Full Text
EXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 2 16-01 2016-00194 2090.00 ED 16-04 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 2 Page 2 of 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 3 Page 1 of 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 3 Page 2 of 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 3 Page 3 of 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 3 Page 4 of 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 3 Page 5 of 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 3 Page 6 of 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- 600 ft 1 : 6960 1in : 580ft This plan is suitable for informational use only. City of Kennewick accepts no liability for any error whatsoever. Produced by CITY\wesr 14:39 2/1/2016 Page 1 of 1 Print Preview 2/1/2016 http://cokgisweb02/gisdataviewer/commands/printadvanced/print_preview_landscape.asp EXHIBIT 4 Page 1 of 1 Project Area PP 16-01 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 11,598 SF 2 8,836 SF 3 8,774 SF 4 10,008 SF 5 9,940 SF 6 9,940 SF 7 9,001 SF 8 8,836 SF 9 8,228 SF 10 9,042 SF 11 7,990 SF 12 8,853 SF 13 8,939 SF 14 10,518 SF 15 10,153 SF 16 10,499 SF 17 10,499 SF 18 10,266 SF TRACT A 20,205 SF 19 11,723 SF 20 11,478 SF 21 10,260 SF 22 10,241 SF 24 10,980 SF 23 10,222 SF 25 13,899 SF 28 17,694 SF 27 16,996 SF 79' 79' L = 4 7 ' R = 2 5 ' L=4 4' R=2 25' 58' 110' 80' 80' 80' 110' 80' 110' L=81' R=375' 104' 110' L=80 ' R=3 75 ' 104' 110' L=80' R=37 5 ' 104' 110' L=11' R=375' 83' 110' 70' 80' 80' 110' 75' 75' 110' L = 93' R= 1 3 0' 11' 55' 112' L=84' R=820 ' 64' 109' L=76' R=820' 86' 111' L=78' R =820' 86' 109' L=74 ' R=820' 14' 111' 37' L= 25' R=2 70' L = 3 6 ' R = 2 5 ' L=5 6' R= 3 2 0' 105' 105' 31' 100' 100' 105' 100' 100' 105' L = 4 1 ' R = 2 5 ' 76' 56' 32' 22' L= 4 0 ' R= 28 0 ' 24' 102' 112' 94' 130' L=5 5 ' R= 320 ' 18' 119' 103' 27' 103' 100' 100' 100' 102' 100' 100' 102' 100' 3' 106' L=59 ' R=820 ' L = 4 0 ' R = 2 5 ' L = 1 4' R =23 0 ' 37' L = 49' R=2 80' L=89 ' R=82 0' 159' 92' 150' L=68 ' R=82 0 ' 93' 150' 24' 183' 185' 92' 188' 98' L = 4 1 ' R = 2 5 ' 24' L =46 ' R= 320 ' 92' 105' 195' 86' TRACT B 17,792 SF 18' 275' 30' L= 4 1' R= 820 ' TRACT C 24,934 SF 75' 332' 75' 26 13,784 SF 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 40' ROW 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 40' ROW 18' UTIL & SW ESMT INTX W. 38TH AVE. INTX PENN ST. 40' ROW PENN STREET PARCEL BOUNDARY (TYP) SECTION LINE (TYP) ~STORM TRACT~ ~OPEN SPACE~ ~OPEN SPACE~ W. 38TH AVE. 10' EXST PUD ESMT AFN 552608 40' EXST IRR ESMT AMON PUMP LATERAL AFN 349642 20' EXST IRR ESMT 20' EXST ACCESS ESMT ALONG THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO BPA, AFN 717820 75' ESMT FOR GAS PIPELINE AFN 350927 & 362631, THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT SPECIFY A WIDTH, WIDTH IS SHOWN PER EXST SURVEYS OF EXST PARCELS 20' EXST IRR ESMT 15' EXST ESMT 15' EXST ESMT 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 18' UTIL & SW ESMT EXST BLDG (TYP) 30' EXST HALF-WIDTH ROW RIDGELINE DRIVE SHERMAN STREET 60' EXST ROW INTX RIDGELINE DR. 40' EXST IRR ESMT AMON PUMP LATERAL AFN 349642 75' ESMT FOR GAS PIPELINE AFN 350927 & 362631, THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT SPECIFY A WIDTH, WIDTH IS SHOWN PER EXST SURVEYS OF EXST PARCELS SECTION CORNER FD. 5/8" REBAR IN 2" PIPE AT CENTER 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17, SEE SURVEY NO. 1848. 20' GAS ESMT FOR ANODE BED TO NORTHWEST PIPELINE 20' ACCESS ESMT 50' 103.65' 1 103.65' 54.96' 6 63.84' 86.13' 100.19' 72.33' 69.98' R=170.00' A=121.30' CH=118.74' 6 83.42' 40' ACCESS ESMT R=780.00' A=624.51' CH=607.96' R=335.00' A=225.23' CH=221.01' R=265.00' A=76.06' CH=75.80' 40.00' 1 R=265.00' A=96.97' CH=96.43' R=25.00' A=42.52' CH=37.58' 79.34' 40.97' 10' PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY ESMT (SEE NOTE) PUD EASEMENT TO BE VACATED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT 20' SEVA ACCESS ROAD 395 82 RIDGELINE W S SHERMAN ST PLAZA WAY SOUTHRIDGE BLVD CREEKSTONE DR S UNION ST S IRVING ST S KELLOGG ST CHRISTENSON RD C A N Y O N R D W 26TH AVE RAND HIL D E B BLVD W 36TH AVE DR W 23RD AVE W 20TH AVE W 33RD PL SITE K.I.D. AMON PUMP LATERAL CANAL DESIGNED: DRAWN: CHECKED: SCALE: V: H: SHEET 6115 Burden Blvd, Suite E Pasco, WA 99301-8930 509/547-5119 306/695-3488 509/547-5129 fax SAGE CREST - PHASE 5 SG / JAM 1" = 80' N/A January, 2016 4192-00 1 1 SG JLM / PWPT PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE AREA: TOTAL LOT COUNT: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS: MINIMUM LOT AREA: MAXIMUM LOT AREA: OVERALL SINGLE FAMILY AVG. LOT AREA: RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION: OPEN SPACE TRACTS: 10.61 ACRES 28 LOTS + 3 TRACTS 28 LOTS 7,990 SF 17,565 SF 10,681 SF 99,870 SF (2.29 ACRES) 62,931 SF (1.44 ACRES) LAND USE TABLE APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: WILLIAM SMITH PROPERTIES, INC. ATTN: MATT SMITH 15 SW COLORADO AVE., SUITE 1 BEND, OR 97702 (541) 382-6691 ENGINEER: HDJ DESIGN GROUP P.L.L.C. ATTN: JASON MATTOX, PE 