Document Kennewick_doc_64d2568572

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING DEPARTMENT PO BOX 6108 ▪ 210 W. 6 TH AVENUE, KENNEWICK, WA 99336 PHONE: (509) 585-4558 FAX: (509) 585-4442 CITY OF KENNEWICK HEARING EXAMINER Sharon Rice, Hearing Examiner AGENDA MONDAY, MAY 9, 2011 @6:00 PM KENNEWICK CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBER 210 W. 6TH AVE, KENNEWICK, WA 99336 I. CALL TO ORDER II. PROCEDURAL INFORMATION III. PUBLIC HEARING A. Preliminary Plat for a 35 lot subdivision on an approximately 10.1 acre portion of a 53.5 acre parcel. The remaining 43.4 acres will be reserved for future development. The property is located on the southwest corner portion of parcel #1-1288-200-0009-000, north of Leslie Road (to be renamed Ridgeline Drive) and west of Clodfelter Road. IV. ADJOURN ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A-1 Page 1 of 6 Staff Report Date: May 2, 2011 Public Hearing Date and Location: May 9, 2011, Kennewick City Hall Report Prepared By: Wes Romine Development Services Manager Report Reviewed By: Gregory McCormick, AICP Planning Director Summary Recommendation: The City of Kennewick RECOMMENDS that Preliminary Plat 11-01 be APPROVED with conditions. Summary of Proposal: A Preliminary Plat for a 35 lot subdivision on an approximately 10.1 acre portion of a 53.5 acre parcel. The remaining 43.4 acres will be reserved for future development. Proposal Location: Southwest corner portion of parcel #112882000009000, north of Leslie Road (to be renamed Ridgeline Drive) and west of Clodfelter Road. Legal Description: That portion of the east half of the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter and the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter and that portion of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter lying west of Clodfelter Road, all of which are lying in Section12, Township 8 north, Range 28 east W.M., Benton County, Washington, except Clodfelter Road, and except the south 330 feet of the east 660 feet of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter, and also except that portion deeded to the City of Kennewick by instrument recorded on February 17, 2010 under Auditors File No. 2010-004289 Property Owner: Victor V. and Marilyn M. Johnson 1500 S. Clodfelter Road Kennewick, Washington 99338 Applicant: Matt Smith Tri Cities Development, LLC 15 S.W. Colorado Avenue, Suite 1 Bend, Oregon 99702 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND COMMUNITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE HEARING EXAMINER FILE NO: PP 11-01/PLN-2011-00868 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A-1 Page 2 of 6 Surveyor: Richard S. Russum Worley Surveying Service, Inc. P.S. P.O. Box 6132 Kennewick, WA 99336 Approval Criteria: 1. Comprehensive Plan – Land Use 2. KMC Title 18 – Zoning 3. KMC Title 17 – Subdivisions 4. KMC Section 5.56 – Public Works Construction Standards 5. Washington State Environmental Policy Act PP Key Application Processing Dates: Pre-Application/Feasibility Meeting Application Submittal March 18, 2011 Determination of Completeness Issued March 18, 2011 Notice of Application Mailed March 24, 2011 Property Posting Sign March 19, 2011 City Department Review Meeting March 30, 2011 SEPA Threshold Determination Issued April 13, 2011 Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing April 24, 2011 Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing April 20, 2011 SEPA Appeal Period Ends May 4, 2011 Public Hearing Date May 9, 2011 Exhibits: A-1 Staff Report A-2 Application A-3 Notice of Application/Mailing List A-4 Vicinity Map A-5 Preliminary Plat Drawing A-6 SEPA Determination A-7 City Department and Outside Agency Comments Staff Analysis of Proposal & Discussion: The proposed Preliminary Plat (PP 11-01) is a request for a 35 lot subdivision located on the southwest 10.01 acre portion of a 53.5 acre parcel (parcel no. 112882000009000). The project is located north of Leslie Road (to be renamed Ridgeline Drive), between W. Clearwater Avenue and Clodfelter Road. The site topography has rolling hills with the steepest slopes being approximately 12%. A Preliminary Plat (KMC 17.10) is the first step in subdivision process for subdivisions with more than nine lots and is an approval for overall lot layout and compliance with land use regulations. A Final Plat is required for preliminary plats and is the last phase in the subdivision process and must be recorded prior to the creation of individual lots. Final plat approval is based on the Preliminary Plat conditions of approval, and a civil permit is required prior the final plat approval which involves a detailed review of street, utility and stormwater construction standards. ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A-1 Page 3 of 6 Property History: 1. The subject parcel was annexed into the City in August of 1995 (Ord. No. 3647) with a Commercial Community (CC) zoning designation and Commercial Comprehensive Plan land use designation. 2. In August of 2001 the zoning was changed to Business Park (BP) as part of adoption of the Clearwater Master Plan (Ord. No. 3981). 3. In December of 2010 the Comprehensive Plan land use designation was changed from Commercial to Low Density Residential (Ord. No. 5329). 4. In February of 2011 the zoning designation was changed from Business Park (BP) to Residential Low Density (RL) (Ord. No. 5347). Density/Lot Size: Per the Table of Residential Development Standards (KMC 18.12.010 A.2) the Residential Low Density (RL) zoning district requires a minimum density of 3 units per acre and a maximum density of 4 units per acre. The proposed density for the 10.01 acre project area is 3.5 units per acre. The remaining area of the parcel is proposed for future development. The RL zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet. The smallest lot is proposed to be 9,012 square feet, the largest lot 13,633 square feet and the average lot size is proposed to be 9,546 square feet. STAFF COMMENT: The preliminary plat as proposed meets the Residential Development Standards contained in KMC 18.12.010(A.2). Traffic: The City’s traffic engineer has estimated that the proposed project will generate 396 average weekday vehicle trips per day, and has stated in an e-mail dated May 2, 2011 (Exhibit A-7) that this project meets Concurrency for Transportation. As part of the mitigation for the SEPA Determination the developer will be required to contribute $30,292 for traffic for traffic mitigation, of which $21,864 will be for a percentage of costs to install a new roundabout at Leslie (Ridgeline) and Clodfelter and $8,428 will be for a percentage of the costs to install a roundabout at “5 Corners” (Clodfelter/Steptoe/10th/Hildebrand). Storm Water: The City stormwater standard for residential subdivisions is to be designed to retain and dispose of a 25-year, 24 hour developed state storm and the 10-year 24-hour event for the natural pre-developed state. Prior to Final Plat approval the applicant will be required to submit detailed civil engineering drawings for review and approval to the City’s Public Works department. This submittal will include a stormwater plan that will need to meet City standards. Streets & Utilities: A separate permit will be required from the Department of Public Works prior to construction for driveways, sidewalks, wheelchair ramps and utility extensions (water, sewer, street, storm drainage, street lights, fire hydrants, etc.). Half street improvements with new sidewalks will be required for the section of Leslie Road (to be renamed Ridgeline) that fronts the subdivision and will be required to be constructed per the City’s Major Collector Street detail drawing no. 2-3, sheet 2 of 2 and full streets with sidewalks will be required to ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A-1 Page 4 of 6 be constructed per detail drawing no. 2-1 sheet 2 of 4 for the subdivision’s residential streets. An existing 12-inch waterline and an existing 8-inch sewer line are available from Leslie Road. The developer will be required to extend the existing water line and sewer line to serve the proposed subdivision. Parks: Based on the City’s “Park Fee Determination Process” form, which uses land value and density of living units for the calculation it has been determined that for the 35 dwelling unit project the applicant will be required to pay $25,944 to mitigate impacts on park zone 7W (Five Corners). (Per KMC 17.100.010) Park fees will be collected as the project builds out based on a percent of units in the phase of work that a final plat is applied for. Common Area Maintenance: As part of the recommended conditions of approval by City staff, a landscape plan will be required to be submitted for review and approval prior to final plat approval, and a maintenance agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney for common open space and private streets will be required to be recorded against the property. Schools: Per an e-mail from Doug Carl April 29, 2011 of the Kennewick School District, the schools that will serve the subdivision are Cottonwood Elementary, Desert Hills Middle School and Kamiakin High School. None of the above schools are in a walk zone and students living in the proposed subdivision will be bused to all three schools. Surrounding Property: To the north and east of the subject plat area is Residential Low Density (RL) zoned property. The applicant has stated there are plans for a future single-family subdivision similar to the proposed Preliminary plat for the property to the north and east. To the south and across Leslie Road (Ridgeline) is Residential Medium Density (RM) zoned property with plans for a 642 unit apartment complex, and to the west is Business Park (BP) zoned property. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed Preliminary Plat will be harmonious with the surrounding properties. Provisions for Public Health, Safety, and Welfare: Based on the above information it is Staff’s opinion that with approval of the Preliminary Plat, appropriate provisions will be made for the Public Health, Safety, and Welfare. Comprehensive Plan: Staff is of the opinion that this request is consistent with and generally conforms to the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and it will implement, goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Particularly the following: URBAN AREA POLICY 3: “Promote new growth consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Map, the Capital Facilities Plan and the Capital Improvement Plan.” ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A-1 Page 5 of 6 Single-Family housing is a permitted use within Residential Low Density (RL) zoning and Low Density Residential land use. The subject property can be served by City utilities. RESIDENTIAL GOAL 1: “Guide the design of new residential developments to be compatible with adjacent residential area.” The proposed Preliminary Plat is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Land Use and development standards for Residential Low (RL) zoning. RESIDENTIAL GOAL 3: “Promote a variety of residential densities with a minimum density target of 3 units per acre as averaged throughout the urban area.” The proposed Preliminary Plat has a density of 3.5 units per acre. RESIDENTIAL GOAL 4: “Encourage residential development only in urban areas where services can be provided.” City water & sewer is currently available at Leslie Road near the west boundary of the Preliminary Plat area. RESIDENTIAL POLICY 5: “Provide provisions for parks, schools, drainage, transit, water, sanitation, infrastructure, pedestrian, and aesthetic considerations in new residential developments.” The proposed Preliminary Plat provides the above provisions. HOUSING GOAL 1: “Support and develop a variety of housing types and densities to meet the diverse needs of the population.” The City of Kennewick hereby RECOMMENDS that Preliminary Plat 11-01 be APPROVED with the following conditions: 1. Comply with City of Kennewick regulatory controls, policies and codes, including the Single-family Residential Design Standards. 2. Excess right of way on Leslie Road (Ridgeline) to be vacated or submit a request for a license agreement for maintenance of excess right of way. Minimum 15-foot wide landscape, utility and sidewalk tracts are to be created on the final plat drawing. 3. All fees required by the City shall be paid prior to the approval of the final plat. 4. Development shall be in conformance with the plat drawing date stamped April 27, 2011, Exhibit A-5. 5. A landscape plan must be submitted for approval of all common areas, open spaces and rights of way not left in a natural state, listing the number, location and species of trees, sizes of plant materials and ground cover prior to final plat approval. The landscape plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect or licensed landscape installer drawn to a legible scale. 6. All landscaped areas to be irrigated with an automatic sprinkler system or drip irrigation system that meets the requirements of the Critical Area Report. Xeriscape landscaping is encouraged. 7. A Homeowner’s Association must be formed prior to final plat approval. ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A-1 Page 6 of 6 8. Execute a written agreement to the satisfaction of the City Attorney which will allow the City to make arrangements for maintenance of the common areas, open spaces, private roads, access driveways, and landscaped areas should the Homeowner’s Association fail or refuse to maintain these areas. The arrangement must be recorded prior to the first building permit being issued. 9. Comply with the Public Works memorandum dated April 5, 2011 (Exhibit A-7). 10. Comply with Traffic Engineer memorandum dated April 11, 2011 and subsequent e-mail dated April 19, 2011 (Exhibit A-7). 11. Submit a storm comprehensive plan for the entire site. The comprehensive plan needs to be approved by the City prior to approval of Phase 1 construction plans. 12. Provide a temporary cul-de-sac or hammer head turnaround at the end of each road at the end of phase one construction built to Fire Department and Public Works standards. 13. Fire lanes over 150-feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around a fire apparatus. 14. Provide emergency vehicle access easements on new private streets. 15. Install fire hydrants and looped water mains in accordance with City engineering standards. Fire hydrants shall be installed at intersections and maximum 500-foot spacing. 16. Provide dust control method(s) such as hydroseeding for all areas of the site that are disturbed. Re-hydroseeding may be required. 17. In lieu of dedication of park land and based on the “Park Fee Determination Process” calculation, pay park fees in the amount of $25,944.00 for impacts to Park Planning Zone 7W (Five Corners). 18. Prior to Final Plat approval, the developer shall contribute $30,292.00 for the cost of adding roundabouts at the intersections of the 5-Corners intersection of Hildebrand/Steptoe/Clodefelter/10th and the Leslie Road (Ridgeline)/Clodfelter intersection. This can be accomplished with either an escrow agreement or irrevocable five-year letter of credit approved by the City. Report Prepared By and Contact Person: Wes Romine Development Services Manager [EMAIL REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- + QJIA- ìb - cìr- ¿i\þ rx!t5'\Y CIÒz ¡Ò-15 Feonr E'f t-o Ê-l tlO I ?ct¿ ADtl Óo &rb PAI .r 1 rr:i j 1 i' I iá ¿ i-i D ii r ICK City Of Kennewick Preliminary Plat Application 3l r t lt-ott Date: Name Or Number Of Plat: General Location: Parent Parcel Numbers: Applicant Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone Number: Owner's Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Surveyor's Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Engineer's Name. Address: City, State, Zip: Septic Yes Yes x T Other Private city K City No É \ 6 4r.^r f o\ofA,àô Arle. Area Of Plat: \Cl.