Full Text
EL CERRITO EL CERRITO PARKING STUDY November 21, 2011 ---PAGE BREAK--- El Cerrito TOD in Context: El C it d l N t BART St ti El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Average Weekday Ridership 7,800 Bus Service AC Transit 7 routes Golden Gate Transit 2 routes Vallejo Transit 1 route Travel Mode Drive Alone 45% Vallejo Transit 1 route Fairfield/Suisun 1 route WestCAT 4 routes Drive Alone 45% Transit 22% Walk 13% Bicycle 3% Carpool/ Drop-off 17% Carpool/ Drop off 17% City of Home Origin Richmond 26% El Cerrito 18% Vallejo 11% San Pablo 9% Hercules 9% Other 27% ---PAGE BREAK--- El Cerrito TOD in Context: El C it Pl BART St ti El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Average Weekday Ridership 4,400 Bus Service AC Transit 5 routes Travel Mode Drive Alone 38% Transit 1% Walk 44% Bicycle 6% Carpool/ Drop-off 11% Cit f H O i i City of Home Origin El Cerrito 47% Albany 20% Richmond 14% K i t 7% Kensington 7% Berkeley 4% Other 8% ---PAGE BREAK--- Recap of Last Presentation: P ki S R lt Parking Survey Results Overall on street and off street parking occupancy rates are below 85% except BART Overall on-street and off-street parking occupancy rates are below 85% except BART parking facilities and the blocks surrounding the BART stations. BART parking facilities have very high occupancy rates (above 95%) during weekday daytime, but low on weekday night and on weekends (20 to 30%). daytime, but low on weekday night and on weekends (20 to 30%). The San Pablo Midtown area has extremely low occupancy rate (below 50%). The highest rate is 72%. BART commuters are using on-street parking spaces in the vicinity of the El Cerrito del Norte and El Cerrito Plaza BART Stations. In the BART station areas parking occupancy rates are substantially higher on the street In the BART station areas, parking occupancy rates are substantially higher on the street segments without time restrictions than those within Residential Parking Permit zone with 4- hour time restriction. There are several underutilized parking lots along San Pablo Avenue (e g Moeser Lane There are several underutilized parking lots along San Pablo Avenue. Moeser Lane Shopping Center, Big 5 parking lots, etc.). ---PAGE BREAK--- Recap of Last Presentation: B t P ti Best Practices Transportation & Parking Strategies Hayward Oakland Mountain View Redwood City Pasadena Portland 1 Reduced Parking Near Transit/TOD Zoning Overlay ● ● ● ● ● ● 2 Elimination of Minimum Parking ● 3 Shared Parking ● ● ● ● ● ● 4 Flexible Parking Space Size ● 5 In-Lieu Payment ● ● ● ● 6 Transportation Demand Management Program ● ● 7 Credit Bicycle & Parking ● 8 Universal Transit Pass ● ● ● 9 Parking Cash Out ● 10 CarSharing Program ● ● 11 Unbundled Parking ● ● ● 12 Market Rate BART Parking ● 13 Metered Parking ● ● ● ● ● 14 Parking Benefit District ● ● ● ● 15 Remote Parking for BART ● 16 Transit Discounts/Preferential Parking for Car/Vanpool ● 17 Attended Parking ● 18 Parking Exemption ● 19 Flexible Zone ● 20 Innovative Parking/Site Design ● 21 Parking Maximum ● ● ● ● 22 On-Street Parking Credit ● 23 No New Surface Parking ● 24 TOD Property Tax Exemption ● 25 Free Rail Zone ● 26 Establish Transportation Management Association ● ---PAGE BREAK--- City Council Comments and Q ti R i d Questions Received Address changes in parking demand due to recession Address changes in parking demand due to recession Indicate parking regulations on San Pablo Avenue in the Survey Area Provide detailed parking occupancy information for El Cerrito Plaza Status of shared parking provision in Rockridge BART Station Status of shared parking provision in Rockridge BART Station Clarify minimum parking requirements in Redwood City Develop parking strategies that address both the existing and future parking needs ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Study Overview g y ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: C id ti Consideration El Cerrito’s Existing Parking Codes El Cerrito’s Existing Parking Codes Interviews with Past El Cerrito Developers MTC’ S G h P ki D d M d l MTC’s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model National Average (ITE) Best Practice Examples Unit (per) Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Unit (per) Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/ 1-bed Multi-Family du 0.8 1 1 0.8 2-bed Multi-Family du 1.1 1.5 2 1.1 Retail/ Office 1,000 sq. ft. 2.5 3.3 3.3 2.5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: C id