAL 8.30 ECS2013-00046 01/28/2013 DER UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 01/28/2013 1500 SUNRISE AVENUE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00047 02/13/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/13/2013 702 HIGH STREET 1 CEMENT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00048 01/25/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OECS 01/25/2013 207 PHOENIX AVENUE 1 MUD 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00049 02/13/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/13/2013 107 A ROSEMONT AVENUE 1 CARPET CLEANER WASTEWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00050 02/01/2013 CLO STORM EMPL FLDOB 02/01/2013 2405 APACHE LANE 1 WASTEWATER 300.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2013-00051 02/14/2013 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 02/14/2013 730 17TH STREET 1 MUDDY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00052 02/16/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 02/16/2013 1009 MERTON AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 250.00 GAL 250.00 ECS2013-00053 02/18/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 02/18/2013 3220 CARVER ROAD 1 WASTEWATER 175.00 GAL 175.00 ECS2013-00054 02/19/2013 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 02/19/2013 401 11TH STREET 1 WASTEWATER 150.00 GAL 150.00 ECS2013-00055 02/25/2013 CLO STORM ECS FDESK 02/25/2013 132 GRANGER 1 MUD & SILT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00056 02/25/2013 BUILDING DEPT CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/25/2013 1121 EL VECINO AVENUE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00057 02/25/2013 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 02/25/2013 1123 CAMBRIDGE CT 1 PERMITTED POTABLE WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00058 02/28/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 02/28/2013 1016 WOLVERINE WAY 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00059 03/03/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 03/03/2013 1033 VENTURA DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 40.00 GAL 40.00 ECS2013-00060 03/04/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 03/04/2013 3813 GATESVILLE AVENUE 1 DEGREASER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00061 03/05/2013 CLO STORM COLL ANSSV 03/05/2013 522 AVENUE 1 PAINT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00062 02/28/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 02/28/2013 601 NEECE DRIVE 1 MUDDY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00063 03/06/2013 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 03/06/2013 1200 6TH STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00064 03/09/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 03/09/2013 3337 CARDINAL FLOWER AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 1.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2013-00065 03/09/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 03/09/2013 729 SPINDALE DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 10.00 ECS2013-00066 03/13/2013 CLO STORM BLD FDESK 03/13/2013 1513 JANUARY DRIVE 1 DIRT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00067 03/14/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 03/14/2013 229 H STREET 1 GRAY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00068 03/14/2013 UNF STORM ECS FLDOB 03/14/2013 207 H STREET 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00069 03/15/2013 CLO STORM ECS FDESK 03/15/2013 3113 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 MUDDY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00070 03/15/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 03/15/2013 1218 BANGS AVENUE 1 MUD & SILT 0.00 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- ECS2013-00071 03/20/2013 STANISLAUS COU CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 03/20/2013 2121 LANCEY DRIVE 1 DIRT & MUD 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00072 03/12/2013 ECS CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 03/12/2013 4112 LAURANT CT 1 GRAY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00073 03/12/2013 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 03/12/2013 1400 CELESTE DRIVE 1 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00074 03/20/2013 UNF STORM CITZN OECS 03/20/2013 2401 BLACK WALNUT DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00075 03/25/2013 NPU CLO SEWER COLL FDESK 03/25/2013 4025 CORNFIELD CT 1 GREASE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00076 03/26/2013 CLO STORM COLL ANSSV 03/26/2013 2213 PEPPERMINT DR 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2013-00077 03/27/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 03/27/2013 819 SUNSET AVENUE 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00078 03/29/2013 CLO STORM WATER FDESK 03/29/2013 217 KING ARTHUR WAY 1 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00079 04/03/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 03/28/2013 2601 OAKDALE ROAD -5 GREASE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00080 04/01/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 04/01/2013 420 CHICAGO AVENUE 1 FIRE FOAM 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00081 04/04/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 04/04/2013 203 ROSELAWN AVENUE 1 PAINT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00082 04/03/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 04/03/2013 3308 CHANDON DRIVE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00083 04/07/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 04/07/2013 1721 LAURALEE COURT 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00084 04/08/2013 CLO STORM COLL FLDOB 04/08/2013 950 10TH STREET 1 SAW CUTTING 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00085 04/05/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 04/05/2013 2408 LINCOLN OAK DRIVE 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00086 04/05/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 04/05/2013 3225 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00087 04/05/2013 DER UNF STORM ECS FDESK 04/05/2013 700 H STREET 1 PERMITTED WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00088 04/09/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 04/09/2013 529 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 60.00 GAL 60.00 ECS2013-00089 04/09/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 04/09/2013 1300 MCGUIRE DRIVE 1 GRASS, YARD DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00090 04/10/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 04/10/2013 2524 WOODVALE DRIVE 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00091 04/10/2013 CLO STORM ECS FDESK 04/10/2013 650 SUTTER AVENUE 1 MUDDY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00092 04/08/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 04/08/2013 1124 TOULON DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 290.00 GAL 190.00 ECS2013-00093 04/11/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 04/11/2013 110 E GRANGER AVENUE 1 GRAY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00094 04/15/2013 REF STORM CITZN FDESK 04/15/2013 1036 PETALUMA DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00095 04/23/2013 NPU CLO STORM COLL FDESK 04/23/2013 1737 RELIANCE STREET 1 PAINT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00096 04/18/2013 CLO STORM EMPL OEMP 04/18/2013 1109 EL TERINO AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2013-00097 04/09/2013 EXP STORM COLL FDESK 04/09/2013 529 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 60.00 GAL 60.00 ECS2013-00098 04/22/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 04/22/2013 160 NORWEGIAN AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 25.00 GAL 25.00 ECS2013-00099 04/18/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 04/18/2013 2508 SPRING WATER DRIVE 1 GRAY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00100 04/22/2013 CLO STORM STREETS FDESK 04/22/2013 1832 HAGSTROM COURT 1 DIRT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00101 04/22/2013 BUILDING DEPT CLO STORM ECS FDESK 04/22/2013 611 FRANKLIN STREET 1 PAINT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00102 04/29/2013 REC ILLCON STREETS OEMP 1001 GORHAM AVENUE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00103 04/30/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/01/2013 705 PARK HURST DRIVE 2 WASTEWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00104 05/01/2013 UNF STORM CITZN FDESK 05/01/2013 3401 FALLEN OAK DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00105 04/30/2013 UNF STORM WATER FDESK 04/30/2013 1705 KRUGER DRIVE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00106 05/02/2013 CLO STORM WATER OEMP 05/02/2013 2609 PALOMINO LANE 1 WASTEWATER 747.00 GAL 153.00 ECS2013-00107 05/01/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/01/2013 150 ORANGEBURG AVE EAST 1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00108 05/06/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/06/2013 1921 RUMBLE EAST 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00109 05/10/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 05/10/2013 229 H STREET 1 WASHWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00110 05/08/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/08/2013 217 WINMOORE WAY 1 SAW CUTTING 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00111 05/08/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/08/2013 3229 CLEARVEIW CT 1 MOTOR OIL LEAKS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00112 05/08/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/08/2013 2109 CHRISTINE STREET 1 MOTOR OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00113 05/10/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/10/2013 1125 GORHAM AVE 1 DIRT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00114 05/13/2013 SOLID WASTE CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/13/2013 1106 ALAMEDA DRIVE 1 WASTEWATER 0.50 GAL 0.50 ECS2013-00115 05/09/2013 CLO STORM WATER FDESK 05/09/2013 519 E MORRIS AVE 1 WASTEWATER 5.00 GAL 5.00 ECS2013-00116 05/09/2013 UNF STORM NPU OEMP 05/09/2013 917 E RUMBLE RD 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00117 05/09/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/09/2013 1917 E RUMBLE ROAD 1 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00118 05/14/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/14/2013 1401 MCHENRY AVENUE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00119 05/14/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 05/14/2013 2117 MONTICELLO AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00120 05/08/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 05/08/2013 2617 REMBRANDT PLACE 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00121 05/16/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 05/16/2013 1705 CARVER COURT 1 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00122 05/18/2013 NPU CLO STORM COLL OEMP 05/18/2013 1717 FLOYD AVENUE 1 WASTEWATER 10.00 GAL 0.00 ECS2013-00123 05/23/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/23/2013 1125 GORHAM AVENUE 1 DIRT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00124 05/23/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/23/2013 1800 PRESCOTT ROAD 1 WAX 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00125 05/24/2013 CLO STORM ECS FLDOB 05/24/2013 1109 OAKDALE RD. 1 DIRT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00127 05/29/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 05/29/2013 601 NORTHGATE DR. 1 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00128 05/28/2013 CLO STORM CITZN ANSSV 05/30/2013 1305 COLORADO AVE 3 WASTEWATER 150.00 GAL 150.00 ECS2013-00129 06/06/2013 REC SEWER COLL FDESK 06/03/2013 345 LA LOMA -2 MUDDY WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00130 06/04/2013 REC STORM CITZN FDESK 06/04/2013 2520 WOODVALE DR. 0 WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00131 06/10/2013 CLO STORM MFD FDESK 06/06/2013 618 BRADY AVE -3 WASHWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2013-00132 06/10/2013 CLO STORM WATER FDESK 06/04/2013 2405 VAN WINKLE COURT -5 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00133 06/06/2013 REC STORM COLL FDESK 1233 STANDIFORD AVE 1 OILY SHEEN 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00134 06/10/2013 REC STORM SOLWAS FDESK 06/06/2013 4008 HOLLY FIELD COURT -3 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- ECS2013-00135 06/10/2013 CLO STORM COLL OEMP 06/08/2013 1924 LANCEY DR. -2 POND WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00136 06/10/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 06/07/2013 2101 WESTVIEW COURT -3 WASTEWATER 875.00 GAL 775.00 ECS2013-00137 06/12/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 06/09/2013 805 TASSAJARA CT. -2 OIL 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00138 06/12/2013 CLO STORM EMPL FDESK 06/10/2013 320 9TH STREET -1 WASTEWATER 50.00 GAL 50.00 ECS2013-00139 06/12/2013 SW COLLECTIONSCLO STORM WATER ANSSV 06/10/2013 500 SYCAMORE AVE -1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00140 06/17/2013 CLO STORM MFD OEMP 06/15/2013 500 KANSAS AVE. -2 SANITARY SEWER WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00142 06/18/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 06/17/2013 512 BRODERIC -1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00143 06/18/2013 CLO STORM COLL FDESK 06/17/2013 1510 LORAINNE AVENUE -1 WASTEWATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00144 06/18/2013 REC STORM COLL FDESK 1711 CARLTON AVENUE 1 PAINT 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00145 06/20/2013 CLO STORM CITZN 06/19/2013 1657 WYLMA WAY -1 POOL WATER 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00146 06/24/2013 CLO STORM CITZN 06/22/2013 1821 MARGATE WAY -2 DEBRIS 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00147 06/24/2013 CLO STORM CITZN OEMP 06/22/2013 316 CENTER ST. -2 WASTEWATER 165.00 GAL 165.00 ECS2013-00149 06/25/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 06/22/2013 1606 DEL VISTA AVE -3 WASTEWATER 480.00 60.00 ECS2013-00150 06/28/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 06/26/2013 1524 HAZEL LANE -2 NONE 0.00 0.00 ECS2013-00151 06/28/2013 CLO STORM CITZN FDESK 06/18/2013 1711 CARLTON AVE -10 PLASTER 0.00 0.00 Number of unfounded complaints processed: 32 Building CED Citizen Collections RECAP OF CALLS BY PROGRAM AND ANSWERING STAFF Illicit Connection Other-Employee 0 0 0 0 Total for Program 0 0 0 0 Sewer Answering Service 0 0 1 0 Front Desk 0 0 0 4 Field Observation 0 0 0 0 Other-Employee 0 0 0 1 Total for Program 0 0 1 5 Stormwater 0 0 2 0 Answering Service 0 0 28 5 Front Desk 2 0 71 29 Field Observation 0 1 1 9 Other-ECS 0 0 2 1 Other-Employee 0 0 16 7 Total for Program 2 1 120 51 Totals by Initial Complainant Type 2 1 121 56 ECS Employee Maintenance MFD 0 0 0 Illicit Connection Other-Employee 0 0 0 0 Total for Program 0 0 0 0 Sewer Answering Service 0 0 0 1 Front Desk 1 1 0 0 Field Observation 0 0 0 0 Other-Employee 0 1 0 1 Total for Program 1 0 0 0 Stormwater 0 0 1 0 Answering Service 1 5 2 0 Front Desk 2 26 1 0 Field Observation 0 0 0 0 Other-ECS 0 0 3 0 Other-Employee 1 31 7 0 Total for Program 4 32 7 1 Totals by Initial Complainant Type 5 MPD NPU Other Parks Solid Waste Stanislaus County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- 0 1 0 1 0 0 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 Streets Water Totals by Answering Staff Illicit Connection Other-Employee 1 0 1 Total for Program 1 0 1 Sewer Answering Service 0 0 1 Front Desk 0 0 6 Field Observation 0 0 1 Other-Employee 0 0 1 Total for Program 0 0 9 Stormwater 0 0 2 Answering Service 0 1 39 Front Desk 3 6 121 Field Observation 2 0 41 Other-ECS 0 2 6 Other-Employee 0 2 31 Total for Program 5 11 240 Totals by Initial Complainant Type 6 11 250 TOTALS FOR POLLUTANT BY UNITS RECAP OF POLLUTANT GROUPS #CASES UNITS RELEASED UNITS RECOVERED Construction Waste 17 0.00 0.00 Dirt/Earthen Material 19 0.00 0.00 No Pollutant 43 0.00 0.00 Non Permitted Water 15 0.00 0.00 GAL 1 50.00 50.00 Organics 4 0.00 0.00 Petroleum Product 30 0.00 0.00 Paint 6 0.00 0.00 Pool Water 28 0.00 0.00 Permitted Water 8 0.00 0.00 Solid Material 2 0.00 0.00 Wastewater 5 480.00 60.00 GAL 73 20,428.80 9,862.80 ---PAGE BREAK--- Hazmat Incidents With Detail Date Range: From 7/1/2012 To 6/30/2013 Modesto Fire Department EMS call, no vehicle-Patient Info Required (321) Narrative 10 2012-0015175 FMA = 1921 S HWY 99 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 0 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: Yes Mutual Aid Code: 2 Total of 321- EMS call, no vehicle-Patient Info Required: 1 02 2012-0019349 FMA = On 5TH St at I St 44-Hazardous materials leak control & containmen Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 0 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: Yes Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 322- Vehicle accident with injuries-Patient Info Required: 1 Printed: Page 1 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Motor vehicle accident with no injuries (324) Narrative 01 2012-0018004 FMA = On SCENIC Dr at BODEM St 40-Hazardous condition, other Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 06 2012-0021027 FMA = 3900 SISK Rd 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 0 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 06 2012-0021040 FMA = On CHAPMAN Rd at PELANDALE Ave 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 0 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 324- Motor vehicle accident with no injuries: 3 Hazardous condition, other (400) Narrative Printed: Page 2 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Hazardous condition, other (400) Narrative 03 2012-0015156 FMA = 2410 E ORANGEBURG Ave 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 07 2012-0019963 FMA = 3011 DELTA Ave 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 2 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 02 2013-0004196 FMA = On S JEFFERSON St at RUBERTO St 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 3 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Hazardous condition, other (400) Narrative 02 2013-0010469 FMA = 500 KANSAS Ave 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 5 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 400- Hazardous condition, other: 4 11 2012-0013985 FMA = 4120 DALE Rd 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 06 2012-0015802 FMA = 3401 DALE Rd 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 4 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 4 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill (411) Narrative 06 2012-0017384 FMA = 3001 HAHN Dr 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 06 2012-0018436 FMA = 1451 S HWY 99 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 04 2012-0021667 FMA = 1531 S HWY 99 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 5 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill (411) Narrative 11 2012-0023235 FMA = 3604 COLONIAL Dr 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 11 2013-0003653 FMA = 4216 KEEPSAKE Ct 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 07 2013-0006844 FMA = On SYLVAN Ave at OAKDALE Rd 44-Hazardous materials leak control & containmen Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 6 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill (411) Narrative 04 2013-0006938 FMA = 901 N CARPENTER Rd 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme 84-Refer to proper authority Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 02 2013-0008185 FMA = 601 BRIGGS Ave 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 411- Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill: 10 07 2012-0018615 FMA = 3424 DRAGOO PARK Dr 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials 55-Establish safe area Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 7 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) (412) Narrative 02 2013-0004352 FMA = 426 OAK St 40-Hazardous condition, other Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 412- Gas leak (natural gas or LPG): 2 01 2012-0013657 FMA = On 11TH St at I St 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 10 2012-0018693 FMA = On S CARPENTER Rd at W HATCH Rd 44-Hazardous materials leak control & containmen Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 8 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Oil or other combustible liquid spill (413) Narrative 09 2013-0007159 FMA = On LAKEWOOD Ave at E BRIGGSMORE 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 413- Oil or other combustible liquid spill: 3 11 2012-0018894 FMA = 3430 TULLY Rd 46-Decontaminate persons or equipment 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 5 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 420- Toxic condition, other: 1 01 2012-0015497 FMA = 620 SCENIC Dr 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 3 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 9 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Chemical spill or leak (422) Narrative 07 2012-0017660 FMA = On OAKDALE Rd at E BRIGGSMORE A 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 02 2013-0011096 FMA = On SUTTER Ave at PARADISE Rd 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 422- Chemical spill or leak: 3 05 2012-0014453 FMA = 1627 TIMOTHY Ave 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials 51-Ventilate Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 2 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 424- Carbon monoxide incident: 1 Printed: Page 10 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Biological hazard, confirmed or suspected (451) Narrative 05 2012-0020179 FMA = 1306 SCHULENBERG Ave 47-Decontaminate occupancy or area Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 451- Biological hazard, confirmed or suspected: 1 11 2012-0012160 FMA = On TULLY Rd at STANDIFORD Ave 40-Hazardous condition, other Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 2 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 06 2012-0013044 FMA = On W RUMBLE Rd at LOU ANN Dr 40-Hazardous condition, other Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 0 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 11 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Vehicle accident, general cleanup (463) Narrative 06 2012-0018515 FMA = 4100 PELANDALE Ave 44-Hazardous materials leak control & containmen Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 04 2013-0002873 FMA = On W ROSEBURG Ave at KEARNEY Av 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Total of 463- Vehicle accident, general cleanup: 4 Assist police or other governmental agency (551) Narrative 07 2012-0018914 FMA = 2239 LA FORCE Dr 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 12 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Assist police or other governmental agency (551) Narrative 01 2013-0009668 FMA = On E ZEERING Rd at N SANTA FE Ave 42-Hazmat detection, monitoring, sampling, & anal 551-Safety Officer Duties Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: 3 Total of 551- Assist police or other governmental agency: 2 Hazmat investigation w/ no hazmat (671) Narrative 03 2013-0007524 FMA = 2846 FINCH Rd 43-Hazardous materials spill control and confineme Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 3 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N 04 2012-0019724 FMA = On N 9TH St at CARVER Rd 41-Identify, analyze hazardous materials 86-Investigate 82-Notify other agencies. Actions Taken: Number of Units Responding: 1 Casualties?: Yes EMS Provided?: No Mutual Aid Code: N Printed: Page 13 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- Hazmat investigation w/ no hazmat (671) Narrative Total of 671- Hazmat investigation w/ no hazmat: 2 Total Incident Count: 38 Printed: Page 14 of 14 INCde030 07/22/2013 10:06:11 ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Illicit Discharges 7/1/2012-6/30/2013 ! 0 9,400 4,700 Feet City of Modesto ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Illicit Discharges SSO 7/1/2012-6/30/2013 ! 0 4,800 2,400 Feet City of Modesto ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix C Public Outreach and Education Mobile Washers and Cleaners Spanish FOG Spanish ---PAGE BREAK--- Opciones de eliminación Utilice productos sólo ambientalmente seguros que pueden ser eliminados con seguridad de en el sistema de alcantarillado. Controlar el pH para asegurarse de que la basura es entre pH 5.0 y 12.0 antes de desecharlos. Si la basura contiene petróleo o coche motor residuos o está fuera del rango de pH, debe ser manejado y desechado como residuos peligrosos. Reciclaje & eliminación de residuos peligrosos Ciudad de Modesto Manejo de Residuos Sólidos (209) 577-5494 Stanislaus County Household Hazardous Waste (209) 525-4123 Para reportar un desagüe obstruido Ciudad de Modesto División de Aguas Residuales (209) 577-6200 Para reportar un derrame o ilegal Dumping Ciudad de Modesto División de Aguas Residuales (209) 577-6200 Esto es parte de una serie de folletos que describen las medidas de protección de desagüe de tormenta. Otros folletos incluyen: Mantenimiento automotriz & cuidado de coche Alquiler de Equipos Alimentos Industria de Servicios Hormigón fresco y aplicación de mortero Construcción general & supervision Equipo pesado & actividades de movimiento de tierras Inicio de reparación y remodelación Dueños de caballos & la industria equine Residencia canina Paisajismo, jardinería, Control de plagas Limpiadores y arandelas móviles Vivero Pintura Carreteras y pavimentación Piscina, Jacuzzi & mantenimiento de la fuente Para obtener más información sobre protección de desagüe de tormenta o folletos adicionales, llame al: www.modestogov.com City of Modesto Public Works Department Environmental Compliance Section (209) 577-6377 Aguas Pluviales Mejores Prácticas de Manejo (BMPs) Limpiadores y Arandelas Móviles Seguros ambientales hábitos y procedimientos para: Coche almacenamiento mantenimiento motor limpiadores Máquina y limpieza de equipo Potencia de lavado Alfombra, alfombra y limpiadores de cortinas Sección de Cumplimiento Ambiental Departamento de Obras Públicas City of Modesto Stormwater Program ---PAGE BREAK--- ¿Cómo puedes tener grasa alcantarillas libre? Estas son algunas maneras que usted puede ayudar: • Nunca vierta grasa en el fregadero o el WC • Raspe la grasa y residuos de comida de ollas, sartenes y platos en una lata o bote de basura • Utilice filtros para atrapar hunde desechos de comida y vaciar el filtro en la basura • No hay alimentos grasos en el fregadero triturador de basura. Sólo triturar la comida y no dejar de grasa. • No confíe en los detergentes para disolver la grasa, que solo puede pasar a la grasa por el desagüe y causar problemas en otras areas. • Coloque la grasa en una bolsa de lata o sellado, deje que se enfríe y luego poner en su contenedor de basura negro acera y se recogió con su basura regular. • Limpie el sistema de aire de la cocina filtra rutinariamente. • Hable con sus amigos y vecinos sobre el problema de la grasa para que la comunidad es consciente de riesgo. • Llame a la ciudad de Modesto, si usted tiene algura pregunta acerca de las operaciones del sistema de alcantarillado y de mantenimiento. Para informar de un desbordamiento de alcantarillado, desagüe obstruido tormenta o inundación: City of Modesto Wastewater Division (209) 577-6200 Para informar de vertido en alcantarilla en los drenaje pluvial: City of Modesto Wastewater Division (209) 577-6200 Recyling & Hazardous Waste Disposal: City of Modesto Solid Waste Management (209) 577-5494 Stanislaus County Household Hazardous Waste Facility (209) 525-4123 SIN GRASA ALCANTARILLAS M Maanntteeccaa,, A Acceeiittee yy llaa G Grrraassaa;; E Ellllooss nnoo ssoonn ssóólloo m maalloo ppaarraa llaass aarrtteerriiaass yy llaa cciinnttuurr aa,, qquuee ssoonn m maallooss ppaarraa llaa ttuubbeerriiaa ddee ssuu ccaassaa yy M Mooddeessttoo maa ddee aallccaannttaarriillllaaddoo ssaanniittaarriioo.. ---PAGE BREAK--- ¿Por que es manteca, aceite y la grasa un problema? Incluso una pequeña cantidad de grasa en el desagüe del fregadero puede causar obstrucciones graves en las tuberias de residencia o, peor aún un desbordamiento de alcantarillado en su casa o jardin. Las sustancias también pueden causar obstrucciones en el sistema de alcantarillado de Modesto. La grasa caliente puede no paracer dañino, pero a medida que la grasa se enfria, se congela y se endurece en el interior de las tuberías y equipos de tratamiento. ¿Donde se produce la grasa? Restaurantes, condominios, apartamentos, casas, escuelas, Iglesias, plantas procesadoras de alimentos, centros comerciales, hospitales, hoteles y muchos otros lugares. La grasa es un producto de la cocción y se encuentra en cosos como estas: • Carne grasa de cerdo • Sobra des comida • Grasa de cerdo, manteca • Productos de panaderia • Aceite de cocino • Salsas • Materia grasa • Mantequilla y la margarina • Productos lácteos No lavar la grasa por el desagüe, con el tiempo puede bloquear su fuga. Qué problemas son causados por la grasa? • Desbordamientos de alcantarillado sanitario en los parques, patios, calles y casas. • Olores rancios • Caro de limpieza, reparación, reemplazo de los bienes dañados. • Posible contacto con los microorganismos que pueden causar enfermedades • Operación de drenaje y los costes de mantenimiento más altos, causando mayors costos para ¿Por qué te importa? Problemas relacionados con la grasa puede provocar subidas de aguas residuals de la espalda y debordamientos que son sucios, caros y una amenaza potencial para su salud y el medio ambiente. Por eso, Modesto quiere ayudar a los consumidores evitar que los problemas con respecto a la grasa antes de que suceda. Nunca vierta grasa por desagüe de fregadero, Raspe la grasa y la comida de todos los utensilios de cocina y los platos en una lata o en la basura para su eliminación. Manteca, Aceite Y la Graso… Cuasa número uno de copias de suguridad de alcantarillado en casas y las empresas servicio de comida La forma más fácil de prevenir los desbordamientos causados grasa de las alcantarillado es mantener manteca, aceite y la grasa fuera del sistema de alcantarillado. ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix D Municipal Operations Program Element Modesto SSO-Backup Response Plan SSO Cleanup Procedure Storm Drain SOP Modesto Pesticide Use Contract Language Addendum No. 1 Modesto Landscape MP Landscape Maintenance BMP Landscape Maintenance BMP Spanish Curb Markers Special Event Guidelines Special Event Permit Storm Basins & Pump Stations Storm Pump Station Volumes Street Sweeping BMP Street Maintenance BMP Water Line Repair BMP Curbs, Gutters, & Sidewalks BMP Suggested EOP BMP Non-Emergency Fire Fighting BMP Illicit Discharge Cards ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan Effective Date: Revised Date: May 20 2010 Approved by: Signature: Date: Prepared by David Patzer, DKF Solutions Group [PHONE REDACTED] Copyright © 2004-2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto Sanitary Sewer Overflow/Backup Plan Table of Contents Response Plan Binder (PB) Purpose, Policy and Definitions Sewer Overflow/Backup Response -2 Field Guide (FG) Customer Relations Practices Following a Sewer Line Clearing SOPs How To Use a Hydroflusher How To Use a Continuous Rodder -2.2 Containment FG-3 Flow Volume Estimation Procedures Contained Contained in Roadway Gutter -4.2 Counting Upstream Connections -4.3 Bypass Pump Selection Tables 0-25 Feet Total Lift 25-50 Feet Total Lift -5.2 Determining Overflow Rates From a Manhole Flow From a Manhole Picture Matching Flow From a Manhole With Cover in Place -6.2 Flow From a Manhole With Cover Removed -6.3 Flow From a Manhole Pick Hole -6.4 Sewer Overflow Response Tactics Internal Resources Contact -8 Regulatory Notifications Packet (RN) Instructions Guide to Reporting to Regulatory Authorities Fax Reporting Form: To Water Board -2 Fax Reporting Form: To Local Health -3 Field Sampling Kit (FS) Procedures for Sampling Receiving Waters and Posting Warnings after a Sewage Sample Collection Chain of Custody -2 Kit Contents Cooler w/ice pack Latex gloves Safety glasses 2 ammonia-nitrogen sample bottles (1pt bottle w/H2SO4) 20 Sample bottle labels Waterproof Pen (i.e. Sharpie®) 10 Total/Fecal Coliform sample bottles (100ml sterilized bottle) Disposable Camera Chain of Custody Form Sewer Backup Packet (BP) Instructions and Chain of label Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Cleaning Declination Form (3-copy First Responder Form/Livability Lodging Authorization Form (3-copy Rejection of Relocation Recommendation Form (3-copy ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 Tabular Report of PSR Lateral TV Claims Submittal Sewer Overflow Report OP-2 SSO Investigation OP-3 Customer Service Packet Customer Claim Form Sewer Spill Reference Guide Door Sewer Spill Reference Sanitary Sewer Overflow Packet (OP) Instructions and Chain of Envelope Label Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Overflow Sewer Overflow Report SSO Investigation Sewer Spill Reference Door Miscellaneous Public Posting Door Hangers Sewer Spill Reference Guide ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of modesto Purpose, Policy and Definitions PB-1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan is to ensure that City of Modesto (City) personnel follow established guidelines in responding to, reporting, relieving, cleaning and decontaminating sanitary sewer overflows and backups which may occur within the City service area in order to safeguard public health and the environment. POLICY City employees are required to report all wastewater overflows found and to take the appropriate action to secure the wastewater overflow area, properly report to the appropriate regulatory agencies, relieve the cause of the overflow, and ensure that the affected area is cleaned as soon as possible to minimize health hazards to the public and protect the environment. The City’s goal is to respond to sewer system overflows as soon as possible following notification. The City will follow reporting procedures in regards to sewer spills as set forth by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board and the California State Water Resources Control Board. SEWER BACKUP INTO/ONTO PRIVATE PROPERTY CLAIMS HANDLING POLICY It is the Policy of the City that claims form shall be offered to anyone wishing to file a claim. The following procedures will be observed for all sewer backup into/onto private property claims: 1. City staff will offer a City claim form where it is possible that the sanitary sewer backup may have resulted from an apparent blockage in the City-maintained sewer lines or whenever a City customer requests a claim form. The claim may later be rejected if subsequent investigations into the cause of the loss indicate the City was not at fault. The claim will be processed pursuant to City procedures. 2. It is the responsibility of City staff to gather information regarding the incident and notify the City Manager or his/her designee. 3. It is the responsibility of the City Manager or his/her designee to review all claims and to oversee the adjustment and administration of the claim to closure. AUTHORITY Health & Safety Code Sections 5410-5416 CA Water Code Section 13271 Fish & Game Code Sections 5650-5656 State Water Resources Control Board Order No. 2006-0003-DWQ State Water Resources Control Board Order No. WQ 2008-0002-EXEC Revised Monitoring and Reporting Program DEFINITIONS AS USED IN THIS SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW & BACKUP RESPONSE PLAN Nuisance - California Water Code section 13050, subdivision defines nuisance as anything which meets all of the following requirements: a. Is injurious to health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, or an obstruction to the free use of property, so as to interfere with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property. b. Affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any considerable number of persons, although the extent of the annoyance or damage inflicted upon individuals may be unequal. c. Occurs during, or as a result of, the treatment or disposal of wastes. Private Lateral Sewage Discharges – Sewage discharges that are caused by blockages or other problems within a privately owned or privately maintained house or building sewer as defined in Title 5 of the Municipal Code. Sanitary Sewer Overflow (SSO) - Any overflow, spill, release, discharge or diversion of untreated or partially treated wastewater from a sanitary sewer system. SSOs include: Overflows or releases of untreated or partially treated wastewater that reach waters of the United States; (ii) Overflows or releases of untreated or partially treated wastewater that do not reach waters of the United States; and (iii) Wastewater backups into buildings and on private property that are caused by blockages or flow conditions within the publicly owned portion of a sanitary sewer system. NOTE: Wastewater backups into buildings caused by a blockage or other malfunction of a building or house lateral that is privately maintained are not SSOs. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 SSO Categories - Category 1: All discharges of sewage resulting from a failure in the City’s sanitary sewer system that: • Equal or exceed 1000 gallons, or • Result in a discharge to a drainage channel and/or surface water; or • Discharge to a storm drainpipe that was not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system. Category 2: All other discharges of sewage resulting from a failure in the City’s sanitary sewer system. Sanitary sewer system – Any system of pipes, pump stations, sewer lines, or other conveyances, upstream of a wastewater treatment plant headworks used to collect and convey wastewater to the publicly owned treatment facility. Temporary storage and conveyance facilities (such as vaults, temporary piping, construction trenches, wet wells, impoundments, tanks, etc.) are considered to be part of the sanitary sewer system, and discharges into these temporary storage facilities are not considered to be SSOs. Unauthorized discharge –Title 23 California Code of Regulations Section 2250 states that an unauthorized discharge is defined to be a discharge, not regulated by waste discharge requirements, of treated, partially treated, or untreated wastewater resulting from the intentional or unintentional diversion of wastewater from a collection, treatment or disposal system. For the purposes of this Plan and in accordance with letter May 1, 2008 File No. 1210.57 (RS and MC), Unauthorized Discharges shall refer to those that occur at the City wastewater treatment plant facilities. Unauthorized discharges can include such discharges as untreated wastewater, partially treated wastewater, fully treated wastewater to an unauthorized location, oil spills, and spills of hazardous waste. Untreated or partially treated wastewater – Any volume of waste discharged from the sanitary sewer system upstream of a wastewater treatment plant headworks. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto Sewer Overflow/Backup Summary PB-2 SEWER BACKUP CLAIMS HANDLING POLICY It is the Policy of the City of Modesto that claim forms shall be offered to anyone wishing to file a claim. The following procedures will be observed for all sewer backup claims: 1. City staff will provide instructions on how to obtain a claim form where it is possible that the sanitary sewer backup may have resulted from an apparent blockage in the City-maintained or City-owned and maintained sewer lines or whenever a customer requests a claim form. The claim may later be rejected if subsequent investigations into the cause of the loss indicates the City of Modesto was not at fault. The claim will be processed pursuant to City procedures. 4. It is the responsibility of City staff to gather information regarding the incident and notify the City of Modesto Risk Manager or their designee. 5. It is the responsibility of the City of Modesto Risk Manager or their designee to review all claims and to oversee the adjustment and administration of the claim to closure. Receive notification of Overflow/ Backup [PHONE REDACTED] (bus hrs) [PHONE REDACTED] (after hrs) City Staff Responds Does the backup appear to be as a result of a failure in the City-maintained or City- owned and maintained sewer lines? Inform owner/tenant the cause of the backup is not in the City-maintained or City-owned and maintained sewer lines. Wastewater Collections Staff performs the following: • Relieve blockage/stoppage • Provide the customer with the City of Modesto Wastewater Collection Division Notice. • Complete the Sewer Maintenance Log and Sewer Equipment Request Slip • Complete the Sanitary Sewer Backup Response Envelope (instructions on the envelope cover) • Forward completed Sanitary Sewer Backup Response Envelope to Collections System Crew Leader or Supervisor City of Modesto Risk Manager performs the following: 1. Review incident reports, claim for and other incident information 2. Communicate with claimant, as appropriate 3. Adjust and administer claim to closure. Wastewater Collections System Supervisor or Wastewater Collections System Manager performs the following: Review incident reports & forwards, as appropriate, to City of Modesto Risk Manager NO YES ---PAGE BREAK--- Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan Field Guide Prepared by David Patzer, DKF Solutions Group [PHONE REDACTED] Copyright © 2004-2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan © COPYRIGHT 2004-2012 DKF Solutions Group All rights reserved. All material contained in this program is protected and may not be reproduced without the express, written consent of DKF Solutions Group. This program, including procedures, forms and letters was created by DKF Solutions Group (except where otherwise cited) and may not be shared, loaned or otherwise given, in part or in whole, to any entity, company or organization except regulatory agencies, without the express, written consent of DKF Solutions Group. DKF Solutions Group and the Agency indicated on the cover page are the only authorized entities allowed to alter or reproduce this document for the Agency’s internal use. In the development of this program, a concerted professional effort was made to ensure the accuracy of the contents; however, no warranty is express or implied. This program should not be regarded as a substitute for the advice and counsel of an attorney. For any questions regarding the copyright or contents of this program, contact DKF Solutions Group at [PHONE REDACTED] or at ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Field Guide Table of Contents Customer Relations Practices Following a Sewer FG-1 Line Clearing SOPs How To Use a Hydroflusher FG-2.1 How To Use a Continuous -2.2 Containment FG-3 Flow Volume Estimation Procedures Contained Volume FG-4.1 Contained in Roadway Gutter -4.2 Counting Upstream -4.3 Bypass Pump Selection Tables 0-25 Feet Total Lift FG-5.1 25-50 Feet Total Lift -5.2 Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole Flow From a Maintenance Hole Picture FG-6.1 Flow From a Maintenance Hole With Cover in Place Tables -6.2 Flow From a Maintenance Hole With Cover Removed Tables......... -6.3 Flow From a Maintenance Hole Pick Hole -6.4 Sewer Overflow Response Tactics FG-7 ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR Customer Relations ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Customer Relations Practices Following a Sewer Backup FG 1 It is important for employees to communicate effectively with customers, especially in sewage overflow and backup situations. How we communicate - on the phone, in writing, or in person -is how we are perceived. Good communication with the homeowner results in greater confidence in our ability to address the problem satisfactorily, less chance of having the homeowner prolong the claims process, and less chance of him/her exaggerating the damage done to their property. As a representative of your agency, you will occasionally have to deal with an angry homeowner. A sewer backup is a stressful event and even a reasonable homeowner can become upset should he/she perceive us as being indifferent, uncaring, unresponsive, or incompetent. Although sometimes difficult, effective management of a sewage backup situation is critical. If it is not managed well, the situation can end up in a costly prolonged process with the homeowner. We want the homeowner to feel assured that we are responsive and the homeowner’s best interest is a top priority. A Few Communication Tips 1. Give the homeowner ample time to explain the situation or to vent. Show interest in what the homeowner has to say, no matter how many times you have heard it before, or how well you understand the problem. 2. As soon as possible, let the customer know that you will determine if the source of the sewer backup is in the public sewer and, if it is, will have it corrected as quickly as you can. 3. Acknowledge the homeowner’s concerns. For example, if the homeowner seems angry or worried about property damage, say something like, “I understand you’re concerned about the possible damage to your property, but a professional cleanup crew can restore the area, and if it is determined that the agency is at fault, the property owner has the right to file a claim for any reasonable repairs or losses resulting from this incident.” 4. Express understanding and empathy for any inconveniences caused by the incident, but do not admit fault. 5. As much as possible, keep the homeowner informed on what is being done and will be done to correct the problem. 6. Keep focused on getting the job done in a very professional manner. Focus on the problem without unnecessary small talk with the homeowner. 7. Don’t find fault or lay blame on anyone. ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR Line Clearing SOPs ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan How to Use a Hydroflusher to Clear a Line Blockage FG 2.1 Procedures for opening and cleaning a blocked municipal sewer line with a high-velocity waterjet. Individual situations may be unique, but use these basic procedures for any jetting project. Best tools: High-velocity flushing trucks. The jet may be a combination machine or a truck- or trailer-mounted jetter. Types of municipal sewer systems: • Sanitary sewers carry waste from homes and businesses to a municipal wastewater treatment plant • Storm sewers carry stormwater runoff to streams and rivers. Storm sewers carry heavier waste (sand, silt and gravel) than sanitary sewers. The size of the pipe and the type of sewer dictate cleaning procedures. • Wear necessary PPE: Eye protection, coveralls, hardhat, work boots and work gloves. • Follow the CalTrans (MUTCD) Traffic Control Manual and be aware of manhole hazards. • Follow all OSHA rules when entering confined spaces (manholes) • Proper tools for manhole lid removal: Gas tech, manhole lifter and traffic control • Never enter a manhole (confined-space) with the line under pressure because of the possibility of drowning or personal injury. Professional Standards Safety Overview • Follow all safety rules • Always consider every option available to hydroflush a municipal sewer system in a safe and cost effective manner. • Ensure that the residents and businesses within the work area or jurisdiction do not experience problems due to high pressure back ups or damage. • Effectively clean the sewer mains by incorporating these standard procedures of maintenance, experience, training and available tools to complete required day-to-day operations. ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.1 How to Use a Hydroflusher Page 2 Locating the Blockage • Determine the direction of flow in the system. Wastewater flows downhill in a gravity-based sewer. • Use a sewer map and/or your familiarity with the area to identify the direction of flow OR remove a manhole lid and look into the invert. • Keep moving to the nearest manhole until the blockage is located. A manhole filled with wastewater or with a flow line above the sewer shelf is typically the problem area. • A full manhole means water and debris have entered the manhole, but because of a blockage cannot drain away. • The blockage is normally between the first empty manhole and the first full manhole (upstream). STEP 2 STEP 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.1 How to Use a Hydroflusher Page 3 Setting up the Hydroflusher • Position the vehicle/sewer-cleaning equipment at nearest manhole below the stoppage on the side nearer the blockage. • On steep lines where the manholes are less than 5 feet deep, necessary precautions to prevent secondary overflows at manholes must be taken. Form a containment barricade near the manhole with use of sandbags, etc. • Position the water jet over the 1st empty manhole of the blockage • If not already attached, attach 20’-25’ of leader hose (a hose of a different color) to the regular hose – this serves as a benchmark for insertion & retrieval (NOTE: A leader hose helps prevent the hose from exiting the pipe prematurely & causing injury!) DO NOT use the alternative method of marking the jet hose five feet from the end! • Select a PENETRATING forward jet nozzle with a small angle (i.e. 15-degrees) for blockages. • Install a nozzle extension between the end of the hose & the nozzle to prevent the nozzle and hose from turning up a service lateral causing damage. • Lower the hose, nozzle extension & nozzle into the manhole & into the pipe invert • Insert the jet hose through the Tiger Tail & tie the device in place to stabilize it. Note: failure to use a Tiger Tail or Roller Guide may result in the hose being damaged while flushing the main! • Set up a vacuum truck/trailer or have a catcher available to completely capture and remove the debris to avoid future stoppages. This is a must when breaking mainline stoppages! STEP 2 STEP 4 STEP 7 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 3 STEP 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.1 How to Use a Hydroflusher Page 4 Hydroflushing • Ensure that the hose, the nozzle extension and nozzle are inserted into the pipe completely and the hose is protected by a hose guide device (i.e. Tiger Tail). • Run the line with just enough pressure to reach the blockage. When you reach the blockage, the hose should stop. • Begin hydro flushing. Adjust water pressure as needed, but do not exceed 2500psi. • Clean the sewer from the lower end to the higher end of the flow so that when the hose is retrieved, it works with the downward grade of the pipe and allows for more efficient cleaning of remaining debris. NOTE: In sewer lines where toilets have bubbled or overflowed due to high pressure back flushing, a lower pressure must be used to prevent additional backups • If the hose does not advance, pull back on it and then let go (Be careful not to strain your back!). Repeat the steps until the hose breaks through the blockage. • If the hose breaks through and the line is still plugged, run the hose until you hit another plug, then repeat the steps again. • Clear the blockage by working from the lower end to the higher end of the flow. • Pull the hose back in a slow continuous speed to ensure that the line is being cleaned sufficiently. Bringing the hose back too fast will leave the pipe with areas not cleaned, which is an unacceptable level of cleaning. NOTE: Always jet the line a few feet at a time, returning the debris to the manhole – completely remove debris so further blockages are not created Pulling heavy debris is time-consuming and laborious, and if not done properly can cause the hose and nozzle to be buried and stuck. Then you may need to dig up the sewer. • The debris is pulled to the manhole by the water flow and the returning hose and nozzle. Allow the hose to enter slowly on the initial passes and pull the hose and nozzle back occasionally to prevent them from exiting a defective pipe or becoming buried in debris. • Remove the debris using the vacuum portion of the combination truck, or a debris removal hand tool. Anytime you hydro flush a sewer, remove the debris completely to avoid future stoppages. If this can’t be done, then drag the debris into a high flow trunk main to prevent a stoppage from occurring • Always look into the bottom of the manhole for the amount and type of debris being pulled from the pipe to determine the number of passes and the length of the passes needed to clean the sewer effectively. STEP 2 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 3 STEP 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Once you hear or see the rush of the water, turn off the pressure until the water level drops in the line. Once the flow is back to normal, run the hose up to the next manhole to insure that the line is free of all blockages, then pull the hose back. Check the upstream manholes to make sure the line is running. Always rewind the jet hose with the water pressure on to avoid flattening the hose. NOTE: Always turn down the water pressure once you see the leader hose – Run hose until spray from the nozzle fills the pipe, then shut down the water. Shutting the water down prematurely will leave material at/or upstream from the manhole causing another blockage in a very short time. STEP 7 STEP 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan How to Use a Continuous Rodder FG 2.2 General Safety Guidelines • Know your equipment: never operate the rodder in excess of it’s rated capacity, speed, pressure and temperature • Take your time: Trying to move too fast or trying to force a blockage can be disastrous • Inspect equipment before AND after every job: check the condition of the rod, guides, engine and assemblies • Wear the required PPE including gloves at all times when operating the rodding equipment • Be aware of working near confined spaces: o Always suspect gas and test for it o Never smoke around a manhole o Never open a manhole while standing over it o Give the opening time to ventilate before beginning work • Never touch the rod when it’s rotating and never rotate the rod until everyone is clear • Be aware of contamination hazards • Use proper traffic safety procedures when setting up on the street • Do not enter the manhole to change tools • Never grasp the rod or coupling with your hands until all torque is relieved. ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 2 Setting up the Rodder Start the rodder unit and let it warm up Run out the rod until a coupling is between the guide hose and the end of the machine Insert a length of cut rod through the open center hole of the coupling. DO NOT TOUCH ROD CONTROL LEVERS DURING THIS STEP Turn the pressure relief valve counter clockwise until it stops Depress the lateral control lever to retrieve rod into the drive head assembly Keeping the lever depressed, slowly turn the pressure relief valve clockwise until the rod moves into the machine and is stopped by the rod through the coupling Holding the lever down, slowly turn the valve clockwise to increase the pressure. Watch the hydraulic oil pressure gauge on the control panel. Stop increasing the pressure when the needle reads 300 to 350 pounds (should be 350 pounds for robotic rodders). Pressure is now set for manual machines. Remove the rod from the coupling and begin work. Secure the lock ring to retain setting. For robotic rodders, continue to Step 8. STEP 2 STEP 4 STEP 7 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 3 STEP 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 3 (Setting up the Rodder continued) Set the manual pressure to 350 pounds using the above procedures. Reverse the rod travel and send the rod into the guide hose until the rod through the coupling hits the opening of the guide hose. Leave the lateral control lever locked in the forward position and open the Robotic control box. Set the robotic pressure gauge to about 600 pounds Flip the MODE switch to automatic and slowly turn the robotic pressure valve counter clockwise until the system activates. Note where on the valve this happens and then dial it down to the next mark. This ensures that the pressure is not too close to the manual or primary system. The robotic system should now be set up for operation. NOTE: pressures may have to be adjusted periodically when working with heavy materials or on long runs. STEP 9 STEP 11 STEP 10 STEP 8 Continue for Robotic Rodders Only ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 4 Rod Guide Hose Set Up Place the bell end approximately four to six inches inside the pipe to be cleaned. Place the lower manhole brace so that it hits the barrel wall of the manhole at approximately a 35° to 45° angle. This will keep the bell end from creeping back up the manhole Pull the rodder forward to remove all slack from the guide hose. Confirm that the rod guide hose has a smooth and low-angled entry into the manhole. Avoid bends in the rod guide hose. Bends force the rod to turn while bent which generates heat which weakens the rod. Without the manhole brace, the bell end of the hose can creep back into the manhole creating a severe bend. STEP 2 STEP 4 STEP 3 STEP 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 5 Controlling Rod Torque Productive Torque: The force needed to cut into and remove heavy roots and other debris. It can be seen as a gentle flexing of the rod—twisted up to 90 degrees. Excessive Torque: Develops when the tool is not pulled away from the material it is bound in. It can result in rod damage and downtime in the field. It can be seen as rods twisting past 180 degrees, making the guide hose twist slowing down the reel and making the engine work too hard. Testing for Rod Damage: Stretch 50-100 feet of rod out on a flat surface. Damaged rods will appear twisted, won’t lie flat and bends will be obvious. CONTROLLING ROD TORQUE IN THE FIELD 1 To test the torque pressure: Release the reel spin direction lever to neutral to see if the reel stops quickly or even begins to spin in reverse. If it does, then the tool is lodged and the rod is relieving the torque pressure. 2 Move the tool a few feet from the obstruction, and allow the tool to spin off excessive torque. Keep the machine rotating so there is less time needed to resume rotation. 3 Begin rotation again and continue until the material is penetrated. 4 Continue to watch for torque building up on the rod. Repeat steps above as necessary. Test torque pressure Spin off torque Resume rotation Monitor ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 6 Grease Removal Techniques Tools: Square Bar Auger Three-Blade Cutter 1 Use an Auger or Square Bar auger that is at least one full pipe size smaller than the pipe. Send it up the pipe until it reaches the next manhole. 2 Turn auger at approximately 20-25 rpm and push slowly to cut away material. Refer to “Controlling Rod Torque” procedure to maintain control of the rod torque. If there is too much resistance, remove the auger and use the next smaller size. 3 Relieve the torque from the rod and gaff it up to the street. 4 Attach a larger auger to the rod. Use the next size auger if there was heavy resistance on the first pull. Use a pipe-sized auger if there was little resistance. Continue Attach auger to rod Make pilot hole Gaff auger to street Attach larger auger ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 7 (Grease Removal Techniques continued) 5 Lower the auger into the manhole. Rotate the rod AFTER the tool is safely inside the pipe. Use the same slow rotation (rpm) and speed as on the previous pass. Refer to “Controlling Rod Torque” procedure to maintain control of the torque. 6 When the auger returns to the machine, reverse the direction and return it to the remote manhole. Keep the same rpm as the previous pass, but increase the speed 7 If a pipe-sized auger was not used on the second pass, increase the auger size and repeat the above procedure until a pipe-sized auger can be pulled through the pipe to the remote manhole. 8 Attach a Three-Blade Cutter to the rod. Return this tool to the machine maintaining a slow speed, but increasing the rotation to 50-65 rpm. This tool will scour the pipe walls and remove all remaining material. 