Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-01 WW-09 WW-07 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Sewer R&D (sewer line repair) 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 3,036,521 Sewer R&D (sewer line rehabilitation) 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 3,036,521 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 240,000 1,694,662 C. Contingencies (10% of B) 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 24,000 169,466 D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 36,000 254,199 E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,118,328 Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Steve King Public Works CJK 45 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Proper equipment and training allows the Wastewater Facility staff to evaluate the condition of the sewer collection system. These evaluations, conducted during routine line maintenance, help identify and prioritize system upgrades. The City annually repairs and maintains a significant amount of sanitary sewer mains and related appurtenances. Completion of the WWTF upgrade project in October 2005, allows the City to refocus on maintenance of sewer lines again. Since 1994 the City has spent $2,118,327 to complete repairs to: * 58 STEP sewer system repairs * 39 Flush tank and tank repairs * 85 Manhole repairs * 232 Main repairs consisting of 11,692 lineal feet Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation Program Date Submitted to Finance 02/19/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 15:38 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-07 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 45 Repair of older sewer lines helps reduce water pollution resulting in better water well protection. Maintenance of the wastewater collection system is a necessary obligation. Providing additional capacity allows the City to continue providing sewer services to the adjacent unsewered areas, per the 2001 Wastewater Facility Plan. Quantitative Analysis Comments A small investment in line rehabilitation will reduce the need for plant expansion. 100% leveraging. Reduction of inflow resulting from sewer repairs enhances treatment plant capacity. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Sewer Pipe Rehabilitation Program ---PAGE BREAK--- 0 200 400 [PHONE REDACTED] 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 * 2005 main focus was main replacement rather than repair (Birch and Broadway mains). Sewer Mains Repaired Annually (Lineal Feet) 0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 [PHONE REDACTED] 2002 2003 2004 2005* 2006 2007 2008 Sewer Mains Video Inspected Annually (Lineal Feet)