Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-04 PR-11 PR-09 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 Impact Fees 90,000 60,000 85,000 115,000 160,000 60,000 Cash in Lieu 34,000 20,000 20,000 102,000 20,000 80,050 CDBG funds (ED/RR) 44,000 Sale of Carter Court (pending) 50,000 Pineview Park SID 750,000 GF CIP - Future GO bond, Mill levy, SID/Other - 36,000 615,000 1,087,000 300,500 100,000 Total 124,000 116,000 720,000 1,304,000 480,500 1,084,050 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost C. Contingencies (10% of B) D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 124,000 116,000 720,000 1,304,000 480,500 240,285 (Estimates based on FY09) 124,000 116,000 720,000 1,304,000 480,500 240,285 Expense Object Accounting Code FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 Personnel 20,468 21,491 22,566 23,694 24,879 - Supplies 5,437 5,709 5,994 6,294 6,608 - Purchased Services 6,076 6,380 6,699 7,034 7,386 - Fixed Charges - Capital Outlay - Debt Service - 31,981 33,580 35,259 37,022 38,873 - 31,981 33,580 35,259 37,022 38,873 Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Dave Shaw Park & Rec KM 49 Project Title: New & Expanded Park Development per MPP & NHD Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/02/2009 9:22 Description of additional operating budget impact: FY 08 average cost/acre of developed neighborhood park = $2918/acre with LaFray Park and Pineview will incur operational costs in FY 08. White Pine (3.0) & 44 Ranch (5.86) to be added in FY 09 and Silver Park (14 acres* .15 inf FY 09 and the remainder in FY10 - total acres = 10.96 acres. see site plans for each park OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Per Ordinance #3250, impact fees may be used to provide park, trail, open space, recreation opportunities if these expansions or improvement are related to growth. Cash in lieu from area development could be an additional revenue source. Park Development is in accordance with the Master Park Plan. The approach is to develop parks in two phases with Phase 1 addressing immediate infrastructure such as turf, irrigation, trees and basic park furnishings (benches, tables, garbage) and Phase 2 to include amenities such as picnic shelters, playgrounds, sports areas, restrooms, etc. The goal is to encourage developers, when feasible to develop a park at a Phase 1 level. The City using cash in lieu, impact fees, SID's, grants, or CIP-GF develops the park at the Phase 2 level. In FY07 - LaFray Park Phase I was funded and CTA Architects began design, development of Phase 1. Construction of Phase I at Lafray was completed Fall 2008. Pineview Park SID was approved in January 2007. The park is now in City ownership and renovation construction is scheduled for spring 09. This CIP includes priority listing of New Park development and the proposed year for park development using the two phase approach. CIP also includes expansion due to growth demand of existing parks. In 2003 White Pine Park was approved for Phase I development (turf and irrigation) at $42,000. This project was moved to PR-12. FY10 project will be at 44 Ranch. Stimulus Package: Silver's Park would have a newly developed 14 acre park. See stimulus package CIP for details. Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 09 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-09 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other x requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local x participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- x cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be x shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 49 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: New & Expanded Park Development per MPP & NHD Trails and green space support and preserve our Natural Environment Per Growth Policy, public polls and perception, and the Master Park Plan as well as the Strategic Plan Growth Policy, Master Park Plan, OS Plan & Non-Motorized Plan Quantitative Analysis Comments Yes, per intention of impact fee ordinance, the Master Park Plan, and Citizen support. Projects leverage 50% + of funding.SID mandated project completion, Citizen initiated It would be most appropriate if Parks & Recreation infrastructure were developed with Public Works infrastructure ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Priority 5 Year FY11 & FY13 Pleasant View Acres 5.37 Phase I Costs Grading & Seeding To be completed by Developer Irrigation To be completed by Developer Turf To be completed by Developer Blvd, Trees & Sidewalks To be completed by Developer Projected Date Credited Developer $86,000 FY11 Impact Fees not collected by City Phase II Large Amenities $240,000 Picnic Shelter $50,000 Restroom $35,000 Professional Services $100,000 Contingencies $75,000 Projected Date Total $500,000 FY13 Pending Neighborhood SID Request Cost per Acre Grand Total $500,000 $93,110 (Phase 2 Only) Project Priority 1 Year FY08 & FY 09 LaFray Acres 1.94 Phase I Costs Grading & Seeding $6,000 Irrigation $40,000 Plantings $24,000 Trails $38,000 Furnishings $14,000 Water Hookup $5,000 Professional Services $35,000 Contingencies $40,000 Projected Date Total $202,000 FY07 /FY08 $202,000 Phase II Playground $66,000 Climbing Structure $23,000 Small Skatepark $14,000 Picnic Shelter $35,000 Restroom $25,000 Professional Services $16,300 Contingencies $40,750 Projected Date Total $220,050 FY08/FY09 Cost per Acre Grand Total $422,050 $217,552 Project Priority 2 Year FY08 & FY 09 PineView Acres 4.58 SID Improvements* Costs Design & Construction $750,000 Projected Date Cost per Acre** Total $750,000 FY07-08 $163,755 *See Resolution to create SID 510 for improvements at Pineview Park for details **Includes all financing and SID costs PINEVIEW BUDGET SUMMARY 1‐29‐09 BID SUMMARY BID SET ‐ APPARENT LOW BIDDER BASE BID ALT 1‐DRINKING FOUNTAIN ALT 2‐SOIL CONDITIONING ALT 1&2 Set 1 ‐ PATTERSON $88,709.20 Set 2 ‐ VALLEY LANDSCAPE $121,696.00 $2,140.00 $31,265.00 $33,405.00 Set 3 ‐ PATTERSON $17,100.00 Set 4 ‐ FENCECRAFTERS $37,900.00 W/ ALT 1 W/ ALT 2 W/ ALT 1&2 TOTAL OF LOW BIDS $265,405.20 $267,545.20 $296,670.20 $298,810.20 SID CONSTRUCTION BUDGET $561,500.00 $561,500.00 $561,500.00 $561,500.00 REMAINING BUDGET AVAILABLE $296,094.80 $293,954.80 $264,829.80 $262,689.80 BUDGET SUMMARY Project Phases Estimate/Bid Amount Phase 0 ‐ Owner Items ‐ IN HOUSE ESTIMATE $96,700.00 Phase A ‐ Demolition/Grading/Excavation ‐ IN ESTIMATE $10,625.00 Phase B ‐ Asphalt Construction ‐ IN HOUSE ESTIMATE $68,000.00 Phase C ‐ Playground Construction ‐ FUTURE BID ESTIMATE $75,000.00 SUM PHASES 0 ‐ C $250,325.00 Phase 1 ‐ Structures & Concrete BID $88,709.20 Phase 2 ‐ Landscape & Irrigation BID $121,696.00 Phase 3 ‐ Sport Court Surfacing BID $17,100.00 Phase 4 ‐ Fencing & Baseball Backstop BID $37,900.00 SUM PHASES 1 ‐ 4 $265,405.20 SUBTOTAL PH. 0‐C + PH. 1‐4 $515,730.20 CONTINGENCY 5% $45,769.80 TOTAL PROJECTED CONSTRUCTION COSTS $561,500.00 SID BUDGET SUMMARY A&E Budget $80,000.00 Finance Budget $108,500.00 Construction Budget $561,500.00 Total SID $750,000.00 Project Priority 4 Year FY9 & FY 10 44 Ranch Acres 5.80 Phase I Costs Grading & Seeding To be completed by Developer Irrigation To be completed by Developer Plantings To be completed by Developer Trails To be completed by Developer Furnishings/Pond system To be completed by Developer Professional Services To be completed by Developer Contingencies To be completed by Developer Projected Date Total (estimated credit to Developer) $100,000 FY09 *Impact fees to be collected by City Phase II Playground Equipment $70,000 Picnic Shelter $55,000 Spray Deck $102,000 Furnishings $30,000 Trails & Benches $15,000 Professional Services $38,000 Contingencies $42,000 subtotal $352,000 Projected Date Total $352,000 FY10 Cost per Acre Grand Total $452,000 $58,276 (Phase 2 Only) ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Priority 8 Year FY15 & FY 16 O'Keefe Ranch Acres 10.20 Phase I Costs Grading & Seeding To be completed by Developer Irrigation To be completed by Developer Plantings Trails Furnishings $510,000 Professional Services $102,000 Contingencies $76,500 Projected Date Total $688,500 FY15 Phase II Large Amenities $300,000 Picnic Shelter $60,000 Restroom $45,000 Professional Services $71,000 Contingencies $103,000 Subtotal $579,000 Projected Date Total $579,000 FY16 Cost per Acre Grand Total $1,267,500 $124,265 Project Priority 9 Year FY16 & FY 17 Running W Ranch Acres 5.00 Phase I Costs Grading & Seeding To be completed by Developer Irrigation To be completed by Developer Plantings Trails Furnishings $350,000 Professional Services $70,000 Contingencies $52,000 Projected Date Total $472,000 FY16 Phase II Large Amenities $235,000 Picnic Shelter $45,000 Restroom $35,000 Professional Services $46,000 Contingencies $50,000 $411,000 Projected Date Total $411,000 FY17 Cost per Acre Grand Total $883,000 $176,600 Project Priority 6 Year FY12 & FY 13 Bellevue Acres 7.85 Phase I Costs Grading & Soil Preparation $115,000 Utilities $45,000 Irrigation & Plantings $88,000 Trails/Furnishings/Ditch Mitigation $142,000 Professional Services $120,000 Contingencies $90,000 Projected Date Total $600,000 FY12 Phase II Costs Large Amenities $325,000 Professional Services $100,000 Contingencies $75,000 Total $500,000 Projected Date Total $500,000 FY13 Cost per Acre Grand Total $1,100,000 $140,127 Project Priority 7 Year FY13 & FY 14 Whitaker Acres 2.27 Phase I Costs Grading &Site Prep $26,000 Irrigation $30,000 Plantings & Turf $20,000 Trails $41,000 Furnishings $15,000 Professional Services $41,000 Contingencies $31,000 Projected Date Total $204,000 FY13 Phase II Large Amenities/Shelter $100,000 Restroom $35,000 Professional Services $50,000 Contingencies $20,500 Subtotal $205,500 Projected Date Total $205,500 FY14 Cost per Acre Grand Total $409,500 $180,396