ti t’d Consideration – cont’d El Cerrito’s E isting Parking Codes El Cerrito’s Existing Parking Codes Interviews with Past El Cerrito Developers MTC’ S G h P ki D d M d l MTC’s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model National Average (ITE) Best Practice Examples Unit (per) Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Unit (per) Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Residential du 1.35 2 2 1.5 Live-work Townhouse du 1.5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: C id ti t’d Consideration – cont’d El Cerrito’s E isting Parking Codes El Cerrito’s Existing Parking Codes Interviews with Past El Cerrito Developers MTC’ S t G th P ki D d M d l MTC’s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model National Average (ITE) Best Practice Examples Unit (per) Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Unit (per) Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Residential du 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.2 Retail 1,000 sq. ft. 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Office 1,000 sq. ft. 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.6 ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: C id ti t’d Consideration – cont’d El Cerrito’s E isting Parking Codes El Cerrito’s Existing Parking Codes Interviews with Past El Cerrito Developers MTC’ S G h P ki D d M d l MTC’s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model National Average (ITE) Best Practice Examples Unit (per) Suburban Urban Residential du 1.7 1.5 Office 1,000 sq. ft. 3.4 3.0 Non‐December December Weekday Weekend Retail 1,000 sq. ft. 3.4 5.9 ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: C id ti t’d Consideration – cont’d El Cerrito’s E isting Parking Codes El Cerrito’s Existing Parking Codes Interviews with Past El Cerrito Developers MTC’ S G h P ki D d M d l MTC’s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model National Average (ITE) Best Practice Examples Hayward Hayward/ Mission Oakland Mt. View Redwood Pasadena Portland Berkeley Union City Studio/ 1-bed Multi-Family 1 0 0.5 1.8 0.8/1 1 0 0.3 1.5 2-bed Multi-Family 1 0 0.5 2.3 1.5 1.5 0 0.3 2 3 2 3 2 0 3 3 3 3 6 0 1 5 2 5 Retail 3.2 3.2 0 3.3 3 3.6 0 1.5 2.5 Office 3.2 3.2 0 3 3 2.3 0 1.5 3.3 *Minimum parking requirements per residential unit or per 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial space ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: C i Comparisons *Average ratios from 9 different cities ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Rates: S i Scenarios Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Cit ’ i ti ki d d i t f l l Land Use Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1BR 0.8 1 1 0.8 City’s existing parking codes City’s existing parking codes and inputs from local developers Land Use Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1BR 0.8 1 1 0.8 / 2 BR 1.1 1.5 2 1.1 Retail/Office 2.5 3.3 3.3 2.5 / 2 BR 1.4 2 1.5 1.5 Retail/Office 2.5 3.3 3.3 2.5 Scenario #3 Best Practice Examples and MTC’s Smart Growth parking demand model Scenario #4 Best Practice Examples City of Oakland, Redwood City, Hayward, City of Berkeley) Land Use Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1BR 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 2 BR 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.1 Retail 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.8 Land Use Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1BR 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.5 2 BR 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 Retail/Office 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Office 1.8 1.9 1.9 1.6 Retail/Office 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Demand Estimation: S i Scenarios Land Use (max) Estimated Parking Demand based on Minimum Requirements ( ) g q Area Residential Commercial Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 (du) (kSF) (Current Code) (Current Code & Developers) (Best Practices & MTC Model) (Best Practices) Del Norte 2 [PHONE REDACTED] 4911 3698 2628 Del Norte 2,[PHONE REDACTED] 4911 3698 2628 Midtown 437 86 822 923 595 507 Plaza North 145 9 242 208 162 139 Plaza 311 65 492 522 376 274 a a 3 65 492 522 376 274 Total 3,739 964 6,171 6,564 4,830 3,549 Reduction Compared to Current City Codes: Del Norte 0 295 -917 -1,987 Midtown 0 101 -227 -315 Plaza North 0 -33 -80 -103 Pl 0 31 116 218 Plaza 0 31 -116 -218 Total 0 393 -1,341 -2,622 % Change 