Document elcerrito_gov_doc_ec7af96645

AGENDA BILL Agenda Item No. 7(A) Date: March 6, 2012 To: El Cerrito City Council From: Yvetteh Ortiz, Engineering Manager Jerry Bradshaw, Public Works Director I City Engineer Subject: I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project, Memorandum of Understanding ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee to execute the I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility Project, Memorandum of Understanding (Exhibit A to the Resolution) and to make non-substantive changes subject to the review of the City Attorney. BACKGROUND Traffic Conditions Interstate 80 (I -80), between the Carquinez Bridge and the Bay Bridge, is one of the most congested corridors in the San Francisco Bay Area. Traffic demands on the freeway far exceed the roadway capacity, causing severe congestion, unreliable travel times, and traffic diversion to the local arterials. During the peak periods, the majority of the corridor operates with significant congestion and delays. The congestion on the roadway network contributes to an increase in incident rates, including rear-end collisions on both the freeway and local arterials. With projected increase in travel demand, congestion will get worse. As congestion along the corridor increases, incident rates will increase causing additional congestion. Along I-80, about half of the collisions that occur during the peak period appear to be congestion-related/end-of-queue crashes. Currently, when there is an incident on I-80, the amount of time the freeway is affected (referred to as "recovery time") is directly related to how quickly emergency services, and/or roadside assistance, can reach the incident and clear blocked lanes. Because emergency response is also hindered by congestion, the recovery time increases as congestion levels increase. Project Description The I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project is a $93 million project intended to enhance the effectiveness of the existing transportation network, including the freeway, San Pablo A venue, crossing arterials and bus transit in Alameda and Contra Costa ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 7(A) Counties. The project has been developed through a partnership among multiple jurisdictions and transportation agencies including Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC), Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCT AC), Caltrans, AC Transit, WestCat, Contra Costa County, the Cities of Hercules, Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo, El Cerrito, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville and Oakland. The ACTC (formerly the Alameda Congestion Management Agency) is the lead agency for the implementation of the project. The project is primarily funded through the 2006 California Infrastructure Bond Act (State Proposition 1B), including $55.3 million from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) and $21.4 million from the Traffic Light Program (TLSP). Contra Costa Measure J is also a contributing fund for project development. In order to secure the TLSP funds for arterial and transit improvements along San Pablo Avenue and crossing arterials, jurisdictions along the I-80 corridor approved resolutions of support for the project in late 2007 through early 2008. The City of El Cerrito City Council adopted Resolution No 2007-91 on November 19, 2007. The I-80 ICM Project is aimed to optimize the use of the existing transportation infrastructure by implementing state-of-the-practice technologies to improve safety, reduce congestion, shorten travel times, and provide real time information to motorists. The scope of the project includes the following five major components: • Adaptive ramp metering; • Incident management; • Information to travelers regarding transit and traffic; • Improvements along San Pablo A venue and other arterials; and • System Integration The project provides tools for Caltrans and local agencies to manage traffic tn an integrated manner along I-80, San Pablo Avenue and crossing arterials, including: • Monitoring/measuring devices such as cameras, video detection systems and loop detectors; • Communication links to a central location including signal interconnect and wireless modems; • Traffic control devices; • Intelligence in the form of software and algorithms to respond to changing traffic conditions on ramps and freeway; and • Tools to communicate traffic/transit information back to drivers such as Changeable Message Signs, Variable Advisory Speed Signs, Lane Use Signs, and Highway Advisory Radio. Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 7(A) The anticipated benefits of the I-80 ICM Project include: • Improved travel time within the existing transportation network; • Improved safety and operation of the existing transportation network; • Reduced traffic congestion by expediting incident clearance and recovery; • Improved air quality; and • Enhanced real-time traveler information. Construction Phasing To expedite the project delivery and benefits, the project will be constructed in phases. The first two phases of the projects are now under construction: • Installation of Traffic Operations System (TOS) elements along I-80: Construction started in Spring 2011. • Arterial and transit improvements along San Pablo A venue: Construction started in late 2011 as previously reported in the City Manager Update dated November 9, 2011. Remaining phases of the project, which are scheduled to begin in Spring 2012 and be completed in 2014, include installation of ramp metering, equipment, installation of other devices on the freeway mainline, procurement of specialty materials, software development and system integration. ANALYSIS Over the past several months, all partner agencies have worked closely to develop a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the project to ensure all project elements are operated and maintained in an integrated manner and that the project provides benefits to all travelers along the corridor. More specifically, the MOU serves the following purposes: • Confirm support from all project partners, particularly local support for ramp metering and other freeway elements; • Articulate key operations and maintenance (O&M) principles for continuing project development; • Clarify ownership, O&M, and management responsibilities; • Clarify the distribution of costs and funding sources; • Outline the framework for multi-agency cooperation, collaboration, and conflict resolution; • Identify which existing I-80 Smart Corridor devices will be made part of the I-80 ICM project; and • Signify the ongoing commitment of the project partners to deliver the project and make it a success. Page 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 7(A) Allocation of approximately $45 million in remaining State Proposition 1B funds by the California Transportation Commission is contingent upon execution of the MOU. Over the course of the project, many issues/concerns brought up by the project stakeholders were resolved by the project partners through the project design, regional collaboration and inclusion of the appropriate language in the MOU. They include: • O&M Funding: Although Caltrans will be the primary operator of the I-80 ICM system and equipment, they cannot fund O&M outside of the State right-of-way. As such, the MOU commits the CCTA to provide up to $2 million to fund O&M costs in Contra Costa outside the State right-of-way. In addition, much of the old equipment, such as traffic signal controllers, will be replaced, which will lower the existing O&M costs. O&M costs are not expected to be incurred until 2015, a year after the project is fully operational, and the CCT A funding is anticipated to be sufficient through 2030. Note that Caltrans is responsible for O&M costs for equipment located in the State portion of San Pablo A venue (State Route 123). • Traffic Signal Several jurisdictions expressed concern that traffic signals at the ramp intersections, controlled by Caltrans, are currently not with other signals along the crossing arterials. The ability to with Caltrans signals was added to the system. In addition, optimizing traffic signal timing plans along San Pablo A venue and crossing arterials, including ramp intersections, will be completed toward the end of the project. • Obstruction of Local Traffic Flow: Many jurisdictions expressed concern about ramp metering impacts on adjacent streets traffic flow. The project was designed to include end- of-queue detection along each on-ramp. These detectors will be used to monitor and contain the queues within the on-ramps. Once queues extend beyond the queue detector, the ramp meter rate will increase or rest on green to avoid queuing that obstructs local traffic flow. In addition, Caltrans will work with each jurisdiction to make any necessary adjustment to the metering rates during the roll-out period for the project. • Actively Diverting Traffic to San Pablo Avenue: The project will not actively divert freeway traffic to San Pablo Avenue. However, freeway traffic will continue to overflow onto San Pablo A venue and other local arterials as it has in the past during major incidents on the freeway. When that happens, the project is designed to flush out freeway traffic that naturally diverts to San Pablo A venue back to I -80 past the incident location. This will be accomplished through the use of special signal timing plans (called flush plans) and trailblazer signs (directional signs). By improving travel time on I-80, freeway traffic is encouraged to stay on the freeway. Through the use of flush plans and efficient Page4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 7(A) guidance of traffic back to 1-80, the local arterials will recover more quickly from the impact of an incident. • Encourage Use of Transit: The project was originally defined to include high- occupancy vehicle (HOV) preferential lanes at seven out of eight ramps used by buses. Several entities still expressed concern that the project may delay buses at the on-ramps due to metering. To resolve this, the project was modified to include transit signal priority (TSP) equipment at the on-ramp meters, where HOV preferential lanes are added, so that when transit vehicles are detected in the queue, the green time for the HOV lane is extended to allow the buses to bypass congested lanes. Furthermore, TSP equipment will be added in WestCA T service area and extended along San Pablo Avenue (from Richmond Parkway to Contra Costa College) to improve transit travel times. By improving travel time reliability along 1-80 and San Pablo Avenue, buses will better adhere to their schedules. Providing motorists with information such as next BART arrival time, transit travel times, and/or available parking spaces will encourage more use of transit in the corridor. • Formation of a Policy Committee: The project MOU includes the formation of a Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) to provide input on any issues that may arise that require additional input from communities along the corridor. The PAC will be comprised of three members including the Caltrans District 4 Director, one elected official from a jurisdiction in Alameda County who may serve on the Alameda CTC Board, and one elected official appointed by WCCTAC. In addition, all project partners are expected to participate in the Technical Coordinating Committee to provide oversight and input into the project operations. • Before/After Studies: The project team intends to conduct before/after studies to assess the project benefits/impacts. • Metering of Traffic in Solano County: It is anticipated that ramp metering will be activated along all freeways in the Bay Area. Caltrans is currently in the process of installing ramp metering equipment along 1-80 in Solano County. Ramp metering along portions of 1-880, 1-580 and US101 has already been activated. As part of the public information effort for the project, an open house was held on February 13, 2012 to provide detailed information about the project and to answer questions from the public. The public raised questions similar to the issues discussed above, particularly regarding the impact of the project on local streets. The MOU addresses these issues and provides policies and procedures for resolving them. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS Execution of the MOU will not burden the City with additional O&M costs because it commits the CCT A to provide for or seeking funding for O&M within Contra Costa County and outside of State right-of-way. The MOU requires that the CCTA provide up Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 7(A) to $2 million to fund O&M costs of about $135,000 per year for approximately 15 years. In the MOU, the CCTA is also committed to seek funding beyond the $2 million amount from other sources. More specifically, the CCTA anticipates applying for funding from the Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI) Program, sponsored by the Metropolitan Commission, and other regional sources. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS The City Attorney has reviewed the draft MOU. The final MOU will be substantially in the form attached and subject to the review of the City Attorney. Reviewed by: _ / Scouan:n:c:ty inager Attachment: 1. Accompanying Resolution 2. I-80 ICM MOU- Exhibit A to the Resolution Page 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- RESOLUTION 2012-XX Agenda Item No. 7(A) Attachment 1 RESOLUTION OF THE EL CERRITO CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE THE 1-80 INTEGRATED CORRIDOR MOBILITY PROJECT, MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING AND TO MAKE NON- SUBSTANTIVE CHANGES SUBJECT TO THE REVIEW OF THE CITY ATTORNEY WHEREAS, 1-80 is one of the most congested corridors in the San Francisco Bay Area; and WHEREAS, with projected increase in travel demand, congestion will get worse and incident rates will increase causing additional congestion; and WHEREAS, 1-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (1-80 ICM Project) is a $93 million project along 1-80, San Pablo Avenue and connecting arterials aimed to optimize the use of existing infrastructure by implementing state-of-the-practice technologies to improve safety, reduce congestion, shorten travel times, and provide real time information to motorists; and WHEREAS, the 1-80 ICM Project is primarily funded through the 2006 California Infrastructure Bond Act (State Proposition 1B), including $55.3 million from the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) and $21.4 million from the Traffic Light Program (TLSP); and WHEREAS, the City of El Cerrito City Council adopted Resolution No. 2007-91 in support of the project conditioned upon receiving the TLSP funds for arterial and transit improvements along San Pablo A venue and crossing arterials; and WHEREAS, the scope of the project includes five major components: adaptive ramp metering; incident management; traveler information; arterial and transit improvements along San Pablo A venue and crossing arterials; and system integration where all project components are coordinated; and WHEREAS, the anticipated benefits of the 1-80 ICM Project include improved travel time within the existing transportation network; improved safety and operation of the existing transportation network; reduced traffic congestion by expediting incident clearance and recovery; improved air quality; and enhanced real-time traveler information; and WHEREAS, the project will be constructed in phases -two of which are already underway, including improvements along San Pablo Avenue and connecting arterials to 1-80; and WHEREAS, operation and maintenance costs of the project components within Contra Costa County and outside the State right-of-way will be funded by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority; and ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 7(A) Attachment 1 WHEREAS, over the past several months, staff from all partner agencies, worked closely to develop the I-80 ICM Memorandum of Understanding (MOU); and WHEREAS, the I-80 ICM MOU sets the framework for cooperation among all partner agencies along the corridor in implementing the project and addressing any issues that may arise such as impacts on local streets from ramp metering and flush plans; and WHEREAS, allocation of approximately $45 million in remaining State Proposition 1B funds is contingent upon execution of the MOU. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of El Cerrito authorizes the City Manager or his designee to execute the I-80 ICM MOU, incorporated by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit A, and to make non-substantive changes subject to the review of the City Attorney. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. I CERTIFY that at a regular meeting on March 6, 2012 the City Council of the City ofEl Cerrito passed this Resolution by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: IN WITNESS of this action, I sign this document and affix the corporate seal of the City ofEl Cerrito on March XX, 2012. Cheryl Morse, City Clerk APPROVED: William C. Jones III, Mayor ---PAGE BREAK--- smart corridor r~ 1-80 ICM MEMO UNDERSTANDING Agenda Item No. Attachment 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CAL TRANS) & LOCAL AND REGIONAL AGENCIES FOR INTEGRA TED CORRIDOR MOBILITY STRATEGIES IN ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES This MOU is a compilation of the goals, policies, and procedures intended to be followed by the parties working together in a coordinated manner to enhance traffic operations along the Interstate 80 (1-80) corridor in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties. This MOU is intended to identify the overall commitment and responsibilities regarding ownership, operations, and maintenance of the various equipments installed as part of the 1-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) Project. The following entities are parties to this MOU: California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Alameda County Transportation Commission (ACTC), Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCT West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC), Contra Costa County, AC Transit, WestCAT, Cities of Oakland, Emeryville, Albany, Berkeley, El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, and Hercules. 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Table of Contents I. BACKGROUND 4 II. DEFINITION AND EXPLANATION OF TERMS 6 Ill. PURPOSE OF MOU, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, AND PROJECT GOVERNANCE 9 IV. PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES 14 V. OPERATIONS STRATEGIES AND PRINCIPLES 15 VI. EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE 20 VII. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES 21 VIII. COSTS & FUNDING 25 IX. FUTURE MOU MODIFICATIONS 29 ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT A Ramp Metering Locations ATTACHMENT 8 Project Devices; Ownership & Maintenance ATTACHMENT C Operations & Maintenance Costs 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 I. BACKGROUND Interstate 80, between the Carquinez Bridge and the San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge, is one of the most congested corridors in the San Francisco Bay Area. Traffic demands on the freeway far exceed the roadway capacity, causing severe congestion, unreliable travel times, and traffic diversion to the local arterials. During the peak periods, the majority of the corridor operates with significant congestion and delays. The congestion on the roadway network contributes to an increase in incident rates, including rear-end collisions on both the freeway and local arterials. Congestion and associated incidents in this corridor are expected to increase over the next 20 years. By 2015, delay for westbound 1-80 will increase by 50°/o in the AM peak, while delay for eastbound 1-80 will increase by 1 OOo/o in the PM peak. The San Pablo Avenue corridor is approximately 20 miles long and is the major travel corridor parallel to 1-80. This corridor extends from 17th Street in downtown Oakland to Hercules, through the cities of Emeryville, Berkeley and Albany in Alameda County; and the cities of El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, Hercules, and unincorporated portions of Contra Costa County. There are approximately 85 traffic signals along the project corridor. San Pablo Avenue is State Route 123 from' West McArthur Boulevard in Emeryville to Cutting Boulevard in Richmond. The East Bay SMART Corridor Program, which includes San Pablo Avenue, is an existing multi-modal Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) along the corridor. The program, which took effect in 2003, is a cooperative effort by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) and 15 local agencies. Components of the SMART Corridor include Closed Circuit TV (CCTV), Vehicle Detection System (VDS), Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP), and Transit Signal Priority (TSP). These technologies are used to improve the performance of transportation systems, by promoting efficient use of the existing roadway and transit systems. The goal of the SMART Corridor is to allow local agencies to better manage congestion and incidents, improve transportation safety, mobility and efficiency along San Pablo Avenue, and efficiently operate and manage emergency services and transit resources. In order to improve the efficiency of the entire transportation corridor, the 1-80 ICM project will expand and integrate the San Pablo Avenue portion of the SMART Corridor with new elements on San Pablo Avenue, 1-80 and crossing arterials. The primary goal of the 1-80 ICM project is to enhance the effectiveness of the existing transportation network, including the freeway, ramps, parallel arterials, and the crossing arterials in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, as well as the transit service. 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 The Project provides tools for Caltrans and local agencies to manage traffic, including: • Monitoring/measuring devices such as cameras, video detection systems and loop detectors; • Communication links to a central location: signal interconnect, wireless modems; • Traffic control devices; • Intelligence in form of software and algorithms to respond to changing traffic conditions on ramps and freeway; and • Tools to communicate traffic/transit information back to drivers The Project includes five major components: • Adaptive ramp metering; • Incident management; • Information to motorists regarding transit and traffic travel time; • Improvements along San Pablo Avenue and other arterials; and • System Integration. The Project benefits include: • More reliable travel time within the existing transportation network by optimizing the use of existing capacity. • Improved safety and operation of the transportation network. • Reduced traffic congestion by expediting incident clearance and recovery. • Improved air quality associated with reduced traffic congestion, and. • Enhanced real-time traveler information. The 1-80 ICM project is a $93 million project that is primarily funded with Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA) and Traffic Light Program (TLSP) funds secured in 2007. Contra Costa Measure J is a contributing fund for project development. Other local funds, including Alameda County 2000 Measure B funds, are also programmed for this project. This project is developed through a partnership among Caltrans, the ten municipalities along the corridor (Oakland, Emeryville, Albany, Berkeley, El Cerrito, Richmond, San Pablo, Pinole, Hercules, and Contra Costa County), AC Transit, WestCAT, Alameda County Transportation Commission, Contra Costa Transportation Authority, West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and the California Highway Patrol (CHP). 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 II. DEFINITION AND EXPLANATION OF TERMS Active Traffic Management (ATM)- The use of technology for real-time management of traffic flow and communication of travel information to drivers in an effort to reduce congestion and to increase throughput along a corridor. Adaptive Ramp Metering (ARM) -The use of freeway mainline, ramp, and local street traffic volumes to adjust metering rates for traffic entering the freeway on a real-time basis. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Cameras- Fixed and pan-tilt-zoom cameras mounted on poles to monitor freeway, on-ramp, and local street traffic flow conditions as a way to confirm actual conditions and to implement appropriate traffic management strategies. Changeable Message Signs (CMS)- Technology to provide advisory traveler information such as incidents, events, construction, maintenance, road closures, parking availability and travel times so that travelers can make informed choices of their travel mode or route. Corridor Steering Committee (CSC) - The 1-80 esc will be comprised of executive staff or designees of all member agencies to address any issues not resolved by the 1- 80 Technical Coordinating Committee (1-80 TCC). Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP)- Devices on emergency vehicles communicate with devices at traffic signals to provide a green traffic signal phase for emergency vehicles approaching an intersection. End-of-Queue Detection - Detection at the entrance to the on-ramp to monitor the length of queued vehicles waiting for the ramp meter and alerts the ramp meter controller if the queue is approaching the adjacent local intersection. Monitoring could be in terms of occupancy (on the loop) or volume differential (vehicles in vs. vehicles out). Highway Advisory Radio (HAR)- Radio system used to convey real-time traveler information to drivers during incidents or special events. Incident Condition -An operational scenario as agreed upon by partnering agencies such as loss of fifty-percent of the through lanes on the freeway for 30 minutes or more. Information Display Boards (IDB) - Large electronic signs used to display real-time traveler information with color and graphic capability to more efficiently communicate with drivers than is possible using traditional Changeable Message Signs. 6 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Trailblazer Signs -Devices that are located at critical decision points along potential local routes to efficiently guide traffic that has left the freeway along a dedicated route past an incident. Lane Use Signs (LUS) -An ATM device used to display graphic or text information relative to each specific lane, facilitating clear communication with motorists and dynamic lane management as needed for incident management or planned highway work. Microwave Vehicle Detection System (MVDS)- Uses microwave motion sensor to detect a moving vehicle. 1-80 Policy Advisory Committee (1-80 PAC)- A committee formed to provide guidance and direction on any issues that may arise that require additional input from communities within the 1-80 corridor. Signal Coordination -A traffic operations strategy of setting traffic signal timing plans and offsets such that a platoon of vehicles can travel along a corridor under a green phase as they approach each intersection. (See alas Signal Flush Plans) Signal Flush Plans - Special traffic signal timing plans that would be implemented at local intersections during freeway incidents in which a large amount of traffic would be expected to leave the freeway and use local streets to bypass an incident. Flush plans provide a long green phase for major traffic route during an incident. Plans are stored in the local traffic signal controller and called out by a plan number. These could be a series of timing plans used for different incident severity, are triggered under specified traffic volume thresholds, and will only be in effect until congestion dissipates on the local streets. (See also Signal Coordination) Signal Interconnect- Connecting traffic signals along a corridor using copper, fiber, or wireless media to enable data transfer and communication. Signal Timing Plans- Parameters for allowing green timing for each movement. 1-80 Technical Coordinating Committee (1-80 TCC) - Committee comprising of technical staff from agencies in the 1-80 ICM Corridor, responsible for day-to-day transportation service, operations and management of their respective systems within the 1-80 corridor. Transit Signal Priority (TSP)- Equipment installed on transit vehicles that communicates with equipment at the traffic signal to grant an early green or green extension. Transportation Management Center (TMC)- Central facility at Caltrans or local agencies that houses software, workstations, and staff to operate the system. 7 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Variable Advisory Speed Signs (VASS)- Device that provides timely information to motorists on suggested reduced speeds in advance of congestion or changing conditions. Also used for End of Queue Warning on the freeway. VASS could also be used for speed harmonization. Speed harmonization is a strategy of dynamically and automatically adjusting speed limits approaching areas of traffic congestion, collision, or special events to help maintain traffic flow and reduce risk of collisions due to speed differentials. 8 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Ill. PURPOSE OF MOU, PROJECT DESCRIPTION, AND PROJECT GOVERNANCE PURPOSE OF MOU This MOU serves the following purposes: • Confirm support from all project partners, particularly local support for ramp metering and other freeway elements; • Articulate key operations and maintenance (O&M) principles for continuing project development; • Clarify ownership, O&M, and management responsibilities; • Clarify the distribution of costs and funding sources; • Outline the framework for multi-agency cooperation, collaboration, and conflict resolution; • Identify which Smart Corridor devices will be made part of the 1-80 ICM project; and • Signify the ongoing commitment of the project partners to deliver the project and make it a success. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 1-80 ICM Project is located in Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, on a segment of 1-80 approximately 20 miles long, from just north of the 1-80/580/880 Interchange to just south of the Carquinez Bridge, on San Pablo Avenue from MacArthur Blvd. in Oakland to Cummings Skyway in Contra Costa County (portions of which are also designated as State Route 123), and on other local arterials along the corridor that connect 1-80 and San Pablo Avenue. The 1-80 ICM Project consists of five major components, as described below: a. Adaptive Ramp Metering Adaptive ramp metering (ARM) will be implemented at 44 on-ramps for both directions of the freeway during the weekday peak periods and weekends as needed (refer to Attachment ARM manages traffic volumes at the freeway on-ramps during recurring congestion and freeway incidents. Incident-related congestion can be managed through the use of more restrictive metering upstream and less restrictive metering of the incident. The ARM algorithm can adjust metering rates at each on-ramp based on the prevailing or real-time corridor traffic conditions, both on the freeway and the adjacent local arterial. 9 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 b. Incident Management During an incident, Active Traffic Management (ATM) strategies will be deployed to reduce delay and to prevent secondary incidents on the freeway, and to also manage incident traffic on local arterials. This will be accomplished through specific incident response plans (I RP), to be developed in coordination with the local agencies, that employ the 1-80 ICM project elements (i.e. CMS, CCTV, LUS, VASS) and San Pablo Avenue East Bay SMART Corridor devices (i.e. CCTV and MVDS) to expedite incident detection, response, and clearance while also minimizing incident impacts via enhanced motorist information. c. Transit and Traffic Motorist Information Real-time information for the transportation network, including travel speeds, travel time and transit options, will be provided to motorists and transit passengers via lOBs, CMS, HAR, and 511. This will assist motorists to make timely, informed, and personal decisions earlier in their journey through the corridor, thus, enhancing motorists' trip quality and convenience. This can also at times reduce traffic demand within the corridor by encouraging travelers to use available transit options or to postpone their travel to times when congestion is lower. d. Improvements along San Pablo Avenue Corridor and Other Arterials The 1-80 ICM Project includes upgraded traffic signal hardware, software and interconnect enhancements, and installation of arterial management components such as closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, trailblazer signs, CMS and communication and detection equipment on San Pablo Avenue from MacArthur Boulevard in Oakland to Cummings Skyway in Contra Costa County and local arterials. Other improvements include: extended transit signal priority along San Pablo Avenue Corridor and crossing arterials; extended emergency vehicle preemption; and installation of pedestrian push buttons and countdown signal heads at traffic signals in Pinole, minor traffic signal modification in El Cerrito, intersection striping improvements for transit near El Cerrito del Norte BART Station, and installation of two new traffic signals in Richmond. e. System Integration System integration provides for coordinated operations between all of the above project components and sharing of corridor traffic and transit 10 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 information among various agencies relative to 1-80, San Pablo Avenue and other key local arterials. GOVERNANCE It is the intent that all technical and operational matters be resolved among the partnering agencies at the lowest working level. In general, the 1-80 integrated corridor management activities will be directed through three bodies of governance, in the following order of hierarchy, from low to high: Technical Coordinating Committee (1-80 TCC): The 1-80 TCC will be comprised of technical staff responsible for day-to-day transportation service, operations and management of their respective systems within the 1-80 corridor. The 1-80 TCC will consist of representatives from Caltrans/District 4, the California Highway Patrol (CHP), Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC), AC Transit, Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), Contra Costa County (CCC), the West Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCT AC), WestCAT,, and the Cities of Hercules, Pinole, San Pablo, Richmond, El Cerrito, Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, and Oakland. The 1-80 TCC will develop operational strategies needed for integrated corridor system management, ultimately to be adopted by the 1-80 Corridor Steering Committee (CSC) as appropriate. The 1-80 TCC will ensure efficient monitoring and enhanced day-to-day freeway and arterial operations, incident management, and timely dissemination of real-time multimodal traffic data to travelers. The 1-80 TCC will directly interact, communicate, and exchange information and cooperatively assist in resolving issues. In the course of these activities, operational protocols will be developed to best serve ramp metering, incident management, signal operations, and transit service. While Caltrans will be responsible for 24/7 emergency deployment of the ICM components, The 1-80 TCC members will, on an ongoing basis, provide input and concurrence on operational strategies such as ramp metering rates or operational periods, flush plans, traffic signal modifications & coordination, and activation of trailblazer signs on local arterials during incidents or major events that affect transportation. 11 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 The 1-80 TCC will meet or as needed. At these meetings, the 1-80 TCC will review available traffic data and recommend solutions to issues relating to the integrated corridor management, including ramp metering and incident response. For example, Caltrans' representative(s) will provide a status report on the operations of ramp metering in both counties. The status report will include a list of operational issues that were reported by the local agencies and how these issues were resolved. If needed, the Caltrans 1-80 TCC representative will lead the 1-80 TCC meetings and help formulate recommended changes to the daily operations of the system within the 1-80 Corridor. Corridor Steering Committee (1-80 CSC): The 1-80 CSC will be comprised of executive staff or designees from all member agencies. The 1-80 esc will meet as needed, to address issues unresolved by the 1-80 TCC. Policy Advisory Committee (1-80 PAC): A Policy Advisory Committee (1-80 PAC) will provide guidarice and direction on any issues that may arise that require additional input from communities within the corridor. The 1-80 PAC will be comprised of three members: the Caltrans District 4 Director, one elected official from an Alameda County jurisdiction within the corridor appointed by the Alameda CTC, and one elected official appointed by WCCTAC. The 1-80 PAC meetings will be held on an as-needed basis. Table 1 below shows all of the partner agencies that will be represented by the three bodies. 12 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Table 1: 1-80 ICM Member Agencies Member Agencies California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) California Highway Patrol (CHP) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC) Contra Costa County Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) Western Contra Costa Transportation Advisory Committee (WCCTAC) AC Transit WestCAT City of Albany City of Berkeley City of El Cerrito City of Emeryville City of Hercules City of Oakland City of Pinole City of Richmond City of San Pablo 13 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 IV. PROJECT GOALS & OBJECTIVES The ICM strategies pursued herein shall: 1. Provide traffic operation on the corridor that is equitable and balanced for both the freeway and arterials. 2. Integrate transportation system management activities to enhance safety and mobility for all travel modes within the corridor. 3. Enhance overall transit travel time along corridor routes during normal operations. 4. Enhance trip reliability by providing consistent and predictable travel times on the freeway and local arterials. 5. Avoid impacts on local arterials while managing access at on-ramps during peak periods on weekdays and weekends. 6. Efficiently guide traffic naturally diverted to local arterials during major freeway incidents back to the freeway. ' 7. Cooperatively operate, manage and maintain all elements installed as part of the 1-80 ICM project in an integrated and coordinated manner. 8. Cooperatively develop, implement, evaluate and revise strategies to ensure balanced benefits to local, regional, and inter-regional travelers. 9. Cooperatively identify and address any adverse impacts in a timely fashion. 10. Ensure on-going communication among partnering agencies for timely review and adjustment of activities as needed. 11. Ensure timely and appropriate communication with the public, media, and elected officials. 12. Monitor, evaluate, and report on project performance to ensure compliance with goals and objectives. 13. Facilitate cooperative activities that ensure the sustainability of benefits from the project. 14 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 V. OPERATIONS STRATEGIES AND PRINCIPLES a. OPERATIONAL SCENARIOS & LEAD AGENCIES Table 2 below illustrates the operational strategies that will initially be deployed as part of the 1-80 ICM Project and the agencies that will take the lead in implementing the strategies. T bl 2 0 r a e - 'Pera 1ona I St t ra eg1es Facility Operational Strategy (Lead Agency or Agencies) Normal Operations Incident Management I Special Events Adaptive Ramp Metering (Caltrans) Freeway Adaptive Ramp Metering (Caltrans) Lane Use Signals (Caltrans) & Transit Priority (AC Transit & WestCAT) · Variable Advisory Speed Signs/ Ramps End-of-Queue Warning (Caltrans) Transit Priority (AC Transit & WestCAT) Signal Coordination (Local & Caltrans) Flush Plans (Caltrans) San Trailblazers (Caltrans) Pablo Transit Priority (AC Transit & WestCAT) Avenue Emergency Vehicle Preemption (1 51 Resp.)* Transit Priority (AC Transit & WestCAT) Emergency Vehicle Preemption (1st Resp.)* Signal Coordination (Local & Caltrans) Flush Plans (Caltrans) Crossing Transit Priority (AC Transit & WestCAT) Trailblazers (Caltrans) Arterials Emergency Vehicle Preemption (1st Resp.)* Transit Priority (AC Transit & WestCAT) Emergency Vehicle Preemption (1st Resp.)* Note: The project will add and upgrade Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) receivers along San Pablo Avenue and crossing arterials connecting to 1-80, as shown in Attachment B, for use by first responders. Emergency vehicle response will continue to be operated by the first responders. Normal Operations Under normal conditions, ramp metering will function under adaptive control. This means that traffic conditions along the entire corridor (freeway, ramps, and local streets) will be considered when determining metering rates at each ramp. Each ramp will have an end-of-queue detector to monitor the queue length of vehicles waiting on the on- ramp using either occupancy or volume differential between end-of-queue detector and ramp output loop. If the end of queue approaches the cross street, the ramp meter controller will increase the metering rate up to the maximum rate in order to reduce the queue. If the queue is not dissipating, the ramp meter controller will change the meter to rest on green until the queue is dissipated. At ramp HOV bypass lanes, TSP will allow equipped buses to obtain priority by expediting or flushing out any queue ahead of the bus. Ramp metering will be operated by Caltrans. 15 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT! 2-21-12 On San Pablo Avenue and crossing arterials (connecting San Pablo Avenue to 1-80), signal coordination and transit signal priority will be used to improve traffic flow throughout the corridor during normal operating conditions. Much of San Pablo Avenue already has traffic signal interconnect that allows for efficient signal timing coordination and progression. Additional signal interconnect on several crossing arterials will improve the flow of traffic between San Pablo Avenue and 1-80. The 1-80 ICM project will provide an update to the signal timing along the corridor for normal operating conditions. In the future, signal timing updates will be achieved through other programs, such as those administered by MTC. Local traffic signals will be controlled by the local agency during normal operations. As discussed below, Caltrans will have the ability to control certain signals if required during a special event or following an incident. TSP exists along much of San Pablo Avenue and serves routes such as AC Transit 72 Rapid. This equipment is also used for emergency vehicle preemption. The 1-80 ICM project will add TSP for San Pablo Avenue in the WestCAT service area, and for crossing arterials for AC Transit and WestCAT service areas. Incident I Special Events Management Incident conditions will be defined by the 1-80 Technical Coordinating Committee (TCC) (e.g. blockage of 50o/o of freeway lanes for 30 minutes or more). Under incident conditions, ramp metering will continue to operate under an adaptive control as described above. Since freeway conditions rapidly change following an incident, the ramp meter rates could frequently adjust in reaction to the changes. Ramp metering at on-ramps will still be operated such that spill backs onto the crossing arterials are avoided. LUS will be turned on based on specific incident conditions. Red X's, yellow diagonal arrows, or text messages will be displayed to convey conditions and guide traffic through the incident scene. Lane use signs will be operated by Caltrans. VASS will display an advisory reduced speed to reflect congestion or end- of-queue. Initially these signs will only be used for end-of-queue warning; however, the signs could be used for speed harmonization in the future. Speed harmonization is a strategy of dynamically and automatically adjusting speed limits approaching areas of traffic congestion, collision, or special events to help maintain traffic flow and reduce risk of collisions due to speed differentials. Variable advisory speed signs will be operated by Caltrans. During incident conditions, San Pablo Avenue and crossing arterials may become congested due to traffic that (naturally) leaves the freeway to use the local streets to bypass the incident. The project will not actively divert freeway traffic on to local streets. Trailblazer signs placed on San Pablo Avenue and local arterials will advise drivers where to return back to the freeway after passing the incident location. These signs are 16 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 meant to discourage the use of other local streets that could lead to more severe congestion on the local network. Traffic signal timing along a relevant incident route will be modified during an incident to help increase the throughput of traffic along that route, and to reduce recovery time to normal conditions. The incident timing is referred to as a "signal flush plan". Caltrans will be responsible for executing the appropriate flush plans on affected traffic signals (Caltrans and local agency owned) when an incident occurs. Caltrans and local agencies will develop the Incident Response Plan to help formulate acceptable timing plans that increases the throughput without adverse delays to local traffic including bicycles, pedestrians and transit. The timing plans will be preapproved so activation of them during incidents will be efficient.TSP and emergency vehicle preemption will still be operational during an incident. The Incident Response Plan will identify a specific subset of devices (ramp metering, VASS, CMS, LUS, Trailblazer signs, I DB, and traffic signals) that will be used to manage the network during an incident. Each scenario will be dependent on many different parameters including time of day, location, incident severity, and expected incident duration. Local agencies will review and approve the use of each strategy. When an incident occurs, Caltrans will determine the scenario that is most appropriate for the incident and deploy the appropriate strategy. ' b. OPERATING PRINCIPLES The following primary guidelines will be used in directing day-to-day transportation management and operational activities along the corridor: 1. General a. The project will not actively divert freeway traffic onto local streets in the event of an incident on the freeway. b. The 1-80 Technical Coordinating Committee (1-80 TCC) members shall actively participate in monitoring operations within their jurisdictions and in on-going communication relative to the corridor management operations. c. Caltrans shall be responsible for 24/7 monitoring of ICM devices on the arterials and freeway, and during incidents, selecting and executing the appropriate pre-determined plans, protocols, and parameters in accordance with the IRP. Such activities will be undertaken from the Transportation Management Center (TMC) jointly operated by Caltrans and the California Highway Patrol (available via telephone at 510-286- 17 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 6915), located at 111 Grand Avenue, Oakland, and staffed on a 24/7 basis. d. During normal conditions, each local agency shall have primary control and will be responsible for operating all the project devices within their jurisdiction. Refer to Attachment B for the project devices. Local agencies may also operate signals on San Pablo Avenue within Caltrans jurisdiction upon prior agreements and protocols developed for local needs. e. Local jurisdictions shall provide contact information for a 24/7 dispatch and/or on-call personnel to be contacted for emergency activities or notification purposes. f. For safety reasons, only under exigent and unforeseen circumstances such as being directed by law enforcement or in reaction to secondary accidents, Caltrans may be required to make short-term, spot decisions without first consulting with local agencies. Under such circumstances, Caltrans shall notify the local jurisdic,tions of the actions taken as soon as possible and practicable. 2. Adaptive Ramp Metering a. Ramp meters will be operating at the freeway on-ramps in both directions, during weekday and weekend peak periods. In addition, ramp meters may be activated during non-peak conditions, as needed, in response to prevailing traffic demand for special events or major incidents. b. Ramp metering will be operated in adaptive fashion, considering traffic demands and capacity on both the freeway and local arterials. During the metering periods, the implemented system will automatically adjust metering rates to ensure that queues at on-ramps do not extend beyond local agency-specified maximum end-of-queue locations, or shall rest on green for as long a time as necessary. c. End of queue detection will be used to monitor and contain the queues within the on-ramps, and when absolutely needed on the appropriate turn- lanes, as approved by local jurisdictions, on the local arterials specifically dedicated for freeway entry. Once queues extend beyond the end of queue detector, the ramp meter rate will increase or rest on green to avoid queuing that obstructs local traffic flow. 18 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 d. Ramp metering rates will be based on the Adaptive Ramp Metering Algorithm which will consider parameters such as end of queue detection, communication failures, etc. e. If the ramp metering implementation or ramp metering plan modification does not perform as expected so that there would be excessive delays and queues impacting traffic operations on the local arterial, or results in excessive complaints, Caltrans will consider other options, such as, changing ramp metering rates or operating on-ramps on temporary "rest on green". f. Caltrans shall respond to requests to modify ramp metering rates from local agencies for initial diagnosis of the issue. If the response times are not met or the operational issue results in significant or adverse impacts, the matter shall be referred to the 1-80 TCC for immediate resolution. g. The metering rates will be developed to avoid delays to buses either at on- ramps or crossing arterials. For buses that are bound for the freeway, transit signal priority will be provided for the HOV by-pass lane ramp metering signal. 3. Local Arterials a. Under normal conditions, local agencies will have, within their jurisdictions, control of the ICM devices and traffic signals which will be coordinated upon project implementation. b. Under incident conditions, pre-approved Incident Response Plans (IRPs) will be implemented by Caltrans. Caltrans will assume control of the ICM devices until the incident is cleared. Typical daily signal operations will be resumed immediately upon incident clearance and stabilization of traffic conditions. c. The I RPs will be evaluated periodically to assess their effectiveness and need for adjustments. Any adjustments to the I RPs will be subject to approval by the TCC. 19 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT! 2-21-12 d. Trailblazer signs installed on local arterials will direct motorists that have naturally diverted to the local streets, due to an incident on 1-80, back to the freeway at appropriate location( s) of the incident. Trailblazer signs will be activated only at locations where signal flush plans are turned on. e. TSP will be utilized at crossing arterials adjacent to on-ramps to provide priority for transit vehicles along those routes. 4. Public Outreach, Response to Inquiries and Complaints a. Caltrans shall address any and all public inquiries, complaints, and concerns in a timely manner via telephone hotline, e-mail, or correspondence, on an on-going basis, related to freeway operations or related to IRP. b. On local streets, the local jurisdiction will address any and all public ' inquiries, complaints, and concerns in a timely manner via telephone hotline, e-mail, or correspondence, on an on-going basis. c. Caltrans and local agencies will coordinate responses, as appropriate. VI. EQUIPMENT OWNERSHIP & MAINTENANCE The 1-80 ICM project utilizes various equipment installed throughout the corridor, which are located within different jurisdictional rights-of-way. Table 5 in Section VIII provides a summary of ownership and maintenance responsibilities by type of equipment and right- of-way. Attachment B provides the location of each type of equipment to be utilized, grouped by operational strategy. Attachment B also delineates the ownership and operations responsibilities. 20 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 VII. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES a. Project Documents The following documents have been prepared to design the project: Project Report: Defines the purpose and need for the project, identifies the alternative selected, describes how that alternative was decided upon, and describes how consensus was reached among stakeholders. Environmental Document: For a capital project to proceed, it must receive official federal, state, and environmental approvals as well as consensus from all the stakeholders and the public. Corridor Systems Management Plan (CSMP): Overall corridor operational conditions, existing and future conditions, list of future projects, and recommendations. Concept of Operations Report (Con Ops): Concept for proposed system, user-oriented operational description, operational needs, system overview, operational and support environment, operational scenarios, summary of impacts. Ramp Metering Plan (RMP): Ramp Meeting operational plans, including metering rates. Traffic Operations Analysis Report (TOAR): Existing traffic conditions, proposed alternatives, traffic forecasts, modeling results. The following documents will govern the implementation of the project: Project Implementation Plan Document identifying the staging and commissioning of each 1-80 ICM project element (TOS, TLSP, ARM, and ATM). Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan: Operational scenarios and cost of operations, maintenance and management for each city along the corridor. 21 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Incident Response Plan (IRP): Overall incident response plan that defines various incident scenarios and procedures for managing traffic congestion during incidents, including signal flush plans. System Integration Plan: Specifies the procedures, methods and strategies to implement the required project elements based on project documents and system requirements. Configuration Management Plan: Details the process to establish and maintain the integrity and control of software and hardware products. Outreach Plan: Outlines strategies to disseminate periodic project information and updates to various stakeholders. b. Construction The project will be constructed in six contracts -four construction contracts, one material procurement contract, and one systems integration contract. While local business preference is not allowed for State-funded construction contracts, such as these, outreach will be conducted to encourage local participation. PHASING AND IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE For delivery purposes, the 1-80 ICM project has been split into six contracts as shown in Table 3 below. 22 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 TABLE 3- SCHEDULE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DELIVERY Implementing Tentative Construction Agency for 1-80 ICM Construction Contracts Schedule Construction & Procurement Contracts Start End Project 1 : Software Development I March January 2015* Alameda CTC System Integration 2012 Project 2: Specialty Materials October April 2014 Alameda CTC Procurement 2012 Project 3: Traffic Operation Systems April 2011 May 2012 Alameda CTC Project 4: Adaptive Ramp Metering May 2012 December Caltrans 2013 Project 5: Active Traffic Management May 2012 April 2014 Caltrans Project 6: San Pablo Corridor Arterial May 2011 December Alameda CTC and Transit Improvement Project 2013 ' * Includes a 1-year rollout, implementation and commissionmg penod The public will be notified as appropriate of imminent construction activities. c. System Integration The Project deploys a number of components and equipment that need to communicate with each other and with the TMC. In order to achieve such automated data flow, various components of the project are linked via a data network. The disaggregate components will be controlled and communicated utilizing a custom application (software) that will be developed by the System Integrator. The System Integrator working with the 1-80 TCC will be responsible for developing a System Integration Plan for automated communications and interaction between the various devices and the TMC. Phase I of System Integration integrates devices on San Pablo Avenue (existing devices from East Bay SMART Corridor and new devices installed under the project) and Phase II will address the 1-80 devices and the interaction with San Pablo Avenue components system. System Integration provides for coordinated operations and sharing of corridor traffic and transit information among various agencies relative to 1-80, San Pablo Avenue Corridor and other key local arterials. Software is provided to enable operations of all 1-80 project elements from Caltrans TMC and share information with local agency TMC. 23 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 d. Implementation & Initial System Evaluation Project Implementation is outlined in the Project Implementation Plan with input provided by the 1-80 TCC. It is expected that Adaptive Ramp Metering and Active Traffic Management components of the projects listed on Table 3 will be activated at the same time, in early 2014. After the devices are installed, system components will be tested individually and then collectively prior to performing a full rollout. Following full roll-out, driver behavior is expected to adjust and eventually settle into a repetitive, predictive pattern. The system will then be monitored extensively and minor fine tuning of signal timing and ramp metering algorithms will be performed as appropriate. The monitoring activities will include evaluating impacts of the project on transit operations and the magnitude of traffic diversion to local streets. Strategic transit enhancements, such as relocation of bus stops, etc., changes to the signal flush plans, and use of the trailblazer signs may be implemented to address such impacts. A study will be done to document conditions before and after the project is implemented, recommend changes, if necessary, and report on the project benefits. e. Regular Operations & Maintenance The regular operations and maintenance will be in accordance with the Project Operations and Maintenance Plan (O&M) developed for the project with input provided by the 1-80 TCC. The O&M Plan addresses staffing, training, performance monitoring and reporting, and data ownership. f. Configuration and Change Management The configuration and change management will be in accordance with the Project Configuration Management Plan developed for the project with input provided by the 1-80 TCC. The Configuration Management Plan details the process to establish and maintain the integrity and control of software and hardware products. 24 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 VIII. COSTS & FUNDING I The project is funded by various fund sources for the different phases of the project- Project Development, Construction, and Operation & Maintenance phases. Funding for each phase is outlined as follows: a. Project Development Phase: The following table (Table 4) breaks down funding for the project development phase: Table 4- Project Development Funding Sources Fund Source Funding Agency Amount CMAQ (Fed) Federal $3,243,000 STIP (CCC) State $ 954,000 CMATIP Alameda CTC $ 1,080,000 Measure J CCTA $ 4,876,000 WCCTAC WCCTAC $ 47,000 2000 Measure B Alameda CTC $ 1,800,000 TFCA BAAQMD $ 1,155,000 Total $ 13,155,000 b. Construction Phase: The construction of freeway portion of 1-80 ICM project is funded by $55.3 million from California State Proposition 1 B Bond funds - Corridor Mobility Improvement Account (CMIA). The construction of San Pablo Avenue components is funded by $21.4 million from California State Proposition 1 B Bond funds -Traffic Light Program (TLSP) Account. c. Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Phase: Caltrans is responsible for funding, operating and maintaining the equipment in State right-of-way, except for traffic signals subject to other maintenance agreements and EVP receivers at Caltrans-maintained traffic signals. Caltrans shall maintain TSP receivers at HOV ramp meter bypass lanes. • Caltrans is responsible for funding the 24/7 monitoring of the 1-80 ICM from the TMC. 25 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 • Within Alameda County outside of State right-of-way, cities will be responsible for operations and maintenance of the equipment. Alameda CTC will provide funding for operating and maintaining ICM equipment. • Within Contra Costa County outside of State right-of-way, local jurisdictions will be responsible for operations and maintenance of ICM equipment, and may choose to contract with Contra Costa County for maintenance. Local jurisdictions will not be responsible for funding the operations and maintenance of ICM equipment in perpetuity. CCTA will secure $2,000,000 in funding for operating and maintaining ICM equipment. This amount is estimated to fund about 15 years of operations and maintenance. CCT A will seek additional funding beyond the $2 million from regional and other sources. • Funding for East Bay SMART Corridor devices that are not used for deploying 1-80 ICM strategies will continue to be funded under the terms of the existing O&M Agreement between Alameda CTC and the local agencies. • Cities I Contra Costa County will be responsible for funding, operating and maintaining existing and upgraded traffic signals within their right-of-way. • Cities I Contra Costa County will be responsible for funding, operating and maintaining non-ICM equipment requested by local agencies within their right-of- way. This includes speed feedback signs (Pinole) and Changeable Message Signs on local arterials (Oakland). • Funding for the TSP equipment in transit vehicles will be provided as part of the 1-80 ICM project. Installation, Operation and maintenance of TSP equipment in the transit vehicles, and funding for installation, operations and maintenance of such equipment, will be the responsibility of the respective transit agency. The foregoing is summarized in Table 5 below: 26 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Table 5 - O&M and Funding Responsibility Table O&M Funding Grouping ROW Equipment Responsibility Responsibility CCTV Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans MVDS Caltrans Caltrans TSP Caltrans Caltrans East Bay SMART Corridor Equipment CCTV Cities/County * Alameda CTC -Used for ICM Strategy or CCTA Non- MVDS Cities/County * Alameda CTC Caltrans or CCTA TSP Cities/County * CCTA/Aiameda CTC* CCTV NONE NONE Caltrans MVDS NONE NONE East Bay SMART Corridor TSP NONE NONE Equipment CCTV , Cities/County Cities/County - NOT used for ICM Strategy Non- MVDS NONE NONE Caltrans TSP Cities** Cities** CCTV Caltrans Caltrans MVDS NONE NONE TRAILBLAZERS Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans TRAFFIC SIGNAL Caltrans Caltrans TSP Caltrans Caltrans EVP Caltrans Caltrans 1-80 ICM Equipment -Used for ICM Strategy CCTV Cities/County CCTA*** (CC only)* MVDS Cities/County CCTA*** (CC only)* TRAILBLAZERS Cities/County Alameda CTC Non- or CCTA Caltrans TRAFFIC SIGNAL Cities/County Cities/County TSP Cities/County Alameda CTC or CCTA EVP Cities/County Cities/County 27 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Caltrans Ramp Meter HOV TSP Caltrans Caltrans OAKLAND: PTZ cameras Arterial CMS Oakland Oakland Intersection Detection (VID, Magnetometer), Video Encoders 1-80 ICM Equipment - Other/ Requested by Cities Non- BERKELEY: Caltrans Intersection Video Berkeley Berkeley Detection RICHMOND: Intersection Video Richmond Richmond Detection PINOLE: Pinole Pinole Speed feedback signs NOTES: * Contra Costa cities may contract with Contra Costa County for maintenance of these devices. , **No TSPs in Contra Costa County that are not used for 1-80 ICM Strategy. No new CCTV or MVDS in Alameda County. Refer to Attachment C for detailed estimates of operations and maintenance costs in each jurisdiction. Responsibility for funding O&M costs is detailed in Table 5 above. The estimates are provided to document assumptions on how the O&M costs are derived. 28 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 IX. FUTURE MOU MODIFICATIONS This MOU is a legally non-binding document. However, revisions to this MOU may be requested by the 1-80 TCC and approved by the esc. Revisions may also be recommended by the esc. In either case, implementation of changes to the MOU would require a written amendment by all the partnering agencies that are signatories of this MOU. This MOU expires after ten years from the date of its execution, unless extended by partnering agencies pursuant to an approved amendment. X. NEED FOR ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS New maintenance agreements or amendments to existing maintenance agreements between Caltrans and affected jurisdictions will be developed and executed as necessary to address maintenance arrangements, liabilities, or any other legal issues. The parties to this MOU specifically repudiate the division of liability and indemnification outlined in Government Code section 895.2, and will address these topics in future agreements, as necessary. 29 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 Signature Page to include signature lines for the following partnering agencies: Caltrans City of Emeryville Alameda CTC City of Oakland CCTA City of San Pablo WCCTAC City of Richmond Contra Costa County City of Pinole City of Albany City of Hercules City of El Cerrito AC Transit WestCAT City of Berkeley 30 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 ATTACHMENT A 31 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 R amp M t e enng L f oca 1ons Location Lane City Configuration EASTBOUND Powell St. 2 Emeryville Ashby Ave./Potter St. 2 Berkeley University Ave. 2 Berkeley Gilman St. 2 Berkeley Buchanan St. 1 Albany Central Ave. 2 Richmond Carlson Blvd. 2 Richmond Cutting Blvd. (loop ramp) 1 Richmond Cutting Blvd. 2 Richmond San Pablo Ave. 2 ' Richmond San Pablo Dam Rd. 1 San Pablo El Portal Dr. 2 Richmond Eastbound Hilltop Dr. 1 Richmond (loop ramp) Westbound Hilltop Dr. 1+1* Richmond Eastbound Fitzgerald/ Pinole Richmond Pkwy. (loop 2 ramp) Westbound Richmond Fitzgerald/Richmond 1 Parkway Southbound Appian Way 1 Pinole (loop ramp) Northbound Appian Way 2 Pinole Pinole Valley Rd. 1 Pinole John Muir Pkwy. (SR-4) By another project Willow Ave. By another project Cummings Skyway By another project Note: * Denotes TSP for HOV By-pass Lane 32 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 R amp M t e enng L f oca 1ons Location Configuration City WESTBOUND San Pablo Ave. I Pomona 1 CC County St. Cummings Skyway 1 CC County Willow Ave. By another project John Muir Parkway (SR-4) 2+1* Hercules Pinole Valley Rd. 2 Pinole Appian Way 2 Pinole Fitzgerald Dr./Richmond 1 Richmond Parkway Westbound Hilltop Dr. 1 +1 * Richmond (loop ramp) Hilltop Dr. 1+1* Richmond ' El Portal Dr. 2 CC County San Pablo Dam Rd. 2 San Pablo Solano Ave. 1 Richmond Barrett Ave. 2 Richmond Potrero Ave. 2 Richmond Carlson Blvd. 2 Richmond Central Ave. 1 Richmond Buchanan St. 2 Albany Gilman St. 1+1 * Berkeley University Ave. (loop) 1 Berkeley Ashby Ave. & Frontage 2+1* Berkeley Rd. Powell St./Frontage Rd. 2 Emeryville Powell St. 1 Emeryville Note:* Denotes TSP for HOV By-pass Lane 33 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 ATTACHMENT B 34 ---PAGE BREAK--- Cameras INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT 8 CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) CAMERA LOCATIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street Used by 1-80 ICM Vicinity Project? EXISTING SMART CORRIDOR CCTV CAMERA LOCATIONS (USED FOR 1-80 INCIDENT MANAGEMENT) 1 San Pablo Ave John Muir Pkwy Hercules Yes 2 San Pablo Ave Richmond Pkwy Richmond Yes 3 San Pablo Ave San Pablo Dam Rd San Pablo Yes 4 San Pablo Dam Rd 1-80 SB Ramps San Pablo Yes 5 San Pablo Ave Cutting Blvd El Cerrito Yes 6 San Pablo Ave Portero Ave El Cerrito Yes 7 Central Ave 1-80 NB ramps Richmond Yes 8 San Pablo Ave Central Ave El Cerrito Yes 9 Buchanan St 1-80 NB Ramps Albany Yes 10 San Pablo Ave Buchanan St Albany Yes 11 San Pablo Ave Gilman St Berkeley Yes 12 San Pablo Ave University Ave Berkeley Yes 13 San Pablo Ave Ashby Ave Berkeley Yes 14 San Pablo Ave Powell St I Stanford Ave Oakland Yes 15 San Pablo Ave W. Grand Ave Oakland Yes EXISTING SMART CORRIDOR CCTV CAMERA LOCATIONS (*NOT* USED FOR 1-80 INCIDENT MANAGEMENT) 1 San Pablo Ave Church Ln San Pablo No 2 San Pablo Ave Macdonald Ave Richmond No 3 University Ave 6th St Berkeley No 4 Ashby Ave 7th St Berkeley No 5 Powell St Christie Ave Emeryville No 6 San Pablo Ave 40th St Emeryville No 7 W. Grand Ave Mandela Pkwy Oakland No NEW 1-80 ICM PTZ CCTV LOCATIONS (VIDEO ENCODER AT CAL TRANS-MAINTAINED LOCATIONS) 1 San Pablo Ave MacArthur Blvd Oakland Yes 2 1-80 EB on-ramp Powell St Emeryville Yes 3 1-80 WB on/off ramps Frontage Road/ Captian Dr Emeryville Yes 4 1-80 EB on/off ramps Ashby Berkeley Yes 5 1-80 WB on-ramp University Berkeley Yes 6 1-80 EB on/off ramps Gilman Berkeley Yes 7 1-80 WB on/off ramp Buchanan St Albany Yes 8 1-80 WB on/off ramp Central Ave Richmond Yes 9 1-80 WB on-ramp Potrero El Cerrito Yes 10 1-80 WB on-ramp Cutting Richmond Yes 11 1-80 WB on/off ramps Carlson Richmond Yes 12 1-80 EB on/off ramps Carlson Richmond Yes 13 1-80 EB on/off ramps San Pablo Ave Richmond Yes 14 1-80 EB on/off ramps San Pablo Dam Rd San Pablo Yes 15 1-80 WB on-ramp El Portal San Pablo Yes 16 1-80 EB on/off ramps El Portal San Pablo Yes Video Encoder? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No - Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes ROW (Maintaining Agency, if different) Hercules Richmond San Pablo Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Oakland Oakland Richmond Richmond Berkeley Caltrans {Berkeley) Emeryville Caltrans Oakland Caltrans {CCTV O&M by Oakland) Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans C:\Users\mur34283\0ocuments\PROJECf FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revlslons\Final Verslon\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINALxls Operating Agency- Normal Hercules Richmond San Pablo Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Caltrans Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Oakland Oakland Richmond Richmond Berkeley Berkeley Emeryville Caltrans Oakland Oakland Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans - Operating Agency- Incidents Cal trans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans m X I OJ 11 z r 0 ;o 11 -f N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT 8 CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION (CCTV) CAMERA LOCATIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 17 1-80 WB on/off ramps Hilltop 18 1-80 EB on/off ramps Hilltop 19 1-80 WB on/off ramps Richmond Parkway 20 1-80 EB on/off ramps Richmond Parkway 21 1-80 EB on/off ramps Appian 22 1-80 WB on/off ramps Appian 23 1-80 WB on/off ramps Pinole Valley Rd 24 1-80 WB on-ramp Willow 25 1-80 EB on/off ramps Willow 26 1-80 WB on-ramp Cummings Skyway 27 San Pablo Ave 20th 28 San Pablo Ave 30th 29 San Pablo Ave 35th 30 Grand Harrison 31 Grand Broadway 32 Grand MacArthur Blvd 33 Grand Lake Park 34 San Pablo Ave El Portal 35 San Pablo Ave Hilltop 36 San Pablo Ave Appian 37 San Pablo Ave Pinole Valley Rd 38 San Pablo Ave Willow Ave 39 San Pablo Ave Cummings Cameras Used by 1-80 ICM Video ROW (Maintaining Vicinity Project? Encoder? Agency, if different) Richmond Yes Yes Cal trans Richmond Yes Yes Cal trans Richmond Yes Yes Caltrans Pinole Yes Yes Caltrans Pinole Yes Yes Cal trans Pinole Yes Yes Caltrans Pinole Yes Yes Caltrans Hercules Yes Yes Cal trans Hercules Yes Yes Cal trans Conta Costa County Yes Yes Caltrans Oakland Yes No Oakland Oakland Yes No Oakland Oakland Yes No Oakland Oakland Yes No Oakland Oakland Yes No Oakland Oakland Yes No Oakland Oakland Yes No Oakland San Pablo Yes Yes San Pablo Richmond Yes Yes Richmond Pinole Yes Yes Pinole Pinole Yes Yes Pinole Conta Costa County Yes Yes Conta Costa County Conta Costa County Yes Yes Conta Costa County OAKLAND VIDEO ENCODER LOCATIONS (VIDEO DETECTION CAMERAS) 1 W. Grand Ave Mandela Pkwy Oakland No Yes Oakland 2 W. Grand Ave Adeline St Oakland No Yes_ Oakland 3 W. Grand Ave Broadway Oakland No Yes Oakland 4 Grand Ave Webster St Oakland No Yes Oakland 5 Grand Ave Valdez St Oakland No Yes Oakland 6 Grand Ave MacArthur Blvd Oakland No Yes Oakland 7 MacArthur Blvd Lakeshore Ave Oakland No Yes Oakland 8 Lakeshore Ave Lake Park Oakland No Yes Oakland 9 Grand Ave Lake Park Oakland No Yes Oakland C:\Users\mur34283\0ocuments\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revlslons\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency- Normal Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Caltrans Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland San Pablo Richmond Pinole Pinole Conta Costa County Conta Costa County Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Caltrans Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Ca.ltrans Cal trans Caltrans Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used Not Used I I I m X I OJ -1 z r 0 -1 N I N ~ I N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B VEHICLE DETECTION LOCATIONS (COUNT STATIONS) 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street Vehicle Detection Used by 1-80 ICM Vicinity Project? EXISTING SMART CORRIDOR MICROWAVE VEHICLE DETECTION STATIONS 1 John Muir Pkwy east of San Pablo Ave Hercules Yes 2 San Pablo Ave southof Sycamore Hercules Yes 3 San Pablo Ave south of Del Monte Pinole Yes 4 San Pablo Ave south of Richmond Pkwy Richmond Yes 4 Richmond Pkwy west of 1-80 Richmond Yes 6 San Pablo Ave south of Robert H. Miller Richmond Yes 7 San Pablo Ave south of El Portal San Pablo Yes 8 San Pablo Ave south of Barrett Richmond Yes 9 San Pablo Ave south of Eastshore I Hill El Cerrito Yes 10 San Pablo Ave south of Portera El Cerrito Yes 11 Portera Ave east of 1-80 El Cerrito Yes 12 Central Ave east of 1-80 El Cerrito Yes 13 San Pablo Ave south of Fairmont Albany Yes 14 San Pablo Ave south of Buchanan Albany Yes 15 Buchanan Ave east of 1-80 Albany Yes 16 San Pablo Ave south of Gilman Berkeley Yes 17 Gilman east of 1-80 Berkeley Yes 18 San Pablo Ave south of University Berkeley Yes 19 University Ave east of 1-80 Berkeley Yes 20 San Pablo Ave south of Ashby Berkeley Yes 21 Ashby Ave east of 1-80 Berkeley Yes - 22 San Pablo Ave south of Powell I Stanford Emeryville Yes 23 Powell east of 1-80 Emeryville Yes NEW 1-80 ICM MICROWAVE VEHICLE DETECTION STATIONS 1 San Pablo Dam Rd east of San Pablo Ave San Pablo Yes 2 El Portal Dr east of Mission Bell Dr San Pablo Yes 3 Hilltop Dr south of Hillview Dr Richmond Yes 4 Richmond Pkwy east of Lakeside Dr Richmond Yes 4 Appian Way north of Mann Dr Pinole Yes 6 San Pablo Ave west of Oakridge Rd Pinole Yes 7 Pinole Valley Rd south of Henry Ave Pinole Yes 8 San Pablo Ave south of Victoria Crescent Hercules Yes 9 San Pablo Ave west of Cummings Skwy Conta Costa County Yes 10 San Pablo Ave east of Cummins Skwy Conta Costa County Yes - ROW (Maintaining Agency, if different) Contra Costa County Hercules Pinole Richmond Richmond Richmond San Pablo Richmond Caltrans Caltrans El Cerrito El Cerrito Caltrans Caltrans Albany Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Emeryville San Pablo San Pablo Richmond Richmond Pinole Pinole Pinole Hercules Conta Costa County Conta Costa County C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revislons\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 6_2012 0216-FINALxls Operating Agency - Normal Contra Costa County Hercules Pinole Richmond Richmond Richmond San Pablo Richmond Caltrans Caltrans El Cerrito El Cerrito Caltrans Caltrans Albany Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Caltrans Emeryville San Pablo San Pablo Richmond Richmond Pinole Pinole Pinole Hercules Conta Costa County Conta Costa County Operating Agency - Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans I I : I I m I OJ -I 11 z r 0 ;a -I N I N l N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATIACHMENT 8 EMERGENCY VEHICLE DETECTION (EVP)/ TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY (TSP) INTERSECTIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street Vicinity NEW 1-80 ICM TSP INTERSECTIONS 1 San Pablo Ave WillowRd Hercules 2 WillowRd Hawthorne Dr Hercules 3 San Pablo Ave Victoria Crescent E Hercules 4 San Pablo Ave John Muir Pkwy (SR 4) Hercules 5 San Pablo Ave Transit Center Hercules 6 San Pablo Ave Sycamore Ave Hercules 7 Sycamore Ave WillowRd Hercules 8 San Pablo Ave Hercules Ave Hercules 9 San Pablo Ave John St Pinole 10 San Pablo Ave Pinole Valley Rd Pinole 11 San Pablo Ave Fernandez Ave Pinole 12 San Pablo Ave Tennent Ave Pinole 13 Pinole Valley Rd Tennent Ave Pinole 14 Pinole Valley Rd Henry Ave Pinole 15 Pinole Valley Rd Kaiser Entrance Pinole 16 San Pablo Ave Oak Ridge ln Pinole 17 San Pablo Ave Appian Way Pinole 18 San Pablo Ave Sunnyview Dr Pinole 19 San Pablo Ave Pinole Shores Pinole 20 San Pablo Ave Del Monte Dr Pinole 21 San Pablo Ave Tara Hills Dr Pinole 22 San Pablo Ave Shamrock Dr Pinole 23 San Pablo Ave Crestwood Dr Pinole 24 San Pablo Ave Kay Rd Pinole 25 San Pablo Ave Richmond Pkwy Richmond 26 Richmond Pkwy lakeside Dr Richmond 27 Richmond Pkwy Bella Vista Entrance Richmond 28 San Pablo Ave Hilltop Dr Richmond 29 San Pablo Ave Robert Miller Dr Richmond 30 San Pablo Ave Rivers St San Pablo NEW 1-80 ICM TSP FOR RAMP METER HOV LANES 1 John Muir Parkway (SR-4) 1-80 WB on-ramp Hercules 2 Hilltop Dr 1-80 WB on-ramp Richmond 3 Hilltop Dr 1-80 EB on-ramp Richmond 4 Hilltop Dr 1-80 WB on-ramp (loop) Richmond 5 GilmanSt 1-80 WB on-ramp Berkeley 6 University Ave (loop) 1-80 WB on-ramp Berkeley 7 Ashby Ave 1-80 WB on-ramp Berkeley EVP-TSP ROW (Maintaining Transit Agency User Agency, if different) Contra Costa County WestCAT Regional Hercules WestCAT Regional Contra Costa County WestCAT Regional Contra Costa County WestCAT Regional Hercules WestCAT Regional Hercules WestCAT Regional Hercules WestCAT Regional Hercules WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Pinole WestCAT Regional Contra Costa County WestCAT Regional Contra Costa County WestCAT Regional Richmond WestCAT Regional AC Transit 72R Richmond WestCAT Regional AC Transit 72R Richmond WestCAT Regional AC Transit 72R Richmond AC Transit 72R Richmond AC Transit 72R San Pablo AC Transit 72R Caltrans WestCAT Regional Caltrans AC Transit Trans bay service Caltrans AC Transit Transbay service Caltrans AC Transit Trans bay service Caltrans AC Transit Transbay service Caltrans AC Transit Transbay service Caltrans AC Transit Transbay service NEW 1-80 ICM EVP ONLY INSTALLATIONS (*CAL TRANS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINENCE OF EVP EQUIPMENT BUT NOT REPLACEMENT) 1 Willow Ave 1-80 WB Off Ramp Hercules Caltrans* None at this time 2 Pinole Valley Rd San Pablo Ave Pinole Pinole None at this time 3 Appian Way Canyon Dr Pinole Pinole None at this time 4 Appian Way 1-80 WB Oft Ramp Pinole Caltrans* None at this time 5 Appian Way 1-80 EB On Ramp Pinole Caltrans• None at this time 6 Richmond Pkwy 