Full Text
Program Category: 07 Project # 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Street Improvements S-05 S-22 S-21 S-18 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Gas Tax 410,000 380,000 360,000 340,000 320,000 Street Division in Kind 590,000 620,000 640,000 660,000 680,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 800,000 C. Contingencies (10% of B) 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Doug Harby Public Works CJK 46 Project Title: Street Improvement and Major Maintenance Program Date Submitted to Finance 03/25/3009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 14:28 Description of additional operating budget impact: OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Most streets are designed for and have a useful life span of 20 years if no major maintenance is performed. The street improvements and major maintenance program has changed from all reconstruction to a combination of: 1) Reconstruction of completely deteriorated streets; 2) Overlays on the streets showing the most duress; and 3) Chip sealing or application of reclamite to prolong the life of the streets with only moderate deterioration. Overlaying, chip sealing and reclamiting before complete deterioration will extend the life of a street beyond the normal 20 years. All sidewalk work has been transferred to the annual sidewalk replacement/installation program. Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Street Improvements S-18 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 1 3 3 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 46 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Street Improvement and Major Maintenance Program Quantitative Analysis Comments Gas Tax funds are allocated to each city based on miles of streets and population. Funds are earmarked for the maintenance and construction of streets. Long term maintenance of community infrastructure is more cost effective than major reconstruction. Postponement of any part of the street program means increased future costs to replace deteriorated streets. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK---