Document elcerrito_gov_doc_b84d08c96e

AGENDA BILL Agenda Item No. 6 Date: April 21, 2015 To: El Cerrito City Council From: Hilde Myall, Housing Program Manager Margaret Development Services Manager Melanie Mintz, Interim Community Development Director Subject: 2015-2023 Housing Element Update Adoption ACTION REQUESTED Conduct a public hearing and upon conclusion: 1. Adopt a resolution making findings and approving the Initial Study/Negative Declaration prepared for the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update; and 2. Adopt a resolution adopting the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update and Amending the 1999 General Plan accordingly. BACKGROUND California Government Code Section 65300 requires each city and county to adopt a General Plan to guide the physical development of the jurisdiction. The El Cerrito General Plan establishes a vision for the City’s long-term growth and enhancement, and provides strategies and implementing actions to achieve this vision. State law requires that General Plans address seven topics (or “elements”): Land Use, Circulation, Housing, Safety, Noise, Conservation, and Open Space. The City of El Cerrito Housing Element was last adopted and certified in 2012. The Housing Element is the only General Plan element that must be reviewed and certified by the state and the only element with a regulated update cycle. Along with all other Bay Area jurisdictions, the City must complete an update to its Housing Element by January 2015. The element must be adopted by City Council no later than May 31, 2015, after review by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), to avoid State penalties. The Housing Element describes housing-related needs and resources in the community, particularly the availability, affordability, and adequacy of housing, and establishes a strategy to address housing needs for community members across the economic and social spectrum. ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 Page 2 Housing Element Components To meet statutory requirements, housing elements must include the following components: • Review and evaluation of the current Housing Element: a detailed description of accomplishments toward implementing the programs from the City’s current Housing Element, as well as an analysis of the continued appropriateness and feasibility of each program for the new planning cycle. • Needs assessment: a detailed analysis of demographic and employment/income trends, housing conditions and affordability, and special housing needs. • Constraints analysis: an examination of potential constraints to housing development including governmental factors such as land use regulations and non-governmental factors such as the cost of land and availability of financing. • Resources: a detailed inventory of land available for housing development and a demonstration of the City’s capacity to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), as well as a description of administrative and financial resources available to assist with the development, improvement, and preservation of housing in the community. • Policies, programs and quantified objectives: a plan to address the City’s identified housing needs, and mitigate and remove (to the extent feasible) constraints to housing development. ANALYSIS Update Process City staff and the housing element consultant, Mintier Harnish, initiated work on an update to the Housing Element for the 2015 to 2023 planning period in July 2014 and completed a draft for the Planning Commission’s consideration, review, and comment. City staff and the consultant completed a public outreach process that included an online survey, two public workshops (held on July 19, 2014 and August 13, 2014) and a stakeholder round table discussion (held on November 20, 2014). As detailed in the schedule in Table 1, the Draft 2015-2023 Housing Element Update was released for public review on November 10, 2014, and presented to the Planning Commission on December 4, 2014 and the City Council on December 16, 2014. Following these meetings staff made revisions based on direction from the City Council. These changes are described below. The draft was submitted to the HCD for review on December 24, 2014. On February 12, 2015, the City received a letter from HCD confirming that the draft Housing Element was conditionally compliant with state housing law. In March 2015, following receipt of the HCD conditional compliance letter, staff incorporated HCD comments into the document and prepared the Final Draft 2015-2023 Housing Element (Attachment The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on March 18, 2015 and, at its conclusion, adopted resolutions recommending the approval of the Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the project and recommending City Council adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element. Following City Council consideration and adoption, scheduled for April 21, 2015, the Housing Element will then be resubmitted to HCD for final review and certification. ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 Page 3 Table 1. Housing Element Update Schedule Stage Time Frame Event/Milestone Gather information and July 1, 2014 Launched web page and online survey develop draft July 19, 2014 Public workshop August 13, 2014 Public workshop Release and refine draft November 10, 2014 Release of draft Housing Element November 20, 2014 Stakeholder round table meeting December 4, 2014 Planning Commisson special meeting December 16, 2014 City Council meeting HCD Review December 24 - February 12 Initial HCD review (letter of conditional compliance dated February 12) CEQA Document January 9 - February 9 Circulation of Initial Study/Negative Declaration Finalize and adopt March 18, 2015 Planning Commission adoption hearing Housing Element April 21, 2015 City Council adoption hearing Certification June - July Final HCD review and certification (up to 90 days) Revisions to the Draft Housing Element Since the Draft Housing Element Update was last presented to the City Council on December 16, 2014, changes have been made to the document. Following guidance from the City Council at the December 16th meeting, staff made revisions as indicated below: A. Policy and Program Revisions • Modified Policy H3.5 to indicate policy goal to encourage housing to match housing needs established by local and regional entities for persons with developmental disabilities. • Modified Program H1.6 (formerly H1.5) – Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance was modified to indicate the ordinance would be vetted. • Modified Table A4 – Potential Sites to reinstate site 67, Madera property, and indicate that the property has been purchased for open space. B. Housing Needs Analysis, Formatting and Grammatical Revisions The City Council recommended incorporation of the changes requested by the Planning Commission as indicated below: • Modified Section I.E.2 discussion of Housing Needs Survey to add discussion of survey response rate and omit discussion of findings; • Modified Section II.B.1.a discussion of Historical, Existing and Forecast Growth to clarify discussion of historical population trends; and • Modified Figure II-1 Population Trends to revise the y-axis of the table to zero. In addition, staff and the consultant made several technical, formatting and grammatical corrections including: 1) the addition of Table II-15 Employment Projections on page 25; 2) the correction of the order of Section III table numbers, 3) the correction of the site identification numbers on the sites inventory map; and 4) text updates to reflect the final reading and adoption ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 Page 4 on January 6, 2015 of Zoning Ordinance amendments related to transitional and supportive housing. HCD Review As previously noted, the Draft Housing Element Update was submitted to HCD for the initial compliance review on December 24, 2014. Based on work previously completed to comply with state housing law, the draft Housing Element qualified for HCD’s streamlined review process. Under streamlined review, HCD reviews only areas of the document in which there have been substantive changes from the previous certified Housing Element, resulting in a reduced turnaround time. Following a brief period of correspondence with HCD in which staff and the consultant provided responses to questions to confirm HCD’s understanding of City policies, the City received a letter of conditional compliance on February 12, 2014 (Attachment HCD was complimentary of the City’s land use policies and housing programs and initiatives. During review, HCD offered comments that were addressed by staff in the Final Draft Housing Element as indicated below: Added New Program H1.4 – Evaluate Displacement – to help support the goals of H1.1 and H1.2 to conserve and improve the City’s existing supply of housing, the City will participate, as appropriate, in studies of regional housing need and displacement, and consider policies or programs to address the displacement of lower income residents. Modified Program H1.5 – Monitoring of Assisted Units – to clarify the notification provisions to tenants of at-risk housing and to detail City efforts to preserve at-risk units and outreach to tenants. Modified Program H2.6 – Assist in Affordable Housing Development – to specify an annual review of funding opportunities. Added New Program H2.11 – Plan for Infrastructure to Support Development – to reinforce City’s efforts in the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Area to partner with other public agencies to plan for infrastructure improvements to support future development. Staff is supportive of the above revisions as consistent with the vision and intent of the adopted San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan and the goals of the Plan Bay Area, which is the region’s Sustainable Communities Strategy. Staff is recommending the inclusion of the revisions in the Housing Element. HCD reviewed the proposed program revisions and will maintain conditional approval if they are included in the Housing Element. If no substantive changes, other than those discussed above, are made to the Housing Element during the adoption process, HCD will certify the 2015-2023 Housing Element without comment during its final review of the adopted document. The certification review may take up to 90 days. STRATEGIC PLAN CONSIDERATIONS Preparation of the 2015-2023 Housing Element update is consistent with El Cerrito Strategic Plan Goal A – Deliver exemplary government services and Goal C – Deepen a sense of place and community identity. The Housing Element update supports the City in ensuring that “programs and services are inclusive of people of diverse backgrounds” (Goal A) by providing a resource that presents demographic and economic data regarding El Cerrito’s population, and by planning for the housing needs of residents at all income levels and including those with special ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 needs. The Housing Element policies and programs reinforce the "promote strong neighborhoods" strategy (Goal C) and the "re-imagine underdeveloped and underutilized properties through advanced planning efforts that encourage investment and/or new development" strategy (Goal C) by an explicit focus on neighborhood preservation and encouragement of new housing development. As an element of the City's General Plan, the Housing Element update helps the City "plan for the needs of the community now and in the future" (Goal C) based on the eight year cycle of the 2014-2023 period. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS Adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update requires review under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). The Initial Study and Negative Declaration prepared for the City's 2015-2023 Housing Element Update (Attachment 4) identified no significant impacts. The 2015-2023 Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the City's General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SP ASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development based on existing land use designations and zoning. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and the SPASP EIR. The 2015-2023 Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS There are no direct costs associated with the action requested tonight. The Housing Element is a long-range planning and policy document. Potential funding sources for implementation of housing policy programs are presented in Section IV - Housing Policy Program of the draft document. The Housing Element is not a budget document and does not commit or appropriate funds. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS The City Attorney has reviewed this agenda bill, resolutions, the 2015-2023 Housing Element update, the Initial Study/Negative Declaration and all documents associated with the action requested in this agenda bill. Scott Hanin City Manager Attachments: 1. Resolution Approving the Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the Housing Element Update 2. Resolution adopting the 2015-2023 Housing Element and amending the 1999 General Plan Accordingly 3. Final Draft 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element 4. Initial Study/Negative Declaration for the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update 5. HCD Conditional Approval Letter for the City ofEl Cerrito Page 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 1 Page 1 of 2 RESOLUTION 2015-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CERRITO APPROVING THE INITIAL STUDY/NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE 2015-2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE OF THE CITY’S GENERAL PLAN WHEREAS, in connection with the preparation of the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update, the City prepared and circulated an Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration, finding that no significant impacts would result from 2015-23 Housing Element Update’s policies and programs; and WHEREAS, the Initial Study and proposed Negative Declaration have been submitted to the Contra Costa County Recorder’s Office and the State Clearinghouse in accordance with Article 6, Section 15073 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the public review period for the proposed Negative Declaration commenced on January 9, 2015 and ended on February 9, 2015; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2015 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, reviewed and considered the staff report and attachments thereto, the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update, the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, all public comments and other relevant documents, reports and testimony, and adopted Planning Commission Resolution PL15-03 making findings and recommending that the City Council of El Cerrito adopt the Negative Declaration for the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2015, the City Council of the City of El Cerrito held a duly noticed public hearing, and has reviewed and considered the staff report and attachments thereto, the 2015- 2023 Housing Element Update, the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, all public comments and other relevant documents, reports and testimony; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of El Cerrito, after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered for review, does find and determine the following: 1. The proposed Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. 2. The proposed Negative Declaration adequately addresses the impacts of the project and all public comments have been addressed. 3. The proposed Negative Declaration has been considered pursuant to the Article 6, Sections 15070, 15072 and 15074 of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of El Cerrito does hereby approve the Negative Declaration for the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update. ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 2 of 2 I CERTIFY that at a regular meeting on April 21, 2015 the City Council of the City of El Cerrito passed this Resolution by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: IN WITNESS of this action, I sign this document and affix the corporate seal of the City of El Cerrito on April XX, 2015. Cheryl Morse, City Clerk APPROVED: Mark Friedman, Mayor ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 2 Page 1 of 3 RESOLUTION 2015-XX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EL CERRITO ADOPTING THE 2015-2023 HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE AND AMENDING THE 1999 GENERAL PLAN ACCORDINGLY WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65300 requires each city and county to adopt a General Plan including seven mandatory elements, one of which is the Housing Element; and WHEREAS, state law requires cities to revise the housing elements of their General Plans periodically and Bay Area housing elements are due by May 31, 2015, for the 2015 to 2023 planning period; and WHEREAS, the City of El Cerrito held public meetings on July 19, 2014 and August 13, 2014 to discuss revising the Housing Element of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, the City of El Cerrito prepared and circulated a Draft 2015-2023 Housing Element Update to the general public and local agencies and organizations for public review; and WHEREAS, on December 24, 2014, the Draft 2015-2023 Housing Element Update of the General Plan (2015-23 Housing Element) was submitted to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for initial compliance review as required by state law; and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2015, the City received a response letter from HCD indicating that the 2015-2023 Housing Element Update was in conditional compliance with state law; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2015, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing, and, after review and consideration of the staff report and attachments thereto, the 2015-2023 Housing Element, the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, all public comments and other relevant documents, reports and testimony, adopted Planning Commission Resolution PL15-04 making findings and recommending that the City Council adopt the Draft 2015-2023 Housing Element; and WHEREAS, notice for the City Council’s consideration of the 2015-2023 Housing Element was provided pursuant to Government Code Section 65090; and WHEREAS, the provisions of the Government Code, 65350, et. seq. have been complied with, including that the City has not previously adopted four amendments to the mandatory elements of the General Plan in calendar year 2015; and WHEREAS, in connection with the preparation of the 2015-2023 Housing Element, the City prepared and circulated an Initial Study/Negative Declaration, finding that no significant impacts would result from its policies and programs; and WHEREAS, on April 21, 2015, the City Council of the City of El Cerrito held a duly noticed public hearing, and has reviewed and considered the staff report and attachments thereto, the 2015- ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 2 of 3 2023 Housing Element, the Initial Study/Negative Declaration, all public comments and other relevant documents, reports and testimony. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of El Cerrito that it hereby finds as follows: 1. The proposed amendment is deemed to be in the public interest. The 2015-23 Housing Element will facilitate the development, maintenance, and improvement of adequate and affordable housing for new and existing residents, which will be a benefit to the public. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent and compatible with the rest of the General Plan and any implementation programs that may be affected. The 2015-23 Housing Element retains internal consistency with other General Plan elements and the City’s Planning Regulations. Policies and programs in the 2015-23 Housing Element do not call for changes to land use regulations or other measures that would require revisions to existing plans. 3. The potential impacts of the proposed amendment have been assessed and have been determined not to be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare. The 2015-23 Housing Element will facilitate the development, maintenance, and improvement of adequate and affordable housing for new and existing residents, which will be a benefit to the public. 4. The proposed amendment has been processed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the California Government Code and the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The policies and implementation programs in the 2015-23 Housing Element will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. No significant impacts were identified in the Initial Study completed for this project. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that after careful consideration of facts, exhibits, correspondence, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, and, in consideration of the findings, the City Council of the City of El Cerrito hereby adopts the 2015-2023 Housing Element and amends the 1999 General Plan accordingly. ---PAGE BREAK--- Page 3 of 3 I CERTIFY that at a regular meeting on April 21, 2015 the City Council of the City of El Cerrito passed this Resolution by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: IN WITNESS of this action, I sign this document and affix the corporate seal of the City of El Cerrito on April XX, 2015. Cheryl Morse, City Clerk APPROVED: Mark Friedman, Mayor ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6( ) Attachment 3: El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Update, March 2015 can be viewed at: http://www.el‐cerrito.org/DocumentCenter/View/4448 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element March 2015 Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 3 ---PAGE BREAK--- This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- Cover: Photo credit: Dale F. Mead Eden Senior Housing, VanMeter, Williams & Pollack “Pomona Fence”, acrylic painting by Lin Salamo. www.mesart.com/linsalamo 2015‐2023 Housing Element Update Final Draft City of El Cerrito Community Development Department 10890 San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito, CA 94530 March 2015 ---PAGE BREAK--- This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- CITY COUNCIL Mark Friedman, Mayor Greg Lyman, Mayor Pro Tem Janet Abelson Jan Bridges Gabe Quinto PLANNING COMMISSION Andrea Lucas, Chair Carla Hansen, Vice Chair Kevin Colin Michael Iswalt Bill Kuhlman Lisa Motoyama Tim Pine STAFF Scott Hanin, City Manager Melanie Mintz, Interim Community Development Director Margaret Development Services Manager Hilde Myall, Housing Program Manager CONSULTANT – MINTIER HARNISH Larry Mintier, FAICP, Principal Chelsey Norton Payne, AICP, Project Manager Dov Kadin, Planner Allison Ferrini, Research Assistant ---PAGE BREAK--- This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Final Draft I March 2015 Page 5 of 190 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 9 A. PURPOSE AND CONTENT 9 B. HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE PROCESS 9 C. STATE LAW AND LOCAL PLANNING 10 1. Consistency with State Law 10 2. General Plan Consistency 10 3. Relationship to Other Plans and Programs 10 D. HOUSING ELEMENT ORGANIZATION 11 E. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION 13 1. Community Workshops 13 2. Housing Needs Survey 13 II. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND INVENTORY 15 A. INTRODUCTION 15 B. COMMUNITY PROFILE 15 1. Population Trends and Characteristics 15 2. Household Type and Composition 19 3. Income Characteristics 21 4. Poverty 23 5. Employment 24 6. Special Housing Needs 25 7. Existing Housing Stock 37 8. Housing Costs 41 9. Affordability 45 10. Future Housing 48 III. RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS 50 A. ADEQUATE SITES ANALYSIS 51 1. Units Under Construction and Approved Projects 51 2. Sites Summary – Future Development Potential 52 3. Assumptions 52 4. RHNA Summary 54 B. GOVERNMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS 57 1. Land Use Controls 57 2. Density Bonus Ordinance 69 3. Residential Care Facilities 71 4. Emergency Shelters 72 5. Transitional Housing/Supportive Housing 73 6. Single Room Occupancy Units 74 7. Second Unit Ordinance 74 8. Housing for Persons with Disabilities 76 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 6 of 190 Final DraftI March 2015 9. Building Codes and Enforcement 78 10. Local Processing and Permit Procedures 79 11. Former Redevelopment Agency and Successor Agency 86 12. On and Off‐Site Improvements 88 C. NON‐GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 88 1. Land Prices 88 2. Construction Costs 89 3. Financing 90 4. Energy Conservation 92 5. Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints 97 IV. HOUSING POLICY PROGRAM 101 A. GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS 101 B. QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES 122 V. LIST OF APPENDICES 123 APPENDIX A: LAND RESOURCES 124 APPENDIX B: AT RISK ASSISTED UNITS 143 APPENDIX C: EVALUATION OF PRIOR HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS 149 APPENDIX D: SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH 159 APPENDIX E: CONSISTENCY WITH STATE LAW 173 APPENDIX F: GLOSSARY OF HOUSING TERMS 181 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Final Draft I March 2015 Page 7 of 190 LIST OF TABLES Table II‐1 Historical Population Change 16 Table II‐2 Projected Population Growth 17 Table II‐3 Comparison of Race/Ethnicity 18 Table II‐4 Percentage of Persons per Household 20 Table II‐5 Household Composition by Type 20 Table II‐6 Household Projections 20 Table II‐7 Household Income Distribution 21 Table II‐8 HUD Income Limits by Persons per Household 22 Table II‐9 Household Income Range by Income Category 23 Table II‐10 Poverty Thresholds 23 Table II‐11 Change in Poverty Rates 24 Table II‐12 Poverty Rates by Age 24 Table II‐13 Major Employers 24 Table II‐14 Employment Profile 25 Table II‐15 Employment Projections 25 Table II‐16 Elderly Population and Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR) 26 Table II‐17 Senior Households by Income 27 Table II‐18 State Department of Social Services Licensed Elderly Care Facilities 27 Table II‐19 Persons With Disabilities 29 Table II‐20 Female‐Headed Families 30 Table II‐21 Household Size by Tenure 32 Table II‐22 Median Household Income by Household Size 33 Table II‐23 Total Housing Units by Number of Bedrooms 33 Table II‐24 Unsheltered Homeless Persons 35 Table II‐25 Housing Problems in Extremely Low‐Income Households 37 Table II‐26 Housing Estimates 38 Table II‐27 Housing Occupancy 38 Table II‐28 Owner‐Occupied and Renter‐Occupied Units by Race/Ethnicity 39 Table II‐29 Tenure by Age 39 Table II‐30 Age of Housing Units 40 Table II‐31 Persons Per Room in All Occupied Housing Units 41 Table II‐32 Median Rental Rates 42 Table II‐33 RV Park Space Rental Rates 43 Table II‐34 Home Sale Information 43 Table II‐35 Overpayment by Tenure 46 Table II‐36 Ability to Pay for Housing by Income Category 47 Table II‐37 Regional Housing Needs Allocation 49 Table III‐1 Residential Projects Under Construction or Approved, El Cerrito (2014) 51 Table III‐2 Remaining Need Based on Units Approved/Built/Under Construction 52 Table III‐3 Summary of Residential Development Potential 54 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 8 of 190 Final DraftI March 2015 Table III‐4 General Plan Residential Land Use Designations 58 Table III‐5 Transect Zone Land Use Regulations 60 Table III‐6 Development Standards 60 Table III‐7 Housing Types Permitted by Zone 62 Table III‐8 Residential Development Standards 64 Table III‐9 Multifamily Residential Development Standards in Commercial Areas 65 Table III‐10 Maximum Density in RM District 67 Table III‐11 Required Residential Parking 68 Table III‐12 Vacant Parcels in the CC Zone 73 Table III‐13 Fees for New Residential Multifamily Development 81 Table III‐14 Lot and Land Characteristics 89 Table III‐15 Mortgage Lending Rates 92 Table IV‐1 Quantified Objectives 122 Table A‐1 Zoning Districts that Permit Residences 125 Table A‐2 Allowable Building Height 125 Table A‐3 Projects Under Construction, Approved Projects, and Pending Projects 131 Table A‐4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) 132 Table B‐1 Inventory of Publicly Assisted Rental Housing 143 Table B‐2 Market Value of At‐Risk Projects 145 Table B‐3 Rental Subsidies Required 146 Table B‐4 Construction of Replacement Units 147 Table B‐5 Qualified Entities 148 Table C‐1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007‐2014) 149 Table C‐2 Total Projects 157 Table E‐1 State Housing Element Requirements 173 Table E‐2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing 175 LIST OF FIGURES Figure II‐1 Population Trends 16 Figure II‐2 Population by Age Group 19 Figure II‐3 Average Rents 42 Figure II‐4 Comparison of Median Home Sale Prices 44 Figure II‐5 Historical Median Home Sale Prices 45 Figure III‐1 Sites Inventory Map 55 Figure III‐2 Fee Comparison for 100‐Unit Multifamily Rental Development 82 Figure III‐3 Historical Mortgage Rates 91 Figure A‐1 Northern Sites 126 Figure A‐2 Southern Sites 129 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Introduction I March 2015 Page 9 of 190 I. INTRODUCTION A. PURPOSE AND CONTENT The City of El Cerrito’s Housing Element is the component of the City’s General Plan that addresses housing needs and opportunities for present and future El Cerrito residents through 2023. The Housing Element provides the primary policy guidance for local decision‐making related to housing. The Housing Element of the General Plan is the only General Plan Element that requires review and certification by the State of California. The Housing Element provides a detailed analysis of El Cerrito’s demographic, economic, and housing characteristics as required by State law. The Element also provides a comprehensive evaluation of the City’s progress in implementing the past policy and action programs related to housing production, preservation, conservation, and rehabilitation. Based on the community’s housing needs, available resources, constraints, opportunities, and past performance, the Housing Element identifies goals, policies, actions, and objectives that address the housing needs of present and future El Cerrito residents. The El Cerrito Housing Element is based on five strategic goals that have been developed by the community over time: 1) conserve and improve El Cerrito’s existing housing supply, 2) facilitate and encourage the development of housing to meet regional housing needs allocations established by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG), 3) expand housing opportunities for the elderly, the disabled, households with very low‐ to moderate‐ income, and for persons with special housing needs, 4) promote housing opportunities for all persons regardless of race, age, marital status, ancestry, national origin, or color, and 5) promote energy efficiency in the location, construction, renovation and maintenance of housing units. B. HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE PROCESS The California State Legislature has identified the attainment of a decent home and suitable living environment for every Californian as the State’s main housing goal. Recognizing the important part that local planning plays in pursuit of this goal, the Legislature has mandated that all cities and counties prepare a Housing Element as part of their comprehensive General Plans (California Government Code Section 65580 et al.). It is intended that this Housing Element be reviewed annually and updated and modified no less than every eight years in order to remain relevant and useful and reflect the community’s changing housing needs. This Housing Element covers the planning period from January 31, 2015 to January 31, 2023. State law determines the time frame of the planning period. This document represents the update required and responds to the issues that currently face the City. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 10 of 190 IntroductionI March 2015 C. STATE LAW AND LOCAL PLANNING 1. Consistency with State Law The Housing Element is one of the seven General Plan elements mandated by the State of California, as articulated in Sections 65580 to 65589.8 of the California Government Code. State law requires that each jurisdiction’s Housing Element consist of “identification and analysis of existing and projected housing needs and a statement of goals, policies, quantified objectives, and scheduled program actions for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing.” The Housing Element plans for the provision of housing for all segments of the population. Section 65583 of the Government Code sets forth specific requirements regarding the scope and content of each Housing Element. 2. General Plan Consistency The Housing Element is one component of the City’s overall long‐range planning strategy. The California Government Code requires that the General Plan contain an integrated, consistent set of goals and policies. The Housing Element is affected by policies contained in other elements of the General Plan. For example, the Land Use Element designates land for residential development and indicates the type, location, and density of the residential development permitted in the city. Working within this framework, the Housing Element identifies goals, policies, actions, and objectives for the planning period that directly address the housing needs of El Cerrito’s existing and future residents. The policies contained within other elements of the General Plan affect many aspects of life that residents enjoy – the amount and variety of open space, the preservation of natural, historic, and cultural resources, the permitted noise levels in residential areas, and the safety of the residents in the event of a natural or man‐made disaster. The Housing Element policies must be consistent with policies identified in other elements of the General Plan. The Housing Element has been reviewed and found to be consistent with the City’s other General Plan elements. As portions of the General Plan are amended in the future, this Housing Element will be reviewed to ensure that internal consistency is maintained. The 1999 General Plan contains several elements with policies related to housing. Policies and the means for achieving consistency are summarized in Appendix E. 3. Relationship to Other Plans and Programs The Housing Element identifies goals, objectives, policies, and action programs for the 2015‐ 2023 planning period that directly address the housing needs of El Cerrito. There are a number of City plans and programs that work to implement the goals and policies of the Housing Element, including, the City’s Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance and the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Introduction I March 2015 Page 11 of 190 a. El Cerrito Municipal Code The El Cerrito Municipal Code contains the regulatory and penal ordinances and certain administrative ordinances of the City, codified pursuant to Sections 50022.1 through 50022.8 and 50022.10 of the Government Code. The El Cerrito Municipal Code includes the City’s zoning regulations. The Subdivision Chapter of the Municipal Code Title 18 – Divisions of Land) regulates the design, development, and implementation of land division. It applies when a parcel is divided into two or more parcels; a parcel is consolidated with one or more other parcels; or the boundaries of two or more parcels are adjusted to change the size and/or configuration of the parcels. Title 19 ‐ Zoning of the Municipal Code is the primary tool for implementing the General Plan, and is designed to protect and promote the health, safety, and welfare of the people. The Zoning Chapter designates various districts and outlines the permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for each zone district. Finally, Title 19 provides property development standards for each zone district and overall administrative and legislative procedures. b. San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Specific Plans are customized regulatory documents that provide focused guidance and regulations for a particular area to address the specific characteristics or needs for that area. They generally include a land use plan, circulation plan, infrastructure plan, zoning classifications, development standards, design guidelines, and implementation plan. The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan was approved by City Council in September 2014 with an effective date of November 6, 2014 and represents a planning horizon through 2040. The Plan includes a Form‐Based Code that is intended to guide the physical environment and character of the streets, buildings and opens spaces in the Plan area. It supports the vision to create a vibrant, walkable, sustainable, and transit‐orientated corridor that respects surrounding neighborhoods. D. HOUSING ELEMENT ORGANIZATION California Government Code Section 65583 requires a jurisdiction’s Housing Element include the following components:  A review of the previous Element’s goals, policies, objectives, and programs to ascertain the effectiveness of each of these components, as well as the overall effectiveness of the Housing Element.  An assessment of housing need and an inventory of resources and constraints related to meeting these needs. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 12 of 190 IntroductionI March 2015  A statement of goals, policies, and quantified objectives related to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing.  A policy program that provides a schedule of actions that the City is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies set forth in the Housing Element. The El Cerrito Housing Element is organized into four parts:  Introduction ‐ Explains the purpose, process, and contents of the Housing Element.  Housing Needs Assessment and Inventory ‐ Describes the demographic, economic, and housing characteristics of El Cerrito and analyzes the current and projected housing needs in El Cerrito.  Resources and Constraints ‐ Analyzes the actual and potential governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the rehabilitation, preservation, conservation, and construction of housing.  Housing Policy Program ‐ Details specific policies and programs the City of El Cerrito will carry out over the planning period to address the City’s housing goals. Given the detail and analysis in developing the Housing Element, supporting background material is included in the following appendices:  Appendix A: Sites Inventory  Appendix B: At‐Risk Assisted Units  Appendix C: Review of Past Performance  Appendix D: Summary of Community Outreach  Appendix E: Consistency with State Law  Appendix F: Glossary of Terms ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Introduction I March 2015 Page 13 of 190 E. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION The City of El Cerrito has encouraged and provided opportunities for public participation in the process of identifying housing needs and formulating housing policies and programs. The City’s objectives for the public participation process in the Housing Element update were as follows:  To inform the public of the purpose of the Housing Element;  To present information regarding the City’s housing needs and current programs;  To gather information about housing needs and ideas for addressing those needs;  To learn from housing and social service professionals who have experience developing, operating or providing services to housing in El Cerrito or other Bay Area jurisdictions; and  To gather comments and feedback on updated programs and policies. The City provided several opportunities for public involvement. The City of El Cerrito’s public outreach and community involvement activities are summarized below and described in more detail in Appendix D. 1. Community Workshops The City conducted community workshops on July 19, 2014 and August 13, 2014. Notices of the public meetings were posted prior to the meetings in the citywide newsletter, on the City’s website, through a postcard mailer to approximately 2,300 landlords and renter households and local and regional stakeholders, as well at City Hall and the El Cerrito Public Library. Both meetings focused on the Housing Element update process and scope, the demographic information from the 2010 Census, housing market trends, and the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). After presenting an overview of the Housing Element update, City staff facilitated an interactive discussion to answer questions about the Housing Element’s purpose and solicit ideas from participants about the most critical housing issues in El Cerrito and potential ways to address these issues. 11 people attended the July 19th workshop and 13 people attended the August 13th workshop. 2. Housing Needs Survey As part of the 2015‐2023 Housing Element Update, the City of El Cerrito developed an online survey to gather feedback about community housing and to help ensure that the City’s Housing Element reflects the vision and priorities of the El Cerrito community. The Housing Survey included 12 questions that asked respondents about their current housing situation as well as their views on El Cerrito’s housing issues more generally. The survey also gave opportunity for respondents to contribute written comments on El Cerrito’s housing or other topics. The survey was publicized through announcements at the ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 14 of 190 IntroductionI March 2015 Housing Element workshops, through the City’s website and through a press release to local print and online media. The online survey received a total of forty‐four responses, of which forty‐three (97.7%) self‐ identified as currently living in El Cerrito. Forty‐three responses from a census population of 24,000 residents represents a response rate of less than 0.2%. The survey response is not assumed to be a statistically relevant representation of the views of the city’s population. However, the results of the survey and written comments offer insight into the views of the people who made the effort to complete the survey and are included in Appendix D. 3. Stakeholder Workshop On November 20, 2014, staff hosted a stakeholder roundtable discussion on the Draft Housing Element. Local public agencies, community organizations, and developers and realtors active in the community were invited to participate and share their views. The meeting was attended by one representative from Stege Sanitary District who received a presentation on the Draft Housing Element and did not have any formal comment. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 15 of 190 II. HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND INVENTORY A. INTRODUCTION The Housing Needs Assessment analyzes population and housing characteristics, identifies special housing needs among certain population groups, evaluates housing conditions, and provides other important information to support the goals, policies, and programs to meet the needs of current and future El Cerrito residents. An understanding of housing needs helps formulate an appropriate and adequate housing plan for the City. The needs assessment and inventory focuses on demographic information, such as population trends, ethnicity, age, household composition, income, employment, housing characteristics, general housing needs by income, and housing needs for specialized segments of the population. Primary data sources used in this analysis include the 2000 and 2010 U.S. Census, the 2007‐ 2011 American Community Survey (ACS) 5‐Year Estimates, 2010‐2012 ACS 3‐Year Estimates the California Department of Finance (DOF), the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). These data sources are the most reliable for assessing existing conditions and provide a basis for consistent comparison with historical data and for making forecasts. B. COMMUNITY PROFILE 1. Population Trends and Characteristics The type and amount of housing need in a community is largely determined by population growth and various demographic characteristics. Factors such as age, race/ethnicity, occupation, and income level combine to influence the type of housing needed and the ability to afford housing. This section provides a summary of the changes to the population size, age, and racial/ethnic composition of the City. a. Historical, Existing, and Forecast Growth The City of El Cerrito is one of 19 cities in Contra Costa County. The California Department of Finance (DOF) estimates that Contra Costa County’s population in 2014 was 1,087,008. Table II‐1 shows historical population estimates for El Cerrito in 10‐year increments from 1940 to 2010 as reported in the decennial US Census. El Cerrito was incorporated in 1917, and the City’s population increased steadily until the 1960s. The greatest increase occurred between 1940 and 1950, in which the City experienced an average annual growth rate of 19.3 percent. Between 1960 and 2010 the City’s population has fluctuated within 10%. A possible explanation for the reported slight decline between 1960 and 1980 could be the City reached build‐out and household sizes declined. A possible explanation for the modest increases from 1980 to 2010 could be an influx of residents seeking lower housing costs and larger ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 16 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 home sizes. Between 1990 and 2010 the US Census reported that the City gained 680 residents, an increase of 3.0% from the 1990 figure. Table II-1 Historical Population Change El Cerrito (1940-1990) Year Population Average Annual Growth Rate 1940 6,137 1950 18,011 19.31% 1960 25,437 4.12% 1970 25,190 -0.12% 1980 22,731 -1.03 1990 22,869 0.11% 2000 23,171 0.13% 2010 23,549 0.16% Source: US Census Bureau, 1940-2010. Figure II‐1shows annual estimates of El Cerrito’s population growth since 2000 as reported by the DOF. These figures are derived from the decennial US census figures, then adjusted annually based on the information from the county on residential building activity. Much of the 4.0% total population growth reported for El Cerrito since 1990 has resulted from infill development, redevelopment, and changes in household size. The reported estimate of El Cerrito’s population has been steadily increasing since 2008 and is currently (2014) estimated at 24,087. Figure II-1 Population Trends El Cerrito (2000-2014) Source: Department of Finance Population Estimates, 2000-2014. 23,171 23,354 23,398 23,379 23,305 23,120 23,030 22,952 23,193 23,350 23,549 23,649 23,801 23,945 24,087 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 17 of 190 Table II‐2 shows the City of El Cerrito and countywide projected population increases between 2010 and 2040 according to ABAG. In El Cerrito, ABAG has projected a 5.3 percent increase in population between 2020 and 2030 and a 5.8 percent increase between 2030 and 2040. Comparatively, ABAG has projected a 9.0 percent increase between 2020 and 2030, and a 9.3 percent increase between 2030 and 2040 countywide. ABAG projects that the number of households in El Cerrito will grow by 468 (4.6 percent) between 2010 and 2020, 470 (4.4 percent) between 2020 and 2030, and 480 (4.3 percent) between 2030 and 2040. Between 2010 and 2040 the number of persons per household is projected to increase from 2.31 to 2.37. ABAG projects Contra Costa County as a whole will experience an increase in the number of persons per household from 2.77 in 2010 to 2.85 by 2040. Table II-2 Projected Population Growth El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2010-2040) 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population El Cerrito 23,549 24,700 26,000 27,500 Contra Costa County 1,049,025 1,123,500 1,224,400 1,338,400 Households El Cerrito 10,142 10,610 11,080 11,560 Contra Costa County 375,364 400,800 432,430 464,150 Persons per Household El Cerrito 2.31 2.32 2.34 2.37 Contra Costa County 2.77 2.77 2.80 2.85 Source: ABAG Preapproved data package, ABAG Projections 2013. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 18 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 b. Race and Ethnicity Table II‐3 shows an analysis of El Cerrito’s population by race and ethnicity in 2000 and 2010. During this time there was a slight shift in the city’s demographic distribution. From 2000 to 2010 the city’s White, non‐Hispanic population decreased by 5.7 percent. The population of Hispanic and Asian residents increased by 3.2 percent and 2.8 percent, respectively. By comparison, the White, non‐Hispanic population decreased by 10.3 percent countywide and 7.7 percent in the Bay Area. In 2010 El Cerrito had a significantly larger proportion of Asian residents than countywide, but only 4.1 percent more than in the Bay Area. Table II-3 Comparison of Race/Ethnicity El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and the Bay Area (2000 and 2010) Race/Ethnicity El Cerrito Contra Costa County Bay Area Percent (2000) Percent (2010) Percent (2000) Percent (2010) Percent (2000) Percent (2010) Non-Hispanic White 54.4% 48.7% 58.5% 48.2% 50.6% 42.9% Black 8.4% 7.6% 9.2% 9.0% 7.4% 6.5% Asian 24.6% 27.4% 10.9% 14.3% 19.1% 23.3% Two or More Races, 4.6% 5.1% 3.5% 3.8% 3.3% 3.5% Hispanic of Any Race 8.0% 11.2% 17.9% 24.6% 19.6% 23.8% Source: ABAG preapproved data package; US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census. c. Age of Population Figure II‐2 shows a comparison of El Cerrito’s and the countywide population by age group in 2010.El Cerrito had a higher percentage of residents aged 65 and older (17.9 percent) than countywide (12.4 percent) and statewide (16.2 percent), and a lower population under 24 (22.7 percent) than either countywide (33.1 percent) or statewide (28.4 percent). Therefore, El Cerrito has a higher median age of 44 in 2010 compared to 38 for all of Contra Costa County and 35 for all of California. Individuals over the age of 35 comprised 65 percent of the city’s population in 2010, compared to 54 percent countywide and 50 percent statewide. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 19 of 190 Figure II-2 Population by Age Group El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2010) Source: ABAG preapproved data package; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census. 2. Household Type and Composition Further insight into the characteristics of the city’s population can be gained by examining the composition of the household population, such as the proportion of families with children, single adults, and single parents. Table II‐4 shows that two‐person households represented the highest percentage of owner‐ occupied households in both El Cerrito and Contra Costa County at 39.3 percent and 33.9 percent, respectively. Two‐person renter‐occupied households represented a larger proportion of households in El Cerrito (32.5 percent) than countywide (25.3 percent), while countywide there were larger percentages of large (five or more persons) owner‐ and renter‐ occupied households. 5.6% 17.1% 29.4% 29.9% 17.9% 6.4% 26.7% 26.5% 27.9% 12.4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% El Cerrito Contra Costa County ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 20 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 Table II-4 Percentage of Persons per Household El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2010) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Owner Occupied Renter Occupied 1-Person 26.2% 33.7% 19.6% 28.9% 2-Persons 39.3% 32.5% 33.9% 25.3% 3-Persons 16.4% 17.6% 17.1% 17.0% 4-Persons 12.8% 10.4% 17.0% 13.8% 5-Persons 3.8% 4.3% 7.4% 7.9% 6- Persons 0.9% 0.8% 2.9% 3.7% 7+ Persons 0.8% 0.7% 2.1% 3.3% Source: ABAG preapproved data package; US Census Bureau, 2010 Census. As described in Table II‐5 El Cerrito has a larger percentage of couples with no children (37 percent) than countywide (34 percent). El Cerrito’s proportion of families with children (26 percent) is significantly lower than countywide (37 percent). Table II-5 Household Composition by Type El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2011) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Households Percentage Households Percentage Single person (living alone) 2,853 29% 87,806 24% Family, no children 3,689 37% 125,159 34% Family with children 2,562 26% 137,256 37% Multi-person, non-family 869 8% 20,704 5% Total 9,973 100% 370,925 100% Source: ABAG preapproved data package; US Census Bureau, 2007-2011 ACS (5-Year Estimate). Table II‐6 shows ABAG household projections for El Cerrito and Contra Costa County. Households are expected to grow at a slower rate in El Cerrito than countywide. Table II-6 Household Projections El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2013) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Number Average Annual Growth Rate Number Average Annual Growth Rate 2010 10,142 N/A 375,364 N/A 2020 10,610 0.46% 400,800 0.68% 2030 11,080 0.44% 432,430 0.79% 2040 11,560 0.43% 464,150 0.73% Source: ABAG projections, 2013. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 21 of 190 3. Income Characteristics Table II‐7 shows the median household incomes in 2000 and 2011 in El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and California. Income values in 2000 were adjusted using Bay Area consumer price index information and expressed in 2011 dollars. The 2007‐2011 ACS reported that the median household income in El Cerrito was $83,933, an 8.6 percent increase from the 2000 median income adjusted for inflation in 2011 dollars). By comparison, the countywide median household income was $79,135, a 7.9 percent decrease from the 2000 median income adjusted for inflation. As shown in Table II‐7, the city’s median household income is $22,301 more than the statewide median, but only $4,798 more than countywide. Table II‐7 shows the household income distribution from the 2007‐2011 ACS. A majority of the city’s households have incomes greater than $100,000 (40 percent), which is 11.3 percent more than statewide. Table II-7 Household Income Distribution El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, Bay Area, and California (2011) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Bay Area California Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Households 9,973 100% 370,925 100% 2,577,480 100% 12,433,172 100% Less than $24,999 1,342 13.5% 53,254 14.4% 404,254 15.7% 2,462,985 19.8% $25,000 to $49,999 1,681 16.9% 64,908 17.5% 440,575 17.1% 2,672,484 21.5% $50,000 to $74,999 1,553 15.6% 59,214 16.0% 403,087 15.6% 2,155,425 17.3% $75,000 to $99,999 1,404 14.1% 47,280 12.7% 324,123 12.6% 1,568,927 12.6% $100,000 or more 3,993 40.0% 146,269 39.4% 1,005,441 39.0% 3,573,351 28.7% Median Household Income $83,933 $79,135 N/A $61,632 Median Household Income (2000)1 $77,292 $85,961 N/A N/A Source: ABAG preapproved data package; 2007-2011 ACS (5-Year Estimate). Five income categories are typically used for comparative purposes. These categories are based on a percentage of the Area Median Income (AMI) and adjusted for household size:  Extremely Low‐Income: household whose income is less than 30 percent of the AMI.  Very Low‐Income: a household whose income is between 31 and 50 percent of the AMI.  Low‐Income: a household whose income is between 51 percent to 80 percent of the AMI.  Moderate‐Income: a household whose income is between 81 percent to 120 percent of the AMI.  Above Moderate‐Income: a household whose income is above 120 percent of the AMI. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 22 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 The median income on which these five categories are based represents the mid‐point at which half of the households earn more and half earn less. In a normally distributed population (that is, one not skewed to either end of the income scale), approximately 40 percent of the population will have income within the extremely low‐, very low‐ and low‐ income ranges, about 20 percent within the moderate‐income range, and about 40 percent in the above moderate‐income range. Both the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) calculate annual income limits. The HCD calculated income limits are used to determine eligibility for certain State housing programs, and the HUD‐calculated income limits are used to determine eligibility for Section 8 and other Federal programs. Each year HUD reports the AMI the Oakland‐Fremont Metro Area. HUD uses the AMI to set income levels extremely low‐, very low‐, low, moderate‐, and above moderate‐ income) that are used in affordable housing programs and projects. According to HUD, the AMI for a four‐person household in Oakland‐Fremont Metro Area was $88,500 in 2014. For all income categories, income limits are defined for various household sizes based on a four‐ person household. Table II‐8 shows income limits for larger or smaller households, calculated by HUD. Table II-8 HUD Income Limits by Persons per Household Oakland-Fremont Metro Area (2014) Income Categories Persons per Household 1 2 3 4 5 Extremely Low-Income $19,350 $22,100 $24,850 $27,600 $29,850 Very Low-Income $32,200 $36,800 $41,400 $46,000 $49,700 Low-Income $47,350 $54,100 $60,850 $67,600 $73,050 Median-Income (100%*) $61,950 $70,800 $79,650 $88,500 $95,580 Moderate-Income (120%*) $74,340 $84,960 $95,580 $106,200 $114,696 *Percentage of Fiscal Year 2014 Estimate of Median Family Income. Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 23 of 190 El Cerrito and Contra Costa County as a whole have a relatively similar percentage of people in the extremely low‐, very low‐ and low‐income categories. However, as shown in Table II‐9, the city has a lower percentage of households in the moderate‐income category (17.9 percent) compared to countywide (18.2 percent) and a larger percentage of households in the above‐moderate income category (49.5 percent) than countywide (47.0 percent). Table II-9 Household Income Range by Income Category City of El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2010) Income Category El Cerrito Contra Costa County Households Percent Households Percent Extremely Low Income 1,030 10.4% 41,650 11.4% Very Low Income 1,050 10.6% 37,410 10.2% Low Income 1,135 11.5% 48,360 13.2% Moderate Income 1,770 17.9% 66,452 18.2% Above Moderate Income 4,880 49.5% 171,796 47.0% Total Households 9,865 100% 365,668 100% Median Household Income (2011) $83,933 $79,135 1 Income values in 2000 were adjusted using Bay Area consumer price index information and expressed in 2011 dollars. Source: CHAS, based on 2006-2010 ACS (5-Year Estimate). 4. Poverty The poverty rate is a Federally‐defined level of income for minimum subsistence. The dollar threshold for poverty is adjusted for household size and composition. Table II‐10 provides year 2013 poverty thresholds for several types of households. Table II-10 Poverty Thresholds United States (2013) Single Person 65+ $11,173 Two Adults, One Child $18,751 Single Person Under 65 $12,119 One Adult, Three Children $23,707 Two Persons 65+ $14,081 Two Adults, Two Children $23,624 Two Persons Under 65 $15,600 One Adult, Four Children $27,376 One Adult, Two Children $18,769 Two Adults, Three Children $27,801 Source: US Census Poverty Data, 2013. According to the 2007‐2011 American Community Survey (ACS) 5‐Year Estimates, El Cerrito’s poverty rate was low (7.5 percent), compared to 9.9 percent countywide, 10.1 percent in the Bay Area, and 14.4 percent statewide. As shown in Table II‐11, the city’s poverty rate grew (0.8 percent) from 2000 to 2011, whereas the countywide rate increased more substantially (2.3 percent). ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 24 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 Table II-11 Change in Poverty Rates El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, Bay Area, and California (2000 and 2011) 2000 2011 Percent Change El Cerrito 6.7% 7.5% +0.8% Contra Costa County 7.6% 9.9% +2.3% Bay Area 8.6% 10.1% +1.5% California 14.2% 14.4% +0.2% Source: ABAG Pre-Approved data package, 2007-2011 ACS (5-Year Estimate). While Table II‐11 shows El Cerrito’s 2011 poverty rate, Table II‐12 describes 2012 poverty rates by age group. In 2012, 5.3 percent of city residents under 18 and 5.4 percent of the elderly (65 years and over) lived in poverty. Table II-12 Poverty Rates by Age El Cerrito (2012) Group Above Poverty Level Below Poverty Level Poverty Rate Under 18 years 3,503 187 5.3% 18-64 15,582 1,235 7.9% 65 years and over 4,668 256 5.4% Total 23,753 1,678 7.1% Source: 2010-2012 American Community Survey (3-Year Estimate). 5. Employment Trends a. Area Employment Profile According to the 2007‐2011 ACS, 30 percent of El Cerrito residents were employed in educational, health, and social services. Professional, scientific, management, administrative and waste management services had the second largest number of employees (18.7 percent); 6.5 percent were employed in finance, insurance, real estate, rental, and leasing; and 8.4 percent were employed in retail trade. Table II‐13 lists major employers in El Cerrito according to the City’s 2013 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Table II-13 Major Employers El Cerrito (Fiscal Year 2012-2013) Barnes and Noble Nation’s Bed Bath & Beyond Pastime Hardware City of El Cerrito Prospect Sierra School CVS Pharmacy Romano’s Macaroni Grill El Cerrito Royale Safeway Fat Apple’s Restaurant Shields Nursing Center Home Depot Tehiyah Day School Honda of El Cerrito Trader Joe’s Lucky’s Supermarket US Post Office Mira Vista Golf and Country Club West Contra Costa Unified School District Source: City of El Cerrito Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, 2013. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 25 of 190 Table II‐14 describes the types of jobs held by residents in El Cerrito. From 2000 to 2011 the number of residents employed in the retail trade industry decreased by 3 percent, while the number of residents employed in the professional, scientific, management, administrative, and waste management services category increased by 1.2 percent. Table II-14 Employment Profile El Cerrito (2000 and 2011) 2000 2011 2000-2011 Persons Percent Persons Percent Percent Change Agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting, and mining 7 0.1% 70 0.6% 0.5% Construction 417 3.4% 527 4.4% 0.9% Manufacturing 759 6.3% 793 6.6% 0.3% Wholesale Trade 255 2.1% 211 1.8% -0.3% Transportation, warehousing, and utilities 413 3.4% 462 3.8% 0.4% Retail Trade 1,386 11.4% 1,015 8.4% -3.0% Information 650 5.4% 612 5.1% -0.3% Finance, insurance, and real estate 755 6.2% 786 6.5% 0.3% Arts, entertainment, recreation, and food services 755 6.2% 732 6.1% -0.1% Education, Health, and Social Services 3,451 28.5% 3,620 30.0% 1.5% Other services (except public administration) 488 4.0% 501 4.2% 0.2% Public Administration 669 5.5% 479 4.0% -1.5% Professional, Scientific, Management, Administrative, and Waste Management Services 2,115 17.5% 2,249 18.7% 1.2% Employed Population 12,120 100% 12,057 100% Source: ABAG preapproved data package; US Census Bureau 2000 Census and 2007-2011 ACS (5-Year Estimate). Table 11‐15 shows employment projections in El Cerrito and Contra Costa County from 2010 to 2040. The number of jobs in El Cerrito is expected to grow at a lower rate than the county and is projected to reach 7,310 jobs by 2040. Table II-15 Employment Projections El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2013) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Number Average Annual Growth Rate Number Average Annual Growth Rate 2010 5,880 N/A 344,920 N/A 2020 6,590 1.2% 407,810 1.8% 2030 6,900 0.5% 432,730 0.6% 2040 7,310 0.6% 467,390 0.8% Source: ABAG projections, 2013. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 26 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 6. Special Housing Needs a. Elderly The elderly face special housing challenges related to physical and financial conditions. Older adults experience declining mobility and self‐care capabilities, which create special housing needs and challenges. Many older adults, even those who own their homes, face financial challenges due to limited incomes from Social Security and other retirement benefits. Data on the incomes and housing expenses of the elderly indicate that a substantial number (although by no means the majority) of these older adults may need assistance related to:  Repair and maintenance of owned dwellings units;  Modifications to existing homes to better meet mobility and self‐care limitation;  Financial assistance to meet rising rental costs for those who do not own; and  Supportive services to meet daily needs. Table II‐16 shows the elderly population (65 and older) in El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and the Bay Area in 2000 and 2010. From 2000 to 2010 the City of El Cerrito experienced a slight decrease in the number of individuals ages 65 to 84; however, there were increases both countywide and in the Bay Area. Despite the decrease in the number of elderly residents in El Cerrito from 2000 to 2010, the city’s proportion of elderly residents was still larger than the proportion countywide (see Figure II‐2). Table II-16 Elderly Population and Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR) El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and Bay Area (2000 and 2010) Age El Cerrito Contra Costa County Bay Area 2000 2010 AAGR 2000 2010 AAGR 2000 2010 AAGR 65 to 74 years 2,039 1,973 -0.3% 54,722 70,719 2.9% 389,437 467,258 2.0% 75 to 84 years 2,026 1,397 -3.1% 39,179 40,347 0.3% 272,643 279,326 0.2% 85+ years 668 857 2.3% 13,371 19,372 4.4% 95,427 131,645 3.8% Total 4,733 4,227 107,272 130,438 757,507 878,229 Source: ABAG preapproved data package; US Census Bureau, 2000 and 2010 Census. In 2012 the incidence of poverty in El Cerrito was lower among the population over 65 years of age (5.4 percent) than it was for the total population of the city (7.1 percent).This is likely due to programs like Social Security that provide assistance to senior households. Older adults tend to have the highest rates of homeownership of any age group. In 2010 seniors represented about 18 percent of El Cerrito’s population, but made up 36 percent of all homeowners (2,219) and only 14 percent of renters (566). Table II‐17 describes the income composition of seniors in El Cerrito and countywide in 2011. In El Cerrito 23 percent of the city’s elderly population had an income below $30,000 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 27 of 190 and 29 percent had an income of over $100,000. Using the city’s 2011 median household income of $83,933, several senior households in El Cerrito would fall into the extremely low‐ or very low‐income categories. Table II-17 Senior Households by Income El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2011) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Number Percent Number Percent Total 2,554 100% 76,950 100% Income under $30,000 599 23% 22,677 29% $30,000 to $49,999 465 18% 14,908 19% $50,000 to $74,999 487 19% 13,831 18% $75,000 to $99,999 284 11% 8,225 11% More than $100,000 719 29% 17,309 23% Source: ABAG preapproved data package; 2007-2011 ACS (5-Year Estimate). Some seniors require assisted living facilities that combine meal, medical, and daily living assistance in a residential environment. Table II‐18 shows the State Department of Social Services licensed elderly care facilities that provide services in El Cerrito. All offer assisted living services in a residential home setting. Table II-18 State Department of Social Services Licensed Elderly Care Facilities El Cerrito (2014) Name Address License Status Facility Capacity Adams Care Home 7400 Potrero Avenue Licensed 6 Bayview Happy Home 1345 Scott Street Licensed 6 El Cerrito Royale 6510 Gladys Avenue Licensed 145 Grace Elder Care 2610 Francisco Way Licensed 6 Grace Homes 3 LLC 635 Ashbury Avenue Licensed 4 Red Maple Residential Home 7100 Manila Avenue Licensed 6 RN Loving Care Home 1299 Lawrence Street Licensed 6 Rn3 Loving Care Home I 917 Elm Street Licensed 6 Rn3 Loving Care Home II 921 Elm Street Licensed 6 Rn3 Loving Care Home III 1320 Devonshire Drive Licensed 6 Rn3 Loving Care Home IV 8320 Buckingham Drive Licensed 6 Via Community 253 Pomona Avenue Licensed 6 Wagaya Assisted Living 905 Elm Street Licensed 6 Yume Assisted Living 7450 Moeser Lane Licensed 6 Source: State of California Care Network, 2010, Department of Social Services, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 28 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 The facilities listed above are primarily institutional care facilities. There is also a need in the community to provide high quality, independent‐living senior housing that provides on‐site assisted care and individual living units. Because many seniors desire to “downsize” when they move, these senior housing developments would likely be higher density projects with on‐site supportive services. An increase in this type of available housing for seniors makes it possible for them to sell their homes and remain in the community. b. Persons with Disabilities Less than 11 percent of the city’s non‐institutionalized residents have physical conditions that affect their abilities to live independently in conventional residential settings. These individuals have mobility impairments, self‐care limitations, or other conditions that may require special housing accommodations or financial assistance. Individuals with such disabilities can have a number of special needs that distinguish them from the population at large. Individuals with mobility difficulties (such as those confined to wheelchairs) may require special accommodations or modifications to their homes to allow for continued independent living. Such modifications are often called “handicapped access.” Individuals with self‐care limitations (which can include persons with mobility difficulties) may require residential environments that include in‐home or on‐site support services, ranging from congregate to convalescent care. Support services can include medical therapy, daily living assistance, congregate dining, and related services. Individuals with developmental disabilities and other physical and mental conditions that prevent them from functioning independently may require assisted care or group home environments. Some people with mobility and/or self‐care limitations are able to live with their families to assist in meeting housing and daily living needs. A segment of the disabled population, particularly low‐income and retired individuals, may not have the financial capacity to pay for needed accommodations or modifications to their homes. In addition, even those able to pay for special housing accommodations may find them unavailable in the city. Disabled persons often require special housing features to accommodate physical limitations. Some disabled persons may have financial difficulty due to the cost of having their special needs met or due to difficulty in finding appropriate employment. Although the California Administrative Code Title 24 requires that all public buildings and “covered multifamily dwellings” (as defined in the California Government Code, Section 12955.1) be accessible to the public through architectural standards such as ramps, large doors, and restroom modifications to enable handicap access, not all available housing units have these features. According to 2010‐2012 ACS, there were approximately 2,597 non‐institutionalized disabled persons over age five in El Cerrito. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 29 of 190 Table II‐19 compares the number of people with disabilities by age group. The majority of the population with disabilities is in the senior group (aged 65 years and older). Most of the disabilities in this group are ambulatory (22.4 percent), followed by independent living difficulty, and self‐care. About 1,369 residents reported disabilities that prevented them from living without assistance; an estimated 1,004 of these residents, or 73.3 percent, were seniors. Countywide the majority of the population with disabilities is in the adult group (aged 18 to 64); 26,296 people experienced ambulatory difficulty and 20,619 people of people aged 18‐64 experienced cognitive difficulties. It is important to note that the percentages may not sum to 100 percent as residents may have more than one disability. Table II-19 Persons With Disabilities El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2012) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Age Group Number Percent Number Percent Total Population 5-17 2,430 194,072 5-17 years old with a disability 123 5.0% 8,331 4.3% With a hearing difficulty 18 0.7% 1,037 0.5% With a vision difficulty 39 1.6% 1,484 0.8% With a cognitive difficulty 88 3.6% 6,082 3.1% With an ambulatory difficulty 16 0.7% 1,176 0.6% With a self-care difficulty 62 2.5% 1,862 1.0% Total Population 18-64 16,706 734,704 18-64 years old with a disability 867 5.2% 51,181 7.0% With a hearing difficulty 153 1.0% 9,007 1.2% With a vision difficulty 46 0.3% 8,675 1.2% With a cognitive difficulty 226 1.4% 20,619 2.8% With an ambulatory difficulty 515 3.1% 26,296 3.6% With a self-care difficulty 247 1.5% 8,974 1.2% With an independent living difficulty 365 2.2% 18,642 2.6% Total Population 65 years and over 4,694 137,556 65 years and over with a disability 1,067 22.7% 46,110 33.5% With a hearing difficulty 562 12.0% 16,851 12.3% With a vision difficulty 218 4.7% 7,040 5.1% With a cognitive difficulty 642 13.7% 11,185 8.2% With an ambulatory difficulty 1,047 22.4% 28,926 21.1% With a self-care difficulty 660 14.1% 11,023 8.1% With an independent living difficulty 1,004 21.4% 22,477 16.4% All Ages with a Disability 2,057 105,622 Total Population 23,830 1,066,333 Source: 2010-2012 ACS data (3-Year Estimate). Developmental Disabilities SB 812, which took effect January 2011, amended State housing element law to require an evaluation of the special housing needs of persons with developmental disabilities. A ʺdevelopmental disabilityʺ is defined as a disability that originates before an individual becomes 18 years old, continues or can be expected to continue indefinitely, and constitutes ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 30 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 a substantial disability for that individual. This includes mental retardation, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, and autism. According to the California Department of Developmental Services (DDS), El Cerrito currently (2014), has 46 individuals under 18 years old and 47 individuals 18 years or older with a developmental disability. Of the developmentally‐disabled population in El Cerrito, about 91 percent live in their own home, and the remaining live either in an independent living facility, community care facility, or foster home. However, this count only includes residents who use DDS services. It is possible the count is much higher. An estimate from the Housing Consortium of the East Bay (HCEB) estimates 150 individuals with developmental disabilities in El Cerrito. This estimate includes 52 individuals younger than 14, 24 between the ages of 15 and 22, 70 ages 23 to 54, two ages 55 to 65, and two above the age of 65. According to HCEB, there will be 50 more housing units needed for residents with developmental disabilities in El Cerrito by 2023. c. Female Heads of Households Most female‐headed households are either single elderly women or single mothers. Traditionally, these two groups have been considered special needs groups because their incomes tend to be lower, making it difficult to obtain affordable housing, or because they have specific physical needs related to housing (such as child care or assisted living support). Single mothers, in particular, tend to have difficulty obtaining suitable, affordable housing. Such households also have a greater need for housing with convenient access to child‐care facilities, public transportation, and other public facilities and services. As shown in Table II‐20 female‐headed families made up 16.9 percent of total families in El Cerrito, compared to 17.6 percent countywide and 17.4 percent in the Bay Area. Female‐ headed families with children under 18 made up 47.9 percent of the 1,047 female‐headed families in El Cerrito, which was less than the 60.9 percent countywide and 58.0 percent in the Bay Area. Table II-20 Female-Headed Families El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and the Bay Area (2010) Total Families Female-Headed Family Female-Headed Family With Children Under 18 Female-Headed Family With No Children Under 18 Number Percent Number Percent of Total Families Number Percent of female- headed families Number Percent of female-headed families El Cerrito 6,166 100% 1,047 16.9% 502 47.9% 545 52.1% Contra Costa County 265,280 100% 46,706 17.6% 28,421 60.9% 18,285 39.1% Bay Area 1,685,972 100% 293,126 17.4% 169,879 58.0% 123,247 42.0% Source: ABAG Pre-Approved Data Package, 2010 Census. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 31 of 190 According to the 2010‐2012 ACS, 8.4 percent of female‐headed families are classified as living below the poverty level, and female‐headed families with related children under 18 are more likely to live in poverty (20.2 percent) than married couple families (3.0 percent). It may be assumed that most of these households are overpaying for housing more than 30 percent of their income), or are experiencing other unmet housing needs. As a result of poverty, female heads of households often spend more on immediate needs such as food, clothing, transportation, and medical care, than on home maintenance, which can result in living units falling into disrepair. d. Large Households The Census Bureau defines large households as households of five or more individuals. Large households often face special challenges in the housing market because they need to find housing of sufficient size (three or more bedrooms) and do not always have sufficient income to purchase or rent such housing. Table II‐21 shows household size by tenure. In 2010, large households accounted for 5.6 percent of all households, or 566 households in El Cerrito, compared to 13.2 percent in Contra Costa County. Large owner and renter households represented 334 or 59 percent and 232 or 41 percent, respectively, of the large households in El Cerrito. In comparison renters comprised 39.4 percent of all El Cerrito households, indicating that large households were more likely to rent than the city’s population as a whole. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 32 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 Table II-21 Household Size by Tenure El Cerrito (2010) Total Owner Occupied Total Renter Occupied El Cerrito Contra Costa County Bay Area El Cerrito Contra Costa County Bay Area All Households Households 6,145 251,904 1,465,362 3,997 123,460 1,142,661 Percent 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1-person household Households 1,607 49,321 297,554 1,346 35,374 383,371 Percent 26.2% 19.6% 20.3% 33.7% 28.9% 33.6% 2-person household Households 2,415 85,270 487,169 1,300 31,253 310,670 Percent 39.3% 33.9% 33.2% 32.5% 25.3% 27.2% 3-person household Households 1,005 43,148 253,975 702 21,036 175,156 Percent 16.4% 17.1% 17.3% 17.6% 17.0% 15.3% 4-person household Households 784 42,939 242,922 417 17,036 134,567 Percent 12.8% 17.0% 16.6% 10.4% 13.8% 11.8% 5-person household Households 231 18,516 101,041 172 9,813 71,081 Percent 3.8% 7.4% 6.9% 4.3% 7.9% 6.2% 6-person household Households 56 7,326 42,950 32 4,515 33,693 Percent 0.9% 2.9% 2.9% 0.8% 3.7% 2.9% 7+ person household Households 47 5,384 39,751 28 4,073 34,123 Percent 0.8% 2.1% 2.7% 0.7% 3.3% 3.0% Source: ABAG Pre-Approved Data Package, 2010 U.S. Census. According to 2006‐2010 CHAS data 83, or 14 percent of large households in El Cerrito overpaid for housing (spent 30 percent or more of their household income on housing) in 2010, compared to 37 percent of all households (See Table II‐34 Overpayment by Tenure). Another issue that large households can face is overcrowding, defined as households with more than 1.01 persons per room. The 2010‐2012 ACS reported that only 0.09 percent of El Cerrito households were overcrowded, many of which are likely to be large families based on the definition of overcrowding. However, this is a very small percentage of households. Table II‐22 shows that large households tend to have higher median household incomes than smaller households. However, even if large households have the income of a smaller household, it is split between more people. This means that less income is typically available to be spent on housing. The median household income for large households in El Cerrito is higher than countywide. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 33 of 190 Table II-22 Median Household Income by Household Size El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2011) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Total Median Income $83,933 $79,135 1-person household $41,993 $40,919 2-person household $91,250 $85,497 3-person household $99,733 $96,653 4-person household $124,526 $111,971 5-person household $102,639 $95,901 6-person household $112,500 $92,991 7+ person household $130,733 $85,382 Note: 2011 Inflation adjusted dollars Source: ABAG preapproved data package, 2010 U.S. Census As shown in Table II‐23 large housing units are not as common in El Cerrito. A majority of housing units in the city have either two or three bedrooms (72.1 percent). Only 17 percent of housing units in El Cerrito have four or more bedrooms, compared to 31.4 percent countywide and 22.3 percent in the Bay Area. Table II-23 Total Housing Units by Number of Bedrooms El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and Bay Area (2011) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Bay Area No bedroom 1.3% 1.2% 3.8% 1 bedroom 9.7% 9.5% 15.2% 2 bedrooms 37.8% 23.3% 26.8% 3 bedrooms 34.3% 34.6% 31.9% 4 bedrooms 13.7% 24.4% 17.6% 5+ bedrooms 3.3% 7.0% 4.7% Source: ABAG Pre-Approved Data Package, 2007-2011 ACS. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 34 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 e. Farmworkers El Cerrito is not an agricultural area. Therefore, the likelihood of special farmworker housing needs is extremely low. According to the 2010‐2012 ACS, less than 1 percent of the Cityʹs residents were employed in farming, forestry, and fishing occupations of the total labor force. Given El Cerrito’s location in an urban region, it is likely that few, if any, of these “farmworkers” are employed in crop production or harvesting and would require special farmworker housing. If needed, the construction of a farmworker housing project is allowed within all residential and commercial zones. The Employee Housing Act requires local governments to treat employee housing providing accommodations for six or fewer employees the same way as a single family unit with a residential land use designation. The City cannot require a conditional use permit or other permit that is not required of a family dwelling of the same type in the same zone, and use of a family dwelling for the purposes of employee housing for six or fewer occupants shall not constitute a change of occupancy. The City complies with these requirements of State law. f. Homeless Population The homeless population has a wide variety of needs that impact access to housing, including physical and mental disabilities, HIV, and substance abuse. Depending on an individual’s circumstances, these needs may be addressed via emergency shelters, transitional housing, or supportive housing. It is challenging to accurately count homeless populations, which include people living in vehicles and in places not designed to be permanent housing (such as motels) in addition to those on the streets and in shelters. Contra Costa County conducts a point‐in‐time count every two years of the sheltered (annual count) and unsheltered (bi‐annual count) homeless living in the county. The count is typically conducted in the winter, when seasonal demand is likely at its highest. The 2013 Contra Costa County Homeless Census found 3,798 total homeless, of which 2,448 were sheltered and 1,350 were unsheltered. The 2013 count found an overall decrease in the number of individuals experiencing homelessness, from 4,274 persons in 2011. Table II‐24 describes the unsheltered homeless population by region within the county. El Cerrito is in the West County Region of Contra Costa County, along with Crockett, El Sobrante, Hercules, North Richmond, Pinole, Richmond, Rodeo, and San Pablo. Of the 376 unsheltered homeless persons identified in the West County Region, approximately 7.2 percent (27 persons) were counted in the City of El Cerrito. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 35 of 190 Table II-24 Unsheltered Homeless Persons West Region of Contra Costa County (2013) Location Number Percent Crockett 19 5.1% El Cerrito 27 7.2% El Sobrante 48 12.8% Hercules 18 4.8% North Richmond 13 3.5% Pinole 20 5.3% Richmond 142 37.8% Rodeo 3 0.8% San Pablo 86 22.9% Total 376 100% Source: Contra Costa Inter-Jurisdictional Council on Homelessness 2013 Count. There are no homeless or transitional shelters located in El Cerrito. The closest shelters are located in Richmond, including: the Bay Area Crisis Nursery, which provides 20 year‐round individual beds; Calli House Youth Shelter, with six year‐round beds for transition‐age youth; Emergency Shelter, with 75 year‐round beds for families with children; and Bay Area Rescue Mission with 150 year‐round beds for families with children. Building Opportunities for Self‐Sufficiency’s (BOSS) multi‐agency services center in the City of Berkeley – located south of El Cerrito – is also a resource center for homeless persons in El Cerrito. In terms of permanent housing serving the formerly homeless, the City of El Cerrito was a sponsor of the Idaho Apartments, a 28‐unit affordable housing development located on the El Cerrito‐Richmond border. In addition, the Ohlone Gardens Apartments, currently under construction, will include ten units for households with special needs, including supportive services where appropriate. Contra Costa County is the primary planning agency charged with providing services to the homeless throughout the County. The County’s Public Health Division offers a variety of homeless programs such as the Shelter Plus Care (S+C) Program; Project HOPE; Project Coming Home; Health, Housing and Integrated Services Network (HHISN); and other programs. They are made available to all Contra Costa County residents, including those in El Cerrito. Besides the County, there are a number of private non‐profit organizations in and around the Bay Area that provide services to the homeless and special needs groups. They include Shelter, Inc., Rubicon Programs, Inc., The Food Bank of Contra Costa and Solano, American Red Cross, and Bay Area Rescue Mission. The City supports the County’s “Ending Homelessness in Ten Years: A County‐Wide Plan for the Communities of Contra Costa County” (Ten Year Plan); particularly its “housing first” strategy, which works to immediately house a homeless individual or family rather than force them through a sequence of temporary shelter solutions. Additionally, the City supports the Ten Year Plan goal of deemphasizing emergency shelters by supporting “interim housing,” also ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 36 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 referred to as “transitional housing,” as a preferred housing type. Interim housing is very short‐term and focuses on helping people access permanent housing as quickly as possible. Services provided in interim housing include housing search assistance and case management to help address immediate needs and identify longer‐term issues to be dealt with once in permanent housing. The Idaho Apartments, operated by Rubicon Programs, is an example of permanent rental housing that offers supportive services for its residents. Consistent with the Ten Year Plan, the City will prioritize the use of its limited housing development resources to support permanent housing affordable to those with extremely low, very low‐, and low‐incomes. State law (Government Code 65583 requires local jurisdictions to identify a zone or zones where emergency shelters are allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit. The City Zoning Ordinance allows emergency shelters as a permitted use within the Community Commercial (CC) zone, as well as the Transit‐ Oriented High‐Intensity Mixed‐Use (TOHIMU) and the Transit‐Oriented Medium‐Intensity Mixed‐Use (TOMIMU) zones of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, subject to the operating standards defined in the Plan. g. Extremely Low-Income Households Extremely low‐income households are defined as those households with incomes under 30 percent of the County median income. Extremely low‐income households typically consist of minimum wage workers, seniors on fixed incomes, the disabled, and farmworkers. This income group is likely to live in overcrowded and substandard housing conditions. This group of households has specific housing needs that require greater government subsidies and assistance, housing with supportive services, single room occupancy (SRO), shared housing, and/or rental subsidies or vouchers. In recent years, rising rents, higher income and credit standards imposed by landlords, and insufficient government assistance has exacerbated the problem. Without adequate assistance this group has a high risk of homelessness. In 2014 the HUD median income in Contra Costa County was $88,500. For extremely low‐ income households, this results in an income of $26,550 or less for a four‐person household. Households with extremely low incomes have a variety of housing situations and needs. In 2011, approximately 960 extremely low‐income households resided in the city, representing 9.6 percent of the total households. Most (78.6 percent) extremely low‐income households experience one or more housing problems. These concerns include incomplete kitchen facilities, incomplete plumbing facilities, overcrowding, and overpayment, exist for 84.1 percent of extremely low‐income renters and 69.4 percent of extremely low‐income owners. Extremely low‐income households are more likely to rent; 62.5 percent of extremely low‐ income households rent compared to 38.4 percent of the total households in El Cerrito that rent. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 37 of 190 Table II-25 Housing Problems in Extremely Low-Income Households El Cerrito (2011) Household by Type, Income, & Housing Problem Owners Renters Total Households Extremely Low-Income Households 360 600 960 % with any housing problems 69.4% 84.1% 78.6% Total Households 6,145 3,830 9,975 % with any housing problems 30.0% 49.3% 37.3% Source: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, 2007-2011 data. To calculate the projected housing needs, the City assumed that 50 percent of extremely low‐income households make up its very low‐income regional housing needs allocation. As a result, from the very low‐income need of 100 units, the City has a projected need of 50 units for extremely low‐income households by 2022. Many extremely low‐income households will be seeking rental housing and most likely facing an overpayment, overcrowding, or substandard housing condition. Some extremely low‐income households could have mental or other disabilities and special needs. 7. Existing Housing Stock a. Housing Composition Table II‐25 shows housing estimates in El Cerrito, countywide, and statewide. According to the California Department of Finance (DOF) over two‐thirds of the units in El Cerrito in 2014 are single family detached (69.8 percent), 13.5 percent are multiple units of five or more, 12.9 percent are multiple units of two to four, 3.2 percent are single family attached housing and 0.5 percent are mobile homes. The definition of housing unit, including mobile home, used by the DOF is a self‐reported description of the type of housing unit a survey respondent lived in. The housing types reported in Table II‐25 do not necessarily correspond to regulated land use types or property tax assessment codes. As shown in Table II‐26, El Cerrito has a greater proportion of units in multifamily complexes with two to four housing units (12.9 percent) compared to countywide (7.0 percent) and statewide (8.1 percent), but a lower proportion of units in larger multifamily complexes (13.5 percent), compared to countywide (16.8 percent). In 2014 the average household size was 2.36 persons per household, which is lower than the countywide 2.83 persons per household. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 38 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 b. Housing Occupancy and Tenure Vacancy rate can be a good indicator of how effectively for‐sale and rental units are meeting the current demand for housing in a community. Vacancy rates of 6 or 7 percent for rental housing and 1 to 2 percent for ownership housing are generally considered optimum, where there is a balance between the demand and supply for housing. A higher vacancy rate may indicate an excess supply of units and, therefore, price depreciation, while a low vacancy rate may indicate a shortage of units and escalation of housing prices. Of the 10,730 year‐round dwelling units in El Cerrito reported by the DOF in January 2014, 10,156 units (94.7 percent) were occupied and 574 units (5.3 percent) were vacant. By comparison, 93.8 percent of the dwelling units countywide were occupied and 6.2 percent were vacant. Table II‐27 shows that, in 2012, El Cerrito had a lower homeowner vacancy rate (1.0 percent) compared to the countywide rate (1.6 percent). El Cerrito also has a lower rental vacancy rate of 3.5 percent compared to the countywide rental vacancy rate of 5.7 percent. El Cerrito’s low vacancy rates indicate there is a limited supply of available units in the city. Table II-27 Housing Occupancy El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2014) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Number Percent Number Percent Occupied housing units 10,156 94.7% 380,562 93.8% Vacant housing units 574 5.3% 25,266 6.2% Total housing units 10,730 100% 405,828 100% 2012 Homeowner vacancy rate1 1.0% 1.6% 2012 Rental vacancy rate1 3.5% 5.7% 1 American Community Survey 2010-2012 (3-Year Estimate). Source: Department of Finance City/County/State Population and Housing Estimates, January 2014. Table II-26 Housing Estimates El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and California (2014) Housing Type El Cerrito Contra Costa County California Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Single Detached 7,487 69.8% 270,316 66.6% 8,038,217 58.1% Single Attached 345 3.2% 31,678 7.8% 972,976 7.0% Multifamily, Two to Four 1,389 12.9% 28,583 7.0% 1,119,175 8.1% Multifamily, Five or More 1,450 13.5% 67,982 16.8% 3,154,907 22.8% Mobile Homes 59 0.5% 7,269 1.8% 560,000 4.0% Total 10,730 100% 405,828 100% 13,845,281 100% Source: Department of Finance City/County/State Population and Housing Estimates (Table E-5), 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 39 of 190 Table II‐28 shows owner‐occupancy rates and renter‐occupancy rates by race/ethnicity in 2012. Table II‐27 shows El Cerrito’s Hispanic or Latino population is more likely to rent (74.4 percent) than own (25.6 percent) and the Asian population has higher rates of owner‐ occupancy (70.1 percent) than renter‐occupancy (29.9 percent). Table II-28 Owner-Occupied and Renter-Occupied Units by Race/Ethnicity El Cerrito (2012) Race/Ethnicity Owner Occupied Renter Occupied Number Percentage Number Percentage White 3,899 58.9% 2,717 41.1% Black or African American 312 48.7% 329 51.3% Asian 1,621 70.1% 694 29.9% Other 51 23.1% 170 76.9% Two or More Races 217 56.2% 169 43.8% Hispanic or Latino 244 25.6% 710 74.4% Not Hispanic or Latino 3,733 62.5% 2,244 37.5% Source: American Community Survey 2010-2012 (3-Year Estimate). Table II‐29 describes housing tenure by age according to 2010‐2012 ACS. In El Cerrito, homeowners tended to be age 45 and older (83 percent). A larger percentage of El Cerrito’s renters were under the age of 45 (47.4 percent) compared to the percentage of homeowners under the age of 45 (17 percent), which is similar to countywide rates (55.3 percent and 24.4 percent, respectively). Table II-29 Tenure by Age El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2012) El Cerrito Contra Costa County Age Owners Renters Owners Renters Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 15 to 24 0 0.0% 208 5.1% 890 0.4% 8,479 6.5% 25 to 34 225 3.7% 1,039 25.3% 16,203 6.6% 31,547 24.1% 35 to 44 811 13.3% 697 17.0% 42,369 17.4% 32,333 24.7% 45 to 54 1,195 19.6% 787 19.2% 63,033 25.9% 24,902 19.1% 55 to 64 1,443 23.5% 792 19.4% 55,968 22.9% 17,537 13.4% 65 to 74 1,178 19.3% 269 6.6% 36,550 15.0% 7,300 5.6% 75 and over 1,258 20.6% 308 7.5% 28,744 11.8% 8,706 6.6% Total 6,110 100% 4,100 100% 243,748 100% 130,804 100% Source: American Community Survey 2010-2012 (3-Year Estimate). ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 40 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 c. Age and Condition of Housing Stock The age and condition of the housing stock provide additional measures of housing adequacy and availability in many communities. Although age does not always correlate with substandard housing conditions, neighborhoods with a preponderance of homes more than 40 years old are more likely than newer neighborhoods to have a concentration of housing problems related to deferred maintenance, inadequate landscape care, outdated utilities or interior amenities, and a need for housing rehabilitation. The year a structure was built can, at times, be an indicator of the current condition of the housing unit. Housing units built before 1940 may be old, but may not necessarily be in a rundown condition if properly maintained. In contrast, newer homes that were built equipped with adequate utilities and amenities may already be rundown due to abuse or general lack of care. However, it is useful to look at the age of the housing stock to determine where inadequacies may exist, or why certain units remain vacant. Table II‐30 shows that nearly two‐thirds of housing units in El Cerrito were built before 1960 (65.6 percent). Less than 10 percent of El Cerrito’s housing units were built after 1980 (9.4 percent). Table II-30 Age of Housing Units El Cerrito (2012) Year Number of Units Percentage 1939 or earlier 1,478 13.5% 1940 to 1949 2,905 26.5% 1950 to 1959 2,798 25.5% 1960 to 1969 1,296 11.8% 1970 to 1979 1,459 13.3% 1980 to 1989 392 3.6% 1990 to 1999 317 2.9% 2000-2009 308 2.8% 2010 and later 8 0.1% Total 10,961 100% Source: 2010-2012 American Community Survey (3-Year Estimate). d. Overcrowding Generally overcrowding is a measure of the ability of existing housing to adequately accommodate residents and can result in deterioration of the quality of life within a community. The U.S. Census defines an “overcrowded” household as 1.01 or more persons per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, balconies, foyers, halls, and half‐rooms. “Severe overcrowding” occurs in households with more than 1.5 persons per room. Overcrowding typically results when either: 1) the costs of available housing with a sufficient number of ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 41 of 190 bedrooms for larger families exceeds the family’s ability to afford such housing, or 2) unrelated individuals (such as students or low‐wage single adult workers) share dwelling units due to high housing costs. This can lead to overcrowded situations if the housing unit is not large enough to accommodate all of the people effectively. Table II‐31 summarizes the overcrowding status in El Cerrito and countywide. Less than one percent of the City’s occupied households lived in overcrowded conditions in 2012; 0.8 percent of owners were overcrowded and 1.1 percent of renters were overcrowded. By comparison, 1.6 percent of the owners and 6.8 percent of renters were overcrowded countywide. No occupied housing units were severely overcrowded in El Cerrito, while about one percent of households were severely overcrowded countywide. In 2012 the average household size for owners was 2.44 persons in El Cerrito and 2.83 countywide. The average household size for renters was 2.13 in El Cerrito and 2.79 countywide. Table II-31 Persons Per Room in All Occupied Housing Units El Cerrito and Contra Costa County (2012) Occupants Per Room El Cerrito Contra Costa County Owners Renters Owners Renters Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent .50 or less 5,143 84.2% 2,751 67.1% 178,484 73.2% 68,704 52.5% .51 to 1.00 917 15.0% 1,303 31.8% 60,344 24.8% 50,465 38.6% 1.01 to 1.50 50 0.8% 46 1.1% 3,855 1.6% 8,859 6.8% 1.51 to 2.00 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 648 0.3% 1,992 1.5% 2.01 or more 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 417 0.2% 784 0.6% Total 6,110 100% 4,100 100% 243,748 100% 130,804 100% Source: 2010-2012 American Community Survey (3-Year Estimate). 8. Housing Costs a. Rental Rates A 2009 survey of rental rates in the city and surrounding communities reveals a variety of units and the different rental price ranges. Table II‐32 shows El Cerrito’s rental prices appear to be higher than some of the neighboring communities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 42 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 Table II-32 Median Rental Rates El Cerrito and surrounding Cities (2009) City Median Rent by Bedroom Type: Bedroom (BR)/Bath (BA) Studio 1BR/1BA 2 BR/1BA 2BR/1+BA 3BR/1+BA El Cerrito $756 $1,217 $1,260 $1,515 $1,387 Pinole $800 $944 $1,082 $1,798 $1,610 Richmond $985 $888 $1,026 $1,510 $2,450 San Pablo $870 $899 $1,247 $1,908 $1,751 Pleasant Hill $989 $1,202 $1,236 $1,478 $2,004 Concord None $875 $1,073 $1,369 $1,725 Martinez $723 $1,137 $1,204 $1,512 $1,860 Walnut Creek $1,122 $1,075 $1,090 $1,578 $2,725 El Sobrante $1,256 $1,247 $1,264 $1,639 $1,406 Source: 2010-2015 Contra Costa County Draft Consolidated Plan. Figure II‐3 shows the change in average rents in El Cerrito since 2006. Rents remained fairly even between 2006 and 2010, but began increasing in 2010, and even more rapidly in 2012. In 2014 the average rent is $1,960. From 2010 to 2014 average rent prices increased by 40.7 percent. Based on Table II‐36 (Ability to Pay), extremely low‐, very low‐, and low‐income households cannot afford average rents in El Cerrito, but moderate‐income households can. Figure II-3 Average Rents El Cerrito (2006-2014) Source: RealFacts.com, July 2014. $0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average Rent 1 Bedroom 1 Bath 2 Bedroom 2 Bath ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 43 of 190 Table II‐33 shows the rental listing for recreational vehicle (RV) park space rents at an RV park in El Cerrito. There are very few vacancies. Table II-33 RV Park Space Rental Rates El Cerrito (2014) Name Total Spaces Average Rent Audiss RV Park 28 $625.00 for small spaces $695.00 for large spaces Source: Audiss RV Park, 2014. b. Home Prices Renting is generally more affordable than buying a home in El Cerrito. Table II‐34 shows home sale information for 2013 in El Cerrito. The median sale price increased significantly from 2012 to 2013, by 28.6 percent. In 2013 the median sale price was $565,000. Based on Table II‐36 (Ability to Pay), only above moderate‐income households can afford to purchase a home at the median sale price of $565,000 in El Cerrito. Table II-34 Home Sale Information El Cerrito (2013) Sales Percent Change from 2012 Median Sale Price Percent Change from 2012 Dollars per Square Foot El Cerrito 292 2.8% $565,000 28.6% $414 Source: DQNews.com, San Francisco Bay Area Home Sale Activity, 2013. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 44 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 Homes Prices in Surrounding Areas Figure II‐4 shows median home sale prices in El Cerrito and surrounding jurisdictions in 2013 according to DQNews. El Cerrito’s median home sale price was $565,000, compared to $216,491 in Richmond (directly northwest of El Cerrito) and $603,000 in Albany (directly south of El Cerrito). Figure II-4 Comparison of Median Home Sale Prices El Cerrito and Surrounding Jurisdictions (2013) Source: DQNews.com, July 2014. $565,000 $603,000 $752,375 $350,000 $350,000 $407,004 $315,000 $216,491 $225,000 $576,375 El Cerrito Albany Berkeley Emeryville Hercules Oakland Pinole Richmond San Pablo Walnut Creek ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 45 of 190 Figure II‐5 shows the change in median home sale price in El Cerrito since June 2004. Although the median home sale price fluctuated between 2004 and 2013, it has been steadily increasing since December 2011 and was at $650,100 as of June 2014 according to Zillow.com. Figure II-5 Historical Median Home Sale Prices El Cerrito (2004-2013) Source: Zillow.com, July 2014. 9. Affordability a. Lower Income Households Overpaying for Housing As stated previously, there are five income categories typically used for comparative purposes based on the median countywide income: extremely low‐income (0‐30 percent of median income), very low‐income (30‐50 percent of median income), low‐income (50‐80 percent of median income), moderate‐income (80‐120 percent of median income), and above moderate‐income (120 percent or more of median income). One method of analyzing housing affordability for each income group is to compare the number and/or percent of housing units by cost to the number and/or percent of households by comparable income levels. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) establishes that a household is “cost‐burdened” overpaying for housing) if it spends more than 30 percent of gross income on housing‐related costs. The prevalence of overpayment varies significantly by income, tenure, household type, and household size. Those who pay 30 percent or more of their income on housing may have trouble affording other necessities. However, to truly evaluate housing affordability individual circumstances must be taken into account. These factors include other long‐term debt, mortgage interest rates, the number of household $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 $550,000 $600,000 $650,000 $700,000 Home Sale Prices Trendline ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 46 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 members, and other large, ongoing expenses (such as medical bills). Since it is impossible to consider each household’s individual circumstances, the 30 percent rule‐of‐thumb provides a general measure of housing affordability for the average household. Table II‐35 shows overpayment by tenure. In 2010 36.9 percent of all El Cerrito households overpaid and 17.3 percent severely overpaid for housing. This is lower than the countywide overpayment rate of 45.0 percent and the Bay Area’s rate of 42.6 percent. Renters experienced particularly high overpayment rates, with 46.1 percent of renter households being cost‐burdened and 26.1 percent of renter households being severely cost‐burdened in El Cerrito. Owners in El Cerrito experienced overpayment far less (29.3 percent) than countywide (42.7 percent) and Bay Area owners (39.7 percent), but a higher proportion of renters in El Cerrito were cost‐burdened than countywide and in the Bay Area. Table II-35 Overpayment by Tenure El Cerrito, Contra Costa County, and Bay Area (2010) Total Units Total Households Paying 30%-50% Paying 50%+ Total overpaying Percent overpaying El Cerrito 9,865 1,893 1,750 3,643 36.9% Contra Costa County 364,085 90,241 73,445 163,686 45.0% Bay Area 2,489,089 567,249 492,793 1,060,042 42.6% Total Owner Units Total Paying 30-50% Paying 50%+ Total overpaying Percent overpaying El Cerrito 6,145 1,095 705 1,800 29.3% Contra Costa County 251,904 62,803 44,870 107,673 42.7% Bay Area 1,465,362 332,991 248,612 581,603 39.7% Total Renter Units Total Paying 30-50% Paying 50%+ Total overpaying Percent overpaying El Cerrito 3,997 798 1,045 1,843 46.1% Contra Costa County 123,460 27,438 28,575 56,013 45.4% Bay Area 1,142,661 234,258 244,181 478,439 41.9% Source: ABAG Pre-Approved Data Package, 2006-2010 CHAS. Table II‐36 shows affordability scenarios for very low‐, low‐, and moderate‐income households in Contra Costa County (including the City of El Cerrito) by the number of persons in the household. The table shows maximum affordable rents and maximum affordable purchase prices for homes. The affordable sales prices were calculated using household income limits published by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), conventional financing terms, and assuming that households spend 30 percent of gross income on housing costs. Households earning the 2014 area median income for a family of four in El Cerrito ($93,500) could afford to spend up to $2,338 per month or $28,056 per year on rental housing without being considered “overpaying.” For renters this is a straightforward calculation but homeownership costs are less transparent. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 47 of 190 A household can typically qualify to purchase a home that is 2.5 to 3.0 times the annual income of that household, depending on the down payment, the level of other long‐term obligations (such as a car loan), and interest rates. In practice, the interaction of these factors allows some households to qualify for homes priced at more than three times their annual income, while other households may be limited to purchasing homes no more than two times their annual incomes. These factors—interest rates, insurance, and taxes—are held constant in the table below in order to determine maximum affordable rent and purchase price for households of each income category. Table II-36 Ability to Pay for Housing by Income Category Contra Costa County (2014) Extremely Low-Income Households at 30% of Median Family Income (MFI) Number of Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 Income Level $19,650 $22,450 $25,250 $28,050 $30,300 $32,550 Max. Gross Rent $491 $561 $631 $701 $758 $814 Max. Purchase Price $79,371 $90,681 $101,991 $113,301 $122,389 $131,478 Very Low-Income Households at 50% of MFI Number of Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 Income Level $32,750 $37,400 $42,100 $46,750 $50,500 $54,250 Max. Gross Rent $819 $935 $1,053 $1,169 $1,263 $1,356 Max. Purchase Price $132,286 $151,068 $170,053 $188,835 $203,982 $219,130 Low-Income Households at 70% of MFI For Sale and 60% of MFI for Rental Number of Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 Income Level for Sale (70% MFI) $45,800 $52,350 $58,900 $65,450 $70,700 $75,900 Income Level for Rental (60% MFI) $39,250 $44,900 $50,500 $56,100 $60,600 $65,100 Max. Gross Rent $981 $1,123 $1,263 $1,403 $1,515 $1,628 Max. Purchase Price $184,998 $211,455 $237,912 $264,369 $285,575 $306,580 Median-Income Households at 100% of MFI Number of Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 Income Level $65,450 $74,800 $84,150 $93,500 $101,000 $108,450 Max. Gross Rent $1,636 $1,870 $2,104 $2,338 $2,525 $2,711 Max. Purchase Price $264,369 $302,136 $339,903 $377,671 $407,965 $438,057 Moderate-Income Households at 120% of MFI Number of Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 Income Level $78,550 $89,750 $101,000 $112,200 $121,200 $130,150 Max. Gross Rent $2,291 $2,618 $2,946 $3,273 $3,535 $3,796 Max. Purchase Price $370,164 $422,944 $475,959 $528,739 $571,151 $613,327 1Assumes that 30 percent of income (35 percent of moderate income) is available for either: rent, including utilities; or mortgage payment, taxes, mortgage insurance, and homeowners insurance. 2Assumes 96.5 percent loan at 4.5 percent annual interest rate and 30-year term; assumes taxes, mortgage insurance, and homeowners’ insurance account for 21 percent of total payments. 32014 State Area Median Income for Contra Costa County $93,500 Source: California Department of Housing and Community Development, 2014,http://www.hcd.ca.gov/hpd/hrc/rep/state/inc2k13.pdf; Mintier Harnish, 2014 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 48 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 10. Future Housing Needs a. Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) This section evaluates projected future housing needs for El Cerrito based on the RHNA adopted by Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) on July 18, 2013. ABAG, the Council of Governments (COG) representing the region, in cooperation with local jurisdictions, is responsible for allocating the region’s projected new housing demand in each jurisdiction. The demand represents the number of additional units needed to accommodate the anticipated growth in the number of households, to replace expected demolitions and conversions of housing units to non‐residential uses, and to allow for a future vacancy rate conducive to a healthy functioning housing market. This process is known as the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) and the goals are referred to as the RHNA goals or the “regional share” goals for new housing construction. The allocation takes into account factors such as employment opportunities, market demand for housing, availability of suitable sites and public facilities, community patterns, types and tenure of housing needs and others. The allocation is divided into four income categories:  Very Low‐Income – 0 to 50 percent of the median income  Low‐Income – 51 to 80 percent of the median income  Moderate‐Income – 81 to 120 percent of the median income  Above Moderate‐Income – more than 120 percent of the median income In determining a jurisdiction’s share of new housing needs by income category, the allocation is adjusted to avoid an over‐concentration of lower‐income households in one jurisdiction. In addition to the allocation in the four income categories, recent legislation requires cities to consider the needs of extremely low‐income households earning 30 percent or less of the median income. The RHNA planning period (January 1, 2014 to October 31, 2022) is different from the Housing Element planning period of January 31, 2015 to January 31, 2023. The 2014‐2022 RHNA, prepared by ABAG, assigns El Cerrito a need for 398 housing units, including 100 very low‐income units, 63 low‐income units, 69 moderate‐income units, and 166 above moderate‐income units. State law also requires jurisdictions to estimate future housing needs for extremely low‐income households. The law allows local agencies and jurisdictions to assume that the need for extremely low‐income households is 50 percent of the very low‐ income household need. This estimate is shown in the table below. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Needs I March 2015 Page 49 of 190 Table II-37 Regional Housing Needs Allocation El Cerrito (2014-2022) Income Level Dwelling Units Percent of Total Extremely Low-Income 50 12.6% Very Low-Income 50 12.6% Low-Income 63 15.8% Moderate-Income 69 17.3% Above Moderate-Income 166 41.7% Total 398 100% Source: ABAG (2015-2023) Regional Housing Needs Determination. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 50 of 190 Housing NeedsI March 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 51 of 190 III. RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS A. ADEQUATE SITES ANALYSIS Each city is mandated by State Housing Element Law to demonstrate it has adequate sites available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with the required infrastructure for a variety of housing types and income levels. The City must demonstrate it has capacity or adequate sites to accommodate the projected need for housing through the 2014‐2022 RHNA planning period. 1. Units Under Construction and Approved Projects Since the RHNA planning period begins January 1, 2014, El Cerrito’s RHNA can be reduced by the number of new units under construction or approved as of January 1, 2014. City staff compiled an inventory of all residential projects that are (as of August 2014) under construction or approved and anticipated to be built during the current Housing Element planning period. The units shown as affordable to lower‐ and moderate‐income households are all deed‐restricted affordable units. As shown in Table III‐1 (and Table A‐3 in Appendix there are 251 units currently under construction or approved within El Cerrito, including 86 very low‐income units, 38 low‐ income units, 13 moderate‐income units, and 114 above moderate‐income units. The Map ID column in Tables III‐1 and A‐3 in Appendix A correspond with the labels in Figures A‐1 and A‐2 in Appendix A. Table III-1 Residential Projects Under Construction or Approved, El Cerrito (2014) Map ID Project Name Status Total Units Units by Income Level Methodology of Affordability Determination VL L M AM A Ohlone Gardens, 6495 Portola Drive Under Construction 57 56 0 1 Deed-restricted B 6747 Hagen Blvd Under Construction 2 2 C Eden Senior Housing10848- 10860 San Pablo Ave. Approved 63 30 32 1 Deed-restricted D Creekside at El Cerrito Plaza Approved 128 6 13 109 Deed-restricted E 1626 Julian Dr. Approved 1 1 Subtotal 251 86 38 13 114 Source: City of El Cerrito, July 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 52 of 190 Resources & ConstraintsI March 2015 After accounting for units under construction and approved projects, El Cerrito has a remaining need of 147 units, including 14 very low‐income units, 25 low‐income units, 56 moderate‐income units, and 52 above moderate‐income units. The remaining need is shown in Table III‐2. Table III-2 Remaining Need Based on Units Approved/Built/Under Construction El Cerrito (2014) Income Category A B A-B 2014-2022 RHNA Units Under Construction or Approved Remaining Need Very Low (0-50% of AMI) 100 86 14 Low (51-80% of AMI) 63 38 25 Moderate (81-120% of AMI) 69 13 56 Above Moderate (over 120% of AMI) 166 114 52 TOTAL UNITS 398 251 147 Source: City of El Cerrito, July 2014. 2. Sites Summary – Future Development Potential There is vacant and underutilized land located throughout the city ranging from very low‐ to high‐density zoning. Table A‐4 in Appendix A, summarizes the development potential of the vacant lots based on zoning classification, general plan land use designation, and comments specific to the site. Figure III‐1 shows the locations of all units under construction, approved projects, and potential sites. Figures A‐1 and A‐2 in Appendix A include map IDs that correspond with the “map ID” column in Table III‐1 and Table A‐4. To show the development capacity to meet the remaining RHNA of 147 units, the City conducted a site‐by‐site analysis of sites suitable for residential development. All of the sites in the inventory are vacant or underutilized sites zoned for residential use and meet the classification in State law (Government Code Section 65583.2(a)) as “land suitable for residential development.” Together, the identified opportunity sites can yield more than 900 new housing units, exceeding the City’s RHNA. 3. Assumptions A majority of the sites are located within the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. Many of these sites are owned by Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) and have additional hurdles to development beyond that of normal land development. The City is poised to work closely with BART and facilitate these future developments. Before the Specific Plan was adopted, the majority of the sites within the Plan Area were designated Commercial/Mixed Use and zoned Community Commercial or Transit‐Oriented Mixed Use (TOM), which allowed up to 35 units per acre. When the previous Housing Element was adopted, additional density (up to 45 units per acre) was allowed through the ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 53 of 190 City’s Incentives Program or through the Affordable Housing Density Bonus. The previous Housing Element assumed 40 units per acre on these sites halfway between the maximum permitted density of 35 and the maximum permitted density with zoning incentives of 45). The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan created two Transect Zones: TOHIMU and TOMIMU. The Plan contains a Form‐Based Code (FBC) that includes land use regulations permitted uses), building height standards, and open space and parking requirements. However, there are no maximum permitted density standards within the FBC of the Specific Plan. Since the FBC significantly increased the allowed building heights, decreased parking and eliminated maximum densities, the City anticipates that future development densities under the Specific Plan will exceed the maximum permitted densities under the former General Plan designations and zoning. As described in the next section, the Housing Element conservatively assumes the densities allowed under the former General Plan designations and zoning districts in order to estimate capacity on the sites within the Specific Plan. These sites are inventoried as lower‐income in accordance with the “default density standard” set forth in Government Code Section 65583.2(c). The default density standard is the density “deemed appropriate” in State law to accommodate housing for lower‐income households given the type of the jurisdiction. El Cerrito is considered a “suburban jurisdiction” with a default density standard of 20 units per acre. HCD is required to accept sites that allow for zoning at this density as appropriate for accommodating El Cerrito’s share of the regional housing need for lower‐income households. It has been the City’s experience that these densities are realistically achievable when all other required development standards are taken into account. Several approved multifamily projects have achieved densities at or exceeding 35 units per acre and 45 units per acre through the incentives program. The Creekside project was approved through the City’s incentives program with a density of 45 units per acre. The Ohlone Gardens Apartments, which is currently under construction, includes housing for the persons with special needs with services at a density of 61 units per acre. The Eden Senior Housing project, which received approvals in 2013, includes senior housing with services at a density of 65 units per acre. The San Pablo Avenue Plan increased the development potential on these sites. The densities and modified development standards that were granted under the incentives program are now permitted by‐right for sites within the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. As previously stated, the City anticipates that future development densities under the Specific Plan will meet or exceed the maximum permitted densities under the former General Plan designations and zoning. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 54 of 190 Resources & ConstraintsI March 2015 There are seven small sites (map numbers 80 ‐ 86) that are currently zoned Multi‐Family Residential (RM) and designated High Density Residential. This designation allows up to 35 units per acre, but all seven of the sites are less than 0.5 acres. There is also one site (map number 79) that is currently zoned RD and designated Medium Density Residential. This designation allows up to 20 units per acre, but the site is less than 0.5 acres. Due to the difficulty associated with multifamily development on small lots, these sites are inventoried as moderate‐income. All other sites were inventoried as above moderate‐income. 4. RHNA Summary Table III‐3 summarizes El Cerrito’s capacity to meet the RHNA for the 2014‐2022 projection period. After accounting for capacity from units under construction, approved projects, and potential sites, El Cerrito has a surplus of 810 lower‐income units, 25 above moderate‐ income units, and 796 total units. There is a deficit of 39 moderate‐income units, but this need is covered by the surplus in the lower‐income categories. Table III-3 Summary of Residential Development Potential El Cerrito (2014) Units by Income Level Total Units VL L M AM 2014-2022 RHNA 100 63 69 166 398 Units Under Construction 56 0 0 3 59 Approved Projects 30 38 13 111 192 Remaining Need 14 25 56 52 147 Potential Sites 849 17 77 943 RHNA Surplus/(Deficit) 810 (39)1 25 796 1Covered by surplus capacity from lower-income categories Source: City of El Cerrito, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- " T " T Hillside Nature Area Hillside Nature Area A l a m e d a A l a m e d a C o u n t y C o u n t y C o n t r a C o s t a C o n t r a C o s t a C o u n t y C o u n t y 80 80 580 U V 123 U V 123 Arlin gt o n Richmond Carlson Potrero B a r r e tt A sh bury Manila Navellier Fairmount San Mateo Moeser C o l u s a Tehama Cutting Central Curtis Dimm Moeser Carlson Ar l i n gto n Potrero Barrett Ashbury Wildcat Canyon Regional Park Wildcat Canyon Regional Park Hillside Nature Area Hillside Nature Area Albany Hill Park Albany Hill Park Casa Cerrito Park Casa Cerrito Park Canyon Trail Park Canyon Trail Park Castro Park Castro Park Cerrito Vista Park Cerrito Vista Park Arlington Arlington Park Park Tiller Park Tiller Park Huber Park Huber Park Booker T Booker T Anderson Jr Park Anderson Jr Park Tassajara Park Tassajara Park Mira Vista Park Mira Vista Park Poinsett Park Poinsett Park Fairmont Fairmont Park Park Harding Harding Park Park Memorial Park Memorial Park Abraham Abraham Braxton Braxton Park Park Eastshore State Park Eastshore State Park Figure III-1 Citywide Sites 0 0.2 0.4 0.1 Miles ¯ Source: City of El Cerrito (2014); Contra Costa County (2014) Map Date: 8/14/2014 City Limits San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Boundary Approved Project Potential Site Under Construction Under Review " T BART Station BART ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 56 of 190 Resources & ConstraintsI March 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 57 of 190 B. GOVERNMENTAL RESOURCES AND CONSTRAINTS Governmental resources include programs that provide funds for housing‐related activities, as well as, incentives provided by the local jurisdiction for the provision of housing. Governmental constraints are policies, standards, requirements, and actions imposed by the government that may have a negative impact on the development and provision of housing for a variety of income levels. These constraints may include land use controls, building codes and their enforcement, environmental review fees and processes, site improvements, fees and exactions required of developers, and local processing and permit procedures. State and Federal agencies play a role in the imposition of governmental constraints; however, these agencies are beyond the influence of local government and are, therefore, not addressed in this analysis. 1. Land Use Controls Land use controls include City‐initiated General Plan policies, zoning regulations and standards, permit processing requirements, and development fees. a. General Plan The General Plan constitutes the highest‐level policy document for the City of El Cerrito. The Land Use Element of the General Plan identifies the location, distribution, and density/intensity of the land use within the city. Residential densities are measured in dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The 1999 El Cerrito General Plan, as amended in November 2014, identifies seven land use designations that permit residential uses, shown in Table III‐ 4. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 58 of 190 Resources & ConstraintsI March 2015 Table III-4 General Plan Residential Land Use Designations El Cerrito (2014) Designation Description Permitted Density Very Low Density Residential The Very Low Density category of residential land uses is intended for single family, residential units on large lots. Typically the Very Low Density category is to protect sensitive hillside areas from extensive development and to protect against hazards related to earthquakes, unstable terrain, and wild fires. In addition, Very Low Density land uses are also intended to protect sensitive environmental areas and features, and provide sites for larger, distinctive residences. Maximum of 6 dwelling units per net acre. Low Density Residential The Low Density category of residential land uses is intended to promote and protect single family neighborhoods. 7 to 9 dwelling units per net acre. Medium Density Residential The Medium Density category of residential land use accommodates more intensive forms of residential development while still remaining compatible with surrounding land uses. This category is intended to provide greater housing choice in the city for different family sizes and incomes. Medium density residential uses are intended to be located closer to community and retail services, such as neighborhood shopping centers, parks, and open spaces areas, and near minor and major collector streets where greater access can be provided. This land use category includes a number of housing development types including duplexes, townhouses, apartments, and small-lot, single family residential designs. 10 to 20 dwelling units per net acre. High Density Residential The High Density residential land use category is intended to provide opportunities for multifamily residential development in a well-designed environment. The range is intended to be located in areas where higher traffic volumes and buildings can be accommodated. These developments should be located outside of single family residential communities, where services and transportation systems are adequate to serve the increased densities. 21 to 35 dwelling units per net acre. Commercial/ Mixed Use The Mixed-Use Commercial designation is intended primarily for all types of commercial uses and secondarily for residential uses or a combination of the two. The designation is intended to encourage ground floor, pedestrian-friendly, retail sales and service uses with upper floors of office and residential uses. The Mixed-Use Commercial category applies to commercial activity ranging from neighborhood convenience stores to community shopping centers and regionally- oriented specialty stores. In addition to retail stores, the Mixed-Use Commercial designation is also intended to allow for residential and office uses, including administrative, professional, medical, and dental offices, and “high-tech” research and development uses and laboratories. The Mixed-Use Commercial designation also allows for limited, small-scale specialty manufacturing uses, such as arts and crafts, woodworking, and assembly processes, when located on sites compatible with surrounding neighborhoods. Maximum of 35 units per net acre. Transit-Oriented Higher-Intensity Mixed Use The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan articulates a vision for the future of San Pablo Avenue, identifies improvements, and adopts context-sensitive regulations that can be applied along its length and to adjacent areas. The Plan’s Form- Based Code regulates land use and development standards based on Transect Zone, Transit-Oriented Higher-Intensity Mixed Use (TOHIMU) and Transit- Oriented Mid-Intensity Mixed Use (TOMIMU), designed to encourage vertical and horizontal mixed use. The TOHIMU zone emphasizes commercial uses on the ground floor with upper residential uses to activate the pedestrian right-of-way and cluster services near transit nodes. Maximum height of 65 feet. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 59 of 190 Table III-4 General Plan Residential Land Use Designations El Cerrito (2014) Designation Description Permitted Density Transit-Oriented Mid-Intensity Mixed Use The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan articulates a vision for the future of San Pablo Avenue, identifies improvements, and adopts context-sensitive regulations that can be applied along its length and to adjacent areas. The Plan’s Form- Based Code regulates land use and development standards based on Transect Zone, Transit-Oriented Higher-Intensity Mixed Use (TOHIMU) and Transit- Oriented Mid-Intensity Mixed Use (TOMIMU), designed to encourage vertical and horizontal mixed use. The TOMIMU zone allows for “flex” spaces on the bottom floors to accommodate ground floor commercial where needed, but emphasizing mid-intensity residential uses to increase housing along the transportation corridor to encourage walking, biking and public transit use. Maximum height of 55 feet. Source: City of El Cerrito General Plan, September 2014. b. San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan and Form-Based Code The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, effective date of November 6, 2014, articulates a vision for the future of San Pablo Avenue, identifies improvements, and adopts context sensitive regulations that can be applied within the Specific Plan Area. The Plan’s key principles are to deepen a sense of place and community identity; attract private investment; strengthen partnerships; enhance the public realm; promote the everyday use of transit, walking, and biking; and foster environmental sustainability. The Plan establishes a Form‐Based Code that regulates land use and development standards based on Transit‐Oriented Higher‐ Intensity Mixed Use (TOHIMU) and Transit‐Oriented Mid‐Intensity Mixed Use (TOMIMU) Transect Zones. Goals and strategies include:  Maximize Transit‐Oriented Development (TOD) potential along the corridor;  Allow ground floor residential development to provide flexibility and expand the Plan Area’s residential base;  Promote residential infill development through increased land use intensity close to existing transit infrastructure; and  Increase the supply, diversity, and affordability of housing in proximity to existing or planned transportation investments. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 60 of 190 Resources & ConstraintsI March 2015 Table III-5 Transect Zone Land Use Regulations El Cerrito (2014) TOHIMU TOMIMU Theater Overlay Block Residential Use Types Single Family Dwelling L-1 L-1 Second Unit L-1 L-1 Duplex L-1 L-1 Multiple Family Residential P P L-4 Group Housing A A Residential Care Facilities (Institutional Residential) Residential Care Facilities, General C C C Residential Care Facilities, Limited C C C Residential Care Facilities, Senior C C C — Uses permitted as-of-right that require no discretionary review if in compliance with all standards. — Uses permitted as-of-right subject to limitations restricting location, size or other characteristics to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. — Uses subject to an Administrative Use Permit following discretionary review by the Zoning Administrator. — Uses subject to a Conditional Use Permit following discretionary review and public hearing by the Planning Commission. — Uses that are not permitted. Source: San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, Form-Based Code, 2014. Table III‐6 provides a summary of development standards in the TOHIMU and TOMIMU zones. The TOHIMU and the TOMIMU zones are further analyzed under Residential Development Standards. Table III-6 Development Standards El Cerrito (2014) TOHIMU TOMIMU Building height Maximum Height 65’ maximum. Up to 85’ with affordable housing density bonus. 55’ maximum. Up to 65’ with affordable housing density bonus. Minimum Height 3 Stories Residential (Except Constrained Lots) Parking Requirement Residential Buildings: Automobile Up to 1 auto space/unit Up to 1.5 auto spaces/unit Residential Buildings: Bicycle Minimum 1 short-term bicycle space/10 units Minimum 1 long-term bicycle spaces/unit Parking Areas Auto parking shall be located behind habitable space, underground, or on the interior of the building. Long-term bicycle parking shall be located in a secure, weather-protected place on-site. Short-term bicycle parking shall be located inside or outside the building. It will need to be visible to pedestrians and bicyclists and serve the main entrance of a building Types of Auto Parking Shared, Stacked, Unbundled Source: San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, Form-Based Code, 2014 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 61 of 190 It is important to note that most sites included in Table A‐4(Available Land Inventory) of the Housing Element’s sites inventory zoned CC or TOM were rezoned as either TOHIMU or TOMIMU when the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan was adopted in November, 2014. These available sites are subject to the development standards described in Table III‐6 above. c. Zoning Code The Zoning Code is the primary tool for implementing the General Plan. It is designed to protect and promote public health, safety, and welfare, as well as to promote quality design and quality of life. The City of El Cerrito’s residential zoning designations control both the use and development standards of each residential parcel. The housing types allowed within the City of El Cerrito zoning districts are described below in Table III‐7. Residential zoning includes six main districts: RS, RD, RM, TOM, CC, and CN as well as the TOHIMU and TOMIMU Transect Zones of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (See section b. San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan). The RS District is split into four separate subsets guiding the minimum size of each lot and other development standards such as minimum lot depth and width and setbacks. Single family units are permitted by right in all single family residential districts. New single family uses are not allowed in the RM, TOM, CC, and CN districts. Multiple family dwellings are permitted by right in the RM, TOM, CC, CN zones, and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Transect Zones. Multiple family dwellings are not permitted on the ground floor of the Theater Overlay Block of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 62 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Table III-7 Housing Types Permitted by Zone El Cerrito (2014) RS-5 RS-7.5 RS-10 RS-20 RD RM CN CC TOM TOMIMU TOHIMU Single Family Detached P P P P P P2 P2 P2 P2 P2 Multifamily townhouse, apartments) P P P<25 units C>25 units P P P Second Unit P P P P P P1 P1 P1 P1 P2 P2 Duplex P P P P P2 P2 Community Social Service Facilities homeless shelters) C P A A A Emergency Shelters P3 P3 Manufactured Housing4 P P P P P P Single Room Occupancy C C P P C C Group Housing C C P P A A Live/Work Loft A A P P P Senior Citizen Housing A A A A A P P P P Residential Care – General (for 7 or more) C C C C C C C C C C C Residential Care – Limited (for 6 or fewer) P P P P P P C C C C C Residential Care – Senior C C C C C A C C C C C P = Permitted, C = Conditional Use Permit, A = Administrative Use Permit 1 Permitted with existing single family use. 2 Permitted if an existing use; new uses are prohibited. 3Within the Specific Plan Area, emergency shelters are a separate land use type from Commercial Social Service Facilities. Emergency shelters are permitted in the TOHIMU and TOMIMU zones, with the exception of the Theater Overlay Block, subject to operating standards described in the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. 4The City of El Cerrito Municipal Code defines “single family dwelling” to include manufactured homes. Source: City of El Cerrito Municipal Code, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 63 of 190 Residential Development Standards The City regulates the type, location, density, and scale of development through the General Plan, San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance. Provisions in the Zoning Ordinance specify minimum lot areas, setbacks, coverage, FAR, height limits, and parking. El Cerrito regulations are comparable to those of similar cities. In addition to the base zoning districts described in the following tables, applicants can request rezoning to a customized Planned Development (PD) District that allows deviation from the normal regulations where a development project is consistent with the General Plan and meets other community objectives. El Cerrito’s zoning regulations are not restrictive and do not create a financial or physical constraint to residential development due to a wide range of densities permitted by the City and flexible parking requirements. Additionally, the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan contains a Form‐Based Code, which establishes flexible development regulations for structures within its Plan Area, including building height, parking, setbacks, and access (See Table III‐6). ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 64 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Table III-8 Residential Development Standards El Cerrito (2014) RS-5 RS-7.5 RS-10 RS-20 RD RM Minimum Lot Area (sq. ft.) Interior Lots 5,000 7,500 10,000 20,000 5,000 5,000 Corner Lots 6,000 7,500 10,000 20,000 6,000 6,000 Minimum Lot Width at Building Setback Line (ft.) Interior Lots 50 75 80 100 50 50 Corner Lots 60 75 80 100 60 60 Maximum Lot Coverage Where Lot Slope is 30% or Less 50 50 50 50 50 60, up to 80 with underground parking Where Lot Slope >30% 40 40 40 40 40 40 Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage on Lots with Slopes >30% 40 40 40 40 40 40 Minimum Yards (ft.) Front - Minimum 10 20 20 30 10 10 Front - For the Entire Width of Required Covered Parking 20 25 25 35 20 20 Side 5 6 6 12 5 5; 10 for portions of building greater than 25 feet in height Minimum Yards (ft.) Corner Side – Minimum 8.5 8.5 8.5 12 8.5 8.5 Corner Side – For the Entire Width of Required Covered Parking 20 20 20 20 20 20 Rear 15 15 20 25 15 15, 20 in some cases Maximum Height (ft.) Base Height 25-35; Maximum Height with CUP 30-40 Base Height 30; Maximum Height with CUP-35 35 Required Off-Street Parking 2 spaces per dwelling unit for each unit of two or more bedrooms. 1 space per studio or 1-bedroom unit. 1 space for a second unit in addition to the spaces required for the primary dwelling unit. Source: City of El Cerrito Municipal Code, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 65 of 190 Multifamily Housing The purpose of the City’s mixed‐use zones is to promote and encourage multiple family developments at densities that are consistent with the General Plan land use designation and surrounding development. The intent is to provide for higher‐density classifications in and around the development nodes and adjacent to major transit centers, and lower‐density multifamily development in transition areas between single family development and commercial areas or higher‐density residential areas. Multiple family dwellings are permitted by right in the RM, TOM, CC, CN and San Pablo Avenue TOHIMU and TOMIMU transect zones. Multifamily structures that contain more than 25 units require a conditional use permit in the CC zone. However, as described earlier, the TOHIMU and TOMIMU transect zones of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan replaced most of the CC and TOM zoned sites in the city. Table III‐9 describes multifamily development standards in commercial areas and the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan TOHIMU and TOMIMU transect zones. Table III-9 Multifamily Residential Development Standards in Commercial Areas El Cerrito (2014) CN CC TOM San Pablo Avenue TOHIMU San Pablo Avenue TOMIMU Minimum Lot Size (sq. ft.) 5,000 2,000 for commercial 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Minimum Residential Density 35 units per acre within 300 feet of the BART stations N/A N/A Maximum Residential Density – lot area per unit (sq. ft.) (may be in addition to non-residential FAR) Base Density 20 units per acre 35 units per acre 35 units per acre N/A N/A Density for Mixed Use Development 35 units per acre N/A N/A Density with Incentives 25 units per acre 45 units per acre 45 units per acre; up to 70 du/ac for housing for elderly and disabled persons if services are provided. N/A (See State Affordable Housing Bonuses) N/A (See State Affordable Housing Bonuses) Density with State Affordable Housing Bonuses 27 units per acre 48 units per acre 48 units per acre; up to 70 du/ac for housing for elderly and disabled persons if services are provided. Affordable Housing Bonuses will be granted through height increases Affordable Housing Bonuses will be granted through height increases Maximum Building Height (ft.) 35 35, up to 50 with CUP 50, up to 65 with CUP in Del Norte & 65, up to 85 with State Affordable Housing Bonuses 55, up to 65 with State Affordable Housing Bonuses ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 66 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Table III-9 Multifamily Residential Development Standards in Commercial Areas El Cerrito (2014) CN CC TOM San Pablo Avenue TOHIMU San Pablo Avenue TOMIMU Plaza areas 35, up to 45 with CUP in Midtown node Minimum Building Height 2 stories, exceptions may be granted with a CUP 3 stories Residential (except constrained lots) 2 stories commercial (exceptions granted with CUP) 3 stories Residential (except constrained lots) 2 stories commercial (exceptions granted with CUP) Building Setback on Street Frontages 0 - 10 feet 0 - 10 feet, more with a CUP 0 - 10 feet 0 – 15, front setback is regulated by Street Type. See Section 2.04.01 Regulation by Street Type of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan 0 – 15, front setback is regulated by Street Type. See Section 2.04.01 Regulation by Street Type of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Minimum Yard Requirements (ft.) – None unless adjacent to a residential district Building Transition Zone Adjacent to Residential Districts For any portion of a structure adjacent to a residential district boundary), the minimum required setbacks of the residential district shall apply. To protect privacy and minimize sunlight blockage, structures shall not intercept a 45- degree daylight plane inclined inward starting from a height of 35 feet above existing grade at the setback line. Exceptions to the above requirements are permitted for a one-story parking or garage structure that does not exceed 10 feet in height in a side or rear yard that does not front on a street. To minimize impacts of shadows on adjacent residential districts, buildings shall not cast shadows onto adjacent existing residential uses on December 21st greater than 14’ deep at 1:30 pm on adjacent parcels to the east. To protect privacy and minimize additional sunlight blockage, structures shall not intercept a 45-degree daylight plane inclined inward starting from a height of 35 feet above existing grade at the setback line. To minimize impacts of shadows on adjacent residential districts, buildings shall not cast shadows onto adjacent existing residential uses on December 21st greater than 14’ deep at 1:30 pm on adjacent parcels to the east. To protect privacy and minimize additional sunlight blockage, structures shall not intercept a 45-degree daylight plane inclined inward starting from a height of 35 feet above existing grade at the setback line. Required Off Street Parking RM & CC Zones: 2 spaces per dwelling unit for each unit of two or more bedrooms. TOM Zones: 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit for each unit of two or more bedrooms. At least one space per unit must be located in a garage or carport. In the TOM district, required parking reduced by 25% within ¼ mile of a BART station. Residential up to 1 auto space/unit Commercial Buildings: <3,000 square feet no parking required > 3,000 square feet up to 1 auto space/1,000 square feet Residential: up to 1.5 auto space/unit Commercial Buildings: < 3,000 sf - no parking required > 3,000 sf – up to 1 auto space/500 sf Source: City of El Cerrito Municipal Code, 2014 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 67 of 190 Table III‐10 describes the minimum lot area for a given number of units in the RM District. When a lot is irregular, the minimum lot area shall be as determined by the Zoning Administrator but at least 10 percent greater than the following table. Table III-10 Maximum Density in RM District El Cerrito (2014) Number of Units Minimum Lot Size 2 units: 5,000 square feet 3 units: 6,500 square feet 4 units: 7,700 square feet 5 units: 8,700 square feet 6 units: 9,650 square feet 7 units: 10,500 square feet 8 units: 11,350 square feet 9 units: 12,150 square feet 10 units: 13,000 square feet 11 units 13,900 square feet 12 units 15,000 square feet 12+ units 1,250 square feet x the number of units. Source: City of El Cerrito Municipal Code, 2014. Parking Table III‐11 summarizes residential parking requirements in El Cerrito. Parking requirements do not constrain the development of housing directly. However, parking requirements may reduce the amount of available lot area for residential development. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 68 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Table III-11 Required Residential Parking El Cerrito (2014) Use Classification Required Off-Street Parking Spaces Additional Regulations Single Family Dwelling 2 spaces per dwelling unit for each unit of two or more bedrooms. 1 space per studio or 1-bedroom unit. 19.06.030(N), Limitations on Parking and Garage Frontage. All required spaces must be located in a garage or carport. Second Unit 1 space for the Second Unit in addition to the spaces required for the primary dwelling unit. Section 19.20.190(D), Second Units. Two-Family Dwelling; Multiple Family Residential 1 space per unit for each studio or 1- bedroom unit. RD, RM & CC Zones: 2 spaces per dwelling unit for each unit of two or more bedrooms. TOM Zones: 1.5 spaces per dwelling unit for each unit of two or more bedrooms. 19.06.030(N), Limitations on Parking and Garage Frontage At least one space per unit must be located in a garage or carport. Transit-Oriented Higher-Intensity Mixed Use (TOHIMU) Up to 1 auto space/unit All projects include basic Transportation Demand Management (TDM). Projects proposing 0-0.5 auto spaces/residential unit may be required to perform a parking study and/or provide additional TDM measures. Projects requesting more parking need to provide justification for the increased amount. Transit-Oriented Mid-Intensity Mixed Use (TOMIMU) Up to 1.5 auto spaces/unit All projects include basic TDM. Projects proposing 0-1 auto spaces/residential unit may be required to perform a parking study and/or provide additional TDM measures. . Projects requesting more parking need to provide justification for the increased amount. Group Housing 0.5 per unit 19.06.030(N), Limitations on Parking and Garage Frontage. Senior Citizen Housing 0.5 per unit 19.06.030(N), Limitations on Parking and Garage Frontage. Transitional Housing1 0.5 per unit 19.06.030(N), Limitations on Parking and Garage Frontage. Source: City of El Cerrito Municipal Code, 2014. 1 The Zoning Ordinance Text Amendments of December 16, 2014 (see page 75) amend Municipal Code Section 19.06 as follows: “Transitional and Supportive Housing are allowed in all zoning districts under the same standards as other types of permitted residential uses.” ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 69 of 190 d. Planned Development District The specific purpose of the ‐PD Planned Development district is to provide for detailed review of development that warrants special review and deviations from the existing development standards. This district is also intended to provide opportunities for creative development approaches and standards that will achieve superior community design, environmental preservation, and public benefit, in comparison to subdivision and development under district regulations. All site and building requirements, including yard, building height, lot coverage, and landscaping are determined on a case‐by‐case basis based on the specific characteristics of the site and the need to provide additional zoning control by establishing site specific conditions of approval and standards for a specific PD District. 2. Density Bonus Ordinance In order to encourage the construction of affordable housing developments for very low‐ and low‐income households and senior households, and in accordance with Section 65915 et seq. of the California Government Code, the City of El Cerrito has two different Density Bonus Ordinances. The first is the Affordable Housing Bonus Program (Chapter 19.22 of the Zoning Ordinance) that is governed by the requirements of Government Code Section 65915. The second is the Incentives Program (Chapter 19.23. of the Zoning Ordinance), which is still in place but has limited applicability now that the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan is in place. In addition to the Affordable Housing Bonus Program, the San Pablo Specific Plan includes a “Tier IV” review process to consider projects that provide community benefit, such as affordable housing, but do not meet the form‐based code standards. The Tier IV process is described under below. a. Affordable Housing Bonus The Affordable Housing Bonus Program is in Chapter 19.22 of the El Cerrito Municipal Code. The City last updated its affordable housing bonus ordinance in 2008, which implements the policies of the General Plan Housing Element for encouraging and expanding housing opportunities for households with extremely low‐, very low‐, and low‐ incomes, seniors, disabled, other persons with special housing needs, and development that includes a childcare facility through density bonuses and additional incentives, consistent with Government Code Section 65915. The program also provides additional incentives for affordable housing containing three or more bedrooms to meet the needs of large families. It also requires resale and rental controls on affordable housing and ensures that lower‐ income rental units remain affordable for at least 30 years or such other term approved by the City, consistent with State law. The amount of the density bonus is set on a sliding scale, based upon the percentage of affordable units at each income. The number of units to which the applicant is entitled can increase to a maximum of 35 percent of the maximum allowable residential density for the site for very low‐income dwellings, low‐income dwellings, condominium and planned unit developments, and housing accompanied by land donation. Depending upon the ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 70 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 percentage of affordable units and the level of affordability, the program also provides the applicant with the opportunity to receive incentives such as increased building height, reduced building setbacks, reduced parking requirements or other incentives that would improve the economic feasibility of the affordable development. b. Incentives Program (Chapter 19.32 of the ECMC) In 1977 the City adopted an Incentives Program that provided flexibility in the application of development standards within the RM, CC, or TOM districts in exchange for community and environmental benefits or creative designs that enhanced quality of life in the City. The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan was adopted in September 2014 and rezoned the majority of parcels zoned RM, CC, and TOM to TOHIMU and TOMIMU. Many of the incentives provided through the program are now granted as a matter of right through the Form‐Based Code in an effort to encourage mixed‐use development along the corridor. With the adoption of the Specific Plan, the Incentives Program now has limited applicability. c. San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Projects within the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Area will be subject to the Administration regulations of the Specific Plan. The Plan Form‐Based Code is designed to facilitate an increased intensity of residential development in proximity to transit. In the event that the development standards for the Transect Zones create an impediment to achieving multifamily residential development, the developer may submit an application for Site Plan and Design Review – Tier IV. The Tier IV Site Plan and Design Review process is meant to incentivize overarching community benefits, including affordable housing, as part of developments that would not otherwise be permitted under Specific Plan regulations but nevertheless comply with the intent of the Specific Plan. Approval findings for Tier IV Site Plan and Design Review include the following:  That the project furthers the goals of the Specific Plan by encouraging practical and market‐friendly development, ensuring return on investment, strengthening a sense of place, enhancing and humanizing the public realm, and catalyzing mode shift;  That the project provides a public benefit which is consistent with the goals of the Specific Plan and furthers an important goal(s) stated in adopted city policy documents as identified by the Community Development Director. These documents include, but are not limited to: o El Cerrito Climate Action Plan o El Cerrito Strategic Plan o El Cerrito General Plan o El Cerrito Economic Development Action Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 71 of 190 o El Cerrito Urban Greening Plan o El Cerrito Active Transportation Plan  That the development will not have an undue adverse effect upon the Transect Zone in which it is located, and will be compatible with the design features and land uses permitted in the Transect Zone in which the project is located;  That the proposed development complies with the intent of the Specific Plan, and;  That the project implements applicable goals and policies of the General Plan. 3. Residential Care Facilities A “residential care facility” is a resident‐occupied dwelling, licensed by the State/County that provides housing and care for children and/or adults on a full‐time, live‐in basis. According to the Federal Department of Health and Social Services, there are a total of 14 licensed care facilities in El Cerrito (See Table II‐18. The City of El Cerrito Municipal Code defines three types of residential care facilities as follows:  Residential Care – General. A residential care facility providing 24‐hour nonmedical care for more than six persons in a single unit in need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living. This classification includes only those facilities licensed for residential care by the State of California. Residential Care – General facilities require a conditional use permit in all residential and commercial zones.  Residential Care – Limited. A residential care facility providing 24‐hour non‐ medical care for six or fewer persons in a single unit, in need of personal services, supervision, protection, or assistance essential for sustaining the activities of daily living. This classification includes only those facilities licensed for residential care by the State of California. This classification includes residential care facilities restricted to persons 60 years of age or older if there are six or fewer residents. Six or fewer persons does not include the licensee or members of the licenseeʹs family or persons employed as facility staff. Residential Care – Limited facilities are permitted by right in all residential zones (consistent with State law), but require a conditional use permit in all commercial zones.  Residential Care – Senior. A housing arrangement chosen voluntarily by the resident, the residentʹs guardian, conservator, or other responsible person; where residents are 60 years of age or older and where varying levels of care and supervision are provided as agreed to at time of admission or as determined necessary at subsequent times of reappraisal. Any younger residents must have needs compatible with other residents, as provided in Health & Safety Code Section 1569.316 or a successor statute. This classification includes continuing care ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 72 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 retirement communities and lifecare communities licensed for residential care by the State of California. Residential Care – Senior facilities require a conditional use permit in all residential and commercial zones, except in RM zones, where an administrative use permit is required. 4. Emergency Shelters State law (Government Code 65583(a)(4)) requires local jurisdictions to identify a zone or zones where emergency shelters are allowed as a permitted use without a conditional use or other discretionary permit. The City Zoning Ordinance allows emergency shelters as a permitted use under “Community Social Service Facilities” within the Community Commercial (CC) zone. The definition of Community Social Service Facilities as listed in the City’s Zoning Ordinance:  Community Social Service Facilities. Any noncommercial facility, such as homeless shelters, emergency shelters and facilities providing social services such as job referral, housing placement and which may also provide meals, showers, and/or laundry facilities, typically for less than 30 days. Specialized programs and services related to the needs of the residents may also be provided. This classification excludes transitional housing facilities that provide living accommodations for a longer term. As updated by the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, emergency shelters with fewer than 50 beds are also permitted in the TOHIMU and TOMIMU zones, with the exception of the Theater Overlay Block, subject to specified operational standards. The definition of Emergency Shelter as listed in the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan is:  Emergency Shelters. Housing with minimal supportive services for homeless persons that is limited to occupancy of six months or less by a homeless person or family. No individual or household may be denied emergency shelter because of an inability to pay. Medical assistance, counseling, and meals may be provided. Emergency shelters are permitted subject to the following operational standards: emergency shelters shall have a maximum of 50 beds, shall provide on‐site staffing and shall comply with licensing requirements and all applicable health and safety codes. Emergency shelters shall provide a written management plan to the Zoning Administrator. A minimum separation of 300 feet is required between Emergency Shelters. Nearly all Community Commercial parcels are being rezoned with the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan to either TOHIMU or TOMIMU. There are five vacant parcels currently (June 2014) zoned for CC that will be rezoned to TOMIMU ranging from 0.12 acre to 0.23 acres which could accommodate one or more year‐round emergency shelters. All four lots have utilities and are in existing service areas. In addition, the zoning district contains other underutilized parcels such as surface parking lots and underdeveloped properties that total ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 73 of 190 a little more than an acre. Existing and future building vacancies could also accommodate one or more year‐round emergency shelters. Table III-12 Vacant Parcels in the CC Zone El Cerrito (2014) APN Zoning* General Plan Designation* San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Designation Acreage 503233033 CC Commercial/Mixed Use TOMIMU .154 503233015 CC Commercial/Mixed Use TOMIMU .233 503233032 CC Commercial/Mixed Use TOMIMU .191 503233007 CC Commercial/Mixed Use TOMIMU .115 503236027 CC Commercial/Mixed Use TOMIMU .172 Total .865 *Prior to adoption of San Pablo Specific Plan Source: City of El Cerrito, 2014. 5. Transitional Housing and Supportive Housing With the enactment of SB 2 in 2008, State law requires cities and counties to treat transitional and supportive housing as a residential use subject only to those restrictions that apply to other residential uses of the same type in the same zone. As updated in 2014 by the San Pablo Specific Plan, transitional housing and supportive housing are allowed in the TOHIMU and TOMIMU zones under the same standards as other types of permitted residential uses. The definitions of transitional housing and supportive housing contained within the San Pablo Specific Plan Land Use Definitions are:  Transitional Housing. Buildings configured as rental housing developments, but operated under program requirements that require the termination of assistance and recirculation of the assisted unit to another eligible program recipient at a predetermined future point in time that shall be no less than six months from the beginning of assistance.  Supportive Housing. Housing with no limit on length of stay that is occupied by the target population, and that is linked to an onsite or offsite service that assists the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and , where possible, work in the community. The City has amended other sections of the Zoning Ordinance to also comply with State law. These amendments, which will ensure that transitional and supportive housing are treated the same as other residential uses citywide, received their first approval and reading by City Council of the City of El Cerrito on December 16, 2014. The final reading and adoption of the Zoning Ordinance amendments occurred on January 6, 2015. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 74 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 6. Single Room Occupancy Units Single Room Occupancy (SRO) units, as defined in the California Code of Regulations, Title 4, Section 10325(g)(3), are efficiency units that may include shared or private bath and kitchen facilities and are typically between 200 and 500 square feet in size. SROs are rented on a and can provide an entry point into the housing market for extremely low‐income individuals, formerly homeless, and disabled persons. The City Zoning Ordinance allows SROs as a permitted use under “Group Housing” within the Community Commercial (CC) zone, requires a Conditional Use Permit in the CN, and RM zones, and requires an Administrative Use Permit in the TOHIMU and TOMIMU zones. The definition of Group Housing as listed in the City’s Zoning Ordinance and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan is below:  Group Housing. Shared living quarters without separate kitchen or bathroom facilities for each room or unit. This classification includes rooming and boardinghouses, dormitories, and private residential clubs, offering shared living quarters, but excludes hotels, residential care facilities and transitional housing facilities. 7. Second Unit Ordinance A “second unit” is an additional residential unit on the same lot as a primary single family dwelling that provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons. Second units are usually considered to be housing that is affordable to lower‐income households because there are no land costs associated with their development and they frequently rent for less than comparably‐sized apartments. They may also occupy unused space in large homes, and by supplementing the income of the homeowner, allow the elderly to remain in their homes or make it possible for lower‐income families to afford homes. The State of California has determined that second units are a valuable form of housing in the state for extended family members, students, the elderly, in‐home health care providers, the disabled, and others. State law provides that any regulations adopted by the City to regulate second units cannot be so arbitrary, excessive, or burdensome so as to unreasonably restrict the ability of homeowners to create second units. Second units may be established on any lot in any district where a primary single family dwelling has been previously established or is proposed to be established in the RS zone in conjunction with construction of a second unit. Only one second unit is permitted per primary single family dwelling on the same lot. Second dwelling units must comply with City design and development standards to ensure that they are compatible with existing neighborhoods. The City’s Second Unit regulations (Municipal Code Section 19.20.190) sets forth the criteria for second units including the definition of a second unit, the maximum ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 75 of 190 allowable square footage, and the development standards for these units. These criteria do not pose a constraint to the development of second units. Criteria for second units include:  Type of Unit. A second unit may be attached, detached, or located within the living area of the primary dwelling unit on the lot, subject to the standards of this Section.  Minimum and Maximum Floor Area. The maximum floor area of a second unit shall not exceed 750 square feet or 40 percent of the floor area of the primary dwelling, whichever is less, except that an attached second unit of 400 square feet in floor area is permitted regardless of the size of the primary dwelling. Up to 1,200 square feet, or 75 percent of the floor area of the primary dwelling, whichever is less, may be permitted with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. No second unit may be smaller than 150 square feet.  Development Standards. Second units shall conform to setback, height, lot coverage, and other zoning requirements applicable to the primary dwelling in the zoning district where the second unit is proposed, subject to the following additional standards: o A detached second unit may exceed 15 foot in height with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. o An attached or detached second unit shall be located on the interior side of a corner lot or behind the existing dwelling. o An attached second unit that results in two‐story construction shall be located in the rear half of the structure. o A second unit shall have a separate, private exterior entrance.  Architectural Compatibility. The architectural design, exterior materials and colors, roof pitch and style, type of windows, and trim details of the second unit shall be substantially the same as, and visually harmonious and compatible with, the primary dwelling, as determined by the Zoning Administrator. Color photographs of the street‐facing side(s) of the primary dwelling unit shall be submitted with the second unit building permit application.  Parking. One additional parking space shall be provided for each second unit. This space may be in tandem with required parking of the principal dwelling unit, may be located in front setback areas provided the ground slope in this area does not exceed 10 percent and may be uncovered. The principal dwelling unit must conform to the parking requirements of Chapter 19.24: Off‐Street Parking and Loading.  Exceptions. Exceptions to Development Standards and Architectural Compatibility above shall require an Administrative Use Permit and a finding that the second unit ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 76 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 is compatible with, and preserves, the single family character of the primary dwelling and the surrounding neighborhood. Exceptions to Minimum and Maximum Floor Area and Parking above shall require a Conditional Use Permit.  Deed Restriction. The second unit shall not be sold, transferred, or assigned separately from the primary dwelling. 