Document Jerome_doc_2f37d45e86

City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser REGULAR MEETING December 9, 2025 6:00 p.m. Please Note: Speakers who have been given the floor may be limited to three minutes of discussion. Any item can be added or removed from the consent calendar prior to the meeting. 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Public Hearing for a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc for a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plat/ Final Development Plan, on the property described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel ID Number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 Inside acreage (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho; and Parcel 2 and 3: Parcel ID Numbers RPJ13702320090A and RPJ13702320100A Tax 9 &10 Blk 232 Jerome Townsite (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho. 3. Consider a request for Centurion Engineers, Inc for a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plat/ Final Development Plan, on the property described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel ID Number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 Inside acreage (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho; and Parcel 2 and 3: Parcel ID Numbers RPJ13702320090A and RPJ13702320100A Tax 9 &10 Blk 232 Jerome Townsite (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho- action item 4. Public Hearing for a request from Sara Cromer for a Front Yard Variance for a porch, on the property described as Lot 1, Blk 62 Jerome Townsite (SW 18-8-17), more commonly known as 329 2nd Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho. 5. Consider a request for Sara Cromer for a Front Yard Variance for a porch, on the property described as Lot 1, Blk 62 Jerome Townsite (SW 18-8-17), more commonly known as 329 2nd Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho - action item 6. Public Hearing for AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF JEROME, IDAHO, CREATING TITLE 16 CHAPTER 16.22, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS OF THE JEROME MUNICIPAL CODE; PROVIDING FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS; PROVIDING AN APPEAL AND HOW TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS PROCESS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 7. Consider AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF JEROME, IDAHO, CREATING TITLE 16 CHAPTER 16.22, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS OF THE JEROME MUNICIPAL CODE; PROVIDING FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS; PROVIDING AN APPEAL AND HOW TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS PROCESS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE- action item ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser 8. Public Hearing for AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF JEROME, IDAHO, AMENDING JEROME MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION SECTIONS: 17.03.005, ADDING TO THE ACCESSORY USE OR STRUCTURE DEFINITION; 17.14.020, ADDING SETBACKS FOR FRONT PORCHES AND MINIMUM FRONT LOT WIDTH; 17.18.020, REQUIRING FRONT ENTRANCES; 17.18.030, CLARIFYING FENCES IN THE FRONT YARD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 9. Consider AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF JEROME, IDAHO, AMENDING JEROME MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION SECTIONS: 17.03.005, ADDING TO THE ACCESSORY USE OR STRUCTURE DEFINITION; 17.14.020, ADDING SETBACKS FOR FRONT PORCHES AND MINIMUM FRONT LOT WIDTH; 17.18.020, REQUIRING FRONT ENTRANCES; 17.18.030, CLARIFYING FENCES IN THE FRONT YARD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE- action item 10. Consider a Design Review for 1016 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho – action item 11. Citizen Correspondence and Issues 12. Consent Agenda- action item The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the October 14, 2025, regular meeting. B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc for a Special Use Permit allowing a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD), on the properties described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel ID Number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 Inside acreage (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho; and Parcel 2 and 3: Parcel ID Numbers RPJ13702320090A and RPJ13702320100A Tax 9 &10 Blk 232 Jerome Townsite (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho. C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Chris Barber representing Dennis Stauffer Estate for a De-Annexation, removal of property from the City boundary, of the property described as RPJ00000175001, Tax 2503351 of SWNW Jerome Unplatted Sec 17 T8 R17, more commonly known as the property containing corrals and shops on the north side of 50 North Rd East, Jerome, Idaho, excluding all residential dwellings, containing approximately 3.51 acres. 13. Discussion Period & Staff Reports 14. Adjournment Note: Any person requiring special accommodations to participate in the meeting should contact City Hall (City Planner, [PHONE REDACTED], ext. 140) at least two business days before the meeting. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser Cualquier persona que necesite traducción para participar debe comunicarse con el municipio (Planificador Urbano [PHONE REDACTED] ext. 140) siete días antes de la reunión. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Subdivision Preliminary Approval for Planned Unit Development and Final Development Plan Current Zoning Designation: Residential 3 (R-3) Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD): requesting reduced lot size and building setbacks with an increased area of landscape and open space with private drives. Request: Applicant requests preliminary plat approval, along with the final development plan, to move forward with final PUD approval from the City Council. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: December 9, 2025 Subject: Staff report on Centurion Engineers, Inc. request for a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plat, on the property described in the agenda, more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho. PRELIMINARY PLAT: STAFF REPORT I. As it pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance: a. The property in question, described herein, containing approximately 3.68 acres, is zoned Residential 3 b. The proposed project is a Planned Unit Development, creating 28 single- family residential lots, one of which will include the existing single-family home, and eight lots for landscape and open space. The proposed project requires approval in phases, including an approved special use permit, plat, and final development plan. The special use permit was approved after a public hearing on October 14th. The Findings and conclusions are on the agenda for approval at tonight’s meeting. c. Planned Unit Developments (PUD) allow for a variety of housing, permitting reduced lot dimensions, yards, and building setbacks, with an increase in open space and increased landscape, with clustering of buildings encouraged. i. The application is requesting reduced lot dimensions and building setbacks to allow for a unique variety of housing and a more efficient use of land that includes open space and landscaping. II. As it pertains to Title 16 of the JMC, the Subdivision Ordinance a. The preliminary plat is subject to Title 16; the analysis is attached. III. As it pertains to the Jerome Comprehensive Plan a. Meets objectives in Chapter 4 – Our Built Environment i. Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. ii. Objective 4.4: Support development of affordable housing for a full range of employees and residents (retirees, families, etc.). b. The Comprehensive Plan Map designates the property in question as Residential Medium. SUBDIVISION – PRELIMINARY PLAT CRITERIA STAFF ANALYSIS 16.16.050: Preliminary Plat: • The applicant has provided a complete subdivision application with adequate information to review the preliminary plat. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org • The subdivision application was deemed complete and scheduled for the next available meeting date, which would allow staff to review the application, take comments from other agencies, and properly notify the public of the public hearing. A mailed notice was sent to adjacent property owners on November 20, 2025, as required by code. • The following agencies were sent notice regarding the proposed subdivision: Idaho Power, Intermountain Gas, School District, Jerome County, Northside Canal Co. and the Post Office. o Northside Canal Co. responded with no further comments received. • City departments, including Building, Engineering, Fire, Public Works, and Wastewater, were allowed to comment on this application. o Comments were minor and have been corrected. • The applicant shall have one year to file and obtain the certification of the acceptance of the final plant application by the administrator within one year after action by the commission. Failure to do so shall cause all approvals of said preliminary plat to be null and void, unless an extension of time is applied for by the subdivider and granted by the commission. 16.28.040: Lot Requirements: As allowed in a PUD and as approved in the Special Use Permit, the lots have been reduced to 2,475 -2,772 square feet for the townhomes and from 4,525 – 4,750 square feet for the single-family homes. 16.28.050-.051: Streets & Dedication of Streets The application does not propose public streets. Lots will be accessed via a private shared drive from N Birch and a private lane accessible from N Birch or 8th Ave W. 16.28.070: Easements The plat proposes easements in accordance with City standards. Easements have been platted for utilities. 16.28.080: Sewage System & 16.28.090: Water Mains Water and sewer models will need to be prepared before a will-serve letter can be issued. The lots will be served by municipal water and sewer. 16.28.100: Stormwater Retention/Detention The preliminary plat proposes appropriate underground stormwater retention. 16.28.110: Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk The preliminary plat proposes installing curb, gutter, and sidewalk on N Birch St. There is existing curb, gutter, and sidewalk on 10th Ave W and 8th Ave W. The existing driveway approaches on 10th will be removed and replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalk. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org 16.28.140: Irrigation Lines & Water Stocks Pressurized surface irrigation will be provided to all lots. Water shares will be transferred to the City for delivery of irrigation per municipal code, once the project has been approved. 16.28.150: Required Improvements Mailboxes and streetlights have been included on the preliminary plat, meeting the requirements of the code. 16.16.050: Preliminary Plat A. Commission Action a. Findings: In determining the acceptance of a proposed subdivision, the commission shall consider the objectives of this title and at least the following: i. The conformance of the subdivision with the comprehensive plan; ii. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development; iii. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program of the city; iv. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development; v. The other health, safety of environmental problems that may be brought to the commission’s attention. 17.40.060: Planned Unit Development, Common Open Space a. A minimum of 10% of the gross land area in any residential PUD shall be reserved for common open space. i. Planned open space is .83 acres of the 3.68 project area. That is 22.6% of the gross land area as open space, meeting the 10% requirement. ii. The open spaces are called out on the plat by lots 1, 10, 18, 23, 30, and 35. The HOA will maintain all open spaces. Recommended Conditions: • Comply with all City of Jerome department requirements pertaining to the needed sewer, water, roads, hydrants, irrigation, construction, and any other needed improvements; • A final plat or any part thereof shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Council before recording with the County; • Comply with all City, State, and Federal requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: December 9, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding request from Centurion Engineers, Inc. for Final Development Plan review and approval allowing a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD), on the properties described in the agenda and more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report I. Background: This request includes three parcels. The bare southwest parcel on the corner of 10th Ave West and N Birch, and two parcels addressed as 328 8th Ave West, which include one single-family home. The Special Use Permit was approved, and the Preliminary Development plan was approved in principle. II. As pertains to Title 17.40 Planned Unit Developments a. After approval of the Preliminary Development Plan, the applicant shall submit a final development plan that contains: Document Approved Special Use Permit Yes Preliminary Plan Approved in Principle Yes Final Development Plan Pending Survey of development site (plat) Yes Proposed density & sizes of lots Yes Schedule of development & No. of Houses Yes Engineered Plans for Feasibility Yes Site Plan Yes Preliminary floor plans Yes Landscape Plan Yes Deeds and CC&Rs Yes, with final CC&Rs pending III. 17.40.160: Recommendation by Commission of Final Development Plan: a. Within forty-five days after receipt of the final development plan, the commission shall recommend to the council that the final development plan be approved as presented, approved with supplementary conditions, or disapproved. b. The commission shall find that the facts submitted with the application and presented to them establish that: i. The proposed development can be initiated within one year of the date of approval; ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org ii. The total development can exist as an independent unit capable of creating an environment of sustained desirability and stability, or that adequate assurance will be provided that such objective will be attained, and the uses proposed will not be detrimental to present and potential surrounding uses, but will have a beneficial effect which would not be achieved under standard district regulations; iii. The streets and thoroughfares proposed are suitable and adequate to carry anticipated traffic, and increased densities will not generate traffic in such amounts as to overload the street network outside the PUD; iv. Any exception from standard district requirements is warranted by the design and other amenities incorporated in the final development plan, in accordance with the PUD and the adopted policy of the council; v. The area surrounding said development can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial compatibility with the proposed development; vi. The PUD is in general conformance with the comprehensive plan; and vii. The existing and proposed utility services are adequate for the population densities. IV. Staff Recommendation: a. Staff recommends approval of the final development plan to the City Council. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-49 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-49 Category Subdivision Workspace state In review Workspace created 11/07/2025, 12:41:26 PM MST Application submitted 11/07/2025, 2:04:59 PM MST Assignee Ida Clark Package generation date 12/01/2025, 11:10:10 AM MST LOCATION INFORMATION Address 328 8TH AVE W, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ13702320090A, TAX 9 BLK 232 JEROME TOWNSITE (NE 13-8-16) 17,700 SQFT PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Tamee Crawford Centurion Engineers, Inc 2323 S Vista Ave 206 Boise [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant JACKSON AARON PO BOX 56 JEROME ID 83338 ID 83338 Property owner ---PAGE BREAK--- PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION 152 East Ave A, Jerome, Idaho 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] Ext. 140 Applicant Information Current Use of Property: Bare Land with one existing house Current Zoning: Residential Requested Zone: Descriptoin Write a complete description of your request: See attached detailed explanation of PUD PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 12/09/2025, 7:00:00 PM MST Description: Preliminary Plat Public Hearing and review of the Final Development Plan Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 12/09/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviews REVIEWS Wastewater Department - Reviewed Assignee: Brad Henry Description: Reviewed Review started: 11/13/2025, 4:33:49 PM MST Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: See comment letter. Public Works Director Review - Unreviewed Assignee: Jon Caton Description: General P&Z Review - Unreviewed Assignee: Ida Clark Description: Fire Department - Reviewed Assignee: Dave LaCelle Description: Reviewed Review started: 11/13/2025, 4:32:05 PM MST Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: No comment. Engineering Department - Reviewed Assignee: Tyson Carpenter Description: Reviewed Review started: 11/13/2025, 4:33:28 PM MST Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: See comment letter. Building Department - Reviewed Assignee: Description: Reviewed Review started: 11/13/2025, 4:33:07 PM MST Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: None at this time. Reviews, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Deed Attachment type(s): Deed VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST RPJ13702320100 (Original).pdf, RPJ13702320100.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Affidavit of Legal Attachment type(s): Affidavit of Legal Interest VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Affidavit of Legal (Original).pdf, Affidavit of Legal.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Deed Attachment type(s): Deed VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST RPJ13702320090 (Original).pdf, RPJ13702320090.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Preliminary Plat Attachment type(s): Preliminary Plat VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Ellie's Landing Pre Plat 11-4-25 (Original).pdf, Ellie's Landing Pre Plat 11-4-25.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Narrative of proposed project Attachment type(s): General Summary VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST General Summary (Original).pdf, General Summary_2.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Deed Attachment type(s): Deed VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST RPJ13702340020 north (Original).pdf, RPJ13702340020 north.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 1 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Contents: Final development plan Attachment type(s): Site Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:52:47 PM MST Ellies Landing Final Development 11-5-25 (Original).pdf, Ellies Landing Final Development 11-5-25.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:56:23 PM MST Contents: Single family home elevations Attachment type(s): Architectural Elevations VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:56:23 PM MST SF_Elevation (Original).pdf, SF_Elevation.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/07/2025, 12:56:23 PM MST Contents: Single family home elevations Attachment type(s): Architectural Elevations VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/07/2025, 12:56:23 PM MST Perrine_3b2b_9_29_25 (Original).pdf, Perrine_3b2b_9_29_25.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/13/2025, 2:10:53 PM MST Attachment type(s): Draft Plan of Subdivision VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/13/2025, 2:10:53 PM MST General Summary.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/13/2025, 2:12:13 PM MST Contents: Updated Attachment type(s): Landscape Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/13/2025, 2:12:13 PM MST ElliesLandingLandscapePlan11.10.25Color (Original).pdf, ElliesLandingLandscapePlan11.10.25Color.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/17/2025, 2:48:00 PM MST Contents: Phased Plan for Subdivision Attachment type(s): General Summary VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/17/2025, 2:48:00 PM MST Phased plan for Ellie's Landing (Original).pdf, Phased plan for Ellie's Landing.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 2 / 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Fees & Payments Application PAID BILL, CREATED ON 11/07/2025, 2:11:49 PM MST Bill type Approval bill Fee schedule Copy of Copy of Copy of City of Jerome Fees Total amount $125.00 Due date 12/31/2025 FEES STATUS TITLE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT Paid Special Use Permit - Commercial or Industrial PUD-Already charged for the plat 1.0 $125.00 PAYMENTS STATUS PAID ON PAYMENT METHOD PAYMENT DETAIL CHECK NUMBER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AMOUNT Paid 11/13/2025, 1:16:14 PM MST Online card SJR Homes called and paid with a check $125.00 Fees & Payments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- PUD Final Plan Sign-Off 152 East Ave A, Jerome, Idaho 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] Ext. 140 Approval of Timeframe I understand approval shall expire and may be revoked if construction on the project has not begun within one year from the date of issuance of the approval. Signature Applicant I, Tamee Crawford (The Applicant), do hereby declare that the information contained in this application, the attached schedules and forms, the attached plans and specifications, and other attached documentation is true to the best of my knowledge. If a permit is granted, I agree to comply with Local Ordinances and the conditions of the permit. If the Applicant is a corporation or partnership, I have the authority to bind the corporation or partnership by signing off, I understand that it constitutes a legal signature confirming that I acknowledge and agree to the above declaration. Digitally signed on 11/07/2025, 12:56:49 PM MST by Tamee Crawford. Property owner I, JACKSON AARON (The Property owner), do hereby declare that the information contained in this application, the attached schedules and forms, the attached plans and specifications, and other attached documentation is true to the best of my knowledge. If a permit is granted, I agree to comply with Local Ordinances and the conditions of the permit. If the Property owner is a corporation or partnership, I have the authority to bind the corporation or partnership by signing off, I understand that it constitutes a legal signature confirming that I acknowledge and agree to the above declaration. Digitally signed on 11/07/2025, 2:04:47 PM MST by Tamee Crawford with an authorization letter from JACKSON AARON. Yes No ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Centurion Engineers, Inc. 2323 S. Vista Ave Suite 206 I Boise, ID 83705 I [PHONE REDACTED] Over a Century of Engineering Excellence Page 1 of 4 City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Department c/o Ida Clark 152 E Avenue A Jerome, ID 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] November 5, 2025 Dear Mayor, City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, and Staff, On behalf of our clients, Ryan Recla and Aaron Scott Jackson, we are pleased to present Ellie’s Landing. The intent is to provide an uncommon style of housing for the City of Jerome— townhomes—as well as more traditional detached homes. The lots for the detached homes are sized to allow construction of a single-story home of a manageable size for aging seniors or a little larger two-story home for a young family. We trust you will see the value in providing a new path to home ownership as an alternative to apartment living. Our clients’ goal is to provide affordable, right-size housing for aging seniors, young residents starting their work careers or for anyone that does not want the maintenance responsibilities of a yard but still wants to live in a single-family home. The Site. Three properties comprise the project site: • APN RPJ13702340020A; no address assigned; 3 acres; recently rezoned from M1 to R3. The rezone was approved in September 2025. Currently used for outdoor storage • APN RPJ13702320100A; 328 8th Avenue W; .271 acres; zoned R3. Currently vacant • APN RPJ13702320090A; 328 8th Avenue W; .402 acres; zoned R3. There is an existing home on this property that will remain. To accomplish this development, we recently received rezone approval from City Council and preliminary approval of the planned unit development (PUD) development plan from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Now we are requesting approval of the final development plan for the PUD and approval of a preliminary plat. Subdivision. The proposed subdivision includes 1 lot for the existing home, 27 residential lots, 4 landscape buffer lots, 4 open space I recreation lots, and 1 private street lot. The new residential lots vary in width from 25 feet to 50 feet and in area from 2,475 square feet to 4,750 square feet. The existing home will be refurbished and sold. There is a fire department turnaround toward the end of the common drive. The common drive and private street will be maintained by the HOA. ---PAGE BREAK--- Centurion Engineers, Inc. 2323 S. Vista Ave Suite 206 I Boise, ID 83705 I [PHONE REDACTED] Over a Century of Engineering Excellence Page 2 of 4 The open space and landscape lots will be held in common ownership by the homeowners’ association. Special Use Permit for a Planned Unit Development. The Special Use Permit is the mechanism to approve a Planned Unit Development. The PUD is necessary to modify the dimensional standards of the R3 zone to construct the townhouses and smaller homes. Specifically, the PUD is needed: • To allow the units to be attached (zero-foot interior side setbacks). • To allow structures on the interior of the site to have a six-foot separation (three-foot interior side setback). Structures on the boundary of the subdivision would have a five-foot interior side setback. • For homes that have garage access at the rear of the property, allow a 10-foot front setback. • To allow smaller lot sizes (2,475 square feet minimum). • To allow an increase in density. • To allow a common drive to serve as an alley access to the northern tiers of lots, and • To create a private street from Birch Street to 8th Avenue. Arbor Lane will provide access to the interior of the area and to the three single family homes tucked behind the existing residence. In exchange for these allowances, our clients are proposing to provide four recreation lots: the central commons is 6,933 square feet in area and will be developed with a pavilion and trees; the sports court is 6,237 square feet in area; the entry open space (6,332 square feet) provides a sidewalk into the development, large grassy spaces, and the fire department turnaround; and there is another large, grassy open area across from the sports court (5,722 square feet). There are also several street buffers. The total open space is over 36,000 square feet or 22.6% of the site. The look and feel of each streetscape will be improved as follows: • 10th Avenue. This is the streetscape that will change the most. The homes will have front doors that face 10th Avenue. (Garages will be at the rear of the building taking access from the common drive.) The front of the buildings will be attractively and cohesively landscaped with trees, shrubs, and ground cover. The townhouses will have front porches that create a welcoming streetscape for pedestrians. Toward the middle of the block, there will be a common lot with a path leading to the large central open space. • Birch Street. The streetscape along Birch Street will be similar to that on the east side of the road. You will see a two-story townhome at the corner of Birch and 10th that look similar in massing to those of the apartments buildings across the street. Along the rest of the streetscape will be two, single story homes. In general, the replacement of the construction lay-down yard with a residential project will improve the appearance and minimize use conflicts with surrounding neighbors. • 8th Avenue. As noted previously, the existing home on 8th Avenue will be renovated. The existing gravel driveway will be paved, and three homes will be tucked behind the original home. This will protect the look and feel of the single family detached homes along 8th Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Centurion Engineers, Inc. 2323 S. Vista Ave Suite 206 I Boise, ID 83705 I [PHONE REDACTED] Over a Century of Engineering Excellence Page 3 of 4 • Arbor Lane. Arbor Lane is labeled as having a section and section on the preliminary plat to clarify the two different street sections necessary to drain storm water. o Arbor Lane (Section This section will extend from Birch Street to the west. The lots on the north side of the street will have front doors and porches that face Arbor Lane, but the garages will take access from the common drive. Those homes on the south side of Arbor Lane will have garages and front doors that face the street. o Arbor Lane (Section Section B immediately transitions into A. This section will extend north from 8th Avenue past the sport court and connect with section B. Style and Architecture. We have provided conceptual images of the proposed structures as detailed below. There will be five types of structures. • Three, four-unit townhouses (along 10th Avenue) • Twelve single-family homes (along Arbor Lane Section B) • Three single-family homes (along Arbor Lane Section A) and • The existing home. The townhomes will have zero-lot-line setbacks where they attach. End units that adjoin a property boundary will have a five-foot setback. Interior end units will have a three-foot setback. This means that the minimum distance between structures will be six feet. All units that have a garage on the rear will not have fences within the required front and rear setbacks. This includes the townhomes and the homes on the north side of Arbor Lane. Required Findings for Special Uses. A. A planned unit development is a special use as established in City Code. B. The project is designed to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of “Residential Medium”. The project will add to the variety of homes available within the City limits and create new opportunities for home ownership. C. The site is designed to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the surrounding developments. Along 10th Avenue and Birch Street, the townhouse structures will be similar to appearance to the apartment units to the east of the project site. Along 8th Avenue, the new single-family homes will be tucked behind the existing home—maintaining the appearance of the neighborhood. D. The proposed development will not create any hazardous conditions to disturb existing or future neighboring uses. E. The project site is currently serviced by adequate highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools. The site is well-suited to have children walk to school. Busing or driving kids to school will not be required. The project will provide additional internal streets and drives, drainage, and recreation opportunities. F. The proposed development will add affordable for-sale and for-rent homes to the City of Jerome. The proposed development will also diversify the housing stock in the City. Affordability and diversity will make this an economic asset to the City. ---PAGE BREAK--- Centurion Engineers, Inc. 2323 S. Vista Ave Suite 206 I Boise, ID 83705 I [PHONE REDACTED] Over a Century of Engineering Excellence Page 4 of 4 G. The proposed use of the property is for single family residential. As such, the use will not create excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. H. The proposed development has significant frontage on 10th Avenue and provides two other, parallel vehicular access drives. The three proposed vehicular approaches are designed as not to interfere with traffic on the surrounding streets. I. The project site is currently used as an industrial open storage area and a single family residential homesite. There are no existing natural, scenic or historic features of importance. c Jerome subdivision code requires that a preliminary plat must demonstrate the following: a. The conformance of the subdivision with the comprehensive plan. The project is designed to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designation of “Residential Medium”. The project will add to the variety of homes available within the City limits and create new opportunities for home ownership. J. The availability of public services to accommodate the proposed development. Because this is an infill project, it is currently serviced by adequate highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools. As noted previously, the site is well-suited to have children walk to school. b. The continuity of the proposed development with the capital improvement program of the city. Because of its infill development location, the proposed subdivision will not extend services to areas outside of the city’s capital improvement program. c. The public financial capability of supporting services for the proposed development. We understand that the project may be conditioned to extend services as necessary to serve the development while tying into the City’s existing systems. d. The other health, safety or environmental problems that may be brought to the commission's attention. The proposed use of the property is for single family residential. As such, the use will not create excessive traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. At the hearing for the draft PUD development plan, one neighbor expressed concerns regarding flooding in his basement. We have fine-tuned drainage design to better collect stormwater and channel it into underground basins. If approved, we will take particular care to address this issue in the subdivision construction documents. We look forward to answering any questions you may have about the proposal. Sincerely, Anna B Canning, AICP Planning Manager Centurion Engineers, Inc. [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- 31 32 33 34 14 13 12 11 17 16 15 7 20 6 5 4 3 2 22 21 Block 1 23 8 35 18 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 36 19 9 10 Arbor Lane (Section A) Arbor Lane (Section B) Common Drive 1 2 Land Use Calculations Setback/Zoning Table Underground Utility Note Owner/Applicant 25-Foot Arbor Lane (Section B) Preliminary Plat Vicinity Map Notes Legend Ellie's Landing 1.1 C E N T U R I O N E N G I N E E R S Consulting Engineers, Land Surveyors, Planners 2323 S. Vista Ave. Suite 206 I Boise, ID 83705 [PHONE REDACTED] I www.centengr.com N. Birch St. 10th Ave W. 8th Ave W. Project Site Sawtooth Subdivision Addition Preliminary Plat 20-Foot Common Drive Section Map of Jerome Map of Jerome 25-Foot Arbor Lane (Section A) R E G I S T E R E D P R O F E S S I O N A L ---PAGE BREAK--- Common Drive Arbor Lane Arbor Lane MG MG MG MG MG MG CY CY CY CY SD WLC SD WLC KFG KFG KFG KFG SD WLC SD WLC HLG KFG KFG KFG KFG KFG KFG WRW WRW WRW WRW WRW WRW GMS GMS GMS GLS GLS MG WRW WRW WRW WRW WRW WRW GMS GMS GLS WRW GLS WLC WLC WLC WLC WRW WRW WRW WRW WRW GMS GMS GMS GLS GLS WLC HLG HLG HLG SD SD WLC WLC HLG 16’x24’ PAVILION CY HLG PLANTING KEY: CY = COLORGUARD YUCCA GMS = GOLDMOUND SPIREA HLG = HAMELN GRASS KFG = KARL FOERSTER MG = MAIDEN GRASS SD = STELLA D’ORO DAYLILY WLC = WALKER’S LOW CATMINT WRW = WINE AND ROSES WEIGELA LAWN 3/4” BLACK/TAN PERMABARK GREENSPIRE LINDEN, TILIA CORDATA, CLASS II ‘KINDRED SPIRIT’ COLUMNAR OAK, QUERCUS ROBUR X ALBA, CLASS III ASSORTED CRABAPPLE TREES: PROFUSION, ROYAL RAINDROPS, SPRING SNOW, MALUS SPP, CLASS I DATE: NOVEMBER 10, 2025 CLIENT: RYAN RECLA LOCATION: 328 8TH AVE W JEROME, ID 83338 PREPARED BY: MEGAN BENNETT PRINCIPAL DESIGNER OWYHEE LANDSCAPE DESIGN LLC PO BOX 7097, BOISE, ID 83707 [PHONE REDACTED] N 40 0 80 SCALE 1”=20’ 20 WRW CY WLC HLG HLG HLG ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- From: Anna B. Canning To: Ida Clark Cc: Ryan Recla Subject: RE: RR20 Revised Landscape Plan for Ellie"s Landing Date: Thursday, November 13, 2025 4:45:44 PM Attachments: image001.png Ida, I spoke to our client regarding anticipated construction. The current plan is to build a mix of type and size of units in sets. The first set of construction would be on the east end of the project. It would include one four-plex unit, two single-family homes that are accessed from the common drive, and two single-family homes that are accessed from the private street. As those units sell, they will continue construction east-to-west. Please let me know if this email will suffice or if I need to prepare an addendum to our application. As always, thank you in advance! Anna Anna B. Canning, AICP Office and Planning Manager 2323 S Vista Avenue, Suite 206 [PHONE REDACTED] x 222 [EMAIL REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2025 2:15 PM To: Anna B. Canning <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: David Crawford <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ryan Recla <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: RR20 Revised Landscape Plan for Ellie's Landing Hi Anna, I do need a summary of the proposed development of the homes. Can you please send me the location where they plan to start? Thanks, Ida From: Anna B. Canning <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2025 9:28 AM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: David Crawford <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ryan Recla <[EMAIL REDACTED]> ---PAGE BREAK--- Subject: RR20 Revised Landscape Plan for Ellie's Landing Good morning, Ida, Would you please replace the existing landscape plan with the attached? I realized that the landscape plan had an older underground drainage design on it. This revised plan has removed the drainage systems to focus on the landscaping and hardscape features. As always, thank you in advance! Anna Anna B. Canning, AICP Office and Planning Manager 2323 S Vista Avenue, Suite 206 [PHONE REDACTED] x 222 [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 9th day of December 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc for a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminary Plat/ Final Development Plan, on the property described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel ID Number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 Inside acreage (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho; and Parcel 2 and 3: Parcel ID Numbers RPJ13702320090A and RPJ13702320100A Tax 9 &10 Blk 232 Jerome Townsite (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by December 3rd, 2025, or physically submitted by noon December 5th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 17th day of November 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: November 22, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 16 16 16 16 16 16 1 2 4 5 7 8 3 4 1 2 5 B A 3B 3A 6B 6A 42 35 37 27 222 212 132 128 709 212 218 228 602 608 225 207 131 429 427 425 417 411 405 401 329 325 321 309 307 428 412 402 328 326 316 304 429 427 421 411 409 407 405 401 327 325 323 317 315 309 303 613 605 601 529 525 515 513 505 501 528 516 514 500 705 517 519 521 601 605 609 613 513 511 509 501 609 705 721 802 606 600 530 520 512 508 506 914 612 606 600 520 500 428 420 412 408 400 328 326 320 318 312 809 916 912 432 426 420 416 408 400 328 320 312 310 300 901 909 228 224 216 212 204 200 128 124 120 114 801 920 914 230 228 222 218 214 210 206 202 200 130 128 126 124 116 112 901 905 909 921 108 200 520 616 620 626 121 117 115 710 706 702 112 114 116 113 107 810 800 102 104 114 117 116 916 900 140 141 [PHONE REDACTED] 1020 1002 1035 1000 1034 1008 1100 1128 1118 1222 1204 1236 1302 328-A 328-B 125 BLDG 125 BLDG L 125 BLDG N 125 BLDG C 125 BLDG A 125 BLDG K 125 BLDG E 125 BLDG J 125 BLDG I 125 BLDG H 125 BLDG G 9 8 7 6 5 4 30 10 11 29 12 28 13 27 14 24 17 A-239 A-238 A-237 A-236 A-233 A-232 A-231 A-230 A-235 A-234 A-228 A-227 A-225 Jerome Middle School Summit Elementary School St. Luke's Medical Center Trailer Park American Legion N Fir St 8th Ave W 6th Ave W 7th Ave W N Lincoln Ave N Date St 10th Ave W N Birch St N Elm St 6th Ave E 7th Ave E 8th Ave E 10th Ave E N Cedar St N Alder St 7th Ave W N Birch St 8th Ave W N Cedar St A-229 1 inch = 300 feet . Ellies Landing Nearest Neighbor 500ft Ellies Landing November 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE AFF'IDAVIT r/we, KAl,e [-ltiu* narne(s) PPs l3l o *Nqoff , certify that on AJer, A AM5 date of mailing (at least l5 days prior to hearing) the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the property located at Please attach: and a notice was posted at said property on , 00 , lltJ- date ofposting (at least 15 days priorto hearing) NA, L 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Property Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested R:\01 - Planning & Zoning\1a Forms & Templates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July'24.doc t t t l l l My commission = m i ^^rr1 "ryhf,.'i$ ---PAGE BREAK--- !j0ru,e A & U Planning and Zoning Department Public Hearing Comment Submittal Sheet Please note that comments postmarked after December 3'd. or physically submitted after 12:00 PM on December 5th, will notbe included in the public hearing record. Name and Request for public hearing: Centurion Engineers. lncfora Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD) Preliminarv Plat/ Final Development Plan. Date of Hearing: December 9th 2025 Please Print Lesiblv YourName: Rttl Aept.)ot-lh City of Residence and State: lf not a Jerome resident. do vou own propertv in Jerome: -T"Q€rorne-,Ttr Choose One: Support the application Yes No _ Neutral ,Xoppose the application Your comments noted below will be read into the record as long as it is written legibly, is sisned, and does not exceed the space allotted. Signature City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, lD 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] www.cityofjerome.org Date ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Variance – Front Yard Setback 329 2nd Avenue East, Jerome, ID Current Zoning Designation: Residential 2 (R-2) Subdivision: No Setbacks: Front 25’, Side street 15’ Summary: The applicant requests a variance from the front-yard setback to expand the front porch and bring it into compliance. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: December 9, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the request from Sara Cromer for a Variance, allowing a reduced front yard setback on the property located at 329 2nd Ave East, Jerome, Idaho. Variance Request: Staff Analysis I. Background – The home at 329 2nd Ave East was built in the 1950s. The original house has a front porch that was built several years ago. We have been unable to find any permits for the front porch. The Jerome Municipal Code (JMC) has been updated several times over the last 30 years. The applicant requested rebuilding and expanding the porch to the full length of the house. The porch will encroach by about four feet into the front yard setback. The front porch would not encroach on any easements. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC: a. The property in question, 329 2nd Ave East, is currently zoned Residential 2 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. Per JMC, 17.03.710: Setback Line, “A line established by this title, generally parallel with and measured from the lot line, defining the limits of a yard in which no building or structure may be located aboveground except as may be provided herein.” c. Setbacks for the R-2 zone are Front 25’, Rear 20’, Side and Street Side 15’. i. The home is setback 25’ from the front and 15’ from the streetside property lines. d. Per JMC, 17.14.020, B: Note Conditions: i. Setback reductions (to be measured from the foundation to the property line): ii. No portion of the structure may extend more than three feet into the side yard setback; iii. Open structures such as porches, canopies, balconies, platforms, carports, covered patios and similar architectural projections shall be considered part of the building to which it is attached and shall not project more than fifteen feet (15') into the required rear yard setback; iv. A garage, carport or other accessory building detached from a residential structure may be constructed within three feet from the rear and side property line within the zones and for the yards indicated. 1. The code is silent on front porches; therefore, staff will apply the 25’ front yard setback to all structures. III. The Jerome Municipal Code defines a Variance as: a. A modification of the requirements of this title as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings or other provisions of this title affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or special privilege but may be granted to an applicant only upon a showing of undue hardship because of the characteristics of the site and that the variance is not in conflict with the public interest. i. The applicant requests a variance on the front yard setback requirement of 25’ to rebuild and expand an attached, open front porch. Variance Criteria Staff Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org I. 17.70.030: VARIANCES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed variance request in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that the requested variance conforms to the following standards: A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district; • Staff Analysis: The home is existing and already has an attached open front porch. Porches are allowed to extend into the rear and side setbacks; however, the code is silent on front porches. B. That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title; • Staff Analysis: Because the code is silent on front porch setbacks, it is assumed that the intent was for any structure in the front yard to conform to the 25’ setback. A literal interpretation to comply with the current 25’ setback would deny the applicant the right to construct an open front porch. C. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; • Staff Analysis: The application notes that the house was built several years ago and had an existing front porch that did not have any permits. The applicant did not build the house and would like to make improvements to the home. D. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. • The application notes granting the variance will not confer any special privilege on the applicant. They feel it would improve the home's appearance, and the addition will fit the neighborhood. This process will also have a permitted porch that complies with the building, planning & and zoning code. II. Staff Comments A. Will need to keep the street side setback as it is a corner lot. i. It is noted that the porch will expand the length of the house only. It will not encroach on the street side setback. III. 17.70.040: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: Under no circumstances shall a variance or an appeal of a variance be granted so as to allow a use not permissible under the terms of this title and the zoning district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of this title in said district. (Ord. 1070, 2010) IV. Recommended Conditions: • Front porch will not extend into the street side yard setback or encroach more than five feet into the front yard setback. • Comply with all City, State, and Federal requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-42 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-42 Category Variance Workspace state In review Workspace created 10/20/2025, 4:14:18 PM MDT Application submitted 09/25/2025, 4:06:00 PM MDT Assignee Katie Elliott Package generation date 12/01/2025, 11:08:29 AM MST LOCATION INFORMATION Address 329 2ND AVE E, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ13700620010A, LOT 1, BLK 62 JEROME TOWNSITE (SW 18-8-17) PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Sara Cromer 329 2ND AVE E JEROME ID 83338 ID 83338 JErome +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant, Property owner ---PAGE BREAK--- Variance 152 East Ave A, Jerome, Idaho 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] Ext. 140 Project Information Description of the Variance Requested Front yard setback for attached porch. Narrative statement About 20 years ago, a contractor built a front porch on our property. We thought they pulled permits, and they did not. The attached porch encroaches on the 25-foot front setback. We are asking for a variance to allow an upgraded porch to be built. The home was built over 20 years ago with different front setbacks and porch requirements. The City code is silent on front porches encroaching into the setback; therefore, a variance is required. Granting this will confer on the applicant any special privileges. 1. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district; 2. That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title; 3. That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant; and 4. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this title to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. Conditions A variance shall not be granted unless the commission makes specific findings of fact based directly on the particular evidence presented to it which support conclusions that the above mentioned standards and conditions have been met by the applicant. (Ord. 1070, 2010) Variance, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 12/09/2025, 7:00:00 PM MST Description: Front Yard Setback Variance for Attached Porch Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 12/09/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviews REVIEWS Building Department - Unreviewed Assignee: Kortnie Kent Description: General P&Z Review - Unreviewed Assignee: Ida Clark Description: Reviews, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 10/20/2025, 4:28:04 PM MDT Contents: Application and current picture Attachment type(s): Site Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 10/20/2025, 4:28:04 PM MDT DOC25102016_04_39 (Original).pdf, DOC25102016_04_39.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Fees & Payments Application PAID BILL, CREATED ON 10/20/2025, 4:32:40 PM MDT Bill type Approval bill Fee schedule City of Jerome Fees Total amount $75.00 Due date 10/24/2025 FEES STATUS TITLE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY AMOUNT Paid Variance Payment taken when I was gone - applicant was told it was $75 1.0 $75.00 PAYMENTS STATUS PAID ON PAYMENT METHOD PAYMENT DETAIL CHECK NUMBER ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AMOUNT Paid 10/20/2025, 4:34:56 PM MDT Over-the-counter Credit card Confirmation # 244104825 $75.00 Fees & Payments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 9th day of December 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Sara Cromer for a Front Yard Variance for a porch, on the property described as Lot 1, Blk 62 Jerome Townsite (SW 18-8-17), more commonly known as 329 2nd Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by December 3rd, 2025, or physically submitted by noon December 5th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 17th day of November 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: November 22, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- East 2nd Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 17 16 24 16 17 16 16 24 16 16 16 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 14 10 12 214 104 500 508 510 512 520 600 604 600 606 609 601 521 517 513 509 505 501 500 504 510 512 516 214 416 420 416 412 410 404 328 324 320 308 120 114 112 202 105 414 412 408 404 400 409 415 417 421 300 145 147 229 225 140 152 204 200 240 260 154 212 224 221 216 209 202 121 129 132 208 212 220 228 200 128 301 305 315 317 319 325 329 405 409 413 417 429 420 412 408 404 400 328 318 316 312 308 304 300 301 305 309 313 317 321 327 405 409 417 420 412 410 404 400 328 320 314 312 308 306 406 220 609 603 521 517 509 505 222 216 500 518 520 600 606 505 509 511 515 521 601 605 607 504 510 512 516 526 600 604 608 57 78 63 58 43 79 80 62 59 41 42 61 60 A-195 A-199 A-196 A-204 A-200 ICCU Park Shepherd Park National Guard First Baptist Church St Jerome Catholic Church Post Office Tennis Court Historical Society 1st Ave E E Main St 3rd Ave E 2nd Ave E N Davis St N Cleveland St N Buchanan St N Eisenhower St N Adams St 2nd Ave E E Main St 3rd Ave E 1st Ave E N Adams St 1 inch = 200 feet . 329 2nd Ave E Nearest Neighbor 500ft 329 2nd Ave E November 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- PUBLIC NOTICE, AFFIDAVIT the attached Notice of Public Hearing was mailed to all propefty owners within feet of the property located at 351:An4 ftYL fa\f- address or legal description and a notice was posted at said property on l\v e,4 , Ng5 date ofposting (at least 15 days prior to hearing) Witness: Please attach: 1. Public Hearing Notice 2. Property Owners within the designated map area 3. Photo of Posted Notice Requested R:\01 - Planning & zoning\1a Forms & Temptates\Affidavit Notice of publication- July'24.doc r/we, Ktlie El lim , certify that on ltJov 00 ,10fr5 , narne(s) date of mailing (at least 15 days prior to hearing My commission expires: (lid?"a _"$rr+E ii;*" "orAP Y W Wm ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: December 9, 2025 Subject: Amendment to Title 16 – Adding Language for Lot Line Adjustments Background: The Current Jerome Municipal Code is silent on lot line adjustments. This is the process of moving the boundaries of existing lots, without increasing or reducing the number of parcels. We have been using an administrative procedure that is approved by Public Works, the Engineer, and Planning and Zoning to ensure compliance with the current municipal code and infrastructure. We have recently received pushback and incomplete information, making it challenging to ensure the adjustments meet code requirements. This language will give the applicant, surveyors, and staff a process to follow to ensure compliance. All language proposed is new and will be added to Title 16 – Subdivisions. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 9th day of December 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF JEROME, IDAHO, CREATING TITLE 16 CHAPTER 16.22, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS OF THE JEROME MUNICIPAL CODE; PROVIDING FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL PROCESS; PROVIDING AN APPEAL AND HOW TO CORRECT VIOLATIONS PROCESS; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by December 3rd, 2025, or physically submitted by noon December 5th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 17th day of November 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: November 22, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: December 9, 2025 Subject: Amendment to Title 17 – Amendments Background: 17.03.005 Accessory Structure: We have received numerous requests not to allow containers, railroad cars or semitrailers as an accessory structure. Staff agree with this request, as many are located in areas that do not enhance our community's appearance. 17.14.020 Schedule of Building Height and Lot Area Regulations 1. Front porch setback. The commission has had three variances for requests to build front porches, since our code is silent on them. Staff have also received several questions and requests for clarification on front porches. This language would allow a property owner to build a porch 10’ into the front yard setback without a variance. 2. This stems from a few subdivisions that met the city code requirements; however, it was not a design or visual that we wanted to see continue in our city. After researching other cities, it is common to require a minimum lot front width. 17.18.020: SUPPLEMENTAL GENERAL PROVISIONS: This adds a new provision by requiring single- family homes to have a front door and porch facing a street. This requirement is common in several other cities, like Twin Falls and Idaho Falls. It eliminates “crowding” in homes on narrow lots. 17.18.030: Supplemental Yard and Height Regulations: This clarifies the installation of front yard fences. Public safety would like to keep the maximum of 3’ for a solid fence for safety reasons. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 9th day of December 2025, at the hour of 6:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF JEROME, IDAHO, AMENDING JEROME MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION SECTIONS: 17.03.005, ADDING TO THE ACCESSORY USE OR STRUCTURE DEFINITION; 17.14.020, ADDING SETBACKS FOR FRONT PORCHES AND MINIMUM FRONT LOT WIDTH; 17.18.020, REQUIRING FRONT ENTRANCES; 17.18.030, CLARIFYING FENCES IN THE FRONT YARD; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by December 3rd, 2025, or physically submitted by noon December 5th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 17th day of November 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: November 22, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission Cc: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: December 9, 2025 Subject: Staff Report on Design Review Change for Tesla Supercharger at 1016 S Lincoln Ave, Jerome, ID. DESIGN REVIEW REQUEST: STAFF REPORT Background: Tesla Supercharger would like to install eight superchargers and a transformer pad in the northwest parking lot of Ridley’s grocery store. The parcel is located within the Design Overlay District. There will be eight supercharge posts and trash bins. All existing landscape, including the trees and grass area on S. Lincoln and East Ave I will remain. The Ridley’s parking area has a shared parking lot with other businesses. While eight will be reserved for Tesla charging, several other parking spaces are available. Also, these are the furthest from Ridley's entrance. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning application PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone (208) 324-8189 www.cityofjerome.org Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] For use by Principal Authority Cloudpermit application number US-ID41320-P-2025-44 PIN RPJ13701610090A Application submitted to City of Jerome, ID, Idaho Description of Subject Property Address 1016 LINCOLN AVE S Municipality City of Jerome, ID, Idaho PIN RPJ13701610090A Legal description TAX 2403914-1 OF A-161 JEROME TOWNSITE (SW 19-8-17) 95,201 SQFT Purpose of Application Application type Design Review — New Building Applicant Last name Sliger First name Brian Corporation or partnership Tesla Street address 3500 Deer Creek Rd. Unit number Lot / Con. Municipality Palo Alto State CA ZIP code 94304 Other phone Mobile phone +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Fax Email [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- Property owner Last name CJM LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP First name Corporation or partnership Street address 10780 W STATE ST #252 STAR ID 83669 ID 83669 Unit number Lot / Con. Municipality State ZIP code Other phone Mobile phone Fax Email Declaration and Signatures Applicant I, Brian Sliger (The Applicant), do hereby declare that the information contained in this application, the attached schedules and forms, the attached plans and specifications, and other attached documentation is true to the best of my knowledge. If a permit is granted, I agree to comply with Local Ordinances and the conditions of the permit. If the Applicant is a corporation or partnership, I have the authority to bind the corporation or partnership by signing off, I understand that it constitutes a legal signature confirming that I acknowledge and agree to the above declaration. Digitally signed on 10/30/2025, 10:45:41 AM MDT by Brian Sliger. ---PAGE BREAK--- US-ID41320-P-2025-44 package WORKSPACE INFORMATION Application number US-ID41320-P-2025-44 Category Design Review Workspace state In review Workspace created 10/30/2025, 10:39:40 AM MDT Application submitted 10/30/2025, 10:48:35 AM MDT Assignee Ida Clark Package generation date 12/01/2025, 11:07:19 AM MST LOCATION INFORMATION Address 1016 LINCOLN AVE S, City of Jerome, ID Property information RPJ13701610090A, TAX 2403914-1 OF A-161 JEROME TOWNSITE (SW 19-8-17) 95,201 SQFT PARTIES NAME AND COMPANY CONTACT DETAILS ROLES Brian Sliger Tesla 3500 Deer Creek Rd. Palo Alto [EMAIL REDACTED] +1 [PHONE REDACTED] Applicant CJM LIMITED LIABILITY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 10780 W STATE ST #252 STAR ID 83669 ID 83669 Property owner ---PAGE BREAK--- Council and committee meetings Name and municipality: Planning & Zoning Commission, City of Jerome, ID, Planning Department Date: 12/09/2025, 7:00:00 PM MST Description: Tesla Supercharger Design Review Status: Pending Agenda: Planning & Zoning Commission agenda 12/09/2025.pdf Council and committee meetings, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- Reviews REVIEWS General P&Z Review - In review Assignee: Ida Clark Description: Changes requested Review started: 10/30/2025, 3:15:41 PM MDT Reviewer: Ida Clark Comment: Changes requested Review started: 11/21/2025, 11:01:51 AM MST Reviewer: Comment: Reviews, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- ATTACHMENTS This section includes relevant information about the various attachments that have been uploaded to the workspaces or that have been generated as part of the workspace. The actual files are not included in this pdf. Refer to other folders within the downloaded file to view the actual files. Phase: Application Uploaded on: 10/30/2025, 10:45:20 AM MDT Contents: Design Drawings (Full Set) Attachment type(s): Architectural Elevations, Construction Plans - Stamped, General Summary, Landscape Plan, Site Plan VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 10/30/2025, 10:45:20 AM MDT 2025.10.28 - JB-833348-00 Jerome, ID – 1016 S Lincoln Ave_Rev_0_IFP_S&S (Original).pdf, 2025.10.28 - JB-833348-00 Jerome, ID – 1016 S Lincoln Ave_Rev_0_IFP_S&S.pdf application/pdf Phase: Application Uploaded on: 11/21/2025, 11:01:44 AM MST Attachment type(s): Property Owner's written authorization VERSIONS VERSION UPLOADED ON FILENAME(S) MEDIA TYPE 1 11/21/2025, 11:01:44 AM MST 2025-11-01 Letter of Authorization - Executed (Original).pdf, 2025-11-01 Letter of Authorization - Executed.pdf application/pdf Attachments, page 1 / 1 ---PAGE BREAK--- LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION APPLICATION FOR ZONING/USE/BUILDING PERMIT The undersigned, Donald Mark Ridley, Authorized Partner for CJM Limited Liability Limited Partnership , owner of the below described Property (“Owner”), does hereby appoint Tesla Inc. (Tesla) and their employees, agents and contractors, as Owner’s agent for the purpose of filing and completing any approval or application necessary to ensure its ability to use and/or construct improvements to the Property leased or licensed to it for the purpose of installing an electric car charging facility and for constructing or installing charging stations and related equipment on the Property as Tesla Inc. may require for its electric car charging system. I understand that the application may be denied, modified or approved with conditions and that those conditions or modifications must be complied with prior to issuance of building permits. Owner hereby authorizes the employees of the City with jurisdiction to enter upon the Property during normal business hours as necessary to inspect the Property for the purpose of processing this application. Tesla will be responsible for all costs, fees and expenses incurred in securing any approval. Property Located at: 1016 S Lincoln Ave, Jerome, ID 83338 (“Property”) Owner's Name (print): Donald Mark Ridley Signature (and title, if applicable) of Property Owner: By: Title: Authorized Partner Date Executed: Site Name: TRT – 458505 – Jerome, ID November 1st, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- TESLA SUPERCHARGER JEROME, ID - 1016 S LINCOLN AVE 8 SUPERCHARGERS APN: RPJ13701610090A PROJECT TEAM ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD: MICHAEL P. HENDERSON TESLA, INC. 3500 DEER CREEK RD, PALO ALTO, CA 94304 M: (678) 687-1976 [EMAIL REDACTED] APPLICABLE CODES 2018 IDAHO BUILDING CODE 2023 IDAHO ELECTRICAL CODE SHEET INDEX DESIGN CRITERIA TRT: 458505 SYSTEM SUMMARY SUPERCHARGER SYSTEM SUMMARY EQUIPMENT QTY PSU 3.5 PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT 2 V4 SUPERCHARGER POST (NON-PSU) 1 UTILITY TRANSFORMER 1 LIGHT POLES 2 N S E W AC ALTERNATING CURRENT ADA AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR BLDG BUILDING CLR CLEAR COMM COMMUNICATION CONC CONCRETE DC DIRECT CURRENT DIA DIAMETER DIST DISTANCE EXISTING EA. EACH EGC EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING EQ EQUAL ERMS ENERGY REDUCTION MAINTENANCE SETTINGS ESS ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM EV ELECTRIC VEHICLE GAB GRADED AGGREGATE BASE GALV GALVANIZED GEC GROUNDING ELECTRODE CONDUCTOR GFP GROUND FAULT PROTECTOR GND GROUND HVAC HEATING, VENTILATION, & AIR CONDITIONING I CURRENT IMP CURRENT AT MAX POWER INV INVERTER ISC SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT KVA KILOVOLT AMPERE KW KILOWATT KWH KILOWATT-HOUR LOS LINE OF SIGHT LSIG LONG TIME, SHORT TIME, INSTANTANEOUS GROUND LV LOW-VOLTAGE LVDC LOW VOLTAGE DIRECT CURRENT MAX MAXIMUM MIN MINIMUM MV MEDIUM-VOLTAGE NEW NEC NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NRTL NATIONALLY-RECOGNIZED TESTING LABORATORY NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER PCC POINT OF COMMON COUPLING PL PROPERTY LINES PLC POWER LINE COMMUNICATION POE POWER OVER ETHERNET PP POWERPACK PSU PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT PV PHOTOVOLTAIC PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE RSD RAPID SHUTDOWN SCCR SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT RATING SCH SCHEDULE SQ. IN. SQUARE INCHES SS STAINLESS STEEL SSBJ SUPPLY SIDE BONDING JUMPER SSD SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS STC STANDARD TESTING CONDITIONS TYP TYPICAL UON UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W WATT ABBREVIATIONS PROJECT SCOPE 1. WIND DESIGN - DESIGN WIND SPEED = 103 MPH (ULTIMATE) - RISK CATEGORY = II - WIND EXPOSURE = C 2. SEISMIC DESIGN - RISK CATEGORY = II - SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR = 1.0 - SITE CLASS = D - Ss = 0.175 / S1 = 0.08 - Sds = 0.187 / Sd1 = 0.128 - SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = B - BASIC SEISMIC-FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM = NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENT - R = 2.5 / a_p = 1.0 3. GROUND SNOW LOAD = 12 PSF SITE LAYOUT AERIAL MAP REFERENCED DOCUMENTS TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY UTILITY DESIGN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD: MICHAEL P. HENDERSON TESLA, INC. 3500 DEER CREEK RD, PALO ALTO, CA 94304 M: (678) 687-1976 [EMAIL REDACTED] INSTALLATION OF SUPERCHARGERS AND NEW PSU 3.5 PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT, ASSOCIATED AC AND DC EQUIPMENT. INSTALLATION OF PLP EQUIPMENT PADS AND WALKWAYS. INSTALLATION OF NEW PARKING STRIPING, SIGNAGE AND ADA ACCESS FEATURES. ASPHALT OVERLAY FOR PROPOSED EV ADA STALLS. INSTALLATION OF NEW LED LIGHTING. PROJECT DESIGNER: FERNANDA SOLIS TESLA, INC. 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 [EMAIL REDACTED] ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS ARE BASED OFF THE SURVEYOR'S ESTABLISHED BENCHMARK AND CONTROL. IMPORTANT NOTE: 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US COVER PAGE G-001 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:53 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS N S E W AREA OF WORK N S E W SHEET # SHEET TITLE G-001 COVER PAGE G-002 NOTES G-101 DEMOLITION PLAN E-101 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E-201 SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM E-501 ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-502 ELECTRICAL DETAILS S-301 ENLARGED SITE PLAN S-501 STRUCTURAL DETAILS S-502 STRUCTURAL DETAILS WEST AVENUE I S LINCOLN AVE 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- CONCRETE ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND ANY OTHER REGULATING AUTHORITIES WHICH HAVE AUTHORITY OVER ANY PORTION OF THE WORK. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE FROM TESLA OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. ANY WORK PERFORMED IN CONFLICT WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT THE SUBCONTRACTORS SOLE EXPENSE. SUBCONTRACTOR INITIATED CHANGES SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING TO TESLA FOR APPROVAL BEFORE MAKING ANY CHANGES. DEVIATION FROM PLANS BEFORE WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM TESLA PLACES LIABILITY ON THE SUBCONTRACTOR. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE MOUNTED AS SHOWN. WHERE DETAILS ARE NOT PROVIDED, CONTRACTOR SHALL USE STANDARD CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES. ALL SURFACES SHALL BE PATCHED AND PAINTED AROUND NEW DEVICES AND EQUIPMENT TO MATCH EXISTING FINISHES. ANY METAL SHAVINGS FROM SITE WORK SHALL BE CLEANED FROM ALL SURFACES WHERE OXIDIZED OR CONDUCTIVE METAL SHAVINGS MAY CAUSE RUST, ELECTRICAL SHORT CIRCUITS, OR OTHER DAMAGE. APPROVALS FROM BUILDING INSPECTORS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AUTHORITY TO DEVIATE FROM THE DRAWINGS. NEW PAVEMENT INSTALLED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT SHALL MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION. ASPHALT AND GAB DEPTHS SHALL BE MAINTAINED. GENERAL NOTES SUPERCHARGER NOTES 1. NEUTRAL MUST BE INCLUDED FOR PROPER OPERATION OF TESLA SUPERCHARGERS. 2. ALL CONDUIT FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. ALL WIRING FURNISHED BY TESLA AND INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR. 3. ALL BUSHINGS AND WIRING INTERNAL OF PROPOSED SERVICE EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY MANUFACTURER. ANY MODIFICATIONS SHALL REQUIRE ENGINEERING APPROVAL PRIOR TO ANY CHANGES BEING MADE. 4. ALL ALUMINUM(AI) CONDUCTORS TO RECEIVE ANTI-OXIDATION COATING DURING INSTALLATION. ALL OTHER CONDUCTORS ARE COPPER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. THE FOLLOWING CHARGING CABINETS AND THE CHARGING POSTS USED ON THIS PROJECT COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: · IEC 61851-23: 2014 / EN 61851-23: 2014 · UL 2202: 2009(R2012) · CAN CSA C22.2 NO. 107.1-01(R2011) 6. THE AFOREMENTIONED STANDARDS IDENTIFY THE REQUIREMENTS MET BY THE EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: · PROTECTION AGAINST ELECTRIC SHOCK · OVERLOAD AND SHORT CIRCUIT PROTECTION · FAULT PROTECTION · DEGREES OF PROTECTION AGAINST ACCESS TO HAZARDOUS LIVE PARTS · THE INTERNAL COMPONENTS OF THE SYSTEM ARE PROPRIETARY. ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING ACTUAL INTERNAL PROTECTIVE DEVICES MUST BE COORDINATED DIRECTLY WITH TESLA. 7. TESLA SUPERCHARGER SIGNAL WIRING RATED 1000V AND USED FOR POWER LIMITED CLASS 1 CIRCUITS SHALL BE PERMITTED TO RUN IN CONDUITS, CABLE TRAYS, WIRE WAYS, OR RACEWAYS ALONG WITH ASSOCIATED DC CONDUCTORS AS ALLOWED PER NEC 725.48(B)(1) AND 620.36. 8. SUPERCHARGER CABINET AC CONDUCTORS SIZED UNDER ENGINEERING SUPERVISION USING THERMAL MODELING SOFTWARE. SPECIFICATIONS ABOUT THE TRENCHING REQUIREMENTS ARE SHOWN IN E-501 9. FOR DC RUNS IN EXCESS OF 330 FEET, CONTACT TESLA. 10. UNDERGROUND CONDUITS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC OR UL LISTED HDPE. THE ABOVEGROUND PORTION OF AN UNDERGROUND/ABOVEGROUND TRANSITION SHALL BE SCHEDULE 80 PVC OR UL LISTED HDPE. 11. ABOVEGROUND CONDUITS EXPOSED TO VEHICULAR OR EQUIVALENT PHYSICAL DAMAGE SHALL BE RMC. ABOVEGROUND CONDUITS NOT EXPOSED TO VEHICULAR OR EQUIVALENT DAMAGE SHALL BE PERMITTED TO BE EMT. 12. WIRE SPLICES ARE NOT PERMITTED TO EXTEND WIRE RUN LENGTH. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RERUNNING FULL LENGTH OF WIRE IF RUN LENGTH IS MISCALCULATED. 13. SPECIAL INSPECTION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL POST-INSTALLED CONCRETE ANCHORS. 14. PLANT GUARANTEE: CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANTS FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FROM DATE OF PROJECT ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PLANT MAINTENANCE FOR THE FIRST GROWING SEASON. 15. IF EXISTING GRASS IS DAMAGED/REMOVED DURING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY SEED PER HYDROSEED METHOD. RATING OF SEED SHALL BE PER DISTRIBUTOR BASED ON SPECIES TYPE. 16. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH EXISTING LANDSCAPE; USE GRASS, RIVER ROCK, MULCH ETC. TO MATCH EXISTING LANDSCAPE AROUND EQUIPMENT, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 17. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL WEED BARRIER IN FRONT OF SUPERCHARGER CABINETS. BARRIER TO EXTEND FULL WIDTH AND DEPTH OF NEC REQUIRED WORKING CLEARANCES. GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE AS AMENDED BY APPLICABLE STATE AND LOCAL CODES. 2. ALL WIRING SHALL BE MANAGED IN A PROFESSIONAL, WORKMAN-LIKE MANNER AND MUST BE SUPPORTED, SECURED, AND PROTECTED TO PREVENT DAMAGE. 3. AC CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY PHASE AND SYSTEM PER ART 210.5 OR 215.12. UNLESS OTHERWISE REQUIRED BY ART 210.5(1) OR AHJ, COLOR-CODING OF POWER CONDUCTORS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: CONDUCTOR 277/480V 120/208V PHASE A BROWN BLACK PHASE B ORANGE RED PHASE C YELLOW BLUE NEUTRAL GRAY WHITE 4. DC CIRCUIT CONDUCTORS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED PER ART 210.5 OR 215.12: CONDUCTOR STD COLOR ALT COLOR DC+ RED RED-STRIPED DC- BLACK BLACK-STRIPED 5. TERMINATIONS OF AC, DC, AND COMMUNICATIONS CONDUCTORS SHALL BE PROFESSIONALLY AND LEGIBLY LABELED WITH CIRCUIT SCHEDULE IDENTIFIER, CONDUCTOR SIZE (AS APPLICABLE) AND TERMINATION TORQUE. 6. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE LISTED BY A NRTL IN COMPLIANCE WITH ART 110.3. WHERE EXISTING NRTL LISTING CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, ENGINEERING APPROVAL SHALL BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION, AND THE EQUIPMENT SHALL BE RELISTED BY A SUITABLE NRTL. 7. UNDERGROUND CONDUCTORS & CABLES TO BE INSTALLED IN CONDUIT UON. 8. ALL WIRES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH STRAIN RELIEF AT ALL ENTRY INTO BOXES AS REQUIRED BY NRTL LISTING. 9. REFER TO MANUFACTURER'S CURRENT PLANNING AND INSTALLATION MANUAL FOR TORQUE SPECS FOR ALL BOLTS AND TERMINAL CONNECTIONS. 10. ALL CONDUCTOR TERMINATIONS ON BUSSING OR TRANSFORMER SPADES SHALL BE MADE WITH HIGH-PRESS CRIMP LUGS UON. 11. ALL TERMINATIONS OF ALUMINUM CONDUCTORS SHALL BE PROPERLY INSTALLED WITH BEST PRACTICES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO: · USE OF TERMINATION EQUIPMENT RATED FOR ALUMINUM AT THE CONDUCTOR TEMPERATURE, CURRENT, AND VOLTAGE · ALLOWANCE FOR MOVEMENT DUE TO THERMAL EXPANSION/CONTRACTION · PROPER COATING OF EXPOSED ALUMINUM WITH ANTI-OXIDIZATION COMPOUND · USE OF CALIBRATED DEVICES TO TORQUE AND MARK TERMINALS TO REQUIRED SETTINGS 12. DUCT SEAL COMPOUND SHALL BE APPLIED WHEREVER CONDUITS TRANSITION INDOOR/OUTDOOR OR UNDERGROUND/ABOVEGROUND. REFER TO EQUIPMENT NOTES FOR ADDITIONAL DUCT SEAL REQUIREMENTS. 13. BELL ENDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEREVER CONDUIT ENTERS EQUIPMENT FROM UNDERGROUND AND WHEREVER POTENTIAL FOR DAMAGE TO CONDUCTORS IS PRESENT AT ANY POINT. BELL ENDS SHALL NOT PREVENT THE USE OF GROUNDING FITTINGS OR COUPLERS WHEN REQUIRED. 14. ALL STUB-UPS WITHIN FLOOR-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE 3-5" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 15. ALL CONDUITS EXPOSED TO VEHICULAR OR EQUIVALENT PHYSICAL DAMAGE SHALL BE RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL. 16. GROUND LUGS SHALL BE RATED FOR THEIR ENVIRONMENT AND CONDITION OF USE. ELECTRICAL NOTES SITE LEGEND (EXISTING OBJECTS) UTILITY IDAHO POWER CO (ID) CATEGORY ITEMS TESLA UTILITY PRIMARY PRIMARY TRENCHING X INSTALL PRIMARY CONDUIT X INSTALL PULL ROPE X INSTALL PRIMARY FEEDERS X PROVIDE PRIMARY FEEDERS X PROVIDE ROAD CUTS / ROAD BORES X PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT X TRANSFORMER INSTALL TRANSFORMER PAD X PROVIDE TRANSFORMER X INSTALL TRANSFORMER X INSTALL CONNECTIONS - PRIMARY X INSTALL CONNECTIONS - SECD X PROVIDE METER X INSTALL METER X SECONDARY LAND SECONDARY FEEDERS X SECONDARY TRENCHING X INSTALL SECONDARY CONDUIT X INSTALL PULL ROPE X INSTALL SECONDARY FEEDERS X PROVIDE SECONDARY FEEDERS X PROVIDE ROAD CUTS / ROAD BORES X PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT X SCOPE OF WORK UNDERGROUND SANITARY LINE SS COMMUNICATION MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER LIGHT POLE UTILITY POLE COMMUNICATION VAULT TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAST DECIDUOUS TREE UNDERGROUND WATER LINE WL UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE UE UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE UC 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US NOTES G-002 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:53 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 25' BUILDING SETBACK PARKING STRIPING, TYP. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. TREE, TYP. PROPERTY LINE 30'-1" DRIVE AISLE WIDTH LANDSCAPE ASPHALT LIGHT POLE TO BE REMOVED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE TO BE REROUTED AS NEEDED TO AVOID EQUIPMENT FOUNDATIONS, REF. E-101 FOR EXTENTS STRIPING TO BE REMOVED, TYP. ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED FOR INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT PADS AT SHADED AREA. ASPHALT TO BE REPLACED AFTER INSTALLATION ASPHALT TO BE REMOVED FOR INSTALLATION OF TRENCHING AT SHADED AREA. ASPHALT TO BE REPLACED AFTER INSTALLATION OF TRENCHES SHED TO BE REMOVED DEMOLITION PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" N S E W ANY OBJECT TO BE DEMOLISHED SITE LEGEND ANY ELEMENT TO BE REMOVED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE TRENCHING DETAILS ON THE ELECTRICAL DETAILS SHEET. THE LIMITS OF HARDSCAPE REMOVAL ARE SHOWN AS FOR INFORMATION ONLY AND IT SHALL BE UP TO THE CONTRACTOR TO DETERMINE THE EXACT LIMITS. NOTES HARDSCAPED AREA TO BE MODIFIED 0 1' 12' 8' 4' 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US DEMOLITION PLAN G-101 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS WEST AVENUE I 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 25' BUILDING SETBACK 1A TSC LGT-1 PSU-1 PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT - V3 CABINET, POSTS & ENCLOSED CIRCUIT BREAKER, (TYP. PER STRUCTURAL MTR EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD MOUNTED ACCESSIBLE SIGN, PER STRUCTURAL PARKING STRIPING, TYP. WIDE WHITE STRIPINGWITH 4" WIDE WHITE CROSS STRIPING AT 36" O.C. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. TREE, TYP. "DC BUS" CONDUIT TO BE ENCASED IN 2" MINIMUM, ALL SIDES, TYP. WHITE PARKING STRIPING, TYP. PROVIDE PAVING AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 2% MAX SLOPE ALL DIRECTIONS AT ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGE STALLS AND ACCESS AISLE PROPERTY LINE PAVEMENT OVERLAY AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 2% MAX SLOPE ALL DIRECTIONS UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL LINE TO BE REROUTED AS NEEDED TO AVOID EQUIPMENT FOUNDATIONS 5' 11' 9' TYP. UON 25' DRIVE AISLE WIDTH 18' TYP. 1B ACDS-1 LANDSCAPE EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD, (TYP. 10), PER STRUCTURAL ACCESSIBLE EV STALLS PER STRUCTURAL POINT OF CONNECTION AT EXISTING POLE, BY UTILITY, PER UTILITY DESIGN ASPHALT UTILITY BOLLARD, (TYP. PROVIDED BY UTILITY, PER UTILITY DESIGN WIFI XR-1 LGT-2 1C 1D 2A 2B 2C 2D SPR-1 SPR-2 PSU-2 ACDS-2 SUPERCHARGER POST W/ PLP FOUNDATION, PER STRUCTURAL ACDM REUSE ASPHALT OR PLACE GRAVEL IN NON-REPAVED AREAS RECYCLE/ TRASH BIN, PER STRUCTURAL 3748.378 3748.453 3747.939 3748.005 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" N S E W CHARGE POST FROM PAD EDGE 3' ON ALL SIDES AND 10' FROM FRONT (VERIFY WITH UTILITY STANDARDS) MINIMUM SERVICE CLEARANCES TRANSFORMER NOTES: SUPERCHARGER CABINET 2D POST TAG SIGN TYPE ACCESSIBLE CHARGING STALLS SCHEDULE 2 0 1' 12' 8' 4' EXISTING STANDARD STALLS UTILIZED AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT 8 PROPOSED TESLA STALLS 8 PROPOSED STANDARD STALLS 0 NET STALL COUNT 0 PARKING STALL SCHEDULE 1'-6" 1' SERVICE SIDE CHARGE HANDLE 5" SITE LEGEND EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD SIGN CONDUIT ROUTE, SHOWN FOR DIAGRAMMATIC PURPOSES ONLY. EQUIPMENT TAGS MONITORING DISCONNECT ACDM-# ACDS-# AC DISCONNECT, INTEGRAL TO PSU XR-# TRANSFORMER (PROVIDED BY UTILITY PER UTILITY DESIGN) WIFI WIFI BROADCAST UNIT TESLA SYSTEM CONTROLLER TSC MTR UTILITY METER (PROVIDED BY UTILITY PER UTILITY DESIGN) #X SUPERCHARGER POST SPR-# SUPERCHARGER CABINET PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT PSU-# POLE-MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE 5' SUPERCHARGER CABINET ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN, REF. S-501 ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGING USE LAST UTILITY BOLLARD ASPHALT SEAL COAT 3' EV LITE WIFI, REF. SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM UTILITY EQUIPMENT/FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS PER UTILITY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AGAINST EXECUTED UTILITY DESIGN. UTILITY BOLLARDS PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH UTILITY ON LOCATION, QUANTITY, AND SPECS. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO EXECUTED UTILITY DESIGN FOR PRIMARY AND POINT OF CONNECTION DETAILS. FOR ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGING AREA(S), CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY SLOPES ARE COMPLIANT PER ACCESSIBLE STALL DETAIL (REF. ARCHITECTURAL OR STRUCTURAL SHEETS). REGRADE AND ADD ASPHALT OVERLAY, NEW FULL DEPTH ASPHALT, AND/OR ASPHALT MILLING IF REQUIRED. EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE PER SURVEY DATA AND ARE TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. SPOT ELEVATION EXISTING ELEVATION XX.XX 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E-101 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS WEST AVENUE I 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- EQUIPMENT NOTES # LEGEND CIRCUIT BREAKER SWITCH FUSE CURRENT TRANSFORMER DELTA TRANSFORMER WINDING WYE TRANSFORMER WINDING GROUNDED WYE TRANSFORMER WINDING M METER POWER TRANSFORMER AC-DC OR DC-AC CONVERTER EQPT. ENCLOSURES BUSSING CONDUCTORS SHIELDED CAT6 CABLE C MS PS LIGHT WITH MOTION AND PHOTO SENSOR WIFI CONNECTION DELTA HIGH-LEG TRANSFORMER WINDING ST SHUNT TRIP ADDITIONAL PLACARDS REQUIRED FOR ARC FLASH LABELS PLACARDS TO BE MADE OF RED PHENOLIC PLASTIC W/ 1" WHITE LETTERING. ATTACH PLACARDS WITH RIVETS OR SELF-TAPPING SCREWS PLACARD NOTES: SYSTEM PLACARDS ATTACH AT ALL PSU DISCONNECTS TESLA EV SYSTEM DISCONNECT ATTACH AT ALL PSU DISCONNECTS TESLA SUPERCHARGER 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US WARNING CONTROLS COMPARTMENT EQUIPMENT IS STILL LIVE WHEN THE MAIN SERVICE DISCONNECT IS IN THE "OFF" POSITION. INDEPENDENT "CONTROLS DISCONNECT" LOCATED ADJACENT TO MAIN DISCONNECT ATTACH ON EXTERIOR OF TESLA SYSTEM CONTROLLER PANEL AT PSU SERVICE DISCONNECT FIRST RESPONDERS: CONTACT (725) 223-2450 FOR EMERGENCY USE ONLY ATTACH ON EXTERIOR OF EACH EV LITE DISCONNECT FIRST RESPONDER PLACARD AC CIRCUIT SCHEDULE CIRCUIT # CONDUCTOR METAL UON # OF CONDUITS # POWER CONDUCTORS PER CONDUIT POWER CONDUCTOR SIZE EGC SIGNAL WIRE DC MID MAX CIRCUIT LENGTH WIRE TYPE CONDUIT TYPES MIN CONDUIT SIZE (IN) DC-POST (FACTORY WIRED) AL 1 4 600 KCMIL 2/0 AWG (CU) TESLA PROVIDED - 330' XHHW-2 (1000V) PVC, RMC, EMT 4 DC-POST AL 1 4 600 KCMIL 2/0 AWG (CU) TESLA PROVIDED - 330' XHHW-2 (1000V) PVC, RMC, EMT, HDPE, DIRECT-BURY 4 DC-BUS AL 1 4 600 KCMIL 1/0 AWG (CU) - 3/0 AWG 900' XHHW-2 (1000V) PVC, RMC 3.5 DC CIRCUIT SCHEDULE CIRCUIT # CONDUCTOR METAL UON # OF CONDUITS # PHASE CONDUCTORS PER CONDUIT PHASE CONDUCTOR SIZE NEUTRAL CONDUCTOR SIZE EGC MAX CIRCUIT LENGHT WIRE TYPE CONDUIT TYPES MIN CONDUIT SIZE (IN) AC-PSU AL 2 3 500 KCMIL 500 KCMIL - 300' XHHW-2 PVC, RMC, EMT 4 AC-SPR (FACTORY WIRED) AL 2 3 500 KCMIL 500 KCMIL 1 AWG (CU) 600' XHHW-2 PVC, RMC, EMT 4 AC-LGT CU 1 1 12 AWG 12 AWG 12 AWG 150' THWN-2 PVC, RMC, EMT 1 AC-WIFI CU 1 1 12 AWG 12 AWG 12 AWG 330' THWN-2 PVC, RMC, EMT, LFNC 1 AC-PSU C C C SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS NOTE: SUPERCHARGER CABINETS AND POST ARE PART OF A CERTIFIED SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE DC-POST CONDUCTORS. AN NRTL HAS INSPECTED AND APPROVED OF ALL PROTECTION MECHANISMS WITHIN THE SYSTEM. 5 SUPERCHARGER POST "DC" 4 SUPERCHARGER CABINET "SPR-1" 3 PSU PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT "PSU-1" AC-SPR FACTORY-WIRED, TYP. 600A/3P 80% RATED 65kAIC FIELD-INSTALLED SERVICE DISCONNECT "ACDS-1" (INTEGRAL TO THE PSU, TYP.) 480V, 3P MONITORING DISCONNECT "ACDM" TESLA SYSTEM CONTROLLER DROP-IN KIT FIELD-INSTALLED (INTEGRAL TO THE PSU) 277V, 1P, 30A, 6A FUSE ENCLOSURE FOR DISCONNECTS 6 GROUND RODS DROP-IN KIT, FIELD-INSTALLED FACTORY-WIRED, TYP. DC-POST C C TO "AC-WIFI" 600A/3P 80% RATED 65kAIC "PSU-2" SERVICE DISCONNECT "ACDS-2" (INTEGRAL TO THE PSU, TYP.) 480V, 3P 6 GROUND RODS DC-BUS TYP. C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C NEMA 4X ENCLOSURE AC-WIFI MOUNTED TO POLE 7 8 POWER SUPPLY WIFI BROADCAST UNIT "WIFI" 1 UTILITY TRANSFORMER "XR-1" • SIZE & PRIMARY VOLTAGE PER UTILITY • SECONDARY 480Y/277V 2 UTILITY METER "MTR" 3 PSU 3.5 PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT "PSU-#" • SUPERCHARGER CABINET "SPR" PER UNIT • SUPERCHARGER POSTS "DC" PER UNIT • INTEGRAL 600A CIRCUIT BREAKER SERVICE ENTRANCE RATED • FACTORY PRE-WIRED DC-POST CIRCUIT • FACTORY PRE-WIRED AC-SPR CIRCUIT • PSU's TOTAL 4 SUPERCHARGER CABINET "SPR-#" • SUPERCHARGER CABINETS • 480VAC, 3PH, 4W • 465A MAX AC INPUT • DC OUTPUT TO 4 CHARGE POSTS MAX EACH SUPERCHARGER CABINET • 85 kA SCCR 5 SUPERCHARGER POST "DC" • 250KW • SUPERCHARGER POSTS • 0 VDC - 500 VDC 6 GROUND RODS • COPPER • SEE E-501 FOR MORE DETAILS 7 24VDC POWER SUPPLY • MEAN WELL # WDR-120-24 • 277VAC INPUT, 120W AT 24 VDC OUTPUT • DIN-RAIL MOUNTED WITHIN NEMA 4X ENCLOSURE WITH CRADLEPOINT WIFI BROADCAST UNIT • ENCLOSURE MOUNTED TO POLE 8 WIFI BROADCAST UNIT "WIFI" ENCLOSURE MOUNTED • CRADLEPOINT # R1900 BROADCAST UNIT • CRADLEPOINT # RX30 POE SWITCH REQUIRED IF ANY ACCESS POINT(S) CONNECTED TO THIS R1900 • UNIT TO BE INSTALLED IN NEMA 4X ENCLOSURE WITH 24VDC POWER SUPPLY • ENCLOSURE MOUNTED TO POLE • ANTENNA SERVING KITTED ENCLOSURE TO BE MOUNTED PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS • CRADLEPOINT # 170585 CABLE REQUIRED FOR 24VDC 9 LIGHT FIXTURE "LGT-#" • WISCONSIN LIGHTING # NF-SLS-100-40-HV-3W-RAL-MPS • 96W, 277-480VAC DRIVER • INTEGRATED PHOTOCELL AND MOTION SENSOR • POLE MOUNTED • 4000K COLOR TEMPERATURE • -40°C MIN REQUIRED AMBIENT TEMPERATURE • TOTAL FIXTURES "SPR-2" 15A/1P 80% RATED 65kAIC MS PS AC-LGT "LGT-2" 15,689 AFC NOTE: AFC CALCULATED ASSUMING 750kVA TRANSFORMER, 5.75% IZ AND INFINITE AFC AT PRIMARY. LOAD SCHEDULE TRIP AMPS DESCRIPTION VOLT-AMPS A B C 600 SUPERCHARGER #1 129,000 - - " " - 129,000 - " " - - 129,000 30 MONITORING 100 - - TOTALS PHASE A B C APPARENT POWER CURRENT 258 kVA 258 kVA 258 kVA 931 A 931 A 931 A 15 WIFI & LIGHTING - 296 - - - - - - VOLT-AMPS DESCRIPTION TRIP AMPS A B C 129,000 - - SUPERCHARGER #2 600 - 129,000 - " " - - 129,000 " " 15A/1P 80% RATED 65kAIC AC-LGT 9 MS PS LIGHT FIXTURE "LGT-1" DC-POST TO UTILITY 1 UTILITY TRANSFORMER "XR-1" BY UTILITY M 2 UTILITY METER BY UTILITY TERMINATIONS OF ALL SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS TO BE MADE WITHIN THE TRANSFORMER - - LIGHTING 96 15 C TO "TSC" SERVICE DISCONNECT 2 OF 2. IST DISCONNECT LOCATED AT PSU-1 ATTACH AT PSU #2 SERVICE DISCONNECT SERVICE DISCONNECT 1 OF 2. 2ND DISCONNECT LOCATED AT PSU-2 ATTACH AT PSU #1 SERVICE DISCONNECT AC-PSU SERVICE ENTRANCE CONDUCTORS 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM E-201 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- TRENCHING NOTES · THE TRENCH DESIGNS FOR ALL VEHICLE CHARGING CIRCUITS REQUIRING RHO VALUES ARE THE RESULT OF A THERMAL ANALYSIS OF THE CONDUCTORS UNDER LOAD. FOR PROPER PROTECTION THEY MUST BE FOLLOWED. · APPROVED BACKFILL REQUIRES DOCUMENTATION THAT SPECIFIES TESTED RHO VALUE. USE THE SPECIFIED BACKFILL LISTED BELOW OR TEST NATIVE SOIL CONDITIONS TO CONFIRM MAX DEFINED RHO VALUES. MINIMUM 2" OF APPROVED BACKFILL COVERAGE AROUND CONDUITS REQUIRED. · RHO 60 BACKFILL - CONCRETE BACKFILL WITH MIN 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3000 PSI MUST BE USED TO ACHIEVE MAX RHO 60. · RHO 90 BACKFILL - LOW STRENGTH FLUIDIZED THERMAL (SLURRY) BACKFILL WITH MIN 28 DAY COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 150 PSI MUST BE USED TO ACHIEVE MAX RHO 90. · RHO 120 BACKFILL - NATIVE SOILS/SAND. · FOR TRENCHES WITH MIXED CIRCUIT TYPES, APPLY THE CONDUIT SPACING FOR THE CIRCUIT TYPE WITH THE LARGER SPACING REQUIREMENT. · CONDUIT ARE PERMITTED TO HAVE GREATER COVER THAN SPECIFIED FOR SHORT DISTANCES WHERE REQUIRED TO CROSS UNDER UTILITY LINES, TO ALLOW FOR NEC REQUIRED MIN RADIUS FOR CONDUIT TURN-UPS INTO PAD-MOUNTED EQUIPMENT, TO AVOID OBSTRUCTIONS, ETC. · OUTSIDE WALLS AND UNDERNEATH BOTTOM ROW OF CONDUIT SPACING REQUIRED FOR ALL CONFIGURATIONS. · IF NO CONDUIT RACKS AVAILABLE, CONTRACTOR MAY USE HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONDUITS OR STAKES TO ACHIEVE THE SPACING REQUIRED. E501.1221 DC-BUS CIRCUITS TRENCH - MAX RHO 90 RA NTS "DC-BUS" CIRCUITS TRENCH - MAX RHO 90 MAX RHO 90 BACKFILL CONDUIT, RUN IN A SINGLE ROW, CANNOT BE STACKED. DC-BUS 24" MAX DETECTABLE RED WARNING TAPE 8" BELOW THE SURFACE. C "AC-PSU" CIRCUIT TRENCH - 4" CONDUITS NTS AC-PSU MAX RHO 90 BACKFILL 4" CONDUIT, MAX CONDUITS PER GROUP. DETECTABLE RED WARNING TAPE 8" BELOW THE SURFACE, TYP. 24" MAX 4" MIN CONDUITS MAY NOT BE STACKED MORE THAN HIGH. SPARE 4" CONDUITS MAY BE USED AS SPACERS. E511.123 TRENCH - PAVEMENT TRAFFIC DETAIL RA TRENCH THROUGH PAVEMENT TRAFFIC NTS 30" SUGG. DEPTH 24" MIN. COVER 8" ASPHALT/CONCRETE FINISHED GRADE, REPAIR CAP TO MATCH EXISTING. RED WARNING TAPE APPROVED BACKFILL COMPACTED 95% PVC CONDUIT (REFER TO PLANS AND WIRE SCHEDULE FOR ACTUAL NUMBER AND LOCATION OF CONDUITS). D A NTS "DC-POST" CIRCUITS TRENCH - DIRECT BURIAL DC-POST PER TABLE NO. OF POST CIRCUITS (MAX) MAX RHO BACKFILL* MAX DEPTH MIN DEPTH (VEHICULAR AREA) MIN DEPTH (NON-VEHICULAR AREA) 16 120 28" 24" 24" 24 90 28" 24" 24" 3" 4C 600 KCMIL AL + 2/0 AWG CU PVC 600/1000V UL TRAY CABLE (DIRECT BURIAL RATED), INSULATED GROUND. CABLE PER CHARGE POST. MAX. (24) CABLES PER GROUP. DETECTABLE RED WARNING TAPE. 8" BELOW THE SURFACE. CABLES MAY NOT BE STACKED MORE THAN HIGH. 3" 24" MIN BETWEEN GROUPS. * SEE TRENCHING NOTES. E NTS "DC-POST" CIRCUITS TRENCH - 4" CONDUITS DC-POST PER TABLE 4" CONDUIT, CONDUIT PER CHARGE POST. MAX. (24) CONDUITS PER CONDUIT GROUP. DETECTABLE RED WARNING TAPE. 8" BELOW THE SURFACE. CONDUITS MAY NOT BE STACKED MORE THAN HIGH. NO SPACING REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN CONDUITS. 24" MIN BETWEEN GROUPS. NO. OF POST CIRCUITS (MAX) MAX RHO BACKFILL* MAX DEPTH MIN DEPTH (VEHICULAR AREA) MIN DEPTH (NON-VEHICULAR AREA) 16 120 28" 24" 18" 24 60 28" 24" 6" * SEE TRENCHING NOTES. B NOTES: 1. DURALINE SMOOTH-COR FLEX CONDUIT HAS BEEN CERTIFIED AS PART OF TESLA’S SUPERCHARGER SYSTEM. 2. RELEVANT TESTING REPORTS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. 3. DURALINE SMOOTH-COR FLEX TO BE UTILIZED AS DC-POST CONDUIT ONLY. 4. PVC TO BE UTILIZED FOR ALL 90-DEGREE TRANSITIONS. DURALINE SMOOTH-COR FLEX CONDUIT NTS E501.107 SMOOTH-COR FLEX CONDUIT DETAIL KEYLOCK STRIPS NO GLUE O-RING GASKET AIR & WATERTIGHT SEMI SMOOTH INNER WALL KEYLOCK COUPLING CORRUGATED OUTER WALL HIGH CRUSH STRENGTH O-RING GASKET AIR & WATERTIGHT KEYLOCK STRIPS NO GLUE CONDUIT CLAMP ADAPTER SMOOTH-COR FLEX DURALINE SMOOTH-COR FLEX TO SMOOTH-COR FLEX COUPLER DURALINE SMOOTH-COR FLEX TO HDPE, PVC, THREADED GALVANIZED STEEL F 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-501 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- PSU INTEGRAL BREAKER EATON PD-3 THERMAL-MAG TRIP UNIT (600A TRIP) EATON LGH3 THERMAL-MAG TRIP UNIT (600A TRIP) SQUARE D LJL W/ U31 TRIP UNIT (600A TRIP) ABB TMAX XT5 TRIP UNIT (600A TRIP) INSTANTANEOUS (li): 5 (3000A) INSTANTANEOUS (li): 5 (3000A) LOW (li): 5 (3000A) INSTANTANEOUS (li): (3000A) NOTE: CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY BREAKER MODEL IN FIELD AND USE THE CORRESPONDING BREAKER SETTINGS TABLE. IF THE BREAKER MODEL DOES NOT MATCH EITHER TABLE, VERIFY SETTINGS WITH ELECTRICAL ENGINEER OF RECORD. GROUNDING DIAGRAM - PSU E501.1254 GROUNDING DIAGRAM - PSU DIRECT TO TRANSFORMER RA · REFER TO ONE-LINE DIAGRAM FOR SPECIFIC CIRCUIT IDENTIFIERS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT. · REFER TO AC & DC CIRCUIT SCHEDULES FOR NEUTRAL/GROUND SIZING PER CIRCUIT. NOTES LEGEND IRREVERSIBLE SPLICE OR CRIMP PER NEC 250.64(C) NEC 250.52(A)-COMPLIANT GROUNDING ELECTRODE PRIMARY OR SECONDARY COMMON TERMINAL, AS APPLICABLE G TERMINAL ON NEUTRAL OR GROUND BUSBAR N O NEUTRAL BUSBAR GROUND BUSBAR G TO ADDITIONAL POSTS EGC, TYP. "DC-POST" G N 3/0 AWG BARE CU GEC, 5/8 " DIA X 8' LONG COPPER GROUND RODS BURIED BELOW GRADE AT 6' MIN SEPARATION. ELECTRODES SHALL BE BONDED WITH 3/0 AWG SOLID CU. EGC, TYP. "AC-SPR" FACTORY-WIRED G N MAIN BONDING JUMPER TO UTILITY TRANSFORMER GROUNDED CONDUCTOR (NEUTRAL), TYP. "AC-PSU", AND CONNECTIONS PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS INTEGRATED BREAKER SERVICE DISCONNECT "ACDS-2" PSU 3.5 SUPERCHARGER CABINET, TYP. SUPERCHARGER POST, TYP. NEUTRAL, TYP. "AC-SPR" FACTORY-WIRED TO OTHER SUPERCHARGER CABINET(S) EGC, TYP. "DC-BUS" TO LIGHTING OR WIFI CIRCUITS, WHERE APPLICABLE G TO ADDITIONAL POSTS EGC, TYP. "DC-POST" FACTORY-WIRED G N 6 AWG BARE CU GEC, 5/8" DIA x 8' LONG COPPER GROUND ROD BURIED BELOW GRADE AT 6' MIN SEPARATION. ELECTRODES SHALL BE BONDED WITH 6 AWG SOLID CU. EGC, TYP. "AC-SPR" FACTORY-WIRED G N MAIN BONDING JUMPER (FACTORY-INSTALLED) TO TSC TO UTILITY TRANSFORMER INTEGRATED BREAKER SERVICE DISCONNECT "ACDS-1" PSU 3.5 SUPERCHARGER CABINET, TYP. SUPERCHARGER POST, TYP. NEUTRAL, TYP. "AC-SPR" FACTORY-WIRED · REFER TO ONE-LINE DIAGRAM FOR SPECIFIC CIRCUIT IDENTIFIERS BETWEEN EQUIPMENT. · REFER TO AC & DC CIRCUIT SCHEDULES FOR NEUTRAL/GROUND SIZING PER CIRCUIT. NOTES LEGEND IRREVERSIBLE SPLICE OR CRIMP PER NEC 250.64(C) NEC 250.52(A)-COMPLIANT GROUNDING ELECTRODE PRIMARY OR SECONDARY COMMON TERMINAL, AS APPLICABLE G TERMINAL ON NEUTRAL OR GROUND BUSBAR N O NEUTRAL BUSBAR GROUND BUSBAR N MONITORING EQUIPMENT DISCONNECT "ACDM" GROUNDED CONDUCTOR (NEUTRAL) AND CONNECTIONS PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS TO OTHER SUPERCHARGER CABINET(S) EGC, TYP. "DC-BUS" E501.1255 GROUNDING DIAGRAM - PSU WITH INTEGRATED TESLA SYSTEM CONTROLLER RA GROUNDING DIAGRAM - PSU WITH INTEGRATED TESLA SYSTEM CONTROLLER A B 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US ELECTRICAL DETAILS E-502 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 25' BUILDING SETBACK PARKING STRIPING, TYP. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, TYP. CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP. TREE, TYP. 25' DRIVE AISLE WIDTH LANDSCAPE SUPERCHARGER POST W/ PLP FOUNDATION, REF. S-502 5' 2'-9" 5' 11' 9' TYP. UON 5' 18' TYP. 26'-11" 31'-6" UTILITY BOLLARD, (TYP. PER UTILITY DESIGN EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD, (TYP. 10), REF. S-501 TRANSFORMER PAD, PER UTILITY DESIGN UTILITY METER, PROVIDED BY UTILITY, PER UTILITY DESIGN PAVEMENT OVERLAY AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 2% MAX SLOPE ALL DIRECTIONS AT ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGE STALLS AND ACCESS AISLE PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT - V3 CABINET, POSTS & ENCLOSED CIRCUIT BREAKER, (TYP. REF. S-501 5' EV ACCESSIBLE STALL, REF. S-501 PROVIDE PAVING AS REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 2% MAX SLOPE ALL DIRECTIONS AT ACCESSIBLE EV CHARGE STALL AND ACCESSIBLE AISLE 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING WITH 4" WIDE WHITE CROSS STRIPING AT 36" O.C. 4'-6" TYP. PROPERTY LINE 13'-3" 2'-4" 8'-6" 4'-6" 23'-5" 2'-7" ASPHALT POLE MOUNTED WIFI BROADCAST UNIT, REF. S-501 PSU TO BE FLUSH WITH PAVEMENT, (TYP. 2) 5' RECYCLE/ TRASH BIN, REF. S-501 PROVIDE CABLE HANDLE ACCESSIBILITY ATTACHMENT AT ACCESSIBLE CHARHE POSTS, REF. S-502 9'-2" STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA: DESIGN CODE: - 2018 IBC DESIGN CRITERIA: 1. WIND DESIGN - DESIGN WIND SPEED = 103 MPH (ULTIMATE) - RISK CATEGORY = II - WIND EXPOSURE = C 2. SEISMIC DESIGN - RISK CATEGORY = II - SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR = 1.0 - SITE CLASS = D - Ss = 0.175 / S1 = 0.08 - Sds = 0.187 / Sd1 = 0.128 - SEISMIC DESIGN CATEGORY = B - BASIC SEISMIC-FORCE-RESISTING SYSTEM = NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENT - R = 2.5 / a_p = 1.0 3. GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION - ALLOWABLE BEARING PRESSURE = 1,500 PSF USED FOR EQUIPMENT FOUNDATION 4. SNOW LOAD - GROUND SNOW LOAD = 12 PSF ENLARGED STRUCTURAL SITE PLAN 3/16" = 1'-0" N S E W SITE LEGEND 0 1' 12' 8' 4' NOTES: 1. PAD EXTENTS AND FOOTING TO BE CONFIRMED BY CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. SWITCHBOARD DIMENSIONS AND ANCHOR LOCATIONS ARE LIABLE TO CHANGE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AGAINST VENDOR FINAL SHOP DRAWINGS. 3. UTILITY EQUIPMENT/FOUNDATION DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS PER UTILITY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AGAINST EXECUTED UTILITY DESIGN. 4. UTILITY BOLLARDS PER UTILITY REQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AND COORDINATE WITH UTILITY ON LOCATION, QUANTITY, AND SPECS. SUPERCHARGER POST PROPERTY LINE EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD SIGN POLE-MOUNTED LIGHT FIXTURE UTILITY BOLLARD ASPHALT SEAL COAT WIFI, REF. SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US ENLARGED SITE PLAN S-301 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS WEST AVENUE I 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- CONCRETE DESIGN 1. ALL CONCRETE SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF THE ACI. 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE NORMAL WEIGHT AND SHALL HAVE 4,500 PSI STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. 3. REINFORCED CONCRETE IN THE FOUNDATION SHALL BE OF NATURAL AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO ASTM C-33. 4. TYPE I/II CEMENT TO MEET ASTM C150. 5. REINFORCING STEEL - ASTM A615 WITH THE FOLLOWING SIZE STRENGTH: #4 AND SMALLER GRADE 60 (fy = 60000 PSI) #5 AND LARGER GRADE 60 (fy = 60000 PSI) 6. FABRICATE AND PLACE REINFORCEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI PUBLICATION SP-66, ACI DETAILING MANUAL - LATEST EDITION. 7. PLACE CONCRETE IN COMPLIANCE WITH ACI 304. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE MECHANICALLY VIBRATED. 8. CONFORM TO ASTM C-94 FOR CONCRETE MIXING OPERATIONS. 9. CONCRETE COVER FOR REINFORCEMENT FOR NON-PRESTRESSED, CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: CONDITION COVER CAST AGAINST EARTH 3" EXPOSED TO WEATHER #5 AND SMALLER 1-1/2" #6 AND LARGER 2" SLAB-ON-GRADE 2" 10.EMBEDS -ALL ITEMS TO BE CAST INTO CONCRETE SUCH AS REINFORCING DOWELS, BOLTS, ANCHORS, PIPES, SLEEVES, ETC., SHALL BE SECURELY AND ACCURATELY POSITIONED INTO THE FORMS PRIOR TO PLACING THE CONCRETE. 11. ALL CONCRETE EXPOSED TO THE WEATHER TO BE AIR ENTRAINED AND SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM C-260. 12.PROVIDE CONTINUOUS REINFORCING BARS UNLESS WHERE SPLICES ARE SPECIFICALLY SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 13.CALCIUM CHLORIDE ADMIXTURES OR ADMIXTURES CONTAINING CHLORIDE SALTS SHALL NOT BE ADDED TO THE CONCRETE. SIDE NTS TOP FRONT NATIVE SOIL SUPERCHARGER HANDLE SUPERCHARGER CABINET 7'-7 19 32" V4 SUPERCHARGER POST V3.5 PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT SLAB DETAIL SEE CUTSHEETS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. APPROXIMATE COMPONENT WEIGHTS: CABINET = 2,448 LBS POST = 198 LBS (EACH) LIGHT POLE (INSTALLED IN FIELD) = 136 LBS TOTAL UNIT WEIGHT: 13,205 LBS - SUPERCHARGER CABINET, CHARGEPOSTS, AND LIGHT POLE ARE ANCHORED DOWN USING 5/8" UNC THREADED BOLTS INTO CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE INSERTS AT THE ASSEMBLY PLANTS. EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARDS USE 3/8" UNC THREADED BOLTS. FINISHED GRADE PSU SLAB FLUSH WITH ADJACENT GRADE. POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL DIRECTIONS REQUIRED. SEE GRADING PLAN. 9 1 2" FINISHED GRADE 12" MIN. 4' 12" MIN 95% RELATIVE COMPACTED CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE. THE PRECAST SHALL MAINTAIN A CROSS SLOPE OF 1-2% AND A LONGITUDINAL SLOPE OF 0-5% S501.1446 V4 PRE-ASSEMBLED SUPERCHARGER UNIT DETAIL RF 2'-8 13 16" 9' 9' 31'-5 5 8" 4'-1 13 16" EV MINI REBOUNDING BOLLARD, TYP. PRECAST CONCRETE FOUNDATION DANGER ARC FLASH DANGER HIGH VOLTAGE 480V NAMEPLATE DC BUS, DC POST, ETHERNET & LIGHTING CONDUITS, TYP. CIRCUIT BREAKER W/ DROP-IN KIT PROVISION FOR TESLA SYSTEM CONTROLLER 4" DC BUS CONDUIT 1" SPARE CONDUIT 4" DC POST CONDUIT 1" ETHERNET CONDUIT 13'-3 3 8" 4'-10 3 4" TRASH RECEPTACLE BOLT PATTERN 1/2" - 13 THREAD 1.25'' MAX EMBEDMENT BOLT LENGTH 13'-3 3 8" 9' 8' 41 2" 1'-2" 12' MAX. 4" MAX. OPTIONAL CRADLEPOINT ANTENNA OPTIONAL JUNIPER ACCESS POINT LIGHT POLE FIELD INSTALLED, DESIGNED BY OTHERS 4'-6" MAX. THRU-HOLE B A501.1105 BOLLARD MOUNTED ACCESSIBLE EV SIGN DETAIL RB REBOUNDING BOLLARD MOUNTED EV SIGN NTS REBOUNDING BOLLARD PRE-ASSEMBLED WITH PRE-CAST SUPERCHARGER FOUNDATION, PER STRUCTURAL 3' 80" MIN. TO BOTTOM OF ANY SIGN FREESTANDING IN CIRCULATION PATHS 60" TYP. - NOT LOCATED IN CIRCULATION PATHS BOLTED OR WELDED CAP ACCESSIBLE SIGN - USE LAST SIGN PER PLAN & PER C 2" X 2" SQUARE POWDER COATED GRAY HSS TUBE SIGN POST, ONLY REQUIRED WHEN SIGNS ARE REQUIRED 3/8" DIA. ALUMINUM SECURITY PIN BOLT RIVET W/ 3/4" DIA. DOME HEAD FLANGE & .330" GRIP LENGTH C MOUNTING OPTIONS: 1. SIGN CAN BE INSTALLED ON WALL USING ANCHOR SYSTEM MATCHING WALL TYPE. 2. SIGN CAN BE POLE MOUNTED PER SPECIFICATIONS IN POLE MOUNTED SIGN DETAILS. SIGN MATERIAL: ALUMINUM A501.118 TESLA EV CHARGER SIGN DETAIL RD TESLA EV STALL PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE 8" 11" 1/2" RADIUS SIGN CORNER NTS EV CHARGING USE LAST 1/4" DIA MOUNTING HOLES NO PARKING CABLE TERMINUS 12" HIGH WHITE TEXT 4" WHITE BORDER AND CROSS STRIPING, TYP. 30" X 48" CLEAR FLOOR SPACE 5' WIDE ACCESS AISLE A501.1621 ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL - TESLA STANDARD RA NTS G SIGN PER PLAN HANDLE 5' 11' MIN 5' MIN 1:48 MAX SLOPE ALL DIRECTIONS AT ACCESSIBLE EV VEHICLE STALL AND ACCESS AISLE 18' MIN ACCESSIBLE VAN EV CHARGE STALL - IBC & ADA TOP VIEW BOTTOM VIEW CONCRETE SURFACES: ANCHOR WITH MANUFACTURER PROVIDED CONCRETE ANCHORS LANDSCAPE AREAS: ANCHOR WITH MIN. 12" LONG J-HOOK REBAR ANCHORS 3'-6" NTS 2'-4" Ø0.5" ANCHOR HOLE (TYP.) 11" 8.73" S501.1642 TRASH BIN DETAIL RA CONCRETE SLAB OR LANDSCAPE FRONT VIEW TRASH & RECYCLING BIN DETAIL NOTE: TRASH & RECYCLING BINS TO BE PROVIDED BY TESLA RECYCLE ONLY USE BLUE BIN W/ "RECYCLE" TEXT & SYMBOLS IN LOCATIONS INDICATED ON SITE PLAN (IF ANY) F D A 48" MAX. TO TOP OF LOOP HANDLE ATTACHMENT A501.1639 V4 LOOP HANDLE ACCESSIBILITY DETAIL V4 LOOP HANDLE ACCESSIBILITY DETAIL NTS FINISHED GRADE V4 TESLA SUPERCHARGER POST LOOP HANDLE ATTACHMENT OPERABLE PART NOT USED NTS E OPTIONAL WIFI SUPERKIT REF DETAIL H NTS 16'' APPROXIMATE COMPONENT WEIGHT: WIFI BROADCAST UNIT: 2.15 LBS NF141208AU ENCLOSURE: 10.8 LBS STAINLESS STELL U-BOLT, MATCHING SIZE OF POLE TOP VIEW SIDE VIEW UNISTRUT PLASTIC CAP COVERING ALL ENDS ANTENNA TO BE MOUNTED ON TOP OF LIGHT FIXTURE PER DETAIL D/ S-501 BOLT AND SPRING CHANNEL NUT. LOCKNUT & WASHER LIQUID-TIGHT NON-METALLIC CONDUIT W/ FITTINGS WIFI BROADCAST UNIT - POLE MOUNTING DETAIL FOR LIGHT POLE, LIQUID-TIGHT FLEX CONDUIT AND FITTINGS. RUN PULL-STRING AS NEEDED FOR LIGHT POLE, ROUTE CONDUIT AROUND PIER FOUNDATION 14'' MYERS HUB, TYP.2 LIGHT POLE H 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US STRUCTURAL DETAILS S-501 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- SEAL WITH EMULSIFIED ASPHALT ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION TO MATCH EXISTING TACK COAT PRIME COAT 3" ORIGINAL SAW CUT FOR DEMOLITION 6" 3" NEW PAVEMENT EXISTING PAVEMENT SAW CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT TO DEPTH OF NEW SURFACE COURSE PRIOR TO FINISH PAVING COMPACTED SUBGRADE COMPACTED GRADED AGGREGATE BASE A501.1600 NEW AND EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT JOINT DETAIL RA NEW/EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT JOINT DETAIL NTS D NOTE: 1. ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE AVAILABLE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT, OR MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION. 2. MATERIALS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CALTRANS STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, LATEST VERSION; SECTION 39, HOT MIX ASPHALT(HMA). 3. PRIME COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL SUBBASE SURFACES PRIOR TO PLACING ASPHALT PAVEMENT. 4. TACK COAT SHALL BE APPLIED TO ALL ABUTTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT AND CONC. PAVEMENT SURFACES, PRIOR TO PLACING ASPHALT PAVEMENT. COMPACTED GRADED AGGREGATE BASE HMA SURFACE COURSE HMA BASE COURSE COMPACTED SUBGRADE PRIME COAT A501.1613 ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION RA ASPHALT PAVEMENT SECTION DETAIL NTS TACK COAT C V4 POST PLP FOUNDATION - FLUSH W/ PAVEMENT ON-THE-LINE NTS PLP FOUNDATION BASE 11" 11" 11" 6'-41 2" 2'-23 4" ASPHALT, REF TO DETAIL C/S-502 ASPHALT PAVEMENT 11" ASPHALT JOINT, REF TO DETAIL D/S-502 6" 25" ASPHALT, REF TO DETAIL C/S-502 ASPHALT JOINT, REF TO DETAIL D/S-502 CABLE OR CONDUIT WINDOW NATIVE SOIL A 6" MIN DEPTH & 11" MIN WIDTH ON ALL SIDES OF 95% COMPACTED CLASS 2 AGGREGATE 11" TOP VIEW BELOW PAVEMENT 3'-2" 4' ANGLED VIEW CABLE OR CONDUIT WINDOW FOUNDATION BASE 11" FRONT VIEW SIDE VIEW V4 TESLA SUPERCHARGER POST WEIGHT: 198 LBS TESLA SUPERCHARGER HANDLE (MAX. 48" HEIGHT FOR ACCESSIBLE CHARGE POSTS) ASPHALT PAVEMENT NO OTHER EQUIPMENT OR FOUNDATION TO BE IN GRAVEL OFFSET PROVIDE 60% MIN. (16" FROM THE BOTTOM) FILL INSIDE WITH COMPACTED CLASS 2 AGGREGATE 95% COMPACTED CLASS 2 AGGREGATE TRAFFIC-RATED SMC LID EV MINI BOLLARD USING 3/8" DIA A307 HDG THROUGH BOLT 5/8" DIA A307 HDG THROUGH BOLT AND WASHER POST LOCATION ON PLP W/ BOLLARD ON-THE-LINE NTS TOP VIEW- POST ON-THE-LINE ON LID W/ BOLLARD SIDE VIEW POST W/ THRUBOLT B PROVIDE BOLTS, WASHERS, AND LOCKNUTS PER INSTALLATION MANUAL. USE 3/8" FOR EV MINI BOLLARDS & 5/8" CHARGEPOST 1'-41 4" 1'-33 4" 53 4" DRILLED HOLE PER INSTALLATION MANUAL 83 4" 1'-11 4" 2'-91 4" 1'-6" EV MINI BOLLARD CHARGE HANDLE 1" 12" 0 PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 5 6 DATE NO. REVISION ORIGINAL SIZE 24"X36" SHEET SIZE ARCH 3500 DEER CREEK RD. PALO ALTO, CA 94304 (650) 681-5000 1016 S LINCOLN AVE JEROME, ID 83338, US STRUCTURAL DETAILS S-502 REV: 0 IFP MARISOLIS PLOT DATE: 10/28/2025 4:54 PM JB-833348-00 TESLA SUPERCHARGER_JEROME, ID 8 SUPERCHARGERS 10/28/2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning & Zoning Meeting October 14th, 2025 This regular meeting of the City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Rod Mink, Commissioner Benjamin Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. Also present were City Planner Ida Clark, Legal Counsel BJ Hess, and City Clerk Bernadette Coderniz. Secretary Katie Elliott and Commissioner Jeff Schroeder were excused. Chairman Mink led the audience in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:02 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc for a Special Use Permit allowing a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD), on the properties described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel ID Number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 Inside acreage (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho; and Parcel 2 and 3: Parcel ID Numbers RPJ13702320090A and RPJ13702320100A Tax 9 &10 Blk 232 Jerome Townsite (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated this request includes three parcels. The bare southwest parcel on the corner of 10th Ave West and N Birch, and two parcels addressed as 328 8th Ave West, which include one single-family home. The parcels in question are currently zoned Residential The proposed use, a residential Planned Unit Development, requires a Special Use Permit. Regardless of use, setbacks in the R-3 zone are: Front- 25’; Rear- 20’; Interior Side- and Side Street- 15’. The minimum lot size is 5,000 sq. ft, and the maximum height is 35’. Ms. Clark went over Title 17.40, Planned Unit Developments, with the commission. She provided a map and briefly explained what PUDs allow. Regarding Section A- Planned Unit Developments (PUD) allow for a variety of housing, permitting reduced lot dimensions, yards, and building setbacks, with an increase in open space and increased landscape, with clustering of buildings encouraged. The application is requesting reduced lot dimensions and building setbacks to allow for a unique variety of housing and a more efficient use of land that includes open space and landscaping. Regarding Section B- 17.40.040 and 17.40.050, Uses Permitted and Minimum Area: residential uses are allowed with a minimum of three acres. This project is for residential uses on 3.68 acres. Regarding Section C- 17.40.060, Common Open Space: a minimum of 10% of the gross land area in any residential PUD shall be reserved for common open space. Planned open space is .83 acres of the 3.68 project area. That is 22.6% of the gross land area as open space, meeting the 10% requirement. The Home Owners Association (HOA) will maintain this area. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Section D- 17.40.140 requires that a preliminary development plan be submitted and reviewed by the Commission, with the conditions and standards for a special use permit considered before the applicant can move forward with a preliminary plat. The applicant has submitted a preliminary development plan for your review and consideration. Ms. Clark stated since the lots can be sold individually, they need to look at a density calculation for the R-3 zone. The density calculation in the R-3 zone for individual ownership of dwelling units is the total square footage of the project area divided by the minimum lot size in square feet in the zone. Ms. Clark stated this PUD is 160,300.8 sq ft (3.68 acres)/5,000 sq ft 3) = 32.1, 32 dwelling units are allowed. The project proposes 28 dwelling units meeting the density calculation. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated the Future Land Use Map designates this area as Residential Medium. The application complies with Chapter 4, Our Built Environment. Residential Medium is defined as areas that encourage a mix of housing types and PUDs. Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. As proposed, the PUD will have townhomes facing 10th Ave west and transition to smaller single-family homes blending with the existing homes on 8th Ave. It also meets Objective 4.3.c Encourage new housing developments that provide a mix of duplexes, townhomes, and age-in-place options that include walkable design and access to community amenities and healthcare. As proposed, the PUD has a mix of housing that will connect the sidewalk out to N Lincoln to amenities and St. Luke’s on 5th Ave West. Ms. Clark stated a PUD allows for reduced lot dimensions, yards, and building setbacks, with an increase in open space and increased landscape. Ms. Clark went over the Special Use Permit Criteria with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning code allows Planned Unit Developments in the Residential 3 zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request, as proposed, is harmonious with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Map, and Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code by utilizing a unique layout to provide a variety of homes for ownership. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity, and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. As noted in the application, the townhouses will be similar in appearance to the apartment units to the east and will face 10th Ave West. The new single-family homes will transition south, ---PAGE BREAK--- blending in with the existing single-family homes on Birch and 8th Avenue West. The project proposes extensive landscaping. The homes will be accessed via private drives. As designed, the PUD will not change the essential character of the area. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The application states that the residential uses will not be disruptive or hazardous to existing or future uses in the neighborhood. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. The project site has access from existing public roads. There is water and sewer available. It is noted that sewer upgrades will be required at the developer's expense. Police and fire will be able to access and respond adequately to this proposed PUD. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. There is no indication that this use will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. The development will add additional housing to the City and provide a diverse range of housing options. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Single- family dwelling projects do not involve uses that are detrimental to persons or property by producing smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. The PUD application meets and provides for on-site parking for each dwelling. There will be an increase in traffic, which is normal with residential projects. Twenty-eight units will not provide enough traffic which will be detrimental. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. As proposed in the preliminary plan, access will be from private drives on N Birch and 8th Ave West. There is no access from 10th Ave West. Two private drives will be from N Birch, with the southern private drive curving to allow access from 8th Ave West. As proposed, the approaches are designed to avoid interfering with traffic or public thoroughfares. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The existing lots are bare with one single-family home. There are no natural, scenic, or historic features of major importance. Ms. Clark sent the application to City Staff and received the following comments: Fire, Engineering, and Building have no comments on the proposed PUD preliminary plans; and ---PAGE BREAK--- Wastewater- no concerns with the layout; however, the existing 8” sewer line on West 8th Ave, where they plan to hook into the sewer, doesn’t have the capacity to take more development. They will possibly need to replace the 8” line along 8th West with a 12” line. Ms. Clark noted that costs for the sewer line replacement would be the applicant’s responsibility. Ms. Clark stated the commission shall determine if the application is consistent with the following to allow the applicant to submit the plat and final development plan. The commission needs to look at the Standards for Special Uses. Does the preliminary plan meet the intent of a PUD? Does it advance the general welfare of the community and neighborhood? Does the PUD plan design justify the deviation from the standards in the R-3 zone? Commissioner Reed inquired about the lot sizes that currently exist around these parcels. A discussion was held on the surrounding lot sizes and the current code for lot sizes. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that the roads will be private and maintained, as well as the landscaping, by the HOA. Commissioner Reed inquired about the sewer line and whether the developer would be responsible. Ms. Clark stated that she was unsure where the developer would need to start the larger line. Still, any costs to ensure capacity for the new development would be the developer's responsibility. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that they were not considering a lift station. Commissioner Reed confirmed there would be 28 structures. Chairman Mink stated that, given the property's square footage, the developer would be allowed up to 32 dwellings; however, this is not logistically possible. Ms. Clark confirmed that the turnaround time needed for the private drive and green space resulted in a reduced number of units. Ms. Clark stated that tonight's meeting is for a preliminary plan to seek approval for a SUP that would allow the PUD to reduce setbacks and lot sizes. If approved, they will return to the commission with a final development plan and a Preliminary Plat for the subdivision. Commissioner Reed inquired about parking. Ms. Clark stated the commission should consider parking along with the PUD. The plans indicate that each lot will have its own garage and parking space. Applicant testimony: Anna Canning, a resident of Boise and representative of the project, presented the proposed project in detail. Ms. Canning reviewed the landscape buffer on Birch, which shows some variation in height due to the buildings. There will be heavy landscaping and another large structure at the end. There will be a large, open green space, which will serve as a fire truck turnaround if needed. They are proposing six feet between the structures, with them all being single stories. On the common drive, there will be a two-car garage for each unit, along with a 20-foot pad. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Canning stated that the homes will be single-story, but they will also feature two-story structures within the townhomes. She stated they will have adequate room for a two-car garage. Commissioner Reed inquired about the square footage of the homes. Ms. Canning stated that the area would be approximately 1,657 square feet, excluding the garage. She stated that the homes will be 45 feet wide and will have a three-foot side setback for a single-story home, and if they decide to build a two-story home, it would require a five-foot side setback. She stated there will be trees along the ---PAGE BREAK--- common drive between the townhouses and the single-family homes. There will be a common area featuring trees and a pavilion. There will be three more homes at the end of the common drive turning south. Along the private street, Ms. Canning stated there will be some homes that will have a detached garage in the back. Those homes will be 10 feet off the roadway, and the lots will be 50 feet wide. At the end of the street, there will be a sports court for recreation. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Canning stated the HOA would be responsible for maintaining the green spaces, landscaping, and private drives. Ms. Canning stated that the last three new homes will be situated on 50-foot-wide lots, with a 20-foot setback in both the front and back. They are not requesting a lesser setback on those properties that border other existing properties. The existing home will remain the same. Ms. Canning showed the commission elevation renderings for both the single-family homes and the townhomes. Ms. Canning stated that the homes will be 1,687 square feet. Chairman Mink inquired about the setbacks of the buildings, whether they are 3 feet or 6 feet. Ms. Canning stated the setbacks will be 3 feet for each, so there will be 6 feet between each dwelling. They may not have fencing for those who have the 3-foot setback. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Canning stated that they will probably fence the west and southern boundary. Single-family homes can construct their own fencing, but townhomes cannot. Commissioner Reed inquired about the affordability of the houses. Ms. Canning stated that she said they would be affordable housing. They want to focus on small individual homes. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink regarding water retention, Ms. Clark stated that the applicant plans to place them near the sports court, and they may be run underground. They will work with the engineering staff to explore their options. Testimony in Favor: None Testimony in Neutral: None Testimony in Opposition: H.O. Nix, a Jerome resident, appeared before the commission and spoke of flooding on that property. He stated he is concerned about the water runoff, as he has been flooded twice. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Nix showed the commission that he lives on 8th Street West behind the proposed development. Mr. Nix spoke of a piped city ditch and mentioned that he is concerned about flooding, as it has occurred twice when the ground froze and water could not be absorbed. The ditch was used to catch the water that flooded the property. Ms. Coderniz read the following onto the record: Williams Hepwork Resident of Jerome Oppose the application Too much traffic, too crowded, makes too many apartments in the neighborhood. ---PAGE BREAK--- Rebuttal Testimony: Ms. Canning stated regarding Mr. Nix’s concern that preliminary drainage work has been done, and they feel they can collect the water into their underground structures so it will not freeze with the structures in place. Regarding the issue of traffic, she stated that most units are single-family homes and are in conformance with the comprehensive plan regarding density. Ms. Canning noted that there will be some traffic on the private streets, but they will have two ways to exit the property. Commissioner Reed inquired about the water mitigation. Ms. Canning referred Joe Canning from Centurion Engineers to address the flooding concerns. Mr. Canning, a Boise resident, stated he heard the problem is when the ground is frozen and is unable to absorb water, and staff suggest swells. Mr. Canning noted that, regarding swells, they can also freeze, making it so they don’t absorb water either. They are trying to design open spaces on the project that can be utilized as catch basins for underground storage. He believes this will be a good solution for the area. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Mr. Canning stated that the underground storage is the more common method of stormwater disposal in southwest Idaho. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Canning noted that this will be located under the open recreation area and will be large enough to accommodate the development. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:40 p.m. Consider a request from Centurion Engineers, Inc for a Special Use Permit allowing a Residential Planned Unit Development (PUD), on the properties described as follows: Parcel 1: Parcel ID Number RPJ13702340020A, Tax 2 of A-234 Inside acreage (NE-18-16), more commonly known as the bare property on the southwest corner of North Birch and 10th Avenue West in Jerome, Idaho; and Parcel 2 and 3: Parcel ID Numbers RPJ13702320090A and RPJ13702320100A Tax 9 &10 Blk 232 Jerome Townsite (NE 13-8-16), more commonly known as 328 8th Ave West, Jerome, Idaho—action item. Ms. Clark reminded the commission to review the Special Use Standards. The applicant is requesting a PUD with reduced lot sizes and setbacks, but increased landscaping, open space, and a potential upgrade to the sewer line. Chairman Mink went over the Special Use Standards with the commission. Topics discussed were neighboring townhouses to the east may be too much; this is primarily single- family homes; close to the school; less expensive with being a smaller home; in-filling lot so no new neighboring future uses; letters from city regarding the sewer line that might not be big enough; construction noises while building but not afterwards; there will be more traffic but if there are school age kids, they should be able to walk to school; and sidewalk connection for 10th Ave. to N Lincoln. Ms. Clark inquired if the application followed the Comp Plan. Commissioner Reed affirmed he thought it did. Chairman Mink inquired what the difference was between a Subdivision and a PUD. Ms. Clark stated that the advantage of a PUD is that it allows parcels to be less than 5,000 square feet, accommodating townhomes and reducing setbacks. The Subdivision enables the sale of the individual lots. Commissioner Reed stated the ---PAGE BREAK--- homes will be a decent size on a nice-sized lot. Ms. Clark stated the approval will be for the Special Use and the preliminary development plan. This commission will review the Final development plan. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated that the development plan should not have too many significant changes, as they had already addressed the staff's comments. The private drives, common open space, home layouts, etc, should be essentially the same. Chairman Mink stated that they want to ensure it aligns with the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Reed stated that it fits with the Comp Plan, as the application is a good addition. His concerns with the water mitigation have been addressed by their engineer, and they have provided solutions. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve a Special Use Permit for a residential planned unit development in principle of the preliminary development plan, finding it advances the general welfare of the community by providing a variety of additional housing and will blend with the existing neighborhood. Seconded by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Reed, Commissioner Fraser, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:52 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Chris Barber representing Dennis Stauffer Estate for a De- Annexation, removal of property from the City boundary, of the property described as RPJ00000175001, Tax 2503351 of SWNW Jerome Unplatted Sec 17 T8 R17, more commonly known as the property containing corrals and shops on the north side of 50 North Rd East, Jerome, Idaho, excluding all residential dwellings, containing approximately 3.51 acres. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the parcel is located by 8th Avenue East and North Tiger. She showed the commission a map of the city limits and the location of the parcel. The parcel was annexed into the city boundary in 2005 as part of a larger parcel and was zoned Residential 1. The original parcel was 74.2 acres. This parcel was in the original plan of the Stauffer Estates subdivision. The Stauffer Estates subdivision was proposed for development in three phases, with the third phase including a road connecting to 50 North Road. There were four existing houses surrounding the original parcel when it was annexed. Three are accessed from 50 North Road and one from S Tiger. Two of the four homes remained in the County. The Stauffer Estates subdivision developed phase one, and the remaining acreage was farmed, with the parcel in question containing corrals and outbuildings. In 2021, all but this parcel was purchased and platted for another subdivision. This resulted in odd boundaries for this parcel, which included wrapping around two other parcels in the County. Parcel contains outbuildings and corrals. Idaho State Code, Section 50-225, Exclusion of Territory, states, “The boundaries of any city in this state may be altered and a portion of the territory thereof excluded therefrom, and the councils of such cities are hereby granted power to enact ordinances for that purpose.” The ---PAGE BREAK--- applicant is requesting that the parcel be removed from the city boundaries due to the oddity of the parcel and the two surrounding parcels in the County. The application notes that there are no existing houses on this parcel. Ms. Clark stated that the City Code does not address de- annexation. Commissioner Reed inquired who came up with the idea of de-annexation and what the legal basis was. Ms. Clark stated she and legal counsel reviewed the city and state codes, and the decision was based on the lack of guidance in the city and state codes. The Idaho Code states that the city can exclude boundaries within the city. Ms. Clark stated that the code does not address a de-annexation process, but they wanted the hearings to be public so that if there were questions or concerns, they could be heard before the commission and city council. Ms. Clark stated when we propose annexing a parcel of property into the City’s boundaries, we consult the Comprehensive Plan. With a de-annexation, we will do the same. Regarding Chapter 3 – Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.d Consider the impact on adjacent agricultural businesses (fertilizer production, food processing, shipping,3.3.i etc.) when reviewing new annexations and development applications. This request is to remove one parcel from the city boundary. There is no impact. The property north is being farmed until houses are built. The area in the south is County Residential. Regarding Chapter 4 – Our Built Environment, C. “Future growth is also visualized within the ACI, as annexation requests are received adjacent to city limits, they will continue to be evaluated to ensure that adequate public services and facilities are available and that any new development is compatible with the surrounding urban uses. This request will return to the Area of City Impact. There are no current water or sewer connections on this parcel, and it is compatible with surrounding urban uses. Regarding Chapter 6 – Our Quality of Life, Objective 6.2: Diversify the economic base of businesses and industries (through retention, expansion, and recruitment) while preserving Jerome’s identity. This request to de-annex will have no impact. After the public hearing at the Planning and Zoning meeting, the Commissioners shall consider the following and forward a recommendation to the City Council regarding the compatibility of the comprehensive plan: Will the proposed zone have any detrimental effects on the City’s or any other public entity’s ability to provide public services to the annexed land? Is the proposed amendment consistent with the policies of the adopted comprehensive plan? Ms. Clark stated the request is to take the property from the city and return it to the County. Commissioner Johnson inquired if the county has to accept the property. Ms. Clark stated Idaho code doesn’t address whether the county has to accept it or not. They will send the decision to the State of Idaho for review and approval. Commissioner Reed inquired about the tax loss this would incur for the city. Ms. Clark states she will refer the question to the applicant, but believes it will be minimal, as there are no improvements on the land. Commissioner Reed inquired about the purpose of de-annexation. He stated the parcels to the north and south are in city limits, and eventually, more will be. Ms. Clark clarified that the ---PAGE BREAK--- parcels to the south are located in the county, but they may eventually come under the city's jurisdiction; however, they do not have a specific timeline for those. Chairman Mink inquired about the new annexation law. Ms. Clark explained that for the city to annex, they must have a very detailed annexation plan. She stated that it is a multi-page document that must be shared with the property owners, outlining the impact of taxes, the services that will and will not be provided, etc. The city council has chosen not to develop an annexation plan, which means we do not annex property unless it is at the property owner's request. The Idaho Code does allow the city to annex property if it is completely surrounded by other city parcels. Commissioner Johnson inquired who owns the road. Ms. Clark stated that the city owns the road, but with the de-annexation, we would like to return it to the highway district. She is unsure why the road was within the city in the first place. She stated there are no city residences on that road. Ms. Clark stated she is asking for a yes or no recommendation to the city council, as the tax difference is minimal. She stated there are no water or sewer connections on that property. Applicant testimony: Chris Barber, a Jerome resident, commended Ms. Clark on reviewing the request. He noted that approximately 50 feet of this parcel is located behind one of the existing County residences, which adds to the property's complexity. He listed a few characteristics of the neighboring county properties that are not for city living. They have significant investments in the wells and septic tanks on their properties. Mr. Barber stated that the city has an agreement with the highway district for road maintenance. He said he met with city staff, and the road is in a state of disrepair. There is a rock shelf that runs along 50 N Rd so they would not be able to bring water down the road very easily, and it could take millions of investment money to install curb, gutter, and sidewalk. Mr. Barber stated that the taxes are minimal with bare land. The Stauffer family sold some of the property so they could square it off. In most cities, there is a place where the city meets the county, where growth is unlikely and development would be difficult. He stated that the home on the corner (northeast corner of N. Tiger and 8th) is on city services but still on septic, as it is uphill and would require a lift station to add sewer services. Mr. Barber stated it was the city engineer who suggested de-annexing the property. He reviewed the surrounding properties. Cities do not have to consume every inch of property they are near. Everything is changing. Mr. Barber stated that he met with the county regarding the road, and they are happy to take it back. Annexation is vital to city growth; however, this is not the case. The plat has changed in the Stauffer Estates, so there will no longer be any connectivity to this parcel. Commissioner Reed inquired whether the homes to the south would potentially be annexed into the city. Mr. Barber stated that he does not believe they will, as they currently do not have access to city water or sewer services. Ms. Clark stated that it would be the property owner who would have to request the annexation. Commissioner Fraser stated there is probably as much rock to the south as there is on the north side. Mr. Barber stated there is no road base for the road. Commissioner Johnson inquired if they should include the road in the motion. Mr. Barber stated that he did not believe it was necessary, as the City Administrator would meet with the highway district, and they would dedicate the road back to the county. Ms. Clark ---PAGE BREAK--- suggested not including the road in the motion so they can confirm what the agreements were and what the city has in right of way. Mr. Barber stated that there are right-of-ways for the county on some of the other properties that they need to work out. He stated the property owners on the south side of the road do not want to be annexed into the city. He stated that de-annexation makes sense to maintain contiguous areas. Mr. Barber spoke of the two homes on N Tiger that are in the city but do not have sewer. Commissioner Reed inquired about extending infrastructure to the east for future connectivity within the Area of Impact. Mr. Barber stated that, under private property rights in Idaho, property owners cannot be forced to have water or sewer lines run through their property. A discussion was held on future subdivisions to the east, including concerns about having hodgepodge properties, reverting to the way things used to be, and the fact that the property to the east, within the Area of Impact, is subject to the airport overlay, which would significantly limit housing options. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that the request would be to de-annex the 3.51 acres and return them to the county. Chairman Mink noted Mr. Barber is currently on the city council for transparency. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 8:23 p.m. Consider a request from Chris Barber representing Dennis Stauffer Estate for a De-Annexation, removal of property from the City boundary, of the property described as RPJ00000175001, Tax 2503351 of SWNW Jerome Unplatted Sec 17 T8 R17, more commonly known as the property containing corrals and shops on the north side of 50 North Rd East, Jerome, Idaho, excluding all residential dwellings, containing approximately 3.51 acres—action item. Commissioner Fraser made a motion to recommend to the City Council that the request for de-annexation of the property described in the agenda, located in Jerome, Idaho, and containing approximately 3.51 acres, be approved as presented. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Fraser, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: Commissioner Reed. Commissioner Reed stated he understands the reason for services with a cost, but he is hesitant to decertify anything the city currently has. He noted the city is expanding and doesn’t want to lose areas that are part of the city and then annex them again later. Commissioner Fraser stated it was his right to have his opinion. Consider a Design Review for 117 West Main Street, Jerome, Idaho- action item ---PAGE BREAK--- Staff report: Ms. Clark stated that this is an existing building on Main Street. The property is located in the Design Review Overlay District, within 150 feet of the right-of-way of Main Street, as defined in Section 17.10.020 of the Jerome Municipal Code. The application proposes an exterior paint update to comply with the standard colors for the Principal Financial brand. Ms. Clark went over a few Design Review Guidelines. Regarding Guideline #1 Adjacent Buildings and Uses- the proposed building is in a cluster. The proposed update will complement the attached buildings. Regarding Guidelines #13 & #14 Enhance Jerome Classic Styles and Minimize Scale- the existing building will remain; however, the proposed façade updates will renew interest while maintaining the classic style. Regarding Guidelines #22 and #24 Wall Materials and Wall Colors- the application proposes updated colors in neutral tones that include grey and white. The proposal is a standard color theme of the Principal Financial brand. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Painting must be done professionally with at least two coats of paint. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that it is a whole storefront. Sergio Mendoza appeared before the commissioner and stated that he had recently started working with Principal Financial, and they had requested that he use their colors to maintain uniformity. He is still working on a sign, but today’s purpose is to approve the colors as the building must be painted before the signage is placed. Chairman Mink inquired about the rock in front of the building. Mr. Mendoza stated he repainted the building a few years ago. Commissioner Reed asked if he needed to recuse himself, as Mr. Mendoza is a client of his. Chairman Mink stated that he did not need to recuse himself, as it was not a public hearing. The commission agreed that the colors look good. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the design review as proposed for 117 West Main Street, Jerome, Idaho, coordinating with the City on improvements with the Main Street Improvements project. Seconded by Commissioner Fraser and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Reed, Commissioner Fraser, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None. Discussion Planning and Zoning By-Laws update- action item Ms. Clark stated that bylaw changes are done by resolution, and wanted to review the resolution to adopt governing procedures, including the scheduling time. The changes will be ---PAGE BREAK--- that the “The regular meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be at 6:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month for no less than nine months in a year. A second meeting shall be held as needed on the fourth Tuesday of the month.” Commissioner Reed suggested adding 6:00 pm for the second meeting for clarity. Ms. Clark stated she will add that. Chairman Mink inquired about adding wording to rearrange the agenda items. Ms. Clark stated she schedules the applicants accordingly. She stated it is usually first-come, first-served, but they can make exceptions. She stated that applicants go first if they are traveling to attend the meeting. Ms. Clark also stated that if any of the commissioners need to change the meeting dates, they can set a special meeting, provided that public notices have not been posted or mailed out. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the resolution updating the P&Z Bylaws to say “The regular meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be at 6:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month for no less than nine months in a year. A second meeting shall be held as needed on the fourth Tuesday of the month.” Seconded by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Reed, Commissioner Fraser, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None. Update Area of City Impact Ms. Clark stated that with the new legislation, the Area of City Impact (AOI) falls back to the County Planning and Zoning She will attend the county P&Z workshop on Monday, October 27. The county will notify property owners of the proposed hearing dates. The final decision is up to the county, and they will no longer require negotiations. Ms. Clark stated that with the new annexation laws and AOI, she is struggling to understand the purpose of AOI. She understands the concept, but with the new laws, it is hard to know why they are there. Commissioner Reed concurs with Ms. Clark. Commissioner Fraser stated that there is minimal benefit to cities in having an AOI. Ms. Clark went over the changes the county has proposed on a map. She reviewed the parcels that both the city and the county are considering for removal, addition, and rezoning. She noted the parcels by the airport are considering a rezone to A1 to reduce the potential impact near our well. Commissioner Reed suggested looking into a second commercial corridor. Ms. Clark stated that the county controls AOI, but the city controls our Future Land Use Map. She said she will bring the Future Land Use Maps back to the commission in December for an update. A discussion was held regarding the request to add the parcel southwest of the new Maverik, near the new interchange, into the AOI; removing a couple of properties at Crossroads and retaining the KOA, which is connected to the city sewer. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ms. Clark stated that she will keep the commission informed of the public hearing date if the public inquires. Commissioner Reed inquired about Crossroads in the AOI. Ms. Clark noted that the city and county attorneys suggested keeping Crossroads since the infrastructure is already in place, and there are specific agreements in place for Crossroads, as they are guaranteed a certain amount of water and sewer services. Ms. Clark went over how Crossroads is connected to services with the commission. CITIZEN CORRESPONDENCE AND ISSUES None Chairman Mink spoke of a house on the west side of South Davis that is very close to the new sidewalk installed with the extension of South Davis. Commissioner Fraser stated that he believes the house was there before the sidewalk was installed. Ms. Clark thinks it may not have met code for setbacks, as it is an older home. Consent Agenda The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the Sept 23, 2025, regular meeting. B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Jerome County Sheriff’s Office for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as T57 of N1/2NESE Jerome Unplatted (SE 30-8-17), more commonly known as 2151 South Tiger Dr., Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF JEROME COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGN ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS T57 OF N1/2 NESE JEROME UNPLATTED (SE 30-8-17), MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2151 SOUTH TIGER DRIVE, JEROME, IDAHO A public hearing on the application of Jerome County Sheriff’s Office, concerning the use of real property described herein within the City of Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark showed the Commission where the sign would be located on the southeast corner of the property. She stated the Applicant ---PAGE BREAK--- is requesting to install an electronic message display (EMD) sign for the Sheriff’s Office. The parcel is zoned Heavy Industrial which allows one freestanding sign not over 200 square feet and no higher than 35 feet. The EMD display area shall not exceed 75% of the sign area. The display area is approximately 17.25 square feet and less than 75% of the sign area. Ms. Clark showed a picture of how the Applicant is requesting the sign to look. She stated there will be brickwork along the side on a concrete base. Ms. Clark reviewed the General Requirements for all signs, Section Q, in JMC 17.032.040. She stated the EMDs are required to dim from 5,000 nits to 500 nits at night for traffic and must scroll or be a static message. The Applicant acknowledges the guidelines and intends to comply. Ms. Clark went over the Special Use Permit Criteria with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Jerome Municipal Code allows an EMD sign with an approved special use permit in all zoning districts. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity, and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The Applicant has provided professionally designed renderings of the sign and the EMD portion. The sign, as designed, is appropriate and harmonious with the areas existing character. The surrounding area consists of heavy industrial uses. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant is required to meet the electronic display criteria. They have provided a rendering and electrical outline that meets the current code. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. An EMD sign will not require public facilities or services. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. As proposed, the EMD sign will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. The request to include an EMD sign will not be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic or glare. The Applicant shall comply with the nit code requirement for illumination. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. The vehicular approaches to the property have remained unchanged. The sign is designed with automatic dimmers to decrease light during dust and at night. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The sign will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Ms. Clark went over the Design Review Guidelines should be considered. Regarding Guideline 1- Promote sign design and placement that reflects the community’s desire for human scale regarding height, proposition, site features, shapes and materials. The EMD sign is professionally designed and meets the appropriate height and materials required. The freestanding sign is approximately 48.33 square feet. Regarding Guideline 2- Signs must be produced using professional workmanship without hand lettering or with a sloppy or garish paint job. The Application indicates the sign will be professionally manufactured. Regarding Guideline 3- The primary sign(s) for a business must be constructed of permanent materials. Unacceptable temporary materials include but are not limited to paper, cardboard, vinyl banner, fabric, poster board, and unfinished wood. The pictures show that it is constructed of durable, all-weather material, including professionally installed brick and an outdoor EMD screen. ---PAGE BREAK--- If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; and Comply with all City sign requirements. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated all EMD signs must come in for a Special Use Permit. Applicant Testimony: Lt. Bohling, Jerome resident, representing Jerome County Sheriff’s Office, appeared and testified before the Commission. Lt. Bohling stated they want to have a sign for building closures and any other public information. Lt. Bohling stated they have the Driver’s License office in the building, and this would help announce the office’s closures. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Lt. Bohling stated that this is for the Sheriff’s Office on South Tiger, which houses the driver’s license office. The vehicle license office (DMV) is still located at the courthouse on North Lincoln. Any identification documents are located at the Sheriff’s Office. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark affirmed that the Applicant may push the sign back towards the gate so they can get power to it. The sign will be two- sided. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented and having reviewed the Application, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The property described herein, 2151 South Tiger Drive, Jerome, Idaho, is within the City of Jerome and is currently zoned Heavy Industrial B. The proposed use, electronic message display sign, requires a special use permit to operate in all zoning districts. ---PAGE BREAK--- C. JMC 17.32.040 and JMC 17.14.010 provide the standards for special use permits. Specifically, JMC 17.32.040(q) allows for electronic message displays in all zoning districts by special use permit only. D. The proposed use is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that a sign such as this promotes economic development and growth by providing a means of distributing information to the public with greater ease. E. The proposed use is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that it is located in an M-2 area, and sign criteria limit the impact on neighboring uses. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the Applicant to install an electronic message board in an M-2 zone, on the above-described property. B. The Commission approves the application of Jerome County Sheriff’s Office for a special use permit allowing an electronic message board located at the property described herein at 2151 South Tiger Drive, within the City of Jerome, Idaho, subject to the following condition: 1. Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; 2. Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; 3. Comply with all City sign requirements; and 4. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 14th day of October, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 23rd day of September, 2025, to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 14th day of October, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). ---PAGE BREAK--- C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Lytle Signs representing Urgent Care of Idaho for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display Sign, on the parcel described as Tax 2216694 of SESE 24-8-16, more commonly known as 1225 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF URGENT CARE OF IDAHO FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGN ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TAX 2216694 OF SESE 24-8-16, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1225 SOUTH LINCOLN, JEROME, IDAHO A public hearing on the application of Urgent Care of Idaho, concerning the use of real property described herein within the City of Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated the Applicant is requesting to install an electronic message display (EMD) sign in the existing freestanding sign for Urgent Care. The parcel is zoned General Business which allows one freestanding sign not exceeding 200 square feet in area and no higher than 35 feet in height. The EMD display area shall not exceed 75% of the sign area. The display area is approximately 24 square feet and less than 75% of the sign area. Ms. Clark showed the Commission the proposed sign. The existing tenant signs will be reduced in size to accommodate the EMD sign incorporation into the existing freestanding sign. Ms. Clark reviewed the General Requirements for all signs, Section Q, in JMC 17.032.040. She stated the EMDs are required to dim from 5,000 nits to 500 nits at night for traffic and must scroll or be a static message. The Applicant acknowledges the guidelines and intends to comply. Ms. Clark went over the Special Use Permit Criteria with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Jerome Municipal Code allows an EMD sign with an approved special use permit in all zoning districts. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this ---PAGE BREAK--- title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The Applicant has provided professionally designed renderings of the sign and the EMD portion. The sign, as designed, is appropriate and harmonious with the areas existing character. The surrounding area consists of other commercial uses transitioning into residential. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant is required to meet the electronic display criteria. They have provided a rendering and electrical outline that meets the current code. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. An EMD sign will not require public facilities or services. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. As proposed, the EMD sign will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. The request to include an EMD sign will not be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic or glare. The Applicant shall comply with the nit code requirement for illumination. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. The vehicular approaches to the property have remained unchanged. The sign is designed with automatic dimmers to decrease light during dust and at night. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The sign will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Ms. Clark went over the Design Review Guidelines that should be considered. Regarding Guideline 1- Promote sign design and placement that reflects the community’s desire for human scale regarding height, proposition, site features, shapes and materials. The EMD sign is professionally designed and meets the appropriate height and materials required. The freestanding sign exists. Regarding Guideline 2- Signs must be produced using professional workmanship without hand lettering or with a sloppy or garish paint job. The Application indicates the sign will be professionally manufactured. Regarding Guideline 3- The primary sign(s) for a business must be constructed of permanent materials. Unacceptable temporary materials include but are not limited to paper, cardboard, vinyl banner, fabric, poster board, and unfinished wood. The pictures show it is constructed of durable, all-weather material. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; and Comply with all City sign requirements. Applicant Testimony: Craig Lookingbill, Twin Falls resident, representing Urgent Care of Idaho appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Lookingbill stated they want to add to the display to attract more customers to the business. He noted the sign was initially designed to include messaging in the future, which is why they are here now before the Commission. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented and having reviewed the Application, and the other documents and material ---PAGE BREAK--- in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The property described herein, 1225 South Lincoln, Jerome, Idaho, is within the City of Jerome and is currently zoned General Business B. The proposed use, electronic message display sign, requires a special use permit to operate in all zoning districts. C. JMC 17.32.040 and JMC 17.14.010 provide the standards for special use permits. Specifically, JMC 17.32.040(q) allows for electronic message displays in all zoning districts by special use permit only. D. The proposed use is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that a sign such as this promotes economic development and growth by providing a means of distributing information to the public with greater ease. E. The proposed use is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that it is located in a C-2 area, and sign criteria limit the impact on neighboring uses. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the Applicant to install an electronic message board in a C-2 zone, on the above-described property. B. The Commission approves the application of Urgent Care of Idaho, for a special use permit allowing an electronic message board located at the property described herein at 1225 South Lincoln, within the City of Jerome, Idaho, subject to the following condition: 1. Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; 2. Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits. 3. Comply with all City sign requirements; and 4. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 14th day of October, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 23rd day of September, 2025, to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 14th day of October, 2025. ---PAGE BREAK--- ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). D. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Lorena Ortega for a Variance reducing the side setback from seven feet to five feet on the parcel described as Lot 6 of Blk 21 of the Jerome Townsite 18-8-17, more commonly known as 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON A REQUEST FROM LORENA ORTEGA, FOR A VARIANCE REDUCING THE SIDE SETBACK FROM SEVEN FEET TO FIVE FEET ON THE PARCEL DESCRIBED AS LOT 6 OF BLOCK 21 OF THE JEROME TOWNSITE 18-8-17, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 401 6TH AVENUE EAST, JEROME, IDAHO A Public Hearing at the request of Lorena Ortega, for a side setback variance from seven feet to five feet, on the property commonly known as 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho, was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission and other speakers addressing the Commission and to comment if so desired, all of which was noted in the agenda. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided staff report and background on this request. Ms. Clark gave a brief background on the property, stating 401 6th Avenue East consists of two parcels, Lots 5 and 6 of Block 21. An existing house sits over the north-south lot line. The Applicant would like the opportunity to sell or build another house on the second lot. The existing survey does not comply with the current interior side setbacks, which require a distance of seven feet from the foundation to the new property line. The new lot line is approximately five feet from the foundation. The variance would allow the existing home foundation, on Lot 6, to be five feet from the new lot line instead of seven feet as stated in JMC. Any new home on Lot 5 would be required to meet the side yard setback of seven feet on both sides. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance, Ms. Clark stated Lots 5 and 6 are zoned Residential 2 as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear- 20’; Interior Side- and Side Street- 15’. Ms. Clark went over the variance criteria with the Commission. Regarding Criteria A- That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which do not apply to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. The Application notes that the existing single-family home encroaches onto Lot 5 by about two feet. This is common in the City of Jerome, as we permit homes to be built over lot lines, and the setbacks have been adjusted over the years. Regarding Criteria B- That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title. A literal interpretation of the title would not deprive the Applicant of any rights enjoyed by other properties. The Applicant is requesting a variance to build; however, alternative options can be considered. Regarding Criteria C- That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The house was existing and leaves a large area for yard that the new property owner does not want. The new property owner would like to adjust the property lines to allow for another home. Regarding Criteria D- That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege denied by this title to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Variances are typically granted when the applicant proves undue hardship because of the site's characteristics and the variance does not conflict with the public interest. The Applicant has not proven an undue hardship; however, there is no conflict with public interest. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following condition: The open carport must be removed before a building permit can be issued. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated that the Applicant had moved the lot line over, believing they had enough room to meet the setbacks, but the house sits two feet over the line. The carport would have to be removed. The lot would be narrow but not unbuildable. Whoever builds on Lot 5 would have to meet all setbacks. Ms. Clark showed the Commission where the house sits on the existing property. They need a two-foot variance on Lot 6. ---PAGE BREAK--- Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated the structure would only be able to be 28 feet wide. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark noted the Fire Department was okay, as they have sufficient room between the structures. Chairman Mink stated that they could have previously added to the east of the house, which would have brought it closer to the property line. Ms. Clark noted the existing house meets all other setbacks. Applicant Testimony: Lorena Ortega, a resident of Jerome, appeared and testified before the Commission. Ms. Ortega testified that she purchased the house about two months ago and wanted to get it cleaned up, as it was abandoned. She stated the Lot will be over 5000 sq feet, which meets the code for the area. She didn’t realize they would be short. She said they will put a doublewide, which is 28 feet wide. Ms. Ortega stated that if it were less than five feet, they would need to install a firewall. It is common to have the house built over both lots. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission, having heard the testimony presented, and having reviewed the application, testimony, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing, enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The parcel of land commonly known as 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho, is currently zoned Residential 2 B. The R-2 zone pursuant to Title 17 of the City of Jerome Municipal Code, has a front setback of 25 feet, a rear setback of 20 feet, an interior side setback of 7 feet, and a street side setback of 15 feet. C. The purpose of the Variance is to allow a side setback variance to allow the Applicant to construct a single-family home encroaching on Lot 5 by two feet. II. Conclusions A. The application is consistent with development standards and objectives for R-2 Zone. ---PAGE BREAK--- B. This variance is granted, to allow a reduced side setback for a porch on the property located at 401 6th Avenue East, Jerome, Idaho, finding that granting the variance will not confer on the Applicant any special privilege that is denied by this title to other lands or structures, and the following conditions shall be: 1. Granting a reduction of the side setback from seven feet to five feet 2. The open carport must be removed before a building permit can be issued; and 3. Comply with all City, State, and Federal requirements. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 14th day of October, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on the 23rd day of September, 2025, to approve the application for a preliminary plat is hereby made final this 14th day of October, 2025, subject to appeal by an interested party within the prescribed period under Idaho law. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve the consent agenda as presented. Seconded the motion by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Reed, Commissioner Fraser, and Commissioner Johnson. NAYE: None. DISCUSSION PERIOD & STAFF REPORTS Ms. Clark stated that she is not planning a November meeting unless more applications are submitted, but she will inform the commission accordingly. She said they will have a meeting in December. Commissioner Reed wanted to give kudos to whoever cleaned up the weeds by Dairy Queen. Commissioner Reed also stated that he is still seeing numerous signs outside the Cook’s building on Main Street. Ms. Clark said that when she has gone over, the ---PAGE BREAK--- signs have been appropriate, but she will continue to monitor. A discussion was held with someone standing outside with a sign that is not allowed. Without further discussion, Chairman Mink closed this regular meeting at 8:55 p.m. Rod Mink, Chairman Katie Elliott, Secretary