Full Text
NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER A Courthouse is a unique and significant Civic Structure, representing the importance, dignity, and weight of the Judicial System and what that means for our Democratic Society. Its design has the potential to embody the value of the rule of law and how this rule ought to be administered to the people. Courthouses should be both welcoming and open, while also exuding strength and order. Creating a building mass with strong forms and materiality with clear transparency works to achieve these dual goals, paying homage to the grandeur and history of the judicial system while also bringing greater visibility and metaphorical transparency into how justice works. To best serve a community, a courthouse’s design should be of the time and place in which it serves. The Courthouse ought to speak to the local character and design of the region, as the embodiment of law in the area. It should also speak to the time in history in which is occupies, not seeking to recreate the past, but instead to honor the past while moving into the future. COURTHOUSE DESIGN ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER LOCALLY REFERENCED DESIGN DESIGN INTENT: Building upon the language of the local community and extending it to the future. The locally referenced design style of the Douglas County Judicial Center seeks to carry out this important task of bringing the symbol of law to Douglas County in the 21st Century. The building works to create a welcoming place for the public’s interaction, connection and involvement in the judicial system for the county. Frederick J. DeLongchamps Western Classical Revival Design of the 1915 Courthouse is a beautiful embodiment of the judicial system and the needs of the county in the beginning of the 20th century. This building along with a number of the other buildings DeLongchamps designed for the town of Minden have created a great visual language and character which the new design seeks to emulate as a representation of Douglas County, while taking this language and extending it into the future. Wood Entry CMU and Steel Columns Raised Entry Panel System DESIGN OPTION 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER LOCALLY REFERENCED DESIGN DESIGN OPTION 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER LOCALLY REFERENCED DESIGN DESIGN OPTION 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER LOCALLY REFERENCED DESIGN DESIGN OPTION 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER Glass Fiber Reinforced Gypsum Column Pointed Entry Foam Cornice NEO-CLASSICAL DESIGN DESIGN INTENT: A historical referenced view of what courthouses used to be. The neo-classical design seeks to reference the American historical view of courthouses that previously used classical design as a metaphor for temples of justice. The following pages reference some of the design principles that drive classical design and therefore this design. DESIGN OPTION 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER NEO-CLASSICAL DESIGN OPTION 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER DESIGN OPTION 2 NEO-CLASSICAL ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER DESIGN OPTION 2 NEO-CLASSICAL ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER CMU Column Pointed Entry Plaster Fascia MODERN INTERPRETATION DESIGN DESIGN INTENT: A modern adaptation of historical courthouses. Modern Interpretation of Classical Architecture has been employed at various times as an attempt to retain the general visual image behind classical architecture while employing modernism’s design aesthetics. Modernism seeks to achieve sleek clean lines and to eliminate ornamentation that was purely used for decoration. DESIGN OPTION 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER MODERN INTERPRETATION DESIGN OPTION 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER DESIGN OPTION 3 MODERN INTERPRETATION ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER DESIGN OPTION 3 MODERN INTERPRETATION ---PAGE BREAK--- DOUGLAS COUNTY I NEW DOUGLAS COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER OPTION 1 - LOCALLY REFERENCED OPTION 2 - NEO-CLASSICAL OPTION 3 - MODERN INTERPRETATION ---PAGE BREAK--- Electromagnetic Safety Prepared for the Town of Minden NV, July 3rd 2024 David Witkowski, CEO, Oku Solutions LLC www.okusolutions.com ---PAGE BREAK--- My Bio • CEO & Founder, Oku Solutions LLC – 3rd Party Review, Expert Witness, RF Safety Studies & Measurements • U.S. Coast Guard: Electronics, High-power comms & RADAR • University of California, B.Sc. Electrical Engineering, w/ focus on microwave/RF, electromagnetic applied physics. • IEEE: Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers – Senior Member – Life Member: Microwave Theory and Techniques Society – Member: IEEE Standards Association, International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (C95 Standards Family) – Member: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Committee on Man and Radiation ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- How do we study human safety? • In Vivo : Studies on living beings. • In Vitro : Studies on biological materials. • In Silico : Computer modeling. • Cohort Studies : Tracking trends in population over time. • Meta Analysis : Reviews of studies and reports. ---PAGE BREAK--- Research Quality (EM or otherwise) • High-Quality Research: – Uses large numbers of test subjects. – Uses objective data and “blind” methods. – Is reliably reproducible. – Is peer-reviewed by reputable experts. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- IEEE International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety (ICES) • Over 200 members: scientists, doctors, academics, engineers, and government employees. • EMBS COMAR reviews scientific and medical literature. • ICES meets every six months. • Produces standards for exposure, measurement methods, safety practices, dosimetry, etc. • Standards are used by regulatory bodies (incl. the FCC) to create maximum permissible exposure guidelines. ---PAGE BREAK--- International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection • Independent non-profit. • Recognized by the World Health Organization, International Labour Organization, and the European Commission. • Collaborates with other protection organizations. • Like ICES, produces standards for exposure, measurement methods, safety practices, dosimetry, etc. • The FCC also considers ICNIRP when creating maximum permissible exposure guidelines. ---PAGE BREAK--- • IEEE C95 Standard Family • Updates every 10 years. • Standards for safety, measurement and computation methods, dosimetry, modeling… • IEEE C95.1 “EM Safety Levels” was updated in 2019. • FCC maintained guidance in 2019 based on various inputs. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- World Health Organization • 2024: Cognition, Self- Reported EHS, Male Fertility. • 2023: Tinnitus Migraine and Non-specific Pregnancy and Birth Outcomes. • All had negative or likely- negative findings. ---PAGE BREAK--- International Cohort Study of Mobile Phone Use and Health (COSMOS) • International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2024: Looked at mobile phone use and brain tumor risk in over 250,000 phone users, many with 15 years or more of use. – Emergence of tumors in the cohort groups did not correlate with phone usage. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸= ℎ⋅𝑣𝑣= ℎ⋅𝑐𝑐 𝜆𝜆 Applied Physics: Photons are Photons Ionizing Non-Ionizing (heating) ---PAGE BREAK--- Free-Space Path Loss 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑆𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝑃𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿𝐿 = 4 ȉ 𝜋𝜋ȉ 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑ȉ 𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑓 𝑐𝑐 2 RF levels DECREASE as the SQUARE of the DISTANCE and the SQUARE of the FREQUENCY ---PAGE BREAK--- Free-Space Path Loss Walls attenuate (reduce) RF energy, and this reduction increases with frequency. For cellular frequencies, the reduction is approx. by 1/2 or 1/10th depending on material and construction. ---PAGE BREAK--- Electromagnetic effects on living beings • EM sources in our daily lives – Sunlight (visible and invisible). – Infrared: Space heaters, stoves, radiant heat, walls/floors. – Cellular Phones: Largest sunlight source, esp. when kept close to our bodies. – Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, cordless phones, DSL/Cable broadband wires, lights esp. fluorescent and LED. ---PAGE BREAK--- Electromagnetic effects on living beings • We know that EM energy – whether it’s RF, microwave, heat, or visible light – is not cumulative, it is not a toxin, and it does not build up in the body. • All other hypotheses and harm claims are either disproven or low-quality. • IEEE C95.1 and ICNIRP (and thus the FCC MPE Guidelines) define a 98% safety margin to allow for multiple sources. ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviewed levels for proposed site 98% safety margin Per the EME Report: Waterford, 10-Jan-2024, PE: D. Cotton • Max 14% Public MPE on ground • Max 64% Public MPE in adj. building sides Predictive EMEs are worst-case – actual levels will be 5x to 10x lower. ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviewed resident concerns EM Effects on Children Not evident in ICES or ICNIRP Reviews Mentioned in EHT vs FCC, but is not evident in the natural cohort Outdated Safety Studies ICES / ICNIRP are updated regularly DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on violations of the APA, but not errors “To be clear, we take no position in the scientific debate regarding the health and environmental effects of RF radiation—we merely conclude that the Commission’s cursory analysis of material record evidence was insufficient as a matter of law. As the dissenting opinion indicates, there may be good reasons why the various studies in the record, only some of which we have cited here, do not warrant changes to the Commission’s guidelines.” EHT vs FCC decision ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviewed resident concerns New Hampshire Setbacks Similar to Switzerland etc. Precautionary distances, with no reference to FCC MPE or engineering data An effective prohibition, if not an explicit prohibition Cancer Not evident in cohort studies (Danish, COSMOS, etc.) NTP Rodent Study was judged low-quality in peer review, with numerous issues “I suspect that [the NTP Rodent] experiment is substantially underpowered and that the few positive results found reflect false positive findings. The higher survival with RFR, along with the prior epidemiological literature, leaves me even more skeptical of the authors’ claims. M.S. Lauer, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviewed resident concerns Fire Risk of Cell Sites No different than any other electrical equipment Governed by NEC as adopted by local codes ---PAGE BREAK--- David Witkowski, CEO, Oku Solutions LLC www.okusolutions.com ---PAGE BREAK--- Tower Facility at Fire Station 14 Minden NV ---PAGE BREAK--- Presentation topics • Cell tower network and coverage basics • Existing cell towers in Minden / Gardnerville / Douglas County • Verizon Coverage Gaps • Limited Gap Coverage by others • County / Town wireless ordinance and location requirements • Search Rings & Setbacks • Project design details • Design review and submittal process ( Town, County, State, Federal – including NEPA ) • Building a single tower solution for Verizon and other service providers • Safety measures ( Structural, Fire, FCC, FAA, etc. ) ---PAGE BREAK--- Cell towers network and coverage basics ---PAGE BREAK--- Cell towers: network and coverage basics Cell towers operate using FCC licensed frequencies in blocks known as “radio channels”. The simultaneous use of multiple radio channels across multiple frequency blocks is known as “Broadband”. 4G and 5G technologies are the same basic technology. 5G technology includes re- purposed frequency blocks previously used by other broadcast systems to the latest transmission protocols to provide simultaneous transmission of multiple frequencies to create high speed data connections. ---PAGE BREAK--- Cell towers: network and coverage basics The radio channels licensed for wireless phone use were specifically selected for this purpose due to the limited distance they can be transmitted. Wireless carriers optimize the use of their networks by using 3 or 4 specific blocks of these frequencies in different directions known as “Sectors”. Each overlapping area of multi sector coverage are described as a “Cell”. Sector B Tower ---PAGE BREAK--- Cell towers: network and coverage basics Each tower location is carefully selected and engineered with the rest of the grid in mind. This includes considerations for available height above the ground, terrain and buildings. Along with density and proximity to existing towers. ---PAGE BREAK--- Cell towers: network and coverage basics When cell towers are placed too far apart, or one tower is limited in height, obstructed by terrain, etc. It creates a “Coverage gap”, or a space where cell service may drop calls, or be unavailable should the tower be at maximum capacity. ---PAGE BREAK--- Cell towers: network and coverage basics With careful consideration for proximity to existing towers, coverage gaps in an area are identified by Verizon’s engineering team. A “search ring” is issued based on their review, this search ring is typically a radius around a single point that represents the best location to build a single tower to cover the maximum area and user base in a community. ---PAGE BREAK--- Verizon coverage gaps: ---PAGE BREAK--- Coverage gaps Verizon sites Coverage Gaps Gap in mid-band AWS coverage in west Minden area •Lack of in-building coverage at Douglas High School, and commercial and residential areas • Lack of in-vehicle service along Highway 88 and local roads • Existing Verizon Wireless Gardnerville facility 1.1 miles southeast too distant to serve gap ---PAGE BREAK--- County / Town wireless ordinance and location requirements ---PAGE BREAK--- Douglas County Code of Ordinances 20.664.180 Telecommunications facilities: The following standards apply to all telecommunications facilities as defined in this title: A. Maximum heights. The height of telecommunications facilities includes all antenna array structures. The following are the maximum facility heights permitted within the applicable zoning districts: 1. NC, MUC, OC, GC, TC, PR and AP: 60 feet. 2. PF, LI, and SI: 80 feet. 3. GI and A-19: 100 feet. 4. FR-19 and FR-40: 120 feet. 5. Residential zoning districts: Prohibited. B. Setbacks. 1. Telecommunications facilities and accessory structures that do not exceed the maximum required height of the applicable zoning district must meet the required building setbacks for the zoning district in which the facility is located. 2. Facilities exceeding the height requirement of the zoning district in which the facility is located shall have the following minimum setbacks: a. A minimum of 20% of the structure height or the minimum required setback of the applicable zoning district, whichever is greater, from all property lines. b. A minimum of five-times the structure height from any residentially zoned property, master plan designated receiving area, and any existing residence on surrounding properties located within the A-19 or FR-19 zoning districts. c. A minimum of 2,500 feet from major highway and road corridor rights of-way, including US 395, SR 88, SR 208, SR 207, US 50, Foothill Road and Jacks Valley Road, excluding facilities to be located within the town boundaries of Minden or Gardnerville. d. A minimum separation of one mile between all telecommunications facilities, measured from the nearest point of each structure, including facilities with a valid approval that have not yet been constructed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Douglas County Code of Ordinances 20.664.180 Telecommunications facilities: The following standards apply to all telecommunications facilities as defined in this title: B. Setbacks. 3. Telecommunications facilities shall not be located within the front-yard area when there is an existing building on the parcel. C. Design criteria. 1. Support structures for wireless communications antennas shall be monopole type. The use of lattice tower structures or guyed-wire towers is prohibited. 2. Monopole support structures may not exceed four feet in diameter unless technical evidence is provided showing that a larger diameter is necessary to attain the proposed tower height and that the proposed tower height is necessary. 