Document Jerome_doc_e3e115b024

City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser REGULAR MEETING May 13, 2025 7:00 p.m. Please Note: Speakers who have been given the floor may be limited to three minutes of discussion. Any item can be added or removed from the consent calendar prior to the meeting. 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Public Hearing for a request from Farmers Bank for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing automotive sales, on the property described as Lot 8, block 1, South Lincoln Business Park SEC 24-8- 16, more commonly known as 1441 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. 3. Consider a request from Farmers Bank for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing automotive sales, on the property described as Lot 8, block 1, South Lincoln Business Park SEC 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1441 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho- action item 4. Public Hearing for a request from DL Evans Bank for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing automotive sales, on the property described as Tax 3, Block A-170, JT SW 19-8-17, more commonly known as 980 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho. 5. Consider a request from DL Evans Bank for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing automotive sales, on the property described as Tax 3, Block A-170, JT SW 19-8-17, more commonly known as 980 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho – action item 6. Public Hearing for a request from Jerome Cemetery District for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing six cows, on the property described as Tax 6, Block A-285 Inside Acreage, SW 24-8-16 approximately 5.028 acres, more commonly known as the western most pasture at the end of West Avenue I, Jerome, Idaho. 7. Consider a request from Jerome Cemetery District for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing six cows, on the property described as Tax 6, Block A-285 Inside Acreage, SW 24-8-16 approximately 5.028 acres, more commonly known as the western most pasture at the end of West Avenue I, Jerome, Idaho - action item 8. Public Hearing for a request from TKO Homes, LLC. c/o Jared Hunt for a Special Use Permit allowing eight duplex units, on the property described as Lots 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, 14B,15A and 15B, Block 1 Jerome Estates Sub Phase 6 (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as the empty lots in the northeast corner of Jerome Estates Subdivision, that boarders North Lincoln and North Ash Street, Jerome, Idaho. 9. Consider a request from TKO Homes, LLC. c/o Jared Hunt for a Special Use Permit allowing eight duplex units, on the property described as Lots 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, 14B,15A and 15B, Block 1 Jerome Estates Sub Phase 6 (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as the empty lots in the northeast corner of Jerome Estates Subdivision, that boarders North Lincoln and North Ash Street, Jerome, Idaho - action item ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser 10. Public Hearing for a request from Venigno Arinaga for a Variance reducing the side yard setback to five feet, on the property described as Lot 14 Block 128 Jerome Townsite 6250 Sqft (NE 24-8-16), more commonly known as 410 West Avenue E, Jerome, Idaho. 11. Consider a request from Venigno Arinaga for a Variance reducing the side yard setback to five feet, on the property described as Lot 14 Block 128 Jerome Townsite 6250 Sqft (NE 24-8-16), more commonly known as 410 West Avenue E, Jerome, Idaho - action item 12. Consider a Design Review for Maria De Jesus Mejia, 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. 13. Discussion Noise Ordinance Update – action item 14. Citizen Correspondence and Issues 15. Consent Agenda- action item The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the April 8th, 2025, regular meeting. B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Quadrant Investments LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as the pasture on the south side of East Yakima Avenue between 715 East Yakima Avenue and 79 East 200 South, Jerome, Idaho. C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from South Tiger Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property described as Jerome Unplatted Tax 2215519 of NESE 19-8-17, more commonly known as the cultivated farm ground to the east of 800 blk East Ave I, J, and K (Hovey Subdivision), south of 821 East Ave H, and west of the East Ave K cul-de-sac. 16. Discussion Period & Staff Reports 17. Adjournment Note: Any person needing special accommodations to participate in the above-noted meeting should contact City Hall (City Planner [PHONE REDACTED] x 140) seven days before the meeting. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit Renewal – Automotive Sales 1441 South Lincoln Ave., Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: General Business Setbacks: N/A, cannot park any vehicles in the right of way. Summary: The applicant is requesting the renewal of the SUP for the third time to allow automated sales, with no changes to the application. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, City Planner Date: May 13, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the Special Use Permit renewal request from Farmers Bank/JP Property LLC allowing automotive sales, on the property known as Lot 8, Block 1, South Lincoln Business Park SEC 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1441 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Request: Staff Report I. Background: Farmers Bank received a Special Use Permit for automotive sales in June 2019 and renewed it in June 2020. The automotive sales are conducted on the bare lot north of the bank, and do not impact neighboring businesses' entrances or parking. Farmers Bank allows employees, bank customers, and any collateral for bank loans on the lot. They do not allow junked or salvage vehicles. Staff have not received any complaints or concerns during the last five years. Farmers Bank is asking for a renewal of the permit with no changes. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. The property in question, 1441 South Lincoln Avenue, is currently zoned General Business as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. The proposed use, automotive sales, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. III. As pertains to Title 8 of the JMC, the ordinance addressing nuisances a. Vehicles placed on the property shall not be abandoned, wrecked, or junked as defined in 8.16.040 of the JMC. IV. As pertains to Title 16 of the JMC, the Subdivision Ordinance a. Title 16 has no bearing on this request. V. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan it complies with Chapter 6, Our Quality of Life: Our Quality of Life Goal: Foster a supportive, healthy, and resilient community of residents, rooted in Jerome’s rich history, that collaborates to welcome visitors and newcomers, and offers opportunities for everyone to live, work, and play. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org VI. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: i. Vehicles shall be parked on private property and not in the public right- of-way; ii. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and iii. Special Use permit shall be permanent. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 13th day of May 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Farmers Bank for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing automotive sales, on the property described as Lot 8, block 1, South Lincoln Business Park SEC 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1441 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by May 7th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon May 9th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 18th day of April 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: April 26th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 3 1 2 1 1 2 10 13 11 12 4B 4A 3D 3C 3A 3B 3G 3F 3E 4D 4C 21 27 9 1 3 5 7 8 6 4 2 68 69 33 31 30 34 35 37 41 40 39 38 51 52 53 49 48 47 46 50 5957 55 65 62 61 64 74 75 76 77 79 80 85 86 87 92 91 96 97 10 27 25 23 19 17 15 13 11 12141618 20 222426 28 218 314 323 237 238 310 199 183 167 151 135 [PHONE REDACTED] 1441 1343 1323 1285 1225 1555 1515 1575 1532 1703 1466 1410 1302 1228 1 5 1 3 5 6 Lincoln Plaza Valley Country Store Rich Thompson Trucking Inc USDA Darigold Trailer Yard Southside Park B & R Bearing Napa Auto Parts First Federal Bank Progressive Dairyman Farmers National Bank Automated Dairy Systems Farm Bureau Dairy Health Plaza Mexico Family Health Today's Dental Links Properties Farnsworth Mortuary S Lincoln Ave W Nez Perce Ave E Nez Perce Ave Bridon Way Country Ln S Buchanan St 1 inch = 300 feet . Lot Pin RPJ17500010080A 750ft Nearest Neighbor . April 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- I/we, K Eliin+ , certiry rnur ot^ , the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within feet of the property located at and a notice was posted at said property on PIJBLIC NOTICE AFFIDAVIT Witness: My commission t5D Please attach: \ \ I 1. Public Hearing Notice f \ I 2. Property Owners within the designated map area t \l 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested address or legal description (at least I 5 days prior to hearing) R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1 a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July'24.doc ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit Renewal – Automotive Sales 980 South Lincoln Ave., Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: General Business Setbacks: N/A, cannot park any vehicles in the right of way. Summary: The applicant is requesting the renewal of the SUP for the third time to allow automated sales, with no changes to the application. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, City Planner Date: May 13, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the Special Use Permit renewal request from Kelly Human, representing D.L. Evans Bank, allowing automotive sales, on the property known as Tax 3, Block A-170, JT SW 19-8-17, more commonly known as 980 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Request: Staff Report I. Background: D.L. Evans Bank received a Special Use Permit for automotive sales in April 2019 and renewed it in May 2020. The automotive sales are conducted on the bare lot north of the bank parking lot. The area does not impact the entrance or parking of neighboring businesses. D.L. Evans Bank allows individuals to park for sale by owner vehicles, trailers, and RVs for up to two weeks. They do not allow junked or salvage vehicles. Staff have not received any complaints or concerns during the last five years. Mr. Human is asking for a renewal of the permit with no changes. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. The property in question, 980 South Lincoln Avenue, is currently zoned General Business as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. The proposed use, automotive sales, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. III. As pertains to Title 8 of the JMC, the ordinance addressing nuisances a. Vehicles placed on the property shall not be abandoned, wrecked, or junked as defined in 8.16.040 of the JMC. IV. As pertains to Title 16 of the JMC, the Subdivision Ordinance a. Title 16 has no bearing on this request. V. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan it complies with Chapter 6, Our Quality of Life: Our Quality of Life Goal: Foster a supportive, healthy, and resilient community of residents, rooted in Jerome’s rich history, that collaborates to welcome visitors and newcomers, and offers opportunities for everyone to live, work, and play. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org VI. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: i. Vehicles shall be parked on private property and not in the public right- of-way; ii. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and iii. Special Use permit shall be permanent. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 13th day of May 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from DL Evans Bank for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing automotive sales, on the property described as Tax 3, Block A-170, JT SW 19-8-17, more commonly known as 980 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by May 7th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon May 9th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 18th day of April 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: April 26th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 18 11 16 15 12 16 16 16 12 16 13 16 16 16 16 16 10 10 16 10 12 16 12 16 21 27 12 13 11 10 6 8 5 3 1 9 6 7 8 5 4 3 2 1 9 1 3 5 7 8 6 4 2 VUT SRQ M O P L K J I H F E D B A 10 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 68 69 33 31 30 34 35 37 41 40 39 38 51 52 53 49 48 47 46 50 5957 55 65 62 61 64 74 75 76 77 79 80 85 86 87 92 91 96 97 10 27 25 23 19 17 15 13 11 121416 18 20 222426 28 18 14 10 22 42 52 46 32 36 28 40 62 56 66 325 423 405 427 419 415 411 407 403 425 421 417 413 409 419 418 422 434 430 438 426 418 417 421 425 429 433 437 423 427 431 435 439 422 426 430 434 438 129 121 115 316 601 431 427 423 417 413 409 401 429 421 417 415 409 405 401 430 420 418 416 414 400 329 321 319 313 309 305 301 328 314 312 308 304 301 307 309 315 321 325 329 128 120 200 208 212 218 220 230 229 225 223 219 217 129 125 129 201 213 215 221 227 406 404 400 414 426 420 408 712 702 328 326 322 314 312 310 300 224 220 216 212 208 200 114 112 106 714 429 419 403 331 323 317 313 311 301 209 219 217 211 201 221 229 115 125 129 801 975 901 218 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 115 100 106 215 411 401 327 323 319 315 309 305 301 227 221 215 209 307 311 315 321 325 329 401 407 411 415 419 425 429 433 304 308 314 318 322 326 408 412 416 420 424 148 202 210 216 222 228 306 310 314 320 324 328 400 406 410 414 418 424 428 432 503 437 427 421 415 409 333 327 321 315 309 303 237 231 225 219 213 209 203 123 115 109 103 527 521 515 509 508 514 520 526 527 521 515 509 409 415 420 414 412 402 403 409 415 421 403 409 415 421 420 414 408 335 329 323 317 311 307 303 304 306 310 316 322 328 329 323 317 311 303 300 304 310 316 322 328 329 323 317 311 301 225 225 201 221 229 219 508 936 934 924 922 501 503 511 515 523 525 609 600 520 512 303 305 315 401 921 424 412 406 400 332 326 324 320 316 310 306 942 930 928 906 230 222 122 909 913 919 923 927 929 117 119 125 127 203 207 213 219 223 225 980 942 932 910 900 417 409 820 810 320 309 305 301 225 219 215 211 205 201 126 125 121 117 832 808 600 524 518 516 510 504 800 517 509 501 514 524 603 601 519 517 515 501 701 420 412 408 402 415 413 401 300 310 312 316 320 324 328 329 325 321 319 317 309 305 301 118 120 124 128 131 716 706 700 113 229 225 221 219 213 209 205 201 200 212 218 220 224 135 125 121 117 113 109 602 610 628 634 104 108 116 122 130 200 204 216 218 220 224 228 231 225 221 217 213 209 205 201 326 320 318 312 308 300 325 323 317 315 309 305 604 428 416 412 404 400 604 409 413 419 421 606 602 601 605 602 524 518 512 640 [PHONE REDACTED] 1005 1027 1035 1031 1027 1023 1019 1013 1009 1005 1001 1323 1285 1225 1302 1201 1200 1002 1120 1016 1100 1210 1120 1102 1038 1030 1228 910C 914C 914B 910B 914A 910A 1 5 2 1 3 6 4 5 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 148 153 147 154 133 134 155 146 156 145 136 135 144 157 158 143 137 138 159 142 141 160 139 140 A-167 A-164 A-170 A-291 A-290 A-172 A-169 A-171 A-161 A-162 A-168 A-173 A-174 A-178 A-179 A-180 Ridley's D & B Supply Rotary Park Windwood Apts Southside Park B & R Bearing Majestic Meadows Candlelight Park Thompson Subdivision Family Dollar Retail Spaces Jerome Homes Plaza Mexico Links Properties Old Hickory Sheds S Davis St E Avenue I S Lincoln Ave E Avenue F E Avenue H W Avenue I W Avenue F W Avenue H W Avenue G E Avenue G W Avenue K E Avenue J S Alder St W Avenue J S Adams St E Avenue K S Birch St S Cedar St S Cleveland St S Buchanan St Thompson Ct. S Eisenhower St E Avenue G S Birch St S Alder St S Birch St S Cedar St S Cleveland St W Avenue J S Cedar St S Buchanan St 1 inch = 400 feet . 980 South Lincoln Nearest Neighbor 750ft 980 South Lincoln April 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFFIDAVIT I/we, ( t tlli r* , certify that on 04 ,0085 narne(s) date o{ mailing (at least I 5 days prior to hearing) the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within l5() feet of the properly located at and a notice was posted at said properly on Please attach: \ \ f 1. Public Hearing Notice f \l 2. Property Owners within the designated map area t \ 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested \ (at least 15 days prior to hearing) R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Tempiates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July'24.doc My commi s si on ire_:i:% =*H:'*orAs y W lfudrt Lltir't+ wffi ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit Renewal – Automotive Sales Westernmost pasture at the end of West Ave I, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: Residential 3 (R-3) Setbacks: N/A Summary: The applicant requests the renewal of the SUP for the third time to allow cattle to keep the weeds and grass down until the district expands. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, City Planner Date: May 13, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the Special Use Permit renewal request from the Jerome Cemetery District allowing six cows, on the property known as Tax 6, Block A-285 Inside Acreage, SW 24-8-16 approximately 5.03 acres, more commonly known as the westernmost pasture at the end of West Avenue I, Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Request: Staff Report I. Background: The Cemetery District purchased approximately five acres in 2017. They fixed the fence and updated the irrigation system. They want to keep the cows on the property to keep the weeds and grass down until the cemetery expands. The Cemetery District received a special use permit for six cows in May of 2018 and renewed it in June 2020. The Cemetery owns the property to the south, with City right of way located to the east, and two homes located to the north. There were cows on the property before the Cemetery District purchased it. Staff have not received any complaints or concerns during the last five years. The Cemetery District would like to renew its permit with no changes to the application. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. The property in question, westernmost pasture at the end of West Avenue I, is currently zoned Residential 3 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. The proposed use, the possession of livestock, cows, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. c. The application was approved before the update to the City code for livestock keeping; however, it is noted that they do not exceed the current restriction of no more than six total head of livestock. d. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, this request complies with the Comprehensive Plan as relates to Chapter 3, Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.j. Consider provisions in the zoning ordinance for rural residential uses within city limits, including some agricultural activity and limited animal husbandry. III. Regarding Title 8 of the JMC, the ordinance addressing nuisances a. According to 8.08.010, stable matter is considered a public nuisance according to the following definition: ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org Stable Matter can become a nuisance if animals are not properly maintained. IV. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds, and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds, or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: i. Fencing shall be maintained; ii. Will not create odors, noise, or be detrimental to persons, property, or the general welfare; iii. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and iv. Special Use Permit shall be permanent until the cemetery expands to the pasture. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 13th day of May 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Jerome Cemetery District for a renewal of a Special Use Permit allowing six cows, on the property described as Tax 6, Block A-285 Inside Acreage, SW 24-8-16 approximately 5.028 acres, more commonly known as the western most pasture at the end of West Avenue I, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by May 7th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon May 9th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 18th day of April 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: April 26th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 1 8 524 512 608 612 604 520 516 515 519 523 527 601 605 609 511 515 519 523 603 607 611 514 518 522 526 600 604 608 619 618 601 615 708 525 519 704 706 715 616 606 717 528 520 805 615 609 535 523 913 901 705 810 814 923 921 917 915 901 701 710LS 829LS 150 151 A-285 A-284 A-294 A-293 A-286 A-283 A-295 A-287 A-282 A-281 A-288 A-292 Cemetery S Fir St 100 West Rd W Avenue H West Blvd S Elm St W Avenue I W Avenue G Thompson Ct. W Avenue F W Avenue I 1 inch = 300 feet . Cemetary Lot Nearest Neighbor 500ft Cemetery Pasture April 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFFIDAVIT I/we, (.fu E \ticJ" , certiry that on frpr'I &rl ,gOA5 narne(s) dat'e of mailing (at least 15 days pfior to hearing; the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all properly owners within feet of the properly tocated at KPJ \310&850qs3+ address or legal description and a notice was posted at said property on Witness: My commission ""Oo"r, {riJ_{!#f Please attach: I 1. Public Hearing Notice I 2. Property Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested (at least 1 5 days pdor to hearing) R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July,24.doc t t i ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit – Duplexes Jerome Estates, Ash Street N, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: Neighborhood Business (C-1) Subdivision: Yes, Jerome Estates Setbacks: Front, 25’, Rear 10’, interior and street side 25’ Landscape Required: Yes Summary: The applicant requests to build a duplex on each platted lot. Access would be from a private drive on North Ash Street. No access from North Lincoln is permitted. Each building will meet the parking requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: May 13, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the Special Use Permit request from TKO Homes, LLC. c/o Jared Hunt for a Special Use Permit allowing eight duplex units, on the property described as Lots 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, 14B,15A, and 15B, Block 1 Jerome Estates Sub Phase 6 (NE 13-8-16), Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Permit Request: Staff Report I. Background: The parcels are currently bare and zoned commercial. When Jerome Estates was initially platted, these lots were planned for four-plexes. As the subdivision has been built with single-family homes, the applicant would like to request to build duplexes instead of fourplexes on each platted lot. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. The property is zoned Neighborhood Business as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. The proposed use, duplex (two dwelling units), requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. c. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows i. Front: 25’, Rear 10’, Interior Side Side Street 25’ ii. Minimum lot size: N/A iii. Maximum height: 35’ III. As pertains to Title 16 of the JMC, the Subdivision Ordinance a. Title 16 has no bearing on this Special Use Permit request as the lots are already platted. IV. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, the request is in accordance with: a. Chapter 4. Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” i. Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. 1. 4.3.e Consider zoning ordinance amendments to promote a variety of housing types, including higher density residential along corridors and adjacent to commercial and industrial areas. 2. 4.4: Support development of affordable housing for a full range of employees and residents (retirees and families). ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org Special Use Permit Criteria Staff Analysis V. 17.60.030: GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed special use in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that such use at the proposed location: a. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved; i. Staff Analysis: The Planning and Zoning Code allows two-dwelling units in the C-1 zone with an approved special use permit. b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; i. Staff Analysis: The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; i. Staff Analysis: This area has residential uses to the north, east, and west, as well as schools, a dental office, and a restaurant to the south. Building duplexes will not change the existing or intended character of the area. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; i. Staff Analysis: There are no hazardous or disturbing impacts from constructing more residential uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; i. Staff Analysis: Water and sewer connections are available to serve the property in Ash Street. The parcels are part of the platted subdivision and will be served by public and private streets. f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; i. Staff Analysis: There is no indication that residential uses will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org i. Staff Analysis: It is not anticipated that the addition of two housing units per lot will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of noise or traffic. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; i. Staff Analysis: Access to the units will be from Ash Street and then from a private drive. No access from N Lincoln is allowed. This will not create any interference or delays on N Lincoln Avenue. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Staff Analysis: This use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. VI. 17.26: OFF STREET PARKING: Per the Jerome Municipal Code this project shall comply with section 17.26 as follows: a. 17.26.150: Schedule of Parking Requirements: Multi-family dwellings with two or more bedrooms shall have two parking spaces with .25 for guest parking. “Adjacent on street parking on a local street may be credited towards the guest parking”. o Each building will have four parking spaces with adequate on-street parking for guests. VII. 17.18.070: LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: a. This project is located in the C-1 district and would require landscaping for commercial use. I recommend that the white vinyl fencing be placed along the north parcel line and N Lincoln, with a minimum of landscape rock between the walking path and the fence line. VIII. STAFF COMMENTS: a. Fire had comments on the private drive on signage, which has been shared with the applicant. IX. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the commission may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: i. Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; ii. Provide CC&Rs for the maintenance of the private road when a building permit is submitted; iii. Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; iv. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and v. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 13th day of May 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from TKO Homes, LLC. c/o Jared Hunt for a Special Use Permit allowing eight duplex units, on the property described as Lots 12A, 12B, 13A, 13B, 14A, 14B,15A and 15B, Block 1 Jerome Estates Sub Phase 6 (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as the empty lots in the northeast corner of Jerome Estates Subdivision, that boarders North Lincoln and North Ash Street, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by May 7th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon May 9th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 18th day of April 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: April 26th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 2 3 2 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 3 15 18 16 10 14 11 11 17 22 16 17 10 11 12 13 10 12 13 14 15 16 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 12 11 10 12 11 10 10 11 12 10 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 110 114 118 204 208 212 216 220 224 302 306 111 115 119 203 207 211 215 219 223 303 307 200 108 112 116 204 208 216 220 212 304 308 312 137117 121 129 133 125 211 215 219 223 227 231 364 359 367 363 370 360 109 311 315 319 323 327 331 413 417 421 425 429 431 200 212 310 314 318 322 432 428 424 420 416 412 330 326 501 505 506 502 309 213 209 205 201 119 115 111 109 105 108 112 122 118 114 110 106 113 109 101 103 100 104 503 507 513 506 502 503 509 232 224 218 231 221 217 231 223 219 230 222 218 101 103 105 107 113 115 111 109 117 119 121 123 121 125 117 111 203 207 213 219 225 231 309 315 321 325 363 371 405 415 427 242 238 232 226 220 214 210 114 508 556 544 532 412 434 519 509 509 525 508 121 125 205 209 215 219 225 229 305 309 313 103 125 119 113 109 205 209 215 219 227 233 237 243 249 129 216 312 308 304 230 226 224 220 248 246 238 232 226 222 216 210 204 134 128 122 116 110 102 337 464 456 440 332 400 412 500 220 224 228 304 308 312 104 114 122 136 204 214 230 304 322 328 101 213 217 221 225 229 305 309 313 221 229 237 309 313 321 325 441 455 333 403 [PHONE REDACTED] 1136 1144 1208 1216 1222 1228 1304 1308 1720 1824 1820 1816 1812 1718 1900 1904 1905 1709 1705 1701 1702 1706 1710 1714 1713 1716 1712 1708 1704 1715 1719 1817 1813 1809 1711 1707 1703 1428 1432 1436 1508 1512 1444 1456 1510 1200 1230 1226 1516 1704 1808 1814 1822 1517 1601 1605 1510 1514 1518 1600 1604 1605 1601 1521 1517 1513 1509 1503 1500 1504 1508 1512 1516 1520 1600 1604 1421 1417 1413 1409 1410 1414 1418 1422 1604 1608 1409 1413 1417 1410 1414 1418 1409 1413 1417 1410 1414 1418 1604 1600 1520 1516 1512 1508 1504 1500 1501 1505 1509 1513 1517 1521 1601 1605 1604 1600 1520 1516 1512 1508 1504 1500 1501 1505 1509 1513 1517 1521 1601 1605 1605 1601 1521 1517 1513 1509 1505 1501 1409 1413 1417 1421 1422 1421 1422 1421 1504 1500 1422 1418 1414 1410 1509 1513 1409 1413 1417 1421 1501 1505 1504 1500 1422 1418 1414 1410 1505 1508 1512 1409 1413 1417 1421 1501 1304 1305 1409 1408 1412 1413 1422 1421 1201 1301 1128 1118 1222 1204 1236 1302 1410 1402 1408 1414 1418 1424 1312 1471 1451 1441 1437 1407 1417 1431 1462 1470 1480 1490 1418 1340 1328 1304 1450 1506 1526 1510 1500 1530 1534 1538 1542 1502 1520 1501 1505 1509 1511 1511 1519 1527 1533 1803 1809 1815 1823 1903 1909 1915 1 1 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 7 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 2 3 1 4 5 1 2 1 5 3 4 7 9 11 10 10 A-219 A-235 A-228 A-227 A-220 Jerome Middle School Summit Elementary School Camozzi Park Drainage N Lincoln Ave 16th Ave E 16th Ave W 13th Ave W N Date St 15th Ave E Teton Dr Alpine Dr N Cedar St Glacier Dr N Alder St N Davis St Rainier Dr E Mountain View Dr 14th Ave W N Cottonwood St N Birch St W 17th Avenue W 18th Avenue N Buchanan St 15th Ave W Clover Creek Drive Gazebo Ct N Adams St 11th Ave E 12th Ave E N Ash St Paradise Dr Mountain View Dr 100 North Rd W Teton Dr 12th Ave E N Birch St 14th Ave W N Alder St N Birch St 15th Ave W Glacier Dr N Davis St 11th Ave E 3 6 8 6 8 1 inch = 400 feet . Jerome Estates Nearest Neighbor1000ft Jerome Estates April 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFFIDAVIT r/we, Kht [lii,t+ , certify that on 44 ,0#f name(s) date oflrnailing (at least 15 days prior to hearing) the attached Notice orPubric Hearing was [,3i"41#dlf,Af{?fJffiffi];lj$fi zpl&500rDrlAA,RpJrilin},$ I ,tnI feet of the property located "t Ugfg@O 64luolarSl and a notice was posted at said propefiy on Witr-re 1 . Public Hearir-rg Notice 2. Properly Owners witl-rin the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested Please 1 r1l r il rlr t attacl-r: at least l 5 days prior to hearing) Nanre(s) R:\0'1 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July,24.doc MYcommission$ffi wffi ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Variance – Residential Interior Side Setback 410 West Ave E, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: Residential 3 (R-3) Subdivision: No, original townsite (each parcel is 50’ x 125’) Setbacks: Front 15’, Rear 20’, Interior Side 7’ Summary: The applicant requests a variance from 7’ to 5’ for an addition that will match the existing house. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: May 13, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the request from Venigno Arinaga for a Variance, allowing a reduced side yard setback on the property located at 410 West Ave E, Jerome, Idaho. Variance Request: Staff Analysis I. Background—The home at 410 West Avenue E was established several years ago as part of a group of homes brought in and placed with the old setback requirements. The applicant is remodeling and would like to make the new addition line up with the existing house, which is setback at five feet, not seven feet on the interior side. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC: a. The property in question, 410 West Ave E, is currently zoned Residential 3 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. Per JMC, 17.03.710: Setback Line, “A line established by this title, generally parallel with and measured from the lot line, defining the limits of a yard in which no building or structure may be located aboveground except as may be provided herein.” c. Setbacks for the R-3 zone are Front 25’, Rear 20’, Side and Street Side 15’. i. The home is setback 5’ from the interior property line. d. Per JMC, 17.14.020, B: Note Conditions: i. Setback reductions (to be measured from the foundation to the property line) III. The Jerome Municipal Code defines a Variance as: a. A modification of the requirements of this title as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings or other provisions of this title affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or special privilege but may be granted to an applicant only upon a showing of undue hardship because of the characteristics of the site and that the variance is not in conflict with the public interest. i. The applicant requests a variance on the side yard setback requirement from seven feet to five feet so that the addition matches the existing home. Variance Criteria Staff Analysis I. 17.70.030: VARIANCES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed variance request in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that the requested variance conforms to the following standards: A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district; • Staff Analysis: The home was built at least 50 years ago, and the interior side setbacks were These homes are very small, and most need to be remodeled and expanded to be livable homes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org B. That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title; • Staff Analysis: This is a large parcel that does not impact the surrounding neighborhood. A literal interpretation would deprive the applicant, as almost every existing home in this area of the city does not comply with the current setbacks. C. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; • Staff Analysis: The applicant did not build the house. The applicant would like to improve the house and the property. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. • The application notes granting the variance will not confer any special privilege on the applicant. The remodel and addition to this parcel will improve the residential area. II. Staff Comments A. None received. III. 17.70.040: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: Under no circumstances shall a variance or an appeal of a variance be granted to allow a use not permissible under the terms of this title and the zoning district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this title in said district. (Ord. 1070, 2010) a. Recommended Conditions: i. The west interior side setback may be reduced to no less than five feet; and ii. Comply with all City, State, and Federal requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 13th day of May 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Venigno Arinaga for a Variance reducing the side yard setback to five feet, on the property described as Lot 14 Block 128 Jerome Townsite 6250 Sqft (NE 24-8-16), more commonly known as 410 West Avenue E, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by May 7th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon May 9th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 18th day of April 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: April 26th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 11 1 2 3 5 6 7 9 8 4 6 5 1 2 3 4 8 7 18 20 21 22 23 24 26 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 325 300 417 410 406 611 605 601 610 606 520 518 516 514 512 500 529 521 513 511 509 503 501 218 226 220 228 208 231 227 221 217 213 209 315 308 314 318 324 326 329 325 317 425 423 419 415 411 407 402 406 410 414 418 422 426 431 427 423 417 413 409 401 527 525 521 517 515 509 505 501 500 502 506 508 514 522 526 528 526 624 604 600 601 603 615 603 607 611 602 619 613 618 612 601 501 529 525 517 511 502 708 525 519 515 513 509 507 501 429 421 417 415 409 405 401 430 420 418 416 414 400 329 321 319 313 309 305 301 328 314 312 308 304 301 307 309 315 321 325 329 208 212 218 220 230 229 225 223 219 217 213 215 221 227 704 706 717 712 702 710LS 150 149 131 130 111 129 132 112 148 147 133 128 113 134 127 114 146 135 126 115 Sutco Mobile Homes W Avenue E W Avenue D W Avenue F S Date St S Birch St S Elm St S Cedar St W Avenue C S Elm St W Avenue C 1 inch = 200 feet . 410 W Ave E Nearest Neighbor 500ft 410 West Ave E April 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFFIDAVIT I/We, narne(s) the attached Notice of Public Hearing was certify that on frf nt A4 , Aqc. date of Inailing (at least lS-days prior to hearing) SO feet of the property located at mailed to all property owners within and a notice was posted at said property on /tV., it A1 " datb ofposting (at least I 5 days prior to hearing) Witn 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Properly Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested ease attach: PI d I l l l R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July,24.doc l(,lrr Iltilr Pnnted Name(s) ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: May 13, 2025 Subject: Design Review for Alfonso Piedra and Maria de Jesus Mejia for a new pre- fabricated building located at 975 South Lincoln, Jerome, ID Mr. Piedra and Ms. Jesus Mejia were approved for a special use permit for automotive sales. The parcel is currently bare, and they propose to develop the eastern half at this time. They propose a small, approximately 420 square-foot building for office space, a restroom, and a storage area. The following Design Review Guidelines should be considered: Section 5.1 Site Planning Guideline #1 Adjacent Buildings and Uses Other commercial and residential developments surround the project area. Guidelines #4-5 Street Alignment and Retaining Walls The driveway approaches are existing from S Lincoln. One new access is proposed from East Avenue I. Retaining walls are not needed. Guideline #6 Snow Storage Snow storage can be stored on-site. Guideline #9 Screen Service Areas Utilities will blend with the landscape and the building. Guidelines #10 - #12 Off- Street, On-Street Parking, and Circulation All parking is on-site. Employees can park in front of the building or to the side, with ample room for vehicles to be displayed. Section 5.2 Architecture Guideline #13 Enhance Jerome Classic Styles The proposed building will be placed on a one-story foundation with windows on the front and rear elevations. Guidelines #22 and #24 Wall Materials and Wall Colors The wall material includes textures board siding in the color Pearly White and trim in Caviar. The roof will be metal. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org Section 5.3 Landscaping and Site Design Guideline #25 Light Fixtures Exterior lighting will be on the building to provide safety. Guidelines #26 - #36 The parking area for employees and the display area will be asphalt. The large tree on the corner of S Lincoln and West Ave I will remain. Additional trees will be added along S Lincoln Ave, and grasses will be planted along the eastern half of West Ave I. Small shrubs and/or grasses will be planted around the building. Guidelines #38 and #39 Sidewalks and Bike Paths There is an existing sidewalk along South Lincoln and West Avenue I. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Small Commercial Office 975 Lincoln S Jerome, ID SITE PLAN Project Address: Subdivision Print Date: Jerome Townsite 4/24/2025 3 (TYP.) SCALE 1/4"=1'-0" Floor Plan 1 OF Starling Pro Drafting and Design Starling Pro Drafting and Design Starling Pro Drafting and Design Starling Pro Drafting and Design [EMAIL REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] Drafter: N 48'-0" 251'-0" 25'-0" MIN SETBACK 25'-0" MIN SETBACK 12'-0" MIN SETBACK 10'-0" MIN SETBACK 46'-31/2" 80'-0" 25'-0"NEW CURB CUT 60'-0" EXISTING SIDEWALK TREE LANDSCAPING NEW FENCE TIED INTO EXISTING FENCE GRASS BUSH FLOWER BUSH EXISTING FENCE SITE PLAN SCALE: 1/32"=1'-0" 975 LINCOLN AVENUE SOUTH JEROME TOWNESITE 345' W AVENUE I 124.3' LINCOLN AVENUE EXISTING CURB CUT WATER CONNECT 1.5" PIPE SEWER CONNECT 4" PIPE 1" TEE TO AUTOMATIC LANDSCAPING IRRIGATION WITH BACKFLOW SYSTEM ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning & Zoning Meeting April 8th, 2025 This regular meeting of the City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Rod Mink, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. Also present were City Planner Ida Clark, Legal Counsel BJ Hess, and Secretary Katie Elliott. Commissioner Benjamin Reed was excused. Chairman Mink led the audience in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:01 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Quadrant Investments LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as the pasture on the south side of East Yakima Avenue between 715 East Yakima Avenue and 79 East 200 South, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the property was recently annexed into the City. Quadrant is the applicant, but they are seeking the special use permit on behalf of Dairy Farmers of America (DFA). They have the property under contract pending approval or denial of the special use permit. The property is zoned High-Density Business The proposed use, truck terminal yard and truck repair, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear- 10’; Interior Side- 12’; and Side Street- 25’. There is no minimum lot size. However, no more than 80% of the lot can be built on. The maximum height is 50’. Title 16 has no bearing on this Special Use Permit request. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request is in accordance with Chapter 6. Our Quality of Life, “Foster a supportive, healthy, and resilient community of residents, rooted in Jerome’s rich history, that collaborates to welcome visitors and newcomers, and offers opportunities for everyone to live, work, and play.”; Objective 6.2: Diversify the economic base of businesses and industries (through retention, expansion, and recruitment) while preserving Jerome’s identity. This development brings a business from the County into the City limits, allowing it to expand its operations. The company currently transports to Idaho Milk Products (IMP) and utilizes services from Western Dairy Transport. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code allows a truck terminal yard and maintenance in the C-3 zone with an approved SUP. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 and the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity, and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. This area in Jerome blends commercial and industrial uses. To the north is a truck terminal yard and IMP. To the east is one residential home, to the west is a business, and to the south are the railroad tracks. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroder, Ms. Clark stated that the property to the east was part of this property, but they split it where there is one parcel with a house and two parcels that are just land. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. As stated, the property is surrounded by various commercial and industrial uses. There is no indication that the proposed uses will be hazardous or disturbing. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. Water and sewer connections are available to serve the property. At the developer's expense, they can connect from East Yakima Avenue. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. There is no indication that the requested uses will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. A normal amount of noise and traffic will be associated with a truck terminal yard and maintenance facility. Per the applicant, they are a 24/7 operation. Shift changes are from 2:00 am - 6:00 am and 1:00 pm- 4:00 pm. They currently operate from a site south of the interstate, where they travel north to Valley Wide to fuel and then proceed to farms. This development would allow that route to be eliminated. Many of their current routes continue along 200 South/Yakima to deliver milk to IMP, as the permit provides access to the Western Dairy Transport yard adjacent to IMP. While there will be an increase in truck traffic, trucks are already utilizing this route. The increase in noise and traffic should not be excessive. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. Two ---PAGE BREAK--- access points have been shown, and they will work with engineering on any needed access changes. Ms. Clark showed the access points to the commission. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Ms. Clark went over the off-street parking code with the commission. This project requires 54 parking spaces, as shown in the plan, which includes more than 54 spots and parking for trucks. The parking area must be paved and drainage provided. Ms. Clark stated that this project requires landscaping. They propose a 10-foot landscape strip with trees along Yakima Avenue. A fence with gates will surround the property, and landscaping around the building is also planned. Ms. Clark stated she sent the application to City Staff, who reviewed it and did not have any comments or concerns at this time. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and the Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Ms. Clark stated there have been some concerns regarding the condition of the road on East Yakima. This road is currently within a URA district, and they will send bids for a total reconstruction along East Yakima from South Lincoln to South Tiger. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark is not sure of the exact design of the road. Ms. Clark stated the applicant is appearing via zoom. Applicant testimony: Simone Young-Tem, resident of California, appeared via zoom. She stated they have a contract to sell to the parcel to DFA and they have applied on DFA’s behalf. Ms. Young-Tem stated they have seen the plans and they are comfortable signing off on those plans. Testimony in Favor: Cory Johnson, appeared via zoom, stated he is representing DFA if there were any questions. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:14 p.m. Consider a request from Quadrant Investments LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as the pasture on the south ---PAGE BREAK--- side of East Yakima Avenue between 715 East Yakima Avenue and 79 East 200 South, Jerome, Idaho—action item. Commissioner Fraser made a motion to approve the Special Use Permit from Quadrant Investments LLC on behalf of DFA, allowing a Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property more commonly known as 815 East Yakima Ave, Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. Chairman Mink clarified 815 East Yakima Ave as the property's address. Ms. Clark confirmed, yes. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:16 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from South Tiger Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi- family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property described as Jerome Unplatted Tax 2215519 of NESE 19-8-17, more commonly known as the cultivated farm ground to the east of 800 blk East Ave I, J, and K (Hovey Subdivision), south of 821 East Ave H, and west of the East Ave K cul-de-sac. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the property in question is currently zoned General Business The proposed use, multi-family dwellings (five or more units), requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. It is noted that this parcel is approximately 23 acres. The request for multi-family housing would be planned across approximately 15 acres. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear- 10’; Interior Side- 12’; and Side Street- 25’. Ms. Clark stated there is no minimum lot size. However, the development cannot exceed 80% of the total lot area. The maximum height is 50’. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request is in accordance with the following: Chapter 4. Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.”; Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. 4.3.e Consider zoning ordinance amendments to promote a variety of housing types, including higher density residential along corridors and adjacent to commercial and industrial areas. 4.4: Support development of ---PAGE BREAK--- affordable housing for a full range of employees and residents (retirees and families). The commission will need to consider blending single-family housing with 100 units of four-plexes. Ms. Clark stated the Commission should consider Chapter 3. Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.d: consider the impact on the adjacent agricultural business when reviewing new annexations and development applications. Future Land Use Map: The future land use map indicates that this parcel is designated for Residential Low use. As noted, the Future Land Use Map is a guiding document for future development. As stated above, this parcel is currently General Business, and single-family housing isn’t permitted in that zone. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that the Future Land Use Map is a guide. However, the commission must ensure the request aligns with the Comprehensive Plan goals. Staff believes this was an oversight during the Future Land Use Map update, as it was previously designated as Mixed- Use. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code permits multi- family dwellings in the C-2 zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 3.3.d of the Comp Plan must be considered. It is noted that the surrounding farmland is planned for future development of housing and commercial use. The current zoning and the future land use map should also be considered. The protection of the existing single-family neighborhood should also be taken into consideration. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity, and such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The parcel is currently farmland, with single-family housing to the west, public entities to the north, planned commercial development to the east, and single-family housing and a school to the south. The applicant has noted that they plan to request a lot split if the SUP is approved, to retain the remaining acreage to the east for commercial use. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The application states that it is providing a landscape buffer zone with green space between the existing single-family homes and the proposed multi-family housing. They proposed widening and improving the existing fire lane between East Avenue J and East Avenue K. Access will primarily be from East Avenue K, off South Tiger Drive. They will be required to improve half of East Ave I. As proposed, there is no indication that this development would be hazardous to the existing neighboring uses. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson regarding the straightening out of I Street, Ms. Clark stated they would not be straightening the ---PAGE BREAK--- street out. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Fraser, Ms. Clark stated that I Street will not be extended to South Tiger at this time. Ms. Clark showed the commission where this parcel is compared to Frontier Elementary. She stated she cannot confirm whether I Street will be extended to South Tiger. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. Water, sewer, and irrigation are available to serve the property. At the developer's expense, water and sewer can be extended. First responders will have adequate access to the development. The development will be required to meet the fire code. The School District was sent a notice letter of the request, to which we have received no comment. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. There is no indication that the multi-family, residential use will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. It is not anticipated that a multi-family use will be detrimental to any person, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of odors, noise, smoke, fumes, or glare. There will be an increase in traffic production. There are two access points to alleviate congestion when the development is fully built out. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. As previously discussed, the development is proposing two access points. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. There is no indication that the residential use will result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Ms. Clark went over the parking code with the commission. She stated that this project is required to have 225 parking spaces. The application shows over 230 parking spots, and the parking area is paved with a stormwater pond. Regarding the landscaping requirements, Ms. Clark stated that this project is located in the C-2 district. Any multi-family project within this zone must comply with the landscape requirements outlined in 17.18.070. The application includes landscape and green space. The landscape plan will be required as part of the building permit application. A landscape divider ---PAGE BREAK--- will be required for every 21 parking spaces. The commission may also require a fence if it deems it necessary. Ms. Clark stated she sent the application to City Staff, who reviewed the application for the Special Use Permit and have no comment on the SUP at this time. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Dwelling-units will not exceed 100; The special use permit is allowed for the approximately 15 acres as shown in the application; Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Ms. Clark went over the Future Land Use Map with the commission. The commission must ensure the project does not directly conflict with the Comprehensive Plan goals. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated she does not believe the project conflicts with the goals. They are proposing a buffer for the transition from single-family dwellings to multi-family dwellings, and promoting a variety of housing types in the area. Ms. Clark stated that this is a Special Use Permit, and the commission can add conditions if they deem necessary. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated the applicant has the property under contract. They need the permit to move forward with their project. Upon inquiry from Commission Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated the applicant would not return to the Commission with this application unless they propose a subdivision. She stated the applicant's site plan must be similar when they submit for a building permit. There may be small road and parking changes to comply with the code. The Commission is approving up to 100 units. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark went over the layout of the proposed complex and where the green spaces were located. Ms. Clark stated the commission could require the applicant to put a playground on the property. Commissioner Fraser stated she would like to see a playground there so they would not have to walk down to use the school’s playground. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated that the current fire lane (at the end of East Ave J and K) is a public right-of-way. Applicant testimony: Justin Scheel, a Filer resident from JUB Engineers, represents the applicant. He stated the current zoning is for general business commercial use, and he believes the residential use will be more of a harmonious blend to the area than commercial uses. They are proposing that the landscaping buffer and the open spaces will help shield the residential housing to the west, to maintain the safe enclosed feel of the neighborhood. Mr. Scheel stated they intend to have a park and a playground. They will not be extending East Ave J or East Ave K, but they will be extending half of East Ave I. They will only be able to construct half of East Ave I. They will construct curb, gutter, and sidewalk that comply with the City’s code. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Scheel showed where the roads would be connected within the development. He stated he has been working with City Engineering for options to help with the construction of East Ave I. Mr. Scheel stated they have discussed punching East Ave I through to South Lincoln when the commercial portion is developed. Upon inquiry from ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Scheel stated that they will have pressurized irrigation. They will be looking at where they can have their pump station for the irrigation. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Scheel stated that there are utility services that stub out to East Ave J and East Ave K. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Scheel stated that they are open to having a fence around the development. Currently, the local residents are parking on the fire lane, but they will be widening the lane to be a full road instead of a 20-foot one. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Mr. Scheel stated the apartments would be under one ownership. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Fraser, Mr. Scheel stated the apartments would be rented out at market rate. They will not be low-income housing; they will be more affordable housing. Ms. Clark clarified that the apartments would be rented out at market rate and the units would be under one owner. Testimony in opposition: Jeanne Inselman, resident of Jerome, testified to some of her concerns with the project. Her concerns were the horrendous traffic in the area; more low- income housing that would decrease home values; not being able to come out of her cul-de-sac due to traffic; the bike path is graded too high as people look into her yard over the fence; fears for her safety; does not want more low-income housing to make the area look like the ghetto; would like to know who qualifies for the houses; and what the percentage is for low-income to regular housing. Commissioner Johnson stated that the rentals are at the market rate. Ms. Inselman stated that many apartments within the area are not kept up, and she believes there are too many within the area. She does not believe another 100 units will help with the traffic. Ms. Elliott read the following onto the record: Neal and Lisa Cardozo- residents of Jerome Oppose the application We feel this would devalue the homes in this area. We just brought our home and would hate to see this permit to pass. We definitely oppose this permit. William Wood- resident of Jerome Oppose the application- no further comment was provided. Alicia Acevedo & Juan Jose Acevedo-Torrero- residents of Jerome Oppose the application We object and oppose this application. We’ve worked extremely hard to buy our home in a nice subdivision not expecting to be surrounded by apartment buildings. If you’re truly worried about housing issues, why not encourage developers to build more homes or even duplexes in this 15 acres. We feel Jerome has already built more than enough apartments in any area they could find. Why don’t we try to encourage people to stay in Jerome by offering options to purchase instead of renting. Dave & Christy McBride- residents of Jerome ---PAGE BREAK--- Oppose the application We strongly oppose this! Not only because we live close by but the people they attract. The traffic at Fillmore &I has increased and none of them know what the stop sign is about. What happens when these folks don’t make rent, they become homeless. I know at the end of the day it doesn’t matter what we think because the dollar will always win! Maybe stick built homes would be a better option for the city and attract people that might care about their property. Lets not allow Jerome to become known as the “projects!”. Jesse Angel Murillo- resident of Jerome Oppose the application- no further comment was provided. Rebuttal Testimony: Justin Scheel stated he cannot speak to the current traffic situation, but adding additional housing is an important factor. Sometimes it takes that change to implement other changes. There is a need for road updates and expansions, but it comes in phases. He stated that adding through streets and connectivity helps the area. East Ave I is a collector road, and he does not believe this project would be a detriment to the area. Mr. Schell stated that multiple routes exist to get in and out of the proposed area. He stated this is not low-income housing. There are rental properties within the single-family subdivision to the west, and there is no way of getting away from rental properties. The applicant wants to provide additional affordable housing to the residents of Jerome. They think adding more housing is better than commercial uses on this property. He feels this is a good use of the property. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:57 p.m. Consider a request from South Tiger Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property described as Jerome Unplatted Tax 2215519 of NESE 19-8-17, more commonly known as the cultivated farm ground to the east of 800 blk East Ave I, J, and K (Hovey Subdivision), south of 821 East Ave H, and west of the East Ave K cul-de-sac- action item. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that another proposed subdivision, which will be going to the City Council, will bring single-family homes to the area southwest of this property, connecting South Fillmore and Nez Perce. Chairman Mink went over the General Standards with the commission. Discussion was held specifically on Standard C: parks, picnic areas, and playgrounds; Standard D; and Standard E. Commissioner Fraser stated that when the town grows, the population grows. When the population grows, there needs to be housing, and not everyone can afford or care for a home. She believes apartments are needed. More discussion was held on the need for housing, how ---PAGE BREAK--- many bedrooms within each apartment, doing “in only” or “out only” on I Street, traffic, and improvements to the walking path. Commissioner Schroeder stated he struggled initially with this application, but the need for housing is important. He stated the comments and complaints are not from adjacent property owners but from surrounding owners. Instead of multi-family housing, what could be built on the property could be worse for neighbors. He continued that he was thinking about a fence, but it may just be a trash collector. With the apartments being under one management, he stated he believes they will make it look nice and that it will fit the neighborhood. Commissioner Schroeder stated he favors the application because of the need for it and that it fits in the general plan. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the Special Use Permit from South Tiger Dr. LLC, allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property as described in the agenda, Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: Dwelling-units will not exceed 100; The special use permit is allowed for the approximately 15 acres as shown in the application; Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Seconded by Commissioner Schroeder and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Discussion- Future Land Use Maps- action item Ms. Clark stated she has been working with GIS on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM). They are also working on the Area of Impact (AOI) with the County Planning and Zoning. The County is working on a few things, and they will meet with them in the next couple of months to review proposed changes. Ms. Clark stated that the AOI can only extend two miles from the current city limits with the new laws. She stated they will remove some areas from the AOI, like the Tech Park, and some property around the Flying J area. They will be working with legal to remove the property from the AOI. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that there are already commitments that were made with property owners out by Flying J, and they will continue with those commitments. Discussion was held on why the infrastructure was built and how much water and sewer were promised to the area; rezoning in areas that have not grown the way they thought they would grow; and making sure we have transitions from industrial to residential. Ms. Clark stated that the updates will need to come back with a public hearing to the commission. Commissioner Schroeder thanked City Staff for helping with the city code and for making it better. Chairman Mink thanked the commission for giving their reason why they voted as it helps staff. CITIZEN CORRESPONDENCE AND ISSUES None ---PAGE BREAK--- Consent Agenda The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the March 11th, 2025, regular meeting. B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto for a Special Use Permit allowing vehicle sales, on the property described as Tax 2200877 of NESE (24-8-16) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF ALFONSO PIEDRA MORENO AND MARIA DE JESUS MEJIA NIETO FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING VEHICLE SALES, ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TAX 2200877 OF NESE (24-8-16) JEROME UNPLATTED, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 975 SOUTH LINCOLN AVENUE, JEROME, IDAHO. A public hearing on the application of Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto, concerning the use of real property located at 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated that a Special Use Permit request, approved a few years ago, had several conditions. Since that approval, the City received a grant that helped with the improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalk along West Avenue I. The grant also allowed improvements for sewer connections. The property in question, 975 South Lincoln Avenue in Jerome, is zoned General Business The proposed request, vehicle sales, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear- 10’; Interior Side- 12’; and Side Street- 25’. Ms. Clark stated that Title 8 of the JMC addresses the nuisance ordinance. The ordinance states that property owners cannot have any abandoned, wrecked, or junked vehicles. Vehicles placed on the property shall not be wrecked or junked. As pertains to off-street parking, Ms. Clark stated they have plenty of space, but once they get their building, they would have to have the appropriate parking spaces, along with the number of vehicles they decide to display. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ms. Clark stated that they will also need to meet the Landscape code. They have submitted plans for landscaping along West Avenue I and a small portion along South Lincoln. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Jerome Municipal Code allows vehicle sales with an approved special use permit in the General Business Zone Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The application shows the front half of the lot being utilized for used vehicle sales with a small office located behind the car lot. The car display area will be asphalt. The application shows landscaping along West Avenue I and South Lincoln. The application proposes a fence to separate the use from the parcel to the north. The Avenue I and South Lincoln intersection has developed into a shopping and service area with Ridley’s Grocery Store, D.L. Evans Bank, and Family Dollar. The proposed use will blend with the existing area businesses. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The use of vehicle sales should not disturb existing or future neighboring uses. Hours of operation will be regular for a car dealership. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. The sewer line has been extended as part of the West Avenue I reconstruction. The Applicant must connect the city’s sewer system. A water connection already exists. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. As proposed, vehicle sales will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the community’s economic welfare. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Traffic ---PAGE BREAK--- will increase at the intersection but not more than at any other business. Vehicle sales, with no car repair proposed at this time they would not produce excessive odors, noise, smoke, fumes, or glare. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. The application proposes two vehicular access points. Existing access is from West Avenue I and South Lincoln Avenue. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The property is bare. This use will not destroy, lose or damage the natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Ms. Clark sent the application to City Staff and received the following comment from Code Enforcement: “Weeds must be taken care of at all times.” If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and the Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Ms. Clark stated that the Applicant will need to return for a design review of the building. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark noted that staff reviews and approves signage unless there is a request for an Electronic Message Display Sign. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark affirmed she was recommending the Special Use Permit be permanent due to the improvements the Applicants would be making to the property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated the code defines a wrecked vehicle as a vehicle that cannot be moved on their own; these are not allowed. A salvaged title is still roadworthy. A salvage yard or a storage yard requires a different permit. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that when the sidewalk was installed along West Avenue I, they were not aware of what would be placed on that property. They have spoken with Engineering, and they will be allowed to install an access cut in the sidewalk on the back side of the parcel, providing them with access. The Commission could request that a fence be installed behind the property to separate it from the existing homes. They would like to have access off West Avenue I. Chairman Mink stated there needs to be two access points. Commissioner Johnson affirmed that the Applicant would be responsible for the sidewalk cut. Jesus Mendez, Certified Interpreter, was sworn in. ---PAGE BREAK--- Applicant Testimony: Maria de Jesus Mejia, a resident of Utah; and Ivan Piedra, a resident of Utah, appeared and testified before the Commission. After being sworn in, and through the certified interpreter, Ms. Mejia stated she wants the opportunity to develop new business. Chairman Mink inquired whether the Applicant understood the presentation regarding the road cut for the entrance, and Ms. Mejia stated that she did. Testimony in Neutral: Ms. Clark read the following onto the record: Ruby Reed-resident of Jerome “Neutral to the application. No further comment was provided.” Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, Ms. Clark’s report, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. 975 South Lincoln Avenue is in the City of Jerome and is currently zoned General Business B. The proposed use, specifically limited to vehicle sales, requires a special use permit to operate in C-2 zones. C. JMC 17.14.010 provides the standards for special use permits. D. The proposed use is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that it serves a community need. E. The proposed use is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that there is no proposal to modify the exterior of the building. F. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. G. No additional public facilities will be necessary for the proposed use. H. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community and will not involve activities materials, equipment or conditions that will create excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. We consider the parking concern to be minimal, as there is adequate parking on the premises. I. The vehicle approaches to the property will not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares, but access cuts will need to be made into the existing sidewalk. J. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural scenic or historic feature of major importance. II. Conclusions ---PAGE BREAK--- A. A special use permit is required for the applicant to allow vehicle sales in the C-2 zone for the City of Jerome. B. A special use permit promoting new business is consistent with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan. C. The Commission approves the application of Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto for a special use permit allowing vehicle sales located at 975 South Lincoln Drive, Jerome, Idaho, subject to the following conditions: a. Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements about the construction and needed improvements; b. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and c. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 8th day of April, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11th day of March, 2025 to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 8th day of April, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Enrique Sandoval for a Special Use Permit allowing a Duplex, on the property described as Tax 1 and Tax 2 of Lots 13 thru 15, Block 97 (NW 19-8-17, more commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Ave A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF ENRIQUE SANDOVAL FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING A DUPLEX, ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TAX 1 AND TAX 2 OF LOTS 13 THRU 15, BLOCK 97 (NW 19-8-17), MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE BACK PARKING LOT BEHIND 117 EAST AVE A, AND TO THE NORTH OF 222 SOUTH LINCOLN AVENUE, JEROME, IDAHO. A public hearing on the application of Enrique Sandoval, concerning the use of real property located at Tax 1 and Tax 2 of Lots 13 thru 15, block 97 (NW 19-8-17), more commonly ---PAGE BREAK--- known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Avenue A, and to the North of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated the Applicant owns several small parcels (part of the original townsite) that contain Cheverria’s, a parking lot, and the single-family residence that faces East Avenue A. The Applicant has recently made lot line adjustments so that the parking lot will be on one parcel, the single-family residence on another, and the proposed duplex will be on one parcel, with an access easement across the parking lot. There is also alley access to the existing single-family and the proposed duplex. The proposed duplex will come with an access easement guaranteed to follow the property. The alley can also provide access to a single-family home or duplex. The property is zoned Central Business District (CBD). The proposed use, duplex (two dwelling units), requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- Rear- Interior Side- and Side Street- Minimum lot size is 3,125 square feet, and the maximum height is 35’. Title 16 has no bearing on this Special Use Permit request. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated that the request is in accordance with Chapter 4. Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. 4.3.e Consider zoning ordinance amendments to promote a variety of housing types, including higher density residential along corridors and adjacent to commercial and industrial areas. 4.4: Support development of affordable housing for a full range of employees and residents (retirees and families). Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code allows two-dwelling units in the CBD zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. This area in Jerome blends commercial and residential uses. Two dwelling units are south of Cheverria’s, and a bakery is south of those residences. The residence and council chambers are to the north, with PMT storage to the east. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. As stated, the property is surrounded by various uses, including residential and commercial. This will reduce the parking for the area by four parking spots to allow access to the duplexes. The duplex plans propose two units, each with its own separate parking spot. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. Water and sewer connections are available to serve the property. Fire has reviewed the plans, and they will have access with the access easement and the alley. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. There is no indication that two residential uses will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. It is not anticipated that the addition of two housing units will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of noise or traffic. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. As previously discussed, an access easement will be recorded, if the SUP is approved, allowing access from the parking lot, should this parcel be sold. There is also alley access. Access will remain from South Lincoln and East Ave A. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Regarding off-street parking, Ms. Clark stated this project requires a total of four parking spaces. Four parking spaces have been provided in the plans. Ms. Clark showed the Commission a map of the proposed duplex. The parking area must be paved. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding the Landscaping requirements, Ms. Clark stated that this project is located in the CBD district. Due to the zero-lot line setbacks, they have requested a waiver of full landscaping requirements. As shown on the plans, a few grasses will be planted at the front of the building facing South Lincoln. Ms. Clark stated that she sent the application to City Staff, and they have all reviewed it. A pre-application meeting was held with the Applicant to discuss the process for a SUP and minimum requirements. Code Enforcement did comment that all bulky items in the alleyway must be removed and the area kept clean. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Storage of bulky items must be removed from the property before a building permit can be issued; Vehicles cannot impede access to the alley; Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Ms. Clark stated this is a very large investment, and would consider making the special use permanent. With SUP, the Commission needs to review the conditions and determine if the duplex would have an impact on the City. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated the Applicant owns the parking lot, but if the parking lot is sold, they do have an easement to access the property. She also stated that she would like to have a conditional approval, as the alleyway is cluttered and needs to be cleaned up. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated the garbage bins would need to be brought out to the street in the winter. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark noted that the fire department was okay with the access easement but stated that it must remain accessible, as well as the alleyway. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated that Code Enforcement would be responsible for enforcing the maintenance of the alleyway. Ms. Clark stated that the architect and contractor are present. Applicant Testimony: Colby Ricks, a resident of Twin Falls and architect from Laughlin Ricks Architecture, appeared and testified before the Commission, thanking them for hearing this request. After being sworn in, Mr. Ricks stated regarding the alley, there are two power poles, and they will be cleaning up the wires that are hanging down. They will be doing a two- story duplex. They will have firewalls, maintaining a minimum distance of 10 feet from the property line to the north and south. This will allow for the four tandem parking spaces. They want a nice design that will be attractive, cleaning up the site and not using that property for storage. This will be a nice addition to the area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Chairman Mink stated that one of the power poles is right in the driveway. They will be relocating the power lines underground. Ms. Clark showed the property lines to the Commission Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Favor: Miguel Serna, a resident of Buhl, stated that they are already making efforts to clean up the property. Idaho Power will relocate the power poles. They have already taken down a couple of trees. The owner is aware of the clean-up needs. They want to make downtown beautiful again. Testimony in Opposition: Acting Secretary, Ms. Coderniz, read the following onto the record: Bill and Melinda Bunn, residents of Jerome. “Oppose the application. From experience we want to bring up the point of “parking” when you mix business and commercial and have residential together. We have a business @ 125 1st Ave E and now we hardly ever have parking in front of our business for our clients and customers because all the residential units now take up our parking as well as the other businesses needing our parking. It is very hard for our older clients to park far away from our office. Thank you, Melinda Bunn Bill Bunn” Commissioner Johnson stated they have already discussed parking, and no one sees off- street parking as an issue. Ms. Clark noted the Applicant is taking their own parking spaces away to make room for resident parking. Commissioner Johnson stated the business won’t be affected. Ms. Clark noted that the testimony is asking the Commission to consider this application due to its location and the issues it presents to their businesses. Commissioner Reed stated the area is already a mix of residential and commercial uses. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, Ms. Clark’s report, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. Lots 13 thru 15, Block 97, commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Avenue A, and to the north of 222 North Lincoln Avenue, is in the City of Jerome and is currently zoned Central Business District (CBD). B. The proposed use, allowing a duplex on the property, requires a special use permit in a CBD zone. C. JMC 17.14.010 provides the standards for special use permits. D. The proposed use is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that it serves a community need. ---PAGE BREAK--- E. The proposed use is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that there is no proposal to modify the exterior of the building. F. The proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. G. No additional public facilities will be necessary for the proposed use. H. The proposed use will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community and will not involve activities materials, equipment or conditions that will create excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. We find the parking concern to be of minimal concern as there is adequate parking on the premises. I. The parking on the property will have an access easement guaranteed to follow the property. J. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural scenic or historic feature of major importance. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the Applicant to build a duplex in the CBD zone for the City of Jerome. B. A special use permit promoting a variety of housing types, including higher density residential along corridors and adjacent to commercial and industrial areas, is consistent with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan. C. The Commission approves the application of Enrique Sandoval for a special use permit allowing a duplex on the property located at Tax 1 and Tax 2 of Lots 13 thru 15, Block 97 commonly known as the pack parking lot behind 117 East Avenue A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho subject to the following conditions: a. Storage of bulky items must be removed from the property before a building permit can be issued; b. Vehicles cannot impede access to the alley; c. Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; d. Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; e. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and f. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 8th day of April, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11th day of March, 2025 to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 8th day of April, 2025. ---PAGE BREAK--- ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). D. Findings and Conclusions for a request from C&H Land & Investments for a Special Use Permit allowing livestock on the property described as Lots 9 - 13, Blk 1, and Lots 5 & 6, Blk 2, Brockman’s Ind. Subdivision 31-8-17, more commonly known as cultivated farm ground on the north side of Farmore Road, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF C&H LAND & INVESTMENTS FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING LIVESTOCK ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 9 THRU 13, BLOCK 1, AND LOTS 5 & 6, BLOCK 2, BROCKMAN’S IND. SUBDIVISION (31-8-17), MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS CULTIVATED FARM GROUND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF FARMORE ROAD, JEROME, IDAHO A public hearing on the application of C&H Land & Investments, concerning the use of real property located at Lots 9 thru 13, Block 1, and Lots 5 & 6, Block 2, Brockman’s Ind. Subdivision (31-8-17), Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark explained the location of the parcel along Farmore Road. She stated the area is a platted subdivision but remains undeveloped. The parcels have been farmed for years. The area is approximately 8.5 acres of pasture. The property in question is currently zoned High-Density Business The proposed use, the keeping of farm animals, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for detached accessory structures on the property must be at least three feet from the rear or side property lines. Ms. Clark stated the keeping of livestock was changed and went over the updated code with the Commission. JMC 17.18.050, E also states: For each lot of one and one-half (1 ½) acres the owner may maintain, in combination, no more than two head of horses, cattle, or sheep per acre of improved pasture. For each additional acre of improved pasture, the owner may maintain an additional combined total of two head, provided no owner shall maintain a total of more than six head irrespective of the total size of the lot or acres of improved pasture. The Applicant has enough pasture for six head of cattle. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated that this request complies with the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to Chapter 3, Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.j. Consider provisions in the zoning ordinance for rural residential uses within city limits, which may include some agricultural activities and limited animal husbandry. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that manure can be considered a nuisance, but with eight acres, they should be able to compost the manure on the property. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code allows farm animals in the C-3 zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The application notes that the animals will be kept in a fully fenced pasture. The general vicinity includes the new D&B location to the west, Farmore of Idaho to the East, and other businesses towards Frontage Road. The property to the north is undeveloped. However, there is one building that is currently occupied. If properly cared for, the farm animals would not change the essential character of the area. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant wants cattle on the land. The livestock must be adequately cared for to avoid disturbing neighboring uses. Water and feed will need to be provided during the months when they are not readily available. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. No additional services will be required to care for farm animals. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Farm animals will create excessive additional requirements at public cost. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Farm animals can become a nuisance if not properly cared for. They can also become detrimental by producing excessive noise and odors. With the property spanning almost 8.5 acres, the manure can be composted on-site. Adequate care and fencing must be provided to ensure animals are kept within the property boundaries. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. This request will not impact vehicular approaches. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This request will not destroy or damage a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: farm animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property, or the general welfare; Adequate fencing will be kept at all times; and Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. Commissioner Johnson inquired about building on the property. Ms. Clark stated that the property is within a platted subdivision, and she is not aware of any plans as of yet. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated there will be six head of cattle. Commissioner Johnson inquired whether there would be sheds or if it was just pasture. Ms. Clark noted the Applicant can address that question. Applicant Testimony: Troy Chandler, a resident of Twin Falls, Idaho, appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Chandler stated they have been farming the area for years. With new development, they can no longer farm that area with corn or hay as they did before. They had a year with nothing to show, and the weeds got out of control. He would like to put some cows out to pasture, as he has 60 employees, and would like to have cattle to provide beef for his employees during the winter. He would also like to add a couple of horses, along with the six cattle, to help keep the pasture under control. He would also put a loafing shed and a place to feed the animals. They will also be installing a water trough. Mr. Chandler stated that they would be installing a steel cable fence and explained where the wall would be located around the property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Chandler stated that the property has a well that will provide water for the cattle. He also has shares from the North Side Canal Company for that property. They will also irrigate the property. He stated he wants the property to look nice, as he also owns Farmore of Idaho. ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Schroder wanted to clarify the number of animals that were allowed. Ms. Clark stated the code states “For each additional acre of improved pasture, the owner may maintain an additional combined total of two head, provided no owner shall maintain a total of more than six head irrespective of the total size of the lot”. Chairman Mink stated at the time of the code, they did not consider this large of a parcel. Ms. Clark noted this is one of the last larger parcels within the city. Mr. Chandler stated that he does not think six cattle will be sufficient to keep the pasture down and would also like to have two horses. Ms. Clark stated the code would need to be amended to allow additional animals. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: Acting Secretary, Ms. Coderniz, read the following onto the record: Tonn Peterson, Resident of Meridian “Oppose the application. Ahlquist Development, on behalf of D&B Supply, submits this notice in opposition to the application submitted to the City of Jerome by C&H Land and Investments for a Special Use Permit allowing livestock on the subject property, the same of which is immediately adjacent to the D&B parcel. Millions of dollars worth of infrastructure has been and/or is being constructed to satisfy the requirements. To build the D&B in this commercial corridor. To allow livestock in the same area will destroy or ruin these improvements.” The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the renewal application, Ms. Clark’s report, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. Lots 9 thru 13, Block 1, and Lots 5 & 6, Block 2, Brockman’s Ind. Subdivision (31- 8-17), more commonly known as cultivated farm ground on the north side of Farmore Road, Jerome, Idaho, is zoned High-Density Business which requires a special use permit for the proposed use, allowing livestock on the property. B. Title 16 of the JMC has no bearing on this application. C. The application for a special use permit complies with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan, Section 3.1.1., and inasmuch as it is compatible with the existing and potential land uses in the surrounding area. D. The Commission finds the General Standards for Special Uses as outlined in JMC 17.60.030, are satisfied as follows: 1. As mentioned, the proposed use does constitute a special use as defined in JMC; ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. The use is harmonious with and in compliance with the general objectives of the Comprehensive Plan relating to the objectives of Rural Residential Land Uses; 3. The proposed use will be designed, constructed and maintained in harmony and appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity by maintaining proper enclosures for the livestock and keeping their enclosures clean. 4. Pursuant to the comment from City staff, it is evident that adequate infrastructure and services are available to accommodate the proposed use; and 5. There was no evidence that the proposed use would create any additional requirements or public facilities or services, nor that it would be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare. E. The vehicular approaches are not an issue and there is no indication the proposed use will impact any natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the applicant to be able to allow livestock on the herein described property. B. A special use permit promoting this use is consistent with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan, Section 3.1.1. and with JMC 17.60.030. C. The Commission approves the application of C&H Land & Investments for a special use permit allowing no more than six head of livestock, cattle, sheep or horses, on that property described herein, in Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: a. Farm Animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property or the general welfare; b. Adequate fencing be kept at all times; and c. Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 8th day of April, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 11th day of March, 2025 to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 8th day of April, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning ---PAGE BREAK--- Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). E. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga for a Special Use Permit allowing two horses and three goats, on the property described as Tax 22303643 (Resolution) (SW 7-8-17) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF EFRAIN TELLEZ AND SHEYLA ZUNIGA FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING LIVESTOCK (TWO HORSES AND THREE GOATS) ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TAX 22303643 (SW 7-8-17) JEROME UNPLATTED, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1720 GREEN ACRES LANE, JEROME, IDAHO A public hearing on the application of Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga, concerning the use of real property located at Tax 22303643, (SW 7-8-17) Jerome Unplatted, commonly known as 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated that this parcel was a recorded residential subdivision but had been vacated into two separate lots. It is 5.43 acres. They built a house with a yard and a barn area, leaving approximately 5 acres for pasture. The Applicant previously had a special use permit for horses, but it expired two years ago. The property is zoned Residential 1 The proposed use, keeping Farm Animals, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for detached accessory structures on the property must be at least three feet from the rear or side property lines. Horses, Cattle, and Sheep require a Special Use Permit if, “No such animals at all be on the real property for a period of at least one year, then a special use permit shall be required before any such animals may be quartered on the real property” as detailed in 17.18.050, E, 2. This parcel had no such animals for over one year. JMC 17.18.050, E also states: For each lot of one and one-half (1 ½) acres the owner may maintain, in combination, no more than two head of horses, cattle, or sheep per acre of improved pasture. For each additional acre of improved pasture, the owner may maintain an additional combined total of two head, provided no owner shall maintain a total of more than six ---PAGE BREAK--- head irrespective of the total size of the lot or acres of improved pasture. The applicant has enough pasture to have two horses and three goats. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated that the request complies with the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to Chapter 3, Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.j. Consider provisions in the zoning ordinance for rural residential uses within city limits, including some agricultural activity and limited animal husbandry. Ms. Clark reminded the Commission that manure is considered a public nuisance, and proper disposal of the manure must be considered. The applicant does have pasture in the back for disposal. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code permits farm animals in the R-1 zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The application notes that the animals will be kept in a fully fenced pasture to the north of the house. There are corrals to provide shelter. The general vicinity is larger parcels with single- family homes. The property to the north is farmed. If properly cared for, the farm animals would not change the essential character of the area. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant notes that they would like to have horses and goats for weed and grass control, as well as pets. Livestock must be adequately cared for to avoid disturbing neighboring uses. Water and feed will need to be provided during the months when water and feed are not readily available. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. No additional services will be required to care for farm animals. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Farm animals will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Farm animals can become a nuisance if they are not properly cared for. They can also become detrimental by producing excessive noise and odors. With the property being almost five acres, the manure can be composted on-site. Adequate care and fencing must be provided to ensure animals are kept within the property boundaries and do not cause excessive noise. Regarding Standard H, vehicular approaches to the property shall be designed to avoid interfering with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. This request will not impact vehicular approaches. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This request will not destroy or damage natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Farm Animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property or the general welfare; Can only possess up to two horses and three goats, does or kids, at any given time; Adequate fencing kept at all times; and Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. Ms. Clark recommended that no male goats be allowed at any time. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark showed the Commission where the property was on the map. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Fraser, Ms. Clark stated that the property is within city limits, but it is located right at the city boundary on the north side of their property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated that they do have a permit for chickens, and the roosters are no longer on the property. Applicant Testimony: Rosario Tellez, daughter of Applicant Efrain Tellez and a resident of Twin Falls, Idaho, appeared and testified before the Commission. Ms. Tellez stated that they are asking for two horses, two goats, and a sheep. She has an autistic brother, and they want horses for his horse therapy. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, they have about 375 feet of entrance on private land. They already have a fence, and there is also a gate at the end of the private lane. Ms. Clark stated that they would be allowed to have two horses and a sheep when applying the code. Upon inquiry from Ms. Tellez, Ms. Clark said that no male goats were permitted Testimony in Favor: Acting Secretary, Ms. Coderniz, read the following onto the record: ---PAGE BREAK--- “Mia Paz, Jerome resident - Supports the application Granting the special use permit for two horses and three goats will support responsible animal husbandry, promote sustainable land use, and provide educational and agricultural benefits to the community. Anyone should be allowed to own their animals as long as they pay for it, and are responsible for its care.” “Ron Tilley- Jerome resident - Supports the application I have no problem with this request.” Testimony in Neutral: Ms. Coderniz read the following onto the record: “Shirley Buttram, Jerome resident-Neutral to the application. No further comments were provided.” Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the renewal application, Ms. Clark’s report, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho is zoned Residential 1 which requires a special use permit for the proposed use, allowing livestock/farm animals on the property. B. Title 16 of the JMC has no bearing on this application. C. The application for a special use permit complies with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan, Section 3.1.1., and inasmuch as it is compatible with the existing and potential land uses in the surrounding area. D. The Commission finds the General Standards for Special Uses as outlined in JMC 17.60.030, are satisfied as follows: 1. As mentioned, the proposed use does constitute a special use as defined in JMC; 2. The use is harmonious with and in compliance with the general objectives of the Comprehensive Plan relating to the objectives of Rural Residential Land Uses; 3. The proposed use will be designed, constructed, and maintained in harmony and appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity by maintaining proper enclosures for the livestock and keeping their enclosures clean. 