Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-07 WW-05 WW-08 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Sewer R&D 50,000 1,000,000 - 50,000 1,000,000 - - - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost - 800,000 - C. Contingencies (10% of B) - - 80,000 - - D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) - 50,000 120,000 - - E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other - 50,000 1,000,000 - - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Steve King Public Works CJK 45 Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: The reconstruction of Russell Street will cause evaluation of the existing 21" to 30" Russell Interceptor sewer line. Portions of the existing sewer are planned to be reconstructed or relined. Televised inspection has rated portions of the pipe for relining or reconstruction. Funding would come from the Sewer R&D Fund. Spent in Prior Years OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE Project Title: Russell Street Interceptor (6th - Idaho) Date Submitted to Finance 02/26/2009 Today's Date and Time 06/03/2009 15:40 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 10 Project # Wastewater Facilities WW-08 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 2 4 8 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce 2 3 6 pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 2 4 8 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 45 Sanitary sewer reduces pollution. Sanitary sewer is an essential City service. Sanitary sewer has been identified as necessary to a livable community. Quantitative Analysis Comments City Sewer R&D funds are being used for this interceptor replacement. This project must be complete dprior to site redevelopment and Russell and 3rd Street improvements. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: Russell Street Interceptor (6th - Idaho)