Full Text
Program Category: 08 Project # 09 Project # 10 Project # Community Service CS-32 CS-09 CS-13 Yes No NA X Funding Source Accounting Code FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 General Fund 4060.390.430000.930 25,000 25,000 25,000 Title I 4060.390.430000.930 9,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 CIP-Carryforward from 08 + $50,000 for 09 98,070 107,070 50,000 50,000 50,000 - Budgeted Funds Accounting Code FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 A. Land Cost B. Construction Cost C. Contingencies (10% of B) D. Design & Engineering (15% of B) E. Percent for Art of B) F. Equipment Costs G. Other 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 50,000 50,000 50,000 - - Expense Object Accounting Code FY 10 FY 11 FY 12 FY 13 FY 14 Personnel Supplies Purchased Services Fixed Charges Capital Outlay Debt Service - - - - - - Responsible Person: Responsible Department: Preparer's Initials Total Score Gail Verlanic Human Resources GV - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Missoula CIP Project Request Form FY 2010-2014 Description and justification of project and funding sources: See attached ADA FY09 project listing. Is this equipment prioritized on an equipment replacement schedule? Are there any site requirements: OPERATING BUDGET COSTS Spent in Prior Years Funded in Prior Years REVENUE EXPENSE How is this project going to be funded: Does this project have any additional impact on the operating budget: How is this project going to be spent: Spent in Prior Years Project Title: ADA Study/Implementation Date Submitted to Finance Today's Date and Time 05/29/2009 9:01 Description of additional operating budget impact: ---PAGE BREAK--- Program Category: 08 Project # Community Service CS-13 Yes No 1. Is the project necessary to meet federal, state, or local legal requirements? This cri- terion includes projects mandated by Court Order to meet requirements of law or other X requirements. Of special concern is that the project be accessible to the handicapped. 2. Is the project necessary to fulfill a con- tractual requirement? This criterion includes Federal or State grants which require local X participation. Indicate the Grant name and number in the comment column. 3. Is this project urgently required? Will de- lay result in curtailment of an essential ser- vice? This statement should be checked "Yes" only if an emergency is clearly indi- X cated; otherwise, answer "No". If "Yes", be sure to give full justification. 4. Does the project provide for and/or im- prove public health and/or public safety? This criterion should be answered "No" un- less public health and/or safety can be X shown to be an urgent or critical factor. Raw Score Total Range Weight Score (0-3) 5. Does the project result in maximum benefit to the community from the 3 5 15 investment dollar? (0-3) 6. Does the project require speedy implementation in order to assure its 1 4 4 maximum effectiveness? (0-3) 7. Does the project conserve energy, cultural or natural resources, or reduce - 3 - pollution? (0-2) 8. Does the project improve or expand upon essential City services where such 3 4 12 services are recognized and accepted as being necessary and effective? (0-3) 9. Does the project specifically relate to the City's strategic planning priorities or other 2 4 8 plans? Total Score 39 Program accessibility to citizens and employees with disabilities. Accessibility to public spaces is a federal mandate. Has been included in strategic planning priorities and can be incorporated with many strategic goals of the organization. Federal Funds (contracts, grants, CDBG) require compliance with ADA Quantitative Analysis Comments In some cases capital plans and remodels can include ADA accessibility measures by being included in the original project or remodel construction plans. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (See C.I.P. Instructions For Explanation of Criteria) Qualitative Analysis Comments Project Rating Project Title: ADA Study/Implementation