Document Jerome_doc_2d0a3b8a0c

City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser REGULAR MEETING April 8th, 2025 7:00 p.m. Council Chambers is open to the public. You are encouraged to join the meeting by clicking on the link or calling in from your phone before 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, April 8th: Meeting ID: 837 9912 9109 Passcode: 784038 Please Note: Speakers who have been given the floor may be limited to three minutes of discussion. Any item can be added or removed from the consent calendar prior to the meeting. 1. Call to Order & Roll Call 2. Public Hearing for a request from Quadrant Investments LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as the pasture on the south side of East Yakima Avenue between 715 East Yakima Avenue and 79 East 200 South, Jerome, Idaho. 3. Consider a request from Quadrant Investments LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as the pasture on the south side of East Yakima Avenue between 715 East Yakima Avenue and 79 East 200 South, Jerome, Idaho- action item 4. Public Hearing for a request from South Tiger Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property described as Jerome Unplatted Tax 2215519 of NESE 19-8-17, more commonly known as the cultivated farm ground to the east of 800 blk East Ave I, J, and K (Hovey Subdivision), south of 821 East Ave H, and west of the East Ave K cul-de-sac. 5. Consider a request from South Tiger Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property described as Jerome Unplatted Tax 2215519 of NESE 19-8-17, more commonly known as the cultivated farm ground to the east of 800 blk East Ave I, J, and K (Hovey Subdivision), south of 821 East Ave H, and west of the East Ave K cul-de-sac– action item 6. Discussion Future Land Use Maps – action item 7. Citizen Correspondence and Issues 8. Consent Agenda- action item The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the March 11th, 2025, regular meeting. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Agenda City Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, ID 83338 City Administrator Mike Williams, City Planner Ida Clark COMMISSION MEMBERS: Chairman Rod Mink; Commissioners Jeff Schroeder, Paul Johnson, Benjamin Reed, and Shonna Fraser B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto for a Special Use Permit allowing vehicle sales, on the property described as Tax 2200877 of NESE (24-8-16) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Enrique Sandoval for a Special Use Permit allowing a Duplex, on the property described as Tax 1 and Tax 2 of Lots 13 thru 15, Block 97 (NW 19-8-17, more commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Ave A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. D. Findings and Conclusions for a request from C&H Land & Investments for a Special Use Permit allowing livestock on the property described as Lots 9 - 13, Blk 1, and Lots 5 & 6, Blk 2, Brockman’s Ind. Subdivision 31-8-17, more commonly known as cultivated farm ground on the north side of Farmore Road, Jerome, Idaho. E. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga for a Special Use Permit allowing two horses and three goats, on the property described as Tax 22303643 (Resolution) (SW 7-8-17) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho. F. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Cook Realty for a Variance decreasing the Interior Side Setback, on the property described as Lots 10 & 11, Blk 139 Jerome Townsite 100 x 125 (NW 19-8-17), more commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho. 9. Discussion Period & Staff Reports 10. Adjournment Note: Any person needing special accommodations to participate in the above-noted meeting should contact City Hall (City Planner [PHONE REDACTED] x 140) seven days before the meeting. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit – Truck Terminal Yard and Repair 815 Yakima Ave. East, Jerome Current Zoning Designation: High-Density Business (C-3) Subdivision: No Setbacks: Front 25’, Rear 10’, Interior Side 12’, Street Side 25’ Summary: This parcel was recently annexed into the City limits. The applicant requests a special use permit to permanently relocate their business to this parcel. The use includes a development for a truck terminal yard and truck repair. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: April 8, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the Special Use Permit request from Quadrant Investments LLC allowing a Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as 815 Yakima Ave East, Jerome, Idaho. Special Use Permit Request: Staff Report I. Background: The property was recently annexed into the City. The applicant is seeking a special use permit on behalf of Dairy Farmers of America. They have the property under contract pending approval or denial of the special use permit. II. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. The property is zoned High-Density Business as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. The proposed use, truck terminal yard and truck repair, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. c. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows i. Front: 25’, Rear 10’, Interior Side 12’, Side Street 25’ ii. Minimum lot size: N/A, no more than 80% of the lot can be built on iii. Maximum height: 50’ III. As pertains to Title 16 of the JMC, the Subdivision Ordinance a. Title 16 has no bearing on this Special Use Permit request. IV. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, the request is in accordance with: a. Chapter 6. Our Quality of Life, “Foster a supportive, healthy, and resilient community of residents, rooted in Jerome’s rich history, that collaborates to welcome visitors and newcomers, and offers opportunities for everyone to live, work, and play.” i. Objective 6.2: Diversify the economic base of businesses and industries (through retention, expansion, and recruitment) while preserving Jerome’s identity. 1. This development brings a business from the County into the City limits, allowing it to expand its operations. The company currently transports to Idaho Milk Products and utilizes services from Western Dairy Transport. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org Special Use Permit Criteria Staff Analysis 6Ǥ 17.60.030: GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed special use in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that such use at the proposed location: °Ǥ Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved; ©Ǥ Staff Analysis: The Planning and Zoning Code allows a truck terminal yard and maintenance in the C-3 zone with an approved SUP. ¢Ǥ Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; ©Ǥ Staff Analysis: The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. £Ǥ Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity, and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; ©Ǥ Staff Analysis: This area in Jerome blends commercial and industrial uses. To the north is a truck terminal yard and IMP. To the east is one residential home, to the west is a business, and to the south are the railroad tracks. §Ǥ Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; ©Ǥ Staff Analysis: As stated, the property is surrounded by various commercial and industrial uses. There is no indication that the proposed uses will be hazardous or disturbing. •Ǥ Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; ©Ǥ Staff Analysis: Water and sewer connections are available to serve the property. At the developer's expense, they can connect from East Yakima Avenue. ¶Ǥ Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; ©Ǥ Staff Analysis: There is no indication that the requested uses will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors; i. Staff Analysis: There will be a normal amount of noise and traffic associated with a truck terminal yard and maintenance facility. Per the applicant, they are a 24/7 operation. Shift changes are from 2:00 am - 6:00 am and 1:00 pm- 4:00 pm. They currently operate from a site south of the interstate, where they travel north to Valley Wide to fuel and then proceed to farms. This development would allow that route to be eliminated. Many of their current routes continue along 200 South/Yakima to deliver milk to IMP, as the permit provides access to the Western Dairy Transport yard adjacent to IMP. While there will be an increase in truck traffic, trucks are already utilizing this route. The increase in noise and traffic should not be excessive. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; i. Staff Analysis: Two access points have been shown, and they will work with engineering on any needed access changes. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. i. Staff Analysis: This use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. VI. 17.26: OFF STREET PARKING: Per the Jerome Municipal Code, this project shall comply with section 17.26 as follows: a. 17.26.150: Schedule of Parking Requirements: 1 per 250 sq. ft. of office space and 1 per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area. o This project requires a total of 54 parking spaces, as shown in the plan, which includes more than 54 spots, plus parking for trucks. b. 17.26.030: Design and maintenance: a. The parking area must be paved with drainage provided. VII. 17.18.070: LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: a. This project does require landscape. They propose a 10-foot landscape strip with trees along Yakima Avenue. There will be a fence around the property with gates. They also plan some landscaping around the building. VIII. STAFF COMMENTS: a. The Fire, Engineering, Building, Wastewater, and Streets Departments have all reviewed the application. IX. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the commission may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds, or ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: i. Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; ii. Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; iii. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and iv. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. ---PAGE BREAK--- 152 East Ave A, Jerome, ID 83338 Phone: (208) 324-8189 [EMAIL REDACTED] www.cityofjerome.org PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION Request Type ☒ Special Use Permit ☒ Annexation ☐ Variance ☐ Rezone ☐ Subdivision Preliminary Plat ☐ Subdivision Final Plat ☐ Zoning Ordinance Amendment ☐ $75 filing fee is required with a complete application. Preliminary and final plats are a $150 fee plus $1.00 for each proposed lot in the subdivision. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Quadrant Investments LLC Mailing Address: PO Box 298, Woodburn, OR 97071 Physical Address: a portion of 209 S. 100 East, Jerome, ID 83338 Telephone Number: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] Legal Description: A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 8 SOUTH, RANGE 17 EAST, BOISE MERIDIAN, JEROME COUNTY, IDAHO, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 31, SAID CORNER BEING MARKED BY A 2" ALUMINUM CAP PER CORNER PERPETUATION AND FILING RECORD RECORDED NOVEMBER 6, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2144103 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 00⁰07’15” EAST ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION, A DISTANCE OF 202.64 FEET; THENCE, LEAVING SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY, NORTH 89°50’54” WEST, A DISTANCE OF 396.61 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE SOUTH 50°25’23” WEST 645.27 FEET TO THE NORTHEASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EASTERN IDAHO RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS DESCRIBED IN QUITCLAIM DEED TO EASTERN IDAHO RAILROAD INC. AN IDAHO CORPORATION RECORDED NOVEMBER 24, 1993 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 934403 IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE NORTH 70°57’04” WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY, A DISTANCE OF 101.79 FEET TO A POINT AT THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE RIGHT AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 8544.34 FEET, A RADIAL LINE FROM THE POINT OF CURVATURE TO THE RADIUS POINT BEARS NORTH 19°02’30” EAST; Docusign Envelope ID: 37F7CBD6-2CFA-44EC-AEAC-A361788F6C1F ---PAGE BREAK--- THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2°20’48” AN ARC DISTANCE OF 349.96 FEET, WITH A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF N69°47’13”W, 349.94 FEET TO THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 31; THENCE NORTH 00°11’21” WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER 462.06 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE SOUTH 89°50’55” EAST ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 31, 923.06 FEET THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY, SOUTH 00°07’17” EAST, A DISTANCE OF 202.64 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. SUBJECT TO THE 25 FEET WIDE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY. CONTAINING 9.94 ACRES (9.41 ACRES W/O RIGHT-OF-WAY) Current Use of Property: vacant land Current Zoning: not in city; impact commercial Ownership ☒ I am the recorded owner of the property. ☐ I am the purchaser thereof, under a contract in writing. ☐ I am the lessee or the agent authorized. By signature hereon, the property owner acknowledges that City officials and/or employees may, in the performance of their functions, enter upon the property to inspect, post legal notices, and/or other standard activities in the course of processing this application, pursuant to Idaho Code §67- 6507. The lessee or agent has my permission to act on. Property Owner’s Signature: / Write a complete description of your request: The current property is vacant land, zoned commercial. We will sell to a Buyer (Dairy Farms of America) who wants to tie into city utilities. The location is in an area that Jerome Planning and Zoning has marked as a gateway location. Surrounding land use is agricultural, residential, and commercial. DFA will request a special use permit, with our permission, to zone for Industrial. This business will create jobs and add diversity to business types in the area. Docusign Envelope ID: 37F7CBD6-2CFA-44EC-AEAC-A361788F6C1F 11/14/2024 ---PAGE BREAK--- Notification of adjacent property owners: signature of an adjacent property owner is not an approval or denial of your request but acknowledgment that you notified them of your request. 500 feet, property zoned Residential - 1, 2, 3, or Multi-Family Residential 750 feet, property zoned General Business High Density Business or Central Business District (CBD) 1,000 feet, property zoned Neighborhood Business (C-1) 1,500 feet, if property is zoned Public/Semi Public (PS), Mixed Use (MU) , Light Industrial (M-1) or Heavy Industrial 2) Applicant Signature AT ITS OPTION, THE JEROME CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY, UPON NOTICE AND HEARING, AND WITH GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, REVOKE A ZONING AMENDMENT IF THE TERMS THEREOF ARE BEING VIOLATED. I hereby certify that I am the applicant named herein, and that I have familiarized myself with the rules and regulations with respect to preparing and filing this application, and that the foregoing statements and answers herein contained, and the information on the attached maps, are in all respects true and accurate to the best of my belief. Printed Name: Mark A. Nyman Signature: Date: Appeals: Any interested party may appeal in writing any final decision of the Planning and Zoning Administrator, or Commission to the City Council by filing an appeal with the Jerome City Clerk within fifteen (15) days from the date of the decision. The appeal shall specifically state the decision appealed and the reasons for the appeal. If no appeal is filed within the fifteen (15) day period, the decision shall be deemed final. Docusign Envelope ID: 37F7CBD6-2CFA-44EC-AEAC-A361788F6C1F 11/14/2024 ---PAGE BREAK--- Special Use Permit Application Checklist An application for special use permit shall be filed with the administrator by at least one owner or lessee of property for which such special use is proposed. At a minimum, the application shall contain the following information:  Complete Application  Legal description of property  Description of existing use  Zoning district  Description of proposed special use  A plan for the proposed site for the special use showing the location of all buildings, parking and loading area, traffic access and traffic circulation, open spaces, landscaping, refuse and service areas, utilities, signs, yards and such other information as the council may require to determine if the proposed special use meets the intent and requirements of this title  A narrative statement evaluating the effects on adjoining property; the effect of such elements as noise, glare, odor, fumes and vibration on adjoining property; a discussion of the general compatibility with adjacent and other properties in the district; and the relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan. (See attached questions) 152 E Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Email: [EMAIL REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES *Answer these as if they are questions relating to your request for a Special Use Permit. A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in City code for the zoning district involved; (Yes) B. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; C. Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; D. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; E. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; F. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; G. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors; H. