Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-09 PR-04 PR-08 Yes No NA x Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 CTEP (obligated) 333,333 CTEP (to be obtained) 240,000 Open Space Bond 95 13,510 Open Space Bond 06 200,000 28,775 RTP (to be obtained) 35,000 475,000 - - - - 375,618 Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost 474,980 C. Contingencies (10% of B) 264,700 D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) 26,333 E. Percent for Art of B) 39,660 F. Equipment Costs 2,660 G. Other 42,285 808,333 - - 42,285 Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel 1,703 1,788 1,878 1,971 2,070 Supplies 452 529 619 724 847 Purchased Services 506 592 693 810 948 Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service 2,661 2,909 3,189 3,506 3,865 - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Dave Shaw Parks & Recreation KM 49 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: This project will create a bicycle/pedestrian trail along the Milwaukee Corridor between Russell St and Reserve St. Corridor acquisition is the #1 priority of the adopted 2001 Non- Motorized Plan. This project enables a coordinated effort to acquire access to land, through purchases or easements. Development of trail would follow acquisition. The project leverages federal funds (CTEP) and possible Recreational Trails Program grants from FWP. The CTEP numbers from FY09 and beyond account for the 12.25% ICAP fee. Matching funds are from the Open Space bond. Originally, it was planned to fund the acquisition from the $200K set aside in the 1995 Bond for trail construction. It was decided that the 95 Bond $ needed to be preserved for urban parks, which the 06 Bond does not fund. It was requested and approved by Council and OSAC that $200K from the 06 Bond be set aside for acquisition of the Milwaukee for trail development. WGM was hired in 2007 for the acquisition work. It is anticipated that acquisition will be completed by TIME. CTEP has approved the project and acquisition negotiations have begun. Construction is expected to begin late summer 2009. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Milwaukee Railroad Trail West Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 06/02/2009 9:16 Description of additional operating budget impact: In FY09 the cost of maintaining trails was estimated at $2,535, additional years estimated at 5% increase for personnel and 17% for supplies per mile per year. The total mileage is about .94 miles. Cost of routine resurfacing approximately every 7 years dependent on weather not included in budget. Requires acquisition of lands or easement for trail right of way. ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Parks, Recreation and Open Space PR-08 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other x requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local x participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- x cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be x shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 3 4 12 plans? Total Score 49 Yes. The project will preserve the Milwaukee Corridor which is eligible for historic status. It will allow continuation of the historic use, transportation in a related mode, via non-motorized means. The project works in concert with plans to conserve open space. It encourages use of non-polluting non-motorized transportation mitigating air quality problems. It is an integral part of the City's TDM plan to reduce VMT The project contributes to Strategic goal of liability by providing an inexpensive, convenient and safe means of travel and healthy recreation linking neighborhoods with community resources. Specifically, it is identified as a goal in the Master Park Plan, the 2001 Non-motorized Plan, the Urban Transportation Plan Update, as well as the Emma Dickenson/River Road Neighborhood Plan. Quantitative Analysis Comments Yes. The City's match leverages SAFETEA-LU (CTEP) and other grant funds. This fund reimburses 86.58% of project costs, requiring only 13.42% local matching funds. A 12.25% ICAP fee is added to the total CTEP portion. Yes. Each year more development occurs along the corridor, making establishment of a continuous corridor more problematic. Also, the CTEP agreement is in effect. Federal appropriation availability over the long term is always in question. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Milwaukee Railroad Trail West ---PAGE BREAK--- MILWAUKEE RR PATH‐MISSOULA STPE 8199(66) CONTROL # 5578 WHOLE‐PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Unit name # of Units Unit Cost Est. Total 1. ROW Acquisition Consultant Fees Negotiation/Appraisal 12 $6,250.00 $75,000.00 Acquisition Costs Easements per SF - Assuming 20' Easement 3500' long 70,000 $8.00 $560,000.00 Subtotal $635,000.00 2. Project Implementation Professional Services PE & CE $45,000.00 Trail Construction Linear Feet of Trail $170,000.00 Subtotal $215,000.00 Estimated Total $850,000.00 This does not account for ICAP on new CTEP allocations ICAP accounted for on front page. CTEP BREAKDOWN Account# Name % Reimb. Amount 9102 Preliminary Engineering 86.58% $30,000.00 9202 ROW/Easement Acquisition 86.58% $170,000.00 9302 (Utility Relocation) Incidental Construction 64.93% $0.00 9402 Construction Engineering (Including Contract admin. and inspections) 86.58% $15,000.00 9502 Construction 86.58% $170,000.00 Total $385,000.00 ICAP is not applicable to this number because it was under agreement before ICAP was instituted.