6115 BURDEN BLVD., SUITE E PASCO, WA 99301 PHONE: (509) 547-5119 SURVEYOR: HDJ DESIGN GROUP P.L.L.C. ATTN: ALEX MATARAZZO 6115 BURDEN BLVD., SUITE E PASCO, WA 99301 PHONE: (509) 547-5119 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE BASIS OF BEARINGS: ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 17, ESTABLISHED BY HOLDING THE COORDINATES OF FOUND MONUMENTS ON THE NORTH 1/4 CORNER & NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 17, T8N, R29E, W.M., AS LISTED IN BOOK 1 OF SURVEYS, PAGE 1540, RECORDS OF BENTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. SAID MONUMENTS ARE SHOWN AS CONTROL POINTS #0937 & #0927, RESPECTIVELY IN SAID SURVEY NO. 1540. PARENT PARCELS: TAX LOT # 117894000002011 & TAX LOT # 117894010857011 CITY OF KENNEWICK FILE # LEGEND 5/8" x 30" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED: "HDJ - LS 25893" PURSUANT TO SURVEY VOL. 1, PG. 4595 ELEVATION INTERSECTION PAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY SQUARE FEET TYPICAL SIDEWALK, IRRIGATION & UTILITY EASEMENT (OR A COMBINATION THEREOF) VOLUME SECTION LINE OR SUB-SECTION LINE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR AS DERIVED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY GEOTERRA ON FEBRUARY 20, 2015 PARCEL 1 BOUNDARY PARCEL 2 PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT BOUNDARY PROPOSED PHASE LINE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE EL INTX PG. ROW SF TYP SW, IRR & UTIL ESMT VOL. 735 Scale 1" = 80' SAGE CREST PHASE 2B Located In The SE 1/4 Of Sec. 17, T. 8 R. 29 W.M., City Of Kennewick, Benton County, Washington EXST LOT 7 EXST LOT 3 EXST LOT 2 EXST LOT 1 EXST LOT 8 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 17, TOWNSHIP 8 NORTH, RANGE 29 EAST, W.M., BENTON COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FULL LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT. ZONING CLASSIFICATION: RM - RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY EASEMENT NOTE: ALL LOTS SHALL HAVE AN 18' SIDEWALK, IRRIGATION, AND UTILITY EASEMENT ABUTTING ANY RIGHT-OF-WAY IRRIGATION: THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE KENNEWICK IRRIGATION DISTRICT NOTE: 10' PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY EASEMENT FINAL LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT. EXHIBIT 5 Page 1 of 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 40' ROW 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 40' ROW 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 40' ROW PARCEL BOUNDARY (TYP) SECTION LINE (TYP) ~STORM TRACT~ ~OPEN SPACE~ ~OPEN SPACE~ W. 38TH AVE. 10' EXST PUD ESMT AFN 552608 40' EXST IRR ESMT AMON PUMP LATERAL AFN 349642 20' EXST IRR ESMT 20' EXST ACCESS ESMT ALONG THE ROUTE OF TRAVEL TO BPA, AFN 717820 75' ESMT FOR GAS PIPELINE AFN 350927 & 362631, THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT SPECIFY A WIDTH, WIDTH IS SHOWN PER EXST SURVEYS OF EXST PARCELS 20' EXST IRR ESMT 15' EXST ESMT 15' EXST ESMT 18' UTIL & SW ESMT 18' UTIL & SW ESMT EXST BLDG (TYP) 30' EXST HALF-WIDTH ROW RIDGELINE DRIVE SHERMAN STREET 60' EXST ROW 40' EXST IRR ESMT AMON PUMP LATERAL AFN 349642 75' ESMT FOR GAS PIPELINE AFN 350927 & 362631, THESE DOCUMENTS DO NOT SPECIFY A WIDTH, WIDTH IS SHOWN PER EXST SURVEYS OF EXST PARCELS SECTION CORNER FD. 5/8" REBAR IN 2" PIPE AT CENTER 1/4 CORNER SEC. 17, SEE SURVEY NO. 1848. 20' GAS ESMT FOR ANODE BED TO NORTHWEST PIPELINE 20' ACCESS ESMT 20' 40' ACCESS ESMT 824 826 828 830 830 832 834 836 838 840 842 844 846 848 844 842 840 838 828 830 832 834 836 838 822 824 826 822 820 818 816 814 812 810 808 806 804 802 800 798 796 794 792 790 788 786 784 782 780 778 776 774 772 770 768 766 766 768 770 772 774 776 778 780 782 784 786 788 788 792 794 796 798 800 806 808 810 814 816 820 840 836 834 846 844 842 838 832 828 826 824 822 820 818 816 814 812 810 808 806 804 802 800 796 794 792 790 788 784 782 780 778 776 774 768 770 772 774 776 778 780 782 784 786 788 790 790 792 794 796 798 800 802 804 806 808 810 812 814 816 818 820 792 794 796 798 804 800 806 808 810 812 814 816 818 820 822 824 2:1 SLOPE (TYP) PENN STREET 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 395 82 RIDGELINE W S SHERMAN ST PLAZA WAY SOUTHRIDGE BLVD CREEKSTONE DR S UNION ST S IRVING ST S KELLOGG ST CHRISTENSON RD C A N Y O N R D W 26TH AVE RAND HIL D E B BLVD W 36TH AVE DR W 23RD AVE W 20TH AVE W 33RD PL SITE K.I.D. AMON PUMP LATERAL CANAL DESIGNED: DRAWN: CHECKED: SCALE: V: H: SHEET 6115 Burden Blvd, Suite E Pasco, WA 99301-8930 509/547-5119 306/695-3488 509/547-5129 fax SAGE CREST - PHASE 5 PDA 1" = 80' N/A March, 2016 4192-00 1 1 PDA JLM PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN APPLICANT/DEVELOPER: WILLIAM SMITH PROPERTIES, INC. ATTN: MATT SMITH 15 SW COLORADO AVE., SUITE 1 BEND, OR 97702 (541) 382-6691 ENGINEER: HDJ DESIGN GROUP P.L.L.C. ATTN: JASON MATTOX, PE 6115 BURDEN BLVD., SUITE E PASCO, WA 99301 PHONE: (509) 547-5119 SURVEYOR: HDJ DESIGN GROUP P.L.L.C. ATTN: ALEX MATARAZZO 6115 BURDEN BLVD., SUITE E PASCO, WA 99301 PHONE: (509) 547-5119 VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE LEGEND 5/8" x 30" IRON REBAR WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP STAMPED: "HDJ - LS 25893" PURSUANT TO SURVEY VOL. 1, PG. 4595 ELEVATION INTERSECTION PAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY SQUARE FEET TYPICAL SIDEWALK, IRRIGATION & UTILITY EASEMENT (OR A COMBINATION THEREOF) VOLUME SECTION LINE OR SUB-SECTION LINE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING GROUND CONTOUR AS DERIVED FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED BY GEOTERRA ON FEBRUARY 20, 2015 PROPOSED CONTOURS PARCEL 1 BOUNDARY PARCEL 2 PROJECT BOUNDARY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT BOUNDARY PROPOSED PHASE LINE FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTERLINE EL INTX PG. ROW SF TYP SW, IRR & UTIL ESMT VOL. 735 Scale 1" = 80' SAGE CREST PHASE 2B Located In The SE 1/4 Of Sec. 17, T. 8 R. 29 W.M., City Of Kennewick, Benton County, Washington EXST LOT 7 EXST LOT 3 EXST LOT 2 EXST LOT 1 EXST LOT 8 PRELIMINARY 735 EXHIBIT 6 Page 1 of 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ED #15-62 CITY OF KENNEWICK MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE FILE/PROJECT NUMBER: ED 16-12 FOR PP 16-01 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR 28 LOT SUBDIVISION PROPONENT: MATT SMITH, WILLIAM SMITH PROPERTIES LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF S. SHERMAN STREET AND RIDGELINE DRIVE. LEAD AGENCY: CITY OF KENNEWICK DETERMINATION: The City of Kennewick has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact o the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will not be required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the City. This information is available to the public on request. Application for other required permits may require further review under SEPA procedures. There is no comment period for this DNS. This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in WAC 197-11-355. There is no further comment period on the DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the City will not act on this proposal for fifteen days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by April 5, 2016 . After the review period has elapsed, all comments received will be evaluated and the DNS will be retained, modified, or withdrawn as required by SEPA regulations. RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: Gregory McCormick, AICP POSITION/TITLE: Community Planning Director ADDRESS: 210 W 6th Ave., P.O. Box 6108, Kennewick, WA 99336 PHONE: (509) 585-4463 Changes, modifications and /or additions to the checklist have been made on the attached Environmental Checklist Review. This DNS is subject to the attached conditions: No conditions. See attached condition(s). Date:__March 21, Appeal: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Planning Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date issued. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City’s threshold determination. Appeals shall be conducted in conformance with Section 4.12.090(9) of the Kennewick Municipal Code and the required fees pursuant to the City’s adopted Fee Schedule shall be paid at time of appeal submittal. Copies of this DNS were mailed to: Dept. of Ecology, WA Dept of Fish & Wildlife, WSDOT, Yakima Nation, CTUIR, PP 16-01 File EXHIBIT 7 Page 1 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- ED #15-62 CITY OF KENNEWICK ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW E. D. File #16-12 Reviewed by: Wes Romine Action: PP 16-01 March 17, 2016 The City of Kennewick has reviewed the checklist and made additions & corrections to it. Please note the following condition(s): Park Fees For this proposal, PP 16-01/PLN-2016-00194, conditions include the mitigation fees for impacts for the addition of 28 dwelling units in Park Planning Zone 6W – Southridge. In lieu of land dedication, fees are required to be paid to Park Planning Zone 6W in the amount of $4,811.65 as calculated per the City’s Park Fee Determination Process form. This fee must be paid at the time of final plat as a percentage of lots in each final plat phase. . EXHIBIT 7 Page 2 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 1 SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Purpose of checklist: Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal. Instructions for applicants: [help] This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use “not applicable” or "does not apply" only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown. You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision- making process. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Instructions for Lead Agencies: Additional information may be necessary to evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: [help] For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part Please completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent," and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements –that do not contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal. Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 1 of 24 ED 16-12 for PP 16-01 EXHIBIT 7 Page 3 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 2 A. BACKGROUND [help] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: [help] 2. Name of applicant: [help] 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: [help] 4. Date checklist prepared: [help] 5. Agency requesting checklist: [help] 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): [help] 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. [help] 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. [help] Evaluation for Agency Use Only Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 2 of 24 Sage Crest - Phase 5 William Smith Properties, Inc. 15 SW Colorado Ave, Suite 1 Bend, OR 97702 Matt Smith [EMAIL REDACTED] (541) 382-6691 (office) - (541) 410-8470 (cell) January 7, 2016 City of Kennewick Summer/Fall 2016 There are no plans for future additions connected with with pro- posal. - An engineered stormwater plan and grading plan will be fully developed with the construction drawings. -Engineered plans for W. 38th Ave & Penn Street have been permitted by the City of Kennewick. EXHIBIT 7 Page 4 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 3 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. [help] 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. [help] 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) [help] 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. [help] Evaluation for Agency Use Only Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 3 of 24 A preliminary plat to be approved by the City of Kennewick for the development. Engineering plans would be permitted through City of Kennewick for utilities with service to individual lots. Building permits will be issued for each residential unit within the development. The proposed preliminary plat will develop approximately 10.6 acres into 28 single family homes with dedicated open spa- ces. The development is south and east of the intersection of Sherman Street and Ridgeline Drive. The property is a portion of parent parcels identified as Par- cel # 117894000002011 and Parcel #117894010857011. EXHIBIT 7 Page 5 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 4 B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS [help] 1. Earth a. General description of the site [help] (check one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? [help] c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils. [help] d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. [help] e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. [help] f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. [help] Evaluation for Agency Use Only Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 4 of 24 While most of the site is hilly between 5-10% there are portions of the site less than 5% Within the boundaries of the preliminary plat, the steepest slope is approximately 15%. The soils in the site boundary are a mixture of Warden and Prosser silt loams. The City of Kennewick GIS indicates areas of steep slopes within the site boundary, there are no critical areas identified within the plat boundary. Project development would seek to regrade as necessary for street, utility and residential development. The fill and excavation would be limited to the site and would be conducted in accordance with the recommendation of a geotechnical engineer. Potential erosion, both wind blown and runoff, are possible as a result of construction and will be managed with a tem- porary erosion control plan approved by the City of Kennewick. ✔ EXHIBIT 7 Page 6 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 5 g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? [help] h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: [help] 2. Air a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. [help] b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. [help] c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: [help] 3. Water a. Surface Water: [help] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. [help] Evaluation for Agency Use Only Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 5 of 24 The development will be approximately 35% impervious area. During construction erosion control measures will be implemented such as person operated watering devices and silt fencing. After construction the majority of the pervious surface on the site will be grass and landscaping consistent with single family yards. The site will also have landscape open spaces consisting of live ground cover and trees. During construction there will be exhaust emissions from con- struction equipment as well as dust. After project completion there would be normal air emissions resulting from a residential neighborhood setting. There are no known off-site sources of emissions will affect this proposal. During construction, emissions will be limited to working hours and dust will be controlled by person operated wa- tering devices. There are no bodies of water located within the site boundary. EXHIBIT 7 Page 7 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 