1-80 EB Oft Ramp Richmond Caltrans• None at this time 7 Richmond Pkwy 1-80 WB On Ramp (HOV) Richmond Caltrans• None at this time 8 Hilltop Dr Blume Dr Richmond Richmond None at this time 9 Hilltop Dr Shane Dr Richmond Richmond None at this time 10 Hilltop Dr Robert Miller Dr Richmond Richmond None at this time 11 Hilltop Dr Hillview Dr Richmond Richmond None at this time 12 Hilltop Dr Research Dr Richmond Richmond None at this time 13 Hilltop Dr 1-80 EB Oft Ramp Richmond Caltrans* None at this time C:\U"'rs\rnur~l83\0oc:umenU\Pfi.OJECTFIL£S\1-801CM\MOU\MOURe.vlslons\Fin11Verslon\Firnti\Att.chment8_20120216-FtNAL.Id' m X I OJ 11 z r 0 ;o 11 N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B EMERGENCY VEHICLE DETECTION (EVP)/ TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY (TSP) INTERSECTIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street Vicinity 14 Hilltop Dr 1-80 WB Off Ramp Richmond 15 El Portal Dr Rollingwood Lane San Pablo 16 El Portal Dr Road 20 San Pablo 17 El Portal Dr 1-80 EB On Ramp San Pablo 18 El Portal Dr 1-80 WB Off Ramp San Pablo 19 San Pablo Dam Rd Ventura Ave San Pablo 20 San Pablo Dam Rd Contra Costa Ave San Pablo 21 San Pablo Dam Rd 1-80 EB On Ramp/Amador St San Pablo 22 San Pablo Dam Rd 1-80 WB Off Ramp San Pablo 23 Ave AmadorSt Richmond (NEW SIGNAL) 24 Ave 1-80 WB Off Ramp Richmond (NEW SIGNAL) 25 Cutting Blvd 1-80 HOV Ramp Richmond 26 Cutting Blvd 1-80 WB Off Ramp Richmond 27 Potrero Ave 1-80 EB Off Ramp EICerrito 28 Central Ave Carlson Blvd EICerrito 29 Central Ave San Luis Ave/Pierce St Richmond 30 Central Ave 1-80 EB Off Ramp Richmond 31 Central Ave San Joaquin St/Jacuzzi St Richmond 32 Fairmount Ave San Pablo Ave El Cerrito 33 Buchanan St 1-80 Eastbound Ramps Albany 34 Buchanan St 1-80 Westbound Ramps Albany 35 GilmanSt Eight St Berkeley 36 GilmanSt Sixth St Berkeley 37 University Ave Ninth St Berkeley 38 University Ave Sixth St Berkeley 39 Ashby Ave Seventh St Berkeley 40 Grand Ave Lake Park/1-580 Off Ramp Oakland 41 Grand Ave Macarthur Blvd Oakland 42 West Grand Ave El Embaracadero Oakland 43 West Grand Ave Valdez St Oakland 44 West Grand Ave WebsterSt Oakland 45 West Grand Ave Broadway Oakland 46 West Grand Ave MarketSt Oakland 47 West Grand Ave AdelineSt Oakland 48 West Grand Ave Poplar St Oakland 49 West Grand Ave Mandela Pkwy Oakland EVP-TSP ROW (Maintaining Transit Agency User Agency, if different) Caltrans• None at this time San Pablo None at this time San Pablo None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans• None at this time San Pablo None at this time San Pablo None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans* None at this time Caltrans (Richmond) None at this time Caltrans (Richmond) None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans* None at this time Caltrans• None at this time EICerrito None at this time Richmond None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans• None at this time Caltrans* None at this time Berkeley None at this time Berkeley None at this time Berkeley None at this time Berkeley None at this time Caltrans (Berkeley) None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time Oakland None at this time EXISTING EAST BAY SMART CORRIDOR TSP INSTALLATIONS (*CALTRANS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINENCE OF EVP EQUIPMENT BUT NOT REPLACEMI 1 San Pablo Ave Rumrill Rd San Pablo San Pablo ACTransit (72R) 2 San Pablo Ave El Portal Dr San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 3 San Pablo Ave International Market PI San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 4 San Pablo Ave 23rd St San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 5 San Pablo Ave Van Ness St San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 6 San Pablo Ave Church Ln San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 7 San Pablo Ave Vale Rd San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 8 San Pablo Ave San Pablo Dam Rd San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 9 San Pablo Ave Food Maxx Entr San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 10 San Pablo Ave Rheem Ave San Pablo San Pablo AC Transit (72R) 11 San Pablo Ave Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) 12 San Pablo Ave Esmond Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) 13 San Pablo Ave Garvin Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) 14 San Pablo Ave Solano Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) 15 San Pablo Ave Clinton Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) 16 San Pablo Ave Sierra Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) 17 San Pablo Ave Barrett Ave Richmond Richmond AC Transit (72R) C:\Uurs\mur;.l.l83\0ocumenb\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Rev!Jions\Finll Verilon\Fl~I\Attachm•nt 8_2.012 02 16·FINAUds m X I OJ -I , z r 0 , -I N I ~ I ~ ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B EMERGENCY VEHICLE DETECTION (EVP)/ TRANSIT SIGNAL PRIORITY (TSP)INTERSECTIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street Vicinity 18 San Pablo Ave EB 80 Ramps I Roosevelt Richmond 19 San Pablo Ave MacDonald Ave Richmond 20 San Pablo Ave Conlon Ave EICerrito 21 San Pablo Ave Knott Ave El Cerrito 22 San Pablo Ave Cutting Blvd El Cerrito 23 San Pablo Ave Hill St I Eastshore Blvd EICerrito 24 San Pablo Ave Potrero Ave El Cerrito 25 San Pablo Ave Manila Ave I Bayview Ave El Cerrito 26 San Pablo Ave Schmidt Ln El Cerrito 27 San Pablo Ave Moeser Ln El Cerrito 28 San Pablo Ave Stockton Ave EICerrito 29 San Pablo Ave Central Ave EICerrito 30 San Pablo Ave Fairmount Ave El Cerrito 31 San Pablo Ave Carlson Blvd El Cerrito 32 San Pablo Ave Brighton Ave Albany 33 San Pablo Ave Clay St Albany 34 San Pablo Ave Washington Ave Albany 35 San Pablo Ave Solano Ave Albany 36 San Pablo Ave Buchanan St Albany 37 San Pablo Ave Marin Ave Albany 38 San Pablo Ave Monroe St Albany 39 San Pablo Ave Gilman St Berkeley 40 San Pablo Ave Cedar St Berkeley 41 San Pablo Ave Delaware St Berkeley 42 San Pablo Ave University Ave Berkeley 43 San Pablo Ave Addison St Berkeley 44 San Pablo Ave Allston Way Berkeley 45 San Pablo Ave Dwight Way Berkeley 46 San Pablo Ave Grayson St Berkeley 47 San Pablo Ave Heinz Berkeley 48 San Pablo Ave Ashby Ave (SR 13) Berkeley 49 San Pablo Ave 65thSt Oakland 50 San Pablo Ave Alcatraz Ave Oakland 51 San Pablo Ave 63rd St Oakland 52 San Pablo Ave Powell St I Stanford Ave Oakland 53 San Pablo Ave 53rd St Emeryville 54 San Pablo Ave 47th St Emeryville 55 San Pablo Ave 45th St Emeryville 56 San Pablo Ave Park Ave Emeryville 57 San Pablo Ave 40th St Emeryville 58 San Pablo Ave Adeline St I MacArthur Emeryville 59 San Pablo Ave 36th St Oakland 60 San Pablo Ave 35th St Oakland 61 San Pablo Ave 31st St I Market St I 30th St Oakland 62 San Pablo Ave 27th St Oakland 63 San Pablo Ave West St /25th St Oakland 64 San Pablo Ave West Grand Ave Oakland EVP-TSP ROW (Maintaining Transit Agency User Agency, if different) Richmond AC Transit (72R) Richmond AC Transit (72R) El Cerrito AC Transit (72R) El Cerrito AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• ACTransit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* ACTransit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Berkeley) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Oakland) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Oakland) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Oakland) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans (Oakland) AC Transit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• ACTransit (72R) Caltrans* AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Caltrans• AC Transit (72R) Oakland AC Transit (72R) Oakland AC Transit (72R) Oakland AC Transit (72R) Oakland AC Transit (72R) Oakland AC Transit (72R) Oakland AC Transit (72R) C:\U~trs\rnur34:Z1B\DocumenU\PROJECT FILES\1-ao ICM\MOU\MOU fl•vlslon$\Fin•l 8_2tll2 01 16-FINALxls m I OJ z r 0 N I N ~ l ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B TRAILBLAZER SIGNS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 1 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of W. Grand Ave 2 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of 23rd St 3 San Pablo Ave- northbound north of Aileen St 4 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Stanford St 5 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Carrison St 6 San Pablo Ave- southbound south of Burnett St 7 San Pablo Ave- northbound north of Addison St 8 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of University Ave 9 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Gilman Ave 10 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Gilman Ave 11 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Marin Ave 12 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Buchanan St 13 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Central Ave 14 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Central Ave 15 San Pablo Ave- northbound north of Hill St 16 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Hill St 17 San Pablo Ave- northbound north of Barrett Ave 18 San Pablo Ave- southbound south of Clinton Ave 19 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of San Pablo Dam Rd 20 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of San Pablo Dam Rd 21 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of El Portal Dr 22 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of El Portal Dr 23 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Hilltop Dr 24 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Hilltop Dr 25 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Richmond Pkwy 26 San Pablo Ave- southbound south of Kay Rd 27 San Pablo Ave- northbound west of Appian Way 28 San Pablo Ave- southbound east of Laurel Ave 29 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of Tennent Ave 30 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of Tennent Ave 31 San Pablo Ave- northbound south of John Muir Pkwy 32 San Pablo Ave- southbound north of John Muir Pkwy Trailblazers ROW (Maintaining Vicinity Agency, if different) Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Emeryville Caltrans Oakland Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Albany Caltrans Albany Caltrans El Cerrito Caltrans El Cerrito Caltrans El Cerrito Cal trans El Cerrito Caltrans Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond San Pablo San Pablo San Pablo San Pablo San Pablo San Pablo San Pablo San Pablo Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Hercules Hercules Hercules Hercules C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency - Normal Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Not Applicable Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans I ! I m I OJ -i z r 0 -i N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B TRAILBLAZER SIGNS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 33 San Pablo Ave- northbound wouth of Willow Ave 34 Parker Ave- southbound north of San Pablo Ave 35 San Pablo Ave- northbound west of Cummings Skwy 36 San Pablo Ave- southbound east of Cummings Skwy Trailblazers ROW (Maintaining Vicinity Agency, if different) Hercules Hercules Hercules Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Contra Costa County C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 6_2012 0216-FINAL.xls Operating Agency- Operating Agency- Normal Incidents Not Applicable Caltrans Not Applicable Caltrans Not Applicable Caltrans Not Applicable Caltrans I I j m X I OJ -i 11 z r 0 ;a "T1 -i N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS BY 1-80 ICM PROJECT 2/16/2012 No. Main Street/ Cross Street Freeway ramps Controllers (Controller and Equipment Upgrades) 1 San Pablo Ave I Pomona St/1-80 WB Ramps 2 Willow Ave /1-80 EB Ramps 3 Willow Ave I 1-80 WB Ramps 4 Pinole Valley Rd I 1-80 EB Ramps 5 Pinole Valley Rd I 1-80 WB Ramps 6 Appian Way I 1-80 EB Ramps 7 Appian Way I 1-80 WB Ramps 8 Richmond Pkwy I 1-80 EB Ramps 9 Richmond Pkwy I 1-80 HOV Ramps 10 Richmond Pkwy I 1-80 WB Ramps 11 Hilltop Dr/ 1-80 EB Ramps 12 Hilltop Dr I 1-80 WB Ramps 13 El Portal Dr I 1-80 EB Ramps 14 El Portal Dr/ 1-80 WB Off-ramp 15 San Pablo Dam Rd I 1-80 WB & EB Ramps (one controller) 16 San Pablo Ave/ Roosevelt/ 1-80 EB Ramps 17 Barrett Ave I 1-80 WB Ramps 18 Cutting Blvd /1-80 HOV Ramps 19 Cutting Blvd I 1-80 WB Off-ramp 20 Carlson Blvd/ 1-80 EB Ramps 21 Carlson Blvd/ 1-80 WB Ramps 22 Eastshore Blvd I Potrero Ave I 1-80 Ramps 23 Central Ave I 1-80 EB Ramps 24 Central Ave I 1-80 WB Ramps 25 Buchanan St /1-80 EB Ramps 26 Buchanan St I 1-80 WB Ramps 27 Frontage Rd I 1-80 WB Ramps 28 Powell St I 1-80 EB Ramps 29 Powell St I Frontage Rd I 1-80 WB On-ramp San Pablo Avenue {Controller Upgrades and Equipment Upgrades) 1 San Pablo Ave I Hercules Ave 2 San Pablo Ave I Pinole Valley Rd 3 San Pablo Ave I Tennent Ave 4 San Pablo Ave I Appian Way 5 San Pablo Ave I Sunnyview Dr 6 San Pablo Ave I Pinole Shores Rd 7 San Pablo Ave I Crestwood Dr 8 San Pablo Ave I Kay Rd 9 San Pablo Ave I Richmond Pkwy Traffic Signa Is NEW NEW NEW NEW ROW (Maintaining GPRS Ethernet Ethernet Intersection Agency, if different) Vicinity Modem Module Switch Detection Crockett Caltrans Hercules Cal trans Hercules Yes Yes Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Yes Yes Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Yes Yes Caltrans Pinole Yes Yes Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Yes Yes Caltrans San Pablo Caltrans San Pablo Yes Yes Caltrans San Pablo Yes Yes Caltrans Richmond Yes Yes Cal trans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Yes Yes Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Yes Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Yes Caltrans Albany Caltrans Emeryville Caltrans Emeryville Caltrans Emeryville Yes Yes Caltrans Hercules Hercules Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole - Contra Costa County Pinole Contra Costa County Richmond - Richmond C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revlsions\Final Verslon\Flnai\Anachment 8_2012 02 16-FINALxls Operating Agency - Normal Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Hercules Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole Contra Costa County Contra Costa County Richmond Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans m I OJ -f z r 0 -f N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS BY 1-80 ICM PROJECT 2/16/2012 No. Main Street/ Cross Street 10 San Pablo Ave I Hilltop Dr 11 San Pablo Ave I Robert Miller Dr 12 San Pablo Ave I Ave 13 San Pablo Ave I Esmond Ave 14 San Pablo Ave I Garvin Ave 15 San Pablo Ave I Solano Ave 16 San Pablo Ave I Clinton Ave 17 San Pablo Ave I Sierra Ave (Ped Signal between Clinton and 1-80 ) 18 San Pablo Ave I Barrett Ave 19 San Pablo Ave I MacDonald Ave 20 San Pablo Ave I Cutting Blvd 21 San Pablo Ave I Hill St I Eastshore Blvd 22 San Pablo Ave I Potrero Ave 23 San Pablo Ave I Manila Ave I Bayview Ave 24 San Pablo Ave I Schmidt Ln 25 San Pablo Ave I Moeser Ln 26 San Pablo Ave I Stockton Ave 27 San Pablo Ave I Central Ave 28 San Pablo Ave I Fairmount Ave 29 San Pablo Ave I Carlson Blvd 30 San Pablo Ave I Brighton Ave 31 San Pablo Ave I Clay St 32 San Pablo Ave I Washington Ave 33 San Pablo Ave I Solano Ave 34 San Pablo Ave I Buchanan St 35 San Pablo Ave I Marin Ave 36 San Pablo Ave I Monroe St 37 San Pablo Ave I Gilman St 38 San Pablo Ave I Cedar St 39 San Pablo Ave I Delaware St 40 San Pablo Ave I University Ave 41 San Pablo Ave I Addison St 42 San Pablo Ave I Allston Way 43 San Pablo Ave I Dwight Way 44 San Pablo Ave I Grayson St 45 San Pablo Ave/ Heinz Ave 46 San Pablo Ave I Ashby Ave (SR 13) 47 San Pablo Ave I 65th St 48 San Pablo Ave I Alcatraz Ave 49 San Pablo 63rd St - - - Traffic Signals NEW NEW NEW NEW ROW {Maintaining GPRS Ethernet Ethernet Intersection Vicinity Modem Module Switch Detection Agency, if different) Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Cal trans El Cerrito Yes Cal trans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans El Cerrito Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Albany Yes Caltrans Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Oakland Yes Yes Caltrans Oakland Oakland Oakland - Oakland C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revlslons\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 8_20U 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency- Normal Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Caltrans Oakland Oakland Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans I I . I I I m X I OJ 11 z r 0 t-V I t-V ~ I ~ ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS BY 1-80 ICM PROJECT 2/16/2012 No. Main Street/ Cross Street so San Pablo Ave I Stanford Ave 51 San Pablo Ave I 53rd St 52 San Pablo Ave I 47th St 53 San Pablo Ave /45th St 54 San Pablo Ave I Park Ave 55 San Pablo Ave I 40th St 56 San Pablo Ave I Adeline St ICM Routes (Controller and Equipment Upgrades, New signals) 1 Willow Ave I Sycamore 2 Willow Ave I Hawthorne Dr 3 Appian Way/ Fitzgerald 4 Appian Way/ Tara Hills 5 Richmond Pkwy I 1-80 EB Ramps 6 Richmond Pkwy I Bella Vista Entr 7 Richmond Pkwy I Lakeside Dr 8 Hilltop Dr I Blume Dr 9 Hilltop Dr I Shane Dr 10 Hilltop Dr I Robert Miller Dr 11 Hilltop Dr I Hillview Dr 12 Hilltop Dr I Research Dr 13 /1-80 WB off-ramp (*NEW SIGNAL) 14 Amador (*NEW SIGNAL) 15 Central Ave I San Luis St I Pierce St 16 Gilman St /6th St (*SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION) 17 Gilman St /8th St 18 University Ave I 6th St 19 University Ave/ 9th St 20 Ashby Ave/ 7th St 21 Ashby Ave /9th St 22 West Grand Ave/ Maritime 23 West Grand Ave/ 880 ramps/ Frontage 24 West Grand Ave I Mandel a Pkwy 25 West Grand Ave I Poplar St 26 West Grand Ave I Adeline St 27 West Grand Ave I Market St 28 W. Grand Ave- MLK, Jr Wy 29 W. Grand Ave- Northgate Ave 30 W. Grand Ave- Broadway 31 Grand Ave- Webster St 32 Grand Ave- Valdez St 33 Grand Ave- El Embarcadero Traffic Signals NEW NEW NEW NEW ROW (Maintaining GPRS Ethernet Ethernet Intersection Vicinity Modem Module Switch Detection Agency, if different) Oakland Oakland Emeryville Yes Caltrans Emeryville Yes Caltrans Emeryville Yes Cal trans Emeryville Yes Caltrans Emeryville Yes Caltrans Emeryville Yes Caltrans Hercules Hercules Hercules Hercules Pinole Pinole Pinole Yes Yes Pinole Pinole Caltrans Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Yes Yes 3 Video Cam Richmond Richmond Yes Yes 4 Video Cam Richmond Richmond Richmond Berkeley 4 Video Cam Berkeley Berkeley 4 Video Cam Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley 4 Video Cam Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Oakland Yes Yes Caltrans Oakland Yes Yes Caltrans Oakland Yes Yes 4 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 4 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 4 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 2 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 2 Mag Lanes Oakland Oakland Yes Yes Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 4 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 3 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes 3 Video Cam Oakland Oakland Yes Yes Oakland C:\Users\mur34283\0ocuments\PROJECT FILES\I...SO ICM\MOU\MOU Revlsions\Final Verslon\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINALxls Operating Agency- Normal Oakland Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Hercules Hercules Pinole Pinole Caltrans Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Berkeley Caltrans Caltrans Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Operating Agency - Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Richmond Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland I I J J m I OJ -I 11 z r 0 11 -1 N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT 8 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS BY 1-80 ICM PROJECT 2/16/2012 No. Main Street/ Cross Street 34 Grand Ave- MacArthur Blvd 35 Lake Shore Ave- MacArthur Blvd 36 Lake Shore Ave- Lake Park Ave 37 Grand Ave- Lake Park Ave NEW FIELD MASTERS (Controller and Equipment Upgrades) 1 Richmond Pkwy I Lakeside Dr 2 Hilltop Dr I Robert Miller Dr 3 El Portal Dr I Church Ln I Rollingwood Dr 4 