Full Text
City of Farmington Park & Recreation Master Plan Findings Presentation 4/24/14 ---PAGE BREAK--- kk q Process q Demographics q Survey Results q Level of Service q Key Issues q Reoccurring Themes q Preliminary Recommendations q Q & A Agenda ---PAGE BREAK--- Process q Start-up q Community Input q Focus Groups q Survey q Inventory q Level of Service Analysis q Operational & Marketing Analysis q Program & Other Service Provider Analysis q Organizational Analysis q Findings Presentation q Visioning Workshop q Draft Plan & Presentation q Final Plan & Presentation ---PAGE BREAK--- Demographics Population projections for Farmington, New Mexico Source: 2010 Census and ESRI Business Information Solutions. *GreenPlay, LLC, calculated projected populations based on ESRI growth multiplier of .71% for Farmington, New Mexico. US Census (2000 and 2010) and ESRI Projections 2000 Population 38,404 2010 Population 45,877 2013 Estimated 46,815 2018 Projected 47,413 2023 Projected 50,296 ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics Farmington Map showing sub-area “Quadrants” ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 Northeast Quadrant Northwest Quadrant Southeast Quadrant Southwest Quadrant 2010 2012 2017 Population Per Quadrant ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics Median Age (2010) Average Household Size (2010) Median Income (2012 forecast) % of City Population (2010) Northeast Quadrant 33.4 2.96 $54,021 41% Northwest Quadrant 33.5 2.82 $50,290 34% Southeast Quadrant 30.7 2.88 $40,594 19% Southwest Quadrant 32.9 2.72 $28,938 6% City of Farmington 32.8 2.7 $48,933 Demographic Overview by Quadrant ---PAGE BREAK--- Demographics 2012 City of Farmington and Quadrants Population Breakdown by Age ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics Ethnicity by Quadrant ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics Annual Household Income Distribution by Quadrant ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics Educational Attainment Comparison: Farmington- New Mexico – Unites States (ages 25+) ---PAGE BREAK--- kk Demographics Health Rankings The United Health Foundation has ranked New Mexico 32nd in its 2012 State Health Rankings, unchanged from its ranking in 2011. The State’s biggest include: q High per capita public health funding q Low levels of air pollution q Low rate of cardiovascular and cancer deaths Some of the challenges the State faces include: q High percentage of children in poverty q High rate of uninsured population q Low high school graduation rate Source: http://www.americashealthrankings.org/NM/2012 ---PAGE BREAK--- Survey Results Methodology Survey Methods 1) Randomly distributed mail-back survey 2) Randomly distributed online invitation-only web survey 3) Open-link online survey for anyone not in random sample q 4,000 surveys randomly distributed to Farmington residents q Final sample size was 424 (10.6% return rate) o 268 from random sample o 156 from open-link responses q Margin of error approximately 4.8 % ---PAGE BREAK--- Survey Results Methodology (cont.) q Northeast: o 40% of the sample o 41% of the city’s population q Northwest: o 38% of the sample o 34% of the city’s population q Southeast: o 15% of the sample o 19% of the city’s population q Southwest: o 7% of the sample o 6% of the city’s population ü Respondent profiles per quadrant largely mirror demographic trends in those areas ü Sample sizes per quadrant are roughly proportional to the % of the Farmington population that reside in each area ---PAGE BREAK--- 13% 6% 5% 12% 43% 21% 11% 17% 24% 17% 18% 7% 1% 4% 43% 26% 18% 13% 13% 85% 3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Single, no children Single with children at home Single, children no longer at home Couple, no children Couple with children at home Couple, children no longer at home Under $25,000 $25,000 - $49,999 $50,000 - $74,999 $75,000 - $99,999 $100,000 - $149,999 $150,000 - $199,999 $200,000 - $249,999 $250,000 or more 0 1 2 3 or more Yes No Don't know Percent of Respondents Number of Dogs in Household Household Need for ADA Accessibility Household Income Household Profile Household Characteristics ---PAGE BREAK--- 15% 14% 25% 46% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 5 years or less 6 to 10 11 to 20 21 or more Percent of Respondents Average: 21.6 Median: 20.0 Household Characteristics ---PAGE BREAK--- 78% 17% 4% 1% 98% 1% 1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Own residence Rent Other Own undeveloped property Primary residence Secondary/vacation residence Temporary residence Percent of Respondents Household Characteristics ---PAGE BREAK--- 32% 68% 2% 21% 27% 14% 21% 12% 4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% Male Female 18 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 54 55 - 64 65 - 74 75 or