9 Remove the guide hose and then the scene according to agency procedures. Make another pass Make a third pass Repeat as needed Attach cutter Remove guide hose ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 8 Root Removal Techniques Tools: Square Bar Auger Concave Root Saw Three-Blade Cutter 1 Use an Auger or Square Bar auger that is at least one full pipe size smaller than the pipe. Send it up the pipe until it reaches the next manhole. 2 Turn auger at approximately 20-25 rpm and push slowly to cut away material. Refer to “Controlling Rod Torque” procedure to maintain control of the rod torque. If there is too much resistance, remove the auger and use the next smaller size. 3 Relieve the torque from the rod and gaff it up to the street. 4 Attach a Concave Root Saw to the rod. Use a pipe-sized saw if there was little resistance with the auger. Use a smaller size if there was heavy resistance with the auger. Continue Attach auger to rod Make pilot hole Gaff auger to street Attach larger auger ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 9 (Root Removal Techniques continued) 5 Lower the saw into the manhole. Rotate the rod AFTER the tool is safely inside the pipe. Slowly pull the saw back to the machine maintaining a slow speed, but increasing the rotation to 40-55 rpm. Refer to “Controlling Rod Torque” procedure to maintain control of the torque. 6 When the root saw arrives at the machine, reverse the direction and return it to the remote manhole. Keep the same rpm as the previous pass, but increase the speed Refer to “Controlling Rod Torque” procedure to maintain control of the torque. 7 If a pipe-sized root saw was not used, increase the saw size and repeat the above procedure until a pipe-sized saw can be pulled through the pipe to the remote manhole. 8 Attach a Three-Blade Cutter to the rod. Return this tool to the machine maintaining a slow speed, but increasing the rotation to 50-65 rpm. This tool will scour the pipe walls and remove all remaining material. 9 Remove the guide hose and then the scene according to agency procedures. Back-cut Return saw Repeat as needed Attach cutter Remove guide hose ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 10 Emergency Stoppage Techniques These procedures are to be used as a guide when dealing with emergency stoppages. Each situation is unique and may require different set up and operation. Consider access locations, length of pipe section, set up difficulties and traffic when following these basic steps. Tool: Square Bar 1 Locate the closest dry manhole from the surcharged manhole. If possible, set up and operate equipment from there. If forced to work from the surcharged manhole, use extreme caution and make sure the tool is in the invert and the guide hose is properly set. Test the tool before full engagement to make sure it is in the pipe. 2 The Square Bar is a good tool for tearing through blockages. Use one that is at least one full size smaller than the blocked pipe. 3 Push and rotate the tool up the pipe. As obstructions are met, pull back to relieve the torque and then return to the obstruction. Continue until the tool passes the obstruction. There should be a rush of water. If not, then there may be another obstruction further up the pipe. Continue Locate manhole Select auger Clear obstruction ---PAGE BREAK--- FG - 2.2 How to Use a Rodder Page 11 (Emergency Stoppage Techniques continued) 4 When the stoppage is cleared, there will be a rush of wastewater and solids. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THERE BE ANYONE IN THE MANHOLE. Lift the guide hose as needed to make sure the bell end is not preventing obstructions from getting by. 5 Once the flow has started, move the tool up the line to the next manhole. Dislodge settled debris and allow obstructions to pass. Pull the tool back slowly to the machine to make sure the obstruction is fully punctured and removed. 6 Clean the pipe section with proper tools for removing any remaining materials. Pipe must be cleaned with pipe-sized tools to make sure the pipe is fully cleared. Refer to agency policy for the timing of this task. Move up the line Return saw Prepare for water ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR Containment SOPs ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Containment Procedures FG 3 Protection of the public’s health and a safety is a top priority! The overflow must be contained. Containment becomes more difficult if the overflow reaches the storm drain system or drainage channel since the overflow can rapidly contaminate receiving waters such as creeks, streams, rivers, and other water bodies. During dry weather, the storm drain system can be used to store the overflow if it can be plugged of the overflow or if the storm drain pump station can be deactivated. Options for containing the overflow Rubber mats at catch basin or inlet Sand bags in gutter and around catch basin or inlet Dig earthen trench or build berm to create pond Evacuate affected people if necessary Use sand bags/plastic sheeting if necessary Avoid electrical shock - have power turned off if outlets or other energized equipment is sitting in water or is wet Trace overflow in storm drainage system to end point Plug all affected storm system outlets and coordinate with appropriate personnel for strategy to contain spill Turn off storm water pump station Required equipment for containing overflow Rubber mats Sand bags Plastic sheets Bypass pumps and pipe/hose Vacuum truck Plugs Bypass pump Vacuum truck Emergency generator Bypass pump Overflow in building Overflow onto ground and in buildings Overflow into storm drain/drainage channel Overflow at pump station Overflow into storm drain/drainage channel Overflow onto ground ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR Volume Estimations ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Flow Volume Estimation Procedures: Contained Volume FG 4.1 The volume of some small spills can be estimated using this method if the overflow is contained in one area and if it is not raining. The shape, dimensions, and depth of the spilled wastewater are needed. The shape and dimensions are used to calculate the area of the spills and the depth is used to calculate the volume. EXAMPLE: EXAMPLE: 100 Feet 100 Feet 100 Feet 100 Feet 0.5 Feet Deep 0.5 Feet Deep Volume = 100’ x 100’ x 0.5’ x 7.48 Volume = 37,400 gallons Volume = 100’ x 100’ x .785 x 0.5’ x 7.48 Volume = 29,359 gallons STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 STEP 5 STEP 6 STEP 7 Sketch the shape of the contained sewage Measure or pace off the dimensions. Measure the depth in several locations. Calculate an average depth for the entire area by adding all measured depths together and dividing by the number of measurements taken. Convert the dimensions, including depth, to feet. Calculate the area using the following formulas: Rectangle Area = length x width Circle Area = diameter x diameter x 0.785 Triangle Area = base x height x 0.5 Multiply the area times the depth Multiply the volume by 7.48 to convert the volume to cubic feet to gallons ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Flow Volume Estimation Procedures: Contained in a Roadway Gutter FG 4.2 The volume of an overflow contained in a roadway gutter can be estimated by this method: STEP 1 STEP 2 STEP 3 STEP 4 Measure the length of gutter containing the overflow. Measure the depth and width of the overflow in the gutter. Refer to the drawing below. Convert all measurements to feet Calculate the overflow volume using the following equation: Volume (gal) = length x width x depth x 3.74 ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Flow Volume Estimation Procedures: Counting Upstream Connections FG 4.3 METHOD 1. Count the number of upstream connections. 2. Estimate the time that the overflow has been occurring (Remember: the overflow was probably flowing before it was reported). 3. Each residence contributes about 240 gallons per day or about 10 gallons per hour. Multiply the number of residences by 10 and by the number of hours. This gives you the number of gallons. NOTES: a. Remember that 10-gallons per hour is an estimate. This number will be higher during peak water usage times and lower during low water usage times. Take this into account when estimating the overflow volume. b. This is a conservative estimate because stoppages rarely stop all of the flow. Example: m/l stoppage at 330 # of homes on this section of 11 Homes. Avg. FR= 240 240 x 11=2420 Overflowin manhole ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR Bypass Pump Tables ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Bypass Pump Selection Table: 0-25 Feet Total Lift FG 5.1 Pipe Size Flow rate (in) (gpm) 18 4500 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 4000 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 3500 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 3000 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 2500 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 15 2000 6” 6” 6” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 15 1500 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 15 1000 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 10 750 4” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8 500 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8 400 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8 300 3” 3” 3” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4 200 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4 100 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 4 50 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 [PHONE REDACTED] Hose Length (ft) Assumptions 1. All losses are ignored except for frictional losses. 2. Velocity heads are zero because of low speeds. 3. Pump curves are from www rainforrent.com. a. 3" pump DV-80 @ 2800 rpm b. 4" pump DV-100 @ 2200 rpm c. 6" pump DV-150 @ 2200 rpm d. 8" pump DV-200c @ 1900 rpm 4. Hose diameter is same as pump size. 5. Fire hose roughness coefficient C=120 6. Inlet and outlet pressures are at atmospheric pressure. 7. Average flow rates for pipe diameters are calculated using average slopes. 8. Maximum 25 feet suction lift. Pipe Size (in) Avg Flow Rate (gpm) 4 270 6 314 8 486 10 764 12 1667 15 2153 18 4444 ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Bypass Pump Selection Table: 25-50 Feet Total Lift FG 5.2 Pipe Size Flow rate (in) (gpm) 18 4500 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 4000 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 3500 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 3000 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 18 2500 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 15 2000 6” 6” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 15 1500 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 8” 15 1000 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 10 750 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8 500 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8 400 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 6” 8 300 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4 200 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4” 4 100 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 4 50 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 3” 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 600 700 [PHONE REDACTED] Hose Length (ft) Assumptions 1. All losses are ignored except for frictional losses. 2. Velocity heads are zero because of low speeds. 3. Pump curves are from www rainforrent.com. a. 3" pump DV-80 @ 2800 rpm b. 4" pump DV-100 @ 2200 rpm c. 6" pump DV-150 @ 2200 rpm d. 8" pump DV-200c @ 1900 rpm 4. Hose diameter is same as pump size. 5. Fire hose roughness coefficient C=120 6. Inlet and outlet pressures are at atmospheric pressure. 7. Average flow rates for pipe diameters are calculated using average slopes. 8. Maximum 50 feet suction lift. Pipe Size (in) Avg Flow Rate (gpm) 4 270 6 314 8 486 10 764 12 1667 15 2153 18 4444 ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR Flow Calculation SOPs ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow from a Maintenance Hole Picture Matching FG 6.1 Reference Sheet for Estimating Sewer Flow Rate From Overflowing Sewer Maintenance Holes All estimates are calculated in gallons per minute (gpm) All photos were taken during a demonstration using metered water from a hydrant in cooperation with the city of San Diego’s Water Department 5 gpm 25 gpm 50 gpm 100 gpm 150 gpm 200 gpm 225 gpm 250 gpm 275 gpm ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow From a Maintenance Hole with Cover in Place Tables FG 6.2 side A The formula used to develop Table 1 measures the maximum height of the water coming out of the maintenance hole above the rim. The formula was taken from hydraulics and its application by A.H. Gibson (Constable & Co. Limited). Example Overflow Estimation: The maintenance hole cover is unseated and elevated on a 24" casting. The maximum height of the discharge above the rim is 5 1/4 inches. According to Table 1, these conditions would yield an SSO of 185 gallons per minute. FLOW OUT OF MH WITH COVER IN PLACE Height to be measured This sanitary sewer overflow drawing was developed by Debbie Myers, Principal Engineering Technician, for Ed Euyen, Civil Engineer, P.E. No. 33955, California, of County Sanitation District 1. ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow From a Maintenance Hole with Cover in Place Tables FG 6.2 side B 24" COVER 36" COVER S S O FLOW Q S S O FLOW Q Height of spout above M/H rim H in inches in gpm in MGD Min. Sewer size in which these flows are possible Height of spout above M/H rim H in inches in gpm in MGD Min. Sewer size in which these flows are possible 1/4 1 0.001 1/4 1 0.002 1/2 3 0.004 1/2 4 0.006 3/4 6 0.008 3/4 8 0.012 1 9 0.013 1 13 0.019 1 1/4 12 0.018 1 1/4 18 0.026 1 1/2 16 0.024 1 1/2 24 0.035 1 3/4 21 0.030 1 3/4 31 0.044 2 25 0.037 2 37 0.054 2 1/4 31 0.045 2 1/4 45 0.065 2 1/2 38 0.054 2 1/2 55 0.079 2 3/4 45 0.065 2 3/4 66 0.095 3 54 0.077 3 78 0.113 3 1/4 64 0.092 3 1/4 93 0.134 3 1/2 75 0.107 3 1/2 109 0.157 3 3/4 87 0.125 3 3/4 127 0.183 4 100 0.145 4 147 0.211 4 1/4 115 0.166 4 1/4 169 0.243 4 1/2 131 0.189 4 1/2 192 0.276 4 3/4 148 0.214 4 3/4 217 0.312 6" 5 166 0.240 5 243 0.350 5 1/4 185 0.266 5 1/4 270 0.389 5 1/2 204 0.294 5 1/2 299 0.430 5 3/4 224 0.322 6" 5 3/4 327 0.471 6 244 0.352 6 357 0.514 6 1/4 265 0.382 6 1/4 387 0.558 8" 6 1/2 286 0.412 6 1/2 419 0.603 6 3/4 308 0.444 6 3/4 451 0.649 7 331 0.476 7 483 0.696 7 1/4 354 0.509 7 1/4 517 0.744 7 1/2 377 0.543 7 1/2 551 0.794 7 3/4 401 0.578 8" 7 3/4 587 0.845 10" 8 426 0.613 8 622 0.896 8 1/4 451 0.649 8 1/4 659 0.949 8 1/2 476 0.686 8 1/2 697 1.003 8 3/4 502 0.723 8 3/4 734 1.057 9 773 1.113 Disclaimer: Ed Euyen, Civil Engineer, P.E. No. 33955, California developed this sanitary sewer overflow table, for County Sanitation District 1. This table is provided as an example. Other Agencies may want to develop their own estimating tables. ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow From a Maintenance Hole with Cover Removed Tables FG 6.3 side A Example Overflow Estimation The maintenance hole cover is off and the flow coming out of a 36" frame maintenance hole at one- inch height will be approximately 660 gallons per minute. FLOW OUT OF MH WITH COVER REMOVED (TABLE 2) This sanitary sewer overflow drawing was developed by Debbie Myers, Principal Engineering Technician, for Ed Euyen, Civil Engineer, P.E. No. 33955, California, of County Sanitation District 1. Height to be measured ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow From a Maintenance Hole with Cover Removed Tables FG 6.3 side B 24" FRAME 36" FRAME S S O FLOW Q S S O FLOW Q Water Height above M/H frame H in inches in gpm in MGD Min. Sewer size in which these flows are possible Water Height above M/H frame H in inches in gpm in MGD Min. Sewer size in which these flows are possible 1/8 28 0.04 1/8 49 0.07 1/4 62 0.09 1/4 111 0.16 3/8 111 0.16 3/8 187 0.27 6" 1/2 160 0.23 1/2 271 0.39 5/8 215 0.31 6” 5/8 361 0.52 8" 3/4 354 0.51 8” 3/4 458 0.66 7/8 569 0.82 10” 7/8 556 0.8 10" 1 799 1.15 12” 1 660 0.95 12" 1 1/8 1,0355 1.49 1 1/8 1,035 1.49 1 1/4 1,340 1.93 15” 1 1/4 1,486 2.14 15" 1 3/8 1,660 2.39 1 3/8 1,951 2.81 1 1/2 1,986 2.86 18” 1 1/2 2,424 3.49 18" 1 5/8 2,396 3.45 18” 1 5/8 2,903 4.18 1 3/4 2,799 4.03 1 3/4 3,382 4.87 1 7/8 3,132 4.51 1 7/8 3,917 5.64 21" 2 3,444 4.96 21” 2 4,458 6.42 2 1/8 3,750 5.4 2 1/8 5,000 7.2 24" 2 1/4 3,986 5.74 2 1/4 5,556 8 2 3/8 4,215 6.07 2 3/8 6,118 8.81 2 1/2 4,437 6.39 2 1/2 6,764 9.74 2 5/8 4,569 6.58 24” 2 5/8 7,403 10.66 2 3/4 4,687 6.75 2 3/4 7,972 11.48 30" 2 7/8 4,799 6.91 2 7/8 8,521 12.27 3 4,910 7.07 3 9,062 13.05 3 1/8 9,604 13.83 3 1/4 10,139 14.6 3 3/8 10,625 15.3 36" 3 1/2 11,097 15.98 3 5/8 11,569 16.66 3 3/4 12,035 17.33 3 7/8 12,486 17.98 4 12,861 18.52 4 1/8 13,076 18.83 4 1/4 13,285 19.13 4 3/8 13,486 19.42 Disclaimer: Ed Euyen, Civil Engineer, P.E. No. 33955, California developed this sanitary sewer overflow table, for County Sanitation District 1. This table is provided as an example. Other Agencies may want to develop their own estimating tables. ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow From a Maintenance Hole Pick Hole Tables FG 6.4 side A The formula used to develop Table 3 is Q=CcVA, where Q is equal to the quantity of the flow in gallons per minute, Cc is equal to the coefficient of contraction V is equal to the velocity of the overflow, and A is equal to the area of the pick hole. If all units are in feet, the quantity will be calculated in cubic feet per second, which when multiplied by 448.8 will give the answer in gallons per minute. (One cubic foot per second is equal to 448.8 gallons per minute, hence this conversion method). Example Overflow Estimation: The maintenance hole cover is in place and the height of water coming out of the pick hole of an inch in diameter is 3 inches This will produce an SSO flow of approximately 4.7 gallons per minute. FLOW OUT OF VENT OR PICK HOLE (TABLE 3) This sanitary sewer overflow drawing was developed by Debbie Myers, Principal Engineering Technician, for Ed Euyen, Civil Engineer, P.E. No. 33955, California, of County Sanitation District 1. Height to be measured ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Determining Overflow Rates From a Maintenance Hole: Flow From a Maintenance Hole Pick Hole Tables FG 6.4 side B Height of spout above M/H cover H in inches SSO FLOW Q in gpm Height of spout above M/H cover H in inches SSO FLOW Q in gpm 1/8 1.0 5 1/8 5 1/4 6.2 6.3 1/4 1.4 5 3/8 6.3 3/8 1.7 5 1/2 6.4 1/2 1.9 5 5/8 6.5 5/8 2.2 5 3/4 6.6 3/4 2.4 5 7/8 6.6 7/8 2.6 6 6.7 1 2.7 6 1/8 6.8 1 1/8 2.9 6 1/4 6.8 1 1/4 3.1 6 3/8 6.9 1 3/8 3.2 6 1/2 7.0 1 1/2 3.4 6 5/8 7.0 1 5/8 3.5 6 3/4 7.1 1 3/4 3.6 6 7/8 7.2 1 7/8 3.7 7 7.2 2 3.9 7 1/8 7.3 2 1/8 4.0 7 1/4 7.4 2 1/4 4.1 7 3/8 7.4 2 3/8 4.2 7 1/2 7.5 2 1/2 4.3 7 5/8 7.6 2 5/8 4.4 7 3/4 7.6 2 3/4 4.5 7 7/8 7.7 2 7/8 4.6 8 7.7 3 4.7 8 1/8 7.8 3 1/8 4.8 8 1/4 7.9 3 1/4 4.9 8 3/8 7.9 3 3/8 5.0 8 1/2 8.0 3 1/2 5.1 8 5/8 8.0 3 5/8 5.2 8 3/4 8.1 3 3/4 5.3 8 7/8 8.1 3 7/8 5.4 9 8.2 4 5.5 9 1/8 8.3 4 1/8 5.6 9 1/4 8.3 - 4 1/4 5.6 9 3/8 8.4 4 3/8 5.7 9 1/2 8.4 4 1/2 5.8 9 5/8 8.5 4 5/8 5.9 9 3/4 8.5 4 3/4 6.0 9 7/8 8.6 4 7/8 6.0 10 8.7 5 6.1 Note: This chart is based on a 7/8-inch diameter pick hole Disclaimer: Ed Euyen, Civil Engineer, P.E. No. 33955, California developed this sanitary sewer overflow table, for County Sanitation District 1. This table is provided as an example. Other Agencies may want to develop their own estimating tables. Unrestrained MH cover will start to lift ---PAGE BREAK--- TAB HOLDER FOR SSO Response Guide ---PAGE BREAK--- The following is intended to be used a guide for generating ideas in how to respond to sewer overflows resulting from a variety of causes. Please bear in mind that each indicated response tactic may not be appropriate for a given sewer overflow. Always choose the tactic that best meets the circumstances at the time and the resources available. Protection of employee, public and environmental health should always be the top consideration when responding to a sewer overflow, regardless of its cause. SSO/Backup Response Plan Sewer Overflow Response Tactics Guide FG 7 These are the recommended solutions you should consider If you encounter an SSO due to: Hydro- Jetter Rodder Vacuum Truck TV Van* Backhoe Hand Tools By-Pass Piping By - Pass Pumping Maint. Hole Entry*** Storage Tanks or Set Up Ponds USA Request** Backup Generators Capacity due to gradient ■ ■ ■ ■ Capacity due to undersized line ■ ■ ■ ■ Capacity due to surcharged system ■ Collapse ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Debris in Maintenance Hole ■ ■ ■ Debris in line ■ ■ ■ ■ Grease ■ ■ ■ ■ Misc. blockage ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Roots ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ Pump Station Failure ■ ■ Power Failure ■ ■ * CCTV operations may be required for this particular task. USA Services MUST be contacted prior to start of excavation! (1-[PHONE REDACTED]) Confined space entry procedures MUST be followed! ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revised 5-20-10 City of Modesto Internal Resources Contact Information FG-8 Telephone Function Contact Primary Secondary Other Tom Sinclair Environmental Regulatory Compliance Administrator 577.6240 652.3334 573.1995 City of Modesto Environmental Services Staff Standby Inspector 577.6200 See on-duty call roster Jack Cooke WW Supervisor 577.6234 652.9506 524.1389 David Steeley WW Supervisor 577.6287 652.7425 847.4950 Ken Merkle Storm Supervisor 577.6239 652.9069 239.4766 Aaron Trott Pump Supervisor 577.6217 652.9563 595.0884 Alan Cozby Wastewater Collections Manager 577-6222 652-9502 863.8713 City of Modesto Collections Staff On-Call Collections Operator 652.9068 523.4567 See On-Call Duty Roster Public Works Deputy Director Gary DeJesus 577.6255 652.9847 Public Works Director Dennis Turner 577.5205 262.7216 ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 2/10/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Field Sampling Kit: Table of Contents FS-1 Side A Form Form Number Procedures for Sampling Receiving Waters and Posting Warnings after a Sewage Sample Collection Chain of Custody -2 The Field Sample Kit contains: • Cooler w/ice pack • Nitrile zinc-free gloves • Safety glasses • 2 ammonia-nitrogen sample bottles (1pt bottle w/H2SO4) • 20 Sample bottle labels • Waterproof Pen (i.e. Sharpie®) • 10 Total/Fecal Coliform sample bottles (100ml sterilized bottle) • Disposable Camera • Chain of Custody form • Electro-conductance Meter • pH Meter • Dissolved Oxygen Meter • Sample for total and fecal coliform through a disposable bailer ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 2/10/10 • City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Field Sampling Kit: Procedures For Sampling Receiving Waters and Posting Warnings After A Sewage Spill FS-1 Side A COLLECT SAMPLES AS FOLLOWS: 1. Get Field Sampling Kit from the Lab 2. Get ice pack from the lab freezer or from a convenience store and place In cooler 3. Determine point spill entered waterway – photograph this location (include a reference point in the photo) 4. Don the PPE from the Sampling Kit 5. SAMPLING: a. Move 50’ upstream of point where spill entered waterway (reference sample) b. Remove the seal from the coliform sample container (100ml) just prior to collecting your sample. A chemical has been added to the sample container. Leave the chemical in the bottle and do not rinse. 1. Remove the cap immediately before collecting each sample. 2. Do not allow the inside of the cap to touch anything 3. Holding the bottle in one hand, face upstream and lower the bottle 6” below the water surface. Then sweep the bottle upstream and out of the water. Be careful not to disturb the bottom sediment. Pour a little water out so that bottle is filled to the line. Immediately replace the cap. c. Open the ammonia-nitrogen sample container and follow collection process above (steps 5a-c) to fill to just below the neck of the jar. NOTE: The ammonia-nitrogen sample container contains sulfuric acid – LEAVE THE ACID IN THE BOTTLE AND DO NOT ALLOW IT TO TOUCH YOUR SKIN! d. Electro-conductance upstream and of discharge. e. Label all of the samples with their location and note the date and time collected f. Record the pH and dissolved oxygen of the ambient water at this sample location and record. g. Place samples in cooler on the ice pack h. Take a photo of this sample location (include a reference point in the photo) i. Move at least 10’ of point where spill entered waterway and repeat steps 5a-f 7. Complete the Chain of Custody form from the Sampling Kit 8. Immediately contact: City of Modesto Lab Telephone: (209) 577.6200 or 577.6279 Telephone (after hrs): (209) 652.8901 and inform them the following samples require processing: a. Total and Fecal Coliform – Holding time = <4hours b. Ammonia-Nitrogen – Holding Time = 28 days c. Electro-conductance 9. Take cooler containing the samples and completed chain of custody to City of Modesto Lab. Samples should be taken to lab within 6 hours of collection time. 10. Post warning signs as directed by the County Environmental Health Department. 11. Repeat sampling daily from time the spill is known until the results of two consecutive sets of samples indicate the return to the normal level or cessation of monitoring is authorized by the County Department of Health Services. 12. Remove Warning Signs and lift restrictions when authorized by the County Environmental Health Department. • COLLECT ALL SAMPLES AGAINST THE DIRECTION OF THE WATER FLOW! (FACE UPSTREAM) • COLLECT UPSTREAM SAMPLE FIRST! • COLLECT SAMPLES WELL AWAY FROM THE BANK (preferably where water is visibly flowing) AND 6” BELOW THE SURFACE • AVOID SAMPLING DEBRIS OR SCUM LAYER FROM THE SURFACE. • PHOTOGRAPH EVIDENCE OF DEAD FISH! ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 2/10/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Field Sampling Kit: Procedures For Sampling Receiving Waters and Posting Warnings After A Sewage Spill FS-1 Side B NOTE: This example is provided for illustrative purposes only! Base each sampling event on the geography, drainage and interference factors (i.e. birds, animals, runoff, etc) of the area impacted. Birds Storm Drains SSO 1 2 3 4 5 REMEMBER! Always try to get photos of each sample point & include reference points & interference factors in each photo. 1 2 3 4 5 Sample Location 1: Baseline Sample, no observable interference from birds, animals, runoff, etc Sample Location 2: Baseline Sample, observable interference from birds, animals, runoff, etc NOTE: Only collect this sample if you observe any possible interfering factors upstream from the spill location Sample Location 3: Immediately of SSO entry point Sample Location 4: Further of SSO entry point – note any possible interfering factors Sample Location 5: Further of SSO entry point – note any possible interfering factors Stream Flow ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 2/10/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Field Sampling Kit: Sample Collection Chain of Custody Record FS-2 Customer Name Hazardous Waste PO# Customer Address Unknown Material WO# Customer Telephone Mail Code CONTRACT LAB INFORMATION Turnaround Requirement Program Name Ship to: Lab Program Coordinator Phone # Ship Date: Sampled By Courier: Normal (21 days) Rush: Other: SAMPLE COLLECTION INFORMATION Analysis Requested QA/QC Requirements Lab Standard Type Special (see attached) LIMS# (Issued by Lab) Date Time Composite Grab Sample Location Field pH Field Trip # Containers Matrix* Ammonia/BOD Coliform (fecal/total) Remarks/Notes Upstream 2 A Entry Point 2 A 2 A 2 2 2 2 *Matrix: P = Potable Water, W = Wastewater, A = Ambient Water, G = Groundwater, S = Soil, B = Biosolids, I = Industrial, O = Other (specify in remarks) Relinquished Date Time Relinquished to Date Time Transport/Shipping Information USPS UPS FedEx Tracing Other: Sample Receiving Documentation Container intact? Yes No Correct container? Yes No Field preserved? Yes No Custody tape intact? Yes No Cooled? Yes No Temp. Blank? Yes No ( Comments: Sample distribution: Lab bench Ice chest Walk-in cooler shelf # Disposal Date: Disposed by: (inits.) C-O-C Distribution Date: By: Lab Admin File Prog/proj Mgr. Lab Prog. Coord. Delivery courier Pick-up courier ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5/20/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Regulatory Notifications Packet Instructions to First Responder: 1. Hand this packet to the person responsible for and authorized to make regulatory notifications. 2. Enter name and title of that individual on the front of the Sewer Backup or Sewer Overflow Response Envelope. Instructions for Reporting Authority: 1. Open this packet 2. Refer to the Guide to Reporting to Regulatory Authorities for instructions. Contents: Form Page Number Guide To Reporting To Regulatory Authorities...............RN-1 Fax Reporting Form: to Water Board -2 Fax Reporting Form: to Local Health -3 Internal Resources Contact List -4 Print on 6”x9” envelope ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5/20/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Regulatory Notifications Packet Guide To Reporting To Regulatory Authorities RN-1 Side A Primary Reporting Summary Refer to Side B for contact information, timeframes and reporting procedures If the backup or SSO: Then contact: • 1,000 gal, and/or • Results in a discharge into a drainage channel or a surface water, and/or • Discharged to a positive storm drain and was not fully recovered • California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA) • Regional Water Quality Control Board • State Water Resources Control Board • Collections Supervisor or Manager • Reached surface water • All of the above plus Fish and Game • Required posting of public warning signs, and/or • Results in a discharge into a drainage channel or a surface water • County Health Department • Was caused by problems with a private service lateral • Optional reporting to Regional Water Quality Control Board and State Water Resources Control Board • All SSOs & Backups due to failure in public sewer • State Water Resources Control Board Persons authorized to perform regulatory reporting: Legally Responsible Official (LRO) authorized to electronically sign online SSO reports: • Regulatory Compliance Administrator Wastewater Collections Manager • Wastewater Collections Supervisor (business hours) 577.6222 • Wastewater Collections Manager (cell phone) 652.9502 • Deputy Director of Public Works Alternate: Deputy Director Internal Reporting Requirements: Report to: Business hours After hours Trigger for reporting: Environmental Services [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] All SSOs/Backups Wastewater Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] or [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] All SSOs/Backups Wastewater Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] All SSOs/Backups Wastewater Supervisor 209. 577.6329 209. 652.9069 All SSOs/Backups Senior Operator on Duty [PHONE REDACTED] or Nextel 607 [PHONE REDACTED] All SSOs/Backups ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5/20/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Regulatory Notifications Packet Guide To Reporting To Regulatory Authorities RN-1 Side B Call or Notify In The Order Listed: Regulatory Agency Contact Information Report if Backup or Overflow meets any of the following conditions Timeframe California Emergency Management Agency (CalEMA) Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] • Results in a discharge into a drainage channel or a surface water, • Discharged to a storm drain & not fully recovered (regardless of volume), • Equal to or greater than 1,000 gal. Within 2 hours of becoming aware of the discharge County Health Department Stanislaus County Health Department Notify County Health Department of the known details of the SSO using RN-3 Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] (bus hrs) [PHONE REDACTED] (after hrs) Fax: • Results in a discharge into a drainage channel or a surface water, • Discharged to a storm drain & not fully recovered (regardless of volume) • Equal to or greater than 1,000 gal. Immediate reporting required (within 2 hours of becoming aware of the discharge) • Results in a discharge into a drainage channel or a surface water, • Discharged to a storm drain & not fully recovered (regardless of volume) • Equal to or greater than 1,000 gal. Within 2 hours of becoming aware of the discharge AND within 24 hrs submit certification to that CalEMA and County Health Dep’t have been notified. • All SSOs & Backups due to a failure in a public sewer Immediate reporting required as soon as practical Regional Water Quality Control Board: Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board Notify the Regional Water Quality Control Board of the known details of the SSO using RN-2 as a guide. Main Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] Main Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] (Sac) City Contact Victor Vasquez Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] • Was caused by problems with a private service lateral Optional reporting within 30 Days • 1,000 gallons, and/or • Discharged to a storm drain & not fully recovered (regardless of volume) , and/or • Reached surface water Immediate reporting required If you leave any requested information blank, then you must return within 15 days and complete • All SSOs & Backups due to a failure in a public sewer Reporting required within 30 days after end of the month the SSO occurs in State Water Resources Control Board 1. Go to the CIWQS Online SSO Reporting Database 2. Enter User Name & Password. 3. Enter requested information using information on the completed Sewer Overflow Report Website: qs/ (refer to RN2) Notes: • All electronic reports must be certified by the Legally Responsible Official • If SSO was from a private service lateral, provide all information available, indicate cause as being a private service lateral and identify responsible party, if known. • Was caused by problems with a private service lateral Optional reporting within 30 days CA Dept. of Fish & Game Spill Prevention & Response 24-Hour Dispatch: (916) 445-0380 Press to report a pollution incident • Reached surface water Immediate reporting required Refer to Side A for additional reporting requirements, if any. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5/20/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Regulatory Notifications Packet Sanitary Sewer Overflow Report for IMMEDIATE REPORTING BY FAX RN-2 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board SSO Two Hour Notification/24-Hour Certification. This does not replace the requirement to report to CIWQS-SSO e-Reporting Program within 3 days of the spill. CalEMA Telephone Number: 1-[PHONE REDACTED] Important: * = Required Field 1. CalEMA Control number* 2. Method of 2hr/24hr Report to Regional Board. Check all that apply. Fax ([PHONE REDACTED]) Voice Mail ([PHONE REDACTED]) Staff Contacted: (Staff name) 3. Date Reported: * I I (mm/dd/yyyy) 4. Time Reported: * : (hh:mm) 5. Reported By: * Phone Number: * ( ) - 6. Reporting Sewer Agency: * City of Modesto 7. Responsible Sewer Agency: * 8. Overflow Street Location/Comments -please indicate the spill cause, sources, and final spill destination entered:* drainage channel/surface water entered) City: * ZIP Code: * County: * SSO Description if information is not available, please input 00:00 for time and 00 for gallons 9. Overflow Start Estimate: Date:* / / (mm/dd/yyyy) Time:* 10. Overflow End: Date:* Date:* / / (mm/dd/yyyy) Time:* : (hh:mm) 11. Estimated Overflow Flow Rate: * (gallons per minute) 12. Estimated Total Overflow Volume:* (gallons) 13. Overflow Volume Recovered: * (gallons) 14. Person Completed:* Date: / / (mm/dd/yyyy) Official Title: * Phone Number * Email:* 15. When Did You Notify Your Local Health Department?: * Date: / / (mm/dd/yyyy) * Time: : (hh:mm) ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5/20/10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Regulatory Notifications Packet IMMEDIATE REPORTING BY FAX To Local Health Agency RN-3 TO: FROM: Stanislaus County Health Department City of Modesto Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] Fax: [PHONE REDACTED] Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] (bus hrs) [PHONE REDACTED] (after hrs) Telephone: [PHONE REDACTED] DATE: Re: # of Pages: URGENT FOR REVIEW PLEASE COMMENT PLEASE REPLY Notes/Comments: NOTICE OF SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOW In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 5410 et. seq. Overflow Street Location/Comments -please indicate the spill cause, sources, and final spill destination entered:* drainage channel/surface water entered) City: * ZIP Code: * County: * SSO Description if information is not available, please input 00:00 for time and 00 for gallons Overflow Start Estimate: Date:* / / (mm/dd/yyyy) Time:* Overflow End: Date:* Date:* / / (mm/dd/yyyy) Time:* : (hh:mm) Estimated Overflow Flow Rate: * (gallons per minute) Estimated Total Overflow Volume:* (gallons) Overflow Volume Recovered: * (gallons) Person Completed:* Date: / / (mm/dd/yyyy) Official Title: * Phone Number * Email:* Time spill was noticed: Notifications: Notified Regional Water Quality Control Board Notified CalEMA ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 In the event of a Sewer Backup into a home/business READ THIS FIRST Request that the customer cease all activities contributing to the backup. Trigger Contact Immediately Telephone Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] or 524-1389 Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] or 652.7425 Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] or 239-4766 Collections Manager [PHONE REDACTED] or 652-9502 Assistant Risk Manager 577-5446 or 543-1527 For all backups into/onto private property possibly due to problems in the public sewer: (contact in order until someone is reached) Risk Manager 577-5270 For any media requests Public Information Analyst [PHONE REDACTED] (office) [PHONE REDACTED] (cell) For cleaning services Coit Restoration Services [PHONE REDACTED] Restoration Management Services [PHONE REDACTED] City of Modesto Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan Chain of Custody Collections Staff 1st: Open this envelope. 2nd: Follow instructions on “Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Backup.” 3rd: If the backup appears to be due to a failure in the City-owned sewer line & the customer is home, give them the Customer Service Packet and have them initial this envelope below: Customer acknowledgement of receipt of Customer Service Packet: If customer is not home, complete the Door Hanger and hang it on the customer’s door. 5th: Complete the Chain of Custody record (right) and forward this packet to the Collections System Supervisor Collections System Supervisor 1st: Open this envelope. Review forms. 2nd: Complete the Claims Submittal Checklist (enclosed) 3rd: Forward the Regulatory Notifications Packet to the person authorized to make required notifications (enter name and title of that individual to the right). 4th: Copy all items on the Claims Submittal Checklist for internal archiving purposes and forward the originals to the City Risk Manager Print Name Initial Date Time City Risk Manager Refer to Claims Handling Procedure Summary Print Name Initial Date Time Regulatory Notification Packet given to: Name Title Instructions ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Table of Contents BP Form Form Number Instructions and Chain of label Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Cleaning Declination Form (3-copy First Responder Form/Livability Assessment Lodging Authorization Form (3-copy Rejection of Relocation Recommendation Form (3-copy Tabular Report of Lateral TV Claims Submittal Sewer Overflow Report SSO Investigation Customer Service Packet envelope Customer Claim Sewer Spill Reference pamphlet Regulatory Notifications Packet envelope Guide to Reporting to Regulatory Authorities Fax Reporting Form: to Water Fax Reporting Form: to Local Health Door Sewer Spill Reference Guide pamphlet For pre-assembled packets contact DKF Solutions Group at [PHONE REDACTED] or ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Backup BP-1 Side A Does the backup appear to be due to a failure in the City-owned and maintained sewer line? If customer is not home: • Complete Door Hanger and leave on customer’s door If customer is home: 1. Explain to customer that the blockage is in their lateral and that the City does not have legal authority to maintain or perform work on privately-owned laterals. Consider showing the customer the unobstructed flow in the public sewer to help explain that the blockage is in their lateral. 2. Consider cleaning the City-owned line in front of the customer’s house. 3. Recommend to customer they hire a contractor to clear their line. 4. Give customer the Sewer Spill Reference Guide pamphlet. YES Wastewater Collections Staff (Bus. Hrs.) or Wastewater Collections Standby (After Hours) : Start Here Go to the SSO Packet, complete procedures and return here. Has sewage impacted public areas? NO Notify a Wastewater Collections Supervisor as indicated on the front of the sewer Backup Packet. 1. Go to the SSO Packet and complete procedures. 2. Document the service call according to City procedures. 3. Follow the routing instructions of the front of the Sewer Backup Packet envelope. 1. Document the service call according to City procedures 2. Follow routing instructions on the front of the Sewer Backup Envelope Go to Side B NO YES WASTEWATER COLLECTION CREW DUTIES Environmental Compliance: Start Here Communicate with Collections Crew to evaluate the spill and cause Has any sewage spilled outside? NO YES Go to the SSO Packet. Complete and return here. 1. Estimate volume of the backup that spilled into and out of the affected property. See the Field Guide for methods. 2. Document the method you used to calculate the volume. Is this a Category 1 SSO? NO YES Within 2 hours, complete the Regulatory Notifications Packet (inside Sewer Backup envelope) As soon as possible, complete the Regulatory Notifications Packet (inside Sewer Backup envelope) ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE DUTIES FOR BACKUPS THAT ARE ALSO CATEGORY 1 SSO’s Has any sewage spilled outside a manhole? YES NO Category 1 SSO Criteria: Discharge of sewage: 1. Which equals or exceeds 1,000 gal, or 2. To a surface water and/or drainage channel, or 3. To a storm drainpipe which was not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Backup BP-1 Side B Can you locate a backwater prevention device (BPD) or cleanout on the affected building? Photograph the backwater prevention device or cleanout If it is possible, safe and allowed by City policy, look for a backwater prevention device or cleanout for the house/property. YES NO Continue Here from Side A Remove the SSO Investigation Report and the Sewer Overflow Report (inside Sewer Backup envelope) and complete as thoroughly as possible. Be certain to make all required notifications on Side B of the Sewer Overflow Report. NOTE: Notify ECS if the spill volume is equal to or greater than 1,000-gal (i.e. a Category 1 SSO). 1. Document the service call according to City procedures. 2. Put all completed forms back in the Sewer Backup Envelope 3. Follow routing instructions as indicated on the front of the Sewer Backup Packet envelope. 1. Call for restoration/remediation according to the front of the Sewer Backup Packet. 2. Wait for the Cleaning Contractor to arrive, if appropriate. Does the customer want cleaning service? 1. Have Customer sign the Cleaning Declination form (inside Sewer Backup Packet) 2. Ask permission to photograph the affected area. If they decline, note on the Cleaning Declination form. 3. Give the customer the bottom copy of the form and put other copies in the Sewer Backup Packet. NO YES SUPERVISORY DUTIES EMPLOYEE: Normally, a Wastewater Supervisor will arrive to complete the following steps. However, in the event they are unavailable or if they direct you, perform the following: 1. Give customer the Customer Service Packet. (inside Sewer Backup Packet) 2. Ask the customer to initial the bottom front of the Sewer Backup Packet, as appropriate. Remove the First Responder Form from the Sewer Backup Packet envelope and complete side A and side B (Livability Assessment): 1. If the Livability Assessment indicates the resident should vacate the premises, notify a Wastewater Collections Supervisor (if not already at the scene) and complete either the Lodging Authorization form (inside Sewer Backup Packet) if the resident agrees to relocate, or the Rejection of Relocation Recommendation form (inside Sewer Backup Packet) if they don’t. Give customer bottom copy of completed form. 2. Take photographs of affected and non-affected areas, if allowed and safe. Complete the Tabular Report of PSR and the Lateral TV Report (as necessary) – both forms can be found in the Sewer Backup Packet. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Declination of Sewage Cleaning Services BP-2 Customer Information NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: ON (date) AT (time) Approximately (quantity) GALLONS OF: Sewage Grey Water Toilet Bowl Water Odor Other (describe): Overflowed from (or odor emanating from) Toilet Shower/Tub Washer Other (describe): The overflow affected the following areas (check one): Bathroom Bedroom Hallway Garage Kitchen Crawlspace Other (specify): The overflow affected the following flooring: Tile Wood Flooring Linoleum Carpet Other (specify): and/or additional materials: Area Rugs Towels Clothing Other (specify): Photos: Were Not Taken Were Taken, number of photos: This Form Completed By: Date: Time: CUSTOMER, please read the following and sign below: I/We acknowledge that City of Modesto (City) has offered to provide professional cleaning and decontamination services to remediate the sewage backup and/or overflow described above and that we declined the offer. We further understand and acknowledge that because we have declined, any necessary remediation activities will be conducted without City assistance, and that the City will not accept responsibility for work performed by persons other than those engaged by the City. The City will also not accept responsibility for any charges related to this incident that are not usual and customary. Please refer to the Customer Service Packet for who to contact if you have any questions. Customer Signature*: Date: Name: Title: The information above was explained to the customer by the following employee: Signature: Date: *Note to responders: if customer declines to sign this form, have a co-worker sign as a witness and check here Recommendations to customer to clean up the spill: Keep pets and children out of the affected area Turn off heating/air conditioning systems Wear rubber boots, rubber gloves, and goggles during cleanup of the affected area. Remove and discard items that cannot be washed and disinfected (such as: mattresses, rugs, cosmetics, baby toys, etc.) Remove and discard drywall and insulation that has been contaminated with sewage or flood waters. Thoroughly clean all hard surfaces (such as flooring, concrete, molding, wood and metal furniture, countertops, appliances, sinks and other plumbing fixtures) with hot water and laundry or dish detergent. Help the drying process with fans, air conditioning units, and dehumidifiers. After completing cleanup, wash your hands with soap and water. Use water that has been boiled for 1 minute (allow the water to cool before washing your hands.) OR use water that has been disinfected (solution of 1/8 teaspoon of household bleach per 1 gallon of water). Let it stand for 30 min. If water is cloudy, use teaspoon of household bleach per 1 gallon of water. Wash all clothes worn during the cleanup in hot water and detergent (wash separately from uncontaminated clothes). Wash clothes contaminated with flood or sewage water in hot water and detergent. Use a laundromat for washing large quantities of clothes and linens until your onsite wastewater system has been professionally inspected and services. See immediate attention if you become injured or ill. Distribution Instructions – Top Copy to City records; Middle Copy to City Risk Manager; Bottom Copy to Customer ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: First Responder Form BP-3 Side A Fill out this form as completely as possible. Ask customer if you may enter the home. If so, take photos of damaged and undamaged areas. SECTION A PHONE: DATE: PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM: TIME: TIME STAFF ARRIVED ON-SITE: DID CUSTOMER CALL CLEANING CONTRACTOR? Yes No If YES, name of contractor: RESIDENT: PROPERTY MANAGERS: STREET ADDRESS: CITY, STATE AND ZIP: PHONE: STREET ADDRESS: CITY, STATE AND ZIP: PHONE: IS NEAREST UPSTREAM MANHOLE VISIBLY HIGHER THAN THE DRAIN THAT OVERFLOWED? Yes No # OF PEOPLE LIVING AT RESIDENCE: Approximate Age of Home: # of Bathrooms: # of Rooms Affected: Approximate Amount of Spill (gallons): Approximate Time Sewage Has Been Sitting (hrs/days): Numbers of Pictures Taken Digital or Film? Does property have Curbside Cleanout? YES NO Unknown Does the Customer have a Backwater Prevention Device (BPD)? YES NO Unknown If yes, was the BPD operational at the time of the overflow? YES NO Unknown Have there ever been any previous spills at this location? YES NO Unknown Has the Resident Had Any Plumbing Work Done Recently? If YES, please describe: YES NO GO TO SIDE B ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: First Responder Form BP-3 Side B SECTION B LIVABILITY ASSESSMENT NOTE: Unless otherwise directed, the livability assessment must be completed by a WWC Supervisor or those listed in the “Contact Immediately” section on the front of the Sewer Backup Envelope. SECTION C SANITARY SEWER LINE BLOCKAGE LOCATION PLEASE CHECK THE BOX THAT DESCRIBES YOUR OBSERVATIONS Public Cleanout was: Customer Cleanout Was: Non - Existent Full Empty Non-Existent Full Empty Recommended Follow-Up Action(s): SECTION D CLEANING CONTRACTOR Company Name: Phone: Arrival Time: Comments: Place completed form in Sewer Backup Envelope and follow routing instructions. Is there sufficient non-contaminated living space for residents to stay during cleaning? Is it after 8pm or will the cleaning and disinfection be completed after 10pm 1. Recommend to resident they stay at a hotel while the area is cleaned & disinfected 2. Review Hotel Selection Form with resident 3. Explain City will pay for one night’s hotel lodging & that the City Risk Manager will discuss additional nights, food & other necessities with them directly the next business day. 4. Follow the instructions on the Hotel Authorization form Is there a functioning and non- contaminated bathroom Any residents that: • Are pregnant? • Have severe allergies/asthma? • Have respiratory problems? • Have a compromised immune system? Is the area a childcare or extended care facility? Is the food preparation area contaminated? STOP: Resident can stay in premises Ask resident to vacate premises while area is cleaned & disinfected. YES YES YES YES YES YES NO NO NO NO NO NO Place an X where the blockage occurred Circle the areas where sewage overflowed/backed Affected House Upstream House Property Line Direction of Flow Manhole # Manhole Did sewage go under buildings? Yes No Unsure Notify either the Wastewater Collections Supervisor or Manager ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City o SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Hotel Selection Form BP- 4 INSTRUCTIONS TO EMPLOYEE: 1. Ensure either the Wastewater Collections Supervisor or Manager has been notified of this situation. 2. Review this with the customer and ask them to read, sign and take their copy to one of the hotels listed below. 3. Explain to customer that additional nights and other incidentals will be addressed by the City Risk Manager or their Designee. 4. Instruct the customer that this emergency authorization is for LODGING ONLY – NO FOOD, MINIBAR, MOVIE, PHONE or Other Charges). Additional nights and other incidentals will be addressed by the City’s Risk Manager. 5. Have the resident sign the Acknowledgement section of this form. 6. Complete the voucher information. Please note that an unsigned voucher will not be honored at the hotels. 7. Give the bottom copy of this form to the resident. INSTRUCTIONS TO RESIDENT: City of Modesto recommends that you temporarily relocate to one of the hotels listed below for your safety and convenience while your residence is being cleaned. Please note that this emergency authorization is granted under the following conditions: 1. The voucher authorizes payment of one night’s lodging at one of the hotels listed below. 2. The voucher is good for room and tax ONLY. Phone, food, mini-bar and other incidental charges will be your responsibility. 3. Additional nights/other allowances/incidentals may be discussed by contacting the Assistant Risk Manager at [PHONE REDACTED] or [PHONE REDACTED] OR the City Risk Manager at [PHONE REDACTED]. 4. Please bring a photo ID with you so that hotel staff can verify the voucher’s authenticity. CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: I/we have read and understood the terms and conditions governing this offer of temporary relocation and agree to abide by them as described above. Customer Name (please print): Customer Address: Phone # where customer may be reached: Customer Signature: Date: Good for one night’s stay on (date): Other guest names: Field Supervisor’s Name: Phone Number: Holiday Inn Express Address: 4300 Bangs Road, Modesto Phone: 543-9009 La Quinta Inn Address: 4909 Sisk Road, Modesto Phone: 579-8723 Super 8 Address: 4100 Salida Blvd., Modesto Phone: 543-9000 Ramada Hotel Address: 2100 W. Orangeburg Ave., Modesto Phone: 543-9000 Hotel Staff, please direct questions about this voucher to City Assistant Risk Manager at [PHONE REDACTED] or Collections System Supervisor at [PHONE REDACTED]. Distribution Instructions – Top Copy to City records; Middle Copy to City Risk Manager; Bottom Copy to Customer ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Rejection of Relocation Recommendation BP-5 On , a backup into structure occurred at (date) (address) Property Owner: Resident: Due to a backup into the structure, the above listed property has sewage to be cleaned up/mitigated, which may also include remediation of part of the structure. It is recommended by City of Modesto that the residents of the above listed property relocate until the cleanup/mitigation and any required remediation is completed City staff provided the information to the resident: “Your Responsibilities as a Private Owner.” Resident(s) determined that they did not want to relocate and will remain in the structure. PROPERTY OWNER/RESIDENT RELEASE OF LIABILITY AND ASSUMPTION OF RISK I have decided that I do not want to relocate from the address listed above during any cleanup/mitigation and/or remediation. I have received all the materials listed above from City of Modesto. I understand that there are inherent risks with exposure to sewage and the associated cleanup/mitigation and/or remediation process due to the potential for coming into contact with sewage through breathing, swallowing, or cuts and abrasions in the skin that may cause pathogens. Risks may range from minor temporary discomfort and illness, more serious illness that may require medical treatment, very serious illness that could result in life threatening conditions and including death. I know, understand, and appreciate these and other risks inherent in being exposed to sewage. I knowingly assume all such risks which may result from my own actions, inactions, or negligence of others, and the condition of the structure during the cleanup/mitigation and/or remediation process. I, for myself, my heirs, personal representative or assigns, hereby release, discharge and hold harmless City of Modesto, its respective Boards, officers, employees, agents and contractors from any and all claims, actions, causes of action, demands, rights, damages, costs, loss of service, expenses, legal expenses, including subrogation or liens or damage caused by or related to my remaining in the structure while cleanup/mitigation and/or remediation is performed as a result of the backup. Resident Signature Date City of Modesto Witness Comments: Distribution Instructions – Top Copy to City records; Middle Copy to City Risk Manager; Bottom Copy to Customer ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Tabular Report of PSR BP-6 Setup Surveyor Certificate # System Owner Drainage Survey Customer PO# Date Time Street City Further location details Start Rim to invert Grade to invert Rim to grade ft Finish Rim to invert Grade to invert Rim to grade ft Use Direction Flow control Media No Shape Height Width ins Preclean Year cleaned Material Joint length Total length Weather Purpose Cat Additional info Location Structural O&M Constructional Miscellaneous Hydraulic Count Video CD Code In1 In2 % Jnt Fr To ImRef Remarks Total Length Surveyed Place completed form in Sewer Backup Envelope and follow routing instructions. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: SSO Investigation Report OP-3 Side A SITE: ID: SSO Investigation Report Date: / / Time: Hours Worked: After Hours: Yes No Investigation Closed: Investigator _PRIMARY: ___Investigator 2: ___Investigator 3: Incident Address: Zipcode:9535 _ Site Type: Commercial Industrial Multi-Family Residential ROW Drainage System: Detention Receiving Water Retention Rockwell Type of Call: Stormwater Sewer Illicit Connection SSO TYPE: Manhole Multiple Manholes Lamphole Private Lateral Other: GALLONS DISCHARGED: GALLONS RECOVERED: SSO CAUSE: SEE BELOW FOR PRIVATE LATERAL INFORMATION Category 1 SSO’s: OVER 1000 GALLONS DISCHARGED?----- IF YES: CALLED CalEMA? DATE: TIME: ANY AMOUNT INTO RECEIVING WATER?