Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Street Improvements S-14 S-09 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Assessments 90,000 Street in Kind 30,000 - 120,000 - - - - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 96,000 - C. Contingencies (10% of B) - 9,600 - - - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) - 14,400 - - - E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other - 120,000 - - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Doug Harby Public Works CJK 36 Project Title: Eldora Lane Drainage Improvements Date Submitted to Finance 02/13/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 14:06 Description of additional operating budget impact: OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Citizen request to improve drainage on Eldora Lane between Linda Vista Boulevard and April Lane. The current road section has no curbs, gutters or sidewalks. The road is deteriorating and drainage improvements are needed. The project would be funded by a mix of assessments and Street In Kind. This project will be scheduled into the annual street maintenance program with like projects for FY11 and will be addressed when its priority comes up in the annual review of priority projects in the street maintenance program. Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Street Improvements S-09 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 2 5 10 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 1 4 4 plans? Total Score 36 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Eldora Lane Drainage Improvements Improves street maintenance. Street and drainage improvements are an essential function. Improve quality of life. Quantitative Analysis Comments 50% assessments. The street will continue to deteriorate until improvements are made. ---PAGE BREAK---