0% -22% -42% ---PAGE BREAK--- TOD Parking Needs g Current City Code v. MTC Model Output Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/ 1-bed Multi-Family 0.8 a 0.5 1.0 a 0.8 1.0 a 0.8 0.8 a 0.5 Current City Code v. MTC Model Output 2-bed Multi-Family 1.1 1.5 a 1.3 2.0 a 1.3 1.1 Retail 2.5 a 1.8 3.3 a 1.8 3.3 a 1.8 2.5 a 1.8 Office 2.5 a 1.8 3.3 a 1.9 3.3 a 1.9 2.5 a 1.6 Supporting Policies Unbundle parking Increase the minimum bike parking requirements O ce Increase the minimum bike parking requirements Establish TMA to administer the transportation and parking management strategies Establish criteria for maximum allowable Allow parking requirements to be met off‐site (in‐lieu parking) ---PAGE BREAK--- Parking Study Overview g y ---PAGE BREAK--- Recap of Best Practice Examples p p Transportation & Parking Strategies Hayward Oakland Mountain View Redwood City Pasadena Portland 1 Reduced Parking Near Transit/Zoning Overlay ● ● ● ● ● ● 2 Elimination of Minimum Parking ● 3 Allow Shared Parking ● ● ● ● ● ● 4 Flexible Parking Space Size ● 5 In-Lieu Payment ● ● ● ● 6 Transportation Demand Management Program ● ● 7 Credit Bicycle & Parking ● 8 Universal Transit Pass ● ● ● 9 Parking Cash Out ● 10 CarSharing Program ● ● 11 Unbundled Parking ● ● ● 12 Market Rate BART Parking ● 13 Metered Parking ● ● ● ● ● 14 Parking Benefit District ● ● ● ● 15 Remote Parking for BART ● 16 Transit Discounts/Preferential Parking for Car/Vanpool ● 17 Attended Parking ● 18 Parking Exemption ● 19 Flexible Zone ● 20 Innovative Parking/Site Design ● 21 Parking Maximum ● ● ● ● 22 On-Street Parking Credit ● 23 No New Surface Parking ● 24 Transit Oriented Development Property Tax Exemption ● 25 Free Rail Zone ● 26 Establish Transportation Management Association ● ---PAGE BREAK--- Proposed Parking Management St t i Strategies Proposed Parking Strategies Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Station Proposed Parking Strategies Del Norte Midtown North Station 1. Establish and Participate in Transportation Management Association ● ● ● ● 2. Unbundled Parking ● ● ● ● 3. Allow On-Street Parking to Meet Off-Street Parking Requirements ● ● ● 3. Allow On Street Parking to Meet Off Street Parking Requirements 4. CarShare Services ● ● 5. Peer-to-Peer CarSharing ● ● 6. 10-Hour Paid Parking ● ● New New 7. Charge BART Patrons for On-Street Parking ● ● 8. EcoPass for Residents ● ● ● ● 9. Increase BART Parking Fee ● ● 10. Free Parking for Carpool/Vanpool ● ● 11. Attended Parking ● 12. Establish Joint Powers Association ● ● New New 13. Innovative Site Design and Requirements to Promote Bike Usage ● ● ● ● 14. Credit Bicycle and Parking ● ● ● ● 15. Transportation Demand Management Program ● ● ● ● ---PAGE BREAK--- 1. Establish Transportation M t A i ti (TMA) Management Association (TMA) Description: Funded through HOA dues or fees paid by Responsible City of El Cerrito p g p y the residents and business members, TMA would provide transportation and parking management services throughout the study areas. TMA staff would implement transportation demand management programs; provide ki b k i t h l id t d Party: Priority: High Effectiveness: Medium parking brokerage services to help residents and businesses share, trade, and lease parking spaces; produce and distribute user information; coordinate enforcement services; monitor parking problems. Potential Benefits Efficientl implement parking Examples: SFTMA Potential Benefits: Efficiently implement parking management strategies and TDM programs. Potential Impacts & Costs: Annual operational costs of $115,000 to $220,000 depending on development scenarios scenarios. Feasibility: HOA and membership fee contribution of $5 a month per each household would cover the operational costs. ---PAGE BREAK--- 2. Unbundled Parking Description: Resident parking spaces can be unbundled, Responsible City of El Cerrito p p g p , meaning the parking spaces can be rented and sold separately from building space so that residents and tenants only pay for the parking they actually want to use. Developers can make some or all parking optional h lli d lli d t il/ ffi it I f l Responsible Party: City of El Cerrito Priority: High Effectiveness: High when selling dwelling and or retail/office units. Informal unbundling can also be encouraged by helping to create a secondary market for available spaces. Potential Benefits: Increase housing affordability for those who do not need or want parking spaces Pro ide g Examples: S. Hayward BART Affordable/Senior Housing those who do not need or want parking spaces; Provide incentives to walk, bike, take transit, or use car share options; Could potentially provide surplus parking to BART patrons. Potential Impacts & Costs: Administration costs Could Potential Impacts & Costs: Administration costs; Could potentially cause parking spillover problems in the area if free on-street parking is available nearby. Feasibility: Feasible when combined with other supporting parking management strategies such as supporting parking management strategies such as carsharing services. ---PAGE BREAK--- 3. Allow On-street Parking to Meet Off t t P ki R i t Off-street Parking Requirements Description: In order to maximize the on-street parking Responsible City of El Cerrito p p g utilization and to minimize additional off-street parking spaces being built on project sites, on-street parking supply may be counted toward the total parking requirements on the site. Responsible Party: City of El Cerrito Priority: High Effectiveness: Medium Potential Benefits: Efficient use of parking spaces; Reduce parking foot prints Potential Impacts & Costs: Administration costs Feasibility: Feasible when combined with other Examples: Emeryville Bay St., Redwood City Feasibility: Feasible when combined with other supporting parking management strategies. ---PAGE BREAK--- 4. CarShare Services Description: Carsharing service provides a fleet of Responsible City of El Cerrito p g p vehicles available to members of a carsharing group. Membership fees typically include insurance, fuel, and maintenance costs and may be paid on a per-hour or per-mile basis. A group membership to carshare i ill b ff d t ll id t f id b Responsible Party: City of El Cerrito Priority: High Effectiveness: Medium services will be offered to all residents, free or paid by a portion of HOA dues or by the developer. Carshare pods would be placed in the BART parking lot in a highly visible area to shed car ownership for residents and to allow BART patrons to use. Examples: S. Hayward BART Affordable/Senior Housing p Potential Benefits: Discourage car ownership and usage; Help ensure the success of unbundled parking strategies. Potential Impacts & Costs: Loss of BART parking Potential Impacts & Costs: Loss of BART parking Feasibility: A group membership to carshare services could be offered to all residents at free of charge or at a substantially discounted price. ---PAGE BREAK--- 5. Peer-to-Peer CarSharing Description: Peer-to-Peer CarSharing service allows an Responsible City of El Cerrito p g existing car owner make their vehicle available for use to other drivers in their area in exchange for payment. TMA could facilitate and encourage residents to participate in this program to reduce parking foot print i th t d Responsible Party: City of El Cerrito Priority: Medium Effectiveness: Low in the study area. Potential Benefits: Encourage car shedding. Potential Impacts & Costs: Administration costs. Feasibility: TMA could potentially take on the services Examples: San Francisco Feasibility: TMA could potentially take on the services. ---PAGE BREAK--- 6. 10-Hour Paid Parking Description: Install 10-hour paid parking for on-street Responsible City of El Cerrito p p p g parking spaces surrounding the BART station and potentially in the non Residential Parking Permit (RPP) parking spaces in the BART station areas. On-street parking rates should be set to match the ongoing BART ki t ( tl b t $0 20/h ) ith 10 h Responsible Party: City of El Cerrito Priority: High Effectiveness: High parking rate (currently about $0.20/hour) with a 10-hour time limit. Potential Benefits: Generates additional revenue to the City to pay for enforcement costs parking strategies (enforcement costs are likel to be paid b citations) g Examples: MacArthur Transit Village (proposed) (enforcement costs are likely to be paid by citations); Retains on-street parking capacity for BART patrons. Potential Impacts & Costs: Capital costs for meters and maintenance and enforcement costs; Cause inconvenience to the affected residents to the affected residents. Feasibility: Generates additional revenue of up to $85,000 a year for the City. The City may use this revenue to pay for enforcement and other parking strategies strategies. ---PAGE BREAK--- 7. Charge BART Patrons for O t t P ki On-street Parking Description: Alternative to installing parking meters in Responsible City of El Cerrito p g p g non-RPP zones, the City may consider converting all residential streets into RPP zones and sell surplus RPP permits (approx. 