Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Community Service CS-27 CS-22 CS-15 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Parking Commission 50,000 50,000 50,000 CTEP 100,000 180,000 180,000 80,000 Lighting SID (lighting installation) 115,000 115,000 115,000 100,000 345,000 345,000 245,000 - - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 276,000 276,000 196,000 - C. Contingencies (10% of B) - 27,600 27,600 19,600 - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) - 41,400 41,400 29,400 - E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other - 345,000 345,000 245,000 - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Kevin Slovarp Public Works CJK 37 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: This project is the 1st of 10 recommendations from the Missoula Downtown Streets Project Plan for improving and revitalizing streets in the downtown area. This project consists of street enhancements on Higgins from Broadway to Alder including pedestrian amenities such as pedestrian scale lighting, street furniture, etc., change in parking orientation and improved traffic circulation. The Downtown Streets Project is intended to: provide a high quality pedestrian environment; improve traffic flow, access and circulation to downtown; provide additional on-street parking; create an inviting streetscape and festival atmosphere; and establish Downtown as a high quality place inviting additional investment in redevelopment. This project would help to "brand" the area by offering a unique look exclusive to the Downtown. The 10 recommendations consist of: 1) North Higgins Streetscape; 2) Two-way Front & Main Street Traffic Flow; 3) New Street & Pedestrian Lights; 4) Diagonal Parking on Front Street; 5) Streetscape Hip Strip; 6) "Blues Alley" Entertainment District; 7) Streetscape Pine Street; 8) Upgrade Traffic Signals; 9) Create Carousel" Gateway" on Front Street; and 10) Additional Streetscaping & Bulb-outs through redevelopment and individual projects. Phase 1 - FY2011, North Higgins (Spruce to Alder) City Street forces to pave and chip and seal entire street Phase 2 - FY2012, North Higgins (Pine to Spruce) City Street forces to pave and chip and seal entire street Phase 3 - FY2013, North Higgins (Broadway to Pine) City Street forces to pave and chip and seal entire street Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: North Higgins Streetscape Date Submitted to Finance 02/23/2009 Today's Date and Time 05/29/2009 9:14 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Community Service CS-15 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 1 4 4 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 1 4 4 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 37 It is anticipated that the proposed improvements will improve traffic circulation and encourage more pedestrian activity. This project would be a substantial improvement to the transportation system in the Downtown. This project enhances community livability, which has been a goal in past strategic plans of the City. Quantitative Analysis Comments Yes, because three of the funding sources are other than the General Fund. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: North Higgins Streetscape ---PAGE BREAK---