Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Community Service CS-01 CS-03 CS-20 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Tax Increment 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 80,000 80,000 80,000 C. Contingencies (10% of B) 8,000 8,000 8,000 D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 12,000 12,000 12,000 E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 100,000 100,000 100,000 - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Ellen Buchanan MRA kln 45 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: This project involves improvements to the West Broadway corridor within the boundaries of Urban Renewal District II through implementation of the Downtown Master Plan. The plan outlines several implemetnation strategies that will serve to carry out the community vision. This CIP item will be used to help implement the first phase of strategies which includes projects such as riverront greenway, interesection improvments, and land acquisition/assembly. A specific project for the first phase of West Broadway Corridor Improvements has yet to be identified, however a survey of the right-of-way has been conducted and a Certificate of Survey created to facilitate future projects. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: URD II West Broadway Corridor Improvements Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/01/2009 12:57 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: CS-20 Community Service CS-20 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 45 Projects that involve multi-modal, particularily bike/ped improvements, vehicular travel can be reduced. Alternative transportation and/or traffic circulation would be addressed and improved through projects under this CIP item. Improvements that would be done under this CIP item would be in accordance with the Downtown Master Plan. Quantitative Analysis Comments This project is 100% leveraged using tax increment funds. Streetscape and corridor improvements are a highly visible reinvestment in urban renewal districts and can serve to jumpstart interest in the West broadway Corridor. If tax increment funds were to be used in conjunction with other fundsfor a project initiated by another department such as public works, speedy implementation may be necessary. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: URD II West Broadway Corridor Improvements