Full Text
City of Everett y Climate Action Plan Final Presentation of Strategies & R d i Recommendations May 25 2011 May 25, 2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- Presentation Agenda Presentation Agenda • Project Overview j • Everett’s Municipal Operations GHG Emissions Inventory – results • GHG Emissions Forecast • Analysis Main Results C i i f E i i P – Continuation of Existing Programs – Expansion of High-Performing Programs – Introduction of High-Impact New Programs Introduction of High Impact New Programs • GHG Reduction Target Framework ---PAGE BREAK--- Project Overview Project Overview • Step 1 – Analyzed & Updated Existing GHG Inventory for Municipal Operations (2001 & 2006) for Municipal Operations (2001 & 2006) • Step 2 – Drafted Framework for Setting Future GHG Reduction Target(s) Reduction Target(s) • Step 3 – Conducted Analysis of GHG Impact for Existing City Actions City Actions • Step 4 – Conducted Analysis of GHG Impact for P t ti l N & E d d A ti Potential New & Expanded Actions • Step 5 – Drafted & Delivered Municipal Operations Climate Action Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- Inventory Comparison: U d d I R l (2011) Updated Inventory Results (2011) Total emissions: CO2e (Metric Tons) 9,000 ‘01 – 26,503 tons ’06 – 27,130 tons 2 5% increase 5 000 6,000 7,000 8,000 2001 2.5% increase 2 000 3,000 4,000 5,000 2001 2006 - 1,000 2,000 Buildings Street Employee Vehicle Solid Water Transit g & Facilities Lights & Traffic Signals p y Commute Fleet Waste Facilities Delivery Facilities ---PAGE BREAK--- Revised Emissions Forecast Revised Emissions Forecast 40,000 30,000 35,000 15 000 20,000 25,000 MTCO2e 5 000 10,000 15,000 M 0 5,000 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2022 2025 2028 2031 2034 2037 2040 2043 2046 2049 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 No Action Measures Included Business as Usual ---PAGE BREAK--- Analysis Main Results Analysis Main Results • Continuation of Existing Programs Continuation of Existing Programs • Expansion of High-Performing Programs I d i f Hi h I N P • Introduction of High-Impact New Programs ---PAGE BREAK--- Continuation of Existing Programs L C Si l S • Largest Current Single Source Reductions: – Employee Commute Trip Reduction Program – Energy efficiency in Water Delivery System – Biofuels in Vehicle Fleet • Economic Savings ~ $275,000 annually Extremely conservative estimate Extremely conservative estimate ---PAGE BREAK--- Expansion of High Performing Programs • Significant GHG Emissions Reductions: – Near-Term (2010-2020) • Energy efficiency from facilities retrofits • Energy efficiency in water delivery & wastewater system system • Commute Trip Reduction – Longer-Term (2015-2030) • Expansion of hybrid & electric vehicles (including transit fleet) transit fleet) ---PAGE BREAK--- Introduction of New Hi h I P High-Impact Programs • Green Purchasing • Green Purchasing • Greatest Single Source Reduction – Anaerobic digester(s) at wastewater treatment plant (long-term: 2030) ---PAGE BREAK--- Net Impact of All 2001 Net Impact of All Programs – MTCO2e 2001 – 2010 % 2015 % 2020 % 2030 % Total Reduction from Existing Measures 2,880 11% 2,880 11% 2,880 11% 2,880 11% Total Reduction from All Total Reduction from All Expansion Measures ‐ ‐ 688 3% 1,438 5% 3,899 15% Total Reduction from N M ‐ ‐ 35 0% 2,790 11% 3,083 12% New Measures 35 0% 2,790 11% 3,083 12% Total Combined Reduction 3,603 14% 7,108 27% 9,862 37% Reduction ---PAGE BREAK--- Reduction Target – Context Reduction Target Context • Kyoto – 7% below 1990 levels by 2012 (MCPA) • IPCC (450 ppm) – 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 • USA (COP15) – 17% below 2005 by 2020 • Washington State – 25% below 1990 by 2035 • Snohomish County – 20% below 2000 by 2020 • Snohomish County – 20% below 2000 by 2020 • City of Kirkland – 20% below 2005 by 2020 • Bellevue, Edmonds – 7% by 2012 (Kyoto) ---PAGE BREAK--- GHG T t F k GHG Target Framework • Multiple target years – For example: 2020 & 2030 • 2020 Conservative: 15% – Conservative: 15% – Ambitious: 25% • 2030 – Conservative: 25% – Ambitious: 35% ---PAGE BREAK--- Questions? Questions?