Document elcerrito_gov_doc_e2cbf95fa8

AGENDA BILL Agenda Item No. 5(D) Date: February 5, 2013 To: El Cerrito City Council From: Sean Moss, Senior Planner Subject: Eden Housing San Pablo Avenue Mixed-Use Senior Apartments Environmental Review - Award of Contract ACTION REQUESTED Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract with Pacific Municipal Consultants (PMC) in an amount not to exceed $113,088.70 to perform environmental review services for the Eden Housing Senior Apartments project. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Eden Housing is pursuing approvals for 63 affordable senior housing units and ground floor clinic and retail space. There are potential traffic, historic resources, noise and air quality issues on the site that create a necessity for specialized California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review. A Request for Proposals (RFP) was circulated from December 16, 2011 to January 27, 2012. Requests were sent to twelve firms and seven submitted proposals. The table on page 2 lists each firm and the proposed total budget for the project. The question as to what type of environmental document was necessary was left to the consultant to propose based on the information contained in the RFP. As the Lead Agency, the City will ultimately make this decision. However, City staff felt that it was appropriate to allow the consultants to advise staff on the suitable type of environmental document. It is anticipated that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) will be necessary; City staff will make this determination, with input from the consultant, after the completion of the Initial Study. Some firms’ proposals reflect the need for a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), others proposed preparation of an EIR, and some proposed options for both types of documents (shown on the table as two total budget amounts). PMC proposed options for both an MND and an EIR. PMC’s EIR budget was the lowest proposed budget for an EIR and PMC’s MND budget was among the lowest proposed MND budgets. PMC was selected based on these costs, the overall value of the work based on the proposed scope, and the firm’s reputation and expertise in producing environmental documentation for complex projects. ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 5(0) Bid Summary Firm Bid for Required Tasks AEM $48,832 (MND) David J. Powers & $61,346 Associates (MND) Lamphier-Gregory $118,000 (EIR) LSA $60,990 (MND) MIG $103,953/$128,168 (MND/EIR) The Planning Center I $113,486 DC&E (EIR) PMC $58,128/$98,338 (MND/EIR) City and consulting staff anticipates completion of the Administrative Draft of the Eden Housing San Pablo Avenue Mixed-Use Senior Apartments Environmental Review 22 weeks after the start date. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS The environmental review process is legally required and must accompany the entitlement process. As is normal for projects of this type, the applicant, Eden Housing, will place on deposit with the City the $98,338 in contract funds and a fifteen percent (15%) contingency or $14,750.70 to fund this process for a total amount of$113,088.70. Scott Hanin, City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution 2. PMC Scope of Services Page 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 5(D) Attachment 1 RESOLUTION 2013–XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CERRITO AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EL CERRITO AND PMC IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $113,088.70 FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW SERVICES FOR THE EDEN HOUSING SAN PABLO AVENUE MIXED-USE SENIOR APARTMENTS PROJECT WHEREAS, the City conducted a Request for Proposal (RFP) process during which PMC submitted a proposal for the Eden Housing San Pablo Avenue Mixed-Use Senior Apartments project Environmental Review in the amount of $113,088.70; and WHEREAS, PMC has demonstrated that it can best perform the tasks outlined in the Eden Housing San Pablo Mixed-Use Senior Apartments Environmental Review RFP; and WHEREAS, the City will oversee the environmental review, and the funding for the environmental review ($98,338) and a fifteen percent (15%) contingency ($14,750.70) will be paid for entirely by the applicant, Eden Housing. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of El Cerrito that it hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute an agreement between the City of El Cerrito and PMC in an amount not to exceed $113,088.70 and appropriate said funds as described. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. I CERTIFY that at an adjourned regular meeting on February 5, 2013, the El Cerrito City Council passed this resolution by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBER: NOES: COUNCILMEMBER: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBER: IN WITNESS of this action, I sign this document and affix the corporate seal of the City of El Cerrito on February XX, 2013. Cheryl Morse, City Clerk APPROVED Gregory B. Lyman, Mayor ---PAGE BREAK--- I N I TI AL S TUDY/MITIG ATED NEGATIVE D ECLARAT ION OR E N V I R O N M ENTA L IMPAC T R EPOR T FOR ED EN HOU SING, SAN PABLO MIXED-USE SENIOR APAR TMENTS T HE CIT Y OF EL CER R ITO A P R O P O S A L TO JANUARY 27, 2012 S U B M I T T E D TO : SEAN MOSS SENIOR PLANNER CITY OF EL CERRITO PLANNING DIVISION 10890 SAN PABLO AVENUE EL CERRITO, CA 94530 (510) 215-4330 SUBMITTED BY: 500 12TH STREET, SUITE 240 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94607 PHONE: (510) 272-4491 FAX: (510) 268-9207 ® W W W.PMC WORL D.COM (866) 828-6PMC Agenda Item No. 5(D) Attachment 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- I N I TI AL S TUDY/MITIG ATED NEGATIVE D ECLARAT ION OR E N V I R O N M ENTA L IMPAC T R EPOR T FOR ED EN HOU SING, SAN PABLO MIXED-USE SENIOR APAR TMENTS T HE CIT Y OF EL CER R ITO A P R O P O S A L TO JANUARY 27, 2012 S U B M I T T E D TO : SEAN MOSS SENIOR PLANNER CITY OF EL CERRITO PLANNING DIVISION 10890 SAN PABLO AVENUE EL CERRITO, CA 94530 (510) 215-4330 SUBMITTED BY: 500 12TH STREET, SUITE 240 OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94607 PHONE: (510) 272-4491 FAX: (510) 268-9207 ® W W W.PMC WORL D.COM (866) 828-6PMC ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- i TABLE OF CONTENT ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- CONSULTANT TEAMCONSULTANT TEAM ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- A-1 CONSULTANT TEAM ---PAGE BREAK--- A-2 environmental documentation preparation experience. Mr. Angell has o ---PAGE BREAK--- A-3 projects, performed invasive weed eradication programs, and habitat ---PAGE BREAK--- A-4 utilizes subconsultants that represent ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 PATRICK ANGELLPrincipal-in-Cha ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 City of Pinole, City of Pinole General Plan Update, Specific Plans, Zo ---PAGE BREAK--- 3 Saratoga Unified School District, Foothill Elementary School Expa ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 SCOTT DAVIDSON, AICPSenior Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Pinole General Plan and Specific Plan. While helping the City update ---PAGE BREAK--- 1 SETH A. MYERSAssociate Planner Mr. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 City of Pittsburg, Pittsburg/Bay Point BART Master Plan EIR.Mr. My ---PAGE BREAK--- Alice Chen Page 1 Alice Chen, AICP Principal Ms. Chen has over eighteen years of experience in transportation planning and engineering. She has managed the transportation analysis for environmental impact assessments, general plans, master plans, and specific plans. She has had extensive experience with traffic and transportation analysis for environmental impact assessments, transit station access plans, and pedestrian and bicycle planning. Her planning experience includes the Oakland General Plan Land Use and Transportation Elements Update, Jack London District Transportation Improvement Study, and the City of Alameda General Plan Amendment for the Transportation Master Plan. These studies included the technical analyses as well as public outreach and consensus building. She recently completed the transportation analyses for the Concord Community Reuse Plan EIR for redevelopment of the former Concord Naval Weapons Station, which includes transit-oriented development (TOD) at the North Concord BART station. Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers American Planning Association, Certified Planner Professional Experience Transportation Planning Ms. Chen was project manager for the Jack London District Transportation Improvement Study, which included documenting existing traffic, parking, bicycling, and walking conditions, analyzing the traffic and parking impacts of four alternative development scenarios, and identifying options to address the deficiencies in the existing transportation system or the impacts due to future development. Other planning studies include the transportation section of the City of Pinole General Plan, City of Concord Urban Area General Plan and the City of Walnut Creek General Plan Update and EIR. She is currently working on the general plan updates for the City of West Sacramento and the City of San Pablo. She also worked with the Oakland Chinatown Advisory Committee on Recommendations for Comprehensive Transportation Planning. Ms. Chen managed the City of Alameda General Plan Amendment for the Transportation Element, which involves developing a focused demand forecasting model for the city and a citywide traffic operations model using to assess the impacts of multimodal transportation policies and better understand the trade-offs among the modes (auto, transit, bike, and walk) when considering improvements to the transportation system. Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Ms. Chen has worked on several bicycle and/or pedestrian planning studies including the Oakland Bicycle Master Plan, the 15th Street Bike Trail in South Lake Tahoe, and feasibility studies for bikeway projects in Oakland. The Oakland Bicycle Master Plan involved working closely with a citizen’s group to develop an overall plan for the city. The Alameda County Pedestrian Master Plan for Unincorporated Areas included developing policies as well as an extensive project list for prioritization, while working with a range of stakeholders, including public works, planning, redevelopment, and public health staff. For the Alameda County Pedestrian Master Plan, Ms. Chen made presentations at community meetings to ---PAGE BREAK--- Alice Chen Page 2 solicit input from the general public. She is currently managing a team to prepare the City of Roseville Americans with Disabilities Act Transition Plan and Pedestrian Master Plan. Traffic/Transportation Impact Studies Ms. Chen has conducted traffic impact analyses and environmental assessments for numerous developments and roadway improvements. For the East 12th Street Realignment project in Oakland, CA, she analyzed seven alternatives using Ms. Chen has conducted the traffic impact analyses for numerous projects, including the environmental analyses for the Fruitvale BART Transit Village Phase 1 project, which included a mixed-use development and multi-modal transfer center for BART and AC Transit. For the Fruitvale Village Phase 2, her work included preparing a feasibility study for car sharing and conducting research on trip generation reductions for Transit-Oriented Developments (TODs) in Oakland. She has prepared transportation analyses for in-fill developments in urbanized areas that cover impacts to transit, bicyclists, and pedestrians in addition to the traditional automobile traffic. Education M.S., Transportation Engineering, University of California at Berkeley, College of Engineering, May 1991 B.A., Urban Studies and Civil Engineering, Brown University, May 1990 Employment History Sept 1991 – present Dowling Associates, Oakland, California. Feb 91 - Jun 91 Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California at Berkeley. ---PAGE BREAK--- Bill A. Cisco Page 1 Bill A. Cisco, P.E. Principal Associate Bill Cisco is a licensed Traffic Engineer with over 15 years of experience in transportation planning and engineering. He has conducted numerous transportation planning, traffic engineering and parking studies, including: transportation planning analyses for HOV, arterial HOV and transit facilities, highway corridor Major Investment Studies, circulation elements of general plan updates, and public access studies; traffic impact and site access studies for public and private developments and specific plan areas; traffic operations analyses for freeway interchange reconfigurations and facility improvements; and parking studies for public and private developments and municipal business districts. Mr. Cisco has also developed and updated travel demand models. Additionally, Mr. Cisco is the lead staff person for software support, marketing and content development for the TRAFFIX™ software program by Dowling Associates in partnership with PTV America. He also markets and manages the CompleteStreetsLOS™ software program, a multimodal level of service analysis software authored and distributed by Dowling Associates. Mr. Cisco serves as a Traffic Operations and Highway Capacity Analysis instructor for the UC Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies. Professional Registration Traffic Engineer - California No. 1924 Professional Engineer – No. PE075083 Professional Engineer – Michigan No. 57278 Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers American Society of Civil Engineers Professional Experience Transportation Planning Deputy project manager for the Middle Harbor Shoreline Park Public Access Feasibility Study (Port of Oakland). Project engineer for a study that evaluated future BART station locations in the Route 4 corridor (Contra Costa County). Project engineer for the Central-East Oakland EIR, Route 84 Transfer Project (Livermore), I-580/Isabel General Plan (Livermore), Montague Expressway Improvement Project (Santa Clara County), Highway 17 Corridor Transportation Improvement Study (Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties), Marin Avenue Bike Lane Study (City of Albany), HOV System Integration Plan (Los Angeles County), and an Arterial HOV Study for the Southern California Association of Governments. Conducted a trip generation analysis for a mixed-use development in the City of Thousand Oaks. ---PAGE BREAK--- Bill A. Cisco Page 2 General and Specific Plans Project manager for the Castro Valley General Plan and Eden Area Redevelopment Plan EIR in Alameda County and the Amended Downtown Hayward Redevelopment Plan EIR. Project engineer responsible for traffic modeling for updates to the circulation elements of general plans for Morgan Hill and Danville. Project engineer for the Santa Nella Specific Plan EIR. Transportation Impact Studies Project manager for various traffic impact studies for the City of Pleasanton. Project manager for the East Bayshore Recycled Water EIR (Albany, Berkeley, Emeryville, Oakland and Alameda), the Bayside Groundwater EIR (San Leandro, San Lorenzo), the Scenic Pressure Zone EIR (Danville) and the Berryman Reservoir EIR (Berkeley, Oakland) traffic studies for the East Bay Municipal Utilities District. Project engineer for County Medical Center traffic impact study (Sacramento). Project manager and project engineer for traffic impact and circulation studies for commercial, industrial, residential, office and mixed-use developments in California and Hawaii. Duties have included the preparation and interpretation of intersection capacity analyses, projection of traffic shifts, trip generation, and projection of future travel paths and distribution patterns. Study locations have included the cities of Oakland, Hayward, Pleasanton, Novato, Sacramento, South San Francisco, San Mateo, Morgan Hill, Richmond, Beverly Hills, Burbank, Highland, Irvine, Los Angeles, Redlands, Santa Barbara, Santa Monica, Stockton and Honolulu. Traffic Operations Project manager for Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2010 Level of Service Monitoring and Conformance Studies. Project manager for the San Bruno Avenue Traffic Operations and Safety TETAP project in San Bruno. Project engineer for the 42nd Avenue/I-880 interchange Project Study Report (PSR) in Oakland, the Route 4 East Major Investment Study (MIS) in Contra Costa County, I-238 freeway widening PSR in Alameda County, the 5th Avenue Overhead Seismic Retrofit project in Oakland, the US 101/Bayshore Boulevard Hook Ramps PSR in South San Francisco, and the Riverside Avenue/I-10 interchange PSR in Rialto. Determined traffic forecasts, and performed operational analyses of freeway mainline, ramps, weaving sections and intersections, including queueing analysis. Provided data analysis for a freeway mobility project in the metropolitan Detroit area. Analyzed traffic operational consequences of traffic signal preemption by buses along an arterial corridor in Ann Arbor, Michigan. Parking Studies Project engineer for area-wide parking studies for the North Beach/ Fisherman’s Wharf area in San Francisco, the Canoga Park and Reseda Business Districts in Los Angeles, and the Mid-Brand District in Glendale. Project engineer for development studies including the Carpenter’s Union in Oakland, the Spago’s restaurant and the Beverly Hills Linden Hotel in the City of Beverly Hills, and the Santa Monica YMCA, the Santa Monica Public Library and the Santa Monica Public Safety Facility. Performed inventory of existing parking supply, conducted utilization and user surveys, and determined existing and projected parking surplus and shortfall. Applied techniques of Shared Parking (Urban Land Institute) and Parking Generation (Institute of Transportation Engineers). Complete Streets Studies Project manager for a multimodal level of service complete streets analysis of a road diet project on Orange Grove Boulevard in Pasadena, California. Project manager for multimodal level of service impact analysis addendum for a development impact project in Pasadena, California. ---PAGE BREAK--- Bill A. Cisco Page 3 Transit Planning Project engineer for travel forecasting tasks for the Route 4 Major Investment Study (Pittsburg and Antioch), which included local revalidation and application of the MTC model to forecast ridership for BART extension alternatives. Project engineer for travel model network updates for the Santa Clara Valley Transportation Plan 2020 and BART to San Jose projects. Participated in the development of a paratransit resource center for the Detroit Department of Transportation. Duties included conducting telephone surveys of both equipment users and suppliers and evaluating survey results. Software Support Lead staff person for software technical support, marketing, content development and training for TRAFFIX™ software, a transportation site analysis planning and operations software program by Dowling Associates in partnership with PTV America. He also markets and manages the CompleteStreetsLOS™ software program, a multimodal level of service analysis software authored and distributed by Dowling Associates. Travel Demand Management Evaluated travel demand management strategies for a mixed-use development containing residential, commercial and film production uses in Los Angeles. Congestion Management Conducted research on congestion management strategies in California, including ITS applications for HOV lanes, incident management and parking management. Travel Forecasting Models Experienced with several travel demand forecasting models, including TRANSCAD, TRANPLAN, EMME/2, MINUTP and TP+/Viper. Training Taught multiple training courses for the TRAFFIX™ traffic impact analysis software program, including fundamentals of traffic impact analysis and traffic engineering. Developed software training manual. Co- taught training courses for the CompleteStreetsLOS™ multimodal level of service analysis software program. Co-taught the Traffic Operations and Highway Capacity Analysis course for the UC Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies for multiple open-enrollment and Caltrans specific course offerings. Education M.S., Transportation Engineering, University of California, Berkeley (1995) B.S., Civil Engineering, Wayne State University (1993) Employment History 2001-present Dowling Associates, Inc. –Principal Associate 1997-2001 CCS Planning and Engineering, Inc. – Transportation Engineer/Planner 1995-1997 Kaku Associates, Inc. - Associate Transportation Engineer/Planner 1994-1995 Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley – Research Assistant 1993-1994 Urban Transportation Institute, Wayne State University – Research Assistant ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ERIC L. BROADHURST, PE Senior Vice President PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Broadhurst has been an acoustical consultant with Charles M. Salter Associates since 1989. His areas of expertise are environmental, architectural, and mechanical noise control. He has extensive consulting experience with projects both during the design phases and as an expert witness. Mr. Broadhurst has been project manager/engineer for the following environmental noise and vibration projects: - El Cerrito Lumber Site Apartments, El Cerrito, CA - Jack London Square Housing Railroad Noise and Vibration Study, Oakland, CA - CityWalk Mixed-Use, Oakland, CA - SFRA Parcel C Senior Housing, San Francisco, CA - Haight Street Senior Housing, San Francisco, CA - Temescal Place, Oakland, CA - Uptown Oakland Apartments, Oakland, CA - Peralta Condominiums, Oakland, CA - Hollywood and Vine Apartments, Los Angeles, CA - One Rincon Hill Tower, San Francisco, CA - The Century, Los Angeles, CA - Terrazzo Mixed-Use, Nashville, TN - Carroll Street Station Mixed-Use, San Francisco, CA - Fairmont Ghirardelli Square Timeshare, San Francisco, CA - Guangzhou Fashion and Convention Center, Guangzhou, China - Raley Field Amphitheater, West Sacramento, CA - El Capitan Entertainment Center (Jimmy Kimmel Studio), Hollywood, CA - Hollywood Cinerama Dome, Hollywood, CA - Howe Avenue Waterline Drilling Noise Monitoring, Sacramento, CA - EBMUD Orinda Water Treatment Plant, Orinda, CA - EBMUD South Folsom Pumping Stations, Folsom, CA - Brisbane Freight-Forwarding Facility, Brisbane, CA - Lowe’s Pile Driving Vibration Monitoring, South San Francisco, CA - Nishimoto Trading Mechanical Equipment, Brisbane, CA - UC Berkeley Etcheverry Hall Construction Noise, Berkeley, CA - UC Berkeley Doe Library Construction Noise, Berkeley, CA - Berkeley National Laboratory Chiller, Berkeley, CA - NASA Ames Wind Tunnel Noise Insulation Project, Mountain View, CA PUBLICATIONS - Coauthor (2006, December Multi-family housing sound isolation: a summary of industry standards for design of demising assemblies. Presented at Inter-Noise 2006 – Sponsored by I-INCE. - Coauthor ACOUSTICS: Architecture, Engineering, the Environment (1998 William Stout Publishing). PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION California: M.E. No. M28195 EDUCATION University of California, Berkeley, B.S. Mechanical Engineering, 1989 ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- JEREMY L. DECKER, PE Senior Consultant PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Mr. Decker has been an acoustical consultant with Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. since 2005. His areas of expertise include environmental noise studies, architectural noise control, room acoustics, mechanical system noise and vibration reduction, and vibration analyses. He has consulting experience with multi-family housing, offices, educational facilities, and community buildings. Mr. Decker’s experience includes the following projects: - Agemark at Wilder Environmental Noise Study, Orinda, CA - Mission Bay Block 3 Environmental Noise Study, San Francisco, CA - Tamal Vista Mixed-Use EIR, Corte Madera, CA - West Dublin BART Transit Village Environmental Noise Study, Dublin, CA - Stanford Hoover Pavilion Construction Noise Study, Stanford, CA - One Rincon Hill Environmental Noise Study, San Francisco, CA - West San Carlos Mixed-Use Environmental Noise Study, San Jose, CA - Redwood City Saltworks Environmental Study, Redwood City, CA - 5175 Broadway Environmental Noise Study, Oakland, CA - 2650 El Camino Real Environmental Noise Study and EIR, Mountain View, CA - Bay Meadows Environmental Noise Study, San Mateo, CA - Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Environmental Noise Study, Berkeley, Oakland, and Orinda, CA - Kaiser Permanente Construction Noise Monitoring, Oakland, CA - Alta Bates Summit Medical Center Construction Noise Monitoring, Oakland, CA - Gateway Valley Construction Noise Study, Orinda, CA - The Century, Los Angeles, CA - Devil’s Slide Tunnel Noise and Vibration Study, San Mateo County, CA - Jack London Square Offices Train Noise Study, Oakland, CA - Alcoa - Skyfarm Cellular Site, Santa Rosa, CA - Alcoa – Berkeley Cellular Site, Berkeley, CA - NRG Cogeneration Facility, San Francisco, CA - Velocity in the Gulch Train Noise and Vibration, Nashville, TN - Courtyard Marriott Train Noise and Vibration, Campbell, CA - St. Bonaventure Noise Study, Concord, CA - Central Avenue Carwash, Richmond, CA - Wattling Street Environmental Noise Study, Oakland, CA - Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Palo Alto, CA PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION California: M.E. No. 34231 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS American Institute of Architects, Allied Member Acoustical Society of America, Member Institute of Noise Control Engineering, Member California Preservation Foundation, Member United States Green Building Council, Northern California Chapter, Member EDUCATION California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, B.S. Mechanical Engineering ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- DONNA GRAVES 1204 Carleton Street Berkeley, CA 94702 Phone [PHONE REDACTED] Cell [PHONE REDACTED] e-mail EDUCATION Loeb Fellowship, Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, 2009-1010 M.A. - Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles, 1989 M.A. - American Civilization, Brown University, Providence, 1982 B.A. - American Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1981 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE Donna Graves, Arts & Cultural Planning, Berkeley, CA 1996-present Consultant Specializing in project planning, research and development for public history, public art, historic preservation and interdisciplinary public programming that creatively connects communities with their heritage. Clients include: National Park Service; City of San Francisco Planning Department; City of Riverside Planning Department; California Japanese American Community Leadership Council; Richmond Community Redevelopment Agency: Fort Mason Foundation; San Francisco Arts Commission; Japanese Cultural and Community Center of Northern California; Abraham Lincoln Brigade Monument Committee; City of Oakland Cultural Arts Division; City of San Jose; City of Berkeley. Selected Projects Public History: Rosie the Riveter/WWII Home Front National Historical Park Visitor Center, content specialist on exhibit design team for National Park Visitor Center to be opened in 2012. Blossoms & Thorns: The Legacy of Richmond’s Historic Japanese American Nurseries, co-curator for exhibit combining work by contemporary photographers with historic photographs and artifacts. Project includes extensive public programming and numerous partners including community organizations and the National Park Service. Preserving California’s Japantowns, Project Director and lead historian for statewide historic survey of fifty pre- WWII Japanese American communities, funded by the California State Library’s Civil Liberties Public Education Program, 2005-present. Project involved dozens of community volunteers and uncovered hundreds of historic resources. Co-created comprehensive website www.californiajapantowns.org as research and planning tool to support the historic legacy of California Japanese American communities. Rosie the Riveter/World War II Home Front National Historical Park, instrumental role in conceptualizing and initiating national park dedicated to the diverse social history of the WWII home front in Richmond, CA. After providing leadership for City of Richmond’s Rosie the Riveter Memorial project, the first in the US to honor women’s contributions to the WWII home front, have continued to serve as project planner and historian for City of Richmond and National Park Service, 2000-present. Secured additional project funding from California State Library, California Humanities Council, California Coastal Conservancy and Association of Bay Area Governments. Bay Trail Markers and Memories of Macdonald, Project Director for two community-based permanent interpretive programs along waterfront and Richmond’s historic downtown for Community Redevelopment Agency and National Park. Not at Home on the Home Front, Directed research and oral history project documenting experiences of Japanese Americans and Italian Americans during WWII. Frances Albrier/San Pablo Park Community History Project, Raised funds from City of Berkeley public art program and a local foundation to develop a permanent interpretive project at a community center, a middle school education program and a community history event focused on past and current struggles for civil rights in South Berkeley, 2005-07. ---PAGE BREAK--- Historic Preservation: Thematic Context Statement for Riverside’s Harada House, lead historian for city-wide survey and context statement expanding understanding of a National Historic Landmark significant to U.S. civil rights history and Japanese American heritage. Report on California Historic Preservation Policies and Programs, commissioned by the California Cultural and Historic Endowment to assess potential strategies to strengthen preservation of privately owned resources throughout California. Downtown Richmond Historic Context, Lead historian for project to identify resources in the city’s historic core, especially those that could expand preservation and interpretation for Rosie the Riveter National Park. Project team lead by Page & Turnbull, funded through a Preserve America grant. San Francisco Japantown Historic Context, Lead author for historic context statement for City of San Francisco’s Japantown Better Neighborhood Plan project led by Page & Turnbull, Inc., 2007-09. Miraflores Japanese American Nursery Historic Context Report with Ward Hill and Woodruff Minor. Wrote historic context portion for report on Richmond, CA Japanese American cut-flower nurseries, 2004. Accessibility & Preservation, Assisted with organization and fundraising for statewide conference on the impact of the Americans with Disabilities Act on historic buildings for the California Preservation Foundation, 1992. Public Art: Rosie the Riveter Memorial: Honoring American Women's Labor During WWII, Project Director for first national memorial to women’s contribution to the home front, designed by Cheryl Barton and Susan Schwartzenberg. Monument to the Abraham Lincoln Brigade, served as project manager for competition for monument designed by Walter Hood and Ann Chamberlain on San Francisco’s waterfront, 2001-03. Access to the Visual Arts, developed report for San Francisco Arts Commission on expanding access to public art and gallery programs for people with disabilities, 2000. Public Art Master Plan for City of Tampa, Florida (in collaboration with McGregor Associates), 1998-99. Save Outdoor Sculpture! Secured major contract from Smithsonian Institution to co-direct statewide documentation of 1,500 outdoor sculptures. University of Southern California, Art Department, Member of panel developing guidelines for new graduate program in public art, 1991. Artist/Designer Collaboration Studies, Conducted research and wrote report on collaborative, interdisciplinary public art projects jointly sponsored by the National Endowment for the Art's Design Arts and Visual Arts Programs, 1989-92. Previous Experience Headlands Center for the Arts, Sausalito, CA 1994-96 Program Director Planned and developed diverse programming for nationally acclaimed interdisciplinary arts organization. Public Art Works, San Rafael, CA 1993-94 Executive Director Responsible for administration, fundraising, publicity and outreach for non-profit public arts organization. The Power of Place, Los Angeles, 1987-91 Executive Director Responsible for administration, fundraising, research, publicity and outreach for influential non-profit corporation dedicated to public art and historic preservation with special emphasis on the history of ethnic groups, workers, and women. Artist/Designer Collaboration Studies, Conducted research and wrote report on collaborative, interdisciplinary public art projects jointly sponsored by the NEA's Design Arts and Visual Arts Programs. 