3. Wireless communications facility support structures and antennas must be painted a non-glossy color so as to minimize visual impacts from surrounding properties. Specific color is subject to county review based on a visual analysis of the particular site. 4. Accessory structures must be designed and screened according the provisions of the adopted Douglas County design manual. 5. Support structures for wireless communications antennas shall be designed to allow at least one additional wireless service provider to co-locate antennas on the structure. 6. Towers shall not be artificially lighted unless required by the FAA or other applicable authority. Security lighting must be in conformance with this title and the adopted design manual. D. Access. 1. Unmanned telecommunications facilities must have a minimum 12 foot access easement to the facility. 2. When access is from a paved public street or alley, a paved driveway approach shall be constructed a minimum ten feet in length and 12 feet in width at the point of access. ---PAGE BREAK--- Douglas County Code of Ordinances 20.664.180 Telecommunications facilities: The following standards apply to all telecommunications facilities as defined in this title: E. Signage. A permanent, weather-proof identification sign, approximately 16 inches by 32 inches in size, must be placed on the gate of the fence around the facility or, if there is no fence, on the facility itself. The sign must identify the facility operator(s), provide the operator’s address, and specify a 24-hour telephone number at which the operator can be reached so as to facilitate emergency services. F. Landscaping. 1. Landscaping is to be provided in accordance with section 20.694 (Landscaping) for the purposes of screening the facility from surrounding properties or rights-of-way. 2. Landscaping must include re-vegetation of any cut or fill slopes. Where native vegetation exists, re-vegetation should include native plant species that can exist without irrigation. 3. Where possible, existing plants and trees should be used to the full extent possible for screening the facility. G. Noise and traffic. 1. Backup generators shall only be operated during power outages and for testing and maintenance purposes. Testing and maintenance shall only take place on weekdays between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 2. Traffic shall be limited to no more than one round-trip per day on an average annual basis once construction is complete, except for emergency maintenance purposes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Douglas County Code of Ordinances 20.664.180 Telecommunications facilities: The following standards apply to all telecommunications facilities as defined in this title: E. Signage. A permanent, weather-proof identification sign, approximately 16 inches by 32 inches in size, must be placed on the gate of the fence around the facility or, if there is no fence, on the facility itself. The sign must identify the facility operator(s), provide the operator’s address, and specify a 24-hour telephone number at which the operator can be reached so as to facilitate emergency services. F. Landscaping. 1. Landscaping is to be provided in accordance with section 20.694 (Landscaping) for the purposes of screening the facility from surrounding properties or rights-of-way. 2. Landscaping must include re-vegetation of any cut or fill slopes. Where native vegetation exists, re-vegetation should include native plant species that can exist without irrigation. 3. Where possible, existing plants and trees should be used to the full extent possible for screening the facility. G. Noise and traffic. 1. Backup generators shall only be operated during power outages and for testing and maintenance purposes. Testing and maintenance shall only take place on weekdays between the hours of 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. 2. Traffic shall be limited to no more than one round-trip per day on an average annual basis once construction is complete, except for emergency maintenance purposes. H. Submittal requirements. (The remainder of the code is process specifics) ---PAGE BREAK--- Setbacks & search rings • 20.664.180_B1. Telecommunications facilities and accessory structures that do not exceed the maximum required height of the applicable zoning district must meet the required building setbacks for the zoning district in which the facility is located. ---PAGE BREAK--- Search Rings & Setbacks • A search ring is a radius placed around a central point. • This point is the optimal location for tower placement within a search area to complete two specific tasks. 1. Fill an existing coverage gap 2. Provide optimal coverage between nearby tower facilities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Search Rings & Setbacks • In review of a search ring, we start by looking for existing towers in the search ring area. • We understood that there was an tower project taking place at the high school and reached out for more information. After discussions with the High School, it was determined that the the facility being constructed at the school was a Microcell antenna system. • This system is designed to provide indoor coverage on campus with limited range and capacity. • This system was placed on the high school as a temporary solution to provide cell phone and emergency service coverage that can not be provided by another carriers tower just under a mile away. ---PAGE BREAK--- Search Rings & Setbacks • We then looked for towers beyond the search ring. With consultation with County staff, field visits to the area, and discussions with tower operators. It was determined that there are only 3 co-locatable towers in the area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Search Rings & Setbacks • The closest co-location facility to the coverage objective at Douglas High School is the AT&T tower located at the Sherriff’s office. ---PAGE BREAK--- Search Rings & Setbacks • The next closest Co-location facility is a T-Mobile tower located across the street from the Sherriff’s office at the Minden Mill Distillery. ---PAGE BREAK--- Search Rings & Setbacks ---PAGE BREAK--- Residentially zoned properties expressly prohibited from development Minden Town boarder County Islands: Search Rings & Setbacks ---PAGE BREAK--- Residentially zoned properties expressly prohibited from development Minden Town boarder County Islands: 2500’ scenic corridor setback Search Rings & Setbacks Setbacks were depicted using google earth measuring tool from observed property lines. This is presented with the intent to represent setbacks accurately based on this images available in google earth, are representative only, and have not verified by a surveyor. ---PAGE BREAK--- Residentially zoned properties expressly prohibited from development Minden Town boarder County Islands: 2500’ scenic corridor setback 500% setback from residentially zoned properties (as applies to sites proposed taller than the approved height limit) Search Rings & Setbacks Setbacks were depicted using google earth measuring tool from observed property lines. This is presented with the intent to represent setbacks accurately based on this images available in google earth, are representative only, and have not verified by a surveyor. ---PAGE BREAK--- Public facilities zoned properties outside of setbacks Within maximum setback for this zone Requires variance for 80’ tower: Meets all setback requirements Search Rings & Setbacks Setbacks were depicted using google earth measuring tool from observed property lines. This is presented with the intent to represent setbacks accurately based on this images available in google earth, are representative only, and have not verified by a surveyor. ---PAGE BREAK--- Overview with plan set overlay Public facilities zoned property outside of setbacks Meets all setback requirements Search Rings & Setbacks Setbacks were depicted using google earth measuring tool from observed property lines. This is presented with the intent to represent setbacks accurately based on this images available in google earth, are representative only, and have not verified by a surveyor. ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Design Details • Verizon is proposing a new 80’ monopole tower to fill a significant gap in coverage in the town of Minden at Fire Station 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Design Details • The proposed Verizon facility would be developed at the Northwest rear corner of the property, currently part of an ongoing East Fork Fire Station training facilities development. ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Design Details ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Design Details ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Design Details ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Design Details ---PAGE BREAK--- • Design review and submittal process Town, County, State, Federal – including NEPA ---PAGE BREAK--- Design review and submittal process Development Process Entity Step 1: Secure Interested Landlord East Fork Fire Board of Directors Step 2: Develop initial drawings for project, verifying existing easements, setbacks and conditions with survey Verizon / Epic Step 3: Present initial design to landlord for approval and secure lease for the premises Verizon / Epic / East Fork Fire Board of Directors Step 4: Submit for Town of Minden review and advisement Town of Minden (routed through Douglas County Planning Dept.) Step 5: Submit for Douglas County review and approval Douglas County Planning Dept. Step 6: Complete engineering documents based on advisement and approval by Planning Dept. Verizon / Epic Step 7: File project for review with FCC, FAA, State, NEPA and other required entities with completed engineering documents Verizon / Epic Step 8: Submit for Douglas County review and permit issuance Douglas County Building Dept. Step 9: Construction start Upon receipt of all applicable approvals and permits, ---PAGE BREAK--- • Building a single tower solution for Verizon and other service providers County Emergency Services is already on-board to install LMR antenna systems on the proposed tower which is designed and leased with space reserved at no cost to East Fork Fire and no cost to the taxpayer. The tower is designed to accommodate additional service providers per Douglas County code. This will include structural capacity for additional equipment and will ensure that this tower can serve the surrounding community and other service providers for decades to come. Verizon representatives have already notified other service providers with our intention to develop a co-location tower at this location with positive reviews of the design and available elevation shown in the planning drawings presented. ---PAGE BREAK--- • Safety measures Documents Approval Process Waterford EME Report FCC Review and approval FAA - ASR FAA review and clearance Building Permit 2018 IBC 2018 IRC 2018 IEC 2018 IMC 2018 UBC 2018 UMC 2017 NEC Fire Review 2018 IFG 2018 IFC Structural Engineering ANSI/EIA-TIA-222-H * And any additional State and local codes that may apply ---PAGE BREAK--- Thank you Chris Hatch (916) 243-5440 [EMAIL REDACTED]