Document Jerome_doc_ad06c96a06

City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser REGULAR MEETING September 23, 2025 7:00 p.m. Please Note: Speakers who have been given the floor may be limited to three minutes of discussion. Any item can be added or removed from the consent calendar prior to the meeting. 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Public Hearing for a request from Jerome County Sheriff’s Office for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as T57 of N1/2NESE Jerome Unplatted (SE 30-8-17), more commonly known as 2151 South Tiger Dr., Jerome, Idaho. 3. Consider a request for Jerome County Sheriff’s Office for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as T57 of N1/2NESE Jerome Unplatted (SE 30-8-17), more commonly known as 2151 South Tiger Dr., Jerome, Idaho- action item 4. Public Hearing for a request from Lytle Signs representing Urgent Care of Idaho for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as Tax 2216694 of SESE 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1225 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho. 5. Consider a request for Lytle Signs representing Urgent Care of Idaho for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as Tax 2216694 of SESE 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1225 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho- action item 6. Public Hearing for a request from Lorena Ortega for a Variance reducing the side setback from seven feet to five feet on the parcel described as Lot 6 of Blk 21 of the Jerome Townsite 18-8-17, more commonly known as 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho. 7. Consider a request for Lorena Ortega for a Variance reducing the side setback from seven feet to five feet on the parcel described as Lot 6 of Blk 21 of the Jerome Townsite 18-8-17, more commonly known as 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho- action item 8. Consider a Design Review for 124 East Main Street, Jerome, Idaho – action item 9. Consider a Design Review for 210 West Main Street, Jerome, Idaho- action item. 10. Citizen Correspondence and Issues 11. Consent Agenda- action item The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the September 9, 2025, regular meeting. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc. for Rezone from Light Industrial (M-1) to Residential 3 on the property described as parcel ID number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho. C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Ben Lyda/EHM Engineers, Inc. for a residential preliminary plat of Becker Subdivision Phase 2, on the property located at Parcel ID Number RPJ00000086601A (Less Becker Sub No. more commonly known as the farmland east of 20th Ave East, Trae Street, and 18th Ave East for approximately 1,120 feet to the City limits then approximately 1,333 feet south to 16th Ave East, then approximately 840 feet to the west, Jerome, Idaho, containing approximately 30.55 acres. D. Findings and Conclusions for a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie, for a Future Land Use Map amendment from commercial to residential on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E). E. Findings and Conclusions for a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie, for a rezone request from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 (R-2) on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E). 12. Discussion Period & Staff Reports 13. Adjournment Note: Any person requiring special accommodations to participate in the meeting should contact City Hall (City Planner, [PHONE REDACTED], ext. 140) at least two business days before the meeting. Cualquier persona que necesite traducción para participar debe comunicarse con el municipio (Planificador Urbano [PHONE REDACTED] ext. 140) siete días antes de la reunión. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit – Electronic Message Display 2151 Tiger Dr. South, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: Heavy Industrial (M-2) Subdivision: Yes Setbacks: 10 feet from the property line and other existing freestanding signs. Summary: Applicant requests to place a freestanding sign with an electronic message display in the southeast corner of the property. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: September 23, 2025 Subject: Staff Report Regarding the Request from Jerome County Sheriff’s Office for a Special Use Permit, Allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign on the Property More Commonly Known as 2151 South Tiger Drive, Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Request: Staff Report I. Project Summary: The applicant is requesting to install an electronic message display (EMD) sign for the Sheriff’s Office. The parcel is zoned Heavy Industrial which allows one freestanding sign not over 200 square feet and no higher than 35 feet. The EMD display area shall not exceed 75% of the sign area. a. The display area is approximately 17.25 square feet and less than 75% of the sign area. II. The proposed signs will be subject to Section 17.32.040 Section Q since it has an electronic display. “Electronic Message Display”: A sign or portion thereof capable of displaying words, symbols, figures or images that can be electronically or mechanically changed by remote or automatic means.” a. 17.032.040: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL SIGNS, Section Any animated sign, electronic message display (EMD), illuminated advertising device or advertising display shall conform to the following requirements: 1. Shall contain static messages only and shall not have movement, or the appearance of optical illusion of movement of any part of the sign structure, design, or pictorial segment of the sign, including the movement or appearance of movement of any illumination or the flashing/varying of light intensity. 2. Each message or frame must be displayed for a minimum of three seconds. 3. Area shall not occupy more than seventy five percent (75%) of the sign. 4. Shall emit a light of constant intensity, and shall be constructed of hardware capable of programming that will limit the nits output to five thousand (5,000) on clear days and five hundred (500) nits from dawn to dusk. In no event shall such an illuminated sign or device be placed or directed to permit the beams and illumination therefrom to be directed or beamed upon a public thoroughfare, highway, sidewalk or adjacent premises to cause glare or reflection that may constitute a traffic hazard or nuisance. 5. Text only single color message displays with letters no higher than twelve inches (12") may scroll or travel without the static message limitation. Maximum area for such displays is sixty (60) square feet. 6. Each parcel of real property may have one electronic message display. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org 7. Such signs, displays, or device may not be installed on a nonconforming sign. 8. Animated signs and EMD are allowed by special use permit only and in accordance with chapter 17.60 of this title. (Ord. 1149, 2016) • The applicant acknowledges the guidelines and intends to comply. Special Use Permit Criteria Staff Analysis III. 17.60.030: GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed special use in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that such use at the proposed location: A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved; Staff Analysis: The Jerome Municipal Code allows an electronic message display sign with an approved special use permit in all zoning districts. B. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; Staff Analysis: The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff Analysis: The applicant has provided professionally designed renderings of the sign and the EMD portion. The sign, as designed, is appropriate and harmonious with the area's existing character. The surrounding area consists of heavy industrial uses. D. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Staff Analysis: The applicant is required to meet the electronic display criteria. They have provided a rendering and electrical outline that meets the current code. E. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Staff Analysis: An electronic message display sign will not require public facilities or services. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; Staff Analysis: As proposed, the electronic message display sign will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org G. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff Analysis: The request to include an EMD sign will not be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic or glare. The applicant shall comply with the nit code requirement for illumination. H. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and Staff Analysis: The vehicular approaches to the property have remained unchanged. The sign is designed with automatic dimmers to decrease light during dust and at night. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Staff Analysis: The sign will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. IV. The following Design Review Guidelines should be considered: 1. Promote sign design and placement that reflects the community’s desire for human scale regarding height, proposition, site features, shapes and materials. The electronic message display sign is professionally designed and meets the appropriate height and materials required. The freestanding sign is approximately 48.33 square feet. 2. Signs must be produced using professional workmanship without hand lettering or with a sloppy or garish paint job. The application indicates the sign will be professionally manufactured. 3. The primary sign(s) for a business must be constructed of permanent materials. Unacceptable temporary materials include but are not limited to paper, cardboard, vinyl banner, fabric, poster board, and unfinished wood. The pictures show it is constructed of durable, all-weather material that includes professionally installed brick and an outdoor EMD screen. V. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: • Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; • Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; and • Comply with all City sign requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-25 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-25 Category Special Use Workspace state In approval Workspace created 08/18/2025, 2:36:48 PM MDT Application submitted 08/19/2025, 1:55:42 PM MDT Assignee Ida Clark Package generation date 09/15/2025, 9:21:35 AM MDT LOCATION INFORMATION Address 2151 S TIGER DR., City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ00000307210A, T57 OF N1/2NESE JEROME UNPLATTED (SE 30-8-17) EXEMPT 7.881 AC PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES JEROME COUNTY 300 N LINCOLN AVE RM 301 JEROME ID 83338 ID 83338 Property owner George Oppedyk Jerome County Sheriff's Office 2151 S Tiger Dr Jerome [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Agent Brent Culbertson Jerome County 2151 S Tiger Dr Jerome [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover page 1 Table of contents 2 Special Use 3 Council and committee meetings 4 Reviews 5 Attachments 6 Public notice 7-8 Fees & Payments 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Special Use PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Project Information Current Use Sheriff's Offices, DMV, County Jail Zoning District Industrial Summary Narrative Statement Would like to add an electronic message display sign in a freestanding sign on the southeastern portion of the property. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES Answer these as if they are questions relating to your request for a Special Use Permit A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in City code for the zoning district involved; An SUP is required to install an EMD. B. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; Yes C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; The display area will be framed by PVC and have brick casing that will blend with the surrounding uses and character of the area. D. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses No, the EMD must comply with the requirements, and the size and placement must meet code. E. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Yes F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; No G. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; No, the emd will dim for evening hours. H. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and No impact as there is no change to the access. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. No Special Use, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 09/23/2025, 7:00:00 PM MDT Description: Special Use Permit for an Electronic Message Display Sign Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 09/23/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviews REVIEWS Building Department - Unreviewed Assignee: Kortnie Kent Description: General P&Z Review - Reviewed Assignee: Ida Clark Description: Reviewed Review started: 08/25/2025, 9:06:26 AM MDT Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: Engineering Department - Unreviewed Assignee: Tyson Carpenter Description: The sidewalk is within their property line. I am assuming that is for when we widen S Tiger? What is the ROW out there? Reviews, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 2:43:03 PM MDT Attachment type(s): Sign Rendering/Picture VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 2:43:03 PM MDT DOC08_18_2514_11_15 (Original).pdf, DOC08_18_2514_11_15.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 2:43:20 PM MDT Contents: Current area Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 2:43:20 PM MDT Sheriff Office (Original).png, Sheriff Office.pdf image/png Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/19/2025, 1:55:10 PM MDT Contents: EMD Sign Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/19/2025, 1:55:10 PM MDT FW_ Lighted Sign (Original).pdf, FW_ Lighted Sign.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Public notice Letters Letters can be found from the package under the folder Letters Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Letter: Planning & Zoning Commission Notice of hearing 09/23/2025.pdf Link to public notice Link has not been published. Neighboring properties Neighbor radius: 1500 ft ID: RPJ535000ROAD0A Property owner(s): NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDING CO LLC ID: RPJ53500010010A Property owner(s): THE SCOULAR COMPANY ID: RPJ53500040030A Property owner(s): NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDING CO LLC ID: RPJ53500020010A Property owner(s): THE SCOULAR COMPANY Address: 2330 S DAVIS ST ID: RPJ00000309003A Property owner(s): NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDING CO LLC ID: RPJ18050010010A Property owner(s): BBL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC Address: 1401 LESLIE DR ID: RPJ00000296301A Property owner(s): HAY BOOMER LLC Address: 2526 TIGER DR S ID: RPJ00000309125A Property owner(s): IDAHO MILK PRODUCTS INC Address: 800 DAIRY DR ID: RPJ53510060010A Property owner(s): THE SCOULAR COMPANY ID: RP08S17E301816A Property owner(s): THOMPSON ARTHUR J Address: 1835 TIGER DR S ID: RP08S17E293000A Property owner(s): GILTNER WILLIAM C ID: RPJ00000309004A Property owner(s): IDAHO MILK PRODUCTS INC ID: RPJ00000294804A Property owner(s): HAY BOOMER LLC ID: RPJ53500040040A Property owner(s): NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDING CO LLC Public notice, page 1 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RP08S17E292401A Property owner(s): NOTCH BUTTE FARMS LLC ID: RPJ535200040100A Property owner(s): ABN PROPERTIES IDAHO LLC Address: 2423 S GARFIELD ID: RP08S17E300601A Property owner(s): BURGESS DAVID E & KATHLEEN G LIVING TRUST ID: RPJ53500010030A Property owner(s): THE SCOULAR COMPANY Address: 809 E AVE T ID: RPJ00000307493A Property owner(s): IDAHO MILK PRODUCTS INC Address: 2249 SOUTH TIGER DR ID: RPJ000003072RDA Property owner(s): CITY OF JEROME ID: RPJ00000309123A Property owner(s): IDAHO MILK PRODUCTS INC ID: RPJ53500010020A Property owner(s): THE SCOULAR COMPANY ID: RP08S17E295500A Property owner(s): GUTIERREZ Address: 2220 TIGER DR S ID: RPJ00000307209A Property owner(s): NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDING CO LLC ID: RP08S17E301801A Property owner(s): DAVIS FAMILY IDAHO LLC ID: RPJ18050030030A Property owner(s): BBL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC ID: RPJ00000307500A Property owner(s): NORTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT HOLDING CO LLC ID: RP08S17E301818A Property owner(s): STOCK RANDY Address: 1845 TIGER DR S Public notice, page 2 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Fees & Payments Application CONFIRMED BILL, CREATED ON 08/19/2025, 2:07:10 PM MDT Bill type Approval bill Fee schedule City of Jerome Fees Total amount $75.00 Due date 09/19/2025 FEES STATUS TITLE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT Unpaid Special Use Permit - Home Occupation, Livestock, Agriculture County Sign 1.0 $75.00 Fees & Payments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- From: George Oppedyk To: Ida Clark Subject: FW: Lighted Sign Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 1:47:51 PM Attachments: image001.png This is the sign we ordered. It lists the dimensions of it on it. According to Brent it will be secured on a concrete pad like the sign at 300 North Lincoln. From: George Oppedyk Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2025 10:35 AM To: Christopher Garner <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Lighted Sign Sheriff George Oppedyk Jerome County Sheriff’s Office 2151 South Tiger Drive Jerome, Idaho 83338 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 23rd day of September 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Jerome County Sheriff’s Office for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as T57 of N1/2NESE Jerome Unplatted (SE 30- 8-17), more commonly known as 2151 South Tiger Dr., Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by September 17th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon September 19th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 29th day of August 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: September 6th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFF'IDAVIT I/We, cerlify that on date of rnaillng (at leasi l5 days prior to hearing) the attached Notice of Public I-Iearing was mailed to all property owners within tll lSnO feet of the property located at and a notice was posted at said properly on Please attach: 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Properly Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested Witness: (at least l5 days prior to hearing) R:\01 - Plannirrg & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July,24.doc ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit – Electronic Message Display 1225 South Lincoln Ave, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: General Business (C-2) Subdivision: No Setbacks: N/A, Existing freestanding sign Summary: Applicant requests to incorporate an electronic message display in the existing freestanding sign. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: September 23, 2025 Subject: Staff Report Regarding the Request from Lytle Signs for a Special Use Permit, Allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign for Urgent Care on the Property More Commonly Known as 1225 South Lincoln Drive, Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Request: Staff Report I. Project Summary: The applicant is requesting to install an electronic message display (EMD) sign in the existing freestanding sign for Urgent Care. The parcel is zoned General Business which allows one freestanding sign not exceeding 200 square feet in area and no higher than 35 feet in height. The EMD display area shall not exceed 75% of the sign area. a. The display area is approximately 24 square feet and less than 75% of the sign area. The existing tenant signs will be reduced in size to accommodate the EMD sign's incorporation into the existing freestanding sign. II. The proposed signs will be subject to Section 17.32.040 Section Q since it has an electronic display. “Electronic Message Display”: A sign or portion thereof capable of displaying words, symbols, figures or images that can be electronically or mechanically changed by remote or automatic means.” a. 17.032.040: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL SIGNS, Section Any animated sign, electronic message display (EMD), illuminated advertising device or advertising display shall conform to the following requirements: 1. Shall contain static messages only and shall not have movement, or the appearance of optical illusion of movement of any part of the sign structure, design, or pictorial segment of the sign, including the movement or appearance of movement of any illumination or the flashing/varying of light intensity. 2. Each message or frame must be displayed for a minimum of three seconds. 3. Area shall not occupy more than seventy five percent (75%) of the sign. 4. Shall emit a light of constant intensity, and shall be constructed of hardware capable of programming that will limit the nits output to five thousand (5,000) on clear days and five hundred (500) nits from dawn to dusk. In no event shall such an illuminated sign or device be placed or directed to permit the beams and illumination therefrom to be directed or beamed upon a public thoroughfare, highway, sidewalk or adjacent premises to cause glare or reflection that may constitute a traffic hazard or nuisance. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org 5. Text only single color message displays with letters no higher than twelve inches (12") may scroll or travel without the static message limitation. Maximum area for such displays is sixty (60) square feet. 6. Each parcel of real property may have one electronic message display. 7. Such signs, displays, or device may not be installed on a nonconforming sign. 8. Animated signs and EMD are allowed by special use permit only and in accordance with chapter 17.60 of this title. (Ord. 1149, 2016) • The applicant acknowledges the guidelines and intends to comply. Special Use Permit Criteria Staff Analysis III. 17.60.030: GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed special use in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that such use at the proposed location: A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved; Staff Analysis: The Jerome Municipal Code allows an electronic message display sign with an approved special use permit in all zoning districts. B. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; Staff Analysis: The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; Staff Analysis: The applicant has provided professionally designed renderings of the sign and the EMD portion. The sign, as designed, is appropriate and harmonious with the area's existing character. The surrounding area consists of other commercial uses transitioning into residential. D. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; Staff Analysis: The applicant is required to meet the electronic display criteria. They have provided a rendering and electrical outline that meets the current code. E. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; Staff Analysis: An electronic message display sign will not require public facilities or services. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org Staff Analysis: As proposed, the electronic message display sign will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. G. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; Staff Analysis: The request to include an EMD sign will not be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic or glare. The applicant shall comply with the nit code requirement for illumination. H. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and Staff Analysis: The vehicular approaches to the property have remained unchanged. The sign is designed with automatic dimmers to decrease light during dust and at night. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Staff Analysis: The sign will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. IV. The following Design Review Guidelines should be considered: 1. Promote sign design and placement that reflects the community’s desire for human scale regarding height, proposition, site features, shapes and materials. The electronic message display sign is professionally designed and meets the appropriate height and materials required. The freestanding sign is existing. 2. Signs must be produced using professional workmanship without hand lettering or with a sloppy or garish paint job. The application indicates the sign will be professionally manufactured. 3. The primary sign(s) for a business must be constructed of permanent materials. Unacceptable temporary materials include but are not limited to paper, cardboard, vinyl banner, fabric, poster board, and unfinished wood. The pictures show it is constructed of durable, all-weather material. V. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the council may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: • Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; • Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; and • Comply with all City sign requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-16 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-16 Category Special Use Workspace state In approval Workspace created 08/11/2025, 4:14:34 PM MDT Application submitted 08/12/2025, 10:43:36 AM MDT Assignee Ida Clark Package generation date 09/15/2025, 9:44:02 AM MDT LOCATION INFORMATION Address 1225 LINCOLN AVE S, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ00000249002A, TAX 2216694 OF SESE SEC 24 T8 R16 JEROME UNPLATTED 1.00 AC PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Peyton Lookingbill Lytle Signs PO Box 305 Twin Falls [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant DJDK PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 5809 TWIN FALLS ID 83303 Property owner ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover page 1 Table of contents 2 Special Use 3-4 Council and committee meetings 5 Reviews 6 Attachments 7 Public notice 8-11 Fees & Payments 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- Special Use PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Project Information Current Use The current use of the property is Urgent Care of Idaho - Jerome. We are requesting to modify the existing freestanding sign to add an EMC to it. There will be no change in size or structure, as the sign was made to eventually to add the EMC. Zoning District C2 General Business Summary Narrative Statement August 12, 2025 City of Jerome Office of Planning & Zoning 152 E Ave A Jerome, Idaho 83338 Re: Special Use Permit Application for Urgent Care of Idaho - Jerome To whom this may concern: We are proposing to modify an existing freestanding sign for Urgent Care of Idaho on their property located at 1225 South Lincoln Ave., in Jerome, Idaho. The existing sign is at an existing building and an existing developed property. The freestanding sign will be adding an electronic message center. The sign will not change in square footage, and the structure will not change. The sign will be manufactured and installed by Lytle Signs and will have a professional appearance. There will not be any hand lettering or painting and the copy on the signs will be in English. The sign will be designed to blend with the construction on the property. We believe that this will not adversely affect the area and be in harmony with the vicinity, not changing the essential character of this commercial property. This Sign Review application has been submitted in accordance with the City of Jerome’s sign code and has met all the requirements. Sincerely, Peyton Lookingbill Special Use, page 1 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES Answer these as if they are questions relating to your request for a Special Use Permit A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in City code for the zoning district involved; Under section 17.32.040, all electronic message centers shall be allowed by special use permit only. B. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; The electronic message center will be incorporated into the sign. This is to update the sign with a new appearance, but not increase the size or placement of what was existing. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; The sign will be similar to the previous sign in height, square footage, and location with the exception of the electronic message center. D. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses The sign is in a commercial zone, it will not be in a location to adversely affect existing or future neighbors. E. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; The sign will not require any of these types of services. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; The sign will have no bearing on the economic welfare of the community and will require no public services. G. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; The sign will not affect any of the uses described above. H. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and There will be no interference with traffic, the sign will not flash and will have automatic dimmers for decreasing the light level at dusk and night times. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The location of the sign will not change nor have a negative impact on the above factors. Special Use, page 2 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 09/23/2025, 7:00:00 PM MDT Description: Urgent Care requesting to add an electronic message display sign Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 09/23/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviews REVIEWS General P&Z Review - Reviewed Assignee: Ida Clark Description: Reviewed Review started: 08/25/2025, 9:08:05 AM MDT Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: Adding to the existing freestanding sign. Reviews, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/12/2025, 10:41:34 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Site Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/12/2025, 10:41:34 AM MDT 11x17 (Original).pdf, 11x17.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/12/2025, 10:41:47 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Sign Rendering/Picture VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/12/2025, 10:41:47 AM MDT EMC - J07581 (Original).pdf, EMC - J07581.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/12/2025, 10:42:00 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Vicinity Map VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/12/2025, 10:42:00 AM MDT Urgent Care Jerome Building Drawings and Maps-1 (Original).pdf, Urgent Care Jerome Building Drawings and Maps-1.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/12/2025, 10:42:45 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Property Owner's written authorization VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/12/2025, 10:42:45 AM MDT Lytle Consent (Original).pdf, Lytle Consent.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Public notice Letters Letters can be found from the package under the folder Letters Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Letter: Planning & Zoning Commission Notice of hearing 09/23/2025.pdf Link to public notice Link has not been published. Neighboring properties Neighbor radius: 750 ft ID: RPJ17750050340A Property owner(s): ROSE CODY Address: 203 K AVE W ID: RPJ00000196610A Property owner(s): CITY OF JEROME URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY ID: RPJ17750040010A Property owner(s): TIBBITS JOHN E Address: 1024 BIRCH ST S ID: RPJ17750040020A Property owner(s): GREENLEY CHARLES JR Address: 227 J AVE W ID: RPJ00000196242A Property owner(s): FAIRBROTHER SUSIE LINDA ID: RPJ17750050260A Property owner(s): DIAZ-ANDRES GONZALO Address: 309 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750050350A Property owner(s): RUIZ MAGDALENO DE JESUS MORENO Address: 123 W AVE K ID: RPJ17750040090A Property owner(s): RAMIREZ NORMA HERNANDEZ Address: 216 K AVE W ID: RPJ00000247489A Property owner(s): STATE OF IDAHO DEPT OF HIGHWAYS ID: RPJ17750060020A Property owner(s): KLT LLC Address: 148 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750040100A Property owner(s): CONTRERAS-LUGO MARIA JOSEFINA Address: 222 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750030040A Property owner(s): THOMPSON KURT Public notice, page 1 / 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ14570010010A Property owner(s): PRESTWICK LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Address: 1285 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ17750040060A Property owner(s): MCCOOL BENJAMIN J Address: 1027 ALDER ST S ID: RPJ1457001002BA Property owner(s): WESTERN GAILES LTD PARTNERSHIP ID: RPJ00000196002A Property owner(s): CERVANTES ROCIO Address: 1228 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ13701610120A Property owner(s): DNKK LLC Address: 1120 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ17750020170A Property owner(s): PEREZ GABRIEL JIMENEZ Address: 306 K AVE W ID: RPJ13701610030A Property owner(s): KDJA LLC Address: 1210 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ17750040080A Property owner(s): ADVANCE STUCCO & STONE LLC Address: 210 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750050330A Property owner(s): NUNES STEVEN Address: 209 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750020180A Property owner(s): ESPINO CESAR I Address: 310 K AVE W ID: RPJ00000196101A Property owner(s): AGEQUITY HOLDINGS LLC Address: 1302 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ17750040110A Property owner(s): THOMPSON CLAIRISSA M Address: 228 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750050270A Property owner(s): BRAVO JORGE & GODOY SUSANA FAMILY TRUST Address: 303 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750050280A Property owner(s): ODIAGA JOHN Address: 237 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750040120A Property owner(s): HAYS KARL D Address: 234 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750050300A Property owner(s): SANDERSON CHERYL DENISE Address: 225 K AVE W Public notice, page 2 / 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ00000196008A Property owner(s): STATE OF IDAHO DEPT OF HIGHWAYS ID: RPJ00000196623A Property owner(s): CITY OF JEROME URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY ID: RPJ13701610130A Property owner(s): DNKK LLC Address: 1120 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ17750020160A Property owner(s): GALVAN JOSE PEREZ Address: 1029 BIRCH ST S ID: RPJ17750050320A Property owner(s): ODIAGA JOHN JR Address: 213 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750040030A Property owner(s): TAPIA LESLIE C CARLOS Address: 221 J AVE W ID: RPJ1775002014AA Property owner(s): DENNING KEN G Address: 1025 BIRCH ST S ID: RPJ17750040070A Property owner(s): MALDONADO SERGIO E CARDONA Address: 202 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750050360A Property owner(s): JUAREZ FELIMON SANCHEZ Address: 115 W AVE K ID: RPJ17750020130A Property owner(s): GIL KIMBERLEE Address: 311 J AVE W ID: RPJ17750050290A Property owner(s): RODRIGUEZ JOSE RUVALCABA Address: 231 K AVE W ID: RPJ00000196010A Property owner(s): CERVANTES ROCIO ID: RPJ13701610080A Property owner(s): STATE OF IDAHO DEPT OF HIGHWAYS ID: RPJ17750050370A Property owner(s): KLT LLC ID: RPJ1750001003FA Property owner(s): ELW HOLDINGS LLC ID: RPJ13701610140A Property owner(s): DNKK LLC ID: RPJ17500010050A Property owner(s): MENDOZA PROPERTIES LLC Address: 1323 LINCOLN AVE S Public notice, page 3 / 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ17750050250A Property owner(s): SANCHEZ MARICELA Address: 315 K AVE W ID: RPJ14570010030A Property owner(s): WESTERN GAILES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Address: 1285 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ17750050380A Property owner(s): KLT LLC ID: RPJ00000196654A Property owner(s): DARIGOLD INC ID: RPJ13700000000A ID: RPJ1457001002AA Property owner(s): BALTRAY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Address: 1285 LINCOLN AVE S ID: RPJ13701620060A Property owner(s): HUNT TIMOTHY L ID: RPJ17750050310A Property owner(s): GARCIA HUGO Address: 219 K AVE W ID: RPJ17750040050A Property owner(s): QUINTERO ENRIQUE Q Address: 209 J AVE W Public notice, page 4 / 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Fees & Payments Application PAID BILL, CREATED ON 08/13/2025, 9:29:10 AM MDT Bill type Approval bill Fee schedule City of Jerome Fees Total amount $125.00 Due date 09/01/2025 FEES STATUS TITLE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT Paid Special Use Permit - Commercial or Industrial Electronic Message Display Sign for Commercial Use 1.0 $125.00 PAYMENTS STATUS PAID ON PAYMENT METHOD PAYMENT DETAIL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AMOUNT Paid 08/18/2025, 11:23:16 AM MDT Over-the-counter Credit card $125.00 Fees & Payments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning application PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] For use by Principal Authority Cloudpermit application number US-ID41320-P-2025-16 PIN RPJ00000249002A Application submitted to City of Jerome, ID, Idaho Description of Subject Property Address 1225 LINCOLN AVE S Municipality City of Jerome, ID, Idaho PIN RPJ00000249002A Legal description TAX 2216694 OF SESE SEC 24 T8 R16 JEROME UNPLATTED 1.00 AC Purpose of Application Application type Special Use — New — Commercial Applicant Last name Lookingbill First name Peyton Corporation or partnership Lytle Signs Street address PO Box 305 Unit number Lot / Con. Municipality Twin Falls State Idaho ZIP code 83303 Other phone Mobile phone +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Email [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- Property owner Last name DJDK PROPERTIES LLC First name Corporation or partnership Street address PO BOX 5809 TWIN FALLS ID 83303 Unit number Lot / Con. Municipality State ZIP code Other phone Mobile phone Fax Email Declaration and Signatures Applicant I, Peyton Lookingbill (The Applicant), do hereby declare that the information contained in this application, the attached schedules and forms, the attached plans and specifications, and other attached documentation is true to the best of my knowledge. If a permit is granted, I agree to comply with Local Ordinances and the conditions of the permit. If the Applicant is a corporation or partnership, I have the authority to bind the corporation or partnership by signing off, I understand that it constitutes a legal signature confirming that I acknowledge and agree to the above declaration. Digitally signed on 08/12/2025, 10:43:23 AM MDT by Peyton Lookingbill. ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Information Current Use The current use of the property is Urgent Care of Idaho - Jerome. We are requesting to modify the existing freestanding sign to add an EMC to it. There will be no change in size or structure, as the sign was made to eventually to add the EMC. Zoning District C2 General Business Summary Narrative Statement August 12, 2025 City of Jerome Office of Planning & Zoning 152 E Ave A Jerome, Idaho 83338 Re: Special Use Permit Application for Urgent Care of Idaho - Jerome To whom this may concern: We are proposing to modify an existing freestanding sign for Urgent Care of Idaho on their property located at 1225 South Lincoln Ave., in Jerome, Idaho. The existing sign is at an existing building and an existing developed property. The freestanding sign will be adding an electronic message center. The sign will not change in square footage, and the structure will not change. The sign will be manufactured and installed by Lytle Signs and will have a professional appearance. There will not be any hand lettering or painting and the copy on the signs will be in English. The sign will be designed to blend with the construction on the property. We believe that this will not adversely affect the area and be in harmony with the vicinity, not changing the essential character of this commercial property. This Sign Review application has been submitted in accordance with the City of Jerome’s sign code and has met all the requirements. Sincerely, Peyton Lookingbill GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES Answer these as if they are questions relating to your request for a Special Use Permit A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in City code for the zoning district involved; Under section 17.32.040, all electronic message centers shall be allowed by special use permit only. B. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; The electronic message center will be incorporated into the sign. This is to update the sign with a new appearance, but not increase the size or placement of what was existing. C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; The sign will be similar to the previous sign in height, square footage, and location with the exception of the electronic message center. D. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses The sign is in a commercial zone, it will not be in a location to adversely affect existing or future neighbors. E. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; The sign will not require any of these types of services. F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; The sign will have no bearing on the economic welfare of the community and will require no public services. G. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; The sign will not affect any of the uses described above. H. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and There will be no interference with traffic, the sign will not flash and will have automatic dimmers for decreasing the light level at dusk and night times. I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The location of the sign will not change nor have a negative impact on the above factors. ---PAGE BREAK--- 1225 8’-3” 3’-5” 3’-0” Urgent Care of Idaho Jerome, ID 7/16/2025 CL AS Urgent Care of Idaho\EMC - J07851 J07851 LYTLE SIGNS © 2025 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Twin Falls P.O. BOX 305 1925 KIMBERLY RD. TWIN FALLS, ID 83303 [PHONE REDACTED] 1.[PHONE REDACTED] fax [PHONE REDACTED] Boise/Meridian 2070 E. COMMERCIAL ST. MERIDIAN, ID 83642 [PHONE REDACTED] fax [PHONE REDACTED] THIS RENDERING IS CONCEPTUAL — COLORS MAY NOT REPRESENT ACTUAL FINISH — ILLUMINATED AND DAYLIGHT COLORS WILL VARY UNAUTHORIZED USE, REPRODUCTION AND/OR DISPLAY SHALL RENDER THE INFRINGER LIABLE FOR UP TO $150,000 IN STATUTORY DAMAGES, PLUS ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS FOR EACH INFRINGEMENT UNDER THE U.S. COPYRIGHT ACT (17 U.S.C. 412 & 504) lytlesigns.com CLIENT: ADDRESS: DATE: ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE: DRAWN BY: FILE NAME: QUOTE: REVISIONS: PAGE OF 1 APPROVED BY: DATE: SCALE: 3/8” = 1’ 1 EXISTING PROPOSED EMC RETROFIT REMOVE (4X) EXISTING TENANT PANELS RETROFIT NEW 10MM FULL COLOR EMC 90 X 240 PIXEL MATRIX 3’ X 8’ VIEWING AREA MANUFACTURE NEW: (2X) HORIZONTAL ALUMINUM DIVIDERS PAINTED SENSUOUS GRAY (SW 7081) (4X) NEW WHITE POLYCARBONATE PANELS BRIGHT BLUE (#167) AND TEAL (#246) TRANSLUCENT VINYL GRAPHICS APPLIED INSTALLED IN BOTH SIDES OF EXISTING TENANT CABINET 1’-6” 1’-6” ---PAGE BREAK--- Freestanding sign to be modified EMC added ---PAGE BREAK--- Parcel RPJ00000249002A ---PAGE BREAK--- Letter of Consent City of Jerome Idaho sign permit application As Owner of Urgent Care of Idaho This letter is to confirm that Lytle Signs Inc. has permission and is authorized to act as our agent regarding any activities involving the application and permit of the business located at: 1225 South Lincoln Ave 8/8/25 Kyle James ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 23rd day of September 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Lytle Signs representing Urgent Care of Idaho for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as Tax 2216694 of SESE 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1225 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by September 17th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon September 19th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 29th day of August 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: September 6th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 1 1 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 1 18 11 16 15 12 12 21 27 9 1 3 5 7 8 6 4 2 68 69 33 31 30 34 35 37 41 40 39 38 51 52 53 49 48 47 46 50 5957 55 65 62 61 64 74 75 76 77 79 80 85 86 87 92 91 96 97 10 27 25 23 19 17 15 13 11 12141618 20 222426 28 129 121 115 215 401 327 323 319 315 309 305 301 227 221 215 209 307 311 315 321 325 329 401 407 304 308 314 318 322 326 408 148 202 210 216 222 228 306 310 314 320 324 328 400 406 333 327 321 315 309 303 237 231 225 219 213 209 203 123 115 109 103 311 307 303 304 306 310 311 303 300 304 310 311 301 225 225 201 221 [PHONE REDACTED] 1005 1027 1343 1323 1285 1225 1410 1302 1016 1100 1210 1120 1102 1038 1030 1228 1 5 3 6 4 5 2 A-161 A-162 Ridley's D & B Supply Lincoln Plaza Rotary Park B & R Bearing Progressive Dairyman Family Dollar Retail Spaces Jerome Homes Plaza Mexico Links Properties Farnsworth Mortuary S Lincoln Ave W Avenue I W Avenue K E Avenue I S Birch St W Avenue J S Alder St E Avenue J E Avenue K W Avenue J 1 inch = 250 feet . 1225 S Lincoln Nearest Neighbor 500ft 1225 S Lincoln January 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFF'IDAVIT r/we, ikhr [l\rO++ , certify that on t , narne(s) date of rnbiling (at lbast 15 a"vs prio,' to t ea.i,ui the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within feet of the propertv rocated at iso5 1*:r*r##ft*:r,,rrh*n , /i ru, and a notice was posted at said properly on Witn 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Property Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested My commission "*prr"r, (ii?bg attach: Please rI (at least 15 days prior to hearing) R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July ,24.doc %ktm ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Variance – Residential Interior Side Setback 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: Residential 2 (R-2) Subdivision: No Setbacks: Front 25’, Interior Side Side street 15’ Summary: The applicant requests a variance to the interior side yard from 7’ to The covered car porch will be removed. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: September 23, 2025 Subject: Staff Report Regarding the Request from Lorena Ortega for a Side Yard Setback Variance on the Property Commonly Known as 401 6th Ave East, Jerome, Idaho. Variance Request: Staff Report I. Background—401 6th Ave East is two parcels, lots 5 and 6 of Block 21. An existing house sits over the north-south lot line. The applicant would like the opportunity to sell or build another house on the second lot. The existing survey does not meet the current interior side setbacks of seven feet from the foundation to the new property line. The new lot line is approximately five feet from the foundation. The variance would allow the existing home’s foundation, on lot 6, to be five feet from the new lot line instead of seven feet as stated in JMC. Any new home on lot 5 would be required to meet the side yard setbacks of seven feet on both sides. II. Regarding Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. Lots 5 and 6 are zoned Residential 2 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: i. Front: 25’, Rear 20’, Interior Side Side Street 15’ III. The Jerome Municipal Code defines a variance as: a modification of the requirements of this title as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings, or other provisions of this title affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or special privilege. Still, it may be granted to an applicant only upon a showing of undue hardship because of the site's characteristics and that the variance does not conflict with the public interest. Variance Criteria Staff Analysis IV. 17.70.030: VARIANCES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed variance request in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that the requested variance conforms to the following standards: a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which do not apply to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district; i. Staff Analysis: The application notes that the existing single-family home encroaches onto lot 5 by about two feet. This is common in the City of Jerome, as we allow homes to be built over the lot lines, and the setbacks have been changed over the years. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org b. That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title; i. Staff Analysis: A literal interpretation of the title would not deprive the applicant of any rights enjoyed by other properties. The applicant is requesting a variance to build; however, alternative options can be considered. c. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; i. Staff Analysis: The house was existing and leaves a large area for yard that the new property owner does not want. The new property owner would like to adjust the property lines to allow for another home. d. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege denied by this title to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. i. Staff Analysis: Variances are typically granted when the applicant proves undue hardship because of the site's characteristics and the variance does not conflict with the public interest. The applicant has not proven an undue hardship; however, there is no conflict with public interest. V. 17.70.040: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: Under no circumstances shall a variance or an appeal of a variance be granted to allow a use not permissible under the terms of this title and the zoning district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this title in said district. (Ord. 1070, 2010) a. Conditions: i. The open carport must be removed before a building permit can be issued. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-5 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-5 Category Lot Line Adjustment / Merger Workspace state In approval Workspace created 07/14/2025, 10:15:51 AM MDT Application submitted 07/15/2025, 1:53:32 PM MDT Assignee Tyson Carpenter Package generation date 09/15/2025, 10:00:58 AM MDT LOCATION INFORMATION Address 401 6TH AVE E, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ1370021005AA, LOT 5 & 6 BLK 21 JEROME TOWNSITE (SW 18-8-17) 12,500 SQFT PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Brian Woelke 401 6th Ave E Jerome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Property owner Lorena Ortega 234 W 100 N Jerome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant Brian Woelke 401 6th Ave E Jerome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Property owner Lorena Ortega 234 W 100 N Jerome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant ---PAGE BREAK--- Lot Line Adjustment Application PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Lot #1 (Lot to be reduced) Parcel No. RPJ1370021005AA Current Lot Size: 6250 Lot Size Reduced by: 1000 Lot Size Created: 5250 Lot #2 (Lot to be increased) Parcel No. RPJ1370021005AA Current Lot Size: 6250 Lot Size Increased by: 997 Lot Size Created: 7247 GENERAL INFORMATION Zone Site Plan: Must be Mechanical Drawings which are descriptive precision drawings to scale, done with the aid of drafting implements such as a ruler, T squares, compasses, etc. May be drawn by hand or computer-aided design programs Other: any such information as may be deemed necessary by the Planning & Zoning Administrator. Residential 1 Residential 2 Residential 3 Residential Multi-Family C1 Neighborhood Business C2 General Business C3 High Density Business Central Business District M1 Light Industrial M2 Heavy Industrial Public/Semi Public Mixed Use Lot Line Adjustment Application, page 1 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Checklist * Copy of the Deeds showing ownership and the legal descriptions * Vicinity Map showing streets, driveways, property lines, etc. * Narrative Statement demonstrating that the proposed lot line adjustment conforms to the following standards: o Will not reduce the area, frontage, width, depth, or building setback lines of each building site below the minimum zoning requirements o Will not increase the original number of lots in any block of the recorded plat * A legal description of the original lot(s) to be adjusted * Site Plan o The site plan must be a Mechanical Drawing drawn with descriptive precision using the aid of drafting implements such as a ruler, T squares, compasses, etc. May be drawn either by hand or computer generated. o Must be to scale using an accurate drawing scale (for example: “1 in. = 10 ft.”, “1 in. = 100 ft.” etc.) and on a minimum of 11" x 17” paper. o A depiction of all existing building(s) with either the distances from the buildings to any parcel boundary line established by the survey or a note that the building(s) are to be demolished at the time of any remodeling or new construction o Location of existing and proposed sanitary sewers, sewer services, storm drains, water supply mains, water services, fire hydrants, irrigation, and culverts within the property and immediately adjacent thereto. Lot Line Adjustment Application, page 2 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Pre-consultation PRE-CONSULTATION Application id US-ID41320-P-2025-5 Category Lot Line Adjustment / Merger Workspace status In approval Requested date and time 07/14/2025, 10:28:29 AM MDT Zoning - Pre-consultation status Completed RESULT Held. Need Notarized form for Brian. PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Brian Woelke 401 6th Ave E Jerome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Property owner Lorena Ortega 234 W 100 N Jerome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant Pre-consultation, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 09/23/2025, 7:00:00 PM MDT Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 09/23/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Conditions and comments Conditions Number: 1 Condition name: Lot Line Adjustment/Merger/Split Status: Draft Text: 1. Upon recordation, the applicant shall notify the Planning & Zoning office by producing a recorded copy of the Record of Survey. The Record of Survey shall be completed per the requirements of Chapter 19, Title 55 of the Idaho Code. 2. New deeds must be recorded, and any existing and newly created easements must be recorded with deeds. Comments and responses Attached car port must be removed before any permits can be issued. Conditions and comments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Pre-consultation Uploaded on: 07/14/2025, 10:28:20 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Site Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 07/14/2025, 10:28:20 AM MDT DOC07_14_2509_34_25 (Original)_2.pdf, DOC07_14_2509_34_25_2.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 07/14/2025, 10:34:55 AM MDT Attachment type(s): New Legals VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 07/14/2025, 10:34:55 AM MDT DOC07_14_2509_34_05 (Original).pdf, DOC07_14_2509_34_05.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 07/14/2025, 10:35:13 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Site Plan, Survey VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 07/14/2025, 10:35:13 AM MDT DOC07_14_2509_34_25 (Original).pdf, DOC07_14_2509_34_25.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 07/15/2025, 1:38:31 PM MDT Attachment type(s): Deed, Property Owner's written authorization VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 07/15/2025, 1:38:31 PM MDT Owner Authorization (Original).pdf, Owner Authorization.