San Pablo Dam Rd I Ventura Ave 5 San Pablo Ave I Knott Ave NEW GPRS Vicinity Modem Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Richmond Yes Richmond Yes San Pablo Yes San Pablo Yes El Cerrito Yes EXISTING CONTROLLER TO REMAIN {GPRS MODEM AND ETHERNET MODULE UPGRADE ONLY) 1 San Pablo Ave- Cummings CC County Yes 2 San Pablo Ave- Refinery CC County Yes 3 Parker-2nd CC County Yes 4 Parker-4th CC County Yes 5 San Pablo Ave-Parker-Willow CC County Yes 6 Pinole Valley- Henry Pinole Yes 7 Fitzgerald/ Best Buy Pinole Yes 8 Central Ave/ Carlson Ave El Cerrito Yes 6 Powell St I Christie Ave Emeryville Yes 7 53rd I Hollis (support for Powell- Beudry) Emeryville Yes Traffic Signals NEW NEW NEW ROW (Maintaining Ethernet Ethernet Intersection Agency, if different) Module Switch Detection Yes Yes 2 Video Cam 3 Mag Lanes Oakland Yes Yes 2 Video Cam 3 Mag Lanes Oakland Yes Yes 3 Video Cam Oakland 3 Mag Lanes Yes Yes 4 Video Cam Oakland Yes Richmond Yes Richmond Yes San Pablo Yes San Pablo Yes El Cerrito Yes CC County Yes CC County Yes CC County Yes CC County Yes CC County Yes Pinole Yes Pinole Yes El Cerrito Yes Emeryville Yes Emeryville C:\Users\mur34283\0ocuments\PROJECT FILB\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revlsions\Final Verslon\Finai\Anac.hment 6_2012 02 16-FINALxls Operating Agency- Normal Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Richmond Richmond San Pablo San Pablo El Cerrito CC County CC County CC County CC County CC County Pinole Pinole El Cerrito Emeryville Emeryville Operating Agency - Incidents Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans m I CD -1 11 z r 0 ;o -1 N I ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B SPEED FEEDBACK SIGNS- PINOLE 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 1 San Pablo Ave- eastbound west of Del Monte Dr 2 San Pablo Ave- westbound east of Sunnyview Dr Speed feedback ROW (Maintaining Vicinity Agency, if different) Pinole Pinole Pinole Pinole C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency - Operating Agency - Normal Incidents NA NA NA NA - m X I OJ z r 0 N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B ARTERIAL CHANGEABLE MESSAGE SIGNS {CMS)- OAKLAND 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 1 San Pablo Ave- northbound north of 34th St 2 San Pablo Ave- southbound south of 35th St 3 W. Grand Ave- eastbound east of Chestnut St 4 Lake Park Ave- westbound east of Lakeshore Ave Arterial CMS ROW {Maintaining Vicinity Agency, if different) Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency - Normal Oakland Oakland Oakland Oakland Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans m X I OJ -I -n z r 0 -n -I N I N --lt. I --lt. N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B ADAPTIVE RAMP METERING LOCATIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street NEW 1-80 ICM RAMP METERING CONTROLLERS (EASTBOUND 1-80) 1 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Powell St. 2 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Ashby Ave./Potter St. 3 1-80 eastbound on-ramp University Ave. 4 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Gilman St. 5 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Buchanan St. 6 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Central Ave. 7 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Carlson Blvd. 8 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Cutting Blvd. (loop ramp) 9 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Cutting Blvd. 10 1-80 eastbound on-ramp San Pablo Ave. 11 1-80 eastbound on-ramp San Pablo Dam Rd. 12 1-80 eastbound on-ramp El Portal Dr. 13 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Westbound Hilltop Dr. 14 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Eastbound Hilltop Dr. (loop ramp) Eastbound 15 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Fitzgerald/Richmond Parkway 16 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Eastbound Fitzgerald/ Richmond Pkwy. (loop ramp) 17 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Northbound Appian Way 18 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Southbound Appian Way (loop ramp) 19 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Pinole Valley Rd. 20 1-80 eastbound on-ramp John Muir Pkwy. (SR-4) 21 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Willow Ave. 22 1-80 eastbound on-ramp Cummings Skyway NEW 1-80 ICM RAMP METERING CONTROLLERS {WESTBOUND 1-80) 1 1-80 westbound on-ramp San Pablo Ave. I Pomona St. Ramp Meters ROW (Maintaining Vicinity Agency, if different) Emeryville Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Albany Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans San Pablo Caltrans San Pablo Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Hercules Caltrans Hercules Caltrans Contra Costa County Caltrans Crockett (CC County) Caltrans C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 6_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency - Normal Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Cal trans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans - - I : m X I OJ -I , z r 0 , -I N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B ADAPTIVE RAMP METERING LOCATIONS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 2 1-80 westbound on-ramp Cummings Skyway 3 1-80 westbound on-ramp Willow Ave. 4 1-80 westbound on-ramp John Muir Parkway {SR-4} 5 1-80 westbound on-ramp Pinole Valley Rd. 6 1-80 westbound on-ramp Appian Way 7 1-80 westbound on-ramp Fitzgerald Dr./Richmond Parkway 8 1-80 westbound on-ramp Hilltop Dr. 9 1-80 westbound on-ramp Westbound Hilltop Dr. (loop ramp) 10 1-80 westbound on-ramp El Portal Dr. 11 1-80 westbound on-ramp San Pablo Dam Rd. 12 1-80 westbound on-ramp Solano Ave. 13 1-80 westbound on-ramp Barrett Ave. 14 1-80 westbound on-ramp Potrero Ave. 15 1-80 westbound on-ramp Carlson Blvd. 16 1-80 westbound on-ramp Central Ave. 17 1-80 westbound on-ramp Buchanan St. 18 1-80 westbound on-ramp Gilman St. 19 1-80 westbound on-ramp University Ave. (loop) 20 1-80 westbound on-ramp Ashby Ave. & Frontage Rd. 21 1-80 westbound on-ramp Powell St./Frontage Rd. 22 1-80 westbound on-ramp Powell St. Ramp Meters ROW (Maintaining Vicinity Agency, if different) Contra Costa County Caltrans Hercules Caltrans Hercules Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Pinole Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans San Pablo Caltrans San Pablo Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Richmond Caltrans Albany Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Berkeley Caltrans Emeryville Caltrans Emeryville Caltrans C:\Users\mur34283\Documents\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Version\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency- Operating Agency- Normal Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans I I I m I OJ -1 z r 0 -1 N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B ACTIVE TRAFFIC MANGEMENT (ATM) FREEWAY SIGNS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street NEW 1-80 ICM ATM SIGNS (WESTBOUND 1-80) 1 1-80 westbound Powell/ Frontage Hook ramp (SS 3-2) 2 1-80 westbound Ashby Ave (SS 6-2) 3 1-80 westbound bet. Ashby Ave and University Ave (SS8-1) 4 1-80 westbound University Ave (SS 9-2) 5 1-80 westbound bet. Univeristy Ave and Gilman Ave (SS 12-1) 6 1-80 westbound Gilman Ave (SS 13-1) 7 1-80 westbound bet. Gilman Ave and Buchanan Ave (SS 13-2) 8 1-80 westbound Cleveland Ave (SS 16-1) 9 1-80 westbound Central Ave (SS 18-1) 10 1-80 westbound bet. Central Ave and Carlson Ave (SS 21-1) 11 1-80 westbound bet. Carlson Ave and Potrero Ave (SS 23-1) 12 1-80 westbound bet. Potrero Ave and Cutting Blvd (SS 25-1) 13 1-80 westbound Cutting Blvd (SS26-1) 14 1-80 westbound bet. Solano and Barret 15 1-80 westbound bet. San Pablo Dam Rd and 16 1-80 westbound bet. El Portal and San Pablo Dam Rd 17 1-80 westbound bet. Hilltop Dr and El Portal 18 1-80 westbound bet. Richmond Pkwy and Hilltop Dr 19 1-80 westbound bet. Appian Way and Richmond Pkwy 20 1-80 westbound bet. Pinole Valley Rd and Appian Way 21 1-80 westbound bet. SR-4 and Pinole Valley Rd 22 1-80 westbound bet. Willow Ave and SR-4 23 1-80 westbound bet. California St OC and Willow (SS 56-1) 24 1-80 westbound bet. Cummings and California OC NEW 1-80 ICM ATM SIGNS (EASTBOUND 1-80) 1 1-80 eastbound bet. 1-80/ 1-880/1-580 Interchange and Powell St 2 1-80 eastbound Powell St (SS 3-1) 3 1-80 eastbound bet. Powell Stand Ashby Ave (SS 3-2 back) 4 1-80 eastbound bet. Powell Stand Ashby Ave 5 1-80 eastbound bet. Ashby Ave and University Ave (SS 8-1 back) 6 1-80 eastbound bet. Ashby Ave and University Ave 7 1-80 eastbound bet. University Ave and Gilman Ave (SS 12-1 back) 8 1-80 eastbound bet. Gilman Ave and Buchanan Ave (SS 13-2 back) 9 1-80 eastbound Cleveland Ave (SS 16-1 back) 10 1-80 eastbound Cleveland Ave 11 1-80 eastbound Central Ave (SS 18-1 back) 12 1-80 eastbound bet. Central Ave and Carlson Ave (SS 21-1 back) 13 1-80 eastbound bet. Carlson Ave and Potrero Ave (SS 23-1 back) 14 1-80 eastbound bet. Carlson Ave and Potrero Ave 15 1-80 eastbound bet. Potrero Ave and Cutting Blvd (SS 25-1 back) ATM Signs ROW (Maintaining Operating Agency- Vicinity LUS VASS VMS IDB Agency, if different) Normal Emeryville y y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y y y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y y y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y y Caltrans Caltrans Albany y y - - Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y y y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y y y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond - y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y Caltrans Caltrans San Pablo y Caltrans Caltrans San Pablo - y - Caltrans Caltrans San Pablo y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond - y - Caltrans Caltrans Pinole y Caltrans Caltrans Pinole y Caltrans Caltrans Pinole y Caltrans Caltrans Hercules y Caltrans Caltrans Contra Costa County y Caltrans Caltrans Contra Costa County y - Caltrans Caltrans Emeryville y Caltrans Caltrans Emeryville y Caltrans Caltrans Emeryville y - - Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y Caltrans Caltrans Berkeley y Caltrans Caltrans Albany y Caltrans Caltrans Albany y Caltrans Caltrans Albany y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond - y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond - y Caltrans Caltrans Richmond - y Caltrans Caltrans C:\Users\mur34283\Doruments\PROJECT FILES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Ve~lon\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINALxls Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans - C_altran~ m X I OJ -1 T1 z r 0 T1 -1 N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- INTERSTATE 80 CORRIDOR ICM MOU: ATTACHMENT B ACTIVE TRAFFIC MANGEMENT (ATM) FREEWAY SIGNS 2/16/2012 No. Main Street Cross Street 16 1-80 eastbound bet. Potrero Ave and Cutting Blvd 17 1-80 eastbound MacDonald Ave 18 1-80 eastbound El Portal Dr 19 1-80 eastbound bet. El Portal Dr and Hilltop Dr (SS 37-1) 20 1-80 eastbound bet. Hilltop Dr and Richmond Blvd 21 1-80 eastbound bet. Richmond Pkwy and Appian Way 22 1-80 eastbound bet. Appian Way and Pinole Valley Rd 23 1-80 eastbound bet. Pinole Valley Rd and SR-4 (SS 50-1) 24 1-80 eastbound bet. Willow Ave and California St OC (S 55-1) 25 1-80 eastbound bet. Willow Ave and California St OC (S 56-1) ATM Signs ROW (Maintaining Vicinity LUS VASS VMS IDB Agency, if different) Richmond - y Caltrans Richmond y Caltrans San Pablo y Caltrans San Pablo y - y Caltrans San Pablo y - Caltrans Pinole y - Caltrans Pinole y Caltrans Hercules y - y Caltrans Hercules y Caltrans Contra Costa County y Caltrans C:\Users\mur34283\0ocuments\PROJECT FllES\1-80 ICM\MOU\MOU Revisions\Final Ver5ion\Finai\Attachment 8_2012 02 16-FINAL.xls Operating Agency- Normal Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Operating Agency- Incidents Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans Caltrans m I OJ -f z r 0 ;u -f I ~ I ~ ---PAGE BREAK--- EXHIBIT A FINAL DRAFT, 2-21-12 ATTACHMENT C 35 ---PAGE BREAK--- ENTIRE SAN PABLO CORRIDOR ARTERIAL AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Device Number of II Oakland I Emeryville I Berkeley I Devices Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 15 New closed-circutt television (CCTV) cameras 39 New video encoders 35 10 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection stations (used by project) 23 0 2 6 New Vehicle Detection stations 10 0 0 0 Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 64 10 6 10 New TSP intersections (including ramp metering locations) 37 0 0 3 New EVP-only intersections 49 10 0 5 New Trailblazer Signs 36 3 1 6 New Traffic Signal 2 0 0 0 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 127 20 9 16 New Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 36 4 3 0 New Controller communications: Ethernet 14 14 0 0 New Controller communications: Ethernet module 72 17 9 0 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 53 35 0 11 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 16 16 New Speed Feedback Signs 2 0 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 2 2 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 1 1 T 0 T 0 T Exisiting TSP emitters 40 0 I 0 0 I New multi-mode (GP5-InfraRed) TSP Emttters 80 0 I 0 I 0 I Traffic Signal System Software Maintenance/Upgrades 10% I 10% I 10% I I TOTAL NUMBER OF DEVICES 753 II 152 I 34 I 66 I I TOTAL NUMBER OF NEW FIELD DEVICES 548 II 130 I 23 41 I I Delta Percent Increase of New Devices 100% II 23.72% I 4.20% 7.48% I Total Maintenance Costs $ 32o.122.ooJl $ 64,657.50 $ 12,694.50 $ 27,924.00 $ Total Operating Costs $ 224,435.0411 $ 37,415.07 $ 12,965.93 $ 17,446.04 $ L TOTAL O&M COSlJ. $ 544,557.04.1$ 102,072.57J $ 25,660.431$ 45,370.041$ Notes: THIS AITACHMENT IS SHOWN FOR COST ESTIMATING PURPOSES AND PROVIDES BACKGROUND ON HOW THE O&M COSTS WERE ESTIMATED. Total Number of Devices= sum of above quantities; this includes upgrades Total Number of New Devices= does not include upgrades to existing devices. Software Maintenance/Upgrades = based on percent of total new devices in each agency Staffing Costs are assumed included in current staffing levels 50% of San Pablo Avenue Collocation costs already being paid by local agencies BENEFITS TO LOCAL AGENCIES - Ability to remotely monitor and revise signal timing without sending staff to field cabinet Saves staff time. - Ability to remotely view signal timing information in other jurisdictions. Improves efficiency. - Creates tools that enable local agencies and Caltrans to improve traffic flow on local streets during major freeway incidents. Albany I CCCounty I 3 1 0 2 7 0 0 5 2 0 2 3 0 0 9 1 1 5 0 0 8 5 0 J 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0% I 10% I 36 I 26 I 22 I 24 I 4.01% I 4.38% I 11,103.50 $ 12,6o1.oo 1 $ 8,446.36 $ 17,485.49 $ 19,549.861$ 30,086.491$ snliirt corridor El Cerrito I San Pablo I Richmond I Pinole I Hercules I WestCA T I AC Transit 4 0 2 12 10 9 0 0 1 8 14 3 8 16 4 4 4 6 4 0 0 2 0 14 5 33 15 4 4 8 0 14 0 I 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 40 0 0 I 0 I 0 j_ 0 I 40 I 40 10% 10% I 10% I 10% I 10% I I 60 48 I 122 I 65 j_ 24 I 40 I 80 I 39 I 40 83 I 49 I 17 I 40 I 40 I 7.12% I 7.30% 15.15% I 8.94% J 3.10% I 7.30% I 7.30% I 21,6o7.5o I $ 20,86o.5o 1 s 5o, 114.5o 1 s 26,2o6.oo 1 s 12,353.00 I I 14,550.92 $ 23,054.48 $ 50,859.65 $ 32,122.541 $ I s 2o.ooo.oo s 4o,ooo.oo 10,088.55 36,158.42J $ 43,914.981$ 100,974.151$ 58,328.54J $ 22,441.55J $ 20,000.00J $ 40,000.00 SUMMARY OF ACRONYMS ATM Active Traffic Management CCTV Closed Circuit Television CMS Changeable Message Sign CT Cattrans CTC (Alameda) County Transportation Commission EVP Emergency Vehicle Preemption GPRS General Packet Radio System HW Hardware IP Internet Protocol MVDS O&M SIC TS TSP VlD Microwave Vehicle Detection System Operations and Maintenance Signal Interconnect Cable Traffic Signal Transit Signal Priority Video Image Detection Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 1 of26 m X I OJ , z r 0 , N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- snll:rt corridor CAL TRANS MAINTAINED Device Number of II Oakland I Emeryville I Berkeley I Albany I CCCounty I El Cerrito I San Pablo I Richmond Devices Pinole Hercules WestCAT I AC Transit 2 Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by proj~ 10 25 New closed-circuit television (Qg"[\1}-cameras 4 New video encoders 25 _l 0 j_ 2 3 1 1 1 2 Existing SMART Corri(j()rVehicle Detectioll stations (usedby project) 1 4 2 0 2 New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 0 0 0 0 Existi119_ SMART Corridor TSP intersections 23 0 6 0 7 0 10 New TSP intersections Oncluding rartl_ll_ metering locations) 7 0 0 3 0 0 0 New EVP-only intersections 19 0 0 0 2 0 2 4 2 New Trailblazer Sjg_ns 14 1 1 6 2 0 4 0 New Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 56 3 9 0 9 1 13 3 I 10 New Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 17 3 1 0 1 0 2 2 I 4 New Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Controller communications: Ethernet module 40 3 7 0 8 0 12 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer New Speed Feedback SiQns New Arterial Changeable Message SiQn (CMS): single sided New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided Exisiti119_ TSP emitters 0 0 CALTRANS I 10% I I I I New muKi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters Software Maintenance/I..J!lgrades l TOTAL NUMBER OF DEVICES 245 10 29 I 22 I 35 I 3 50 18 46 T 22 T 10 I TOTAL NUMBER OF NEW FIELD DEVICES! 170 7 19 I 15 I 22 I 2 32 14 35 I 16 I 8 L Delta Percent Increase of New Devices 31.02% 1.28% 3.47% I 2.74% l 4.01% I 0.36% 5.84% 2.55% 6.39% I 2.92% I 1.46% I 0.00% 0.00% I Total Maintenance Costs I $ 79,013.50 $ 3,038.50 $ 8,727.5o 1 s 10,724.5o 1 s 10.745.5o 1 s 945.00 $ 15,825.00 $ 5,304.00 $ 14,2o5.5o 1 s 6,373.5o 1 s 3,124.50 Total Operating Costs I $ 120,061.55 $ 3,868.93 $ 10,535.681 $ 11,633.431 $ 8,446.361$ 3,207.12 $ 11,449.99 $ 12,945.87 $ 32,976.67 1 s 16,920.99 I s 8,076.50 I TOTAL O&M COST I$ 199,075.05 $ 6,907.43 $ 19,263.181 $ 22,357.931 $ 19,191.861$ 4,152.12 $ 27,274.99 $ 18,249.87 $ 47,182.171 $ 23,294.491 $ 11,201.oo Is l Net Increase in Maintenance Costs -New Devices I $ 68,373.5o 11 s 2,288.5o 1 s 6,477.5o 1 s 11,732.5o 1 s 9,167.5o 1 s 695.oo 1 s 13,583.oo 1 s 4.89o.oo 1 s 12,o41.5o 1 s 4,873.5o 1 s 2,624.50 Net Increase in Operating Costs- New Devices! $ 120,061.5511$ 3,868.931 $ 10,535.681 $ 11,633.431 $ 8,446.361 $ 3,207.121 $ 11,449.991 $ 12,945.871 $ 32,976.671 $ 16,920.991 $ 8,076.50 - ~ • Non-Caltrans Regional Contribution paid by regional MPO or CMAs Total Number of Devices = sum of above quanmies. Total Number of New Devices= does not include upgrades to existing devices. Software Maintenance/Upgrades = based on percent of total devices in each agency Individual agencies quantities are linked to this table -·lis 1!7' L~ -JU· ~ . · . · - Is · · ~ 1$ Is O:!ii' , ;~'js 2~:Roo:oo II:· '1~1 liL Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2/16112 2 of26 m X I OJ -f 11 z r 0 -f N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- I I I I snliirt corridor LOCAL MAINTAINED Number of ACTransit Devices Device 14 Existii19_SMART Corridor cameras (used_ by project) New closed-circuit television~ cameras New video encoders 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 T 0 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by proje~ 14 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 l 4 New Vehicle Detection Stations 10 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Existi~ SMART Corridor TSP intersections 41 10 0 10 0 0 2 10 New TSP intersections 30 0 0 0 0 5 0 1 T 5 T 14 New EVP-only intersections 30 10 0 5 0 0 1 4 New Trailblazer Signs 22 2 0 0 0 3 0 4 New Traffic Signal 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signaO 71 17 0 16 0 0 1 2 T 23 New Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 19 1 2 0 0 5 2 2 l 4 New Controller communications: Ethernet switch 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Controller communications: Ethernet module 32 14 2 0 0 5 2 2 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 53 35 0 11 0 0 0 0 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 16 16 New Speed Feedback Signs 0 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exisiting TSP emitters 40 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 New multi-mode (GP5-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 80 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 40 Software Maintenance/Upgrades I 10% 10% 10% 0% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% 10% NA NA TOTAL NUMBER OF DEVICE~ 508 II 142 5 44 L 1 J 23 I 10 30 I 76 I 43 I 14 I 40 I 80 TOTAL NUMBER OF NEW FIELD DEVICES! 