older Percent of Respondents Average: 47.9 Median: 46.0 Gender Age of Respondent Household Characteristics ---PAGE BREAK--- 0% 1% 7% 17% 74% 2% 8% 20% 46% 25% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 1=Not at all important 2 3=Neutral 4 5=Extremely important 1=Not at all meeting needs 2 3=Neutral 4 5=Completely meeting needs Percent of Respondents Average: 3.8 Average: 4.6 Importance of Availability of Recreational Amenities and Activities Extent to Which Recreational Amenities and Activities are Currently Meeting the Needs of You and Your HH Current Services & Facilities - Importance & Needs Met ---PAGE BREAK--- Degree to Which Needs are Being Met by Location of Residence ---PAGE BREAK--- 85% 82% 76% 75% 74% 74% 72% 70% 68% 62% 55% 55% 53% 51% 50% 47% 46% 21% 4% 7% 9% 5% 7% 10% 9% 13% 11% 13% 18% 19% 11% 19% 18% 25% 26% 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Quality/maintenance of grounds, trails, etc. Quality/maintenance of rec. amenities Proximity of amenities to my home Customer service from PRCA staff Positive economic benefit to the community Safety of the grounds, trails, and natural areas Safety while visiting PRCA facilities Number of trails and natural areas Hours of operation and activities Recreational activities offered Signage and maps Availability of program and facility info Class registration process Restroom maintenance Website helpfulness and usability Restroom availability Promotions and publicity of programs Other Percent of Respondents Very satisfied (4 or 5) Not very satisfied (1 or 2) Satisfaction with Recreation Amenities & Services - % Satisfied vs Not Satisfied ---PAGE BREAK--- 80% 78% 76% 71% 69% 53% 48% 40% 38% 35% 33% 29% 27% 26% 19% 18% 15% 12% 11% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Paved paths Unpaved trails Riverfront area Open space Picnic areas Amphitheater Fountains and splash pads Access to river (fishing, canoeing, etc.) Lake recreation (fishing, boating, etc.) Field sports Golf courses Outdoor pools Mountain bike trails Dog parks Jeep trails Tennis Other outdoor activities Skate parks Camping RV Camping Percent of Respondents Outdoor Amenities & Activities - % Households Who Used Programs & Facilities in Past Year ---PAGE BREAK--- 77% 77% 75% 75% 74% 70% 70% 66% 61% 57% 53% 52% 51% 51% 50% 49% 49% 42% 41% 32% 11% 10% 9% 8% 9% 11% 17% 15% 15% 24% 23% 24% 30% 27% 26% 23% 27% 26% 37% 42% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Amphitheater Paved paths Unpaved trails Open space Picnic areas Riverfront area Golf courses Fountains and splash pads Field sports Mountain bike trails Outdoor pools Other outdoor activities Dog parks Tennis Lake recreation (fishing, boating, etc.) Access to river (fishing, canoeing, etc.) Jeep trails Skate parks Camping RV Camping Percent of Respondents Needs Met (4 or 5) Needs Not Met (1 or 2) Outdoor Amenities & Activities – Degree to Which Needs are Being Met vs Not Met ---PAGE BREAK--- 86% 82% 78% 60% 24% 19% 18% 16% 11% 5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Library Civic Center/performing arts space Museums Indoor pools and aquatic center Community Center Senior Center Gym (basketball, volleyball, etc.) Courts (racquetball, wallyball, etc.) Farmington Indian Center Other indoor activities Percent of Respondents Indoor Amenities & Activities - % Households Who Used Programs & Facilities in Past Year ---PAGE BREAK--- 88% 80% 75% 72% 63% 58% 55% 50% 42% 33% 4% 7% 13% 9% 16% 19% 22% 26% 28% 21% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Library Civic Center/performing arts space Indoor pools and aquatic center Museums Community Center Senior Center Gym (basketball, volleyball, etc.) Courts (racquetball, wallyball, etc.) Farmington Indian Center Other indoor activities Percent of Respondents Needs Met (4 or 5) Needs Not Met (1 or 2) Indoor Amenities & Activities – Degree to Which Needs are Being Met vs Not Met ---PAGE BREAK--- 8% 8% 9% 7% 4% 5% 4% 5% 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 4% 5% 10% 8% 6% 4% 6% 5% 6% 5% 4% 5% 4% 3% 4% 3% 2% 8% 5% 4% 8% 8% 7% 5% 5% 4% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 3% 25% 21% 20% 19% 18% 18% 15% 15% 13% 12% 11% 11% 10% 9% 9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Unpaved trails Paved paths Library Civic Center/performing arts space Riverfront area Indoor pools and aquatic center Museums Open space Lake recreation (fishing, boating, etc.) Picnic areas Access to river (fishing, canoeing, etc.) Dog parks Fountains and splash pads Mountain bike trails Outdoor pools Percent of Respondents Most important Second most important Third most important Combined Top 3 Current Amenities & Activities – Ranked Priorities to be Added, Expanded, Improved ---PAGE BREAK--- 4% 4% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 0% 2% 2% 1% 0% 0% 1% 1% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 0% 1% 1% 2% 0% 8% 7% 6% 6% 6% 5% 4% 4% 4% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% Field sports Golf courses Amphitheater Senior Center Community Center Camping Other outdoor activities Gym (basketball, volleyball, etc.) Jeep trails Courts (racquetball, wallyball, etc.) Tennis RV Camping Farmington Indian Center Other indoor activities Skate parks Percent of Respondents Most important Second most important Third most important Combined Top 3 (Cont.) Current Amenities & Activities – Ranked Priorities to be Added, Expanded, Improved ---PAGE BREAK--- 52% 33% 19% 18% 17% 16% 16% 14% 14% 9% 8% 6% 4% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Not aware of programs or facilities No time/other personal issues Don't have the programs I want Safety concerns Hours of operation Lack of facilities and amenities Programs not offered at the times I want Price/user fees prohibitive Condition/maintenance or safety of facilities Prefer other recreation providers/clubs Accessibility Customer service/staff knowledge Program/class was full Other Percent of Respondents Programs & Amenities – Reasons Do Not Use / Improvements Needed ---PAGE BREAK--- 63% 53% 45% 38% 33% 33% 22% 21% 12% 4% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% State parks & natural areas College/university facilities Churches Private or public schools Private health and fitness clubs Recreation facilities and centers in neighboring towns Private instruction (dance, martial arts, etc.) Youth Sports Associations Boys and Girls Club Other None Percent of Respondents Current Programs & Facilities – Other Providers Used by Households ---PAGE BREAK--- 61% 49% 44% 44% 41% 40% 39% 37% 35% 35% 30% 29% 29% 29% 29% 22% 16% 16% 27% 26% 29% 39% 36% 32% 38% 33% 33% 41% 39% 40% 49% 53% 44% 54% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Swimming programs Summer programs - youth Athletic leagues - adult Volunteer programs Programming and activities along river Walking/running programs Naturalist and outdoor education programs Special events concerts, festivals) After-school programs - youth Fitness programs Health and wellness programs Teen programs Other Programs for persons with disabilities/special needs River programs (kayaking, canoeing, etc.) Percent of Respondents Needs Met (75% Met - 100% Met) Needs Not Met Met - 25% Met) Programs, Activities, Events – % Met vs Not Met ---PAGE BREAK--- Athletic leagues - youth Senior programs Swimming programs Summer programs - youth River programming and activities Naturalist and outdoor education programs Athletic leagues - adult Special events Volunteer programs Walking/running programs After-school programs - youth Health and wellness programs Fitness programs Teen programs Disabilities/special needs programs River programs 20% 90% 30% 70% Households Having a Need for Programs/Special Events (average How well needs are currently being met (average More HH in need/ Lower level of needs being met More HH in need/ Higher level of needs being met Less HH in need/ Lower level of needs being met Less HH in need/ Higher level of needs being met Average Needs-Met Score (50%) Average Percentage of HH In-Need (53%) Programs, Activities, Events – In-Need vs Needs Met Matrix ---PAGE BREAK--- 16% 8% 9% 6% 5% 5% 4% 6% 7% 6% 7% 5% 5% 5% 4% 2% 10% 10% 10% 6% 7% 8% 6% 5% 6% 6% 3% 5% 5% 4% 4% 2% 1% 15% 7% 5% 9% 9% 7% 7% 6% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 2% 1% 3% 41% 25% 24% 21% 21% 20% 18% 17% 17% 16% 15% 14% 14% 11% 10% 6% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Special events concerts, festivals) Health and wellness programs Programming and activities along river Walking/running programs Fitness programs River programs (kayaking, canoeing, etc.) Naturalist and outdoor education programs Summer programs - youth Swimming programs Senior programs Athletic leagues - youth Teen programs After-school programs - youth Programs for persons with disabilities/special needs Athletic leagues - adult Volunteer programs Other Percent of Respondents Most important Second most important Third most important Combined Top 3 Programs, Activities, Events – Ranked Priorities to be Added, Expanded, Improved ---PAGE BREAK--- 62% 52% 51% 50% 47% 44% 41% 41% 39% 39% 39% 37% 36% 36% 36% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% River trails expanded Riverfront park and amenities upgrade Miniature golf course Connector paths and trails Civic center theater upgrade New water park Renovate existing recreation center Lions Wilderness Park Farmington Lake River access Ice skating facility Renovated E3 Children's Museum Farmington Museum upgrade Renovate Indoor leisure pools Playgrounds Percent of Respondents Facilities / Amenities - % Households Who Would Participate ---PAGE BREAK--- 36% 