183 spaces) to BART patrons and/or commercial businesses. Party: Priority: Low Effectiveness: Medium Potential Benefits: Generates additional revenue (through paid parking and citations) to the City to pay for enforcement costs and other parking strategies; Retains (or increase) on-street parking capacity for BART; Potential impacts on residents wo ld be minimal on Examples: MacArthur Transit Village (proposed) Potential impacts on residents would be minimal on weekdays. Potential Impacts & Costs: Increase administration costs Feasibility: Generates additional revenue of up to $157,000 a year for the City. ---PAGE BREAK--- 8. EcoPass for Residents Description: An EcoPass is a transit pass offered at a Responsible City of El Cerrito, p p discount to a user based on a group rate. The pass would require a commitment from the residents through HOA to purchase a set number of passes each month to make the program financially viable. Since BART does t tl ff di t th TMA Party: BART, AC Transit Priority: Low Effectiveness: High not currently offer group discount passes, the TMA should work with the agency to initiate a pilot program for the study. Potential Benefits: Increase transit ridership. Examples: MacArthur Transit Village (proposed), S. Hayward BART Affordable/Senior Potential Impacts & Costs: Increased administration costs, and cost of EcoPass subsidies. Feasibility: Uncertain at this time because BART currently doesn't offer group discount. Affordable/Senior Housing ---PAGE BREAK--- 9. Increase BART Parking Fees g Description: BART currently charges $1 a day or Responsible BART p y g $ y $42 a month for parking. These rates can be increased up to $2 and $84, respectively. Potential Benefits: Generate additional revenue to the BART which can be used to support other Party: Priority: High Effectiveness: High pp parking strategies free carpool parking, attended parking); Discourage Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) usage. Potential Impacts & Costs: Could shift some BART Examples: $2/day @Daly City, S. San Francisco, San Bruno, Millbrae, Colma Stations $63/month @Castro patrons to other stations such as Richmond which offers free parking. Feasibility: Generates additional revenue of up to $384,000 a year for the BART. $63/month @Castro Valley, Ashby, Fruitvale, Pleasant Hill, Dublin Stations ---PAGE BREAK--- 10. Free BART Parking for C l/V l Carpool/Vanpool Description: BART currently provides preferential parking Responsible BART p y p p p g spaces to carpool/vanpool vehicles and charges daily fee of which is the same rate as SOVs. These spaces can be offered for free as an additional incentive to carpool or vanpool. While SOV parking lot is usually full by 8AM, l/ l ki l t i i t l h lf f ll b Party: Priority: Low Effectiveness: Low carpool/vanpool parking lot is approximately half full by 10AM (and full by noon) according to the 2008 BART survey. Depending on the projected demand, carpool/vanpool parking supply may be increased. Potential Benefits Red ce SOV access to BART Enco rage Potential Benefits: Reduce SOV access to BART; Encourage carpool/vanpool usage. Potential Impacts & Costs: Loss of parking revenue (approx. $11,000/year); Increase enforcement and administration costs administration costs. Feasibility: Loss of parking revenue would be offset by the increased SOV parking rates. ---PAGE BREAK--- 11. Attended Parking Description: Attended parking employs the service of a Responsible BART p p g p y parking attendant who organizes efficient parking based on arrival and departure times. Unlike valet parking, where a valet parks a vehicle on arrival and retrieves the vehicle on departure, attended parking relies on i d ki D i t i ll k d Party: Priority: Low Effectiveness: Low organized parking queues. Drivers typically park and retrieve their own vehicles. Parking attendants in the garage would instruct patrons to park on a certain level and in tandem based on their planned return time. Attendants would retain keys to each vehicle to enable Examples: Pleasant Hill BART Station, MacArthur Transit Village (proposed) y shuffling as needed during off-peak hours and upon patron return. Potential Benefits: Increase parking capacity on site by up to 35%; Added security for patrons and their vehicles. (proposed) p ; y p Potential Impacts & Costs: Increase parking costs; Increase administration costs; Inconvenience