Õb Zoning: {4 L #/Lots: 35 Min. Lot Size Tut-V & Average Lot Size: ctã\b Sur+t Proposed Land Use: (À¿e\òenliaL Plat Will Be Served By: (Check Those Which Apply) Telephone Co: Water System: Sewer System: Natural Gas: Cable Tv: lrrisation District: 14T Þ Power: euo tXfùcì EXHIBIT A-2 Page 1 of 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- I certify that the information given above is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. SIGNATURE OF APPLICA This preliminary plat is being submifted with my consent. SIGNATURE OF OWNER: Received by: Date: Fee paid: _SEPA Checklist_EsA Supplement Affidavidt of Posting _Ownership Report _Receipt No. _File No. tue 7n/ï,_fzt / TZy' EXHIBIT A-2 Page 2 of 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- NOTIFICATION OF MAILING ror Dre- as shown on the attached Iist. EXHIBIT A-3 Page 1 of 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- PP 11-01/PLN-2011-00868 35 LOTS coz t0-L5/P LN-2010-05 157 BP TO RL 37 JULIA STEFFLER 1OOO5 W 1OTH AVE KENNEWICK, WA 99336 37 MAHAFFEY ENÏERPRISES 1.213 S CLODFELTER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 ROBERT A & LAUREE L CANNON 1128 COUNTRY RIDGE DR RICHLAND, WA 99352 37 JAMES STAFFORD TRUSTEE 11911 W CLEARWATER AVE KENNEWICK, WA 99336 37 JOHN T & HARMONY S FLEMING T2T5 S SANDALWOOD PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 JANIE THOMPSON 2IO7 S CLODFELÏER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 JON & JULIE WADDOUPS T2185 WILLOWS PR KENNEWICK, WA 99338 JI BRUCE M & TANA LOUIS PRATT T2t4 S TRANQUILITY PRSE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 RONALD RYBARSKI 5818 186TH PL SW WA 98037 37 HFRP LLC 21611 AHÏANUM RD YAKIMA, WA 98903 37 VICTOR V & MARILYN JOHNSON 15OO S CLODFELTER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 LINDA L COLLIER T2345 CLODFELTER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99337 37 CHAD A & KRICHELLE A ESVELT 1117 WILLOW PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 JOHNT&DEBRAFEO 4OO1 W 43RD AVE KENNEWICK, WA 99337 37 19OO S CLODFELTER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 LEO MELDE 1.21.55 WILLOW PRSE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 DAVID L & BARBARA J STAPLETON 1203 S TRANQUILITY PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 DAVID CRAIG & MARY F BLOMBERG 121.8 S TRANQUILITY PRSE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 STANLEY C & MARY A WALLACE 1205 S SUNNYVALE DR KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 JOHNB&RENEEMICHEL 2555 W HWY 24 OTHELLO, WA 99344 37 SHERRILL A ROBINSON 1.2402 N DIVISION ST PMB 104 SPOKANE, WA 99218 37 JERRYD&BERNICEMALOY 1210 S CLODFELTER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 1101S WILLOW PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 GAEL J GETTELMAN T2TTS SANDALWOOD PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 BEVERLY D HARTLEY 131 PINIONWOOD CT RICHLAND, WA 99352 37 ALAN & KELLI FRANKLIN 1130 S WILLOW PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 WILLIAM B & GINGER J BARTON T217 S TRANQUILITY PRSE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 DOUGLAS RYBARSKI IT22S WILLOW PR SE KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 KELLY R & KRISTIE C BAYLES T2O7 S SUNNYVALE DR KENNEWICK, WA 99338 EXHIBIT A-3 Page 2 of 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 37 37 37 RAYMOND C & SHARON L QUINN BADGER CANYON WATER ASSOC RONALD J JR & KATERE KLEIN PO BOX7223 1204 S SUNNYVALE DR 1206 S SUNNYVALE DR KENNEWICK, WA 99336 KENNEWICK, WA 99338 KENNEWICK, WA 99338 37 37 37 WORLEY SURVEYING SERVICES IN PS CALVARY CHAPEL OF TRI-CITIES MATT SMITH RYAN LIDDICOAT 1.0611 W CLEARWATER AVE 15 SW COLORADO AVE STE 1 121 S ELY STREET KENNEWICK, WA 99336 BEND, OR 97702 KENNEWICK, WA 99336 37 LESLIE ROAD DEVELOPMENT LLC T8707 S CLODFELTER RD KENNEWICK, WA 99338 EXHIBIT A-3 Page 3 of 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- NOTICE OF APPLICATION Map on Back Proposal: An application for a preliminary plat (PP 11-01) has been submitted by Matt Smith of Tri Cities Development, LLC (15 S.W. Colorado Avenue, Bend, OR 99702). The site is located north of Leslie Road, between W. Cleanryater Avenue and Clodfelter Road. The site consists of approximately 10 acres and is proposed to be divided into thirty-five (35) single family lots. The smallest lot size is 9,012 square feet and the largest lot size is 13,633 square feet. The average lot size is 9,546 square feet. The site is currently zoned Residential Low Density District (RL), and is subject to the single-family design standards. The Comprehensive Plan designation is Low Density Residential. Open Record Hearing: The City of Kennewick Hearing Examiner will conduct an open record hearing at 6:00 p.m. on May 9, 2011 in the Gouncil Chambers in Kennewick City Hall al21O W. 6th Avenue, Kennewick, WA 99336. Testimony will be taken at this meeting. The Hearing Examiner is expected to make a decision following this meeting. Public Comment Period: You may submit comments at any time until April 29,2011, before 4:30 p.m. Comments submitted on or before April29,20ll will be included in the Hearing Examiner's meeting packet. lf you have questions on the proposal, contact Wes Romine, Development Services Manager at (509) 5854558 or via e-mail at [EMAIL REDACTED]. Environmental Documents and/or Studies Applicable to this Study: Environmental Determination No. 1l-12. A Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance was issued for this project on April 13, 2011. The time for appealing SEPA issues is twenty-one (21) days from the issue date. Contact Gregory McCormick, City of Kennewick Planning Director, to request procedures for SEPA appeals. Determination of Completeness: The application was declared complete on March 18,2011 for the purpose of processing. Project Permits Associated with this Proposal: None Determination of Regulations Used for Project Mitigation: Title 18 (Zoning), Title 17 (Subdivision) of the Kennewick Municipal Code and the land use policies contained in the Kennewick Comprehensive Plan. Estimated Date of Decision: Within 10 calendar days of the Hearing date, May 19,2011. To Receive Notification of the Decision and/or the Environmental Determination: Contact the Develooment Services Division al21O W. 6th Avenue, Kennewick, WA 99336 or via telephone at (5Og) 585-4230. Appeal: Any person aggrieved by the decision of the Kennewick Hearing Examiner on this proposal may appeal to the Superior Court of Benton County within twenty-one (21) days of the date of decision. Wes Romine, Development Services Manager The City of Kennewick welcomes full participation in public meet¡ngs by all citizens and does not discriminate on the bas¡s of disability, pursuant to the requirements of the Amer¡can with Disabilities Act of 1 990, pub. L 'f 01-336 No qualifìed individual with a disability shall be excluded or denied the benefìt of part¡cipating in such meetings. lf you wish to use auxiliary aids or require assistance to comment at this public meeting, please contact the City of Kennewick, Wes Romine, Development Services Department at (509) 585-4558 or TDD (509) 585-4425 or through the Wâshington Relay Service Center TTY at #711 at least ten days prior to the date of the meeting to make arrangements for special needs. 210W. Sixth Avenue / PO Box 6108. Kennewick WA 99336 EXHIBIT A-3 Page 4 of 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 800 ft 1 : 9960 1in : 830ft This plan is suitable for informational use only. City of Kennewick accepts no liability for any error whatsoever. Produced by CITY\wesr 09:28 3/24/2011 Vicinity Map EXHIBIT A-4 Page 1 of 1 Project Location PP 11-01 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- P rcEL 1128420ûæ900N PRELIMINARY PUT CANYON RANCH PORflON NORÍH t/2 SECnON 12 T. I R. 28 W.H KENNEWICK. BENTON COUNN, WASHINCTON POÍnCN OF P RCg. 't2æ20æØ9W MT rcRNON OF fHE W MLF É HE SOßWEST QURER OF BE NæNW€SI OUÁRIER flD fHE SOUHEASI QUpiER OF ffE XORfrÆST AURÍER ND MT rcRTþN OF HE SOUHWESI OURÍER OF HE NORÊæT OÆIER LYNG WES¡ OF CLûÆLER ROAD, ALL OF WHICH ARE LYNC ¡il sEc¡oil 12, fowsírP I NoRÊ, ffiGE 2a EÆf w.M., B&Tù COUNll, fÆfllilCrd, EXCPI CLODFELIER ROAD, AND ÍHE SOUH JN FEEÍ OF NE æI 660 FEET OF HE SOUÎHEÆT OWÌËR OF 'HE ilORÈÍ/€ST QÆER, dD ALSO ãCEPI MT WTIN DEEOED ÍO HE CIÙ OF KENNffiCK BY INSTRUIEil¡ RECORDED ON ÆBRUìAY 17, 2O1O UNæR AUDIÍORS NE NO 2010-æ1289. OESCRi9EO AS FOLLOß: coMMEilCtX6 Af ÈE SOUWEST ¿ORTER OF fHE NORfrWESf QWIR OF S4/0 SECnOT t2; HENCE ilOre THE SOUfr ¿INE OF HE NORHÆST QUÁRTER NORÈ 884,23' EÆf FOR 668 79 FEfl TO HE Æs¡ LINE OF EAST ruF OF THE SOUÍHWES¡ QWER ff HE NORTHWEST QUÆÌER OF g/D SECnOil 12: HilCE AOdO S4/0 tl€ST LlilE ilORft æ'2t'57' ÆSÍ FOR 22 55 Eã fO HE NORfrERLY R/Gffi ff WAY MAREN OF LESUE RgD ANO HE MNT OF 8Ec'fltrIffi; ÈEflCE COmNU/re ÆOrc vtD WES¡ UilE NoRB ñ2t'57 WES¡ FOR 59062 Æfr,'ÈENCE SOW 6t52'12' EASI FOR lJ6 46 FEt; HilCE NORB 11'O3'O7' æT FOR 91A6 FEt; HENCE NOPIH 11'32'09' EASÍ FoR 10 û Æfr: HENâE NORH 17'10'29' æI FoR 95 45 ffii tHE¡lCE SOUH 1259'1J'ær FOR 10630 FEET: frENCE SOUH Ag27'O2' Eñ Fffi 5A28 Eg: HENCE 9m 5715'16' æT FR 12331 FEET: HENCE NæH aÛl9'lI- EAST Fffi A3l5 FEEL HENCE $UTH A5'27'3O- EAST FOR tJ9.9l ftú; SOUH 08'22'11' æT FOR llJ 71 Æ¡j IHENCE SOUH O71O'æ' ñ FOR 1O.O7 FElf; fHENCE SOIJH 11'16'52' EASI FOR llOY FEET; HErcE fim Aã31'2J- ÆST FOR 61.21 FEFr; ¡HENCE SOUH O3'2A37 FlSf FOR 11159 FEEr; BENCE SOffi Ot4'36- WEST FOR 11.20 Æt: üENCE SOUTH 04'1955' ær FOR 121 59 Æt TO fHE NORIH RICÆ OF wAY úReN tr LESLE rcAD; lH€ilCE ÆdG gD RICHÍ OF VAY MrcN SOTJH 8A10'2J' WESI FOR 650 91 Æt rO HE sl;€r OF A 571û WUS flOil-rÁXcEtrr CURVE (WOSE mlUS aARS NæfH 11'O9'O8' lvESÐ; nEXCE TRHT6IERLY Æ016 gD CURVE fO HE HeHf HROUôH A CENIRÆ NGLE OF O757'OA' AÍ ÆC DiSTÁflCE OF 79 67 ÆT TO lHE NM OF cdrÁ/fl/ilG t o.ot ÁcREs 1A' gDilALK AND UNUX ÚSEMENT 'A'SDryÁTK ÁND æEilflI 25 sfl e¡,cK OWNER VCÍæ V. AND trRiLW I, JOHilSON I5û S. CLODFEL7ER ROAD KENNEIIICK WÄSHINGION 99JJA DElIELOPER ÎR, CMES DE\,ELOPMEI.,7 COUPAT.IY LLC M[ SMI'H t5 sw coLoRÆo aw suÍE 1 æND OR 99702 PARCÈL 112æ20000æ00æ IÀì,ID SUøTEYOR R'CMRO S. RUSSUÍ WoRLEI SURIEÍ,NE SERI//CE. 