6 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. [help] 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. [help] 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. [help] 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. [help] 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. [help] b. Ground Water: 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. [help] 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 6 of 24 There will be potential for individual home grading within 200 feet of the KID canal. No fill or dredge material would be placed in or re- moved from the canal. The overall development does not propose or require any surface water withdrawls or diversions. The project does not lie within a 100-year floodplain. The proposal does not involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters. No groundwater will be withdrawn for development of the project. No water will be directly discharged to the groundwater with the project. EXHIBIT 7 Page 8 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 7 of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. [help] c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. [help] 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. [help] 3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any: [help] 4. Plants [help] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: [help] deciduous tree: alder maple aspen other evergreen tree: fir cedar pine other bullrush shrubs grass pasture crop or grain Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. wet soil plants: cattailbuttercup skunkFDEEDJH RWKHUwater plants: water lily eelgrass milfoil Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 7 of 24 No waste material will be discharged into the ground with the development of the project. Stormwater runoff will be collected within the roadway prism and disposed of via surface and subsurface methods consistent with City of Kennewick stan- dards for stormwater disposal. There will be no off-site discharges of stormwater proposed with with project. All stormwater plans will be developed consistent with the Eastern Washington Stormwater Manual. It is not anticipated that will will occur since waste ma- terials are not allowed to be discharged to City of Kennewick owned and maintained storm systems. There are no know affects to the existing drainage pattens to the applicant's knowledge. The stormwater disposal methods will be in compliance with the City of Kennewick standards as well as the Washington State Department of Ecology Eastern Washington Stormwater Manual. ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ EXHIBIT 7 Page 9 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 8 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? [help] c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. [help] d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: [help] e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. 5. Animals a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include: [help] birds: hawk heron eagle songbirds other: mammals: GHHr bear elkbeaver other: fish: bass salmon trout herring shellfish other b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. [help] c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 8 of 24 Existing crops and native vegetation will be removed dur- ing the course of the development. There are no threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site to the applicant's knowledge. The single family residential lots will be landscaped with grass and trees. The open areas and common areas will be landscaped with ground cover and trees. There are not any noxious weeds or invasive species known to be on or near the site. There are no threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site to the applicant's knowledge. Yes, Canada Geese and ducks are known to migrate through the Columbia Basin. ✔ ✔ ✔ EXHIBIT 7 Page 10 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 9 d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: [help] e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. 6. Energy and natural resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. [help] b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. [help] c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: [help] 7. Environmental health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 9 of 24 There are no direct measures being proposed to solely enhance wildlife. There will be open spaces within the devel- opment in which wildlife will continue to use. No known invasive animal species are known to be on or near the site to the applicant's knowledge. The project will require energy in order to serve the proposed homes with electricity and gas. This project is not anticipated to have any impacts to adjacent properties potential solar use. The proposed homes will be constructed in accordance with all applicable building and energy codes as recog- nized by the City of Kennewick. There are no recognized toxic health hazards usually associated with the development of Residential homes within a defined urban area. EXHIBIT 7 Page 11 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 10 1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses. [help] 2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. 