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Public notice Letters Letters can be found from the package under the folder Letters Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Letter: Planning & Zoning Commission Notice of hearing 09/23/2025.pdf Link to public notice Link has not been published. Neighboring properties Neighbor radius: 500 ft ID: RPJ13700400020A Property owner(s): CAMPBELL RICHARD Address: 419 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019009AA Property owner(s): FARFAN ENIO Address: 708 BUCHANAN ST N ID: RPJ1370020001BA Property owner(s): COFFEL DEBORAH S Address: 421 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370021011BA Property owner(s): WESTEC ENTERPRISES LLC Address: 420 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700200060A Property owner(s): LARSEN JESSE L Address: 401 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019003AA Property owner(s): QUINTERO ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ Address: 319 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370022003AA Property owner(s): SCARROW DONALD L Address: 321 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700190080A Property owner(s): BLAKLEY DONNA L Address: 301 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700220110A Property owner(s): ANDREWS BENJAMIN P Address: 308 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700220060A Property owner(s): SCARROW DON JR Address: 309 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370020000AA Property owner(s): COLEMAN BONNIE Public notice, page 1 / 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ13700220080A Property owner(s): LUPHER BILL S Address: 301 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370210003AA Property owner(s): WHEELOCK WENDY Address: 720 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ1370021010AA Property owner(s): LOPEZ JANET GARCIA Address: 414 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13702090040A Property owner(s): BOLICH ERIC SCOTT Address: 610 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ13700220010A Property owner(s): VILLAGOMEZ ARMANDO PIZANO Address: 329 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700390030A Property owner(s): GARCIA MARIA G HERNANDEZ Address: 321 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700200050A Property owner(s): WORTHINGTON AMY Address: 405 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370209010AA Property owner(s): GIBBONS SHERYL J Address: 501 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370040005AA Property owner(s): HUNT TIMOTHY L Address: 405 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370022013AA Property owner(s): PIERCE KARISSA M Address: 322 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700390020A Property owner(s): ABONZA DAISY Address: 325 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370021007BA Property owner(s): ELLIS PHILLIP Address: 400 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370021005AA Property owner(s): WOELKE BRIAN K Address: 401 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019010AA Property owner(s): MOLINA RONALD SALINAS Address: 306 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370020010AA Property owner(s): MOBLEY ADA Address: 705 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ13702090020A Property owner(s): AHRENS COREY RAY Address: 521 6TH AVE E Public notice, page 2 / 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ1370022002BA Property owner(s): MADRIGAL EDUARDO RUIZ Address: 325 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370039007AA Property owner(s): GARCIA JOSE L Address: 520 1/2 BUCHANAN ST N ID: RPJ13702090060A Property owner(s): APPELL WALTER E Address: 606 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ1370019001AA Property owner(s): THORNTON ROBERT E E Address: 351 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019016AA Property owner(s): LEMRICK BONNIE KAY Address: 324 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13702050010A Property owner(s): DMC REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC Address: 526 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ1370021002AA Property owner(s): KRANZLER ERIC Address: 421 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700220120A Property owner(s): HILARIDES HEATHER Address: 312 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370022004AA Property owner(s): SCARROW DONALD LEE JR Address: 307 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370021002BA Property owner(s): COOK GERALD L ID: RPJ1370040006AA Property owner(s): NELSON JIM Address: 401 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700400010A Property owner(s): FLORES RENTAL COMPANY LLC Address: 421 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370022014AA Property owner(s): SEWARD MICHAEL Address: 324 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13702090070A Property owner(s): SILVA JAVIER Address: 600 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ13700190070A Property owner(s): WRIGHT WILLIAM O JR Address: 305 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ13702100100A Property owner(s): MCALEE ERIC R Address: 512 6TH AVE E Public notice, page 3 / 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ13700390050A Property owner(s): TRUJILLO JOSEPH P ID: RPJ13700220100A Property owner(s): TORRES ROBERTO ESTRADA Address: 304 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370021011AA Property owner(s): DAVIS NEAL E Address: 609 DAVIS ST N ID: RPJ1370039008AA Property owner(s): NUNES AUGUSTO A Address: 520 BUCHANAN ST N ID: RPJ13702090130A Property owner(s): BARNES TRACY L Address: 515 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700390010A Property owner(s): CASEL BLAKE W Address: 329 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019002AA Property owner(s): LIMAS GABRIEL JR Address: 325 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370020008AA Property owner(s): HUBER ALEXIS PAIGE Address: 410 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019013AA Property owner(s): ALLPHIN RICHARD Address: 320 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019005AA Property owner(s): LEVDANSKIY PETER & NADEZHDA TRUST Address: 313 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700390060A Property owner(s): GROVE BARBARA J Address: 311 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700220070A Property owner(s): CISNEROS BALBINA TENA Address: 305 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370019012AA Property owner(s): AGUILAR REYES Address: 308 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700210090A Property owner(s): AGUILAR SAUL Address: 408 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700220090A Property owner(s): MEYERS ROBERT J Address: 600 BUCHANAN ST N ID: RPJ13700390040A Property owner(s): LACELLE DAVID LYNN Address: 319 5TH AVE E Public notice, page 4 / 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ID: RPJ13700400030A Property owner(s): MERCADO ALMA VERONICA Address: 413 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700200030A Property owner(s): ACUNA JOSE ISABEL Address: 413 7TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700400040A Property owner(s): WESTEC ENTERPRISES LLC Address: 409 5TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700000000A ID: RPJ13702100010A Property owner(s): FEENSTRA LIVING TRUST Address: 508 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ1370021007AA Property owner(s): GARCIA JOSE L Address: 604 CLEVELAND ST N ID: RPJ1370020007BA Property owner(s): JUAREZ ADMED IRAM ALBARRAN Address: 404 6TH AVE E ID: RPJ13700200040A Property owner(s): WHEELER ALEC M Address: 409 7TH AVE E Public notice, page 5 / 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 23rd day of September 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Lorena Ortega for a Variance reducing the side setback from seven feet to five feet on the parcel described as Lot 6 of Blk 21 of the Jerome Townsite 18-8-17, more commonly known as 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by September 17th, 2025, or physically submitted by noon September 19th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 29th day of August 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: September 6th, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- name(s) date of nJailing (at least l5 days prior to hearing) the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all propefiy owners within r/we, ntlt+ , cerrify that on feet of the propertv l0cated at 70 l r , /cr^ , . , PUBLIC NOTICE AFFIDAVIT and a notice was posted at said properly on Kfihr [ltior+ Printed Name(s) Witn Please attach: 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Properly Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested l l l t l 5 days pdol to healing) R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of Publication- July'24.doc t ruJ: ) ollR t t t ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: September 23, 2025 Subject: Exterior Façade Design Review for 124 Main Street East, Jerome, ID The property is located in a cluster building sharing walls east and west. The property is located in the Design Review Overlay District, within 150 feet of the right-of-way of Main Street as defined in Jerome Municipal Code Chapter 17.10.020, M. The application proposes an exterior update, including new windows, a new door, and stucco and rock masonry. The following Design Review Guidelines should be considered: 1. Section 5.0 Guidelines for All Projects a. Section 5.1 Site Planning i. Guideline #1 Adjacent Buildings and Uses The proposed building is in a cluster and shares walls with two other buildings. The proposed updates will complement the other buildings in the area. b. Section 5.2 Architecture i. Guidelines #13 & #14 Enhance Jerome Classic Styles and Minimize Scale The existing building will remain; however, the proposed façade updates will renew interest while maintaining the classic style. ii. Guidelines #22 and #24 Wall Materials and Wall Colors The application proposes updated colors in grey masonry with dark charcoal as an accent color. This façade update will enhance appeal on Main Street while avoiding harsh colors and combinations. iii. Guideline #23 Shop Front Design Shop fronts should avoid gimmicky, garishness, and excessive ornamentation. The proposed update is modern and improves the shop front that has been neglected. 2. Recommended Conditions: a. Workmanship shall be professional in nature, and any painting shall have at least two coats. b. Coordinate with the City on improvements with the Main Street Improvements project. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning application PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] For use by Principal Authority Cloudpermit application number US-ID41320-P-2025-15 PIN RPJ13700770220A Application submitted to City of Jerome, ID, Idaho Description of Subject Property Address 124 MAIN ST E Municipality City of Jerome, ID, Idaho PIN RPJ13700770220A Legal description LOT 22 BLK 77 JEROME TOWNSITE (SW 18-8-17) 3,125 SQFT Purpose of Application Application type Design Review — Facade Update Applicant Last name Madsen First name Kyndell Corporation or partnership Street address 134 3rd ave e Unit number Lot / Con. Municipality Twin Falls State Idaho ZIP code 83301 Other phone +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Mobile phone +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Email [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- Property owner Last name S & J HOLDINGS LLC First name Corporation or partnership Street address 351 BOB BARTON RD JEROME ID 83338 Unit number Lot / Con. Municipality State ZIP code Other phone Mobile phone Fax Email Declaration and Signatures Applicant I, Kyndell Madsen (The Applicant), do hereby declare that the information contained in this application, the attached schedules and forms, the attached plans and specifications, and other attached documentation is true to the best of my knowledge. If a permit is granted, I agree to comply with Local Ordinances and the conditions of the permit. If the Applicant is a corporation or partnership, I have the authority to bind the corporation or partnership by signing off, I understand that it constitutes a legal signature confirming that I acknowledge and agree to the above declaration. Digitally signed on 08/25/2025, 10:57:40 AM MDT by Kyndell Madsen. Instructions Submittal Deadline: Due two weeks prior to the next scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Application Must Contain: □ Narrative statement □ Property owner’s written authorization, if applicable □ Description of color and/or exterior materials (if applicable) □ Paint swatches □ Pictures or drawings of proposed updates Facade Update Narrative Statement Facade remodel, rock veneer finish with an updated canopy. This project also includes an interior remodel. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-15 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-15 Category Design Review Workspace state In approval Workspace created 08/11/2025, 1:10:41 PM MDT Application submitted 08/25/2025, 10:57:50 AM MDT Assignee Package generation date 09/15/2025, 11:02:26 AM MDT LOCATION INFORMATION Address 124 MAIN ST E, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ13700770220A, LOT 22 BLK 77 JEROME TOWNSITE (SW 18-8-17) 3,125 SQFT PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Kyndell Madsen 134 3rd ave e Twin Falls [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant S & J HOLDINGS LLC 351 BOB BARTON RD JEROME ID 83338 Property owner ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 09/23/2025, 7:00:00 PM MDT Description: Facade update Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 09/23/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/11/2025, 1:51:06 PM MDT Attachment type(s): Architectural Elevations, Building Sections, Construction Plans, Exterior Building Elevations, Facade Design Plan, Floor Plans VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/11/2025, 1:51:06 PM MDT 124 E MAIN JEROME W AWNING 7.28.25 (Original).pdf, 124 E MAIN JEROME W AWNING 7.28.25.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/11/2025, 1:51:33 PM MDT Contents: SITE PLAN Attachment type(s): Site Plan Drawing number: A1-0 VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/11/2025, 1:51:33 PM MDT 124 E MAIN JEROME W AWNING SITE PLAN (Original).pdf, 124 E MAIN JEROME W AWNING SITE PLAN.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/25/2025, 8:39:30 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Property Owner's written authorization VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/25/2025, 8:39:30 AM MDT SJH Lettter head - 124 Main - P&Z Letter (Original).pdf, SJH Lettter head - 124 Main - P&Z Letter.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/25/2025, 10:55:41 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/25/2025, 10:55:41 AM MDT EXISTING FRONT (Original).png, EXISTING FRONT .pdf image/png Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/25/2025, 10:56:23 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/25/2025, 10:56:23 AM MDT IMG_20250127_111409013 (Original).jpg, IMG_20250127_111409013.pdf image/jpeg Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/25/2025, 10:56:23 AM MDT Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/25/2025, 10:56:23 AM MDT IMG_20250127_111412202 (Original).jpg, IMG_20250127_111412202.pdf image/jpeg Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Public notice Letters Letters can be found from the package under the folder Letters Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Letter: Planning & Zoning Commission Notice of hearing 09/23/2025.pdf Link to public notice Link has not been published. Public notice, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Ref DN DN Ref DN DN UP DN DN UP UP DN DN UP 2' 5' 9' 6' 20' 5' 6' 4' 8' 7' 11' 9' 10' 13' 8' 13' 13' 13' 7' 6" 6 12' 7' 6" 5' 6" 10' 6' 9' 6" 8' 7' 6" 10' 5' 6' 5' 6" 1 A6-0 8' 9' 4' 6' 4' 8' 5' 2' 9' 6' 1' 5' 3' 5' 2' 4' 2A10BC F.E. 2A10BC F.E. FEIE FEIE 1 A6-0 ADA R.R. 7 BREAK ROOM 6 OFFICE 5 OFFICE 4 WORK ROOM 3 OFFICE 2 CONFERNECE 1 OPEN OFFICE 9 STORAGE 8 8' 6" 14' 15' 6" 14' 6" 6' 4' 6" 5' 6" 5' 5' 18' 37' 13' 15' 6" 13' 6" 3' 6" 7' 4' 2' 37' 12' 2A10BC F.E. OCCUPANT LOAD ASSEMBLY W/ FIXED SEATS 8 SEATS STORAGE 2736 SF / 300 = 9 OFFICE / BUSINESS 1833 SF / 150 = 13 TOTAL OCCUPANTS 30 LICENSED AR-985708 ARCHITECT R. COLBY RICKS STATE OF IDAHO DATE Drawn Laughlin Ricks Architecture (208) 736-8050 134 3RD Ave East, * Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 architecture/planning DATE: Checked PROJECT # TWIN CAPTIAL HOMES OFFICE SPACE 214 E MAIN ST. JEROME A0-1 KC CODE ANALYSIS RCR 7/7/25 REMODEL FOR: 7/7/25 25006 3/16" = 1'-0" 1 MAIN FLR EXITING 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 MAIN FLR OCCUPANCY 3/16" = 1'-0" 3 BASEMENT OCCUPANCY 3/16" = 1'-0" 4 BASEMENT FLR EXITING 1/4" = 1'-0" 5 OCCUPANCY KEY PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT 33 / 2 = 17 TOILETS 1 PER 25 FOR THE FIRST 50 AND 1 PER 50 FOR THE REMAINDER EXCEEDING 50 1 REQUIRED SEE EXCEPTION BELOW LAVATORIES 1 PER 40 FOR THE FIRST 80 AND 1 PER 80 FOR THE REMAINDER EXCEEDING 80 1 REQUIRED SEE THE EXCEPTION BELOW DRINKING FOUNTAIN 1 PER 100 0 PROVIDED SEE EXCEPTION BELOW OTHER 1 SERVICE SINK 1 REQ'D 1 PROVIDED IDAHO PLUMBING CODE IDAHO PLUMBING CODE 415.2 DRINKING FOUNTAINS ALTERNATIVE DRINKING FOUNTAINS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED FOR AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 30 OR LESS. 422.2 SEPARATE FACILITIES EXCEPTION: IN BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES WITH A TOTAL OCCUPANT LOAD OF 50 OR LESS INCLUDING CUSTOMERS & EMPLOYEES, ONE TOILET FACILITY, DESIGNED FOR USE BY NO MORE THAN ON PERSON AT A TIME, SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR USE BY BOTH SEXES. ---PAGE BREAK--- METAL ROOF ADHERED ROCK MASONRY VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOORS VINYL WINDOW STUCCO FINISH SYSTEM - LICENSED AR-985708 ARCHITECT R. COLBY RICKS STATE OF IDAHO DATE Drawn Laughlin Ricks Architecture (208) 736-8050 134 3RD Ave East, * Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 architecture/planning DATE: Checked PROJECT # TWIN CAPTIAL HOMES OFFICE SPACE 214 E MAIN ST. JEROME A3-0 KC EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS RCR 7/7/25 REMODEL FOR: 7/7/25 25006 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 EXTERIOR EL 2 3D View 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- WALL 4' - 9 1/4" TRUSSES PLYWOOD BOUNDARY NAILING MANUFACTURED WOOD TRUSS FRAMES AT 24" O.C. 1/2" PLYWOOD ON ALL EXPOSED SIDES OF TRUSS FRAMES FASTED TO FRAMES W/ 8D NAILS AT 6" O.C. AT PANEL EDGE AND 12" O.C. ELSE WHERE 2X CONT. BLOCKING AT CORNERS SIMPSON SDWC15600 SCREW FROM EACH NEW TRUSS TO EACH TRUSS 7/8" GAP CONT. TRUSS BLOCKING 60.00° DECKING 0"-1/2" GAP 1/2" GAP NON VENTED METAL SOFFIT 1' - 11" INSULATION TO FILL SPACE T.P.O. UP AND OVER METAL ROOF METAL CAP INSULATION TO FILL SPACE ADHERED ROCK MASONRY VENEER LAYERS TYPE D BLDG PAPER & DRAINAGE MAT EXTERIOR SHEATHING 2X6 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. R-21 BATT INSULATION VAPOR BARRIER 5/8" GYP BD TYPICAL @ EXTERIOR WALLS U.N.O. 1/2" CEMENT BD W/ STUCCO FINISH LAYERS TYPE D BLDG PAPER & DRAINAGE MAT EXTERIOR SHEATHING 2X6 FRAMING @ 16" O.C. R-21 BATT INSULATION VAPOR BARRIER 5/8" GYP BD ICE & WATER SHIELD UP & OVER TPO 1/2" PLYWOOD 24 GA. PRE FINISHED METAL FLASHING W/ DRIP EDGE-UP & UNDER ICE & WATER SHIELD 5/8 GYP. BD METAL SOFFIT LICENSED AR-985708 ARCHITECT R. COLBY RICKS STATE OF IDAHO DATE Drawn Laughlin Ricks Architecture (208) 736-8050 134 3RD Ave East, * Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 architecture/planning DATE: Checked PROJECT # TWIN CAPTIAL HOMES OFFICE SPACE 214 E MAIN ST. JEROME A6-0 KC WALL SECTION RCR 7/7/25 REMODEL FOR: 7/7/25 25006 1" = 1'-0" 1 Section 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- DATE Drawn Laughlin Ricks Architecture (208) 736-8050 134 3RD Ave East, * Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 architecture/planning DATE: Checked PROJECT # TWIN CAPTIAL HOMES OFFICE SPACE 214 E MAIN ST. JEROME SKS-01 KC AWNING DETAIL RCR 7/7/25 REMODEL FOR: 7/7/25 25006 ---PAGE BREAK--- WELLS FARGO BANK ARACELY'S BOUTIQUE WAFD BANK MAIN STREET CUSTOM CUTTING & GRILL COOK REALTY ALLEY N ADAMS ST W MAIN ST S LINCOLN AVE VACANT PARKING PARKING DRIVE THRU PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING AREA OF WORK DATE Drawn Laughlin Ricks Architecture (208) 736-8050 134 3RD Ave East, * Twin Falls, Idaho 83301 architecture/planning DATE: Checked PROJECT # TWIN CAPTIAL HOMES OFFICE SPACE 214 E MAIN ST. JEROME A1-0 KC SITE PLAN RCR 7/7/25 REMODEL FOR: 7/7/25 25006 1" = 20'-0" 1 Site ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- S&J Holdings, LLC Mailing: 148 Blue Lakes Blvd N #308, Twin Falls, ID 83301 Physical: 647 Filer Ave Ste 101, Twin Falls, ID 83301 [EMAIL REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] 8/21/25 RE: 124 E Main St, - P&Z Review – submission authorization To whom it may concern: We authorize Laughlin Ricks Architecture to submit and represent us for P&Z application and design review for the proposals for improvements at 124 E Main St, Jerome. S&J Holdings, LLC Jeremy Orton, Managing Member ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: September 23, 2025 Subject: Staff report on Design Review for Jean Reyes at 210 West Main St., Jerome, ID The property is located in a cluster building sharing walls east and west. The property is located in the Design Review Overlay District, within 150 feet of the right-of-way of Main Street as defined in Jerome Municipal Code Chapter 17.10.020, M. The application proposes an exterior update, including new windows and stucco. The following Design Review Guidelines should be considered: 1. Section 5.0 Guidelines for All Projects a. Section 5.1 Site Planning i. Guideline #1 Adjacent Buildings and Uses The proposed building is in a cluster and shares walls with two other buildings. The proposed updates will complement the other buildings in the area. b. Section 5.2 Architecture i. Guidelines #13 & #14 Enhance Jerome Classic Styles and Minimize Scale The existing building will remain; however, the proposed façade updates will renew interest while maintaining the classic style. ii. Guidelines #22 and #24 Wall Materials and Wall Colors The application proposes updated colors in green with dark charcoal as an accent color. This façade update will enhance appeal on Main Street while avoiding harsh colors and combinations. iii. Guideline #23 Shop Front Design Shop fronts should avoid gimmicky, garishness, and excessive ornamentation. The proposed update is modern and improves the shop front. 