378 II 123 I 4 I 26 0 I 22 7 26 I 48 I 33 I 9 I 40 40 Delta Percent Increase of New Devices 68.98% II 22.45% I 0.73% I 4.74% 0.00% 1 4.01% 1.28% 4.74% I 8.76% I 6.02% I 1.64% I 7.30% 7.30% 181,108.5011 $ 61,619.00 $ 3,967.oo 1 s 17,199.50 $ 358.oo 1 $ 11,656.00 $ 5,782.50 $ 15,556.5o 1 s 35,909.00 $ 19,832.50 $ 9'228"50 $ 20,000.00 $ 40.000.00 104,373.4911 $ 33,546.13 $ 2,430.25 $ 5,812.61 $ $ 14,278.36 $ 3,100.93 $ 10,108.61 $ 17,882.98 $ 15.201.55 $ 2,012.06 Total Maintenance Costs I $ Total Operating Costs TOTAL O&M COST 345,481.9911 $ 95,165.13 $ 6,397.25 $ 23,012.11 $ 358.00 $ 25,934.36 $ 8,883.43 $ 25,665.11_l$ __3791.981$ 3S,034.05l $ 11,240.56J $ 20,000.00 l $ 40,000.00 Net Increase in Maintenance Costs- New Devices $ $ 8 814.50 Net Increase in Operating Costs- New Devices $ $ 2:012.06 $ 20·000·00 I $ 20·000·00 TOTA o CALC?NJ"~IBU")l()N T<;ll $ 1503724sll $ 82,140 131 $ t1,S21M I$ INCREASE!lO&M•COSTS · , · · < , • ' ·E5tir:.Ai§:!!9q~~i~t9~•fo§+:l;$"i:i4,o2o.533:oo ''s1,6oe;11!3.oo 1 • Non-Caltrans Regional Contribution paid by regional MPO or CMAs Total Number of Devices= sum of above quantities Total Number of New Devices = does not include upgrades to existing devices. Software Maintenance/Upgrades = based on percent of total devices in each agency Individual agencies quantities are linked to this table $ • , ~ h - !4 - I s s,672.~ lli._i~.ooo.~_l, $ , : - 1 2o,ooo.oo t•s zo.ooo:oo . 1.s ~ 966.:o ~ ' ~~.27(1:9911 . 7qs.oo i ' i , r 1' : • ' • : , , • i ' : : ' I , ' I ;I I Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 3 of26 m I OJ -1 p. , z r 0 , -1 N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- snlilft corridor " 1:0: · ~ · · r~ LOCAL SAN PABLO CORRIDOR ARTERIAL AND TRANSIT IMPROVEMENT (CONTRA COSTA REGION Device Existino SMART Corridor cameras (used by pro.Lect_l_ New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras New video encoders Existino SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used bv project) New Vehicle Detection Stations Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections NewTSP intersections (including ramp metering locations) New EVP-onlv intersections New Trailblazer Signs New Traffic Signal Traffic Sional Controller Uporades (existino sionall Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers)_ Controller communications: Ethernet switch Controller communications: Ethernet module New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video lmaoe Detection camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer Speed Feedback Sions New Arterial Chanoeable Messaoe Sion (CMS): sinole sided New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided Exisiting TSP emitters New multi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters Software Maintenance/Upgrades TOTAL NUMBER OF DEVICES TOTAL NUMBER OF NEW FIELD DEVICES Delta Percent Increase of New Devices Net Increase in Maintenance Costs - New Devices • This table is a subset of the information shown on the Local Summary. Total Number of Devices= sum of above quantities Total Number of New Devices = does not include upgrades to existing devices. Software Maintenance/Upgrades= based on percent of total devices in each agency Individual agencies quantities are linked to this table Number of CCCounty El Cerrito Devices 3 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 0 10 1 2 10 2 0 21 0 2 30 5 0 15 0 1 20 3 0 2 0 0 38 0 1 16 5 2 0 0 0 16 5 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 0 0 San Pablo Richmond Pinole Hercules WestCAT 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 1 1 0 2 2 3 1 0 10 9 0 0 0 1 5 14 5 0 4 8 2 0 0 4 6 4 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 23 9 3 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 43 14 33 6.02% 1.64% I Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2/16/12 4 of26 m X I OJ -I , z r 0 ;u , -I N I ~ I ~ ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs -OAKLAND (CT ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Device Maintenance Devices Cost Cost/Year Existing_ SMART Corridor cameras_(_used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 New closed-circu~ television (CCTV) cameras 0 $23,000 $336 New video encoders 0 $3,590 $359 Existinq SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 0 $14,080 $358 New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 Existinq SMART Corridor TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New TSP intersections (includinCI ramp meterin!l locations) 0 $5,060 $403 New EVP-onlv intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New Trailblazer Siems 1 $24,675 $1,000 New Traffic Siqnal 0 $200,000 $3,000 Traffic Siqnal Controller Upqrades (existin!l siQnal) 3 $2,500 $250 Wireless GPRS modem (traffic siQnal controllers) 3 $2,820 $282 Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 Controller communications: Ethernet module 3 $1,475 $148 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 New Arterial Changeable Messag_e Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 New Arterial Changeable Messa_g_e Sign (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 Exis~in_g_ TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 New muHi-mode (GP5-InfraRed}_ TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades • 0.00% $500,000 $27,500 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) I - - - ~AL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTI~~-C>STI $ - 45,060.00 J Operating Costs Unit Operation Device Quantity Capital Cost Cost San Pablo Corridor Collocation 1.28% $122,512 Wireless GPRS modem 3 $768 Point-Point T1 line for each camera 0 $2,100 Field Devices Electricity (new traffic signal, new CCTV cameras) 0 $660 IT/Staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 1.28% IT/Staffing Assistance•- Operation Staff 1.28% Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Total Life Devices that Increase Maintenance Cost Notes Cost/Year (Years) Inventory $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost $0 $0 10 same as New MVDS $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 10 Same as EVP/TSP intersection $0 $1,000 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost $1,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord $0 $750 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost No increase in maint cost. $846 3 10% ofCap~al cost $846 $0 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost $0 $443 10 10% of Cap~al cost $443 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera $0 $0 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost $0 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 10 AC Transit Data $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing $0 $0 5 Actual bids $0 $3,039 Total Increase due to ICM Devices $2,289 , ~ Total Devices that Increase Notes Cost/Year Inventory $1,565 Estimated Cost $1,565 $2,304 $64 per month $2,304 $0 $175 per month $0 $0 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $3,869 I Total Increase due to ICM Devices $3,869 Total Increase due to ICM Devices corridor Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans AlamedaCTC City $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $846 $0 $0 $443 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,289 $0 $0 • p Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $1,565 $0 $2,304 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,869 $0 $0 I Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2/16/12 5 of26 m X I OJ z r 0 -I r'V I I ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs - OAKLAND (LOCAL ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Total Life Device Maintenance Maintenance Cost Notes Devices Cost CostNear Cost/Year (Years) Existinq SMART Corridor cameras _fused by project)_ 2 $9,300 $336 $672 10 Same as new CCTV Camera New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras 8 $23,000 $336 $2,688 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New video encoders 10 $3,590 $359 $3,590 10 1 0% of Capital cost Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used bv project) 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 same as New MVDS New Vehicle Detection stations 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections** 10 $5,060 $403 $4,025 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New EVP-only intersections 10 $5,060 $403 $4,025 10 Same as EVP/TSP intersection New Trailblazer Signs 2 $24,675 $1,000 $2,000 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 17 $2,500 $250 $4,250 10 1 0% of Capital cost Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 1 $2,820 $282 $282 3 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet switch 14 $4,060 $406 $5,684 10 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet module 14 $1,475 $148 $2,065 10 1 0% of Capital cost New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 35 $11,785 $336 $11,760 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 16 $8,438 $844 $13,500 10 10% of Capital cost Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Messag_e Sign (CMS): single sided 2 $160,333 $1,500 $3,000 10 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Messaqe Sion (CMS): double-sided 1 $246,782 $2,000 $2,000 10 Compared to trailblazer Exisitinq TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 $0 10 AC Transit Data New muHi-mode (GPS-InfraRedl TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades* 10.00% $500,000 $27,500 $2,750 5 Actual bids Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) $61,619 Total Increase due to ICM Devices , TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 1,608,183.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Total Device Quantity Capital Cost Notes Cost Cost/Year San Pablo Corridor Collocation 22.45% $122,512 $27.498 Estimated Cost Wireless GPRS modem 1 $768 $768 $64 per month _ Point-Point T1 line for each camera 0 $2,100 $0 $175 per month Field Devices Electricity {new traffic signal, new CCTV cameras) 8 $660 $5,280 Alameda CTC Cost Data IT/staffing Assistance*- Maintenance Staff 22.45% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy IT/staffing Assistance*- Operation Staff 22.45% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) $33,546 due to ICM Devices *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Increase due to ICM Devices Devices that Increase Inventory $672 $2,688 $3,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,025 $2,000 $0 No increase in main! cost. $282 $5,684 $2,065 $11,760 $13,500 $0 $3,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,266 ~ ty Devices that Increase Inventory $27,498 $768 $0 $5,280 $0 $0 $33,546 snlirt corridor Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans AlamedaCTC City $672 $0 $0 $2,688 $3,590 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,025 $2,000 $0 $0 $282 $5,684 $2,065 $11,760 $13,500 $0 $3,000 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,672 $48,594 . per p Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans AlamedaCTC City $27,498 $768 $0 $5,280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,546 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 6 of26 m X I OJ "T1 z r 0 "TT N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs EMERYVILLE (CT ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Total Life Device Maintenance Maintenance Cost Notes Devices Cost Cost/Year Cost/Year (Years) Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras 2 $23,000 $336 $672 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New video encoders 2 $3,590 $359 $718 10 1 0% of Capital cost Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 1 $14,080 $358 $358 10 same as New MVDS New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 6 $5,060 $403 $2,415 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New TSP intersections (including ramp metering locations) 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New EVP-only intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Same as intersection New Trailblazer Signs 1 $24,675 $1,000 $1,000 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 9 $2,500 $250 $2,250 10 1 0% of Capital cost Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 1 $2,820 $282 $282 3 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet module 7 $1,475 $148 $1,033 10 1 0% of Capital cost New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer Exisiting TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 $0 10 AC Transit Data New muHi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades • 0.00% $500,000 $27,500 $0 5 Actual bids Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) $8,728 Total Increase due to ICM Devices TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COS $ 143,860.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Total Device Quantity Capital Cost Notes Cost Cost/Year San Pablo Corridor Collocation 3.47% $122,512 $4,248 Estimated Cost Wireless GPRS modem 1 $768 $768 $64 per month Point-Point T1 line for each camera 2 $2,100 $4,200 $175 per month Field Devices Electricity (new traffic signal. new CCTV cameras) 2 $660 $1,320 Alameda CTC Cost Data IT/staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 3.47% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy IT/staffing Assistance•- Operation Staff 3.47% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) $10,536 IT due to ICM Devices *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Increase due to ICM Devices Devices that Increase Inventory $0 $672 $718 $358 $0 $2,415 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 No increase in maint cost. $282 $0 $1,033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,478 ' • Devices that Increase Inventory $4,248 $768 $4,200 $1 320 $0 $0 $10,536 snlirt corridor Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $0 $672 $0 $718 $0 $358 $0 $0 $2,415 $0 $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $282 $0 $0 $1,033 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,478 $0 $0 I : Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $4,248 $0 $768 $0 $4,200 $0 $1,320 $0 $0 $0 $10,536 $0 $0 I Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 7 of26 m X I lJJ , z r 0 ;a II N I ~ I --lo. N ---PAGE BREAK--- snlirt cgrridor Maintenance Costs - EMERYVILLE (LOCAL ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Device Devices Cost Maintenance Cost/Year Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 New closed-circuit television (CCT\1) cameras 0 $23,000 $336 New video encoders 0 $3,590 $359 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by p-roject) 1 $14,080 $358 New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New EVP-only intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New Trailblazer Signs 0 $24,675 $1,000 New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 0 $2,500 $250 Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 2 $2,820 $282 Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 Controller communications: Ethernet module 2 $1,475 $148 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 Speed Feedback Si!:JnS 0 $12,875 $500 New Arterial Chan!leable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 New Arterial Chan!leable Message Si!ln (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 Exisiting TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 New muHi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades • 10.00% $500,000 $27,500 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 8,590.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Device Quantity Capital Cost Cost San Pablo Corridor Collocation 0.73% $122,512 Wireless GPRS modem 2 $768 Point-Point T1 line for each camera 0 $2,100 Field Devices Electricity (new traffic sional. new CCTV cameraS) 0 $660 IT/staffing Assistance*- Maintenance Staff 0.73% IT/staffill[ Assistance*- Operation Staff 0.73% Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Total Life Devices that Increase Paid by Paid by Net Cost/Year (Years) Maintenance Cost Notes Inventory Caltrans Alameda CTC Contribution by City $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 $358 10 same as New MVDS $358 $358 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 10 Same as EVP/TSP intersection $0 $0 $0 10 Per SkYline; includes GPRS cost $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Based on City of Concord $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost No increase in maint cost. $564 3 10% of Capital cost $564 $564 $0 10 10% of Capital cost $0 $0 $295 10 1 0% of Capital cost $295 $295 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 AC Transit Data $0 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existino $0 $0 $2,750 5 Actual bids $2,750 $2,750 $3,967 Total Increase due to ICM Devices $3,967 $0 $358 $3,609 , _ _ - _ u: : , : : Total Devices that Increase Notes Cost/Year Inventory $894 Estimated Cost $894 $1,536 $64 per month $1,536 $0 $175_1l_er month $0 $0 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $2,430 due to ICM Devices $2,430 Increase due to ICM Devices Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $0 $894 $1,536 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,430 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 8 of26 m X I OJ -I z r 0 -I I I ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs BERKELEY {CT RO\ V} Number of Unit Capital Unit Device Maintenance Devices Cost Cost/Year Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 3 $9,300 $336 New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras 3 $23,000 $336 New video encoders 3 $3,590 $359 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations _(_used by project) 4 $14,080 $358 New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New TSP intersections (includingramp metering locations) 3 $5,060 $403 New EVP-only_intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New Trailblazer Signs 6 $24,675 $1,000 New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades_{_existing signaD_ 0 $2,500 $250 Wireless GPRS modem (traffic s_ig_nal controllers)_ 0 $2,820 $282 Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 Controller communications: Ethernet module 0 $1,475 $148 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 Exisiting TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 New muHi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades • 0.00% $500,000 $27,500 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) I TOTAL ESTIM~~D CONS~RUCTION COST' $ 24~ Operating Costs Unit Operation Device Quantity Capital Cost Cost San Pablo Corridor Collocation 2.74% $122.512 Wireless GPRS modem 0 $768 Point-Point T1 line for each camera 3 $2,100 Field Devices Electricity (new traffic signal, new CClV cameras) 3 $660 IT/Staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 2.74% IT/staffing Assistance•- Operation Staff 2.74% Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) - *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Total Life Devices that Increase Maintenance Cost Notes Cost/Year (Years) Inventory $1,008 10 Same as new CClV Camera $1,008 $1,008 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $1,008 $1,077 10 1 0% of Capital cost $1,077 $1,432 10 same as New MVDS $1,432 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $1,208 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $1,208 $0 10 Same as intersection $0 $6,000 10 Per Skyline: includes GPRS cost $6,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord $0 $0 10 10% of Capital cost No increase in maint cost. $0 3 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 10 Estimated same as CClV camera $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 10 AC Transit Data $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existin!l $0 $0 5 Actual bids $0 $10,725 Total Increase due to ICM Devices $11,733 • I \AI : I Total Devices that Increase Notes Cost/Year Inventory $3,353 Estimated Cost $3,353 $0 $64 per month $0 $6,300 $175 per month $6,300 $1,960 Alameda CTC Cost Data $1 960 $0 Internal based on each Aqencies' O&M policy $0 $0 Internal based on each ~gencies' O&M policy $0 $11,633 _ __jr due to ICM Devices $11,633 - Increase due to ICM Devices sn1irt corridor . ' Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by caltrans AlamedaCTC City $1,008 $0 $1,008 $0 $1,077 $0 $1,432 $0 $0 $0 $1,208 $0 $0 $6,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,733 $0 $0 I Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans AlamedaCTC City $3,353 $0 I $0 $0 I $6,300 $0 I $1,980 $0 $0 $0 $11,633 $0 $0 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2/16/12 9 of26 m X I IJJ -1 z r 0 ;o -I N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs BERKELEY (LOCAL ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Total Life Device Maintenance Maintenance Cost Notes Devices Cost CostNear CostNear (Years) Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras 0 $23,000 $336 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New video encoders 0 $3,590 $359 $0 10 10% of Capital cost Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 2 $14,080 $358 $716 10 same as New MVDS New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections** 10 $5,060 $403 $4,025 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New EVP-only intersections 5 $5,060 $403 $2,013 10 Same as EVP/TSP intersection New Trailblazer Signs 0 $24,675 $1,000 $0 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 16 $2,500 $250 $4,000 10 1 0% of Capital cost Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 0 $2,820 $282 $0 3 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet module 0 $1,475 $148 $0 10 10% of Capital cost New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 11 $11,785 $336 $3,696 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 $0 10 10% of Capital cost Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer Exisiting TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 $0 10 AC Transit Data New multi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades* 10.00% $500,000 $27,500 $2,750 5 Actual bids Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) $17,200 Total Increase due to ICM Devices TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 245,535.