4. Pursuant to the comment from City staff, it is evident that adequate infrastructure and services are available to accommodate the proposed use; and ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. There was no evidence that the proposed use would create any additional requirements or public facilities or services, nor that it would be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare. E. The vehicular approaches are not an issue and there is no indication the proposed use will impact any natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the applicant to be able to allow livestock/farm animals on the herein described property. B. A special use permit promoting this use is consistent with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan, Section 3.1.1. and with JMC 17.60.030. C. The Commission approves the application of Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga for a special use permit allowing two horses, two female goats, and one sheep on that property described herein, in Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: a. Farm Animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property or the general welfare; b. Can only possess up to two horses, two female goats, and one ewe sheep, does or kids, at any given time; c. Adequate fencing kept at all times; and d. Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 8th day of April, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 11th day of March, 2025 to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 8th day of April, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). F. Findings and Conclusions for a request Cook Realty for a Variance decreasing the Interior Side Setback, on the property described as Lots 10 & 11, Blk 139 Jerome ---PAGE BREAK--- Townsite 100 x 125 (NW 19-8-17), more commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON A REQUEST FROM COOK REALTY, FOR AN INTERIOR SIDE SET BACK VARIANCE FOR LOTS 10 & 11, BLOCK 139, JEROME TOWNSITE 1000x125 (NW 19-8-17) MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 308 EAST AVENUE F, JEROME, IDAHO A Public Hearing at the request of Cook Realty, for an interior side setback variance on the property commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho, was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, March 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a staff report and background on this request. Ms. Clark stated 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, is two parcels, Lot 10 and Lot 11 of Block 139. An existing house sits over the north-south lot line, primarily on Lot 11. The Applicant wishes to construct a single-family residence on Lot 11. Without permission, the Applicant moved the north-south lot line, which does not meet current interior side setbacks. The new lot line is approximately three feet from the new lot line. Ms. Clark stated Lots 10 and 11 are zoned Residential 2 Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear -20’; Interior Side- and Side Street- 15’. Ms. Clark stated that they want to move the lot line, but this does not allow the interior setback to be met. They are asking for a variance for this project. The Jerome Municipal Code defines a variance as: a modification of the requirements of this title as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings, or other provisions of this title affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or special privilege. Still, it may be granted to an applicant only upon a showing of undue hardship because of the site’s characteristics and that the variance does not conflict with the public interest. Ms. Clark went over the criteria for a variance with the Commission. Criteria A- That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which do not apply to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. The application notes that the existing single-family home encroaches onto Lot 10 by about one foot. This is common in the City of Jerome, as we allow homes to be built over the lot lines that the same person owns. ---PAGE BREAK--- Criteria B- That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title. A literal interpretation of the title would not deprive the applicant of any rights enjoyed by other properties. The Applicant is requesting a variance to build; however, alternative options can be considered without placing the two other homes at risk. Criteria C- That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The request for a side yard setback variance is a direct result of the Applicant’s actions. We could have offered solutions if the Applicant had consulted with staff before adjusting lot lines. There are other ideas to build on Lot 10. Criteria D- That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege denied by this title to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Variances are typically granted when the applicant proves undue hardship because of the site’s characteristics and the variance does not conflict with the public interest. The Applicant has not proven an undue hardship. A building permit has not been issued. There is a concern for the other existing homes, as allowing a side variance would require the existing homes also to have a firewall. Ms. Clark stated that she sent the application to city staff, and they recommended that the variance request be denied, as there are no special conditions or circumstances peculiar to the land or structures, and no undue hardship. The following comments were received from staff: Fire- Fire is concerned about reducing a setback that could put any new or existing building at risk from radiant heat from a fire. A reduction of 4 ft. would create a risk for both homes. Without a survey showing the locations of the existing houses at both 300 and 308 E. Avenue F, as they relate to the property lines, fire cannot support this variance request; Building- Essentially, this is asking us to allow a variance that would make two existing homes non-compliant with our fire codes to build a new compliant home. Contrary to the narrative statement, granting this variance does indeed create special conditions and affects more than just the two lots in question. Based on documents provided, I cannot legally issue a building permit for this new home. I see other options for the builder that I am willing to discuss if they are interested. Ms. Clark stated that without the 10’ minimum distance, fire requires firewalls. Since they don’t own the nearby homes, this poses a potential fire risk to them. Ms. Clark stated that if they were granted the 3’ setback and they placed the new home at the required 7’ setback, they could meet the 10’ distance requirement. The concern is the neighboring house to the west. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that this is located in the older part of town, where setbacks are different. At this time, a building permit has not been issued, and the foundation has not been poured, so there are no undue hardships. Other possibilities could be considered for working with the property owners. If the variance is approved, the fire separation is acceptable for that lot, but it raises concerns for the other nearby homes. Ms. Clark showed the Commission the lots on a map. Ms. Clark stated that the Applicants do have building plans for a narrow home that meet the setbacks. She stated there ---PAGE BREAK--- is a larger area in the back where they could push the home back and meet the setbacks. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that they have already adjusted the lot lines without the staff’s knowledge. She continued that Parcel 9’s addition is approximately 6 inches from the property line. Ms. Clark showed the Commission another picture of the lot lines and where the homes are in respect to the lot lines. A discussion was held on how they could remedy the setbacks without violating the fire code. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated the original home was built over the lot line of the two lots, which is allowed if the same person owns them. Applicant Testimony: Scott Cook, resident of Jerome, appeared and testified before the Commission. After being sworn in, Mr. Cook stated that the existing property is built one foot over the property line. They are 50 feet x 125 feet. One lot is 51’ away from the east property line. They want to move the lot line 4 feet over to the west; the proposed house would meet all setbacks. A single-wide trailer is 12’ wide; this house would be 36’ wide. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Cook stated they would meet setback on the existing house. Regarding the other house, they would meet setbacks on one side but not the other. The proposal is for but fire requires 10’. The proposed home is a three-bedroom, two-bath residence at 1,209 sq. ft. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Cook is requesting a 4- foot variance, as the existing house is built 1 foot over the lot line, which would provide a 3-foot setback. He is only asking for a variance for his two homes. Ms. Clark stated the firewall would be required for the new house and the existing house. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Cook stated that he was unsure who would be building the firewall, as he was not aware of the project. Commissioner Reed inquired if having a cinder block fence would be an acceptable barrier. Ms. Clark stated she is not aware if that is acceptable or not. Mr. Cook stated that he would be willing to install a firewall in their house. Mr. Cook stated that other places have zero setbacks. Chairman Mink stated that there are additional requirements that accompany the fire codes for various locations. He spoke of the Gazebo Subdivision, which has 5’ setbacks, and they still meet the 10’ requirement. Mr. Cook stated that they can make the setbacks for their lot, but cannot speak for the other lots that were built a long time ago. Commissioner Schroeder stated that the commission’s purpose is to address the lot line adjustment, and the building permit would address the issue of how close the home would be to the other homes. Ms. Clark stated the Commission is to approve or deny the variance for the side setback. A discussion was held regarding the location of the lot line and how to protect neighboring homes. Chairman Minks stated the results of tonight’s meeting are a concern for the Commission. Commissioner Schroeder stated that, as the property owner, they may want to consider other options to avoid any issues with the Fire Department. Mr. Cook stated that 50’ x 120’ for a small residential home is a lot for someone to keep up. Ms. Clark stated the variance is for the 3’ from the house, and the Commission needs to decide if the criteria are met for a ---PAGE BREAK--- variance. Mr. Cook stated that he is requesting a variance from the Commission, not a building permit. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: Ronald Posey, resident of Jerome, stated his sister owns the house next door. Her fence is right up against her house; he asked that the fence be moved to the property line. He stated that he had property surveyed and doesn’t think the city rules allow for a fence right up against a house. Mr. Posey moved the fence after nothing was done; he has to go around the house to work on the fence since it is too close to the house. Chairman Mink stated the house was built close to the property line. Mr. Posey noted the house was built before they owned it. He has spoken with the engineer about the property lines, and he assumed the lines on the county maps were correct. He was going to put the fence back up, but the ground was frozen. Now he received a notice about the new building that would be close to his home. Chairman Mink stated that they would be 7 feet from the foundation. Testimony in Rebuttal: Upon inquiry from Ms. Clark, Mr. Cook stated that the stakes were from the most recent survey conducted by Desert West. Mr. Cook stated they first heard of the fence being down from their tenant. They are willing to work with their neighbors, and a new fence can be installed. He stated they would include a walking area. He spoke with a family member and agreed that he was willing to split the cost of the fence. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, testimony, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The parcel of land commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho, is currently zoned Residential 2 B. The R-2 zone pursuant to Title 17 of the City of Jerome Municipal Code has a front setback of 25 feet, a rear setback of 20 feet, an interior side setback of 7 feet, and a street side setback of 15 feet. C. The purpose of the variance is to allow an interior side setback variance to allow Applicate to have a 3-foot interior side setback. II. Conclusions A. The application is consistent with development standards and objectives for R-2 Zone. B. Not granting the variance as requested in the application would not confer on the applicant any special privilege, as referenced in Title 17 of the City of Jerome Municipal Code, to the Applicant. ---PAGE BREAK--- C. This variance is granted, allowing an interior side setback variance by 4-feet, for an interior side setback of 3-feet between Lots 10 and 11 on the property set forth herein. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 8th day of April, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 11th day of March, 2025, to approve the application for a preliminary plat is hereby made final this 8th day of April, 2025, subject to appeal by an interested party within the prescribed period under Idaho law. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). Commissioner Johnson motioned to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded the motion by Commissioner Schroeder and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. DISCUSSION PERIOD & STAFF REPORTS Ms. Clark stated she is working with a consultant for zoning district codes. The May meeting may get busy, she may need to schedule a workshop, but she will let the commission know. West Ave A and Alder updates are coming along. If they know of anyone who has any questions or concerns regarding the streetscape, please have them reach out to her. She does not have an update on the Main Street streetscape, as they are hoping to have bids sent out in late April or early May. Without further discussion, Chairman Mink closed this regular meeting at 8:33 p.m. Rod Mink, Chairman Katie Elliott, Secretary