2. Recommended Conditions: a. Workmanship shall be professional in nature, and any painting shall have at least two coats. b. Coordinate with the City on improvements with the Main Street Improvements project. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-23 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-23 Category Design Review Workspace state In review Workspace created 08/18/2025, 12:52:48 PM MDT Application submitted 08/15/2025, 10:45:00 AM MDT Assignee Package generation date 09/16/2025, 3:53:01 PM MDT LOCATION INFORMATION Address 210 MAIN ST W, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ13700750300A, LOT 30, BLK 75 JEROME TOWNSITE (SE 13-8-16) PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES BLF LLC 153 AUSTIN AVE TWIN FALLS ID 83301 ID 83301 Property owner Jean Reyes 210 S. Main Street Jerome City [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant, Property owner ---PAGE BREAK--- TABLE OF CONTENTS Cover page 1 Table of contents 2 Design Review Facade Update - Existing Building 3 Council and committee meetings 4 Reviews 5 Attachments 6 Public notice 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- Design Review Facade Update - Existing Building PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Instructions Submittal Deadline: Due two weeks prior to the next scheduled Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Application Must Contain: □ Narrative statement □ Property owner’s written authorization, if applicable □ Description of color and/or exterior materials (if applicable) □ Paint swatches □ Pictures or drawings of proposed updates Facade Update Narrative Statement I currently have a permit and I am wanting to change the exterior paint color to black and green and add one garage door that is 14x10 with clear glass. Design Review Facade Update - Existing Building, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 09/23/2025, 7:00:00 PM MDT Description: Front Facade Update Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 09/23/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviews REVIEWS General P&Z Review - Reviewed Assignee: Ida Clark Description: Reviewed Review started: 09/16/2025, 3:52:16 PM MDT Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: Seeking re-approval for change in colors. Reviews, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 1:01:51 PM MDT Attachment type(s): Facade Design Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 1:01:51 PM MDT 210 west main garage door_cp_17592300221475.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 1:02:05 PM MDT Contents: Previous Permit Attachment type(s): General Summary VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 1:02:05 PM MDT Jerome permit 210 west main_cp_17592300223897.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 1:02:20 PM MDT Contents: Green Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 1:02:20 PM MDT Screenshot 2025-08-15 at 10.44.28-AM_cp_17592300221743.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 1:02:35 PM MDT Contents: Charcoal Attachment type(s): Pictures VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 1:02:35 PM MDT Screenshot 2025-08-15 at 10.45.33-AM_cp_17592300221915.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 08/18/2025, 1:04:02 PM MDT Attachment type(s): Site Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 08/18/2025, 1:04:02 PM MDT Screenshot 2025-08-18 130246 (Original).png, Screenshot 2025-08-18 130246.pdf image/png Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Public notice Letters Letters can be found from the package under the folder Letters Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Letter: Planning & Zoning Commission Notice of hearing 09/23/2025.pdf Link to public notice Link has not been published. Public notice, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME 152 E Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho 83338 (208) 324-8189 • Fax (208) 324-8204 [PHONE REDACTED] www.cityofjerome.org 152 E Ave A Jerome, ID December 14, 2022 Jean Reyes 210 West Main Street Jerome, ID 83338 RE: Design Review Permit application for Jean Reyes on the property located at 210 West Main Street Jerome, ID 83338. Ms. Reyes, Thank you for submitting the necessary materials to review the design of 210 West Main Street Jerome, ID 83338. As proposed, the design is in compliance with the Jerome Municipal Code - Design Review Guidelines with the following conditions: • Comply with all Building and Fire Departments requirements and inspections; • Comply with all City, State, Federal requirements. Note that the property lies within and must abide by requirements in the design overlay district. Please contact Dave Richey, Building Official at [PHONE REDACTED] x 131 or [EMAIL REDACTED] to submit and obtain any necessary building permits. You are encouraged to continue to work closely with staff as your project moves forward. Thank you so much for your time. If you have any questions, please contact me with the information below. Sincerely, Ervina Covcic City Planner [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] Enclosure: Design Review Permit Project Plans CC: Building Official, Dave Richey, via email. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning & Zoning Department 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] Planning & Zoning Design Review Permit PERMIT NO: ‐ _ Applicant Name: Applicant Mailing Address: Street Address of Property: Legal Description of Property: Description of Project: Conditions of Design Review Permit: Compliance with City of Jerome Design Review Guidelines: Yes No This permit is issued pursuant to the provisions of the Jerome City Code, Title 17 Land Use Ordinance. The person to whom this permit is granted understands that he/she must abide by each and every term and condition expressed herein, and by the relevant portions of the Jerome City Code and the Design Review Guidelines. Failure to comply with the Jerome Municipal Code, the Design Review Guidelines or any condition set forth herein will be cause for revocation of this permit. THIS PERMIT IS NON TRANSFERRABLE without the permission of the Jerome City Planning & Zoning Commission. DATED this day of , 20 . Ervina Covcic Ervina Covcic, City Planner 22 27 Jean Reyes 538 Blue Lakes Blvd. Twin Falls, ID 83301 210 West Main Street Jerome, ID 83338 Lot 30, Block 75, Jerome Townsite (SE 13-8-16) Exterior facade updates. • Comply with all Building requirements and inspections; • Comply with all City, State and Federal requirements. ✔ 13 December 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- Z [PHONE REDACTED] (USA) [EMAIL REDACTED] www.mattzech.com Matthew Zech Architect NOVELTY WAFFLES 210 MAIN ST. WEST MAIN ST. LINCOLN AVE. EXISTING BUILDING ---PAGE BREAK--- Z [PHONE REDACTED] (USA) [EMAIL REDACTED] www.mattzech.com Matthew Zech Architect NOVELTY WAFFLES 210 MAIN ST. W 3 1 2 MATERIAL KEY: 1 - NEW STUCCO COLOR: Valspar Rustic Oak 2007 3 - WOOD ACCENTS 2 - WOOD SIGNAGE ---PAGE BREAK--- Z [PHONE REDACTED] (USA) [EMAIL REDACTED] www.mattzech.com Matthew Zech Architect NOVELTY WAFFLES ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning & Zoning Meeting September 9th, 2025 This regular meeting of the City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Rod Mink, Commissioner Benjamin Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. Also present were City Planner Ida Clark, Legal Counsel BJ Hess, and Secretary Katie Elliott. Commissioner Shonna Fraser was excused. Chairman Mink led the audience in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Consider a Design Review for 252 West Main Street, Jerome, Idaho- action item Staff report: Ms. Clark stated the building is on the corner of West Main Street and N. Birch. It does share an eastern wall with another business. The property is located in the Design Review Overlay District, within 150 feet of the right-of-way of Main Street. The application proposes an exterior paint update. The applicant started painting the building, not realizing they needed the Commission's approval. Ms. Clark went over a few Design Review Guidelines with the commission. Regarding Section 5.1 Site Planning: Guideline #1 Adjacent Buildings and Uses, she stated the proposed building does share a wall with two other buildings. Regarding Section 5.2 Architecture: Guidelines #13 & #14 Enhance Jerome Classic Styles and Minimize Scale, she stated the existing building will remain; however, the proposed façade updates will renew interest while maintaining the classic style. Regarding Guidelines #22 and #24 Wall Materials and Wall Colors, Ms. Clark stated the application proposes updated colors in red with white accents around the top of the building and around the doors and windows. They would like to have a brighter red color. She said she would also recommend the shared east wall be repainted back to white. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark showed the commission the red color the applicant would like to paint. The sample was passed around. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated the applicant had started to paint the building red and yellow on the eastern wall, and would recommend that they return it to white. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed regarding keeping the color on the east wall, Chairman Mink stated that they do not own that wall. Ms. Clark said it was white, and they painted without permission. It is her suggestion to add it white. She also stated the colors for design reviews are more neutral tones. If brighter colors are selected, a neutral color is asked to be used as an accent color. Commissioner Reed stated he liked the brighter colors. Luis Felipe Martinez Ruiz stated, through Esmeralda Chavez, who was interpreting, that he initially started with the yellow and the red that they had started to paint with, but he is okay with the red with white trim. His goal is to make the building nice and add to the beauty of Jerome. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed regarding the red wall, Ms. Clark stated it is up to the commission to decide what color, but they do not own the wall that they had started to paint. Commissioner Reed stated that he thought it would look better to have the wall one ---PAGE BREAK--- color than two. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Mr. Martinez Ruiz asked the owner of the other building, and they were okay with them painting the shared wall. He understands that it is a shared wall, and he is okay with painting it white again if the commission wants him to. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that the shared wall was originally white. Chairman Mink clarified that the applicant had obtained permission from the other property owner. Ms. Chavez stated he had. Chairman Mink stated that if the neighbors were okay, he would be okay with extending the red. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Commissioner Schroeder stated the colors do fit the color scheme, but he also doesn’t mind the wall being white to help differentiate between the two buildings, and he is okay with red, too. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that the vote has to be unanimous or it will go before the City Council. Commissioner Reed stated he likes the wall being red as it blends better with the rest of the color. He also stated that if the neighbors gave them permission, he would be okay with it, as it would be different if they were against the applicant painting it. Commissioner Johnson stated he was okay with the colors as long as they were within the color scheme. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the design review for the façade update at 252 West Main Street, and that it be professionally painted with at least two coats of paint, and the East shared wall be painted the same Umbra Red 1316 with white trim. Seconded by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:13 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc. for Rezone from Light Industrial 1) to Residential 3 on the property described as parcel ID number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark gave a brief background for the commission. This area of town was zoned light industrial when the entire city was rezoned in 2010. This area did have the North Side Canal Company. Over the years, the middle school and an elementary school have been built along with more single-family and multifamily housing. This area is no longer conducive to light industrial uses. Adjacent Land Use for the surrounding properties are as follows: to the north are schools and residential properties with Public/SemiPublic (PS) and Residential 2 (R-2) for the zoning. To the south is residential property with the Residential 3 (R-3) zoning. To the east is residential-high density property with Residential 3 (R-3) zoning, and to the west are school fields that are zoned Light Industrial ---PAGE BREAK--- The Future Land Use Map designates this parcel as Residential Medium. Ms. Clark stated the parcel is currently zoned Light Industrial which allows contractor’s yard, food processing, tire shops, vehicle repair, and other light industrial uses detailed in 17.14.010 of the Jerome Municipal Code. The proposed zone for Residential 3 (R-3) would allow for single-family up to multifamily housing, public educational facilities, bed and breakfast, convenience store with no fuel services, planned unit developments, and care facilities are also allowed, as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. All land use regulations as detailed in Title 17 of the JMC will apply to the property, including but not limited to setbacks and building height restrictions. The minimum lot size for the R-3 zone is 5,000. The parcel is three acres. As required by 17.80.040, GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR AMENDMENTS, the Commission shall be reviewed by the Commission to determine if the request: Is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; Will create a demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available, including municipal sewer and water services; Is compatible with the zoning uses in the surrounding areas; and No non-conforming uses will be created. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request is in accordance with Chapter 1: Property Rights and the request is in accordance with Chapter 4, Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” A rezone from light industrial to residential is more appropriate, as light industrial is not harmonious with the current land uses. As pertains to the demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available, including municipal sewer and water services: All utility connections for this parcel exist. There are sewer improvements that would be needed at the developer's cost. As pertains to the compatibility with the zoning uses in the surrounding areas, there are existing multi-family townhomes directly east of this parcel, with single-family housing to the north and south. An elementary school is located directly north. A rezone to Residential 3 (R-3) would ensure compatibility with the existing and surrounding uses. As pertains to the creation of non-conforming uses, the parcel is currently bare, creating no non-conforming uses. Ms. Clark stated that the staff recommends a rezone from light industrial to Residential 3. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark confirmed it was a baseball field, but it is currently a bare parcel. Applicant testimony: Anna Canning, Boise, Idaho resident, stated that this is the first step of many. She noted this is consistent with the Comp Plan and they would be working ---PAGE BREAK--- towards creating a residential area rather than coming up with an industrial use. Ms. Canning stated it has been a delight to work with Ms. Clark. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:20 p.m. Consider a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc. for a Rezone from Light Industrial (M-1) to Residential 3 on the property described as parcel ID number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho—action item. Chairman Mink stated this rezone meets the Comprehensive Plan and is conducive to the surrounding area. Commissioner Reed agreed and said it makes sense to have the property rezone to residential instead of light industrial. Commissioner Schroeder made a motion to recommend the rezoning request for the property described in the agenda, more commonly known as the bare parcel on the southwest corner of N Birch and 10th Ave West, from Light Industrial (M-1) to Residential 3 be approved, finding that the rezone: Is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; Adequate public facilities exist; The proposed zones is compatible with the zoning uses in the surrounding areas; and No non-conforming uses will be created. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:23 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Ben Lyda/EHM Engineers, Inc. for a residential preliminary plat of Becker Subdivision Phase 2, on the property located at Parcel ID Number RPJ00000086601A (Less Becker Sub No. more commonly known as the farmland east of 20th Ave East, Trae Street, and 18th Ave East for approximately 1,120 feet to the City limits then approximately 1,333 feet south to 16th Ave East, then approximately 840 feet to the west, Jerome, Idaho, containing approximately 30.55 acre. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the property contains approximately 57 acres and is currently zoned Residential 1 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. The property was annexed into the City and zoned Residential 1 in April of 2006. Per Chapter 16, phases must be approved within one year, or an extension given. It has been over one year, and an extension was not granted—tonight’s request for re-approval of the preliminary plat. This will enable them to proceed with the final plat approval for Phase 2. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ms. Clark stated the original preliminary was brought before the Commission in July 2021. It was shared with the Commission that the original number of lots, 194, would be reduced, as approximately 10- 12 acres would be donated to the Jerome Recreation District (JRD) for future development of open space. Eleven acres were donated to the JRD with 181 buildable lots. Final plat for phase 1 was approved by Council on May 3rd, 2022, for 66 lots. The preliminary plat is subject to Title 16. As pertains to the Jerome Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated the application meets objectives in Chapter 4 – Our Built Environment. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the property in question as residential. Ms. Clark went over the Subdivision – Preliminary Plat Criteria with the commission. Regarding 16.16.050: PRELIMINARY PLAT, the applicant has provided a complete subdivision application with adequate information to review the preliminary plat. The subdivision application was deemed complete and scheduled for the next available meeting date, which would allow staff to review the application, take comments from other agencies, and properly notify the public of the public hearing. A mailed notice was sent to adjacent property owners. The following agencies were re-notified regarding the proposed subdivision: Idaho Power, Intermountain Gas, School District, Jerome County, North Side Canal Company, and the United States Postal Service. North Side Canal Company responded to the initial preliminary plat. All items have been addressed between the developer and the North Side Canal Company. City departments, including Building, Engineering, Fire, Water, and Wastewater, were allowed to comment on this application. Regarding 16.28.040: LOT REQUIREMENTS, as proposed, all lots meet the minimum lot size for the respective zone. Regarding 16.28.050 - .051: STREETS AND DEDICATION OF STREETS, the application proposes local streets meeting the 56-foot right-of-way. The application notes that all streets will be dedicated to public use and be constructed to meet City standards. Access to the subdivision will come from 18th and 20th Avenues East. There are also two accesses proposed from 16th Avenue East, including a half-mile road. The northern portion of 16th Ave East will be constructed as the subdivision is built out. Regarding 16.28.052 - .053: STREET LOCATION AND STREET SPECIFICATIONS, the streets are located accordingly to serve all proposed lots. The streets meet the required horizontal and vertical geometry and minimum and maximum grades. It is noted that there is no driveway access onto 16th Avenue East. Regarding 16.28.054: STREET NAMES, most proposed street names conform. A couple of streets may align with the City’s grid and will need to be changed. The name updates can be made during the final plat process. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding 16.28.080: SEWAGE SYSTEM and 16.28.090: WATER MAINS, Will Serve letter have been issued for phase 1. The existing water and sewer in phase 1 will continue to serve phase 2. Regarding 16.28.110: CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS, the development proposes a five-foot wide sidewalk along 16th Avenue East. A five-foot sidewalk with curb and gutter will be constructed within the subdivision. Regarding 16.28.140: IRRIGATION LINES AND WATER STOCKS, pressurized surface irrigation will be provided to all lots. Ms. Clark briefly explained the Commission’s actions for a Preliminary Plat, as explained in JMC 16.16.050. In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the commission shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: The conformance of the subdivision with the comprehensive plan; The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program of the city; The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; and The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the commission's attention. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to construction, and any other needed improvements; A final plat or any part thereof shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Council before recording the plat at the County; and Comply with all City, State, and Federal Requirements. Upon inquiry from Commission Johnson, Ms. Clark stated the developer is responsible for bringing services to the area, streets, and improvements along 16th. They are not proposing any private roads, and the city staff has approved. Applicant Testimony: Matt Ahrens, representing EHM from Twin Falls, Idaho, stated that the commission has already seen this plat, but there was a little back and forth with the size of the park, which has been resolved. They just missed the one-year window to record the plat. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Ahrens stated that the only thing that changed was the size of the park. Ms. Clark stated they also had to change a few street names. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:31 p.m. Consider a request from Ben Lyda/EHM Engineers, Inc. for a residential preliminary plat of Becker Subdivision Phase 2, on the property located at Parcel ID Number RPJ00000086601A (Less Becker Sub No. more commonly known as the farmland east of 20th Ave East, Trae Street, and 18th Ave East for approximately 1,120 feet to the City limits then approximately ---PAGE BREAK--- 1,333 feet south to 16th Ave East, then approximately 840 feet to the west, Jerome, Idaho, containing approximately 30.55 acre—action item. Commissioner Reed made a motion to approve the request from EHM for a re-approval of a residential preliminary plat on the property described in the agenda, Jerome, Idaho, finding that the subdivision is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and adequate public services are available to accommodate the proposed subdivision. Seconded by Commissioner Schroeder and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:32 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie, for a Future Land Use Map amendment from commercial to residential on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E). Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the property in question was part of the Bird Farm. The property was annexed into the City of Jerome in May 2007 and zoned Area Business. In May of 2008, Lot 1, Block 1, was rezoned to Light Industrial. The subdivision was known as the Jerome Professional Business Park and remained undeveloped. The entire subdivision was rezoned to General Business (C-2) in April of 2010. In 2020, the Jerome Professional Park plat was vacated and then subdivided into the Upland Meadows subdivision. At the applicant's request, the northern lots of Upland Meadows were approved for a rezone to Residential 1 Lots 2 and 3 remained General Business The Future Land Use Map designates these parcels as Commercial. It is noted that this area has been designated as commercial for several years, and with the new adopted Comprehensive Plan in 2023, the parcels remained Commercial. Ms. Clark went over the adjacent land use and zoning with the commission. To the north, the existing land use is city/ county single-family homes, the current zoning of Residential 2/Area of Impact (AOI) Residential, and the Future Land Use Map is Residential Medium/Residential Rural. To the south, the existing land use is farmland/houses, the current zoning is Area of Impact Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is Industrial. To the east, the existing land use is farmland, the current zoning is Area of Impact Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is Ag Transition. To the west, the existing land use is farmland/houses, the current zoning is Area of Impact Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is Industrial. The applicant is requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map from Commercial to Residential. They would like to develop a second phase of single-family homes. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ms. Clark went over the general procedures for amendments. The commission needs to consider if the request meets the following: Is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, and will it create a demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request is in accordance with Chapter 1: Property Rights. The request is not in accordance with Chapter 4, Our Built Environment, which states, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” Commercial designation states: Areas that provide for and encourage the grouping together of business, retail, public, quasi- public, and other related uses. Special permits, including PUDs, may be considered for more intense uses or to incorporate residential uses. Single-family dwellings are not permitted in the C-2 zone; however, three or more units for multi-family housing are allowed by a special use permit. Leaving this area as Commercial as designated allows a variety of businesses and housing that can provide a transition zone from the existing heavy industrial uses to the south and the planned industrial zoning in the future. Ms. Clark stated that the Future Land Use Map designates the surrounding area as future industrial. The current zoning map has existing heavy industrial to the south. This commercial boundary gives a transition zone. Regarding Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. Consideration needs to be given to the protection of the existing Upland Meadows Subdivisions. While additional single-family housing is needed and would be compatible with the existing housing, this would place homes even closer to the existing heavy industrial uses. This would leave the planned development of single-family dwellings unprotected from future industrial development. Ms. Clark stated they needed to review and consider Chapter 3, 3.3.d, which is to consider the impact to adjacent agricultural businesses (fertilizer production, food processing, shipping, 3.3.i etc.) when reviewing new annexations and development applications. As pertains to the demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available, including municipal sewer and water services: Water and sewer would be available to extend at the developer's expense. It is noted that if an easement cannot be obtained for a gravity sewer, a lift station, privately owned and maintained, would be required for higher-density uses. Ms. Clark stated the staff recommendation is to deny the request to amend the Future Land Use Map from Commercial to Residential, as it is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. She did receive comments from City Departments: These two lots have access to sewer via planned single-site lift pumps into the gravity sewer at the north boundary. The property does not have direct access to gravity sewer due to depth and site elevation limitations. It would require either the extension of a gravity sewer to the location or the construction of a lift station, which would then need to be operated and maintained by City staff. Due to the time ---PAGE BREAK--- and cost of maintaining a public lift station, the City will not accept a public lift station at this time. A private lift station maintained by the HOA would be an option. A private 25 ft. wide road was allowed at the SE corner of the Upland Meadows subdivision, leading to a dedicated fire apparatus access road along the north end of the second phase commercial property. This was only allowed because a dedicated fire lane would be located along the north edge of the commercial property. As two separate access roads are required for the current subdivision, changing the use of the commercial property and reconfiguring the fire apparatus access change this. The current secondary fire apparatus access would no longer meet the terms of the existing agreement. The configuration of the property in question does not allow for two separate fire apparatus access roads that would meet the Fire Code requirements. Fire Code states: Developments of one or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that the dedicated access road is only for emergency vehicles and does not know who maintains it. Ms. Clark re-stated that staff recommends, based on the comprehensive plan, land use map, and utility access, that this application be denied. Applicant Testimony: Matt Ahrens, EHM Engineers in Twin Falls, stated he recognizes that what they are asking for is big, and expectations have been managed. With Phase 1 of this development, there was some pushback from neighboring residents. He stated that Phase 1 was very successful and is almost entirely built out in four years. They have had a lot of interest in this subdivision, and it is in the interest of the property owners to move forward. Mr. Ahrens stated there were two engineering concerns. One being the sewer and the other being the apparatus road. The first phase has a gravity sewer, but with the second phase, they are fighting the topography. They can go south with the sewer, but there is an existing sewer to the south, so they would have to receive an easement from the south or southwest property owners, or they would have to build a lift station. These are not preferred due to maintenance agreements with HOA and DEQ requirements. Regarding the fire apparatus road, two accesses are required. They have one access off of Nez Perce, and they built an “access only” road to the south that goes to Tiger Drive to the east. With the layouts they are proposing, there will be two accesses off of Tiger Drive coming into Phase 2. The “access only” will be gated. Mr. Ahrens stated he is not sure who maintains the access road, but believes it is the property owners to the south. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Ahrens stated that there is a lock box that will have keys for the gate, which the fire department will have access to. These boxes are also used for businesses in the community for an emergency. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson regarding the building of homes close to industry, Mr. Ahrens stated that, with the costs of houses now, some of the younger generations may look at buying these homes since ---PAGE BREAK--- they may be more affordable. They already have Phase 1 that borders industrial, this would just be an extension of that. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that the surrounding properties are the Area of Impact Industrial, as the county only has one zone for industry. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Mr. Ahrens stated they may have up to 35-40 lots with approximately 30 acres. Commissioner Reed stated he is sympathetic, as they need single-family homes. Mr. Ahrens stated there will be sewer issues with that property regardless of the zoning and use. Commissioner Johnson stated that, with the lift station, if it is private, it would be up to the HOA to maintain it, and some HOAs are active, while others are not. Mr. Ahrens stated the lift station would be reviewed by the state and permitted by DEQ, where they require a plan of operation and a maintenance schedule with points of contact. There is accountability through the state. Testimony in Favor: Randy Stock, a Jerome resident, stated he lives to the southwest of the project. He would rather have single-family homes instead of commercial ones and is behind this project. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Stock does not hear any industrial nuisance on this property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Mr. Stock stated they have Scoular, Scott Jackson Trucking, Dairy Gold, IMP, and the Sheriff’s office. He said they do not bother him. They are to the south of him. He stated he hears more noise from the Sheriff’s office than the industries. Barbara Allen, a Jerome resident, stated she lives on the north side of the property, and they have all of the factories around them, and they do not bother them. She would like to know about lighting and noise ordinances. She stated she does not want commercial use next to them. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Allen stated she prefers single-family homes instead of duplexes or multifamily homes. She stated that with Jerome growing, it makes sense to have residential on that property, and there is a need for residential housing. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Allen stated that it is currently zoned commercial, but it has had other zoning before. Ms. Clark stated it has been commercial and then light industrial, and then back to commercial. Ms. Allen noted that if Phase 1 is residential, it makes sense to zone it residential in Phase 2. Ms. Elliott read the following comments into the record: Michael Tylka and Linda Baker Tylka Resident of Jerome Support the application We approve of this rezone from commercial C-2 to Residential R-2. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: ---PAGE BREAK--- Sean Robinson, a resident of Jerome, stated he was the third home buyer in Phase 1. When they were told that the land was going to be used for storage units, they now hear rumors that it would be habitat to humanity homes, then it was going to be housing, but more affordable housing with an easement and fencing. He understands there needs to be affordable housing, but he does not want to lose their home values. He stated they have a house that is worth up to $500,000. They have an HOA, and with a big snowstorm, the roads were not maintained. He did not know that the access road was a fire road and had driven on it himself. He asked the commission to deny the application. If it is approved, ensure that the housing is the same as in Phase 1. He would like to have the storage as they were told before. He understands that housing can be good and bad. He stated that the HOA already has issues with people not following the rules. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that the roads are public. Rebuttal Testimony: Ms. Clark stated that there is a lighting ordinance for commercial areas where they are required to have downlit lights. If the property is next to residential, there are further restrictions on the height and the brightness of the lights. Ms. Clark stated they are currently working on a noise ordinance, which should be going to the city council as it recently passed the Planning and Zoning Commission. Matt Ahrens stated that the roads are currently public. The HOA does not deal with roads. The HOA deals with style references and irrigation in nature. Regarding the housing, he has not seen anything regarding a Phase 1 house being devalued when Phase 2 is built out. He stated that the vision for Phase 2 is the same as Phase 1, with lots ranging from 8,000 sq ft to 12,000 sq ft, featuring single-family homes. They are not looking at smaller homes or trailer parks. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 8:10 p.m. Consider a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie for a Future Land Use Map amendment from commercial to residential on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E)—action item. Chairman Mink stated his primary concern is with the noise complaints that they have received from other county residents. He was recently down in the area, and he was amazed by the truck noise that he heard. Extensive discussion was held on the following topics: noise going to the south instead of the north; concern of transitional zoning from industrial to residential; problems down the road when surrounding areas are developed for the zoning that is currently approved; updating the Future Land Use Map for the property to the west to commercial; recent meetings with putting industry next to residential; southern part of town being close to the interstate and closer to Twin Falls for both industry and residents; protecting single-family homes; current county housing south of the property zoned industrial; why put commercial between existing residential; creating a buffer from industrial to residential; ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Reed made a motion to recommend the Comprehensive Land Use Map Amendment request from EHM for BBL Property Investments LLC, for the property more commonly known as Lots 2 and 3, Block 3 Upland Meadows Subdivision, from Commercial to Residential, be approved, finding that the existing Comp Plan Future Land Use Map designation needs to be adjusted to Residential and aligns with the Comprehensive Plan objective s and goals. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder. Chairman Mink stated he did not have to vote but would have voted “naye” if there had been a tie. Commissioner Schroeder stated his concern is the lack of transitional zoning. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 8:24 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie, for a rezone request from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 (R-2) on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E). Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated that this request is concurrent with the request for the Future Land Use Map amendment to be rezoned from commercial to residential 2 so the applicant does not have to return before the commission for a rezone if the council approves the application. The request is to rezone the property from General Business to Residential 2. This would allow for single-family homes, duplexes, along with public educational facilities, and bed and breakfasts as detailed in 17.14.010 JMC. Ms. Clark stated they went over the compatibility of the neighboring uses in the previous public hearing and that no non- conforming uses will be created. Chairman Mink noted that they had discussed the uses in the previous hearing, as they are the same thing. Applicant Testimony: Matt Ahrens, EHM Engineering, Twin Falls, stated that they recently made a recommendation for the land use plan, which involves rezoning. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 8:27 p.m. Consider a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie for a rezone request from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 (R-2) on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E)—action item. ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Johnson made a motion to recommend a request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie, for a rezone request from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 (R-2) on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E), be approved. Seconded by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder. CITIZEN CORRESPONDENCE AND ISSUES None. Consent Agenda The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the July 23rd, 2025, special meeting. Commissioner Johnson motioned to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded the motion by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None DISCUSSION PERIOD & STAFF REPORTS Ms. Clark stated the next meeting will be on September 23rd. They have a few Electronic Message Display Sign SUPs and a design review. She and other city staff have met with the county regarding the Area of Impact map. She stated they have a good relationship with the County and they have given recommendations, but in the end, it is up to the County. Once she knows more, she will provide the information to the commission, which she hopes will be in October. Ms. Clark went over a few houses that the commission had inquired about. For the house on 3rd East, she stated she sent a letter to the owner, and she is currently working with the owner. For the house on East E, this house is not currently in probate, so it has been a little more challenging to get information on. Currently, the weeds have been taken care of. She will be following up with the county to see if the taxes are paid. Habitat for Humanity is searching for a parcel in Jerome and this may be an option for them. Chairman Mink stated he believes the property owner's daughter is around, and he will see if he can get contact information. ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Johnson inquired about the overgrown weeds on the walking path between Producers Livestock and Rich Thompson Trucking. Ms. Clark stated she has been in contact with the property owner, and it should be done by the end of this week. Commissioner Reed stated there is a trailer and fence around Fillmore and 8th or 10th that is burned out, and it is a safety hazard. Ms. Clark said she would look into it. Commissioner Johnson stated that there was another house that had burned, and the chimney was about to fall down. Ms. Clark noted that the property was more recent, and they are currently working through their insurance. Commissioner Reed inquired about the sandwich boards that are blocking the sidewalk. It is at the Cook Plaza on Main Street. Chairman Mink stated there is a lot of signage by the tire shop that was approved for the design review. He said it is not just the business signage, as there was a realtor sign and a detour sign that were with the business's flag signs. This makes it hard to see the stop sign. Commissioner Reed stated there are a lot of weeds in front of Dairy Queen. Ms. Clark stated she recently saw someone moving those weeds. Without further discussion, Chairman Mink closed this regular meeting at 8:38 p.m. Rod Mink, Chairman Katie Elliott, Secretary ---PAGE BREAK--- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON THE PUBLIC REVIEW REQUESTED BY EHM ENGINEERS, INC., FOR A RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY PLAT OF BECKER SUBDIVISION PHASE 2, ON THE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE FARMLAND EAST OF 20th AVENUE EAST, TRAE STREET, AND 18th AVENUE EAST FOR APPROXIMATELY 1,120 FEET TO THE CITY LIMITS THEN APPROXIMATELY 1,333 FEET SOUTH TO 16TH AVE EAST, THEN APPROXIMATELY 840 FEET TO THE WEST, JEROME, IDAHO, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 30.55 ACRE A public hearing at the request of Ben Lyda/EHM Engineers, Inc. for a residential preliminary plat of Becker Subdivision Phase 2, on the property located at Parcel ID Number RPJ00000086601A (Less Becker Sub No. more commonly known as the farmland east of 20th Avenue East, Trae Street, and 18th Avenue East for approximately 1,120 feet to the City limits then approximately 1,333 feet south to 16th Avenue East, then approximately 840 feet to the west, Jerome, Idaho, containing approximately 30.55 acre, was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, September 9, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission and other speakers addressing the Commission, in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a staff report and background on this request. The property contains approximately 57 acres and is currently zoned Residential 1 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. The property was annexed into the City and zoned Residential 1 in April of 2006. Per Chapter 16, phases must be approved within one year, or an extension given. It has been over one year, and an extension was not granted—tonight’s request for re-approval of the preliminary plat. This will enable them to proceed with the final plat approval for Phase 2. Ms. Clark stated the original preliminary was brought before the Commission in July 2021. It was shared with the Commission that the original number of lots, 194, would be reduced, as approximately 10-12 acres would be donated to the Jerome Recreation District (JRD) for future development of open space. Eleven acres were donated to the JRD with 181 buildable lots. Final plat for Phase 1 was approved by Council on May 3rd, 2022, for 66 lots. The preliminary plat is subject to Title 16. As pertains to the Jerome Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated the Application meets objectives in Chapter 4 – Our Built Environment. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the property in question as residential. Ms. Clark went over the Subdivision – Preliminary Plat Criteria with the Commission. Regarding 16.16.050: PRELIMINARY PLAT, the Applicant has provided a complete subdivision application with adequate information to review the preliminary plat. The subdivision application was deemed complete and scheduled for the next available meeting date, which would allow staff to review the application, take comments from other agencies, and properly notify the public of the public hearing. A mailed notice was sent to adjacent property ---PAGE BREAK--- owners. The following agencies were re-notified regarding the proposed subdivision: Idaho Power; Intermountain Gas; Jerome School District; Jerome County; North Side Canal Company; and the United States Postal Service. North Side Canal Company responded to the initial preliminary plat. All items have been addressed between the developer and the North Side Canal Company. City departments, including Building, Engineering, Fire, Water, and Wastewater, were allowed to comment on this application. Regarding 16.28.040: LOT REQUIREMENTS, as proposed, all lots meet the minimum lot size for the respective zone. Regarding 16.28.050 - .051: STREETS AND DEDICATION OF STREETS, the application proposes local streets meeting the 56-foot right-of-way. The application notes that all streets will be dedicated to public use and be constructed to meet City standards. Access to the subdivision will come from 18th and 20th Avenues East. There are also two accesses proposed from 16th Avenue East, including a half-mile road. The northern portion of 16th Ave East will be constructed as the subdivision is built out. Regarding 16.28.052 - .053: STREET LOCATION AND STREET SPECIFICATIONS, the streets are located accordingly to serve all proposed lots. The streets meet the required horizontal and vertical geometry and minimum and maximum grades. It is noted that there is no driveway access onto 16th Avenue East. Regarding 16.28.054: STREET NAMES, most proposed street names conform. A couple of streets may align with the City’s grid and will need to be changed. The name updates can be made during the final plat process. Regarding 16.28.080: SEWAGE SYSTEM and 16.28.090: WATER MAINS, Will Serve letter have been issued for Phase 1. The existing water and sewer in Phase 1 will continue to serve Phase 2. Regarding 16.28.110: CURBS, GUTTERS AND SIDEWALKS, the development proposes a five-foot wide sidewalk along 16th Avenue East. A five-foot sidewalk with curb and gutter will be constructed within the subdivision. Regarding 16.28.140: IRRIGATION LINES AND WATER STOCKS, pressurized surface irrigation will be provided to all lots. Ms. Clark briefly explained the Commission’s actions for a Preliminary Plat, as explained in JMC 16.16.050. In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the Commission shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: The conformance of the subdivision with the comprehensive plan; The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program of the city; The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; and The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the Commission’s attention. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to construction, and any other needed improvements; A final plat or any part thereof shall be submitted for review and approval by ---PAGE BREAK--- the City Council before recording the plat at the County; and Comply with all City, State, and Federal Requirements. Upon inquiry from Commission Johnson, Ms. Clark stated the developer is responsible for bringing services to the area, streets, and improvements along 16th Avenue East. They are not proposing any private roads, and the city staff has approved. Applicant Testimony: Mr. Matt Ahrens, a resident of Twin Falls Idaho, representing EHM Engineers appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Ahrens stated that the Commission has already seen this plat, but there was a little back and forth with the size of the park, which has been resolved. They just missed the one-year window to record the plat. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Ahrens stated that the only thing that changed was the size of the park. Ms. Clark stated they also had to change a few street names. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the preliminary plat application, Ms. Clark’s report, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The subdivision preliminary plat as presented is consistent with the Objectives in Chapter 4 of the Comprehensive Plan, as described in Ms. Clark’s report. No evidence contradicting Ms. Clark’s report was presented. And, the project, as described by Ms. Clark and by Mr. Ahrens, does in fact appear to promote the objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan in the manner described by Ms. Clark. B. Based on the Staff Report and based upon the testimony presented, the Commission finds that there is availability of public services to accommodate the proposal. C. The Commission finds that, based on the representations of Ms. Clark, the capital improvement program of the City is not implicated by this project. D. The Commission heard no evidence from any person at the hearing that would suggest there are other health, safety, or environmental problems that would prevent the approval of the preliminary plat as presented. II. Conclusions A. The proposed residential subdivision is in accordance with and satisfies the requirements of Title 16, Chapter 16 of the Jerome Municipal Code. ---PAGE BREAK--- B. Finding that the proposed residential subdivision is in conformance with the Jerome Comprehensive Plan and adequate public services are available to accommodate the proposed subdivision. C. The Commission approves of the request from EHM Engineers, Inc. for a re- approval of a residential preliminary plat on the property described in the agenda, Jerome, Idaho, finding that the subdivision is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and adequate public services are available to accommodate the proposed subdivision. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 23rd day of September, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 9th day of September, 2025, to approve the application for a preliminary plat is hereby made final this 23rd day of September, 2025, subject to appeal by an interested party within the prescribed period under Idaho law. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning ---PAGE BREAK--- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF BBL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, REPRESENTED BY EHM ENGINEERS, INC., FOR REZONING THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND MORE COMMONLY AS LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 3, UPLAND MEADOWS SUB. (30-8S-17E), JEROME, IDAHO A Public Hearing at the request from EHM representing BBL Property Investments LLC, C/O Michael Brock Leslie, for a rezone request from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 2) on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3 BLK 3 Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E), in Jerome, Idaho, (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”) was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday September 9, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, gave a staff report and brief background for the Commission on the application. Ms. Clark stated this request is concurrent with the request for the Future Land Use Map amendment to be rezoned from commercial to residential 2 so the Applicant does not have to return before the Commission for a rezone if the council approves the application. The request is to rezone the property from General Business to Residential 2. This would allow for single-family homes, duplexes, along with public educational facilities, and bed and breakfasts as detailed in 17.14.010 JMC. Ms. Clark stated they went over the compatibility of the neighboring uses in the previous public hearing and that no non-conforming uses will be created. Chairman Mink noted that they had discussed the uses in the previous hearing, as they are the same thing. Applicant Testimony: Matt Ahrens, of EHM Engineering, Inc. of Twin Falls, Idaho appeared and presented before the Commission. Mr. Ahrens stated they recently made a recommendation for the land use plan, which involved rezoning. Testimony in Favor: None Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, the stated report, and the other documents and materials in the file, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The Application seeks to have the property described herein rezoned from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 B. Rezoning of the parcel will allow for single-family homes, duplexes, along with public educational facilities and bed and breakfasts as detailed in 17.14.010 JMC C. The proposed use of the parcel will not create any non-conforming uses; and ---PAGE BREAK--- D. The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Jerome promotes providing areas of different residential densities and the development of various types to meet the needs of the citizens of the City of Jerome. II. Conclusions A. Taken as a whole, the application complies with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Jerome. It will not adversely affect the character of the area where the property is located. B. The Commission recommends that the property described above, for rezoning from General Business (C-2) to Residential 2 be approved. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 23rd day of September, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 9th day of September, 2025, to approve the application for a preliminary plat is hereby made final this 23rd day of September, 2025, subject to appeal by an interested party within the prescribed period under Idaho law. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning. ---PAGE BREAK--- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF BBL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LLC, FOR A FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT FROM COMMERCIAL TO RESIDENTIAL ON THE PARCEL ID NUMBERS RPJ18050030020A AND RPJ18050030030A, LOTS 2 AND 3 BLOCK 3 UPLAND MEADOWS SUB. (30-8S-17E), JEROME, IDAHO A Public Hearing at the request of BBL Property Investments, LLC, c/o Michael Brock Leslie, represented by EHM Engineers, Inc., for a future land use map amendment from commercial to residential on the parcel ID numbers RPJ18050030020A and RPJ18050030030A, Lots 2 and 3, Block 3, Upland Meadows Sub. (30-8S-17E), (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”) was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday September 9, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, gave a staff report and a brief background for the Commission on the application. Ms. Clark stated the property in question was part of the Bird Farm. The property was annexed into the City of Jerome in May 2007 and zoned Area Business. In May of 2008, Lot 1, Block 1, was rezoned to Light Industrial. The subdivision was known as the Jerome Professional Business Park and remained undeveloped. The entire subdivision was rezoned to General Business (C-2) in April of 2010. In 2020, the Jerome Professional Park plat was vacated and then subdivided into the Upland Meadows subdivision. At the Applicant’s request, the northern lots of Upland Meadows were approved for a rezone to Residential 1 Lots 2 and 3 remained General Business The Future Land Use Map designates these parcels as Commercial. It is noted that this area has been designated as commercial for several years, and with the new adopted Comprehensive Plan in 2023, the parcels remained Commercial. Ms. Clark went over the adjacent land use and zoning with the Commission. To the north, the existing land use is city/ county single-family homes, the current zoning of Residential 2/Area of Impact (AOI) Residential, and the Future Land Use Map is Residential Medium/Residential Rural. To the south, the existing land use is farmland/houses, the current zoning is Area of Impact Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is Industrial. To the east, the existing land use is farmland, the current zoning is Area of Impact Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is Ag Transition. To the west, the existing land use is farmland/houses, the current zoning is Area of Impact Industrial, and the Future Land Use Map is Industrial. The Applicant is requesting a change to the Future Land Use Map from Commercial to Residential. They would like to develop a second phase of single-family homes. Ms. Clark went over the general procedures for amendments. The Commission needs to consider if the request meets the following: is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; and will it create a demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request is in accordance with Chapter 1: Property Rights. ---PAGE BREAK--- The request is not in accordance with Chapter 4, Our Built Environment, which states, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” Commercial designation states: Areas that provide for and encourage the grouping together of business, retail, public, quasi-public, and other related uses. Special permits, including PUDs, may be considered for more intense uses or to incorporate residential uses. Single-family dwellings are not permitted in the C-2 zone; however, three or more units for multi-family housing are allowed by a special use permit. Leaving this area as Commercial as designated allows a variety of businesses and housing that can provide a transition zone from the existing heavy industrial uses to the south and the planned industrial zoning in the future. Ms. Clark stated that the Future Land Use Map designates the surrounding area as future industrial. The current zoning map has existing heavy industrial to the south. This commercial boundary gives a transition zone. Regarding Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. Consideration needs to be given to the protection of the existing Upland Meadows Subdivisions. While additional single-family housing is needed and would be compatible with the existing housing, this would place homes even closer to the existing heavy industrial uses. This would leave the planned development of single-family dwellings unprotected from future industrial development. Ms. Clark stated they needed to review and consider Chapter 3, 3.3.d, which is to consider the impact to adjacent agricultural businesses (fertilizer production, food processing, shipping, 3.3.i etc.) when reviewing new annexations and development applications. As pertains to the demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available, including municipal sewer and water services: Water and sewer would be available to extend at the developer’s expense. It is noted that if an easement cannot be obtained for a gravity sewer, a lift station, privately owned and maintained, would be required for higher-density uses. Ms. Clark stated the staff recommendation is to deny the request to amend the Future Land Use Map from Commercial to Residential, as it is not in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. She did receive comments from City Departments: These two lots have access to sewer via planned single-site lift pumps into the gravity sewer at the north boundary. The property does not have direct access to gravity sewer due to depth and site elevation limitations. It would require either the extension of a gravity sewer to the location or the construction of a lift station, which would then need to be operated and maintained by City staff. Due to the time and cost of maintaining a public lift station, the City will not accept a public lift station at this time. A private lift station maintained by the HOA would be an option. A private 25 foot wide road was allowed at the SE corner of the Upland Meadows Subdivision, leading to a dedicated fire apparatus access road along the north end of the second phase commercial property. This was only allowed because a dedicated fire lane would be located along the north edge of the commercial property. As two separate access roads are required for the current subdivision, changing the use of the commercial property and reconfiguring the fire apparatus access change this. The current secondary fire apparatus access would no longer meet the terms of the existing agreement. The configuration of the property in ---PAGE BREAK--- question does not allow for two separate fire apparatus access roads that would meet the Fire Code requirements. Fire Code states: Developments of one or two-family dwellings where the number of dwelling units exceeds 30 shall be provided with two separate and approved fire apparatus access roads. Where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that the dedicated access road is only for emergency vehicles and does not know who maintains it. Ms. Clark re-stated the staff recommendations, based on the comprehensive plan, land use map, and utility access, that this Application be denied. Applicant Testimony: Matt Ahrens, representing EHM Engineers, Inc. in Twin Falls, Idaho, appeared and presented before the Commission. Mr. Ahrens states he recognizes that what they are asking for is big, and expectations have been managed. With Phase 1 of this development, there was some pushback from neighboring residents. He stated that Phase 1 was very successful and is almost entirely built out in four years. They have had a lot of interest in this subdivision, and it is in the interest of the property owners to move forward. Mr. Ahrens stated there were two engineering concerns. One being the sewer and the other being the apparatus road. The first phase has a gravity sewer, but with the second phase, they are fighting the topography. They can go south with the sewer, but there is an existing sewer to the south, so they would have to receive an easement from the south or southwest property owners, or they would have to build a lift station. These are not preferred due to maintenance agreements with HOA and DEQ requirements. Regarding the fire apparatus road, two accesses are required. They have one access off Nez Perce, and they built an “access only” road to the south that goes to Tiger Drive to the east. With the layouts they are proposing, there will be two accesses off Tiger Drive coming into Phase 2. The “access only” will be gated. Mr. Ahrens stated he is not sure who maintains the access road, but believes it is the property owners to the south. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Ahrens stated that there is a lock box that will have keys for the gate, which the fire department will have access to. These boxes are also used for businesses in the community for an emergency. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson regarding the building of homes close to industry, Mr. Ahrens stated that, with the costs of houses now, some of the younger generations may look at buying these homes since they may be more affordable. They already have Phase 1 that borders industrial, this would just be an extension of that. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that the surrounding properties are the Area of Impact Industrial, as the county only has one zone for industry. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Mr. Ahrens stated they may have up to 35-40 lots with approximately 30 acres. Commissioner Reed stated he is sympathetic, as they need single-family homes. Mr. Ahrens stated there will be sewer issues with that property regardless of the zoning and use. Commissioner Johnson stated that, with the lift station, if it is private, it would be up to the HOA to maintain it, and some HOAs are active, while others are not. Mr. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ahrens stated the lift station would be reviewed by the state and permitted by DEQ, where they require a plan of operation and a maintenance schedule with points of contact. There is accountability through the state. Testimony in Favor: Ms. Elliott read the following comments into the record: Michael Tylka and Linda Baker Tylka, Resident of Jerome “Support the application. We approve of this rezone from commercial C-2 to Residential R-2.” Randy Stock, a Jerome resident, appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Stock stated he lives to the southwest of the project. He would rather have single-family homes instead of commercial ones and is behind this project. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Stock does not hear any industrial nuisance on this property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Mr. Stock stated they have Scoular, Scott Jackson Trucking, Dairy Gold, IMP, and the Sheriff’s office. He said they do not bother him. They are to the south of him. He stated he hears more noise from the Sheriff’s office than the industries. Barbara Allen, a Jerome resident, appeared and testified before the Commission. Ma. Allen stated she lives on the north side of the property, and they have all of the factories around them, and they do not bother them. She would like to know about lighting and noise ordinances. She stated she does not want commercial use next to them. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Allen stated she prefers single-family homes instead of duplexes or multifamily homes. She stated that with Jerome growing, it makes sense to have residential on that property, and there is a need for residential housing. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Allen stated that it is currently zoned commercial, but it has had other zoning before. Ms. Clark stated it has been commercial and then light industrial, and then back to commercial. Ms. Allen noted that if Phase 1 is residential, it makes sense to zone it residential in Phase 2. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: Sean Robinson, a resident of Jerome, appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Robinson stated he was the third home buyer in Phase 1. When they were told that the land was going to be used for storage units, they now hear rumors that it would be habitat to humanity homes, then it was going to be housing, but more affordable housing with an easement and fencing. He understands there needs to be affordable housing, but he does not want to lose their home values. He stated they have a house that is worth up to $500,000. They have an HOA, and with a big snowstorm, the roads were not maintained. He did not know that the access road was a fire road and had driven on it himself. He asked the Commission to deny the Application. If it is approved, ensure that the housing is the same as in Phase 1. He would like to have the storage as they were told before. He understands that housing can be good and bad. He stated that the HOA already has issues with people not following the rules. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that the roads are public. Ms. Clark stated that there is a lighting ordinance for commercial areas where they are required to have downlit lights. If the property is next to residential, there are further restrictions on the height and the brightness of the lights. Ms. Clark stated they are currently working on a noise ordinance, which should be going to the city council, as it recently passed the Planning and Zoning Commission. ---PAGE BREAK--- Testimony in Rebuttal: Matt Ahrens stated that the roads are currently public. The HOA does not deal with roads. The HOA deals with style references and irrigation in nature. Regarding the housing, he has not seen anything regarding a Phase 1 house being devalued when Phase 2 is built out. He stated that the vision for Phase 2 is the same as Phase 1, with lots ranging from 8,000 sq ft to 12,000 sq ft, featuring single-family homes. They are not looking at smaller homes or trailer parks. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, the stated report, and the other documents and materials in the file, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The Application seeks to have a future land use map amendment from commercial to residential; B. The request is in accordance with the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, specifically Chapter 4; and C. The request will not create a demand for public infrastructure, promote and provide for areas of different residential densities, and the development of various types of housing to meet the needs of the citizens of the City of Jerome while protecting single-family neighborhoods. II. Conclusions A. Taken as a whole, the Application complies with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Jerome. It will not adversely affect the character of the area where the property is located, as there are existing single-family housing to the north and south, with agriculture to the east and west. B. The Commission recommends that the existing Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation be adjusted to residential to align with the Comprehensive Plan objectives and goals. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 23rd day of September, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 9th day of September, 2025, to approve the application for a preliminary plat is hereby made final this 23rd day of September, 2025, subject to appeal by an interested party within the prescribed period under Idaho law. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning. ---PAGE BREAK--- FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON THE APPLICATION OF CENTURION ENGINEERS, INC. FOR REZONING THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS BARE PROPERTY ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF NORTH BIRCH AND 10th AVENUE WEST, JEROME, IDAHO A Public Hearing at the request from Centurion Engineers, Inc., represented by Anna Canning, for a zoning map amendment for parcel ID number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A- 234 (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho, (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”) was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday September 9, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission in person and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, gave a staff report and a brief background for the Commission on the application. Ms. Clark stated that this area of town was zoned light industrial when the entire city was rezoned in 2010. This area did have the North Side Canal Company. Over the years, the middle school and an elementary school have been built along with more single-family and multifamily housing. This area is no longer conducive to light industrial uses. Adjacent Land Use for the surrounding properties are as follows: to the north are schools and residential properties with Public/SemiPublic (PS) and Residential 2 (R-2) for the zoning. To the south is residential property with the Residential 3 (R-3) zoning. To the east is residential high-density property with Residential 3 (R-3) zoning, and to the west are school fields that are zoned Light Industrial The Future Land Use Map designates this parcel as Residential Medium. Ms. Clark stated the parcel is currently zoned Light Industrial which allows contractor’s yard, food processing, tire shops, vehicle repair, and other light industrial uses detailed in Jerome Municipal Code 17.14.010. The proposed zone for Residential 3 (R-3) would allow for single-family up to multifamily housing, public educational facilities, bed and breakfast, convenience store with no fuel services, planned unit developments, and care facilities are also allowed, as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. All land use regulations as detailed in Title 17 of the JMC will apply to the property, including but not limited to setbacks and building height restrictions. The minimum lot size for the R-3 zone is 5,000. The parcel is three acres. As required by 17.80.040, GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR AMENDMENTS, the Commission shall be reviewed by the Commission to determine if the request: Is in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan; (ii) Will create a demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available, including municipal sewer and water services; (iii) Is compatible with the zoning uses in the surrounding areas; and (iv) No non-conforming uses will be created. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request is in accordance with Chapter 1: Property Rights and the request is in accordance with Chapter 4, Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” A ---PAGE BREAK--- rezone from light industrial to residential is more appropriate, as light industrial is not harmonious with the current land uses. As pertains to the demand for public infrastructure that is not currently available, including municipal sewer and water services: All utility connections for this parcel exist. There are sewer improvements that would be needed at the developer’s cost. As pertains to the compatibility with the zoning uses in the surrounding areas, there are existing multi-family townhomes directly east of this parcel, with single-family housing to the north and south. An elementary school is located directly north. A rezone to Residential 3 (R-3) would ensure compatibility with the existing and surrounding uses. As pertains to the creation of non-conforming uses, the parcel is currently bare, creating no non-conforming uses. Ms. Clark stated that the staff recommends a rezone from light industrial to Residential 3. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark confirmed it was a baseball field, but it is currently a bare parcel. Applicant Testimony: Anna Canning, a Boise, Idaho resident, representing Centurion Engineers, Inc., appeared and presented before the Commission. Ms. Canning stated that this is the first step of many. She noted this is consistent with the Comp Plan and they would be working towards creating a residential area rather than coming up with an industrial use. Ms. Canning stated it has been a delight to work with Ms. Clark. Testimony in Favor: None Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, the stated report, and the other documents and materials in the file, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The Application seeks to have the property described herein rezoned from Light Industrial (M-1) to Residential 3 B. Rezoning of the parcel will allow for single-family up to multifamily housing, public educational facilities, bed and breakfast, convenience store with no fuel services, planned unit developments, and care facilities to be located in this zone; C. The proposed use of the parcel will not create any non-conforming uses; and D. The Comprehensive Plan of the City of Jerome promotes providing areas of different residential densities and the development of various types to meet the needs of the citizens of the City of Jerome. ---PAGE BREAK--- II. Conclusions A. Taken as a whole, the application complies with the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Jerome. It will not adversely affect the character of the area where the property is located. B. The Commission recommends that the property described above, for rezoning from Light Industrial (M-1) to Residential 3 be approved. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 23rd day of September, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 9th day of September, 2025, to approve the application for a preliminary plat is hereby made final this 23rd day of September, 2025, subject to appeal by an interested party within the prescribed period under Idaho law. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning.