Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Street Improvements S-16 S-08 S-19 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Assessments 2,170,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 565,000 55,000 2,170,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 620,000 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 1,736,000 508,000 508,000 508,000 508,000 565,000 C. Contingencies (10% of B) 173,600 50,800 50,800 50,800 50,800 55,000 D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 260,400 76,200 76,200 76,200 76,200 E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 2,170,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 635,000 620,000 Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Doug Harby Public Works CJK 49 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: This program systematically replaces hazardous and deteriorated sidewalks and installs curb ramps throughout the existing sidewalk system of Missoula and installs new curbs and sidewalks where there are none. The Public Works Master Sidewalk Plan is used to prioritize the areas that will be upgraded first. This program replaces 40 to 50 blocks and installs 20 to 30 blocks of sidewalk annually. The costs are assessed to property owners. The costs of installing curb ramps are shared by property owners and gas tax monies depending on the situation. The sidewalk program proposed for construction in 2009 is attached. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Annual Sidewalk Installation and Replacement Program Date Submitted to Finance 03/02/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 14:29 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Street Improvements S-19 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 49 Allows for the mobility impaired to use pedestrian facilities. A safe sidewalk system encourages non-motorized transportation. ADA is mandated. MMC requires the replacement of hazardous sidewalks. Was included in the livability goals of past strategic plans. Quantitative Analysis Comments 100% leveraging. Court cases stating City's liability. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Annual Sidewalk Installation and Replacement Program ---PAGE BREAK---