Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-10 PR-15 PR-10 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 TBD - Park Maintenance District - 150,000 550,000 550,000 300,000 36,231 ADA access - grant funding 25,000 25,000 25,000 40,000 Impact Fees 32,820 CTEP 113,000 - 150,000 575,000 575,000 325,000 222,051 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost C. Contingencies (10% of B) D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other - 150,000 575,000 575,000 325,000 - 150,000 575,000 575,000 325,000 - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Donna Gaukler Parks & Recreation KM 53 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: The most significant improvement has been the construction and opening of Splash Montana, and the newly constructed picnic shelter. A final site plan design was completed in January 2005. The design incorporates many elements that enhance the function of the park after construction resulting from SID 524. In FY06 funding was received for construction of design elements that address parking lot construction as a final component of SID 524 and the impact of Splash Montana. Safety issues related to uncontrolled vehicle access on the levees and outfall area were addressed with additional fencing. Completion of Baseball Parking lot, sidewalks and ADA trail connectors and landscaping will be the main focus of improvements to the park FY10 In the next fiscal years, the park will need the playground replaced and irrigation. FY09 projects will be completed summer 2009. See project detail. Stimulus Package: Renovation of the entire 60 acre at Playfair is estimated at $2,000,000. See Stimulus Package CIP for details. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Playfair Park Site plan, design, renovation Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/02/2009 9:39 Description of additional operating budget impact: See master park site plan ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-10 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other x requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local x participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- x cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be x shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 3 4 12 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 53 Paving the parking lots will reduce particulae matter form the gravel parking lots. Yes, as stated in the Master Park Plan, facilities such as picnic areas should be upgraded where necessary as in Playfair Park. Further, the new picnic area reduces the primary use of the park from programmed sports to more self directed, community gathering functions. Complies with parking surface regulations. Provides appropriate parking for park. Improves access for all. Yes, this project complies with the Master Park Plans recommendations for diversifying recreational uses at Playfair Park. Also meets Aquatics plan needs, restores park attributes following dike construction. Quantitative Analysis Comments ADA funding and inkind labor will offset constuction costs of improvements. Additional parking facilities will support generation of revenue from Splash Montana and the 50 meter pool. Lack of parking affects ability to generate revenue as well as use of the fields. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Playfair Park Site plan, design, renovation ---PAGE BREAK--- FY 2009 361,050 $ Patte Street West Parking Lot Baseball Parking Lot Per Doug Harby 161,179 $ Landscaping 40,000 $ CTEP sidwalk project 113,000 $ FY 2010 - $ ADA - connections to Sidewalk FY 2011 - $ Playground 150,000 $ FY 2012 575,000 $ Irrigation System 300,000 $ ADA - Parking/trails/sidewalks connectors 25,000 $ Baseball Fencing/Renovation 250,000 $ FY 2013 575,000 $ Irrigation System 300,000 $ ADA - Parking/trails/sidewalks connectors 25,000 $ Baseball Fencing/Renovation 250,000 $ FY 2014 325,000 $ Irrigation System 300,000 $ ADA - Parking/trails/sidewalks connectors 25,000 $ Playfair Park Master Site Plan