Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-05 PR-05 PR-03 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 CTEP 362,300 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 443,700 RTP 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 Open Space Bond 1995 15,700 25,000 25,000 38,000 25,000 28,300 Open Space Bond 2006 Impact fees - County - Arco 46,518 TIF TBD 555,000 778,300 413,000 815,000 1,038,300 273,000 260,000 553,518 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 327,922 647,110 824,410 216,762 200,000 C. Contingencies (10% of B) 32,627 64,385 82,025 21,567 20,000 D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 49,147 96,985 123,558 32,487 30,000 9,130 E. Percent for Art of B) 3,304 6,520 8,307 2,184 2,000 F. Equipment Costs 8,000 G. Other 413,000 815,000 1,038,300 273,000 260,000 9,130 Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel 1,702 1,789 1,879 1,973 2,071 Supplies 453 530 620 726 849 Purchased Services 506 592 693 810 948 Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service 2,661 2,911 3,191 3,509 3,868 - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Dave Shaw Parks & Recreation KM 49 Project Title: Bicycle Commuter Network - Pending CTEP Projects Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/02/2009 8:41 Description of additional operating budget impact: In FY09 the cost of maintaining trails was estimated at $2,535, additional years estimated at 5% increase for personnel and 17% for supplies per mile per year. The total mileage is about .94 miles. Cost of routine resurfacing approximately every 7 years dependent on weather not included in budget. Requires acquisition of lands or easement for trail right of way for any of the above mentioned projects. OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Create, expand and enhance trails along Milwaukee Railroad, Bitterroot Branch Trail (BBT) and the Clark Fork River corridors. Corridor acquisition is the #1 priority of the adopted 2001 Non-motorized Plan. This project enables a coordinated effort to acquire access to land, through purchases or easements. Development of selected areas would follow acquisition. The project leverages federal funds (CTEP), donations and grants, such as RTP. Matching funds are from the Open Space Bond. Open Space funds will be requested for the 2006 Bond and will be listed on a per project basis. Numbers shown here account for the 12.25% ICAP fee associated with CTEP project in 2008. Included Projects: FY08 - Silver Park Trails (Appears as MRA Project "South Bank Riverfront Trail") not funded by Parks FY09 - Milwaukee Russell to Reserve (Appears as "Milwaukee Railroad West" $475.000, separated because established CTEP) FY09 - Kim Williams to Canyon River Connection $322,000 FY09 - Kim Williams to Clark Fork Subdivisions Connections $185,000 (could move to FY10 but, prefer to build it with Canyon River connection) FY10 - BBT North to Livingston (Also appears as MRA Project "URD III Trail Connections" $300,000) FY10 - Milwaukee Trail - Reserve to Mullan Phase I, $421,000 (Asphalt Surface) FY11 - Milwaukee Trail - Reserve to Mullan Phase II, $830,650 (4 Bridges) FY12 - Milwaukee Trail - Mullan to Deschamps Lane, $887,000 (Asphalt Surface) FY12 - BBT to Lolo connection (Scope not yet defined) FY12 - Trail lighting Improvements on Kim Williams and Ron McDonald River Front Trails for "Dark Skies" compliance and improved efficiency, $173,000 (Figures are from FY06 estimate) FY13 - River trail - VanBuren east, $414,300 (this estimate in FY06 numbers) *Build in floodplain and floodway if ROW is not obtainable Further expansion of trails along the north and south shores of the Clark Fork River Further expansion of the Milwaukee corridor, BBT expansion Stimulus Package: Rails to Trails Conservatory 2010 - estimated at $50,000,000. See Stimulus Package CIP for details Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-03 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other x requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local x participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- x cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be x shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 49 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Bicycle Commuter Network - Pending CTEP Projects Corporate and community support is high. Development is threatening the continuous corridor for the corridor between Russell Street and Mullan Road. Yes. The project will preserve the Milwaukee Corridor which is eligible for historic status. It will allow continuation of the historic use, transportation in a related mode, via non-motorized means. Portions of the trail are adjacent to riparian areas. The project works in concert with plans to conserve open space. It encourages use of non-polluting non-motorized transportation mitigating air quality problems. It is an integral part of the City's TDM plan to reduce VMT The projects proposed here are designated as "commuter routes" as per the Non-Motorized Transportation Plan. These routes are heavily supported by the public. The project contributes to Strategic goal of liability by providing an inexpensive, convenient and safe means of travel and healthy recreation linking neighborhoods with community resources. Specifically, it is a primary component of the 2001 Non-Motorized Plan, with specific reference to corridor preservation as #1 goal. These projects are supported by the goals of the Master Parks Plan and also appear in the Urban Transportation Plan Update. Quantitative Analysis Comments Yes. The City's match leverages SAFETEA-LU (CTEP) and other grant funds. This fund reimburses 86.58% of project costs, requiring only 13.42% local matching funds. A 12.25% ICAP fee is added to the total CTEP portion. Yes. Each year more development occurs along many potential trail corridors in the City, making establishment of a continuous trail system more problematic. Air quality improvements and quality of life improvements are benefits of these projects. ---PAGE BREAK--- MILWAUKEE/D.C./K.W. TRAIL CONNECTIONS Based on TLI Preliminary Estimates KW to CR Trail Construction $229,879 8' Paved Trail Engineering $59,155 Plus retaining wall, fence & Subtotal $289,034 RR safety features Contingency $28,903 CTEP ICAP 12.25% $3,541 Total $321,478 Kim Williams to Clark Fork Subs Connection Construction $131,259 8' Paved Trail Engineering $34,741 Subtotal $166,000 Contingency $16,600 CTEP ICAP 12.25% $2,033 Total $184,633 Grand Total $506,110 Note: Estimates based on 2007 figures Estimate assumes the City will do all the following construction. Costs could decline if development occurs along the trail corridor MILWAUKEE RESERVE TO MULLAN Unit Unit Cost Total Property Asphalt Trail, Phase I 1.875 $200,000 $375,000 Includes Design & Construction Costs CTEP ICAP 12.25% $45,938 Total Estimated Cost $420,938 Bridges, Phase II Bridge 1 Existing $0 Kolenditch Bridge 2 200 $1,000 $200,000 Clouse Bridge 3 300 $1,000 $300,000 Clouse Bridge 4 60 $1,000 $60,000 JTL Bridge 5 Existing $0 $0 JTL Bridge 6 Install At Grade Crossing $0 $0 Schmidt Rd. Bridge 7 180 $1,000 $180,000 Frey Bridges Subtotal $740,000 CTEP ICAP 12.25% $90,650 Total Estimated Costs $830,650 Note: Estimate assumes the City will do all the following construction. Costs could decline if development occurs along the trail corridor MILWAUKEE MULLAN TO DESCHAMPS LN. Miles Unit Cost/mile Total Miles of Trail 3.95 $200,000 $790,000 8' wide Asphalt Surface CTEP ICAP 12.25% $96,775 Total $886,775 Miles of Trail 3.95 $130,000 $513,500 Gravel Only (not CTEP eligible)