1989-92 San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, 1983-87 Curatorial Assistant Oakland Museum of California, 1982-83 Acting Curator Teaching Visiting Lecturer, University of California/Berkeley. Co-taught seminar and studio courses on citizen participation in community design at the College of Environmental Design, 2005-2006. Visiting Lecturer, University of California/Davis. Designed and taught course in the Dept. of Art History on the history of public art and urbanism in the U.S. 1993 ---PAGE BREAK--- PROFESSIONAL AND COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES National Trust for Historic Preservation Board of Advisors, 2009-present “Preserving Asian Pacific Islander America; Mobilizing Our Communities,” member of steering and program committees for first national API historic and cultural preservation forum held in San Francisco, June 2010. Exhibit Advisor, “Under the Sun: Los Angeles, California and the World,” Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 2009-2010 Advisor to Citywide Historic Context Statement, San Francisco Planning Department, 2008-present Flight 93 Memorial, appointed to Stage I Jury, 2005 Steering Committee, Public Art Master Plan, City of San Jose, 1999 - 2000 Advisory Committee, San Francisco Art Commission Gallery, 1998 - 2000 Cultural Master Plan Advisory Committee for San Francisco Presidio, 1995 Little Tokyo Community Development Advisory Committee Public Art Task Force, 1990-92 Served on awards and grant panels for National Trust for Historic Preservation, Alameda County Public Art Program, San Francisco Arts Commission Public Art Program, Los Angeles Cultural Affairs Department, the LA Community Redevelopment Agency, The Los Angeles Conservancy,. PUBLICATIONS Selected list “Preserving California’s Japantowns,” Cultural Resources Management: The Journal of Heritage Stewardship, Winter 2009. “Revising Rosie the Riveter: From Public Art to National Park” in Public Art by the Book, Barbara Goldstein ed., University of Washington Press (2005). “Tending the Home Front: The Many Roles of Bay Area Women During WWII,” thematic essay for Over Here: WWII in the San Francisco Bay Area, an on-line National Register travel itinerary for the National Park Service, 2004. www.nps.gov/history/nr/travel/wwIIbayarea/womenatwar.htm. “Not at Home on the Home Front: Japanese Americans and Italian Americans in Richmond, California During WWII,” with Lawrence DiStasi and Lynne Horiuchi (Berkeley, 2004). “Mapping Richmond’s World War II Home Front,” an historical report prepared for the National Park Service (Berkeley, 2004). Sento at Sixth and Main: Preserving Landmarks of Japanese American Heritage with Gail Dubrow (Seattle: Seattle Arts Commission, 2002, reprinted by Smithsonian Institution Press, 2005). "Tracing the Past: Mapping Cities Through Public Art," in The Public Art of Re-Collection (Natl. Assembly of Local Arts Agencies Monographs: vol. 4, no. 2, 1995), pp. 16-21. Reprinted in On the Ground (vol. 1, no. 4 , 1995). "Representing the Race: Detroit's Monument to Joe Louis," in Harriet Senie and Sally Webster, eds. New Perspectives in Public Art: Content, Context, and Controversy (Harper Collins Press) 1992. Reprinted by Smithsonian Press, 1998. LECTURES & PRESENTATIONS, Selected List “Immigration and Landscapes of Cultural Heritage,” Graduate School of Design, Harvard University, 2010. Presidential plenary session speaker, Vernacular Architecture Forum annual conference, Fresno, 2008. “Public Histories” invited speaker Huntington Library-USC Institute on California and the West, Pasadena, 2007. Panel chair, California Preservation Foundation Annual Conference, Los Angeles, 2007 Panelist, California Council for the Promotion of History Annual Conference, San Jose, 2006 Panel Chair, Preserving California’s Japantowns conference, San Francisco, 2006 Panelist, Great Places, Great Debates: Opening Historic Sites to Civic Engagement Conference, Lower East Side Tenement Museum, New York, 2004 Art History Lessons:’ Investigating Memory, Meaning and Place Through Contemporary Art Projects” George Wright Society Annual Conference, San Diego, 2004 American Studies Assoc. Natl. Conference, Washington, DC 2001 (session chair) and 1997 (panelist) “Public Art and Preservation,” National Trust for Historic Preservation Conference, Los Angeles, 2000 “Monuments and Memorials in Design,” California Historical Society/Organization of Black Designers, San Francisco, 1998 "Presenting the Past: The Uses of History in Public Art," University of California, Davis, 1992 "Common Grounds: Artists and Designers," Yale University School of Architecture, New Haven, 1991 "La Fuerza de Union: A Public History Workshop on Labor Organizing in Los Angeles," Los Angeles, 1991 "Preserving and Interpreting Cultural Diversity," American Collegiate Schools of Planning Annual Conference, Austin, 1990 "Organizing Ethnic Women: A Case Study in Preserving Cultural Diversity," So. Cal. Society of Architectural Historians Annual Conference, Los Angeles, 1990 ---PAGE BREAK--- AWARDS AND FELLOWSHIPS Loeb Fellowship, Harvard University Graduate School of Design, 2009-2010 Home Front Award, National Park Service & City of Richmond Historic Preservation Award, 2008 Vernacular Architecture Forum Advocacy Award for Preserving California’s Japantowns, 2008 Environmental Design Research Association/Places Research Award 2003 for Sento at Sixth and Main: Preserving Landmarks of Japanese American Heritage Environmental Design Research Association/Places Award for Rosie the Riveter Memorial, 2000 National Endowment for the Arts Research Fellowship, 1991 UCLA Alumni Association Distinguished Scholar Award, 1990 National Endowment for the Arts, Arts Administration Fellowship, 1989 University Fellowship, UCLA, 1989 Blair Fellowship, Graduate School of Architecture and Urban Planning, UCLA, 1988 Women's University Club Fellowship, 1988 Kahn Foundation Fellowship in California Art History, Oakland Museum, 1983 University Fellowship, Brown University, 1981 Departmental and College Honors, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1981 ---PAGE BREAK--- EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCESE ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- B-1 EXPERIENCE AND R ---PAGE BREAK--- B-2 CITY OFPITTSBURGPITTSBURG/BAY POINT BART ---PAGE BREAK--- B-3 ADDITIONAL EXPERIENCEClientScope of Service City of Sunnyva ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- SCOPE OF SERVICESSCOPE OF SERVICES 12-20-2012 Revised Version ---PAGE BREAK--- C-1 SCOPE OF SERVICES Based on our review of the project materials, technical reports, the Request for Proposals (RFP), and conversations with City staff, we are aware of the following key aspects and expectations of the project: • Technical studies done for the project include a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Hazardous Building Materials Survey, Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA threshold evaluation for risk and hazards, and two historic resources reports (PBS&J 2008; Knapp & VerPlanck 2011). This technical information is expected to be utilized in the analysis. • The City has not yet determined whether the project will require the preparation of an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration (MND). The ultimate determination will be based on the results of impact determinations associated with historic resources (Mabuchi House/Contra Costa Florist), traffic impacts at area intersections, noise, air quality, and greenhouse gas emission impacts. The consultant is expected to assist the City in making the determination as to the appropriate environmental document. • Preparation of adequate and high-quality environmental documents that meet the City’s expectations and are easy for the public to understand. PROJECT APPROACH Based on our understanding of the project, we have assembled a project team of PMC staff and key technical consultants to meet the above expectations. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-2 The following scope of work details our approach, which calls for detailed site analysis under Phase 1 in order to determine the appropriate CEQA level of review, and preparation of the CEQA document in Phase 2. This approach will provide all of the necessary technical information early in the process for the City to determine whether a mitigated negative declaration or an environmental impact review is appropriate and allow expedited completion of the environmental review process. The following scope of work is organized into two phases. • Phase 1 – Environmental Review. This phase would consist of the preparation of a detailed Initial Study and technical analysis of potential historic resource, traffic, noise, air quality, and greenhouse impacts associated with the project. PMC will meet with City staff and the applicant (as considered appropriate by the City) to go over the results of the Initial Study and respond to any comments. This phase will provide the City with the critical information needed to determine the appropriate level of environmental review required under CEQA. • Phase 2 – Preparation of CEQA Document. This phase would be based on the results and conclusions of the Initial Study under Phase 1 and involves the preparation of the required environmental document. This phase includes two options: preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration, or preparation of an EIR. PHASE 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW TASK 1 – PROJECT INITIATION PMC will review all relevant data for the project including project files, previous technical studies and maps, and other environmental documents prepared, including studies and documents prepared by the City. PMC will conduct a site visit and photograph the project site, as well as collect all pertinent information available on the site and the environmental setting. A kickoff meeting will be held with City staff and the project applicant to go over project details and obtain site access permission. Task 1 Meetings: One project start-up meeting Task 1 Deliverables: None ---PAGE BREAK--- C-3 TASK 2 – PREPARATION OF HISTORIC RESOURCE ASSESSMENT VerPlanck Historic Preservation Consulting, in coordination with Cultural Historian Donna Graves, will prepare this assessment. This subconsultant was chosen given their experience and knowledge of the project as well as expertise regarding historic architecture. This task will involve the preparation of an addendum to the 2011 Historic Resource Evaluation for 10848 & 10860 San Pablo Avenue that will focus on the proposed alterations to the project site and whether such alterations would result in significant impacts to the historic attributes of the Mabuchi House/Contra Costa Florist and will identify whether potential impacts can be mitigated to a less than significant level under CEQA. TASK 3 – PREPARATION OF TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT Kittelson & Associates will perform the following tasks as part of this scope of work to determine traffic impacts of the project: Existing Conditions Kittelson & Associates will evaluate existing traffic conditions (intersection level of service analyses) as well as document existing transit, bicycle, and pedestrian circulation in the study area. Based on initial coordination with City staff, the following intersections will be evaluated for this study: • San Pablo Avenue & Manila Avenue • San Pablo Avenue & Schmidt Lane • Kearney Street & Manila Avenue • Kearney Street & Schmidt Lane The traffic analysis will focus on weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Task 2 Meetings: Up to two meetings Task 2 Deliverables: Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the addendum to the 2011 Historic Resources Evaluation Task 3 Meetings: Up to four meetings Task 3 Deliverables: Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the traffic analysis report ---PAGE BREAK--- C-4 Estimate Project Trip Generation and Trip Distribution Kittelson & Associates will determine the projected trip generation of the proposed project using trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Project trip distribution will be estimated based on existing traffic patterns in the study area and the location of the proposed access to the project site. Existing + Project Traffic Analysis The project traffic will be assigned to the transportation network, adding to the existing traffic. The traffic conditions at the study locations with the addition of project trips will be analyzed. Baseline Traffic Analysis (Existing + Approved Traffic) The traffic conditions without the project trips, but including the trips of nearby projects that have already been approved for development by the City of El Cerrito, will also be analyzed. This would include determining the estimated traffic from the nearby approved projects that would need to be added to the existing conditions traffic counts at the study intersections. Baseline + Project Traffic Analysis Kittelson & Associates will then evaluate traffic operations at the study locations with the addition of the project traffic to the baseline traffic (existing + approved traffic) at the study intersections. Parking Analysis Kittelson & Associates will determine the expected parking demand for the proposed project based on parking generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Additionally, Kittelson & Associates will survey three comparable sites in El Cerrito to examine off-street parking utilization at maximum parking occupancy (late night or very early morning) to determine a parking utilization rate (spaces per unit). The three sites would include: • Del Norte Place, 11720 San Pablo Avenue, has 27 units set aside for very low income seniors and families, out of a total of 185 units. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-5 • Eskaton’s Hazel Shirley Manor, 11026 San Pablo Avenue, has 63 units. • El Cerrito Royal Assisted Living, 6510 Gladys Avenue, has 121 units of congregate care for seniors and the disabled. Kittelson & Associates will also determine the required number of spaces based on City code. All three resulting parking calculations (based on ITE rates, surveyed rates, and City code) would then be compared to the number of off-street parking spaces proposed to estimate potential parking surplus or shortfall. For on-street parking, Kittelson & Associates will survey the block faces adjacent to the project site as well as the block face immediately to the east of the study site (on the far side of Kearney Street) to determine the parking utilization of on-street spaces during the a.m. peak, p.m. peak ,and late- night (or very early morning) times. These block faces include: • San Pablo Avenue between Schmidt Lane and Manila Avenue (east side) • Manila Avenue between San Pablo Avenue and Kearney Street (south side) • Kearney Street between Schmidt Lane and Manila Avenue (west and east sides) • Schmidt Lane between San Pablo Avenue and Kearney Street (north side) Impacts and Mitigation Measures Kittelson & Associates will determine appropriate mitigation measures for significant traffic and/or parking impacts from the proposed project, in consultation with City staff. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-6 Prepare Study Reports Kittelson & Associates will submit a draft traffic study report for review and comment by the City of El Cerrito. Thereafter, Kittelson will submit the final report after receipt of one set of consolidated and reconciled comments from the City on the draft report. The budget assumes that report revisions would be editorial in nature and not be related to any expansion of study scope. TASK 4 – PREPARATION OF THE NOISE IMPACT ASSESSMENT Charles M. Salter Associates will prepare the noise analysis. The noise study will consist of the following tasks: • Assess the existing noise environment at the site by conducting up to two continuous 48-hour noise measurements and 15-minute “spot” measurements (requires two site visits) • Project future traffic noise levels at the site using data to be provided by traffic analysis • Quantify the noise level at each building facade • Based on building plans, calculate necessary sound ratings for facade elements windows) to meet the project interior noise criteria (based on state and City code requirements) • In a written report, summarize findings regarding the following: a. Expected environmental noise at the site b. Preliminary mitigation measures to reduce noise in the residences c. Potential community noise resulting from the project • Be available for one follow-up conference call to discuss findings • Review and comment on the noise section of the environmental document Task 4 Meetings: None Task 4 Deliverables: Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the noise impact assessment ---PAGE BREAK--- C-7 TASK 5 – PREPARATION OF THE AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS ASSESSMENT PMC will prepare the air quality and greenhouse gas analysis. While the BAAQMD has recently had their CEQA Guidelines litigated (California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG10548693), we advise that these CEQA Guidelines can be utilized with supporting evidence (based on consultation with the BAAQMD and attorneys with CEQA and BAAQMD experience). Air Quality The air quality impact analysis will be prepared in accordance with the BAAQMD’s recommended guidance and methodologies. Accordingly, the analysis will include a description of regional air quality. Meteorological conditions that could affect air pollutant dispersal or transport will be described. Applicable air quality regulatory framework, standards, and significance thresholds will be discussed. Both short-term construction) and long-term operational) increases in regional air pollutant emissions, including stationary and mobile source emissions, will be assessed. Emissions will be quantified utilizing emission factors derived from the most current emissions modeling software CalEEMOD. This model is publically available and employs widely accepted calculation methodologies for emissions estimates combined with appropriate default data if site-specific information is not available. The project’s contribution to cumulative regional air quality impacts will also be addressed. Potential increases in exposure of sensitive land uses to odorous and toxic air contaminants (TACs) have been addressed by the BAAQMD in its April 25, 2011, analysis (though an analysis of construction TAC emissions was not provided). The assessment will utilize this analysis and will address construction TAC issues. Task 5 Meetings: None Task 5 Deliverables: Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the air quality and greenhouse gas assessment ---PAGE BREAK--- C-8 Local mobile-source carbon monoxide (CO) concentrations will be assessed using the BAAQMD’s screening methodologies. If deemed necessary, localized concentrations of mobile-source CO concentrations will be modeled using the Caline4 computer program. Local mobile-source CO concentrations are typically quantified for congested areas level of service [LOS] E or worse) with high background CO concentrations. Modeled CO concentrations at sensitive receptors will be compared with state and federal 1- and 8-hour ambient air quality standards to determine impact significance. The significance of air quality impacts will be determined in comparison to applicable local and state thresholds. Mitigation measures will be incorporated to reduce significant air quality impacts. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The BAAQMD does not have an adopted threshold of significance for construction-related greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as it does for operational GHG. However, quantification and disclosure of construction- generated GHG emissions that would occur during construction is recommended. For greenhouse gases resulting from operations of land use development projects, the BAAQMD threshold of significance is either compliance with a Qualified GHG Reduction Strategy, or annual emissions less than 1,100 metric tons per year (MT/year) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e), or 4.6 MT CO2e/service population/year (residents + employees). Land use development projects include residential, commercial, industrial, and public land uses and facilities. For the purposes of this analysis, 1,100 MT/year of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) is the chosen threshold of significance. However, if the City’s proposed Climate Action Plan (CAP) is adopted once this analysis is commenced, this analysis will focus on the project’s compliance with the CAP. GHG emissions associated with the project will be estimated in a manner consistent with current emission inventory work on the City’s CAP. Project CO2e emissions from construction of the proposed project will be quantified with the CalEEMod software. Yearly emissions from project operations, including those associated with transportation, natural gas use, ---PAGE BREAK--- C-9 consumer products, architectural coatings, and indirect emissions from the disposal of solid waste, treating and supply water, and generating electricity will be estimated using the BAAQMD’s Greenhouse Gas Model (BGM). Given our experience with similar projects, we do not expect that the proposed project would result in a significant GHG emission impact. TASK 6 – PREPARATION OF THE DRAFT INITIAL STUDY (IS) Initial Study Project Description The project description will be a succinct description of the proposed residential development of the site and all associated improvements that will be the subject of the Initial Study. The project description will include a listing of the City-required approvals. Initial Study Technical Analysis PMC will prepare a Draft Initial Study using the current Environmental Checklist Form in Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (2012). The Initial Study will consist of a Project Description, CEQA Environmental Checklist, Discussion of Environmental Issues, and References and will be formatted consistent with the City’s preferred format. The Initial Study will include a brief discussion of each issue item in the Environmental Checklist, with a more thorough analysis given to those items that could result in potentially significant impacts. PMC will also identify current City standards and specific mitigation measures that are required to reduce adverse impacts to less than significant levels. The Draft Initial Study will be prepared and provided to the City for review and discussion intended to determine the appropriate environmental document (EIR versus MND). Should an MND be determined appropriate, this Initial Study will be the substantive evidence supporting the MND determination. Should an EIR be determined appropriate, this Initial Study can be used to focus the scope of the Draft EIR, be circulated with the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and the technical analysis incorporated into the EIR. Task 6 Meetings: None Task 6 Deliverables: Draft Initial Study (five hard copies and one electronic copy in Word) ---PAGE BREAK--- C-10 While all of the environmental issue areas below will be addressed, agricultural resources and forestry resources, biological resources, geology/soils, mineral resources, population/housing, public services, utilities/service systems, and recreation will be identified as “no impact” given the specific nature of the project. The technical study results prepared for historic resources, traffic, noise, air quality, and greenhouse gases, as well as the results of the project’s Hazardous Building Materials Survey (which identified asbestos and lead-containing building material issues to be addressed), will be integrated into the Initial Study. • Aesthetics • Agricultural and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology/Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology/Water Quality • Land Use/Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population/Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Utilities/Service Systems • Traffic and Circulation ---PAGE BREAK--- C-11 PHASE 2 – PREPARATION OF THE CEQA DOCUMENT TASK 7 – CITY REVIEW OF DRAFT INITIAL STUDY PMC will meet with City staff to go over the results of the Draft Initial Study and answer any questions regarding the analysis conclusions as well as identify any changes to the Initial Study. PMC will also provide a brief technical memorandum identifying our recommendations on the level of CEQA document to be prepared for the project. TASK 8 – PREPARATION OF THE CEQA DOCUMENT Based on the discussion and decision made under Task 7, PMC will prepare the required CEQA document. This phase includes two options: preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration or preparation of an EIR. The scopes of work for both options are outlined below. Option Task 8.1 – Preparation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Draft The draft mitigated negative declaration will be based on the Draft Initial Study (IS/MND) and will incorporate all City edits and comments. A camera-ready draft of the IS/MND will be prepared for final review by the City prior to release. Upon final approval, PMC will generate twenty-five (25) copies of the IS/MND for City distribution. This task will also include preparation of the Notice of Intent. If submittal to the State Clearinghouse is required, PMC will handle this submittal on behalf of the City. Meetings: None Deliverables: Twenty-five (25) copies and an electronic version of the Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Task 7 Meetings: One meeting to discuss Draft Initial Study and its conclusions Task 7 Deliverables: Technical memorandum recommending the appropriate CEQA document for the project ---PAGE BREAK--- C-12 Response to Comments on the Mitigated Negative Declaration At the end of the public comment period for the IS/MND, PMC will provide the City with a technical memorandum that responds to any written comments received on the document. PMC staff will also attend up to two public meetings on the project and will assist on the preparation of CEQA findings for the MND. Preparation of the Notice of Determination and Mitigation Monitoring Program PMC will prepare the Notice of Determination for the City as well as the Mitigation Monitoring Program for adoption should mitigation measures be identified. Option Task 8.2 – Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) In the event the preparation of an EIR is identified as necessary in Task 7, PMC will use the initial study and completed technical studies to focus the EIR analysis on the environmental issues of concern and will scope out environmental impacts that will clearly not occur. Meetings: None Deliverables: Notice of Determination and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) Meetings: Up to two public meetings Deliverables: Technical memorandum responding to written comments received ---PAGE BREAK--- C-13 Notice of Preparation PMC will prepare the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and attach the initial study (NOP/IS) describing the project location, topics to be analyzed in the EIR, and a map of the project area. It is assumed that the City will develop the public distribution list and distribute the NOP/IS. PMC will distribute the required fifteen (15) sets of document(s) to the State Clearinghouse. PMC will assist the City in conducting a scoping meeting associated with the release of the NOP. Preparation of Administrative Draft EIR PMC will prepare the Administrative Draft EIR (ADEIR), which will consist of the following sections, and will prepare the document in a form that will allow for use in subsequent project review. 1.0 Introduction Section 1.0 of the Draft EIR will provide an introduction and overview describing the intended use of the EIR and the review and certification process. 2.0 Executive Summary (Including Matrix of Project Impacts and Mitigation Measures) This section will summarize the characteristics of the proposed project and will provide a concise summary matrix of the project’s environmental impacts and associated mitigation measures as required under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15123. 3.0 Project Description The Project Description will be consistent with the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines Section 15124 and will consist of a detailed description of the project and associated approvals for the project. Meetings: One scoping meeting Deliverables: Twenty-five (25) copies of the NOP and an electronic version. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-14 4.0 Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures Individual environmental issue areas will be evaluated in the EIR. For each issue area, impacts as well as mitigation measures will be identified. This section of the EIR will utilize the analysis provided in the Initial Study developed in Task 6 and the technical studies under Tasks 2 through 5. 5.0 Cumulative Impact Summary PMC will assess the impacts of the project in combination with other known, approved, or reasonably foreseeable development activity in the project vicinity, including all past, present, existing, approved, pending, and reasonably foreseeable future projects. Consistent with the State CEQA Guidelines, a clear cumulative setting will be described in the EIR. The cumulative analysis will address each topic covered in the environmental analysis and will identify appropriate mitigation measures for any significant impacts identified. 6.0 Alternatives PMC assumes that three alternatives will be analyzed. PMC will coordinate with City staff in the development of up to three reasonable alternatives to the proposed project, in addition to the CEQA-required No Project Alternative. 7.0 Other CEQA Requirements The EIR will include the other required sections including growth-inducing impacts of the project and a summary of significant and unavoidable impacts of the project. 