35% 34% 32% 31% 30% 27% 25% 23% 22% 22% 21% 13% 12% 11% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% New recreation center New Children's Museum Renovate Nature Center Splashpads Indoor therapeutic pool Outdoor leisure pool Teen center Spraygrounds Sports Complex New Native American cultural museum RV facilities at Lake Farmington Senior Center renovations Community center at Crouch Mesa Renovated Indian Center New Indian Center Percent of Respondents (Cont.) Facilities / Amenities - % Households Who Would Participate ---PAGE BREAK--- 76% 72% 71% 65% 64% 64% 62% 60% 58% 58% 57% 55% 54% 54% 52% 8% 8% 9% 14% 12% 11% 15% 21% 16% 13% 22% 17% 22% 22% 28% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% River trails expanded Riverfront park and amenities upgrade Connector paths and trails Renovated E3 Children's Museum Farmington Lake River access Playgrounds Miniature golf course Civic center theater upgrade Lions Wilderness Park New water park Teen center New Children's Museum Splashpads Ice skating facility Percent of Respondents Very Important (4 or 5) Not Important (1 or 2) Facilities / Amenities – Importance to - % Important vs Not Important ---PAGE BREAK--- 52% 51% 50% 49% 49% 48% 47% 44% 41% 40% 39% 38% 30% 27% 23% 21% 21% 21% 21% 20% 19% 24% 23% 30% 37% 30% 36% 42% 46% 53% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Indoor therapeutic pool Senior Center renovations Renovate Nature Center Outdoor leisure pool Renovate Indoor leisure pools Renovate existing recreation center Farmington Museum upgrade Spraygrounds New recreation center New Native American cultural museum Sports Complex RV facilities at Lake Farmington Community center at Crouch Mesa Renovated Indian Center New Indian Center Percent of Respondents Very Important (4 or 5) Not Important (1 or 2) (Cont.) Facilities / Amenities – Importance to - % Important vs Not Important ---PAGE BREAK--- 21% 11% 22% 8% 14% 8% 5% 4% 3% 3% 19% 12% 13% 16% 11% 10% 9% 2% 4% 3% 13% 17% 8% 13% 12% 10% 11% 6% 4% 4% 59% 40% 38% 37% 36% 32% 20% 12% 12% 9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Maintain and Improve Existing Facilities Improve Quality of Life and Attract Tourism Trails and Connectivity Improve Access to Rivers and/or Lakefronts Increase Programming for Family, Youth and Teens Improve Safety and Security Increase and Improve Large Special Events Improve Communication and Marketing Additional Funding Improve Cultural Relationships Percent of Respondents Most important Second most important Third most important Combined Top 3 Top Priorities Over Next 5-10 Years – Ranked Priorities to be Added, Expanded, Improved ---PAGE BREAK--- 9% 49% 11% 31% 4% 38% 9% 48% 16% 44% 25% 9% 3% 4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Fees are under-priced for the value received Fees are acceptable for the value received Fees are too high for the value received Don't know/unsure Fees are under-priced for the value received Fees are acceptable for the value received Fees are too high for the value received Don't know/unsure $0 (none) $1 - $5 per month $6 - $10 per month $11 - $20 per month $21 - $25 per month $26+ per month Percent of Respondents User Fees Assessment Fees Support for Additional Tax Increment Levels Financial Choices ---PAGE BREAK--- 38% 35% 30% 35% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% Information provided to you Information provided to visitors/tourists Percent of Respondents Very Good or Excellent (4 or 5) Poor or Fair (1 or 2) Average Rating You: 3.1 Visitors/Tourists: 3.0 Communication – Performance of Providing Information ---PAGE BREAK--- 57% 51% 42% 29% 28% 20% 17% 17% 8% 1% 1% 23% 25% 3% 9% 13% 16% 3% 5% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Word of mouth Local newspapers/magazines Internet/website At the recreation facilities/program location Radio Social networking Twitter, Facebook) PRCA Update E-mails PRCA Program Brochures Other Mobile Apps Percent of Respondents How You Currently Receive Information How to Best Reach You Communication – Current vs Best Method of Receiving Information ---PAGE BREAK--- 68% 54% 49% 48% 28% 2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Information at hotels Advertisements in Durango and surrounding areas Additional information available at visitor centers Billboards and signs along highways and bypass Other None, do not want to draw visitors to town Percent of Respondents Communication – Best Method for Communicating with Visitors/Tourists ---PAGE BREAK--- Key Issues Matrix 2014 Data Source Qualitative Data Quantitative Data Consultant's Analysis and Professional Expertise Key Issue - Rating Scale a - priority b - opportunity to improve c - minor or future issue blank means the issue didn't come up or wasn't addressed Planning Documents Consultant Team Staff Input Public Input