------ IF YES: CALLED CalEMA? DATE: TIME: “Any discharge to a storm drainage pipe that was not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system.” This is somewhat ambiguous. You will need to confer with your call down tree to determine if your SSO is a category 1 and should be called in within the 2 hour time limit. CalEMA will ask questions that you will answer to the best of your knowledge. Any changes must be called in later: P.O.BOX 642, MODESTO, CA 95353 CalEMA PHONE NUMBER:1-[PHONE REDACTED] CONTROL NUMBER THEY GIVE YOU: CalEMA Date/Time DER Date/Time Day (209) 525-6700 / Night (209) 558-4357 Date/Time Day or Night (916) 464-3291 Indicate if you notified other personnel or agencies: ECS SUPERVISOR WATER DEPT (MANUEL MARTINEZ) MFD MPD STREETS BLDG NPU FISH AND GAME Manhole Locations: Location 1 : º º TIME STARTED: TIME ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 STOPPED: GPM: Location 2 : º º TIME STARTED: TIME STOPPED: GPM: Location 3 : º º TIME STARTED: TIME STOPPED: GPM: Location 1 total minutes: X gpm = Location 2 total minutes: X gpm = Location 3 total minutes: X gpm = Before and after photos of manhole and storm drains FIRST RESPONDER WAS? FIRST ACTIONS TAKEN ON SCENE? Catch basins affected: Location 1 How protected Location 2 How protected Location 3 How protected Initial Complainant: Received Call From: Front Desk Answering Service ECS Complainants Name: Telephone: Pollutant Found: Pollutant Identified By: ES DER MFD MPD Circumstance: Accidental Intentional Negligent Suspicious Unknown Disposition of Waste: Contained on site Partial Recovery Not Recoverable Removed DETAILS and ACTION TAKEN ON SCENE: Clean up and Mitigation: INTERVIEWED: IF other agencies were called, list who called them, when they were called, what action did the other agency take: Investigation Referred to: Date: Resources Utilized: Public Private Both IF Private Lateral, was blockage caused by CITY? IF YES, did you provide resident with House Sewer Line Cost Share Program Literature? If YES, did you provide resident with information regarding COST RECOVERY for any other damages to their private property, incurred due to CITY blockage? Investigator City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: SSO Investigation Report OP-3 Side B ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: SSO Investigation Report OP-3 Side C ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS (IF ANY) SSO DATE SSO ADDRESS Response: Verbal Letter NOV Citation Cost Recovery: Yes No Responsible Parties Party 1: Owner Resident Responsible Suspect Witness Send Letter: Y N Brochure Provided on Site: Y N Name: Phone Address: Company: Company Address: Party 2: Owner Resident Responsible Suspect Witness Send Letter: Y N Copy Only: Name: Phone: Address: Company: Company Address: ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Sanitary Sewer Overflow Report OP-2 Side A This Report is (check one): Preliminary Final Revised Final A. SPILL LOCATION Spill Location Name: GPS Latitude Coordinates: GPS Longitude Coordinates: Street Name and Number: Street Direction N, S, W, NE, SW, etc.): Nearest Cross Street City: Zip Code: County: Spill Location Description: B. SPILL DESCRIPTION Spill Appearance Point: Building/Structure Force Main Gravity Sewer Other Sewer System Structure Pump Station Manhole- Structure ID#: Other (specify): Did the spill reach a drainage channel and/or surface water? Yes No If the spill reached a storm sewer, was it fully captured and returned to the Sanitary Sewer? Yes No Was this spill from a private service lateral? Yes No If YES, name of responsible party: Final Spill Destination: Beach Building structure Other paved surface Storm drain Street/curb& gutter Surface water Unpaved surface Other (specify): Estimated spill volume (in gallons): Method calculated: Est. volume of SSO recovered (gal): Were photos taken? No Yes – how many? Estimated volume of spill reaching surface water, drainage channel, or not recovered from a storm drain (gal): Note: Notify Supervisor immediately if the spill reached a positive stormdrain C. SPILL OCCURRING TIME SSO Reported to: SSO Reported by: Phone: Estimated spill start date and time: Date and time spill reported to sewer crew: Date and time sewer crew arrived: Estimated spill end date and time: Weather conditions prior 72 hours: Sunny Weather Cloudy Weather Measurable Rain Rain for Several Days D. CAUSE OF SPILL SSO cause (check all that apply): Debris/Blockage Flow exceeded capacity Grease Operator error Roots Pipe problem/failure Pump station failure Rainfall exceeded design Vandalism Inflow/infiltration Animal carcass Electrical power failure Bypass Debris from laterals Construction Debris Other (specify): If SSO is caused by a private service lateral, please specify: This is the owner tenant manager Property contact: Contact telephone: If SSO is caused by wet weather, choose size of storm: 1-yr 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 50-yr 100-yr >100-yr Unknown Diameter (in inches) of pipe at point of blockage/spill cause (if applicable): Sewer pipe material at point of blockage/spill cause (if applicable): Description of terrain surrounding point of blockage/spill cause: Flat Mixed Steep E. SPILL RESPONSE Spill response activities (check all that apply): Cleaned up Contained all/portion of spill TV inspection Restored flow Returned all/portion of spill to sanitary sewer Other (specify): Spill response completed (date & time): Name of impacted waters (if applicable): Visual inspection result of impacted waters (if applicable): Any fish killed? Yes No Any ongoing investigation? Yes No Name of impacted beach (if applicable): Were health warnings posted? Yes No Health warning/beach closure posting/details: Were samples of impacted waters collected? Yes No If YES, select the analyses: DO Ammonia Bacti Other Spill Volume Estimated by: Report Completed by: Report Verified by: GO TO SIDE B ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Sanitary Sewer Overflow Report OP-2 Side B F. NOTIFICATION DETAILS CALEMA contacted date and time (if applicable): CALEMA Control Number (if applicable): Spoke to: Immediate Regulatory Reporting Guide: If any of the following conditions exist, immediately contact one of the individuals on the list below and request that they make notifications as indicated in the Regulatory Notifications Packet: • Estimated volume is greater than 1,000 gallons • SSO was discharged to a drainage channel or surface waters • SSO was discharged to a storm drain and not fully captured and returned PERSON CELL PHONE BUSINESS HOURS AFTER HOURS Regulatory Compliance Inspector (on call) See Standby Roster [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Regulatory Compliance Adminstrator [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Stormwater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Wastewater Collections Manager [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Deputy Director [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] RECOMMENDED FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS TO PREVENT FUTURE OCCURRENCES This section to be completed by the Crewleader CURRENT PM FREQUENCY: DATE OF LAST PM: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: TV RE-RUN REPLACE LINE SEGMENT REPAIR LINE SEGMENT CHANGE CLEANING SCHEDULE CASSWORKS Updated? No Yes DATE: NEW SCHEDULE: OTHER (describe): CLEANING SCHEDULE CHANGED BY: PLEASE PRINT NOTES: Place completed form in Sewer Backup Envelope and follow routing instructions. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Lateral TV Report BP-7 PLEASE COMPLETE AS THOROUGHLY AS POSSIBLE PERSON COMPLETING THIS FORM: DATE: PHONE: CAMERA TYPE: AFFECTED PROPERTY STREET ADDRESS: CITY, STATE AND ZIP: PHONE LOCATION OF CAMERA ENTRY: LOCATION OF CAMERA STOP: DESCRIBE AREA TV’d: UPSTREAM MANHOLE TIME OF OVERFLOW: TIME BLOCKAGE RELIEVED: TIME LATERAL TV’d: DEPTH OF LATERAL: PLEASE CHECK ALL THAT WERE DISCOVERED – Describe Extent & Location Using Camera Entry Point As Reference: Broken Lateral – Describe: Depth: Roots – Severity: Light Moderate Heavy Grease – Severity: Light Moderate Heavy Sag – Describe: Depth: BPD – Describe: Location: Cleanout – Describe: Location: Joint/Junction – Describe: Depth Grade – Describe: Grit – Severity: Light Moderate Heavy Other – Describe: RECOMMENDED FOLLOW UP WORK ACTIONS: Mark for USA location? Yes No Lateral Locations Marked in Green Paint? Yes No SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE PERFORMING TV WORK: DATE If applicable, place completed form in Sewer Backup Envelope and follow routing instructions. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Claims Submittal Checklist BP-8 Collections System Supervisor 1. Complete the following information: Title: Name: Phone: Today’s Date: 2. Complete the Building History Form 3. Copy the items listed below and retain for internal archiving purposes. 4. Place the originals back in the Backup Response Envelope and forward envelope with original forms to City Risk Manager: Form BP-2: Cleaning Declination Form (if applicable) Form BP-3: First Responder Form Form BP-4: Lodging Authorization Form (if applicable) Form BP-5: Refection of Relocation Recommendation Form (if applicable) Form BP-6: Tabular Report of PSR Form BP-7: SSO Investigation Report Form BP-8: Sewer Overflow Report Form BP-9: Lateral TV Report (if applicable) Form BP-10: Claims Submittal Checklist (this form) All photos taken (hardcopy or electronic) Any other information you feel is important in this claim Environmental Regulatory Compliance Administrator or Other Reporting Authority Go to Regulatory Notifications Packet and make all appropriate notifications. City Risk Manager Verify claims packet is complete. ---PAGE BREAK--- Print on 6” x 9” envelope © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revised 5-20-10 City of Modesto Sanitary Sewer Overflow/Backup Response Plan Customer Service Packet Contents: Form Form Number Customer Information Letter Sewer Spill Reference pamphlet Instructions: 1. Review the Customer Information letter to determine actions that need to be taken immediately. 2. See the Customer Information letter for information about filing a claim. 3. Review the Sewer Spill Reference Guide pamphlet. Cleaning Contractor (Crew member check one) Restoration Management Services [PHONE REDACTED] Coit Restoration Services [PHONE REDACTED] This packet provided by: Name: Title: Telephone: If you have any questions contact: City Risk Manager at [PHONE REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Backup Response Packet: Customer Information Regarding Sewer Backup Claims CS-1 Dear Property Owner: We recognize that sewer back flow incidents can be stressful and require immediate response when all facts concerning how an incident occurred are unknown. Rest assured that we do all we can to prevent this type of event from occurring. Nevertheless, occasionally tree roots or other debris in the sewer lines cause a backup into homes immediately upstream of the blockage. At this time the City is investigating the cause of this incident. If the City is found to be responsible for the incident, we are committed to cleaning and restoring your property, and to protecting the health of those affected during the remediation process. Refer to the front of this envelope for the contact information for the company assigned to perform the necessary cleaning and restoration process for your property. The cleaning contractor(s) have been selected because of their adherence to established protocols that are designed to assure all parties thorough, cost- effective and expeditious cleaning services. You also have the right to select your own cleaning contractor, but the City does not guarantee payment of fees/expenses incurred and reserves the right to dispute fees/expenses deemed not usual and customary. If you need to temporarily relocate while your home is being cleaned, please contact the City Risk Manager at [PHONE REDACTED] to discuss the necessary arrangements. The City Risk Manager has the responsibility for processing any claims for damages that are submitted. If you wish to discuss this matter, or submit a claim for damages, please contact either of the following: • City Risk Manager: [PHONE REDACTED] • Collections System Supervisor: [PHONE REDACTED] What you need to do now: The City has prepared this brief set of instructions to help you minimize the impact of the loss by responding to the situation. • Do not attempt to clean the area yourself, let the cleaning and restoration company handle this. • Keep people and pets away from the affected area(s). • Turn off heating/air conditioning systems. • Turn off any appliances using water. • Do not remove items from the area – the cleaning and restoration company will handle this. • If you had recent plumbing work, contact your plumber or contractor and inform them of this incident. • If you intend to file a claim, do so as soon as practical in order to have your claim considered. To obtain a claim form contact City Risk Manager at [PHONE REDACTED]. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 Refer to the Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan Binder for instructions for using this packet READ THIS FIRST In the event of a Sanitary Sewer Overflow Check here if you believe that fats, oils and/or grease (FOG) caused or contributed to the SSO After performing initial evaluation, contact (in order until someone is reached): Environmental Services: 577.6200 (bus hrs) 575.5245 (after hrs) Wastewater Supervisor: 577.6234 (bus hrs) 652.9506 (cell) 524.1389 (night) Wastewater Supervisor: 577.6287 (bus hrs) 652.7425 (cell) 847.4950 (night) Senior Operator on Duty: 577.6225 (bus hrs) 607 (Nextel) 652.8668 (cell) For any media requests: Public Information Analyst [PHONE REDACTED] (office) [PHONE REDACTED] (cell) City of Modesto Sanitary Sewer Overflow and Backup Response Plan Collections Staff 1st: Open this envelope. 2nd: Follow the instructions on the card: “Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Overflow” 3rd: Reference the Field Binder as necessary 4th: Complete the Chain of Custody record (right) and forward this packet to the Collections System Supervisor Chain of Custody Instructions Print Name: Initial: Date: Time: Collections System Supervisor 1st: Open this envelope. Review forms. 2nd: Forward the Regulatory Notifications Packet to the person authorized to make required notifications (enter name and title of that individual to the right). 3rd: Archive all documentation related to this incident in accordance with City of Modesto procedures. Print Name: Initial: Date: Time: Regulatory Notifications Packet given to: Name: Title: ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Sanitary Sewer Overflow Packet: Table of Contents OP Form Form Number Instructions and Chain of label Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Sewer Overflow Report SSO Investigation Regulatory Notifications Packet envelope Guide to Reporting to Regulatory Authorities Fax Reporting Form: To Water Board Fax Reporting Form: To Local Health Sewer Spill Reference Guide pamphlet Public Posting Door For pre-assembled packets contact DKF Solutions Group at [PHONE REDACTED] or ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Overflow OP-1 Side A Start Here NO 1. CONTAIN SPILL & RETURN TO SYSTEM, IF POSSIBLE: a. Plug storm drain catch basins or use rubber mats to cover basin inlet b. Plug storm drain line to prevent receiving water contact c. Build/excavate a berm to channel flow to sanitary sewer manhole (barricade manhole if left open) d. Divert to low area of ground where it can be collected later e. ENSURE PUBLIC CONTACT DOES NOT OCCUR. Use cones/barricades to isolate area. 2. PHOTOGRAPH BEFORE CLEAN PROCEDURE BEGINS Use the appropriate cleaning equipment (jet or power rodder) to clear a blockage. Make certain to have the Vac-con setup at the manhole or the outlet of the manhole in the channel to catch any debris released. If using the power rodder, set-up at the first dry manhole and run upstream until you hit the blockage. Once the flow is back to normal, run line to next manhole. PHOTOGRAPH SPILL AREA AFTER CLEANUP ROCKWELL CLEANUP PROCEDURE: 1. DO NOT INTRODUCE ANY SANITIZERS INTO A ROCKWELL! 2. Vacuum the rock in the top of the well to remove any solids or trapped materials 3. Insert piping into the core pipe and vacuum while simultaneously applying a minimum of 500 gallons of clean rinse water to the drain rock (volume to vary with the depth of the rockwell) NOTE: Backhoe wells without core pipes shall be rinsed and simultaneously vacuumed to a maximum depth allowable, dictated by the rockwell can length. Flushing volume shall be of sufficient quantity to effectively remove sewage to the maximum extent practical. POSITIVE STORM DRAIN SYSTEM CLEANUP PROCEDURE: 1. Shut off pumps at any storm station affected 2. Remove and rinse sewage from piping, where possible 3. Vacuum, sanitize, rinse and re-vacuum impacted wet pits 4. Follow any additional instructions from Environmental Services STREET SURFACE CLEANUP PROCEDURE: 1. Remove all signs of gross pollution (toilet paper, solids, grease, etc.) 2. Flush area w/clean water as directed by ECS a. Setup a berm or other means to contain flush water so that it can be delivered to the sewer or removed with the Vac-con b. DO NOT USE ANY DISINFECTANT THAT MAY ENTER THE STORM DRAIN (unless directed by ECS) Contact appropriate resources. See Field Guide YES Are additional resources/staff needed? Make notifications: • ECS (see standby roster after hours) • Standby Assist Crew • Supervisor of Category 1 spills • Supervisor of backups into homes/ businesses Perform initial evaluation of the spill site. • Post “WARNING RAW SEWAGE” signs in immediate areas. • Photograph areas where warnings/barricades are posted, as appropriate. NO YES Is the spill in an area where public contact may occur or is it likely to reach receiving waters? Complete the following & forward to the collections system maintenance crewleader and supervisor: Sewer SSO Response Form Stormdrain/SSO Response Form Sewer Maintenance Request Slip Sewer Maintenance Door Hangar, as necessary All photos taken STEP 1: BEGIN DIVERSION AND CONTAINMENT STEP 2: BLOCKAGE CLEARING STEP 3: AREA CLEANUP STEP 4: DOCUMENT AND REPORT ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan Responding to a Sanitary Sewer Overflow OP-1 Side B Oversee/Direct Cleanup Operations See Side 1 – Step 3: Street Surface Cleanup Procedure NOTE: Determine if the ground surface needs to be disinfected as part of the cleanup. If so, direct staff to put 1ounce bleach to 5 gal water. This will provide ~200ppm Cl. DO NOT ALLOW CHLORINATED WATER TO ENTER STORM DRAINS! Estimate the spill volume using one of the methods found in the Field Guide At D.E.R.’s direction assign available City staff to post “WARNING- RAW SEWAGE” SIGNS Meet with Collections to convey estimates and info necessary to complete the Sewage Overflow Report and the Pollution Investigation Report • Refer to Regulatory Notifications Packet and make all required notifications • File reports Direct Cleanup Operations See Side 1 – Step 3: Positive Storm Drain Cleanup Procedure Notify Env. Reg. Comp. Administrator NO YES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES START HERE Has the SSO reached any of the following types of receiving waters? Tuolumne River Dry Creek Irrigation Canal Basin Direct Cleanup Operations See Side 1 – Step 3: Rockwell Cleanup Procedure Rockwell 1. Notify Reg. Compliance Administrator 2. Direct Cleanup 3. Document cleanup methods 4. Contact the lab Tuolumne River/Dry Creek/Canal Using your best professional judgment, is sampling possible, safe and/or manditory? NO Street/Other Surface YES Notify CalEMA/DER within 2 hours if becoming aware of incident ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan SSO Packet: Sanitary Sewer Overflow Report OP-2 Side A This Report is (check one): Preliminary Final Revised Final A. SPILL LOCATION Spill Location Name: GPS Latitude Coordinates: GPS Longitude Coordinates: Street Name and Number: Street Direction N, S, W, NE, SW, etc.): Nearest Cross Street City: Zip Code: County: Stanislaus Spill Location Description: B. SPILL DESCRIPTION Spill Appearance Point: Building/Structure Force Main Gravity Sewer Other Sewer System Structure Pump Station Manhole- Structure ID#: Other (specify): Did the spill reach a drainage channel and/or surface water? Yes No If the spill reached a storm drain, was it fully captured and returned to the Sanitary Sewer? Yes No Was this spill from a private service lateral? Yes No If YES, name of responsible party: Final Spill Destination: Beach Building structure Other paved surface Storm drain Street/curb& gutter Surface water Unpaved surface Other (specify): Estimated spill volume (in gallons): Method calculated: Est. volume of SSO recovered (gal): Were photos taken? No Yes – how many? Estimated volume of spill reaching surface water, drainage channel, or not recovered from a storm drain (gal): Note: Notify Supervisor immediately if the spill reached a positive stormdrain C. SPILL OCCURRING TIME SSO Reported to: SSO Reported by: Phone: Estimated spill start date and time: Date and time spill reported to sewer crew: Date and time sewer crew arrived: Estimated spill end date and time: Weather conditions prior 72 hours: Sunny Weather Cloudy Weather Measurable Rain Rain for Several Days D. CAUSE OF SPILL SSO cause (check all that apply): Debris/Blockage Flow exceeded capacity Grease Operator error Roots Pipe problem/failure Pump station failure Rainfall exceeded design Vandalism Inflow/infiltration Animal carcass Electrical power failure Bypass Debris from laterals Construction Debris Other (specify): If SSO is caused by a private service lateral, please specify: This is the owner tenant manager Property contact: Contact telephone: If SSO is caused by wet weather, choose size of storm: 1-yr 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 50-yr 100-yr >100-yr Unknown Diameter (in inches) of pipe at point of blockage/spill cause (if applicable): Sewer pipe material at point of blockage/spill cause (if applicable): Description of terrain surrounding point of blockage/spill cause: Flat Mixed Steep E. SPILL RESPONSE Spill response activities (check all that apply): Cleaned up Contained all/portion of spill TV inspection Restored flow Returned all/portion of spill to sanitary sewer Other (specify): Spill response completed (date & time): Name of impacted waters (if applicable): Visual inspection result of impacted waters (if applicable): Any fish killed? Yes No Any ongoing investigation? Yes No Name of impacted beach (if applicable): Were health warnings posted? Yes No Health warning/beach closure posting/details: Were samples of impacted waters collected? Yes No If YES, select the analyses: DO Ammonia Bacti Other Spill Volume Estimated by: Report Completed by: Report Verified by: GO TO SIDE B ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan SSO Packet: Sanitary Sewer Overflow Report OP-2 Side B F. NOTIFICATION DETAILS CALEMA contacted date and time (if applicable): CALEMA Control Number (if applicable): Spoke to: Immediate Regulatory Reporting Guide: If any of the following conditions exist, immediately contact one of the individuals on the list below and request that they make notifications as indicated in the Regulatory Notifications Packet: • Estimated volume is greater than 1,000 gallons • SSO was discharged to a drainage channel or surface waters • SSO was discharged to a storm drain and not fully captured and returned PERSON CELL PHONE BUSINESS HOURS AFTER HOURS Regulatory Compliance Inspector (on call) See Standby Roster [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Regulatory Compliance Adminstrator [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Wastewater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Stormwater Collections Supervisor [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Wastewater Collections Manager [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Deputy Director [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] RECOMMENDED FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS TO PREVENT FUTURE OCCURRENCES This section to be completed by the Crewleader CURRENT PM FREQUENCY: DATE OF LAST PM: RECOMMENDED ACTIONS: TV RE-RUN REPLACE LINE SEGMENT REPAIR LINE SEGMENT CHANGE CLEANING SCHEDULE CASSWORKS Updated? No Yes DATE: NEW SCHEDULE: OTHER (describe): CLEANING SCHEDULE CHANGED BY: PLEASE PRINT NOTES: Place completed form in Sewer Backup Envelope and follow routing instructions. ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan SSO Packet: SSO Investigation Report OP-3 Side A SITE: ID: SSO Investigation Report Date: / / Time: Hours Worked: After Hours: Yes No Investigation Closed: Investigator _PRIMARY: ___Investigator 2: ___Investigator 3: Incident Address: Zipcode:9535 _ Site Type: Commercial Industrial Multi-Family Residential ROW Drainage System: Detention Receiving Water Retention Rockwell Type of Call: Stormwater Sewer Illicit Connection SSO TYPE: Manhole Multiple Manholes Lamphole Private Lateral Other: GALLONS DISCHARGED: GALLONS RECOVERED: SSO CAUSE: SEE BELOW FOR PRIVATE LATERAL INFORMATION Category 1 SSO’s: OVER 1000 GALLONS DISCHARGED?----- IF YES: CALLED CalEMA? DATE: TIME: ANY AMOUNT INTO RECEIVING WATER?------ IF YES: CALLED CalEMA? DATE: TIME: “Any discharge to a storm drainage pipe that was not fully captured and returned to the sanitary sewer system.” This is somewhat ambiguous. You will need to confer with your call down tree to determine if your SSO is a category 1 and should be called in within the 2 hour time limit. CalEMA will ask questions that you will answer to the best of your knowledge. Any changes must be called in later: P.O.BOX 642, MODESTO, CA 95353 CalEMA PHONE NUMBER:1-[PHONE REDACTED] CONTROL NUMBER THEY GIVE YOU: CalEMA Date/Time DER Date/Time Day (209) 525-6700 / Night (209) 558-4357 Date/Time Day or Night (916) 464-3291 Indicate if you notified other personnel or agencies: ECS SUPERVISOR WATER DEPT (MANUEL MARTINEZ) MFD MPD STREETS BLDG NPU FISH AND GAME Manhole Locations: Location 1 : º º TIME STARTED: TIME ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 STOPPED: GPM: Location 2 : º º TIME STARTED: TIME STOPPED: GPM: Location 3 : º º TIME STARTED: TIME STOPPED: GPM: Location 1 total minutes: X gpm = Location 2 total minutes: X gpm = Location 3 total minutes: X gpm = Before and after photos of manhole and storm drains FIRST RESPONDER WAS? FIRST ACTIONS TAKEN ON SCENE? Catch basins affected: Location 1 How protected Location 2 How protected Location 3 How protected Initial Complainant: Received Call From: Front Desk Answering Service ECS Complainants Name: Telephone: Pollutant Found: Pollutant Identified By: ES DER MFD MPD Circumstance: Accidental Intentional Negligent Suspicious Unknown Disposition of Waste: Contained on site Partial Recovery Not Recoverable Removed DETAILS and ACTION TAKEN ON SCENE: Clean up and Mitigation: INTERVIEWED: IF other agencies were called, list who called them, when they were called, what action did the other agency take: Investigation Referred to: Date: Resources Utilized: Public Private Both IF Private Lateral, was blockage caused by CITY? IF YES, did you provide resident with House Sewer Line Cost Share Program Literature? If YES, did you provide resident with information regarding COST RECOVERY for any other damages to their private property, incurred due to CITY blockage? Investigator City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan SSO Packet: SSO Investigation Report OP-3 Side B ---PAGE BREAK--- © DKF Solutions Group 2004-2012 All rights reserved. Revision 5-20-10 City of Modesto SSO/Backup Response Plan SSO Packet: SSO Investigation Report OP-3 Side C ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS (IF ANY) SSO DATE SSO ADDRESS Response: Verbal Letter NOV Citation Cost Recovery: Yes No Responsible Parties Party 1: Owner Resident Responsible Suspect Witness Send Letter: Y N Brochure Provided on Site: Y N Name: Phone Address: Company: Company Address: Party 2: Owner Resident Responsible Suspect Witness Send Letter: Y N Copy Only: Name: Phone: Address: Company: Company Address: ---PAGE BREAK--- On (date) at (location) , we responded to a reported blockage of the sanitary sewer service to your property. We discovered a blockage in: The sanitary sewer main and cleared the line The City-maintained portion of your sanitary sewer lateral and cleared the line. Your portion of the sanitary sewer lateral, which is your responsibility to maintain. We also found the City’s portion of the lateral and the main to be flowing normally. If you require assistance to clear your portion of the lateral you can look in the Yellow Pages of your telephone book under “Sewer Contractors” or “Plumbing Drains & Sewer Cleaning”. If you plan to hire a contractor we recommend getting estimates from more than one company. City representative notes: City representative: For questions or comments, please call City of Modesto [PHONE REDACTED] For Sewer Emergencies at Night and on Weekends, please call [PHONE REDACTED] Print on door hanger die cut paper. Each hanger is 4.5” x 11” finished size. City of Modesto On (date) at (location) , we responded to a reported blockage of the sanitary sewer service to your property. We discovered a blockage in: The sanitary sewer main and cleared the line The City-maintained portion of your sanitary sewer lateral and cleared the line. Your portion of the sanitary sewer lateral, which is your responsibility to maintain. We also found the City’s portion of the lateral and the main to be flowing normally. If you require assistance to clear your portion of the lateral you can look in the Yellow Pages of your telephone book under “Sewer Contractors” or “Plumbing Drains & Sewer Cleaning”. If you plan to hire a contractor we recommend getting estimates from more than one company. City of Modesto representative notes: City representative: For questions or comments, please call City of Modesto [PHONE REDACTED] For Sewer Emergencies at Night and on Weekends, please call [PHONE REDACTED] Print on door hanger die cut paper. Each hanger is 4.5” x 11” finished size. City of Modesto ---PAGE BREAK--- SSO/Backup Response Plan Public Posting DANGER RAW SEWAGE AVOID CONTACT PELIGRO AGUA CONTAMINADA EVITE TODO CONTACTO City of Modesto [PHONE REDACTED] PRINT THIS PAGE ON ORANGE PAPER For more information Para mas informacion ---PAGE BREAK--- How a Sewer System Works A property owner's sewer pipes are called service laterals and are connected to larger local main and regional trunk lines. Service laterals run from the connection at the home to the connection with the public sewer. These laterals are the responsibility of the property owner and must be maintained by the property owner. Is My Home Required to Have a Backflow Prevention Device? Section 710.1 of the 2007 California Plumbing Code states: “Where a fixture is installed on a floor level that is lower than the next upstream manhole cover of the public or private sewer, serving such drainage piping, shall be protected from backflow of sewage by installing an approved type of backwater valve.” The intent of Section 710.1 is to protect the building interior from mainline sewer overflows or surcharges. Additionally, Section 710.6 states: “Backwater valves shall be located where they will be accessible for inspection and repair at all times and, unless continuously exposed, shall be enclosed in a masonry pit fitted with an adequately sized removable cover.” If you have a sewage spill from your private sewer line that impacts public areas or storm drains, contact: City of Modesto CA [PHONE REDACTED] (Business Hours) [PHONE REDACTED] (After Hours) Stanislaus County Health Department [PHONE REDACTED] (bus hrs) [PHONE REDACTED] (after hrs) California Health and Safety Code, Sections 5410-5416 requires: • No person shall discharge raw or treated sewage or other waste in a manner that results in contamination, pollution, or a nuisance. • Any person who causes or permits a sewage discharge to any state waters: o Must immediately notify the local health agency of the discharge. o Shall reimburse the local health agency for services that protect the public’s health and safety. o Who fails to provide the required notice to the local health agency is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (between $500–$1,000) and/or imprisonment for less than one year. Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (5S) [PHONE REDACTED] Requires the prevention, mitigation, response to, and reporting of sewage spills. California Office of Emergency Services [PHONE REDACTED] California Water Code, Article 4, Chapter 4, Sections 13268- 13271 & California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Division 3, Chapter 9.2, Article 2, Sections 2250-2260 require: • Any person who causes or permits sewage in excess of 1,000 gallons to be discharged to state waters shall immediately notify the Office of Emergency Services. • Any person who fails to provide the notice required by this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine (less than $20,000) and/or imprisonment for not more than one year. Your Responsibilities as a Private Property Owner Provided to you by: City of Modesto P.O. Box 642 Modesto, CA 95353 [PHONE REDACTED] Revised 5-20-10 ---PAGE BREAK--- Why do sewage spills happen? Sewage spills occur when the wastewater in underground pipes overflows through a manhole, cleanout, or broken pipe. Most spills are relatively small and can be stopped and cleaned up quickly, but left unattended they can cause health hazards, damage to homes and businesses, and threaten the environment, local waterways, and beaches. Common causes of sewage spills: • Grease build-up • Tree roots • Broken/cracked pipes • Missing or broken cleanout caps • Undersized sewers • Groundwater/rainwater entering the sewer system through pipe defects and illegal connections Prevent most sewage backups with a Backwater Overflow Device This type of device can help prevent sewage backups into homes and businesses. If you don’t already have a Backwater Overflow Device, contact a professional plumber or contractor to install one as soon as possible. Protect the environment! If you let sewage from your property discharge to a gutter or storm drain, you may be subject to penalties and/or out-of-pocket costs for clean-up and enforcement efforts. A property owner may be charged for costs incurred by agencies responding to spills from private properties. What to look for: Sewage spills can be a very noticeable gushing of water from a manhole or a slow water leak that may take time to be noticed. Don’t dismiss unaccounted-for wet areas. Look for: • Drain backups inside the building. • Wet ground and/or water leaking around manhole lids onto your street. • Leaking water from cleanouts or outside drains • Unusual odorous wet areas: sidewalks, external walls, ground/landscape around a building. The following are indicators of a possible obstruction in your sewer line: • Water comes up in floor drains, showers or toilets. • Toilets, showers or floor drains below ground level drain very slowly. What to do if there is a spill: Immediately notify the City of Modesto. Our crews locate the blockage and determine if it is in the public sewer; if it is the crew removes the blockage and arranges for cleanup. If the backup is in your private internal plumbing or in the private service laterals, you are required to immediately: • Control and minimize the spill by shutting off or not using the water • Keep sewage out of the storm drain system using sandbags, dirt and/or plastic sheeting • Call a plumbing professional to clear blockages and make repairs as needed. Look in the yellow pages under “Plumbing Drain & Sewer Cleaning” or “Sewer Contractors.” • Always notify your sewer/public works department or public sewer district of sewage spills. Spill cleanup inside the home: For large clean ups, a professional cleaning firm should be contacted to clean up impacted areas, You can locate local firms by looking in the Yellow Pages under “Water Damage” or “Fire Damage.” If you hire a contractor, it is recommended to get estimates from more than one company. Sometimes, homeowner’s insurance will pay for the necessary cleaning due to sewer backups. Not all policies have this coverage, so check with your agent. If you decide to clean up a small spill inside your home, protect yourself from contamination by observing the following safety measures. Those persons whose resistance to infection is compromised should not attempt this type of clean up. Other Tips: • Keep children and pets out of the affected area until cleanup has been completed. • Turn off heating/air conditioning systems • Wear rubber boots, rubber gloves, and goggles during cleanup of the affected area. • Discard items that cannot be washed and disinfected (such as: mattresses, rugs, cosmetics, baby toys, etc.) • Remove and discard drywall and insulation that has been contaminated with sewage or flood waters. • Thoroughly clean all hard surfaces (such as flooring, concrete, molding, wood and metal furniture, countertops, appliances, sinks and other plumbing fixtures) with hot water and laundry or dish detergent. • Help the drying process with fans, air conditioning units, and dehumidifiers. • After completing cleanup, wash your hands with soap and water. Use water that has been boiled for 1 minute (allow the water to cool before washing your hands.) OR use water that has been disinfected (solution of 1/8 teaspoon of household bleach per 1 gallon of water). Let it stand for 30 min. If water is cloudy, use teaspoon of household bleach per 1 gallon of water. • Wash clothes worn during cleanup in hot water and detergent (wash apart from uncontaminated clothes). • Wash clothes contaminated with sewage in hot water and detergent. Consider using a Laundromat until your onsite wastewater system has been professionally inspected and serviced. • Seek immediate attention if you become injured or ill. Spill cleanup outside the home: • Keep children and pets out of the affected area until cleanup has been completed. • Wear rubber boots, rubber gloves, and goggles during cleanup of affected area. • Clean up sewage solids (fecal material) and place in properly functioning toilet or double bag and place in garbage container. • On hard surfaces areas such as asphalt or concrete, it is safe to use a 2% bleach solutions, or cup of bleach to 5 gallons of water, but don’t allow it to reach a storm drain as the bleach can harm the environment. • After cleanup, wash hands with soap and water. Use water that has been boiled for 1 minute (allow to cool before washing your hands.) OR use water that has been disinfected (solution of 1/8 teaspoon of household bleach per 1 gallon of water). Let it stand for 30 min. If water is cloudy, use teaspoon of household bleach per 1 gallon of water. • Wash clothes worn during cleanup in hot water and detergent (wash apart from uncontaminated clothes). • Wash clothes contaminated with sewage in hot water and detergent. Consider using a Laundromat until your onsite wastewater system has been professionally inspected and serviced. • Seek immediate attention if you become injured/ill. CAUTION! When trying to locate a sewer problem, never open manholes or other public sewer structures. Only our crews are allowed to open & inspect these structures. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 1 CITY OF MODESTO TITLE OF SOP: Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells DATE ISSUED: 02/06/2009 DATE REVISED: WATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION APPROVED BY: T. Souza ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 2 INTRODUCTION: Welcome to the Storm branch of the Public Works Department of the City of Modesto. As an employee working for Wastewater Collections/Storm Drain Maintenance Branch, this S.O.P. has been created to guide you with visual aids to help you become familiar with the day to day operations when assigned to a Storm Vac-con Truck. PURPOSE: The purpose of cleaning positive storm drain catch basins, and rockwells is to protect the environment and minimize flooding during the rainy winter months, and in the event of over watering during the summer months. This helps reduce surface water on city streets and allows citizen drivers, emergency vehicles and pedestrians a safe passage. RESPONSIBLE PARTY: Cleaning is scheduled by Storm Drain Crewleader. Once it is determined what areas are in the biggest need of being cleaned, assignments are then given to the Storm Drain field crews. TABLE OF CONTENTS: Sequence Contents Page # 1 Daily Vehicle Inspection – Vaccon & Vehicle Inspection Report 2 1 Daily Vehicle Inspection – Unlocked & Secured Rear Door 3 1 Daily Vehicle Inspection – Fan Wash Out Doors, Water Level Sight Tube, Water Pump Engine 4 1 Daily Vehicle Inspection – Securing Boom, Water Handgun, Safety Lights 5 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Vehicle Preparation, Illicit Discharge/FRA 6 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Pump Controls, Washing Down Curb & Gutters 7 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Cleaning C/B or R/W, Vacuuming Debris 8 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Curb & Gutters Cleaned, Stormwater Placards, Marking Lids 9 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Opening C/B or R/W for Cleaning, Starting Vacuum Compressor, Installing Cleaning Pipes 10 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Cleaning C/B or R/W, Cleaning Cross Pipe 11 2 Cleaning Out in Field – Replacing Lids, Replacing All Equipment and Moving Onto Next Location 12 3 End Of Shift – Arriving to the dumping station, unlocking wing nut 13 3 End Of Shift – Closing handle for pressure tank, Dumping Debris, Washing out holding tank 14 3 End of Shift – Closing valve to holding tank 15 3 Troubleshooting 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 3 Vehicle Inspection: 1. The following steps will be performed before you leave the treatment plant each morning to ensure that your vehicle is in safe working condition. (See figure 1) Figure 1: Storm Vaccon truck to be inspected. 2. Inspect the vehicle using the City of Modesto, Daily Inspection Report. See Figure 2) Figure 2: Daily Vehicle Inspection Report Daily Vehicle Inspection Report Storm Vac-con Truck ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 4 3. The rear door will be unlocked and the safety wing nut will be off (See figure 3) Figure 3: Truck with rear door unlocked & no safety wing nut Note: In order to close the rear door and install the safety wing nut, you will have to start the engine of the truck. 4. Once the engine is running, close and lock the rear door and install the safety wing nut. (See figure 4) Figure 4: Rear door secured with safety wing nut installed Safety wing nut not secured Rear door secured w/safety wing nut ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 5 5. Close and lock fan wash out door (See figures 5a & 5b) 5a. Vacuum door open 5b. Fan wash out door closed 6. Check fresh water level in tank by looking at sight tube (see figure 6) Figure 6: Sight tube levels 7. Check water pump engine to make sure that it starts. (See figure 7a & 7b) 7a: Water pump engine 7b. Control panel for water pump & vacuum Fan wash out door open Switches to lock rear door & raise or lower tank Door closed Sight tube Starter switch ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 6 8. Make sure that boom is secured in transportation cradle. (See figures 8a & 8b) 8a. Boom unsecured 8b. Secured in transportation cradle 9. Make sure hand held water gun and hose are secured. (See figure 9) 9a. Water nozzle and hand gun secured onto truck 10. Make sure that arrow-board and all safety lights are working properly. (See figures 10a & 10b) 10a. Safety lights on arrow-board on 10b: Safety lights on arrow-board turned off 11. Proceed to your designated work area. Cradle Boom Latch Boom Water nozzle and hand gun ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 7 SETTING UP WORK AREA OUT IN FIELD: 1. When arriving at designated work area, make sure to put out ALL safety devices, cones, etc. turn on safety lights and put on all Personal Protective Equipment. ILLICIT DISCHARGES/FIRST RESPONDER AWARENESS: 2. Upon arriving to designated work area, you will need to check for any illicit discharges. The following steps need to be taken • If there is any discoloration, Trash & Debris, Chemical odors (such as: Smell, Burning Sensations, or Copper/Metallic Taste), or an unidentifiable hazardous material, remove yourself from the area and call 911 IMMEDIATELY. • Notify Environmental Compliance Services at the following number 209- 577-6200. • Isolate the area, so that it is completely blocked off until help arrives. • If the worksite is clear of hazards, proceed to cleaning 3. Set up vehicle for cleaning (connecting pipes and securing with clamps) 3a. Pipes to be connected to reducer cone 3b. Connecting pipe to reducer cone 3c. Connecting pipe to reducer cone 3d. Securing pipe to reducer cone PRECAUTION: When attaching tubes together make sure that vacuum is either off or at the lowest possible idle position. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 8 3e. Pipe secured to cone with clamp. 3f. Controls for water system pump control for Handgun, washout and Jetter hose. 3g. Remote pendant control 3h. Control panel for water pump & vacuum 4. Wash down curb in both directions into the catch basin. 4a. Use hand nozzle to wash down curbs 4b. Cleaning curb from both directions ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 9 4c. Curb cleaned 4d. Leaves and debris into drain 5. Proceed to cleaning the catch basin or Rockwell. 6. Use boom and nozzle to suction the leaves and debris out of Rockwell or catch basin. 6a. Suctioning leaves and debris 6b. Leaves and debris removed 7. Clean leaves and debris from catch basin/Rockwell grate. 7a. Cleaning catch basin grates 7b. Grate cleaned and replaced ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 10 7c. Catch basin and Rockwell area cleaned 8. Inspect Stormwater Placard. If placard inspection shows that the placard is damaged, missing, or illegible, fill out a “Storm Equipment Request Slip” with the following information: • Date • Call Duty Request or Routine Request (typically a routine request) • Address of placard to be replaced • Section Page and/or Map Grid • Comments, should there be any • Place a check mark in the box for “Install/Replace Curb Marker • Write your name in “Written By” field • Write your truck number down • Turn into your Storm Drain Crewleader who will then, forward to ECS for placard placement 9. Mark lids with proper paint color depending on year. 9a. Marking catch basin to be cleaned. 9b. Positive catch basin marked for recent cleaning Replace grate perpendicular to curb face Check placard for replacement ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 11 10. Open catch basin or Rockwell for cleaning. 10a. Opening catch basin with Rockwell hook 11. Engage hydro-static motor (vacuum compressor) 11a. Power transfer operator NOTE: Some trucks require vacuum switches to be turned on 12. Install cleaning pipes for Rockwells and 8” for positive storm catch basins). 12a. Install pipes into catch basins Engage vacuum compressor ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 12 13. When cleaning Rockwells you may have to vacuum the core pipe. 13a. Coring pipe 14. Cleaning the cross pipe. (Be sure to use “Tiger Tail” for this operation.) 14a. Putting straight nozzle into cross pipe 14b. Cleaning cross pipe with water 14c. Remove nozzle out of cross pipe Vacuuming core pipe Tiger Tail ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 13 15. Replace catch basin lids when finished. NOTE: Depending on the amount of dirt, you may have to deep clean the Rockwell; if that is the case, the well may need additional added rock. Fill out a Rockwell refill list by circling, either Turlock or Modesto rock and listing the address and map grid. 16. When you are finished, roll the hose up and hand gun. 17. Lower engine speed. 18. Turn off fan. 19. Disconnect pipe from reducer cone. 20. Remove reducer cone and secure it for travel. 20a: Reducer cone secured for travel. 21. Pick up all safety devices and proceed to next catch basin or Rockwell to be cleaned. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 14 END OF SHIFT: 1. Before returning to plant make sure that truck has a full tank of fuel. 2. Upon arrival to Wastewater Treatment Plant, drive truck to area for dumping debris and water in holding tank. 3. Unlock safety wing nut. 4. Yellow handle must be in down or sideways position in order to turn on water for washing out tank. Area for dumping holding tank Safety wing nut unlocked Move to down position ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 15 5. Handle must closed in order to have more pressure in tank. 6. Dumping debris, grit and rocks from holding tank. 7. Washing out holding tank. NOTE: In addition to the debris body, make sure that you wash off any mud or debris from the outside of the vehicle, clean fan housing, and make certain that the filter(s) located in the debris body are also cleaned. NOTE: Open hand gun valve before closing debris tank washout valve. Handle closed to ensure pressure ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Standard Operating Procedure Cleaning Storm Drain Catch Basins & Rockwells Created on: 02/06/2009 16 8. Close the valve, otherwise all of the remaining water will go into the debris tank. TROUBLESHOOTING: Should any issues arise, prior to leaving the plant, or while out in the field, please contact your Crewleader. ---PAGE BREAK--- NAME OF PRODUCT % and name of active ingredients Streets Division (WQC Sutter) (WQC Jennings) (Retention & Detention Basins) (Water Division Well Sites) (Jennings - Compost) (Sutter) (Streets) (Parks/Trails) (Water Department) (Lift Stations) (Basins) (Fire Department) (Police Department) (Parking/Transportation Services) FERTILIZERS 25-5-5 200.00 5,250.00 6,780.00 50.00 12,280.00 lbs X-COTE 43-0-0 200.00 4,675.00 5,700.00 50.00 10,625.00 lbs WEED-N-FEED 18-2-3 150.00 150.00 lbs LESCO 18-3-6 18% Nitrogen LESCO 12-0-0 12% Nitrogen MILOGRANITE 6-2-0 5% Nitrogen YARA VERA UREA 4600 46% Nitrogen YARA VERA 0-0-50 50% Potasium Sulfate BEST 10-4-16 10% Nitrogen SIMPLOT FERROUS SULFATE 25% Sulfate HERBICIDES TURFLON ESTER 61.6% Triclopyr AQUAMASTER 53.8% Isopropylamine Salt (1855) HARDBALL 19.6% 2,4-D, dimethylamine salt (806) SNAPSHOT 2.5TG 2% Trifluralin (597) 0.5% Isoxaben (2289) DIMENSION 270G 0.27% Dithiopyr (2308) TRANSLINE 40.9% Clopyralid PLUS 41% SPIKE 80DP 80% tebuthiuron MILESTONE VM 40.6% tri-isopropanolammonium salt FUSILADE II 24.5% Fluazifop-P-butyl ® PROSECUTOR PRO 41% of Isopropylamine salt (1855) DIMENSION 2 EW 24% Dithiopyr (2308) SEDGEHAMMER 75% Halosulfuron-methyl (3919) PENDULUM 2G 2% Pendimethalin GOAL 2XL 22.3% Oxyfluorfen 10.4% N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone SUREGARD 51% Flumioxazin ROUNDUP EXTENDED CONTROL 18% 0.73% Diquat dibromide CLETHODINE 26.4% Clethodine ROUNDUP PRO 41% Isopropylamine Salt (1855) GARLON 4 61.6% Triclopyr, Butoxyethyl Ester (2170) RANGER PRO 41% Isopropylamine Salt (1855) PROSECUTOR 36.5% Isopropylamine Salt (1855) OUST XP 75% Sulfometuron-Methyl (2149) RAZOR PRO 41% Isopropylamine Salt (1855) TRIMEC 99Z 30.56% 2,4-D, dimethylamine salt (806) 8.17% MCPP-P, dimethylamine salt (5333) 2.77% Dicamba, dimethylamine salt (849) SYNGENTA REWARD 37% Diquat dibromide LANDMARK 50% Sulfometuron methyl 25% Chlorsulfruon LESCO AQUA C PRE-M 38.70% Pendimethalin GALLERY 75 DRY FLOWABLE 75% Isoxaben (2289) FINALE 11.33% Glufosinate-ammonium (3946) GOAL TENDER 41% of Oxyfluorfen (1973) PESTICIDES (INSECTICIDES) MERIT 75 WP 75% of Imidacloprid (3849) METALDEHYDE GRANULES 3.5 3.5% Metaldehyde BANDIT 2F 21.4% Imidacloprid TENGARD 36.8% Permethrin (2008) CATALYST 18.9% Propetamphos ALLECTUS 5% Imidaclopid 2% Bifenthrin RODENTICIDES GIANT DESTROYER (gas bombs) 46.2% Sodium Nitrate 34.8% Sulfur 8.7% Charcoal P.C.Q RODENT BAIT 0.01% Diphacinone ALUMINUM PHOSPHIDE TABLETS 60% Aluminum phosphide (484) (each tablet is 3 grams) FUNGICIDES EAGLE 20EW 19.7% Myclobutanil BASF INSIGNIA 23% Pyraclostrobin DACONIL 5% Chlorothalonil SYGENTA BANNER MAX 14.3% propiconazole BAYER PROSTAR 70WDG 70% Flutolanil AMVAC PCNB 10% 10% Pentachloronitrobenzene PROPICONAZOLE 14.3 14.3% Propiconazole HERITAGE 50% ADJUVANTS CHOICE WEATHERMASTER 1,500.00 lbs lbs 26,200.00 1,500.00 gal 24.00 oz oz 400.00 oz 10.75 oz 782.00 5.50 30.00 6.60 587 00 155 00 67 00 lbs 1 845 00 1 036 00 gal oz 172.00 32.00 32.00 93.00 1,680.00 172.00 19.00 1.00 8.00 36.00 140.00 8.00 6.60 gal 30.00 gal lbs 140.00 44.00 gm 52,281.00 units oz lbs 19.00 1.00 gal 8.00 50,697.00 1,584.00 2.00 10.00 350.00 517.00 1,160.00 lbs 12.00 3,137.72 oz 1,680.00 lbs oz 350.00 1,677.00 gal 93.00 3,112.00 2,188.00 128.00 584.00 12.75 212.00 3,137.72 12.75 1,085.00 357.00 1.00 16.00 400.00 oz 3.00 1,486.00 10.75 gal 463.50 90.00 0.26 3,040.00 270.00 6.00 7.00 791.00 2,242.00 0.26 oz 59.50 46.50 26.50 47.50 6.00 19.00 364.00 875.00 3,468.00 2,357.00 6.00 gal lbs 18.00 gal oz 545.00 8.00 oz 48.00 Amount of Material Used by Department or City-Hired PCOs 2012-2013 Water Division WQC Jennings WQC Sutter Airport Urban Forestry Valley Crest Golf Course Maintenance 9.00 208.00 574.00 73.25 UOM Total 8.00 lbs 9.00 oz 5.00 18.00 gal 283.00 33.00 gal 94.75 14.00 39.00 1.50 212.50 oz 5.00 123.00 35.00 17.00 30.75 2.00 315.00 1.00 28.00 230.00 oz 6.00 gal oz 5.50 gal oz 3,040.00 48.00 lbs gm 206.00 31.00 48.00 36.75 6,102.00 6.00 1.00 3,917.00 1.00 23,040.00 464.00 42.00 37,522.00 8,954.00 103.00 14.00 88.50 gal 3,059.00 oz 118.00 92.00 1.00 gal 103.50 15.50 1.00 Horizon Landscaping RMG Pest Technology Grover Landscaping 794.00 gal 281.00 281.00 gal 794.00 2,500.00 lbs 5,200.00 26,200.00 5,200.00 lbs 2,500.00 7,400.00 lbs 21.25 21.25 gal 7,400.00 gal 5.00 60.00 21.50 48.00 5.00 gal 60.00 lbs 103.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- 50% Propionic acid ammonium salt ethoxylate phosphate ester MSO CONCENTRATE 100% Methylated vegetable oil, alcohol ethoxylate phospatidycholine REIGN 1% Polyvinyl polymer (polyacrylamide) INLET 90% blend of polyalkoxylated and non-alkoxylated aliphatics, alkanolamides, and derivatives thereof MAGNFIY 51.15% alkyl ammonium sulfate, and ammonium nitrate 139.00 726.00 oz 1,437.00 711.00 587.00 155.00 67.00 oz 1,313.00 311.00 2,115.00 oz 3,878.00 1,845.00 1,036.00 96.00 oz gal 7.50 7.50 96.00 ---PAGE BREAK--- Changes to City of Modesto Contract Language for Application of Pesticide or Fertilizer Materials Submitted to and approved by City of Modesto Purchasing Department for inclusion into contracts June 25, 2010 Original language 1.16 DISCHARGE TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM: The Contractor shall at no time permit herbicide materials to be applied in such a manner as to allow the herbicide to runoff or drift into any storm drainage system. Herbicide tanks and equipment shall not be rinsed out as to allow the herbicide to runoff or drift into any storm drainage system. Updated Language 1.16 DISCHARGE TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM: The Contractor shall at no time permit pesticide* or fertilizer materials to be applied in such a manner as to allow the pesticide or fertilizer to runoff or drift into any storm drainage system, including, but not limited to: streets, gutters, storm drain catch basins, rockwells, drainage channels, receiving waters, or any other body of water. Pesticide or fertilizer tanks and equipment shall not be rinsed out as to allow the pesticide or fertilizer to runoff or drift into any storm drainage system, including, but not limited to: streets, gutters, storm drain catch basins, rockwells, drainage channels, receiving waters, or any other body of water. (Note: Any materials to be applied within storm drain basins shall be approved for aquatic application). All City contractors shall abide by the City of Modesto Landscape Management Plan – Pesticides and Fertilizer Application in all aspects of pesticide or fertilizer usage, including storage, transportation, application, disposal, equipment maintenance, and accident & spill mitigation, as well as Integrated Pest Management (IPM) protocols. In addition, all City contractors responsible for pesticide or fertilizer application shall keep records of the following information to be submitted to the City of Modesto Environmental Compliance Section on or before July 1 of each year. The information shall include: type of product used (fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, disinfectant); brand name of product; active ingredient in product; percent of active ingredient in product; and the amount of product that was used (i.e. ounces, gallons, pounds, etc) during the period beginning July 1 through June 30th of each year. The required information shall be submitted to the City of Modesto Water Quality Control Division, Environmental Compliance Section, located at 1221 Sutter Avenue, Modesto, CA 95351. If there are any questions regarding City contractors’ reporting responsibilities, please contact the Environmental Compliance Section at (209) 577-6206. * “Pesticide” as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ---PAGE BREAK--- 6 CITY OF MODESTO June 25, 2010 ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR BID AND SPECIFICATIONS NO. 0910-24 For WEED ABATEMENT AND TRASH REMOVAL SERVICES The following web site contains the complete bid package: http://www.modestogov.com/fin/purchasing Bidders who do not have the complete bid package are encouraged to download the package from the City’s web site. This addendum addresses an additional specification and questions submitted in writing. Additional Specification DISCHARGE TO STORM DRAIN SYSTEM: The Contractor shall at no time permit pesticide* or fertilizer materials to be applied in such a manner as to allow the pesticide or fertilizer to runoff or drift into any storm drainage system, including, but not limited to: streets, gutters, storm drain catch basins, Rockwells, drainage channels, receiving waters, or any other body of water. Pesticide or fertilizer tanks and equipment shall not be rinsed out as to allow the pesticide or fertilizer to runoff or drift into any storm drainage system, including, but not limited to: streets, gutters, storm drain catch basins, Rockwells, drainage channels, receiving waters, or any other body of water. All City contractors shall abide by the City of Modesto Landscape Management Plan – Pesticides and Fertilizer Application in all aspects of pesticide or fertilizer usage, including storage, transportation, application, disposal, equipment maintenance, and accident & spill mitigation, as well as Integrated Pest Management (IPM) protocols. In addition, all City contractors responsible for pesticide or fertilizer application shall keep records of the following information to be submitted to the City of Modesto Environmental Compliance Section on or before July 1 of each year. The information shall include: type of product used (fertilizer, herbicide, pesticide, disinfectant); brand name of product; active ingredient in product; percent of active ingredient in product; and the amount of product that was used (i.e. ounces, gallons, pounds, etc) during the period beginning July 1 through June 30th of each year. The required information shall be submitted to the City of Modesto Water Quality Control Division, Environmental Compliance Section, located at 1221 Sutter Avenue, Modesto, CA 95351. If there are any questions regarding City contractors’ reporting responsibilities, please contact the Environmental Compliance Section at (209) 577-6206. * “Pesticide” as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ---PAGE BREAK--- Written Submission Q. I assume some or all of the sites specified are located in or near water. Who is responsible for NPDES permitting and PCA recommendations? Does the City take care of these or is it the responsibility of the Contractor? A. The City has a Municipal NPDES Phase I Permit. PCA recommendations are the responsibility of the Contractor. Q. Has this service ever gone out to bid before? A. Yes it has. Q. When was the last contract effective date? A. March 28, 2005. Q. What is the prior contract number? A. A05521 Q. What was the winning contractor name and the winning bid amount: A. Clark Pest Control. $71,500 – Year 1, $71,500 – Year 2, $74,975 – Year 3, $78,720 – Year 4, $82,650 – Year 5 Q. Can the City provide the bid tabulation results for the past/current contract? A. The City received only one bid response; Clark Pest Control. Q. What was the last service date? A. The last service date was in May 2010. Q. Have there been any changes to the scope of work since the last contract? A. Yes – Three basins have been added and the trash removal frequency has increased to comply with the City of Modesto’s current Stormwater Management Plan. Q. Can the City identify any sites that have been added or deleted to the scope of work since the last bid? A. Yes – the locations added to this contract include the Fairview Basin, North Pointe Basin and the Salida Blvd. Basins Fairview and North Pointe will require grubbing but little if any spraying will be necessary at these two basins. Q. Can the City supply the square footage of each site listed in the bid document? A. No – the square footage for the sites is not available. Q. I would like to know how I can become licensed and certified for this weed abatement bid, specifically in the City of Modesto and also the County if these basins are in County area? A. A company must obtain and maintain a valid business license with the City of Modesto in order to do business with the City. The basins referenced in the bid are specifically City. You will need to contact the California State Licensing Board regarding certification. Per RFB Specification, Pg 19, 1.11 Required Licenses: Prior to beginning any service that shall be furnished under this specification and proposal. The proposer shall secure the appropriate Business/Delivery license from the City of Modesto. Business/Delivery license information may be obtained by calling (209) 577-5389. ---PAGE BREAK--- If the bidder is furnishing any labor or service including installation or maintenance, the bidder shall possess the appropriate California Contractor's license(s) at the time the proposal is submitted. A contract shall not be awarded to a bidder that does not possess the appropriate Contractor's license(s). The appropriate Contractor's license(s) is that specified in this request, or if not specified, that which is otherwise required by law, and qualifies the Contractor to do business in the State of California. Q. Can mowing be substituted for grubbing? A. No. Q. There are quite a few tules in these basins. Do these need to be removed as part of the contract? A. Yes, tule growth will need to be removed to maintain storage capacity of the basins. Q. Many of the storm drains contain significant aquatic weed growth, in particular the Snyder twin basins. The growth here is extensive and comprises 50% of the area of the basins. Is removal of this vegetation considered part of the bid? A. Yes – keeping the inlet structure clear of obstructions and the growth maintained at the water line are important to maintaining effective basin operation. Q. Can the City provide a map of the storm basin locations? A. No – the City of Modesto web page has a GIS site available and bidders may utilize the information from the site to locate each basin using the addresses listed in the RFB. The website can be found at www.modestogov.com then by clicking on the GIS link. Q. Would the City consider using goats for the detention/retention basins project? A. No – the Fecal Coliform (Bacteria) levels would increase causing a violation of the City’s Stormwater NPDES Permit. Q. What is the expected expenditure? A. The annual budget for this service is $80,000/year. Q. What is the expected number of routine service requested during the year? A. Quarterly. Per RFB Specification 1.1 Scope of Work, Paragraph 3: Weed abatement and trash removal services include regularly scheduled spraying of weeds as needed, and removal of litter and debris (including disposal), on a quarterly basis. Additionally, a rodent control component of this service is provided at three storm water basins Central Basin, North Pointe and West Basin to prevent erosion by squirrels burrowing into the walls of the basins. Previous damage from rodents has resulted in costly erosion repairs to be made to the basins. Any chemicals used in the process shall be applied by a licensed and certified weed abatement Contractor. Q. Can subs be used to complete the service requested? A. Yes. Per RFB Specification 1.10 Subcontractors: The Contractor shall provide the names and location of the place of business for each subcontractor that shall perform work or labor or render service to the Contractor. All subcontractors shall be licensed by the State of California, and shall be held to the same standards as the Contractor. Q. MSDS or approved weed abatement chemicals to use? A. This information shall be provided by the bidder. ---PAGE BREAK--- All bids must be sealed and filed with the City Clerk’s office, 1010 Tenth Street, Suite 6600, Modesto, CA 95354 no later than Tuesday, July 6, 2010 at 11:00 A.M. On the outside of both the bid envelope and courier envelope the bidder shall indicate the following: NAME AND ADDRESS OF BIDDER SPECIFICATION NUMBER 0910-24 WEED ABATEMENT AND TRASH REMOVAL SERVICES BID OPENING DATE: JULY 6, 2010 AT 11:00 A.M. MAIL TO: CITY CLERK COURIER TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF MODESTO CITY OF MODESTO P.O. BOX 642 1010 10TH STREET, SUITE 6600 MODESTO, CA 95353 MODESTO, CA 95354 Bidders shall submit one “inked” (preferably blue ink) signed original bid document, plus three copies of the signed original bid document. The original bid document shall be clearly marked. Photocopies do not constitute an original bid document. FAILURE TO FURNISH ONE “INKED” SIGNED ORIGINAL BID DOCUMENT MAY RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF MODESTO August 2004 Stormwater Quality Landscape Management Plan Pesticides and Fertilizer Applications ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 1 August 2004 1.0 INTRODUCTION As a part of its normal operations, the City of Modesto manages a number of landscaped areas within public recreational areas, public rights-of-way, and municipal facilities. In order to properly manage these areas, maintain plant health and minimize pests, pesticides and fertilizers often need to be applied. Used properly, pesticides help to protect plants from potential harm due to insects, mites, plant diseases, nematodes, vertebrates (such as gophers and rats), and weeds and fertilizers provide important nutrients. Used improperly, these materials can endanger human health through exposure and/or impact surface and ground water supplies. Careless handling when applying, mixing, transporting, storing, and/or disposing of these materials can allow these chemicals to enter surface and/or groundwater through runoff and infiltration. In order to properly plan for these activities and prevent potential adverse impacts, the Federal regulations [40 CFR 122.26(d)(2)(iv)(A)(6)] and the municipal National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (Order No. R5-2003-0132) requires the City of Modesto to prepare procedures to control the application of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers in the public right-of-way and at municipal facilities. As a result, the City of Modesto has developed Landscape Management Procedures and a Landscape Maintenance Best Management Practices (BMP) Fact Sheet. The purpose of the documents is to provide standard protocols for the administration and application pesticides and fertilizers in the public right-of way or at other municipal owned/operated facilities. In addition, the Procedures also provide a framework for the development and implementation of an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program. In order to allow for coordination between the two agencies, the City has designated a Pest Control Manager within the Public Works Department who coordinates these applications with the Stanislaus County Office of Agricultural. The Office of the Agricultural Commissioner is responsible for the implementation and enforcement of all Federal, State and County regulations pertaining to pesticides and their use, storage, disposal, environmental impacts, and effects of the health and safety of pesticide users and the general public. The Procedures that have been developed are consistent with laws, management guidelines, research-based recommendations, and “management measures and practices” established by other federal, state, and local agencies and universities. They also recognize that, in order to be effective, the management of pesticides and fertilizers is a shared responsibility between the municipal and contract applicators, handlers, and management. For the purposes of these Procedures the following apply: • “Pesticides” encompass herbicides, fungicides, and various other substances used to control pests. Under United States law, a pesticide is also any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant; • Fertilizers may be referred to as “nutrients” or “soil nutrients”; • The California Food and Agriculture Code (FAC) and the California Code of Regulations, Title 3 (3 CCR), constitute most of the laws and regulations referred to in these guidelines. They are referenced often and usually referred to as the “State Laws”; • The City of Modesto employees responsible for the handling and application of the pesticides and fertilizers are referred to as “municipal staff”. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 2 August 2004 2.0 INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2.1 Approach For the last few decades, the trend in pest management has been toward a greater reliance on chemical pesticides. This approach resulted in a significant increase in the use of many pesticides as well as an increase in the number of pests that are resistant to them. In addition, some pesticides used for terrestrial pest management have been found in waterways causing additional problems in the environment. As a result, the City of Modesto is now moving away from the reliance on pesticides alone toward an integrated approach that combines limited pesticide use with more environmentally friendly pest control techniques. While this section identifies the approach that is being used to develop and implement an IPM program within the City of Modesto, the program will remain fairly dynamic over the next few years as it matures. This move away from a pesticide based landscape management program has resulted in the development and implementation of an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program that is a long-term, multi-faceted program that proactively manage pests. In general, IPM programs utilize monitoring techniques and thresholds to determine when to implement pest control tactics, which are then used according to established guidelines. Pest control materials are selected and applied in a manner that minimizes risks to human health, non-target organisms, and the environment. The IPM approach focuses on the long-term prevention and elimination of pests through a combination of techniques, including pest identification, monitoring, action thresholds, prevention, and pest control tactics (Figure 2-1). When used simultaneously, these techniques can effectively control pest populations. Figure 2-1 Integrated Pest Management Program Components Monitoring Pest Identification Pest Control Tactics Prevention Action Thresholds While the overall IPM approach is not to eliminate all pests, but rather keep their populations at tolerable levels, the IPM approach recognizes that pesticides may be utilized if pest populations ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 3 August 2004 exceed established thresholds within certain areas. In general, the pest control tactics chosen are those that are least disruptive to the biological control organisms (natural enemies), least hazardous to humans and the environment (including non-target organisms), and have the best likelihood of long-term effectiveness. Since pesticides are not applied until pests are approaching damaging levels, monitoring and early detection of pests is extremely important and is used to determine if natural enemies are present and adequately controlling the pests. For informational purposes, the key advantages and disadvantages of pesticide based and IPM based pest control programs are presented below in Table 2-1. Table 2-1 Pesticide-Based Programs Versus IPM-Based Pest Control Programs Issue Pesticide Based Pest Control IPM Based Pest Control Pesticide Use Approach solely uses pesticides. Results in more pesticides being used. Pesticides used as a last resort Pest Suppression Quick suppression. May get outbreaks of other pests after applications Long-term suppression – uses proactive techniques Natural Controls/Enemies Loss of natural controls. Pesticides do not distinguish between “good” and “bad” insects Maintains and supports the use of natural controls. Reduces disruption of natural enemies. Effect on Environment Potential contamination of water bodies from runoff Reduces potential contamination from runoff since less pesticides are used Safety Measures Safety measures necessary to protect staff, public, animals, etc. from potential exposure Less exposure to pesticides – less safety measures necessary Record Keeping Record use of pesticides Record the results of the pest identification, monitoring activities and pesticides when used Training Applicators must be properly trained in order to apply pesticides IPM managers must be trained to be able to identify pests and natural enemies Since the use of pesticides is the last resort within an IPM program, the Pesticide Management techniques are presented in Section 3. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 4 August 2004 2.2 Integrated Pest Management Components As presented in Figure 2-1, the IPM approach focuses on the long-term prevention and elimination of pests through a combination of techniques, including pest identification, monitoring, action thresholds, prevention, and pest control tactics. These IPM components are discussed in further detail below. 2.2.1 Pest Identification In order to be able to effectively manage a landscaped area, responsible municipal staff needs to be able to: • Identify the primary life stages of the common pests that are typically found; and • Be able to determine if the identified pest is actually causing the problem(s) noted. For example, if weed seedlings are identified at a site, they can be controlled before they become larger and more difficult to control or before they flower and disseminate seeds throughout the site. In addition, damage such as wilting is often attributed to root disease but can actually be caused by under watering or wind damage. Once staff identifies the pests that are at each site they can be properly monitored and managed with IPM techniques. 2.2.2 Monitoring In order to effectively control the pest(s) and assess the effectiveness of the various treatment controls, data regarding the occurrence, density, and presence of any natural enemy and pest populations are collected as a part of an ongoing monitoring program. In addition, information regarding the sensitive habitat areas and/or conditions that may limit control options is also gathered. Monitoring involves activities such as examining plants and surrounding areas, examining tools such as sticky traps for insect pests, and quantitatively or qualitatively measuring the pest population size or injury. This information is then used to determine if pest populations are increasing, decreasing, or staying the same. A systematic approach is also used when monitoring for pests. For example, when monitoring, the same section of a plant is examined instead of randomly looking at various sections of the plants (i.e. looking at the lower leaves on some plants and the upper ones on other). By using a systematic approach, the monitoring program provides more accurate data for tracking changes in the various pest population(s) or damage over time. It is also important to establish and maintain a record-keeping system in order to effectively evaluate the IPM program. Records include information such as date of examination, pests found, size and extent of the infestation, location of the infestation, control options utilized, effectiveness of the control option, labor, and material costs. Figure 2-2 includes an example of a form that may be used to record monitoring information collected in the field. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 5 August 2004 Figure 2-2 Example Form for Monitoring Pests and Control Activities Reported by: Date: Location: Initial report Follow-up Report 2nd Follow-up Report Date reported to IPM Coordinator or Supervisor: Arthropods Pest name Growth stages Host Count or estimate Damage Recommended action Weeds Pest name Growth stages Count or estimate Damage Recommended action Diseases Pest name Growth stages Host Count or estimate Damage Recommended action Comments (include labor and materials cost or used): ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 6 August 2004 2.2.3 Action Thresholds In order to determine when a pest control measure should be taken, injury levels and action thresholds are set for each pest. An injury level is the pest population size where unacceptable damage occurs. Action thresholds are the set of conditions required to trigger a control action. For some pests, treatment may be required by federal or state law. The thresholds are based on the following: a. The tolerable level of environmental, aesthetic, and economic damage as a result of the pest population(s) and the tolerable level of risk to human health as a result of the pest population(s) OR b. The size or density of the pest population that must be present to cause unacceptable environmental, aesthetic, and/or economic damage; and the size, density, and type of pest population that must be present to create a human health risk. Once the action thresholds are set, the responsible municipal staff has a mechanism for determining when pest control tactics should be employed. 2.2.4 Prevention One of the most effective pest management strategies is the implementation of preventative techniques. By reducing the capacity of the ecosystem to support target pest populations through design and appropriate management, the opportunities for pest establishment can be reduced and/or eliminated. Examples of preventative techniques that are used include the following: • Strategies that encourage the retention and planting of native vegetation as well as general reductions in the use of water, fertilizers and pesticides; • Strategies that reduce the preferred harborage, food, water, or other essential requirement of pests; • The use of weed-free materials for road and trail construction and maintenance; • Employing landscape and structural design that is appropriate to the specific habitat, climate, and maintenance that the area will receive; • Consideration of the potential impacts of pests and pre-emptive mitigation through the use of appropriate landscape design (water requirements, weed barriers, native plants etc.). When implementing the IPM program, the prevention practices are reviewed and modified as necessary at each site. If pest populations are found, the prevention practices are reviewed to determine if they are effective or if they need to be modified in order to reduce the pest incidence. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 7 August 2004 2.2.5 Pest Control Tactics IPM programs use a variety of pest control tactics in a compatible manner that minimizes adverse effects to the environment. A combination of several control tactics is usually the preferred approach since it is more effective in minimizing pest damage than any single control method used alone. The type of controls selected will vary on a case-by-case basis due to the varying site conditions. The primary pest control tactics include: • Cultural • Mechanical • Environmental/Physical • Biological • Pesticides The pest control tactics that are selected are generally the ones that will be: • Least-disruptive of natural controls; • Least-hazardous to human health; • Least-toxic to non-target organisms; • Least-damaging to the general environment; • Most likely to produce a permanent reduction in the environment’s ability to support target pests; and • Cost-effective in the short- and long-term. The various tactics that are considered and used are discussed in further detail below. 2.2.5.1 Cultural Cultural controls are modifications of normal plant care activities that reduce or prevent pests due to the enhancement of desired conditions. Examples of the cultural controls that are considered and used include the following: • Selection and placement of materials that provide life-support mechanisms for pest enemies and competitors; • Retention and/or planting of native vegetation ; • Modification of pest habitat by reducing pest harborage, food supply, and other life support requirements; • Management of vegetation including irrigation, mulching, fertilization, aeration, seeding, pruning, and thinning; • Management of waste and proper storage of food; and • Installation of barriers and traps For example, spider mite infestations are worse on water-stressed plants, over-fertilization may cause succulent growth which then encourages aphids and too low of a mowing height may thin turf and allow weeds to become established. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 8 August 2004 2.2.5.2 Mechanical Mechanical controls involve the use of physical methods and machinery to reduce or eliminate pest problems. Examples of mechanical controls that are considered and used include the following: • Mowing or weed-whipping; • Burning; • Hand weeding; • Hand-removal of insect egg masses; and • Installation of physical barriers such as textured mulches or geotextiles. Examples include hand-pulling or hoeing and applying mulch to control weeds, using trap boards for snails and slugs, and the use of traps for gophers. 2.2.5.3 Environmental/Physical The use of environmental/physical manipulations that indirectly control or prevent pests by altering temperature, light, and humidity can be effective in controlling pests. Although in outdoor situations these tactics are difficult to use for most pests, they can be effective in controlling birds and mammals if their habitat can be modified such that they do not choose to live or roost in the area. Examples of environmental/physical controls that are considered and used include the following: • Removing garbage in a timely manner; and • Using netting or wire to prevent birds from roosting 2.2.5.4 Biological Biological control practices use living organisms to reduce pest populations. These organisms are often also referred to as natural enemies or biocontrols. They act to keep pest populations low enough to prevent significant economic damage. Biocontrols include pathogens, parasites, predators, competitive species, and antagonistic organisms. Beneficial organisms can occur naturally or can be purchased and released. The most common organisms used for biological control in landscape management include predators, parasites, pathogens and herbivores. • Predators are organisms that eat their prey (e.g. Green Lace Wings, Ladybugs, Praying Mantis). • Parasites spend part or all of their life cycle associated with their host. Common parasites lay their eggs in or on their host and then the eggs hatch, the larvae feed on the host, killing it (e.g. Tiny sting less wasps for aphids and whiteflies). • Pathogens are microscopic organisms, such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi that cause diseases in pest insects, mites, nematodes, or weeds (e.g. Bacillus thuringiensis or BT). ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 9 August 2004 • Herbivores are insects or animals that feed on plants. These are effective for weed control. Biocontrols for weeds eat seeds, leaves, or tunnel into plant stems (e.g. goats and some seed and stem borers). In order to conserve naturally occurring predators, broad-spectrum pesticides are not used since the use of these types of pesticides may result in secondary pest outbreak due to the mortality of natural enemies that may be keeping other pests under control (Figure 2-3). Figure 2-3 Example of Secondary Pest Outbreak Caused By Use of a Broad Spectrum Insecticide Aphids and mites controlled by predators After a broad spectrum spray for aphids, predators for mites and aphids are also killed, resulting in an outbreak of mites In order to support the use of biological controls, the IPM program • Conserves and augments the pest’s natural enemies; • Introduces host-specific enemy organisms; and • Encourages the preservation and planting of native vegetation . 2.2.5.5 Pesticides Pesticides should only be used when other methods fail to provide adequate control of pests and their populations reach an action threshold. Overuse of pesticides can cause beneficial organisms to be killed and/or allow a pest resistance to develop. When pesticides must be used, some of the considerations include the following: • Selecting the least toxic pesticide (avoid copper-based pesticides); • Avoiding pesticides that are broad-spectrum and relatively persistent in the environment; and • Consideration of the proximity to watercourses, irrigation schedules, weather conditions (wind or rain). The specific protocols that are followed when applying pesticides are discussed in further detail within Section 3. You can also access a host of information at the UC Davis web page on Integrated Pest Management at the following address. http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/ Mite Aphid predator ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 10 August 2004 3.0 PESTICIDE MANAGEMENT A pesticide is any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, or repelling any pest. A pest can be any unwanted insect, rodent or other animal, nematode, plant, fungus, virus, or bacteria. “Pesticides” include herbicides, insecticides, fungicides and rodenticides. Used incorrectly or carelessly pesticides can adversely impact human health and/or the environment. Heightened public awareness about pesticides and their use has created an increased concern that they be used correctly and safely. Although safety concerns and the cost of complying with additional regulations have encouraged the City to reduce the use of pesticides, protocols regarding their proper use, handling, and storage are still necessary since some pesticides are still used. Evidence of this was demonstrated by the City of Modesto Stormwater Program, which identified diazinon as a constituent of concern with chlorpyrofos, and malathion as potential constituents of concern based on results of its monitoring program. The first step in developing a control strategy for any constituent is to define the issue. Modesto identified pesticides as an issue by evaluating Stormwater and receiving water monitoring results and by assessing pesticide use in the Modesto area based on records available fro the Department Pesticide Regulation (DPR). 3.1 Groundwater and Surface Water Protection The main factors that determine the rate at which pesticides enter groundwater and surface water include chemical mobility, solubility, persistence and soil type. Regardless of the category of pesticide being used, pesticide advisors should always be aware of the compatibility of the pesticide with the characteristics of the site of application (soil type, slope, proximity to a water body, vegetation) before recommending pesticides for a specific area. For example, recommended Surflan rates vary according to the amount of organic matter in the soil and pesticides that decompose rapidly may be preferred under certain conditions. However, it should be noted that if a less toxic pesticide is chosen, but then applied two or three times as often, it may not make sense from a transportation and application risk standpoint to choose the pesticide. Furthermore, because the effect of these uses is not always immediately apparent, the City periodically tests areas where frequent pesticide applications occur and the area is identified as particularly vulnerable to contamination or deterioration. Pesticide Wise (http://www.pw.ucr.edu/WQ_Homep.asp) is an informational database that can be utilized in order to determine various properties of pesticides and their potential threat to water quality. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 11 August 2004 3.1.1 Pesticide Use in Aquatic Environments On March 12, 2001, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that discharges of pollutants from the use of aquatic pesticides to waters of the United States require coverage under an NPDES permit (Headwaters, Inc. v. Talent Irrigation). As a result, the State Water Resources Control Board adopted an interim Statewide General NPDES permit, Order No. 2001-12-DWQ on an emergency basis. The General Permit covers the use of properly registered and applied aquatic pesticides that constitute discharges of “pollutants” to waters of the United States. The aquatic pesticides that are covered by the Permit are those that are applied directly into watercourses and/or directly to organisms in the water or on the water surface with the purpose and intent of killing the target aquatic organisms. The basic requirements of the General Permit state that dischargers must: 1. Comply with all pesticide label instructions, Department of Pesticide Regulation and Department of Health and Safety regulations, and any Use Permits issued by the local Agricultural Commissioner; 2. Identify and implement BMPs; and 3. Comply with the monitoring requirements. Prior to applying any aquatic pesticides, staff must ensure that the pesticides are applied in accordance with the General Permit. The General Permit is available at the following link: Although the permit expiration date was January 31, 2004, the permit is extended until a revised General Permit is adopted in mid to late 2004. Once the revised General Permit is adopted, the City will review and revise their procedures as necessary. 3.2 Pesticide Labels The labels that are provided by the manufacturer for each pesticide are the primary source of information for the use of that pesticide. Whenever a pesticide is going to be used by municipal staff, they must read the label instructions and requirements. If staff does not understand the label, he or she cannot handle or apply the pesticide until the information is explained and understood. The label must appear on the container and include, in prominent, bold type, the appropriate signal words according to its toxicity classification: Danger or Poison, Warning, or Caution. If the pesticide is transferred to another container, a copy of the label is transferred with it. Figure 3-1 depicts a portion of a typical pesticide label. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 12 August 2004 Figure 3-1 Sample Pesticide Label The section of the label entitled ‘Precautionary Statements’ immediately after the list of ingredients, information on the environmental hazards associated with use of the pesticide, such as toxicity to wildlife and aquatic organisms. Particular attention is given to the application of ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 13 August 2004 pesticides near surface waters or inlets to surface waters, especially if the hazard is listed on the label. Municipal staff should never handle a container that does not have a label attached and the supervisor in charge should be immediately advised of the situation. If a label is badly damaged and cannot be read, the supervisor must replace it. The labels are also reviewed from time to time to ensure that any changes that may have been made are noted and communicated to staff. 3.3 Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) In maintaining compliance with California Proposition 65, municipal staff using pesticides must have the Material Safety Data Sheets for each chemical they are using readily available. Although the MSDS is a form that may vary in appearance for different chemicals, the information is the same, as required by law. Similar to the chemical labels, these sheets contain information necessary to handle each chemical safely and all responsible municipal staff should be familiar with the information. MSDS sheets include chemical identifications, hazardous ingredients, physical data, fire and explosion data, health hazards, reactivity data, spill or leak cleanup procedures, special protection and special precautions. are kept in a notebook or file in a location where they can be readily accessible. 3.4 Certification, Licensing and Permitting The general guidelines that are followed for pesticide applicator certification, licensing and permitting include the following: • Recommendations to use each chemical by a certified Pest Control Advisor (PCA). • All pesticides shall be applied by certified pest control applicators or employees closely supervised by certified employees. To receive a Qualified Applicators Certificate, a person must take a test administered by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. To obtain test materials, test schedules, and an application, see http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/license/liccert.htm. • In cases where state law requires supervision of pesticide applications, supervision is handled by a state-licensed or certified pesticide applicator. For all other pesticide applications, staff with equivalent training may handle supervision. • Pesticides listed as "restricted" in the State of California may only be used under a restricted materials permit (3CCR, Section 6142) issued by the Stanislaus County Agricultural Commissioner. This permit must be renewed annually. • All other guidelines concerning permits, licensing and certification requirements to be followed before pesticide application are detailed in FAC, Sections 12971-12988 and 3CCR, Sections 6500-6636. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 14 August 2004 • If contractors are used for pest control, these guidelines are provided to them so that they follow the same protocols as municipal staff. In addition to the certification and licensing, responsible municipal staff is provided with training so that they have a general knowledge of: • The information on the chemical label and the MSDS before using or handling pesticides; • The immediate and long-term health hazards posed by chemicals used, the common of chemical poisoning and the ways poisoning could occur; and • The safe work practices to be followed, including the appropriate protective clothing, equipment, mixing, transportation, storage, disposal rates, spill cleanup and first aid procedures that apply to the specific chemicals being used. In addition to the training and annual continuing education (CEU’s) required for licensing and certification as specified in 3CCR, Section 6511, applicators are encouraged to participate in training and continuing pesticide education programs whenever available. 3.5 Pesticide Application 3.5.1 Planning As a part of the overall management of program, the municipal staff ensure that several planning activities and implemented and maintained. These activities include the following: • Only pesticides approved for use by the designated Pest Control Advisor (PCA) may be used; • A complete list of the pesticides and their uses is maintained. This includes the pesticide name, amount in storage, dates, use site, and rate of applications and pests controlled with each application (3CCR, Section 6624 – unless exempt under FAC, Section 11408); • All relevant label and MSDS information for each pesticide is updated and readily available to staff handling the materials; • The pesticides that are used are periodically reviewed in order to determine if other alternatives may be implemented in lieu of the pesticide applications; and • All pesticides applied in aquatic environments should be applied in accordance to Section 3.1.1 Pesticide Use in Aquatic Environments and comply with the Statewide General Permit, Order Number 2001-12-DWQ. 3.5.2 Safety and Protection Prior to applying pesticides, the following steps and precautions are taken to protect staff safety and health: ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 15 August 2004 • Before responsible municipal staff come in contact with pesticides they are trained about the specific pesticides being used, including how to properly handle them, the dangers involved in their use, and proper training and safety procedures of the pesticides; • Proper personal protective equipment (PPE) is available and used by the municipal staff when applying or cleaning pesticide equipment. This includes eye protection, gloves, respiratory gear and impervious chemical resistant full-body clothing when called for by the pesticide label. Respiratory equipment use requires special training, care, mask fitting, records of use and often-medical exam for preexisting respiratory problems. The staff also wash his/her hands thoroughly after each application prior to eating, smoking or rest room visits even though gloves are worn; • Even when not required to wear respiratory gear or masks, staff avoid inhaling the pesticide when dealing with spray or dust applications of pesticides; • Staff avoids working alone, especially at night. If it is necessary to work alone at night, the staff is in contact with a supervisor via a phone or radio; and • State laws regarding re-entry into areas that have recently been treated with pesticides are followed (3CCR, Section 6770). For the most part, pesticides used for landscape and turf pest control allow entry after the product has dried. Nevertheless, treated areas are blocked off, warning signs posted or otherwise isolated until re-entry is allowed in order to reduce human exposure to the pesticide. 3.5.3 Storage The following protocols are followed when storing pesticides: • No banned or unregistered pesticides are stored; • Inspections of storage facilities are to be done annually, City of Modesto NPDES Permit but more frequently would be preferable to ensure container integrity. • Emergency telephone numbers posted in a visible location. • Pesticides are purchased in the quantities necessary and are not stockpiled (maximum storage time is six months to one year); • Pesticides are stored indoors, in covered areas with cement floors and good ventilation or in areas with secondary containment. Storage area should provide adequate lighting when possible. • The storage areas are clearly marked according to state standards and securely locked when not in use; • Signs are posted around the storage areas where containers that hold, or have held pesticides that are required to be labeled with "Warning" or "Danger", or, at a minimum, “Caution Pesticides”. Each sign is readable at a distance of 25 feet and contains the following statement: DANGER POISON STORAGE AREA ALL UNAUTHORIZED PERSONS KEEP OUT KEEP DOOR LOCKED WHEN NOT IN USE ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 16 August 2004 If it is reasonably anticipated that persons who do not understand the English language will have access to the enclosure, then the signs are also in a language other than English; • Labels on the pesticide containers being stored or used are kept in good condition; and • The storage area, equipment and containers are inspected frequently for leaks or defects. Containers are also inspected before storing them at the end of the day. 3.5.4 Transportation The following protocols are followed to ensure that municipal staff utilizes safe transportation methods when traveling to and from worksites: • The pesticide containers are sealed and secured from tipping or excess jarring; • The pesticide transportation compartments on vehicles are isolated from the compartment carrying people, food and clothing are securely locked; • Under no circumstance is a pesticide placed or kept in any container of a type commonly used for food, drink or household products; • Only the amount of pesticide needed for the day is transported to the site. If the pesticide is transferred to another container, a copy of the label or a service label is attached; • Appropriate pesticide labels and MSDS sheets, a spill cleanup kit, and a first aid kit are brought along when transporting pesticides. Additionally, the location of an emergency medical care center is known; and • All vehicles used for pesticide transportation include radio or cellular communications for contacting help in case of a spill or some other emergency. 3.5.5 Application Protocols The following steps are taken when applying pesticides: • No banned or unregistered pesticides are applied; • Apply pesticides only under the supervision of a California qualified pesticide applicator. • When selecting pesticides for application, the following factors are considered: i. Avoid the use of copper-based pesticides; ii. Pesticides that are broad-spectrum and relatively persistent are avoided since they are likely to cause the most environmental damage and increase pesticide resistance; iii. The type, methods, and timing of application are determined after consideration has been given to protection of non-target organisms (including threatened or endangered species), protection of water quality, pest biology, soil types, anticipated adverse weather (winds, precipitation, etc.), and temperature; iv. The initial review of potential pesticides begins with the least toxic compounds (i.e. EPA Toxicity Categories III and IV). The use of compounds in EPA Toxicity Categories I and II are avoided if possible or used in situations where exposure to the active ingredient is limited (i.e. baits or soil/trunk injections); and v. If the only effective or practical control is an EPA Toxicity Category I or II compound, a state-licensed pest control adviser (PCA) reviews the decision- making process and provides a recommendation; ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 17 August 2004 vi. Any agricultural application requires a PCA review and approval. If there is a structural or industrial application additional licenses maybe needed. Reports for “Use” or “Intent to Apply” are forwarded to the Stanislaus County Agricultural Comissioner who locally enforces rules and regulations of pesticide use. • Apply pesticides only when wind speeds are low (less than 7 mph). No pesticide applications are made or continued when wind drift or runoff result in: i. A reasonable possibility of the pesticide contacting the body or clothing of persons not involved in the application process; ii. A reasonable possibility of damage to non-target crops, animals, or other public or private property; or iii. A reasonable possibility of contamination of non-target public or private property; • The pesticide label, which must be attached to the container, contains information regarding how to safely use the product. The responsible municipal staff read the label and follows the application instructions. Special attention is given to the list of pests that the pesticide will control to ensure that the correct chemical is being used for the application. In essence, the label is the law; • When a range of rates is given on the pesticide label, the lowest rate is used unless there are circumstances that warrant using a higher rate. These circumstances are provided for on the label; • Prepare the minimum amount of pesticide that is needed for the job and use the lowest rate that will effectively control the pest. Do not mix or prepare the pesticide near storm drains or watercourses. When mixing pesticides, ensure that the proper protective equipment is worn; • Pesticides are not applied immediately before, during, or after a rain event, when water is flowing off the area to be applied, or when fog is present (for spray application only). ; • Employ techniques to minimize off-target application (spray drift) of pesticides, including consideration of alternative application techniques; • Pesticides are not applied if there is a high chance of movement into watercourses; for example, they aren’t applied near wetlands, streams, lakes, ponds or storm drains unless it is for an approved maintenance activity; • Pesticide applications on public property, which take place on school grounds, parks, or other public rights-of-way where public exposure is possible, are posted with warning signs. The specific criteria for the signage can be found in FAC, Section 12978; and • Equipment is cleaned at the end of the day’s applications. The equipment is not rinsed in an area where the wash water can contaminate surface or groundwater. Staff doing the cleaning should wear the same safety equipment as required on the pesticide label (e.g. eye protection, gloves). Rinse water alternately should be applied to the commodity being sprayed or treated. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 18 August 2004 3.5.6 Disposal The following protocols are followed when disposing of pesticides and their containers: • Pesticide containers are triple-rinsed before disposal and the rinse water used as product. Particular information on the proper disposal of the pesticide and its container can be found on the label; • Cleaned containers are sent back to the manufacturer for recycling whenever possible. However, once triple-rinsed most haulers can take them to a landfill; and • Disposal of concentrated or diluted pesticides is a last resort. Concentrated pesticides should be kept until used. If the department cannot use a pesticide for its intended purpose an attempt is made to return it to the supplier. • Surplus or out-of-date pesticides are either given to the San Joaquin County Agricultural Department or a licensed hazardous waste hauler for disposal. 3.5.7 Equipment Maintenance The following protocols are followed when maintaining equipment that is used for pesticide application: • All equipment that is used for the handling of pesticides is inspected and cleaned by municipal staff before each use to ensure that there are no problems that could lead to chemical leaks, spills or accidents during the day's work; • The calibration of equipment is routinely completed to ensure that the proper amount of pesticide is applied. Clean water should be used for this process. The maintenance of application rates within label recommendations reduces the risk of surface and ground water contamination; and • The equipment is never cleaned or rinsed in the vicinity of storm drains or other open water areas. Rinse water should be returned to the target crop or commodity whenever possible. 3.5.8 Accident and Spill Mitigation The following protocols are followed when mitigating an accident or spill that involves a pesticide: • Unless their safety is compromised, municipal staff must immediately clean up any spills according to label instructions and notify the appropriate supervisors and agencies. If feasible and safe to do so, the material should be cleaned up using a dry technique (such as sweeping) or with the proper material from a clean up kit. Materials should never be washed down; • All staff handling pesticides are trained so that they are familiar with the accident mitigation information that is included on pesticide labels and MSDS sheets; • In the event of a pesticide spill of one or more pounds (approximately one pint), call 911 Emergency. The City of Modesto Fire Department will respond and, if necessary, will contact Engine 23 Hazardous Material Response Team. Additionally, the Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources, and the City of Modesto Water Quality ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 19 August 2004 Division Environmental Compliance Section should be notified of a pesticide spilled into the wastewater system, storm drain or any waterway. • Spill cleanup kits are available in pesticide storage areas, on vehicles used to transport pesticides and on location where the pesticides are being applied. Although these kits may vary in what they contain, it is important to observe the MSDS label to determine the necessary equipment and ensure vehicles are equipped with the necessary items, they typically include the following: • Written spill-control procedures • A five gallon drum with sealable lid • A dust pan and broom • A squeegee • A shovel • Protective goggles, gloves, boots, coveralls • A tarp (for covering dry spills) • Detergent and water (check label or MSDS for proper use) • Barricade tape, florescent traffic safety cones or string to cordon off an area • Large sponges, containment booms or other absorbent material; and • First aid and eye flushing material. • Since the spilled pesticides must be prevented from entering the local surface and/or groundwater supplies, the general steps that are outlined in Figure 3-2 are followed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 20 August 2004 Figure 3-2 General Steps to Follow in Case of a Spill NOTIFY the supervisor in charge who should, in turn, notify the proper authorities. If contact cannot be made, dial 911. EVALUATE the accident and quickly determine the most immediate concerns (medical and/or environmental). ISOLATE the area with fluorescent traffic safety cones, ropes or other cordon device to be sure that no one walks, wanders or drives through the spill area. EVALUATE any damage that may have occurred resulting from the spill (property, health, and equipment damage) and make notes on all relevant details and circumstances before leaving the scene. PREPARE A COMPLETE REPORT detailing the incident immediately after leaving the scene upon returning to the work place and submit it to the immediate supervisor. CONTAIN OR CONTROL the spill. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 21 August 2004 3.5.9 Emergency Medical Care Accident situations requiring emergency medical care are likely to involve acute exposure to potentially toxic chemicals. Instructions for handling these exposures appear on the pesticide label. In order to prevent exposures, municipal staff that handle pesticides are trained so that they are aware of: • The of acute exposures for each pesticide being used; and • The label recommendations for dealing with acute exposures and the nearest medical facility where emergency care is available. In the event of a pesticide spill resulting in any injury or illness to an employee, or member of the public, ensure that the injured party is taken to the designated primary care provider. Employee’s that exhibit, or complain of sickness prior to commencing work, should be prohibited from applying pesticides until the subside. There are many of pesticide exposure and could be mistaken for common illnesses such as nausea or vomiting. 4.0 FERTILIZER MANAGEMENT Fertilizers are nutrients that are applied to soil or plants to promote plant growth or health. The fertilizers that are commonly used in landscapes contain: • Nitrogen • Phosphorus and • Potassium Soluble forms of nitrogen and phosphorus can leach through soils or move off-site into surface runoff, which can then cause algal blooms or eutrophication within the local watercourses. Fertilizers also play an important role in promoting plant growth, which protects soil from erosion and enhances landscape aesthetics. Because of the necessity for soil nutrients and the potential for adverse effects on local waterways due to the loss of these nutrients through runoff and leaching, management guidelines and protocols are necessary to reduce the loss of fertilizers into watercourses. Unlike pesticides, fertilizer use is not regulated under state and federal law, since its use does not pose an immediate danger to public health and safety. However, it is well known that the misuse of fertilizers can pose a risk to the environment. As a result, various organizations have developed management guidelines for fertilizer use on specific crops. The California Plant Health Association (http://www.cpha.net) maintains a listing of fertilizer manufacturers, distributors, and associations that provide technical information on the proper use of fertilizer on their web site. 4.1 Nutrient and Soil Assessments Soluble fertilizers can easily leach through the soil and potentially contaminate groundwater following excess irrigation, after heavy rains or where the water table is high. Generally, the ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 22 August 2004 most significant loss of fertilizer is from nitrate-nitrogen, but there is evidence that phosphorus leaching can be significant in soils that have received regular applications of soluble phosphorus. For this reason, foliar and/or soil analyses are utilized whenever possible to assist in the determination of the nutrient status of plants and the soil where they are growing. Nutrient testing is an important management tool for determining baseline nutrient levels and to verify application timing and rates. Although soil testing is usually done on newly developed sites, established sites can benefit from this type of testing as well. Soil testing also provides valuable information on chemical and physical properties of the soil which affects the availability of nutrients. The range of nutrient availability as pH of the soil increases or decreases is illustrated in Figure 4-1. Nutrient analyses are often accompanied with an interpretation and recommendation from the testing laboratory in order to assist the applicator in choosing the proper type and rate of fertilizer. Fertilizer recommendations should be based on the type of plant material (i.e. mature trees versus groundcover), the growth stage, overall health of the plant, and the current nutrient status of the soil. If a reliable soil analyst is not already known, the California Landscape Contractors Association (CLCA) or a Certified Crop Adviser (CCA) can verify fertilizer application rates. Figure 4.1 Effect of pH on Plant Nutrient Availability Source: California Master Gardener Handbook 2002, p. 54 (Dennis Pittenger, Editor). ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 23 August 2004 4.2 Fertilizer Types Many types of fertilizers contain pesticides, both pre and post emergent herbicides including insect and fungus control chemicals. The common types of fertilizers used include and organic. These are both discussed in additional detail below. • Inorganic and Fertilizers The most widely used fertilizers are inorganics characterized as being relatively low in cost, easy to apply, and quick releasing. However, overuse of inorganic fertilizers can result in increased soil salinity and the need to leach soils to avoid salt damage to plants (i.e. leaf burn). Inorganic fertilizers are also available as slow-release fertilizers, but at a much higher cost. The main advantage in using slow-release fertilizers is their ability to provide nitrogen to the root zone at rates that more closely match the growth of the plant, thereby minimizing the amount of nitrogen available for leaching below the root zone. One disadvantage is their use on steep slopes, where broadcast fertilizer prills (capsules) may easily become mobile during irrigation and storm events. • Organic Fertilizers Manures and organic concentrates such as blood and fishmeal are considered organic fertilizers and offer the advantage of releasing nitrogen at a slower rate. A significant advantage to the use of organic fertilizers is that many of them are also classified as soil amendments due to their effect on the soil’s physical properties. Disadvantages include high salt content, presence of weed seeds, varying nutrient content, and a higher cost per pound than inorganic fertilizers rendering them cost ineffective for municipal use. Prior to choosing the type of fertilizer for the application, the following are taken into consideration: 1. Ability of the plant material to uptake and utilize nitrogen (soil temperature, growth rate); 2. Leaching requirements due to soil salinity; 3. Severity of slope and potential for runoff to carry fertilizer; 4. Proximity to storm drains or non-permeable hard surfaces; 5. Receiving water impairments; and 6. Type of irrigation and scheduling. 4.3 Fertilizer Application Methods Since every application has its own circumstances and variables, there are a variety of different methods for applying fertilizers however, the most common methods include the following: • Banding; • Side dressing; • Foliar Fertilization; and • Broadcast Application. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 24 August 2004 Each of these types of applications is described in further detail below. Regardless of which type of application method is chosen, the method should strive to deliver nutrients to the location where maximum plant uptake and utilization occurs. Proper calibration of application equipment insures that the fertilizer is delivered at the recommended rate and record keeping for the amount applied, the location of the application, and the frequency of the application will assist in tracking fertilizer use and refining application timing and rates. • Banding of Fertilizer This method involves physically working small amounts of fertilizer into the soil in a band beneath and/or around the sides of a plant. It allows new roots to efficiently use the nutrients and minimizes potential nutrient loss to surface runoff. Banding is particularly useful for new plantings, however, given the labor involved, banding may not be practical for some fertilizer applications. • Sidedressing Similar to the banding method of fertilizer application, sidedressing involves the placement of dry fertilizer in a band directly next to actively growing plants. Sidedressing is particularly effective for applying fertilizer to established plantings during critical growth stages. Although this method is labor intensive, it delivers nutrients directly to growing roots and minimizes the potential for fertilizer move in surface runoff. • Foliar Fertilization This type of application refers to fertilizer that is applied in liquid form directly to the leaves and stems. However, runoff problems may occur where the spray is allowed to drip off the leaves onto the ground or irrigation and rainfall occur immediately after the application. This method can reduce nutrient leaching into the soil when applied correctly and can often be performed at the same time as pesticide applications to avoid spraying twice (if this is done, it is important to check that the materials are compatible for spraying). In this case, the guidelines for pesticide applications must also apply and the pesticide label checked for appropriateness of this method. • Broadcast Application The most common method utilized is the application of dry or liquid fertilizer uniformly spread over the soil surface. This is often done mechanically with one of the following methods: Drop Spreader – The simplest of mechanical applicators, the drop spreader, is commonly mounted on wheels and pushed by hand or pulled by vehicle to drop granular fertilizer out of the hopper. The use of a drop spreader in that situation reduces the potential for off-target application of fertilizers. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 25 August 2004 Rotary Spreaders and Belly Grinders – generally operate by “throwing” fertilizer in front of the spreader. This type of spreader should not be utilized to fertilize vegetation adjacent to hardscapes, such as streets and sidewalks. Spray Booms – for liquid fertilization. As with the use a rotary spreader, this method does not offer much control over fertilizer drift in adverse weather conditions and care should be taken to avoid spreading fertilizer onto impermeable surfaces such as sidewalks and driveways. Spinning Disks – mounted on a moving vehicle in a manner allowing for the throwing of dry fertilizer into the air. As with the use a rotary spreader, this method does not offer much control over fertilizer drift in adverse weather conditions and care should be taken to avoid spreading fertilizer onto impermeable surfaces such as sidewalks and driveways. A summary of the major advantages and disadvantages of each application method is provided in Table 4-1. Table 4-1 Advantages and Disadvantages of Common Fertilizer Application Methods Fertilizer Application Methods Advantages Disadvantages Banding Nutrients placed directly near roots. Minimizes nutrient loss in surface runoff. Labor intensive. Generally only utilized for new plantings. Sidedressing Efficient application of nutrients to growing roots in established plantings. Labor intensive Foliar Reduces leaching potential of nutrients below the root zone. May be applied with pesticides under certain circumstances. High potential for nutrients to be washed from plant surfaces during irrigation. Adverse conditions such as wind may cause drift on to hard surfaces. Broadcast Drop Spreader Off-target application is minimized. Coverage of large areas is time consuming. Rotary Spreader or Belly Grinder Ease of application. Covers large areas quickly and provides access to difficult areas. Off-target application of fertilizers to hard surfaces is common. Spray Booms Useful for foliar applications over large areas. Potential for drift under adverse weather conditions. Spinning Disks Allows for fertilizer applications over large areas quickly and easily. Off-target application to hard surfaces is common. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 26 August 2004 4.4 Storage and Handling Although fertilizers do not present a hazard when stored and handled properly, municipal staff should be aware that some fertilizers have properties that can result in dangerous chemical reactions if mixed with other substances or under unusual circumstances. For example, a dehumidifier may be necessary for storage areas where sensitive fertilizers are stored such as ammonium nitrate. Problems can also be minimized by only purchasing those quantities that will be used in the immediate future instead of storing materials for long periods. In most cases, dry fertilizers are safe to store, transport, and handle. However, because some fertilizers have unique and potentially dangerous properties these types of fertilizers must be handled carefully. Since fertilizers in liquid form are potentially more hazardous than dry fertilizers, staff need to be aware of the specific properties of each liquid fertilizer in use, including corrosiveness and tolerable temperature and pressure ranges. In addition, protective equipment may be necessary for staff handling these types of fertilizers. Fertilizers suppliers should be consulted for recommending the safest handling and storage procedures for specific liquid fertilizers. The specific protocols for storing and handling fertilizers are detailed below: • Fertilizers are stored indoors, in covered areas with cement floors or in areas with secondary containment. Concrete structures are preferred for storage facilities due to the corrosive nature of most fertilizers; • The storage area, equipment and containers are inspected frequently for leaks or defects. Containers are also inspected before storing them at the end of the day; • Fertilizers are stored in a cool dry facility. A dehumidifier may be necessary, especially for sensitive fertilizers like ammonium nitrate; • Different fertilizers are stored separately to avoid cross-contamination; • Staff use protective equipment when handling fertilizers (sulfuric or phosphoric acid); • Fertilizers are kept away from open flames; • Empty fertilizer bags are disposed of properly; • Fertilizers are not mixed or prepared near storm drains or water bodies; • If a spill occurs, fertilizers are swept up and contaminated material disposed of properly. Spills are not washed with water; • The quantity of fertilizer purchased is minimized to avoid storing materials for long periods; and • Fertilizers are securely covered in the vehicles before being transported to application sites to avoid spillage or loss during transport. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 27 August 2004 4.5 Application Rates, Timing, and Protocols The amount of fertilizer needed for applications depends on a number of factors including: • The rooting characteristics of the vegetation (turf, shrubs, and trees); • The growth stage of the plant i.e. after leaf emergence; • The ability of the plant to uptake the nutrients from the soil (temperature, moisture, soil permeability, pH of the soil, salinity, etc.); • The current nutrient content of the soil; • Additional sources of nutrients (i.e. composts, reclaimed water, atmospheric deposition); • Potential for loss of nutrients by leaching; • The method of irrigation; and • The chemical properties of fertilizer being applied. • Age of new plantings. The application of fertilizers coincides with the growth stage requirements of the plant. For mixed plantings having different growth stages, fertilizer applications are divided into several applications targeting each of the growth stages. Fertilizers are only applied according to the amounts and at the time intervals recommended by the manufacturer or a qualified specialist for fertilizer applications. The protocols that are followed when applying and transporting fertilizers include the following: • Fertilizers are not applied immediately before, during, or after a rain event, when water is flowing off the area to be applied, or when fog is present (for spray application only); • Use slow release fertilizers whenever possible. Slow release fertilizers are not used if there are low soil temperatures since this decreases the release of nitrogen; • Periodically test soils for determining proper fertilizer use. • If highly soluble nitrogen fertilizers are used, smaller amounts of the fertilizer is applied on a more frequent basis; • Where possible, fertilizers are incorporated directly into the soil around the plant; • When fertilizers must be watered in the soil, the watering occurs with light irrigation just after the application; • Irrigation application rates and schedules are adjusted to minimize surface runoff, especially immediately following the application of a fertilizer; • Fertilizer spills are cleaned up using dry methods such as sweeping up the material; • Fertilizer storage facilities are covered and have an impermeable foundation so that potential spills cannot runoff into surface water or leach into groundwater systems; and • Fertilizers are securely covered in the vehicle before being transported. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 28 August 2004 References Literature California Department of Food and Agriculture, Nitrate Working Group. Nitrate and Agriculture in California 1989. California Department of Food and Agriculture, Pesticides and Pest Control Operations. Barclays Official California Code of Regulations 1992. California Fertilizer Association (California Plant Health Association) Western Fertilizer Handbook 2nd Horticulture Edition 1998. County of Orange, Environmental Resources Division. Drainage Area Management Plan, 2003. Wyoming Agricultural Extension Weeds of the West, 5th Edition 1996. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Aquatic Pest Control, Pesticide Application Compendium, Volume 5 2001 University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. The Safe and Effective Use of Pesticides, 2nd Edition 2000. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Pests of Landscape Trees and Shrubs: An Integrated Pest Management Guide 1994. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Natural Enemies Handbook: The Illustrated Guide to Biological Pest Control 1998. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. IPM in Practice: Principles and Methods of Integrated Pest Management 2001. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Turf grass Pests 1989. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines for Turf grass 2000. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Pests of the Garden and Small Farm: A Grower’s Guide to Using Less Pesticide 1998. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. Fertilizing Landscape Trees 2001. University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources. California Master Gardener Handbook 2002. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 29 August 2004 Websites California Department of Pesticide Regulation – www.cdpr.ca.gov California Fertilizer Foundation (CFF) - http://www.calfertilizer.org/ The mission of the foundation is to enhance awareness of plant nutrients and agriculture in California through educational outreach such as a school garden grants program. The California Plant Health Association (CPHA) - http://www.cpha.net/ The organization represents the interests of the fertilizer and crop protection manufacturers, distributors, formulators and retailers in California, Arizona and Hawaii. The purpose of the organization is to promote the environmentally sound use and handling of plant health products and services for the production of safe and high quality food, fiber and horticultural products. The California Department of Food and Agriculture Fertilizer Research and Education Program (CDFA-FREP) - http://www.cdfa.ca.gov/is/frep/index.htm Group created to advance the environmentally safe and agronomic ally sound use and handling of fertilizer materials. Most of FREP's current work is concerned specifically with nitrate contamination of groundwater. FREP facilitates and coordinates research and demonstration projects by providing funding, developing and disseminating information, and serving as a clearinghouse on information on this topic. FREP serves growers, agricultural supply and service professionals, extension personnel, public agencies, consultants, and other interested parties University of California Statewide IPM Program – http://www.ipm.ucdavis.edu The Fertilizer Institute - http://www.tfi.org/ An organization that provides educational information on fertilizers and a reference guide on public policy issues affecting the use of fertilizers. Pesticide Wise - http://www.pw.ucr.edu/ Searches a comprehensive EPA-USDA database and presents critical information on a pesticide's properties and water quality risks. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 30 August 2004 GLOSSARY California Code of Regulations, Title 3, Division 6 (3 CCR) The State of California Code regulating pesticides and pest control operations. This can be found on the Internet at http://www.calregs.com or http://ccr.oal.ca.gov/ under the Department of Pesticide Regulation heading. Chemical Labels As required by federal law, manufacturers of pesticides must provide chemical labels on the containers of all pesticides distributed. These labels include all necessary information on the chemical constituents of the pesticides, including recommendations and instructions for use, toxicity classification, and the appropriate warning statements and emergency procedures in case of acute exposures. As required by state law, labels must be kept in good, readable condition and be attached to all pesticide containers at all times. Label requirements and label instructions refer to printed material on the pesticide container and to other printed material provided with the product when purchased. Eutrophication A response to an increase in the nutrient status (nitrogen and phosphorus) of a water body. The result is an increase in the growth of vegetation (usually algae), a decrease in dissolved oxygen, increased turbidity, and a general degradation in water quality. Integrated Pest Management (IPM) A sustainable approach to pest management that combines the use of prevention, avoidance, monitoring, and suppression strategies in a way that minimizes economic, health, and environmental risks. It is a decision making process which selects, integrates, and implements pest control strategies to prevent or control pest populations. IPM uses a “whole systems approach”, looking at the target species as it relates to the entire ecosystem. In choosing control strategies, minimal impacts to human health, the environment, and non-target organisms are considered. Materials Data Safety Sheet (MSDS) These are documents which supply information about a particular hazardous substance or mixture such as chemical identifications, hazardous ingredients, physical data, fire and explosion data, health hazards, reactivity data, spill or leak cleanup procedures, special protection and special precautions. Federal law requires them to be kept on file for every pesticide or other hazardous material stored or used. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) The national permit program under the Clean Water Act for controlling discharges directly into Water of the United States. Pest Control Adviser (PCA) A person who offers a recommendation on any agricultural use (includes landscape and turf maintenance), who holds him or herself forth as an authority on any agricultural use, or who solicits services or sales for any agricultural use, must possess a valid Agricultural Pest Control Adviser License. Certification obtained from the State of California after demonstrating adequate knowledge of pests, pesticides, and the implications of pesticide use. ---PAGE BREAK--- Landscape Management Procedures City of Modesto/Stanislaus County 31 August 2004 Pest Control Manager The person designated by the City Manager to administer the NPDES Stormwater Pesticide Program. The Pest Control Manager shall ensure that the policies and procedures established by the City are implemented and, on an annual basis, shall submit a report to the Stormwater Division. Pest Any insect, rodent, nematode, fungus, weed, or any other form of terrestrial or aquatic plant or animal life or virus, bacteria, or other microorganism (except viruses, bacteria, or other microorganisms on or in living man or other living animals) which the Administrator of the EPA declares to be a pest under section 25(c)(1)[7 USCA 136w(c)(1)]. Pesticide Any substance or mixture of substances intended for destroying or repelling any pest. This includes fungicides, insecticides, germicides, algicides, nematicides, herbicides, miticides, molluscides, and rodenticides and any substance or mixture of substances intended for use as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant. Qualified Applicator’s Certificate (QAC) A certificate obtained from the State of California after demonstrating adequate knowledge of the proper technique for handling, storing, transporting, and applying pesticides. A person who uses or supervises the use of federally restricted use pesticides or State restricted materials for any purpose must have a QAC. Restricted Materials Permit A permit must be acquired by any City/County before application of pesticides listed as restricted by the State of California in the 3 CCR. A list of restricted materials can be found at the California Department of Pesticide Regulation web site: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/license/pr-pml-013a.pdf Toxicity Classification The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) groups pesticides into three categories according to their toxicity potential to cause injury to humans. Category I pesticides are the most hazardous and their use is normally restricted; they will carry the word “danger” or “poison” on the label. Category II pesticides are moderately toxic and carry the word “warning” on the label. The least hazardous pesticides are Category III and IV pesticides. These are toxic or relatively nontoxic, but basic safety precautions should still be taken. These pesticides carry the word “caution” on the label. ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Landscape Maintenance Best Management Practices Fact Sheet for Municipal Operations Pesticide, Herbicide, and Fertilizer Application Fertilizers, pesticides, and herbicides are chemicals that not only kill garden invaders, they also harm useful insects, poison fish, and contaminate ground water, rivers, creeks, and ponds when they are washed off lawns and landscaped areas. Pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers must be properly applied, stored, handled, and disposed of to prevent contamination of surface water and groundwater. Misuse of pesticides and herbicides can result in adverse impacts to aquatic life, even at low concentrations. Misuse of fertilizer can result in algae overgrowth in water bodies due to excessive phosphorus and nitrogen loading. Pesticides & Herbicides Storage - Pesticides are purchased in the quantities necessary and are not stockpiled (maximum storage time is six months to one year). - Pesticides are stored indoors, in covered areas with cement floors, or in areas with secondary containment. Transportation - The pesticide containers are sealed and secured from tipping or excess jarring. - Appropriate pesticide labels, MSDS sheets, and spill cleanup kits are brought along when transporting pesticides. - All mixing and loading operations must occur on an impervious surface. Application - When selecting pesticides for application, the following factors are considered: 1. Avoid the use of copper-based pesticides. 2. Pesticides that are broad spectrum and relatively persistent are avoided since they are likely to cause the most environmental damage and increase pesticide resistance. 3. The types, methods, and timing of application are determined after consideration has been given to protection of non-target organisms (including threatened or endangered species), protection of water quality, pest biology, soil types, anticipated adverse weather (winds, precipitation, etc.), and temperature. 4. The initial review of potential pesticides begins with the least toxic compounds EPA Toxicity Categories III and IV). The use of compounds in EPA Toxicity Categories I and II are avoided if possible or used in situations where exposure to the active ingredient is limited baits or soil/trunk injections). ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 - Apply pesticides and other chemicals according to manufacturer’s directions. The label is the law for pesticide usage. - Apply pesticides only when wind speeds are low (less than 7 mph). - Prepare the minimum amount of pesticide that is needed for the job and use the lowest rate that will effectively control the pest. Do not mix or prepare the pesticide near storm drains or watercourses. - Pesticides are not applied immediately before, during, or after a rain event, when water is flowing off the area to be applied, or when fog is present. - Do not apply pesticides during high temperatures. - Pesticides are not applied if there is a high chance of movement into watercourses; for example, they aren’t applied near wetlands, streams, lakes, ponds, or storm drains unless it is for an approved maintenance activity. - Leave a minimum eight foot buffer zone of untreated grasses or other vegetation around water bodies, i.e., streams, rivers, ponds, wetlands, or drainage areas, etc. - Manage pest problems with spot applications, avoid broadcast applications. - Never apply pesticides to impervious surfaces, e.g., compacted paths, eroded areas, steep slopes, asphalt, or other paving material. - Equipment is cleaned at the end of the day’s applications. The equipment is not rinsed in an area where the wash water can contaminate surface or groundwater. Disposal - Pesticide containers are triple-rinsed before disposal and the rinse water used as product. Particular information on the proper disposal of the pesticide and its container can be found on the label. - Cleaned containers are sent back to the manufacturer for recycling whenever possible. However, once triple-rinsed most haulers can take them to a landfill. - Disposal of concentrated or diluted pesticides is a last resort. Concentrated pesticides should be kept until used. If the department cannot use a pesticide for its intended purpose, an attempt is made to return it to the supplier. - Surplus or out-of-date pesticides are either given to the Stanislaus County Agricultural Department or a licensed hazardous waste hauler for disposal. Equipment Maintenance - The calibration of equipment is routinely completed to ensure that the proper amount of pesticide is applied. The maintenance of application rates within label recommendations reduces the risk of surface and ground water contamination. - Recalibrate equipment periodically to compensate for wear in pumps, nozzles, and metering systems. Calibrate sprayers when new nozzles are installed. - The equipment is never cleaned or rinsed in the vicinity of storm drains or other open water areas. Rinse water should be returned to the target crop or commodity whenever possible. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Accident and Spill Mitigation - Unless their safety is compromised, municipal staff must immediately clean up any spills according to label instructions and notify the appropriate supervisors and agencies. If feasible and safe to do so, the material should be cleaned up using a dry technique (such as sweeping) or with the proper material from a clean up kit. Materials should never be washed down. - In the event of a pesticide spill of one or more pounds (approximately 1 pint), call 9-1-1. The City of Modesto Fire Department will respond and, if necessary, will contact the Hazardous Materials Response Team. Additionally, the Stanislaus County Department of Environmental Resources and the City of Modesto Environmental Compliance Section should be notified of a pesticide spilled into the wastewater system, storm drain, or any waterway. - Since the spilled pesticides must be prevented from entering the local surface and/or groundwater supplies, the following steps are followed: 1. EVALUATE the accident and quickly determine the most immediate concerns (medical and/or environmental). 2. CONTAIN OR CONTROL the spill. 3. NOTIFY the supervisor in charge who should, in turn, notify the proper authorities. If contact cannot be made, dial 9-1-1. 4. ISOLATE the area with fluorescent traffic safety cones, ropes, or other cordon devices to be sure that no one walks, wanders, or drives through the spill area. 5. EVALUATE any damage that may have occurred resulting from the spill (health, environmental, property, and equipment damage) and make notes on all relevant details and circumstances before leaving the scene. 6. PREPARE A COMPLETE REPORT detailing the incident immediately after leaving the scene upon returning to the work place and submit it to the immediate supervisor. Fertilizers Because of the necessity for soil nutrients and the potential for adverse effects on local waterways due to the loss of these nutrients through runoff and leaching, management guidelines and protocols are necessary to reduce the loss of fertilizers into watercourses. Prior to choosing the type of fertilizer for the application the following are taken into consideration: 1. Ability of the plant material to uptake and utilize the nitrogen (soil temperature, growth rate, etc.). 2. Leaching requirements due to soil salinity. 3. Severity of slope and potential for runoff to carry fertilizer. 4. Proximity to storm drains and non-permeable hard surfaces. 5. Receiving water impairments. 6. Type of irrigation and scheduling. ---PAGE BREAK--- 4 Storage and Handling - Fertilizers are stored indoors, in covered areas with cement floors, or in areas with secondary containment. Concrete structures are preferred for storage facilities due to the corrosive nature of most fertilizers. Fertilizer storage facilities shall have an impermeable foundation so that potential spills cannot run off into surface water or leach into groundwater systems. - Fertilizers are not mixed or prepared near storm drains or water bodies. - Always fill fertilizer spreaders on a hard surface where any spills can be easily cleaned up. - Use a drop spreader instead of rotary type spreader near sensitive areas. - If a spill occurs, fertilizers are swept up and contaminated material is disposed of properly. Spills are not washed with water. Application and Protocols - Keep fertilizer equipment properly calibrated according to the manufacturer’s instructions and in good repair. - Care should be taken to avoid spreading fertilizer onto impermeable surfaces such as sidewalks and driveways. - If fertilizer does get onto an impermeable surface, it shall be swept back onto the landscape as soon as possible. - Never apply fertilizers to impervious surfaces, e.g., compacted paths, eroded areas, steep slopes, asphalt, or other paving material - Fertilizers are not applied in the immediate vicinity of a water body. - Leave a minimum eight foot buffer zone of untreated grasses or other vegetation around water bodies, i.e., streams, rivers, ponds, wetlands, or drainage areas, etc. - Fertilizers are not applied immediately before, during, or after a rain event, when water is flowing off the area to be applied, or when fog is present. - Do not apply fertilizers during high temperatures or windy conditions. - Irrigation application rates and schedules are adjusted to minimize surface runoff, especially immediately following the application of a fertilizer. - Fertilizer spills are cleaned up using dry methods, such as sweeping up the material. - Fertilizers are securely covered in the vehicle before being transported. ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Página de Hechos sobre las Mejores Prácticas de Administración de Mantenimiento de Jardines para Operaciones Municipales Aplicación de Pesticidas, Herbicidas, y Fertilizantes Los fertilizantes, pesticidas, y herbicidas son químicos que no solamente matan a los invasores de jardines, pero también son dañinos para los insectos, envenenan los peces, y contaminan el agua subterránea, ríos, riachuelos, y lagunas cuando son lavados de la grama o áreas enjardinadas. Los pesticidas, herbicidas y fertilizantes tienen que ser aplicados, almacenados y manejados apropiadamente para prevenir la contaminación de agua de superficie y de agua subterránea. El uso incorrecto de pesticidas y herbicidas puede resultar en impactos desfavorables a la vida acuática, aún en cantidades bajas. El uso incorrecto de fertilizantes puede resultar en el sobre crecimiento de alga en cuerpos de agua debido al contenido excesivo de fósforo y nitrógeno. Pesticidas & Herbicidas Almacenamiento - Los pesticidas son comprados en cantidades necesarias y no son almacenados (el tiempo máximo de almacenamiento es de 6 meses a 1 año). - Los pesticidas son almacenados en el interior de un edificio, en áreas cubiertas con pisos de cemento, o en áreas con una contención secundaria. Transportación - Los contenedores con pesticidas están sellados firmemente y asegurados para evitar volcarse o golpe excesivo. - Etiquetas apropiadas de pesticidas, paginas de seguridad (conocidas como MSDS) y un equipo de limpieza tienen que acompañar durante la transportación de pesticidas. - Toda operación de mezcla y carga/descarga tiene que ocurrir sobre una superficie impermeable. Aplicación - Cuando escoja pesticidas para aplicar, los siguientes factores deben de ser considerados: 1. Evite usar pesticidas a base de cobre. 2. Los pesticidas que son de un amplio espectro y relativamente persistente son evitados ya que pueden causar un gran daño al medioambiente y aumentar la resistencia a los pesticidas. 3. Los tipos, métodos y el tiempo de aplicación son determinados después que se ha considerado la protección de los organismos que no son el objetivo (incluyendo especies en peligro o amenazadas), protección de la calidad del agua, plaga biológica, ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 tipos de suelos, clima desfavorable anticipado (vientos, precipitación, etc.) y la temperatura. 4. La revisión inicial de posibles pesticidas comienza con los compuestos menos tóxicos (por ejemplo: Categorías de Toxicidad III y IV de EPA). El uso de compuestos en las Categorías de Toxicidad I y II son evitados si es posible o usados en situaciones donde la exposición a los ingredientes activos es limitada (por ejemplo: anzuelo o inyecciones de suelo/baúl). - Aplique pesticidas y otros químicos de acuerdo a las instrucciones del fabricante. La etiqueta es la ley de uso del pesticida. - Aplique pesticidas solamente cuando la velocidad del viento es baja (menos de 7mph). - Prepare la cantidad minima de pesticida que es necesaria para el trabajo y use la proporción mas baja y efectiva para controlar la plaga. No mezcle o prepare el pesticida cerca de una alcantarilla o fuentes de agua. - Los pesticidas no son aplicados inmediatamente antes, durante o después de un evento de lluvia, cuando el agua esta fluyendo hacia el área donde se va a aplicar o cuando hay neblina. - No aplique pesticidas durante las altas temperaturas. - Los pesticidas no son aplicados si hay una gran posibilidad de movimiento hacia las fuentes de agua, por ejemplo, no son aplicadas cerca de pantanos, riachuelos, lagos, lagunas o alcantarillas a menos que sea una actividad de mantenimiento aprobada. - Deje por lo menos ocho pies de distancia alrededor de zonas de grama sin tratar u otra vegetación alrededor del agua, por ejemplo: riachuelos, ríos, estanques, pantano, u áreas de drenaje, etc. - Administre los problemas de plagas con aplicaciones locales, evite esparcirlos en áreas grandes. - Nunca aplique pesticidas en áreas impermeables, por ejemplo: caminos compactados, áreas erosionadas, cuestas inclinadas, asfalto, u otro material pavimentado. - El equipo es limpiado al final de la aplicación del día. El equipo no es lavado en un área donde el agua sucia pueda contaminar la superficie o el agua subterránea. Eliminación - Los recipientes con pesticidas deben de ser lavados tres veces antes de deshacerse de ellos y del agua sucia usada como producto. La información particular de como deshacerse de los pesticidas y sus recipientes se puede encontrar en la etiqueta. - Los recipientes limpios se mandan de regreso al fabricante para poder reciclarlos cuando sea posible. Sin embargo, media vez sean lavados tres veces la mayoría de transportadores pueden llevarlos a un basurero público. - El deshacerse de pesticidas concentrados o diluido es un último recurso. Los pesticidas concentrados se tienen que guardar hasta que se usen. Si algún departamento no puede usar un pesticida para el propósito determinado, entonces se debe de intentar mandarlo de regreso al fabricante. - Los pesticidas de sobra o vencidos tienen que ser entregados al Departamento de Agricultura del Condado Stanislaus o a un transportador licenciado para remover materiales peligrosos. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Mantenimiento de Maquinaria - La calibración del equipo se termina rutinariamente para asegurarse que la cantidad apropiada de pesticida es aplicada. El mantenimiento de los índices de aplicación dentro de las recomendaciones de la etiqueta reduce el riesgo de contaminación en la superficie y aguas subterráneas. - Calibre de nuevo el equipo periódicamente para reparar el desgaste en las bombas, inyectores, y sistemas de medición. Calibre los regadores cuando los nuevos inyectores son instalados. - El equipo nunca es lavado o limpiado cerca del drenaje de lluvias o cualquier area abierta de aguas. El agua de enjuague debe de ser regresado hacia la cosecha o producto apropiado cuando sea posible. Mitigación de Accidentes y Derrames - A menos que su seguridad esté en peligro, el personal municipal debe de limpiar inmediatamente cualquier derrame de acuerdo a las instrucciones en la etiqueta y avisar a los supervisores y agencias apropiadas. Si es práctico y seguro, el material debe de ser limpiado usando un método seco (como barrer) o con el material apropiado de un equipo de limpieza. Los materiales nunca se deben de lavar con agua. - En el evento de un derrame de pesticidas de una libra o mas (aproximadamente una pinta) llame al 9-1-1. El Departamento de Bomberos de la Ciudad va a responder y, si es necesario, se comunicará con el Equipo de Respuesta para Materiales Peligrosos. Además, el Departamento de Cumplimiento del Medioambiente del Condado de Stanislaus y la Sección de Cumplimiento del Medioambiente de la Ciudad de Modesto deben de ser avisados de cualquier derrame en el sistema de aguas negras, drenaje de lluvias o cualquier sistema de aguas. - Ya que los derrames de pesticidas tienen que ser evitados a que entren en las aguas locales y/o las aguas subterráneas, los siguientes pasos tienen que ser seguidos: 1. EVALUE el accidente y determine rápidamente las preocupaciones mas inmediatas (médicas y/o del medioambiente). 2. CONTENGA O CONTROLE el derramamiento. 3. NOTIFIQUE al supervisor responsable quien debe, alternadamente, notificar las autoridades apropiadas. Si el contacto no puede ser hecho, marque el 9-1-1. 4. AISLE el área con conos fluorescentes para la seguridad del tráfico, lazos, u otros cordones para asegurarse que nadie camine, vague, o maneje sobre el área del derramamiento. 5. EVALUE cualquier daño que pueda haber ocurrido como resultado del derramamiento (salud, ambiental, propiedad y daño al equipo) y haga notas de todos los detalles y circunstancias relevantes antes de retirarse de la escena. 6. PREPAR UN REPORTE COMPLETO detallando el incidente inmediatamente después de retirarse de la escena, al regresar a su lugar de trabajo y entréguelo a su supervisor inmediato. ---PAGE BREAK--- 4 Fertilizantes Debido a la necesidad de los nutrientes del suelo y el potencial a efectos desfavorables de las aguas locales por la perdida de estos nutrientes por medio de las aguas corridas y la lixiviación, guías de administración y protocolos son necesarios para reducir la perdida de fertilizantes hacia las aguas locales. Antes de elegir el tipo de fertilizante para la aplicación los siguientes puntos se toman en consideración: 1. La habilidad del material de planta para tomar y utilizar el nitrógeno (temperatura del suelo, índice de crecimiento, etc.) 2. Los requisitos de lixiviación debido a la salinidad del suelo. 3. La severidad de la cuesta y el potencial que una corriente se lleve el fertilizante. 4. La proximidad hacia los drenajes de lluvias y superficies duras impermeables. 5. Deterioro en la recepción de aguas. 6. El tipo de irrigación y la programación. Almacenamiento y Manejo - Los fertilizantes tienen que estar guardados en el interior de un edificio en áreas cubiertas y con pisos de cemento o en áreas con contención secundaria. Las estructuras de concreto son las mejores para almacenar debido a la naturaleza corrosiva de la mayoría de fertilizantes. Las áreas de almacenamiento de fertilizantes deben de tener una fundación impermeable para que cualquier posibilidad de derrame no se vaya a las aguas de superficie o se penetre a los sistemas de agua subterránea. - Los fertilizantes no se mezclan o se preparan cerca de alcantarillados o donde hay abastecimientos de agua. - Siempre llene el rociador de fertilizante sobre una superficie dura donde cualquier derrame pueda ser limpiado fácilmente. - Use un rociador de gotas en vez de un rociador rotativo cerca de las áreas sensitivas. - Si un derrame ocurre, los fertilizantes tienen que ser barridos y deshágase apropiadamente del material contaminado. Los derrames no se deben lavar con agua. Aplicación y Protocolos - Mantenga el equipo de fertilizantes apropiadamente calibrado de acuerdo a las instrucciones del fabricante y en buen estado. - Tenga cuidado a que el fertilizante no se riegue en las superficies impermeables tales como las aceras y las entradas de vehículos. - Si el fertilizante penetra en un área impermeable, se debe de barrer hacia la grama tan pronto como sea posible. - Nunca aplique los fertilizantes en áreas impermeables tales como: áreas compactadas, áreas erosionadas, cuestas inclinadas, asfalto u otras áreas pavimentadas. - Los fertilizantes no son aplicados en la proximidad de abastecimientos de agua. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5 - Deje por lo menos ocho pies de distancia alrededor de zonas de grama sin tratar u otra vegetación alrededor del agua, por ejemplo: riachuelos, ríos, estanques, pantano, u áreas de drenaje, etc. - Los fertilizantes no se aplican inmediatamente antes, durante o después de un evento de lluvia, cuando el agua esta fluyendo en el área donde se va a aplicar, o cuando hay neblina presente. - No aplique los fertilizantes durante las temperaturas altas o en condiciones de muchos vientos. - Los índices y horarios de aplicación de irrigación son ajustados para evitar el desperdicio, especialmente después de la aplicación del fertilizante. - Los derrames de fertilizantes se limpian usando métodos secos, como barrer el material. - Los fertilizantes se cubren seguramente en el vehiculo antes de ser transportados. ---PAGE BREAK--- Storm Drain Catch Basin Markers Old Markers The Problem with the Old Markers New Markers ---PAGE BREAK--- GUIDELINES FOR STORM DRAIN PROTECTION AT SPECIAL EVENTS CITY OF MODESTO ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE SECTION 1221 Sutter Avenue Modesto, CA 95351 Tel: (209) 577-6200 Fax: (209) 577-6290 General 1. Plan approval required. Submit 14 days prior to desired opening date. 2. All outdoor special events shall comply with Section 5-10.201 of the Modesto Municipal Code. Trash 1. Provide adequate receptacles for use by customers/visitors and workers/vendors 2. Provide routine removal throughout the event of filled trash receptacles, especially in food service and toilet areas. 3. Provide routine litter removal during the event (trash receptacles shall not be allowed to overflow). 4. Remove and properly dispose of all trash and litter immediately following the event. 5. In areas served by a positive storm drain system discharging to the Tuolumne River or Dry Creek, the event holder shall arrange with the municipality for either temporary screens to be placed on catch basins or for catch basins in that area to be cleaned out subsequent to the event. Recycling 1. All festivals and public events must provide for recycling of any aluminum, glass, and plastic products distributed at the event. Recycling shall cover, at a minimum, the use of recycling containers in food service areas. 2. Provide adequate recycling receptacles for use by customers/visitors and workers/vendors. 3. Provide routine removal throughout the event of filled recycling receptacles, especially in food service area ---PAGE BREAK--- 4. Remove and transfer all recyclables to a recycling center following the event. Portable Toilets 1. Provide adequate accessible portable toilets and hand washing facilities. 2. Locate toilets a minimum of 50 feet away from storm drain or rock well inlets and catch basins. 3. Instruct portable toilet service vendor to prevent discharge to ground or storm drainage system during cleaning and servicing. Street Cleaning 1. Arrange for streets and sidewalks to be broom-cleaned or cleaned with a street sweeper following the event. (Washing streets or sidewalks into the storm drainage system is prohibited) 2. For events where alcohol and/or food is served, sidewalks and streets shall be wet vacuumed/swept. All organic material shall be removed and properly disposed. Contents from the wet vacuum shall be disposed of into the sanitary sewer in an approved manner, 3. For events that include domesticated animals, sidewalks and streets shall be wet vacuumed/swept. All organic material shall be removed and properly disposed. Contents from the wet vacuum shall be disposed of into the sanitary sewer in an approved manner. Storm Drain Protection 1. All storm drains in the immediate vicinity of the special event shall be protected with filter fabric and sand/gravel bags 2. During special events which include domesticated farm animals parades, pony rides, petting zoos, etc.) all storm drains shall be sealed to prevent the entry of animal or pet wastes into the City storm drain system. The drains shall be unsealed only after the area has been cleaned by a street sweeper following the event. The sealing of storm drains shall be arranged with the municipality. 3. For events where alcohol and/or food is served, all storm drains shall be sealed to prevent the entry of fluids into the City storm drain system. The drains shall be unsealed only after the area has been cleaned by a street sweeper following the event. The sealing of storm drains shall be arranged with the municipality. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5-10.201 Prohibited Activities. Illicit Discharge. Any illicit discharge to the City’s MS4 is prohibited unless excepted by Section 5- 10.202. All discharges to the City’s MS4 of material other than storm water must be in compliance with an NPDES permit issued for the discharge or other regulatory requirement issued pursuant to the Porter- Cologne Water Quality Control Act if an NPDES permit is not required or applicable. Discharge in Violation of Permit. Any discharge that would result in or contribute to a violation of the City’s existing or future municipal NPDES permit and any amendment, revision or reissuance thereof, either separately considered or when combined with other discharges, is a violation of this chapter and is prohibited. Liability for any such discharge shall be the responsibility of the person(s) causing or responsible for the discharge, as well as the parcel owner on whose property the discharge occurs, who shall be strictly liable for its consequences, and such persons and/or owners shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City in any administrative or judicial enforcement action relating to such discharge. Illicit Connections. It is a violation of this chapter and is prohibited to construct, establish, use, maintain, operate, or continue an illicit connection to the City’s MS4 or cause, permit or suffer any agent, employee, or independent contractor to do so. This prohibition against illicit connections is retroactive and applies to unpermitted connections made in the past, regardless of whether permissible under the law or practices applicable or prevailing at the time of the connection. Roof Run-off. Domestic roof drain leaders may not drain directly to sidewalks and gutters. Any practical method must be administered to discharge roof run-off into permeable areas. Private Drains. Storm water or surface water which is causing flooding on private property served by an on-site storm drainage system may not be discharged to the City’s MS4. Swimming Pool Water. Discharge of water from a swimming pool, hot tub or spa into the City’s MS4 is prohibited. (Ord. 3355 § 1, effective 10-8-04) “Illicit discharge” means any discharge to the City’s MS4, or an upstream flow tributary to the MS4, that is not composed entirely of storm water runoff except discharges made pursuant to a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit, or other regulatory requirement issued pursuant to the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act if an NPDES permit is not required or applicable. Illicit discharges include, but are not limited to: Sewage overflows; Discharges of wash water resulting from the hosing or cleaning of gas stations, vehicle repair services, or other types of automotive service facilities; Discharges resulting from storage, cleaning, repair, or maintenance of any type of equipment, machinery, or facility including motor vehicles, cement-related equipment, and port-a-potty servicing, etc.; Discharges of wash water from mobile operations such as mobile vehicle washing, steam cleaning, power washing, and carpet cleaning, etc.; Discharges of wash water from the cleaning or hosing of impervious surfaces in municipal, industrial, and commercial areas including parking lots, streets, sidewalks, driveways, patios, plazas, work yards and outdoor eating or drinking areas, etc.; Discharges of runoff from material storage areas containing equipment, chemicals, fuels, grease, oil, or other hazardous materials; Discharges of pool or fountain water containing chlorine, biocides, or other chemicals; discharges of pool or fountain filter backwash water; Discharges of sediment, pet waste, vegetation clippings, or other landscape or construction-related wastes; Discharges of food-related wastes grease, fish processing, swill, and restaurant kitchen mat and trash bin wash water, etc.); (10) Discharge of runoff from the washing of toxic materials from paved or unpaved areas; and (11) Discharge of material such as litter, landscape debris, construction debris, or any pesticides “Illicit connection” means any physical connection to the City’s MS4 which has not been permitted by the City, or any physical surface or subsurface condition of property through which the discharge of any pollutant to the MS4 may occur. “Municipal separate storm drain (MS4)” means a conveyance or system of conveyances owned, operated or controlled by the City designed or used to convey storm water to waters of the United States. City’s MS4 includes, but is not limited to, rockwells, roads with drainage systems, municipal streets, catch basins, curbs, gutters, ditches, manmade channels or storm drains. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF MODESTO SPECIAL EVENT ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT PERMIT NO.: SP024-2010 EXPIRATION DATE: July 3, 2010 MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY: 1808 at any given time DAYS & HOURS OF ENTERTAINMENT: Saturday, July 3 from 8:00 pm to 2:00 am TYPES OF ENTERTAINMENT: Live Music and DJ’s Genre of Music: Pop Rock Hip-Hop Punk Country World Rap Metal Vocal Blues R & B Electronic Dance Other: PERMITTED PREMISES: 10th Street between J & I Street – Palladium Night Club, Modesto, CA CA 95354 RESPONSIBLE PARTY(S): Rudy Baca Contact Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Contact Number: Specialized Conditions of Operation Police Department Conditions – 1. The sound generated shall be controlled so that its volume level, duration, or character does not annoy, disturb, injure, or endanger the comfort of reasonable persons of ordinary sensibility within the City. If complaints are received due to the sound generated, the Permittee may be required to lower the volume or stop the sound completely. 2. On-duty security personnel shall not consume alcoholic beverages or be under the influence of an alcohol beverage during the hours of operation of the event. 3. Security personnel will be required at each entrance/exit, checking ID’s. 4. The event must be adjacent to the licensed property and the area must be fenced and covered with a material, so the interior cannot be seen from the outside. 5. Licensed security personnel will be required at each entrance/exit to the “beer garden”, checking ID’s and two inside the “beer garden” area. Must comply with the conditions set forth on their ABC license for their establishment. ---PAGE BREAK--- 6. Total of 8 Modesto Police personnel (1-Sergeant and 5-officers and 2-equestrian) as well as an additional 20 security guards. 7. Must comply with the Entertainment Permit conditions set forth on your entertainment business permit. Fire Department Conditions – 8. Final approval will take place on Saturday, July 3 at 6:30 pm. The fire lane must be maintained and exits marked at all times. 9. The maximum occupant load inside this event is 1808. 10. Personnel will need to be posted at each of the three exits to open the gate in the event of an emergency. 11. Each exit will need an exit sign (it can be plastic or metal attached to the fence). Public Works Conditions – All outdoor special events shall comply with Section 5-10.201 of the Modesto Municipal Code related to storm drain protection. 12. Trash - Adequate receptacles for use by customers/visitors and workers/vendors. 13. Throughout the event, provide routine removal of filled trash receptacles, especially in food service and toilet areas. Trash receptacles shall not be allowed to overflow. 14. Provide routine litter removal during the event 15. Remove and properly dispose of all trash and litter immediately following the event. 16. Recycling - All festivals and public events must provide for recycling of any aluminum, glass, and plastic products distributed at the event. Recycling shall cover, at a minimum, the use of recycling containers in food service areas. 17. Provide adequate recycling receptacles for use by customers/visitors and workers/vendors. 18. Provide routine removal throughout the event of filled recycling receptacles, especially in food service area. 19. Remove and transfer all recyclables to a recycling center following the event. 20. Portable Toilets - Provide adequate accessible portable toilets and hand washing facilities. 21. Provide 10 portable toilets for the outdoor event. The portable toilets may not be stationed in front of another business which will be open during the event and may not be within the designated fire lane. ---PAGE BREAK--- 22. Locate toilets a minimum of 50 feet away from storm drain or rock well inlets and catch basins. 23. Instruct portable toilet service vendor to prevent discharge to ground or storm drainage system during cleaning and servicing. 24. Street Cleaning - Arrange for streets and sidewalks to be broom-cleaned or cleaned with a street sweeper following the event. (Washing streets or sidewalks into the storm drainage system are prohibited). 25. For events where alcohol and/or food is served, sidewalks and streets shall be wet vacuumed/swept. All organic material shall be removed and properly disposed. Contents from the wet vacuum shall be disposed of into the sanitary sewer in an approved manner. 26. Storm Drain Protection - All storm drains in the immediate vicinity of the special event shall be protected with filter fabric and sand/gravel bags. Because this event is served by a positive storm drain system discharging directly into the Tuolumne River, it is imperative that the drains be properly protected throughout the event. a. The storm drains that must be covered are as follows; southwest corner of J Street and 10th Street. b. The drains may be sealed by placing heavy duty plastic over the inlet held in place by sand or gravel bags for the duration of the event. c. The drains shall be unsealed only after the area has been cleaned by a street sweeper following the event. 27. The Permittee shall be responsible for any additional cost to include but not limited to, clean up, staffing, damage to persons or property, storm water protection, security costs and/or any other measures that are required to keep the event safe. 28. By signing this permit, Permittee specifically acknowledges that the Entertainment Commission may suspend, modify or revoke this permit for reasons set forth in MMC 4- 1.419, including but not limited to failing to comply with one or more conditions of this permit, conducting entertainment contrary to the findings for the issuance of the permit, or the discovery that the Permittee has knowingly made a false statement of material fact or has knowingly omitted a material fact in the application. Violations of any condition of the permit can also be prosecuted as a misdemeanor. By my signature, I accept and agree to adhere to the required Entertainment Permit conditions. Owner Date Owner Date ---PAGE BREAK--- Hearing Date: June 3, 2010 Approval Date: Permit issued by: Mary Otten PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Storm Basin/Pump Station List Storm Retention Basins without pumps (12) Location Nearest Address Cross Street Buccaneer Ct 1312 Buccaneer Ct. Amigo Dr. Amigo Dr. 3800 Amigo Dr. Silverado Dr. Cassidy Ct. 304 Cassidy Ct. Towery Ave. Cummins Dr. 1620 Cummins Dr. BlueGum Ave. Rimrock Way 1229 Rimrock Way Medicine Bow Dr. Alder Creek 2921 Alder Creek Dr. Alder Creek Dr. Riverside Dr. 201 Capistrano Dr. Yosemite Blvd. Jim Way 1601 Jim Way Olivero Rd. Algen 2109 Crows Landing Rd. Algen Ave. Grecian 405 Grecian Ave. Imagine Ct. Rose Ln. Sanctuary Ct. Veranda Way Salida Blvd. 4100 Salida Blvd. Dakota Road ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Storm Basin/Pump Station List Storm Detention Basins (w/pumps) (12) Location/Name Nearest Address Cross Street Regency Park/Veneman 3548 Blackstone Way Southport Way Orchard 2408 Merle Ave. Bailey Dr. Northpointe 4506 Chapman Rd. Kiernan Ave. Snyder Basin (West) 2125 Snyder Rd. Prescott Rd. Snyder Basin (East) Pelandale Rd. Prescott/Pelandale Central (VI) 3212 Merle Way Dermond Rd. West (VI) Kodiak Dr. Bear Cub Ln. Carpenter Rd. 1505 Bluegum Ave. Fire Science Ln. Johansen Norseman Dr. Creekwood Dr. Fairview Across from Cielito Dr. 1909 St Salazar Cir. Coffee/Clarentina Drakeshire Dr. Montana Pelandale Pelandale Ave. West of McHenry Pelandale ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Storm Basin/Pump Station List Storm Lift Stations (12) Pump directly to receiving waters: Dry Creek, Tuolumne River, or MID Canal Location/Name Nearest Address Cross Street Bowen 217 Bowen Ave. McHenry Ave. College/Ashford E/Side College Ave. in alley Ashford Ct. Between Ashford Ct. & Mt. Vernon Dr. Hatch/Dallas North end of alley between Hatch Rd. Dallas St. and Vermouth Way Tully/Briggsmore S/Side Briggsmore Ave. Tully Rd. 80’ e/o Tully Rd. Naraghi 3001 Hasheem Dr. Rumble Rd. Stonebridge 2800 Braden Ave. Hahn Dr. Prescott/Standiford Across from ` Prescott Rd. 2100 Standiford Ave. Centre Plaza South On Street across from 10th 10th Street Briggsmore North N/Side Briggsmore Ave. Carver Rd. 500’ w/o Carver Rd. Briggsmore South S/Side Briggsmore Ave. Carver Rd. 500’ e/o Carver Rd. Coffee/Briggsmore N/side Briggsmore Ave. Coffee Rd. 100’ e/o Coffee Rd. @ Memorial Hospital Cheyenne/Ternuezen 1937 Axel Ct. Ternuezen Ave. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF MODESTO STORM LIFT STATION ANNUAL RUNTIME REPORT Jul 2012 Aug 2012 Sep 2012 Oct 2012 Nov 2012 Dec 2012 Jan 2013 Feb 2013 Mar 2013 Apr 2013 May 2013 Jun 2013 TOTAL GPM FLOW BOWEN (HRS) (GAL) PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 15.99 15.00 15.55 55.82 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.12 102.48 350 2,152,055 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.98 8.07 16.22 5.92 2.25 4.91 0.25 0.38 0.31 39.29 9000 21,215,476 PUMP 3 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.74 5.33 10.70 3.31 1.70 2.29 0.21 0.22 0.06 24.56 4600 6,777,803 Total Flow 30,145,335 CHEYENNE/TERNEUZEN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 11.51 51.58 11.67 2.19 4.22 3.38 0.77 0.00 86.14 300 1,550,430 Total Flow 1,550,430 COLLEGE/ASHFORD PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.72 0.70 0.62 0.62 4.72 13.48 5.30 1.78 3.50 0.91 0.86 1.07 34.27 675 1,388,021 Total Flow 1,388,021 COFFEE/CLARATINA PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 1.15 0.45 4.86 3.37 18.85 39.23 11.60 2.95 7.35 4.09 4.45 4.33 102.67 450 2,772,195 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.90 0.31 3.42 2.45 15.66 39.17 11.33 3.66 6.67 4.04 4.37 4.24 96.23 450 2,598,293 Total Flow 5,370,487 HATCH/DALLAS PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 1.40 1.11 0.63 0.22 6.62 15.78 5.06 1.25 4.95 2.83 1.04 1.79 42.69 260 666,038 Total Flow 666,038 ORCHARD PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 1.26 0.00 2.02 24.07 67.95 20.05 5.56 15.34 10.91 3.29 0.64 151.10 4850 43,968,724 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.77 0.01 3.76 32.13 82.20 20.55 5.97 17.04 12.81 5.71 0.24 181.18 4850 52,723,618 PUMP 3 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Total Flow 96,692,342 TULLY/BRIGGSMORE PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.69 0.62 0.47 0.39 4.89 12.98 4.52 1.45 17.44 0.40 0.43 0.27 44.55 925 2,472,540 Total Flow 2,472,540 VENEMAN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.82 0.00 1.97 300 35,375 Total Flow 35,375 NARAGHI PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.01 17.92 63.17 20.10 6.58 8.31 11.46 5.30 14.31 147.18 1700 15,012,291 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 14.26 12.24 13.93 18.86 34.33 77.21 31.33 15.34 21.65 9.59 10.02 0.00 258.77 1700 26,394,358 PUMP 3 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 15.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.52 0.00 15.93 325 310,722 Total Flow 41,717,370 STONEBRIDGE PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.80 0.97 0.44 0.00 4.08 11.71 2.06 0.38 2.05 0.99 0.72 0.96 25.17 900 1,359,270 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.80 1.11 0.62 0.00 2.65 8.38 3.51 0.33 1.51 2.22 0.77 1.03 22.93 900 1,238,070 Total Flow 2,597,340 PRESCOTT/STANDIFORD PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.02 0.04 0.07 0.03 2.43 9.70 2.28 0.11 1.20 0.75 0.11 0.00 16.74 325 326,425 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.03 2.65 8.29 2.17 0.08 0.73 0.86 0.07 0.00 14.91 325 290,819 Total Flow 617,245 COSTCO STORM PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.66 17.11 34.64 14.20 2.15 8.78 7.40 0.45 0.00 86.40 1200 6,220,478 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.45 17.17 34.58 11.00 2.00 8.42 5.32 4.91 0.00 84.86 1200 6,109,833 Total Flow 12,330,312 CENTRE PLAZA GARAGE PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.50 0.27 0.03 0.00 0.08 0.52 0.30 0.20 2.02 150 18,198 Total Flow 18,198 CENTRE PLAZA SOUTH PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.67 0.18 0.18 0.27 0.59 0.91 0.36 0.17 0.96 0.43 0.32 0.30 5.34 250 80,113 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.70 0.19 0.18 0.32 0.62 0.99 0.29 0.18 0.96 0.42 0.33 0.27 5.44 250 81,671 Total Flow 161,783 JOHANSEN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 2.84 0.00 0.00 2.23 20.67 51.39 14.25 4.08 9.75 3.70 1.71 0.01 110.64 800 5,310,507 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 2.84 0.00 0.01 2.22 20.94 52.67 16.72 0.00 9.30 5.72 1.91 0.01 112.34 800 5,392,493 Total Flow 10,703,000 BRIGGSMORE NORTH PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.07 0.51 0.01 1.19 3.07 10.52 2.75 0.00 1.61 1.94 0.45 0.01 22.13 500 664,025 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.08 0.51 0.12 1.19 3.02 10.53 2.75 0.00 1.61 1.94 0.45 0.01 22.19 500 665,800 Total Flow 1,329,825 BRIGGSMORE SOUTH PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.39 0.28 0.00 0.11 2.00 9.17 2.52 0.96 1.19 1.04 0.41 0.91 18.97 500 569,142 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.65 0.47 0.00 0.01 2.95 10.69 4.02 0.98 1.92 0.97 1.05 0.87 24.57 500 737,142 Total Flow 1,306,283 CARPENTER PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.14 59.00 21.46 5.66 7.35 8.85 0.63 0.00 117.10 400 2,810,467 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.56 60.09 18.04 5.63 6.59 8.25 0.64 0.00 114.82 400 2,755,580 Total Flow 5,566,047 COFFEE/BRIGGSMORE PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.09 0.00 14.29 6.27 68.67 121.54 22.41 8.13 12.05 9.40 7.04 2.33 272.22 540 8,819,841 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.09 0.00 16.15 5.72 40.56 117.98 21.89 7.39 16.42 8.77 6.31 2.00 243.28 540 7,882,122 Total Flow 16,701,963 WEST BASIN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 6.73 6.35 5.57 5.50 25.35 79.54 25.98 4.90 20.15 10.31 7.97 8.86 207.20 2500 31,080,706 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 15.76 14.87 12.48 14.83 40.72 103.75 41.99 22.45 33.24 34.29 11.40 6.57 352.35 2500 52,851,816 PUMP 3 RUN HOURS 6.76 6.31 5.54 4.05 17.17 76.82 30.10 3.79 12.93 4.78 9.67 6.23 184.15 2500 27,622,466 PUMP 4 RUN HOURS 7.54 6.88 5.43 4.00 26.29 103.35 32.34 3.71 13.93 4.56 8.03 7.90 223.96 2500 33,593,452 Total Flow 145,148,441 CENTRAL BASIN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.00 184.44 49.56 45.94 53.18 58.29 22.02 0.27 425.95 3500 89,449,785 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 34.44 207.01 50.73 0.00 16.19 11.13 3.16 0.31 322.97 3500 67,824,277 PUMP 3 RUN HOURS 0.25 0.00 0.01 22.79 96.30 262.28 64.86 11.92 21.82 35.77 6.26 37.78 560.04 3500 117,607,380 Total Flow 274,881,442 FAIRVIEW STORM PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.01 4.12 17.03 5.66 1.08 2.95 1.80 0.01 0.00 32.94 4850 9,586,322 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.01 3.86 16.09 5.90 1.10 2.82 1.29 0.01 0.00 31.35 4850 9,122,028 PUMP 3 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 Total Flow 18,708,349 SNYDER WEST BASIN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 4.26 29.94 3.02 2.95 6.14 4.18 1.36 0.00 51.90 2338 7,280,982 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.03 19.17 21.85 15.21 0.95 3.93 1.47 0.06 0.00 67.68 2338 9,493,587 Total Flow 16,774,569 SNYDER EAST BASIN PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 8.29 36.25 10.21 0.02 1.38 4.65 0.02 0.00 60.86 2338 8,538,118 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 8.29 36.25 10.21 0.01 1.38 4.65 0.03 0.00 60.85 2338 8,535,726 Total Flow 17,073,845 PELENDALE PUMP 1 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 13.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.45 0.00 14.02 460 386,825 PUMP 2 RUN HOURS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 14.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.45 0.00 15.34 460 423,385 Total Flow 810,210 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Stormwater is part of a natural hydrologic process; however, human activities, especially urban development and agriculture, cause significant changes in patterns of stormwater flow from land into receiving waters. Urban runoff (water that washes everything left on city streets and in gutters through the storm drain system) can be, or is often, a significant source of water pollution, causing decline in fisheries, swimming, and other beneficial attributes of water resources. Water quality can also be affected when runoff carries sediment and other pollutants into streams, rivers, or groundwater. The costs and impacts of water pollution from urban runoff are significant and can include: Fish kills Health concerns of human and/or terrestrial animals Degraded drinking water Diminished water-based recreation Damage to habitat of fish and other aquatic organisms Inevitable costs of clean-up and pollution reduction Reduced aesthetic values of lakes, streams, and coastal areas The 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act require standards for discharging stormwater into our nation’s waterways. Cities are required to have a permit for discharging into storm drains that lead into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The permit is called a “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)” Permit. An NPDES Permit allows clean stormwater discharges into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The City of Modesto’s current permit was issued in 2008 by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and requires a decrease in pollutants to stormwater and urban runoff. Our Permit is based upon a foundation of education rather than harsh enforcement actions. The Permit requires that all City employees receive training in stormwater pollution prevention. Knowing the general principles that can significantly reduce pollution helps make compliance with stormwater permits and regulations easy. However, the City is responsible to the Regional Board for all employees’ actions and may be fined for polluting activities. Streets, roads, and highways are significant sources of pollutants in stormwater discharges. Street sweeping should be employed on a regular basis to minimize pollutant export to receiving waters. This cleaning practice is designed to remove from road and parking lot surfaces sediment, debris and other pollutants that are potential sources of pollution affecting urban waterways. The objective in stormwater protection is that only rainwater goes down the storm drain. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are specific steps taken to prevent stormwater pollution as a result of day-to-day activities of street maintenance operations. All employees shall review this information fact sheet as a training tool, and make every effort to keep pollutants from going down the storm drain by putting the following BMPs into practice. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Protocols Maintain a consistent sweeping schedule. Provide minimum sweeping of curbed streets. Perform street cleaning during dry weather, if possible Avoid wet cleaning or flushing of street, and utilize dry methods where possible Consider increasing sweeping frequency based on factors such as traffic volume, land use, field observations of sediment and trash accumulation, proximity to water courses, etc. For example: Increase the sweeping frequency for streets with high pollutant loadings, especially in high traffic and industrial areas Increase the sweeping frequency just before the wet season to remove sediments accumulated during the summer Increase the sweeping frequency for streets in special problem areas such as special events, high litter, or erosion zones Schedule special sweepings immediately after all events like street fairs, art shows and parades, and after street maintenance projects such as saw cutting, chip sealing, and new construction and maintenance projects. Maintain cleaning equipment in good working condition and purchase replacement equipment as needed. Old sweepers should be replaced with new technologically advanced sweepers that maximize pollutant removal. Operate all sweepers according to manufacturer’s recommended settings and standards including sweeper speed, brush alignment, and rotation rate To increase sweeping effectiveness consider the following: Institute a parking policy to restrict parking in problematic areas during periods of street sweeping Post permanent street sweeping signs in problematic areas; use temporary signs if installation of permanent signs is not possible Develop and distribute flyers notifying residents of street sweeping schedules Regularly inspect vehicles and equipment for leaks – repair immediately If available, use vacuum or regenerative air sweepers in the high sediment and trash areas (typically industrial/commercial) Keep accurate logs of the number of curb-miles swept and the amount of waste collected Dispose of street sweeping debris and dirt at a landfill Do not store swept material along the side of the street or near a storm drain inlet Take collected debris directly to a permitted landfill or to a temporary storage area where it will not be released into storm drainage or surface waters. Do not dump or store debris uncovered at the yard. Keep debris storage to a minimum during the wet season or make sure debris piles are contained (e.g. by berming the area) or covered (e.g. with tarps or permanent covers) ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Stormwater is part of a natural hydrologic process; however, human activities, especially urban development and agriculture, cause significant changes in patterns of stormwater flow from land into receiving waters. Urban runoff (water that washes everything left on city streets and in gutters through the storm drain system) can be, or is often, a significant source of water pollution, causing decline in fisheries, swimming, and other beneficial attributes of water resources. Water quality can also be affected when runoff carries sediment and other pollutants into streams, rivers, or groundwater. The costs and impacts of water pollution from urban runoff are significant and can include: Fish kills Health concerns of human and/or terrestrial animals Degraded drinking water Diminished water-based recreation Damage to habitat of fish and other aquatic organisms Inevitable costs of clean-up and pollution reduction Reduced aesthetic values of lakes, streams, and coastal areas The 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act require standards for discharging stormwater into our nation’s waterways. Cities are required to have a permit for discharging into storm drains that lead into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The permit is called a “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)” Permit. An NPDES Permit allows clean stormwater discharges into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The City of Modesto’s current permit was issued in 2008 by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and requires a decrease in pollutants to stormwater and urban runoff. Our Permit is based upon a foundation of education rather than harsh enforcement actions. The Permit requires that all City employees receive training in stormwater pollution prevention. Knowing the general principles that can significantly reduce pollution helps make compliance with stormwater permits and regulations easy. However, the City is responsible to the Regional Board for all employees’ actions and may be fined for polluting activities. Street maintenance operations can have a significant effect on pollutants entering storm drains. Street debris can contain sediments, organics, oil and grease. Maintenance work like concrete repair, saw-cut slurry, asphalt repair, and painting can also be a source of storm water pollution. The objective in stormwater protection is that only rainwater goes down the storm drain. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are specific steps taken to prevent stormwater pollution as a result of day-to-day activities of street maintenance operations. All employees shall review this information fact sheet as a training tool, and make every effort to keep pollutants from going down the storm drain by putting the following BMPs into practice. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Pollution Prevention Use the least toxic materials available (e.g. water based paints, gels or sprays for graffiti removal) Recycle paint and other materials whenever possible Do not dump any liquids or other materials outside Enlist the help of citizens to keep yard waste, used oil, and other wastes out of the gutter Protocols Street Repair and Maintenance Pavement Marking Schedule pavement marking activities for dry weather Use thermoplastic markings in place of paint whenever feasible Develop paint handling procedures for proper use, storage, and disposal of paints Provide drop cloths and drip pans in paint mixing areas Properly maintain application equipment Street sweep thermoplastic grindings. Yellow thermoplastic grindings may require special handling as they may contain lead. Paints containing lead or tributyltin are considered a hazardous waste and must be disposed of properly Use water based paints whenever possible. If using water based paints, clean the application equipment in a sink that is connected to the sanitary sewer. Concrete Installation and Repair Schedule asphalt and concrete activities for dry weather Take measures to protect any nearby storm drain inlets (within 25 feet) and adjacent watercourses, prior to breaking up asphalt or concrete (e.g. place sandbags around inlets or work areas) Limit the amount of fresh concrete or cement mortar mixed; mix only what is needed to the job Store concrete materials under cover, away from drainage areas. Secure bags of cement after they are open. Be sure to keep wind-blown cement powder away from streets, gutters, storm drains, rainfall, and runoff Return leftover materials to the transit mixer. Dispose of small amounts of hardened excess concrete, grout, and mortar in the trash or recycle in an approved manner.. Do not wash sweepings from exposed aggregate concrete into the street or storm drain. Collect and return sweepings to aggregate base stockpile, or dispose in the trash. When making saw cuts in pavement, use as little water as possible and perform during dry weather. Cover each storm drain inlet completely with plastic during the sawing operation and place sandbags or gravel bags around the inlets. A wet vacuum shall be used to pick up the slurry as this will prohibit the slurry from reaching storm drain inlets. The water and slurry from saw cutting shall not enter the storm drain system. Wash concrete trucks off site or in designated areas on site designed to preclude discharge of wash water to drainage system ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Patching, Resurfacing, and Surface Sealing Schedule patching, resurfacing, and surface sealing for dry weather Stockpile materials away from streets, gutter areas, storm drain inlets or watercourses. During wet weather, cover stockpiles with plastic tarps or berm around them if necessary to prevent transport of materials in runoff. Pre-heat, transfer or load hot bituminous material away from drainage systems or watercourses Where applicable, cover and seal nearby storm drain inlets (with waterproof material or mesh) and maintenance holes before applying seal coat, slurry seal, etc. Leave covers in place until job is complete and until all water from emulsified oil sealants has evaporated. Clean any debris from covered maintenance holes and storm drain inlets when the job is complete. Prevent excess material from exposed aggregate concrete or similar treatments from entering streets or storm drain inlets. Designate an area for clean up and proper disposal of excess material Use only as much water as necessary for dust control; avoid runoff Sweep – never hose down – streets to clean up tracked dirt. Use a street sweeper or vacuum truck. Do not dump vacuumed liquid into storm drains. Catch drips from paving equipment that is not in use with pans or absorbent material placed under the machines. Dispose of collected material and absorbents properly. Equipment Cleaning, Maintenance and Storage Inspect equipment daily and repair any leaks. Place drip pans or absorbent materials under heavy equipment when not in use. Clean equipment – including sprayers, sprayer paint supply lines, patch and paving equipment, and mud jacking equipment – at the end of each day. Clean in a sink or other area (e.g. vehicle wash area) that is connected to the sanitary sewer. Structure Maintenance Paint and Paint Removal Transport paint and materials to and from job sites in containers with secure lids and tied down to the transport vehicle Do not transfer or load paint near storm drain inlets or watercourses Test and inspect spray equipment prior to starting to paint. Tighten all hoses and connections and do not overfill paint container Plug nearby storm drain inlets prior to starting painting where there is a significant risk of a spill reaching storm drains. Remove plugs when job is completed. If sand blasting is used to remove paint, cover nearby storm drain inlets prior to starting work Capture all clean-up water and dispose of properly Recycle paint when possible (e.g. paint may be used from graffiti removal activities). Dispose of unused paint at an appropriate household hazardous waste facility. Graffiti Removal Schedule graffiti removal activities for dry weather ---PAGE BREAK--- 4 Protect nearby storm drain inlets prior to removing graffiti from walls, signs, sidewalks, or other structures needed graffiti abatement. Clean up afterwards by sweeping or vacuuming thoroughly, and/or by using absorbent and properly disposing of the absorbent When graffiti is removed by painting over, implement the procedures under Painting and Paint removal above Direct runoff from sand blasting and high pressure washing (with no cleaning agents) into a landscaped or dirt area. If such an area is not available, filter runoff through an appropriate filtering device (e.g. filter fabric) to keep sand, particles, and debris out of storm drains If a graffiti abatement method generates wash water containing a cleaning compound (such as high pressure washing with a cleaning compound), plug nearby storm drains and vacuum/pump wash water to the sanitary sewer Consider using a waterless and non-toxic chemical cleaning method for graffiti removal (e.g. gels or spray compounds) Repair Work Prevent concrete, steel, wood, metal parts, tools, or other work materials from entering storm drains or watercourses. Thoroughly clean up the job site when the repair work is completed Non-Stormwater Discharges Field crews should be aware of non-stormwater discharges as part of their ongoing street maintenance efforts Identify location, time and estimated quantity of discharges Notify appropriate personnel Training Train employees regarding proper street repair and maintenance Instruct employees and subcontractors to ensure that measures to reduce the stormwater impacts of roadway maintenance are being followed Use a training log or similar method to document training Train employees on proper spill containment and cleanup, and in identifying non- stormwater discharges Spill Response and Prevention Have spill cleanup materials readily available and in a known location Cleanup spills immediately and use dry methods, if possible Properly dispose of spill cleanup material Develop a formal Spill Response Plan. Post the Plan near spill cleanup materials. ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Stormwater is part of a natural hydrologic process; however, human activities, especially urban development and agriculture, cause significant changes in patterns of stormwater flow from land into receiving waters. Urban runoff (water that washes everything left on city streets and in gutters through the storm drain system) can be, or is often, a significant source of water pollution, causing decline in fisheries, swimming, and other beneficial attributes of water resources. Water quality can also be affected when runoff carries sediment and other pollutants into streams, rivers, or groundwater. The costs and impacts of water pollution from urban runoff are significant and can include: Fish kills Health concerns of human and/or terrestrial animals Degraded drinking water Diminished water-based recreation Damage to habitat of fish and other aquatic organisms Inevitable costs of clean-up and pollution reduction Reduced aesthetic values of lakes, streams, and coastal areas The 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act require standards for discharging stormwater into our nation’s waterways. Cities are required to have a permit for discharging into storm drains that lead into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The permit is called a “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)” Permit. An NPDES Permit allows clean stormwater discharges into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The City of Modesto’s current permit was issued in 2008 by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and requires a decrease in pollutants to stormwater and urban runoff. Our Permit is based upon a foundation of education rather than harsh enforcement actions. The Permit requires that all City employees receive training in stormwater pollution prevention. Knowing the general principles that can significantly reduce pollution helps make compliance with stormwater permits and regulations easy. However, the City is responsible to the Regional Board for all employees’ actions and may be fined for polluting activities. Water line breaks and repairs can be a major source of sediment and other pollutants entering the storm drain system. Care should be taken to protect the storm drains prior to starting any work. In the event of a water line break, the storm drains should be protected as soon as possible. The objective in stormwater protection is that only rainwater goes down the storm drain. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are specific steps taken to prevent stormwater pollution as a result of day-to-day activities of street maintenance operations. All employees shall review this information fact sheet as a training tool, and make every effort to keep pollutants from going down the storm drain by putting the following BMPs into practice. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Protocols • All work should be scheduled to occur in a way that minimizes the potential for sediment and contaminant delivery to waterways using the best available weather forecasts perform work in dry weather, if possible). • BMPs - such as sandbags, rock bags, and filter fabric – should be in place prior to starting any work. • Protect stormwater drainage systems and watercourses from water pumped or bailed from trenches excavated to repair water lines. • Shut off the water source to broken lines as soon as possible to prevent excess water flow into the storm drain system. • When arriving at the scene of a broken water line, protect the impacted storm drains immediately with sand or rock bags. If possible, place filter fabric into the drain inlet to prevent sediment from entering the storm drain system. This is especially important in areas that drain into the Tuolumne River or Dry Creek. • When protecting a storm drain inlet with sand or rock bags, ensure that the bags completely surround the drain inlet so as to prevent sediment from entering. If necessary, stack the bags to form a higher barrier. • If a storm drain system becomes impacted with sediment or other pollutants during the course of a water line break or repair, ensure that the Collections Dept. is immediately contacted for clean up. If you have any questions regarding this BMP Fact Sheet, please contact: Jennifer Peet Environmental Compliance Inspector 577-6242 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Stormwater is part of a natural hydrologic process; however, human activities, especially urban development and agriculture, cause significant changes in patterns of stormwater flow from land into receiving waters. Urban runoff (water that washes everything left on city streets and in gutters through the storm drain system) can be, or is often, a significant source of water pollution, causing decline in fisheries, swimming, and other beneficial attributes of water resources. Water quality can also be affected when runoff carries sediment and other pollutants into streams, rivers, or groundwater. The costs and impacts of water pollution from urban runoff are significant and can include: Fish kills Health concerns of human and/or terrestrial animals Degraded drinking water Diminished water-based recreation Damage to habitat of fish and other aquatic organisms Inevitable costs of clean-up and pollution reduction Reduced aesthetic values of lakes, streams, and coastal areas The 1987 amendments to the Clean Water Act require standards for discharging stormwater into our nation’s waterways. Cities are required to have a permit for discharging into storm drains that lead into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The permit is called a “National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)” Permit. An NPDES Permit allows clean stormwater discharges into rivers, lakes, or the ocean. The City of Modesto’s current permit was issued in 2008 by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board and requires a decrease in pollutants to stormwater and urban runoff. Our Permit is based upon a foundation of education rather than harsh enforcement actions. The Permit requires that all City employees receive training in stormwater pollution prevention. Knowing the general principles that can significantly reduce pollution helps make compliance with stormwater permits and regulations easy. However, the City is responsible to the Regional Board for all employees’ actions and may be fined for polluting activities. Street maintenance operations can have a significant effect on pollutants entering storm drains. Street debris can contain sediments, organics, oil and grease. Maintenance work like concrete repair, saw-cut slurry, asphalt repair, and painting can also be a source of storm water pollution. The objective in stormwater protection is that only rainwater goes down the storm drain. Best Management Practices (BMPs) are specific steps taken to prevent stormwater pollution as a result of day-to-day activities of street maintenance operations. All employees shall review this ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 information fact sheet as a training tool, and make every effort to keep pollutants from going down the storm drain by putting the following BMPs into practice. Pollution Prevention Use the least toxic materials available (e.g. water based paints, gels or sprays for graffiti removal) Recycle paint and other materials whenever possible Do not dump any liquids or other materials outside Enlist the help of citizens to keep yard waste, used oil, and other wastes out of the gutter Protocols Concrete Installation and Repair Schedule asphalt and concrete activities for dry weather Take measures to protect any nearby storm drain inlets (within 25 feet) and adjacent watercourses, prior to breaking up asphalt or concrete (e.g. place sandbags around inlets or work areas) Limit the amount of fresh concrete or cement mortar mixed; mix only what is needed to the job Store concrete materials under cover, away from drainage areas. Secure bags of cement after they are open. Be sure to keep wind-blown cement powder away from streets, gutters, storm drains, rainfall, and runoff Return leftover materials to the transit mixer. Dispose of small amounts of hardened excess concrete, grout, and mortar in the trash. Do not wash sweepings from exposed aggregate concrete into the street or storm drain. Collect and return sweepings to aggregate base stockpile, or dispose in the trash. When making saw cuts in pavement, use as little water as possible and perform during dry weather. Cover each storm drain inlet completely with plastic during the sawing operation and place sandbags or gravel bags around the inlets. A wet vacuum shall be used to pick up the slurry as this will prohibit the slurry from reaching storm drain inlets. The water and slurry from saw cutting shall not enter the storm drain system. Wash concrete trucks off site or in designated areas on site designed to preclude discharge of wash water to drainage system Equipment Cleaning, Maintenance and Storage Inspect equipment daily and repair any leaks. Place drip pans or absorbent materials under heavy equipment when not in use. Clean equipment – including sprayers, sprayer paint supply lines, patch and paving equipment, and mud jacking equipment – at the end of each day. Clean in a sink or other area (e.g. vehicle wash area) that is connected to the sanitary sewer. Repair Work Prevent concrete, steel, wood, metal parts, tools, or other work materials from entering storm drains or watercourses. Thoroughly clean up the job site when the repair work is completed ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Non-Stormwater Discharges Field crews should be aware of non-stormwater discharges as part of their ongoing street maintenance efforts Identify location, time and estimated quantity of discharges Notify appropriate personnel Training Train employees regarding proper street repair and maintenance Instruct employees and subcontractors to ensure that measures to reduce the stormwater impacts of roadway maintenance are being followed Use a training log or similar method to document training Train employees on proper spill containment and cleanup, and in identifying non- stormwater discharges Spill Response and Prevention Have spill cleanup materials readily available and in a known location Cleanup spills immediately and use dry methods, if possible Properly dispose of spill cleanup material Develop a formal Spill Response Plan. Post the Plan near spill cleanup materials. ---PAGE BREAK--- Draft Best Management Practices for Stormwater Protection for Inclusion into the City of Modesto Emergency Operations Plan (EOP) Submitted to Fire Marshal on May 16, 2011 by ECS Current wording in the EOP: Page 49 (Initial Response Operations) Concepts of Operations – Introduction “During initial response operations, City of Modesto field responders will place emphasis on saving lives, property, and the environment, controlling the situation, and minimizing the effects of the emergency”. Suggested changes in wording: Concepts of Operations – Introduction “During initial response operations, City of Modesto field responders will place emphasis on saving lives, minimizing environmental damage, and protecting property”. Minimizing Environmental Damage Despite a municipality’s best efforts, environmental damage can occur during emergencies. These include, but are not limited to, hazardous and toxic waste releases to groundwater and receiving waters, large sewage spills to receiving waters, and fires which cause pollution to receiving waters. Effective preparation and response can prevent or minimize environmental impacts. The following steps will be taken by First Responders when responding to any emergency which has the potential to cause environmental damage: protect/seal all drain inlets, immediate notification of City of Modesto Public Works Department Collections and Environmental Compliance Sections, and notification of Department of Environmental Resources.” ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Illicit Discharge Hotline Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Illicit Discharge Hotline Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 Report stormwater violations in the City of Modesto to Environmental Compliance 24/7 577-6200 ---PAGE BREAK--- Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” Examples of Illicit Discharges: 1. Sanitary Sewer Overflows 2. Discharges of wash water (such as hosing, power washing, carpet cleaning) 3. Discharges of pool water 4. Discharges of sediment, landscape debris, or construction-related waste 5. Discharges of food-related waste “Only Rain Down the Drain” ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix E Industrial and Commercial Businesses SIC Codes Facilities Subject to Inspection 2012-2013 Facilities Inspected Risk Commercial Industrial ---PAGE BREAK--- B Codes 279 Kennels, Breeding & Raising Own Stock (0279) 752 Kennels, Boarding (0752) 5261 Nursery Stock, Seeds & Blubs Retail (5261) 5511 Automobiles, New & Used Retail (5511) 5521 Automobiles, Used Retail (5521) 5541 Gasoline Service Stations (5541) 5812 Restaurants & Caterers (5812) 7216 Dry Cleaning Plants except Rug Cleaning (7216) 7353 Rental of Construction Equipment (7353) 7359 Rental of Tools (7359) 7532 Automotive Body Shops (7532) 7538 Automotive Repair Shops - General (7538) 7539 Automotive Repair Shops - Not Elsewhere found (7539) C Codes 781 Landscape Counseling And Planning (0781) 782 Lawn and Garden Services (0782) 1521 General Contractors-Single Family Houses (1521) 1522 General Contractors-Residential Other Than Single-Family (1522) 1541 General Contractors-Industrial And Warehouses (1541) 1542 General Contractors-Nonresidential (1542) 1721 Painting And Paper Hanging (1721) 1761 Roofing,Siding, And Sheet Metal Work (1761) 1771 Concrete Work (1771) 1795 Wrecking And Demolition Work (1795) 1799 Special Trade Contractors NEC (1799) 7217 Carpet And Upholstery Cleaning (7217) 7342 Disinfecting And Pest Control Services (7342) 7349 Bldg Cleaning & MTC Svcs NEC (7349) 7389 Business Services NEC (7389) 7542 Carwashes (7542) MANDATORY SIC CODES 1389 OIL AND GAS FILED SVCS NOT ELSEWHERE CLA 2426 HARDWOOD DIMENSION AND FLOORING MILLS 2431 MILLWORK 2439 STRUCTURAL WOOD MEMBERS NOT ELSEWHERE CL 2451 MOBILE HOMES 2499 WOOD PRODUCTS NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFIED 2841 SOAP & OTHER DETERGENTS EXCEPT SPECIALTY 2851 PAINTS, VARNISHES, LACQUERS, ENAMELS&ALL 2899 CHEMICALS&CHEMICAL PREPARATION NOT ELSEW 3272 CONCRETE PRODUCTS EXCEPT BLOCK AND BRICK 3281 CUT STONE AND STONE PRODUCTS 3299 NONMETALLIC MINERAL PRODUCTS NOT ELSEWHE 3399 PRIMARY METAL PRODUCTS NOT ELSEWHERE CLA 4111 LOCAL AND SUBURBAN TRANSIT 4119 LOCAL PASSENGER TRANSPORT NOT ELSEWHERE 4121 TAXICABS 4131 INTERCITY AND RURAL BUS TRANSPORTATION 4212 LOCAL TRUCKING WITHOUT STORAGE ---PAGE BREAK--- 4213 TRUCKING EXCEPT LOCAL 4214 LOCAL TRUCKING WITH STORAGE 4215 COURIER SERVICES EXCEPT BY AIR 4226 SPECIAL WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE NOT ELSE 4231 TERMINAL&JNT TERMINAL MTC FACILITIES FOR 4512 AIR TRANSPORTATION SCHEDULED 4581 AIRPORTS, FLYING FILEDS & AIRPORT TERMIN 5015 MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS, USED 5012 AUTOMOBILES AND OTHER MOTOR VEHICLES 5093 SCRAP AND WASTE MATERIALS CONDITIONAL SIC CODES 2024 ICE CREAM AND FROZEN DESSERTS 2026 FLUID MILK 2033 CANNED FRUITS, VEGETABLES, PRESERVES, JA 2034 DRIED & DEHYDRATED FRUITS, VEGETABLES&SO 2038 FROZEN SPECIALTIES NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIF 2041 FLOUR AND OTHER GRAIN MILL PRODUCTS 2047 DOG and CAT FOOD MANUFACTURE 2051 BREAD & OTHER BAKERY PRODS EXCEPT COOKIE 2052 COOKIES AND CRACKERS 2064 CANDY & OTHER CONFECTIONERY PRODUCTS 2079 SHORTENING,TABLE OILS, MARGARINE&OTHER E 2085 DISTILLED AND BLENDED LIQUORS 2086 BOTTLED AND CANNED SOFT DRINKS AND CARBO 2095 ROASTED COFFEE 2097 MANUFACTURED ICE 2099 FOOD PREPARATIONS NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSIFI 2311 MEN'S & BOY'S SUITS, COATS, AND OVERCOAT 2329 MEN'S & BOYS' CLOTHING NOT ELSEWHERE CLA 2339 WOMEN'S,MISSES',&JRS' OUTERWEAR NOT ELSE 2394 CANVAS AND RELATED PRODUCTS 2434 WOOD KITCHEN CABINETS 2511 WOOD HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE EXCEPT UPHOLSTE 2512 WOOD HOUSEHOLD FURNITURE, UPHOLSTERED 2515 MATTRESSES, FOUNDATIONS, AND CONVERTIBLE 2541 WOOD OFFICE&STORE FIXTURES, PARTITIONS, 2591 DRAPERY HARDWARE AND WINDOW BLINDS AND S 2599 FURNITURE AND FIXTURES NOT ELSEWHERE CLA 2656 SANITARY FOOD CONTAINERS, EXCEPT FOLDING 2677 ENVELOPES 2711 NEWSPAPERS:PUBLISHING,OR PUBLISHING&PRIN 2721 PERIODICALS:PUBLISHING, OR PUBLISHING & 2731 BOOKS:PUBLISHING, OR PUBLISHING & PRINTI 2741 MISCELLANEOUS PUBLISHING 2752 COMMERCIAL PRINTING, LITHOGRAPHIC 2759 COMMERCIAL PRINTING NOT ELSEWHERE CLASSI 3011 TIRES AND INNER TUBES 3069 FABRICATED RUBBER PRODUCTS NOT ELSEWHERE 3086 PLASTICS FOAM PRODUCTS 3088 PLASTICS PLUMBING FIXTURES 3432 PLUMBING FIXTURE FITTINGS AND TRIM ---PAGE BREAK--- 3452 BOLTS, NUTS, SCREWS, RIVETS, AND WASHERS 3479 COATING,ENGRAVING,&ALLIED SERVICES NOT E 3492 FLUID POWER VALVES AND HOSE FITTINGS 3496 MISCELLANEOUS FABRICATED WIRE PRODUCTS 3499 FABRICATED METAL PRODUCTS NOT ELSEWHERE 3531 CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT 3541 MACHINE TOOLS, METAL CUTTING TYPES 3545 CUTTING TOOLS,MACHINE TOOL ACCESSORIES 3556 FOOD PRODUCTS MACHINERY 3599 INDL&COMML MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT NOT ELS 3629 ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIAL APPARATUS NOT ELSE 3645 RESIDENTIAL ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES 3646 COMMERCIAL,INDUSTRIAL&INSTIT ELECTRIC LI 3651 HOUSEHOLD AUDIO AND VIDEO EQUIPMENT 3652 PHONO RECORDS & PRERECORDED AUDIO TAPES& 3661 TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH APPARATUS 3663 RADIO AND TV BROADCASTING&COMMUNICATIONS 3669 COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT NOT ELSEWHERE C 3699 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY,EQUIP,SUPPL NOT ELS 3699 ELECTRICAL MACHINERY,EQUIP,SUPPL NOT ELS 3714 MOTOR VEHICLE PARTS AND ACCESSORIES 3799 TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT NOT ELSEWHERE C 3829 MEASURE&CONTROL DEVICES NOT ELSEWHERE CL 3843 DENTAL EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES 3851 OPHTHALMIC GOODS 3873 WATCHES,CLOCKS,CLOCKWORK OPERATED DEVICE 3911 JEWELRY,PRECIOUS METAL 3931 MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS 3942 DOLLS AND STUFFED TOYS 3949 SPORTING & ATHLETIC GOODS NOT ELSEWHERE 3961 COSTUME JEWELRY&NOVELTIES,BUTTONS,MISC N 3993 SIGNS AND ADVERTISING SPECIALTIES 3999 MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES NOT ELSEWHERE C 4221 FARM PRODUCT WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE 4222 REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE 4225 GENERAL WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE ---PAGE BREAK--- SitesID Addressnum Street SiteName SICNum LastInspec ProgramType BusinessID Company NEC Priority Comments SitetypeID category BusinessCategory 10722 959 10th St 5812 Stormwater 6078 5 De Mayo Mexican Resturant 10th st Commercial Restaurant 10680 509 Winmoore Way 7538 Stormwater 6049 A & D Auto Repair Commercial Automotive Repair 10304 325 Maze Blvd 5541 3/22/2013 Stormwater 5763 A & M Gas Station High Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 3814 1616 Angelo Wy 5093 1/31/2012 Stormwater 3826 A & S Metals High Commercial Stormwater Investigated Scap & Waste Materials 3814 1616 Angelo Wy 5093 1/31/2012 Stormwater 3826 A & S Metals High Commercial Stormwater Investigated Stormwater Investigated 4957 1404 G St 5812 5/1/2012 Stormwater 4770 A & W Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10719 1903 Yosemite Blvd 5261 Stormwater 5344 A Better Choice Hydroponics Commercial Nursery and Garden 10392 1001 Reno Ave 5012 Stormwater 5806 A M Auto Sales (Wholesale) Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 9006 719 5th St 4121 4/26/2010 Stormwater 4235 A Touch of Class Taxi 04/26/10 Business signs do nCommercial Taxi Service 6940 1221 Scenic Dr 7538 5/24/2013 Stormwater 4821 AA Auto Pro's High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair 10723 1324 N. Carpenter Rd. 7538 Stormwater 5694 Aaron's Auto Service Commercial Automotive Repair 8955 302 9th St 7539 7/22/2010 Stormwater 5333 Advanced Auto Repair Commercial Automotive Repair 9598 405 McHenry Ave 7539 9/2/2010 Stormwater 5512 Affordable Auto Repair Commercial Automotive Repair 10340 1017 J St 5812 5/1/2013 Stormwater 5773 Al Afndy High Commercial Restaurant 10481 423 7th St 7538 Stormwater 5853 Allspec Auto Commercial Automotive Repair 9989 1901 Prescott Rd 7538 2/3/2011 Stormwater 5631 American Tire Depot Commercial Auto Tire Shop 8768 1623 Yosemite Blvd 7542 3/21/2012 Stormwater 5310 Aqua Blast Carwash Yosemite High Commercial Car Wash 9012 910 12th St 5812 2/24/2011 Both 5367 Aqua Lounge & Fine Dining LLC 02/24/11 Closed at time of inCommercial Restaurant 10444 1105 Yosemite Blvd 5521 Stormwater 5834 Armas Auto Sales Inc Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10693 1328 Crows Landing Rd 5521 Stormwater 6057 Arredondo's Auto Sales 1328 Crows Landing Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10467 1006 Carpenter Rd 5521 Stormwater 5848 Arts Auto Deals Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 9850 405 McHenry Ave 7538 9/2/2010 Stormwater 5587 Auto 1 Pay Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 7053 705 McHenry Ave 5521 5/21/2013 Stormwater 4919 Auto Shopper High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10348 1721 Yosemite Blvd 5521 5/24/2013 Stormwater 5780 Auto World Auto Sales Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 9516 1001 10th St 5812 2/15/2012 Stormwater 5494 Azucar Latin Grill & Mojito Bar High Commercial Restaurant 10067 1510 Miller Ave 5541 2/2/2012 Stormwater 5658 B Z Mart High 02/02/12 Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 7680 801 Oakdale Rd 5812 2/1/2012 Stormwater 5133 Baja Fresh High Commercial Restaurant 10488 2043 Tully Rd 5812 Stormwater 5863 Baker Boy Donuts Commercial Restaurant 10489 1700 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5864 Bauers Catering & Old World Cuisine Commercial Restaurant 10551 615 Kansas Ave 5812 Stormwater 5920 Beans Coffee Co-Kansas Commercial Restaurant 7178 1751 Yosemite Blvd 5812 2/10/2011 Stormwater 5008 Bee's B.B.Q. High 02/10/11 SW Insp: rain wate Commercial Restaurant 6874 917 Yosemite Blvd 5812 8/31/2010 Both 4756 Beiruts Falafel Hut High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10490 2625 Coffee Rd 5812 Stormwater 5865 Bella Italia Commercial Restaurant 10405 1230 Crows Landing Rd 5541 6/3/2013 Stormwater 5815 Best Gas For Less Inc Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10491 1238 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 5866 Birrieria Chito Commercial Restaurant 10296 630 6th St 5511 3/21/2013 Stormwater 5744 BJ's Auto Sales High 01/31/12 Car sales lot on nor Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10486 2200 Plaza Parkway 5812 Stormwater 5856 Black Bear Diner Commercial Restaurant 9857 822 Yosemite Blvd 5511 8/31/2010 Stormwater 5590 Blue Diamond Auto Sales Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 9830 2501 McHenry Ave 5812 2/16/2012 Stormwater 5580 Blue Sage High Commercial Restaurant 9965 1345 McHenry Ave 5812 4/27/2012 Stormwater 5621 Bottoms Up Bar & Restaurant High 04/27/12 unable to inspect, nCommercial Restaurant 10139 901 Yosemite Blvd 5812 3/26/2013 Stormwater 5625 Bottoms Up Espresso High 07/16/11 Car Wash Water inCommercial Restaurant 7224 1011 5th St 7389 2/1/2012 Stormwater 5038 Budget Auto Glass High Commercial Professional 10492 3020 Floyd Ave 5812 Stormwater 5867 Buffalo Wings and Rings Commercial Restaurant 10493 3401 Yosemite Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5868 Burger King on Yosemite Commercial Restaurant 4357 2020 Standiford Ave 5812 Stormwater 3898 Burger King-Standiford High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10455 3460 Oakdale Rd 5812 Stormwater 5839 Café déjà vu Commercial Restaurant 10187 112 La Loma Ave 5093 5/10/2012 Stormwater 5698 LaLoma Ave High Commercial Scrap & Waste Materials 3480 1107 8th St 7538 6/29/2011 Stormwater 3574 California Auto Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10557 830 Kansas Ave 7539 Stormwater 5925 California Customs Commercial Automotive Repair 10716 3401 Dale Rd 5812 Stormwater 6072 California Wireless Solutions, Inc. 3401 Dale Commercial Restaurant 10274 608 McHenry Ave 5521 5/22/2013 Stormwater 5720 Car Xchange Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10178 1400 10th St 5521 5/1/2012 Stormwater 5693 Carplus USA High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10344 821 L St 5812 5/1/2013 Stormwater 5777 Casa Fuego Spirits Co Inc High Commercial Restaurant 10279 400 7th St 5093 3/26/2013 Stormwater 5721 Cash for Recycle High Commercial Facility 10266 702 6th St 5521 2/6/2012 Stormwater 5718 Cen Cal Auto Sales High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10215 1001 5th St 7538 2/1/2012 Stormwater 5707 Central Valley Complete Auto Repair High Commercial Automotive Repair 10713 3816 Windwood Pl 7359 Stormwater 6069 Central Valley Frozen Beverage LLC 3816 Windwood Commercial Rentals 9911 1325 J St 5812 2/24/2012 Stormwater 5610 Charlie Browns Burgers High Commercial Restaurant 3486 3037 Sisk Rd 5541 4/26/2013 Stormwater 6051 Chevron at 3037 Sisk High 12/10/04 ID Name changed Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 3486 3037 Sisk Rd 5541 4/26/2013 Stormwater 6051 Chevron at 3037 Sisk High 12/10/04 ID Name changed Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet Septic Tank 10250 413 Burney St 5812 2/24/2012 Stormwater 5712 Chicago Pizza High Commercial Restaurant 3727 2240 McHenry Ave 5812 2/7/2012 Both 3780 China Express High 08 29 08 ID Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 9343 919 McHenry Ave 5521 5/14/2013 Stormwater 5465 Citi Auto Sales High 06/23/09 Previous name wasCommercial Automobiles, New & Used 3519 1220 McHenry Ave 7538 2/10/2012 Stormwater 3612 City Tire Sales, Inc. High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 9597 950 Oakdale Rd 5812 9/15/2010 Stormwater 5511 Coachs Corner Commercial Restaurant 6662 2601 Oakdale Rd 5812 2/10/2012 Stormwater 4696 Coffee Creek High Commercial Restaurant 8426 1200 6th St 5541 8/2/2010 Stormwater 5219 Connoco 76 (6th St) 5/14/07; Name change from Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10096 1017 J St 5812 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5666 Cupcakes, Bakery and Company High Commercial Restaurant 10721 3401 Dale Rd 5812 Stormwater 6077 Dairy Queen Orange Julius Treat Center 3401 Dale Commercial Restaurant 4709 2075 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 4142 Damians Restaurant High 07/19/06 ID Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 3502 1320 9th St 7538 8/2/2010 Stormwater 3595 Dan's Auto Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial ApplicationPending Automotive Repair 3502 1320 9th St 7538 8/2/2010 Stormwater 3595 Dan's Auto Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial ApplicationPending Automotive Repair 8595 1400 Standiford Ave 5812 Stormwater 5264 De Vincis Delicatessen & Catering Commercial Restaurant 4138 532 McHenry Ave 7216 6/2/2011 Stormwater 3947 Deluxe Cleaners, Inc. High Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 4388 110 McHenry Ave 5812 2/10/2012 Both 4018 Denny's Restaurant High 06/26/08; ID 02/28/11 Pota Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4572 1525 McHenry Ave 5812 2/10/2012 Both 4076 Denny's Restaurant-Mc Henry High 01/29/03 ID; 07/25/07; ID N Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4573 2052 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 4077 Denny's-W Orangeburg High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant ---PAGE BREAK--- 4850 1202 J St 5812 2/18/2004 Stormwater 4192 DeVa High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4850 1202 J St 5812 2/18/2004 Stormwater 4192 DeVa High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 9756 811 McHenry Ave 5521 4/27/2012 Stormwater 4937 Devine Auto Sales High 3/3/11 Gray water discharge Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 3474 935 8th St 7539 3/22/2013 Stormwater 3568 Discount Auto Electric & Radiator High Commercial Radiator Shop Radiator Shop 10692 1402 Crows Landing Rd 7538 Stormwater 6055 Dizneya Wise Towing & Repair Commercial Automotive Repair 9956 2200 Nickerson Dr 4214 1/7/2011 Stormwater 5620 Dot Foods, Inc. Commercial Trucking 4168 1801 H St 7216 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5001 Downtown Cleaners High Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 10535 1025 Lone Palm Ave 7538 Stormwater 5909 Dragonfly Garage Commercial Automotive Repair 10352 725 McHenry Ave 5511 4/27/2012 Stormwater 5782 Dream Auto Sales High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10297 1011 Yosemite Blvd 5521 4/12/2012 Stormwater 5751 Drivetime Auto Sales High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 5054 1204 9th St 7532 8/2/2010 Stormwater 4475 Durham Body Shop High 12/28/01 ID;02/21/03 ID; 03/Commercial Automotive Body Shop 9310 3801 Yosemite Blvd 5812 5/14/2010 Stormwater 5455 El Maguey Restaurante y Taqueria 05/13/09 ID 2 NOV's writtenCommercial Restaurant 10494 1616 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 5869 El Pollo Feliz Commercial Restaurant 6092 801 Oakdale Rd 5812 5/24/2013 Stormwater 4548 El Pollo Loco High No SW treatment device req Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10035 607 7th St 5812 3/21/2013 Stormwater 5649 El Rodeo Bar & Grill High Commercial Restaurant 10291 2241 Yosemite Blvd 5812 1/30/2012 Stormwater 5728 El Taco Sabroso High Commercial Restaurant 9900 413 Maze Blvd 5812 2/1/2012 Stormwater 5605 El Trancazo Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant 8474 2201 Yosemite Blvd 5521 1/30/2012 Stormwater 5252 El Vista Auto Sales High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10300 1230 11th St 7538 5/1/2013 Stormwater 5753 Englands Speed Shop High Commercial Automotive Repair 5539 500 Winmoore Wy 2841 7/13/2011 Both 3878 Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. High at the northwest corner of thIndustrial Stormwater Investigated 5539 500 Winmoore Wy 2841 7/13/2011 Both 3878 Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. High at the northwest corner of thIndustrial Chemicals and Chemical Preparation 5539 500 Winmoore Wy 2899 7/13/2011 Both 3878 Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. High at the northwest corner of thIndustrial Stormwater Investigated 5539 500 Winmoore Wy 2899 7/13/2011 Both 3878 Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc. High at the northwest corner of thIndustrial Chemicals and Chemical Preparation 3430 1616 Oakdale Rd 7538 8/20/2010 Stormwater 3527 Europa Motors High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 3389 820 9th St 7538 6/29/2011 Both 3499 European Automotive Specialties High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 9934 1432 9th St 5541 5/10/2012 Stormwater 5615 Express Mart 1 High Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 8456 3225 McHenry Ave 7538 3/23/2011 Stormwater 5235 Extreme Oil Change High 4/27/07; Name changed fromCommercial Automotive Repair 10005 1411 Yosemite Blvd 7532 2/10/2011 Stormwater 5633 Family Auto Repair and Auto Glass High 02/10/11 name changed fromCommercial Automotive Repair 6979 1228 Tully Rd 5812 4/23/2013 Both 4851 Fast Eddie's MOAB High Commercial Restaurant 6877 3121 Yosemite Blvd 5812 5/30/2013 Both 4759 Fat Wong Chinese Food to Go High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10495 1111 I St 5812 Stormwater 5870 Firkin and Fox Commercial Restaurant 10261 1310 7th St 7532 1/25/2012 Stormwater 5716 Four Star Body and Frame High Commercial Automotive Body Shop 8763 3020 Floyd Ave 7216 5/24/2013 5304 Fresh Cleaners at Modesto Commercial Dry Cleaner 10094 110 Granger Ave 5812 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5664 Fresh Mexican Food High Commercial Restaurant 10453 901 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 5838 Frost Bakery & Café Commercial Restaurant 10496 407 Burney St 5812 Stormwater 5871 Full Moon Bayou Bar B Que Commercial Restaurant 8470 111 Rosina Ave 7538 3/8/2011 Stormwater 5249 G Auto & Transmission, General Auto Repair 6/13/07; Change of buisness Commercial Automotive Repair 10459 2020 Coffee Rd 5812 Stormwater 5843 Gabbys Deli Commercial Restaurant 4576 1033 McHenry Ave 5812 6/1/2011 Both 4079 Garcia Jo Jo's High 03/04/11 Verbal Warning an Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 8440 2241 Yosemite Blvd 5541 5/30/2013 Stormwater 5224 Gas & Market Valero 5/8/07; name changed from Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10497 3121 Yosemite Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5872 Georges Burgers Commercial Restaurant 10539 2215 Scenic Dr 5812 Stormwater 5911 Girasol Paleteria & Neveria Commercial Restaurant 9160 2020 Standiford Ave 752 4/27/2010 Stormwater 5404 Gloria's Grooming and Training 04/27/10 Out of business Commercial Animal Specialties 10477 1025 Lone Palm Ave 5521 Stormwater 5849 Goodspeed Motorsports Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10558 1432 9th St 5812 Stormwater 5926 Gourmet Fresh Delilicious Commercial Restaurant 4326 829 5th St 5521 3/22/2013 Stormwater 4905 Green Auto Sales & Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair 4326 829 5th St 7538 3/22/2013 Stormwater 4905 Green Auto Sales & Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair 10159 953 10th St 5812 4/5/2012 Stormwater 5689 Greens Market LLC High Commercial Restaurant 3433 1400 Coffee Rd 5541 1/26/2012 Stormwater 3530 Griffin Shell Service, Inc. High Commercial Automotive Repair RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 9585 2020 Standiford Ave 752 4/23/2010 Stormwater 5507 Grooming By Stephanie @ A Yuppy Puppy Not there… Commercial Animal Specialties 4141 941 McHenry Ave 7216 5/7/2013 Stormwater 3950 Halford's Dry Cleaners High Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 10704 800 Hatch Rd 5541 Stormwater 6062 Hatch Food & Gas 800 Hatch Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10438 3318 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5828 House of Potsticker Commercial Restaurant 8462 914 7th St 7538 1/25/2012 Stormwater 5240 Hovey's Imports and Motorsports High 4/30/07; Name changed fromCommercial Automotive Repair 10357 330 Needham St 5812 6/11/2012 Stormwater 5786 I Pho Sandwich Café High Commercial Restaurant 6916 2401 Orangeburg Ave 5812 2/15/2012 Both 4800 Ice Cream Company High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10313 609 7th St 7538 2/1/2012 Stormwater 5738 Icon Kustoms High Commercial Automotive Repair 4196 1400 9th St 7538 8/2/2010 Stormwater 3841 Import Auto Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10167 1616 Sisk Rd 5812 Stormwater 5691 In & Out Burgers at 1616 Sisk Commercial Restaurant 9967 217 Winmoore Wy 7538 2/17/2012 Stormwater 5623 Independent Fleet Services, Inc. High Commercial Automotive Repair 10385 1326 Crows Landing Rd 5521 6/3/2013 Stormwater 5805 J & S Quality Motors Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 4590 801 Kansas Ave 5812 Stormwater 4093 Jack In The Box-Kansas High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4593 2044 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 4096 Jack In The Box-W Orangeburg High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10553 2001 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5922 Jack's Pizza Café Commercial Restaurant 3729 2501 McHenry Ave 5812 5/31/2011 Both 3782 Jacob's Fine Dining High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10498 2001 Tully Rd 5812 Stormwater 5873 Jalapenos Taqueria Commercial Restaurant 6357 1021 10th St 5812 Stormwater 4556 Jamba Juice 01/13/04 ID Commercial Restaurant 10499 2401 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 5874 Jamba Juice Orangeburg Commercial Restaurant 10500 3801 Pelandale Ave 5812 Stormwater 5875 Jamba Juice Pelandale Commercial Restaurant 4706 1225 Standiford Ave 5812 Stormwater 4139 Javi's High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10098 1016 H St 5812 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5667 Jax High Commercial Restaurant 10541 1219 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 5912 Jeannies Soulfood Kitchen Commercial Restaurant 10501 1024 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 5876 Jesses Taco Truck Commercial Restaurant 3411 801 Kearney Ave 7538 3/29/2011 Both 3508 John D Silva Automotive High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10463 3801 Pelandale Ave 5812 Stormwater 5847 JP Asian Fusion Inc Commercial Restaurant 8817 609 7th St 7532 3/21/2013 Stormwater 5316 Juanito's Auto Body High 12/08/08 This business is in t Commercial Automotive Body Shop 10216 3020 Floyd Ave 5812 2/7/2012 Stormwater 5708 Juice It Up on Floyd High Commercial Restaurant 4584 3400 McHenry Ave 5812 8/10/2010 Both 4087 Kentucky Fried Chicken-Mc Henry High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 6915 2401 Orangeburg Ave 5812 2/15/2012 Both 4799 King China Gourmet High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant ---PAGE BREAK--- 9564 915 Yosemite Blvd 5812 8/31/2010 Stormwater 5504 Kings BBQ Commercial Restaurant 9476 500 Carpenter Rd 5812 9/8/2010 Stormwater 5485 Knuckleheads Grill Commercial Restaurant 10361 2031 Yosemite Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5790 Kraving Kebab Pizza Commercial Restaurant 8424 1700 Yosemite Blvd 5541 2/1/2011 Stormwater 5217 Kwik Serve (Yosemite Blvd) High 5/8/07; New Business inspec Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10437 959 10th St 5812 4/24/2013 Stormwater 5829 La Patrona American & Mexican Food High Commercial Restaurant 5803 2031 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 4043 La Perla Tapatia 01/08/03 ID Commercial Restaurant 10502 1246 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 5877 La Roca #3 Commercial Restaurant 9434 1728 Oakdale Rd 5812 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5479 La Salsa Fresh Taqueria Commercial Restaurant 10503 4120 Dale Rd 5812 Stormwater 5878 Las Casuelas Restaurant Commercial Restaurant 5703 604 6th St 5812 Stormwater 4453 Las Islitas Mariscos Grease Trap start date 9/26/ Commercial Restaurant 4429 3128 McHenry Ave 5812 8/4/2010 Both 4039 Lee's Kitchen High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10717 901 N. Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 6073 Lion Fusion Express 901 N. Carpenter Commercial Restaurant 4424 2508 Oakdale Rd 5812 Stormwater 4036 Little Caesars High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 6062 315 Paradise Rd 5812 Stormwater 4514 Little Caesars Pizza High Will be sharing an 1500 gal inCommercial Restaurant Restaurant 10504 2800 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5879 Little Caesars Pizza McHenry Commercial Restaurant 10505 2100 Standiford Ave 5812 Stormwater 5880 Little Caesars Pizza Standiford Commercial Restaurant 10684 509 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 6052 Little Ceasars Pizza at 509 McHenry Commercial Restaurant 10283 1340 Coffee Rd 5812 1/11/2013 Stormwater 5723 Los Olivos Salvadorean Food High Commercial Restaurant 10311 110 Trask Ln 7538 1/30/2012 Stormwater 5746 Lowest Price Auto Glass High 01/30/12 This facility also do Commercial Automotive Repair 8726 2027 Yosemite Blvd 5812 4/24/2013 Both 5288 Lucky Bamboo Chinese Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant 6875 1905 Yosemite Blvd 5812 2/1/2011 Both 4757 Luigi's Pizza To GO Kitchen High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10343 137 Orangeburg Ave 5521 5/7/2013 Stormwater 5776 Luxe Auto Sales Orangeburg High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10506 1801 H St 5812 Stormwater 5881 Maisies Sushi House Commercial Restaurant 10479 1300 Sylvan Ave 5812 Stormwater 5851 Maris Restaurant Commercial Restaurant 10507 101 Glenn Ave 5812 Stormwater 5882 Mariscos Colimo Commercial Restaurant 10411 1312 Crows Landing Rd 5812 6/3/2013 Stormwater 5816 Mariscos Sinaloa Commercial Restaurant 10314 808 Yosemite Blvd 5541 1/31/2012 Stormwater 5749 Maxum Petroleum High Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 3473 1400 9th St 7538 8/2/2010 Stormwater 3567 Mazda's Plus High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 4296 900 9th St 5812 Stormwater 3868 Mc Donald's Restaurant - 9th St High 06/06/08 ID 07/21/08 Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4477 1800 Prescott Rd 5812 Stormwater 4067 Mc Donald's-Prescott High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 5102 3801 Yosemite Blvd 5812 2/11/2002 Stormwater 4695 Mc Donald's-Yosemite Blvd 11/04/11 Report of Grease InCommercial Restaurant 6352 2201 McHenry Ave 5541 3/19/2012 Stormwater 4566 McHenry 76 Food Mart High 02/19/04 Citation 12/24/08Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10484 727 McHenry Ave 5521 Stormwater 5854 McHenry Motors Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10122 1445 McHenry Ave 5812 5/31/2011 Stormwater 5673 McHenry's Bar and Restaurant High Used to be Scrambl'z Kounty Commercial Restaurant 9705 421 McHenry Ave 5812 6/17/2013 Both 5537 Mediterranean Market & Grill McHenry 05/04/10 SEWER call, PIR, Gr Commercial Restaurant 10458 1641 Carpenter Rd 7538 Stormwater 5842 Meineke Super Center Modesto Commercial Automotive Repair 10383 854 Crows Landing Rd 5521 5/31/2013 Stormwater 5803 Mendozas Auto Sales High See California Auto Sales 130Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 9822 2508 Oakdale Rd 5812 2/13/2012 Stormwater 5577 Mi Chalateca Pupuseria High Commercial Restaurant 9658 137 Orangeburg Ave 5521 2/3/2011 Stormwater 5526 Mid Valley Motors LLC High 02/03/11 SW Insp made suggCommercial Automobiles, New & Used 3509 338 McHenry Ave 7538 6/15/2012 Stormwater 3602 Midas Auto Service Experts #2 High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 3454 1003 E St 7538 5/24/2011 Stormwater 3549 Miller Automotive High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 3723 1335 McHenry Ave 5812 5/31/2011 Both 3776 Ming's High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 3719 107 McHenry Ave 5812 5/10/2013 Both 3772 Minnie's Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10711 1745 Denver St 7538 Stormwater 6067 Mobile Everlasting Auto Repair 1745 Denver St Commercial Automotive Repair 3553 301 H St 7538 9/1/2010 Stormwater 3643 Modesto Alignment High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair 9208 2000 McHenry Ave 7538 6/2/2011 Stormwater 5423 Modesto Auto Masters Commercial Automotive Repair 10307 1001 5th St 7538 2/1/2012 Stormwater 5761 Modesto Auto Smog High 02/01/12 Written warning duCommercial Automotive Repair 10508 3121 Yosemite Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5883 Modesto Café Commercial Restaurant 8460 3121 Yosemite Blvd 7538 5/30/2013 Stormwater 5239 Modesto Quick Lube 4/6/07; New business Commercial Automotive Repair 10461 1700 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5845 Moe Sushi at Sprouts Commercial Restaurant 10384 1345 McHenry Ave 5812 5/22/2013 Stormwater 5804 Mojos Juke Joint Inc High Waiting to open Commercial Restaurant 10368 1014 Crows Landing Rd 5521 5/31/2013 Stormwater 5794 Motorville Used Cars Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 6879 3801 Yosemite Blvd 5812 5/14/2013 Both 4761 Mountain Mike's Pizza High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10509 901 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 5884 Mountain Mikes Pizza Carpenter Commercial Restaurant 10510 3020 Floyd Ave 5812 Stormwater 5885 Mountain Mikes Pizza Floyd Commercial Restaurant 4688 1221 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 4130 Mountain Mikes-E Orangeburg Ave High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10511 1521 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 5886 Mr. Pickles Carpenter Commercial Restaurant 6878 3121 Yosemite Blvd 5812 5/14/2010 Both 4760 Mr. Pizza High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10351 1105 Yosemite Blvd 7538 4/18/2012 Stormwater 5781 MTC Transmissions High Commercial Automotive Repair 10341 1109 Oakdale Rd 5812 5/24/2013 Stormwater 5774 My Garden Café Commercial Restaurant 10512 3507 Tully Rd 5812 Stormwater 5774 My Garden Café Commercial Restaurant 3500 723 Needham St 7538 9/8/2010 Stormwater 3593 Neville Bros. Service High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial ApplicationPending Automotive Repair 8593 1801 H St 5812 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5262 New Downtown Buffet Commercial Restaurant 5767 2312 McHenry Ave 5812 2/13/2012 Both 4116 New Hong Kong Restaurant High 12/01/02 ID;09/10/03 ID 07 Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4149 2110 College Ave 7216 8/11/2010 Stormwater 3958 Nu-Way Cleaners High Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 4148 1717 Oakdale Rd 7216 8/20/2010 Stormwater 3957 Oakmore Dry Cleaners Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 3470 120 McHenry Ave 7538 2/10/2012 Stormwater 3564 Oil Can Henrys High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10009 3020 Floyd Ave 5812 2/7/2012 Stormwater 5637 Old Plantation Coffee & Café High Commercial Restaurant 4019 2221 McHenry Ave 7216 5/31/2011 Stormwater 3928 One Hour Martinizing High 05/31/11 Verbal Warning seeCommercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 4150 2401 Orangeburg Ave 7216 2/18/2011 Stormwater 3959 One Hour Martinizing #2 High Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 3732 3318 McHenry Ave 5812 8/10/2010 Both 3785 Orient House Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10513 2401 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5888 Osaka Sushi Restaurant Commercial Restaurant 6809 727 McHenry Ave 5521 6/1/2011 Stormwater 4746 Own-A-Car High 07/30/04 ID;08/12/04 ID-CitaCommercial Automobiles, New & Used 10302 1230 11th St 7538 5/1/2013 Stormwater 5755 Ox Rods Motorsports, LLC High Commercial Automotive Repair 3879 1400 9th St 7532 8/2/2010 Stormwater 3836 Pabco Precision Auto Body High 10/25/04 ID;11/21/05 Sent B Commercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10435 1133 Doker Ave 7538 Stormwater 5827 Pacific Clutch & Brake Commercial Automotive Repair 4109 1503 Yosemite Blvd 5521 2/10/2011 Stormwater 5251 Paisanos Auto High 02/10/11 SW Insp: No notica Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 6886 950 10th St 5812 6/12/2012 Stormwater 4773 Paladium High 09 17 10 Warning letter sent Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 9750 3801 Yosemite Blvd 5812 2/3/2012 Stormwater 5549 Panaderia La Michoacana High Commercial Restaurant ---PAGE BREAK--- 10514 3020 Floyd Ave 5812 Stormwater 5889 Panda Express Floyd Commercial Restaurant 4807 801 Oakdale Rd 5812 2/2/2012 Both 4170 Panda Express-Oakdale Rd High 08/05/08 NOV Stormwater InCommercial Restaurant Restaurant 10707 23707 Oakdale Rd 5812 Stormwater 6080 Papa Johns Pizza 2307 Oakdale Rd Commercial Food Service 10446 901 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 5836 Papa Murphy's Pizza on Carpenter Commercial Restaurant 10515 3900 Pelandale Ave 5812 Stormwater 5890 Papa Pizza Pelandale Commercial Restaurant 10066 725 McHenry Ave 7538 6/1/2011 Stormwater 5657 Paradise Tire Auto Service High 06/01/11 New Business, gaveCommercial Automotive Repair 3554 939 McHenry Ave 7538 5/7/2013 Stormwater 3644 Parts House of Modesto High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10516 310 H St 5812 Stormwater 5891 Pasta Pronto Itialian Food Commercial Restaurant 9909 726 7th St 7539 6/16/2011 Stormwater 5608 Payless Auto Repair and Tires 06/16/11 During inspection f Commercial Automotive Repair 10312 2401 Yosemite Blvd 5511 1/30/2012 Stormwater 5747 Payless Auto Sales High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 6217 1105 5th St 7538 3/8/2013 Stormwater 4289 Peek Performance High 09/26/03 ID;11/21/05 Sent B Commercial Automotive Repair 3438 1340 McHenry Ave 7389 6/2/2011 Stormwater 3535 Pep Boys High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 3377 913 5th St 7538 3/8/2013 Stormwater 3494 Phillips Transmission Service High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 6987 1100 McHenry Ave 5812 2/10/2012 Both 4862 Pho Bac Noodle Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant 10097 1222 H St 5812 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5668 Phoenix Noodle House High Commercial Restaurant 10683 1226 H St 5812 Stormwater 6053 Phoenix Sandwich Shop Commercial Restaurant 4231 963 10th St 5812 2/7/2011 Industrial Waste 4604 Picasso's Gourmet Deli High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10517 2401 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 5892 Pizza Hut 2401 Orangeburg Commercial Restaurant 10445 1047 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 5835 Pizza Hut on W Orangeburg Commercial Restaurant 9100 2708 Coffee Rd 5812 Stormwater 5394 Popeye's Chicken 12/05/08 ID Commercial Restaurant 3424 1203 Scenic Dr 7538 5/24/2013 Stormwater 3521 Precision Automotive High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10536 1030 J St 5812 Stormwater 5910 Preservation Coffee Commercial Restaurant 9206 1736 Oakdale Rd 7542 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5426 Prime Shine Express on Oakdale Rd Commercial Car Wash 8463 608 7th St 7538 6/17/2011 Stormwater 5241 Pro Trans Auto Repair High 4/30/07; Name changed fromCommercial Automotive Repair 9091 801 5th St 5541 3/22/2013 Stormwater 5391 Pump & Go High Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 6843 1126 14th St 5812 Stormwater 4750 Queen Bean Coffee House High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10425 1316 7th St 7538 3/21/2013 Stormwater 5823 Quick Auto Repair High Commercial Automotive Repair 3812 110 La Loma Ave 5541 3/15/2011 Stormwater 4600 Quick Stop Market (La Loma) High 03/16/07 ID; 5/14/07; Name Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 8747 2601 Oakdale Rd 5812 2/13/2012 Stormwater 5301 Quizno's Oakdale High Commercial Restaurant 10443 812 Kansas Ave 5521 Stormwater 5832 R & K Auto Sales Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 10545 325 Maze Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5916 Raspados El Amigo Commercial Restaurant 10546 1200 I St 5812 Stormwater 5915 RAW Sushi Bistro Commercial Restaurant 10480 2307 Oakdale Rd 5812 Stormwater 5852 Rivet's American Grill Commercial Restaurant 10552 222 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5921 Rockin Bs Burger Company Commercial Restaurant 7071 1002 Yosemite Blvd 5511 8/31/2010 Stormwater 4938 Rocky's Auto Sales High Commercial Automobiles, New & Used 8986 1300 Carpenter Rd 5812 4/26/2010 Stormwater 5356 S J Taqueria Commercial Restaurant 10288 2601 Oakdale Rd 5812 3/27/2013 Stormwater 5726 Saigon Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant 9650 2221 McHenry Ave 5812 5/31/2011 Stormwater 5523 Sammy's Falafel Express High Commercial Restaurant 3410 1620 Oakdale Rd 7538 8/20/2010 Stormwater 3507 Scenic Automotive High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 4849 1151 Scenic Dr 5812 5/24/2013 Both 4191 Scenic Drive In High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 6898 1100 Carver Rd 5812 5/24/2013 Both 4780 Seng's Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10518 1300 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5412 Shangri La China Bistro Commercial Restaurant 10259 1001 5th St 7539 3/8/2013 Stormwater 5714 Singhs Complete Auto Repair High Commercial Automotive Repair 8592 901 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 5260 Sips Bistro Commercial Restaurant 10007 1410 H St 5812 5/24/2011 Stormwater 5635 Smok'n Smak'n Mac's 06/17/11 Washwater, Verba Commercial Restaurant 6966 650 Sutter Ave 7538 4/5/2013 Stormwater 4843 SNS Car Care-N-Repair High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair 10715 1219 North Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 6071 Sparks City Grill 1219 Carpenter Commercial Restaurant 5524 1202 D St 2033 6/12/2012 Both 4407 Stanislaus Partners (Main) High 6/28/07; Storm Water InspecIndustrial Sales/Distributing 5524 1202 D St 2033 6/12/2012 Both 4407 Stanislaus Partners (Main) High 6/28/07; Storm Water InspecIndustrial Stormwater Investigated 5524 1202 D St 311421 6/12/2012 Both 4407 Stanislaus Partners (Main) High 6/28/07; Storm Water InspecIndustrial Sales/Distributing 5524 1202 D St 311421 6/12/2012 Both 4407 Stanislaus Partners (Main) High 6/28/07; Storm Water InspecIndustrial Stormwater Investigated 10522 1801 H St 5812 Stormwater 5897 Starbucks 1801 H Commercial Restaurant 10521 2001 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5896 Starbucks 2001 McHenry Commercial Restaurant 10523 2045 Briggsmore Ave 5812 Stormwater 5898 Starbucks 2045 Briggsmore Commercial Restaurant 10519 3501 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5894 Starbucks 3501 McHenry Commercial Restaurant 10404 1800 Oakdale Rd 5812 3/27/2013 Stormwater 5814 Starbuck's Coffee #17847 High Commercial Restaurant 10520 2401 Orangeburg Ave 5812 Stormwater 5895 Starbucks Coffee 2401 Orangeburg Commercial Restaurant 10017 950 10th St 5812 4/5/2012 Stormwater 5641 Station on 10th High 03/04/11 Closed for remodel Commercial Restaurant 6503 1424 Coffee Rd 5541 5/24/2013 Stormwater 4660 Stop-N-Save-Coffee Rd Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 6484 3800 McHenry Ave 5541 1/26/2012 Stormwater 5062 Stop-N-Save-McHenry High Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10524 2400 Coffee Rd 5812 Stormwater 5899 Straw Hat Pizza 2400 Coffee Commercial Restaurant 10315 2301 Yosemite Blvd 5812 1/30/2012 Stormwater 5750 Strikes and Spares Grill High Commercial Restaurant 4758 2601 Oakdale Rd 5812 3/27/2013 Both 4311 Strings High 04/21/01 ID;07/24/01 ID;05/ Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4552 801 Oakdale Rd 5812 2/2/2012 Both 4074 Subway High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 5717 1203 McHenry Ave 5812 5/31/2011 Both 4861 Subway - McHenry Ave High 05/31/11 Verbal Warning an Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10525 822 Kansas Ave 5812 Stormwater 5900 Subway 822 Kansas Commercial Restaurant 10526 3121 Yosemite Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5901 Subway Sandwich & Salad Yosemite Commercial Restaurant 7706 2508 Oakdale Rd 5812 5/21/2004 Stormwater 5141 Subway-Oakdale 2508 Commercial Restaurant 4822 2252 McHenry Ave 5812 2/7/2012 Both 4180 Super Giros High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4155 2601 Oakdale Rd 7216 3/27/2013 Stormwater 3963 Superior Cleaner II High Commercial Dry Cleaner Dry Cleaner 9451 431 12th St 5812 2/24/2011 Stormwater 5481 Surlas 02/24/11 Sous chef FranciscoCommercial Restaurant 7205 801 Oakdale Rd 5812 5/24/2013 Stormwater 5028 Sushi Bar High Commercial Restaurant 10527 2704 Coffee Rd 5812 Stormwater 5902 Sushi Cuisine Commercial Restaurant 3425 909 Needham St 7538 9/8/2010 Stormwater 3522 Suzuki's Garage High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 3434 100 La Loma Ave 7538 3/15/2011 Stormwater 3531 Swan's Automotive High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 3728 2401 McHenry Ave 5812 5/31/2011 Both 3781 Szechaun Restaurant High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10694 1328 Crows Landing Rd 7538 Stormwater 6058 T & D Auto & Tow 1328 Crows Landing Commercial Automotive Repair 10528 347 I St 5812 Stormwater 5903 T Ts Seafood Soulfood Commercial Restaurant 3653 825 9th St 5812 4/17/2013 Both 3729 Taco Bell High 01 14 10 NRSSO Private LaterCommercial Restaurant Restaurant ---PAGE BREAK--- 10529 950 10th St 5812 Stormwater 5904 Tacos Guadalajara Commercial Restaurant 10530 1918 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 5905 Taqueria El Grullo Commercial Restaurant 9226 2029 Yosemite Blvd 5812 4/24/2013 Stormwater 5430 Taqueria El Torito High Address was not 2039…but inCommercial Restaurant 6510 1801 H St 5812 Stormwater 4730 Taqueria Los Lagos High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10531 1900 Crows Landing Rd 5812 Stormwater 5906 Taqueria Lucy Commercial Restaurant 10016 959 10th St 5812 4/5/2012 Stormwater 5639 Taqueria Maria #4 High Commercial Restaurant 4772 1401 Coffee Rd 5812 5/24/2013 Both 4164 Tasty Thai High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 8690 3020 Floyd Ave 5812 3/28/2011 Stormwater 5278 Tasty Thai on Floyd High Commercial Restaurant 10487 1809 McHenry Ave 5812 4/29/2013 Stormwater 5859 Taxi's Grill and Bar High Commercial Restaurant 10532 1701 Prescott Rd 5812 Stormwater 5907 Teriyaki King 1701 Prescott Commercial Restaurant 4823 2312 McHenry Ave 5812 2/7/2012 Both 4181 Teriyaki King-Mc Henry High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10442 3401 Yosemite Blvd 5541 Stormwater 5831 Terracotta Shagri-la LLC Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10478 501 7th St 7539 3/26/2013 Stormwater 5850 The Acura Honda Shop High Commercial Automotive Repair 3506 129 Orangeburg Ave 7538 2/3/2011 Stormwater 3599 The Auto Shop High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10682 2039 Yosemite Blvd 5812 4/24/2013 Stormwater 6050 The Blitz Texas BBQ High Commercial Restaurant 7109 1700 McHenry Ave 5812 6/2/2011 Stormwater 4965 The Chicken Barn High 06/02/11 Verbal Warning an Commercial Restaurant 9364 2601 Oakdale Rd 5812 3/27/2013 Stormwater 5467 The Chicken Barn Oakdale High Commercial Restaurant 9810 510 9th St 7532 6/29/2011 Stormwater 5571 The New Earl Scheib Paint & Body High Commercial Automotive Body Shop 9082 1800 Oakdale Rd 5812 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5382 The Tasty Taco Commercial Restaurant 10202 516 12th St 7538 2/24/2012 Stormwater 5702 Tito Rex Complete Auto Repair High Commercial Automotive Repair 5732 1700 McHenry Ave 5812 6/2/2011 Both 4966 Togos Eatery High 06/02/11 Verbal Warning an Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 10720 2416 Nickerson Dr 7538 Stormwater 6076 Tony's Auto Repair 2416 Nickerson Commercial Automotive Repair 9365 2601 Oakdale Rd 5812 3/27/2013 Stormwater 5468 Too Talls Donuts & Café High Commercial Restaurant 8458 1400 9th St 7538 8/2/2010 Stormwater 5237 ToyoTech 4/19/07; Name changed fromCommercial Automotive Repair 6896 927 11th St 5812 3/8/2011 Both 4778 Tresetti's World Caffe High 03 08 11 Written Warning, FaCommercial Restaurant Restaurant 9697 1025 Yosemite Blvd 7538 8/31/2010 Stormwater 5531 U Save Auto Center Commercial Automotive Repair 10533 1533 Oakdale Rd 5812 Stormwater 5908 Uno Chicago Grill Commercial Restaurant 10542 1006 Carver Rd 7538 Stormwater 5913 Valencia Services Commercial Automotive Repair 9323 918 13th St 5812 2/24/2011 Stormwater 5461 Vito's Ristoranto Modesto 02/24/11 Oil spills from tallowCommercial Restaurant 5737 1617 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 4722 Wendys High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4669 1501 McHenry Ave 5812 2/10/2012 Industrial Waste 4006 Wendy's-Mc Henry High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 5738 1521 Carpenter Rd 5812 Stormwater 4720 High Hungry Howies Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 3733 3342 McHenry Ave 5812 8/10/2010 Stormwater 3786 High Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4305 204 McHenry Ave 5812 2/9/2012 Both 3875 Henry High 10/23/06 ID Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 3439 612 Franklin St 7538 5/24/2011 Stormwater 3536 Wilson Lincoln Mercury Body Shop High 12/14/04 ID;11/21/05 Sent B Commercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10712 1700 McHenry Ave 5812 Stormwater 5521 Yogofina Modesto Commercial Restaurant 3569 131 Phoenix Ave 7538 1/30/2012 Stormwater 3659 Yosemite Auto Service High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 10278 3801 Yosemite Blvd 5812 5/14/2013 Stormwater 5722 Zanga Mediterranean Cuisine High Commercial Restaurant 10718 3801 Yosemite Blvd 5812 Stormwater 5722 Zanga Mediterranean Cuisine Commercial Restaurant 5962 1617 Jim Wy Aramark Uniform Services Im 3582 7/22/2010 Stormwater 5055 Aramark Uniform Services High 09/23/03 NOV;Resubmitted pCommercial Dry Cleaner 5962 1617 Jim Wy Aramark Uniform Services Im 3582 7/22/2010 Stormwater 5055 Aramark Uniform Services High 09/23/03 NOV;Resubmitted pCommercial Uniform Service 9562 1717 Oakdale Rd Baskin Robbins on Oakdale 5812 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5503 Baskin Robbins Oakdale Rd Commercial Restaurant 9562 1717 Oakdale Rd Baskin Robbins on Oakdale 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5503 Baskin Robbins Oakdale Rd Commercial Restaurant 9562 1717 Oakdale Rd Baskin Robbins on Oakdale 5812 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5503 Baskin Robbins Oakdale Rd Commercial Restaurant 9562 1717 Oakdale Rd Baskin Robbins on Oakdale 8/20/2010 Stormwater 5503 Baskin Robbins Oakdale Rd Commercial Restaurant 3367 110 Elm St Bus Yard 4173 6/8/2012 Stormwater 3488 City of Modesto - Bus Yard High BUS YARD IS MOVING TO NE Commercial Stormwater Investigated Transportation 3367 110 Elm St Bus Yard 4173 6/8/2012 Stormwater 3488 City of Modesto - Bus Yard High BUS YARD IS MOVING TO NE Commercial Stormwater Investigated Stormwater Investigated 8415 3621 Yosemite Blvd Chevron (Yosemite Blvd) 5541 5/23/2013 Stormwater 5213 Chevron (Yosemite Blvd) High 5/8/07; Used to be Food N FuCommercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 6481 145 Santa Cruz Ave Circle 7 Car Wash 7542 3/26/2013 Both 4849 Circle 7 Car Wash High 10/05/04-plans received and Commercial Car Wash 6872 0 8th St City of Modesto-New Bus Ya 4131 6/11/2013 Stormwater 3690 City of Modesto-CIP High 06/24/10 REMOVE FROM INSCapital Improvement Project Stormwater Investigated 6872 0 8th St City of Modesto-New Bus Ya 4131 6/11/2013 Stormwater 3690 City of Modesto-CIP High 06/24/10 REMOVE FROM INSCapital Improvement Project Transportation 6872 0 8th St City of Modesto-New Bus Ya 4131 6/11/2013 Stormwater 3690 City of Modesto-CIP High 06/24/10 REMOVE FROM INSCapital Improvement Project Stormwater Investigated 6872 0 8th St City of Modesto-New Bus Ya 4131 6/11/2013 Stormwater 3690 City of Modesto-CIP High 06/24/10 REMOVE FROM INSCapital Improvement Project Transportation 10157 500 7th St Commisary Kitchen 5812 Stormwater 5857 Commisary Kitchen 08/11/11 New Project under Commercial Restaurant 10473 1616 Sisk Rd In-N-Out Burger at 1616 Sisk 5812 6/24/2013 Stormwater 5858 In N Out Burger at 1616 Sisk Commercial Restaurant 10473 1616 Sisk Rd In-N-Out Burger at 1616 Sisk 9999 6/24/2013 Stormwater 5858 In N Out Burger at 1616 Sisk Commercial Restaurant 10473 1616 Sisk Rd In-N-Out Burger at 1616 Sisk 5812 6/24/2013 Stormwater 5858 In N Out Burger at 1616 Sisk Commercial Restaurant 10473 1616 Sisk Rd In-N-Out Burger at 1616 Sisk 9999 6/24/2013 Stormwater 5858 In N Out Burger at 1616 Sisk Commercial Restaurant 7161 601 Neece Dr John Thurman Field Food Ser 5812 3/9/2011 Stormwater 5000 Gametime Sports Services, Inc. High Commercial Restaurant 4723 801 Oakdale Rd McDonald's-Oakdale Rd 5812 4/6/2011 Both 4145 Mc Donald's-Oakdale Road High Treatment Device on site. NoCommercial Restaurant Restaurant 4723 801 Oakdale Rd McDonald's-Oakdale Rd 5812 4/6/2011 Both 4145 Mc Donald's-Oakdale Road High Treatment Device on site. NoCommercial Restaurant Restaurant 3550 1400 McHenry Ave McHenry Ave Chevron 5541 3/4/2011 Stormwater 3640 Mchenry Ave Chevron High 03/04/11 Verbal Warning an Commercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 3555 615 7th St Payless Auto Body and Painti 7532 3/21/2013 Stormwater 3645 Payless Auto painting High 11/21/05 Sent BMP fact sheeCommercial Automotive Repair Automotive Repair 7320 815 D St Reliable Rubber Products 5093 4/5/2012 Stormwater 5451 Reliable Rubber Products High 01/05/05-Sent Non-Filer Lett Commercial Stormwater Investigated 5861 328 I St Saigon Plaza Sandwich Shop 5812 3/22/2013 Both 5138 Saigon Plaza Sandwich Shop & Market High 12/30/03 NOV;02/06/04 NOVCommercial Restaurant Restaurant 5861 328 I St Saigon Plaza Sandwich Shop 5812 3/22/2013 Both 5138 Saigon Plaza Sandwich Shop & Market High 12/30/03 NOV;02/06/04 NOVCommercial Restaurant 6147 945 McHenry Ave Seasons Bar and Grill 5812 2/10/2012 Both 4520 The Seasons High Grease trap start date July 20Commercial Restaurant 5852 1420 McHenry Ave Sonic Drive-In McHenry 5812 2/9/2012 Both 4489 Sonic Drive-In High 5/22/03-NOV; 2/24/03 Start Commercial Restaurant Restaurant 4968 617 Airport Wy Stormwater Inspections on th 4581 6/19/2012 Stormwater 4234 City of Modesto - Airport High Construction--Electrical VaultCommercial Stormwater Investigated Stormwater Investigated 4968 617 Airport Wy Stormwater Inspections on th 4581 6/19/2012 Stormwater 4234 City of Modesto - Airport High Construction--Electrical VaultCommercial Stormwater Investigated Transportation 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2026 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2026 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Dairy Products 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2021 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2021 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Dairy Products 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2023 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2023 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Dairy Products 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2026 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2026 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Dairy Products 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2021 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Stormwater Investigated ---PAGE BREAK--- 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2021 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Dairy Products 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2023 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5509 415 Kansas Ave Stormwater Inspections on th 2023 12/6/2011 Both 4394 Foster Farms- Kansas High 10/10/01 ID;10/16/01 ID;06/ Industrial Dairy Products 5398 1421 9th St Stormwater Inspections on th 5093 7/26/2011 Stormwater 3484 Modesto Junk Company High 11/08/04 ID Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5398 1421 9th St Stormwater Inspections on th 5093 7/26/2011 Stormwater 3484 Modesto Junk Company High 11/08/04 ID Industrial Scrap & Waste Materials 5528 725 Zeff Rd Stormwater Inspections this 2011 6/26/2013 Both 4411 California All Natural, LLC 6/21/2002 High end of process, behind buildi Industrial Meat Packing 5528 725 Zeff Rd Stormwater Inspections this 2011 6/26/2013 Both 4411 California All Natural, LLC 6/21/2002 High end of process, behind buildi Industrial Stormwater Investigated 5546 200 Yosemite Blvd Stormwater Inspections this 2084 6/11/2013 Both 3496 E & J Gallo Brandy High east of warehouse A by large Industrial Sales/Distributing 5546 200 Yosemite Blvd Stormwater Inspections this 2084 6/11/2013 Both 3496 E & J Gallo Brandy High east of warehouse A by large Industrial Stormwater Investigated 7227 820 G St Stormwater Inspections this 2048 6/13/2013 Stormwater 5040 J.S. West High 7/2/07; NOV Commercial Stormwater Investigated 7227 820 G St Stormwater Inspections this 2048 6/13/2013 Stormwater 5040 J.S. West High 7/2/07; NOV Commercial Retail 8396 3500 Coffee Rd Sushi Garden 5812 Stormwater 5860 Sushi Garden 05/30/07 ID Commercial Restaurant 7159 1156 Stoddard Ave Taco Truck 5812 2/17/2011 Stormwater 4999 Cinco De Mayo High Commercial Restaurant 8549 2101 Sylvan Ave Taqueria Mis Compandres 5812 Stormwater 5861 Taqueria Mis Compadres 9/25/07: ID Commercial Restaurant 10433 3037 Sisk Rd Texas Roadhouse 5812 5/8/2013 Stormwater 5862 Texas Roadhouse Under acre project Commercial Restaurant 8418 801 7th St Valero (7th St) 5541 2/23/2011 Stormwater 5215 Valero (7th St) 5/10/07; Name changed fromCommercial RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 9563 2413 Yosemite Blvd Yosemite Recycling 5093 5/14/2010 Stormwater 5502 Yosemite Recycling Commercial Facility 9563 2413 Yosemite Blvd Yosemite Recycling 5/14/2010 Stormwater 5502 Yosemite Recycling Commercial Facility 9563 2413 Yosemite Blvd Yosemite Recycling 5093 5/14/2010 Stormwater 5502 Yosemite Recycling Commercial Facility 9563 2413 Yosemite Blvd Yosemite Recycling 5/14/2010 Stormwater 5502 Yosemite Recycling Commercial Facility ---PAGE BREAK--- SchedInspec SitesID InspecDate Street Addressnum NEC Priority SiteName Company SICNum category Lname InActive BusinessCategory 2.5 10437 4/24/2013 10th St 959 High La Patrona American & Mexican Food 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10365 4/24/2013 10th St 959 Taqueria San Martin Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 10302 5/1/2013 11th St 1230 High Ox Rods Motorsports, LLC 7538 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 10300 5/1/2013 11th St 1230 High Englands Speed Shop 7538 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 10382 5/1/2013 12th St 910 High Lotus Ultra Lounge Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 9197 5/22/2013 5th St 1001 Low Jett Transmission & Auto Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Repair 2.5 6217 3/8/2013 5th St 1105 High Peek Performance 7538 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 3377 3/8/2013 5th St 913 High Phillips Transmission Service 7538 Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 9091 3/22/2013 5th St 801 High Pump & Go 5541 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 8437 5/22/2013 5th St 801 Low Kelly's Gas & Food Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 2.5 10259 3/8/2013 5th St 1001 High Singhs Complete Auto Repair 7539 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 4326 3/22/2013 5th St 829 High Green Auto Sales & Repair 7538 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 10296 3/21/2013 6th St 630 High BJ's Auto Sales 5511 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 10328 3/26/2013 7th St 501 Low Huff's Mercedes Benz BMW Service Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Repair 2.5 10425 3/21/2013 7th St 1316 High Quick Auto Repair 7538 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 10329 3/26/2013 7th St 501 Low Jesus Auto Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Repair 2.5 10478 3/26/2013 7th St 501 High The Acura Honda Shop 7539 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 10279 3/26/2013 7th St 400 High Cash for Recycle 5093 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Facility 2.5 10035 3/21/2013 7th St 607 High El Rodeo Bar & Grill 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 9477 5/22/2013 7th St 609 Jesse's Auto Body Frame Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Body Shop 2.5 8817 3/21/2013 7th St 609 High Juanito's Auto Body 7532 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Body Shop 2.5 3555 3/21/2013 7th St 615 High Payless Auto Body and Painting Payless Auto painting 7532 Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 9717 5/22/2013 7th St 609 Low Hernandez Body Frame and Towing Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Body Shop 9257 5/22/2013 7th St 609 Low Kings Auto Body & Paint Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Body Shop 9102 3/21/2013 7th St 622 Low New Image Collision Center Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Body Shop 7119 5/22/2013 8th St 800 Low Taco Truck Los Portalitos Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 7116 3/26/2013 8th St 800 High Taco Truck Jessica Taco #4 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10177 3/26/2013 8th St 800 Low Taco Truck Adelitas Takeria (Food Truck) Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 3474 3/22/2013 8th St 935 High Discount Auto Electric & Radiator 7539 Radiator Shop Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Radiator Shop 7117 3/26/2013 8th St 800 High Taco Truck Adriana's Super Taco Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 6872 6/11/2013 8th St 0 High City of Modesto-New Bus Yard Maintenance Facility City of Modesto-CIP 4131 Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Transportation 10360 4/17/2013 9th St 822 K C Bar and Grill Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 3653 4/17/2013 9th St 825 High Taco Bell 5812 Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10448 12/4/2012 9th St 621 Vito's Open Air Market Vito's Open Air Market 5812 Rodriquez FALSE 5931 3/26/2013 9th St 416 Low Central Janitorial Supply Central Janitorial Supply Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE 3661 4/29/2013 Briggsmore Ave 2045 Low Imperial Garden Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 10369 5/17/2013 Carpenter Ln 1430 Low Kelly Wholesales Auto Broker Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 10420 5/7/2013 Carpenter Rd 1442 Low Penguins Fruit Shop Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 9540 5/17/2013 Carpenter Rd 800 Low 5 Minute Car Wash Carpenter Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Car Wash 9478 5/17/2013 Carpenter Rd 1219 Low Smokey's Barn Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 7696 5/7/2013 Carpenter Rd 1300 Low Chevron-Carpenter Rd Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 3491 5/7/2013 Carpenter Rd 1300 High Willinger's Automotive INC. Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Repair 3545 5/17/2013 Carpenter Rd 1006 Low Magee's Body & Paint Shop Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automotive Repair 10346 3/21/2013 Carpenter Rd 500 Low Michaels Pizza Bar and Grill Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 8439 5/7/2013 Carpenter Rd 1521 Low Gas City Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10325 3/21/2013 Carpenter Rd 500 Low BRAAP Shop Yamaha Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 3573 3/21/2013 Carpenter Rd 500 Low Modesto Harley-Davison Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 6898 5/24/2013 Carver Rd 1100 High Seng's Restaurant 5812 Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 6897 3/28/2013 Carver Rd 1100 Low Pho 7 Vietnamese Restaurant Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 9899 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2600 Low Arco AM/PM RGO Arco 2600 Coffee Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 9104 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2400 Low Guadalajara Taqueria Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 6503 5/24/2013 Coffee Rd 1424 Stop-N-Save-Coffee Rd 5541 Becker FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 3479 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2600 Low Brazil Chevron Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 8423 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2716 Low Valero (Coffee Rd) Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Retail 9583 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2400 Low Grand Buffet Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 4152 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2400 Low Pro Discount Cleaners Dry Cleaner Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Dry Cleaner 9388 3/28/2013 Coffee Rd 2400 Low Saigon Grill Vietnam Bistro Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 8964 1/11/2013 Coffee Rd 1340 Alegres Taco Shop Becker TRUE Restaurant 2.5 10283 1/11/2013 Coffee Rd 1340 High Los Olivos Salvadorean Food 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 4772 5/24/2013 Coffee Rd 1401 High Tasty Thai 5812 Restaurant Becker FALSE Restaurant 4280 3/28/2013 Coldwell Ave 1440 Low Jack Frost Jack Frost Septic Tank Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Septic Tank 10326 5/6/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1940 Low Taqueria Y Loncheria El Giganton Becker TRUE Restaurant 10543 5/6/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1940 Low Las Chalupas Becker FALSE Restaurant 10375 5/7/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1940 Low Pink Pantherz Espresso Becker FALSE Restaurant 9743 5/7/2013 Crows Landing Rd 2301 Low Arco AM/PM RGO Crows Landing Arco AM/PM RGO Crows Landing Becker FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 8765 5/6/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1940 Low La Reina Michoacana Becker FALSE Restaurant 9843 5/7/2013 Crows Landing Rd 2301 Low M & B Petroleum, Inc. Becker TRUE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 2.5 10385 6/3/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1326 J & S Quality Motors 5521 Becker FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 10411 6/3/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1312 Mariscos Sinaloa 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10383 5/31/2013 Crows Landing Rd 854 High Mendozas Auto Sales 5521 Becker FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 10405 6/3/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1230 Best Gas For Less Inc 5541 Becker FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet ---PAGE BREAK--- 10372 5/31/2013 Crows Landing Rd 930 Low California Auto Sales Becker TRUE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 10368 5/31/2013 Crows Landing Rd 1014 Motorville Used Cars 5521 Becker FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 8968 5/6/2013 Dale Rd 4601 Low California Dining at Kaiser Permanente California Dining KP Modesto Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 10289 5/8/2013 Dale Rd 3401 Low Lady PD Cupcakes Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 9067 5/6/2013 Dale Rd 4250 Low Farm Fresh Market Ziegler TRUE Nursery and Garden 6881 5/6/2013 Dale Rd 4342 Low Vintage Gardens Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 9167 3/8/2013 Douglas Ave 1002 Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE 2.5 8763 5/24/2013 Floyd Ave 3020 Fresh Cleaners at Modesto 7216 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Dry Cleaner 9800 3/21/2013 Franklin St 617 Low Marvs Hawg Shop Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 7057 3/22/2013 Franklin St 522 Low JR Wholesale Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 1 7227 6/13/2013 G St 820 High Stormwater Inspections this site J.S. West 2048 Peet FALSE Stormwater Investigated 8727 4/24/2013 H St 1325 Low Beestro Café Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 5861 3/22/2013 I St 328 High Saigon Plaza Sandwich Shop & Market Saigon Plaza Sandwich Shop & Market 5812 Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10340 5/1/2013 J St 1017 High Al Afndy 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 9799 3/28/2013 Kansas Ave 1000 Low Bel Piatto Cucina Italiana Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10424 3/28/2013 Kansas Ave 830 Low Smog Dynamic Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 6901 3/28/2013 Kansas Ave 500 Low J C's Café Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 6900 3/28/2013 Kansas Ave 900 Low Pho Viet Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 6904 3/28/2013 Kansas Ave 1416 Low Taco Bell - Kansas Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 5446 6/25/2013 Kansas Ave 623 High The New Tin Yard Peet FALSE Scap & Waste Materials 10380 3/28/2013 Kansas Ave 830 Low Credo Automotive Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 10298 3/28/2013 Kearney Ave 620 Low Mikes Auto Sales Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 10344 5/1/2013 L St 821 High Casa Fuego Spirits Co Inc 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 0 5573 8/27/2012 Lapham Dr 2068 Paleteria La Michoacana 2099 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE 10426 3/22/2013 Maze Ave 228 Low El Mexicano Restaurant Bar Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 10304 3/22/2013 Maze Blvd 325 High A & M Gas Station 5541 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10460 3/22/2013 Maze Blvd 439 Low Approved Auto Sales Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 9158 3/22/2013 Maze Blvd 413 Low El Primo Mexican Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 8594 3/22/2013 Maze Blvd 421 Low Docs Q In Pit Stop Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 9305 3/22/2013 Maze Blvd 228 Low El Herradero Pool and Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 10333 3/22/2013 Maze Blvd 413 Low Taqueria El Camino Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 9705 6/17/2013 McHenry Ave 421 Mediterranean Market & Grill McHenry 5812 Peet FALSE Restaurant 10398 1/11/2013 McHenry Ave 3766 Low Car Giant Financial Group Inc. Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 5734 5/8/2013 McHenry Ave 1700 Low Verona's Cucina Italiana Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 3719 5/10/2013 McHenry Ave 107 High Minnie's Restaurant 5812 Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 7040 3/26/2013 McHenry Ave 3824 Low California Auto Center LLC Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 2.5 10384 1/7/2013 McHenry Ave 1345 High Mojos Juke Joint Inc 5812 Peet FALSE Restaurant 10355 1/11/2013 McHenry Ave 3824 Low Auto Shopper Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 3554 5/7/2013 McHenry Ave 939 High Parts House of Modesto 7538 Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 10290 3/26/2013 McHenry Ave 2816 Low Dickeys Barbecue Pit Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 6922 3/26/2013 McHenry Ave 3848 Low Round Table - Mc Henry Ave Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10402 5/8/2013 McHenry Ave 1700 Low Kobe Sushi Buffet LLC Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10487 4/29/2013 McHenry Ave 1809 High Taxi's Grill and Bar 5812 Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 10373 1/11/2013 McHenry Ave 3524 Low MAS Auto Sales Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 10384 5/22/2013 McHenry Ave 1345 High Mojos Juke Joint Inc 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 7053 5/21/2013 McHenry Ave 705 High Auto Shopper 5521 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 10414 5/14/2013 McHenry Ave 1707 Low Freebirds World Burrito-McHenry Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 9290 5/21/2013 McHenry Ave 521 Low Bella Vagos Café Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 7079 5/22/2013 McHenry Ave 931 Low Sarkis Auto Sales Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automobiles, New & Used 10457 1/11/2013 McHenry Ave 3536 Low McHenry Smog Center Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Auto Service Center 8854 3/26/2013 McHenry Ave 3848 Low Fuddruckers Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 4816 5/21/2013 McHenry Ave 521 Low Pomo Dora Café Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 9112 5/22/2013 McHenry Ave 1809 Villa Beef House Ziegler TRUE Restaurant 2.5 10274 5/22/2013 McHenry Ave 608 Car Xchange 5521 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 3724 5/22/2013 McHenry Ave 1345 High El Faro Restaurant Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 4141 5/7/2013 McHenry Ave 941 High Halford's Dry Cleaners 7216 Dry Cleaner Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Dry Cleaner 2.5 9343 5/14/2013 McHenry Ave 919 High Citi Auto Sales 5521 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 7052 5/14/2013 McHenry Ave 919 Low Styles Auto Sales Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automobiles, New & Used 10456 1/11/2013 McHenry Ave 3536 Low Noble Motorsports Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 7127 5/8/2013 McHenry Ave 1524 Low Pacific Deli Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 7110 5/8/2013 McHenry Ave 1700 Low Mexicali Grill Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10403 4/26/2013 Motor City 304 Low Greg Fouts Auto Refinishing Ziegler TRUE Automotive Body Shop 10345 5/6/2013 Nickerson Drive 2416 Low Three Brothers Becker FALSE Automotive Repair 10548 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2307 Low M & B Minit Mart Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE 6919 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2307 Low Johnathan's Fish and Meats II Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 6918 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2307 Low East Chinatown Restaurant Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 6554 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2501 Low USA Gasoline #810 (Oakdale Rd) Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 2.5 4758 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2601 High Strings 5812 Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10288 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2601 High Saigon Restaurant 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 4155 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2601 High Superior Cleaner II 7216 Dry Cleaner Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Dry Cleaner 2.5 9365 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2601 High Too Talls Donuts & Café 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 6092 5/24/2013 Oakdale Rd 801 High El Pollo Loco 5812 Restaurant Becker FALSE Restaurant ---PAGE BREAK--- 2.5 10404 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 1800 High Starbuck's Coffee #17847 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10303 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 3460 Low Indian Tacco Plus Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 7205 5/24/2013 Oakdale Rd 801 High Sushi Bar 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10341 5/24/2013 Oakdale Rd 1109 My Garden Café 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 10293 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 1717 Low Sunny Kitchen Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 9363 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2307 Low King Kabob Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 10354 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 3424 Low Platinum Performance Automotive Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 8952 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 3338 Low Western Motors Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 9364 3/27/2013 Oakdale Rd 2601 High The Chicken Barn Oakdale 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10343 5/7/2013 Orangeburg Ave 137 High Luxe Auto Sales Orangeburg 5521 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 10550 3/28/2013 Orangeburg Ave 2099 Low Arco 2099 Orangeburg Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 9406 3/25/2013 Paradise Rd 1001 Low Low Cost Tire and Wheels Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 4455 3/21/2013 Paradise Rd 409 Low Popeyes Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10381 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low Thai Food Express Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 10413 5/7/2013 Pelandale Ave 3601 Low Freebirds World Burrito-Pelandale Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 6882 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low Foster Freeze-Pelandale Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 5747 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low Yakitori Restaurant Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 5739 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low El Rosal - Pelandale Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 5743 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low Me-N-Ed's Pizza Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 5740 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low Taco Bell Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 4160 4/26/2013 Pelandale Ave 3900 Low Pelandale Cleaners Dry Cleaner Ziegler FALSE Dry Cleaner 8642 5/9/2013 Prescott Rd 1901 Low A & J Automotive Ziegler/Bradley FALSE Automotive Repair 9209 5/9/2013 Prescott Rd 1901 Low Prescott Auto Care Ziegler TRUE Automotive Repair 8715 5/7/2013 Primo Way 300 Low Specialty Auto Repair Becker TRUE Automotive Repair 6946 3/28/2013 Princeton Ave 1655 Low Car Pro's Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Radiator Shop 5926 5/1/2013 Rumble Rd 2101 Low Rajrut Rattan Indian Sweets Ziegler TRUE Restaurant 9584 4/29/2013 Rumble Rd 2101 Low Star India Sweets & Catering Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 2.5 6481 3/26/2013 Santa Cruz Ave 145 High Circle 7 Car Wash Circle 7 Car Wash 7542 Becker FALSE Car Wash 2.5 4849 5/24/2013 Scenic Dr 1151 High Scenic Drive In 5812 Restaurant Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 3424 5/24/2013 Scenic Dr 1203 High Precision Automotive 7538 Automotive Repair Becker FALSE Automotive Repair 2.5 6940 5/24/2013 Scenic Dr 1221 High AA Auto Pro's 7538 Becker FALSE Automotive Repair 6948 4/26/2013 Sisk Rd 4201 Low Quick Stop Market Ziegler TRUE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 2.5 3486 4/26/2013 Sisk Rd 3037 High Chevron at 3037 Sisk 5541 RGO-Retail Gas Outlet Ziegler FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 5719 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2900 Low Togo's-Standiford Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 4470 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2101 Low North China Town Restaurant Ziegler/Bradley FALSE Restaurant 4133 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2101 Low Bonded Cleaners Dry Cleaner Ziegler/Bradley FALSE Dry Cleaner 10284 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2100 Low Fumi Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 9586 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2900 Low Ocean Palace Ziegler TRUE Restaurant 6967 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2100 Low Subway - Standiford Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 6926 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2100 Low La Huerta Vieja Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 6124 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2100 Low Wingstop Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 6968 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2101 Low Johnathan's Fresh Fish & More Ziegler/Bradley TRUE Restaurant 4845 5/7/2013 Standiford Ave 1601 Low Del Taco-Standiford Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 10434 5/8/2013 Standiford Ave 2020 Low Bookies Ziegler/Bradley FALSE Restaurant 10462 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2900 Low Mei Wei Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 8441 5/7/2013 Standiford Ave 2020 Low A Yuppy Puppy Ziegler FALSE Animal Specialties 9289 5/8/2013 Standiford Ave 2020 Low El Camino Real Restaurant El Camino Real Ziegler TRUE Restaurant 7101 5/8/2013 Standiford Ave 2020 Low Dry Clean for You Ziegler FALSE Dry Cleaner 9260 5/8/2013 Standiford Ave 2020 Low Grooming by Heather @ Yuppy Puppy Ziegler TRUE Animal Specialties 4151 5/22/2013 Standiford Ave 2100 Low One Hour Martinizing #3 Dry Cleaner Ziegler TRUE Dry Cleaner 6927 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2100 Low Le's Dynasty Restaurant Ziegler TRUE Restaurant 10393 5/2/2013 Standiford Ave 1320 Low Papa Johns Pizza 1320 Standiford Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 4675 5/2/2013 Standiford Ave 1241 Low Taco Bell-Standiford Ave Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 9407 5/9/2013 Standiford Ave 2900 Low Milano Pizza & Greek Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 2.5 6966 4/5/2013 Sutter Ave 650 High SNS Car Care-N-Repair 7538 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 4137 3/25/2013 Sylvan Ave 1300 Low Del Rio Cleaners #3 Dry Cleaner Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Dry Cleaner 10363 3/25/2013 Sylvan Ave 3948 Arco AM/PM on Sylvan Arco AM PM Sylvan Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE 7099 5/30/2013 Trask Ln 104 High Car Exchange Becker FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 10301 5/1/2013 Tully Rd 2039 Low Paleteria Mexicana Alonso Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 6981 5/22/2013 Tully Rd 601 Low Pizza Factory Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 6979 4/23/2013 Tully Rd 1228 High Fast Eddie's MOAB 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 4588 5/8/2013 Tully Rd 3430 Low Jack In The Box-Tully Rd Restaurant Ziegler/Bradley FALSE Restaurant 3450 4/5/2013 Tully Rd 525 Low Kruse Lucas Imports Automotive Repair Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automotive Repair 4679 4/5/2013 Tully Rd 609 Low Orient House Restaurant Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 8438 5/8/2013 Tully Rd 3543 Low General Store Ziegler/Bradley FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 5748 5/2/2013 Tully Rd 3430 Low Thai House Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 4642 5/2/2013 Tully Rd 3430 Low El Rosal Mexican Restaurant Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 9625 5/2/2013 Tully Rd 3430 Low Oodles Frozen Yogurt Inc Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 8970 5/1/2013 Tully Rd 2037 Low China Wok Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 4451 5/2/2013 Tully Rd 3430 Low Papa Murphy's Take N Bake Restaurant Ziegler FALSE Restaurant 9317 4/5/2013 Tully Rd 601 Low Mariscos Seafood El Marisquero Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 10412 5/1/2013 Tully Rd 2057 Low Subway-Tully Rd Ziegler FALSE Restaurant ---PAGE BREAK--- 10399 4/24/2013 Yosemite Blvd 2039 Las Micheladas Restaurant & Bubba BBQ Bradley, R.E.H.S. TRUE Restaurant 2.5 5546 6/11/2013 Yosemite Blvd 200 High Stormwater Inspections this site E & J Gallo Brandy 2084 Peet FALSE Sales/Distributing 0 8460 5/30/2013 Yosemite Blvd 3121 Modesto Quick Lube 7538 Becker FALSE Automotive Repair 0 8440 5/30/2013 Yosemite Blvd 2241 Gas & Market Valero 5541 Becker FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 2.5 6877 5/30/2013 Yosemite Blvd 3121 High Fat Wong Chinese Food to Go 5812 Restaurant Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10348 5/24/2013 Yosemite Blvd 1721 Auto World Auto Sales 5521 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Automobiles, New & Used 2.5 10139 3/26/2013 Yosemite Blvd 901 High Bottoms Up Espresso 5812 Bradley, R.E.H.S. FALSE Restaurant 0 8415 5/23/2013 Yosemite Blvd 3621 High Chevron (Yosemite Blvd) Chevron (Yosemite Blvd) 5541 Becker FALSE RGO-Retail Gas Outlet 10006 3/26/2013 Yosemite Blvd 901 Low Jay Jay Café Expresso Becker TRUE Restaurant 2.5 6879 5/14/2013 Yosemite Blvd 3801 High Mountain Mike's Pizza 5812 Restaurant Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10682 4/24/2013 Yosemite Blvd 2039 High The Blitz Texas BBQ 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 8726 4/24/2013 Yosemite Blvd 2027 High Lucky Bamboo Chinese Restaurant 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 9226 4/24/2013 Yosemite Blvd 2029 High Taqueria El Torito 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 6876 5/30/2013 Yosemite Blvd 3021 High Taco Bell - Yosemite Blvd Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 10278 5/14/2013 Yosemite Blvd 3801 High Zanga Mediterranean Cuisine 5812 Becker FALSE Restaurant 2.5 5528 6/26/2013 Zeff Rd 725 6/21/2002 High Stormwater Inspections this site California All Natural, LLC 2011 Ziegler FALSE Meat Packing ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 90 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 60 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 10 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 30 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 10 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 30 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 30 260 2 520 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor 190 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 40 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 30 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Risk Level Auto Body Shops 1% Risk Level 3 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Risk Level Auto Dealers 13% Risk Level 2 Industrial Commercial Risk ---PAGE BREAK--- Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 10 190 2 380 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Auto Repair Shops 15% 250 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 90 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 60 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 30 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 20 250 2 500 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor 200 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 40 Significant Score: Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Risk Level Risk Level 2 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Risk Level Car Wash 2% ---PAGE BREAK--- Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 10 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 30 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 30 200 2 400 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor 150 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 20 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 10 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 10 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 20 150 2 300 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Risk Level Risk Level 2 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Dry Clears 1% Risk Level 1 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Risk Level ---PAGE BREAK--- 160 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 40 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 10 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 10 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 10 160 3 480 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor 130 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk S Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 20 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 10 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 10 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 10 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 10 130 2 260 Risk Level Equipment Rentals 0.3% Risk Level 2 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Feet Services 1% Risk Level 1 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor 180 Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 40 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 20 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 10 180 2 360 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Score = Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 40 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 20 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Risk Level Risk Level Kennels 2% Risk Level 2 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Nursery 1% Risk Level 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 10 180 2 360 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 30 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 20 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 20 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 10 130 2 260 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 60 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 40 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 30 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Risk Level Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Risk Level Restaurant 53% Risk 4 Recyclers 2% Risk Level 1 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: ---PAGE BREAK--- Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 10 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 20 200 6 1200 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 90 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 60 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 30 Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 30 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 30 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 30 290 2 580 1 2 3 Risk Score Risk Factor Industrial 4% Weighting x Risk Level x Risk Hazard 30% Not Hazardous, Low Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, localized Impact to Water Quality Hazardous, Significant Impact to Water Quality 90 Volume 20% < 55 gals (460 lbs) > 55 (460 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) < 1000 gals (8340 lbs) 60 Containment and BMP 10% Inside or outside Blg contained, BMPs effective Inside Blg minimal containment, minimal BMPs Outside Blg no containment, no BMPs 20 Potential Impact to Water Quality 10% Negligible Moderate Impact Significant impact 30 Gasoline Retailers 5% Risk 3 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Risk Level Risk 3 Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: Risk Level ---PAGE BREAK--- Impact to Environment 10% Negligible potential for release Potential for release but confined onsite Potential for release off site 20 Impact to Blg or Facility 10% Negligible impact to blg or facility Potential impact to Blg or facility Serious impact to Blg or facility 20 Impact to Community 10% Negligible impact to community Potential impact to community Serious impact to community 20 260 2 520 Probability Not Probable Probable Moderately Probable Probable 1 2 3 4 Impact fully mitigated: Impact controlled by procedures and abatement equipment: Aspect is not frequently inspected or check: Aspect is not fully mitigated: Area is monitored, training is in place, and impact is unlikely due to physical characteristics of the material. Area inspected, monitored, BMPs are effective, Public out reach has been effective Equipment piping or sewer lines are subject to failure, no public outreach or outreach has been ineffective, history of failures Impact could have a very serious consequences, countermeasures including BMPs, public outreach have not been fully implemented for past failures Not Significant Significant Moderately Significant Very Significant 1 2 3 4 Significant < 25% 25% < Significant < 50% 50% < Significant < 75% Significant > 75% Less then 25% of total occurrence Occurrence are between 25% and 50% of the total Occurrences are between 50% and 75% of the total Occurrences are greater then 75% of the total Significant Score < 350 350 < Significant Score < 500 500 < Significant Score < 650 Significant Score > 650 Risk Level 1 Risk Level 2 Risk Level 3 Risk Level 4 De Minimums No Action Required Increase monitoring and documentation required Increase monitoring and documentation Increase monitoring and documentation Countermeasures Sum of Risk Factors: Probability Factor (Page Significant Score: ---PAGE BREAK--- BMP Requirement, Increase frequency of cleaning, modify BMPs New BMPs required, increase frequency of l i Additional controls to be evaluated Additional engineering controls required: Design changes maybe required Scoring Formula Where W= weight factor, R = rating, P = (probability, S = Significant Subscripts denote the impact element code Tsinclair 7/5/12 Significant Score = P * S * [(WHaz * RHaz) + (WVol * RVol) + (WConBMP * RConBMP) + (WImpactWater * RImpactWater) + ( WEnv * REnv) + (WFac * RFac) + ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix F Construction Program Element Plan Review Checklist Active Construction Projects Database Construction Site Inspection Checklist Stormwater Device Inspection Checklist ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Site ID Site Name Size (acres) Address Street Site type Commercial ROW CIP MultiFamily Residential 8443 Westurf Nursery 0.16 1612 Claus Rd Commercial 1 10377 Empire Sidewalks (Love Modesto Project) Brad Hawn 0.10 0 Empire Ave Right of Way 1 10378 Cell Tower at 1001 Hammond St 0.10 1001 Hammond St Right of Way 1 10379 Calvary Temple Classroom Addition 0.15 1601 Coffee Rd Commercial 1 10386 Mercedes Benz New Auto Detail 0.08 3900 McHenry Ave Commercial 1 10388 Chevron 1600 Sisk Rd 0.50 1600 Sisk Rd Commercial 1 10389 Chevron 2101 Sylvan Ave 0.50 2101 Sylvan Ave Commercial 1 10390 McDonalds Remodel at 3801 0.19 3801 Yosemite Blvd Commercial 1 10394 Bethel Church Parking Lot Slurry Seal Coat 0.01 2361 Scenic Dr Commercial 1 10395 Façade Renovation 3321 McHenry 0.01 3321 McHenry Ave Commercial 1 10400 Parking Lot Upgrade Gianelli & Associates 0.04 1014 16th St Commercial 1 10406 Wells Fargo Parking Lot Seal Stripe 0.01 1120 K St Commercial 1 10407 Wells Fargo Employee Parking Lot 0.02 1120 K St Commercial 1 10409 Empire Avenue Project between Monterey & Hillside 0.10 0 Empire Ave Capital Improvement Project 1 10410 Valley First Credit Union 0.05 1419 J St Commercial 1 10415 Façade Remodel 0.02 2401 McHenry Ave Commercial 1 10416 New Fijian Cultural Center Building 0.26 2325 Coffee Rd Commercial 1 10417 McDonalds Remodel Prescott 0.01 1800 Prescott Rd Commercial 1 10418 Gallo Glass Parking Lot #18 0.16 112 Las Flores Ave Commercial 1 10419 E & J Gallo Winery Parking Lot #16 0.61 833 Yosemite Blvd Commercial 1 10421 Stagno Meat Modular Office 0.04 725 Zeff Rd Commercial 1 10422 Truck Parking Facility 0.91 400 7th St Commercial 1 10423 Alfred Mathews Auto Dealership Addition 0.00 3807 McHenry Ave Commercial 1 10427 McDonalds on Dale Remodel 0.03 4120 Dale Rd Commercial 1 CONSTRUCTION SITES THAT WERE ACTIVE 2012-2013 2012-2013 Construction Projects <1 acre ---PAGE BREAK--- 10429 Street Imp SB Prescott to WB Plaza Pkwy (CIP) 0.08 0 Prescott Rd Capital Improvement Project 1 10430 Concrete Pad for Dave Wallace 0.01 300 Winmoore Way Commercial 1 10431 Arco AM/PM 2924 McHenry 0.15 2924 McHenry Ave Commercial 1 10433 Texas Roadhouse 0.66 3037 Sisk Rd Commercial 1 10436 Stan Foods New Office Building 0.27 134 12th St Commercial 1 10439 Remodel Trash Enclosures at Garden East Apts 0.11 1213 Norwegian Ave Multi Family Residential 1 10440 Airport Neighborhood Community Center 0.01 805 Empire Ave Capital Improvement Project 1 10447 PG&E Office 0.02 1413 Granite Ln Commercial 1 10449 MJC Sewer Line Replacement at Stoddard and Campus 0.01 0 Campus Way Commercial 1 10450 WalMart at 1421 Coffee Parking Lot Improvements 0.01 1421 Coffee Rd Commercial 1 10452 Valley Builders Exchange Parking Lot Expansion 0.01 1118 Kansas Ave Commercial 1 10454 Bennett Place Supportive Housing (Stanislaus Co) 0.26 421 Lincoln Ave Multi Family Residential 1 10464 Tesoro Oakdale ADA Upgrades 0.83 2501 Oakdale Rd Commercial 1 10465 Tesoro Orangeburg ADA Upgrades 0.01 1649 Orangeburg Ave Commercial 1 10466 Tesoro Standiford ADA Upgrades 0.01 1233 Standiford Ave Commercial 1 10468 TRRP Trails Phase 1.3 0.01 1745 Hillside Dr Capital Improvement Project 1 10470 Scenic Sewer Lift Station 0.01 2800 Scenic Bend Dr Capital Improvement Project 1 10471 McDonalds Remodel Tully Rd 0.01 3430 Tully Rd Commercial 1 10472 Jack In The Box Remodel Coffee Rd 0.06 2612 Coffee Rd Commercial 1 10474 Westurf Nursery Shade Structure 0.01 1612 Claus Rd Commercial 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- 10475 Great Valley Center Fiber Optics Service 0.01 201 Needham St Right of Way 1 10476 Sanitary Lift Station Lining Rehab 0.01 1010 10th St Capital Improvement Project 1 10482 Primary Outfall Rehabilitation Phase III Jennings 0.01 7007 Jennings Rd Capital Improvement Project 1 10483 Bank of Agriculture and Commerce 0.01 1623 J St Commercial 1 10534 SFD to