8.0 Report Preparers and References This section will include reference to all persons, agencies, and references used in the EIR. ---PAGE BREAK--- C-15 Revise Admin Draft EIR/Prepare Draft EIR (DEIR) City staff edits will be incorporated into the Draft EIR and twenty-five (25) copies will be prepared. In order to keep Draft EIR copy costs down, PMC will have the technical appendices placed on a CD that will be inserted in a sleeve in the back of the Draft EIR. PMC will also provide 25 copies on CD and assist the City on placing the Draft EIR on the City’s website. PMC will be responsible for distribution of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse. PMC will also assist in the preparation of the Notice of Availability (NOA). It is assumed that the City will be responsible for posting and noticing requirements. PMC will attend and participate in one public meeting on the Draft EIR, which will include preparation of a presentation on the content of the Draft EIR. Meetings: None Deliverables: Five copies of the Administrative Draft EIR plus one electronic version ---PAGE BREAK--- C-16 • Minor revisions to the text of the Draft EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- C-17 PMC will provide five copies of the Administrative Final EIR for City review. City staff edits will be incorporated into the Final EIR and twenty- five (25) copies will be prepared. Twenty-five (25) CD copies will also be provided. PMC assumes that no more than fifteen (15) comment letters will be submitted on the Draft EIR that will require detailed analysis and response. PMC will attend and participate in up to two public meetings on the Final EIR, which will include preparation of a presentation on the content of the Final EIR. Preparation of the Findings, Notice of Determination, and Mitigation Monitoring Program PMC will prepare the Notice of Determination for the City as well as the Mitigation Monitoring Program and CEQA Findings for project approval as required under State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15091 and 15093. Meetings: Two meetings to present the Final EIR. Deliverables: Five copies of the Admin Final EIR; twenty- five (25) hard copies of the Final EIR and twenty-five (25) copies on CD ---PAGE BREAK--- C-18 Meetings: None Deliverables: Notice of Determination, CEQA Findings, and Mitigation Monitoring Program ---PAGE BREAK--- D-1 SCHEDULE AND BUDGET The following schedule and budget are based on our understanding of the project as well as our experience in preparing MNDs and EIRs under aggressive time frames. SCHEDULE The following is a summary of the scope of work and associated schedule with each task. The following schedule assumes a project start date of January 14, 2013. Task Work Products/Meetings Schedule/Duration PHASE 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Task 1 Project Initiation • One project start-up meeting Task Duration: January 14, 2013 – January 18, 2013 Task 2 Historic Resources Assessment • Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the addendum to the 2011 Historic Resources Evaluation • Up to two project meetings Task Duration: January 18, 2013 – February 15, 2013 Two weeks for preparation of the draft document for City review One week for City review and comment One week for final edits Task 3 Traffic Analysis Report • Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the traffic analysis report • Up to four project meetings Task Duration: January 18, 2013 – March 22, 2013 Six weeks for preparation of the draft document for City review Two weeks for City review and comment One week for final edits ---PAGE BREAK--- D-2 Task Work Products/Meetings Schedule/Duration Task 4 Noise Impact Assessment • Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the noise impact assessment Task Duration: January 18, 2013 – March 22, 2013 Seven weeks for preparation of the draft document for City review (this factors traffic analysis data needed for the noise analysis) One week for City review and comment One week for final edits Task 5 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Assessment • Five hard copies and an electronic copy of the air quality and greenhouse gas assessment Task Duration: January 18, 2013 – March 22, 2013 Seven weeks for preparation of the draft document for City review (this factors traffic analysis data needed for the noise analysis) One week for City review and comment One week for final edits Task 6 Draft Initial Study • Draft Initial Study (five hard copies and one electronic copy in Word) Task Duration: March 22, 2013 – April 12, 2013 Submittal to City will occur three weeks after completion of Tasks 2 through 5 PHASE 2 – PREPARATION OF THE CEQA DOCUMENT Task 7 City Review of Draft Initial Study • Technical memorandum recommending the appropriate CEQA document for the project • One meeting to discuss Draft Initial Study and its conclusions Task Duration: April 12, 2013 – April 26, 2013 Two weeks for review of the Draft Initial Study and the technical memorandum ---PAGE BREAK--- D-3 Task Work Products/Meetings Schedule/Duration Optional Task 8.1 Mitigated Negative Declaration • Twenty-five (25) copies and an electronic version of the Mitigated Negative Declaration • Technical memorandum responding to written comments received on Public Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration • Notice of Determination and Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) • Up to two public meetings Task Duration: April 26, 2013 – June 28, 2013 One week to the preparation of a camera-ready copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration One week for City review and comment One week for preparation of the public Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration Thirty (30) day public review period for Mitigated Negative Declaration One week for preparation of technical memorandum responding to written comments on the Draft Mitigation Negative Declaration One week for preparation of the Notice of Determination and MMP after completion of technical memorandum ---PAGE BREAK--- D-4 Task Work Products/Meetings Schedule/Duration Optional Task 8.2 Environmental Impact Report • Twenty-five (25) copies of the Notice of Preparation (NOP) and an electronic version • One scoping meeting • Five copies of the Administrative Draft EIR plus one electronic version • Twenty-five (25) hard copies of the Draft EIR and twenty- five (25) copies on CD; assistance in preparing the Notice of Availability • One meeting to present the Draft EIR • Five copies of the Admin Final EIR; twenty-five (25) hard copies of the Final EIR and twenty-five (25) copies on CD • Two meetings to present the Final EIR • Notice of Determination, CEQA Findings, and Mitigation Monitoring Program Task Duration: April 26, 2013 – October 25, 2013 One week to the preparation of a camera-ready copy of the NOP One week for City review and comment on the NOP One week for public release of NOP Thirty (30) day comment period of the NOP Submittal of Administrative Draft EIR one week after end of 30-day comment period on NOP Three weeks for City review and comment on the Administrative Draft EIR Two weeks for the preparation of the public Draft EIR Forty-five (45) day public review period for Draft EIR Submittal of the Administrative Final EIR for City review three weeks after end of the 45-day review period on the Draft EIR Two weeks for City review and comment on the Administrative Final EIR One week for preparation of the Final EIR One week for preparation of the Findings, MMRP, and Notice of Determination after completion of the Final EIR ---PAGE BREAK--- D-5 Eden Housing, San Pablo Mixed-Use Senior Apartments Project Task Description P. Angell S. Davidson S Myers Admin/ Graphics Dowling/ Kittelson Charles Salter VerPlanck Outside Direct Costs Totals Principal Senior Planner Air Quality $180 $110 $95 $75 (Traffic) (Noise) (Historic) Phase I. Environmental Review Task 1 Project Initiation 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.0 $360 $220 $0 $0 $0 $0 $55 $635 Task 2 Historic Resources Assessment 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 $360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,848 $7,208 Task 3 Traffic Analysis 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 $360 $0 $0 $0 $22,880 $0 $23,240 Task 4 Noise Impact Assessment 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 $360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,480 $7,840 Task 5 Air Quality/GHG Assessment 2.0 0.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 57.0 $360 $0 $5,225 $0 $0 $0 $5,585 Task 6 Draft IS 4.0 6.0 40.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 58.0 $720 $660 $3,800 $600 $0 $0 $0.0 $110 $5,890 Subtotal Phase I 14.0 8.0 95.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 125.0 $2,520 $880 $9,025 $600 $22,880 $7,480 $6,848 $165 $50,398 Phase II. Preparation of CEQA Document Task 7 City Review Draft IS 2.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 $360 $0 $380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $740 Subtotal Task 7 2.0 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 $360 $0 $380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $740 Task 8.0 Preparation of the CEQA Document Option Task 8.1 Preparation of Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Draft MND 6.0 4.0 20.0 6.0 0.0 36.0 $1,080 $440 $1,900 $450 $0 $0 $0 $660 $4,530 ---PAGE BREAK--- D-6 Task Description P. Angell S. Davidson S Myers Admin/ Graphics Dowling/ Kittelson Charles Salter VerPlanck Outside Direct Costs Totals Principal Senior Planner Air Quality $180 $110 $95 $75 (Traffic) (Noise) (Historic) Response to Comments 2.0 4.0 12.0 2.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 $360 $440 $1,140 $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,090 NOD and MMRP 1.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 3.0 $180 $0 $190 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $370 Subtotal Option Task 8.1 9.0 8.0 34.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 59.0 $1,620 $880 $3,230 $600 $0 $0 $0 $660 $6,990 Option Task 8.2 Preparation of an EIR NOP and Scoping 8.0 0.0 16.0 4.0 28.0 $1,440 $0 $1,520 $300 $0 $0 $0 $660 $3,920 Preparation of ADEIR 30.0 16.0 94.0 30.0 170.0 $5,400 $1,760 $8,930 $2,250 $0 $0 $0 $550 $18,890 Preparation of DEIR 10.0 8.0 30.0 8.0 56.0 $1,800 $880 $2,850 $600 $3,410 $0 $0 $2,600 $12,140 Preparation of FEIR 10.0 8.0 32.0 22.0 72.0 $1,800 $880 $3,040 $1,650 $0 $0 $0 $1,500 $8,870 Preparation of Findings and Notices 4.0 0.0 28.0 0.0 32.0 $720 $0 $2,660 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,380 Subtotal Optional Task 8.2 62.0 32.0 200.0 64.0 0.0 0.0 358.0 $11,160 $3,520 $19,000 $4,800 $3,410 $0 $0 $5,310 $47,200 Project Totals Project Total Under Option 8.1 25.0 16.0 133.