Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Street Improvements S-06 S-11 S-11 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Assessments 600,000 Street Division in Kind 200,000 - - - 800,000 - - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost - 640,000 - C. Contingencies (10% of B) - - - 64,000 - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) - - - 96,000 - E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other - - - 800,000 - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Kevin Slovarp Public Works CJK - Project Title: Duncan/Greenough Drive Reconstruction (Vine - Mtn. View) Date Submitted to Finance 02/13/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 14:11 Description of additional operating budget impact: Reduction of street maintenance costs by $500 per year. OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Duncan/Greenough Drive was reviewed through public input as part of a list of seven corridors considered for reconstruction. Improvements will consist of new curbs, sidewalks, drainage, pavement and utility reconstruction. Neighborhood gateway treatments, lighting and landscaping will be considered. This is a 2 lane cost estimate. Funding: 1) State pilot project; 2) Assessments to area property owners; 3) CTEP for landscaping and lighting; and 4) City Street Division provides in-kind labor and equipment for asphalt and drainage to meet budget (estimate of $200,000 work). Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Street Improvements S-11 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 5 - investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 4 - maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 3 - pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 4 - services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 4 - plans? Total Score - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Duncan/Greenough Drive Reconstruction (Vine - Mtn. View) Quantitative Analysis Comments