← Back to Hooveralaba, MA

Document Hooveralabama_doc_a61d293ee0

Full Text

Summary: Hoover, Alabama; General Obligation Primary Credit Analyst: Theodore Chapman, Dallas [PHONE REDACTED]; [EMAIL REDACTED] Secondary Credit Analyst: Sussan Corson, New York [PHONE REDACTED]; [EMAIL REDACTED] Table Of Contents Rationale Outlook Economy October 17, 2007 www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 1 608159 I 301279465 ---PAGE BREAK--- Summary: Hoover, Alabama; General Obligation Credit Profile US$18. mil GO swr warrants ser 2007 dtd 10/01/2007 due 03/01/2037 Long Term Rating AA/Stable New Hoover GO Long Term Rating AA/Stable Affirmed Rationale Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'AA' standard long-term rating, and stable outlook, to Hoover, Ala.'s series 2007 GO sewer warrants and affirmed its 'AA' standard long-term rating and Standard & Poor's underlying rating (SPUR), with a stable outlook, on the city's parity GO debt. The ratings continue to reflect the city's: • Favorable location in the Birmingham MSA, supporting its role as one of the state's retail hubs; • High income and wealth levels; and • Strong financial performance, including the maintenance of very sound reserves. The importance of the sales and use tax to the city's total general government revenues offsets, in part, these The city's full faith and credit pledge secures the warrants. Officials will use warrant proceeds to support the city's sanitary sewer system and enhance and upgrade the Riverchase wastewater treatment plant. In June 2006, the city entered into a consent decree with Alabama Department of Environmental Management, the state environmental regulatory body, which found the city was in violation of its national pollutant discharge elimination system permit requirements for that treatment plant. The city is expanding treatment capacity and comprehensively upgrading the plant, as well as undertaking related inflow and infiltration remediation to its collection system. Management has indicated it fully expects to have all consent-decree-related projects finished well ahead of the department of environmental management's June 2010 deadline. While officials do not expect these efforts to affect sewer rates, they believe the sewer system will still fully self-support all allocable GO debt, including these warrants. Upon completion of identified projects, management expects to engage in a sewer rate study. For fiscal 2006, the most recent audited year, the sewer fund generated nearly $3.9 million of net operating income. Projected maximum annual debt service for all GO debt allocable to the sewer system, including series 2007 warrants, is roughly $2.1 million. Due to the prominence of Hoover's retail sector, sales and use taxes account for about three-fourths of all general fund revenues. Merchandise retail, a level that has been stable over time, generates roughly 70% of sales tax revenues. The city is not dependent on any of its principal sales tax generators with the 10 leading taxpayers accounting for about 25% of sales tax revenues. Management discretionally transferred a fixed payment of $7.5 million of sales tax revenues received into the school system during fiscal 2007, and it plans to do so again in fiscal Standard & Poors I RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal I October 17, 2007 2 608159 I 301279465 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2008. The city's financial condition remains a strength. The $30.3 million unreserved, undesignated general fund balance for fiscal 2006 equated to a strong 37% of expenditures, which exceeded the city's policy of maintaining 30% in reserve. Management expects to end fiscal 2007 with a $31.3 million fund balance, and it is projecting a break-even fiscal 2008 budget. Sales tax revenues continue their steady growth, but there are no conservative forecasts for fiscal 2008. Standard & Poor's deems Hoover's financial management practices "good" under its Financial Management Assessment (FMA) methodology, indicating financial practices exist in most areas but that governance officials might not formalize or regularly monitor all of them. Highlights include management's: • Regular monitoring and reporting of budgeted figures compared with actual results and year-to-date performance, with special attention paid to sales and use tax revenues; • Five-year capital improvement program that fully delineates funding sources; and • Strong reserve policy. The city's overall net debt burden is elevated at about 4.2% of the estimated $8.7 billion market value. Management, however, attributes most of this to overlapping schools. Direct debt burden has remained constant at between 1.5% and 2.0% of market value. Of the current five-year capital plan, management indicates it will likely use pay-as-you-go financing to fund identified projects; it has not identified any large projects. Management does not plan to issue any additional debt in the near future. Outlook The stable outlook reflects the expectation that the city will maintain a strong financial condition, including sound reserves, to help mitigate risks inherent in its dependence on sales tax revenues. Economy Hoover is one of Birmingham, Ala.'s largest and most affluent suburbs, centrally located near U.S. highways 280 and 31 and State Highway 150. City population, which grew by 58% between 1990 and 2000, is now about 75,000. While the city is home to a diverse employer mix and has perennially low unemployment, its most prominent role is that of the state's retail hub with a strong and growing retail base. Per capita retail sales are 203% of the state's average and 164% of the nation's average. Management attributes continued growth to Riverchase Galleria, the state's largest and most-frequented mall. Additional retail base growth remains ongoing. A large retail center with a Target Corp. supercenter as its anchor should open by the end of 2008. In addition, the galleria's developers are continuing their efforts to ensure its draw and popularity remain high. City wealth and income levels are strong: Median household effective buying income is 173% of the state's average and 145% of the nation's average. Per capita market value, often used as an indicator of relative wealth, is also high at roughly $115,000. Taxable assessed valuation has grown by nearly 80% over the past five years to $1.4 billion. The city is not dependent on any of its principal property taxpayers. Ratings Detail (As Of October 17, 2007) www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 3 608159 I 301279465 Summary: Hoover, Alabama; General Obligation ---PAGE BREAK--- Ratings Detail (As Of October 17, 2007) (cont.) Hoover GO warrants (XLCAP) Unenhanced Rating AA(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Hoover GO (MBIA) Unenhanced Rating AA(SPUR)/Stable Affirmed Many issues are enhanced by bond insurance. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect, the real-time Web-based source for Standard & Poor's credit ratings, research, and risk analysis, at www.ratingsdirect.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com; under Credit Ratings in the left navigation bar, select Find a Rating, then Credit Ratings Search. Standard & Poors I RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal I October 17, 2007 4 608159 I 301279465 Summary: Hoover, Alabama; General Obligation ---PAGE BREAK--- S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain nonpublic information received in connection with each analytical process. To the extent that regulatory authorities allow a rating agency to acknowledge in one jurisdiction a rating issued in another jurisdiction for certain regulatory purposes, S&P reserves the right to assign, withdraw, or suspend such acknowledgement at any time and in its sole discretion. S&P Parties disclaim any duty whatsoever arising out of the assignment, withdrawal, or suspension of an acknowledgment as well as any liability for any damage alleged to have been suffered on account thereof. Credit-related and other analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact. S&P's opinions, analyses, and rating acknowledgment decisions (described below) are not recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions, and do not address the suitability of any security. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor except where registered as such. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC or its affiliates (collectively, S&P). The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions (negligent or otherwise), regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED, OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs or losses caused by negligence) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Copyright © 2012 by Standard & Poor's Financial Services LLC. All rights reserved. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect 5 608159 I 301279465