Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-12 PR-20 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 General Fund 42,000 CDBG 40,000 Impact Fees 68,000 Donation 50,000 In Kind Services 10,000 40,300 TBD 116,500 - 126,500 - - - 240,300 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost C. Contingencies (10% of B) D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 240,300 126,500 240,300 126,500 - - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel 5,603 5,883 6,177 6,486 6,810 Supplies 1,488 1,741 2,037 2,383 2,789 Purchased Services 1,663 1,946 2,277 2,664 3,117 Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service 8754 8,754 9,570 10,491 11,533 12,715 - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Donna Gaukler Parks & Recreation KM 53 Project Title: White Pine Park Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/02/2009 10:09 Description of additional operating budget impact: maintenance for this 3 acre park will be limited to mowing, and garbage pickup - cost is $2,918 per acre for maintenance. Yes, cleanup per DEQ, and see site plan for development OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2009-2013 Description and justification of project and funding sources: . In 2003 White Pine Park was approved for Phase I development (turf and irrigation) at 42,000. Since then the site has become a clean up site. The City completed the cleanup, per DEQ standards Fall 2008. However, the cleanup project used the funding of $42,000 which was slated for park development. A new budget was developed for the site per new existing conditions and after five years of inflation. The Parks Department submitted a grant request for CDBG funds in November 2007for $40,000 and was successful. To ensure proper drainage of the planned soccer fields, Parks negotiated the donation of fill soil from Bretz RV. The soil will be hauled to the White Pine Site by the College of Technology. Zip Beverage donated $50,000 toward the development of the park. Spent in Prior Years ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-20 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other x requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local x participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- x cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be x shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 3 4 12 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 53 CDBG Grant 2008 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: White Pine Park Parks provide for and enhance air and water quality. yes, fulfilled CDBG requirements for service fulfills Master Park Plan and Neighborhood plan priorities and provides neighborhood park and soccer fields in area with limited park services Master Park Plan, Strategic Goal 1 - Continue implementation phase of Master Park Plan for Greater Missoula area. Also supports goals in Neighborhood plan. Follows through with City commitment from time of acquisition. Improve City park lands through the design of newly acquired parks and improving the designs of existing parks ensuring recreational opportunities for people of all ages as stated in the Master Parks Plan. Quantitative Analysis Comments Yes due to CDBG and private funding the project is 75% funded by outside sources CDGB grant funding ---PAGE BREAK--- 09/15/2008 Cash expenses In‐kind expenses Expenses Phase 1 Future (Ph2) Phase 1 Ph 2 donated/inkind (estimates) Hauling and Grading COT $18,750 18,750 $ Streets $15,000 Soil, mixing and amending Bretz RV donation fill @ $3/cy x 3500 cy 10,500 $ top @ $10/cy x 4000 40,000 $ COT $18,750 18,750 $ Amendments @ $5/cy top X 4000cy $10,000 $10,000 Turf development Seeding (supplies, equip, labor) $15,000 Irrigation development Well (<35gpm) 15,000 Lines/heads installed @ $15,000/acre 45,000 Vegetation (Trees, shrubs) $5,000 Perimeter path (gravel, appox 700' x 6'wide) $10,000 Furnishings Goals $2,000 waste (dog, garbage) $750 benches $750 signage $1,000 RR (portalet) shelter and pad $30,000 Climbing or play structure w concrete perimeter $40,000 Fencing $10,000 Installation by Parks Dept (materials) $6,000 2,000 $ 10,000 Picnic Shelter ($45,000 installed on concrete) future ph 3 Project Administration and Coordination Parks and Recreation 1,200 $ Subtotal $142,000 $111,000 91,200 $ 10,000 $ Contingency @ 5% $7,100 $5,500 SUB TOTAL 149,100 $ 116,500 $ 91,200 $ 10,000 $ TOTAL including In‐kind and donations: Ph 1/Ph1+Ph2 240,300 $ 366,800 Revenue/Funding Sources Parks CIP FY04 & FY09 ($42K used for clean up. Replaced & increased with impac $58,250 Bretz (donation of soil) $50,500 Neighboring Business (anonymous pending funding pkg) $50,000 $100,000 Multiple addl funding as needed (private & grants) $16,500 CDBG $40,000 Parks Dept General Fund $850 Parks Dept in‐Kind 3,200 $ 10,000 COT In‐Kind 37,500 $ TOTAL 149,100 $ 116,500 $ 91,200 $ 10,000 $ TOTAL PROJECT including In‐kind and donations: Ph 1/Ph1+Ph2 240,300 $ 366,800 White Pine Park Budget Projections