Dental Office 0.01 500 Standiford Ave Commercial 1 10537 ATT Outdoor Canopy 0.53 1412 Granite Ln Commercial 1 10538 Sanitary Sewer Collection System Replacement 0.01 0 Princeton Ave Capital Improvement Project 1 10540 Bookie's Bar & Grill Dining Patio Addition 0.10 2020 Standiford Ave Commercial 1 10547 Parking Lot Improvements 0.01 701 18th St Commercial 1 10549 Verizon Monopine Cell Tower 0.02 730 9th St Commercial 1 10554 North Point Basin (CIP) 0.03 4500 Chapman Rd Capital Improvement Project 1 10555 Enterprise New Car Wash Canopy 0.01 707 7th St Commercial 1 10556 Cal Mex Meat Company 0.05 921 8th St Commercial 1 10681 Gallo Spirits Parking Lot Improvements 0.54 200 Yosemite Blvd Commercial 1 10686 Dollar General on Carver 0.38 1100 Carver Ave Commercial 1 10687 MJC Signalization Project Blue Gum at Prichard 0.01 2201 Blue Gum Ave Commercial 1 10688 Remodel Garage to Banquet Hall 0.18 425 McHenry Ave Commercial 1 10689 Jennings Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements 0.01 7007 Jennings Road Capital Improvement Project 1 10690 Emerald Maze Storm Drain Project CIP 0.01 0 Emerald Ave Capital Improvement Project 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- 10699 Sutter Wastewater Treatment Plant 0.01 1221 Sutter Ave Commercial 1 10703 Tesoro Parking Lot ADA Upgrades 0.00 1626 Crows Landing Rd Commercial 1 49 3 11 2 Site ID Site Name Size (acres) Address Street Site type Commercial ROW CIP MultiFamily Residential Subdivision 8106 Nuevo Amanecer (Habitat for Humanity Project) 2.65 800 Signature Ct Subdivision Site 1 8268 Graham Estates 9.98 2307 Fine Ave Subdivision Site 1 8319 Rose Villas Subdivision/NW of Oakdale Rd & Mable 25 0 Mable Ave Subdivision Site 1 9603 MJC West Construction 1.2 1820 Blue Gum Ave Commercial 1 9793 Modesto Tallow Construction 8 925 Crows Landing R Commercial 1 9884 Kiernan Business Park East/ Plaza at Dale4620&4754 39.6 4620 Dale Rd Commercial 1 10287 VA Building Shell for Outpatient Clinic 2.76 1225 Oakdale Rd Commercial 1 10336 Archway Commons 5 1024 9th St Multi Family Residential 1 10349 Carpenter Rd Bridge Seismic Retrofit CIP 3 0 Carpenter Rd Capital Improvement Project 1 10353 Mary Grogan Park (CIP) 42 0 Litt Rd Capital Improvement Project 1 10366 Phase II BNR Tertiary WWTP 60 7001 Jennings Road Capital Improvement Project 1 10376 Meadow Glen Supportive Housing 1.74 605 Coolidge Ave Multi Family Residential 1 Total # of private projects (multi-family and commercial) 51 Total # of active <1 acre projects/type Total # of active <1 acre projects = 65 2012-2013 Construction Projects > 1 acre Total # of public projects (Right-of-way and CIP) 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- 10387 PG& E Small Urban Excavation Projects 1.1 0 Dale Rd Right of Way 1 10396 Sylvan Avenue and Litt Road Improvement 13 0 Litt Rd Capital Improvement Project 1 10401 PG&E Modesto DFM 7221 10 Small Urban Excavation Projects 1.1 1270 Bangs Ave Right of Way 1 10451 West Basin Improvements 2.81 3200 Bear Cub Lane Capital Improvement Project 1 10473 In-N-Out Burger 1.1 1616 Sisk Rd Commercial 1 10544 New Dollar General Store 1.36 1539 Yosemite Blvd Commercial 1 10685 E Side of Sutter S of Marshall St Improvements CIP 1.14 515 Sutter Ave Capital Improvement Project 1 10691 Medical Office Bldg Shell, Lot 18,Bridges Business 1.24 4901 Dale Rd Commercial 1 10700 Street Imp E. El Vista Elementary 1.39 0 Viola St Capital Improvement Project 1 21 7 2 7 2 3 CIP = 7 Commercial = 7 Multi-Family Residential = 2 Right-of-Way = 2 Subdivision = 3 Total # of Active Sites ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix G Planning and Land Development Program Element Self-Certification Certification of Maintenance Treatment Control Inspection ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix H Water Quality Based Program Element There are no appendices for Section 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- Appendix I Monitoring Program Element 2012-2013 Dry Weather Data 2012-2013 First Flush Data Laboratory Data and Chains of Custody (available on CD only) Weather Forecasts MID Rainfall 2012-13 Weather 03 19 13 Weather 03 31 13 Weather 04 04 13 Weather Reports Post Storm 04 04 13 Exceedance Notification 2012-2013 Basin and Rockwell Sampling Data 2012-13 Basin Sampling & Rockwell Sampling Basin 8_2012 Basin 9_2012 Rockwell 8_2012 Rockwell 9_2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data Dry Weather Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Conductivity 213 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Total Dissolved Solids 150 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM PH 7.43 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand 4 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Suspended Solids <17 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.91 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM MPN Fecal Coliform 310 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM MPN Escherichia Coli 310 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Turbidity 1.3 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Dissolved Oxygen 6.92 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Temperature 21.1 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Ammonia as N 0.06 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Copper 12 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Lead 0.91 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Zinc 29 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.4 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 62 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Mercury, Methyl 0.0875 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 7:15 AM Copper, Dissolved 4 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Aluminum 32 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 7:15 AM Aluminum, Dissolved 12 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Oil & Grease 1.52 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:15 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.2 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Total Organic Carbon 7.51 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:30 AM Ceriodaphnia dubia 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 7:30 AM Fathead minnow 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.69 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 64 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 22 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Mercury, Total 1.76 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 2:20 PM Iron 270 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 BSK Bodem 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 BSK Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Iron ND -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Mercury, Total ND 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Total Organic Carbon 0.09 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.056 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Aluminum, Dissolved 4.2 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Aluminum ND 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Copper, Dissolved 1.2 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Mercury, Methyl ND 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Zinc ND 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Lead ND 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Bodem - Field Blank 6/5/2013 8:45 AM Copper 0.074 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Dissolved Oxygen 7.99 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Copper 3.9 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Ammonia as N 0.18 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data Dry Weather Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Temperature 24.5 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Lead 0.64 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Zinc 5.6 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.137 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 33 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.68 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:26 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 170 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Turbidity 19 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:26 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 350 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.5 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Suspended Solids 15 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <2 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM PH 7.45 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Total Dissolved Solids 109 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Conductivity 126 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Copper, Dissolved 3.2 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Aluminum 1700 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 770 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Lead, Dissolved 0.42 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Oil & Grease ND 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 None 0001:0001 6/20/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Total Organic Carbon 7.47 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 11:50 AM Fathead minnow 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 11:50 AM Ceriodaphnia dubia 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Mercury, Total 2.47 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/13/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Iron 1500 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 39 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 43 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK - DN 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.96 1.000 mg/L SM4500-NH3 C 0.200 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.97 1.000 mg/L SM4500-NH3 C 0.200 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 42 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 20 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Iron 1600 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Mercury, Total 2.53 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/13/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Total Organic Carbon 7.43 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Oil & Grease ND 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 None 0001:0001 6/20/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Lead, Dissolved 0.32 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 440 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Aluminum 2000 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Copper, Dissolved 2.9 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Total Dissolved Solids 109 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <2 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Suspended Solids 15 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.45 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data Dry Weather Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:26 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 170 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Turbidity 17 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:26 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 170 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.68 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 40 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.144 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Zinc 6 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Lead 0.66 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Ammonia as N 0.26 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC - DN - Duplicate 6/5/2013 12:00 PM Copper 3.9 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Copper 4.3 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Temperature 23.6 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Ammonia as N 0.35 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Dissolved Oxygen 7.37 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Lead 0.83 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.78 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.145 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/11/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 33 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 700 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Turbidity 23 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 700 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.3 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Suspended Solids 27 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <4 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM PH 7.29 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Conductivity 110 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Total Dissolved Solids 112 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Copper, Dissolved 2.7 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Aluminum 1400 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Zinc 11 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 150 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Lead, Dissolved 0.16 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Oil & Grease ND 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Total Organic Carbon 7.19 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 18 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Mercury, Total 2.44 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/13/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Iron 1700 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 38 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK - UP 6/4/2013 12:10 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 1 1.000 mg/L SM4500-NH3 C 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/14/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Iron 100 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 114 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand ND 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Mercury, Total 1.05 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 ALPHA ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data Dry Weather Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Total Organic Carbon 5.52 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Ceriodaphnia dubia 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Fathead minnow 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 2 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Oil & Grease ND 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 None 0001:0001 6/20/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 8:15 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.12 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 8:15 AM Aluminum, Dissolved 13 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Aluminum 65 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Mercury, Methyl 0.147 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 8:15 AM Copper, Dissolved 3.2 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Conductivity 322 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Total Dissolved Solids 220 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM PH 7.35 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <2 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Suspended Solids <17 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 1.96 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Turbidity 1.5 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM MPN Escherichia Coli 130 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM MPN Fecal Coliform 130 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.25 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 104 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Zinc 8.9 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Lead 0.27 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Dissolved Oxygen 3.56 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Temperature 23.3 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Ammonia as N 0.78 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC Scenic 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Copper 6.5 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Copper 4.7 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Lead 0.23 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Zinc 6.6 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 113 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.25 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Turbidity 1.4 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 2 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Suspended Solids <17 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <2 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Total Dissolved Solids 219 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Aluminum 76 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 2.16 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 WQC Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Iron 97 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand ND 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Comp Duplicate 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 113 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Fathead minnow 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Mercury, Total 1.68 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/13/2013 ALPHA Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Ceriodaphnia dubia 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data Dry Weather Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Total Organic Carbon 5.54 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 8:15 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.056 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Oil & Grease ND 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 None 0001:0001 6/20/2013 WQC Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 8:15 AM Aluminum, Dissolved 8.9 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 J 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 8:15 AM Copper, Dissolved 2.8 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Mercury, Methyl 0.17 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM MPN Escherichia Coli 540 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM MPN Fecal Coliform 540 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Scenic Duplicate 6/5/2013 7:00 AM Ammonia as N 0.71 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Copper 1.6 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Ammonia as N 0.13 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Temperature 28.7 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Conductivity 211 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Dissolved Oxygen 12.1 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 47 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Zinc 1.3 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.13 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Lead 0.18 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 74 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Turbidity 2.8 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Suspended Solids <6 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 1 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 74 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM PH 8.38 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Total Dissolved Solids 122 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <2 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/5/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.0957 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/11/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Copper, Dissolved 1.2 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 2.9 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Aluminum 160 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Oil & Grease 1.66 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 J 0001:0001 6/20/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Lead, Dissolved 0.083 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Ceriodaphnia dubia 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Total Organic Carbon 2.78 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Fathead minnow 1 -1.000 TU EPA 821-R-02-013 -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.38 1.000 mg/L SM4500-NH3 C 0.200 J 0001:0001 6/14/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Mercury, Total 1.38 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/13/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Iron 260 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand ND 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 6/5/2013 1:30 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 61 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Iron ND -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Mercury, Total ND 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/27/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Lead, Dissolved ND 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Aluminum 2.3 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data Dry Weather Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Mercury, Methyl ND 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/12/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Copper, Dissolved ND 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Zinc 0.82 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Copper 0.23 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN - Field Blank 6/5/2013 1:25 PM Lead 0.089 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Lead 0.076 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Copper 0.89 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Dissolved Oxygen 7.77 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Ammonia as N 0.16 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 6/28/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Temperature 24.7 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Zinc 0.51 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Phosphorus-T as P 0.02 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 7/2/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 43 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 6/10/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Mercury, Methyl 0.0633 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 6/11/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Suspended Solids <5 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <4 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Total Dissolved Solids 95 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 6/7/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Conductivity 157 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM PH 6.98 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM MPN Fecal Coliform 23 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.74 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.090 None 0001:0001 6/6/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM MPN Escherichia Coli 18 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Turbidity 0.9 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 6/4/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Copper, Dissolved 0.79 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Oil & Grease ND 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 None 0001:0001 6/18/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Aluminum 56 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Aluminum, Dissolved 2.7 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.024 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 6/18/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Total Organic Carbon 1.56 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.050 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Mercury, Total 0.953 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 6/13/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Iron 160 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 6/17/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Hardness (as CaCO3) 48 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 6/26/2013 WQC Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Chemical Oxygen Demand ND 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 6/19/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.24 1.000 mg/L SM4500-NH3 C 0.200 J 0001:0001 6/14/2013 ALPHA Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK Tuolumne - UP 6/4/2013 10:40 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 6/16/2013 BSK ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data First Flush Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Conductivity 141 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Total Dissolved Solids 179 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM PH 6.41 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand 83 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Suspended Solids 97 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.8 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.040 J 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 70000 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 24000 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Turbidity 50 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Dissolved Oxygen 9 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Temperature 15.4 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Ammonia as N 1.82 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Copper 36 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.160 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Lead 13 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.080 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Zinc 200 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Phosphorus-T as P 1.39 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 12/3/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 38 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 12:36 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.158 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Copper, Dissolved 19 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Aluminum 1600 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 8.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 220 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 12:45 PM Oil & Grease 7.9 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.900 None 0001:0001 12/14/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Lead, Dissolved 1.9 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Total Organic Carbon 73 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 5.13 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 12/14/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 36 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 240 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 12/10/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 12:34 PM Mercury, Total 58.8 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 4.000 None 0001:0020 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Iron 2000 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 7.200 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem 11/28/2012 12:20 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Bodem 11/28/2012 12:20 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Iron 2000 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 7.200 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 250 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 12/10/2012 ALPHA Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 36 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 5.34 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 12/14/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Aluminum 1600 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 8.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 41 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Phosphorus-T as P 1.39 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 12/3/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Zinc 190 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Lead 13 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.080 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Copper 35 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.160 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Turbidity 50 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.76 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.040 J 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Suspended Solids 89 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand 77 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Bodem Comp Duplicate 11/28/2012 2:20 PM Total Dissolved Solids 172 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:55 PM MPN Escherichia Coli NR 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data First Flush Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:55 PM MPN Fecal Coliform NR 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Ammonia as N 1.82 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:36 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.136 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Copper, Dissolved 18 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:55 PM Total Organic Carbon 70.4 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Lead, Dissolved 1.7 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:45 PM Oil & Grease 8.9 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.900 None 0001:0001 12/14/2012 ALPHA Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 170 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:34 PM Mercury, Total 46.6 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 4.000 None 0001:0020 12/6/2012 ALPHA Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:20 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Bodem Duplicate 11/28/2012 12:20 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Iron 1200 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 7.200 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Hardness (as CaCO3) 70 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Chemical Oxygen Demand 97 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 12/10/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Mercury, Total 5.02 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 2.000 None 0001:0010 12/6/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Aluminum, Dissolved 9.6 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Oil & Grease 3.6 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 J 0001:0001 12/14/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.3 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Total Organic Carbon 28.1 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 2.26 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 12/14/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Copper, Dissolved 5.9 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Aluminum 470 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 8.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Mercury, Methyl 0.254 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/13/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 81 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Copper 8.6 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.160 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Lead 1.7 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.080 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Zinc 32 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Phosphorus-T as P 0.66 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 12/3/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Ammonia as N 0.17 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Temperature 13.2 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Dissolved Oxygen 3.2 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM MPN Escherichia Coli 11000 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Turbidity 15 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Total Dissolved Solids 159 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Conductivity 222 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Biochemical Oxygen Demand 22 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM PH 7 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Suspended Solids 26 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.08 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.040 J 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN 11/29/2012 10:40 AM MPN Fecal Coliform 17000 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM MPN Fecal Coliform <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM MPN Escherichia Coli <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Zinc 1.5 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Lead 0.069 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Copper 0.24 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data First Flush Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Mercury, Methyl ND 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/13/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Copper, Dissolved 0.22 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Aluminum ND 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Total Organic Carbon 0.16 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 J 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Lead, Dissolved ND 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Mercury, Total ND 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Iron 5.6 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN - Field Blank 11/29/2012 9:40 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Iron 6 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Mercury, Total ND 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.024 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Total Organic Carbon <0.07 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Aluminum ND 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Copper, Dissolved 0.063 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Mercury, Methyl ND 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/13/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Copper 0.11 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Lead 0.037 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM Zinc 0.81 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM MPN Escherichia Coli <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC - DN Travel Blank 11/29/2012 9:30 AM MPN Fecal Coliform <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM MPN Fecal Coliform 9200 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Conductivity 140 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Total Dissolved Solids 260 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand 50 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Suspended Solids 25 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM PH 7.13 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Turbidity 16 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Temperature 15.3 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Ammonia as N 1.14 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Copper 22 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.160 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Dissolved Oxygen 8.5 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM MPN Escherichia Coli 2200 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.98 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.040 J 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Lead 2.2 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.080 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Zinc 64 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.61 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 12/3/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 43 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Mercury, Methyl 0.128 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 12:30 PM Copper, Dissolved 15 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 12:30 PM Aluminum, Dissolved 22 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Aluminum 430 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 8.000 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Total Organic Carbon 68.8 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data First Flush Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 3.25 2.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-D 0.680 None 0001:0001 12/14/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 12:30 PM Lead, Dissolved 0.24 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Oil & Grease 3.5 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 J 0001:0001 12/14/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Mercury, Total 25.5 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 2.000 None 0001:0010 12/6/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 52 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 160 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 None 0001:0001 12/10/2012 ALPHA Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Scenic 11/28/2012 11:50 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Scenic 11/28/2012 1:30 PM Iron 570 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 7.200 None 0001:0004 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA SUB Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA SUB Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Iron 2.6 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Mercury, Total ND 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Lead, Dissolved ND 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Total Organic Carbon 0.14 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 J 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Aluminum ND 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Copper, Dissolved 0.3 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Mercury, Methyl ND 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/13/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Zinc 1.3 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Lead 0.065 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM MPN Fecal Coliform <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM MPN Escherichia Coli <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic - Field Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Copper 0.17 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM MPN Escherichia Coli <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM MPN Fecal Coliform <1.8 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/28/2012 WQC Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Copper 0.26 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Lead 0.074 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Zinc 2.7 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Mercury, Methyl ND 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/13/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Aluminum ND 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Copper, Dissolved 0.075 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Total Organic Carbon <0.07 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Lead, Dissolved 0.036 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/7/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Mercury, Total ND 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Iron 8.1 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Scenic Travel Blank 11/28/2012 11:30 AM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.18 1.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-B 0.100 J 0001:0001 12/21/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Iron 110 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Mercury, Total 0.731 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 12/5/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 20 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 J 0001:0001 12/10/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Oil & Grease 3.7 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 J 0001:0001 12/14/2012 ALPHA ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data First Flush Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Lead, Dissolved ND 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Total Organic Carbon 1.78 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 46 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Aluminum 30 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.0403 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Copper, Dissolved 0.68 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.02 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 12/3/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 59 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Zinc 2.8 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Lead 0.1 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:30 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 330 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 1.06 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.040 J 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Conductivity 157 1.000 umhos/cm SM2510B 1.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Total Dissolved Solids 90 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM PH 7.46 -1.000 SU SM4500-HB -2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <4 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Suspended Solids <17 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:30 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 330 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Turbidity 1.2 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Copper 0.84 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Dissolved Oxygen 10.9 8.000 mg/L SM4500-O-G 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Temperature 13 -1.000 C° SM2550-B -1.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Ammonia as N 0.05 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Ammonia as N 0.07 0.200 mg/L SM4500-NH3-D 0.030 J 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Copper 0.92 0.500 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Turbidity N/A 0.100 NTU SM2130B 0.100 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:30 PM MPN Escherichia Coli 170 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221F 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Suspended Solids <6 3.000 mg/L SM2540D 3.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Biochemical Oxygen Demand <4 2.000 mg/L SM5210B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Total Dissolved Solids 101 25.000 mg/L SM2540C 25.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Nitrate Nitrite Nitrogen 0.97 0.250 mg/L SM4500-NO3-F 0.040 J 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:30 PM MPN Fecal Coliform 260 1.800 MPN Index/100ml SM9221E 1.800 None 0001:0001 11/29/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Lead 0.15 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Zinc 3.1 1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.500 J 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Alkalinity Total (as CaCO3) 55 10.000 mg/L SM2320-B 0.800 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Phosphorus-T as P 0.02 0.030 mg/L SM4500-P-F 0.010 None 0001:0001 12/3/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Copper, Dissolved 0.8 0.200 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.040 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Mercury, Methyl 0.0456 0.050 ng/L EPA 1630 0.020 J 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Aluminum 53 10.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Aluminum, Dissolved ND 0.100 ug/L EPA 200.8 2.000 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Hardness (as CaCO3) 47 6.000 mg/L SM2340-B 2.000 None 0001:0001 11/30/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Total Organic Carbon 1.8 0.210 mg/L SM5310-C 0.070 None 0001:0001 12/4/2012 WQC Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Lead, Dissolved ND 0.250 ug/L EPA 200.8 0.020 None 0001:0001 12/6/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Oil & Grease 3.2 5.000 mg/L EPA 1664 1.500 J 0001:0001 12/14/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Chemical Oxygen Demand 17 10.000 mg/L SM5220D 9.000 J 0001:0001 12/10/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Mercury, Total 0.771 0.500 ng/L EPA 1631E 0.200 None 0001:0001 12/5/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Chlorpyrifos (Dursban) ND 0.010 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.003 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Modesto Water Quality Control 2012-2013 Urban Runoff and Receiving Water Quality Data First Flush Sample Sample Sample Analyte Results Report Units Method MDL Qualifier Dilution Analysis Lab Site Date Time Limit Factor Date Name Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Iron 140 -1.000 ug/L EPA 200.8 1.800 None 0001:0001 12/11/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Kjeldahl Nitrogen as N 0.1 1.000 mg/L SM4500-N-Org-B 0.100 J 0001:0001 12/21/2012 ALPHA Tuolumne - DN Duplicate 11/29/2012 2:00 PM Diazinon ND 0.050 ug/L EPA 8270C 0.004 None 0001:0001 12/12/2012 ALPHA SUB ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Laboratory Data and Chains of Custody Available on CD ONLY ---PAGE BREAK--- Weather Forecasts MID Rainfall 2012-13 Weather 03 19 13 Weather 03 31 13 Weather 04 04 13 Weather Reports Post Storm 04 04 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 2012-2013 Basin and Rockwell Sampling Data 2012-13 Basin Sampling & Rockwell Sampling Basin 8_2012 Basin 9_2012 Rockwell 8_2012 Rockwell 9_2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Dry Weather Characterization Basin Sampling Station Date Aluminum (ug/L) Copper (ug/L) Iron (ug/L) Lead (ug/L) MBAS (mg/L) E. Coli (MPN Index/100ml) Fecal Coliform (MPN Index/100ml) O&G (mg/L) TDS (mg/L) Turbidity (NTU) Algen Basin 1100 19 1700 5.5 0.091 1700 140000 1.6 299 18 Jimway Basin 120 35 760 2.1 0.[PHONE REDACTED] ND 474 7.8 Central Basin 210 7.3 280 0.35 ND 2800 16000 1.9 222 4.5 West Basin 96 7.3 100 0.21 0.12 5400 9200 ND 245 3.2 Grecian Basin 170 6.5 520 0.36 ND 1700 5400 1.9 128 4.3 Terneuzen Ave Basin 120 4.8 190 0.21 0.097 78 24000 1.5 143 2.5 Rose Lane Basin 9/20/2012 230 9.3 280 0.38 ND 160000 >160000 1.9 227 4.4 Rockwell Sampling Station Date Aluminum (ug/L) Copper (ug/L) Iron (ug/L) Lead (ug/L) MBAS (mg/L) E. Coli (MPN Index/100ml) Fecal Coliform (MPN Index/100ml) O&G (mg/L) TDS (mg/L) Turbidity (NTU) July & Albion 180 5 270 0.36 0.1 310 1700 ND 170 4.3 Oates Court South East 230 9.3 300 0.99 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 1.5 621 2.1 Oates Court South East Field Blank ND 0.29 6.9 0.034 <1.8 <1.8 Oates South 1100 29 1500 5.4 0.052 19 52 ND 1270 3.5 Coralwood West 160 11 380 1 0.15 4300 6300 1.6 206 3.3 Coralwood West Dup 140 19 370 0.94 0.14 9200 9200 2 218 3.2 Cheyenne Way & Veneman Ave 9/6/2012 710 15 1500 1.6 0.[PHONE REDACTED] 1.6 130 6 Lakewood & Mulholland 9/20/2012 190 4.4 520 0.93 0.037 <18 20 1.6 82 5.5 8/9/2012 8/23/2012 9/6/2012 8/9/2012 8/23/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Modesto, City of - Wastewater RE: Detention/Retention Basin Sampling Modesto, CA 95351 1221 Sutter Avenue Jeanette L. Poplin For Robbie C. Phillips Project Manager Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 09/06/12 21:20. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 21 September 2012 Work Order: 12I0281 Attn: Regina Scoma ELAP Certificate Numbers 1551 and 2728 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES Date Received Grecian Basin 12I0281-01 Water 09/06/12 11:10 09/06/12 21:20 Terneuzen Basin 12I0281-02 Water 09/06/12 10:05 09/06/12 21:20 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 1 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Metals by EPA Method 200.8 ICP/MS Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Analyte Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Grecian Basin (12I0281-01) Water Sampled: 09/06/12 11:10 Received: 09/06/12 21:20 170 AI20717 09/11/12 09:37 09/17/12 15:24 EPA 200.8 ug/l 1 Aluminum 10 2.0 6.5 " " " " " " Copper 0.50 0.040 520 " " " " " " Iron 50 1.8 0.36 " " " " " " Lead 0.25 0.020 Terneuzen Basin (12I0281-02) Water Sampled: 09/06/12 10:05 Received: 09/06/12 21:20 120 AI20717 09/11/12 09:37 09/17/12 15:43 EPA 200.8 ug/l 1 Aluminum 10 2.0 4.8 " " " " " " Copper 0.50 0.040 190 " " " " " " Iron 50 1.8 0.21 " " " " " " Lead 0.25 J 0.020 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 2 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Analyte Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Grecian Basin (12I0281-01) Water Sampled: 09/06/12 11:10 Received: 09/06/12 21:20 SM5540C 09/07/12 14:15 09/10/12 11:06 mg/l AI20550 1 Methylene Blue Active Substances ND 0.050 U 0.030 1.9 AI21030 09/11/12 08:30 09/12/12 13:00 EPA 1664 " " Oil & Grease (HEM) 6.5 J 1.9 Terneuzen Basin (12I0281-02) Water Sampled: 09/06/12 10:05 Received: 09/06/12 21:20 0.097 AI20550 09/07/12 14:15 09/10/12 11:06 SM5540C mg/l 1 Methylene Blue Active Substances 0.050 0.030 1.5 AI21030 09/11/12 08:30 09/12/12 13:00 EPA 1664 " " Oil & Grease (HEM) 5.0 J 1.5 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 3 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Metals by EPA Method 200.8 ICP/MS - Quality Control Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Batch AI20717 - EPA 200.8 Blank (AI20717-BLK1) Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l ND 10 U 2.0 Copper " 0.0803 0.50 J 0.040 Iron " ND 50 U 1.8 Lead " ND 0.25 U 0.020 LCS (AI20717-BS1) Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Copper ug/l 19.7 0.50 20.0 20 0.040 85-115 98.7 Iron " 507 50 520 20 1.8 85-115 97.6 Lead " 19.4 0.25 20.0 20 0.020 85-115 96.8 Duplicate (AI20717-DUP1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l ND 10 ND 20 U 2.0 Copper " ND 0.50 0.0497 20 U 0.040 Iron " ND 50 ND 20 U 1.8 Lead " ND 0.25 ND 20 U 0.020 Matrix Spike (AI20717-MS1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l 443 10 520 ND 20 2.0 70-130 85.3 Copper " 20.2 0.50 20.0 0.0497 20 0.040 70-130 101 Iron " 555 50 520 ND 20 1.8 70-130 107 Lead " 20.4 0.25 20.0 ND 20 0.020 70-130 102 Matrix Spike (AI20717-MS2) Source: 12I0281-02 Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/17/12 Aluminum ug/l 634 10 520 123 20 2.0 70-130 98.3 Copper " 24.7 0.50 20.0 4.81 20 0.040 70-130 99.5 Lead " 20.0 0.25 20.0 0.208 20 0.020 70-130 99.0 Matrix Spike Dup (AI20717-MSD1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l 410 10 520 ND 20 2.0 70-130 7.82 78.8 Copper " 19.7 0.50 20.0 0.0497 20 0.040 70-130 2.69 98.0 Iron " 514 50 520 ND 20 1.8 70-130 7.69 98.8 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 4 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Metals by EPA Method 200.8 ICP/MS - Quality Control Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Batch AI20717 - EPA 200.8 Matrix Spike Dup (AI20717-MSD1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Lead ug/l 20.0 0.25 20.0 ND 20 0.020 70-130 1.83 100 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 5 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Batch AI20550 - General Preparation Blank (AI20550-BLK1) Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l ND 0.050 U 0.030 LCS (AI20550-BS1) Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.196 0.050 0.200 20 0.030 80-120 98.2 Duplicate (AI20550-DUP1) Source: 12I0254-01 Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.105 0.050 0.115 20 0.030 9.39 Matrix Spike (AI20550-MS1) Source: 12I0254-01 Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.362 0.050 0.200 0.115 20 QM-01 0.030 80-120 123 Matrix Spike Dup (AI20550-MSD1) Source: 12I0254-01 Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.358 0.050 0.200 0.115 20 QM-01 0.030 80-120 1.15 121 Batch AI21030 - General Preparation Blank (AI21030-BLK1) Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l ND 5.0 U 1.5 LCS (AI21030-BS1) Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l 36.5 5.0 40.0 18 1.5 78-114 91.2 LCS Dup (AI21030-BSD1) Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l 36.1 5.0 40.0 18 1.5 78-114 1.10 90.2 Matrix Spike (AI21030-MS1) Source: 12H1213-02 Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l 17.4 5.0 20.0 1.60 18 1.5 78-114 79.0 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 6 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/21/12 12:07 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Detention/Retention Basin Sampling A08503A/149535-36 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Notes and Definitions J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration, detected but not quantified (DNQ). QM-01 The spike recovery for this QC sample is outside of established control limits possibly due to a sample matrix interference. U Analyte included in analysis, but not detected at or above MDL. Sample results reported on a dry weight basis Relative Percent Difference RPD dry Not Reported NR Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit ND Analyte DETECTED DET Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/21/2012 Page 7 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Station Date MPN EC (MPN Index/100ml) MPN Fecal Coliform (MPN Index/100ml) July & Albion 310 1700 Oates Court South East 700 5400 Oates Court South East Field Blank <1.8 <1.8 Oates South 19 52 Coralwood West 4300 6300 Coralwood West Dup 9200 9200 8/9/2012 8/23/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Modesto, City of - Wastewater RE: Rockwell Sampling Modesto, CA 95351 1221 Sutter Avenue Jeanette L. Poplin For Robbie C. Phillips Project Manager Enclosed are the results of analyses for samples received by the laboratory on 09/06/12 21:20. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, 19 September 2012 Work Order: 12I0279 Attn: Regina Scoma ELAP Certificate Numbers 1551 and 2728 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Sample ID Laboratory ID Matrix Date Sampled ANALYTICAL REPORT FOR SAMPLES Date Received Cheyenne Way & Veneman Ave 12I0279-01 Water 09/06/12 09:30 09/06/12 21:20 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 1 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Metals by EPA Method 200.8 ICP/MS Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Analyte Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Cheyenne Way & Veneman Ave (12I0279-01) Water Sampled: 09/06/12 09:30 Received: 09/06/12 21:20 710 AI20717 09/07/12 14:59 09/18/12 16:23 EPA 200.8 ug/l 5 Aluminum 50 10 15 " " 09/17/12 15:04 " " 1 Copper 0.50 0.040 1500 " " 09/18/12 16:23 " " 5 Iron 250 9.0 1.6 " " 09/17/12 15:04 " " 1 Lead 0.25 0.020 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 2 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Analyte Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Dilution Batch Prepared Analyzed Method Notes Cheyenne Way & Veneman Ave (12I0279-01) Water Sampled: 09/06/12 09:30 Received: 09/06/12 21:20 0.049 AI20550 09/07/12 14:15 09/10/12 11:06 SM5540C mg/l 1 Methylene Blue Active Substances 0.050 J 0.030 1.6 AI21030 09/11/12 08:30 09/12/12 13:00 EPA 1664 " " Oil & Grease (HEM) 5.0 J 1.5 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 3 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Metals by EPA Method 200.8 ICP/MS - Quality Control Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Batch AI20717 - EPA 200.8 Blank (AI20717-BLK1) Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l ND 10 U 2.0 Copper " 0.0803 0.50 J 0.040 Iron " ND 50 U 1.8 Lead " ND 0.25 U 0.020 LCS (AI20717-BS1) Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Copper ug/l 19.7 0.50 20.0 20 0.040 85-115 98.7 Iron " 507 50 520 20 1.8 85-115 97.6 Lead " 19.4 0.25 20.0 20 0.020 85-115 96.8 Duplicate (AI20717-DUP1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l ND 10 ND 20 U 2.0 Copper " ND 0.50 0.0497 20 U 0.040 Iron " ND 50 ND 20 U 1.8 Lead " ND 0.25 ND 20 U 0.020 Matrix Spike (AI20717-MS1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l 443 10 520 ND 20 2.0 70-130 85.3 Copper " 20.2 0.50 20.0 0.0497 20 0.040 70-130 101 Iron " 555 50 520 ND 20 1.8 70-130 107 Lead " 20.4 0.25 20.0 ND 20 0.020 70-130 102 Matrix Spike (AI20717-MS2) Source: 12I0281-02 Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/17/12 Aluminum ug/l 634 10 520 123 20 2.0 70-130 98.3 Copper " 24.7 0.50 20.0 4.81 20 0.040 70-130 99.5 Lead " 20.0 0.25 20.0 0.208 20 0.020 70-130 99.0 Matrix Spike Dup (AI20717-MSD1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Aluminum ug/l 410 10 520 ND 20 2.0 70-130 7.82 78.8 Copper " 19.7 0.50 20.0 0.0497 20 0.040 70-130 2.69 98.0 Iron " 514 50 520 ND 20 1.8 70-130 7.69 98.8 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 4 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Metals by EPA Method 200.8 ICP/MS - Quality Control Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Batch AI20717 - EPA 200.8 Matrix Spike Dup (AI20717-MSD1) Source: 12I0178-01 Prepared: 09/07/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Lead ug/l 20.0 0.25 20.0 ND 20 0.020 70-130 1.83 100 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 5 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Result MDL Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Conventional Chemistry Parameters by APHA/EPA Methods - Quality Control Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. Batch AI20550 - General Preparation Blank (AI20550-BLK1) Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l ND 0.050 U 0.030 LCS (AI20550-BS1) Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.196 0.050 0.200 20 0.030 80-120 98.2 Duplicate (AI20550-DUP1) Source: 12I0254-01 Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.105 0.050 0.115 20 0.030 9.39 Matrix Spike (AI20550-MS1) Source: 12I0254-01 Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.362 0.050 0.200 0.115 20 QM-01 0.030 80-120 123 Matrix Spike Dup (AI20550-MSD1) Source: 12I0254-01 Prepared: 09/05/12 Analyzed: 09/10/12 Methylene Blue Active Substances mg/l 0.358 0.050 0.200 0.115 20 QM-01 0.030 80-120 1.15 121 Batch AI21030 - General Preparation Blank (AI21030-BLK1) Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l ND 5.0 U 1.5 LCS (AI21030-BS1) Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l 36.5 5.0 40.0 18 1.5 78-114 91.2 LCS Dup (AI21030-BSD1) Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l 36.1 5.0 40.0 18 1.5 78-114 1.10 90.2 Matrix Spike (AI21030-MS1) Source: 12H1213-02 Prepared: 09/11/12 Analyzed: 09/12/12 Oil & Grease (HEM) mg/l 17.4 5.0 20.0 1.60 18 1.5 78-114 79.0 Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 6 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project: Project Number: Project Manager: 09/19/12 16:53 Modesto, City of - Wastewater 1221 Sutter Avenue Rockwell Sampling A08503A/149534 Regina Scoma Modesto CA, 95351 Reported: Notes and Definitions J Detected but below the Reporting Limit; therefore, result is an estimated concentration, detected but not quantified (DNQ). QM-01 The spike recovery for this QC sample is outside of established control limits possibly due to a sample matrix interference. U Analyte included in analysis, but not detected at or above MDL. Sample results reported on a dry weight basis Relative Percent Difference RPD dry Not Reported NR Analyte NOT DETECTED at or above the reporting limit ND Analyte DETECTED DET Alpha Analytical Laboratories, Inc. The results in this report apply to the samples analyzed in accordance with the chain of custody document. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Bruce L. Gove Laboratory Director 9/19/2012 Page 7 of 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---