'NC , P.S PO BOX 6132 KENN$IICK. WASHINGION 99336 [PHONE REDACTED] LEGEND o + *fÁRY SET€8 UNHOIf WAR ULW HRE ¡MW PffiEL llm2oWOOOO IAI,ID USE SUMMARY rcfL ÆA GROSS fOÍL ARg NT ÄRE4 SIPAEIS NUYSfR OF LOTS AWAACE LOl SIZE NEf uR6E9 rof SIZE LOI SIZE flFT WAfER s€v€R SEfri¿E w m qÀ.E 78 EI490il NOTE 10.0 AcRES 7.9 ACRES 2 r ÁcR€s 9546 SE rJ6S SE 9012 S.F. CIIY OF KEìINEUrcK ffi OF KilNilICK trMOil CÚUN'Y P.U.D. NO. 1 KENilEWCK 'ffim ASlRiCl CffiR æMYUNICATIONS t ELEVAnfi DAilU: NCW 1929 Cm OF KENNEIflCK RECm OF SURV€y 1540 N th SEC 12 TEN, Pæ,w.x -751 J8' ó0 0 50 t00 æ CRIPHIC SCAI¡ - FEET Ðßnre cÍY oF KEHEVX RßI]I OF N 8910'232. 127866' cEN SEC 12 Ía¡t, R2aE, flv- FND 5/6- rcRLEt WAY LA_ I V saee'2J'w66a7s LÊlsuE RO. (HIrea'JNE) - N a'J,ÍJ1E 677f,3' w 1/1 COR SEC. 12 W, R2EE W.H. flD mss orP R l - ÈúOr¡l lW - 558.02 RtU = 57 APR 21 7T11 t+lrRt€y suFv€ìrNc sERt4cE rNC., AS. P.O. æX 6132 KENNE(IICK. WASHINGION 99JJ6 ¡¡gr.5oe-582-6716 ,rÊåf VICINITY MAP PARCEL t12843æO@20001 ¡ LOT 1' ' 10617 so.fr- LOT 19 114)t so.Ft. :ì 1: r'¡:q x EXHIBIT A-5 Page 1 of 30 ---PAGE BREAK--- ED# 11-12 April 13,2011 Matt Smith Tri Cities Development, LLC 15 S.W. Colorado Avenue Bend, Oregon 99702 Dear Mr. Smith: Enclosed is a Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance #11-12 for PP #11-01 located north of Leslie Road (to be renamed Ridgeline) and west of Clodfelter Road. This Determination means no Environmental lmpact Statement if required in order for the City to continue the processing of your application. Please notice that several changes have been made to your Environmental Checklist. Three conditions have been added. The City of Kennewick has determined that as mitigated, this proposal will not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental lmpact Statement (ElS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2Xc). This decision was made after review of a completed Environmental Checklist, and will be available to the public on request. lf you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Enclosure: CC: Dept of Ecology Dept. of Fish & Wildlife - Perry Harvester, 1701 S. 24tn Ave., Yakima, WA 98902 Dept. of Fish & Wildlife - Mark Teske, 201 N Pearl, Ellensburg, WA 98926 WSDOT - Paul Gonseth WSDOT - Rick Yakima Nation,815 Sanford Ave,, Richland, WA 99352 CTUIR - Carey Miller, P O Box 638, Pendleton, OR 97801 CTUIR - Audie Huber PP 11-01 File Vic Johnson, 1500 S. Clodfelter Road, Kennewick, WA 99338 210 6'h Avenue o P.O. Box 6108 o Kennewick, V/A 99336-0108 (509) 585-4200 ¡ Fax (509) 585-4445 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 1 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- ED# 11-12 CITY OF KENNEWICK MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON.SIGNIFICANCE Description of Proposal: Preliminary Plat for 35 lot subdivision on 10 acres. Proponent: Matt Smith. Tri-Cities Development. LLC Location of proposal, including street address, if any, North of Leslie Road (to be renamed Ridoeline) and west of Clodfelter Road. Lead Agency: City of Kennewick Mitigation Required for Potentially Significant Adverse lmpacts: According to KMC 18.42.040(1), the City may impose any condition necessary to protect the health, safety, and welfare or otherwise bring a proposed development into compliance with the purpose and intent of this Title. For this proposal, PP No. 11-01/PLN-2011-00868, conditions include the mitigation fee for the impacts of 35 dwelling units on park zone 7W (Five Corners) in the amount of $25,944.00 in lieu of dedication of park land. Conditions also include traffic mitigation fees for the amount of $30,292.00 and are to be collected at the time of final plat. This Mitigated DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2). The City will not act on this proposal for fifteen (15) days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by_4128111 . After the review period has elapsed, all comments received will be evaluated and the DNS will be retained, modified, or withdrawn as required by SEPA regulations. X Changes, modifications and ior additions to the checklist have been made on the attached Environmental Checklist Review. X This MDNS is subject to the attached conditions. Responsible Official: Gregory McCormick Position/Title: Planning Director Address: 210 West 6'n Ave.. P. O. Bo Phone: (509) 585-4473 4113111 Signature 108, Kennewick, WA 99336 * * * According to KMC 4.08.430, this determination may be appealed to: Hearing Examiner City of Kennewick 21OW 6'n Ave.. P.O. Box 6108 The time for appealing SEPA issues is twenty-one (21) days after notice (WAC 197-11-680(5Xa). You should be prepared to make specific, written factual objections. Contact Gregory McCormick to read or request the procedures for SEPA appeals. 210 6'n Avenue o P.O. Box 6108 o Kennewick. WA 99336-0108 (509) 585-4200 o Fax (509) 585-4445 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 2 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- ED# 11-12 CITY OF KENNEWICK ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST REVIEW E.D. File # 11-12 Action: PP #11-01 Review by: Wes Romine Date: April 13. 2011 The City of Kennewick has reviewed the checklist and has made changes on it. Please note the following condition(s): For this proposal, PP 11-01/PLN-2011-00868, conditions include the mitigation fees for impacts for the addition of 35 dwelling units in Park Planning Zone 7W - Five Corners. The lot is zoned Residential Low Density District (RL). ln lieu of land dedication, fees are required to be paid to Park Planning Zone 7W - Five Corner in the amount of $25,944.00 as calculated per the City's Park Fee Determination Process form. This fee must be paid at the time of final plat. For PP 11-01/PLN-2011-00868, traffic mitigation fees are to be paid per the Traffic Engineers "Traffic Mitigation Fee Calculation" memo date April 11, 2011 for a maximum amount of $30,292.00, based on the Traffic Engineers calculation for trips generated by the project and the proportionate share of impact on the identified nearby intersections for improvements. TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE CALCULATIONS TYPE OF PROJECT PROJECT SIZE AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION (vpd) Single Family Detached Housing (Land Use 210) 35 units 396 the la Mitiqation Gost Galculations : s total ADT of both roads combined based on a calculation from the rolumes were projected to 20'16 which is the analysis year required for this project per KAC 13{8. This calculated PM wlume was conlerted to an ADT using a 12o/o DHV, which is the 2016 ADT calculated abole. 5-Corners Roundabout ADT was calculated in the same manner. 210 W. 6'n Avenue o P.O. Box 6108 o Kennewick. WA 99336-0108 (509) 585-4200 ¡ Fax (509) 585-4445 Specific Mitigation Project(s) Mitigation Cost Estimate Main Street ADT Minor Street ADT Projec t Trips Percent ol r nps using Mitigation Project Trips using Mitigation Percent Respons ible Gost Leslie & Clodfelter Road Roundabout $ 300,000 2,O15 ô 396 4Oo/o 158 7 .3"/o $ 21,864 5-Gorners Roundabout (Clodfe lte r/Ste ptoe/l 0th/ Hildebrand) $ 300,000 5,480 U 396 40o/o '158 2.8% $ 8,428 Total Gosts $ 600,000 $ 30,292 Note: Leslie & Clodfelfer TransCAD model runs of 2005 and 2025 for this intersection. Calculating the growth factor, the PM peak EXHIBIT A-6 Page 3 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- ED# 11-12 Proiect Galculation Method: Formula: Project Trip Generation multiplied by the percent of trips using the intersection divided by sum of Main Street and Minor Street Average Daily Traffic (ADT) plus project trips using mitigation and then multiplied by the cost of the mitigation measure equals the project incremental traffic mitigation fee Water Quality An NPDES Construction Stormwater General Permit from the Washington State Department of Ecology is required if there is a potential for stormwater discharge from a construction site with more than one acre of disturbed ground. This permit requires that the SEPA checklist fully disclose anticipated activities including building, road construction and utility placements. Obtaining a permit is a minimum of a 38 day process and may take up to 60 days if the original SEPA does not disclose proposed activities. Erosion control measure must be in place prior to any clearing, grading or construction. These control measures must be able to prevent soil from being carried into surface water (this includes storm drains) by stormwater runoff. A stormwater construction permit from Washington State Dept. of Ecology may be required if there is a potential for discharge from a construction site larger than one acre. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Erosion Sediment Control Plan) is needed for all permitted construction sites. Please contact Ray Latham, at the Dept. of Ecology, (509) 575-2807, to determine if your site needs such a permit. Water Resources The water purveyor is responsible for ensuring that the proposed use(s) are within the limitations of its water rights. lf the proposal's actions are different than the existing water right (source, purpose, the place of use, or period of use), then it is subject to approval from the Department of Ecology pursuant to Sections 90.03.380 RCW and 90.44.100 RCW. lf you have any questions concerning the Water Resources comments, please contact Breean Zimmerman at (509) 454-7647. 210 6th Avenue ¡ P.O. Box 6108 o Ker¡rewick, WA 99336-0108 (509) 585-4200 ¡ Fax (509) 585-4445 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 4 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Eb ¡l-l y A. BACKGROUND Name of proposed project, if applicable: Preliminary Plat Application Name of applicant: Tri Cities Development, LLC 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: ' Ùf.att Smith 15 SIV Colorado Ave Bend, OR . 4. Date checHist prepared: March 18,2011 5. Agency requesting checHist: City of Kennewick Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Split this project tnto 2 phases 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Future Street construction and construction ofhouses 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will . be prepared, directly related to this proposal. None with this proposal. 9. Do you knowwhether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other / proposals directþ affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. No ro. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if - known. Final Plat Approval n. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the / size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checHist that askyou to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 35 Lots on 10 Acres rz. Location of the proposal. Give sufñcient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site l0-20-010.KAC 3195 6. ENVIRONMENTAL CI{ECKLIST - PAGE 2 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 5 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- plan, vicinity hâp, and topographic ffiâp, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. B. r. Earth a. General description ofthe site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, - other Flat b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope?) - Approximately 12"/" c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, cla¡ sand, gravel, peat, mucþ? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, speci$r them and note any prime farmland. - Sandyloam d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. -No e. Describe the purpose, ty¡re and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate ' Not Sure. Engineered Grading Plan f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction or use? If so, generaþ describe? - Grading to construct road to city standards g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? - Not known h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: - 'Water as Necessarv z. Air a. What ty¡les of emissions to the air would result from the proposal dust, automobile, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project t0-20-010.K4C 3/95 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PAGE 3 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 6 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Road Construction and Grading for House construction b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe. 'No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: - Sprinkler with water to control I)ust 3. Water a. Surface. r. Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinþ of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater,lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. ' None z. Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within zoo feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 'No 3. Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill mateúal. ' None 4. Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, pu{pose, and approximate quantities if known. -No 5. Does the proposal lie within a loo-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan. -No 6. Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. - None b. Ground. - r. Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give ENVIRONMENTAL CI#CKLIST - PAGE 4 1O-20-O1O.KAC EXHIBIT A-6 Page 7 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. No z. Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals . . agricultural; etc.) Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. - City Sewer Available. c. Water Runoff(including storm water). r. Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. All Storm Water will be maintained on site with storm drains built to city of Kennewick standards. z. Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. - No notable source of waste material has been identified. - d. Proposed measured to reduce or control surface, ground and runoffwater impacts, ifany: None 4. Plants a. Check or circle the types of vegetation found on the site: - deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, ced.ar,^pirr", óttró. shrubs x grass x pasture - crop or grain _ wet soil plants; cattail, buttercup, bulmsh, skunk cabbage, other _ water plants: water liþ eelgrass, milfoil, other - other types of vegetation b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? z For Road and house construction c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known at this time. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PAGE 5 TO-20-O1O.KAC 3/95 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 8 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- d. Proposedlandscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: - Residential Landscaping after home construction 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other ' None other than birds flying overhead. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. ' None c. Is the site part of a migration route? Is so, explain. - The entire Columbia Basin is part of a migration route. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: / None 6. Enercv and Natural Resources a. What kinds of enerry (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energr needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing,etc. ' Residents designed and built to current standards b. Ifso, generally describe. ,NO c. What kinds of energ¡r conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: - Residents to be designed and built to current standards 7. Environmental Health ENVIRONMENTAL CI{ECKLIST - PAGE 6 1O-20-O1O.KAC 3/95 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 9 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? Is so, describe. None r. Describe special emergency services that mightbe required, - None z. Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: - None b. Noise. r. What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffrc, equipment, operation, other)? t None z. What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. - Construction Operation 7. Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: / Meet City of þnnewickBuilding Codes ,il!þI !íl,lnø* 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? - The site is currently vacant, Parks and Shopping and Businesses nearby. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. / Yes. Alfalfa planted c. Describe any structures on the site. ' None d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? -No e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? RL etJ oe¡tq tll Pçtr*t{ftrïL f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Residential r0-20-010.KAC 3/95 ENVIRONMENTAL CFIECKLIST - PAGE 7 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 10 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site? . N/A h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentaþ sensitive" area? If so, - speciff. No I. Approximateþ how many people would reside or work in the completed project? - 35 Single X'amily Homes j. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed area? z None until site is developed. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: . N/A l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected / landuses and plans, if any: Meet City of Kennewick Planning Codes 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, - middle or low-income housing. 35 Middle to High income b. Approximateþ how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, a middle, or low-income housing. None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: ' None ro. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what z is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? 2 Story housing b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? - None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: ENVIR.NMENTAL .HECKLIST - 'AGE 8 r0-20-010.K4C EXHIBIT A-6 Page 11 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? None b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? /No c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? -None ight and glare impacts, if any? tz. Recreation a. What designated and informaÌ recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinþ? / Horse Back Riding, Riding, Parks, Shopping b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational use? If so, describe. 'No c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: .ç ot..ÈþQ þr- 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state or local preservation registers known to be on or next to the site? If so, generaþ describe. 'No b. Generaþ describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. / None c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: / lt is unlikely that this Preliminary Plat will uncover artifacts, however if any historical artifacts are found, appropriate agencies will be notified immediately. 10-20-0l0.KAC 3t95 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PAGE 9 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 12 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- 14. Transportation a. Identifi public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. z Leslie Road. Clodfelter to the east and Clearwater to the west. I-82 is south of the project b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? - Public Transit does not serve this site. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the r project eliminate? N/A d. Will the proposal require anynew roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generaþ describe (indicate whether public - or private). Yes this Preliminary plat will require new streets. See Attached. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinþ of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generaþ describe. -No f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peakvolumes would occur. - Proposed 35 Ho , qnU ransportation impacts, if any: a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. /No more than expected with average growth of the City of Kennewick b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any. z None 16. Utilities Circle utilities currently available at the site: eledricity, natural gas, water, refuse senrice, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. 10-20-010.KAC 3/9s a. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PAGE 10 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 13 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utilþ providing the service, andthe general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinþ which mightbe needed. / None C. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of myknowledge. I understand that the City is reþing on them to make its decisions. /signatur"¿i/p Telephone Number ItZ. (l Date Submitted: ntfiCû zo t¡ îlcue l¿ -ç ßrtt¡u.r, ENVIRONMENTAL - PAGE I1 1O-20-O1O.KAC 3/95 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 14 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- . SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS Because these questions are very general, it may be helpfirl to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the environment. When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in general terms. r. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release oftoxic or hazardous substances; or production of I noise? This project will not affect water, air quality, or noise. , Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are: . N/A 2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life? zThis project will not affect plants, animals, fish or marine life. Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are: ¿ N/A 3. Howwould the proposal be likely to deplete eners/ or natural resources? - Preliminary plat will not have any effect. \ilhen the site is developed in the future - normal building enerry usage will have an effect. Proposed measures to protect or conserve eners/ and natural resources are: 'None 4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentaþ sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains or prime farmlands? ' Not likely to have an affect. Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are: - None 5. Howwould the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans? ' Not tikely to affect land and shoreline use. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are: None 10-20-010.KAC 3195 ENVIRONMENTAL CI{ECKLIST - PAGE 12 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 15 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- 6. Howwould the proposal be tikelyto increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities? / This project will not affect transportation or public services and utilities. Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are: zNone 8. Identif,z, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the protection of the environment. / The project will not conflict with local, state or federal laws protecting the environment. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - PAGE 13 IO-20-O1O.KAC 319s EXHIBIT A-6 Page 16 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- ESA LISTED SALMONIDS CHECKLIST The Listed Salmonids Checklist is provided in order that the City can identify a project's potential impacts (if any) on salmonids that have been listed as "threatened" or "endangered" under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). A salmonid is any fish species that spends part of its life cycle in the ocean and returns to fresh water. Potential project impacts that may result in a "taking" of listed salmonids must be avoided, or mitigated to insignificant levels. Generally, under ESA, a "taking" is broadly defTned as any action that causes the death of, or harm to, the listed species. Such actions include those that affect the environmental in ways that interfere with or reduce the level of reproduction of the species. lf ESA listed species are present or ever were present in the watershed where your project will be located, your project has the potential for affecting them, and you need to comply with the ESA. The questions in this section will help determine if the ESA listing will impact your project. The Fish Program Manager at the appropriate Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) regional office can provide additional information. Please contact the Dept. of Fish and Wildlife at 1701 S. 24th, Yakima WA 98902-5720, Phone No. [PHONE REDACTED]. 1. Are ESA listed be? YES xx NO Please Describe. salmonids currently present in the watershed in which your project will r Has there ever been an ESA listed salmonid stock present in this watershed? YES xx NO_ Please Describe. NOTE: Kennewick is located in the upper Mid-Columbia watershed. Salmonoids are present in the watershed - questions no. 1 and no. 2 already answered "yes". Questions A-1 and A-2are also answered. PROJECT SPECIFIC: The questions in this section are specific to the project and vicinity. / A1. '42. 43. Name of watershed Uooer Mid-Columbia Name of nearest waterbody Columbia River What is the distance from this project to the nearest body of water? ûflP*' '6 Often a buffer between the project and a stream can reduce the chance of a negative impact to fish. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SALMONIDS CHECKLIST - PAGE 14 TO-ZO.OIO.KAC EXHIBIT A-6 Page 17 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- A4. \Â/trat is the current land use between the project and the potentially affected water body (parking lots, farmland, etc.) / houS'nq , nä A5. What percentage of the project will be impervious suÉace (including pavement & roof area)? FISH MIGRATION: The following questions will help determine if this project could interfere with migration of adult and juvenile fish. Both increases and decreases ¡n water flows can affect fish migration. 81. Does the project require the withdrawal of Surface water? Yes_ No-rx_ Amount Name of surface water body Ground water? Yes No Kx Amount From Where Depth of well Will any water be rerouted? YES_ NO xx lf yes, will this require a channel change? - B,3. Willthere be retention ponds? YES_ NO - If yes, will this be an infiltration pond or a surface discharge to either a municipal storm water system or a surface water body? lf to a surface water discharge, please give the name of the waterbody. - B,4. Wll this project require the building of new roads? lncreased road mileage may affect the timing of water reaching a stream and may, thus, impact fish habitat. q(5 -8,5. Are culverts proposed as part of this project? Yes_ No_Ðr-_ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SALMONIDS CHECKLIST - PAGE 15 IO-20-O1O.KAC 3t95 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 18 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- 86. Are stormwater drywells proposed as part of this project? - YeS NO 87. Will topography changes affect the duration/direction of runoff flows? ¿ Yes No lf yes describe the changes. - 88. \Mll the project involve any reduction of a floodway or floodplain by filling or other partial blockage of flows? Yes_ No-g_ lf yes, how will the loss of flood storage be mitigated by your project? WATER QUALITY: The following questions will help determine if this project could adversely impact water quality. Degraded water quality can affect listed species. Water quality can be made worse by runoff from impervious surfaces, altering water temperature, discharging contaminants, etc. .-C1. \Mll your project either reduce or increase shade along or over a waterbody? YES- NO x< Removal of shading vegetation or the building of structures such as docks or floats often result in a change in shade. -C2. Will the project increase nutrient loading or have the potential to increase nutrient loading or contaminants (fertilizers, other waste discharges, or runoff) to the waterbody? YES NO -Ca. Willturbidity (dissolved or partially dissolved sediment load) be increased because of construction of the project or during operation of the project? ln-water or near water work will often increase turbidíty. YES_ NOx y_ ENVIRONMENTAL AND SALMONIDS CHECKLIST - PAGE 16 I,o.zo.oTO.KAC EXHIBIT A-6 Page 19 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- C4. \Mll your project require long term maintenance, i.e., bridge cleaning, highway salting, - chemical sprays for vegetation management, clearing of parking lots? YES Noxx Please Describe. Vegetation: The following questions are designed to determine if the project will affect riparian vegetation, which can impact listed species. D1. Will the project involve the removal of any vegetation from the stream banks? ' YES_ NO lX lf yes, please describe the existing conditions and the amount and type of vegetation to be removed. . D2. lf any vegetation is removed, do you plan to re-plant? YES lf yes, what types of plants will you use? E. SIGNATURE The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand mucH I î, Date ENVIRONMENTAL AND SALMOMDS CHECKLIST - PAGE 17 To-zo-oTO.KAC 3/95 EXHIBIT A-6 Page 20 of 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- Municipal Services Department 1010 S. Chemical Drive * PO Box 6108* Kennewick, WA 99336 [PHONE REDACTED] * [PHONE REDACTED] Fax To: Michelle Dellinger, Development Services From: Fernando Garcia, Utility Coordinator Date: April 5, 2011 Re: Public Works Consolidated Comments Project: Pre Plat No. 11-03/PLN-2011-00868 1. Existing 12-Waterline is available from Leslie Road; developer will be required to extend the water line to serve the proposed subdivision. Water comprehensive plan study identified waterline extension to be 16-inch for Leslie Road. The city might require to oversize the water lines and will contribute toward the cost of over sizing above the water main size requirements of the plat, hydraulic calculations will be required to assure the highest point provide the water pressure required by the fire Department. Water main looping is required for water quality and fire protection 2. Existing 8-inch sewer main line is available from Leslie Road; developer will be required to extend the sewer main to serve the proposed subdivision. 3. Submit water, sewer and storm comprehensive plans for the complete site. Comprehensive plans need to be approved by the city for the entire Plat prior to approval of Phase 1 construction plans. 4. Residential subdivisions shall be designed to retain and dispose of the calculated difference between a 25-year 24-hour event for the developed state and the 10- year 24-hour event for the natural pre-developed state. The developed state shall include streets, sidewalks, an estimated average driveway and one-half of an estimated average building roof for impervious surfaces and 50-foot from back of sidewalk for pervious surfaces. 5. Residential street shall be constructed per City of Kennewick Standards detail 2-1, sheet 2 of 4. MEMORANDUM Engineering Division of Public Works EXHIBIT A-7 Page 1 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Municipal Services Department 1010 S. Chemical Drive * PO Box 6108* Kennewick, WA 99336 [PHONE REDACTED] * [PHONE REDACTED] Fax 6. A separate permit is required from the Department of Public Works Department (DPW), prior to construction, for driveways, sidewalks, wheelchair ramps and utility extensions (water, sewer, street, storm drainage, street lights, fire hydrants, etc.). DPW will require one full size 24” x 36” set of civil drawings and one set of storm calculations. Up to 20 working days will be required for preliminary plan reviews. Note on the plans that “All utility construction must conform to the latest revision of the City of Kennewick Standard Specifications”. No permit fees or utility fees will be quoted prior to plan approval by the City Engineer. For further information please visit our website at: www.go2kennewick.com 7. Note: Engineering will not accept civil drawing for preliminary review, until the Site Plan has been approved by Development Services. EXHIBIT A-7 Page 2 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- To: Wes Romine, Development Services Manager From: John Deskins, Traffic Engineer Date: April 11th, 2011 Re: Traffic Engineer’s Comments Project: PP 11-01 – Canyon Ranch Subdivision Conditions Based upon review of the proposed development site plan, existing traffic conditions, the average weekday traffic volumes generated by similar types of developments (per current ITE Trip Generation Manual), traffic flow and safety, proximately to the intersection adjoining property access and in conformance with Kennewick Administrative Code (KAC) Chapter 13-46 “Highway Access Management”, the conditions are as follows: 1. Leslie Road is planned to be renamed Ridgeline Drive in front of the proposed project. 2. The Leslie Road access points as shown on the site plan meet or exceed the minimum driveway spacing of 245 feet from existing & proposed driveway or access points on Leslie Road (Ridgeline Drive). There is one problem as proposed. a. Sight distance requirements are for 415 feet of sight distance at 40mph per KMC 13.12.20. This cannot be achieved at the western access (A Street) for sight distance to the right. Therefore the access must be relocated OR left-turn egress cannot be allowed from A Street. Since alternate access is available at the eastern access point it seems that the latter may be a more practical solution. b. Note that any future phases can be granted a single access to Leslie Road, but the location would be set directly across from the approved access for SPA 11-13. 