8. Housing for Persons with Disabilities The U.S. Census Bureau defines persons with disabilities as those with a long‐lasting physical, mental, or emotional condition. This condition can make it difficult for a person to do activities such as walking, climbing stairs, dressing, bathing, learning, or remembering. This condition can also impede a person from being able to go outside the home alone or to work at a job or business. The provisions of SB 520 require municipalities to analyze potential and actual constraints upon the development, maintenance, and improvement of housing for persons with disabilities, and demonstrate local efforts to remove governmental constraints that hinder the locality from meeting the need for housing for persons with disabilities. Cities are required to include programs that remove constraints and provide reasonable accommodations for housing designed for persons with disabilities. a. Reasonable Accommodations Chapter 19.37 of the City’s Municipal Code contains the City’s reasonable accommodations procedures. The City of El Cerrito makes reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities to allow equal access to City services and facilities and equal participation in public processes. Individuals with disabilities can request special accommodations at the City’s public counter or make an advance request for such accommodations through one of several communications channels offered by the City. These channels include contacting the appropriate department via, phone, email, or permit fax line. A City staff person at the public counter or who takes the inquiry/request determines the nature of the need and ensures that persons requesting accommodations have adequate access to the requested services of the responsible City department. The City follows this same accommodations process for persons with special needs who desire to participate in public events in City facilities (such as public hearings and meetings). At no time has the City denied a zoning ordinance exception to an individual who has requested a variance for access accommodations or other disabilities needs. The City provides public information at its permit counter that summarizes processes for requesting variances from codes and standards to accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities. Discretionary permit applications that do not require California Environmental Quality Act review must be submitted at least 30 days prior to the scheduled hearing dates. But for applicants requesting permits for reasonable accommodations purposes, the discretionary process is fast‐tracked, which means that applicants can apply 20 days prior to the upcoming hearing dates instead of the standard thirty days. Twenty days is necessary for ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 77 of 190 staff to route plans and comply with State public noticing requirements, which stipulates a 10‐day public review and comment period prior to public hearings. Zoning Ordinance standards and CEQA review determines if a project is discretionary. If a project or request complies with zoning ordinance standards and is exempt under CEQA guidelines, then it is not considered discretionary. Non‐discretionary (ministerial) projects are routed through the department responsible for the request. Typically ministerial projects in El Cerrito only require building permits. The Building Department, via administrative procedures, ensures that handicap accessible modifications comply with the California Building Code, so the Department does not distribute brochures. If reasonable accommodations are requested, the Building Department provides additional help, information, and/or consideration to applicants on an as needed basis. b. Permits and Processing Residential care facilities ‐ limited (for less than six individuals) are allowed by right in all residential zones, consistent with State law. The City does not restrict residential care facilities – limited other than compliance with the same zoning standards as for any other single family use. Residential care facilities ‐ general (for six or more individuals) are allowed in all residential and commercial zones with a conditional use permit. c. Zoning and Other Land Use Regulations The City has not identified any zoning or other land use regulatory practices that could discriminate against persons with disabilities and impede the availability of such housing for these individuals. Examples of the ways in which the City facilitates housing for persons with disabilities through its regulatory and permitting procedures are:  Supportive multiple family or single family housing for the disabled is permitted in any residential zone that permits non‐designated single or multiple family housing.  All multiple family complexes are required to provide handicapped parking spaces, depending on the size of the development. The City is flexible and works with the developers of special needs housing and will reduce parking requirements if the applicant can demonstrate a reduced need for parking. The City has no separate restrictions or development standards for group homes or other special needs housing.  Recognizing that some persons with disabilities may require the assistance of specially trained persons who live with the disabled persons, the Zoning Code does not differentiate between related and unrelated persons occupying the same residential unit. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 78 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 9. Building Codes and Enforcement The City of El Cerrito building codes are adopted to preserve public health and safety, and ensure the construction of safe and decent housing. These codes and standards also have the potential to increase the cost of housing construction or maintenance. a. Building Codes The City of El Cerrito currently (2014) operates under the 2013 California Building Code, which is based on the 2012 International Building Code and establishes construction standards for all residential buildings. The latest edition of the California Building Code must be submitted to the City Council from time to time together with changes or modifications as are reasonable and necessary because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions, or as otherwise permitted by State law. The regulations set forth are designed to ensure the safety and welfare of El Cerrito’s residents. The 2013 California Building Code and 2013 Cal Green Building Code were adopted by City Council in October 2013. The City of El Cerrito adopted several amendments to the 2013 California Building Code, which require more stringent building and housing regulations. One amendment (Section 16.02.080 of the City’s Municipal Code), requires automatic fire‐extinguishing systems to be installed in every building where the total floor area exceeds 5,000 square feet and in every building having three or more stories. While this may impact high density housing and mixed‐use structures within the city, this amendment does not substantially add to the cost of housing. b. Americans with Disabilities Act The Federal Fair Housing Act of 1998 (FHA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are Federal laws intended to assist in providing safe and accessible housing. ADA provisions include requirements for a minimum percentage of units in new developments to be fully accessible for persons with physical disabilities. Compliance with these regulations may increase the cost of housing construction as well as the cost of rehabilitating older units, which may be required to comply with current codes. However, the enforcement of ADA requirements is not at the discretion of the City, but is mandated under Federal law. c. Code Enforcement The City conducts code enforcement activities on a complaint basis in response to reports from residents and other community members. When a complaint is received the City inspects the property and determines whether there is a code violation. If there is a code violation, the City sends a letter to the property owner informing them that they have 10 days to correct the violation. If the violation is not abated within the 10 days, an administrative citation with a fine is issued. Each violation of the El Cerrito Municipal Code constitutes a separate violation for every day such violation continues, and an ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 79 of 190 administrative citation may be issued for each and every separate violation. As such, an administrative citation will then be issued every day until the violation is abated. 10. Local Processing and Permit Procedures a. Building and Development Fees Various development fees are charged by the City and other agencies to cover administrative processing costs associated with development. These fees ensure quality development and the provision of adequate services. Often times, development fees are passed through to renters and homeowners in the price/rent of housing, thus affecting the affordability of housing. In most California cities, home builders are required to provide a full complement of on‐site improvements such as streets, curbs, gutters, water lines, and sewer lines. Many cities also collect impact fees to fund the cost of expanding infrastructure and community services, such as sewers, parks, and roads to serve new growth. Impact fees as high as $60,000 per unit are common in newer East Bay cities. These fees are typically passed on to homeowners in the form of higher sales prices. Because El Cerrito is an infill city and essentially built out, the vast amount of development opportunities are on sites with a full complement of existing urban services and impact fees are not required. El Cerrito is one of the few cities in the East Bay that does not collect impact fees, except for a state transportation mitigation program fee of $2,595 per single family home, $1,648 per multifamily dwelling, and $701 per senior housing unit. This represents a significant savings relative to the cost of development in nearby communities. Water and sewer treatment facilities impact fees are levied directly by the East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD). EBMUD charges both connection fees and capacity fees. A typical single family residential unit will have between a 5/8” and 1” line, for a cost of $6,193 per water connection, and a typical multifamily development will require a 3” line for a cost of $23,892. EBMUD also charges a water system capacity fee of between roughly $16,000 and $26,000 (if located in EBMUD Region 2) for a single family unit and $9,370 for a multifamily unit to account for the additional demand of a new water connection. EBMUD charges a wastewater capacity fee of approximately $1,600 per dwelling unit for connections to the regional wastewater treatment system. Developers are required to provide laterals to connect to local sewer lines that feed into the regional system. EBMUD charges additional fees when unusual conditions exist, such as when the meter is more than 25 feet from the lateral line, underground utilities or other obstructions are in the way of a lateral line, or traffic conditions requires special traffic control measures. Wastewater collection in the City is primarily provided by Stege Sanitary District (SSD). New development of 10 or more residential units, 10,000 square feet or more of commercial or more than 1,000 square feet of restaurant use must perform a sewer capacity study to ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 80 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 evaluate whether there is sufficient wastewater infrastructure capacity in the system to accommodate the proposed development. If sufficient capacity exists, SSD collects a connection charge of $1,790 per unit. If there is insufficient capacity, including existing deficiencies, the development project is responsible for the costs of the upgrade to the sewer line capacity, in addition to the connection charge. As part of the implementation of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, the City is working with SSD to assess the capacity of the wastewater collection system to accommodate the new development anticipated under the Plan. The City will also partner with SSD to pursue outside funding to upgrade the system to accommodate future transit‐oriented development. School impact fees are levied by the West Contra Costa Unified School District and collected at the time of application for a building permit. The school impact fee is $4.58 per square foot for new residential dwellings. Based on the residential projects constructed in El Cerrito, the City has not found the development and permit fees to hinder the supply of housing or negatively impact the affordability of housing. City‐assessed fees in El Cerrito are lower than other cities in the region. b. Planning Fees Unless a property is proposed to be rezoned or contain a planned development, planning fees represent a very small percentage of the overall project cost. As noted above in the summary text following Table A‐4 in Appendix A, most of the multifamily housing units built during the planning period will be produced within the City’s commercial zoning districts and within the TOHIMU and TOMIMU transect zones around the City’s two BART stations. A Planning Commission use permit would be required as would Design Review. By themselves, planning fees for discretionary multifamily applications represent a small fraction of the overall development cost and do not pose barriers for multi‐unit development. Fees for environmental review under CEQA vary dependent upon the nature of the proposed development and existing conditions. The City charges a 30 percent administrative fee on any consultant contract for an environmental review. If the project is small enough for City staff to conduct the environmental review, fees run from $204 for a categorical exemption to $3,669 for a negative declaration to $10,641 for a mitigated negative declaration. As described earlier the City does not impose any impact fees. c. Total Fees Based on a Development Fee Comparison prepared for the City of Emeryville Housing Element in July 2014, the City of El Cerrito has low fees compared to other jurisdictions surveyed in the Bay Area. Total fees for a 100‐unit multifamily rental development project in El Cerrito are approximately $736,000 or $7,357 per unit. This is significantly lower than the median fee of $1.2 million. The same is true for owner and townhome development fees; El Cerrito’s fees for a 100‐unit development totaled approximately $809,000 (compared to the ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 81 of 190 median fee of $1.4 million) and its townhome development fees totaled approximately $1.0 million (compared to the median fee of $2.5 million). Table III‐13 shows development impact, plan review and inspection, and permit fees in the City of El Cerrito. For an actual affordable multifamily development that was recently approved in El Cerrito, permit fees and development impact fees were only two percent of total development costs. Table III-13 Fees for New Residential Multifamily Development El Cerrito (2014) Fee Categories 100 Multifamily Units (Rental)12 100 Multifamily Units (Owner-Occupied)13 100 Townhomes14 Development Impact Fees WCCUSD School Developer Fee1 $333,200 $392,000 $548,800 WCCTAC Subregional Transportation2 $164,800 $164,800 $164,800 Construction Tax3 $425 $495 $668 Art in Public Places4 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000 Subtotal $648,425 $707,295 $864,268 Plan Review & Inspection Fees Plan Check5 $47,967 $56,367 $79168 Inspection6 $28,522 $33,472 $46,672 California Building Standards Commission7 $663 $780 $1,092 Subtotal $77,152 $90,619 $126,932 Permit Fees S.M.I.P8 $1,658 $1,950 $2,730 Use Permit9 $4,445 $4,445 $4,445 Grading10 $3,954 $4,677 $3,231 Encroachment11 $75 $75 $75 Subtotal $10,132 $11,147 $10,481 Total Fees $735,709 $809,061 $1,001,681 Total Fees Per Unit $7,357 $8,091 $10,017 1 School fees are calculated based on a cost of $3.92 per sq. ft. for residential development. (Note: In August 2014, school fees are $4.58). 2 Fees charged at $1,648 per multifamily unit 3 Construction tax equal to 0.5 percent of total permit fees charged to new constructions and additions 4 Art in public places fee equal to 1 percent of total project valuation for projects over $250,000, up to a maximum fee of $150,000 5 Includes electric, mechanic, and electric permits. Based on project size and construction type. See Master Fee Schedule p. 27. 6 Includes grading plan check, issuance, and inspection charges. Based on project size and construction type. Master Fee Schedule p.35 7 Administration fee equal to $1.00 per $25,000.00 (or fraction thereof) of project valuation 8 Fee is equal to the construction value x 0.0001 for residential development 9 Based on residential rate for properties greater than 11 units 10 Includes grading plan check, issuance, and inspection charges 11 Includes encroachment issuance and permit charges 12 Project size for the rental prototype was a four story, 85,000 square feet building 13 Project size for owner occupied prototype was a four story, 100,000 square feet building 14 Project size for the townhome prototype was a two story, 140,000 square feet building. Source: City of Emeryville Development Fee Comparison, July 2014, City of El Cerrito. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 82 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) and Stege Sanitary District (SSD) fees water service, installation, and wastewater fees) are not included in the multifamily development fees described above. Although the fee comparison was prepared prior to the adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, it is anticipated that fees for multifamily development within the Plan Area will not vary significantly from the amounts shown. Costs for building permits, grading permits, etc were not impacted by the Specific Plan. Planning fees in the Plan Area were amended to reflect the Plan’s new administration fees and a Specific Plan Maintenance Fee of $160.00 per unit was also included. Since El Cerrito was the lowest in terms of development fees of all the cities surveyed in the July 2014 study, staff does not think these minor costs will negatively impact El Cerrito’s ability to attract new residential development. The City can further help to mitigate the cost of fees by waiving, reducing, or deferring City‐ imposed fees to reduce the initial cost to the affordable housing developer. Figure III‐2 shows a fee comparison for a 100‐unit multifamily rental development. Figure III-2 Fee Comparison for 100-Unit Multifamily Rental Development El Cerrito and Surrounding Jurisdictions (2014) Source: City of Emeryville, 2014. $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $2,500,000 $3,000,000 $3,500,000 $4,000,000 $4,500,000 Permit Fees Plan Review & Inspection Fees Development Impact Fees ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 83 of 190 d. Permit Processing Procedures Applications for development permits are made in writing to the Community Development Department. Application processing times vary depending on the permit being requested. In addition, some planning applications require public hearings. On average, development projects are processed in less than 75 days. Overall, development permit approval processing in El Cerrito does not create any unnecessary delays or increases to the cost of housing. The City is required to determine if an application is complete within 30 days of receipt. Once deemed complete, application processing begins. Applications are reviewed for consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Code, and conformance with design standards. The City has determined that the most likely zoning categories that can accommodate very low‐ or low‐income housing are the RM, CC, TOM, TOHIMU, and TOMIMU zoning districts. Assuming that neither a general plan amendment, Planned Development or rezoning is needed, a typical single family home will require the following permits:  If in a new subdivision, tentative/final subdivision approval (more than four parcels) or minor subdivision approval (four parcels or fewer);  CEQA compliance review (A single family home will typically be exempt or require a negative declaration if part of a subdivision.);  Grading permit;  Site work plan review (if project is not part of a subdivision) if two or more stories are proposed; and  Building permit. A typical multifamily project will require the following permits:  Administrative design review (for small projects such as duplexes) or Design Review Board review;  Use permit if housing is located on the ground floor in the TOM, CC and CN, or it the proposal is greater than 25 units.  CEQA compliance review (typically a negative declaration);  Grading permit; and  Building permit. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 84 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Planning permits are processed by City staff. However, several types of discretionary permits require public hearings before the Planning Commission and/or Design Review Board. These entitlements include: tentative subdivision maps, design review applications and use permits, These layers of review create the potential for a substantial duration of time for project review. The City’s experience has been that even projects requiring discretionary review can be processed within a reasonable timeframe with minimal modifications that do not significantly affect cost or project density so long as the City’s development standards are followed. Developers requesting planned development approvals or participation in the Incentives Program may find longer approval timeframes due to the complexity of these entitlements In the City of El Cerrito, the time necessary for obtaining these typical permit approvals varies widely depending on the complexity of the project. On average, a single family development of more than two dwellings will require a maximum of six months for development approvals. Delays usually occur because of complex environmental analysis. El Cerrito acts upon tentative subdivision applications for minor subdivisions within three months. Final maps require only one month. El Cerrito completes plan checks and building permits within approximately three weeks. Multifamily projects can also be reviewed and approved within six months, unless the project requires an environmental impact report (EIR). It is anticipated that the programmatic EIR prepared for the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan will help facilitate CEQA environmental review for future multifamily development in the Plan Area. Rental multifamily projects do not typically involve subdivision of land, so tentative and final map approvals are usually not required. However, if the project is proposed to be a condominium project, a map would be required. In the part of the city not included in the San Pablo Avenue Plan Area, a typical multifamily project will involve conceptual and final review by the Design Review Board (DRB). If the project is required to secure a use permit, it would also require a hearing at the Planning Commission. In the past, review by the Commission and Board has not resulted in significant delay for residential projects because of the use of study session and conceptual review to identify potential design issues early. Multifamily projects are permitted by right within the multifamily residential zone (RM). A use permit would be required for multifamily projects of 25 units or more within the CC and TOM zones; however mixed use projects are permitted by right (no additional CUP required for retail). The findings of approval required for projects that require a use permit are listed in Section 19.343.040 of the El Cerrito Municipal Code. These findings provide guidance to developers throughout the design and permit processes as do codified guidelines for basic massing and compatibility with other zoning districts within the Zoning Ordinance. The required findings of approval for a CUP are as follows: ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 85 of 190  The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed development will be harmonious and compatible with and will not adversely affect the livability or appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood.  The location and design of the proposal will provide a convenient and functional living, working, shopping, or civic environment that will be an attractive amenity for the City.  The proposal is consistent with the purposes of the district where it is located and conforms in all significant respects with the El Cerrito General Plan and with any other applicable plan adopted by the City Council. In the part of the City that is in the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Area, if a project meets all of the development parameters stated in the Form Based Code, (e.g. height, parking, open space) it qualifies for Tier II design review and it will only require one hearing before the Design Review Board. A completely residential project would no longer require a use permit, even if greater than 25 units. However, if a proposal had a use that did require a use permit, (e.g. restaurant serving alcohol) it would still be required to hold a hearing before the Planning Commission. This approach set out in the FBC is intended to incentivize developers to bring high quality residential multifamily projects forward to the City in return for a streamlined entitlement process. If a project cannot meet the development parameters of the FBC, the City will still make every effort to process the project in a timely fashion, likely in a time frame similar to the previous municipal code of six months if the CEQA documentation is not complex. Design Review Throughout the City, the construction of multifamily housing requires a public hearing before the Design Review Board. In practice, design review by the Board does not add significant time for approving a multifamily project. Outside the Plan Area, if a developer wishes to design a project that varies from the City’s zoning requirements, the Incentives Program is available to permit variations from the underlying standards in exchange for a project‐specific design review. Projects that incorporate “desirable features” can qualify for modified parking, setback, building, lot coverage, and other standards. Because many of the desirable features for which the City may grant incentives relate to project design, the Incentives Program is used in conjunction with design review. However, as described earlier, the Incentives Program has limited applicability now that the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan provides the flexible development standards as a matter of right. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 86 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan’s Tier System. As mentioned above, if an application for a new project conforms to the standards of the FBC, then it qualifies for Tier II review. Inside the Plan Area, if a developer wishes to design a project that varies from the standard of Tier II but has a project that the City feels will serve the goals of the Specific Plan, they can apply for a Tier IV review. This will include review from both the Planning Commission and the Design Review Board. Tier IV is intended to allow high‐quality new development projects that would not otherwise be allowed under a strict interpretation of the Specific Plan regulations but nevertheless comply with the intent of the Specific Plan and that help ensure the City’s long‐term financial sustainability. With the double hearing requirement, this entitlement path is anticipated to take about the same amount of time as steps that an applicant would have needed to through under the prior zoning review process. Environmental Review All applications for development are subject to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and require some level of environmental review. The higher levels of environmental review can include the preparation of an environmental document environmental impact report or mitigated negative declaration) before a project can be approved. The requirement to prepare an environmental document can substantially lengthen the development review process, sometimes taking up to one year to obtain project approval. However, the cost associated with preparing an environmental document is not considered to disproportionately constrain residential development in El Cerrito. The costs associated with development project review will vary between projects. El Cerrito utilizes an efficient and comprehensive approach towards development review and permitting that allows for quick response to developer applications. In addition, the City utilizes many practices such as expedited application processing, reducing costs, and clarification of the process to developers and homeowners to minimize City impacts on the development process. Increased development costs resulting from the City’s development review and permitting process are not considered to constrain housing development. 11. Former Redevelopment Agency and Successor Agency Pursuant to AB1x26, which dissolved redevelopment agencies in California in 2012, the City of El Cerrito elected to serve as the Successor Agency. The Successor Agency assumed all of the former Redevelopment Agency’s assets, liabilities, and obligations. The City’s role is to serve as a fiduciary agent for the Successor Agency, administering payments and performance of its obligations. As allowed under AB1x26, the City elected to retain the housing functions of the former Redevelopment Agency. Prior to the dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies, the Low‐ and Moderate‐Income Housing Fund (LMIHF) was the main source of housing funds used to support the City’s housing programs. State law required that the Redevelopment Agency deposit 20 percent of the gross tax increment revenues from redevelopment project areas into the LMIHF to be used exclusively for housing for persons of low and moderate income. Prior to its dissolution, the LMIHF ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 87 of 190 provided $7.5 million in financial assistance to the Ohlone Gardens and Eden Senior Housing affordable developments to create 120 units of affordable housing. With the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency, there will be no future funding for the LMIHF from property tax increment. a. Federal Entitlement Funds The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) is the largest federal housing‐related program for affordable housing. It is a ʺpass‐throughʺ program that allows local governments to use Federal funds to alleviate poverty and blight. Cities with populations of over 50,000 receive CDBG funds directly from HUD, while smaller cities usually use county‐ administered CDBG funds. HUD makes allocations based on a formula that takes population, poverty, and housing distress into account. CDBG funds are used for a variety of housing efforts including activities aimed at reducing costs for private development (helping fund site acquisition, improvement, and other soft costs); housing acquisition and rehabilitation through short and long‐term loans, grants, or loan guarantees; direct payment of rent or mortgage and housing counseling services; and fair housing activities. CDBG funds are best used in combination with other subsidy sources or to provide predevelopment funding to initiate housing development. El Cerrito’s population is under 50,000, and thus CDBG funds are administered and allocated by Contra Costa County to fund program and service priorities that are established and implemented through the Five‐Year Contra Costa County Consolidated Plan. Contra Costa County will receive $2,976,594 in CDBG funds for the 2014‐15 fiscal year, of which $1,342,443 (45.1 percent) will be used for housing. The Home Investments Partnership (HOME), like CDBG, is a Federal formula‐based block grant program. HOME funds must be spent only on housing, and are intended to provide incentives for the acquisition, construction, and rehabilitation of affordable rental and home ownership units. HOME requires local governments to provide matching funds, though the matching ratio depends on the specific uses to which HOME funds are to be put. The Federal‐to‐local matching ratio for tenant assistance is currently four‐to‐one, while the match for rental construction is two‐to‐one. The fiscal year 2014/15 budget for HOME funds is $1,946,574 million for Contra Costa County. Eligible housing projects in El Cerrito are eligible to apply on a competitive basis for County HOME funds. Section 8 is rental assistance provided to a household which bridges the gap between 30 percent of the householdʹs gross income and the fair market rent of a unit. Although this long‐standing Federal assistance program is not expected to increase in size or scope, it remains an important program for affordable housing by helping to balance household income and housing costs. Section 8 assistance in El Cerrito is administered by the Contra Costa County Housing Authority. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 88 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Other funding sources include Housing Opportunities for Persons Living with Aids (HOPWA) funds from the HUD, California Housing Finance Authority (CalHFA) and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) program funds at the State level, and low income housing tax credit equity funds. Any other loans, grants, or financial assistance from any other public or private sources may be used if available. 12. On and Off-Site Improvements The cost of producing a housing unit not only includes land, construction, and design costs, but also infrastructure connections, site improvements, and payment of fees to ensure adequate public facilities and services. Because many sites are small and being reused, improvements consist of upgrading water and sewer lines if needed for intensification of use, providing parking and on‐site circulation, and placing utilities underground. Public improvements may also be required to improve the safety and livability of the city. These include curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, street trees, street reconstruction, traffic signals, utility lines, and park and greenway improvements. For new subdivisions, the City may require developers to dedicate land, construct on and off‐site improvements, or pay fees necessary to construct the necessary improvements. Pursuant to the City’s Subdivision Ordinance, the City may require construction of streets, including curbs, gutters and sidewalks; and all necessary public utilities. For new projects, underground utilities are required. In addition to the required on‐site improvements, the City may require off‐site improvements as mitigation measures to certain project impacts. These off‐site mitigations are determined as necessary on a project specific basis through the CEQA process. There are virtually no privately held parcels in El Cerrito, within zoning districts that allow residential uses, which are large enough to require new streets at the time of development. Nearly every street in the city is improved with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks that continue to serve future residential development. It is extremely unlikely that new projects would be required to dedicate or construct a significant amount of off‐site street improvements due to the built‐out nature of El Cerrito. Street widening could possibly occur within existing public rights‐of‐way, if necessary, but it is unlikely that any project would need to dedicate right‐of‐way or construct a public street with a right‐of‐way wider than that of a minor street. There are no additional major or secondary streets identified for construction in the City’s General Plan. C. NON-GOVERNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 1. Land Prices Land costs have a demonstrable influence on the cost and availability of affordable housing. Land costs are affected by such factors as zoning density, the availability of infrastructure, the existence or absence of environmental constraints, and the relative amount of similar land available for development. As land becomes less available, the price of land increases. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 89 of 190 Land costs in the San Francisco Bay Area are relatively high as compared with the rest of the nation. A search of Trulia and LandAndFarm land‐for‐sale records in August 2014 uncovered five vacant properties for sale in El Cerrito. The land characteristics and price per square foot are outlined in Table III‐14. As shown in the table, the price per square foot ranged from $27 per square foot for a hillside property to $115 per square foot for a centrally‐located mixed‐use parcel. There are relatively few recent land sales in the City and pricing is variable based on whether the property is improved or unimproved, entitled for an approved project, or has other constraints or considerations. Table III-14 Lot and Land Characteristics El Cerrito (2014) Location General Characteristics Status Square Feet Price Price/Square Foot El Cerrito Flat, vacant lot; Residential zone For Sale 6,000 $259,000 $43 El Cerrito Flat, vacant lot; Commercial/Mixed-Use zone; High traffic area on San Pablo Avenue For Sale 2,178 $250,000 $115 El Cerrito Flat, vacant lot; Transit-Oriented Mixed-Use Zone Sold 40,946 $2,772,948 $68 El Cerrito Down-slope parcel; Boarders Wildcat Canyon Regional Park; East border of El Cerrito For Sale 10,018 $299,000 $30 El Cerrito Lot slopes to southwest and west; Located in the El Cerrito Hills ; Currently no residence on the property For Sale 54,450 1,495,000 $27 Source: Trulia.com and Landandfarm.com, July 2014. Given the relatively high land costs in El Cerrito, increases in density would need to be significant enough to reduce the unit cost of building a dwelling unit to the level of affordability for low‐ or moderate‐income households. Densities of 45 units or more per acre, combined with small dwelling unit sizes, would be necessary to construct affordable housing for moderate‐ and some low‐income households without significant public subsidies. 2. Construction Costs Construction costs are primarily determined by the costs of materials and labor. They are also influenced by market demands and market‐based changes in the cost of materials. Construction costs depend on the type of unit being built and the quality of the product being produced. The most significant constraint on development of new housing in El Cerrito is the overall cost, including land costs and construction costs. Many factors can affect the cost to build, including the type of construction, materials, site conditions, finishing details, amenities, and structural configuration. Development costs were developed from estimates provided ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 90 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 by residential builders who work in the region. Permitting costs and fees are between $30,000 and $35,000 for an average size home. Once a vacant parcel is purchased, the contractor has to make certain site improvements to prepare for building on the property. Such improvements include connections to existing utility systems, rough grading, and installation of water and sewer lines. This type of work generally costs between $55,000 and $80,000 depending on the amount of work required at each location. Including impact fees and land costs (assuming a single family home) the minimum cost to produce a modest home for a family of four in El Cerrito would be nearly $450,000. Based on the costs listed above for a single family home, none of the very low‐, low‐, or even many moderate‐income households in El Cerrito could afford to own a new housing unit constructed in the City. The scarcity of easily developed land, combined with the great demand, indicates that housing construction costs are likely to remain high in the future. El Cerrito will continue to follow the trend of increasing housing costs that is occurring throughout the Bay Area. Construction costs for multifamily residential units can vary more than those for single family homes due to the greater range in which they can be built. As a comparison in 2013, RS Means (a reliable published source for construction industry costs) estimated that the hard construction costs in the Oakland area were $135 per square foot for typical four‐ to seven‐story multifamily residential construction and $114 per square foot for one‐ and two‐ family residential construction. This equals a rough estimate of $135,000 for a 1,000 square foot apartment and $228,000 for a 2,000 square foot single family home. A high‐end senior complex with senior‐friendly amenities will cost more than an affordable multifamily complex. Construction costs for a recent multifamily mixed‐use development in El Cerrito totaled approximately $237,000 per unit. To reduce construction costs, developers may build at higher densities to increase the economies of scale. In most cases, reduced parking requirements can also make construction more affordable. Developers can also reduce costs by using better, newer construction methodology such as modular construction, off‐site manufacturing, and prefabrication. Many of these techniques help save time, control quality, and eliminate waste and labor costs – thereby keeping costs to a minimum. Amenities such as elevators, common open space, and landscaped areas can also add to the overall cost. 3. Financing Mortgage interest rates have a large influence over the affordability of housing. Higher interest rates increase a homebuyer’s payment and decrease the range of housing that a household can afford. Lower interest rates result in a lower cost and lower payments for the homebuyer. When interest rates rise, the market typically compensates by decreasing housing prices. Similarly, when interest rates decrease, housing prices begin to rise. There is often a lag in ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 91 of 190 the market, causing housing prices to remain high when interest rates rise until the market catches up. Lower‐income households often find it most difficult to purchase a home during this time period. During the early to mid‐2000s (2003, 2004, 2005), lenders provided an increasing number of subprime and adjustable‐rate loans, and, in response to high housing costs, many lenders provided mortgages of up to 95 percent of the value of the home, rather than the traditionally allowed 80 percent. In 2006 and 2007, as interest rates increased, borrowers began to default on those loans leading to a foreclosure crisis and housing market crash. In response in 2008 lenders significantly tightened their lending standards. In 2013 lenders began to reduce the qualifications required for a competitive mortgage rate, and as the economy continues its recovery, lenders may continue to make mortgage loans more accessible, although they may never be as easy to obtain as they were prior to 2008. Although there is more scrutiny of developer’s credentials and banks are requiring a higher loan‐to‐value ratio, the cost of construction financing is historically low, with prime rates below five percent in 2013. As shown in Figure III‐3 mortgage interest rates have been steadily declining since January 2010. Interest rates are at historic lows in 2014, but have started to increase. When interest rates decline, sales increase. The reverse has been true when interest rates increase. Interest rates are determined by national policies and economic conditions and there is little that a local government can do to affect these rates. Figure III-3 Historical Mortgage Rates United States (January 2003-January 2013) Mortgage Rates Notes: ARM-Adjustable Rate Mortgage FRM- Fixed Rate Mortgage Source: Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Percent 1 yr ARM 15 yr FRM 30 yr FRM ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 92 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 As shown in Table III‐15, the number of loan applications increases as income increases. The percentage of persons denied for a home loan in the Oakland‐Fremont‐Hayward Metropolitan Area is highest for the very low‐income (less than 50 percent of the MFI) category with 21.9 percent. Table III-15 Mortgage Lending Rates Oakland-Fremont-Hayward MSA (2013) Income Group Total Applications Loans Originated Applications Denied % Denied <50% MFI 2,187 1,289 480 21.9% 50-79% MFI 4,391 2,922 640 14.6% 80-99% MFI 2,799 1,937 338 12.1% 110-119% MFI 2,801 1,976 303 10.8% 120% MFI 14,227 10,484 1,244 8.7% Total 26,405 18,608 3,005 11.4% Source: Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), HMDA Data, 2013. Federal, state, and local housing programs, particularly first‐time homebuyer programs and similar mortgage assistance programs, can be a useful tool for providing help with down payment and closing costs, which can be significant obstacles to home ownership for lower‐ income and minority groups. 4. Energy Conservation There are many opportunities for conserving energy in new and existing homes. New buildings, by design, can easily incorporate energy‐efficient techniques into the construction. In July 2010, the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) adopted the 2010 California Green Building Standards Code, otherwise known as “CALGreen,” which became effective January 1, 2011. CalGreen includes optional “tiers” with higher standards for green building. The California Building Code was most recently updated in 2013, and El Cerrito has adopted the 2013 Green Building Standards Code. El Cerrito adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) in May 2013. Prepared by the City’s Community Development Department, the CAP assists the City Council and the community in determining the best actions to reduce energy use and to create a safer and more sustainable city. The City adopted targets to reduce GHG emissions by 15 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2035. The plan suggests resource conservation measures designed to achieve greater energy efficiency, water efficiency, and renewable energy in existing and new buildings through education, incentives, and ordinances. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 93 of 190 El Cerrito provides free booklets and information on Contra Costa County’s Green Building program at El Cerrito City Hall and online. The Green Building Program promotes designing and constructing buildings that conserve energy, water, and material resources and are healthier, safer, and more comfortable. Since much of El Cerrito is already developed, it is important to consider the opportunity for energy savings in existing housing also. According to the U.S. Department of Energy, the concept of energy efficiency in buildings is demonstrated by the building envelope, which is everything that separates the interior of the building from the outdoor environment: the doors, windows, walls, foundation, roof, and insulation. All the components of the building envelope need to work together to keep a building warm in the winter and cool in the summer. Constructing new homes with energy‐conserving features, in addition to retrofitting existing structures, will result in a reduction in utility costs. There are many ways to determine how energy efficient an existing building is and, if needed, what improvements can be made. PG&E offers free home energy audits and can specify areas for energy conservation. Examples of energy conservation opportunities include installation of insulation and/or storm windows and doors, use of natural gas instead of electricity, installation or retrofitting of more efficient appliances and mechanical or solar energy systems, and building design and orientation that incorporates energy conservation considerations. a. Pacific Gas and Electric PG&E also provides a variety of energy conservation services for residents and participates in several other energy assistance programs for lower‐income households, which help qualified homeowners and renters conserve energy and control electricity costs. These include the following:  The California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) Program ‐ Provides a discount on gas and electric rates to income qualified households, certain nonprofits, facilities housing agricultural employees, homeless shelters, hospices, and other qualified non‐profit group‐living facilities.  The Relief for Energy Assistance through Community Help (REACH) Program ‐ Provides one‐time emergency energy assistance to low‐income customers who have no other way to pay their energy bill. REACH aims to assist those who are in jeopardy of losing their electricity services, particularly the elderly, disabled, sick, working poor, and the unemployed, and those who experience severe hardships and are unable to pay for their necessary energy needs. Customers who have experienced an uncontrollable or unforeseen hardship may receive an energy credit up to $200. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 94 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015  The Balanced Payment Plan (BPP) ‐ Designed to eliminate big swings in a customer’s payments by averaging energy costs over the year. On enrollment, PG&E averages the amount of energy used by the household in the past year to derive the BPP amount. PG&E checks the household’s account every four months to make sure that its estimated average is on target. If the household’s energy use has increased or decreased dramatically, PG&E will change the amount of payment so that the household does not overpay or underpay too much over the course of a year.  The Low‐Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) Block Grant ‐ Funded by the Federal Department of Health and Human Services, it provides two basic types of services. Eligible low‐income persons, via local governmental and nonprofit organizations, can receive financial assistance to offset the costs of heating and/or cooling dwellings and/or to have their dwellings weatherized to make them more energy efficient. This is accomplished through these three program components:  The Weatherization Program ‐ Provides free weatherization services to improve the energy efficiency of homes, including attic insulation, weatherstripping, minor home repairs, and related energy conservation measures.  The Home Energy Assistance Program (HEAP) ‐ Provides financial assistance to eligible households to offset the costs of heating and/or cooling dwellings.  The Energy Crisis Intervention Program (ECIP) ‐ Provides payments for weather‐ related or energy‐related emergencies.  The Family Electric Rate Assistance (FERA) Program ‐ PG&E’s rate reduction program for large households of three or more people with low‐ to middle‐income. It enables low‐income large households to receive a Tier 3 (131 percent to 200 percent of baseline) electric rate reduction on their PG&E bill every month.  Medical Baseline Allowance Program ‐ PG&E offers additional quantities of energy at the lowest (baseline) price for residential customers that have special medical or heating/cooling needs because of certain medical conditions.  Energy Works Program/Energy Partners Program ‐ The Energy Works Program provides qualified low‐income tenants free weatherization measures and energy efficient appliances to reduce gas and electricity usage. In order to qualify for the program, a household’s total annual gross income cannot exceed the income as set in the income guidelines households must receive gas and/or electricity from PG&E; and the residence cannot have participated in the Energy Partners Program in the past 10 years. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 95 of 190  PG&Eʹs SmartAC™ Program ‐ This program offers a simple and convenient way to help prevent power interruptions. When customers sign up, PG&E installs a free SmartAC device that reduces the energy the air conditioner uses automatically in case of a state or local energy supply emergency. PG&E customers receive $50 for signing up for the SmartAC™ program. b. Local Programs El Cerrito supports the programs described above, and also partners with Community Energy Serves Corporation to provide free solar assessments to help residents and businesses consider their energy efficiency and solar options. East Bay Energy Watch East Bay Energy Watch (EBEW) is a collaboration between Pacific Gas and Electric Company and local governments, and non‐profit and for‐profit energy service providers in the East Bay dedicated to providing innovative energy efficiency solutions for residents and businesses in communities throughout Alameda and Contra Costa Counties EBEW’s direct install programs bring energy efficiency services to local governments, small and medium businesses, and residents throughout the year. Through partnerships EBEW has helped communities across the East Bay save millions of kilowatt hours of energy. EBEW provides no‐cost home energy assessments, or Green House Calls, for Alameda and Contra Costa County residents. EBEW also provides energy assistance to businesses, institutions, nonprofits, and multifamily buildings. Services include no‐cost energy assessments of buildings, where Energy Watch professionals make recommendations for cost effective retrofits and improvements that are designed to save business owners money on their utility bills. Such recommendations are based on an inventory of each business’ energy consuming equipment. Recommendations can include such simple solutions as replacing old and inefficient lighting or improving efficiency of refrigeration systems. The Energy Watch program also offers technical assistance for implementation of energy efficiency projects and rebates to help defray project costs. The rebates typically cover between 50 percent and 70 percent of the total project cost and, in some instances, can cover up to 90 percent of the total project cost. Energy Upgrade California  Multifamily Building Enhancements. Energy Upgrade California in the Bay Area offers planning assistance and cash rebates for multifamily properties that undertake energy and green upgrades. The program assists in planning energy saving improvements designed to save 10 percent or more of a building’s energy usage and provides 750$ per unit in rebates to help pay for the upgrade. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 96 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015  Home Upgrades. Energy Upgrade California Home Upgrade provides assistance and incentives for home improvement projects that can reduce energy use and make homes more comfortable. This statewide program is managed locally by utilities and regional energy networks and directed by the California Public Utilities Commission in collaboration with the California Energy Commission. Building Design Many modern building design methods are used to reduce residential energy consumption and are based on proven techniques. These methods can be categorized in three ways: Building design that keeps natural heat in during the winter and keeps natural heat out during the summer. Such design reduces air conditioning and heating demands. Proven building techniques in this category include:  location of windows and openings in relation to the path of the sun to minimize solar gain in the summer and maximize solar gain in the winter;  use of “thermal mass,” earthen materials such as stone, brick, concrete, and tiles that absorb heat during the day and release heat at night;  “burying” part of the home in a hillside or berm to reduce solar exposure or to insulate the home against extremes of temperature;  use of window coverings, insulation, and other materials to reduce heat exchange between the interior of a home and the exterior;  location of openings and the use of ventilating devices that take advantage of natural air flow (particularly cool evening breezes);  use of eaves and overhangs that block direct solar gain through window openings during the summer but allow solar gain during the winter; and  use of zone heating and cooling systems, which reduce heating and cooling in the unused areas of a home. Building orientation that uses natural forces to maintain a comfortable interior temperature. Examples include:  orientating the long axis of a dwelling north‐south;  minimizing the southern and western exposure of exterior surfaces; and  locating dwellings to take advantage of natural air circulation and evening breezes. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 97 of 190 Use of landscaping features to moderate interior temperatures. Such techniques include:  use of deciduous shade trees and other plants to protect the home;  use of natural or artificial flowing water; and  use of trees and hedges as windbreaks. In addition to natural techniques, a number of modern methods of energy conservation have been developed or advanced during the present century. These include:  use of solar energy to heat water;  use of solar panels and other devices to generate electricity;  window glazing to repel summer heat and trap winter warmth;  weather‐stripping and other insulation to reduce heat gain and loss;  use of natural gas for dryers, stovetops and ranges;  use of energy efficient home appliances; and  use of low‐flow showerheads and faucet aerators to reduce hot water use. El Cerrito’s Mediterranean‐like climate is typical of coastal northern California with year‐ round mild temperatures that provides an opportunity to use solar energy techniques to generate electricity, heat water, and provide space heating during colder months. Natural space heating can be substantially increased through the proper location of windows and thermal mass. Use of solar panels can generate 1,000 watts of electricity on a sunny day. This can constitute more than enough power for daily residential operations and a special converter attached to the solar panels can take excess electricity and funnel it back into the PG&E grid. 5. Environmental and Infrastructure Constraints Environmental hazards affecting housing units include geologic and seismic conditions, which provide the greatest threat to the built environment. The following environmental concerns may impact future development of residential units in the city. a. Noise The major sources of noise in El Cerrito are related to vehicular traffic including automobile and truck traffic, particularly in areas along Interstate 80 and San Pablo Avenue. This traffic noise is expected to continue to be a major noise source in the future, however, there is not expected to be a significant increase in noise from these sources. A 3 dBA change is realized by a doubling or halving of the traffic volume or by about 7 miles per hour increase or ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 98 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 decrease in speed. Interstate 80 at the present time only has a direct noise impact on El Cerrito at the northern end of San Pablo Avenue near Cutting and Potrero. In most of this area, the freeway and San Pablo Avenue are just 450 feet apart and the combination of the two generates levels of noise exceeding 70 decibels. BART noise affects the city differently in that unlike traffic, which is characterized by gradual changes in volumes, train noise is characterized by numerous discrete, periodic events during train pass‐bys. Based on existing studies, BART trains produce maximum noise levels typically in the range of 72‐76 dBA. When the trains travel farther away from the station at a significantly higher speed maximum noise levels range from 75‐80 dBA. Multifamily housing is subject to the requirements of Title 24 of the State Building Code and would require further detailed analysis during the design of these projects due to noise exposure. A major concern of the residential land use pattern along the Ohlone Greenway is high levels of noise due to proximity of the BART tracks and San Pablo Avenue. New construction standards and development requirements are expected to mitigate interior noise levels by incorporating required sound barriers such as double paned windows, wall insulation and building orientation. b. Geologic and Seismic Hazards The Hayward Fault passes through El Cerrito, generally following the route of Arlington Boulevard. The city is also potentially subject to ground‐shaking from a major earthquake on the San Andreas Fault, located about 18 miles away. According to earthquake predictions made in 2008 by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), and the California Geological Survey (CGS) with support from the California Earthquake Authority, there is a roughly one in three chance of a large earthquake of a magnitude 6.7 or greater in the next 30 years (beginning in 1990) along the Hayward Rodgers Creek Fault and about a one in five chance of a large earthquake on the San Andreas Fault. The area immediately adjacent to the Hayward Fault has been designated as a special study zone, which imposes some additional development restrictions. From a geologic and geotechnical standpoint, the primary concerns in El Cerrito are slope stability, earthquake ground shaking, fault ground rupture, and liquefaction potential. According to the Tri‐Cities Seismic Safety Study (Bishop 1973), virtually all of the upland areas of El Cerrito have a moderate to high landslide risk. The highest risk for ground shaking is in the flatter areas, which have shallow alluvium. The greatest risk of ground rupture is along the fault trace. Several small areas along Baxter and Cerrito creeks are identified as having a high liquefaction potential. c. Flood Hazards A number of large storms have caused drainage problems and flooding in the past in El Cerrito. Recent completion of the first phase in the City’s storm drain master plan program ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Resources & Constraints I March 2015 Page 99 of 190 has addressed the highest priority sites and significantly reduced localized flooding issues in the city. During past years of heavy rains, only three sites had drainage‐related flooding problems. The only portion of El Cerrito located in a FEMA Flood Insurance Zone is the area located west of San Pablo Avenue and south of Central Avenue. Flooding is generally caused by the relatively low ground elevations and high tides in this area, coupled with hydraulic restrictions in the existing channels located in Richmond between El Cerrito and San Francisco Bay. There are two parcels, shown in Figure A‐2 as site 82, that are within the FEMA 100‐year flood zone. As noted in Table A‐3, no units are counted towards the RHNA on this site. d. Water Water supply to the Planning Area is provided by the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD), which derives its water source from the Mokelumne River in the Sierra Nevada. This pristine water is transmitted, via aqueduct, to storage and treatment facilities throughout EBMUD’s service area, and then distributed to customers. EBMUD operates five terminal reservoirs within the following East Bay areas: Briones, Chabot, Lafayette, Upper San Leandro, and San Pablo. To improve water supply reliability in future droughts, EBMUD is adopting a multi‐ pronged approach to reduce water demand, increase water storage capacity, and find alternative sources of water supply. Some ongoing programs include the Freeport Regional Project, Seawater Desalination Research, and Groundwater Banking Program. These efforts should improve the water supply situation during the planning period. e. Wastewater El Cerrito is located in the Stege Sanitary District, which comprises 5.3 square miles and includes the communities of El Cerrito, Kensington, and a portion of Richmond Annex west of El Cerrito and south of Potrero Avenue. The sewage collection system includes 147 miles of collection lines and two small pump stations. The primary elements of this collection system are the public main sewers and the private lateral sewers. The SSD owns and has maintenance responsibility for the main sewers located in public rights‐of‐way or in easements on private land. Individual property owners own and have maintenance responsibility for their lateral sewers installed between the building plumbing and the main sewer. Wastewater collected in the SSD system flows to the Special District #1 Interceptor sewer and is then conveyed to the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) Wastewater Treatment Facility in Oakland. The anticipated growth of the District is through building on the remaining vacant or underutilized parcels and commercial area redevelopment. Average annual rainfall is 26.3 inches and generally occurs between November and April. As of 2013 the average age of the collection system is about 57 years. The oldest lines in the District are 90 years old. District main lines are predominantly vitrified clay pipe (VCP) with cement mortar joints, and six inches diameter. Over 90 percent of the VCP sewers were installed prior to the introduction of modern pipe joints such as compression gaskets, which ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 100 of 190 Resources & Constraints I March 2015 were not available until the 1960s and the introduction of improved VCP manufacturing standards initiated in the mid 1950s. In 1995 a System Rehabilitation Program (SRP) was developed as a result of the need to maintain the collection system in a serviceable condition for the current and future generations of customers of the District. Its emphasis is on optimizing the useful life of the collection system and eliminating costly and environmentally damaging system failures. The methodology employed first defines the sewer line segments in terms of their vulnerability to failure by assessing various physical, technical, and cost rating factors to each line segment and then ranking the lines by their overall rating. Lines most vulnerable to failure are scheduled for video inspection for verification of condition and possible rehabilitation. Video inspection of the sewer line segments will continue at a rate of approximately 167,000 feet per year until the entire collection system is inspected and rated as to its condition. Each year lines found to be cost‐effective for replacement will be scheduled for construction when within the financial resources of the District. Approximately $750,000 per year is planned for these purposes. The SRP is planned to continue indefinitely. The District is in its 100th year of existence and the majority of the collection system is over 50 years old. Implementation and continuation of the SRP will assure the customers of the District of an economic and reliable sanitary sewer system into the future. f. Electricity and Gas Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) currently provides gas and electric services to El Cerrito homes and businesses and is regulated by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). PG&E obtains its energy supplies from power plants and natural gas fields in northern California and delivers electricity through high voltage transmission lines. Electrical power is provided to the City of El Cerrito from various distribution feeders located throughout the city. The availability of electricity and gas services is not expected to become an issue during the housing planning period since almost all land inventory sites are located within urban infill areas close to existing development. If increased capacity is needed, PG&E can increase demand from regional power plants and natural gas fields or construct new electrical substations in the region, as necessary. While there is no way to completely eliminate additional energy use, improved transportation, conservation and design standards can curtail both existing and future demand for additional energy. Housing Element Goal 5 promotes the residential energy conservation objectives of the City’s Climate Action Plan to support efforts to both conserve energy and reduce housing costs. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 101 of 190 IV. HOUSING POLICY PROGRAM Previous sections of the Housing Element establish the housing needs, opportunities, and constraints in the City of El Cerrito. The Housing Policy Program contains policies and programs that will be implemented to address a number of important housing‐related issues. This section also contains quantified objectives for housing construction, rehabilitation, and the preservation of affordable housing. City staff regularly reviews Housing Element programs and progress towards accommodating the City’s share of the regional housing need. The City will prepare an annual implementation report and provide it to the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). A. GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS This section describes the City of El Cerrito’s Policy Program for the 2007‐2014 planning period. The Policy Program contains broad policy statements to guide decision making and describes specific actions necessary to address present and future housing needs, meet statutory requirements, and consider the input by residents and stakeholders. In developing this Policy Program, the City assessed its housing needs, evaluated the performance of existing programs, considered available staff and financial resources, and collaborated with residents and stakeholders. GOAL H1 Existing Housing Conserve and improve El Cerrito’s existing housing supply. Policies H1.1 Encourage neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation of viable older housing to preserve neighborhood character and, where possible, retain a supply of very low‐, low‐, and moderate‐income units. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 1) H1.2 Discourage the conversion of residential uses to non‐residential uses, unless there is a finding of clear public benefit and equivalent housing can be provided for those who would be displaced by the proposed conversion. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 2) H1.3 Maintain housing supply and reduce the loss of life and property caused by earthquakes by encouraging structural strengthening and hazard mitigation in all housing types. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 3) ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 102 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 H1.4 Continue to permit new housing units and housing rehabilitation in mixed use and commercial zoning districts subject to Zoning Ordinance requirements so that housing and commercial uses can complement and support one another. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.4) H1.5 Continue to regulate condominium conversions in accordance with Chapter 19.45 of the Zoning Ordinance. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.5) H1.6 Retain existing residential zoning and discourage non‐residential uses in these zones. The City will strictly enforce the Zoning Code which states that non‐residential uses in residential areas are limited to churches, daycares, and schools. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 2.1) GOAL H2 New Housing Development Encourage the development of housing at all income levels to meet regional housing needs allocation by facilitating housing development and minimizing the impact of potential governmental constraints on the development of housing. Policies H2.1 Provide adequate residential sites for the production of new for‐sale and rental residential units for existing and future residents. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 4) H2.2 Encourage the construction of transit‐oriented developments (TODs) that seek to maximize opportunities for the use of public transit and transportation corridors through high‐density residential and mixed‐use projects along those corridors in accordance with the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan and the City’s Incentives Program (Chapter 19.23 of the El Cerrito Zoning Ordinance). (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 5) H2.3 Continue to enforce the sections of the Zoning Ordinance that increase density, reduce parking requirements, and establish design and development standards to create inviting, mixed‐use neighborhoods around transit, and enforce the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 23.1, modified) H2.4 Encourage and facilitate the construction of second/accessory dwelling units, pursuant to the City’s Second Unit regulations (Section 19.20.190 of the El Cerrito Zoning Ordinance). (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 6) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 103 of 190 H2.5 Continue to permit manufactured and prefab housing in residential districts provided any manufactured unit is certified under the standards set forth in the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1976 (42 USC 5401 et seq.) and follows the standards set in Chapter 19.20 of the Zoning Ordinance. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 7 and Program 7.1, combined) H2.6 Identify and evaluate the reuse of underutilized or deteriorated sites in commercial areas with potential under the City’s zoning requirements for conversion or redevelopment to mixed use housing, retail, and commercial uses that can support and complement one another. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 8) H2.7 Encourage innovative housing approaches in the design and ownership of units to increase the availability of affordable housing. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 9) H2.8 Encourage diversity of unit size and number of bedrooms within multifamily housing developments and strive to provide family housing of 3 to 4 bedroom units within projects. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 10) H2.9 Provide regulatory and/or financial incentives where appropriate to offset or reduce the costs of affordable housing development, including density bonuses and flexibility in site development standards. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 11) H2.10 Periodically review the City’s regulations, ordinances and development fees to ensure they do not unduly constrain the production, maintenance and improvement of housing. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 12) H2.11 Provide for streamlined processing of residential projects to minimize the time and costs in order to encourage housing production. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 13) H2.12 Based on the land‐use strategy developed in the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, direct growth into compact patterns of development to promote infill and intensify land uses. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 14) ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 104 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 H2.13 Assist and cooperate with non‐profit, private, and public entities to maximize opportunities to develop affordable housing, including extremely low‐income housing. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 18) GOAL H3 Special Needs Housing Encourage and Expand housing opportunities for the elderly, the disabled, the homeless, large households, and for other persons with special housing needs. Policies H3.1 Encourage the provision of housing for special needs groups. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 15) H3.2 Support efforts to provide temporary and permanent shelter and transitional housing for the homeless. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 17) H3.3 Continue to allow emergency shelters as a permitted use within the CC, TOHIMU, and TOMIMU zones. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 17.1) H3.4 Continue to enforce Federal and State Handicapped Accessibility and Adaptability Standards. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 15.2) H3.5 Encourage the development of housing accessible to people with disabilities, including developmental disabilities, and strive to match housing needs established by local and regional entities for persons with developmental disabilities. (Source: New Policy) GOAL H4 Equal Housing Opportunity Prohibit discrimination in the provision of housing based on race, color, religion, gender identity, age, marital status, national origin, ancestry, familial status, disability, or sexual orientation and to promote equal housing opportunities. Policies H4.1 Promote fair housing opportunities for all people. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 19) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 105 of 190 GOAL H5 Energy Conservation and Sustainable Development Promote energy conserving practices in the location, construction, renovation and maintenance of El Cerrito’s housing units. Policies H5.1 Promote residential energy conservation programs that provide assistance for energy conservation improvements. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 20) H5.2 Encourage the incorporation of energy conservation design features in existing and future residential development. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 21) H5.3 Encourage the use of sustainable and green building design in new and existing housing in compliance with the legislation in AB 32 and SB 375. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 22) H5.4 Encourage the location of multifamily housing near transit centers where living and/or working environments are within walkable distances in order to reduce auto trips to work, roadway expansion and air pollution. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Policy 23) H5.5 Continue to enforce the State Energy Conservation Standards for new residential construction and additions to existing structures. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 21.1, modified) ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 106 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame GOAL H1: EXISTING HOUSING Program H1.1. Residential Rental Inspection Program Continue to implement the Residential Rental Inspection Program (Section 16.30.040 of the El Cerrito Municipal Code) to ensure that rental housing units are maintained in a safe and habitable condition and comply with all codes and standards applicable to rental housing. If the property is in compliance with applicable codes and standards, a certificate of compliance shall be issued to the property owner. Over time, as it is implemented, the Program will provide a current housing condition survey of all rental housing units within the city. This survey should include the number of units in need of rehabilitation or replacement. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.1) H1.1 General Fund, Program Fees Building Division Ongoing Program H1.2. Code Enforcement Continue to investigate complaints and take action about code violations in single‐ and multifamily rental housing, and provide information on the City’s Residential Rental Inspection Program, the County Rental Rehabilitation Program, and the County Neighborhood Preservation Program. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.2) H1.1 General Fund Building Division Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 107 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H1.3. Housing Rehabilitation Programs Continue to encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing units by providing information on programs available to assist in housing rehabilitation, such as the Contra Costa County Housing Authority Rental Rehabilitation Loan Program and the Contra Costa County Neighborhood Preservation Program. Informational material on these programs will be available through the City’s website, at City Hall and in conjunction with the City’s code enforcement program. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.3) H1.1 Staff time, County Housing Authority and County CDBG funding Community Development Department Ongoing Program H1.4. Evaluate Displacement The City will participate, as appropriate, in studies of regional housing need and displacement, and consider policies or programs to address the displacement of lower income residents. (Source: New Program) H1.1, H1.2 Staff time Community Development Department Review regional efforts by 2016, annually thereafter ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 108 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H1.5. Monitor Assisted Units Continue to regularly monitor City‐ and former Redevelopment Agency‐assisted housing units to help preserve the existing stock of affordable housing. The City shall continue to maintain a database of assisted housing units and annually review existing agreements to ensure that they are in compliance with affordability requirements. The City shall continue to enforce notification requirements on City‐assisted units and units subject to an Affordable Housing Agreement in accordance with Chapter 19.22 of the Zoning Ordinance. The notification requirement under Chapter 19.22 is one year prior to resale of units or and/or conversion of such units to market‐rate. The City shall meet with the owner of the at‐risk project to determine their financial objectives and analyze the feasibility of providing financial assistance from any available affordable housing resources. The City shall ensure tenants receive proper notification and information on available affordable housing resources. The City shall reach out to qualified entities that may be interested in purchasing and/or managing units at‐risk, and where feasible, shall provide technical and/or financial assistance. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.6 and Program 1.7, combined) H1.1 Staff time Affordable Housing Program Annually ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 109 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H1.6. Eviction for Good Cause Ordinance The City shall vet and consider adopting a Good Cause for Eviction Ordinance that would prohibit landlords from terminating tenancy without good or just cause. (Source: New Program) H1.1 Staff time Affordable Housing Program 2016 Program H1.7. Capital Improvements Program The Planning Commission and City Council shall, on an annual basis, review the City Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to determine what special priorities are needed for capital improvement projects required to maintain the community’s older residential neighborhoods. Annual review of the CIP shall also include verification that needed improvements are scheduled for funding. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 1.8) H1.1 Staff time Planning Division, Public Works Department Annually ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 110 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H1.8. Seismic Retrofit Program Consider enacting additional incentive programs and requirements to encourage retrofitting of seismically unsafe buildings, such as soft‐story buildings. Explore possible funding sources or programs to minimize the financial impact of retrofits on low‐ and moderate‐income residents. Review upcoming grant opportunities on a quarterly basis and explore programs bi‐annually. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 3.1 and 3.2, combined) H1.3 Staff time, grant funding Community Development Department 2017, Review funding opportunities quarterly, plan for programs bi‐ annually GOAL H2: NEW DEVELOPMENT Program H2.1. Maintain Sites Inventory Conduct an annual evaluation of the City’s inventory of available sites, and take appropriate action to ensure that the inventory list is available to potential housing developers. Continue to support property owners and developers to identify underutilized and deteriorated properties where redevelopment as higher‐density, transit‐oriented developments could be feasible. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 4.1and Program 8.1) H2.1, H2.2, H2.6 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 111 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H2.2. Promote High Density and Mixed-use Development in City Nodes Promote development of mixed‐use and high‐density residential housing in development nodes of the city through the use of the following zoning tools that are incorporated in the City’s Zoning Ordinance:  San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan;  Density Bonus;  Planned Development and Development Agreement process; Economic Development efforts to market vacant and underutilized sites (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 5.1) H2.1, H2.2, H2.3, H2.9, H2.10, H2.12 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing Program H2.3. Fast Track Permitting for Second Units Continue to fast‐track processing for second units meeting established City standards and provide additional information on second units and the application process for public distribution. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 6.1) H2.4, H2.7, H.211 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 112 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H2.4. Master Fee Schedule Update During the annual revision of the Master Fee Schedule evaluate planning and development fees as they relate to housing development. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 12.1) H2.10 Staff time Community Development and Public Works Departments Annually Program H2.5. Streamlined Application Process The City will help streamline the application process by continuing to offer interdepartmental team meetings with applicants, conceptual review and study sessions with approval bodies, and assistance with pursuing outside funding opportunities. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 13.1) H2.11 Staff time Community Development and Public Works Departments Ongoing Program H2.6. Assist in Affordable Housing Development To the extent financially feasible, the City shall assist and support in the development of extremely low‐, very low‐, low‐, and moderate income housing units. The City shall encourage developers to leverage limited local funds and resources with other sources of assistance, such as Low Income Housing Tax Credits, mortgage revenue bonds, and other sources that fund affordable housing. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 16.1 and Program 16.3, combined) H2.13 Staff time, future repayments to the Low/Mod Housing Asset Fund and any deposits to the City Housing Trust Fund Affordable Housing Program Review funding opportunities annually ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 113 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H2.7. Explore Partnerships for Affordable Housing The City will look for opportunities with non‐profits and other agencies for cooperative efforts to expand the City’s supply of affordable housing. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 18.1) H2.13 Staff time Affordable Housing Program Ongoing Program H2.8. Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Conduct a study of the feasibility of an inclusionary housing ordinance that would include the terms and conditions under which new developments would be required to provide a specified percentage of housing affordable to very low‐, low‐, and/or moderate‐income households, or pay an affordable housing in‐lieu fee (i.e. based on a percent of project cost) to offset building affordable units. As part of a potential inclusionary program, the City will consider requirements and incentives to developers for a mix of dwelling sizes, including units with three or more bedrooms to meet the need of large families. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 16.2) H2.8, H2.13 Staff time, grant funding Affordable Housing Program 2016 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 114 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H2.9. Local Affordable Housing Financing Source The City shall investigate potential local financing sources that could be used to develop affordable housing, such as a housing mitigation impact fee or community facilities district. Prepare any required financial analyses, such as a nexus study, to legally establish a fee structure, assessment districts or other revenue generating instruments. Evaluate the impact of the proposed fees on the financial feasibility of new residential development. Develop a financing plan to phase in any proposed fees or districts. Consider adoption of financing program as developed under the preceding analyses.(Source: New Program) H2.8, H2.13 Staff time, grant funding Community Development Community Department 2016 Program H2.10. Use Planning Development Process to Encourage Affordable Housing Encourage the use of the planning development process included in the Zoning Ordinance to allow innovative approaches aimed at increasing affordable rental and for‐sale housing opportunities. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 9.1) H2.7 Staff time Planning Division Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 115 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H2.11. Plan for Infrastructure to Support Development Partner with other public agencies to plan and pursue funding for infrastructure improvements to accommodate future transit‐ oriented development within the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Area. (Source: New Program) H2.2 One Bay Area PDA Planning Grant, other outside sources as available Community Development Department, Public Works Department 2015‐16 and ongoing GOAL H3: SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING Program H3.1. Pursue Funding for Special Needs Housing Assist developers in obtaining State, Federal, and other appropriate sources of funding available to develop affordable and supportive housing for seniors, persons with special needs, including developmental disabilities, and large families and households with children. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 15.1) H3.1, H3.6 Staff time, grant funding Affordable Housing Program Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 116 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H3.2. Fast Track Permitting for Special Needs Housing The City will continue to fast track the planning and building inspection processes for housing units with three or more bedrooms for large families, housing for seniors, and other special needs housing for extremely low‐, very low‐, low‐, and moderate‐income households. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 15.3) H2.8, H2.11, H3.1 Staff time Planning and Building Division Ongoing Program H3.3. Senior Housing Development The City shall continue to encourage and support development of senior housing and senior residential care facilities that offer a wide range of housing choices and community services including healthcare, nutrition, transportation, and other amenities, and supports “aging in place” for the City’s senior population. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 15.4 and Program 15.5, combined) H3.1 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing Program H3.4. Participate in Homeless Census Count Participate in the biannual homeless survey conducted by the County’s Task Force on Homelessness to maintain estimates of the demand for emergency housing. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 17.2) H3.2 Staff time Affordable Housing Program Biannually, starting in 2015 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 117 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H3.5. Consolidated Plan Continue to coordinate with the County and cities to develop the Five‐Year Consolidated Plan for 2015‐2020 and 2020‐2025 to address housing and social service needs of the homeless and other special needs groups in Contra Costa County. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 17.3) H3.1, H3.5 Staff time Affordable Housing Program 2015, 2020 Program H3.6. Reasonable Accommodation Procedures To accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities and provide a streamlined permit review process, the City will continue to implement reasonable accommodation procedures. The City will continue to provide information on accommodation procedures. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 19.2) H3.5 Staff time Planning and Building Divisions Ongoing Program H3.7. Encourage Development of Housing for Persons with Disabilities The City shall reach out to developers of supportive housing to encourage development of projects targeted for persons with disabilities, including developmental disabilities. The City shall support applications for funding in support of housing construction and rehabilitation for persons with disabilities, including developmental disabilities. (Source: New Program) H3.1, H3.5 Staff time Affordable Housing Program Annually ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 118 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H3.8. Coordinate with the Regional Center of the East Bay The City shall work with the Regional Center of the East Bay to implement an outreach program informing residents of the housing and services available for persons with developmental disabilities. The City shall make information available on the City website. (Source: New Program) H3.5 Staff time Affordable Housing Program Annually GOAL H4: EQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY Program H4.1. Non-Discrimination Clauses Continue to provide non‐discrimination clauses in rental agreements and deed restrictions for housing constructed with either City funds or when City participation occurs. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 19.1) H4.1 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 119 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H4.2. Participate in CDBG Consortium Continue the City’s participation in the Contra Costa Urban County CDBG Consortium and distribute information about the free services offered by the Housing Services Collaborative including tenant‐landlord counseling, fair housing services, and legal advice and representation to Urban County residents, including El Cerrito. The City will distribute brochures and information about the services offered by the Housing Services Collaborative through the City’s website, at City Hall, the City’s Senior and Community Centers, and the El Cerrito Library. (Source: 2010 Housing Element, Program 19.3) H4.1 Staff time, County CDBG funding Affordable Housing Program Ongoing GOAL H5: ENERGY CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Program H5.1. Structure Fees to Incentivize Energy and Water Efficiency and Solar Energy Installation The City shall review its building permit fees, process, and requirements and consider ways to structure them to incentivize energy efficiency, clean energy, and water conservation improvements. (Source: Climate Action Plan, Objective EW‐1.1) H5.1, H5.2, H5.3 Staff time Community Development Department 2016‐17 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 120 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H5.2. Partnerships for Energy and Water Efficiency The City shall continue to develop partnerships with PG&E, EBMUD, ABAG, Contra Costa County Weatherization and Green Business Programs, CESC, East Bay Energy Watch and others to bring residential energy and water efficiency technical assistance and incentives to El Cerrito. (Source: Climate Action Plan, Objective EW‐1.1) H5.1 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing Program H5.3. Marketing Strategy The City shall continue to implement a low‐cost marketing strategy to encourage resident participation in energy and water efficiency programs. (Source: Climate Action Plan, Objective EW‐ 1.1) H5.1 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing Program H5.4. Apply for Energy Efficiency Grants The City shall apply for appropriate grants for marketing, outreach, and incentive programs dedicated to energy and water efficiency in El Cerrito. H5.1, H5.2 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Housing Policy Program I March 2015 Page 121 of 190 Implementation Program Policies Implemented Potential Funding Responsibility Time Frame Program H5.5. Residential PACE Financing The City will adopt residential PACE financing if it becomes available in California. (Source: Climate Action Plan, Objective EW‐ 1.2). H5.1 Staff time Community Development Department 2016 Program H5.6. Home Energy Performance Reports The City will encourage home energy performance reports at time of sale in order to promote better understanding of home comfort, indoor air quality, and utility costs. (Source: Climate Action Plan, Objective EW‐1.3). H5.1 Staff time Community Development Department Ongoing ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 122 of 190 Housing Policy Program I March 2015 B. QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES State law requires that the City plan to accommodate its fair share of the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). In addition, this Housing Element includes quantified objectives, shown in Table IV‐1, for the number of units that can reasonably be expected to be rehabilitated, conserved, or constructed during the next eight years. The quantified objectives expected to be met through Housing Element programs are estimated based on past program performance, construction trends, land availability, and anticipated future program funding. These quantified objectives reflect current economic conditions and the dramatic decrease in funding with the elimination of the Redevelopment Agency. Table IV-1 Quantified Objectives (January 31,2015 – January 31, 2023) Income Category New Construction Rehabilitation1 Preservation2 Extremely-Low Income 50 0 0 Very-Low Income 50 16 0 Low Income 100 24 58 Moderate Income 75 0 0 Above-Moderate Income 300 0 0 Total 575 32 58 Notes: 1The quantified objective for rehabilitated units is based on the County program. 2 The City will continue to monitor the 58 at-risk assisted units. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendices I March 2015 Page 123 of 190 V. LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Land Resources Appendix B: At Risk Assisted Units Appendix C: Evaluation of Prior Housing Element Programs Appendix D: Summary of Community Outreach Appendix E: Consistency with State Law Appendix F: Glossary ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 124 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 APPENDIX A: LAND RESOURCES The number of units identified in Table A‐3, Available Land Inventory, takes into account Zoning Ordinance standards, General Plan requirements, and the new standards in the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Form‐Based Code. Figures A‐1 and A‐2 show the sites in the northern and southern sections of the city, respectively. The “Map No.” column corresponds with the numbers and letters associated with each site in Figures A‐1 and A‐2. For the vacant parcels in the Single‐Family Residential (R‐1) zoning districts, some of the lots are constrained, as noted in Table A‐3, by their topography (steep slopes) or small size. A few of these sites are within landslide and/or seismic hazard zones based on their proximity to a fault that runs along the eastern border of the City. Both potential landslide hazards and topography specific to each site determine whether and where residences and/or accessory structures can be built. For sites within the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP), there are no maximum density standards. The City considered factors such as commercial development potential, height, parking, and open space requirements in assessing residential development potential on these sites. These factors may limit the number of residential units that can realistically be developed, and the comments on the City’s analysis in Table A‐3 reflect those limitations. In some cases, the inventory includes sites that are not counted towards the RHNA. These sites have residential potential, but site specific constraints and other uncertainties prevent the City from counting units towards the RHNA. These sites have a in the “Units Counted Towards RHNA” column and are explained in the “Constraints and Comments” column. Other factors that govern residential development on vacant sites include design criteria and building height. Site‐specific design requirements that aid in ensuring the compatibility of a development with surrounding uses dictate how a site is configured, thus affecting the number of units created. Design criteria for mixed use, general commercial, industrial, high‐density, and duplex zoning districts are determined by the City’s Design Review procedures. Design Review is a discretionary process whereby developments are reviewed either by staff or the City’s Design Review Board for quality and adequacy in architecture and landscaping. Sites in the RS single‐family residential zoning district are not subject to Design Review. Table A‐2 summarizes height limits by zoning district. In medium‐ to high‐density residential zones, the maximum allowable building height is 35 feet, which restricts housing unit construction to within three stories. In the TOMIMU zoning district the maximum allowable building height is 55 feet, or 65 feet for an affordable housing project. In the TOHIMU zoning district the maximum allowable building height is 65 feet, or 85 feet for an affordable housing project. Within the SPASP, affordable housing projects can also request open space and parking requirement reductions to increase the building footprint. Even with the parking, design, and height limits discussed above, the City has determined that the densities of 35 and 45 units per acre are achievable, and perhaps conservative, for residential and mixed‐use projects within the TOMIMU and TOHIMU zones. As discussed in Section III A, Adequate Sites Analysis, the City anticipates that densities within the Specific Plan will meet or ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 125 of 190 exceed the maximum allowed densities allowed under the previous zoning. However, in an effort to conservatively estimate future densities, the inventory uses the same density assumptions as the previous housing element for sites within the Specific Plan. Table A‐1 shows the Zoning Districts and General Plan Designations included in the inventory: Table A-1 Zoning Districts that Permit Residences El Cerrito (2014) SYMBOL ZONING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Allowed Density RS Single-Family Residential Very Low Density Low Density Up to 6 units per net acre Up to 9 units/acre RD Duplex (2 units) Medium Density Up to 20 units/acre RM High-Density Residential High Density Up to 35 units/acre and up to 45 units/acre with Zoning Ordinance Incentives TOMIMU Transit Oriented Mid-Intensity Mixed Use TOMIMU, TOHIMU No maximum density, but must comply with Form- Based Code TOHIMU Transit Oriented High-Intensity Mixed Use Source: City of El Cerrito (2014), San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (2014) Table A‐2 shows the maximum building heights allowed in each zone included in the inventory: Table A-2 Allowable Building Height El Cerrito (2014) Zoning Districts Ground Slope Height Less than 10% 25 Feet RS-5, RS-7.5, RS-10, RS-20 10%-50% 30 Feet Greater than 50% 35 Feet TOMIMU Not Applicable 55 Feet, or 65 feet for affordable projects TOHIMU 65 Feet, or 85 feet for affordable projects Source: City of El Cerrito (2014), San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (2014) ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 126 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- " T ÆÆ 21 Hillside Nature Area Hillside Nature Area ÆÆ C ÆÆ 32 ÆÆ 67 ÆÆ 4 ÆÆ 5 ÆÆ 4 ÆÆ 10 ÆÆ 2 ÆÆ 60 ÆÆ 76 ÆÆ 77 ÆÆ 78 ÆÆ 3 ÆÆ 37 ÆÆ 68 ÆÆ 59 ÆÆ 34 ÆÆ 61 ÆÆ 69 ÆÆ 74 ÆÆ 47 Æ ÆÆ 73 ÆÆ 6 ÆÆ 71 ÆÆ 72 ÆÆ 46 ÆÆ 70 Æ ÆÆ 15 ÆÆ 53 ÆÆ 81 ÆÆ 80 ÆÆ 42 ÆÆ 27 ÆÆ 22 ÆÆ 23 ÆÆ 9 ÆÆ 56 ÆÆ 14 ÆÆ 55 ÆÆ 13 ÆÆ 52 ÆÆ 12 ÆÆ 58 ÆÆ 17 ÆÆ 18 ÆÆ 66 ÆÆ 16 ÆÆ 20 ÆÆ 44 ÆÆ 30 ÆÆ 29 ÆÆ 11 ÆÆ 48 ÆÆ 79 ÆÆ 7 ÆÆ 54 ÆÆ 57 ÆÆ 49 ÆÆ 43 ÆÆ 50 ÆÆ E ÆÆ A ÆÆ B ÆÆ F ÆÆ 33 ÆÆ 39 ÆÆ 25 ÆÆ 31 80 80 U V 123 U V 123 Potrero Arlington Barrett Richmond Manila Navellier Carlson Moeser Tehama Ashbury Dimm Moeser Key Elm Cutting 55Th Balra Schmidt Blake Liberty Norvell Everett King Portola Donal Hazel Yuba Hill Gladys 56Th Scott Carquinez Sierra Waldo Jordan Hagen Carl Arlin g to n Terrace Knott Tulare Tamalpais Stockton Avis Alva Pomona C ontr a Costa 52Nd Vista Heights Zara Galvin Betty C arl ston Gately Vista Shevlin Canyon 59Th B r e w s t e r Fern Mono Kent Snowdon Ga n ges Bayview Kearney Burlingame Merced Harper 50Th Wildcat 57Th C o l u s a Cypress Plank View Club View Carlos Jefferson San Benito School Walnut Gill Tuller Glen M awr Nevin Lexington Sonoma Orchard Santa Clara Conlon Wilson Wildwood Eastshore Tho r s B a y S e a vie w Park Victor Regency Avila Wenk Earl James La Honda Mound M a de ra Fay Eureka Summit Park Noble Alb e m arle D o u gla s Maiden Linda Vista Ranchito Elm Seaview E lm Madera Hill Everett Kearney 56Th Kearney St o ckton L iberty Wildcat Canyon Regional Park Wildcat Canyon Regional Park Hillside Nature Area Hillside Nature Area Casa Cerrito Park Casa Cerrito Park Canyon Trail Park Canyon Trail Park Castro Park Castro Park Cerrito Cerrito Vista Park Vista Park Arlington Arlington Park Park Huber Park Huber Park Tassajara Park Tassajara Park Mira Vista Park Mira Vista Park Poinsett Park Poinsett Park Figure A-1 Northern Sites 0 0.2 0.4 0.1 Miles ¯ Source: City of El Cerrito (2014); Contra Costa County (2014) Map Date: 8/14/2014 City San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Boundary " T BART Approved Potential Under Under ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 128 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- " T ÆÆ 21 Hillside Nature Area Hillside Nature Area C o n t r a C o s t a C o n t r a C o s t a C o u n t y C o u n t y ÆÆ C ÆÆ 86 ÆÆ 84 ÆÆ 82 ÆÆ 83 ÆÆ 85 ÆÆ D ÆÆ 67 ÆÆ 1 ÆÆ 10 ÆÆ 60 ÆÆ 37 ÆÆ 68 ÆÆ 59 ÆÆ 26 ÆÆ 34 ÆÆ 69 ÆÆ 47 ÆÆ 62 ÆÆ 6 ÆÆ 71 ÆÆ 75 ÆÆ 72 ÆÆ 46 ÆÆ 70 ÆÆ 63 ÆÆ 28 ÆÆ 8 ÆÆ 19 ÆÆ 53 ÆÆ 27 ÆÆ 22 ÆÆ 64 ÆÆ 65 ÆÆ 38 ÆÆ 56 ÆÆ 13 ÆÆ 52 ÆÆ 12 ÆÆ 35 ÆÆ 58 ÆÆ 66 ÆÆ 24 ÆÆ 20 ÆÆ 48 ÆÆ 36 ÆÆ 54 ÆÆ 57 ÆÆ 51 ÆÆ 50 ÆÆ A ÆÆ 25 80 U V 123 Arlington Richmond Ashbury Carlson Manila Navellier Potrero Fairmount Moeser Colusa Central San Mateo Ashbury Moeser Arlington Elm Balra Kearney Schmidt Terrace Norvell Colusa K ing Stockton Everett Portola Donal Lincoln Eureka Central Waldo Scott Carmel B C Liberty H i g h g a te Clayton Cont r a C o sta Seaview Gladys Albemarle Coventry Ramona Pomona Lynn Avis Fresno Franciscan Bonnie Lexington Galvin Betty San Carlos Shevlin Lawrence Avila Van Fleet Blake Kerr Leneve Behrens Highland Ward Kent Sutter Panama A l a m e d a A l a m e d a C o u n t y C o u n t y Santa Clara Anson Sunset El Dorado Bates Kin gsto n Plank R in con Lenox Ganges Stra tf o r d N o rwoo d San Diego San Benito Santa Fe Havens Errol Arb o r Devonshire B u ck i n gham W e s l ey A rdm ore Tho r s B a y Carlson Park Regency Arlmont Oakview Leviston Rockway Earl Craft James J ul i a n Mound San Luis V ill a N u eva Ridgeway Coronado W i llow Marchant Dou g las Maiden Ranchito Seaview Park Pom on a Stockton Elm Liberty Norvell Eureka Kearney Everett Lexington Everett Waldo Lawrence Wildcat Canyon Wildcat Canyon Regional Park Regional Park Hillside Nature Area Hillside Nature Area Casa Cerrito Park Casa Cerrito Park Albany Hill Park Albany Hill Park Castro Park Castro Park Cerrito Vista Park Cerrito Vista Park Arlington Park Arlington Park Huber Park Huber Park Fairmont Fairmont Park Park Figure A-2 Southern Sites 0 0.2 0.4 0.1 Miles ¯ Source: City of El Cerrito (2014); Contra Costa County (2014) Map Date: 8/14/2014 City San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Boundary " T BART Station Approved Potential Under Construction Under ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 130 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 131 of 190 Table A-3 Projects Under Construction, Approved Projects, and Pending Projects El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning at Time of Approval General Plan SPSP Transect Zone & Overlay Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Units Counted Towards RHNA Income Category Constraints & Comments LI MI AM Residential Projects Under Construction as of Jan. 1, 2014 A Ohlone Gardens, 6495 Portola Drive, El Cerrito (new, affordable, MF rental development) 503-121-019, 503-121-020 TOM Commercial/ Mixed Use (as of date of project approval) TOMIMU 40,000 Sites consisted of 2 parcels, one vacant and one occupied by SFH and accessory structures. 57 56 1 56 units of deed-restricted affordable housing, 1 manager's unit. 10 units reserved for special needs residents, including households living with HIV/AIDs and mental health consumers. Very low- income households will occupy the remaining 46 affordable units. All of the units are designed to be adopted to the needs of residents with disabilities, including three that will be built as fully accessible units. B 6747 Hagen Blvd 501-422-011 RS-5 Low Density Residential 5,000 Vacant 2 2 1 primary unit and 1 accessory unit entitled and under construction Residential Projects Approved as of Jan. 1, 2014 C Eden Senior Housing, 10848-10860 San Pablo Ave 503-010-003, 503-010-014 TOM Commercial/ Mixed Use (as of date of project approval) TOMIMU 40,300 Underutilized (several existing commercial structures) 63 63 Mixed-use residential building including 63 deed-restricted units of affordable housing for seniors and ground-floor commercial space, including a medical clinic operated by Samuel Merritt University and a small retail space. D Creekside 504-170-022 TOM Commercial/ Mixed Use (as of date of project approval) TOHIMU 3 acres Vacant 128 22 106 128 unit development consisting of two separate condominium buildings that total approximately 211,596 gross square feet. The Project includes two three-story buildings above single level podium parking garages. The proposed development would range in height from 45 to 59 feet. The North Building would consist of 48 units and South Building would consist of 80 units. The proposal includes 3 studios, 60 1-bedroom, 59 2-bedroom, and 6 3-bedroom units. E 1626 Julian Dr. 505421011 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 10,560 Vacant 1 1 1 single family residence was entitled in 2012 Residential Projects under Review as of Jan. 1, 2014 F 1715 Elm St. 502112038 RM High Density Residential 0.42 acres Occupied by existing structure (SFH) and channeled creek 0 Site contains creek, City Creeks Ordinance applies. Proposed project is for 14 new dwelling units and the conservation of one existing dwelling unit. Project was approved by Planning Commission and then appealed. Total 251 119 22 110 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 132 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA Income Category Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments LI MI AMI 1 El Cerrito Plaza BART Central Avenue at Liberty Street (surface parking lot) 504-130-031, 504-122-010, 504-121-017, 504-050-012 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 2.78 1.63 1.59 1.54 7.54 acres Under Utilized - El Cerrito Plaza BART Station surface parking lot. 260-333 297 297 Yes 289-370 units could be could be developed under the 35-45 units/acre density standards in place before adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. Range is discounted by 10% to account for flexibility related to development standards. 2 Mayfair Block Bordered by San Pablo Avenue, Knott Blvd, Cutting Blvd, and Kearny Street 502-062-003, 502-062-028, 502-062-029 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 0.10 0.29 1.17 1.56 acres Vacant 54-70 62 62 Yes 54-70 units could be developed under the 35-45 units/acre density standards in place before adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. Developer engaged in predevelopment work on site is proposing 240 units under San Pablo Ave Specific Plan 3 Del Norte BART Bordered by Key Blvd, Knott Blvd, Cutting Blvd, and Kearny Street 502-052-006, 502-061-005 502-060-xxx TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 1.58 0.29 0.80 2.67 acres Under Utilized - Site is currently a Del Norte BART Station surface parking lot. 85-110 98 98 Yes 95-122 units could be developed under the 35-45 units/acre density standards in place before adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. Number is discounted by 10% to account for flexibility related to development standards. 4 Del Norte BART bordered by San Pablo Avenue, Cutting Boulevard, Hill Street and Key Blvd 502-071-015, 502-082-029 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 4.63 5.18 9.81 acres Under Utilized - Site is currently used as a Del Norte BART Station surface parking lot and parking structure. 309-397 353 353 Yes About 343-441 units could be could be developed under 35-45 units/acre density standards in place before adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. Number is discounted by 10% to account for flexibility related to development standards. 5 11450 San Pablo Avenue 502-100-041, 502-100-042 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 0.86 5.06 5.92 acres Under Utilized – Site is location of a former Target store now converted to new Safeway store. 104-133 0 Yes About 208-267 units could be could be developed under 35-45 units/acre density standards in place before adoption of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan. The number is reduced by 50% given the location of the new Safeway, which was completed in 2012-13. Low probability of redevelopment into housing in the 2015-2023 period so no units are counted towards the RHNA. However, there is still a desire to see Transit Oriented development including housing on the corner of the project site. 6 10520-10536 San Pablo Avenue 503-233-033, 503-233-015, 503-233-032, 503-233-007 TOMIMU TOMIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 0.15 0.23 0.19 0.11 0.68 acres Under Utilized & Vacant 31 31 31 Yes 31 units previously approved but entitlements have since expired. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 133 of 190 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 7 2101-2103 Kearney St. 501-252-019, 501-252-020 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 2,250 2,250 5,500 sq ft Vacant 2 2 2 Yes This site could accommodate a small mixed use or multi-family residential project. 8 10496 San Pablo Ave. 503-236-027 TOMIMU TOMIMU No maximum permitted density. Density range of 35- 45 units per acre assumed. 7500 sf Vacant 6 to 7 6 6 Yes This site could accommodate a small mixed use or multi-family residential project. 9 2635 Ellerhorst Ave. 500-072-008 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,000 Underutilized - large driveway for 2639 Ellerhorst. 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 2 2 Yes 10 7500 Moeser Lane 503-170-003 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 55,757 Vacant 0 0 Yes Site is owned by the City of El Cerrito and is adjacent to large PG&E power lines. 11 6515 Morris St. 501-310-012 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2500 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 12 1330 Scott St. 502-500-008 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3450 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 13 1431 Scott St. 502-330-008 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3850 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 2 2 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling.. 14 2065 Tapscott Ave. 501-340-036 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 4425 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 0 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may determine the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit construction of a home or accessory structure can be built. It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 134 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 15 2610 Yuba St. 500-050-034 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 6,775 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes 16 5711 Alta Punta 500-350-029 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3,000 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 17 2332 Alva Ave. 500-430-016 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3,564 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 18 2220 Arlington Blvd. 501-110-011 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3,074 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 2 2 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 19 928-934 Arlington Blvd. 505-301-006, 505-301-007 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 7,115 6,885 14,000 sf Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory unit could be developed on these parcels 0 Yes These parcels are landlocked and access easements would be required in order for them to be developed. 20 809 Ashbury Ave. 503-254-016 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,812 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be impossible to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 21 716 Balra Dr. 503-322-068, 503-322-069, 503-322-065, 503-322-063 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 8,600 11,326 4,975 4,343 29,244 sf Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this parcel 2 2 Yes Site consists of multiple lots that would have to be assembled to be developable. This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of the dwelling units and/or any accessory structure. 22 920 Balra Dr. 503-301-024 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,460 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 135 of 190 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 23 5914 Barrett Ave. 500-271-003 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,293 Vacant 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes Site has slope constraints. Site consists of existing SFH on multiple lots. It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 24 Adj. to 565 Bonnie Dr. 504-382-002 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,750 Vacant 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 25 7846-7834 Burns Court 505-101-019, 505-101-020 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,035 5,035 10,070 Under Utilized 2 primary and 2 accessory unit could be developed on these parcels 0 0 Yes Previous residence deemed uninhabitable and demolished. Site is within close proximity of a severe slide and may not be developable. 26 911 Clark Place 505-301-047 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 12,306 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this parcel if it was split. 0 0 Yes This parcel has a steep slope and is located within the Alquist-Priolo fault zone both of which may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence and any accessory structures. 27 704 Colusa Ave. 503-330-018 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,600 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes 28 834 Craft Ave. 505-302-011 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 7,280 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes Parcel is landlocked and an access easement would be required in order for it to be developed. 29 6607 Cutting Blvd. 501-400-028 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,700 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 30 6631 Cutting Blvd. 501-400-025 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,660 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 136 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 31 7120-7140 Cutting Blvd. 501-110-017, 501-110-014 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 6,970 32,670 39,640 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory unit could be developed on these parcels 1 1 Yes Part of a 4-lot subdivision. This is the remaining vacant lot. Site contains huge rock outcropping limiting buildable area; owner proposing one single-family residence at this time. 32 Fairview Dr. 505-040-006 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 14.9 acres Vacant 30 primary units and 30 accessory units 15 15 Yes This parcel has steep slopes and riparian habitat that may limit number and location of any residences or accessory structures 33 5205 Cypress Ave. 509-021-009 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,300 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 34 7755 Earl Ct. 505-103-023 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 11,000 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes This parcel has steep slopes that may the limit number and location of any residences or accessory structures. 35 441-443 Everett St. 504-112-002, 504-112-026, 504-112-027 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3,700 3,700 2,500 9,900 Vacant 4 primary and 2 accessory unit could be developed on these parcels 3 3 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 36 630 Everett St. 503-374-006 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,500 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 37 943 Galvin Dr. 503-301-018 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 13,780 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel if it was split. 2 2 Yes This parcel has steep slopes that may the limit number and location of any residences or accessory structures. 38 712 Gelston Place. 505-282-030 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 4,984 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 137 of 190 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 39 6465-6473 Hagen Blvd. 501-330-013, 501-330-014, 501-330-015 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,750 2,750 2,775 8,275 Vacant 3 primary and 3 accessory units could be developed on these parcels. 1 1 Yes These parcels have steep slopes that may the limit number and location of residences even if they are combined. It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 42 6518 Hagen Blvd. 501-322-014 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 6,000 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel- See comment to the right 0 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit whether a home or accessory structure can be built. 43 6806 Hagen Blvd. 501-410-014 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 1,440 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 0 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 44 2134-2146 Junction Ave. 501-300-005, 501-300-004, 501-300-003, 501-300-002, RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,575 2,525 2,500 2,277 9,877 Vacant 4 primary and 4 accessory units could be developed on these parcels. 2 2 Yes Lots could be combined into conforming parcels to allow for larger single family construction. 45 2150 Junction Ave. 501-300-001 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,574 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes Lots could be combined into conforming parcels to allow for larger single family construction. 46 945 King Dr. 505-222-015 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 8,848 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 0 Yes Large portion of the sites are encumbered by a Pacific Gas and Electric utility company easement that would prohibit construction of a residence. 47 953 - 969 King Dr. 505-222-004, 505-222-011, 505-222-012, 505-222-013 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 10,170 10,971 10,340 10,080 41,561 Vacant 8 primary and 8 accessory units could be developed on these parcels. 0 Yes Large portion of the sites are encumbered by a Pacific Gas and Electric utility company easement that would prohibit construction of a residence. 48 1244 Liberty St. 503-040-023 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,500 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 138 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 49 5550 Ludwig 500-340-010 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 1,595 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 0 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 50 1415 Navellier St. 502-320-005 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 1,250 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes Minimum required residential lot size is 5,000 square feet. 51 543 Norvell St. 504-061-005 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,100 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 52 805 Park Way 505-241-012 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3,910 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 53 754 1/2 Pomona Ave. 503-480-014 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 6,800 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes 54 814 Pomona Ave. 503-350-022 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,331 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 55 5334 Potrero Ave. 509-012-006 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 4,600 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 56 925 Richmond St. 503-241-026 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,000 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit 1 1 Yes 57 1534 Richmond St. 502-290-004 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 2,125 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site. 0 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 139 of 190 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 58 710 Sea View Dr. 505-244-022 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 3,705 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site. 1 1 Yes It would be difficult to locate a detached accessory unit on a lot less than 5,000 feet but it is possible to incorporate one into a primary dwelling. 59 839 Shevlin Dr. 505-230-044 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 12,580 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this site 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit whether a home or accessory structure can be built. 60 937-941 Shevlin Dr. 505-221-026, 505-221-027 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 10,925 29,400 40,325 Vacant 8 primary and 8 accessory units could be developed on these parcels. 0 Yes Large portions of these sites are encumbered by a Pacific Gas and Electric utility company easements that would prohibit construction of a residence. 61 2570 Tassajara Ave. 500-210-010 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 11,550 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this site 2 2 Yes 2 units could be developed if the lot were subdivided, otherwise 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this parcel. 62 8049 Terrace Dr. 505-230-036 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 10,200 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this site 0 Yes A utility easement and slide traverse this site and it has a steep slope, all of which may prohibit where residences are located or if residences can be built. 63 8350 Terrace Dr. 505-273-005 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 8,184 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site. 0 Yes A slide traverses this site and it has a steep slope, both of which may prohibit where residences are located or if residences can be built. 64 8363 Terrace Dr. 505-272-017 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 4,995 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 1 1 Yes 65 8551 Terrace Dr. 505-291-014 RS-5 Low Density Residential 9 units/acre 5,200 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 0 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. 66 1013 King Dr. 505-101-012 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 3,049 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 1 1 Yes Minimum required residential lot size is 5,000 square feet ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 140 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 67 Madera Drive 502-142-014, 505-142-012, 505-142-013 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 331,492 18,295 2,614 352,401 Vacant 14 primary and 14 accessory units 0 Yes The site has a known slide and is very steep. In 2013 the site was purchased by the Trust for Public Land with an agreement with the City to acquire for the purpose of preserving as open space and recreation. 68 1364-1370 Contra Costa Dr. 505-181-004, 505-181-010, 505-181-011 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 10,420 13,600 13,188 37,208 Vacant 3 primary and 3 accessory units could be developed on this site 3 3 Yes These parcels have steep slopes that may the limit number and location of residences. 69 1324 Contra Costa Dr. 505-181-018 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 11,900 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site. 1 1 Yes These parcels have steep slopes that may the limit number and location of residences. 70 1304 Contra Costa Dr. 505-181-032 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 8,400 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 0 Yes Minimum lot size in the RS-10 zoning district is 10,000 sq. ft., so an exception to the subdivision ordinance would be required to build on this site. 71 1103 Contra Costa Dr. 505-203-029 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 9,798 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. 72 1115 Contra Costa Dr. 505-203-009 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 9,750 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. 73 1618 Julian Dr. 505-421-008 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 10,800 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. 74 1638 Julian Dr. 505-421-014 RS-10 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 11,600 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. 75 Leneve Pl. 573-111-008 RS-7.5 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 10,120 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 1 1 Yes This parcel has a steep slope that may limit the location of a residence or accessory structure or prohibit a residence or accessory structure. 76 8407 Wildcat Dr. 573-132-023 RS-20 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 19,994 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 1 1 Yes These sites are located within the Alquist-Priolo fault zone and contain active landslides. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix A I March 2015 Page 141 of 190 Table A-4 Potential Sites, El Cerrito (2014) Map No. Address and Location APN(s) Zoning General Plan Maximum Permitted Density Lot Size (Square Feet or Acres) Vacant or Under Utilized (Existing use) Estimated # of dwelling units Units Counted Towards RHNA LI MI AMI Infrastructure Capacity Constraints & Comments 77 8440-8436 Wildcat Dr. 573-132-002, 573-132-003 RS-20 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 19,800 20,043 39,843 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units 2 2 Yes These sites are located within the Alquist-Priolo fault zone and contain active landslides. 78 1460 Rifle Range Rd. 573-132-021 RS-20 Very Low Density Residential 6 units/acre 19,994 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit 1 1 Yes These sites are located within the Alquist-Priolo fault zone and contain active landslides. 79 1610 Liberty St. 502-211-006 RD Medium Density Residential 20 units/acre 2,500 Vacant 2 1 1 Yes 80 1745 Elm St. 502-112-037 RM High Density Residential 35 units/acre, up to 45 units per acre with incentives 6,150 Vacant 2 2 2 Yes Zoning Ordinance allows up to 2 units on a 5,000 sq. ft. lot 81 1743 Liberty St. 502-113-029 RM High Density Residential 35 units/acre, up to 45 units per acre with incentives 6,500 Vacant 3 3 3 Yes Zoning Ordinance allows up to 3 units on a 6,500 sq. ft. lot 82 3405 Carlson Blvd. 510-014-011, 510-014-015 RM High Density Residential 35 units/acre, up to 45 units per acre with zoning ordinance incentives 2,500 2,280 4,780 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this site 0 Yes Site is located within a FEMA 100-Year flood zone. Due to flood constraints, no units are counted towards the RHNA from this site. Minimum required residential lot size for more than one unit is 5,000 square feet. The parcel could possibly be merged with adjacent parcel, but no application has been submitted for a lot merger. 83 5833 Central Ave. 510-036-012 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density 2,704 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 0 Yes Due to small lot size, the site inventory assumes that developable capacity is zero. 84 3027 Carlson Blvd. 510-037-013 RM High Density Residential 35 units/acre, up to 45 units per acre with zoning ordinance incentives 5,450 Vacant 2 primary and 2 accessory units could be developed on this site 2 2 Yes Minimum required residential lot size for more than one unit is 5,000 square feet. No application has been submitted for a lot merger. 85 5627 Central Ave. 510-043-004 TOHIMU TOHIMU No maximum permitted density 2,175 Vacant 1 primary and 1 accessory unit could be developed on this site 0 0 Yes Due to small lot size, the site inventory assumes that developable capacity is zero. 86 5730 El Dorado St. 510-045-006 RM High Density Residential 35 units/acre, up to 45 units per acre with zoning ordinance incentives 12,500 Vacant 9 9 9 Yes Zoning Ordinance allows up to 9 units on a 12,150 sq. ft. lot Total 943 849 17 77 ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 142 of 190 Appendix A I March 2015 This page is intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix B I March 2015 Page 143 of 190 APPENDIX B: AT RISK ASSISTED UNITS 1. Assisted Housing Units at Risk of Converting to Market Rate Rents Housing that receives governmental assistance is often a significant source of affordable housing in many communities. Because of its significance, this section identifies publicly assisted rental housing in El Cerrito, evaluates the potential of such housing to convert to market rate during a 10‐year planning period (2015 to 2025), and analyzes the options and associated costs to preserving these units. Covenants and deed restrictions are the typical mechanisms used to maintain the affordability of publicly assisted housing, ensuring that these units are available to lower‐and moderate‐income households in the long term. Over time, the City may face the risk of losing some of its affordable units due to the expiration of covenants and deed restrictions. As the relatively tight housing market continues to put upward pressure on market rents, property owners are more inclined to discontinue public subsidies and convert the assisted units to market‐rate housing. Table B‐1 provides the inventory of assisted rental housing units in El Cerrito as of August 2014. Of the 487 total assisted units within five developments, 58 units in two developments are at risk of converting to market‐rate during the 2015 to 2025 period. A total of 31 at‐risk units are reserved for seniors. Hazel Shirley Manor was at‐risk in 2026 but the developers (Eskaton Properties Inc.) renewed the affordability restrictions. Table B-1 Inventory of Publicly Assisted Rental Housing El Cerrito (2014) Project Name Address Total Units Assisted Units Population Assisted Type of Subsidy Earliest Expiration of Affordability At-risk Hazel Shirley Manor 11025 San Pablo 63 63 Senior, mobility impaired HUD 202 and Project Based Section 8 2031 No El Cerrito Royale Assisted Living 6510 Gladys 102 31 Senior RDA, CDBG, County Tax- Exempt Bonds 2019 Yes Del Norte Place 11720 San Pablo 135 27 Family TCAC, County Tax-Exempt Bonds 2020 Yes Idaho Apartments 10203 San Pablo 29 25 HIV/AIDS/Homele ss/Mental Illness RDA, County HOPWA, Richmond 2052 No Village at Town Center Apartments 10810 San Pablo 158 24 Family RDA Inclusionary Agreement 2035 No Total Assisted Units 487 170 Total At-Risk Units - 58 Source: Eskaton Properties Inc., City of El Cerrito, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 144 of 190 Appendix B I March 2015 2. At-Risk Units The following is a summary of the two developments with at‐risk units:  El Cerrito Royale. The El Cerrito Royale is a 102‐unit congregate care facility that is licensed through the State. The project includes 31 very low‐income units. The El Cerrito Redevelopment Agency held the ground lease though a partnership. The County issued tax‐exempt bonds for the project. The initial 30‐year period of affordability is set to expire in 2019. Room, board, and care are included in the rent and some units are double occupancy. This makes the market value of the project difficult to estimate as this project is not a typical multi‐family rental development. For this analysis, the market value was estimated assuming an operating cost that included an estimated social service expense.  Del Norte Place. Del Norte Place is a 135‐unit apartment complex in El Cerrito near the Del Norte BART Station. In exchange for El Cerrito Redevelopment Agency assistance through a Disposition and Development Agreement and a ground lease, the development allocates 27 units for very low‐income households. These units are also restricted through the Low Income Housing Tax Credit program. The term of affordability is set to expire in 2020. Because it is not possible to only acquire the 27 affordable units in Del Norte Place, the estimated market value is calculated for all 135 units in the project, as shown in Table B‐2. 3. Preservation and Replacement Options To preserve the existing affordable housing stock, the City must either preserve the existing assisted units or facilitate the development of new units. Depending on the circumstances of the at‐risk projects, different options may be used to preserve or replace the units. Preservation options typically include: 1) transfer of project to non‐ profit ownership; 2) provision of rental assistance to tenants using other funding sources; and 3) purchase of affordability covenants. In terms of replacement, the most direct option is the development of new assisted multi‐family housing units. Transfer of Ownership. Transferring ownership of an at‐risk project to a non‐profit housing provider is generally one of the least costly ways to ensure that the at‐risk units remain affordable for the long term. By transferring property ownership to a non‐profit organization, affordability restrictions can be secured and the project would become potentially eligible for a greater range of governmental assistance. The estimated market value for the at‐risk units in the two projects is shown in Table B‐ 2. Because it is not possible to only acquire the affordable units in the Del Norte and El Cerrito Royale developments, the estimated market value is calculated for all units in each of the projects, as indicated in Table B‐2. Current market value for the projects is estimated on the basis of the project’s potential annual income, and operating and maintenance expenses from the 2007 Bay Area Local Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC). As indicated below, the estimated market value of the two projects is $44.8 ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix B I March 2015 Page 145 of 190 million. (These estimates are provided for purposes of comparison and understanding the magnitude of costs involved and do not represent the precise market values of these projects. The actual market values at time of sale will depend on market and property conditions, among other factors.) Table B-2 Market Value of At-Risk Projects El Cerrito (2014) Development Costs Del Norte Place Annual Operating Costs $974,565 Annual Gross Income $3,180,408 Estimated Market Value $26,470,116 El Cerrito Royale Annual Operating Costs $583,338 Annual Gross Income $2,117,520 Estimated Market Value $18,410,184 Total Estimated Market Value $44,880,300 Del Norte Place has 135 total units, with 67 1-bedroom units and 68 2-bedroom units. El Cerrito Royale has 102 1-bedroom units. Assumptions: Average market rent 1-bedroom: $1,730 2-bedroom: $2,193 Source: Real Answers rental survey, July 2014 Annual operating expenses per unit per year Del Norte: $7,219.00 EC Royale: $5,719 Source: Bay Area LISC Operating Cost Database, 2007, adjusted to 2014 dollars Rental Assistance. Rental subsidies using other funding sources can be used to maintain affordability of the 58 at‐risk affordable units. These rent subsidies could be structured to mirror the federal Section 8 program. Under Section 8, HUD pays the difference between what tenants can pay (defined as 30 percent of household income) and what HUD estimates as the fair market rent (FMR) on the unit. In Contra Costa County, the 2014 FMR was $1,255 for a one‐bedroom unit and $1,578 for a two‐bedroom unit. The feasibility of this alternative is highly dependent upon the availability of reliable funding sources necessary to make rent subsidies and the willingness of property owners to participate in the program. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 146 of 190 Appendix B I March 2015 As indicated in Table B‐3, the total cost of subsidizing the rents of all 58 at‐risk units is estimated at $21,437 per month or $257,244 annually. This is $14.1 million over 55 years. Table B-3 Rental Subsidies Required El Cerrito (2014) Unit Size Total Units 2014 Fair Market Rent Household Size Annual HH Income - Very Low- Income Affordable Housing Cost per unit Subsidy Total Subsidy 1-bedroom 44 $1,255 2 $37,400 $935 $320 $14,080 2-bedroom 14 $1,578 3 $42,100 $1,053 $526 $7,357 Total 58 $21,437 Total Annual Cost: $257,244 Notes: Fair Market Rent (FMR) is determined by HUD. Contra Costa County 2014 Area Median Income (AMI) limits set by the California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD). Very Low Income is calculated at 50% of AMI. Affordable Housing Cost equals 30% of household income Bedrooms per units: Del Norte (13 1-bedroom and 14 2-bedroom units); El Cerrito Royale (31 1-bedroom units). Tax‐Exempt Bond Refinancing. Contra Costa County acts as a conduit issuer of mortgage revenue bonds. The El Cerrito Royale was partially financed with County‐ issued tax‐exempt bonds. A potential way to preserve the affordability of the 31 very low‐income restricted units at the El Cerrito Royale under the bond program is to refinance the remaining mortgage on the project. When refinanced, the project would be required by the 1986 Tax Reform Act to commit its 20 percent affordable units for the greater of 15 years or as long as the mortgages are outstanding. The costs to refinance the project would include the difference in interest rates on the remaining debt between the previous and renegotiated loan packages, an issuance cost to be paid up front by the County, and administrative costs. To provide the property owner with an incentive to refinance, the County could offer to refinance the project with a new tax‐exempt bond issue at an interest rate lower than the rate on the initial bond. Other assistance, such as rehabilitation loans or grants, may also be available. Purchase of Affordability Covenants. Another option to preserve the affordability of the at‐risk project is to provide an incentive package to the owner to maintain the project as affordable housing. Incentives could include writing down the interest rate on the remaining loan balance, providing a lump‐sum payment, and/or supplementing the rents to market levels. The feasibility of this option depends on whether the complex is too highly leveraged. By providing lump‐sum financial incentives or ongoing subsides in rents or reduced mortgage interest rates to the owner, the City can ensure that some or all of the units remain affordable. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix B I March 2015 Page 147 of 190 Construction of Replacement Units. The construction of new low‐income housing units is a means of replacing the at‐risk units should they be converted to market‐rate units. The cost of developing housing depends upon a variety of factors including density, size of the units, location, land costs, and type of construction. The average construction cost for a rental residential unit is approximately $456,940 (including land costs), based on assessments from a recent multi‐family developments in El Cerrito. Based on this estimate, it would cost approximately $26.5 million to develop 58 new units should both projects convert to market rate. Table B-4 Construction of Replacement Units El Cerrito (2014) Cost Total Per Unit Acquisition Costs Land Cost $2,900,000 $50,877 Title/Recording/Escrow $22,179 $389 Off-Site Improvements $189,252 $3,320 General Development Costs Costs $22,934,148 $402,353 Total Development Costs $26,045,579 $456,940 Total Development Cost for 58 Units $26,502,519 Source: California Housing Partnership Corporation, 2014. 4. Cost Comparisons The previous analysis attempts to estimate the cost of preserving the at‐risk units under various options. The cost of acquiring both projects and transferring ownership to non‐ profit housing organizations is highest at approximately $44.8 million, due to the large number of market‐rate units that would also need to be purchased. In comparison, the annual costs of providing rental subsidies to preserve the 58 assisted units are relatively low ($257,244 annually); however, long‐term provision of rental subsidies for at least 55 years would cost more than $14.1 million. New construction of 58 replacement units is another option at approximately $26.5 million. However, this option is constrained by a variety of factors, including growing scarcity of land zoned for residential use and land costs. 5. Resources for Preserving At-Risk Units Available public and non‐profit organizations with the capacity to preserve assisted housing developments include Contra Costa County, the City of El Cerrito, and various non‐profit developers, including Eden Housing, Resources for Community Development, Mercy Housing, EAH, and Bridge Housing Corporation. Financial resources available include CDBG and HOME funds, Section 8 rental assistance, and low income housing tax credits. According to a list of qualified entities maintained by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), there are a number of non‐profit housing providers that would be suitable candidates to receive the transfer ownership of ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 148 of 190 Appendix B I March 2015 the at‐risk units discussed here. There are three qualified entities on the HCD list that are well established non‐profit housing providers active in Contra Costa County, including BRIDGE Housing Corporation (San Francisco), Resources for Community Development (Berkeley), and Eden Housing, Inc. (Hayward), which could be suitable candidates for the transfer of ownership. The HCD list does not include a number of housing developers who have the capacity to own and manage this type of property. The entities named above are representative of the active developers in the County. Table B-5 Qualified Entities Contra Costa County (2014) Organization Phone Number ACLC, Inc. (209) 466-6811 Alameda County Allied Housing Program (510) 670-5404 Anka Behavioral Health (925) 825-4700 C. Sandidge and Associates (510) 964-0916 Christian Church Homes of Northern California, Inc. (510) 632-6714 City of Walnut Creek (925) 943-5899 x236 Community Housing Developers, Inc. (408) 279-7677 Community Housing Development Corp. (510) 412-9290 Community Housing Opportunities Corporation 530)757-4444 Contra Costa Department of Conservation & Development (925) 335-1290 East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation (510) 287-5353 East Bay NHS (510) 237-6459 Eden Housing, Inc. (510) 582-1460 Eskaton Properties Inc. (916) 331-8513 Northern California Land Trust, Inc. (510) 548-7878 Pacific Community Services, Inc. (925) 439-1056 Resources for Community Development (510) 841-4410 ROEM Development Corporation (408) 984-5600 Rubicon Programs, Inc. (510) 235-1516 Rural California Housing Corp (916) 447-2854 Sacramento-Yolo Mutual Housing Association (916) 453-8400 x219 Satellite Affordable Housing Associates Inc. (510) 647-0700 Vallejo Neighborhood Housing Services, Inc (707) 552-4663 Source: HCD, 2014. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix C I March 2015 Page 149 of 190 APPENDIX C: EVALUATION OF PRIOR HOUSING ELEMENT PROGRAMS Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 1.1: Continue to implement the Residential Rental Inspection Program under Section 16.30.040 of the El Cerrito Municipal Code. The Program’s purpose is to ensure that rental housing units in the City are maintained in a safe and habitable condition and comply with all codes and standards applicable to rental housing and requires that each rental unit in the City be inspected every two years. If the property is in compliance with applicable codes and standards, a certificate of compliance shall be issued to the property owner. Over time, as it is implemented, the Program will provide a current housing condition survey of all rental housing units within the City. This survey should include the number of units in need of rehabilitation or replacement. Ongoing The City continues to implement the Residential Rental Inspection Program, and a new cycle started in 2013. Maintain Program 1.2: Continue to investigate complaints and take action about code violations in single family and multifamily rental housing, and provide information on the City’s Residential Rental Inspection Program, the County Rental Rehabilitation Program and the County Neighborhood Preservation Program. Ongoing The City continues to investigate complaints and take action regarding code violations in single family and multifamily rental housing. Maintain Program 1.3: Continue to encourage the rehabilitation of existing housing units by providing information on programs available to assist in housing rehabilitation, such as the Contra Costa County Housing Authority Rental Rehabilitation Loan Program and the Contra Costa County Neighborhood Preservation Program. Informational material on these programs will be available through the City’s website, at City Hall and in conjunction with the City’s code enforcement program. Ongoing The City continues to make information available to the public at the front counter. Maintain Program 1.4: Continue to permit new housing units and housing rehabilitation in mixed use and commercial zoning districts subject to Zoning Ordinance requirements so that housing and commercial uses can complement and support one another. Ongoing The Zoning Ordinance continues to allow housing in mixed use and commercial zones. The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan expanded housing opportunities in these areas. Maintain as a policy Program 1.5: Continue to regulate condominium conversions in accordance with Chapter 19.45 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ongoing The City continues to regulate condominium conversions consistent with the Zoning Ordinance; however, there were no requests for conversion during the planning period. Maintain as a policy Program 1.6: Continue to regularly monitor assisted housing units to help preserve the existing stock of affordable housing. The Redevelopment Agency will continue to maintain a database of assisted housing units and annually review existing agreements to ensure that they are in compliance with affordability requirements. Annual Although the Redevelopment Agency dissolved in 2012, the City completed annual monitoring of assisted housing units in 2013. Although one development was at-risk during the housing element planning period, the developer renewed the affordability restrictions. Maintain. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 150 of 190 Appendix C I March 2015 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 1.7: Continue to enforce notification requirements on Below Market Rate [BMR] and Section 8 Project Based Subsidy units, prior to resale of units or and/or conversion of such units to market-rate in accordance with Chapter 19.22 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ongoing The Zoning Ordinance continues to mandate notification requirements on Below Market Rate (BMR) and Section 8 Project Based Subsidy units. No units converted to market the during the planning period. Maintain. Program 1.8: Capital Improvements Program: The Planning Commission and City Council shall, on an annual basis, review the City Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to determine what special priorities are needed for capital improvement projects required to maintain the community’s older residential neighborhoods. Annual review of the CIP shall also include verification that needed improvements are scheduled for funding. Annual The City Council and Planning Commission continues to review the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) on an annual basis. Maintain. Program 2.1: Retain existing residential zoning and discourage non- residential uses in these zones. The City will strictly enforce the Zoning Code which states that non-residential uses in residential areas are limited to churches, daycares, and schools. Ongoing The City continues to discourage non-residential uses in residential zones, with the exception of churches, daycares, and schools. Maintain as a policy. Program 3.1: Consider enacting additional incentive programs and requirements to encourage retrofitting of seismically unsafe buildings, such as soft-story buildings. Ongoing The city has a URM ordinance but it does not apply to soft-story residential Maintain Program 3.2: Explore possible funding sources or programs to minimize the financial impact of retrofits on low- and moderate-income residents. Review upcoming grant opportunities on a quarterly basis and explore programs bi- annually. Ongoing The City continues to explore funding sources and programs to minimize financial impacts of retrofits on low-income and moderate-income residents. Maintain Program 4.1: Conduct an annual evaluation of the City’s inventory of available sites, and take appropriate action to ensure that the inventory list is available to potential housing developers. Ongoing The City is updating the sites inventory as part of the Housing Element Update and will make the inventory available to potential developers. Maintain. Program 5.1: Maintain General Plan designations for mixed use and high- density residential housing and the Transit Oriented Mixed Use districts in the development nodes of the City. Ongoing The City continues to maintain General Plan designations for mixed-use and high-density residential housing, and the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan further enforces mixed-use, high-density, and Transit Oriented Mixed Use designations in its Plan Area. Maintain as a policy. Program 6.1: Continue to fast-track processing for units meeting established City standards and provide additional information on second units and the application process for public distribution. Ongoing The City continues to fast-track processing for units meeting City standards. Maintain ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix C I March 2015 Page 151 of 190 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 6.2: Consider the establishment of a “pre-approved” second unit program. Such a program could offer residents and contractors the opportunity to purchase or use second unit plans that have been pre- approved by the City for conformance with building codes and many other standards. Ongoing The City continues to encourage the development of second units. However, upon further investigation, a “pre-approved” program does not appear to be practical given the many potential lot configurations and unit sizes. City will continue policy of encouraging second units. Delete Program 7.1: Continue to implement City-adopted regulations that allow manufactured housing and pre-fab housing in residential districts provided any manufactured unit is certified under the standards set forth in the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1976 (42 USC 5401 et seq.) and follows the standards set in Chapter 19.20 of the Zoning Ordinance. Ongoing The Zoning Ordinance continues to allow for manufactured housing and pre-fabricated housing in residential districts. Maintain as a policy Program 8.1: Continue to support property owners and developers to identify underutilized and deteriorated properties where redevelopment as higher- density, transit-oriented developments could be feasible. The required 431 units may be realized through the redevelopment of lots to higher density across the City’s TOM (Transit Oriented Mixed-Use) zoning district. Ongoing The City continues to support property owners and developers in identifying underutilized and deteriorated properties. Several new projects have been proposed on underutilized sites. For example, the City transferred a City-owned underutilized site to Eden Housing to develop an affordable senior housing project with 63 units, ground floor retail space, and a medical clinic. Ohlone Gardens, a 57-unit affordable development, is under construction on a formerly underused site on Portola Drive. The 1715 Elm Street project is a private development proposed on a site that includes a vacant single family home, which the developer will restore and relocate on site to incorporate it into the project. Maintain ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 152 of 190 Appendix C I March 2015 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 9.1: Encourage the use of the planning development process included in the Zoning Ordinance to allow innovative approaches aimed at increasing affordable rental and for-sale housing opportunities. Through applications for Planned Development or Development Agreements for new units or the conversion of apartments to condo or vise-versa, staff will negotiate with the applicant to provide 15% of the units to be affordable housing units. Through the City’s Density Bonus program in the Zoning Ordinance developers are allowed to build additional units and in turn create additional affordable housing units Ongoing The Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 19.22 ) continues to allow innovative approaches aimed at increasing affordable rental and for-sale housing opportunities. The City works with applicants to encourage affordable housing to be included in new developers. Eden Senior Housing took advantage of the density bonus to build additional units and receive a height increase and parking reduction. Maintain Program 10.1: Revise the Zoning Ordinance to include housing size diversity standards. Staff will examine incentives (i.e. expedited plan check and planning review, see Program 13.1 and 15.3) for multifamily residential projects that have 3 to 4 bedroom units Ongoing The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan Transect zones encourage the provision of multifamily housing that includes units with 3 or more bedrooms. Maintain as a policy Program 11.1: Continue to enforce the Zoning Ordinance which provides regulatory incentives for affordable housing development, including density bonuses and site flexibility.  Incentives currently in the ZO:  Incentives program  Density Bonus  PD and DA process  Parking reduction ¼ mile from Transit Ongoing The City continues to enforce the Zoning Ordinance. Repetitive with Program 5.1. Delete. Program 11.2: Continue to inform developers about and allow density bonuses consistent with State law, the General Plan, and Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 19.22 ECMC). Ongoing The City continues to inform developers about and allow for density bonuses. Maintain as a policy Program 12.1: During the annual revision of the Master Fee Schedule evaluate planning and development fees as they relate to housing development. Fees were updated with Master Fee Schedule as part of the 2013 budget. Maintain ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix C I March 2015 Page 153 of 190 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 13.1: The City will help streamline the application process by continuing to offer interdepartmental team meetings with applicants, conceptual review and study sessions with approval bodies, and assistance with pursuing outside funding opportunities. Ongoing The City continues to streamline the application process by offering interdepartmental team meetings with applicants, conceptual review and study sessions with approval bodies, and assistance with pursuing outside funding opportunities Maintain Program 14.1: Continue to enforce the Zoning Ordinance and encourage development in the Transit Oriented Mixed Use Zone. Ongoing Ongoing Maintain as a policy Program 15.1: Assist developers in obtaining state and federal funding available to develop affordable housing for seniors, persons with special needs, large families and households with children. Where possible, leverage Redevelopment Agency funds with state and federal sources of funding Ongoing The City continues to assist developers in obtaining funding; however Redevelopment Agency funds are no longer available since the Redevelopment Agency was dissolved in 2012. Maintain Program 15.2: Continue to enforce Federal and State Handicapped Accessibility and Adaptability Standards. Ongoing The City continues to enforce Federal and State Handicapped Accessibility and Adaptability Standards through its Building Code. Maintain as a policy Program 15.3: The City will continue to fast track the planning and building inspection processes for housing units with three or more bedrooms for large families, housing for seniors, and other special needs housing for extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Ongoing The City continues to fast-track the planning and building inspection processes for affordable and special needs housing. Any new affordable housing projects would be moved to the top of queue in both entitlements and plan check. Maintain Program 15.4: The City shall continue to encourage and support development of senior housing that offers a wide range of housing choices that offer a wide range of community services including healthcare, nutrition, transportation and other amenities. Ongoing The City provided City-owned property to assist in the development of Eden Senior Housing, which will provide 63 units of mixed-use senior affordable housing with ground floor retail and a community clinic. Maintain, combine with Program 15.5 Program 15.5: Facilitate the provision of housing that supports “aging in place” for the City’s senior population. Ongoing The Eden Senior Housing Mixed-Use Apartments (63 units) will provide opportunities for El Cerrito senior residents. Maintain, combine with Program 15.4 Program 15.6: The City shall update its Zoning Ordinance to include a definition of transitional and supportive housing as defined in Health and Safety Code Sections 50675.2 and 50675.14. Transitional and supportive housing will be allowed as a permitted use subject to only the same restrictions on residential uses contained in the same type of structure Complete The City has updated its Zoning Ordinance to comply with State law requirements for transitional and supportive housing. These code amendments received approval and first reading of the amended ordinance by the City Council on December 16, 2014 and were adopted on January 6, 2015. Zoning Ordinance amended effective January 6, 2015. Delete Program 16.1: To the extent financially feasible, assist in the development of extremely low-, very low-, low- and moderate income housing units. Ongoing The City continues to assist in the development of extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate income housing units. Maintain as a policy ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 154 of 190 Appendix C I March 2015 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 16.2: Conduct a study of the feasibility of an inclusionary housing ordinance that would include the terms and conditions under which new developments would be required to provide a specified percentage of housing affordable to very low-, low-, and/or moderate-income households. or pay into an affordable housing in-lieu fee (i.e. based on a % of project cost) to offset building affordable units. As part of a potential inclusionary program, the City will consider requirements and incentives to developers for a mix of dwelling sizes, including units with three or more bedrooms to meet the need of large families. Incomplete This program is still under development. Maintain Program 16.3: Continue to encourage developers to leverage limited Redevelopment Agency Housing Funds with other sources of assistance, such as Low Income Housing Tax Credits, mortgage revenue bonds and other sources that fund affordable housing. Provide assistance and support to developers in pursuing these sources of funds for affordable housing developments. Ongoing Although the Redevelopment Agency dissolved in 2012, the City continues to work with developers to encourage them to leverage other sources of financial assistance, such as CDBG and HOME funds and Low Income Housing Tax Credits, to encourage the development of affordable housing. For example, the County Affordable Housing Finance Committee recommended the Eden Senior Housing Mixed-Use Apartments to receive $625,000 from CDBG and $150,000 from HOME. Modify to reflect loss of Redevelopment Program 17.1: Continue to allow emergency and transitional housing facilities as a permitted use within the CC zone. Ongoing The Zoning Ordinance allows emergency shelters in the CC zone by right. The City completed an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow transitional housing as a residential use consistent with State law on January 6, 2015. The San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan now applies to many of the areas in the City previously zoned CC. The Specific Plan permits emergency shelters in the TOHIMU and TOMIMU zones by right. The Specific Plan also allows transitional and supporting housing by right in all residential areas and treats transitional and supportive housing as a residential use subject only to the same standards required of other residential uses of the same type in the same zones. Maintain as a policy Program 17.2: Consult with the El Cerrito Police Department and the County’s Task Force on Homelessness to maintain 2007 - 2014 estimates of the demand for emergency housing. Ongoing The City continues to consult with the El Cerrito Police Department and the countywide Task Force on Homelessness. Maintain Program 17.3: Continue to coordinate with the County and cities to develop the annual 5-Year Consolidated Plan to address housing and social service needs of the homeless in Contra Costa County Ongoing The 2015-2020 Contra Costa County Consolidated Plan is in progress, and the first draft will be out in March/April 2015. Update to reflect next Consolidated Plan cycle ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix C I March 2015 Page 155 of 190 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 18.1: The City will look for opportunities with non-profits and other agencies for cooperative efforts to expand the City’s supply of affordable housing. Ongoing The City continues to look for opportunities to expand the City’s supply of affordable housing, and 63 units of affordable housing were approved in 2013. Maintain Program 19.1: Continue to provide non-discrimination clauses in rental agreements and deed restrictions for housing constructed with either City or DD&A’s funds and Owner Participant Agreements when Redevelopment Agency participation occurs. Ongoing The Redevelopment Agency was dissolved in 2012, but the City continues to require non-discrimination clauses. Modify to reflect loss of Redevelopment Program 19.2: Reasonable Accommodation Procedures to accommodate the needs of persons with disabilities and provide a streamlined permit review process, the City will continue to implement reasonable accommodation procedures through the City’s Building Official. The City will continue to provide information on accommodation procedures. Ongoing The City continues to implement reasonable accommodation procedures consistent with Chapter 19.37 of the Municipal Code. Maintain Program 19.3: Continue the City’s participation in the Contra Costa Urban County CDBG Consortium. The County utilizes CDBG funds to help fund the Contra Costa County Housing Services Collaborative on behalf of the Urban County jurisdictions. The Housing Services Collaborative offer free housing services including tenant-landlord counseling, fair housing services, and legal advice and representation to Urban County residents, including El Cerrito. Brochures and information about the services offered by the Housing Services Collaborative will be distributed through the City’s website, at City Hall, the City’s Senior and Community Centers, and the El Cerrito Library. Ongoing The City continues to participate in the Contra Costa County Urban County CDBG Consortium. The County uses CDBG funds to help fund this program on behalf of the Urban County jurisdictions. Maintain Program 19.4: To comply with Senate Bill (SB) 2 the City will continue to maintain emergency shelters, transitional housing, and supportive housing to homeless individuals and families to be allowed by right in the CC (Community Commercial) zone. Ongoing See Program 17.1. Delete. Repetitive with Program 17.1 and inconsistent with State law. Program 20.1: Develop an energy conservation strategy that includes programs that 1) promote programs offered by PG&E; 2) provide educational materials and technical assistance; 3) encourage green building and energy conservation in projects. Ongoing The City adopted a Climate Action Plan in May 2013. Modify based on CAP Program 21.1: Continue to enforce the State Energy Conservation Standards for new residential construction and additions to existing structures, and promote the City policy that provides for no fee building permits for solar energy installations. Ongoing The City continues to enforce the State Energy Conservation Standards through the Building Code. City participated in East Bay Green Corridor to standardize and streamline solar permit process across the region. Residential solar energy installations have increased to the point that a no-fee or low-fee policy is no longer needed to incentivize them. The City has raised solar permit rates to $100 per residential system. Maintain as a policy ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 156 of 190 Appendix C I March 2015 Table C-1 Implementation of Programs from Prior Housing Element (2007-2014) Housing Action Status Achievement Recommendation Program 22.1: Develop policies consistent with AB32 and SB375 to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and work with other agencies in the region to establish common thresholds for Green Building. Incorporate incentives for green building to reduce the costs of compliance, such as reduced building fees and rebates. To address energy conservation in existing buildings, promote Pacific Gas and Electric utility assistance programs on the City’s website and through handouts. Ongoing The City adopted a Climate Action Plan in May 2013 as well as targets to reduce GHG emissions by 15% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 30% below 2005 levels by 2035. The City is working with East Bay Energy Watch program to bring energy efficiency programs to El Cerrito. City staff has hosted two workshops on residential energy and water efficiency measures and available programs. Maintain as a policy. Modify based on Climate Action Plan Program 23.1: Continue to enforce the sections of the Zoning Ordinance that increase density, reduce parking requirements, and establish design and development standards to create inviting, mixed-use neighborhoods around transit. Ongoing The City continues to enforce sections in its Zoning Ordinance that increase density, reduce parking requirements, and establish design and development standards to create inviting mixed-use neighborhoods around transit. In addition, the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan contains a Form-Based Code that establishes flexible regulations that encourage mixed-use development. Maintain as a policy ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix C I March 2015 Page 157 of 190 Table C-2 Total Projects El Cerrito (July 1, 2007 – June 30, 2014) Extremely Low- Income Very Low- Income Low- Income Moderate- Income Above Moderate- Income Total RHNA 2007-2014 46 47 59 80 199 431 Total Complete 0 0 0 0 45 45 Total Under Construction 14 42 0 0 1 57 Subtotal 14 42 0 0 46 102 Pending 0 30 38 13 111 192 Proposed 0 0 0 0 14 14 Total All Units 14 72 38 13 171 308 Percentage of RHNA Met 30.4% 153.2% 64.4% 16.3% 85.9% 71.5% ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 158 of 190 Appendix C I March 2015 This page intentionally left blank. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 159 of 190 APPENDIX D: SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY OUTREACH The City of El Cerrito has encouraged and provided opportunities for public participation in the process of identifying housing needs and formulating housing policies and programs. The City’s objectives for the public participation process in the Housing Element update were as follows:  To inform the public of the purpose of the Housing Element;  To present information regarding the City’s housing needs and current programs;  To gather information about housing needs and ideas for addressing those needs;  To learn from housing and social service professionals who have experience developing, operating or providing services to housing in El Cerrito or other Bay Area jurisdictions; and  To gather comments and feedback on updated programs and policies. The City provided several opportunities for public involvement. The City of El Cerrito’s public outreach and community involvement activities are described below. 1. Community Workshops The City conducted community workshops on July 19, 2014 and August 13, 2014. Notices of the public meetings were posted prior to the meetings in the citywide newsletter, on the City’s website, through a postcard mailer to approximately 2,300 landlords and renter households and local and regional stakeholders, as well at City Hall and the El Cerrito Public Library. Both meetings focused on the Housing Element update process and scope, the demographic information from the 2010 Census, housing market trends, and the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). After presenting an overview of the Housing Element update, City staff facilitated an interactive discussion to answer questions about the Housing Element’s purpose and solicit ideas from participants about the most critical housing issues in El Cerrito and potential ways to address these issues. 11 people attended the July 19th workshop and 13 people attended the August 13th workshop. The input from the meetings was used to update the Housing Element, particularly the goals, policies, and programs. Community Workshop, July 19, 2014  Following is a summary of input from this workshop:  What are potential housing solutions for the lowest income population? Are micro units a solution? ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 160 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015  Would like to see options such as large units for larger household or multigenerational families, or flexible housing that can accommodate those households  El Cerrito is part of a continuous urbanized area. If El Cerrito creates its share of affordable housing, would there be priority for people who live in El Cerrito?  Does senior housing transition to disabled housing? As people age, they may need a wheelchair, etc.  How does the city encourage accessibility in affordable housing?  To encourage housing development, the City should allow variances on road width, EBMUD utility requirements, C3 (stormwater run‐off) requirements, parking, and increases to allowed FAR (floor area ratio).  Government fees are a huge component of development costs.  WCCUSD is a barrier to people wanting to move here, people prefer Kensington (Elementary School) to other schools in the district.  The City of El Cerrito should annex Richmond’s property along San Pablo Avenue to better redevelop El Cerrito.  Encourage alternative construction techniques such as manufactured housing to reduce costs, including the cost of construction transport.  Attracting developers means reducing some of the barriers – improving the school district, reducing government fees (EBMUD) and regulations.  City government wants to increase its tax base. As a current resident, why should I be interested in creating any more housing, especially high density housing?  City should bring data showing vacancy rate trends. Our population hasn’t grown much. I don’t see an urgent need for housing.  (Responding to comment above.) Vacancy rates do not vary a whole lot with housing demand. Rents increase with increased housing demand but vacancy rates do not change very much. If you see for‐sale and for‐rent signs, that doesn’t mean that there is not an extraordinary demand for housing.  General Plan and the housing element is a statement of values of the community. It’s our moral obligation to provide our fair share of housing. Also, acknowledging that the housing shortage has evolved over many years and there is no way we are going to build our way out of it in 8 years.  Can you explain the intersection between affordable housing and Section 8 housing? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 161 of 190  I am surprised that no one’s suggested rent control instead of building smaller and smaller shoe boxes.  San Pablo Avenue has a lot of vacant commercial space. Maybe these landlords are holding their units vacant because they can’t get the rents they want.  Does the rental price data reflect mom and pop who rent out a single family home or a new apartment building?  Single family properties are exempt from rent control under State law.  You can’t maintain affordability with rent stabilization because every time a tenant vacates, the unit rent goes to market‐rate. You may want to look at something like a just‐ cause for eviction ordinance. A rent stabilization program would be pretty expensive to do in a small community. However, a just cause ordinance could assist tenants in providing some stability, especially tenants who have children in school where it would be disruptive if they had to move.  How many units of El Cerrito’s 2007‐2014 RHNA actually happened?  Is the 398 units of the RHNA a minimum number?  Is the 398 units a maximum number?  Because our population has stayed the same since 1960, we are taking on the burden of providing housing for the Bay Area by accepting the 398 RHNA numbers.  398 units spread over 8 years isn’t that much growth in a city with 10,000 housing units.  Rent control tends to serve older and more stable tenants and is a disincentive for building rental housing. (Rent control) is why developers tend to build condos instead (of rental housing). Adding more housing stock, at whatever income level, is best approach to solving housing need.  What is the site inventory about?  I was a Planning Commission meeting where (City) staff told the Planning Commission that there was no longer a requirement for affordable housing (inclusionary housing). What requirement does the City have, if any, for affordable housing?  What sort of measures or strategies are in the current plan and the new one to address meeting the lower income housing needs?  If it’s cheaper to build a higher story building, why not just build a 20 story building? ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 162 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015 Community Workshop, August 13, 2014 Following is a summary of input from this workshop:  Residential energy efficiency policies/programs should focus on voluntary energy upgrades and promoting opportunities for rebates and other types of incentives.  Request that City zoning and planning policies encourage alternative models of housing such as co‐housing.  Is there any way to track rental increases? Concerned about neighbors experiencing significant rent increases, such as 69% in one instance. Could the City do something about rent increases? If the rents go up all over the City, renters will have to move, there will be a large impact on people and on the City. People like me will have to relocate. Where do we go?  Could the housing element address rent increases?  Concerns about existing homeless persons around El Cerrito Creek and El Cerrito Plaza. It seems like homeless population is growing. Maybe related to Albany Bulb closure. How do we get on top of that? Does the housing element address that? Maybe we can be proactive.  Does the City market itself to housing developers and to developers?  Our experience with the local school district has been very good and I think we should use the fact that we have good schools to market the community.  (Responding to comment above.) WCCUSD is a problem. People don’t have a good perception of the schools.  More market‐rate housing will help bring more revenue to the city through property taxes.  What is the City doing regarding the vacation rental issue, i.e. VBRO, AirBnB?  Concerned about Creekside Walk (approved residential project in the pipeline) and the flow of traffic.  Want to see demographic data on income levels of residents of El Cerrito.  If a city meets part of its RHNA during a cycle, how is that accounted for in the next cycle RHNA?  We should help stabilize renter households. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 163 of 190  Don’t want to see changes in zoning in single family neighborhoods.  City needs to fiscally responsible, look for other sources of funds, manage assets wisely.  I want to age in this community, want to be closer to BART, in a more walkable neighborhood. I want other housing options such as co‐housing close to BART. In addition to comments received at workshops, written comments were submitted which expressed concern for the housing stability of older residents who rent and tend to be on fixed incomes in a time when rents are increasing significantly. Another resident offered co‐housing (currently supported by the Land Use Policy LU1.6 of the City’s General Plan) and “tiny house”‐style stand‐alone dwelling units as potentially affordable solutions to the housing shortage. The suggestion was also made that large, infill developments consider purchasing conservation easements in nearby areas with available agricultural and open space. There was a concern that the Climate Action Plan should specify that, for new residential development, the City should specify that building materials and methods be used that can show a net climate benefit. 2. Housing Needs Survey As part of the 2015‐2023 Housing Element Update, the City of El Cerrito developed an online survey to gather feedback about community housing and to help ensure that the City’s Housing Element reflects the vision and priorities of the El Cerrito community. The Housing Survey included 12 questions that asked respondents about their current housing situation as well as their views on El Cerrito’s housing issues more generally. The survey was publicized through announcements at the Housing Element workshops, through the City’s website and through a press release to local print and online media. There were 44 responses to the survey. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 164 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015 20.5% 11.4% 20.5% 45.5% 2.3% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% Q1: How long have you lived in El Cerrito? 81.4% 0.0% 0.0% 18.6% Single family home Town home Condo Apartment/Flat or Guest House 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Q2: Where do you currently live? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 165 of 190 65.9% 34.1% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% Own Rent Live with family Q3: Do you own or rent? 40.9% 56.8% 2.3% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Yes No Don't know/Not Applicable Q4: Do you spend more than 30% of your gross income on housing (rent payment or if you own, mortgage payment, property taxes and insurance)? ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 166 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015 2.3% 2.3% 4.5% 4.5% 75.0% 11.4% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% I don't currently live in El Cerrito 1-2 years 2-5 years 5-10 years No plans to leave Undecided Q5: How many years do you plan to remain a resident of El Cerrito? 11.1% 88.9% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Move to another community in Contra Costa County Move outside the County Q6: If you were to move, where would you move? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 167 of 190 47.8% 0.0% 30.4% 21.7% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Move to a less expensive area Move to a more expensive area Current housing does not meet my family needs Schools Q7: What is the primary reason you would consider moving? ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 168 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015 11.4% 13.6% 6.8% 9.1% 9.1% 22.7% 27.3% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Lower cost of housing More room or square footage Better neighborhood More outdoor space or yard area Proximity to better schools Home improvements/repairs to existing home More shops, cafes, restaurants within walking distance Q8: What is the most important factor that would improve your current housing situation? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 169 of 190 21.1% 15.8% 10.5% 0.0% 15.8% 26.3% 2.6% 7.9% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% Expense of housing Lack of housing options(product type) Quality/age of existing homes for sale Quality/age of existing apartment rentals Lack of affordable housing for lower income households (annual income up to $67,600 for a HH of 4) Lack of affordable housing for middle to moderate income households (income between $67,600 to … Lack of larger rental units (2,3 and 4 bdrm units) Lack of capacity at emergency shelter Q9: The City of El Cerrito's most significant housing issue is: ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 170 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015 11.6% 18.6% 7.0% 11.6% 51.2% 0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% Focus on addition of Single Family units on vacant/under-utilized parcels Promote mixed use housing along the San Pablo Avenue corridor on underutilized sites Encourage townhome- style housing Encourage in-law (secondary living) units on Single Family properties A combination of those listed below Q10: The City of El Cerrito must be prepared to add approximately 398 housing units throughout the city during the next 8 to 9 years to address Statewide growth. What would your primary approach be toward accommodating future units? ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix D I March 2015 Page 171 of 190 8.6% 0.0% 11.4% 22.9% 28.6% 20.0% 8.6% More senior housing More market rate rentals More affordable rentals (affordable to households making less than 80% of area median income) More affordable rentals for those between low to moderate income households (80% to 120% of AMI) More housing near El Cerrito Plaza BART and del Norte BART stations More market-rate single family homes for sale More market-rate condos/townhomes for sale 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0% 35.0% Q11: What would be the best improvement to housing within El Cerrito? ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 172 of 190 Appendix DI March 2015 Q12: Are there any other suggestions or comments you would like to share regarding housing or other topics of interest to El Cerrito? No. Responses 1 More commercial areas! more cafes on san pablo. that's my dream. 2 I would like to see more newer affordable single family homes and townhouses that are close to public transportation(BART) and stores ( Safeway complex and El Cerrito Plaza). El Cerrito is a beautiful city and I would love to be able to walk to more shops to fulfill my daily needs 3 Housing isn't as much of a problem as is the lack of businesses. Especially along San Pablo between Central, Stockton, Moser, and Portero. How long will the old Safeway stay un- occupied? or the Guitar Center building? or the dozen or so vacant store fronts? We need to focus on local business development more. 4 The single option questions are unnecessarily restrictive and will not produce rational results. Very poor design. 5 Encourage in-law units on existing single residency sites vs more apartment/condo buildings. Taller residential building on San Pablo encourage and concentrate traffic. 6 More walkability. It's already great, but could always be better. Encourage and support local business clusters to promote foot traffic and getting people out of their homes. Slow down cars like they do in Berkeley with all of those crazy concrete pylons. 7 Please improve the middle and high school education. Thanks 8 Mixed use housing is a smart choice in our small city. 3. Stakeholder Workshop On November 20, 2014, staff hosted a stakeholder roundtable discussion on the Draft Housing Element. Local public agencies, community organizations, and developers and realtors active in the community were invited to participate and share their views. The meeting was attended by one representative from Stege Sanitary District who received a presentation on the Draft Housing Element and did not have any formal comment. 4. Public Review of Documents Throughout the process of updating the Housing Element, the City posted relevant documents, including presentation materials and draft documents on the website for easy download and review by residents and interested parties. As appropriate, the Housing Element has been revised to address public comments. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix EI March 2015 Page 173 of 190 APPENDIX E: CONSISTENCY WITH STATE LAW 1. Consistency with Housing Element Law The Housing Element is one of seven General Plan Elements required by the State of California. Updated every eight years, this document serves as the guide for residential development and addressing housing needs in the City of El Cerrito. Per State Housing Element law, the document must:  Outline a community’s housing production objectives;  List policies and implementation programs to achieve local housing goals;  Examine the need for housing resources in a community, focusing in particular on special needs populations;  Identify adequate sites for the production of new housing serving various income levels;  Analyze potential constraints to production; and  Evaluate the Housing Element for consistency with other components of the General Plan. Table E‐1 summarizes these requirements and identifies the applicable sections in the Housing Element where these requirements are addressed. Table E-1 State Housing Element Requirements Required Housing Element Component Reference A. Housing Needs Assessment 1. Analysis of population trends in El Cerrito in relation to countywide trends Section II 2. Analysis of employment trends in El Cerrito in relation to regional trends Section II 3. Projections and quantification of El Cerrito’s existing and projected housing needs for all income groups Section III 4. Analysis and documentation of El Cerrito’s housing characteristics, including: a. Level of housing cost compared to ability to pay Section II b. Overcrowding Section II c. Housing stock condition Section II 5. An inventory of land suitable for residential development including vacant sites and having redevelopment potential and an analysis of the relationship of zoning, public facilities and services to these sites Appendix A 6. Analysis of potential and actual governmental constraints upon the maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels Section III 7. Analysis of potential and actual nongovernmental constraints upon the Section III ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 174 of 190 Appendix E I March 2015 Table E-1 State Housing Element Requirements Required Housing Element Component Reference maintenance, improvement, or development of housing for all income levels 8. Analysis of special housing need: elderly, persons with disabilities, large families, farm workers, and families with female heads of household Section II 9. Analysis of housing needs for families and persons in need of emergency shelter Section II 10. Analysis of opportunities for energy conservation with respect to residential development Section III 11. Analysis of assisted housing developments that are eligible to change from lower-income housing during the next 10 years Appendix B B. Goals and Policies 12. Identification of El Cerrito’s goals, quantified objectives and policies relative to maintenance, improvement and development of housing Section IV C. Implementation Program 13. Identify adequate sites which will be made available through appropriate action with required public services and facilities for a variety of housing types for all income levels Appendix A 14. Programs to assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low and moderate income households. Section IV 15. Address, and where appropriate and legally possible, remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing Section IV 16. Remove constraints to or provide reasonable accommodations for housing for persons with disabilities Section IV 17. Conserve and improve the condition of the existing affordable housing stock in El Cerrito Section IV 18. Promote housing opportunities for all persons Section IV 19. Identify programs to address the potential conversion of assisted housing development to market-rate housing Appendix B 20. Program actions to identify zone(s) where emergency shelters are permitted without a conditional use or other discretionary permit and with the capacity to meet the needs of individuals and persons needing emergency shelter. Section II ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix EI March 2015 Page 175 of 190 2. General Plan Consistency Housing Element policies must be consistent with policies identified in other elements of the General Plan. The policies and programs in this Element reflect the policy direction contained in other parts of the General Plan, which was last updated in 1999. As portions of the General Plan are amended in the future, this Housing Element will be reviewed to ensure that internal consistency is maintained. The 1999 General Plan contains several elements with policies related to housing. Policies and the means for achieving consistency are summarized in Table E‐2. The City will ensure consistency between the Housing Element and General Plan policies through the following actions: Table E-2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing General Plan Element Policy Means for Achieving Consistency Land Use LU1.1 Ensure that the existing single-family neighborhoods remain in predominately single-family use, but include accessory units, by prohibiting incompatible uses. All new housing units developed will comply with the City’s existing zoning. LU1.3 Ensure that all multifamily or mixed-use development in residential areas addresses compatibility and quality of life issues. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will incorporate size and design to blend with existing architecture and neighborhood character as well as provide housing for a variety of needs. LU1.5 Promote suitably located housing and services for all age groups within the City. Within the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan area, allow ground floor residential development and increased land use intensity close to existing transit infrastructure to promote residential infill development and catalyze mode shift. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will be phased in accordance with the population and job growth in the City and will provide for a variety of housing needs. LU1.6 Encourage diverse housing types, such as live-work units, studio spaces, townhouses, co-housing, congregate care, and garden apartments. The updated Housing Element policies encourage a diversity of housing types to be incorporated in order to meet the City’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA). LU1.7 Maintain the maximum multifamily density at 35 dwelling units per acre, except in the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan area and as otherwise provided in this Plan. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will be developed in compliance with the City’s Zoning Ordinance and General Plan densities. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 176 of 190 Appendix E I March 2015 Table E-2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing General Plan Element Policy Means for Achieving Consistency LU1.8 Maintain the appearance of existing residential areas by discouraging paving of front yards and parkway strips, excessively wide curb cuts and driveways, and inappropriate fence materials in front yards. All new proposed housing units constructed in the City would be in compliance with the City’s design guidelines. LU5.1 Encourage high-densities and a mix of uses near the city’s two Bay Area Regional Transit (BART) stations to take advantage of the transit opportunities they provide. Some housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element may be constructed between the City’s two BART stations to take advantage of the transit opportunities the City provides. LU5.2 Encourage mixed-use centers along San Pablo Avenue including development along Fairmount Avenue, Stockton Avenue and Moeser Lane, between San Pablo Avenue and the Ohlone Greenway, that provide the opportunity for people to walk among business, employment, and residences. Some high-density housing units may be constructed in mixed-use centers along various downtown City streets to encourage people to walk among business, employment, and residences. LU5.3 Encourage mixed uses, especially offices or housing over ground-floor retail uses, where commercial uses are allowed. Some high-density housing units may be incorporated into mixed-use projects over commercial uses on the ground floor. Community Development and Design CD1.1 Preserve and enhance the character of existing residential neighborhoods by limiting encroachment of new buildings and activities that are out of scale and character with the surrounding uses. All new housing units constructed in the City will reflect the architectural style of the neighborhoods in which they are placed and any visual impacts to the surrounding environment will be carefully considered. CD4.3 Provide front yards in residential areas with structures and parking lots stepped along public streets in keeping with the character and setbacks of surrounding buildings. Ensure that yard spaces are landscaped appropriately to fit the surrounding context. All new housing developed will comply with the City’s Community Development and Design Element. Policies established in the updated Housing Element will not conflict with the current General Plan. CD4.4 Ensure that building design takes into consideration air circulation, natural lighting, views, and shading areas to interior and exterior spaces. All proposed housing units will take into special consideration air circulation, natural lighting, views, and shading areas around interior and exterior spaces. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix EI March 2015 Page 177 of 190 Table E-2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing General Plan Element Policy Means for Achieving Consistency CD4.5 Integrate good design with the use of energy efficient techniques and equipments, and with materials and construction practices that minimize adverse environmental affects. The updated Housing Element policies encourage the use of energy efficient techniques and equipment, and construction practices that minimize adverse environmental affects. CD5.2 Encourage planned development projects and other techniques that cluster developments to create and preserve open spaces, views, and other amenities. Where possible, all new housing units proposed in the updated Housing Element will be clustered to reduce encroachment into open space areas, views, and other amenities. Growth Management GM5.1 Adopt and implement a development mitigation program requiring developers to pay the costs necessary to offset impacts of their projects on the local police, fire and park service system. Ensure that the local development review process includes consultation with contract agencies supplying domestic water, sanitary sewage and flood control services so that cost impacts are identified and appropriate mitigation included on a cooperative basis. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will comply with the City’s development review process. Transportation and Circulation T2.1 Recognize the link between land use and transportation. Promote land use and development patterns that encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. Emphasize high-density and mixed land use patterns that promote transit and pedestrian travel. Some of the City’s housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will be located in mixed-use projects and high density housing units that promote transit and pedestrian travel. T2.2 Projects should be designed to include features that encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. Where feasible new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will incorporate features that encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. Public Facilities and Services PR1.3 Use a level of service standard of five acres of publicly owned parkland per 1,000 residents as the minimum requirement for recreation and open space land. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will comply by the City’s standard of five acres of publicly owned park land per 1,000 residents as the minimum requirement for recreation and open space land. PR1.12 Require that all new multifamily residential projects provide on-site open space and recreational facilities for residents or provide a combination of park in-lieu fees and on-site facilities. All new multifamily residential projects proposed by the updated Housing Element will provide on-site facilities for the residences including open space or a means for providing open space. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 178 of 190 Appendix E I March 2015 Table E-2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing General Plan Element Policy Means for Achieving Consistency Police Service PS1.1 Prior to approval of new development, the Police Department shall be requested to review all applications to determine the ability of the department to provide protection services. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will be reviewed by the Police Department to determine the ability of the department to provide protection services. Fire Service PS2.1 Prior to approval of new development, the applicant will be required to demonstrate that adequate emergency water supply, storage, and conveyance facilities, and access for fire protection either are, or will be, provided concurrent with development All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will be reviewed by the Fire Department to determine the ability of the department to provide protection services. Public Infrastructure PS3.1 Approve new development only if the capacity of public infrastructure is in place or can be reasonably provided. All new housing units developed will show proof that they will be developed to comply with existing capacities. PS3.5 Coordinate and work with other service providers, including East Bay Municipal Utilities District (EBMUD), the Stege Sanitary District, the East Bay Sanitary Company, Contra Costa County, Caltrans, BART, AC Transit, and the East Bay Regional Park District to ensure adequate and safe public infrastructure to serve existing and planned development in the community. All new housing units developed will be designed to comply with existing service providers in the community. Resources and Hazards R1.1 Limit development in areas that support rare and endangered species. If development of these areas must occur, any loss of habitat should be fully compensated onsite. If off-site mitigation is necessary, it should occur within the El Cerrito planning area whenever possible, and a monitoring program prepared by a qualified biologist. No new housing units are proposed in environmentally sensitive areas, and if development should occur, any loss of habitat will be fully compensated onsite. If off-site mitigation is necessary, it should occur within the El Cerrito planning area wherever possible. R1.3 Encourage development patterns that minimize impacts on the City’s biological, visual and cultural resources, and integrate development with open space areas. The updated Housing Element does not propose the development of housing in any environmentally sensitive areas. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix EI March 2015 Page 179 of 190 Table E-2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing General Plan Element Policy Means for Achieving Consistency R1.9 For development adjacent to creeks and major drainages, provide adequate building setbacks from creek banks, provision of access easements for creek maintenance purposes and for public access to creekside amenities, and creek improvements such as bank stabilization. Also, protect riparian vegetation outside the setback. Any new housing units constructed adjacent to creeks and major drainages will require the necessary building setbacks regulated by the City, and special consideration for the natural vegetation in the area will be taken in to consideration. R1.12 Control development on ridges to protect the form of the ridges and, in particular, by restricting development on ridgelines. Natural contours and vegetation on ridgelines should be maintained. Locate and design structures and other public and private improvements so as to minimize cut and fill areas that will impact public views, safety and surrounding uses, and avoid building profiles (silhouettes) being located above the ridgelines when viewed from public and designated public access areas. No new housing units developed in the City will be developed on ridgelines. All new units will be constructed in a way that minimizes cut and fill areas that could potentially impact public views, safety, and surrounding uses. R1.13 Preserve prominent views of visual resources and the bay, and consider visual access and view corridors when reviewing development proposals. Require assessment of critical public views, ridgelines, scenic overlooks, bay vista points, significant knolls, stands of trees, rock outcrops, and major visual features as part of the project review process to assure that projects protect natural resources through proper site planning, building design and landscaping, and that public access is provided if possible to vista points. An assessment of critical public views will be taken into consideration in every housing-units proposal. All prominent views of visual resources and the bay will be preserved. H1.9 Evaluate new development on sites that may have involved hazardous materials (such as older fill sites, historical auto service uses, industrial uses, or areas where hazardous materials may have been used) prior to development approvals. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will comply with the City’s Building Code and will be inspected by the City’s Building Inspector for compliance with all geological hazards prevention standards H1.15 Flood Hazards. Assure existing and new structures are designed to protect people and property from the threat of potential flooding. New development shall be designed to provide protection from potential impacts of flooding during the chance” or “100-year” flood. H1.16 In order to maintain unobstructed drainage courses, existing laws prohibiting the dumping of debris, fill or other waste materials into creeks and channels, and the littering of garbage should be strictly enforced. The City will also continue to maintain a high level of maintenance for its storm drainage facilities. New developments will be carefully reviewed to insure that adequate storm drain facilities are available both on and off the site. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 180 of 190 Appendix E I March 2015 Table E-2 Summary of General Plan Goals and Policies Affecting Housing General Plan Element Policy Means for Achieving Consistency H1.17 Ensure storm drainage capacity to be available to carry runoff generated by new developments, and implement the City’s Storm Water Master Plan. H3.1 New residential development projects shall meet acceptable exterior noise level standards. All new housing units proposed by the updated Housing Element will comply with the City of El Cerrito’s General Plan, which includes noise level standards. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix F I March 2015 Page 181 of 190 APPENDIX F: GLOSSARY OF HOUSING TERMS 1. List of Terms Above‐Moderate Income Household. A household with an annual income usually greater than 120% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city of a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available legibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program. Apartment. An apartment is one or more rooms in an apartment house or dwelling occupied or intended or designated for occupancy by one family for sleeping or living purposes and containing one kitchen. Assisted Housing. Generally multi‐family rental housing, but sometimes single‐family ownership units, whose construction, financing, sales prices, or rents have been subsidized by federal, state, or local housing programs including, but not limited to Federal state, or local housing programs including, but not limited to Federal Section 8 (new construction, substantial rehabilitation, and loan management set‐asides), Federal Sections 213, 236, and 202, Federal Section 221 (below‐market interest rate program), Federal Section 101 (rent supplement assistance), CDBG, FmHA Section 515, multi‐family mortgage revenue bond programs, local redevelopment and in lieu fee programs, and units developed pursuant to local inclusionary housing and density bonus programs. Below‐Market‐Rate (BMR). Any housing unit specifically priced to be sold or rented to low‐ or moderate income households for an amount less than the fair‐market value of the unit. Both the State of California and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development set standards for determining which households qualify as “low income” or “moderate income.” The financing of housing at less than prevailing interest rates. Build‐Out. That level of urban development characterized by full occupancy of all developable sites in accordance with the General Plan; the maximum level of development envisioned by the General Plan. Build‐out does not assume that each parcel is developed to include all floor area or housing units possible under zoning regulations. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). A grant program administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) on a formula basis for entitlement communities and by the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) for non‐entitled jurisdictions. This grant allots money to cities and counties for housing rehabilitation and community development, including public facilities and economic development. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 182 of 190 Appendix F I March 2015 Condominium. A form of ownership in which individuals purchase and own a unit of housing in a multi‐unit complex. The owner also shares financial responsibility for common areas. (See “Townhouse.”) Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs). A term used to describe restrictive limitations that may be placed on property and its use, and which usually are made a condition of holding title or lease. Deed. A legal document which affects the transfer of ownership of real estate from the seller to the buyer. Density Bonus. The allocation of development rights that allow a parcel to accommodate additional square footage or additional residential units beyond the maximum for which the parcel is zoned, usually in exchange for the provision or preservation of an amenity at the same site or at another location. Density, Residential. The number of permanent residential dwelling units per acre of land. Densities specified in the General Plan may be expressed in unites per gross acre or per net developable acre. Developable Land. Land that is suitable as a location for structures and that can be developed free of hazards to, and without disruption of, or significant impact on, natural resource areas. Down Payment. Money paid by a buyer from his own funds, as opposed to that portion of the purchase price which is financed. Duplex. A detached building under single ownership that is designed for occupation as the residence of two families living independently of each other. Dwelling Unit (du). A building or portion of a building containing one or more rooms, designed for or used by one family for living or sleeping purposes, and having a separate bathroom and only one kitchen or kitchenette. See Housing Unit. Elderly Housing. Typically one‐ and two‐bedroom apartments or condominiums designed to meet the needs of persons 62 years of age and older or, if more than 150 units, persons 55 years of age and older, and restricted to occupancy by them. Emergency Shelter. A facility that provides immediate and short‐term housing and supplemental services for the homeless. Shelters come in many sizes, but an optimum size is considered to be 20 to 40 beds. Supplemental services may include food, counseling, and access to other social programs. (See “Homeless” and “Transitional Housing.”) ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix F I March 2015 Page 183 of 190 Extremely‐Low Income Household. A household with an annual income equal to or less than 30% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available eligibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program. Fair Market Rent. The rent, including utility allowances, determined by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development for purposed of administering the Section 8 Housing Program. Family. Two or more persons related by birth, marriage, or adoption [U.S. Bureau of the Census]. An Individual or a group of persons living together who constitute a bona fide single‐family housekeeping unit in a dwelling unit, not including a fraternity, sorority, club, or other group of persons occupying a hotel, lodging house or institution of any kind [California]. General Plan. A comprehensive, long‐term plan mandated by State Planning Law for the physical development of a city or county and any land outside its boundaries which, in its judgment, bears relation to its planning. The plan shall consist of seven required elements: land use, circulation, open space, conservation, housing, safety, and noise. The plan must include a statement of development policies and a diagram or diagrams illustrating the policies. Goal. A general, overall, and ultimate purpose, aim, or end toward which the City will direct effort. Green Building. Green or sustainable building is the practice of creating healthier and more resource efficient models of construction, renovation, operation, maintenance, and demolition. [US Environmental Protection Agency] Historic Preservation. The preservation of historically significant structures and neighborhoods until such time as, and in order to facilitate, restoration and rehabilitation of the building(s) to a former condition. Historic Property. A historic property is a structure or site that has significant historic, architectural, or cultural value. Household. All those persons—related or unrelated—who occupy a single housing unit. (See “Family.”) Housing and Community Development Department (HCD). The State agency that has principal responsibility for assessing, planning for, and assisting communities to meet the needs of low‐and moderate income households. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 184 of 190 Appendix F I March 2015 Housing Element. One of the seven State‐mandated elements of a local general plan, it assesses the existing and projected housing needs of all economic segments of the community, identifies potential sites adequate to provide the amount and kind of housing needed, and contains adopted goals, policies, and implementation programs for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing. Under State law, Housing Elements must be updated every five years. Housing Payment. For ownership housing, this is defined as the mortgage payment, property taxes, insurance and utilities. For rental housing this is defined as rent and utilities. Housing Ratio. The ratio of the housing payment to total gross income. Also called Payment‐to‐Income Ratio or Front‐End Ratio. Housing Unit. The place of permanent or customary abode of a person or family. A housing unit may be a single‐family dwelling, a multi‐family dwelling, a condominium, a modular home, a mobile home, a cooperative, or any other residential unit considered real property under State law. Housing and Urban Development, U.S. Department of (HUD). A cabinet‐level department of the federal government that administers housing and community development programs. Implementing Policies. The City’s statements of its commitments to consistent actions. Implementation. Actions, procedures, programs, or techniques that carry out policies. Infill Development. The development of new housing or other buildings on scattered vacant lots in a built‐up area or on new building parcels created by permitted lot splits. Jobs‐Housing Balance. A ration used to describe the adequacy of the housing supply within a defined area to meet the needs of persons working within the same area. The General Plan uses ABAG’s definition which is a job total equal to 1.2 times the number of housing units within the area under consideration. Land Use Classification. A system for classifying and designating the appropriate use of properties. Live‐Work Units. Buildings or spaces within buildings that are used jointly for commercial and residential purposes where the residential use of the space is secondary or accessory to the primary use as a place of work. Low Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than 51%‐80% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix F I March 2015 Page 185 of 190 survey, based on the latest available eligibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the §8 housing program. Low‐Income Housing Tax Credits. Tax reductions provided by the federal and State governments for investors in housing for low‐income households. Manufactured Housing. Residential structures that are constructed entirely in the factory, and which since June 15, 1976, have been regulated by the federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 under the administration of the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (See “Mobile Home” and “Modular Unit.”) Mixed‐Use. Properties on which various uses, such as office, commercial, institutional, and residential, are combined in a single building or on a single site in an integrated development project with significant functional interrelationships and a coherent physical design. A “single site” may include contiguous properties. Moderate Income Household. A household with an annual income usually no greater than 81%‐120% of the area median family income adjusted by household size, as determined by a survey of incomes conducted by a city or a county, or in the absence of such a survey, based on the latest available eligibility limits established by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Section 8 housing program. Housing Expense. Total principal, interest, taxes, and insurance paid by the borrower on a basis. Used with gross income to determine affordability. Multiple Family Building. A detached building designed and used exclusively as a dwelling by three or more families occupying separate suites. Ordinance. A law or regulation set forth and adopted by a governmental authority, usually a city or county. Overcrowding Housing Unit. A housing unit in which the members of the household, or group. Are prevented from the enjoyment of privacy because of small room size and housing size. The U.S. Bureau of Census defines an overcrowded housing unit as one which is occupied by more than one person per room. Parcel. A lot or tract of land. Planning Area. The area directly addressed by the general plan. A city’s planning area typically encompasses the city limits and potentially annexable land within its sphere of influence. ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 186 of 190 Appendix F I March 2015 Policy. A specific statement of principle or of guiding actions that implies clear commitment but is not mandatory. A general direction that a governmental agency sets to follow, in order to meet its objectives before undertaking an action program. (See “Program.”) Poverty Level. As used by the U.S. Census, families and unrelated individuals are classified as being above or below the poverty level based on a poverty index that provides a range of income cutoffs or “poverty thresholds” varying by size of family, number of children, and age of householder. The income cutoffs are updated each year to reflect the change in the Consumer Price Index. Program. An action, activity, or strategy carried out in response to adopted policy to achieve a specific goal or objective. Policies and programs establish the “who,” “how” and “when” for carrying out the “what” and “where” of goals and objectives. Redevelop. To demolish existing buildings; or to increase the overall floor area existing on a property; or both; irrespective of whether a change occurs in land use. Regional. Pertaining to activities or economies at a scale greater than that of a single jurisdiction, and affecting a broad geographic area. Regional Housing Needs Assessment. A quantification by ABAG of existing and projected housing need, by household income group, for all localities within a region. Rehabilitation. The repair, preservation, and/or improvement of substandard housing. Residential. Land designated in the General Plan and zoning ordinance for building consisting of dwelling units. May be improved, vacant, or unimproved. (See “Dwelling Unit.”) Residential Care Facility. A facility that provides 24‐hour care and supervision to its residents. Residential, Multiple Family. Usually three or more dwelling units on a single site, which may be in the same or separate buildings. Residential, Single‐Family. A single dwelling unit on a building site. Retrofit. To add materials and/or devices to an existing building or system to improve its operation, safety, or efficiency. Buildings have been retrofitted to use solar energy and to strengthen their ability to withstand earthquakes, for example. Rezoning. An amendment to the map to effect a change in the nature, density, or intensity of uses allowed in a zoning district and/or on a designated parcel or land area. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix F I March 2015 Page 187 of 190 Second Unit. A self‐contained living unit, either attached to or detached form, and in addition to, the primary residential unit on a single lot. “Granny Flat” is one type of second unit. Section 8 Rental Assistance Program. A federal (HUD) rent‐subsidy program that is one of the main sources of federal housing assistance for low‐income households. The program operates by providing “housing assistance payments” to owners, developers, and public housing agencies to make up the difference between the “Fair Market Rent” of a unit (set by HUD) and the household’s contribution toward the rent, which is calculated at 30% of the household’s adjusted gross income (GMI). “Section 8” includes programs for new construction, existing housing, and substantial or moderate housing rehabilitation. Shared Living. The occupancy of a dwelling unit by persons of more than one family in order to reduce housing expenses and provide social contact, mutual support, and assistance. Shared living facilities serving six or fewer persons are permitted in all residential districts by §1566.3 of the California Health and Safety Code. Single‐Family Dwelling, Attached. A dwelling unit occupied or intended for occupancy by only one household that is structurally connected with at least one other such dwelling unit. (See “Townhouse.”) Single‐Family Dwelling, Detached. A dwelling unit occupied or intended for occupancy by only one household that is structurally independent from any other such dwelling unit or structure intended for residential or other use. (See “Family.”) Single Room Occupancy (SRO). A single room, typically 80‐250 square feet, with a sink and closet, but which requires the occupant to share a communal bathroom, shower, and kitchen. Subsidize. To assist by payment of a sum of money or by the granting to terms or favors that reduces the need for monetary expenditures. Housing subsidies may take the forms or mortgage interest deductions or tax credits from federal and/or state income taxes, sale or lease at less than market value of land to be used for the construction of housing, payments to supplement a minimum affordable rent, and the like. Substandard Housing. Residential dwellings that, because of their physical condition, do not provide safe and sanitary housing. Supportive Housing. Housing with no limit on length of stay, that is occupied by the target population as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 53260(d), and that is linked to onsite or offsite services that assist the supportive housing resident in retaining the housing, improving his or her health status, and maximizing his or her ability to live and, when possible, work in the community. “Target populationʺ means adults with low incomes having one or more disabilities, including mental illness, HIV ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 188 of 190 Appendix F I March 2015 or A IDS, substance abuse, or other chronic health conditions, or individuals eligible for services provided under the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act and may, among other populations, include families with children, elderly persons, young adults aging out of the foster care system, individuals exiting from institutional settings, veterans, or homeless people. [California Health and Safety Code Sections 50675.14(b) and 53260(d)] Target Areas. Specifically designated sections of the community where loans and grants are made to bring about a specific outcome, such as the rehabilitation of housing affordable by Very‐Low and Low‐income households. Tax Increment. Additional tax revenues that result form increases in property values within a redevelopment area. State law permits the tax increment to be earmarked for redevelopment purposes but requires at least 20% to be used to increase and improve the community’s supply of very low and low income housing. Pursuant to changes in State law effective 2011, the collection of tax increment revenue for new redevelopment and affordable housing projects is no longer permitted. Tenure. A housing unit is “owned” if the owner or co‐owner lives in the unit, even if it is “owned only if it is mortgaged or not fully paid for. A cooperative or condominium unit is “owned only if the owner or co‐owner lives in it. All other occupied units are classified as “rented,” including units rented for cash rent and those occupied without payment of cash rent. Townhouse. A townhouse is a dwelling unit located in a group of three or more attached dwelling units with no dwelling unit located above or below another and with each dwelling unit having its own exterior entrance. Transitional Housing. Shelter provide to the homeless for an extend period, often as long as 18 months, and generally integrated with other social services and counseling programs to assist in the transition to self sufficiency through the acquisition of a stable income and permanent housing. (See “homeless” and “Emergency Shelter.”) Undevelopable. Specific areas where topographic, geologic, and/or superficial soil conditions indicate a significant danger to future occupants and a liability to the City are designated as “undevelopable” by the City. ---PAGE BREAK--- City of El Cerrito Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element Appendix F I March 2015 Page 189 of 190 2. Acronyms Used ABAG: Association of Bay Area Governments ACS: American Community Survey BMPs: Best Management Practices CALTRANS: California Department of Transportation CDBG: Community Development Block Grant CEQA: California Environmental Quality Act CIP: Capital Improvement Program DIF: Development Impact Fee DU/ac: Dwelling units per acre EDD: California Employment Development Department FAR: Floor Area Ratio FEMA: Federal Emergency Management Agency HCD: Department of Housing and Community Development HOA: Homeowners Association HUD: Department of Housing and Urban Development LAFCO: Local Agency Formation Commission MFI: Median Family Income NPDES: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System RTP: Regional Transportation Plan SPA: Sectional Planning Area STF: Summary Tape File (U.S. Census) TOD: Transit‐Oriented Development TOHIMU: Transit‐Oriented Higher‐Intensity Mixed Use ---PAGE BREAK--- Final Draft 2015‐2023 Housing Element City of El Cerrito Page 190 of 190 Appendix F I March 2015 TOMIMU: Transit‐Oriented Mid‐Intensity Mixed Use TDM: Transportation Demand Management TSM: Transportation Systems Management WCP: Water Conservation Plan ---PAGE BREAK--- General Plan Amendment 2015‐2023 Housing Element Update INITIAL STUDY & NEGATIVE DECLARATION December 2014 Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration ii This page intentionally left blank. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update iii TABLE OF CONTENTS A Background 1 B Description of Project 2 C Determination 5 D Project Setting 6 E Other Public Agencies Approval 6 F Environmental Impacts 6 I. AESTHETICS 7 II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES 8 III. AIR QUALITY 9 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 11 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES 12 VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS 13 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 15 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 18 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 20 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING 22 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES 23 XII. NOISE 23 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING 25 XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES 26 XV. RECREATION 28 XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION 29 XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 30 XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 32 G Discussion of Environmental Evaluation H Potentially Significant I Mitigation of Potentially Significant Impacts J References K Exhibits Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration iv This page is intentionally left blank. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 1 A BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: City of El Cerrito 2015-2023 Housing Element Update 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of El Cerrito Community Development Department 10890 San Pablo Ave. El Cerrito, CA 94530 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Margaret Development Services Manager City of El Cerrito (510) 215-4330 4. Project Location: Citywide 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: City of El Cerrito Community Development Department 10890 San Pablo Ave. El Cerrito, CA 94530 6. General Plan Designation: N/A 7. Zoning: N/A 8. Project Description Summary: The proposed project is an update of the Housing Element of the City of El Cerrito General Plan. See further discussion that follows in the “Description of Project” section. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 2 B DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT This Initial Study provides environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed City of El Cerrito General Plan Housing Element Update (proposed project). The project site to be affected by the Housing Element Update is the area within the city limits. State law requires this Housing Element Update (California Government Code Section 65580 – 65589.8). The Draft Housing Element identifies residential sites adequate to accommodate a variety of housing types for all income levels and needs of special population groups defined under State law (California Government Code Section 65583); analyzes governmental constraints to housing maintenance, improvement, and development; addresses conservation and improvement of the condition of the existing affordable housing stock; and outlines policies to promote housing opportunities for all persons. The Initial Study focuses on whether the proposed project may cause significant effects on the environment. In particular, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 21083.3, this Initial Study is intended to assess any effects on the environment that are peculiar to the proposed project or to the parcels on which the project would be located that were not addressed or analyzed as significant effects in an environmental impact report (EIR), or which substantial new information shows will be more significant than described in the General Plan EIR or a more recent specific plan or planned development EIR. The Housing Element is adopted as part of the General Plan. The City of El Cerrito adopted its current General Plan in 1999. The 1999 General Plan underwent extensive environmental review in the form of an EIR. Since 1999, the City has adopted one specific plan consistent with the General Plan: the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The SPASP has been adopted and its EIR contains a comprehensive evaluation of the effects of implementing the El Cerrito General Plan as amended by the SPASP. The SPASP amends the City’s General Plan for the Specific Plan Area and the SPASP EIR supersedes the 1999 General Plan EIR within the Specific Plan Area. The General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR are comprehensive in their analysis of the environmental impacts associated with future development in the city, based on specified land use designations and related densities and population projections. This includes discussion of a full range of alternatives and growth inducing impacts associated with urban development in the city. The EIRs for the El Cerrito General Plan and SPASP are comprehensive documents and are hereby incorporated by reference pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15150. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and adopted specific plan. The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. Housing Element Overview The Housing Element is one of seven mandatory elements to a local jurisdiction's General Plan. Jurisdictions in the nine-county San Francisco Bay Area, including El Cerrito, must update their housing elements based on an eight year planning period that begins in 2015. California Government Code Section 65583 requires a jurisdiction’s Housing Element include the following components: Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 3  A review of the previous Element’s goals, policies, objectives, and programs to ascertain the effectiveness of each of these components, as well as the overall effectiveness of the Housing Element.  An assessment of housing need and an inventory of resources and constraints related to meeting these needs.  A statement of goals, policies, and quantified objectives related to the maintenance, preservation, improvement, and development of housing.  A policy program that provides a schedule of actions that the City is undertaking or intends to undertake to implement the policies set forth in the Housing Element. The housing element must address the City's fair share of the regional housing need and specific State statutory requirements, but it ultimately should reflect the vision and priorities of the local community. The Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) planning period (January 1, 2014 to October 31, 2022) is different from the Housing Element planning period of January 31, 2015 to January 31, 2023. The 2014-2022 RHNA, prepared by ABAG, assigns El Cerrito a need for 398 housing units, including 100 very low-income units, 63 low-income units, 69 moderate-income units, and 166 above moderate-income units. The City is mandated by State Housing Element Law to demonstrate it has adequate sites available through appropriate zoning and development standards and with the required infrastructure for a variety of housing types and income levels. The City must demonstrate it has capacity or adequate sites to accommodate the projected need for housing through the 2014-2022 RHNA planning period. The City has ample capacity to accommodate these units as demonstrated by the site inventory found in Appendix A of the Housing Element. New housing that is at various stages of planning, approval, and construction will offer 251 units that will count towards meeting the City’s RHNA in the 2014-2022 period. Vacant and underutilized sites can accommodate an additional 943 units. After accounting for capacity from units under construction, approved projects, and potential sites, El Cerrito has a surplus of 810 lower-income units, 25 above moderate-income units, and 796 total units. There is a deficit of 39 moderate-income units, but this need is covered by the surplus in the lower-income categories. The El Cerrito Housing Element is organized into four parts:  Introduction - Explains the purpose, process, and contents of the Housing Element.  Housing Needs Assessment and Inventory - Describes the demographic, economic, and housing characteristics of El Cerrito and analyzes the current and projected housing needs in El Cerrito.  Resources and Constraints - Analyzes the actual and potential governmental and nongovernmental constraints to the rehabilitation, preservation, conservation, and construction of housing.  Housing Policy Program - Details specific policies and programs the City of El Cerrito will carry out over the planning period to address the City’s housing goals. Supporting background material is included in the following appendices:  Appendix A: Sites Inventory  Appendix B: At-Risk Assisted Units  Appendix C: Review of Past Performance Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 4  Appendix D: Summary of Community Outreach  Appendix E: Consistency with State Law  Appendix F: Glossary of Terms Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 6 D PROJECT SETTING The Housing Element will be the adopted policy and program document applicable to housing issues throughout the incorporated city limits of El Cerrito. E OTHER PUBLIC AGENCIES APPROVAL None F ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS The following section adapts and completes the environmental checklist form presented in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. The checklist is used to describe the impacts of the proposed project. For this checklist, the following designations are used: Potentially Significant Impact: An impact that could be significant, and for which no mitigation has been identified. If any potentially significant impacts are identified, an EIR must be prepared. Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: An impact that requires mitigation to reduce the impact to a less-than-significant level. Less-Than-Significant Impact: Any impact that would not be considered significant under CEQA relative to existing standards. No Impact: The project would not have any impact. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 7 I. AESTHETICS Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?     b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway?     c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings?     d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?     Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to scenic vistas, scenic resources, or visual character, and will not create sources of substantial light or glare that adversely affect views. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential aesthetic-related impacts are location- specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a: The Housing Element will not result in effects upon scenic vistas. Any specific housing project that might result in a physical change to a scenic vista will be subject to the CEQA review process. b: Policies and programs in the Housing Element will not damage or affect scenic resources as they are consistent with other General Plan policies and programs established to preserve natural features. The City of El Cerrito is not located within a State-designated scenic highway and therefore the Housing Element would not result in impacts to historic buildings within a State scenic highway. c: The Housing Element will not alter or reduce City standards and guidelines for visual quality. Other General Plan policies and planning programs are established to achieve high visual and design standards in the community. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 8 d: The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area. II. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?     b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?     c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))?     d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?     e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?     Discussion: a-e: The City of El Cerrito is an established urbanized area. The Housing Element will have no impact regarding agricultural resources. The El Cerrito General Plan Land Use and Circulation Diagram (page 4-13), indicates that no land in El Cerrito is designated for agricultural uses. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 9 The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to farmland, forestland, Williamson Act contracts, timberland, or timberland-zoned Timberland Production. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential agriculture- and forestry-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. III. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?     b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation?     c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?     d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?     e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?     Discussion: a-e: Ambient air quality is described in terms of compliance with State and Federal standards, and the levels of air pollutant concentrations considered safe to protect the public health and welfare. These standards are designed to protect people most sensitive to respiratory distress, such as the elderly, very young children, persons with asthma or other illnesses, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. The EPA has established national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for seven air pollution constituents. As permitted by the Clean Air Act, California has adopted more stringent air emissions standards and expanded the number of regulated air constituents. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 10 The California Air Resources Board (CARB) is required to designate areas of the state as attainment, nonattainment, or unclassified for any state standard. An “attainment” designation for an area signifies that pollutant concentrations do not violate the standard for that pollutant in that area. A “nonattainment” designation indicates that a pollutant concentration violated the standard at least once. Contra Costa County is currently (2014) in nonattainment for ozone and particulate matter, 2.5 microns (PM2.5). The City of El Cerrito is located in Contra Costa County, which falls within the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin, along with Alameda, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, and Sonoma Counties. The Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) is the agency responsible for monitoring air quality conditions in Contra Costa County, including the City of El Cerrito, and for carrying out enforcement activities to maintain air quality with applicable State and Federal standards. BAAQMD’s duties include: adopting and enforcing rules and regulations concerning air pollutant sources, permitting and inspecting stationary sources of air pollutants, responding to citizen complaints, monitoring ambient air quality and meteorological conditions, awarding grants to reduce motor vehicle emissions, and conducting public education campaigns. The Housing Element has a policy encouraging development near existing transit facilities, thus contributing to mitigation of air quality impacts. Housing Element Policy H5.4 states that the City will “encourage the location of multifamily housing near transit centers where living and/or working environments are within walkable distances in order to reduce auto trips to work, roadway expansion and air pollution.” General Plan policies identified in the General Plan EIR as mitigation for air quality include LU5.5 Pedestrians and Bicycles, T1.3 Bicycle Circulation, T1.4 Pedestrian Circulation, and T2.2 Transit First Policy. These policies will be enhanced by the development patterns supported by Housing Element Policy H5.4, above. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to air quality or plans for air quality, or produce pollutants or odors. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential air quality-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. Short- term air quality impacts resulting from construction of the sites, such as dust generated by clearing and grading activities, exhaust emissions from gas- and diesel-powered construction equipment, and vehicular emissions associated with the commuting of construction workers will be subject to BAAQMD rules/protocols. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 11 IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?     b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?     c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?     d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites?     e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?     f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan?     Discussion: a-f: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. Policies and implementation measures contained in the General Plan EIR as mitigation measures include LU6.1 Natural Features, R1.1 Habitat Protection, R1.2 Rare and Endangered Species, R1.3 Potential Environmental Impacts, R1.7 Creek Protection, R1.8 Creek Improvements, and R1.9 Cerrito Creek. In addition, Mitigation Measure 6-1 of the SPASP EIR ensures development within the Specific Plan Area will avoid the removal of trees, shrubs, or weedy vegetation during the bird nesting period. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 12 The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to biological habitats. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?     b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5?     c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource on site or unique geologic features?     d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries?     Discussion: Any evidence of cultural resources that might be unearthed in the process of construction becomes immediate grounds for the halting all construction until the extent and significant of any find is properly catalogued and evaluated by archaeological and cultural resource authorities recognized as having competence by the State of California. Furthermore, if it can be concluded that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological or paleontological resource, appropriate mitigation measures shall be required to preserve the resource in-place, in an undisturbed state. Mitigation measures may include, but are not limited to, planning construction to avoid the site, deeding conservation easements, or capping the site prior to construction. Adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element will not have an impact on any cultural resources, as the Housing Element does not propose any development. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The pattern, distribution, and intensity of development within the City of El Cerrito will be consistent with the City’s General Plan and with the SPASP. Potential impacts upon cultural resources are addressed through the implementation of General Plan policy R1.3, which encourages development patterns that minimize impacts on the City’s biological, visual and cultural resources. In addition, Mitigation Measures 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 of the SPASP EIR ensure that the City will determine the possible presence and impacts of the action on historic, archaeological, and paleontological resources. Implementation of these measures reduced impacts to cultural resources within the Specific Plan area to less-than-significant. The Housing Element Update does not include Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 13 any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to cultural resources. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area based on other substantial evidence of a known fault?     ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?     iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?     iv. Landslides?     b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?     c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?     d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1B of the Uniform Building Code?     e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater?     Discussion: Soils, geology, and seismicity conditions are important aspects of all development projects in the San Francisco Bay Area. Although most projects have little or no effect on geology, any project involving construction will have some effect on soils and topography; and all may be Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 14 affected by certain geologic events, such as earthquakes, and are protected through existing building codes and regulations. Adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element will not have an impact on any geological or soil resources, as the Housing Element does not propose any development. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to geology and soils. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a.i, a.ii, a.iii, a.iv: With respect to seismic-related hazard of ground rupture, ground failure/liquefaction, and landslide, the Housing Element will have no impact. Development approved under the auspices of the Housing Element, as part of the overall General Plan, will be consistent with the mitigation measures contained in the General Plan, resulting in a less-than-significant level of impact. b: The Housing Element does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites, and thus will not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil. The General Plan EIR identifies policies which mitigate potential impacts regarding soil erosion: H1.1 Location of Future Development, H1.2 Development Review, H1.3 Geotechnical Review, H1.4 Soils and Geologic Review, and R1.6 Runoff Water Quality. The Housing Element is consistent with the referenced policies and other elements of the El Cerrito General Plan. c and d: The Housing Element does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites, and thus will not result in a project on unstable or expansive sites. Specific development proposals would be subject to CEQA analysis of site-specific geotechnical investigation. e: Sewer systems are available for the disposal of wastewater. New development is not allowed to use septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 15 VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the atmosphere?     b. Conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?     Discussion: a-b: It is widely recognized that anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and aerosols are contributing to changes in the global climate, and that such changes could have adverse effects on the environment, the economy, and public health. Under CEQA, an analysis of the physical and environmental consequences of climate change and the contributions of individual development projects to this cumulative effect is therefore required. General guidelines for preparing CEQA climate change analyses were released by the California Office of Planning and Research (OPR). The GHG analysis can also use approaches prepared by a number of professional associations and agencies that have published suggested approaches and strategies for complying with CEQA’s environmental disclosure requirements. Such organizations include the California Attorney General’s Office (AGO), the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), the United Nations and World Meteorological Organization’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and the Association of Environmental Professionals (AEP). In September 2006, the Governor signed AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act (Health and Safety Code Section 38500 et. seq.). The Act codifies the executive order reduction of statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. This change, which is estimated to be a 25 to 35 percent reduction from current emission levels, will be accomplished through an enforceable statewide cap on GHG emissions that will be phased in starting in 2012. On September 30, 2008, Governor Schwarzenegger signed Senate Bill (SB) 375 into law. This legislation links transportation and land use planning with the CEQA process to help achieve the GHG emission reduction targets set by AB 32. Regional transportation planning agencies are required to include a sustainable community strategy (SCS) in regional transportation plans. The SCS must contain a planned growth scenario that is integrated with the transportation network and policies in such a way that it is feasible to achieve AB 32 goals on a regional level. SB 375 also identifies new CEQA exemptions and stream lining for projects that are consistent with the SCS and qualify as Transportation Priority Projects (TPP). TPPs must meet three requirements: 1) contain at least 50 percent residential use; commercial use must have floor area ratio (FAR) or not less than 0.75; 2) have a minimum net density of 20 units per acre; and 3) be located within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high quality transit corridor included in the regional transportation plan. The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments’ (ABAG) Plan Bay Area is the Bay Area’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP)/Sustainable Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 16 Community Strategy (SCS). The Final Plan Bay Area was adopted on July 18, 2013. The SCS sets a development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce GHG emissions from transportation (excluding goods movement) beyond the per capita reduction targets identified by CARB. According to Plan Bay Area, the Plan meets a 16 percent per capita reduction of GHG emissions by 2035 and a 10 percent per capita reduction by 2020 from 2005 conditions. In 2008, MTC and ABAG initiated a regional effort (FOCUS) to link local planned development with regional land use and transportation planning objectives. Through this initiative, local governments identified Priority Development Areas (PDAs) and Priority Conservation Areas (PCAs). PDAs and PCAs form the implementing framework for Plan Bay Area.  PDAs are transit-oriented, infill development opportunity areas within existing communities that are expected to host the majority of future development.  PCAs are regionally significant open spaces for which there exists broad consensus for long-term protection but nearer-term development pressure. Overall, well over two-thirds of all regional growth by 2040 is allocated within PDAs. PDAs are expected to accommodate 80 percent (or over 525,570 units) of new housing and 66 percent (or 744,230) of new jobs. The City’s housing goals and policies are consistent with ABAG’s vision for concentrated growth within the region’s PDAs. There is one PDA within the El Cerrito City Limits: the San Pablo Avenue Corridor. The boundaries of the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan match the boundaries of El Cerrito’s only PDA, the San Pablo Avenue Corridor PDA. Many of the sites that are included in the Housing Element adequate sites analysis are located within this area. After accounting for capacity from units under construction, approved projects, and potential sites approximately 85 percent of the units included in the sites inventory are within the San Pablo Avenue Corridor PDA. Energy conservation standards for new residential and commercial buildings were originally adopted by the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission in June 1977 and most recently revised in 2008 (Title 24, Part 6 of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). In general, Title 24 requires the design of building shells and building components to conserve energy. On July 17, 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). Part 11 establishes voluntary standards on planning and design for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants. Some of these standards have become mandatory in the 2010 edition of the Part 11 code. City Action Since 2006, the El Cerrito City Council has consistently supported local, regional, and state initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In February 2011 the City Council passed Resolution 2011-12 adopting GHG emission reduction targets of 15 percent below 2005 levels by the year 2020 and 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2035 for both municipal operations and the El Cerrito community. The City also adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP). In addition to providing leadership on this important issue, development of a CAP helps prepare El Cerrito for a quickly evolving legislative framework set by the State as part of its implementation of AB 32. Since 2005, the City has undertaken the following activities to pursue a more sustainable urban form. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 17  Completed 158 units and entitled 185 units of multifamily housing along the San Pablo Avenue corridor, including 56 affordable units;  Worked with Caltrans to take possession of sidewalks on San Pablo Avenue, aka State Route 123;  Completed the award-winning San Pablo Avenue Streetscape Improvement Program, including improved pedestrian access and street furniture, upgraded bus stops, 75 new bicycle racks, new Bay-Friendly median and sidewalk plantings that save 1.5 million gallons of water per year, and new rain gardens to clean storm water run-off;  Leveraged the restoration of the Cerrito Theater to catalyze private investment on the "Theater Block;"  Restored Baxter Creek and created Baxter Creek Gateway Park;  Extended Ohlone Greenway to connect with the Richmond Greenway;  Adopted the Ohlone Greenway Master Plan;  Secured funding to construct the Ohlone Greenway Nature Play Park near the El Cerrito BART Station;  Adopted El Cerrito's first Circulation Plan for Bicyclists and Pedestrians;  Completed 75 percent of bike facility improvements identified in the Circulation Plan;  Adopted a Bicycle Parking Ordinance for new development;  Worked with El Cerrito Trail Trekkers to restore and extend the City's network of public paths and trails;  Planted 1,160 street trees;  Adopted the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan in partnership with the City of Richmond in September 2014;  Secured funding to develop a comprehensive Urban Greening Plan. Existing regulations and standards that would apply to any future residential development, summarized above, would significantly reduce GHG emissions associated with future projects. The actions that the City has taken show a commitment to reducing GHG emissions through green design, energy efficiency, and transit-oriented development. Adoption and implementation of the 2015-2023 Housing Element would follow applicable City policies and programs, which support the implementation of AB 32 and SB 375. While future projects will still emit greenhouse gases, the Housing Element demonstrates adequate sites to meet the RHNA. As a policy document, the Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in the emission of greenhouse gasses. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential GHG-related impacts cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the type and location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 18 VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?     b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the likely release of hazardous materials into the environment?     c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?     d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment?     e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area?     g. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?     h. Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?     Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts from hazardous materials, airports, toxic emissions, wildfires, and other emergencies. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential hazards-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 19 until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a through c: Residential development or conservation of the city’s existing housing supply would not involve hazardous materials or processes that would result in creating hazardous material exposure or emissions within quarter mile of a school. d: The Housing Element is a policy and action document, and does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites. As such, there is no significant impact with respect to the list of hazardous sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. e: The project will not result in safety hazards related to aviation because the project does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites. In addition, the nearest airport to El Cerrito is approximately 25 miles to the south, in Oakland, California. f: The Housing Element will not result in hazards due to proximity to a private airstrip because the Housing Element does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites. In addition, there are no private airstrips in the vicinity of the City of El Cerrito. g: The project does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites, and thus will not impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or evacuation plan. h: The Housing Element does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites, and thus will not result in exposure of people or structures to risk involving wildland fires. The General Plan EIR identifies 16 fire/emergency response policies that mitigate potential impacts of demand for fire protection. Of these, the following address wildland/urban interface fire protection specifically: Public Services policies PS2.10 and PS2.11, and Health and Safety policies H1.19, H1.20, and H1.21. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 20 IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements?     b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)?     c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?     d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?     e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?     f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?     g. Place housing within a 100-year floodplain, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?     h. Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede or redirect flood flows?     i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.     j. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?     Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 21 Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to water resources. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential water-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a through e: The potential for environmental impacts due to development was addressed in the General Plan EIR. The potential impacts were determined to be mitigated to a less-than- significant level by the following policies: GM5.1 Local Development Mitigation Program, GM5.2 Performance Standard Review, GM5.3 Capital Improvement Program, GM5.4 Contributions to Improvement, PS 3.5 Coordination with Service Providers, PS1.1 Development Review, PS4.1 Monitoring Storm Drain Needs, and R1.6 Runoff Water Quality. f. The Housing Element will not result in hazards due to location of development within flood plains. The General Plan includes Policy H1.5 Flood Hazards that previously mitigated this potential impact to a less- than-significant level. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 22 X. LAND USE AND PLANNING Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Physically divide an established community?     b. Conflict with any applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating on environmental effect?     c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan?     Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in physically dividing the community or conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural communities conservation plan. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential land use-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a: The Housing Element does not in itself involve development proposals on specific sites, and thus will not result in potential adverse impacts that may physically divide an established community. b: The Housing Element is part of the General Plan. It has been analyzed and found to be consistent with the rest of the General Plan elements. The Housing Element is specifically consistent with the Land Use Diagram of the General Plan, as the potential for new housing production identified in the Regional Housing Needs Allocation can be accommodated with sites currently zoned to allow residential and/or mixed use development including residences. c: No Habitat Conservation Plans or Natural Community Conservation Plans will be affected by the Housing Element, because none are in effect within the City of El Cerrito City Limits. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 23 XI. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State?     b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan?     Discussion: a-b: The project will have no effect upon mineral resources as there are no mineral extraction activities or mineral resources in the vicinity of the project (which is City-wide in scope). The City of El Cerrito General Plan, Chapter 7, Resources and Hazards does not identify any mineral resources. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to mineral resources. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential mineral-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. XII. NOISE Would the project result in: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?     b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels?     c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing     Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 24 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact without the project? d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?     e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     f. For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?     Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to noise. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential noise-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a,b,c,d: The Housing Element will not result in exposure of persons to noise in excess of established standards or excessive vibration or groundborne noise, nor will there be permanent or temporary increases in ambient noise levels within the citywide project area. Any project proposals will be reviewed for conformance with the General Plan policies which mitigate potential noise impacts: H3.1, H3.2, H3.3, H3.4, H3.5, H3.7, and H3.8. e: No airport is located in proximity to the project area. f: No private airstrip is located in proximity to the project area. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 25 XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)?     b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?     Discussion: The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is tasked with allocating regional housing needs amongst the jurisdictions in the nine Bay Area counties, including those in Contra Costa County. El Cerrito’s Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) is 398 housing units. As part of the 2015-2023 Housing Element update, a housing sites inventory was created to demonstrate El Cerrito’s ability to fulfill its RHNA on sites already zoned for residential development. The Housing Element recommends various housing programs to assist in providing housing for all income levels including extremely low-, very low-, low-, moderate-, and above moderate-income households. The Housing Element sets forth programs and policies to facilitate housing conservation, maintenance, and diversity, and no aspect of the project involves the displacement of existing residents. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts from population and housing. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a: The housing element is one part of the General Plan, which establishes policy to guide the orderly development of the community. El Cerrito is in an urbanized area and does not have any geographic areas where substantial growth-inducing impacts could be caused. Population growth foreseen by the General Plan and the SPASP is not a substantial increase that could result in a significant impact, because the growth contemplated is mitigated through all the general plan policies identified in the General Plan Final EIR and SPASP EIR. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 26 b & c: The housing element will mitigate this potential impact of growth, in that several Housing Element policies address conservation and retention of housing stock: H1.1 Encourage neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation of viable older housing to preserve neighborhood character and, where possible, retain a supply of very low-, low-, and moderate-income units. H1.2 Discourage the conversion of residential uses to non-residential uses, unless there is a finding of clear public benefit and equivalent housing can be provided for those who would be displaced by the proposed conversion. H1.3 Maintain housing supply and reduce the loss of life and property caused by earthquakes by encouraging structural strengthening and hazard mitigation in all housing types. H1.5 Continue to regulate condominium conversions in accordance with Chapter 19.45 of the Zoning Ordinance. XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Fire protection?     b. Police protection?     c. Schools?     d. Parks?     Discussion: The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in environmental impacts associated with the construction of new or additional facilities, needed as a result of reduced public service performance objectives. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential public services-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 27 a: Adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element would not impact police protection services in a way that would require the construction or modification of public facilities. The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to fire protection to be mitigated to a less than Significant level with the following mitigating policies: PS2.1, PS2.2, PS2.3, PS2.4, PS2.5, PS2.6, PS2.7, PS2.8, PS2.9., PS2.10, PS2.11, PS2.12, H1.17, H1.18, H1.19, and H2.1. b: Adoption of the 2015-2023 Housing Element would not impact police protection services in a way that would require the construction or modification of public facilities. The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to police services to be mitigated to a Less than Significant level with the following mitigating policies: LU4.6, CED 2.4, PS1.7, PS1.1, PS1.2, PS1.3, PS1.4, PS2.1, PS3.1, and PS5.3. c: School-related impacts depend upon the location and intensity of a project, by students generated per household, and the capacity of facilities in a given attendance area. Legislative requirements for school development fees ensure that new development will provide necessary facilities to meet projected needs, should housing projects be ensure. However, State law does not require developers to provide for school sites within their developments. Any development project will be conditioned to pay current school impact fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance. The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to schools to be mitigated to a Less than Significant level with the following mitigating policies: CF1.8, PR1.6, and PS3.5. In addition, Section 15.3.3 of the SPASP EIR determines that impacts to public schools within the Specific Plan Area would be considered less-than-significant and no mitigation is required. d: Park-related impacts also depend upon the location and intensity of a project. The purpose of park fees is to fund the design and construction of parks and park improvements required to mitigate the impact of new development. Any future residential development will be subject to applicable park improvement fees in effect at the time of building permit issuance. The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to parks to be mitigated to a less than Significant level with the following mitigating policies: PR1.1, PR1.2, PR1.3, PR1.4, PR1.5, PR1.6, PR1.7, PR1.8, PR1.9, PR1.10, PR1.11, PR1.12, PR1.14, PR2.1, PR2.2, and PR2.3. In addition, Section 15.3.3 of the SPASP EIR determines that impacts on parks and recreation facilities within the Specific Plan Area would be considered less-than-significant and no mitigation is required. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 28 XV. RECREATION Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?     b. Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?     Discussion: a and b: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to parks or recreational facilities. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential recreation-related impacts are location- specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to recreation to be mitigated to a less than Significant level with the following mitigating policies: PR1.1, PR1.2, PR1.3, PR1.4, PR1.5, PR1.6, PR1.7, PR1.8, PR1.9, PR1.11, PR1.12. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 29 XVI. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit?     b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways?     c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks?     d. Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses farm equipment)?     e. Result in inadequate emergency access?     f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities?     Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to traffic load or capacity, levels of service, air traffic patterns, or adopted policies relating to alternative transportation, and would not increase hazards due to design features or result in poor emergency access. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential traffic-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 30 a-b: The project will have no adverse affect, such as substantial increase in traffic or traffic in excess of an established level of service standard, because the project will generate no new vehicular traffic. c. The Housing Element will have no effect upon air traffic patterns, as the amount of housing growth contemplated by the City’s General Plan will not result in changes to patterns of air traffic. Nor will the Housing Element involve locational changes that result in safety risks, because the plan does not address specific development proposals. d. Normal City review procedures address conformance with safety standards, reducing potential impact to a less-than-significant level. e. The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to emergency access to be mitigated to a less than significant level with the following mitigating policies: Policy PS2.11, PS2.12. f: The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to parking capacity to be mitigated to a less than Significant level with the following mitigating policies: T4.1, T4.2, T4.3, and T4.4. XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?     b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?     c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects?     d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?     e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?     f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs?     g. Comply with federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste?     Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 31 Discussion: The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. The Housing Element will not, in and of itself, result in impacts to public utilities service for communication, water, sewer, solid waste disposal, and storm drainage. All future development will require project-specific environmental evaluation in order to determine that any potential impacts are less than significant. Potential utilities-related impacts are location-specific and cannot be assessed in a meaningful way until the location of a project site is known. At such time that a development proposal is considered, that project will be subject to adopted development guidelines/standards, and any impacts identified with the development project will be addressed through mitigation measures specific to the impact. a: The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to wastewater treatment requirements to be mitigated to a less than significant level with the following mitigating policies: GM5.1, GM5.2, GM5.3, GM5.4, PS2.8, and PS3.5. b: The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to wastewater treatment facilities to be mitigated to a less than significant level with the following mitigating policies: GM5.1, GM5.2, GM5.3, GM5.4, and PS3.5 c: The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to new stormwater drainage facilities to be mitigated to a less than significant level with the following mitigating policies: S4.1, PR2.3, PS4.1, R1.6, R1.7, R1.8, R1.9, H1.14, and H1.15. d: The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to water supplies to be mitigated to a less than significant level with the following mitigating policies: GM5.1, GM5.2, GM5.3, GM5.4, PS2.8, and PS3.5 e: The General Plan EIR identifies the impact of development within the parameters of the General Plan with regard to adequate capacity to provide wastewater treatment to be mitigated to a less than significant level with the following mitigating policies: GM5.1, GM5.2, GM5.3, GM5.4, and PS3.5. Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update Initial Study Negative Declaration 32 XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Issues Potentially Significant Impact Potentially Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less-Than- Significant Impact No Impact a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?     b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals?     c. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?     d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?     Implementation of the Housing Element will not create any significant or adverse impacts. Potential site-specific impacts that cannot be known at this time will be addressed in conjunction with any development proposal submitted for the individual project sites. The Housing Element is a policy document consistent with the General Plan and San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan (SPASP). The Housing Element identifies sites designated for residential development. The anticipated development capacity was previously evaluated for potential environmental impacts in the General Plan EIR and SPASP EIR. The Housing Element Update does not include any changes to land use designations, zoning, building heights and intensities, or residential densities. G DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION The project provides substantial benefits, including environmental benefits, to the community. Following are discussions of the project’s environmental benefits. Environmental benefits: Adoption of the Housing Element is part of the ongoing planning process for orderly, rational development of the community. As such, the Housing Element does not have specific environmental benefits, but will result in beneficial effects of contributing to environmentally beneficial aspects of the General Plan, such as establishing policy and programs “to assure that future development responds to neighborhood character, site features, environmental constraints and the availability of public services and adequate roadway capacity” (General Plan EIR, page 5-1). The General Plan will also “allow the development of additional housing, including affordable housing, which could have a beneficial impact of increasing affordable housing opportunities and Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Initial Study Negative Declaration 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Update 33 creating an environment where housing is combined successfully with office, retail and transit uses. The policies in the Draft Plan would reduce potential impacts related to population growth, and concentration to a less than significant level…” (General Plan EIR, page 5-1). Potential Adverse Impacts: The project will not have any potentially significant adverse impacts. The Housing Element does not control density or location of development. As discussed in the project description, the Housing Element must be consistent with the other General Plan elements. As required by State law, the Housing Element addresses internal consistency of the General Plan. The 2014-2022 RHNA, prepared by ABAG, assigns El Cerrito a need for 398 housing units, including 100 very low-income units, 63 low-income units, 69 moderate-income units, and 166 above moderate-income units. The City has ample capacity to accommodate these units as demonstrated by the site inventory found in Appendix A of the Housing Element. New housing that is at various stages of planning, approval, and construction will offer 251 units that will count towards meeting the City’s RHNA in the 2014-2022 period. Vacant and underutilized sites can accommodate an additional 946 units. After accounting for capacity from units under construction, approved projects, and potential sites, El Cerrito has a surplus of 810 lower-income units, 25 above moderate-income units, and 796 total units. There is a deficit of 39 moderate-income units, but this need is covered by the surplus in the lower-income categories. As a policy and action document, the Housing Element is consistent with the rest of the General Plan adopted in 1999 and with the San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan adopted in 2014. The General Plan EIR prepared for the 1999 General Plan Update is relied upon for its identification of mitigation measures applicable to the General Plan as a whole, which are referenced in the General Plan Final EIR, pages 2-2 through 2-10. The SPASP amends the City’s General Plan for the Specific Plan Area and the SPASP EIR supersedes the 1999 General Plan EIR within the Specific Plan Area and is relied upon for its identification of mitigation measures associated with development within the Specific Plan Area, which are referenced in the SPASP EIR, pages 2-4 through 2-31. H POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS There are no potentially significant impacts as a result of this project. I MITIGATION OF POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS No mitigation measures are proposed to be adopted with the Negative Declaration for the City of El Cerrito General Plan Housing Element. J REFERENCES City of El Cerrito General Plan, 1999 City of El Cerrito General Plan Final EIR, 1999 San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan, 2014 San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan EIR, 2014 El Cerrito Climate Action Plan, 2013 K EXHIBITS Draft 2015-2023 El Cerrito Housing Element Agenda Item No. 6 Attachment 4 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6(A) Attachment 5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Agenda Item No. 6(A) Attachment 5