Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Street Improvements S-18 S-12 S-12 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 City Gas Tax - Match Funds 37,150 State Match Funds 96,000 37,700 Federal (STPU, CTEP, UHPIP) 951,700 360,982 - 1,047,700 - - - - 435,832 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 838,160 - - C. Contingencies (10% of B) 83,816 - - - - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 125,724 - - - - 435,832 E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 1,047,700 - - - - 435,832 Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Steve King Public Works CJK 49 Project Title: Traffic Control Improvements Higgins/Beckwith/Hill Date Submitted to Finance 03/02/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 14:12 Description of additional operating budget impact: OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: This intersection is currently the only unsignalized major intersection on the east-west traffic corridor, which consists of Mount Avenue, 14th Street, Hill and East Beckwith that goes from Reserve Street to the University of Montana. Installation of this improvement would provide a much needed east-west route across the entire city. Prior traffic engineer analysis did indicate that intersection control was warranted. Engineer has completed the preliminary design of a roundabout. The project is planned to be constructed while school is out during summer 2009. Project Status: 1) MOU signed at State; 2) Final design completed 2008; and 3) Construction is scheduled for 2009. Funding: 1) Urban pilot program funds for ROW and construction; 2) City gas tax for 13% of design engineering costs; 3) Community Transportation Enhancement Program (CTEP) for landscaping, lighting, and non-motorized amenities; and 4) MDT Urban Funds for right-of-way and construction design and public process. Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Street Improvements S-12 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 3 4 12 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 49 Under contract. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Traffic Control Improvements Higgins/Beckwith/Hill This will reduce motor vehicle delays, east bicycle/pedestrian access and reduce cut through traffic in neighborhoods. The enhancement of the transportation plan. Livability. Quantitative Analysis Comments The whole community will benefit from the completio of an east-west corridor. Leveraging of local money is 100%. The remainder of the corridor is in place. Pilot program funding requires speedy implementation.