Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Community Service CS-29 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Tax Increment 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost C. Contingencies (10% of B) D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other - - - - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Ellen Buchanan MRA dtg 42 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Lack of curb and sidewalks have been identified in the URD III Study and URD III Plan as a condition contributing to blight in the Urban Renewal District. This project will construct curb and sidewalk throughout the Franklin To Fort neighborhood west of Southgate Mall (see attached map of project area). Construction of sidewalk and curb in this neighborhood will facilitate the implementation of the URD III Plan, reduce blight in the District, and act as a catalyst for further private investment throughout the District. This project will provide funding to complete curb and gutter in the area of the URD III district that lies south of Sussex and west of the railroad tracks over the next 5 years. The projects will be prioritized in consultation and coordination with the public works department. Spent in Prior Years Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: URD III Curb and Sidewalk - Franklin To Fort Area Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/01/2009 13:12 Description of additional operating budget impact: No ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Community Service CS-29 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 1 3 3 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 42 The curb/sidewalk project may conserve energy as it provides for alternative transportation. The project will connect essential missing segments in the City Sidewalk Network. The curb/sidewalk project provides for alternative transportation, completes essential missing infrastructure in the URD, facilitates implementation of the URD III Plan, and focuses on efforts for reinvestment in the URD to revitalize the District. Quantitative Analysis Comments Because curbs and sidewalks are such a visible form of reinvestment in the District, the investment will tend to serve as a catalyst for further private investment in URD III. This project is 100% leveraged using tax increment funds. Timing is a factor in order to complete construction of the infrastructure prior to sun-set of the District and to allow time for private investment to occur within the URD. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: URD III Curb and Sidewalk - Franklin To Fort Area ---PAGE BREAK--- URD III SIDEWALK INVENTORY Primary Sidewalk Network Secondary Sidewalk Network No Sidewalk No Sidewalk or Curb LEGEND