3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project. 4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. 5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: [help] b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other)? [help] 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 10 of 24 There are no known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses to the applicant's knowledge. There is an existing Williams Gas pipeline that is located within the property boundary. No storage, use or production of toxic or hazardous chemicals is being proposed with the development. The project will require police, fire and ambulance services. None at this time. There are no known sources of noise in the area that will affect this proposal. The project is located near S. Sherman Street and Ridgeline Drive, which will have noise from traffic. During each phase of construction, there will be construction noise due to equipment and home construction. At full build out, noise would be typical of urban homes with traffic entering and exiting the site. EXHIBIT 7 Page 12 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 11 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: [help] 8. Land and shoreline use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. [help] b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use? [help] 1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: c. Describe any structures on the site. [help] d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? [help] e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 11 of 24 Construction hours will be limited to working hours defined by the City of Kennewick The current property is vacant. The property in the past have been used for irrigated crops. The proposal will not affect surrounding working farms or forest lands. The proposal could be affected by the application of pesticides depend- ing on the application technique used and weather conditions. None No structures will be removed by this project. The site is currently zoned RM, per City of Kennewick zoning maps Comply with the City of Kennewick noise ordinance, KMC 9.52 EXHIBIT 7 Page 13 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 12 f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? [help] g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? [help] h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify. [help] i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? [help] j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? [help] k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: [help] l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: [help] m. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with nearby agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any: Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 12 of 24 High density residential per City of Kennewick maps None Not to the applicant's knowledge. Within the fully built site of 28 units there would be approximately 90 residents. No people reside within the area of development. No measures are being proposed with this project. The site is to be built in accordance with City of Kennewick RM zoning requirements This project will not seek to alter the nearby agricultural and forest lands of long term commercial significance. EXHIBIT 7 Page 14 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 13 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. [help] b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. [help] c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: [help] 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? [help] b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? [help] c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: [help] 11. Light and glare a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? [help] b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 13 of 24 28 residential units will be provided during this project. No housing units would be eliminated by this project. Housing impacts and density within the project will be controlled by the City of Kennewick zoning code for an RM designation and the City's Planned Residential Development Code. Maximum height of any proposed structure would be 30 feet per the zoning code. Views in the immediate vicinity would be altered by rooftops. The aesthetic impacts will be controlled by the City of Kennewick zoning code for an RM designation. The proposal would produce light from the residential street lights adjacent to the roadways. Light would also be produced from fixtures on the outside of homes. Light would be present in the evening hours. Not to the applicant's knowledge. EXHIBIT 7 Page 15 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 14 c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? [help] d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: [help] 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? [help] b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. [help] c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: [help] 13. Historic and cultural preservation a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers located on or near the site? If so, specifically describe. [help] b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 14 of 24 None to the applicant's knowledge. Any lighting would be directed downward. Existing recreational opportunities exist at the Southridge Sports Complex and at Southridge High School. The Canyon Lakes Golf Course is within 5 miles of the site. The development plans to include open spaces. No existing recreational uses will be displaced with this project. No buildings of historical significance are located on the site. Not to the applicant's knowledge. Park fees in lieu of dedication of park land will be required. EXHIBIT 7 Page 16 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 15 c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc. [help] d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. [help] b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? [help] c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 15 of 24 No areas of cultural significance are identified on the City of Kennewick's GIS mapping. No impacts to resources are anticipated. The site is located south of Ridgeline Drive, east of S. Sher- man Street and west of Southridge Blvd. The site is not currently served by public transit. The closet transit stop is located at the Southridge Sports Complex. The project would have the ability to provide on-street parking as well as a driveway at each individual home. The development would not eliminate any existing parking spaces. If historic artifact are found work will be stopped immediately and the City of Kennewick and appropriate agencies will be notified. EXHIBIT 7 Page 17 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 16 d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). [help] e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. [help] f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates? [help] g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. [help] h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: [help] 15. Public services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. [help] Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 16 of 24 The development will require the development of new public streets within the overall plan of development. The site is not in the immediate vicinity of water, rail, or air transportation. The proposal will not interfere with or affect the movement of agricultural and forest products in the area. The project would be subject to transportation impact fees issued by the City of Kennewick. This project would increase the need for public services as population in the area increases due to the number of resi- dential units increasing. At full build out, the site would generate approximately 280 vehicular trips per day with 2% of trips being truck trips. The peak trips would be during weekday morning and evening hours. These estimates are from the Per Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition. EXHIBIT 7 Page 18 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT 7 Page 19 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 18 D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS [help] (IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions) Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. 1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise? Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 18 of 24 EXHIBIT 7 Page 20 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 19 3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources? Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are: 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands? Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: 5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 19 of 24 EXHIBIT 7 Page 21 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- May 2014 20 Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: 6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: 7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. Updated 1/2013 ENVIRONMENTAL & SALMONIDS CHECKLIST Page 20 of 24 EXHIBIT 7 Page 22 of 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- ESA LISTED SALMONIDS CHECKLIST 7KH LIDQ\ UHVXOW If ESA listed species are present or ever were present in the watershed where your project will be located, your project has the potential for affecting them, and you need to comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if the ESA listing will impact your project. The Fish Program Manager at the appropriate Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) regional office can provide additional information. Please contact the Dept. of Fish and Wildlife at 1701 S. 24th, Yakima WA 98902-5720, Phone No. [PHONE REDACTED]. EH"