for drivers. Feasibility: Estimated cost of approximately $101,000 for hiring 2 parking attendants on site could be paid by for hiring 2 parking attendants on site could be paid by the increased parking revenue. ---PAGE BREAK--- 12. Establish Joint Powers Authority (JPA) y ( ) Description: JPA would be comprised of representatives Responsible City of El Cerrito p p p from the City of El Cerrito and the BART. Through the formation of JPA, the City and the BART would collectively implement parking management strategies on the BART and the City properties, decide on parking t ll t ki d d t Party: and BART Priority: High Effectiveness: High rates, collect parking revenues, and conduct enforcement. Potential Benefits: Efficient management of on-street and off-street parking revenues and enforcement acti ities activities. Potential Impacts & Costs: Administration costs. ---PAGE BREAK--- 13. Innovative Site Design and Aggressive Bicycle P ki R i t t P t Bik U Parking Requirements to Promote Bike Usage Description: Project sites are situated in close proximity Responsible City of El Cerrito p j p y (some are immediately adjacent) to the Ohlone Greenway, a Class III designated bike path. An innovative site design that allows convenient bike access from the Ohlone Greenway to the project site would bik Th Cit ' l i d Party: Priority: High Effectiveness: Low encourage bike usage. The City's planning code requires 1 bicycle parking space to be provided for every 4 housing units (long-term) and 1 bicycle parking for every 20 housing units (short-term). The bicycle parking requirements could be increased to promote p g q p enhanced bike amenities on the project site 1 per 2 housing units). Potential Benefits: Provide convenient access via bike or walking.g Potential Impacts & Costs: None. Feasibility: More effective when combined with aggressive bike parking requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- 14. Credit Bicycle and P ki Parking Description: Bicycle parking spaces may be counted Responsible City of El Cerrito p y p g p y toward the off-street parking requirements. For example in the City of Hayward, credit for 1 vehicle parking space is given for each 4 bicycle spaces or 2 parking spaces provided, whether the i d t Party: Priority: High Effectiveness: Low spaces are required or not. Potential Benefits: Reduce vehicle footprints and encourage bicycle usage. Potential Impacts & Costs: None. Examples: Hayward Feasibility: More effective when combined with innovative, bicycle-friendly site design and aggressive bicycle parking requirements. ---PAGE BREAK--- 15. Transportation Demand M t P Management Programs Description: Transportation Demand Management Responsible City of El Cerrito p p g (TDM) programs are designed to reduce the number of vehicle trips generated. TDM programs emphasize alternative commuting options, such as public transit, private shuttle service, biking, walking, and carpooling. A d i t d TDM di t ld b i h f Party: Priority: High Effectiveness: Low A designated TDM coordinator would be in charge of helping people plan their trips using alternative mode of transportation, coordinating with and promote 511 Regional Rideshare, promoting TDM programs, etc. Potential Benefits Enco rage the se of alternati e Examples: Hayward, Oakland, South San Francisco Potential Benefits: Encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. Potential Impacts & Costs: Included in TMA. Feasibility: TMA can develop and implement TDM programs. ---PAGE BREAK--- Conclusion: P d St t i Proposed Parking Strategies Priority Effectiveness Proposed Strategies Proposed Parking Strategies Priority Effectiveness 1. Establish and Participate in Transportation Management Association High Medium 2. Unbundled Parking High High 3. Allow On-Street Parking to Meet Off-Street Parking Requirements High Medium 3. Allow On Street Parking to Meet Off Street Parking Requirements High Medium 4. CarShare Services High Medium 5. Peer-to-Peer CarSharing Medium Low 6. 10-Hour Paid Parking High High New New 7. Charge BART Patrons for On-Street Parking Low Medium 8. EcoPass for Residents Low High 9. Increase BART Parking Fee High High 10. Free Parking for Carpool/Vanpool Low Low 11. Attended Parking Low Low 12. Establish Joint Powers Association High High i i i i i New New 13. Innovative Site Design and Requirements to Promote Bike Usage High Low 14. Credit Bicycle and Parking High Low 15. Transportation Demand Management Program High Low