Stakeholder Input Leadership Citizens Survey PRCA Data Facility Assessment/LOS Preliminary Recommendations Organizational Need better marketing and communication of activities a a a a a a a a Create Marketing Plan Attract tourism & ecotourism a a a a a a a a a Develop Riverine Plan, Farmington Lake, Jeep Trails, etc./Create Marketing Plan Website is not current or usable for patrons a a a a a a a Upgrade & Maintain Website Improve technology a a a a b Improve & upgrade technology / Integrated registration system at all locations Need better signage and maps a b a a a a a a Improve directional/wayfinding signage/maps to facilities on roadways & within parks Improve partner agency relationships b a a a b Open lines of communication & meetings with partner agencies Finance Utilize equitable user fees and assessment fees a a a a a a a a Develop Cost Recovery Policy Increase Economic Impact, revitalize downtown a a a a a a a a a Develop Riverine Plan, Farmington Lake, Jeep Trails, etc./Create Marketing Plan Increase Tax Increment Levels a a b a a a Campaign for community investment in long term Master Plan implementation Pursue grant opportunities a a a a a a a a Contract with a dedicate grant writer to research & submit grants Programs and Service Delivery Need more programming for families, youth, teens a a b a a a a a Expand program opportunities for teens, families, youth in all locations Increase programs in wellness/fitness, cultural, special needs, water craft a a a a a a Expand programs in wellness/fitness, cultural, special needs, water craft Increase number of events a a a a a b Expand neighborhood & community special event opportunities Facilities and Amenities Maintain and improve existing facilities a a a a a a a a a Continue to implement existing plans Expand trails & connectivity a a a a a a a a a Expand River Trail, connect amenities via trails, Implement River Plan and revitalize downtown a a a a a a a a a Implement Riverine Plan Increase ADA accessibility at all facilities a a a a a a a a a Create and implement a departmentwide ADA Accessibility Plan Upgrade outdated amenities that do not function well a a a a a a a a a Upgrade skateparks, playgrounds & surfaces, shelters, basketball courts Improve water access (river, lake, ponds) a a a a a b a a a Implement Riverine Plan, Develop Farmington Lake into Flagship Park Deferred maintenance b a a b a b Create a Deferred Maintenance Plan with budget Improve restroom availability & maintenance b b b b b b b Add restrooms, keep open longer, elevate cleaning standards Safety and Security Change unsafe Riverwalk perception a b a a a a a Track & provide education on small # of incidents, create foot traffic, continue patrols Control safety & vandalism a b a a a a a Positive activation of parks & neighborhood involvement Lack of security lighting at many park amenities a b a a b a b Add security lighting at park amenities where vandalism & loitering occurs ---PAGE BREAK--- Level of Service Analysis ---PAGE BREAK--- Inventory q October 2013 q Inventory includes parks, open space, schools, and a few other recreation providers like the Boys and Girls Club q 79 Outdoor Facilities q 19 Indoor Facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Inventory Summary q Numerous shelters and basketball that do not meet current standard q Skate Parks suffer from lack of quality components q More can be done to take advantage of lakes, ponds and river q ADA accessibility is limited in many parks q Some parks have below standard playground structures or local playgrounds where destination playgrounds are warranted ---PAGE BREAK--- Inventory Summary q Park maintenance is generally excellent but a few locations are prone to vandalism q Existing dog parks are exceptional q Noted high quality turf in all parks q Non-turf areas deserve some attention to help with drainage and erosion q Majority of the playgrounds have sand safety surfacing that should be upgraded ---PAGE BREAK--- GRASP® Level of Service Analysis q Applies value to facilities based on quality and quantity ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: GRASP® Process Summary q Anytown, USA • Outdoor/Indoor Locations • Components q Scores of 1,2,3 3= Exceeds expectations, 2= Meets expectations, 1= Does not meet expectations ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Access to a Park q Anytown, USA q Scored assets: • City Park • Playground • Picnic Shelter • Open Turf q “Buffered” q Scores applied to each buffer ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Access to a Playground ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Access to a Picnic Shelter ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Access to Open Turf ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: GRASP® Process Summary q Drivable, bikeable distance