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Total Device Quantity Capital Cost Notes Cost Cost/Year San Pablo Corridor Collocation 4.74% $122,512 $5,813 Estimated Cost Wireless GPRS modem 0 $768 $0 $64 per month _ Point-Point T1 line for each camera 0 $2,100 $0 $175 per month Field Devices Electricity (new traffic siqnal, new CCTV cameras) 0 $660 $0 Alameda CTC Cost Data IT/staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 4.74% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy IT/Staffir~g_Assistance•- QJJ_eration Staff 4.74% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) $5,813 due to ICM Devices 'Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Increase due to ICM Devices Devices that Increase Inventory $0 $0 $0 $716 $0 $0 $0 $2,013 $0 $0 r-,jo increase in main! cost. $0 $0 $0 $3,696 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,425 lty Devices that Increase Inventory $5,813 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,813 snlirt corridor Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $716 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,013 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,696 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $716 $5,709 Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $5,813 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,813 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 10of26 m I OJ -1 z r 0 ;o -1 N I ~ I ~ ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs --ALBANY (CT ROW Number of Unit Capital Unit Device Maintenance Devices Cost CostNear Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 2 $9,300 $336 New closed-circutt television (CCTV) cameras 1 $23,000 $336 New video encoders 1 $3,590 $359 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 2 $14,080 $358 New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 7 $5,060 $403 New TSP intersections (including ramp metering locations) 0 $5,060 $403 New EVP-only intersections 2 $5,060 $403 New Trailblazer Signs 2 $24,675 $1,000 New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 9 $2,500 $250 Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 1 $2,820 $282 Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 Controller communications: Ethernet module 8 $1,475 $148 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 Existting TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 New muHi-mode (GPs-lnfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades • 0.00% $500,000 $27,500 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 158,600.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Device Quantity Capital Cost Cost San Pablo Corridor Collocation 4.01% $122,512 Wireless GPRS modem 1 $768 Point-Point T1 line for each camera 1 $2,100 Field Devices Electrirov (new traffic signal. new CCTV cameras) 1 $660 IT/Staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 4.01% IT /staffing_ Assistance•- qp_eration Staff 4.01% Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) •provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies snliirt corridor Total Life Devices that Increase Paid by Paid by Net Maintenance Cost Notes Contribution by Cost/Year (Years) Inventory Caltrans Alameda CTC City $672 10 Same as new CCTV Camera $672 $672 $0 $336 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $336 $336 $0 $359 10 1 0% of Capttal cost $359 $359 $0 $716 10 same as New MVDS $716 $716 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $2,818 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $2,818 $2,818 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $805 10 Same as EVP/TSP intersection $805 $805 $0 $2,000 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost $2,000 $2,000 $0 $0 10 Based on City of Concord $0 $0 $2,250 10 10% ofCapttal cost No increase in main! cost. $282 3 1 0% of Capttal cost $282 $282 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capttal cost $0 $0 $1,180 10 1 0% of Capttal cost $1,180 $1,180 $0 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capttal cost $0 $0 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 AC Transtt Data $0 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing $0 $0 $0 5 Actual bids $0 $0 $10,746 Total Increase due to ICM Devices $9,168 $9,168 $0 $0 • I 1 Or'\\ AI... + : ; + + 1 + ui +i Total Devices that Increase Notes Cost/Year Inventory $4,918 Estimated Cost $4,918 $768 $64 per month $768 $2,100 $175 per month $2,100 $660 Alameda CTC Cost Data $660 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $8,446 due to ICM Devices $8,446 Increase due to ICM Devices Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC Ci!}l_ $4,918 $768 $2,100 $660 $8,446 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberge• LAST UPDATED: 2/16/12 11 of26 m I OJ -1 z r 0 -1 t\J I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- snlilrt corridor Maintenance Costs -ALBANY (LOCAL ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Device Maintenance Devices Cost CostNear ExistinQ SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras 0 $23,000 $336 New video encoders 0 $3,590 $359 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 1 $14,080 $358 New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New EVP-only intersections 0 $5,060 $403 New Trailblazer Siqns 0 $24,675 $1,000 New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existinq siqnaO 0 $2,500 $250 Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 0 $2,820 $282 Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 Controller communications: Ethernet module 0 $1,475 $148 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video lmaae Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 New Arterial Changeable Messag_e Sign (CMS): sinQie sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 New Arterial Changeable MessaQe Sion (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 ExisitinCI TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 New muHi-mode (GPS-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades * 0.00% $500,000 $27,500 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) 1- TOT~L ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COSTI $ - I Operating Costs Unit Operation Device Quantity Capital Cost Cost San Pablo Corridor Collocation 0.00% $122,512 Wireless GPRS modem 0 $768 Point-Point T1 line for each camera 0 $2,100 Field Devices Electricity (new traffic sional, new CCTV cameras) 0 $660 IT/Staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 0.00% IT/Staffing Assistance•- Operation Staff 0.00% Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Total Life Devices that Increase Paid by Paid by Net Maintenance Cost Notes Contribution by Cost/Year (Years) Inventory Caltrans Alameda CTC City $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 $358 10 same as New MVDS $358 $358 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 $0 10 Same as EVP/TSP intersection $0 $0 $0 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost $0 $0 $0 $0 10 Based on City of Concord $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost No increase in maint cost. $0 3 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost $0 $0 $0 10 10% of Capital cost $0 $0 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera $0 $0 $0 10 10% of Capital cost $0 $0 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 $0 10 AC Transit Data $0 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing $0 $0 $0 5 Actual bids $0 $0 $358 Total Increase due to ICM Devices $358 $0 $358 $0 Local ROW cost only- no increase in maintenance cost if traffic signal system is existmg Albany does not have signal system and will not be installing signal system as part of project Total Devices that Increase Notes Cost/Year Inventory $0 Estimated Cost $0 so $64 per month _ $0 $0 $175 per month $0 $0 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 Internal based on each Aaencies' O&M policv $0 $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy $0 $0 due to ICM Devices $0 Increase due to ICM Devices Paid by Paid by Net Contribution by Caltrans Alameda CTC City $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 12 of26 m X I tJJ -i 11 z r 0 11 -i N I N ~ I ~ N ---PAGE BREAK--- corridor Maintenance Costs CONTRA COST A COUNTY (CT ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Total Life Devices that Increase Paid by Net Device Maintenance Maintenance Cost Notes Paid Contribution by Devices Cost Cost/Year Cost/Year (Years) Inventory Caltrans County Existinq SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera $0 $0 New closed-circu~ television (CCTV) cameras 1 $23,000 $336 $336 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $336 $336 $0 New video encoders 1 $3,590 $359 $359 10 10% of Cap~al cost $359 $359 $0 Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 same as New MVDS $0 $0 New Vehicle Detection stations 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 New TSP intersections (including ramp metering locations) 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data $0 $0 New EVP-only intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Same as intersection $0 $0 New Trailblazer Signs 0 $24,675 $1,000 $0 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost $0 $0 New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 $0 10 Based on C~ of Concord $0 $0 Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 1 $2,500 $250 $250 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost No increase in maint cost. Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 0 $2,820 $282 $0 3 1 0% of Cap~al cost $0 $0 Controller communications: Ethernet sw~ch 0 $4,060 $406 $0 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost $0 $0 Controller communications: Ethernet module 0 $1,475 $148 $0 10 1 0% of Cap~al cost $0 $0 New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera $0 $0 New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Macmetometer 0 $8,438 $844 $0 10 10% of Cap~al cost $0 $0 Speed Feedback Siems 0 $12,875 $500 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 New Arterial ChanQeable Message SiQn (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 New Arterial ChanQeable Message SiQn (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer $0 $0 Exis~inq TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 $0 10 AC Trans~ Data $0 $0 New multi-mode (GP5-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing $0 $0 Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades * 0.00% $500,000 $27,500 $0 5 Actual bids $0 $0 Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) $945 Total Increase due to ICM Devices $695 $695 $0 $0 *I r"'Jo \AI ---oi - TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 29,090.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Total Device Quantity Capital Cost Notes Cost Cost/Year San Pablo Corridor Collocation 0.36% $122,512 $447 Estimated Cost Wireless GPRS modem 0 $768 $0 $64 per month Point-Point T1 line for each camera 1 $2,100 $2,100 $175 per month Field Devices Electricity (new traffic siQnal, new CCTV cameras) 1 $660 $660 Alameda CTC Cost Data IT/Staffing_ Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 0.36% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy IT/staffing Assistance*- Operation Staff 0.36% $0 Internal based on each p,g_encies' O&M polic;y_ Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) $3,207 due to ICM Devices - - - *Provided by Alameda CTC or C~ Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Increase due to ICM Devices Devices that Increase Inventory $447 $0 $2,100 $660 $0 $0 $3,207 Paid by Net Paid Contribution by Caltrans County $447 $0 $0 $0 $2,100 $0 $660 $0 $0 $0 $3,207 $0 $0 Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2116/12 13 of26 m I OJ -i , z r 0 -i N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs-- CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (LOCAL ROW) Number of Unit Capital Unit Total Life Device Maintenance Maintenance Cost Notes Devices Cost Cost/Year Cost/Year (Years) Existing SMART Corridor cameras (used by project) 0 $9,300 $336 $0 10 Same as new CCTV Camera New closed-circuit television (CCT\1) cameras 2 $23,000 $336 $672 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New video encoders 0 $3,590 $359 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Existing SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used by project) 1 $14,080 $358 $358 10 same as New MVDS New Vehicle Detection stations 2 $14,080 $358 $716 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data Existing SMART Corridor TSP intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New TSP intersections 5 $5,060 $403 $2,013 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New EVP-only intersections 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Same as intersection New Trailblazer Signs 3 $24,675 $1,000 $3,000 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost New Traffic Signal 0 $200,000 $3,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord Traffic Signal Controller Upgrades (existing signal) 0 $2,500 $250 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Wireless GPRS modem (traffic signal controllers) 5 $2,820 $282 $1,410 3 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet module 5 $1,475 $148 $738 10 10% of Capital cost New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video Image Detection camera 0 $11.785 $336 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Message Sign (CMS): double-sided 0 $246,782 $2,000 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer Exisiting TSP emitters 0 $1,000 $500 $0 10 AC Transit Data New multi-mode (GP5-InfraRed) TSP Emitters 0 $4,750 $0 $0 10 Assumed to be same as existing Traffic Signal Software Maintenance/Upgrades • 10.00% $500,000 $27,500 $2,750 5 Actual bids Estimated Annual Maintenance Cost (Subtotal) $11,656 Total Increase due to ICM Devices . TOTAL ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST $ 194,960.00 Operating Costs Unit Operation Total Device Quantity Capital Cost Notes Cost Cost/Year San Pablo Corridor Collocation 4.01% $122,512 $4,918 Estimated Cost Wireless GPRS modem 5 $768 $3,840 $64 per month Point-Point T1 line for each camera 2 $2,100 $4,200 $175 per month Field Devices Electricity (new traffic signal, new CCTV cameras) 2 $660 $1,320 Alameda CTC Cost Data IT/staffing Assistance•- Maintenance Staff 4.01% $0 Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy IT/staffing Assistance•- Ojl_eration Staff 4.01% so Internal based on each Agencies' O&M policy Estimated Annual Operating Cost (Subtotal) $14,278 due to ICM Devices *Provided by Alameda CTC or City Traffic Signal Coordinator for all agencies Increase due to ICM Devices Devices that Increase Inventory $0 $672 $0 $358 $716 $0 $2,013 $0 $3,000 $0 l\lo increase in main! cost. $1,410 $0 $738 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,906 "-!LA Devices that Increase Inventory $4,918 $3,840 $4,200 $1,320 $0 $0 $14,278 snli'rt corridor Paid by Net Paid Contribution by Caltrans County $0 $0 $672 $0 $0 $358 $0 $716 $0 $0 $0 $2,013 $0 $0 $3,000 $0 $0 $1,410 $0 $0 $738 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,906 $0 J Paid by Net I Paid Contribution by Caltrans County $4,918 $0 I $3,840 $0 I $4,200 $0 $1,320 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,278 $0 I Prepared and Maintained by: Randy Durrenberger LAST UPDATED: 2/16/12 14 of26 m X I OJ -I 11 z r 0 ;o 11 -I N I N I N ---PAGE BREAK--- Maintenance Costs EL CERRITO (CT ROW} Number of Unit Capital Unit Total Life Device Maintenance Maintenance Cost Notes Devices Cost Cost/Year Cost/Year (Years) Existing SMART Corridor cameras _(used by project)_ 3 $9,300 $336 $1,008 10 Same as new CCTV Camera New closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras 1 $23,000 $336 $336 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New video encoders 1 $3,590 $359 $359 10 1 0% of Capital cost Existinq SMART Corridor Vehicle Detection Stations (used bv project) 2 $14,080 $358 $716 10 same as New MVDS New Vehicle Detection Stations 0 $14,080 $358 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data Existinq SMART Corridor TSP intersections 10 $5,060 $403 $4,025 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New TSP intersections (includinq ramp meterinq locations) 0 $5,060 $403 $0 10 Alameda CTC Cost Data New EVP-onlv intersections 2 $5,060 $403 $805 10 Same as intersection New Trailblazer Siqns 4 $24,675 $1,000 $4,000 10 Per Skyline; includes GPRS cost New Traffic Siqnal 0 $200,000 $3,000 $0 10 Based on City of Concord Traffic Siqnal Controller Upqrades (existinq siqnaO 13 $2,500 $250 $3,250 10 1 0% of Capital cost Wireless GPRS modem (traffic siqnal controllers) 2 $2,820 $282 $564 3 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet switch 0 $4,060 $406 $0 10 1 0% of Capital cost Controller communications: Ethernet module 12 $1,475 $148 $1,770 10 1 0% of Capital cost New Intersection Vehicle Detection: Video lma_g_e Detection camera 0 $11,785 $336 $0 10 Estimated same as CCTV camera New Intersection Vehilce Detection: Magnetometer 0 $8,438 $844 $0 10 10% of Capital cost Speed Feedback Signs 0 $12,875 $500 $0 15 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Messag_e Sign (CMS): single sided 0 $160,333 $1,500 $0 10 Compared to trailblazer New Arterial Changeable Mess