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 190.0 $4,500 $1,760 $12,635 $1,200 $22,880 $7,480 $6,848 $825 $58,128 Project Total Under Option 8.2 78.0 40.0 299.0 72.0 0.0 0.0 489.0 $14,040 $4,400 $28,405 $5,400 $26,290 $7,480 $6,848 $5,475 $98,338 The firm bid for the services identified above is valid for 90 days. ---PAGE BREAK--- FILENAME: P:\CALIFORNIA, STATE OF\EL CERRITO, CITY OF\P11-1097 IS_MND_EIR EDEN HOUSING SENIOR APARTMENTS\DECEMBER 2012 REVISED SCOPE\TRAFFIC - KAI_LETTERPROPOSAL_ELCERRITOEDENHOUSING_PMC.DOCX January 20, 2012 Project A11-283 Dolly Kampfraat PMC 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 RE: El Cerrito Eden Housing Proposal Dear Ms. Kampfraat: Kittelson & Associates is pleased to provide this scope/budget for our effort to provide a traffic study for the Eden Housing development in the City of El Cerrito. The following is a scope of work based on our understanding of the work effort. Project Understanding Kittelson & Associates would conduct a traffic study for the proposed project adjacent to El Cerrito City Hall, which would include 62 low-income senior housing rental units, 1 manager’s housing unit, a 1,782 square foot (sf) health clinic and 1,000 sf of retail space. Scope of Work It is anticipated that Kittelson & Associates would perform the following tasks as part of this scope of work: Task 1. Existing Conditions Kittelson & Associates would evaluate existing traffic conditions (intersection level of service analyses) as well as document existing transit, bicycle and pedestrian circulation in the study area. Based on initial coordination with City staff, the following intersections would be evaluated for this study: • San Pablo Avenue & Manila Avenue • San Pablo Avenue & Schmidt Drive • Kearney Street & Manila Avenue • Kearney Street & Schmidt Drive ---PAGE BREAK--- El Cerrito Eden Housing Proposal Project 11-283 January 19, 2012 Page: 2 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California The traffic analysis would focus on weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Task 2. Estimate Project Trip Generation and Trip Distribution Kittelson & Associates would determine the projected trip generation of the proposed project using trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Project trip distribution would be estimated based on existing traffic patterns in the study area and the location of the proposed access to the project site. Task 3. Existing + Project Traffic Analysis The project traffic (determined in Task 2) would be assigned to the transportation network, adding to the existing traffic (determined in Task The traffic conditions at the study locations with the addition of project trips would be analyzed. Task 4. Baseline Traffic Analysis (Existing + Approved Traffic) The traffic conditions without the project trips, but including the trips of nearby projects that have already been approved for development by the City of El Cerrito would also be analyzed. This would include determining the estimated traffic from the nearby approved projects that would need to be added to the existing conditions traffic counts at the study intersections (determined in Task Task 5. Baseline + Project Traffic Analysis Kittelson & Associates would then evaluate traffic operations at the study locations with the addition of the project traffic (determined in Task 2) to the Baseline traffic projects (existing + approved traffic, determined in Task 4) at the study intersections. Task 6. Parking Analysis Kittelson & Associates would determine the expected parking demand for the proposed project based on parking generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Additionally, Kittelson & Associates would survey three comparable sites in El Cerrito to examine off-street parking utilization at maximum parking occupancy (late night or very early morning) to then determine a parking utilization rate (spaces per unit). The three sites would include: • Del Norte Place, 11720 San Pablo Avenue, has 27 units set aside for very low income seniors and families, out of a total of 185 units. • Eskaton’s Hazel Shirley Manor, 11026 San Pablo Avenue, has 63 units. • El Cerrito Royal Assisted Living, 6510 Gladys Avenue has 121 units of congregate care for seniors and disabled. ---PAGE BREAK--- El Cerrito Eden Housing Proposal Project 11-283 January 19, 2012 Page: 3 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Kittelson would also determine the required number of spaces based on City code. All three resulting parking calculations (based on ITE rates, surveyed rates, and City code) would then be compared to the number of off-street parking spaces proposed to estimate potential parking surplus or shortfall. For on-street parking, Kittelson would survey the block faces adjacent to the project site as well as the block face immediately to the east of the study site (on the far side of Kearny Street) to determine the parking utilization of on-street spaces during the a.m. peak, p.m. peak and late-night (or very early morning) times. These block faces include: • San Pablo Avenue between Schmidt Drive and Manila Avenue (east side) • Manila Avenue between San Pablo Avenue and Kearny Street (south side) • Kearney Street between Schmidt Drive and Manila Avenue (west and east sides) • Schmidt Drive between San Pablo Avenue and Kearny Street (north side) Task 7 . Impacts and Mitigation Measures Kittelson & Associates would determine appropriate mitigation measures for significant traffic and/or parking impacts from the proposed project, in consultation with City staff and the project applicant. Task 8. Prepare Study Reports If the level of environment documentation is a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Kittelson & Associates would submit a draft traffic study report for review and comment by the City of El Cerrito. Following, Kittelson would submit the final report within two weeks of receipt of one set of non-conflicting comments from the City on the draft report. The budget assumes that report revisions would be editorial in nature and not be related to any expansion of study scope. If the environmental documentation is an Environmental Impact Report, Kittelson & Associates would submit documentation for the traffic section of the Administrative Draft EIR, the Draft EIR and the Final EIR. Task 9. Attend Meeting(s) Up to four hours for meetings is included in the budget. Any additional meeting time would be billed on a time and materials basis based on pre-authorization of client. ---PAGE BREAK--- El Cerrito Eden Housing Proposal Project 11-283 January 19, 2012 Page: 4 Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Oakland, California Cost Estimate The total cost estimate for the scope of work presented above is: • Traffic Study for Mitigated Negative Declaration: $20,800 • Traffic Section of EIR: $23,900 Schedule The work outlined above to prepare the draft traffic study (if mitigated negative declaration) or the traffic section of the administrative draft (if EIR) can be completed within six weeks of receipt of signed contract. This scope and budget will remain valid for 90 days. Thank you for the opportunity to submit this proposal. We look forward to being of service to you in this matter. Please call or e-mail if you have questions or comments. Sincerely, Sincerely, KITTELSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. Bill Cisco, P.E. Associate Engineer ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- ---PAGE BREAK--- TERMS AND CONDITIONS Insurance General Liability $2,000,000 Workers Compensation $1,000,000 Automobile Liability $2,000,000 Professional Liability (“Errors and Omissions”): Professional liability of Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. (CSA), its officers, employees, and subconsultants is limited to $50,000 or our total fee, whichever is less. The above limitation of professional liability can be increased to the limit of our insurance policy ($1,000,000) by increasing our total fee by 10% prior to start of our services. Schedule of Hourly Rates President and Senior Vice President $275 Vice President $250 Principal Consultant $210 Senior Consultant $165 Consultant $145 Technical Assistant $100 Reimbursable expenses such as travel, subsistence, meals, lodging, and project-related materials are billed in addition at cost. Measurement instrumentation-use charges are at our standard rates. Invoices for technical labor, reimbursable expenses, and instrumentation use are rendered for services performed during the previous month. Payment for each invoice is due within 30 days. Fee proposals are valid for 60 days. The total fee will be applied as we deem appropriate among the individual tasks. All fee proposals assume that services proceed without unreasonable delays, redesign, or scope changes. Such occurrences may warrant a renegotiation of fees. The schedule of hourly rates is valid for one year from the proposal date. A renegotiation of our hourly rates may be required after this period. CSA specifications input and details have all rights reserved by Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. These documents are for use only on the project for which Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc. is retained. It is the project architect’s and engineer’s responsibility to coordinate and verify the suitability of all specifications input and details as appropriate for the project. To facilitate drawing reviews, we require that paper copies of contract documents be sent to our office. Site visits and observations, if any, conducted by our firm relate only to our services. We are not responsible for the safety of others at the job site. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2 Table 11 Task Description CVP hours @ 125 per hour DG hours @ 125 per hour Total fee for Task/Phase Schedule Task 1. Kick Off Meeting 2 x $135 = $270 2 x $135 = $270 $540 TBD Task 2. Review Revised Drawings and Project Description 4 x $135 = $540 1 x $135 = $135 $675 TBE Task 3: Draft Addendum to Historic Resource Evaluation 24 x $135 = $3,240 4 x $135 = $540 $3,780 TBD Task 4. Response to Comments 4 x $135 = $540 $540 TBD Task 5. Meeting to Discuss Findings 2 x $135 = $270 2 x $135 = $270 $540 TBD Subtotal Subtotal Hours CVP 36 hrs. $4,860 Subtotal Hours DG 9 hrs. $1,215 Subtotal (Labor) $6,075 Expenses $150 Total Anticipated Cost of Project $6,225 This scope of workdoes not includeany additionaldesign consultationmeetingsbeyond the two inclu 1Note, CVP stands for Chris VerPlanck and DGstands for Donna Graves.