3. Provide right-of-way and construct half street improvements along Leslie Road (Ridgeline Drive), using a three lane cross-section to collector/arterial standards. The cross section shall include street, curb, gutter, street lighting, planter, and minimum of a 5 foot sidewalk. Using City of Kennewick Standard Drawing 2-3, Sheet 2 of 2, the face of curb shall be 22 feet from the roadway centerline, while the right-of-way shall be 24 feet from the centerline. A 15 foot minimum sidewalk and utility easement will be required. MEMORANDUM Traffic Engineering Division EXHIBIT A-7 Page 3 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- PP 11-01 Page 2 of 3 Transition from the existing 38 foot curb-to-curb section to the new 44 foot wide section shall occur over a minimum of 100 feet. The existing right-of-way and easement lines should be modified to match these requirements. It may be that the existing right-of-way exceeds the proposed right-of-way above in which case there would be no change to right-of-way, but the sum total of right-of-way and easement shall be as prescribed above with a new easement line being developed appropriately. 4. The Leslie access points will require an 11 foot left-turn lane consisting of 75 feet of full width storage and 100 feet of taper. Additional widening will be required as necessary on the south side of the road to provide for this (unless already constructed). The taper rate on approach and departure shall be at 20:1. If the developer is “first-in” and medians are not yet installed, then c-curb or an alternative solution must be provided to physically limit exiting left-turns from the western access point. If the center median is installed as part of the project, some c-curb will be required extending from the west side of the median on the south side of the road will be required in order to limit the left-turn egress. 5. At the final plat, the developer shall contribute $30,292 total for the cost of adding roundabouts at the intersections of, the 5-corners intersection of Hildebrand/Steptoe/Clodfelter /10th, and Leslie Road at Clodfelter Road to mitigate the project’s traffic impacts at these intersections. This can be accomplished with either an escrow agreement or irrevocable five-year letter of credit approved by the City. The standard escrow form may be obtained through the Public Works Administrative Office. If the developer disagrees with the assigned contributions for traffic mitigation, the developer has the right to hire an independent Traffic Engineering Consultant to prepare a Traffic Impact Study to evaluate appropriate impacts and mitigations. No work should start on such a study until consulting with the City of Kennewick Traffic Engineer. TRAFFIC MITIGATION FEE CALCULATIONS Project Trip Generation: TYPE OF PROJECT PROJECT SIZE AVERAGE WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION (vpd) Single Family Detached Housing (Land Use 210) 35 units 396 Average Weekday Trip Rate determined from the 8th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. EXHIBIT A-7 Page 4 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- PP 11-01 Page 3 of 3 Mitigation Cost Calculations: Specific Mitigation Project(s) Mitigation Cost Estimate Main Street ADT Minor Street ADT Projec t Trips Percent of Trips using Mitigation Project Trips using Mitigation Percent Respons- ible Cost Leslie & Clodfelter Road Roundabout $ 300,000 2,015 0 396 40% 158 7.3% $ 21,864 5-Corners Roundabout (Clodfelter/Steptoe/10th/ Hildebrand) $ 300,000 5,480 0 396 40% 158 2.8% $ 8,428 Total Costs 600,000 $ 30,292 $ Note: Leslie & Clodfelter ADT is total ADT of both roads combined based on a calculation from the TransCAD model runs of 2005 and 2025 for this intersection. Calculating the growth factor, the PM peak volumes were projected to 2016 which is the analysis year required for this project per KAC 13-08. This calculated PM volume was converted to an ADT using a 12% DHV, which is the 2016 ADT calculated above. 5-Corners Roundabout ADT was calculated in the same manner. Project Calculation Method: Formula: Project Trip Generation multiplied by the percent of trips using the intersection divided by sum of Main Street and Minor Street Average Daily Traffic (ADT) plus project trips using mitigation and then multiplied by the cost of the mitigation measure equals the project incremental traffic mitigation fee. EXHIBIT A-7 Page 5 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Wes Romine From: Sent: To: Subject: Yes, John Deskins Monday, May 02,2011 2:04 PM Wes Romine RE: Leslie (Ridgeline) R/W and Cross-Section The Canyon Ranch project meets concurrency requirements. Sincerely, John Deskins, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineer Gity of Kennewick, Washington (509) 585-4400 (509) 585-4451 Fax From: Wes Romine Sent: Monday, May 02,2011 10:06 AM To: John Deskins Subject: RE: Leslie (Ridgeline) R/W and Cross-Section John, I haven't found any comments from you regarding Concurrency. Does this project meet the City's requirements for Concurrency? Thanks, Wes Romine Development Services Manager City of Kennewick 210 W .6th Avenue Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 585-4558 From: John Deskins Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 20IL 3:43 PM To: Wes Romine Cc: Dan Kaufman; Ken Nelson Subject: Leslie (Ridgeline) R/W and Cross-Section Wes, It has recently been determined that the existing R/W line in large part exceeds the requirement forthe COK Standard Drawing 2-3 Sheet 2 of 2 cross section that is required for both the Matt Smith project and forthe Edward Rose project. Ihere have been some questions as to how to handle this. The Traffic Comments for both developments state that: EXHIBIT A-7 Page 6 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- "lt may be that the existing right-of-way exceeds the proposed right-of-way above in which case there would be no change to right-of-way, but the sum total of right-of-way and easement shall be as prescribed above with a new easement line being developed appropriately." ln fact, most of the property probably has R/W that exceeds the sum total of required R/W and easement from the standard cross section. Our preference at this time is for the R/W to remain as located, noting that appropriate R/W and/or easement should be dedicated anywhere where it is found that it is currently insufficient to meet the requirements of the COK Standard Drawing 2-3 Sheet 2 of 2; however, we would entertain a request from either party if they wish forthe City to vacate the R/W such that it would match the standard cross section. Otherwise, we would request that they submit a request for a license agreement for maintenance of the property within this area. Sincerely, John Deskins, PE, PTOE Traffic Engineer Glty of Kennewick, (509) 585-4400 (509) 585-4451 Fax EXHIBIT A-7 Page 7 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Wes Romine From: Doug Carl [[EMAIL REDACTED]] Sent: Friday, April29, 2011 1:27 PM To: Wes Romine Subject: RE: Canyon Ranch Subdivision Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Wes, The schools that will serve that area are: Cottonwood Elementary Desert Hills Middle School Kamiakin High School Students living in that area would be bused to schools. lwouldbetherightpersontofieldtheserequestsl Letmeknowifyouneedanythingadditionally. Da4rh¿7/f. eø,/ Director of Capital Projects Kennewick School District #17 622 N, Kellogg Kennewick, WA 99336 doug.carl@ksd,oro (509)222-7667 Work (509)222-5057 Fax From : Wes Rom i ne [ma ilto : Wes. Rom ine@ci. kennewick.wa. us] Sent: Friday, April 29,207L 11:31 AM To: Doug Carl Subject: Canyon Ranch Subdivision Doug, I have another subdivision that I need information as to where the public schools are located that would serve this developmentiniftheyarewalkzonesorif busingisavailable. Thisisfora35 lotsinglefamilysubdivisionnorthof Leslie Road between Clearwater and Clodfelter. l'm trying to finish the staff report Monday, May 2no so if there is any way you can get me the information by noon on Monday I will appreciate it. Also, if there is another contact person at the KSD that I should be sending these requests to please let me know. Thank you, Wes Romine Development Services Manager City of Kennewick 210W .6th Avenue Kennewick, WA 99336 (509) 585-4558 EXHIBIT A-7 Page 8 of 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 Wes Romine From: Joe Terpenning Sent: Monday, May 02, 2011 2:51 PM To: Wes Romine Subject: Canyon Ranch Wes, The following two items shall apply to the proposed Canyon Ranch development : 1. Install fire hydrants in accordance with International Fire Code, Appendix C (at intersections and average 500 foot spacing). 2. If the project is phased, all dead end streets over 150 feet shall be provided with an approved means for turning around fire apparatus (hammerhead or bulb). Joe Terpenning, Captain Kennewick Fire Department 509‐585‐4563 EXHIBIT A-7 Page 9 of 9