Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-12 WW-07 WW-05 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Sewer Development Fund 50,000 500,000 1,000,000 County TIF 500,000 50,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 800,000 800,000 - C. Contingencies (10% of B) - 80,000 80,000 - - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 50,000 120,000 120,000 - - E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 50,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Steve King Public Works CJK 48 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: This interceptor would allow extended sewer service to the Butler Creek/"Y" area. The interceptor would start at the airport and run west past Butler Creek and on to the area. The "Wye" collection portion of the project was funded by rural special improvement district (RSID) assessments. This RSID was citizen initiated to allow extended sewer service. A sewer collection system was constructed in the "Wye" area to serve the properties in the RSID. City's upsizing of the main occurred in 2009. City Sewer Development Fees would complete the Interceptor portion near the Airport when capacity would be required. Preliminary engineering in 2010. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Airport Interceptor Phase II and "Wye" Collection System Date Submitted to Finance 02/26/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 15:36 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-05 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 3 3 9 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 48 Sole source aquifer protection. Sewer interceptor identified in the updated 2001 Wastewater Facilities Plan. Quantitative Analysis Comments Use of sewer funds to construct this project will open up new areas of the ocmmunity to public sewer and accommodate infill. 3:1 leveraging of private funds (assessments). CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Airport Interceptor Phase II and "Wye" Collection System