Full Text
Program Category: 07 Project # 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-05 WW-02 WW-15 WW-01 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Sewer cash support 141,033 - SID Assessments 2,069,000 710,000 Economic Stimulus (SRF) 750,000 671,000 Grant Funds TSEP 500,000 Grant Funds DNRC 70,000 Grant Funds EPA STAG 482,100 4,012,133 - - - - 1,381,000 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 3,016,401 - C. Contingencies (10% of B) 301,640 - - - - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 452,460 - - - - E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 241,632 4,012,133 - - - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Steve King Public Works CJK 44 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: Portions of central and upper Rattlesnake Valley are served by onsite septic systems that contaminate ground waters and impact Rattlesnake Creek and Missoula Aquifer water quality. These areas ranked as a priority for installation of wastewater collection systems. SIDs were created for over 157 housing units in the Central Valley since 2000. Completion of the Rattlesnake sewer collection system will be funded by a combination of SID assessments, State and Federal grants, and City sewer utility funds. Portions of the project completed to-date, including 157 properties in sub-SIDs: FY2003 - Preliminary design was completed FY2004 - Gilbert Street property owners petitioned to create SID 533 (completed 2006) FY2005 - Lincolnwood property owners petitioned to create SID 534 and 536 (completed 2006) Construction on the sewer to serve the remaining 320 properties is planned for 2010. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Rattlesnake Neighborhood Wastewater Collection System Date Submitted to Finance 03/25/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 15:23 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-01 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and 2069000 number in the comment Economic Stimulus (SRF) 750000 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- 3096880 prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 1 4 4 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 3 3 9 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 44 Protection of the sole source aquifer. The project enhances community livability by protecting the environment. The project has been identified in the updated Wastewater Facility Plan. Quantitative Analysis Comments This SID would be matched for 50% revenue bond matching and is subsidized by grants This area ranks number five in the Missoula Valley Water Quality District's Unsewered Area Study. This is the only high priority area remaining in the City. This project has grants that are time sensitive - DNRC Grant, TSEP Grant and EPA Stag Grant. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Rattlesnake Neighborhood Wastewater Collection System