q 1 mile buffer ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Walkable Access q Walkable distance q 15 minute walk q 1/2 mile buffer q Pedestrian barriers such as major roads , railroads, and river ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: After Considering Pedestrian Barriers ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Premium for Walkable Access ---PAGE BREAK--- LOS Overview: Adding Adjacent Parks or Facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: General Access to Recreation q Includes both driving and walking buffers q As Expected: Best access to recreation concentrated in the center of Farmington = Higher LOS = Lower LOS ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Walkable Access to Recreation q Includes only walking buffers q Concentrations of walkable access 1. Fairgrounds, Soccer, and Aquatics Center 2. Berg/Animas 3. Lions, Bonnie Dallas, US West ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Threshold q Minimum standard q Equivalent to a park with basketball, a playground, and picnic shelter and a trail q Vista De La Plata and the River Trail q Chula Vista, Sycamore, and Rio Vista can stand alone without trail access ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: A Bracketed Look at LOS = Threshold = Below Threshold = No Service ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Walkable Access Threshold q 15 minute q Low-Service and No-Service areas do exist across Farmington = Above = Below = No service ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Walkable Access By Acres ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Walkable Access By Population ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington Visioning: Using GRASP® Analysis to help set Priorities or Target Areas q Identifying Gaps is the first step… q What other information do you need to make decisions? q What are the issues? q How do we get our biggest bang for the buck? q Overall Level of Service q Economic Development q Walkability q Social Equity q Special Populations q Water Access q Trails q Others? ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Pedestrian Barriers and Population Distribution q Providing Parks and Walkability Where People Live q Range: 0 to 6735 ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington LOS Analysis: Pedestrian Barriers and Population Distribution ---PAGE BREAK--- Farmington Riverine Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- Area Identified in Riverine Plan for Developed River Access or Improvements Other Areas that may Provide Additional Water Access Opportunities ---PAGE BREAK--- Key Level of Service Findings qWide variety of well distributed recreational opportunities qOverall level of service is high if accessed by an automobile qAreas with lower level of service tend to have a relatively low population density qAccess by walking is also well distributed & very high in parts of the city but is often limited by major pedestrian barriers qMore than half (69%) of all city land and 91% or residents are within walking distance of at least one recreation component ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Recommendations q ADA transition plan must be developed & implemented q Develop and implement design/maintenance standards including replacement strategies Most in need include: native landscape/non-turf areas, shade structures, basketball courts and playground structure & playground surfacing q Consider long term development of quality skate parks q Develop and implement a system of park master planning for aging existing parks Most in need include: Kiwanis Park, Farmington Lake, Justis Park, Brookside Park, Civitan Park, Westside Estates Park, Highland View Park, Sun Valley Park, Sycamore Park, Boyd Park and Boat Launch ---PAGE BREAK--- Preliminary Recommendations q Promote the great disk golf course and enhance the course with seating, concessions, shade, etc. q Take advantage of the terrain, climate & water opportunities to become an outdoor adventure sports destination with Climbing, Hiking, BMX, Mtn Bike, Jeeping, etc. q Promote water access as a key recreation opportunity thru the development of high level water access and visual connection to the river for Kayaking, Canoeing, etc. ---PAGE BREAK--- Reoccurring Themes • Communication & Promotion • Website • Trails & Connectivity • Ecotourism • River Access & River Park • Safety & Security (River Walk, some parks) • Develop Lake Farmington ---PAGE BREAK--- Reoccurring Themes • Maintain & Improve Existing Facilities • Renovate Recreation Center vs building new • Upgrade outdated amenities that do not function well • Equitable user Fees • Teen, Youth, Family Programming • Wellness/Fitness, Water Craft, Art, Cultural, Special Needs Programming ---PAGE BREAK--- Thank you! Questions ?