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and I. Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Yes Yes Yes Will not Will not Yes Will not Will not ---PAGE BREAK--- 10 10 A A 1 1 G G F F E E D D C C B B 3 3 4 4 5 5 7 7 8 8 9 9 30' - 0 1/4" WASH BAY 2 2 D4 A301 D4 A301 B4 A301 B4 A301 7'-6 1/2" 48'-0" 25'-7" 18'-5" 26'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 30'-4" 230'-10 1/2" 18'-11" 18'-0" 18'-1" 18'-1" 18'-0" 18'-11" 110'-0" 7'-6 1/2" 48'-0" 25'-7" 18'-5" 26'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 30'-4" 230'-10 1/2" 18'-11" 18'-0" 18'-1" 18'-1" 18'-0" 18'-11" 110'-0" / A3 A101.2 / A4 A101.1 / A3 A101.2 / A4 A101.1 FOYER 100 OFFICE 101 OFFICE 102 OFFICE 103 OFFICE 104 OFFICE 105 STORAGE 106 OFFICE 107 TRAINING ROOM 113 ELECTRICAL 126 SHOP 125 RESTROOM 110 RESTROOM 111 SHOP MANAGER 115 PARTS 116 OFFICE 118 OFFICE 119 OFFICE 120 STORAGE 121 OFFICE 122 OPEN OFFICE 123 WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM 109 MAINTENANCE BAY 127 WASH BAY MECH. 128 WASH BAY 129 127-3 127-1 127-11 114 119 100-3 127-2 127-10 128-2 127-6 129-4 129-1 127-5 115 116-3 100-8 100-5 120 121-1 123-1 123-2 113-1 101 102 103 104 105 107 100-6 125-2 112-1 126 127-4 128-1 127-7 113-2 106 117 118 100-4 128-3 129-3 129-2 116-1 STORE 117 W1 B1 A131 A3 A301 A3 A301 11 11 40'-0" 5'-2" 12'-10 39/128" MEN'S LOCKER ROOM 112 127-8 127-9 127-414 108 110-1 111-1 111-2 112-2 112-3 110-2 122 OFFICE 114 1 2 3 4 5 http://www.cartwright-aec.com D C B A CARTWRIGHT PROJECT # DATE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: 1 2 3 4 5 DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS # 635 SOUTH 100 EAST LOGAN, UT 84341 T435 753.2850 F435 753.2851 ©2024 CARTWRIGHT ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CARTWRIGHT AGENCY APPROVAL PROFESSIONAL STAMP 2/10/2025 6:00:44 PM A101 FLOOR PLAN 02/10/2025 JMC PRELIMINARY DFA JEROME TRUCK MAINTENANCE BUILDING JEROME, ID JMC RA SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" A3 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN IECC 2018 PERSCRIPTIVE ENERGY COMPLIANCE METAL BUILDING - CLIMATE ZONE 6 U-FACTOR FIXED FENSTRATION OPERATE FENSTRATION ENTRANCE DOORS SHGC ORIENTATION PF < 0.2 VERTICAL FENESTRATION U-FACTOR SKYLIGHTS SHGC SEW N 0.38 0.51 0.50 0.40 0.77 0.45 0.38 ROOFS METAL BUILDINGS U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.035 R-19 + R-11 LS WALLS ABOVE GRADE METAL BUILDINGS U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.052 R-13 + R-13ci WALLS BELOW GRADE BELOW-GRADE WALL U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.119 R-7.5ci OPAQUE DOORS SWINGING DOOR U-FACTOR U-0.31 GARAGE DOOR <14% GLAZING U-FACTOR U-0.31 NONSWINGING R-FACTOR R-4.75 KEYNOTES # DESCRIPTION ---PAGE BREAK--- A201 C3 10 10 A A G G F F E E D D C C B B 7 7 8 8 9 9 D4 A301 D4 A301 3'-4" 8'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 9'-6 1/8" 7'-9 7/8" 6'-0" 4'-8" 6'-0" 5'-4" 6'-0" 5'-4" 6'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 6'-0" 10'-0" 17'-8" 10'-0" 6'-8" 8'-1" 10'-3" 6'-0" 6'-4 3/4" 10'-11 1/4" 92'-0" 48'-0" 25'-7" 18'-5" 18'-11" 18'-0" 18'-1" 18'-1" 18'-0" 18'-11" 110'-0" 48'-0" 25'-7" 18'-5" 92'-0" / A3 A101.2 / A3 A101.2 114 119 100-3 115 116-3 100-8 100-5 120 121-1 123-1 123-2 113-1 101 102 103 104 105 107 100-6 125-2 112-1 126 113-2 106 117 118 100-4 116-1 FOYER 100 OFFICE 101 OFFICE 102 OFFICE 103 OFFICE 104 OFFICE 105 STORAGE 106 OFFICE 107 ELECTRICAL 126 SHOP 125 RESTROOM 110 WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM 109 RESTROOM 111 SHOP MANAGER 115 PARTS 116 STORE 117 OFFICE 118 OFFICE 119 OFFICE 120 STORAGE 121 OFFICE 122 OPEN OFFICE 123 TRAINING ROOM 113 19'-2 1/2" 12'-2 5/8" 5'-9 7/8" 8'-7 3/4" 8'-9 3/4" 8'-2 3/8" 37'-3 5/8" 9'-9 1/2" 20'-5 7/8" 7'-6 7/8" 19'-4 5/8" 5'-7 1/4" 20'-6 3/8" 18'-5" 26'-5 1/4" 5'-7 1/4" 8'-0 7/8" 4'-0" 8'-5 1/2" 18'-5" 17'-5 1/8" 5'-1 1/4" 12'-5 3/4" 12'-7 1/4" 5'-5 1/4" 26'-5 3/4" 12'-5 5/8" 13'-6 3/8" 12'-6 3/4" 13'-5 1/4" 5'-5 1/4" 44'-4 1/4" 5'-1 1/4" 15'-6 7/8" 39'-6 3/8" 10'-11" 11'-2 3/4" 11'-10 3/4" 11'-6 3/4" 9'-3 1/2" 15'-6 7/8" 8'-5" 5'-9 7/8" 8'-7 3/4" 8'-9 3/4" 15'-0 1/8" 11'-11 7/8" 8'-4 1/4" 7'-11 1/4" 12'-0" 15'-2 7/8" 5'-9 1/4" B1 A131 5'-9" 38'-11 3/8" A3 A301 11 11 10'-8" 3'-0" 18'-0" 5'-0" 54'-0" 6'-0" 13'-4" 4'-0" 8'-0" 6'-0" 3'-4" 4'-0" 8'-0" 4'-0" 8'-0" 10'-0" 8'-0" 28'-8" MEN'S LOCKER ROOM 112 13'-9" 4'-8" 9'-9 1/2" 18'-3 7/8" 9'-2" 6'-7" 9'-11 7/8" 16'-8 1/4" 127-414 108 110-1 111-1 111-2 112-2 112-3 110-2 BREAKROOM 108 16'-0 3/8" 15'-0 3/4" 8'-5 1/4" OFFICE 114 122 1 2 3 4 5 http://www.cartwright-aec.com D C B A CARTWRIGHT PROJECT # DATE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: 1 2 3 4 5 DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS # 635 SOUTH 100 EAST LOGAN, UT 84341 T435 753.2850 F435 753.2851 ©2024 CARTWRIGHT ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CARTWRIGHT AGENCY APPROVAL PROFESSIONAL STAMP 2/10/2025 6:00:45 PM A101.1 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN 02/10/2025 JMC PRELIMINARY DFA JEROME TRUCK MAINTENANCE BUILDING JEROME, ID JMC RA SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A4 ENLARGED MAIN FLOOR PLAN 7-12 IECC 2018 PERSCRIPTIVE ENERGY COMPLIANCE METAL BUILDING - CLIMATE ZONE 6 U-FACTOR FIXED FENSTRATION OPERATE FENSTRATION ENTRANCE DOORS SHGC ORIENTATION PF < 0.2 VERTICAL FENESTRATION U-FACTOR SKYLIGHTS SHGC SEW N 0.38 0.51 0.50 0.40 0.77 0.45 0.38 ROOFS METAL BUILDINGS U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.035 R-19 + R-11 LS WALLS ABOVE GRADE METAL BUILDINGS U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.052 R-13 + R-13ci WALLS BELOW GRADE BELOW-GRADE WALL U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.119 R-7.5ci OPAQUE DOORS SWINGING DOOR U-FACTOR U-0.31 GARAGE DOOR <14% GLAZING U-FACTOR U-0.31 NONSWINGING R-FACTOR R-4.75 KEYNOTES # DESCRIPTION ---PAGE BREAK--- A202 A3 A201 D4 A A 1 1 G G F F E E D D C C B B 3 3 4 4 5 5 7 7 2 2 B4 A301 2'-0" 3'-4" 99'-4" 3'-4" 2'-0" 5'-4" 16'-0" 2'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 16'-0" 2'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 16'-0" 5'-4" 6'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 5'-4" 16'-0" 2'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 16'-0" 9'-4" 16'-0" 2'-8" 3'-4" 3'-4" 16'-0" 10'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0" 26'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 30'-4" 131'-4" 18'-11" 18'-0" 18'-1" 18'-1" 18'-0" 18'-11" 110'-0" 26'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 30'-4" 131'-4" / A4 A101.1 / A4 A101.1 127-3 127-1 127-11 127-2 127-10 128-2 127-6 129-4 129-1 127-5 125-2 127-4 128-1 127-7 128-3 129-3 129-2 116-1 76'-0" 25'-0" 30'-4" 73'-7" 36'-5" MAINTENANCE BAY 127 WASH BAY 129 WASH BAY MECH. 128 A3 A301 127-9 127-8 16'-0" 4'-8" 4'-8" 16'-0" 4'-4" 5'-0" 16'-0" 4'-0" 5'-4" 16'-0" 10'-0" A202 B3 A202 C3 1 2 3 4 5 http://www.cartwright-aec.com D C B A CARTWRIGHT PROJECT # DATE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: 1 2 3 4 5 DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS # 635 SOUTH 100 EAST LOGAN, UT 84341 T435 753.2850 F435 753.2851 ©2024 CARTWRIGHT ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CARTWRIGHT AGENCY APPROVAL PROFESSIONAL STAMP 2/10/2025 6:00:45 PM A101.2 ENLARGED FLOOR PLAN 02/10/2025 JMC PRELIMINARY DFA JEROME TRUCK MAINTENANCE BUILDING JEROME, ID JMC RA SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A3 ENLARGED MAIN FLOOR PLAN 1-7 IECC 2018 PERSCRIPTIVE ENERGY COMPLIANCE METAL BUILDING - CLIMATE ZONE 6 U-FACTOR FIXED FENSTRATION OPERATE FENSTRATION ENTRANCE DOORS SHGC ORIENTATION PF < 0.2 VERTICAL FENESTRATION U-FACTOR SKYLIGHTS SHGC SEW N 0.38 0.51 0.50 0.40 0.77 0.45 0.38 ROOFS METAL BUILDINGS U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.035 R-19 + R-11 LS WALLS ABOVE GRADE METAL BUILDINGS U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.052 R-13 + R-13ci WALLS BELOW GRADE BELOW-GRADE WALL U-FACTOR R-FACTOR U-0.119 R-7.5ci OPAQUE DOORS SWINGING DOOR U-FACTOR U-0.31 GARAGE DOOR <14% GLAZING U-FACTOR U-0.31 NONSWINGING R-FACTOR R-4.75 KEYNOTES # DESCRIPTION ---PAGE BREAK--- 12 A 1 J 110'-0" G F E D C 3 4 5 7 8 9 18'-11" 18'-0" 18'-1" 18'-1" 18'-0" 18'-11" 5'-0" 5'-0" SHOP MANAGER MAINTENANCE BAYS PARTS 14'-0" 30' - 2 3/4" 92'-9" 140'-0" 232'-9" 48'-0" 25'-9" 19'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 25'-0" 40'-0" 5'-0" 5'-0" WASH BAY 12'-0" 12'-0" 2 11'-11" 15'-10 3/4" 5'-0" 5'-0" 12'-0" 12'-0" 11'-11" 12'-10 1/2" 38'-0" BREAKROOM 11'-0" 11'-0" 3'-9" 7'-0" 3'-0" 14'-0 5/8" 5'-0" 5'-0" ELECTRICAL TRAINING ROOM MEN'S LOCKER ROOM WOMEN'S LOCKER ROOM 19'-5" 19'-5" 1 2 3 4 5 http://www.cartwright-aec.com D C B A CARTWRIGHT PROJECT # DATE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: 1 2 3 4 5 DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS # 635 SOUTH 100 EAST LOGAN, UT 84341 T435 753.2850 F435 753.2851 ©2024 CARTWRIGHT ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CARTWRIGHT AGENCY APPROVAL PROFESSIONAL STAMP 12/13/2024 11:33:31 AM A101 FLOOR PLAN 11/14/2024 JMC PRELIMINARY DFA JEROME TRUCK MAINTENANCE BUILDING JEROME, ID JMC RA SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" A3 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN ---PAGE BREAK--- 85'-0" 100'-0" 140'-0" 92'-9" 85'-0" 39'-0" 50'-0" 100'-0" 39'-0" 13'-0" 70'-0" 1 2 3 4 5 http://www.cartwright-aec.com D C B A CARTWRIGHT PROJECT # DATE: APPROVED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: 1 2 3 4 5 DATE DESCRIPTION REVISIONS # 635 SOUTH 100 EAST LOGAN, UT 84341 T435 753.2850 F435 753.2851 ©2024 CARTWRIGHT ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS CARTWRIGHT AGENCY APPROVAL PROFESSIONAL STAMP 12/13/2024 11:33:31 AM AS101 SITE PLAN 11/14/2024 PRELIMINARY DFA JEROME TRUCK MAINTENANCE BUILDING JEROME, ID SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" A1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN ---PAGE BREAK--- SHEET NO. SURVEY BY : CHECKED BY : SCALE : DESIGNED BY : DRAWN BY : NO. DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE DRAWING FILE PROJECT NUMBER LAST REVISED ORIG. DATE : 9270 SOUTH 300 WEST S E R V I C E S TECHNI CAL SANDY, UT 84070 PHONE: (801) 562-2521 FAX: (801) 562-2551 1"=80' CMT CREW MARCH 24, 2025 1206.2410 DWG\DBASE CITY JEROME CIVIL SITE LAYOUT CONCEPT 3/25 100' 39' 20' 9' 223.33' 110.00' 27' 24' 24' 70' 13' 10' 13.0' 35' 9' 5' 8' 5' 200 SOUTH PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED STRUCTURE ASSUMED STORMWATER RETENTION BASIN LOCATION (APPROX.) 90' DRIVEWAY APPROACH 89 9'x20' PARKING STALLS (INCLUDING 4 REQUIRED ADA) 45 13'x70' TRUCK PARKING STALLS W/ 10' CONCRETE PADS 14 ANGLED 15'x100' TRUCK STAGING STALLS PROPOSED CITY ROW LINE PROPOSED 5' SIDEWALK PROPOSED 24" CURB & GUTTER CENTERLINE/SECTION LINE 40.0' 90' DRIVEWAY APPROACH 115' 6' 40' 131.33' 90' 24' 100' 15' 35' 74' 45' 10' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (MEASURE TO BACK OF WALK ON NORTH SIDE) ---PAGE BREAK--- From: Matt Smoot To: Ida Clark; Cory Johnson; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor; Simone Young-Tem Cc: Ashlee Anderson; Greg Packer Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Date: Thursday, March 13, 2025 2:24:39 PM Ok good, thank you. Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 3:23 PM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Correct, they checked the SUP box but the narrative was different. This confirmation is what I need. Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 2:15 PM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Yes, that is correct. I think the Seller checked that box when they completed the SUP application. Do they need to revise and resend or are we good with this confirmation? Thanks, Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate ---PAGE BREAK--- DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 3:14 PM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Yes. I do want to clarify that this request is for a Special Use Permit for your truck facility. You are not asking to rezone to industrial as stated on the Special Use application. Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 12:59 PM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Hi Ida, I believe at this point you have everything from us that is needed for the SUP meeting, is that correct? Thanks, Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> ---PAGE BREAK--- Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 1:59 PM To: Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Re: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Thank you. This is what I needed. Ida Get Outlook for iOS From: Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2025 12:31:07 PM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome We are a 24/7 operation; our shift changes are from 2:00 am - 6:00 am and 1:00 pm- 4:00 pm. We operate currently from a site south of the freeway where we travel north to Valley wide to fuel and travel tour farms from there. This leg will be eliminated with our new site as we will fuel onsite. Many of our current routes continue along W 200 south/ Yakima as we use that route to access our dairies in the county, deliver milk to IMP as sells permit and access the WDT yard next to IMP to wash our equipment. From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Friday, March 7, 2025 7:31 AM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Re: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Hi Matt, Received, thank you. You will be placed on the April 8th P&Z Agenda. ---PAGE BREAK--- What are the hours of operation? Also you had mentioned that you already have trucks that go to IMP? I would like to include these two items in my staff report. Please call Katie ([PHONE REDACTED] x 100) today or Monday and pay the $125 fee for the special use permit. You can also mail in a check. Thanks, Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 6, 2025 6:20 PM To: Ida Clark; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor; Simone Young-Tem Cc: Ashlee Anderson; Cory Johnson; Greg Packer Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Hi Ida, Attached is information for the SUP meeting on April 8th. Please let us know if there is anything else we need to provide for the commission and neighboring property owners review. Thanks, Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2025 9:54 AM To: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome You are correct. The SUP will be placed on the April 8 agenda. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ida From: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 10:26 PM To: Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Re: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Hi Simone, when we talked to Ida about this a couple of weeks ago the March meeting was already full so they have to be on the April calendar. DFA would have already had to have submitted their application - However, they couldn't have submitted their application until the property was officially annexed and I believe the deadline for getting on the March meeting has already passed. Ida, please correct me if I misunderstood that. Thanks! On Wed, Feb 19, 2025 at 8:41 AM Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> wrote: Thanks! Do you know if the SUP will be on the March meeting calendar? Thanks, Simone Young-Tem Asset Manager [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 8:36 AM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Perfect. Let me know if you have any questions about the application. Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> ---PAGE BREAK--- Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 9:32 AM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome That’s great news! Yes, please have it recorded as we will now shift our focus to the SUP application due on March 14th for the April 8th meeting. Thanks, Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 10:29 AM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Simone Young-Tem <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Good morning, Yes, it was approved. Am I good to have it recorded? Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2025 9:18 AM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Hi Ida, ---PAGE BREAK--- Was the property approved for annexation last night? Thanks, Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 4:14 PM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome The next available P&Z meeting is April 8. Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Monday, February 10, 2025 3:02 PM To: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Thanks Aaron. I’ll get with Greg tomorrow on the first 30-day extension amendment. Hopefully that is enough time to allow for the SUP, so we don’t need to exercise the second 30-day extension option. Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] ---PAGE BREAK--- From: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 9, 2025 2:16 PM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Re: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Matt & Greg, due to this new update it looks like we'll need to use one of your 30-day extensions as part of the contract. I know you've been in contact with the seller's legal counsel about satisfying the due diligence but let me know if you need anything from me on that extension request to get signed. As the contract sits right now, I am tracking due diligence ending on March 5th with a closing date of April 4th. Thanks! On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 1:10 PM Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> wrote: You’re welcome. I am available to answer any questions on code requirements. Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 1:30 PM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Ida, Thank you for providing the details below and for being such a great resource as we work through all this. We have both the annexation and SUP final approvals in our contract as express contingencies to our closing so we will stick with that plan and not close before both items are separately and finally approved by the City. As you know, we would be at total risk of not ever receiving the necessary SUP if we were to close prior to it being finally approved by the City. I’ll work with Cory on completing the application and will get the status of the preliminary plans. Thanks, ---PAGE BREAK--- Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 1:45 PM To: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome I understand your concerns. You can speak to surrounding property owners at any time about your proposal to get an idea of their position. You are not going to have opposition from the business to the north. There are a couple of residences left in the area. You may want to speak to them. The P&Z Chairman is a voting member of the commission; he cannot discuss applications before a public hearing. I suggest preliminary architectural plans so the commission and neighboring property owners can see your design. They will be interested in access points, parking, and landscape. This area is and was planned for industry and accessory uses. There are concerns about the condition of East Yakima and added truck traffic. The City is currently working on the reconstruction design. Ida From: Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 11:48 AM To: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: RE: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Yes, thanks Aaron. I was going to ask about the same question below. We really need to understand what the risk is if we were to close on the transaction prior to the SUP application. We would be stuck if the SUP didn’t get approved after we purchased the land. Matt Smoot Director of Real Estate DFA Dairy Brands ---PAGE BREAK--- P: [PHONE REDACTED] C: [PHONE REDACTED] From: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 12:45 PM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Cc: Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Re: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Thanks for the additional information Ida! Would you be able to provide contact info for the P&Z Chairman? They might want to get your and his pulse on the SUP formalities and approval to determine if they feel comfortable finalizing the purchase of this land without that SUP in place yet or if they should extend until that is completed. Matt & Cory, below is Ida's direct line so you can call her for further clarification and insight. Ida Clark - (208) 324-8189 ex 140 Thanks! On Thu, Feb 6, 2025 at 11:23 AM Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]> wrote: Hi Aaron, The Special Use Permit is a separate process. This is a public hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission only. They will decide that night. I cannot take an application for an SUP on property that is not within the City limits (I have no authority). Once the Council passes the resolution and we record, I can move the application forward, as the property will be incorporated into the city limits. I would suggest that you get the application ready to go now. The next available P&Z date is April 8. I attached the application and the checklist. A-I will need to address access, hours, and a general layout. Do you have preliminary engineered/architecture plans ready? The plans need to address parking and landscape. The fee is $125. I must have a complete application no later than March 14th to make the April 8th meeting. Let me know if you have any questions about the process or the application. Ida From: Aaron Miskin - Idaho Realtor <[EMAIL REDACTED]> ---PAGE BREAK--- Sent: Thursday, February 6, 2025 11:13 AM To: Ida Clark <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Ashlee Anderson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Matt Smoot <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Cory Johnson <[EMAIL REDACTED]>; Greg Packer <[EMAIL REDACTED]> Subject: Zoning & SUP - Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) - TBD E 200 S, Jerome Hello Ida, As we prepare for this last step of having this parcel annexed to the City of Jerome the buyers, DFA, and I wanted to make sure the zoning and SUP (Special Use Permit) will all be filed and up-to-date once all that is completed after the Feb 18th meeting. It was our understanding that all that would happen simultaneously but there was a little uncertainty around the SUP and if there was more to do for that to be issued. Can you clarify that for us and provide direction if there is more to do to get that completed? Thanks! Aaron Miskin Realtor I Keller Williams SVSI The Jeremy Orton Real Estate Group Cell Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Serving Mini-Cassia, Twin Falls, and Surrounding Areas “Without dreams and goals there is no living, only merely existing, and that is not why we are here." - Mark Twain Error! Filename not specified. Aaron Miskin Realtor I Keller Williams SVSI The Jeremy Orton Real Estate Group Cell Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Serving Mini-Cassia, Twin Falls, and Surrounding Areas Error! Filename not specified. Error! Filename not specified. Error! Filename not specified. Error! Filename not specified. Error! Filename not specified. Error! Filename not specified. Error! Filename not specified. “Without dreams and goals there is no living, only merely existing, and that is not why we are here." - Mark ---PAGE BREAK--- Twain Aaron Miskin Realtor I Keller Williams SVSI The Jeremy Orton Real Estate Group Cell Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Serving Mini-Cassia, Twin Falls, and Surrounding Areas “Without dreams and goals there is no living, only merely existing, and that is not why we are here." - Mark Twain Aaron Miskin Realtor I Keller Williams SVSI The Jeremy Orton Real Estate Group Cell Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Serving Mini-Cassia, Twin Falls, and Surrounding Areas “Without dreams and goals there is no living, only merely existing, and that is not why we are here." - Mark Twain ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 8th day of April 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from Quadrant Investments LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing Terminal Truck Yard and Truck and Heavy Equipment Repair, on the property described as Tax 2303219 (County Portion) of NENE SEC 31 T8 R17, more commonly known as the pasture on the south side of East Yakima Avenue between 715 East Yakima Avenue and 79 East 200 South, Jerome, Idaho. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by April 2nd, 2025, or physically submitted by noon April 4th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 14th day of March 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: March 22nd, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 9 10 11 915 833 813 813 715 [PHONE REDACTED] 2430 2420 2526 Western Dairy Transportation E Yakima Ave 100 East Rd S S Tiger Dr S Garfield St 200 South Rd E Brockman Lp 1 inch = 400 feet . Quad Invest Nearest Neighbor 750ft November 2024 CITY OF JEROME Quad Investment, LLC ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Special Use Permit – 100 units in four-plexes S Tiger and East Ave K, Jerome Current Zoning Designation: General Business (C-2) Subdivision: No Setbacks: Front, 25’, Rear 10’, interior 12’, and street side 25’ Landscape Required: Yes Summary: The applicant is requesting to build up to 100 units, in four-plexes on approximately 15 acres. Green space and landscaping have been planned with an office and gym. Required parking for the units has been met. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org To: Planning & Zoning Commission CC: BJ Hess, Legal Counsel From: Ida Clark, Planning & Zoning Manager Date: April 8, 2025 Subject: Staff Report regarding the Special Use Permit request from South Tiger Dr. LLC allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units in four-plexes on the property described in the agenda in Jerome, ID Special Use Permit Request: Staff Report I. As pertains to Title 17 of the JMC, the Land Use Ordinance a. The property in question is currently zoned General Business as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. b. The proposed use, multi-family dwellings (five or more units), requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission as detailed in 17.14.010 of the JMC. i. It is noted that this parcel is approximately 23 acres. The request for multi- family housing would be planned across approximately 15 acres. c. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows i. Front: 25’, Rear 10’, Interior Side 12’, Side Street 25’ ii. Minimum lot size: N/A. The development cannot exceed 80% of the total lot area. iii. Maximum height is 50’ II. As pertains to Title 16 of the JMC, the Subdivision Ordinance a. Title 16 has no bearing on this Special Use Permit request. III. As pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, the request is in accordance with: a. Chapter 4. Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” i. Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. 1. 4.3.e Consider zoning ordinance amendments to promote a variety of housing types, including higher density residential along corridors and adjacent to commercial and industrial areas. 2. 4.4: Support development of affordable housing for a full range of employees and residents (retirees and families). 3. The commission will need to consider the blending of single-family housing with 100 units of four-plexes. b. The Commission should consider Chapter 3. Our Natural Environment i. Objective 3.3.d: consider the impact on the adjacent agricultural business when reviewing new annexations and development applications. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org c. Future Land Use Map: The future land use map indicates that this parcel is designated for Residential Low use. As we have noted, the Future Land Use Map is a guiding document for future development. As stated above, this parcel is currently General Business, and single-family housing isn’t permitted in that zone. i. Staff believes this was an oversight during the Future Land Use Map update, as it was previously designated as Mixed-Use. Special Use Permit Criteria Staff Analysis IV. 17.60.030: GENERAL STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USES: The commission shall review the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed special use in terms of the following standards and shall find adequate evidence showing that such use at the proposed location: a. A. Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved; i. Staff Analysis: The Planning and Zoning Code permits multi-family dwellings in the C-2 zone with an approved special use permit. b. Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title; i. Staff Analysis: The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Objective 3.3.d of the Comp Plan must be considered. It is noted that the surrounding farmland is planned for future development of housing and commercial use. The current zoning and the future land use map should also be taken into consideration. The protection of the existing single-family neighborhood should also be taken into consideration. c. Will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity, and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area; i. Staff Analysis: The parcel is currently farmland, with single-family housing to the west, public entities to the north, planned commercial development to the east, and single-family housing and a school to the south. The applicant has noted that they plan to request a lot split if the SUP is approved, to retain the remaining acreage to the east for commercial use. d. Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses; i. Staff Analysis: The application states that it is providing a landscape buffer zone with green space between the existing single-family homes and the proposed multi-family housing. They proposed widening and improving the existing fire lane between East Avenue J and East Avenue K. Access will primarily be from East Avenue K, off South Tiger Drive. They will be required to improve half of East Ave I. As proposed, there is no indication that this development would be hazardous to the existing neighboring uses. e. Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services; i. Staff Analysis: Water, sewer, and irrigation are available to serve the property. At the developer's expense, water and sewer can be extended. First responders will have adequate access to the development. The development will be required to meet the fire code. The School District was sent a notice letter of the request, to which we have received no comment. f. Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community; i. Staff Analysis: There is no indication that the multi-family, residential use will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. g. Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors; i. Staff Analysis: It is not anticipated that a multi-family use will be detrimental to any person, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of odors, noise, smoke, fumes, or glare. There will be an increase in traffic production. There are two access points to alleviate congestion when the development is fully built out. h. Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares; and i. Staff Analysis: As previously discussed, the development is proposing two access points. i. Will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. o Staff Analysis: There is no indication that the residential use will result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. V. 17.26: OFF STREET PARKING: Per the Jerome Municipal Code, this project shall comply with section 17.26 as follows: a. 17.26.150: Schedule of Parking Requirements: Multi-family dwellings with two or more bedrooms shall have two parking spaces with .25 for guest parking. “Adjacent on street parking on a local street may be credited towards the guest parking”. i. This project is required to have a total of 225 parking spaces. The application shows over 230 parking spots. b. 17.26.030: Design and maintenance: The parking area must be paved with drainage provided. i. The application shows the parking area paved with a stormwater pond. ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning and Zoning Department City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, ID 83338 (208) 324–8189 www.cityofjerome.org VI. 17.18.070: LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: ii. This project is located in the C-2 district. Any multi-family project within this zone must comply with the landscape requirements outlined in 17.18.070. The application includes landscape and green space. The landscape plan will be required as part of the building permit application. A landscape divider will be required for every 21 parking spaces. The commission may also require a fence. VII. STAFF COMMENTS: iii. Fire, Engineering, Building, Wastewater, and Streets Departments have all reviewed the application for the Special Use Permit and have no comment on the SUP at this time. VIII. 17.60.050: SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS AND SAFEGUARDS: In granting any special use, the commission may prescribe appropriate conditions, bonds, and safeguards in conformity with this title. Violations of such conditions, bonds, or safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the special use is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this title. a. Recommended Conditions: i. Dwelling-units will not exceed 100; ii. The special use permit is allowed for the approximately 15 acres as shown in the application; iii. Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; iv. Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; v. Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and vi. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A AFFIDAVIT OF LEGAL INTEREST ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT B ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit C Application Narrative The subject property (Parcel ID RPJ00000197654) is approximately 23 acres with a current zoning designation of C-2 General Business. As discussed with staff, the intent is to develop the westerly ~15 acres with multi-family housing (25 buildings with 100 units, open space, and a shared use building to include office space for leasing staff and a gym for resident use) and retain the east side remnant parcel (approximately 8 acres) for future C-2 General Business (commercial/office) uses (along South Tiger Drive) via a required and subsequent Lot Split. The westerly ~15 acres will be developed in a manner to create a pleasing buffer/transitional area between the existing residential area and the proposed multi-family units. This will be accomplished with a landscaping buffer and open area to consist of grass or park features (approximately 1.5-acres of open space to the east of the landscaping buffer). The proposed landscaping buffer will also serve to minimize traffic volume increases for the existing residential streets and to provide a visual buffer from the proposed development. This open space will provide a designated area for storm water management from the property development. The main access for this development will be from South Tiger Drive and East Avenue K, also limiting traffic impacts to the neighboring residential area. As the conceptual site plan seen in Exhibit D indicates, resident and guest parking will be mostly internal to the development along the private drive isles. The proposed layout also provides some additional guest parking along the planned extension of East Avenue I. Based on further discussions with City staff, we understand that this request can be accomplished in the following order: Step 1: A Special Use Permit will allow the 15-acre site, identified in the exhibits as the westerly portion of the parcel, to be developed with similar multi-family housing as currently exists in the area. This design represents a meaningful approach to transitioning and buffering between the existing residential area and other C-2 General Business (8-acre remnant site along S. Tiger Drive). The approach also provides a positive nexus between existing development, the Comprehensive Plan, the Future Land Use Map, and other options under the current C-2 zone. Step 2: A One Time Lot Split must then be approved. As discussed with City Staff, following the approval of the Special Use Permit, a one-time lot split procedure will be performed in order to create and maintain approximately 8 acres for appropriate C-2 Business Development along South Tiger Drive. This will also maintain consistency with the current plans and goals that the City has established. See attached conceptual site plan (Exhibit D) for approximate location of this proposed split. ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit C Description of Existing Use The subject property is currently used for agricultural purposes with grass hay being grown and harvested from the site annually. Below is a photo of the property under it’s current use. Figure 1 - Existing agricultural use of subject property ---PAGE BREAK--- Exhibit C Zoning District The subject property is currently zoned as “C2 General Business”. Below is an image from the City of Jerome zoning maps. Figure 2 - City of Jerome Zoning Designation Map Subject property Zoning Designation: C2 Approx. 23-acres ---PAGE BREAK--- 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"SS 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W W W W W 8"W 8"W 8"W 8"W SS SS SS SS SS SS TOP DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: BY APR. DATE DESCRIPTION REUSE OF DRAWINGS J-U-B SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY, COPYRIGHT AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS OF THESE DRAWINGS, AND THE SAME SHALL NOT BE REUSED WITHOUT J-U-B'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ANY REUSE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT BY J-U-B WILL BE AT CLIENT'S SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO J-U-B. NO. REVISION JUB PROJ. # : INCH, SCALE ACCORDINGLY AT FULL SIZE, IF NOT ONE ONE INCH FILE : J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. www.jub.com J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR PLANS SHEET: DRAWING: Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Twin Falls, ID 83301 Suite 100 2114 Village Park Avenue DESIGN BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: BY APR. DATE DESCRIPTION REUSE OF DRAWINGS J-U-B SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW, STATUTORY, COPYRIGHT AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS OF THESE DRAWINGS, AND THE SAME SHALL NOT BE REUSED WITHOUT J-U-B'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. ANY REUSE WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT BY J-U-B WILL BE AT CLIENT'S SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO J-U-B. NO. REVISION JUB PROJ. # : INCH, SCALE ACCORDINGLY AT FULL SIZE, IF NOT ONE ONE INCH FILE : J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. www.jub.com J-U-B ENGINEERS, INC. CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY NOT FOR PLANS SHEET: DRAWING: Phone: [PHONE REDACTED] Twin Falls, ID 83301 Suite 100 2114 Village Park Avenue LAST UPDATED: 3/13/2025 60-25-003-CONCEPT USE PERMIT\SITE PLAN LAYOUT\60-25-003-CONCEPT.DWG Plot Date:3/13/2025 1:38 PM Plotted By: George Kinslow II Date Created:3/13/2025 SOUTH TIGER DRIVE SUBDIVISION- CONCEPT CHRIS ANDERSON EXHIBIT D - CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT 60-25-003 GCK JDS C-101 1 S TIGER DR E AVE K E AVE I NOTE: THE EXISTING UTILITIES, PROPERTY LINES, AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS DEPICTED IN THIS EXHIBIT ARE SHOWN CONCEPTUALLY AND ARE NOT EXACT. THIS PLAN IS INTENDED FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR PRECISE MEASUREMENTS OR FINAL DESIGN. ACTUAL CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS MAY VARY. N 60 SCALE IN FEET 0 120 STORMWATER RETENTION LANDSCAPING BUFFER (TREES) FIRE LANE IMPROVEMENTS, WIDENING AND CURB/SIDEWALK PARK / OPEN GRASS AREA EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EXISTING 8" WATER MAIN EXISTING 8" SEWER MAIN EXISTING 8" SEWER MAIN S JACKSON ST ACCESS TO COMMERCIAL LOTS FROM E AVE K OR S JACKSON ST ONLY 4 PLEX UNIT, 50'X60' TYP EXTENSION OF E AVE I COMMERCIAL 8± ACRES OFFICE / GYM ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT E General Standards for Special Uses 1) Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in City code for the zoning district involved. a) Yes, as established in City code a special use permit would allow for the proposed use within the current zoning district. 2) Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. a) The proposed use of the property will in part accomplish the goals set forth in the comprehensive plan by maintaining residential use of the property. The comprehensive plan currently reflects “Residential Low” as the future use for this property. b) The proposed use of the property will also accomplish goals set forth by the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Department by maintaining commercial use of the property along South Tiger Drive. Approximately 8-acres of property adjacent to South Tiger Drive will be split from the subject property to aid in the development goals of the City for commercial development in this area, as reflected by the current zoning designation. 3) Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in the appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. a) Yes, the proposed multi-family units will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious with the existing residential uses surrounding the property. Multi-family units of the same design have been constructed less than 1,000ft west of the subject property, on S Eisenhower Street. Photos of these existing housing units have been included with this application (Appendix E) to showcase the appearance of the proposed housing units. 4) Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. a) The proposed multi-family units will comply with all applicable residential development standards per City code. 5) Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. a) Yes, the subject property is located within City limits and includes existing utilities on-site, including water, sewer and power. A city street, West Avenue K, already serves as access to the subject property, with public utilities routed along it. The proposed development will include establishing through-connection streets built to all applicable standards for access and fire protection. The proposed development will include drainage structures to an on- site retention pond that will be designed to all applicable standards. ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT E General Standards for Special Uses 6) Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. a) The proposed housing development will not create additional requirements at public cost, nor will it be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 7) Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions or operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. a) The proposed housing development will be designed and constructed in compliance with all applicable residential development code in such that it will not be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare of the community. Additional residential traffic will be mostly contained within the housing development itself and is not anticipated to impact the neighboring residential community. In fact, by providing an additional through-street connection from W Avenue K to W Avenue I, it will aid in community connectivity and ease of traffic flow through the area. 8) Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. a) Yes, the proposed housing development will have designated approaches into private drive isles and parking areas around the proposed buildings to avoid interference with traffic in the surrounding area. The proposed through-street connection around the perimeter of the housing development will provide additional community connectivity from the existing residential areas to a main throughfare. 9) Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. a) The proposed housing development will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of any feature of major importance. As proposed, the housing development will provide continuity for the residential area and remove farming activities adjacent to the residential communities. ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT F Photos of Existing Multi-Family Units - S Eisenhower Street ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT F Photos of Existing Multi-Family Units - S Eisenhower Street ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY OF JEROME PLANNING & ZONING Ida Clark, City Planner 152 East Ave A [PHONE REDACTED] x 140 [EMAIL REDACTED] NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Tuesday, the 8th day of April 2025, at the hour of 7:00 p.m., a public hearing will be held before the City of Jerome Planning and Zoning Commission at City of Jerome Council Chambers, 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho to consider a request from South Tiger Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi-family housing, up to 100 units on approximately 15 acres of the westerly portion of the property described as Jerome Unplatted Tax 2215519 of NESE 19-8-17, more commonly known as the cultivated farm ground to the east of 800 blk East Ave I, J, and K (Hovey Subdivision), south of 821 East Ave H, and west of the East Ave K cul-de-sac. All interested persons shall have an opportunity to be heard. Please consider joining the meeting or submitting written comment. We strongly encourage written comment be postmarked by April 2nd, 2025, or physically submitted by noon April 4th, 2025. Questions regarding this request should be directed to City Planner, Ida Clark at [PHONE REDACTED] x 140. Dated this 14th day of March 2025. Ida Clark City Planner PUBLISH: March 22nd, 2025 ---PAGE BREAK--- 9 8 7 6 5 4 7 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 3 10 12 16 11 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 10 G VUT SRQ M O P L K J I H F E D B A 427 425 811 812 808 804 809 805 801 719 715 711 707 807 805 801 717 713 709 705 812 808 804 720 716 712 708 800 720 716 712 708 809 805 801 725 945 941 937 933 929 925 921 917 943 939 935 931 927 923 919 915 950 946 942 938 934 930 926 922 948 944 940 936 932 928 924 920 607 527 521 515 509 508 514 520 526 527 521 515 509 420 421 421 420 951 911 821 808 804 800 726 725 801 805 809 808 800 726 915 919 923 927 931 935 942 936 928 920 916 701 711 717 807 803 725 508 936 934 924 922 501 503 511 515 523 525 609 611 617 621 625 629 915 917 923 929 931 938 612 608 602 600 520 512 921 424 417 824 820 817 813 809 929 924 933 929 925 921 917 920 916 909 913 800 817 813 808 804 804 800 720 716 712 706 702 816 812 714 700 616 612 610 602 600 524 518 516 510 504 800 517 509 501 815 801 [PHONE REDACTED] 1302 1010 1005 1310 1314 1326 1322 1318 1317 1305 1329 1321 1313 1333 1325 1301 1208 1015 1002 1018 1002 1201 1200 1005 1001 1 4 3 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 2 3 1 3 6 1 A-167 A-164 A-174 A-178 A-175 A-177 A-176 SIRCOMM Canyonside Christian School LDS Church Desano Place Assisted Living Magic Valley Christian Academy Health & Welfare S Tiger Dr E Avenue H S Davis St E Avenue I Roen Rd S Fillmore St E Avenue K S Garfield St E Avenue J Latemar Rd Concord St Luther Way Glen Eagle Dr Owl Ct Hawk Ct E Avenue G S Eisenhower St Nancolas Ct S Jackson St E Avenue F S Tiger Dr E Avenue G 2 1 inch = 400 feet . 501 South Lincoln Nearest Neighbor 300ft E Avenue K March 2025 CITY OF JEROME ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- aSowre & U Planning and Zoning Department Public Hearing Comment Submittal Sheet Please note that comments postmarked after April 2nd. or physically submitted after 12:00 PM on Apri! 4th. will not be included in the public hearing record. Name and Request for public hearing: South Tiser Dr. LLC for a Special Use Permit allowing multi-familv housing, up to 100 units on approximatelv 15 acres. Date of Hearing: April 8th, 2025 PIease Print Lesiblv Your Name: City of Residence and State: lf not a Jerome resident. do vou own propertv in Jerome: Jqfl" " lb Choose One: Support the application _Yes No _ Neutral XOppose the application Your comments noted below will be read into the record as long as it is written legibly, is sisned, and does not exceed the space allotted. th;s Signature City Hall 152 East Ave A Jerome, lD 83338 [PHONE REDACTED] www.cityofjerome.org ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- Planning & Zoning Meeting March 11th, 2025 This regular meeting of the City of Jerome Planning & Zoning Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. Present were Chairman Rod Mink, Commissioner Benjamin Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. Also present were City Planner Ida Clark, Legal Counsel BJ Hess, and Acting Secretary Bernadette Coderniz. Chairman Mink led the audience in recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:02 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto for a Special Use Permit allowing vehicle sales, on the property described as Tax 2200877 of NESE (24-8-16) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated that a Special Use Permit request, approved a few years ago, had several conditions. Since that approval, the City received a grant that helped with the improvements of curb, gutter and sidewalk along West Avenue I. The grant also allowed improvements for sewer connections. The property in question, 975 South Lincoln Avenue in Jerome, is zoned General Business The proposed request, vehicle sales, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear- 10’; Interior Side- 12’; and Side Street- 25’. Ms. Clark stated that Title 8 of the JMC addresses the nuisance ordinance. The ordinance states that property owners cannot have any abandoned, wrecked, or junked vehicles. Vehicles placed on the property shall not be wrecked or junked. As pertains to off-street parking, Ms. Clark stated they have plenty of space, but once they get their building, they would have to have the appropriate parking spaces, along with the number of vehicles they decide to display. Ms. Clark stated that they will also need to meet the Landscape code. They have submitted plans for landscaping along West Avenue I and a small portion along South Lincoln. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Jerome Municipal Code allows vehicle sales with an approved special use permit in the General Business Zone ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The application shows the front half of the lot being utilized for used vehicle sales with a small office located behind the car lot. The car display area will be asphalt. The application shows landscaping along West Avenue I and S Lincoln. The application proposes a fence to separate the use from the parcel to the north. The Avenue I and South Lincoln intersection has developed into a shopping and service area with Ridley’s Grocery Store, D.L. Evans Bank, and Family Dollar. The proposed use will blend with the existing area businesses. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The use of vehicle sales should not disturb existing or future neighboring uses. Hours of operation will be regular for a car dealership. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. The sewer line has been extended as part of the West Avenue I reconstruction. The applicant must connect the city’s sewer system. A water connection already exists. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. As proposed, vehicle sales will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Traffic will increase at the intersection but not more than at any other business. Vehicle sales, with no car repair proposed at this time they would not produce excessive odors, noise, smoke, fumes, or glare. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. The application proposes two vehicular access points. Existing access is from West Avenue I and South Lincoln Avenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The property is bare. This use will not destroy, lose or damage the natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Ms. Clark sent the application to City Staff and received the following comment from Code Enforcement: "Weeds must be taken care of at all times." If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and the Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Ms. Clark stated that the applicant will need to return for a design review of the building. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark noted that staff reviews and approves signage unless there is a request for an Electronic Message Display Sign. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark affirmed she was recommending the Special Use Permit be permanent due to the improvements the applicants would be making to the property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated the code defines a wrecked vehicle as a vehicle that cannot be moved on their own; these are not allowed. A salvaged title is still roadworthy. A salvage yard or a storage yard requires a different permit. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that when the sidewalk was installed along West Avenue I, they were not aware of what would be placed on that property. They have spoken with Engineering, and they will be allowed to install an access cut in the sidewalk on the back side of the parcel, providing them with access. The commission could request that a fence be installed behind the property to separate it from the existing homes. They would like to have access off of West Avenue I. Chairman Mink stated there needs to be two access points. Commissioner Johnson affirmed that the applicant would be responsible for the sidewalk cut. Jesus Mendez, Certified Interpreter, was sworn in. Applicant testimony: Maria de Jesus Mejia, resident of Utah, and Ivan Piedra, resident of Utah, were sworn in. Through the certified interpreter, Ms. Mejia stated she wants the opportunity to develop new business. Chairman Mink inquired whether the applicant understood the presentation regarding the road cut for the entrance, and Ms. Mejia stated that she did. Testimony in neutral: Ms. Clark read the following onto the record: Ruby Reed- resident of Jerome Neutral to the application- No further comment was provided. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 p.m. ---PAGE BREAK--- Consider a request from Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto for a Special Use Permit allowing vehicle sales on the property described as Tax 2200877 of NESE (24-8-16) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho—action item. Commissioner Reed stated that in the past, there were limits placed on the number of cars to be sold and the number of parking spaces for customers. Ms. Clark said when the applicant provides the square footage of the building, that will determine how many parking spaces are required. The code also requires a certain number of spaces for customers, and cars must be parked a specified distance apart, which will determine the number of vehicles allowed. The code requires one parking space for every 400 square feet of building area. Commissioner Reed made a motion approve the Special Use Permit from Alfonso Piedra Moreno and Maria De Jesus Mejia Nieto allowing vehicle sales, on the property more commonly known as 975 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho with the following conditions: Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements about the construction and needed improvements; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:18 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Enrique Sandoval for a Special Use Permit allowing a Duplex, on the property described as Tax 1 and Tax 2 of Lots 13 thru 15, Block 97 (NW 19-8-17, more commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Ave A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the applicant owns several small parcels (part of the original townsite) that contain Cheverria’s, a parking lot, and the single-family residence that faces East Avenue A. The applicant has recently made lot line adjustments so that the parking lot will be on one parcel, the single-family residence on another, and the proposed duplex will be on one parcel, with an access easement across the parking lot. There is also alley access to the existing single-family and the proposed duplex. The proposed duplex will come with an access easement guaranteed to follow the property. The alley can also provide access to a single-family home or duplex. The property is zoned Central Business District (CBD). The proposed use, duplex (two dwelling units), requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- Rear- Interior Side- and Side Street- Minimum lot size is 3,125 square feet, and the maximum height is 35’. Title 16 has no bearing on this Special Use Permit request. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Plan, Ms. Clark stated that the request is in accordance with Chapter 4. Our Built Environment, “Enhance our built environment to offer a harmonious blend of land uses that serve our entire community, residents, and visitors, now and in the future.” Objective 4.3: Diversify the variety of housing types within the City, while protecting existing neighborhoods. 4.3.e Consider zoning ordinance amendments to promote a variety of housing types, including higher density residential along corridors and adjacent to commercial and industrial areas. 4.4: Support development of affordable housing for a full range of employees and residents (retirees and families). Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code allows two-dwelling units in the CBD zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. This area in Jerome blends commercial and residential uses. Two dwelling units are south of Cheverria’s, and a bakery is south of those residences. The residence and council chambers are to the north, with PMT storage to the east. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. As stated, the property is surrounded by various uses, including residential and commercial. This will reduce the parking for the area by four parking spots to allow access to the duplexes. The duplex plans propose two units, each with its own separate parking spot. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. Water and sewer connections are available to serve the property. Fire has reviewed the plans, and they will have access with the access easement and the alley. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. There is no indication that two residential uses will create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. It is not anticipated that the addition of two housing units will be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of noise or traffic. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. As previously discussed, an access easement will be recorded, if the SUP is approved, allowing access from the parking lot, should this parcel be sold. There is also alley access. Access will remain from S Lincoln and East Ave A. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. Regarding off-street parking, Ms. Clark stated this project requires a total of four parking spaces. Four parking spaces have been provided in the plans. Ms. Clark showed the commission a map of the proposed duplex. The parking area must be paved. Regarding the Landscaping requirements, Ms. Clark stated that this project is located in the CBD district. Due to the zero-lot line setbacks, they have requested a waiver of full landscaping requirements. As shown on the plans, a few grasses will be planted at the front of the building facing South Lincoln. Ms. Clark stated that she sent the application to City Staff, and they have all reviewed it. A pre-application meeting was held with the applicant to discuss the process for a SUP and minimum requirements. Code Enforcement did comment that all bulky items in the alleyway must be removed and the area kept clean. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Storage of bulky items must be removed from the property before a building permit can be issued; Vehicles cannot impede access to the alley; Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Ms. Clark stated this is a very large investment, and would consider making the special use permanent. With SUP, the commission needs to review the conditions and determine if the ---PAGE BREAK--- duplex would have an impact on the City. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated the applicant owns the parking lot, but if the parking lot is sold, they do have an easement to access the property. She also stated that she would like to have a conditional approval, as the alleyway is cluttered and needs to be cleaned up. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated the garbage bins would need to be brought out to the street in the winter. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark noted that the fire department was okay with the access easement but stated that it must remain accessible, as well as the alleyway. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated that Code Enforcement would be responsible for enforcing the maintenance of the alleyway. Ms. Clark stated the architect and contractor are present. Applicant testimony: Colby Ricks, a resident of Twin Falls and architect from Laughlin Ricks Architecture, thanked the commission for hearing the request. Regarding the alley, there are two power poles, and they will be cleaning up the wires that are hanging down. They will be doing a two- story duplex. They will have firewalls, maintaining a minimum distance of 10 feet from the property line to the north and south. This will allow for the four tandem parking spaces. They want a nice design that will be attractive, cleaning up the site and not using that property for storage. This will be a nice addition to the area. Chairman Mink stated that one of the power poles is right in the driveway. They will be relocating the power lines underground. Ms. Clark showed the property lines to the commission. Testimony in favor: Miguel Serna, a resident of Buhl, stated that they are already making efforts to clean up the property. Idaho Power will relocate the power poles. They have already taken down a couple of trees. The owner is aware of the clean-up needs. They want to make downtown beautiful again. Testimony in opposition: Ms. Coderniz read the following onto the record: Bill and Melinda Bunn, residents of Jerome. Oppose the application From experience we want to bring up the point of “parking” when you mix business and commercial and have residential together. We have a business @ 125 1st Ave E and now we hardly ever have parking in front of our business for our clients and customers because all the residential units now take up our parking as well as the other businesses needing our parking. It is very hard for our older clients to park far away from our office. Thank you, Melinda Bunn Bill Bunn Commissioner Johnson stated they have already discussed parking, and no one sees off- street parking as an issue. Ms. Clark noted the applicant is taking their own parking spaces away to make room for resident parking. Commissioner Johnson stated the business won’t be ---PAGE BREAK--- affected. Ms. Clark noted that the testimony is asking the commission to consider this application due to its location and the issues it presents to their businesses. Commissioner Reed stated the area is already a mix of residential and commercial uses. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 7:37 p.m. Consider a request from Enrique Sandoval for a Special Use Permit allowing a Duplex, on the property described as Tax 1 and Tax 2 of Lots 13 thru 15, Block 97 (NW 19-8-17, more commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Ave A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho- action item. Chairman Mink reviewed the general standards for special uses with the commission. The commission agreed it met all of the standards. Chairman Mink stated he was unsure of the request at first, but with the trees and junk gone, he would be okay. Commissioner Johnson stated that the zero lot lines give it more space. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Fraser, Ms. Clark noted that the applicant also owns the house that is to the north. Commissioner Reed made a motion to approve the Special Use Permit from Enrique Sandoval allowing a Duplex, on the property more commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Ave A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: Storage of bulky items must be removed from the property before a building permit can be issued; Vehicles cannot impede access to the alley; Comply with all City of Jerome Department requirements pertaining to the construction and needed improvements; Receive all required building and fire department permits and inspections; Comply with all city, state, and federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be permanent. Seconded by Commissioner Fraser and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Consider a Design Review for Enrique Sandoval, for the property more commonly known as the back parking lot behind 117 East Ave A, and to the north of 222 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho- action item. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated the current parcel has been used for storage and parking. Mr. Sandoval cleaned up the lot lines and moved the fence north of the single-family residence facing Avenue A, with plans to build a duplex. The parcel is approximately 3,300 square feet in size. The design review is for a new two-unit dwelling. Each unit is two stories tall and has three bedrooms. Ms. Clark went over the Design Review Guidelines with the commission. ---PAGE BREAK--- Guideline Adjacent Buildings and Uses, the project area is surrounded by other commercial and residential developments. Guidelines #4-5, Street Alignment and Retaining Walls, the driveway approaches are existing from S Lincoln and East Ave A. Retaining walls are not required. Guideline Snow Storage, snow storage can be stored onsite. Guideline Screen Service Areas, utilities will blend with the landscape and the building. Guidelines #10 - #12, Off-Street, On-Street Parking, and Circulation, all parking is on-site, and two spots are shown for each unit on the north and south sides of the building. Guideline #13, Enhance Jerome Classic Styles: The proposed building is a modern two- story structure that would blend in, as it is set back from South Lincoln. The roof is pitched with two window cutouts. Guidelines #22 and #24, Wall Materials and Wall Colors, the wall material includes textures made of cement board siding, which is proposed as a long-lasting, low-maintenance option. The main color will be Maryville Brown, and the trim and roof are proposed in Little Black Dress. Guidelines #26-#36: The parking areas will be asphalt. Because this is a CBD zoning area, full landscaping is waived due to zero lot setbacks. A small area for grasses or shrubs is provided at the front of the building facing S Lincoln. Guidelines #38 and #39, Sidewalks and Bike Paths, there are existing sidewalks along Avenue A and South Lincoln. This will be maintained. Commissioner Schroeder stated his concern is with the dormers, and asked if there will be an architectural feature to enhance the design of the dormers. They could add trim. Commissioner Fraser inquired whether there was an attic space available for venting. Mr. Ricks stated there was an attic and that the venting can be done with soffits. Commissioner Johnson said they did not want to add more maintenance. Chairman Mink suggested having something to break up the design of the dormers. Commissioner Schroeder made a motion to approve the Design Review for the proposed duplex at 214 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho, with the colors of Little Black Dress Maryville Brown as presented. Also include an architectural feature on the west-facing dormers. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. ---PAGE BREAK--- After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 7:50 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from C&H Land & Investments for a Special Use Permit allowing livestock on the property described as Lots 9 - 13, Blk 1, and Lots 5 & 6, Blk 2, Brockman’s Ind. Subdivision 31-8-17, more commonly known as cultivated farm ground on the north side of Farmore Road, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark explained the location of the parcel along Farmore Road. She stated the area is a platted subdivision but remains undeveloped. The parcels have been farmed for years. The area is approximately 8.5 acres of pasture. The property in question is currently zoned High-Density Business The proposed use, the keeping of farm animals, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for detached accessory structures on the property must be at least three feet from the rear or side property lines. Ms. Clark stated the keeping of livestock was changed and went over the updated code with the commission. JMC 17.18.050, E also states: For each lot of one and one-half (1 1/2) acres the owner may maintain, in combination, no more than two head of horses, cattle, or sheep per acre of improved pasture. For each additional acre of improved pasture, the owner may maintain an additional combined total of two head, provided no owner shall maintain a total of more than six head irrespective of the total size of the lot or acres of improved pasture. The applicant has enough pasture for six head of cattle. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated that this request complies with the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to Chapter 3, Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.j. Consider provisions in the zoning ordinance for rural residential uses within city limits, which may include some agricultural activities and limited animal husbandry. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that manure can be considered a nuisance, but with eight acres, they should be able to compost the manure on the property. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code allows farm animals in the C-3 zone with an approved special use permit. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The application notes that the animals will be kept in a fully fenced pasture. The general vicinity includes the new D&B location to the west, Farmore of Idaho to the East, and other businesses towards Frontage Road. The property to the north is undeveloped. However, there is one building that is currently occupied. If properly cared for, the farm animals would not change the essential character of the area. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant wants cattle on the land. The livestock must be adequately cared for to avoid disturbing neighboring uses. Water and feed will need to be provided during the months when they are not readily available. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer, and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. No additional services will be required to care for farm animals. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services, and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Farm animals will create excessive additional requirements at public cost. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Farm animals can become a nuisance if not properly cared for. They can also become detrimental by producing excessive noise and odors. With the property spanning almost 8.5 acres, the manure can be composted on-site. Adequate care and fencing must be provided to ensure animals are kept within the property boundaries. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property, which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. This request will not impact vehicular approaches. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This request will not destroy or damage a natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. ---PAGE BREAK--- If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: farm animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property, or the general welfare; Adequate fencing will be kept at all times; and a Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. Commissioner Johnson inquired about building on the property. Ms. Clark stated that the property is within a platted subdivision, and she is not aware of any plans as of yet. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated there will be six head of cattle. Commissioner Johnson inquired whether there would be sheds or if it was just pasture. Ms. Clark noted the applicant can address that question. Applicant Testimony: Troy Chandler, resident of Twin Falls, stated they have been farming the area for years. With new development, they can no longer farm that area with corn or hay as they did before. They had a year with nothing to show, and the weeds got out of control. He would like to put some cows out to pasture, as he has 60 employees, and would like to have cattle to provide beef for his employees during the winter. He would also like to add a couple of horses, along with the six cattle, to help keep the pasture under control. He would also put a loafing shed and a place to feed the animals. They will also be installing a water trough. Mr. Chandler stated that they would be installing a steel cable fence and explained where the wall would be located around the property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Chandler stated that the property has a well that will provide water for the cattle. He also has shares from the North Side Canal Company for that property. They will also irrigate the property. He stated he wants the property to look nice, as he also owns Farmore of Idaho. Commissioner Schroder wanted to clarify the number of animals that were allowed. Ms. Clark stated the code states “For each additional acre of improved pasture, the owner may maintain an additional combined total of two head, provided no owner shall maintain a total of more than six head irrespective of the total size of the lot”. Chairman Mink stated at the time of the code, they did not consider this large of a parcel. Ms. Clark noted this is one of the last larger parcels within the city. Mr. Chandler stated that he does not think six cattle will be sufficient to keep the pasture down and would also like to have two horses. Ms. Clark stated the code would need to be amended to allow additional animals. Testimony in opposition: Ms. Coderniz read the following onto the record: Tonn Peterson Resident of Meridian Oppose the application Ahlquist Development, on behalf of D&B Supply, submits this notice in opposition to the application submitted to the City of Jerome by C&H Land and Investments for a Special Use Permit allowing livestock on the subject property, the same of which is immediately adjacent to the D&B parcel. Millions of dollars worth of infrastructure has been and/or is being constructed ---PAGE BREAK--- to satisfy the requirements. To build the D&B in this commercial corridor. To allow livestock in the same area will destroy or ruin these improvements. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 8:04 p.m. Consider a request from C&H Land & Investments for a Special Use Permit allowing livestock on the property described as Lots 9 - 13, Blk 1, and Lots 5 & 6, Blk 2, Brockman’s Ind. Subdivision 31-8-17, more commonly known as cultivated farm ground on the northside of Farmore Road, Jerome, Idaho- action item. Commissioner Reed inquired what was behind this property. Ms. Clark showed the commission a map of the surrounding properties. Ms. Clark stated some of the misunderstanding was the fencing and asked the applicant to come and show the commissioners where the fence would be. Mr. Chandler stated that the fencing would be a steel 4-cable fence. Commissioner Johnson stated he thinks the fence should resolve their concern. Mr. Chandler stated that he would like to raise cattle for meat to provide for his employees. He also inquired about placing another six heads on his property to the south. Commissioner Johnson stated that a separate hearing would be held for a Special Use Permit for that property. A discussion was held on the maximum number of livestock that can be kept on a single parcel. Mr. Chandler stated that he would not have more than 10 heads of livestock, as he would like to keep the pasture well-maintained. Commissioner Johnson stated that they need to adhere to the code. Legal Counsel Hess stated that they must adhere to the existing code, which only allows six heads. Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve a Special Use permit from C&H Land & Investments allowing six head of cattle, sheep or horses, on the property more commonly known as cultivated farm ground on the northside of Farmore Road, Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: Farm Animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property or the general welfare; Adequate fencing be kept at all times; and Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. Seconded by Commissioner Reed and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 8:11 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga for a Special Use Permit allowing two horses and three goats, on the property described as Tax 22303643 (Resolution) (SW 7-8-17) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho. ---PAGE BREAK--- Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated that this parcel was a recorded residential subdivision but had been vacated into two separate lots. It is 5.43 acres. They built a house with a yard and a barn area, leaving approximately 5 acres for pasture. The applicant previously had a special use permit for horses, but it expired two years ago. The property is zoned Residential 1 The proposed use, keeping Farm Animals, requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning and Zoning Commission. Regardless of use, setbacks for detached accessory structures on the property must be at least three feet from the rear or side property lines. Horses, Cattle, and Sheep require a Special Use Permit if, “No such animals at all be on the real property for a period of at least one year, then a special use permit shall be required before any such animals may be quartered on the real property” as detailed in 17.18.050, E, 2. This parcel had no such animals for over one year. JMC 17.18.050, E also states: For each lot of one and one-half (1 1/2) acres the owner may maintain, in combination, no more than two head of horses, cattle, or sheep per acre of improved pasture. For each additional acre of improved pasture, the owner may maintain an additional combined total of two head, provided no owner shall maintain a total of more than six head irrespective of the total size of the lot or acres of improved pasture. The applicant has enough pasture to have two horses and three goats. Regarding the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated that the request complies with the Comprehensive Plan as it relates to Chapter 3, Our Natural Environment, Objective 3.3.j. Consider provisions in the zoning ordinance for rural residential uses within city limits, including some agricultural activity and limited animal husbandry. Ms. Clark reminded the commission that manure is considered a public nuisance, and proper disposal of the manure must be considered. The applicant does have pasture in the back for disposal. Ms. Clark went over the General Standards for Special Uses with the commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Planning and Zoning Code permits farm animals in the R-1 zone with an approved special use permit. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The application notes that the animals will be kept in a fully fenced pasture to the north of the ---PAGE BREAK--- house. There are corrals to provide shelter. The general vicinity is larger parcels with single- family homes. The property to the north is farmed. If properly cared for, the farm animals would not change the essential character of the area. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant notes that they would like to have horses and goats for weed and grass control, as well as pets. Livestock must be adequately cared for to avoid disturbing neighboring uses. Water and feed will need to be provided during the months when water and feed are not readily available. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. No additional services will be required to care for farm animals. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Farm animals will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. Farm animals can become a nuisance if they are not properly cared for. They can also become detrimental by producing excessive noise and odors. With the property being almost five acres, the manure can be composted on-site. Adequate care and fencing must be provided to ensure animals are kept within the property boundaries and do not cause excessive noise. Regarding Standard H, vehicular approaches to the property shall be designed to avoid interfering with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. This request will not impact vehicular approaches. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This request will not destroy or damage natural, scenic, or historic feature of major importance. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Farm Animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property or the general welfare; Can only possess up to two horses and three goats, does or kids, at any given time; Adequate fencing kept at all times; and Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. Ms. Clark recommended that no male goats be allowed at any time. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark showed the commission where the property was on the map. ---PAGE BREAK--- Upon inquiry from Commissioner Fraser, Ms. Clark stated that the property is within city limits, but it is located right at the city boundary on the north side of their property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated that they do have a permit for chickens, and the roosters are no longer on the property. Applicant Testimony: Rosario Tellez, daughter of Efrain Tellez, resident of Twin Falls. Ms. Tellez stated that they are asking for two horses, two goats, and a sheep. She has an autistic brother, and they want horses for his horse therapy. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, they have about 375 feet of entrance on private land. They already have a fence, and there is also a gate at the end of the private lane. Ms. Clark stated that they would be allowed to have two horses and a sheep when applying the code. Upon inquiry from Ms. Tellez, Ms. Clark said that no male goats were permitted. Testimony in Favor: Ms. Coderniz read the following onto the record: Mia Paz, Jerome resident Supports the application Granting the special use permit for two horses and three goats will support responsible animal husbandry, promote sustainable land use, and provide educational and agricultural benefits to the community. Anyone should be allowed to own their animals as long as they pay for it, and are responsible for its care. Ms. Clark read the following onto the record: Ron Tilley- Jerome resident Supports the application I have no problem with this request. Testimony in Neutral: Ms. Coderniz read the following onto the record: Shirley Buttram, Jerome resident Neutral to the application- no further comments were provided. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 8:22 p.m. Consider a request from Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga for a Special Use Permit allowing two horses, one sheep, and two goats on the property described as Tax 22303643 (Resolution) (SW 7-8-17) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho- action item. ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Schroeder stated that if they had the permit before, the commission would have already received negative feedback about the applicant. Commissioner Reed noted that he lives about one and a half blocks away and has no issues. Commissioner Johnson said he was okay with the permit as long as there are no roosters or billy goats. Chairman Mink stated the property is downwind from the sewer plant and does not believe the smell will come from the animals. Commissioner Reed made a motion to approve a Special Use permit for Efrain Tellez and Sheyla Zuniga allowing two horses, two female goats and one sheep, on the property more commonly known as 1720 Green Acres Lane, Jerome, Idaho, with the following conditions: Farm Animals will not create odors, excessive noise, nor be detrimental to persons, property or the general welfare; Can only possess up to two horses, two female goats, and one ewe sheep, does or kids, at any given time; Adequate fencing kept at all times; and Special use permit shall be allowed for up to two years, renewable upon expiration. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. Chairman Mink called the Public Hearing to order at 8:25 p.m. Public Hearing for a request from Cook Realty for a Variance decreasing the Interior Side Setback, on the property described as Lots 10 & 11, Blk 139 Jerome Townsite 100 x 125 (NW 19-8-17), more commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: Ms. Clark stated 308 East Avenue F is two parcels, lot 10 and lot 11 of Block 139. An existing house sits over the north-south lot line, primarily on Lot 11. The applicant wishes to construct a single-family residence on Lot 11. Without permission, the applicant moved the north-south lot line, which does not meet current interior side setbacks. The new lot line is approximately three feet from the new lot line. Ms. Clark stated parcels 10 and 11 are zoned Residential 2 Regardless of use, setbacks for this property are as follows: Front- 25’; Rear -20’; Interior Side- and Side Street- 15’. Ms. Clark stated that they want to move the lot line, but this does not allow the interior setback to be met. They are asking for a variance for this project. The Jerome Municipal Code defines a variance as: a modification of the requirements of this title as to lot size, lot coverage, width, depth, front yard, side yard, rear yard, setbacks, parking space, height of buildings, or other provisions of this title affecting the size or shape of a structure or the placement of the structure upon lots, or the size of lots. A variance shall not be considered a right or special privilege. Still, it may be granted to an applicant only upon a showing of undue hardship ---PAGE BREAK--- because of the site's characteristics and that the variance does not conflict with the public interest. Ms. Clark went over the criteria for a variance with the commission. Criteria A- That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure or building involved and which do not apply to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. The application notes that the existing single-family home encroaches onto lot 10 by about one foot. This is common in the City of Jerome, as we allow homes to be built over the lot lines that the same person owns. Criteria B- That a literal interpretation of the provisions of this title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this title. A literal interpretation of the title would not deprive the applicant of any rights enjoyed by other properties. The applicant is requesting a variance to build; however, alternative options can be considered without placing the two other homes at risk. Criteria C- That special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. The request for a side yard setback variance is a direct result of the applicant's actions. We could have offered solutions if the applicant had consulted with staff before adjusting lot lines. There are other ideas to build on lot 10. Criteria D- That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege denied by this title to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Variances are typically granted when the applicant proves undue hardship because of the site's characteristics and the variance does not conflict with the public interest. The applicant has not proven an undue hardship. A building permit has not been issued. There is a concern for the other existing homes, as allowing a side variance would require the existing homes also to have a firewall. Ms. Clark stated that she sent the application to city staff, and they recommended that the variance request be denied, as there are no special conditions or circumstances peculiar to the land or structures, and no undue hardship. The following comments were received from staff: Fire- Fire is concerned about reducing a setback that could put any new or existing building at risk from radiant heat from a fire. A reduction of 4 ft. would create a risk for both homes. Without a survey showing the locations of the existing houses at both 300 and 308 E. Avenue F, as they relate to the property lines, fire cannot support this variance request; Building- Essentially, this is asking us to allow a variance that would make two existing homes non-compliant with our fire codes to build a new compliant home. Contrary to the narrative statement, granting this variance does indeed create special conditions and affects more than just the two lots in question. Based on documents provided, I cannot legally issue a building permit for this new home. I see other options for the builder that I am willing to discuss if they are interested. ---PAGE BREAK--- Ms. Clark stated that without the 10’ minimum distance, fire requires firewalls. Since they don’t own the nearby homes, this poses a potential fire risk to them. Ms. Clark stated that if they were granted the 3’ setback and they placed the new home at the required 7’ setback, they could meet the 10’ distance requirement. The concern is the neighboring house to the west. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated that this is located in the older part of town, where setbacks are different. At this time, a building permit has not been issued, and the foundation has not been poured, so there are no undue hardships. Other possibilities could be considered for working with the property owners. If the variance is approved, the fire separation is acceptable for that lot, but it raises concerns for the other nearby homes. Ms. Clark showed the commission the lots on a map. Ms. Clark stated the applicants do have building plans for a narrow home that meet the setbacks. She stated there is a larger area in the back where they could push the home back and meet the setbacks. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated that they have already adjusted the lot lines without the staff’s knowledge. She continued that Parcel 9’s addition is approximately 6 inches from the property line. Ms. Clark showed the commission another picture of the lot lines and where the homes are in respect to the lot lines. A discussion was held on how they could remedy the setbacks without violating the fire code. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated the original home was built over the lot line of the two lots, which is allowed if the same person owns them. Applicant Testimony: Scott Cook, a Jerome resident, stated that the existing property is built one foot over the property line. They are 50 feet x 125 feet. One lot is 51’ away from the east property line. They want to move the lot line 4 feet over; the proposed house would meet all setbacks. A single-wide trailer is 12’ wide; this house would be 36’ wide. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Cook stated they would meet setback on the existing house. Regarding the other house, they would meet setbacks on one side but not the other. The proposal is for but fire requires 10’. The proposed home is a three-bedroom, two-bath residence at 1,209 sq. ft. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Cook is requesting a 4’ variance, as the existing house is built 1’ over the lot line, which would provide a 3’ setback. He is only asking for a variance for his two homes. Ms. Clark stated the firewall would be required for the new house and the existing house. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Mr. Cook stated that he was unsure who would be building the firewall, as he was not aware of the project. Commissioner Reed inquired if having a cinder block fence would be an acceptable barrier. Ms. Clark stated she is not aware if that is acceptable or not. Mr. Cook stated that he would be willing to install a firewall in their house. He stated that other places have zero setbacks. Chairman Mink stated that there are additional requirements that accompany the fire codes for various locations. He spoke of the Gazebo Subdivision, which has 5’ setbacks, and they still meet the 10’ requirement. Mr. Cook stated that they can make the setbacks for their lot, but cannot speak for the other lots that were built a long time ago. Commissioner Schroeder stated that the commission’s purpose is to address the lot line adjustment, and the building permit would address the issue of how close the home would be to the other homes. Ms. Clark stated the commission is to approve or deny the variance for the side setback. A discussion was held on where the lot line is and how to protect other homes. Chairman Minks stated the results of tonight’s meeting are a concern for the commission. Commissioner ---PAGE BREAK--- Schroeder stated that, as the property owner, they may want to consider other options to avoid any issues with the Fire Department. Mr. Cook stated that 50’ x 120’ for a small residential home is a lot for someone to keep up. Ms. Clark stated the variance is for the 3’ from the house, and the commission needs to decide if the criteria are met for a variance. Mr. Cook stated that he is requesting a variance from the commission, not a building permit. Testimony In Opposition: Ronald Posey, resident of Jerome, stated his sister owns the house next door. Her fence is right up against her house; he asked that the fence be moved to the property line. He stated that he had property surveyed and doesn’t think the city rules allow for a fence right up against a house. Mr. Posey moved the fence after nothing was done; he has to go around the house to work on the fence since it is too close to the house. Chairman Mink stated the house was built close to the property line. Mr. Posey noted the house was built before they owned it. He has spoken with the engineer about the property lines, and he assumed the lines on the county maps were correct. He was going to put the fence back up, but the ground was frozen. Now he received a notice about the new building that would be close to his home. Chairman Mink stated that they would be 7 feet from the foundation. Rebuttal Testimony: Upon inquiry from Ms. Clark, Mr. Cook stated that the stakes were from the most recent survey conducted by Desert West. Mr. Cook stated they first heard of the fence being down from their tenant. They are willing to work with their neighbors, and a new fence can be installed. He stated they would include a walking area. He spoke with a family member and agreed that he was willing to split the cost of the fence. There being no other testimony in favor, neutral, or in opposition, Chairman Mink closed the Public Hearing at 8:59 p.m. Consider a request from Cook Realty for a Variance decreasing the interior side setback on the property described as Lots 10 & 11, Block 139, Jerome Townsite, 100 x 125 (NW 19-8-17), more commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho - action item. Commissioner Johnson suggested adding verbiage in the motion that the developer work with both neighbors to ensure they have access to the homes. Commissioner Reed stated that he was unsure they could do that, as they are discussing the property lines of other homeowners. Ms. Clark stated the application is only for the one lot line, and the commission needs to decide on the 3’ setback instead of Commissioner Johnson made a motion to approve an interior yard setback Variance for Cook Realty on the property more commonly known as 308 East Avenue F, Jerome, Idaho, finding granting the variance will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by this title to other lands or structure with the following conditions: the interior setback will be no less than 3’ of the existing house. ---PAGE BREAK--- Commissioner Schroeder sought clarification on the location of the setback. Commissioner Johnson revised the motion to include “…between Lots 10 and 11 as described on the official survey.” Seconded by Commissioner Schroeder and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: Commissioner Shonna Fraser. Chairman Mink called for a brief intermission at 9:04 p.m. Chairman Mink resumed the meeting at 9:07 p.m. Consider an exterior façade Design Review for Dairy Queen Grill and Chill, 505 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho- action item Ms. Clark stated the property is located at 505 South Lincoln Ave, Dairy Queen Grill and Chill. This is an existing building. The property is located in the Design Review Overlay District, within 150 feet of the right-of-way of Lincoln Ave. as defined in Jerome Municipal Code Chapter 17.10.020, M. The application proposes an exterior update, including paint, valence, and an exterior wall picture. Ms. Clark went over the Design Review Guidelines with the commission. All Projects Guideline Adjacent Buildings and Uses - The proposed building is stand-alone, and the proposed updates are standard, incorporating the Dairy Queen branding. Other businesses, a school, and multi-family housing surround Dairy Queen. Guidelines #13 & #14: Enhance Jerome Classic Styles and Minimize Scale - The existing building will remain; however, the proposed façade updates will renew interest while maintaining the classic style. Guidelines #22 and #24: Wall Materials and Wall Colors - The application proposes updated colors in tans, greys, and red. The brick will remain with valances added to enhance appeal while avoiding harsh colors and combinations. One painted picture has been chosen for the northern elevation. Ms. Clark stated they are updating the branding. The Dairy Queen representative said they are updating colors. They are working on the brick. He went over the images and colors to be modified. The blue strip lighting will be changed to red. He stated most of the changes will be paint. They are adding spoon handles to the doors, and they will not be adding the big red spoon. Chairman Mink stated that national chains conduct their own research and are aware of ---PAGE BREAK--- the design requirements. He reminded the commission that if there is no unanimous vote, the matter will be presented to the City Council. Commissioner Fraser made a motion to approve the Design Review for a façade update for Dairy Queen Grill and Chill, 505 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho, as presented. Seconded by Commissioner Johnson and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. CITIZEN CORRESPONDENCE AND ISSUES None Consent Agenda The consent calendar consists of items that are considered to be routine in nature and will be enacted in the form of one motion. Any item can be removed from the consent calendar and heard in its regular order at the request of any commissioner or the chairman. A. Approve the minutes from the February 11th, 2025, regular meeting. B. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Juan Gonzalez for a Special Use Permit renewal allowing a commercial entertainment facility (indoors), on the property described as Lots 16 & 17, Block 76 Jerome Townsite SE (13-8-16), more commonly known as 160 West Main Street, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF JUAN GONZALEZ FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT RENEWAL ALLOWING A COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT FACILITY (INDOORS), ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 16 & 17, BLOCK 76 JEROME TOWNSITE SE (13-8-16), MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 160 WEST MAIN STREET, JEROME, IDAHO A public hearing on the application of Juan Gonzalez, concerning the use of real property described herein within the City of Jerome, Idaho, for the renewal of a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, February 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated Mr. Gonzalez received a special use permit for a commercial entertainment facility (indoor) in 2019. Mr. Gonzalez has renewed in 2020, 2022, and 2023. He would like to request renewal with no changes to ---PAGE BREAK--- the application. This property and use remain compliant with the standards for a special use permit. Ms. Clark stated the property, 160 West Main Street, Jerome, Idaho, is zoned Central Business District (CBD). The proposed use, a commercial entertainment facility (indoor), requires a Special Use Permit from the Planning & Zoning Commission. As it pertains to the City of Jerome’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Ms. Clark stated the request complies with Chapter 7, “Economic Development,” Policy 8, which is to “continue to provide an atmosphere for successful business development.” As it pertains to 17.26.040: Location of Parking Spaces. Parking spaces are required and cannot be more than seven hundred feet (700’) from the principal use. Previously, Mr. Gonzalez verbally agreed with Mr. Webb, the previous owner of the parking lots directly north of 160 West Main, to allow parking on his lots. Mr. Gonzalez has no verbal agreement to park with the new owner of those lots. However, there is a parking lot on the southwest corner of 1st Avenue and North Lincoln, and at the southwest corner of West Main and South Alder Street, both are less than 700 feet from the main entrance. Ms. Clark stated she received the following comments back from City Staff: Police—There are no issues as long as all the required inspections and alcohol licensing have been met; Fire—The applicant is required to pass a fire inspection; and Code Enforcement—Weeds must be kept down on the entire parcel. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Schedule and pass fire department inspections; Complete a parking lot inspection within 24 hours of an event; Comply with all City, State, and Federal requirements; and Special Use Permit shall be allowed for five years, renewable upon expiration. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark stated the code states that parking must be within 700 feet. There are two public parking lots that the customers can park in that are within 700 feet. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated she would not recommend the permit be permanent because they are a commercial event facility and she would like to make sure they are following all of the city codes and conditions of the permit. There have been other facilities, in the past, that have not followed the city codes. She also stated parking can be problematic downtown and would like to ensure they comply. She stated she has not received any complaints regarding this property. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark reviewed the process of revoking a Special Use Permit. Ms. Clark stated that the Applicant would be sent a notice and have to appear before the Commission in a public hearing to respond to ---PAGE BREAK--- those allegations of breaking the conditions. Chairman Mink stated the Applicant would have a chance to address the complaint or go before the Commission. Discussion was held on why they need a special use permit in that location. Ms. Clark stated the capacity of the building is approximately 120, which should not create an issue when events are held. Applicant Testimony: Juan Gonzalez, a resident of Jerome, Idaho, appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Gonzalez stated he would like to have the permit for five to seven years. He goes around and picks up the trash after each event. He has not heard of any complaints from any of the events, and he has security at the events. After inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Gonzalez stated he poured concrete in the back last summer to help with the weeds. They are hopefully putting in a fence later this year. The fence will have doors for a vehicle to pull into for catering. Mr. Gonzalez stated he has security outside to ensure no one parks in the Northside’s parking lot because the tow company is quick to tow cars. Testimony in Favor: Ms. Elliott read the following onto the record: Jim Kinsey- Little Tigers, Jerome, Idaho “Support the application. Juan is a good neighbor and we strongly support downtown businesses.” Testimony in Neutral: Ms. Clark read the following onto the record: Northside Club, Jerome, Idaho “Neutral. While we don’t oppose this, we have a concern with the concrete pad that was added in the back. Theres no fence around it, we have had children playing in our parking lot. Yes there’s security, but they always arrive after the events have started. This is a bar parking lot, we don’t need children playing in our parking lot.” Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission having heard the testimony presented and having reviewed the application, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The property described herein is within the City of Jerome and is currently zoned Central Business District (CBD). ---PAGE BREAK--- B. The proposed use, allowing a commercial entertainment facility (indoors), requires the renewal of the special use permit to operate in all zoning districts. C. The Application is consistent with the General Standards for Special Uses as stated in JMC 17.60.030. The proposed special uses is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that businesses serve a need of the community and provide convenience in an CBD zone, in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that there is no proposal to modify the exterior appearance of the property, will not create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares, and will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural scenic or historic feature of major importance. II. Conclusions A. A renewal of the special use permit is required for the applicant to be able to use the above described property for a commercial entertainment facility (indoor) in the CBD zone of the City of Jerome. B. A special use permit promoting an event facility is consistent with the City of Jerome Comprehensive Plan. C. The Planning and Zoning Commission allows event facilities in a CBD zone. D. The Commission approves the application of Juan Gonzalez, for the renewal of a special use permit allowing commercial entertainment facility (indoors) located at the property described herein, within the City of Jerome, Idaho, subject to the following condition: 1. Schedule and pass annual fire department inspections; 2. Complete a parking lot inspection within 24 hours of an event; 3. Comply with all City, State, and Federal requirements; and 4. Special Use Permit shall be allowed as long as the applicant owns the property. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 11th day of March, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11th day of February, 2025, to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 11th day of March, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk ---PAGE BREAK--- within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). C. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Lytle Signs representing Today’s Dental for a Special Use Permit allowing an Electronic Message Display sign, on the property described as Lots 3C and 3D Block 1 Country Corner Subdivision (Replat J.S.IND.PKII- Lots 3-4) (25-8-16), more commonly known as 138 Country Lane, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF TODAY’S DENTAL FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING AN ELECTRONIC MESSAGE DISPLAY SIGN ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS LOTS 3C AND 3D BLOCK 1 COUNTRY CORNER SUBDIVISION (REPLAT J.S.IND.PKII- LOTS 3-4) (25-8-16), MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 138 COUNTRY LANE, JEROME, IDAHO A public hearing on the application of Today’s Dental, represented by Lytle Signs, concerning the use of real property described herein within the City of Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, February 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated the Applicant is requesting to install an electronic message display (EMD) sign for Today’s Dental Care. The business faces a private street, Country Lane. This sign will allow advertising from West Nez Perce. The parcels are zoned General Business which allows one freestanding sign not over 200 square feet and no higher than 35 feet. The EMD display area shall be over 60 feet or 75% of the sign area. The display area is approximately 20 square feet and less than 75% of the sign area. Ms. Clark stated that 17.032.040 of the Jerome Municipal Code, Section G, covers the requirements for Electronic Message Display Signs. The guidelines state that the sign shall contain static messages only and shall not move. The Applicant acknowledges the guidelines and intends to comply. Ms. Clark reviewed the general standards for Special Use Permits with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Jerome Municipal ---PAGE BREAK--- Code allows an electronic message display sign with an approved special use permit in all zoning districts. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The applicant has provided professionally designed renderings of the sign and the EMD portion. The sign, as designed, is appropriate and harmonious with the area's existing character. The surrounding area consists of other businesses. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The applicant is required to meet the electronic display criteria. They have provided a rendering and electrical outline that meets the current code. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. An electronic message display sign will not require public facilities or services. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. As proposed, the electronic message display sign will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. The request to include an EMD sign will not be detrimental to any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic or glare. The Applicant shall comply with the nit code requirement for illumination. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. The vehicular approaches to the property have remained unchanged. The sign has automatic dimmers to decrease light during dust and at night. ---PAGE BREAK--- Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. The sign will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. Regarding the Design Review Guidelines, the electronic message display sign is professionally designed and meets the required height and materials. The freestanding sign is less than 35’ in height. The Application indicates the sign will be professionally manufactured. The pictures show it is constructed of durable, all-weather material. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; and Comply with all City sign requirements. Applicant Testimony: Marcus Lutz, Jerome resident, representing Lytle Signs, appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Lutz stated that Today's Dental Care wants to install the EMD Sign. Upon inquiry from Ms. Clark, Mr. Lutz stated a concrete foundation will go underground. The sign will be about six feet tall. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Lutz stated the EMD will dim at night and change the intensity. Ms. Clark stated they may need to move it back with a utility easement but will work with the Applicant. Chairman Mink stated he likes the monument signs. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission having heard the testimony presented and having reviewed the application, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The property described herein is within the City of Jerome and is currently zoned General Business B. The proposed use, electronic message display sign, requires a special use permit to operate in all zoning districts. C. JMC 17.32.040 and JMC 17.14.010 provides the standards for special use permits. Specifically, JMC 17.32.040(q) allows for electronic message displays in all zoning districts by special use permit only. D. The proposed use is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that a sign such as this promotes economic ---PAGE BREAK--- development and growth by providing a means of distributing information to the public with greater ease. E. The proposed use is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that it is located in a C-2 area and sign criteria limits the impact on neighboring uses. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the applicant to install an electronic message board in a C-2 zone, on the above described property. B. The Commission approves the application of Today’s Dental, for a special use permit allowing an electronic message board located at the property described herein, within the City of Jerome, Idaho, subject to the following condition: 1. Electronic message display sign shall comply with the message restrictions; 2. Obtain the appropriate building and electrical permits; 3. Comply with all City sign requirements; and 4. Special Use Permit shall be permanent. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 11th day of March, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11th day of February, 2025, to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 11th day of March, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). D. Findings and Conclusions for a request from Body Balance for a Special Use Permit allowing signage to exceed 200 square feet, on the property described as Tax 2216694 of SESE (24-8-16) Jerome Unplatted, more commonly known as 1225 South Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ON APPLICATION OF BODY BALANCE FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING SINAGE TO EXCEED 200 FEET, ON THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS TAX 2216694 OF SESE (24-8-16) JEROME UNPLATTED, MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1225 SOUTH LINCOLN AVENUE, JEROME, IDAHO ---PAGE BREAK--- A public hearing on the application of Body Balance, concerning the use of real property described herein within the City of Jerome, Idaho, for a special use permit was held, pursuant to notice, on Tuesday, February 11, 2025, at City Council Chambers with all members of the public, in a format allowing participants to hear the meeting, including all deliberations by Commissioners and other speakers addressing the Commission. The physical meeting was held at 100 East Avenue A, Jerome, Idaho. Staff Report: City Planner, Ida Clark, provided a brief background and staff report on the application and on the property. Ms. Clark stated the building at 1225 South Lincoln has three tenant spaces. The existing signage for two tenants is 171.66 square feet and 245 square feet with the Urgent Care person outline. The Applicant is the third tenant and wants to install a 74-square-foot sign. This would bring the overall signage facing south Lincoln to 319 square feet. The parcel at 1225 South Lincoln is zoned General Business Jerome Municipal code 17.32.050 allows up to 200 square feet facing a street without a special use permit. When the second tenant applied for their signage, the Urgent Care’s signage was left off the application. The second tenant was approved for their signage. The property owner was asked to apply for the whole building, but they have not done so. Body Balance is asking for approval for their signage. Ms. Clark reviewed the general standards for Special Use Permits with the Commission. Regarding Standard A- Will, in fact, constitute a special use as established in section 17.60.060 of this chapter for the zoning district involved. The Jerome Municipal Code allows signage to exceed 200 square feet with an approved special use permit in the C-2 zoning districts. Regarding Standard B- Will be harmonious with and in accordance with the general objectives or with any specific objective of the comprehensive plan and/or this title. The request appears to be harmonious with the objectives of Title 17 of the Jerome Municipal Code and the Comprehensive Plan. Regarding Standard C- Will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and that such use will not change the essential character of the same area. The Applicant has provided professionally designed renderings of the sign. The sign is designed and installed by the same company as the existing signs. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Johnson, Ms. Clark confirmed the sign will be on the building. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Reed, Ms. Clark stated the Special Use permit can be applied for by anyone as long as the property owner gives their permission. It would have been better to have the property owner apply, but they gave ---PAGE BREAK--- permission for the Applicant to apply for the Special Use Permit. Commissioner Reed would like to change the code to have the property owner apply for the Special Use Permit instead of the tenant. Regarding Standard D- Will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. The sign is illuminated; however, the sign will face the street, not the residence, and will not disturb existing or future uses. Regarding Standard E- Will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services such as highways, streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer and schools; or that the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use shall be able to provide adequately any such services. This sign does not require public facilities or services. Regarding Standard F- Will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. The sign will not create additional requirements at public cost for public facilities nor be detrimental to the community's economic welfare. Regarding Standard G- Will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors. The request to exceed 200 square feet for a sign will not impact any persons, property, or the general welfare because of excessive glare production. The Applicant shall comply with the nit code requirement for illumination. Regarding Standard H- Will have vehicular approaches to the property which shall be so designed as not to create an interference with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. There is no change to the vehicular approaches to the property. Regarding Standard I- Will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural, scenic or historic feature of major importance. This is a new building. There is no loss or damage of natural or scenic features. If approved, Ms. Clark recommended the following conditions: Total signage shall not exceed 74 square feet for Body Balance and Total signage for the overall building shall not exceed 319 square feet. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Fraser, Ms. Clark stated Urgent Care and the little guy was lit but Miracle Ear was not. There is a freestanding sign that they can also add onto. Commissioner Schroeder wanted to confirm that the freestanding sign will also be updated. Ms. Clark confirmed they were. ---PAGE BREAK--- Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Ms. Clark stated the Special Use Permit goes with the Applicant, so they would have to apply again if anything else comes in. Discussion was held on changing the code only to allow property owners to apply, but we may have trouble getting property owners who do not live in the area to come to the meetings. Applicant Testimony: Cody Davis, a resident of Buhl, Idaho, appeared and testified before the Commission. Mr. Davis stated they are just applying for the business to have signage. He was not aware of all the requirements and thought they would be able to get the approval quicker for the signage. Upon inquiry from Chairman Mink, Mr. Davis said the back is lit, but Mr. Byce can speak better on the matter Brandon Byce, resident of Jerome, representing Lytle Signs, explained how the signs are lit with the Commission. He stated there is a reverse ban in the signage. This creates a halo and makes the sign look sophisticated and nice. Upon inquiry from Commissioner Schroeder, Ms. Clark stated we do not regulate signage on windows or doors. Testimony in Favor: None. Testimony in Neutral: None. Testimony in Opposition: None. The Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission having heard the testimony presented and having reviewed the application, and the other documents and material in the file, and having heard the testimony given verbally at the hearing enters its findings and conclusions as follows: I. Findings A. The property described herein is within the City of Jerome and is currently zoned General Business B. The proposed use, allowing signage to exceed 200 square feet, requires a special use permit to operate in all zoning districts. C. JMC 17.32.040 and JMC 17.14.010 provide the standards for special use permits. Specifically, JMC 17.32.040(q) allows for signage exceeding 200 square feet in all zoning districts by special use permit only. D. The proposed use is harmonious with the general objectives of the comprehensive plan in that a sign such as this promotes economic development and growth by providing a means of distributing information to the public with greater ease. ---PAGE BREAK--- E. The proposed use is harmonious and appropriate in appearance with the existing and intended character of the general vicinity in that it is located in a C-2 area and sign criteria limits the impact on neighboring uses. II. Conclusions A. A special use permit is required for the Applicant to install signage to exceed 200 feet in a C-2 zone, on the above described property. B. The Commission approves the application of Body Balance, for a special use permit allowing signage in excess of 200 square feet located at the property described herein, within the City of Jerome, Idaho, subject to the following condition: 1. Total signage shall not exceed 74 square feet for Body Balance; and 2. Total signage for the overall building to not exceed 319 square feet. These findings and conclusions, having been adopted by the Jerome City Planning and Zoning Commission on the 11th day of March, 2025, in support of the decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission on 11th day of February, 2025, to approve the application as specified herein is hereby made final this 11th day of March, 2025. ROD MINK, Chairman of the Board Jerome City Planning and Zoning Please be advised Chapter 17.70, Section 17.70.080 of the Jerome Municipal Code provides guidance on how to appeal a decision by the Commission. The appeal must be made by filing a written appeal form with the City Clerk within ten (10) days of the mailing of the decision to the applicant. Remedies before the City of Jerome on such matters shall not be deemed to have been exhausted until a decision on such an appeal has been made by the City Council. Under Idaho Code, you also have 28 days from the date of approval of the Findings and Conclusions to request a regulatory takings analysis pursuant to Idaho Code 67-8003(2). Commissioner Johnson motioned to approve the consent agenda as presented. Second to the motion by Commissioner Fraser and carried. After consideration, the motion passed by the following votes: AYE: Commissioner Jeff Schroeder, Commissioner Ben Reed, Commissioner Shonna Fraser, and Commissioner Paul Johnson. NAYE: None. DISCUSSION PERIOD & STAFF REPORTS ---PAGE BREAK--- Ms. Clark stated that they only have a few items for the next meeting, and she would provide a staff update then. Without further discussion, Chairman Mink closed this regular meeting at 9:15 p.m. Rod Mink, Chairman Katie Elliott, Secretary